Slashdot Mirror


Six Laptops That Don't Burn

digihome writes, "An exploding laptop can really ruin your weekend, so here's a review of six laptops that are unlikely to blow up." From the article: "We evaluated everything from battery and air vent temperatures, AC power draw and battery life to performance and price... What we found is that there's a real difference among those notebooks that know how to take the heat without sacrificing performance."

140 comments

  1. They forgot one! by Salvance · · Score: 2, Funny

    Why not just buy one of the OLPC machines? Price to performance and considering heat produced, nothing else can come close. I'm sure once Brazil and other countries start receiving theirs, we'll see them all over ebay for a bargain.

    Seriously though, this is a great list, except for the fact that the machines are pretty expensive. If I was to blow that type of money on a laptop, I'd probably go for the Toshiba. But until then, I'll stick with my $500 Dell laptop. Sure it's a little bit slower (1.8Ghz I believe), but the battery is too small to catch anything on fire.

    --
    Crack - Free with every butt and set of boobs
    1. Re:They forgot one! by sinij · · Score: 5, Funny

      Imagine having to crank two things at once, your laptop and .... well you know.... heat generated by you will be quite considerable.

    2. Re:They forgot one! by kcelery · · Score: 1

      if you notice the C in OLPC, its not for adults.

    3. Re:They forgot one! by mspohr · · Score: 2, Informative
      One of their criteria was "best performance for the buck" but they chose a bunch of expensive laptops.

      My 1.7GHz Dell 700m barely gets warm even after prolonged use. The fan rarely even runs so I can't measure the "exhaust temperature". Battery life close to 3 hours (twice that with the big battery- NOT Sony). Also has dual display Intel chipset so I can run an external display for twice the desktop real estate. Cost was less than $1000.

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    4. Re:They forgot one! by Fred_A · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's before you become an adult that your cranking is the most intense... Well usually, although I realise that this being /., your mileage may vary...

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
  2. Needless to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Sony's name isn't on the list.

    1. Re:Needless to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sony's name isn't on the list.

      Mind you, Sony did not manufacture blown up laptops, it only supplied the battery. So it won't be on the list of manufacturers.

  3. Twinhead? Uh, no. by Kris_J · · Score: 3, Informative

    Any article that actually considers a laptop from Twinhead as a viable option loses all credibility, even if it does come last. They're junk. My most recent experience with a single Twinhead laptop involved two new hard drives, new RAM, a flakey power socket, a hinge that barely works and a battery pack with a failed cell (it splutters if you have the battery connected.) Prior experience involves machines that didn't come with the right bits and didn't recognise their own floppy drives.

  4. Page rendering sucks by SwabTheDeck · · Score: 5, Funny

    Am I the only one getting this article rendered as though the CSS was written by throwing the keyboard down the stairs? (Firefox 2 on Linux)

    1. Re:Page rendering sucks by c_forq · · Score: 1

      It is because the link is to the "printer friendly" version, if you go to the normal version it looks normal, but they do that annoying one-paragraph-per-page thing so it spans seven pages. Normal version here.

      --
      Computers allow humans to make mistakes at the fastest speeds known, with the possible exception of tequila and handguns
  5. Macbooks does not burn anymore either by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    after intel core 2 duo

  6. Danger by cheese-cube · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Lithium fires like those that occur when a laptop battery explodes are extremely dangerous. Just watch this video.

    1. Re:Danger by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1
      Lithium fires like those that occur when a laptop battery explodes are extremely dangerous. Just watch this video.

      This video took about a minute from "smoking" to "apeshit." My laptop would be flying across the room by that point, no longer on my lap...

      -b.

    2. Re:Danger by cheese-cube · · Score: 1

      Given the right conditions I believe that a lithium can just go off without even being switched on. Imagine if you left your laptop on at home when you you went to work. You'd probably come home to a pile of ash instead of a house.

    3. Re:Danger by magarity · · Score: 1

      My laptop would be flying across the room by that point, no longer on my lap
       
      If you're in economy class when that happens then across the room would just delay the inevitable. Might as well just keep it on your lap and get it over with.

  7. Re:Am I supposed to be afraid of this? by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Smug are we? You didn't look into the battery recall then.

    I remember the first Aluminium PowerBooks. They became so hot, that the bottoms expanded to a convex shape after an hour of running. They tottered, wobbled and turned about, like a Weeble. This was really noticeable on the 12" models - where the footprint was so small, the curvature was really pronounced!

    Now have the Sony exploding, flammable battery problem that Dell and Lenovo suffer from.

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
  8. What about Sony notebooks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I'm posting this from my sweet Sony Vaio notebook powered by the everlasting Sony battery and I%&#@+++ NO CARRIER

  9. misleading summary by cbc1920 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't get how having a cool notebook translates into a battery that doesn't blow up. As far as I remember, the whole battery recall was because of a slight possibility of an internal short in LiIon cells. This had everything to do with manufacturing process and perhaps gravity, and nothing at all to do with the rest of the notebook. To suggest that these products avoided the recall because of their design is ignorant. They avoided the recall because they sourced different batteries.

    Granted, a cooler notebook will result in longer batteries, since heat will reduce the effective capacity over time. That is the only advantage, from a power standpoint.

    1. Re:misleading summary by joshua.e.jacobs · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think the type of notebook does effect the chances of the battery burning. Toshiba said their notebooks don't have this problem despite using the same batteries because they're designed differently. Here's an article with a bit of info about the toshiba recall. http://www.csd.toshiba.com/cgi-bin/tais/su/su_sc_d tlView.jsp?soid=1501060

    2. Re:misleading summary by msormune · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well of course they will say that, it's very good advertising. "Look we made our laptops better, they won't burst into flames!". And if a Toshiba laptop bursts into flames, they will say "Well, we were wrong about the design just like everyone else, let's just make a recall like the others". Toshiba has nothing to lose.

    3. Re:misleading summary by rachit · · Score: 1

      Of course the heat of the laptop affects the chances of internal short.

      You see, heat ~ energy

      According to Einstein, energy = mc^2, there fore energy ~ mass

      And mass causes gravity. By your own words, gravity was the cause of the short, ergo heat caused the short.

    4. Re:misleading summary by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      Even a notebook of the notorious models had about a .00001% chance of blowing up, which is a pretty unlikely occurence.

  10. Say no more, Panasonic Tough Book by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I am already a big fan of Panasonic's Tough Book series. The fact that they earn high marks in yet another review, power consumption and heat dissipation, merely cements my opinion of them as a top choice notebook.

    I would previously recommend ThinkPads, but even before moving to Levono the quality was waning. The only thing the ThinkPad has that is superior is a longer warranty. Always buy the longest extended warranty possible for a laptop if you actually take it back and forth to school or work. The failure rate is abysmal. I pretty much expect a laptop to last a year without repair which translates to expect having to buy a new laptop a year after the warranty runs out.

    1. Re:Say no more, Panasonic Tough Book by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1, Informative
      I would previously recommend ThinkPads, but even before moving to Levono the quality was waning. The only thing the ThinkPad has that is superior is a longer warranty.

      Just pick up a T23 or T41. Should run Linux fine and you'll pay under $300 used for the first, under $500 for the second on EBay. If it conks out, replace it with another $300 notebook.

      -b.

    2. Re:Say no more, Panasonic Tough Book by Grail · · Score: 1

      I'd buy a tough book over a MacBook Pro, except for the fact that the ToughBook video uses shared system memory (ie: it won't run WoW fast enough to play). Even my PowerBook G4 12" (may it rest in peace) had a separate video card (sure, it was a really crappy video card).

      The toughbook fills my other requirements: wireless networking, and being able to withstand being used.

    3. Re:Say no more, Panasonic Tough Book by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My ACER 5100 series laptop with a 2ghz amd turion64, 1gig of ram and ati radeon xpress 1100 shared graphics runs WoW at 15-40fps at reasonable settings (1280x800, shaders off, terrain distance and environment detail at 1/2.)

      It's usually playable if I have a mouse.

      But then I play a shadow priest, it would probably be harder with a rogue or mage.

    4. Re:Say no more, Panasonic Tough Book by astrashe · · Score: 1

      I have a T21. $208. :)

      I use FreeNX to pull up my home desktop, and it works beautifully.

  11. But will it run Linux? by Harmonious+Botch · · Score: 0, Redundant

    No joke. My IBM thinkpad has died from too much abuse. I'm either going to have it repaired, or get something new. So, how hard is a Linux install on a toughbook CF51?

    1. Re:But will it run Linux? by revolu7ion · · Score: 1

      [url:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Captain_obvious]

      --
      Jesus Saves
    2. Re:But will it run Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yep. I've installed gentoo 2006.1 on one. Everything seems to work, except maybe the modem, which I didn't bother to try. The radeon video has the usual limitations, but it's fine for what I do. Just be sure and lspci -v to get all your drivers straight, and you're good to go.

    3. Re:But will it run Linux? by dreamlax · · Score: 1

      The latest ones might possibly have problems with the SD card readers . . . they've [Panasonic] released a new SD card standard, which in order to obtain a specification sheet, you have to sign an agreement (and pay a sum) saying that you will not use the specification sheet to provide an open-source driver.

      It sucks that the major laptop manufacturers don't make it "easy" for you to install Linux, i.e. using proprietary protocols specifically optimised to run in a Windows environment etc. I work for Toshiba fixing laptops, and the number of tools that come "pre-loaded" on a "fresh install" is amazing. People can remove them if they wish, of course, but one case in particular was this customer came in complaining about the life of his battery. I noticed he uninstalled all of the Toshiba software. One critical component was Toshiba Power Management. Only this tool can dim the brightness of the LCD, and various other things. Without it, the battery won't last long at all. Most Toshiba notebooks have a very cut down BIOS which let software do the rest. It's a shame the software is proprietary.

      Having said that, my boss said that the laptop they gave me (as a company asset) is mine to do what I want with, including installing Linux. Also, most Toshiba Satellites have a second partition on the hard drive which is quick to boot and is designed for playing DVDs only. Guess what? It's Linux. I've also heard (from where I used to work selling home electronics), most TV-HDD-DVD recorders run Linux, including Panasonic, Sony and Philips. So, they're getting there . . . but it will take a while.

    4. Re:But will it run Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      uh.... source?(pun intended)

  12. Dell XPS M1210 by NerveGas · · Score: 3, Insightful


        Yeah, Dell has bad press lately. But that particular model uses a Samsung battery, not a Sony model. Very low draw, very good thermal characteristics. I've accidentally put it in my bag (which is a VERY snug fit) while running apps that kept it from entering standby several times - even after running in a sealed bag for a couple of hours, it's still running nice and solid. The bad and laptop were warm, but not at all hot. Having a Core Duo, 2 gigs of RAM, built-in mobile broadband, and still getting 5 hours of real-world runtime out of it are pretty nice, too.

    --
    Oh, you're not stuck, you're just unable to let go of the onion rings.
    1. Re:Dell XPS M1210 by kjart · · Score: 1

      I've been looking at the M1210, but the one thing that has kept me away is the screen. I find high gloss LCD's to be fairly annoying in general and though I've never used one on an extended basis, the few times I have tried them I've found the glare to be overpowering. If the M1210 had an option without the glossy screen I'd probably already have one.

      What is your experience with the m1210?

    2. Re:Dell XPS M1210 by devo4040 · · Score: 1

      I have to say that I don't even notice the high gloss of the LCD on my M1210 any longer and as the thread started said the thing works really well. I am able to get around 7 hours of battery life out of the extended battery which comes in really handy when I'm in the field all day trying to trouble shoot. Plus the high gloss is good for one thing, when the computer is powered down or in standby it works as a great mirror to make sure you don't have anything stuck in your teeth before talking to the attractive girl who just sat down next to you at the coffee house.

    3. Re:Dell XPS M1210 by NerveGas · · Score: 1

      Glossy screens do suck. You do get used to it, though. The M1210 was the only machine that met all of my needs, so I took a chance on the screen. Now that I've used it for a while, I don't really notice unless there's sunlight glaring off of it. Had they used a non-glare screen, though, it would be perfect.

      steve

      --
      Oh, you're not stuck, you're just unable to let go of the onion rings.
    4. Re:Dell XPS M1210 by kjart · · Score: 1

      Glossy screens do suck. You do get used to it, though. The M1210 was the only machine that met all of my needs, so I took a chance on the screen. Now that I've used it for a while, I don't really notice unless there's sunlight glaring off of it. Had they used a non-glare screen, though, it would be perfect.

      Cool, thanks for the info. My thought process is basically very similar to what you're describing. I just find it hard to bite the bullet on a bigger ticket item when there is one glaring shortcoming (sorry :). The other two leading options for me are the Dell D620 and Macbook Pro, though both of those have their issues as well (expensive options to bring it up to spec with M1210 and odd front protruding extended battery for the D620 and relative size + 'soft' feeling keyboard for the macbook pro).

      I'm really just being far too anal though, I guess :)

  13. Re:Twinhead? Uh, no. by presidentbeef · · Score: 2, Funny

    My most recent experience with a single Twinhead laptop involved two new hard drives, new RAM, a flakey power socket, a hinge that barely works and a battery pack with a failed cell (it splutters if you have the battery connected.

    But what about the heat output? The convenient volume control wheel on the front edge? The "magnesium screen lid and bottom case with an attractive finish that looks like carbon fiber"?!

    You didn't address the important stuff!

    :)

    --
    Everything I need to know about copyrights I learned from Slashdot.
  14. The safest notebook by kihbord · · Score: 1

    All notebooks are safe just put 4-inch FANS around it for extra cooling.

    1. Re:The safest notebook by kihbord · · Score: 1

      Better yet. Just remove the batteries altogether. ;-)

  15. forget battery by Tinn-Can · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Heat doesnt matter if the stupid thing has a crappy little 1280x800 screen... thats just sad... What is up with all the new laptops having that? My 4 year old $1000 laptop runs a 1400x1050 on a 15" screen but I can't find anything like that anymore that isn't over 2 grand.

    1. Re:forget battery by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1, Insightful
      What is up with all the new laptops having that? My 4 year old $1000 laptop runs a 1400x1050 on a 15" screen but I can't find anything like that anymore that isn't over 2 grand.

      1400x1050 on a 15" screen (for that matter anything above 1024x768) is useless on a 15" screen unless you have bionic eyesight. For us mortals, 800x600 is sufficient. If you need finer resolution, you're better off with an external monitor.

      -b.

    2. Re:forget battery by Krytical · · Score: 0

      I have a 15.4" laptop with a 1680x1050 resolution, I have no problems reading anything. Graphics actually look better in the laptop than in my 22" desktop monitor. You might want to drop by your local optometrist when you get a chance.

    3. Re:forget battery by Jerf · · Score: 1

      They are hard to find, but it can be done.

      You can customize a Dell E1505 right now with a 1680x1050 screen for well under $1000, though you'll probably want to bump that base model up a bit.

      In previous months, I've seen it where if you pick the lowest model of the laptop at the customization screen, you won't be offered the higher screen res, but if you start with a higher base customization you will be offered better screens. This seems to come and go.

      I have an earlier model of the E1505, called the "Inspiron 6000" (obviously just under 4 times better), which I bought about a year ago, and it was tricky then, too. I honestly don't know if you even have a significant choice other than Dell and maybe HP (which also comes and goes); if you can't customize it onto your system, it doesn't seem to be an option.

    4. Re:forget battery by skiflyer · · Score: 1

      You've misconfigured your OS if higher resolution means smaller font size.... and in regards to photo/video... zoom in. Higher resolution means you have more to work with, not that everything is smaller. (1400x1050 in a 14.1" for the record.)

    5. Re:forget battery by clickclickdrone · · Score: 1

      >For us mortals, 800x600
      Not for this one, 1600x1280 on a 15inch and wishing I had more. There's no such thing as too much screen real-estate.
      Heck, I can't think of anything I could do at 800x600, I haven't had a PC at that res in the last ten+ years. Even my old Atari Falcon back in 1992 had 1024x800.

      --
      I want a list of atrocities done in your name - Recoil
    6. Re:forget battery by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      back in the real world (IE windows) apps are generally designed in terms of pixel counts, so if you mess arround with the windows font size the effect in many apps is horrible.

      also even if we assume the OS and aps are designed to allow scaling like this we run into another problem

      Scaling bitmap images by an ammount other than an integer scale factor generally results in either blockyness of a loss of sharp edges. This is essentially why the image on an LCD monitor running at non-native resoloution ranges from poor to terrible and will mean that any scaled bitmap (and lets face it the web uses a lot of bitmaps) will look relatively poor.

      one soloution to this is to crank up the resoloution to the point at which the concept of a pixel becomes completely invisible to the eye but to get there we have to cross the bad band between "readilly visible pixels" and "pixels too small to see at all"

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    7. Re:forget battery by dfghjk · · Score: 1

      The standard for displays (which is already outdated by the way) is 100 dpi. Notebooks can go higher because they are typically viewed closer. Even Macbook Pros (which aren't high resolution) exceed 100 dpi.

      Meanwhile, your "sufficient" 800x600 resolution equates to 67 dpi at 15". It may be sufficient for you but not for anyone not legally blind. I have no problem using 150 dpi screens on notebooks and I use a 204 dpi screen at home. I even own a a 4.5" WinXP ultraportable that offers 1024x600 resolution (252 dpi) and video iPods are 160 dpi. I will never consider any notebook with resolution as pathetic as 800x600. Sorry, but you are hopelessly wrong.

    8. Re:forget battery by skiflyer · · Score: 1

      Who suggested messing with the Windows font size or scaling bitmap images by an amount other than an integer scale? I was referring to adjustments to DPI to fix problems with, oh I dunno, DPI issues.

    9. Re:forget battery by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      ok so what setting do you propose i change if the high resoloution i've selected makes general text/images in dialogs menus toolbars etc on my windows box too small?

      how will using that setting avoid the problem of text that has a larger size (measured in pixels) won't fit properly in existing pixel designed dialogs?

      how will using that setting deal with images that are too small too see without ugly scaling?

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    10. Re:forget battery by skiflyer · · Score: 1

      Set the DPI to be accurate for your monitor. Things will work. What's confusing? This will have none of the above mentioned errors unless you're running programs which are custom drawing fonts based on pixel heights, which I don't think I've seen in Windows well, ever.

  16. Am the only one.... by RMB2 · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one who finds the mere topic of this review more than a little startling? Back when I used to read PC World as a kid and drool over the PII w/ MMC, I never would have dreamed of being worried about the pyrotechnic features (or lack there of) in a computer. Strange times.... I think I might still prefer a computer marketed "with math co-processor" to one that "won't blow up as much as the other guys'"

    --
    [/sarcasm]
    1. Re:Am the only one.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope that they can only advance chemical fire technology to the CPU overclocking front. Nothing exciting happening there these days.

  17. It's because the masses buy laptops now... by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 1
    And "the masses" just want it to say "wide screen".

    A "wide screen" must be better than ANYTHING in a old fashioned 4:3 ratio, right? That's Sooo 1990's!

    Yeah, I liked my 1400x1050 screen too, but true hi-rez takes a back-seat to watching the latest video in the correct format...

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
    1. Re:It's because the masses buy laptops now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm typing this on a Thinkpad T60 (14 and 15 inch models available for well under $2000 with lots of fancy features). They're having a great sale right now too. www.lenovo.com

    2. Re:It's because the masses buy laptops now... by NerveGas · · Score: 1

      Wide-screen displays also fit notebooks better. Since it has to fold against a keyboard, and a keyboard is wide, they pair together nicely.

      I look at it this way: My laptop is just big enough to fit a decent keyboard and touchpad. And the display is as large as can be used without adding more depth and bulk to the laptop. It works for me.

      Yes, my notebook is a "paltry" 1280x800, but that's on a 12" screen. Higher resolution wouldn't really be very useful.

      --
      Oh, you're not stuck, you're just unable to let go of the onion rings.
  18. Re:Am I supposed to be afraid of this? by kramulous · · Score: 1

    I gotta tell yah, I get pretty worried about my macbook pro. This sucker gets HOT. I worry about it burning though the desk.

    --
    .
  19. Mod parent down ... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

    -1 Juvenile.

  20. Re:Am I supposed to be afraid of this? by Firehed · · Score: 3, Informative

    I've asked the Apple 'Geniuses' about this on both a MacBook and MBP. While it wasn't *that* pronounced, both warped enough that they wouldn't sit flat on the table (notably worse on the MacBook). I don't know whether the MacBook was from heat or poor QC as it never got astonishingly hot during use, but I know it's heat related on my MBP, which I've seen report CPU temps upwards of 85c (where Applecare did absolutely nothing except replacing the main logic board with one that not only failed to fix the heat issue but started causing video corruption).

    I'm not bashing Apple here - my old Gateway was almost as hot, and considerably louder (the fan was off-balance for most of its life; both very loud and almost always on since day one). As the MBP is often on a table it's not the end of the world, but Apple's engineers need to do some rethinking. I've also got a Thinkpad of nearly equal spec (almost identical to a MB except for the size, with over an hour more battery life) and it very rarely gets warm and the fan is never noticible. Apple genius's thoughts: "well, it's plastic, it won't heat up as much". Okay, well I guess IBM/Lenovo use a superplastic that dissipates heat better than aluminum... not even the copper heatsink section of the body gets warm, yet my MBP with plenty of metal surface area to dissipate that heat really roasts. Last I knew, added surface area for more heat dissipation meant a cooler system, but I guess IBM and Apple don't follow the laws of thermodynamics.

    Translation: I still love my MBP (for the OS, not so much the hardware), but the Thinkpad (T60, if you care) runs very cool and has quite a bit of kick to it, with the main faults being a crappy display and Windows (unfortunately, OSx86 on it wasn't functional or reliable enough, or else it'd have been a best-of-both-worlds). For around $1100 I think (school paid for mine), it gives me a solid 5+ hours of battery life (it seems closer to 6 in Vista for some reason that escapes me) and no roasted legs. With a nicer, preferably widescreen, display, and OS X, I'd say it's pretty close to my ideal laptop. Except how the stupid black plastic gets laughably greasy if you ever handle the thing without wearing gloves. If Apple were to talk to the Thinkpad engineers to deal with their heat issues, they'd have a pretty nice system (as I doubt IBM/Lenovo talking to Apple about their choice of OS issue will get them anywhere). They certainly look pretty and OS X is the real reason to buy the thing, but Apple's portables really have a couple pretty inexcusable issues, most significantly heat (rounding the edges where your wrists tend to rest wouldn't get a "no" vote from me either).

    --
    How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
  21. hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "... only had a battery surface temperature of 76 degrees, slightly above room temperature."
    My room temperature is 20 degrees thats 56 degrees diference...

    1. Re:hmmm by empaler · · Score: 1

      It's ~25 degrees i the rest of the world. Google is your friend

    2. Re:hmmm by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      OTOH, if he meant 76 degrees Celsius, that would be 169 degrees F! I am NOT putting that on my lap!!

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  22. This whole thing is totally exaggerated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have owned four laptops (Li-ion) and none of them have had any problems with heat or burning batteries.

    I am even using my sony laptop to post this to slashdot, it barely feels warm.
    Actually I suppose it is a bit hot...

    AHHHHHH MY HANDS. IT BURNS, I

  23. Toughbooks are SOLID! by Doppler00 · · Score: 1

    I've got a Toughbook tablet PC at work and I've got to say, it's an incredible machine (build wise). I've dropped it at least two times from table height onto a hard floor with just a small scratch in the corner. It's really hard to justify the price though. The only reason I needed it at work is because I mostly do field support of industrial control systems, and the 500 nits screen is much easier to read than the crummy 180 nits you find on most laptops. Oh, and the battery lasts about 5 hours to boot!

    1. Re:Toughbooks are SOLID! by MBC1977 · · Score: 1

      I'd definitely concur. We use Toughbooks in Iraq and other combat zones, and the little suckers don't break at all. (Heck, I've even chucked one at somebody... but nevermind that ;). Seriously though, the only issue I have with Toughbooks is the fact that hardware-wise they are always behind the curve by about 4-8 months (in terms of processors, memory, etc.)

      But other than that, Toughbooks are simply grunt-proof. lol

      --
      Regards,

      MBC1977,
    2. Re:Toughbooks are SOLID! by hunterkll · · Score: 1

      Oh, and the battery lasts about 5 hours to boot!

      Takes you five hours to boot? Hope you got a second battery to actually run that sucker...

    3. Re:Toughbooks are SOLID! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hi other side here, we use Toughbooks too. We captured ours from the hands (well fingers) of a burnt out soldier. It seemed to survive our IED, must be worth more than the soldier!

  24. Re:Stupidest... by Lord+Kano · · Score: 2, Funny

    How funny is it that in a discussion about burning laptops, your post got modded "Flamebait"?

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  25. Celsius v. Fahrenheit by Z34107 · · Score: 1

    Are you about to succumb to the elements, or do you live in France?

    Is there a difference?

    --
    DATABASE WOW WOW
    1. Re:Celsius v. Fahrenheit by Grey+Ninja · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      You must be an American. Last I checked, you were one of a handful of countries who refused to adopt the metric system. Hell, even Britain uses it these days.

    2. Re:Celsius v. Fahrenheit by Starayo · · Score: 3, Informative

      I find it amusing that America, whose citizens love to claim the best of everything, still use an outdated system of measurement.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    3. Re:Celsius v. Fahrenheit by GNious · · Score: 5, Funny

      Drives American girls wild, when you tell them that you have got a 12 cm penis

    4. Re:Celsius v. Fahrenheit by aplusjimages · · Score: 1

      Is 12cm bad? Because mine was 11cm and I thought that was close to a foot. Am I wrong?

      --
      Can I bum a sig?
    5. Re:Celsius v. Fahrenheit by empaler · · Score: 1

      Well, it can be expressed in feet, at least.

    6. Re:Celsius v. Fahrenheit by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "Drives American girls wild,"

      Inches, centimeters... US dollars have always been decimal.

    7. Re:Celsius v. Fahrenheit by evilviper · · Score: 0
      still use an outdated system of measurement.

      Outdated? Because metric is more accurate than American units?

      Just because it's somewhat newer, doesn't make it better.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    8. Re:Celsius v. Fahrenheit by kryptkpr · · Score: 1

      Flamebait? I'll bite.

      Being newer doesn't make it better. Having every unit relate to every other by a power of 10 .. THAT is what makes it better.

      --
      DJ kRYPT's Free MP3s!
    9. Re:Celsius v. Fahrenheit by orasio · · Score: 1

      You must have very small feet.

    10. Re:Celsius v. Fahrenheit by orasio · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Base 10 is much easier than base 12.
      I would understand a base 2 system.
      We have one measure for distance.
      The meter. km, cm, mm, micrometers are just a way to not use the zeroes. The unit is the same.
      You have lots of different ways to measure stuff. I don't know how you can tell right away which is longer, two and a half feet, or 27 inches. 29 ounces or two pounds.
      Celsius and Farenheit is not that much of a problem, aside fromt he fact that it makes more sense to use water than CO2 as the base of an imperfect system, but it makes more sense to have a scale that is based on ten, and has some coherence.

    11. Re:Celsius v. Fahrenheit by TrilateralRegression · · Score: 1

      We can tell that 27" is longer than 2' because of the same reason you can tell that 25 degrees is a good temperature right off the bat - we grew up with it. Most of the carpenters I know say it's more "organic" or that chopping it up into 16ths makes it easier to build stuff with. I say asses to that, but it's not going anywhere anytime soon. What's really fun when you're used to both systems is to make random switches between the two when building things (like chairs, not space probes), and have someone try to build them. Hilarity ensues! Also, I could make the same arguement about stones (but I won't, because it's fun to say I weigh fifteen stone seven [cause it sounds like a band :p ]).

    12. Re:Celsius v. Fahrenheit by wytcld · · Score: 1

      Eh, bull. A foot is about the typical length of a male foot - which makes it very easy to pace off a room. An inch is about the length of a segment of your little finger. A yard is about half the height of a typical male (or half the span from outstretched hand to hand). These are natural measures to us.

      If you're doing carpentry, using thickness measured as 1, 1/2, 1/4, 1/8 ... means that when you build things in layers - as most carpentry is - two 1/4 inch layers plus one 1/2 inch layer come out to an even inch. If you're doing metric you'd have to spec things in measures like .125 cm and worse to get layers to just "naturally" come out even. Since the practical way to measure for carpentry is to successively halve your units down to 16ths or 32nds or even 64ths, rather than to have to translate this into decimal fractions - practical in the sense that it's easy to mark distinctly on a rule for human use - the only sane use for metric is for processes without human execution where there's no inconvenience in calibrating stuff against specs with long tails after the decimal point.

      As for the 12 inches in a foot, that allows for easy division by 2, 3 and 4 - whereas 10 would just divide by 2, so that it only works efficiently for doing things by wholes or tenths or halves, lacking facility with thirds and quarters - if you're working from 100 you can do quarters, but still can't handle thirds well. So 12 beats both 10 and 100 for utility.

      Celsius on the other hand has it right: freezing and boiling are important relative to human use of the scale, where 32 degrees and 212 degrees are pretty random assignments. My only defense of it would be that the finer gradations of the Fahrenheit scale better fit the temperature sensitivity of humans, so that Celsius (unless you speak in decimals) impoverishes the description.

      --
      "with their freedom lost all virtue lose" - Milton
    13. Re:Celsius v. Fahrenheit by The+Great+Pretender · · Score: 1
      wouldn't that be Imperial units? Personally, being British and living in the US I'm very happy with the mix of units. In my personal life I use F for the weather temperature, but being a scientist I use C in the lab. I use miles for driving, but at work everything is metric. I buy groceries by the pound, but happily weigh out grams for experiments. The interesting thing is that living in this dual measurement world I can write a paper in metric, but easily present that paper in metric and/or imperial. I can also converse in Imperial with plant operators when out in the field. I find the whole mixed units thing very useful. The only thing that bugs the hell out of me is the difference between a British gallon and a US Gallon, now that has caught me out a few times when I'm think about one and it's actually the other.

      The one thing that I could never deal with was the pre-decimalization coinage in the UK, Didn't they just (+30 years) change it the beginning of 1971? My mum to this day still swears that it's easier to understand 240 pence in a pound than 100 pence in a pound, and she still bitches about the switch to litres (no Mr. US spellchecker I will not spell it liter) from gallons for petrol, or kg from lbs. She was telling my that TESCO or Sainsbury's tried the kg switch and went back to lbs at some point, was that true?

      --
      A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
    14. Re:Celsius v. Fahrenheit by bogado · · Score: 1

      It depends on how tall you are... oh it wasn't that foot that you're talking about, sorry, nevermind

      --
      []'s Victor Bogado da Silva Lins

      ^[:wq

    15. Re:Celsius v. Fahrenheit by orasio · · Score: 1

      Of course, I have heard that, I understand why imperial measures exist, because some of the most basic math is easier with those measures.

      The issue is that metric is much easier for more-than-basic math when it involves changing magnitudes and stuff.
      And right now, most people are not carpenters, so the advantages of easy divide-by-3 are lost.
      For wood, we use milimeters for thickness and meters or cm for length and width (inches are used in some places as a measure of wood thickness, and for some foreign machines nuts and bolts, that has to do with foreign influence).
      The good thing is that we don't have trouble using meters, cm or mm, because it's dumb easy to convert among them.

      My problem with imperial measures is that it's difficult to scale up stuff, because there's algebra involved in converting from inches to feet, to yards. Metric might be tougher on carpenters, but it's easier on engineers.

    16. Re:Celsius v. Fahrenheit by evilviper · · Score: 1
      The only thing that bugs the hell out of me is the difference between a British gallon and a US Gallon,

      Those little differences are why I (and numerous others) call them American units, instead of imperial ;-)

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    17. Re:Celsius v. Fahrenheit by The+Great+Pretender · · Score: 1

      So then a British gallon should be referred to as a British unit?

      --
      A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
    18. Re:Celsius v. Fahrenheit by AnonChef · · Score: 1

      Is 12cm bad? Because mine was 11cm and I thought that was close to a foot. Am I wrong? Emphasis mine

      What happend to it?
      1. Did you have a tragic accident?
      2. Did you find a "MAK3 Y0U4R P3N1S HU63" advert that worked?

      If #2 please send me the details!!!!! I have a "friend" is very interested.

    19. Re:Celsius v. Fahrenheit by aplusjimages · · Score: 1

      None of the above. Instead I used an ancient Chinese torture method in a new way.

      --
      Can I bum a sig?
    20. Re:Celsius v. Fahrenheit by evilviper · · Score: 1
      So then a British gallon should be referred to as a British unit?

      "English Units" is in fact a common notiation.

      However, that really is not necessary. As England is the originator of the Imperial system, it's safe to call British units Imperial units.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  26. Re:Am I supposed to be afraid of this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Look into smcFanControl http://www.conscius.de/~eidac/software/page5/page5 .html
    Set it to something like 3000 rpm, which you can barely notice, and bam, cooler lap. Of course, this shouldn't be required, but until they get the heat issues sorted out...

  27. Finally, Some Guidance by FreeRadicalX · · Score: 1

    Just like when buying any other product these days, my number one concern when buying a computer is "It won't explode, right?". Now I can be sure to not get shafted by craft sales representatives trying to sell me explosive goods.

  28. I tried a Panasonic CFW4 by Rob+Simpson · · Score: 1

    It was a 12.1" one, compare to the 15" CF-51... despite the hard-drive supposedly being surrounded by the shock-absorbing protective stuff, even its seeks would send out shrill rattles amplified by the magnesium case. I didn't expect the optical drive on such a tiny laptop to be quiet, but the sheer grinding racket it made was alarming, not to mention painful. Thankfully, I wasn't dumb enough to buy a $3000 laptop from a place without a decent return policy.

    The bigger laptop mentioned in the article might be better (if heavier), but only comes with a 1.44" floppy drive and a DVD/CD-RW drive - from looking around, it appears that an optional DVD-Multi drive can be bought, but only as a separate item - not an upgrade. What year is this, again? The lack of a memory card reader is a bit annoying, too, though buying one for the expansion card slot wouldn't cost too much.

    1. Re:I tried a Panasonic CFW4 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      uhhh... you don't buy a toughbook for it's multimedia capabilities. it's intended market is for those who want a rugged computer that can take a beating and still work... for working on.

    2. Re:I tried a Panasonic CFW4 by Rob+Simpson · · Score: 1

      It's a semi-Toughbook... Panasonic sells a bunch of laptops that they call Toughbooks that are only semi-rugged... the case is metal instead of plastic and the hard drive has some shock protection, etc., but it's nothing like the massively armored ones that are nearly invulnerable. I think this one isn't even spillproof.

  29. Burnt pockets by Krytical · · Score: 0

    Those laptops might not blow up, but I'm pretty sure they'll burn a hole in your pocket. The high performance ones (core 2 duos, 2 gigs RAM, etc) range from $2,100 - $3,000. I can get a dell with similar specs for $1,600 and 2 years of free repairs. Sorry but I'm taking my chances with the C4 battery laptops.

  30. Re:I didn't RTFA but... by thatgun · · Score: 1

    Dude, you guys are getting rusty. I haven't seen a first post troll make it to first post in quite a long time. I think you should all give it up!

  31. Temperature by C4st13v4n14 · · Score: 0

    I read that the Panasonic's fan exhaust temperature was ONLY 97 degrees, and the surface of the battery measured ONLY 76. This confused me because they failed to mention that the temperature is in degrees Fahrenheit!

  32. This wont burn... by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 5, Funny

    This P-P-P-Powerbook won't burn.

  33. How accurate is /proc/acpi/battery? by Jerf · · Score: 1
    Does anyone know how accurate /proc/acpi/battery/BAT0/state is? The article talks approvingly about 22W of power, but my ACPI reports:
    jerf@localhost ~ $ cat /proc/acpi/battery/BAT0/state
    present: yes
    capacity state: ok
    charging state: discharging
    present rate: 1239 mA
    remaining capacity: 5708 mAh
    present voltage: 12232 mV
    which by my calculations is 15W. This is on my lowest display setting and an idle CPU, but no other extreme power saving efforts (hard disk spinning, wireless on, etc.) (Highest display brightness gives me 21.3W; display is a big draw, apparently.)

    I've wondered if this was accurate. (Although I have to admit the heat on this thing backs that up; even at full load it just gets "a little warm"; a previous laptop reached "burns your lap" while idling.)

    (For reference, this is a Dell Inspiron 6000 with a 1.6GHz Pentium M on the Sonoma (IIRC) chipset.)

    I've wondered how accurate that readout is. It offers four or five significant digits which I find hard to believe. If there are any power hackers out there who could tell me if this is reasonably accurate or full of shit, I'd be appreciative. (I've wondered if I'm seriously running what I find a rather nice computer setup overall on less power than a dim incandescent light bulb or our Christmas lights.)
    1. Re:How accurate is /proc/acpi/battery? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would say that 15W to 21W is pretty accurate.

      I have a slightly faster Inspiron 6000 and I have measured, with a multimeter, around 21W for idle power draw with minimum screen brightness. But that includes the AC/DC power converter and its losses as well.

    2. Re:How accurate is /proc/acpi/battery? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every nerd should have one of the Kill-a-watt 120v power meters (Google for it). They make for some very interesting findings when you get to measuring actual power consumption by a computer. Who would have figured that my fully loaded DEC Personal Workstation 500au only draws 130 watts? Or that my IBM 19" CRT monitor only draws 75 watts? It's well worth the low cost. The Kill-a-watt can be had for around $20/shipped. Fun toy. :)

  34. Re:Twinhead? Uh, no. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    I have to agree with parent post. Twinhead laptops are very disappointing. I own one and using it right now (model E14AL if you care) and only had problems with it. It killed two RAM in the first 3 months, then had to replace the motherboard, dvd drive died last month, plastic case is of very bad quality and get scratched very easily (can scratch it with your nails!), and now my the screen fixations are going away. After one year of use, I'm about to buy a new laptop, as I fear it's going to die soon and continually fixing it will prove to be more costly than buying a brand new one (hey, warranty has just expired!).

    Ok, about heating problem, it's terrible. First, the fan and air intake are located on the bottom of the laptop, which means u need to use it on a perfectly flat desk and not on your lap or bed as it would obstruct all air flow. Second, the fan sometimes doesn't turn on at all and the laptop ends to power down after overheating too much.

    That's my first Twinhead computer and my last one. I don't want to generalize to every single laptop built by Twinhead, but their Efio (EXXX) models are crap. Poor quality parts and bad quality standards. Better pay more and get a more robust computer.

    Ced

  35. Re:Stupidest... by tezbobobo · · Score: 1

    Actualy, this is a very hot topic.

  36. Re:Am I supposed to be afraid of this? by Firehed · · Score: 1

    Already using it (and it seems to have burnt out the GPU fan...) and while it's notably cooler, it's still scorching hot. That's to say, knocking 10c off of 85c still isn't great on the legs. Or the desk, for that matter. Even cranked all the way up to 6000RPM, it still tends to be worryingly toasty.

    Maybe I'll do a real egg-cooking video with the thing and see if it catches the eye of any support persons. 85c is enough to cook meat thoroughly (albeit very slowly), but it's just not the same effect. As far as I'm aware, there's nothing in the warrantee that says I can't...

    --
    How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
  37. Need advice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am looking for a really cheap laptop/notebook that basically just has a keyboard, screen, and wireless. I just want it to browse the internet or do some coding over the wireless. Is the only option to buy some old piece of junk on eBay or craigs? I can't seem to find a "one laptop per chair" kind of product, they are all like 1k+ with featuritis.

  38. Re:Twinhead? Uh, no. by owlman17 · · Score: 1

    I'm not too sure about the new Twinheads but my 1998 Twinhead was a workhorse. It was a P266 with 32MB RAM and a 3.2GB Hard Drive. It had Win98 and dual-booted into Mandrake 7.0. I used it primarily for programming. The battery died in 2001 and the CD-ROM drive in 2003. Otherwise, it was still going strong. It has endured a lot of (minor) falls. It wasn't until late last year till we put it out to pasture. We only did this because the LCD's hinges were starting to break off.

    It was pretty strong for me and served me well.

  39. Say 97 degrees is cool? Not for 97% of the world! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I quit reading the article when it said 76 and 97 degrees. The yankees are so hillbilly they did not learn to use SI units in over 200 years. Kelvin, Celsius anyone? When water freezes at zero and boils at 100deg, that makes sense. Fahrenheit and Remour does NOT make sense. If America wants to remain competitive against Asia, it must metricate. Don't be stupid to hold against the global tide just because the frenchies invented the metrics.

  40. Re:Am I supposed to be afraid of this? by atrocious+cowpat · · Score: 1
    rounding the edges where your wrists tend to rest wouldn't get a "no" vote from me either
    Seconded.

    There have been a few questionable decisions on design vs. ergonomy by Apple / J. Ive (Puck-Mouse anyone?), but none that has left me so completely baffeled as the sharp edges on the new MacBooks. It's really, really annoying when your hands rest lower than the MacBook, for example if you're using your laptop on... your lap.

    I've had my MacBook for 6 weeks now and I absolutely love it, but I'll really have to sandpaper the edges. If that doesn't work it's Duct Tape Time (well... not really. Though it could look kinda cool... ;)
    --
    sig? Oh, that sig...
  41. In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Six iPods that don't eat your face

    Six engineers that aren't cannibals

    Six lamps that don't blind you

    Six Slashdot articles that aren't racist

    Six pillows that don't give you cancer

    since when is laptops that DON'T do something NEWS?
    as if the NORM for laptops today are ones that BURN?

    1. Re:In other news... by alunharford · · Score: 1

      Six iPods that don't eat your face

      Six engineers that aren't cannibals

      Six lamps that don't blind you

      Six Slashdot articles that aren't racist

      Six pillows that don't give you cancer

      And a partridge in a pear tree?

  42. Re:I didn't RTFA but... by Mike89 · · Score: 1
    haven't seen a first post troll make it to first post in quite a long time A gifted AC managed it a dozen stories ago: http://hardware.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/11/ 21/1849223&from=rss
  43. Run Notebook Hardware Control. Longer battery life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had heat problems from my notebook. It's pretty small and I hold it in my hand when I'm travelling so heat was a big problem. (Palm size tablet PC).

      http://www.pbus-167.com/chc.htm

    If you run at a lower voltage heat buildup can cease to become an issue. My notebook runs cooler, crashes less (never now) and lasts longer on battery.

    It can take a little experimentation to get the best settings, but my battery like increased about 50% and being able to force a drop in the clock speed when I travel makes it great to use outside.

    I picked up the app from a forum of users of the same model notebook and it's become standard fare for most of the forum members... Damn impressive stuff since it's free.

    Makes me wonder how the reviewer would have fared if they tried this on the models that just missed out.

    GrpA.

  44. Dell 5150 by clickclickdrone · · Score: 1

    My 5150 has a classic design - the main air intake is underneath. When you put it on your lap, your legs cover the intake, the fan goes nuts and after a while the CPU and/or mobo does a meltdown. I'm on my 3rd mobo/cpu. Whenever you call with a hardware issue their first question is 'are all the rubber feet on?' because if they're not, you can bet its overheated jus sitting on a desk.
    For good measure it also sucks up all the crud and deposits on to the heatsink/fan reducing their effectiveness.

    --
    I want a list of atrocities done in your name - Recoil
    1. Re:Dell 5150 by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      When you said "Classic" and 5150, I thought of this. I was wondering how you managed to hold that on your lap, considering the 70 pound weight, then I read the subject. :)

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    2. Re:Dell 5150 by Jorkapp · · Score: 1

      I've got a 5100, and it's the same story. All my rubber feet are missing, so I usually use a DVD case to prop up the back end.

      --
      Frink: Nice try floyd, but you were designed for scrubbing, and scrubbing is what you shall do.
    3. Re:Dell 5150 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      my 5150 still has all it's rubber feet (i'm meticulous about caring for it) but even still, when I use it on a tabletop I generally prop up the rear with a book. On my lap i just shift my knees around to allow the cooling fan access to fresh air. btw, there's a cooling inlet on the side of the laptop which works as well, but it's not enough if you are really working the cpu hard. /ubuntu ftw!

  45. It's scary by clickclickdrone · · Score: 1

    You'd expect an article headed 6 laptops that do burn not 6 that don't - like it's news some aren't going to explode.

    --
    I want a list of atrocities done in your name - Recoil
  46. Re:Am I supposed to be afraid of this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The new MBP's run much cooler because the Core Duo was common to get very hot

    You can cut a lot of heat with just changing the processors

  47. What, no P-P-P-PowerBook!? by Thwomp · · Score: 1

    I was sure that would be at number one.

  48. The list of six: by eples · · Score: 1
    1. Panasonic Toughbook CF-51
    2. Jetta Jetbook 9700P
    3. Velocity NoteMagix L80
    4. HP Compaq nw8440
    5. Asus F3Jv
    6. Twinhead Durabook D13RI
    "Best" Choice: Panasonic's Toughbook CF-51
    --
    I'm a 2000 man.
  49. Re:Say 97 degrees is cool? Not for 97% of the worl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Science courses in the US use metric. We are just too lazy to change. Think about it, everyone has to completely change their thinking and relearn how to estimate size, temperature, etc. What if you had to change every unit you grew up with?

  50. I tried to read it, I really did by ari{Dal} · · Score: 1

    but I couldn't get past the first paragraph.

    Terrible sentence structure, a lack of comparison specs, the summary is seriously lacking, and what is up with those right hand nav bars all over the place?

    --
    Moral indignation is jealousy with a halo - H. G. Wells
  51. Speaking of Dell... by Choachy · · Score: 0

    I can only speak of Dell laptops since that is what I am familiar with....

    My 2.5 year old Latitude D600 would be so hot that if I didnt put a pillow barrier between it and my legs, it would feel like a very bad sunburn. But as I often forgot, the pillow would slide and cover the the ONE fan slot on the bottom. Keep in mind, this laptop only became this hot when playing games. The plastics under the video controller felt like they could melt.

    Now that I have a new Inspiron 6400, its like going from hell to heaven. They obviously made improvements on cooling with the additional airflow slots on the top, back and many more (3 I think), on the bottom. I think the newer video card doesnt get as hot anyway. No need for that stupid pillow barrier...and just when I was about to break down and buy one of these: aluminum widescreen notebook cooler.

  52. My New Laptop by mrpaco18 · · Score: 1

    I just got a Sony this past week. It actually runs quite cool and has remarkable battery life. I'm not worried about it blo

  53. I think I'm safe... by jridley · · Score: 2, Interesting

    since I don't even carry a battery in my laptop. After a couple of years I realized that I never use it when I'm not near an outlet anyway, so I just took it out and left it in the bag. I suppose it could burst into flames there...

  54. Re:Twinhead? Uh, no. by Fred_A · · Score: 1
    But what about the heat output? The convenient volume control wheel on the front edge? The "magnesium screen lid and bottom case with an attractive finish that looks like carbon fiber"?!
    Not to mention the astounding 2h47 of battery life (which probably means a bit under 2h under real life use) ! Third best in their test ! Amazing !
    Some day you're going to be able to actually be able to carry laptops around without their power cord...
    --

    May contain traces of nut.
    Made from the freshest electrons.
  55. Stupid choices by metamatic · · Score: 1

    They're all high-end Intel Core CPU laptops. If they want to pick out some laptops that actually run cool, rather than merely having lots of fans and heat sinks, they should have included some based on VIA Antaur designs.

    --
    GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
  56. Selling Point? by VinB · · Score: 0

    So is that going to be the new ad slogan for these laptops? "Buy laptop-X. It doesn't explode on your lap!" Almost as catchy as the Vista ad "Windows Vista - It doesn't suck. Really. No, c'mon ... really. Well, maybe a little."

  57. Altair NanoSafe batteries by XNormal · · Score: 1

    A company called Altair is making a lithium battery which does not use graphite. The graphite component of Li-Ion batteries is the catalyst for thermal runaway, leading to fire and explosion of the battery.

    Their energy density is currently equivalent to NiCd or NiMH, still a bit lower than standard lithium batteries. They are mostly targeted at the hybrid and electric vehicle industry. I think they could be interesting for laptops, too. These batteries can be safely charged or discharged at much higher rates. How would you like a laptop that can be fully charged in a couple of minutes?

    --
    Stop worrying about the risks of nuclear power and start worrying about the risks of not using nuclear power.
  58. Watch out for burning laptop stickers! by slimCODE · · Score: 1

    It's great to have cooler laptops, but one must still watch out makers aren't stupid enough to put flammable stickers at the worst place possible, like Dell did with mine.

    http://slimcode.com/cs/blogs/martin/archive/2006/1 0/29/Dell-laptops-catching-fire-_2D00_-Was-it-real ly-a-battery-problem_3F00_.aspx

    Even though Dell support insisted this was a normal hole in the sticker, I can assure you it burnt! And it's getting worse.

  59. Re:Say 97 degrees is cool? Not for 97% of the w by toddestan · · Score: 1

    When water freezes at zero and boils at 100deg, that makes sense.

    While the metric system makes sense for the most part, I've never gotten Celcius. To a chemist, that line might make sense - but most people in the sciences seem to prefer a more useful scale where zero is the coldest temperature, instead of some arbitrary point. If you are going make a temperature scale for general use, you might as well set 0 and 100 degrees to some value that a common person might relate to, instead of the properties of pure water at a certain pressure. Like setting the coldest outdoor temperature that most people will ever experience at 0 degress, and the hottest outdoor temperature most people well ever experience at 100 degrees, which is pretty much the Fahrenhiet scale.

  60. Base 10 by Z34107 · · Score: 1

    Having every unit relate to every other by a power of 10 .. THAT is what makes it better.

    Truth - except keep your silly metric system out of my technology. For all those devices that innately use powers of two - think anything digital slash binary, computers especially - it makes a LOT more sense for a megabyte to equal 2^20 bytes instead of the silly SI 10^3 bytes.

    --
    DATABASE WOW WOW