Slashdot Mirror


Blackberry Owners Chained to Work

seriouslywtf writes "New survey data suggests that Americans are split over whether Blackberrys are chaining them to work. While people who own Blackberries feel 'more productive', those with Blackberrys are more likely to work longer hours and feel like they have less personal time than those without. A Director of Marketing Strategies who owns a Blackberry pointed out that many employees feel obligated by employers who have handed out the devices. 'While being always on in a social context is a natural for young people, many of those in the 25-54 age group with families and corporate jobs are struggling with work-life blending. There is a need for the mainstream workplace culture to offer ways to counterbalance.'" Is the constantly connected, often mobile nature of the modern workplace a good thing, or not?

210 comments

  1. Geez... are people really that malleable? by winkydink · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I have a blackberry. I do not have any audio/vibro "you have mail" announcement enabled (nor do I on my desktop computer's email app). When I get home at the end of the day, guess what? I stop looking at it! Wow! What a concept, huh? But wait, what if it's really urgent? Well, then the blackberry makes a ringing noise and I talk to the person on the other end. Translated: If they really want to get hold of me RIGHT THIS VERY MINUTE, then they'll call when I don't answer their email.

    --

    "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    1. Re:Geez... are people really that malleable? by cayenne8 · · Score: 5, Insightful
      "When I get home at the end of the day, guess what? I stop looking at it! Wow! What a concept, huh? "

      Exactly...I leave my work behind the second that door hits me on the ass. Granted...these days I'm not doing any work where I'm on call....I like development work more...no one gets quite as pissed if you blow something up like they do if you do it to a prod. payroll box.

      :-)

      I dunno...some people seem to let their jobs 'define' them. Don't get me wrong, while I'm fortunate to work and earn a healthy living doing things that interest me...it is only, a job. And a job is nothing more to me than a means to earn money to buy and do things that please me, and allow me to take time off to enjoy them.

      I hate to keep preaching it...but one way to cut that 'my company owns me and can call me 24/7'...is to get away from being a direct, salaried employee. I love contracting....my motto is "I never work for free".

      If they have to PAY you for ever single hour you work...they will think twice on interfering with your free time...

      Don't get me wrong, if there is the need for the 12th hour effort, and 110% to get something working for whatever reason...I'm there for the duration...but, I WILL get paid for that time and effort.

      But really...I've never understood those that let themselves get so tied to a job. When you leave the job...it is YOUR time...enjoy it and leave them alone until they are paying you for it....

      When I leave for the day, or take a vacation, I can guarantee I give not a single thought to work...not on MY time.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    2. Re:Geez... are people really that malleable? by Vengeance_au · · Score: 4, Interesting

      That is the important differentiation - ensuring people with a critical need to contact you call rather than email. Unfortunately there is a prevailing assumption that if someone is packing a blackberry, an email = an instant notification and they are aware. As soon as you break that preconception, the device becomes a truly useful piece of kit - being called with a critical issue, and the person being able to say "I've just sent you an email with the details" makes life significantly easier.

      At a previous job, I had a pro-forma email I'd send out about every 6 months to remind people of the paths of communication, their optimal uses and expected responsiveness. The general gist was email --> IM --> text message --> call --> in person. If you need someone but its not important, start at the left. If it is critical, start at the right. Follow up with slower technologies to keep record of important points or clarify details once engaged. And use your judgement to escalate - the excuse "i IM'ed you about the server room being on fire" doesn't hold water!

    3. Re:Geez... are people really that malleable? by oni · · Score: 1

      I do not have any audio/vibro "you have mail" announcement enabled (nor do I on my desktop computer's email app).

      same here, and I find that I'm a lot more productive at work now. I put on some music and I think about what I'm coding. When I need a break, I flip over to my email (or check a website like slashdot) but I do it on my terms. If my boss emails me, then I get a popup. At home, I have an ambient orb with a serial interface and a script that makes it flash red if she emails me. So otherwise, I don't have to worry that there might be an email out there that I haven't seen.

      It's not that hard (in my job and life) to manage stress.

    4. Re:Geez... are people really that malleable? by SilentChris · · Score: 1

      I have a blackberry. I do not have any audio/vibro "you have mail" announcement enabled (nor do I on my desktop computer's email app). When I get home at the end of the day, guess what? I stop looking at it! Wow! What a concept, huh? But wait, what if it's really urgent? Well, then the blackberry makes a ringing noise and I talk to the person on the other end. Translated: If they really want to get hold of me RIGHT THIS VERY MINUTE, then they'll call when I don't answer their email.

      You're obviously not a sysadmin.

      I have all my systems email me if something goes wrong. ...Which means, if I don't get the email, things just get worse and worse and someone finally calls me and tells me the users are irate. (Or worse, the system degrades to the point that it'll take me 2x or 3x as long to bring it back up then if I had gotten the email in the first place). ...Which means, if I don't monitor these emails, users can't get their work done. Following this, the boss gets pissed. ...Which means, if I don't check my Blackberry, my boss could fire me.

      We're given these things under the assumption that we'll use them. While I agree that the situation has gone too far -- and I'd very much like to stick my Blackberry in a potato, and launch said potato out of some PVC pipes -- that's not how things work today. I don't have my servers call me when there's a problem (how irritating would that be, getting ringed every so often because some log was full?) The altnerative is to suffer the pain of the little blinking light.
    5. Re:Geez... are people really that malleable? by winkydink · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, I began my career as a sysadmin. While I'm not a name in sysadmin, my name is one that most senior sysadmins would recognize. I've published multiple, peer-reviewed papers on topics related to systems administration.

      If you are getting alert notification mail from the systems you administer on a regular basis, you might wish to consider another career because you're not doing a good job as a sysadmin. And I am saying that from both the vantage point of having been one as well as having managed 100+ both directly and indirectly.

      So, now that we've established that alert notifications from your systems are a pretty rare event, I leave it as an exercise to the reader to craft a procmail script such that your blackberry only alerts you to these specific incoming alert messages.

      --

      "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    6. Re:Geez... are people really that malleable? by SilentChris · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well, first, I'd rather not be a sysadmin by trade. I'd rather be a director or move towards CTO/CIO, which is why I'm focusing my time on education/networking. By and large, a monkey could do my position (or a senior sysadmin -- or anyone who would write "peer-reviewed papers on the subject). It's the technological equivalent of being an automechanic, and anyone who writes about them would be better served writing about Joe at the local garage (might want to consider a career change, bud).

      That said, I get alerts based on very specific events. The issue is that I'm motoring 10, 20-node clusters -- 200 machines with probably in the neighborhood of 2000 "important" pieces of hardware that can fail. Let me clarify what I mean by "monitoring" -- I'm the only one who does it. I'm the one who not only gets the alerts but has to head down to one of four sites to repair the nodes. I'm also in charge of optimizing and occasionally tightening the code that runs them. I'm also in charge of security (the IP on these boxes is worth about 1 billion). In any sanely run company, I would at least have 1 underling, so when a hard drive failed in node 18 of cluster 6, I could push a button and say "Johnny, go ship out a drive to the Canada site". Instead, I have to hop on a plane and remember my passport. Braindead way of doing things? Absolutely. I've argued that many times with management. But budgets are budgets and they'd rather pay one lackey a nice salary then 4 lackeys (one for each site).

      As it stands right now, I have multiple scripts that weed out largely unnecessary alerts. Node 4 of cluster 2 is at 90% CPU? Don't care. However, there's only so much one can weed out if you're the only admin. I need to know when critical hardware on any of the 200 nodes fail. I need to know when a node or cluster is pinned at 100% for an extended period of time. I need to know when a competitor might be trying to break into one of the boxes. I need to know if it's safe to bring down half a cluster for a code change (which I usually have to write myself). What is your solution when you have 1 admin and about 300 recognized noteworthy events in this type of environment? "Ignore your Blackberry?"

      In short, I need to act as a responsible employee, as I have no one else to fall back on to do the same. If that means checking my Blackberry on occasion, so be it. If your response is "Your job sucks," well, I agree. Most do. And I doubt I'll be here much longer.

      Bottom line, though, if the alternative is losing cluster time, losing a site, or losing a couple hundred million worth of IP, I'll take a minor inconvenience of checking a blinking light.

      P.s. Calling someone a "bad admin" when you know nothing about the environment, workload, etc. is bad form. My statement that you don't seem to be a sysadmin still stands -- you seem more to be a pompous prick.

    7. Re:Geez... are people really that malleable? by winkydink · · Score: 0

      I'll say it again. If you're getting 300 real alerts a day, something is fundamentally wrong with the computing environment. I applaud the fact that you care enough about the computing environment to respond to such an onslaught; it the exception rather than the rule to find people who do.

      And you're right, I'm no longer a sysadmin. Though in the late 80's I managed an environment with many more than 200 machines in a 24/7 production setup. And, it was the exception, not the rule, to get paged about a failure of any kind after hours.

      Oh, I'm one of those CIO/CTO people you aspire to be, so while I may sound like a pompous prick to you by delivering news you need to hear in a terse way, it doesn't change the fact that you should be able to tune your environment such that you don't get called after hours on a regular basis about failures. And I can tell you, that until you grok that, you're chances of making it to the C-level aren't good.

      --

      "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    8. Re:Geez... are people really that malleable? by LoveGoblin · · Score: 5, Funny

      Do you also get paid by the ellipsis?

    9. Re:Geez... are people really that malleable? by mrmeval · · Score: 1

      Tell them they can wrap it in aluminum foil to stop the evil mind controlrays making them overwork.

      --
      I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
    10. Re:Geez... are people really that malleable? by bbourqu · · Score: 1

      Exactly. I have a blackjack. I have the notifications enabled, but I ignore them in the evening unless I am expecting something or I have some other need to get something important done. There is no law that says you need to react to the thing when it beeps or vibrates.

    11. Re:Geez... are people really that malleable? by emurphy42 · · Score: 1

      I do some after-hours work, but it's really flex time rather than overtime. As long as billable hours per month are high enough to make a decent profit, and response time is low enough to keep the customers happy, then everything's jake.

    12. Re:Geez... are people really that malleable? by earthbound+kid · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I understand your point about not letting your job define you, but the counterpoint is, at 40 hours a week, you end up spending a quarter of your life doing your job, so you may as well make it something that you don't mind doing, you know? If your job is something that you want to completely shut out as soon as you walk out the door, then can you really be doing the right thing with your time there?

      I think the two sides of this argument both have some merit. If you're a Blackberry-addict, slave-to-your-job type, that's just sad, because your field of interests is so narrow. What about your family, friends, eating good food, seeing good art? On the other hand, if you leave work and completely shut it out, does that mean that you consider yourself to be "wasting" a huge chunk of your life? It's true you have to work just to live, but shouldn't you try to find a way to do that having the feeling that money is the only reward for doing a good job?

      Just something to think about...

    13. Re:Geez... are people really that malleable? by cHALiTO · · Score: 1

      I don't think the problem has anything to do with you or him being a good or a bad admin. Your problem is workload. Obviously your work requires 24/7 attention. That, in my world, means more than one shift. You shouldn't be doing that alone; you should have at least 2 or 3 people that can take turns on watch, and if a problem arises, then the one on watch would handle it, only calling the others in extremely rare mega-urgent occasions. Meanwhile, the other two can enjoy their lives and forget about work until the next shift.
      Of course, that means pay 2 or 3 more salaries.. which your boss might not be happy to do ("why? if we're fine now?"). I've had a similar problem in a former job, "no need to hire, we're ok now", but we were busting our asses working till any hour in the night every day. So I quit :)

      --
      "Luck is my middle name," said Rincewind, indistinctly. "Mind you, my first name is Bad." -- Terry Pratchett
    14. Re:Geez... are people really that malleable? by Aceticon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Don't get me wrong, if there is the need for the 12th hour effort, and 110% to get something working for whatever reason...I'm there for the duration...but, I WILL get paid for that time and effort.


      I work as a contractor (freelancer) and in some assignments i get payed by the hour.

      In my experience, when a manager has been spewing his crap about "it's a tight deadline and we're gonna have to work long hours and weekends to do it" and you point out that you're payed by the hour, the need for extra hours "magically" disappears.

      IMHO, the vast majority of the time, the need for extra hours is born out of a bad manager knowingly giving optimistic estimates to upper management/the client to make himself look good or a bad sales person knowingly selling a project on the cheap to get the contract (and the bonus). As long as they can get out of budget extra hours from those working on the project they can keep the illusion that they're good managers/sellers. If the extra hours are budgeted, then it becomes glaring obvious that they're actually dowing a sub-par job.

      The way to see if there's a real need for the extra work is if they're willing to pay for the extra hours at 150% or more rate (if they're only willing to pay the same as for standard hours, they're probably knowingly understaffed).
    15. Re:Geez... are people really that malleable? by PinkPanther · · Score: 1

      If your job is something that you want to completely shut out as soon as you walk out the door, then can you really be doing the right thing with your time there?
      Good point.

      In addition, many people that I know who "carry blackberries" also have flexible schedules at work. I, for one, am able to leave when meetings are completed if I so desire. I get my 40+ hours done, just not always between 9 and 5. I usually am here before 9 and gone around 5, but I have the flexibility and freedom to alter that. I'm sure that if I was to abuse that freedom that I'd have 40+ hours of free time and no blackberry to worry about...with such freedom comes the responsibility to not abuse it (i.e. being responsive and completing work tasks).

      --
      It's a simple matter of complex programming.
    16. Re:Geez... are people really that malleable? by cayenne8 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      "I understand your point about not letting your job define you, but the counterpoint is, at 40 hours a week, you end up spending a quarter of your life doing your job, so you may as well make it something that you don't mind doing, you know? If your job is something that you want to completely shut out as soon as you walk out the door, then can you really be doing the right thing with your time there?"

      Well, in my original post..I did mention that I do enjoy my work...

      I like messing with computers, databases...etc. I do a considerable amount of 'play' with my computers at home...however, it is ALL my stuff and interests I want to do. While at the job site..I try to be 100% concentrated on the efforts to do the job there...to get paid. But, I do not give my work responsibilities a 2nd thought as I leave...I really don't. I do, do some of the same things for fun at home as at work, but, they are my projects...and only for my pleasure, or to increase money I can make on my own. I just do not mull over 'work problems' when I'm not there...I pretty much only solve work problems when I'm 'on the clock'. I do not waste my free time, limited as you pointed out, thinking about other people's problems....I only do that for pay.

      :-)

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    17. Re:Geez... are people really that malleable? by Pointy_Hair · · Score: 1

      A hearty "me too" - sometimes you have to train others about communication channels. I carry a Treo and everyone knows it is for my convenience not thiers and that I also have the incoming mail alert disabled. When I am in the middle of business travel it's kind of nice to be able to keep up with e-mail without having to hassle with the laptop. If something comes through important enought to take action, I will dial a phone number more often than peck out a reply on the tiny excuse for a keyboard.

      IMO those that think of a PDA like instant messaging are in the same class of weasels that send e-mails out on Sundays at 3am expecting a response before business hours begin on Monday. If you don't "feed" the weasel they quit bothering you. If the weasel is your boss or client, you probably needed a different job anyway.

      Bottom line is I highly value my personal time and enforce my right to be left alone during off-hours.

    18. Re:Geez... are people really that malleable? by SilentChris · · Score: 1
      Reread what I wrote. There are 300 recognized "noteworthy events" (management nomenclature, not mine). Those are events defined as important enough that they warrant a notification email -- not that I receive 300 messages a day. Typically, I probably receive about 10-20 a day, most of them minor (but enough to warrant at least some attention).

      And, it was the exception, not the rule, to get paged about a failure of any kind after hours.


      Hardware failure, in particular, is inevitable. You mean to tell me, across 200 servers, that you never received a notification than a hard drive failed somewhere after hours? That an HBA crapped out? As I mentioned, each box has about 10 "important" pieces of hardware in it. The odds that something will fail across 2000 pieces of hardware on occasion are pretty good.

      Or, rather, did you NOT KNOW there was a failure? In my situation, I like to know these things even if they don't have an immediate effect on our output. Does a hard drive failure on a node necessitate a disaster? No. But 3 or more drives failing will. In the meantime, there's going to be IO considerations/barriers on that node that will effect cluster performance. I like to be aware of that.

      Oh, I'm one of those CIO/CTO people you aspire to be, so while I may sound like a pompous prick to you by delivering news you need to hear in a terse way, it doesn't change the fact that you should be able to tune your environment such that you don't get called after hours on a regular basis about failures. And I can tell you, that until you grok that, you're chances of making it to the C-level aren't good.


      I'm not sure where you're getting "regular failures" from. Reread my original posts. I said that if my Blackberry's light is blinking after hours, I check it. You said you don't (how a CIO/CTO gets away with this and is not considered "irresponsible" is beyond me -- but I digress).

      That doesn't mean my Blackberry's light always blinks after hours. It doesn't mean we have failures every night. Typically at least one piece of hardware craps out every 2 weeks across the 200 nodes. As I said, it's inevitable that hardware fails on occasion.

      In terms of pompousness, I've met a lot of great directors/CIOs/CTOs that have provided valuable opinions without attempting to be condescending. I learn from them, not from a random Slashdot poster.

      Finally, as for C-level, buddy, way beyond that. Although my hope is to get past "levels" completely and guide people formerly in my position without appearing as an ass.
    19. Re:Geez... are people really that malleable? by Deagol · · Score: 1
      I gotta speak up here.

      Firstly, as one who does contract work from home, I fully appreciate the ability to disappear from the grid and not give 'work' a second thought for hours/days on end.

      We have no idea what kind of hardware the GP is maintaining. In the late 80s, you didn't have cheaply manufactured commodity hardware. You had tanks, some of which are still chugging along to this day in obscure closets in corporate America, running legacy code whose original vendor ceased to exist long ago. Even if those boxes in question were PCs from that era, as opposed to minis or big iron you'd find in a production environment (both much more reliable than PCs), they were still much more reliable than today's commodity hardware.

      I've helped to maintain HPC environments, and it was a mix of the following:

      1) Large, quality, proprietary machines, like SGI Origin 2000s, beefy Sun servers, and big IBM servers. Short of critical core OS upgrades or the rare hardware replacements (many machines kept running with certain hardware failures), these machines simply never went down. They were a sysadmin's dream come true, and a joy to maintain. Between maybe 20 "machines" (blurred in this case, as the O2K was a single image machine from the OS/user perspective, but had 64 "nodes"), I'd have deal with replacing a single piece of hardware (power supply, CPU, piece of RAM, or HD) per year. This applied to even the "cheap" Sparc-10 and 20 pizza boxes littering the data center, which were old when I started that job, which I stayed at for 5 years.

      2) High-end, vendor-specific PC hardware. This includes racks of cluster nodes from big vendors like HP, Dell, etc.. With a couple of hundred nodes, these had failures much more often. Sure just due to sheer numbers, but also in proportion to the number of machines. Mostly bad memory or HD failures, but the occasional switch or backplane was not uncommon. Enough to keep a single person busy babysitting half-time.

      3) Dirt cheap, beige boxes (sometimes black racks) filled with the lowest price-point commodity hardware our local PC vendor could assemble for us. Several hundred in clusters. Everything would fail, with various levels of severity. All the above previously mentioned hardware, but often motherboards, fans, NICs, and everything in between. I recall a rash of AMD CPU fan failures -- sometimes just killing the CPU, but sometimes fan blades peppering the inside of the case like shrapnel. Good times, indeed! These machines kept a full-time underling swapping hardware most of the time, plus the admin overhead to monitor the state of the nodes.

      Note that the difference in number of failures (per machine count) between 1 and 2 was quite great, but not so much between 2 and 3. Certainly not in proportion to the price.

      So, machines come in all flavors, and, depending on the GP's hardware, we have no reason to criticize his overhead related to hardware problems. If his employer is too cheap to hire a few on-site Jr. Techs, it wouldn't surprise me that if they used less than reliable hardware. Or skimped on cooling. Or something.

      Yes, a good system of setting up and monitoring hardware goes a long way to reduce the workload. However, sometimes it's simply the admin vs the hardware and it's MTBF ratings, and in the cases of 100+ machines, the odds are against you. But, the the guy's defense, I don't believe we've been given enough information to be as harsh as you are sounding.

    20. Re:Geez... are people really that malleable? by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

      "If you don't "feed" the weasel they quit bothering you. If the weasel is your boss or client, you probably needed a different job anyway."

      I totally agree with you here. You have to train your boss/bosses not to hassle you on your weekend. My co-worker/underboss was the CEO's little bitch for years. He would have to go on coffee runs, make emergency trips to the CEO's house on the weekends to monkey with wireless routers, all kinds of crap. For a salaried position making a hair over $32k a year.

      Once they put me in a full-time position, my underboss friend started taking care of clients on the side, during business hours, to make up for his super weak salary. However, this shifted the previous CEO nonsense to me, because I'm on site 40 hours a week. It only took a few stupid false alarms before I put my foot down. I told the CEO that despite what my co-worker has done for him outside the scope of his job description in the past, I'm not him, and I'm not his Starbucks lackey. He has since quit bothering me with his special requests and only contacts me in an actual emergency or problem scenario.

      The situation varies from company to company, but here, it's just not worth it. You can kiss this CEO's ass all day long, and you will never, ever see a single benefit from it. Actually I'm willing to bet most companies are this way. Just because you're the system administrator doesn't mean you owe the CEO anything.

    21. Re:Geez... are people really that malleable? by Vr6dub · · Score: 1

      I sure hope you don't get hit by a beer truck. You're telling me that if something tragic happened to you then they would have no one to admin their system? How did they amass this "fortune" of IP if they are stupid enough to leave one person in charge of their critical infrastructure?

    22. Re:Geez... are people really that malleable? by SilentChris · · Score: 1

      I've made that point, actually, a million times to them. "Hope I don't get hit by a truck tomorrow." Their response is "Make sure you document all procedures and workflows. That way someone else can take over when you leave."

      Of course, that's moronic. There aren't many that admin a group of sites like this, particularly alone. But they don't want to hear that.

      As for how they amassed their fortune, beats me. I assume at some point they had competent management. I consider this position a means to a goal, not the top of the ladder, so I don't typically spend too much time thinking about it.

  2. being always connected to work is terrible by JustNiz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Because for some reason bosses think they have a right to your leisure time, and there are enough weak-willed employees giving in to them already to make you look bad if you don't answer the damn blackberry when you're not at work.

    1. Re:being always connected to work is terrible by TheMeuge · · Score: 1

      It's terrible, but that's exactly what any jobs that matter and pay well are turning into. For doctors, lawyers, research scientists, as well as many programmers, finance professionals, and others, working 60-80 hours per week is not an indication of dedication to work, but a necessity.

    2. Re:being always connected to work is terrible by Shivetya · · Score: 1

      I agree. The people who have accepted these things at my workplace have lost a lot of their personal time. Because the two executives in our department have no other life they think anyone else they can reach doesn't have one either.

      In some cases its the employer doing the chaining, just do your best to avoid it. for some reason email seems to indicate more availability than just a phone

      --
      * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
    3. Re:being always connected to work is terrible by azrider · · Score: 3, Insightful

      For years, I was regional support for a computer maintenance company. I was the only one in the office without an answering machine (pre-cellular times). Six months after I got married, I got an answering machine (since I had always answered the phone, I was the first one to be called). Sure enough, two days later I got several frantic phone calls. My manager asked why I didn't answer the phone and was told "when everybody starts answering, I will". After that, we went to an on-call rotation.

      --
      And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.
      John 8:32(King James Version)
    4. Re:being always connected to work is terrible by The+Great+Pretender · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Most of the time (please note the statement 'most of the time') I find that the people who actually use theirs outside of work hours are the ones who want to feel or look important. "Hey! Look at me everyone! I'm soooo important that my work needs attention at 9pm on a Friday night, when I'm at the bar". The people who are actually that important, and there are not as many as people think, tend to turn theirs off becuase they really need the downtime and they recognize that.

      --
      A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
    5. Re:being always connected to work is terrible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't even understand what the fuck you just said. What on earth does it mean when you say, "when everybody starts answering, I will"? And who was told that, you or the boss? It's almost as bad as the guy up above who spelled ridiculous as "rediculous".

    6. Re:being always connected to work is terrible by Eivind · · Score: 1
      I think it's perfectly reasonable to aks an employee to go the extra mile in an emergency. But if it's *that* important -- then the company should be willing to put action behind its words. Which in practice works best in cold hard cash.

      My boss *CAN* call on me at any time. *BUT* we've agreed that whenever I'm interupted in my free time (even if it's a 2-minute-fix) I put down a minimum of 3 hours work. At overtime rates (1.5 - 3 times normal hourly wages, depending on time of day etc).

      So: End-effect he *CAN* get a 10-minute fix done at 3am the nigth before saturday. No problem. But only if he considers the 10-minute fix worth about a days pay for me. If it's not that important, it'll have to wait until monday.

      What I'd never accept is bosses who on the one hand insists it's an "emergency", but on the other hand balks at paying $300 or whatever to get it fixed. If that is to expensive, then obviously the "emergency" ain't so dire afterall.

    7. Re:being always connected to work is terrible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Problem: The manager calls your blackberry and expects you to answer it.

      Solution: Forward the blackberry number to your home phone and have your kids answer it.

      Most managers can only intimadate their employees, and if they do try to intimidate your kids, well, then you have a legitimate complaint. Don't forget to tell your kids that when Mr. Bob calls to let him know you're "Mowing the lawn" and "You'll be there at 9:00 AM" but "If it is an emergency, like Mr. Bob has a broken leg, you can get daddy on the phone".

      This is the real reason why most managers don't call your home phone. They're scared. Of children, funny enough.

      As far as the blackberry email goes, forward that to a machine with a vacation message when you're out of work that tells the boss to call your blackberry if it is an emergency.

    8. Re:being always connected to work is terrible by SandwhichMaster · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, I have a blackberry for on-call purposes. It is supposed to be for emergency use only, but since people know that I have to be watching it, I get sucked into things all the time. So, I suppose there is increased productivity in that respect, but its definately not by choice. However, recieving spam at 4 a.m that destroy a night of sleep, is quite counterproductive.

  3. well, by President_Camacho · · Score: 2

    A Director of Marketing Strategies who owns a Blackberry pointed out that many employees feel obligated by employers who have handed out the devices.

    From the impression I get from all the PHB's out there, that's kind of the idea.

  4. Depends on whether you choose to be interrupted by joeflies · · Score: 1

    The people I see with the biggest problems of Blackberry dependency are the ones who set the alerts to ring/vibrate for every single communication. It's terribly annoying to have a conversation with someone and see that person turn away because they have a new email.

    I have my blackberry set with a custom profile for no alerts whatsoever except for phone calls and SMS/PIN. That way, I choose when I want to do work, but it won't otherwise bother me.

    1. Re:Depends on whether you choose to be interrupted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where I work, a lot of people have them including myself. We all hear when someone in the room gets a message and we all see the person reach for it and start reading it. It is no big deal and no one feels disrupted by it and no beats or momentum is lost. It is even so common that when three or four people all get messages at the same time, usually only one or two people will pull it out and read it because we all know it was a group email. All of our jobs rely on our email and phone and we all know it.

  5. Turn it OFF by revlayle · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't care if the company gave them to you or not. When you are ready to be uninterrupted, turn it off... and your cell phone. Esp. on weekend I do not want to be bugged, I check messages once in the afternoon before and after heading out to do "my stuff" for the day. I get chained enough with extra contract work from time-to-time... when it's down time, it's down time. Your corporate assigned blackberries, PDAs, laptops, pages, and other gizmos will not make me respond any faster. (Exception: pager when you are officially to be "on-call" for a very *specified* period of time - except I am rarely on-call ever, but some people are on a regular basis)

    1. Re:Turn it OFF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No need to even do that - just suffer from "isn't the reception round here really terrible" every now and again.

    2. Re:Turn it OFF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I tried that. My multinational company uses Tmobile Blackberries and Skytel pagers almost exclusively. Both are really crappy in my area. After several months, I was given a Verizon BB and I got the go ahead to forward my Skytel pages to my personal Sprint cell phones SMS address (I have unlimited SMS already). Now I meet the requirements of "must be able to be contacted at any hour" which is a condition of employment as the Network Engineer. Sprint also supports the delivery of the the industry standard IXO/TAP alpha numeric pages that get sent via a dialup modem to a Sprint tool free number as well. Works great on our systems that dial out and send alerts.

      I actually prefer this method as now I only have to carry two devices, one of which I already carried anyway. I do slack off on carrying the BB though so most of the time I only carry my personal cell phone.

  6. Not just that . . . by mstahl · · Score: 1

    . . . but there's also the quality of communication between blackberry owners and everyone else. At first I was offended when I'd get these short and terse emails from my family and friends with blackberries, but then I realized they have to type on that tiny keyboard.

    Even when people are at work during work hours, I get a little concerned when I see my boss head into the men's room still typing on his.

  7. I don't want to be that connected by LMacG · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Is the constantly connected, often mobile nature of the modern workplace a good thing, or not?

    Not. I'll work late hours, within reason, when whatever project I'm assigned to requires that I do so, but I refuse to be at anyone's beck and call 24/7. (Probably why I'm single, but that's another story).

    I plan on going to a bar tonight to have a couple of beers - I'll have a designated driver - would it be a good idea for me to answer a work call or respond to a work email if I've had one too many?

    --
    Slightly disreputable, albeit gregarious
    1. Re:I don't want to be that connected by Penguinshit · · Score: 5, Funny

      drunk + root prompt = bad hangover....

    2. Re:I don't want to be that connected by QuantumRiff · · Score: 1

      Drunk + root Prompt = Boss that finally wants to talk about disaster recovery scenarios. ;)

      Course, there will be a lecture about coming in drunk.. followed by your question of when are appropriate times for you to do what you want, and which times will you be on the clock... They can tell me not to go to the bar in the evening, when they are paying me to be working!

      --

      What are we going to do tonight Brain?
    3. Re:I don't want to be that connected by kpainter · · Score: 1

      drunk + e-mail to boss = bad idea

    4. Re:I don't want to be that connected by kchrist · · Score: 1

      That was always my standard response when I got an off-hours call at a previous job: "Sorry, I've had a couple drinks and can't drive". Whether it was true or not, you can't argue with it.

  8. productivity by non · · Score: 4, Insightful

    how much of the gains in productivity reported by the federal reserve are due to precisely this; businesses wringing extra, unpaid, work out of their employees.

    i let it run out of battery, i forget it, i don't use it. but i'm not climbing the ladder, i'm just sitting here watching the wheels go 'round and 'round.

    --
    ...vividly encapsulates that post-Watergate/pre-punk/coked-up moment when you could trust no one, least of all yourself.
    1. Re:productivity by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 3, Insightful

      how much of the gains in productivity reported by the federal reserve are due to precisely this; businesses wringing extra, unpaid, work out of their employees.

      Oh I dunno, probably the inverse of whatever gains in productivity are lost by reading slashdot, digg, and being able to pay bills, talk to friends, and handle emergency issues all from your desk at work?

      It's a 2-way street people, don't forget to look the other way. You're liable to get run over.

      --
      Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
    2. Re:productivity by Aceticon · · Score: 1

      how much of the gains in productivity reported by the federal reserve are due to precisely this; businesses wringing extra, unpaid, work out of their employees.

      i let it run out of battery, i forget it, i don't use it. but i'm not climbing the ladder, i'm just sitting here watching the wheels go 'round and 'round.


      I'll tell you a little secret about promotions in IT:
      - They go to those who invest time in socializing, making themselfs look good and knowing the right persons in the company.

      Working hard and/or being a good techie might, at the most, result in a very slow career progress inside a restricted branch in the technical tree. In truth, if you're very good at a technical position and you don't try hard to get out of it you will be kept in that position for all ethernity or (more likelly) until the relevant technologies are phased out.

      Sad but true.
  9. A Couple Anecdotes by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 2, Funny

    1. My dad has one and hates how he feels "tied to his office."

    2. A co-worker was very annoyed when her husband was checking it for mail while on vacation. A desire to "see if it can be skipped across the Pacific" was expressed.

    1. Re:A Couple Anecdotes by tmossman · · Score: 1

      My own father-related anecdote:

      My dad was issued one by his company a couple of years ago. As background, you should understand that, while he's had a (personal, not business) cell phone for years prior, that lived, powered off, in the glove box of his car. Since then, I'd say he's become even *less* tied to his office. He's always travelled a lot for work, so it makes sense for him to have one, but he manages to use it in a manner that allows him *more* personal time, not less. For example: it's 3:00pm. The day's meetings are over, and chances are that no one will be rushing into his office in the next few hours with some mission critical problem. Why not head home, touch up that PowerPoint presentation for tomorrow from there, and catch my little sister's High School volleyball game? If someone *really* needs something, well, that's what the Blackberry's for, right?

      Now, granted, he's at a point in his life (he's towards the top end of that 25-54 demographic) where he's not too concerned with beating out Johnson for the Big Promotion, and thus can use the technology to his benefit. Were he a young up-and-coming executive, things would probably be much different; the guy who rushes into the office at 5:00am at the behest of a 4:45am email will (other things being equal) get the promotion over the guy who says, "Sorry, boss, MY time is MY time." But I don't think that it's strictly an issue with Blackberries, but rather with the culture of connectedness that the proliferation of cell phones has brought us. I've worked a number of part-time (i.e. non-career-related) jobs over the years, waiter, cook, cashier, etc. and every place I worked a) assumed that you had a cell phone, and b) assumed that they could use it at any time to wrangle you in to work if they needed you. Few things are more frustrating than having your evening interrupted by work, calling to "ask" if you can cover someone's shift.

      As a low-paid underling, what can you do? Tell them "No." too often, or simply ignore the call, and you soon find that your hours are reduced, or you're stuck working undesirable shifts. Drop everything and run to their service, and you just reinforce the idea that they own you, that you're their bitch. Eventually I settled into a habit of telling overzealous employers that I was "too drunk to work," even if all I had planned was an evening of Mountain Dew and Counterstrike. I was in college at the time, so it was a feasible excuse. That strategy might not work as well for, say, a cardiothoracic surgeon.

    2. Re:A Couple Anecdotes by TeraBill · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I work in an IT shop for a moderate sized company and our VP has told the people under him that have those things that he expects responses to e-mails within a couple of hours 24x7. And he has chewed out my boss, who currently doesn't have a device like that, for not responding to e-mails when he was on vacation. The problem here is that the VP lives with that thing attached to him and does e-mail while on vacation, so he expect that from pretty much everyone else. Seems like a good recipe for burning out a lot of good employees.

    3. Re:A Couple Anecdotes by Watson+Ladd · · Score: 1

      Doctors expect to be on call all the time. For them it's no big deal for the boss to say "We have an emergency, get here NOW!"

      --
      Inventions have long since reached their limit, and I see no hope for further development.-- Frontinus, 1st cent. AD
    4. Re:A Couple Anecdotes by tmossman · · Score: 1

      Well, obviously when you're dealing with deadly illnesses you're going to have to pull some weird hours. My point was merely that this attitude of total devotion to the job seems to have crept into jobs where the only thing on the line is whether customers have to wait 20 or 30 minutes to get a table.

    5. Re:A Couple Anecdotes by Catiline · · Score: 1

      I work in an IT shop for a moderate sized company and our VP has told the people under him that have those things that he expects responses to e-mails within a couple of hours 24x7. The problem here is that the VP lives with that thing attached to him and does e-mail while on vacation, so he expect that from pretty much everyone else.

      While I've not been in this position (yet!), I already know how I would respond to this — automation. While out of the office, have an email sent for every incoming, that would look something like:

      I am currently out of the office, in Cancun (suckers!). If this is a critical issue, call me at my cell phone number, (XXX) XXX-XXXX. Otherwise, I will deal with this when I return on the (insert date here).

      There - I replied. If the VP doesn't think that's acceptable, he can pay for my vacation hours at overtime rates (oh yes, and travel rates, since I'm not at my regular work place). Since I own no portion of the company (I assume the VP does), I get paid for when I work — even if that work is simply "check my office email while far, far away from the office".
  10. I don't have a blackberry by stratjakt · · Score: 1

    I have a Treo. I shut it off, or don't answer it, when I'm not working.

    In fact, I rarely answer it at all.

    I don't see how the availability of cell-phones means that anybody should be able to reach me, at any hour of the day, regardless of what I'm doing.

    Fucking grow a set, people. If you don't like your job, move on. If your job expects you to carry yoru blackberry 24/7, and you don't like that, move on.

    Your options are only as limited as you choose to make them. Well, mine are. You're probably a fucking retard who's lucky his uncle got him that job as "computer guy".

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  11. "Age group" by igotmybfg · · Score: 1

    There's no way you can lump 25 - 54 year-olds in the same "age group". And anyway, I think 25 to at least 30 year olds are more likely to be "always on" than not.

    1. Re:"Age group" by riskeetee · · Score: 2, Insightful

      While the 25-30 year olds are likely to be more gadget geeks, the older crowd is more likely to be workaholics. I've seen more of the over-40 crowd get addicted to their crackberries, and they are typically more concerned with climbing the corporate ladder. After 50 changing jobs becomes a huge issue; many people at that point are hoping to just ride out their current job until retirement. If that means having an electronic leash, that's still preferable to unemployment. It's not the fear that they would lose their jobs if they didn't answer emails on nights and weekends, but the fear they would be first in line when the next round of layoffs hits.

  12. Not just Blackberrys by mapexvenus · · Score: 1

    PDA's too. I use a Windows Mobile 5.0 - based device and yes, it does chain me to my work. I almost always react to an email. Sometimes this involves me replying from my PDA, or depending on what was sent to me, actually getting on my laptop and doing something more than just replying. The wife isn't happy and she is right when she says that when I PDA says jump, I actually do jump. Thankfully though I dont always jump and have learned that it is OK to let things wait until the next business day, or start of the business day, depending on when the email came in. I need to get to a point where I turn my device off outside of working hours. But then, that would defeat the purpose of having a PDA, wouldn't it?

    1. Re:Not just Blackberrys by mrsmiggs · · Score: 1

      The purpose of a PDA or mobile phone should be to keep a mobile worker or someone on call in touch. I'm currently tied to my desk and despite vague attempts to get me a mobile I have all my calls routed through the reception (there's no direct dials). Partly to get them to install a decent phone system but also so that people will only get in touch if they actually need to get in touch. Sure I can VPN in and check my emails and do some work from home but I'm in control then.

    2. Re:Not just Blackberrys by Moofie · · Score: 1

      "I need to get to a point where I turn my device off outside of working hours"

      You think?

      "But then, that would defeat the purpose of having a PDA, wouldn't it?"

      Why? The purpose of using a tool is solving a problem, not using a tool. You need to be the master of the tool. You need to not be a tool.

      Words to live by.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    3. Re:Not just Blackberrys by Stevecrox · · Score: 1

      I have a windows Mobile 5 device, I don't work full time (I'm a student) I have it because if I'm in a lab which I'm going to type up the results its easier to put them into excel in the first place, its good to keep pitch and putt scores in, when wondering where your lectures been moved I can quickly log into the uni's intranet and find out on the fly, it syncs with outlook meaning I have everyones phone number, address and email which has proved invaliable, finally it can be fun to play with. A WM5 device is a tool, I use it when I need it, to save me running to a computer room to find something out and to remind me that I have a one off lecture. These things exist to help you get on with stuff, unless your wife/GF/etc.. is emailing you why bother answering it? If I started doing that I'd start charging the company for overtime.

  13. They make the choice. by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    My blackberry get's turned off when I get home. IT get's turned on in the morning when I leave for work.

    I am in charge of it and I command it. I was asked once by the director of marketing why I did not answer his email he sent sunday at 5am. I said, I have a life outside work and my blackberry is off on weekends and nights.

    He gave me a look like I had murdered a bag of puppies and walked back to his office.

    It's your choice if you want the device and your job to own you 24/7

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:They make the choice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I said, I have a life outside work and my blackberry is off on weekends and nights.
      So you're also saying you're disposable because if you can't be reached in an emergency then it shouldn't impact anyone right? See, I can't say that unfortunately.. if there's an emergency then thousands of people are put out if I don't respond. :-( I really should train a backup PFY.
    2. Re:They make the choice. by ronrib · · Score: 2, Insightful
    3. Re:They make the choice. by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Yes, but presumably you are properly compensated for the impact that extra responsibility has upon your private life. And if you're not ... well. The problem we're discussing in this thread is about people whose job has negative impacts upon their personal life, but for which they are not compensated.

      Besides, being reached in an emergency has nothing to do with the Director of Marketing sending an email on a Sunday morning. If it's so goddamned important, he can just use the phone like a normal person.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    4. Re:They make the choice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if they pay you the $$$ to compensate you for working 24/7 that is great.

      I bet you dont get $150,000.00 a year. I bet you dont get 1/4th what your direct report get's.

      You let them use you. your fault.

      And no he is not saying he is disposable, he is saying, "I am doing you a favor by working here, I will not act like a slave unless you triple my salary."

    5. Re:They make the choice. by pete6677 · · Score: 1

      Nothing the director of marketing ever does is important enough to warrant a response at 5 AM. I love how these people think they are the lifeblood of the company, when really they would not be noticed if they were gone.

    6. Re:They make the choice. by Macka · · Score: 1


      Haha, love the cartoon. You didn't read it properly though did you.

      Unfortunately he was right and you just "corrected" him with the wrong spelling. You must feel pretty silly right about now.

    7. Re:They make the choice. by 808140 · · Score: 1

      No, I think you (and your sibling poster, it seems) are the ones who are seriously retarded. Humour-impaired, I think, is the term that some people use to describe your kind.

      Seriously.

    8. Re:They make the choice. by ronrib · · Score: 1

      "My blackberry get's turned off when I get home."

    9. Re:They make the choice. by Macka · · Score: 1


      Oh we're humour impaired are we? Well considering no one moderated you funny, and the only two people to reply didn't get it, I guess your humour appeals to a minority of one!

      Here's a little hint for the future. When cracking a (very) non-obvious joke, it's usually polite to give the reader a hint my using an emoticon.

    10. Re:They make the choice. by Macka · · Score: 1

      ... reader a hint by using ...
      Tired and posting. When will I ever learn :-/
    11. Re:They make the choice. by 808140 · · Score: 1

      You were apparently too tired to note that I didn't write the original post, nor did I reply to your message. Perhaps you meant to reply to this post?

  14. change corporate culture by navtal · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I have disliked the passive aggressive corporate culture for a while. Change the work environment culture! Sorry to be complaining without a solution.

    1. Re:change corporate culture by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      Sorry to be complaining without a solution.

      Unionize.

      There are only two ways you can change a corporate culture. One is to be a company officer, and impose the change. The other is to get together with everyone else on the bottom and work together to change it. You don't need to over-specialize or be protective, you just need to stand alongside everyone else in your niche and tell the boss when enough is enough.

      Doctors have entire schools and medical boards. Lawyers have the bar. Why geeks can't have their own "Technologist's Guild" or something is just hubris.

    2. Re:change corporate culture by hb253 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In a previous life, I was a member of a union (not by choice). Although I understand that unions can be good in an ideal world, in reality they suck the life out of anybody with a work ethic. Why should I do a good job if some idiot does zero work, is protected by the union, and gets the same annual salary incrases as me?

      --
      Self awareness - try it!
  15. Blame Your Job by Greenisus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I have a Blackberry for work, as do many of my peers. Most of them work tons of overtime and feel that their Blackberry runs their lives. But not me. I work efficiently and get everything done within regular working hours and rarely need to deal with my Blackberry at night.

    Don't blame the device. Blame your job.

    1. Re:Blame Your Job by PoderOmega · · Score: 4, Insightful

      In some workplaces if you are able to get things done in normal business hours, that means you don't have enough to do, and you will get more work assigned to you.

    2. Re:Blame Your Job by Elladan · · Score: 1

      And if you're smart, you won't do it.

      What you're basically saying is that some places are intolerable places to work, and if you put up with their bullshit, they'll abuse you. If too many people put up with their bullshit, other places will tend to become intolerable too.

      The only ways to curtail the race to the bottom are strong will and legislation.

    3. Re:Blame Your Job by Magada · · Score: 1

      Bullshit places like that are easy to game. Do not do everything requested - do ninety percent and make sure you keep a balance so that once in a while something important you work on doesn't get done - because you delivered at the last possible second. No-one will think of increasing your workload then.

      --
      Something bad is coming when people are suddenly anxious to tell the truth.
    4. Re:Blame Your Job by Aceticon · · Score: 1

      In some workplaces if you are able to get things done in normal business hours, that means you don't have enough to do, and you will get more work assigned to you.

      And at that moment you point out that it's not physically possible to do all that work in the available time and you ask for a prioritization of what's more important to do. (do this via e-mail and keep the e-mail and the responses)

      Then you proceed to work as usual and when the deadline arrives, the least important things will not be ready but the most important things will.

      Now, if you had the guts to follow me all the way here (yes, i work this way all the time) you will notice the unexpected absense of people shouting in your ears or complaining that you are late - that's because you:
      a) Told them up-front that it wasn't possible
      b) Got the really important things done on time

      If, however your direct manager does accuse you of being late, politelly point out that you let him know up front in an e-mail (you kept the e-mail, right!??) that it wasn't possible (in other words, that his deadline was unrealistic). That will shut him up.

      If the manager persists in pestering you at this point (only happened to me once), escalate this to an e-mail discussion and CC at least a couple of key business stakeholders in the project. Make sure you attach your original e-mail (the one saying "this is not possible to do in the given timeframe") and his responses, including the prioritization. Also make sure you let everybody around you know how bad your manager is and why.
      (By the way, the only manager that ever got to this point with me got "shelved" some time after i left the company).

      PS: Contrary to what most people seem to think, this kind of behaviour actually increases your standing because you will consistently deliver the important things within the agreed timeframe. This will positivelly compare to the "i'll work as hard as i can" crowd since they usually end up delivering late and/or with missing/buggy key functionalities.

  16. It is NOT a good thing by BlackHawk · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In Freemasonry, the 24-inch gauge (or ruler) is used as an emblem of the 24 hours in the day. We are taught that we are to divide this time in three parts, with 8 being for refreshment and sleep, 8 being for the service of God and our fellow man, and 8 "for our usual vocations" -- that is, our regular job. While we understand the realities of modern life, the model of "8 for sleep, 8 for work, 8 for service" is a good one that keeps proper balance in our lives. The move to more and more work eats away at that balance, and imbalance is the source of most of our ills.

    BTW, if you're wondering where "family" is in that model, we tend to our families in the 8 we reserve for service. Service to our families is the source of our strength.

    --

    Believe nothing, not even if I say it, if it violates your sense of reason -- Buddha

    1. Re:It is NOT a good thing by Servo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If I can work 5 hours in the office, and 3 at random intervals outside because I get to use a Blackberry, that's still 8 hours. People who insist on constantly checking their Blackberry's afterhours do it to themselves. Its not the device that needs to change, its you. Before I had a Blackberry, I'd have to stay logged into my work email... At home. Now at least if I insist on doing that I can do it from the grocery store while I'm doing something else. I feel the Blackberry is less invasive than getting calls on my cell phone constantly because most folks know if its not immediately important, just email me.

      --
      A slip of the foot you may soon recover, but a slip of the tongue you may never get over. -Benjamin Franklin
    2. Re:It is NOT a good thing by throbbingbrain.com · · Score: 2, Insightful

      8 being for refreshment and sleep, 8 being for the service of God and our fellow man, and 8 "for our usual vocations" -- that is, our regular job
      Where does commuting fit into that?

    3. Re:It is NOT a good thing by Abroun · · Score: 1

      When do you masturbate?

    4. Re:It is NOT a good thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess that's considered "refreshment"?

    5. Re:It is NOT a good thing by farcircle · · Score: 1

      Well, for most slashdotters it could be considered their "usual vocation". The pay sucks but the hours are flexible.

    6. Re:It is NOT a good thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sleep for me. yes i drive to work.

    7. Re:It is NOT a good thing by kchrist · · Score: 1

      Not to mention the nine hour days (8 + 1 for lunch) that are being passed off as eight hours these days. When did the usual 9-5 become 9-6?

      Actually, I'm lucky in that I currently work a true eight hour day (9-5) but I'm looking for new work and know I'll have to give it up.

    8. Re:It is NOT a good thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      excellent post!

    9. Re:It is NOT a good thing by clickclickdrone · · Score: 1

      >Where does commuting fit into that?
      As someone who has a 2hr commute each way, I'd like to know too! I'm betting it's not the work chunk..

      --
      I want a list of atrocities done in your name - Recoil
    10. Re:It is NOT a good thing by comradeeroid · · Score: 1

      Isn't that provided by others as part of the "service" to their fellow man? Then again, it would be considered a service to your fellow man to do it yourself and free them of that particular duty. Also, if you're handy and not afraid of washing your sheets once in a while you can probably sneak some of it into your eight hours of sleep.

      --
      If you see a rock violating the law of gravity, then the law is wrong, not the rock!
  17. huh? by baldass_newbie · · Score: 1

    What are you talking about - work/life balance?
    *posts from a BlackBerry Pearl*

    --
    The opposite of progress is congress
  18. See, there's this feature... by djrogers · · Score: 1

    It's called a power switch. When I don't want to check email, I don't do it. Anyone who is bullied into doing so by their employer either has no cause for complaint (it was their choice) or should seek new employment. Personally, I find my BB to ADD to the time I have with my family; I'm on the road a lot, and am able to keep up on email so when I get back to my home office a the end of the day I don't have to send any time catching up.

    --
    Think outside the... Hey, where'd the friggin' box go?
  19. Which is it? by ednopantz · · Score: 1

    Which is it?

    Headline: "Blackberry Owners Chained To Work"
    Lede: "New survey data suggests that Americans are split over whether Blackberrys are chaining them to work."

  20. Bah by bahwi · · Score: 1

    Either don't answer it if your busy, or be creative, go to the mall, or a movie. Answer your email constantly and just say "Sorry you must've just missed me I stepped out" and have a personal life during work. :)

  21. This is why I ditched my cell and watch by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    Now the man no longer controls me.

    If it's important enough to phone me, you better do it when I'm at work.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    1. Re:This is why I ditched my cell and watch by kpainter · · Score: 1

      Me too but sleeping in the cardboard box and having to use the computers at the library REALLY sucks!

    2. Re:This is why I ditched my cell and watch by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but it's easier to find tin foil.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  22. Like any tool, it's all in ho0w you use it... by ReverendLoki · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you allow your Blackberry or whatever PDA/Smartphone you have to become nothing more than an extended leash, then yes, that is what is going to happen. Myself, I'm the sole IT guy for a small business. I've recently picked one of these up to reduce the time I have to spend in the office - or, more precisely, the time I have to spend coming in to fix whatever blew up. I'm hoping to reduce the times I have to make the half-hour drive into work just to spend an hour or less in the office and drive a half-hour back home.

    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    1. Re:Like any tool, it's all in ho0w you use it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pff, every one knows it's not just how you use it. The size of your tool DOES MATTER.

    2. Re:Like any tool, it's all in ho0w you use it... by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      You know what, a decent way to VPN and a good VNC client on every desktop does that.

      I was able to fix almost any inane call I got from sales,accounting,or engineering from the beach when on vacation.

      Three things happened.
      1 - most everyone at work never realized I was even on vacation
      2 - I did not get a vacation, just an office relocation for a week at my expense.
      3 - One incredibly pissed off wife.

      I suggest you let people get used to that unless it's a major problem, it will not get fixed unless you are there. Really bad things happen if they find out you can fix it from anywhere.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    3. Re:Like any tool, it's all in ho0w you use it... by ReverendLoki · · Score: 1

      Actually, a good VPN and secure connections to the important servers are on the todo list now... And when that happens, I'll be telecommuting on a regular basis. However, I really don't like the idea of lugging a laptop around everywhere - my current one is pretty old and weighs a metric buttload, and I just don't use it enough to justify buying a new one myself, nor do I want the obligation that comes when your employer buys one for you. I'm seeing this as a nice middle ground.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
  23. Learn to spot slavery when you see it by Tom · · Score: 1

    Seriously, work-life-balance only works if both parties to the deal understand it. And a lot of companies, bosses and other parties on the employer side don't. They're under pressure from investors, their bosses, etc. to turn a profit this quarter, and fuck five years down the road, by then we'll have moved our shares elsewhere.

    Responsible use of resources - no matter if natural or human - is only important if you're interested in long-term viability, i.e. sustainability. If you only care for this quarter or this year, then raping it for what it's worth is the rational way to go.

    As long as we as a society haven't decided where to go with this dilemma, it'll hit most of us in our work lives.

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  24. Employers and coworkers with sense... by Kjella · · Score: 1

    ...I'm available almost 24/7 on my cell phone, if they need me. However, my employer and coworkers have a good sense that when you're not on the job, you're not on the job. That goes for vacation time, weekends, days off and working late alike. The mobile office is good when you set limits as to when, even if it's not to where. If I work from home one day, I still "clock in" and "clock out" and between then I work, I don't like half work, half watch TV, play games and surf slashdot and so when I have time off I don't feel like I should be half working either. However, it's infiniately useful when you're really screwed up one side and down the other to pick up the phone and say "Hi, I'm really sorry for disturbing you at this hour, but I need your help." If they abused that, I'd simply not answer the phone. E-mail is a nice extension to that as in "Can you take a look at what I just sent you?" but unless I hear about it otherwise it's things that can wait until next business day, and I never expect answers faster either.

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  25. No, not a good thing by C4st13v4n14 · · Score: 0

    I'm a doctor in Norway. I left the States and my sad life of 100+ hour work weeks, Blackberries, and nasty, aggressive, unionized nurses about four years ago. Now I make as much money as I did in the States, work 37.5 hours a week, have 11 weeks off a year, and do not own a pager. When I'm not on a shift, I don't even think about work. I have time for things such as slashdot, writing, and learning another language (German). As an American citizen, I am obliged to pay taxes to the US, not Norway, so I get to keep much more of my money at the end of the year. Life is great! Now if only I preferred blonds over brunettes...

  26. Blackberry gives you more freedom! by Servo · · Score: 1

    About a year and a half ago, I threatened to strike if I didn't get a Blackberry. Having a Blackberry gives me much much more freedom and I don't understand why some people are so against them.

    Having a Blackberry gives me a competitive edge against my coworkers and let's me get things done and out of the way so I have more free time after work. I typically spend anywhere from 2-4 hours a day in meetings. They are hard to avoid in the corporate world, but I still have a ton of work to do. My Blackberry allows me to get some of that work done while not actively participating in whatever meeting I'm sitting in so I don't have to go back to my desk and spend hours answering email. And if I do have a ton of email to respond to, I can still leave at 5PM and answer them on the train ride back home.

    It also lets me go run off to take care of personal business while still in contact with work, so if something does come up I can respond to it immediately.

    That being said, I do not have the email indicator turned on. The only exception to that is email from my boss. That's ok though, since he rarely emails me. Usually its important, so I like to get that notification.

    Overall, it does make me more productive. It also allows me more freedom to work where I want and when I want, all the while still being productive in the eyes of my management. You don't have to be tied down to a desk or computer all the time to get the same amount of work done.

    --
    A slip of the foot you may soon recover, but a slip of the tongue you may never get over. -Benjamin Franklin
    1. Re:Blackberry gives you more freedom! by riskeetee · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're also being rude to whomever is speaking during the meeting by not paying attention, giving off the impression that your time is more important than theirs. That may be true, but the "competitive edge" you gain in productivity may be offset by the vibe you're giving off by actively ignoring your coworkers.

    2. Re:Blackberry gives you more freedom! by Servo · · Score: 1

      In some cases, that can be true. But you're making the assumption that all I'm doing is answering email and not paying attention the entire time. I don't actively ignore whats going on in meetings. And not to mention that answering an important email during a long boring meeting might just keep me from dozing off or completely tuning out which would be far worse than spending 2 minutes of an hour long meeting being productive.

      --
      A slip of the foot you may soon recover, but a slip of the tongue you may never get over. -Benjamin Franklin
    3. Re:Blackberry gives you more freedom! by Tontoman · · Score: 1

      Blackberry gives you the freedom to check your messages during meeting breaks. You can deal with issues at the time most convenient to you.
      The alternative is to be chained to your PC during the same time period.

    4. Re:Blackberry gives you more freedom! by QuasiEvil · · Score: 1

      About a year and a half ago, I threatened to strike if I didn't get a Blackberry. Having a Blackberry gives me much much more freedom and I don't understand why some people are so against them. Depends on your work environment, management expectations, etc. I personally detest the things, but that's largely because if you carry one around here, you're expected to respond within seconds whenever anything twitches in your inbox. It completely destroys the value of email when used in that manner - email's best benefit is as an asynchronous queuing tool for thoughts and questions. It's worse than a damn cell phone (which I don't carry, either, except when I'm doing on-call production support). The most horrid thing is when you're trying to interact with one of the addicts, because their attention is switching a few times a second and they only at best catch half of what you say. They adamantly claim that they can do both, but the reality is far different from their perceptions. If you're discussing fluff, that's one thing, but if you're trying to explain complex problems and solutions, then eventually you just want to punch the addict or throw the crackberry out the window.

      I simply told them I'd quit before I carried one, and that ended that discussion. I almost always have my laptop in front of me at meetings anyway (because I need to it address technical questions without carrying a mountain of paper), so I can always flip over to email if the meeting goes somewhere boring and irrelevant.

      Once I go home, though, that's it. I don't check work mail, I don't check voicemail, and I don't respond to any phone calls that come up with work's caller ID. (That is unless I'm on production support that week, but that's a special scenario where I do my best to stay on top of everything.) It helps I like to spend my weekends in places that are very electromagnetically quiet and no cell signal ever reaches. They don't know if I'm out hiking in the mountains or just ignoring them, and I prefer it that way.
    5. Re:Blackberry gives you more freedom! by Servo · · Score: 1

      It has been my experience that you have to set their expectations. Emergency on-call means someone picks up the phone and CALLS me if an emergency comes up. Don't expect me to answer your email outside of office hours, don't expect me to answer my phone if I'm not on-call, and don't expect me to be nice to you if you call me in the middle of the night with a non-emergency even if I am on-call.

      --
      A slip of the foot you may soon recover, but a slip of the tongue you may never get over. -Benjamin Franklin
  27. hmm by Loconut1389 · · Score: 1

    The types of jobs where a blackberry would be largely useful are the types of jobs that generally require longer hours and more stress- the people who can afford a non-company provided blackberry probably are the ones who work harder as well.. and if the company provides it, then you're working somewhere big enough they can demand a lot of you. This is a statistic laden with problems.

    1. Re:hmm by theEteam · · Score: 1

      I'm reading all of these posts and am shocked at how many software people have blackberries. My husband is a programmer and he doesn't. I don't think anybody at his company does. What can they possibly need them for? If something is urgent people have called before, but we usually don't answer anyway. How many software people really work with things that are THAT urgent that they wan't wait until morning. And is everybody else really working that late into the evening? I feel sorry for them.

  28. Don't lose hope by mschuyler · · Score: 1


    My wife is a "Black Norwegian," which is a person descended from some of a Spanish fleet that went aground off Norway a few hundred years ago. A few of them managed to wade ashore and wound up 'incorporated' into the population. Opthamologists can spot these people due to the shape of their eyelids which are somehow 'tighter' than normal. So brunette Norwegians do exist, and I'll bet not all of them (like my wife's family) have immigrated to the US. So don't lose hope.

    --
    How about a moderation of -1 pedantic.
  29. Freedom, Thy Name Is Blackberry by sampson7 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I find my BB very freeing. I have had many leisurely morning cups of coffees on my way to work, secure in the knowledge that nobody is looking for me and that no emergencies have arisen. Same on weekends. My *job* chains me sometimes. The Blackberry simply puts me on a (much) longer leash. My options are either wait by the computer for an email, or go about my day with my Blackberry by my side. I can tell you which I prefer. Now, before a thousand people feel the need to point it out, I recognize that there is a problem with my job here. But as a corporate attorney, it's a problem I volunteered for. I knew when I took this job that I was going to be dealing with people who need (or at least think they need) answers yesterday. However, they pay me well for the usage of my time and at least, so far, I'm happy with the trade off. But the Blackberry? Best extension cord ever.

    1. Re:Freedom, Thy Name Is Blackberry by RaymondRuptime · · Score: 1

      I agree completely. I have been able to take an occasional long lunch, go to a ball game, etc. without worrying that someone could not reach me in an emergency, or that an e-mailed alert that a server was down was sitting unread in my mail window at work. I felt the same way about beepers before the BlackBerry Age.

      BBs (and beepers) also have the advantage over mobile phones in that they are not so immediate, but provide a bit of a buffer. When you think you have an emergency, I can take a quick look at your mail and possibly determine that you can really wait, and go back to my movie. When the cell phone rings, the only way I can tell if it is an emergency or a stupid question is to answer it (which means having to step out of the theater).

  30. Are They Really More Productive? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Do these people just feel more productive, maybe because they're using a "business machine" like the Blackberry? Productivity measurements are standard metrics of US workers for at least a century. Have these Blackberry users actually increased their productivity since before they got the Blackberry? Compared to any increase gained by their coworkers who didn't get a Blackberry? Compared to coworkers with a Blackberry who don't feel any more productive?

    Workers whose productivity doesn't increase even when they get expensive technology investments like a Blackberry aren't reliable people to ask whether they're more productive. Working longer hours isn't productivity: often it's a decrease, leaving more to get done in longer time, when fatigue, resentment and just arbitrary final cutoff times decrease productivity.

    If they're less productive, and feel more productive, then they'll want more pay, though they produce less, and cost more in IT costs. How about a real answer to this question, instead of mumbo jumbo about how Blackberries "feel"?

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  31. hmmm by CrackerJackz · · Score: 1

    ...survey results showed that those who owned a Blackberry were, in fact, more likely to work long hours than those who didn't. 19 percent of Blackberry-owning survey respondents reportedly worked more than 50 hours a week, compared to only 11 percent of the general population. Could it be that a higher percentage of blackberry users are either in support roles or in management positions that require more time to be put in? I certainly work more than 50 hours a week, and frankly I'd rather be tethered to my blackberry than a laptop for on-the-go meeting requests, questions, etc.
  32. Contracting, eh? I can top that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    I work for the state. They pay me even when I'm NOT working. Like now, for instance. ;-)

    1. Re:Contracting, eh? I can top that. by bumptehjambox · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah? I promoted myself to unemployed two years ago. :-D

    2. Re:Contracting, eh? I can top that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work for the Federal Government... Wait, umm... What's work?

  33. Weenies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What are you, a powerless weenie? Turn the fucker off. Good Lord. If you want to "blame the man" on this one, look in the mirror for the one to blame.

  34. the good? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No one has really mentioned the positives of having a blackberry. I must admit it does tie me to work sometimes, but I work for a nursing home. Uptime is very important for our 30 facilities (medical records, admissions, etc) and Solarwinds is very nice to tell me when I have an issue with a circuit, server, or whatever. Random requests from end users or bosses can wait untill 8:00AM.

  35. Correlation does not imply causation... by porcupine8 · · Score: 1

    We can't say from this that Blackberries cause people to work longer hours, etc. Just that the same type of people who are likely to work longer hours are also likely to have Blackberries. Could be that those are the just the jobs that are likely to require one, or that people who are already workaholics are likely to jump at the chance to extend that.

    --
    Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
  36. If your job requires you to be "on" 24/7 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Take your salary and divide it by all those hours. If it comes out below minimum wage, treat them with the respect you would accord any common criminal. If it comes out less than what you expect to make (on an hourly basis) in your industry, considering those hours as overtime, kindly point this out to those who express issues with your lack of availability during unusual hours. If you can't adjust your required "on" hours so as to achieve a fair hourly wage, you should already be looking for another job. It's as simple as that, with possible exceptions for "stuff that really matters", such as doctors, paramedics, and military personnel. The former knew what they were getting into, and unlike e-mail from Brad in Marketing, those calls really are important.

  37. It's your choice by tchdab1 · · Score: 1

    Some above have suggested turning it off, or turning off notifications. Fine, if that's what you want.
    The point is that these electronic leashes now provide you with the choice to be always connected, somewhat connected, or only connected when you want to be. How you use them is up to you, or up to the jerks that demand that you use them. With increased power comes increased responsibility.
    Users have options (unless your company has locked them down) to configure the things to be as annoying or as silent as you want.
    Those of us around you have to put up with the choices that you make. Be polite to us, because I always hate it when I have to tell someone that I thought their electronic behavior was really annoying while I was {listening to a seminar,attending a class,reading in a silent room, attending an important meeting}.

    These things and the conversations they inspire are another argument for gun control (aren't there times when you wish you could just shoot the idiot talking in the back?).

    1. Re:It's your choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, that feeling is another reason not to be an idiot, and why you shouldn't have a gun.

  38. Put it down and walk away... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 0

    A co-worker has a Blackberry. He gets a lot of heck because he turns his off and put it in his desk drawer before he leaves work for the day. When he's off the clock, he's off the clock.

  39. Are phones any different? by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Does a boss really expect you to answer a blackberry any more than the phone if the boss has your home/personal cell number? I don't see how the blackberry changes anything really.

    Perhaps this is not so much the blackberry per se, but rather a demographics thing. ie. People who get blackberries on corporate accounts are more likely to be the type doing 24/7 comms. Before they had a blackberry they'd have been doing 24/7 phonecalls.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
    1. Re:Are phones any different? by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      if the boss has your home/personal cell number

      Why on earth would I give that to my boss? It's called *personal* for a reason. Personnel can have it if they insist (I can almost see a reason for them to have it, although as I live alone there's no-one there to notify in the extremely unlikely event of an accident), everyone else can go whistle. Of course, I'm a developer not a sysadmin or support programmer, so I don't do "on call".

    2. Re:Are phones any different? by Doctor+Memory · · Score: 1

      Personnel can have it if they insist (I can almost see a reason for them to have it, although as I live alone there's no-one there to notify in the extremely unlikely event of an accident), Well, in the "extremely unlikely" event you have an accident at home, wouldn't it be nice if your boss could try to get in touch with you? If you don't answer, they might assume you're too sick/hurt to answer, and send someone around to check on you. Depends on where you live, but I know I've read two or three accounts in the paper lately (say in the last six months) about people who have had exactly that happen, and that's how the cops/paramedics found them. Usually in time, except for the guy who — well, he died within a day, before anyone from his office would have reported him missing anyway. This is in "the heartland", so if you're on one of the coasts this may seem rediculous.
      --
      Just junk food for thought...
    3. Re:Are phones any different? by Nimey · · Score: 1

      It comes down to how much you can trust your boss to not abuse your personal phone. I don't do on call or off-hours support, so it doesn't matter to me that my boss has my ph#, and I don't think she'd call me anyway.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    4. Re:Are phones any different? by CrazedWalrus · · Score: 1

      I work in NYC, and my last boss told me about a time one of his employees didn't show up for 3 days. Here, people get concerned, but it tends to be balanced out by a respect for privacy (a.k.a. minding your own business), so there's a bit of a lag.

      Anyway, on the third day of not being able to contact the guy, my boss called the police to go check the guy's apartment. They found him dead. No neighbors had reported anything, and he lived alone with apparently infrequent contact with relatives. Had my boss not been concerned, the neighbors would have called in a couple more days complaining about the smell.

      Unfortunately, not a happy ending, but the point is that this is not a ridiculous concept to us 'coasters, either. We just tend to be a little slower in reacting to it.

  40. Blend? Ummm... no. by Todd+Knarr · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think the basic problem is the phrase "work/life blend". I'm sorry, work is work, life is life. The two are mutually exclusive. Work pays me for a normal workday 5 days a week, and reasonable emergencies and after-hours work considering I'm salaried. I don't see employers offering unlimited paid time off so people can meet the demands of life, I fail to see why they should expect me to take unlimited uncompensated time away from my life to meet the demands of work. That, after all, is what most of the people using the "work/life blend" phrase mean: how does the employee juggle his schedule to accommodate what the employer wants. I have a simple answer: I juggle it based on how much my employer's willing to pay for my time.

    And that's not an empty position. I've left two employers in my life over this. Oddly, in both cases I ended up getting more money and significantly reducing my workload as a result. I'm not afraid of doing the same again. Fortunately at my current job that's not something I'm having to deal with.

    1. Re:Blend? Ummm... no. by sampson7 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Work pays me for a normal workday 5 days a week, and reasonable emergencies and after-hours work considering I'm salaried. I don't see employers offering unlimited paid time off so people can meet the demands of life, I fail to see why they should expect me to take unlimited uncompensated time away from my life to meet the demands of work. See, that's the thing. A Blackberry is not for you. For many of us, our work pays us for a 5 to 7 day-a-week job. Rationale Blackberry usage is for people who are compensated in a manner that makes it clear that their lives are not entirely their own. For people not on salary, for whom getting paid is a function of hours worked, Blackberrys are the greatest thing since the telephone. Let's be clear the subset of employees we are talking about. Because a one-size-fits-all approach makes no sense.
  41. It's really easy. Follow these steps. by Chas · · Score: 1

    When you're off work, and not supposed to be working:

    1. Reach into your pocket/pouch.
    2. Pull your handheld device out
    3. TURN IT THE FUCK OFF!
    4. Place it somewhere out of sight so tht you won't be tempted to turn it back on "just for a second".
    5. Retrieve and power on the device once you're ready to go back to work.
    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  42. Not necessarily a bad thing... by mr_zorg · · Score: 1

    Is the constantly connected, often mobile nature of the modern workplace a good thing, or not?
    I think that depends in large part upon your employer. If they insist on 40 hours during the week and your off time, then that sucks. If on the other hand you've got an employer like mine who accompanies such access with the freedom to work when and where you want then it's a very cool thing indeed. I can work when I'm in the mood, and skip it when I'm not because they always know that they can reach me if they need to. For them, they get my best possible work. Overall I probably work more, because I'm passionate about what I do and often keep going when most people wouldn't. But it doesn't feel like more work because it's on my schedule. FWIW, most employers seem to fall into the former category rather than the later. I'm extremely grateful for my current attitude!
  43. Balance is very good by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I worked once for a company where the engineering culture expected that you'd do all-nighters around product release time. I never did and I expect I was way more productive.

    I did **once** go in at 4 am with a batch of freshly baked muffins. People were walking about like zombies or lying around on their desks waiting for a build or test to complete. Hollow shells. Come approx 9 am they all went home completely stuffed and slept until about 3pm when they came back to work still half-zonked to work another overnighter of almost zero productivity. In the mean time, I did a normal 9-5 and achieved quite a bit. I then biked home at a civilised hour and played with the kids etc. Came back the next morning fresh and ready to engage!

    It is well understood and documented that you often solve problems while doing something other than sitting in front of a computer. Take a dump, have a shower, go fishing.... You need the balance to be a productive worker.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
    1. Re:Balance is very good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having a Blackberry enabled me to spend this afternoon walking in the hills behind my house while "attending" conference calls and replying to the odd email.

    2. Re:Balance is very good by wisdom_brewing · · Score: 1

      a blackberry lets you take a dump while emailing your favourite collegue :)

    3. Re:Balance is very good by ffejie · · Score: 1

      In the mean time, I did a normal 9-5 and achieved quite a bit. I then biked home at a civilised hour and played with the kids etc. Came back the next morning fresh and ready to engage!

      You hit the nail on the head. You see this especially with college students (I was no better when I was in college). But I see it with the people I work with now, too. Your situation is a bit drastic, but you can see it with people that work the weekends. I have worked both days in a weekend (8-10 hour days) in the past and it sucks. Granted, I did it for personal gain not actually for the company's own good (big multi-thousand dollar bonus if I achieved my goal). After working those weekends, by Tuesday of the next week, I would be out of it and wishing for the weekend*. As a result, I really had to push myself to get going for Tuesday-Friday. I work with people that work EVERY weekend. I don't know why, there's not that big of a need, but they do. From what I can tell many of them have poor social lives and don't want to have a work/life balance because their life isn't that exciting. I can't imagine not taking at least 24-48 hours to decompress on the weekend.

      Generally now I work 8-9 hours a day, then come home, eat dinner, check email afterwards, clean up any mess (or flag it for tomorrow). I try not to spend more than 30 minutes on any email that comes in late. If an email comes in after 6-7 and requires more than 30 minutes of work, I usually tell the person they can expect a response tomorrow. On the weekends, I'll check my Blackberry a few times a day (I also have personal email forwarded to it) and if I see anything that looks interesting and I'm just sitting around watching TV or something, I'll load up the laptop email. If I'm busy (with family, at a show) then I don't open email until Monday unless something is flagged as urgent. This happens maybe one day every other weekend. Again, I try not to spend too long on email during the weekend. Maybe 1 hour tops. Occasionally, on Sunday during the day, I'll put in 1-2 hours to set up my Monday (this is not so email intensive and generally involves arranging a spreadsheet and trying to figure out where to fit in meetings). This only happens once a month or so, because I try to do this on Friday. However, if I cut out early on Friday, I don't get a chance to do this. In my current state, I'm extremely happy with my work/life balance. Sometimes I feel guilty that I'm not doing enough but at the end of the week, my current tasks are all done and everyone is saying that things are going along smoothly. I don't know what I would do if I stayed at work longer or worked weekends.

      Disclaimer, I'm not a sysadmin or anything close to it. I do work with technology, but not in the support realm.

      *Over my project, my schedule was basically work 5 days a week 10-12 hours and then put in 8-10 on each weekend day, then do the same for the week, then run a short day on Friday like 4-6 hours and take the weekend off until 9 AM on Monday

      --
      Disagreeing with me does not mean you get to mod me troll.
  44. Kill your cellphone! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I once went through a tedious interview with AT&T wireless for an architect position. I was shocked that the three other architects I interviewed with all responded to the "what do you worry about most?" question with "more layoffs!" They were among the most senior employees.

    Of course the job included a "free" cellphone. The really funny part is that personal calls weren't free. I could only imagine the absurd time-waste tedium of sorting out my work calls from my personal calls and filing some sort of expense report.

    I didn't have the heart to tell them that I don't carry a cellphone before declining their offer.

  45. OK, maybe I'm confused. by Moofie · · Score: 1

    My Treo has this thing called a "power button". I can turn the radio off, and calls go to my voice mail. Do Blackberries not have this basic feature?

    (Yes, that's a stupid question. This is a stupid problem to have.)

    --
    Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  46. Appropriate to ask at time of interview? by failedlogic · · Score: 1

    I am looking for work in a professional role. I'm a recent graduate with not much experience in work past the stereotypical student jobs. I've contemplated asking about expectations re Blackberries during the interview process (by the 2nd or 3rd interview anways). Has anyone been successful with this strategy ... are employeers generally honest about their expectations on this matter? I'm concerned that I'm going to be stuck answering blackberry e-mails during after-hours and not being paid. Even if paid, it takes away from the life-work balance.

    And for those of you who turn off your Blackberries, have you informed your work that this would be the case? Did you have a separate communication method when the shit really hit the fan?

    Though I wouldn't mind, using an idea from an earlier post of mine, answering Blackberry messages while at the beach in the Office: http://ask.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=198407&cid =16260125)

  47. Many workers misled by mutterc · · Score: 4, Interesting

    There are a lot of people who voluntarily take on lots of unpaid overtime. They sincerely believe that this will get them ahead, put them lower on layoff lists, get them higher raises, etc.

    I'm a staunch 40-hour guy, and have yet to be laid off from this particular job, for 5 years now, where there are a lot of people like that. I suppose if I'd worked 70 or 80 hours a week, I might be making a few percent more, though. If you work that out per hour, I'd be way better off doing a side job with that time. Oh, there's stock options, though; I shit you not, when this employer got bought a while back, I stood to gain $4000 before taxes from my 4.5 years' worth of stock options. I'm sure that would have been good incentive to work 50% more.

    I'm not worried about layoffs. My job will go to India when it goes to India. There won't be anything I (or anyone else, right on down from the CEO of the company) can do to prevent or delay it, so why bust my ass trying?

    1. Re:Many workers misled by dbIII · · Score: 1

      I'm a staunch 40-hour guy

      I'm not, but I can spend large chunks of my day reading slashdot or O'Reillys technical books online. People know that I put in the work, they know that I sometimes have to wait for systems to be idle or people to go home before I can finish stuff, so they don't care much if I'm not obviously working every minute of the working day. Sometimes it's better to put in a solid day of work on the weekend with no distractions and come in late each morning for the next week.

    2. Re:Many workers misled by RyoShin · · Score: 1

      I agree tremendously. I may be a lowly college senior with an internship, but I've already learned that working insane hours like that does more harm than good.

      All around me, too many people are working to continue working. I prefer to work to live. If I spend more time working, I do less of that "living" thing.

      I'd rather take a job where I work 30 hours a week and make 50K than one where I work 40 hours a week and make 80K.

  48. My BB's mail config broke over a year ago by I+Like+Pudding · · Score: 4, Funny

    I never got it fixed

  49. I have a personal treo by Unknown+Poltroon · · Score: 1

    People at work have asked me for the number, jokingly, for followup for tech support questions. My response? "Sure, call all you want, I seldom pick up." No one ever calls.

    --
    All Troll + "offtopic" mods are meta moderated as "Unfair", because you abused the system.
  50. To quote Nelson - "Ha ha!" by pla · · Score: 5, Insightful

    many employees feel obligated by employers who have handed out the devices

    With whom does the fault rest here? The employers, or the idiots who make themselves available 24/7 at the whim of their workplace?

    People, do us all a favor, and stop putting up with this bullshit. Just say no. If enough of us do it, "on call" will go back to a paid status (yes, "back" - Companies used to pay damned good money to have trained monkeys available at 3am).

    It really disgusts me that people often tell me they need to actually "go away" on their vacations, or they'll get called in to work. Hello, Whiskey Tango Foxtrot? Stand up for yourselves! "Sorry, Dave, that third margarita looks damned good right now, so I'll talk to you when my vacation ends, on Monday morning. Beach? No, sitting in my living room, five minutes' drive from you. Buh-Bye."

    As for whether or not you can "get away" with that - Yes, you most certainly can. Just do it right from day one, rather than giving in a bit at first to make yourself look more useful. Deluding your employer just sets you up for unhappyness later - Let them know right where you stand on such issues. A decent employer will even respect you for it.

    Not to say I wouldn't honestly help out my coworkers, if convenient for me... I have gone in at bizarre hours to deal with emergencies - And damn well comp'ed the time the next day. But I do that at my pleasure, not as a condition of employment.

    If responding off-hours became a requirement of the job, we'd have a problem, and they would need to find someone else for the position. And no, paying me more would not count as an option, because I work to live, not live to work, end of discussion.

    1. Re:To quote Nelson - "Ha ha!" by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 1

      I'm out of points.

      But you are the first Truly Insightful post I've seen here. Is it just because I agree with you? Maybe.

      Working long hours to stroke your boss' ego isn't a sign of being a good worker. It's a sign of being an inefficient kiss-ass with no spine and no life.

      I work to live, not live to work. Perfect sentiment, although I prefer, "Work is my #2 job, right after 'Everything else'".

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    2. Re:To quote Nelson - "Ha ha!" by logicpaw · · Score: 1
      With whom does the fault rest here? The employers, or the idiots who make themselves available 24/7 at the whim of their workplace? ...

      As for whether or not you can "get away" with that - Yes, you most certainly can.

      Except for the "idiots" who actually do want to get promoted to an executive position (with the stock options as well as the salary) instead of letting pointy-hair types manage them for the rest of their lives. Except for the idiots who don't want to be first in line when there are cut-backs. Except for the types who have looked at or even worked for alternative companies and found them even more farked up than the current employer. Except for the people who actually like to be team players and hold up their share of the workload when all their teammates think it important enough to put in evening and weekend hours. Except for those who feel that their company is actually innovating a valuable contribution to society (for instance, a medical device that will actually save lives the sooner it gets to market). Yes, if you're not one of those, you can certainly just go home and turn the beeping thing off.

    3. Re:To quote Nelson - "Ha ha!" by pla · · Score: 1

      Except for the "idiots" who actually do want to get promoted to an executive position

      If you don't consider that explicitly idiotic, you clearly need to turn in your geek license.

      Geeks can manage. We don't wan't to. We like working in the pits.



      Except for the people who actually like to be team players

      "Team" has no "I" in it. Funny, that.



      and hold up their share of the workload when all their teammates think it important enough to put in evening and weekend hours.

      Y'know, my mother had a pretty good comeback for that one, which I learned somewhere around age 6... "If all your friends jumped off a bridge, would you do it too?". If all your coworkers work themselves to death... Well, need I continue?

      You accomplish nothing but set yourself up for a never-ending spiral: You need to work harder to get ahead, but everyone else does it too so you need to work harder just to keep up. Race harder, little rat! Your cheese keeps moving!



      Except for those who feel that their company is actually innovating a valuable contribution to society

      "There will be poor always, pathetically struggling. Look at the good things you've got!"



      Yes, if you're not one of those, you can certainly just go home and turn the beeping thing off.

      Okay.

      Let's compare notes in the afterlife and see which of us thinks we spent our lives better, you for working harder, or me for enjoying the short time I have on this planet.


      <beep>

    4. Re:To quote Nelson - "Ha ha!" by Todd+Knarr · · Score: 1

      Two come-backs:

      • "There is no 'I' in team. There is, however, an 'I' in life."
      • "I don't want the workaholic drone who spends all his time doing things over and over and over. I want the lazy <elided> who'll figure out how to not need to do it again."
  51. Re:It's really easy. Follow these steps. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    6. ???
    7. Profit!

  52. Managers by Trojan35 · · Score: 1

    The people who fail to manage their work-life balance are the same that never make manager (or become terrible bosses).

    If you can't manage your own time well, how can you be successful managing others'?

  53. I think that whole exempt/non exempt salary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think that whole exempt/non exempt salary vs hourly vs slavery desperately needs to be reexamined in our society.

  54. Change the labor laws by BCW2 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If every manager had to pay an hour of overtime for every question he asked by blackberry, text, or cell, after office hours, there would be no problem! Most would figure out real quick what is really important and what can wait until tomarrow. I don't care if the answer takes 10 seconds, they have to pay an hour.

    --
    Professional Politicians are not the solution, they ARE the problem.
    1. Re:Change the labor laws by daybot · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If every manager had to pay an hour of overtime for every question he asked by blackberry, text, or cell, after office hours, there would be no problem! Most would figure out real quick what is really important and what can wait until tomarrow. I don't care if the answer takes 10 seconds, they have to pay an hour. I had a 1-hour minimum charge policy while at University. If my part-time employer called or emailed me about anything I'd bill for one hour. Any calls/emails during that hour were then included but usually it'd be an hour's pay for a few mins on the phone; a fair compensation for the interruption. This worked pretty well - less dumb questions and more cash for beer :D

    2. Re:Change the labor laws by 955301 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      When my clients do this to me, whether by email or phone call, they *do* pay for an extra hour of work. No email or discussion goes without followup work, so if they actually succeed in getting ahold of me they get a full hours attention between the call and what I do afterwards. And surprise! I'm not on site as long the next day since I'm taking care of personal stuff during the usual work day in retaliation^H^H...^H^H to maintain my work-life balance.

      --
      You are checking your backups, aren't you?
    3. Re:Change the labor laws by spasm · · Score: 1

      That *is* the law in California, if you're in a non-salary position. If you get paid hourly, and document (ie keep your timestamped emails, keep a diary of phone calls etc) time spent outside of your regular paid work you can easily make a claim for unpaid work. The onus is on your manager to notice that you're replying to emails outside of your paid work hours and instruct you not to do so (or tell you to remember to put it on your timesheet).

  55. Somewhat conflicting by leather_helmet · · Score: 1

    As a newly minted business owner I do feel, at times, chained to my BB - Answering emails in the bathroom in the morning, while at lunch & at home - Whats funny is that I go through phases, sometimes I put the BB on my nightstand, put it on silent and do not look at it again till I wake up in the morning to take a shit There are other times that I am answering emails while eating dinner, playing with the children, 'conversing' with my wife, while driving....Having 'resources' overseas compounds the problem...but I'm making decent money! /heh

  56. Discipline by PhotoGuy · · Score: 2

    So prior to the days of blackberries, they couldn't reach you by another on-demand interactive medium, say, ummmmm, I dunno, maybe, errr, the *telephone*??? There is nothing inherent in the technology that creates the social obligations. It's solely the discipline involved in using the technology.

    Having greater enabling technologies for when you need responsiveness isn't a bad thing. Not realizing that there are limits, and applying them appropriately, *can* be a bad thing. (It's similar to the whole wonderful Unix flexiblity thing; it gives you the mechanism, *not* the policy. Yes, you can hang yourself with C pointers, Perl syntax, Unix cryptiveness; but policy and discipline can prevent all of that)

    --
    Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
  57. Correlation Is Not Causation by nick_davison · · Score: 3, Interesting

    While people who own Blackberries feel 'more productive', those with Blackberrys are more likely to work longer hours and feel like they have less personal time than those without.

    People who work harder on their careers at the expense of personal time tend to progress further than those who take an easier path and put personal time first.

    Blackberries [at least initially] were a tool for managers and the most critical infrastructure staff as most companies wouldn't pay many hundreds to buy the hardware plus the service costs for the average employee to check email on the toilet.

    So, one explanation is that people who were already obsessive about their careers and already obsessively shackled themselves to work anyway are the ones who gained Blackberries to simply maintain an existing destructive behavior.

    Whilst it's easy to assume that Blackberries allow working out of hours and people are forced to work longer hours because they get a Blackberry, another explanation is that people get Blackberries because they're the kind of people looking to work longer hours (or at least stay obsessively aware of things which equates to the same thing).

    It's easy to make the assumption that, because there's a correlation between A and B, there is the causation that A must clearly lead to B. It's just as possible that B actually leads to A. If B is a bad thing, we need to be careful not to assume A is thus the cause of a bad thing and therefore just as bad if not worse - it may just be that A is simply yet another symptom of the bad thing (B) itself.

    It's kind of like saying, "People who stay in bed all day are much more likely to have the flu." The easy assumption to make there is that beds somehow lead to the flu. Easy. But totally wrong.

    1. Re:Correlation Is Not Causation by mardukvmbc · · Score: 1

      Agreed. It's a tool, folks. It's impact on your life depends on how you use it.

      For me, it's been a great liberator. My office phone is constantly forwarded to it. I use it for all short email, which for me is about 90% of it. It tells me when to show up for meetings. I use it for task management, too.

      Net result -- nobody knows where I am or what I'm doing except when they need to (like when I need to show up for meetings or I have a deliverable). This means that I'm extremely flexible -- if I have nothing requiring me to be in the office late in the afternoon, I go home. I can answer emails/phone calls as effectively on the bus as I can in the office. I can pop into other's offices and network at work without being chained to my desk. I can go for lunch with colleagues and get a read on work situations without needing "official updates" in meetings which are usually too little and too late. I can pay attention to my staff, spending time at their desk helping with issues. Etc, etc...

      I can also take days off without sweating it -- one glance at the 'berry and I know things are good or coming apart at the seams.

      It's all in how you use it. I work the same amount of time, but I have a lot more flexibility in how I do it. Judging by my performance reviews since I've got it, I'd say I'm a whole lot more effective at work too, and a whole lot happier.

      --
      "You disturb me to the point of insanity. There. I am insane now." - The Sprockets
    2. Re:Correlation Is Not Causation by famikon · · Score: 0
      Did you mean?

      People who take an easier path and put personal time first tend to progress further than those who work harder on their careers at the expense of personal time.

      maybe not. It all depends on what you define as progress. If I can afford to live comfortably, I consider social and personal progress more important.

  58. The Good, The Bad, and The Lovely by catdevnull · · Score: 1

    Blackberry and "Smart Phones" are very handy for staying in touch between computers, but I've found that most people who use them fall into 2 categories:

    1) Work-o-holics
    2) Over-connected technogeeks

    It's rare to find crackberry people who can strike a balance between work and personal life. If you're one of those people, that's great. If you're not, it's probably because you're letting work penetrate your inner sanctum.

    Speaking of which, I'm logging off. I'm home with my lovely wife.

    --

    I might know what I'm talkin' about, but then again, this is Slashdot...
  59. Causation! by StikyPad · · Score: 1

    I wonder if this is related to the recent findings that people who work longer hours and feel like they have little personal time are more likely to buy Blackberries?

  60. My Emergency Number by WrongDecision · · Score: 2, Funny

    I always give everyone my emergency number ...911 I'm not trained or equipped to deal with emergencies, these people are. All else can wait until my normal working hours start. Many years ago, a wise man said to me, "I could have have a different job every day and never miss an hour of work." And so it has been.

  61. My wife is getting one by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1

    My wife's boss finally convinced her to get a blackberry. Her rationale to my wife was that when she wants to check her meeting schedule for the following day, it takes 10 minutes to boot up the computer, and once it's booted up, you wind up spending an hour on it.

    With a blackberry, you can just look at your schedule, respond to an important email (who wants to respond to unimportant email using a small device?), and then put the thing away.

    So, she's getting a blackberry. We'll see how it goes.

    --
    They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
  62. Concept of breaks, lunch for workers a new idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Less than 100 years ago it was found that a 8 hour workday and breaks, lunch for workers raised and not lowered productivity. Today I see all kinds of abuses of workers at jobs, circumvention of all workers rights through contract labor and not permanent jobs. It seems to be a status thing more than anything else with companies giving no thought to the effect on the business itself, much less recyclable workers.

  63. Work chains you to work by FrozenFOXX · · Score: 1

    Honestly I had the same problem for awhile and I didn't even own a Blackberry. Just my e-mail and home phone were enough in order to violate my "off time" from work and make my home feel like my workplace. When I go home I expect to do just that: BE AT HOME. Go to a club, play some games, have dinner, you know all the things that people like to do in the Sims. I found the easiest way to remove yourself from your work when you leave work is to NOT let them e-mail you, don't give them your cell phone number, and only have them contact you if it is an absolute DIRE emergency (I'm talking life and death here). I made this blatantly clear to my last workplace and if they dared violate it they caught quite the earful from me. To date they've only called me at home once and when I get home now it feels great. Biggest suggestion I'd make to anyone who feels like they're chained to work is stop letting your work get in touch with you over anything less than someone just lost a limb and you personally need to apply a tourniquet.

    --
    "Just a fox, a whisper."
  64. BlackBerry + free work = job security by mtmra70 · · Score: 0

    I don't about the rest of you, but the couple emails I reply to, off the clock every day, give me that extra ounce of job security. I have pretty much created the "oh shit, what are we going to do if we fire him" factor for myself by replying to emails at all times of day.

    Even still, having it at work makes me fully accessable during my actual on the clock hours. But, if I reply to an email here and there off the clock, that is more free time x2 the next day.

    1. Re:BlackBerry + free work = job security by Magada · · Score: 1

      Yes, yes. Keep thinking that. You've successfully established yourself as a doormat, buddy. What do YOU do when your doormat wears out?

      --
      Something bad is coming when people are suddenly anxious to tell the truth.
    2. Re:BlackBerry + free work = job security by mtmra70 · · Score: 0

      I'm not a doormat. The work I do is 90% managed by.....myself. The work I do though is important to others and the BlackBerry helps ME more than it helps others.

  65. what's up with the Freemasons by misanthrope101 · · Score: 1

    I have no problems with secret societies, even those that are vaguely sinister, but the key is to remain secret. I see people wearing rings, t-shirts, even tattoos of that symbol. I don't really care if you drink human blood, but why do you act all secret and then talk about it all the time?

    1. Re:what's up with the Freemasons by hb253 · · Score: 1

      They can tell you about everything except the secret handshakes and wink-wink nudge-nudge communications they use to identify each other in public :-)

      --
      Self awareness - try it!
  66. Downsizing by tepples · · Score: 1

    My Treo has this thing called a "power button". I can turn the radio off, and calls go to my voice mail. Do Blackberries not have this basic feature? Yes, but if you press the button, you run the risk of being laid off.
    1. Re:Downsizing by Moofie · · Score: 1

      If that's true, your job really blows.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    2. Re:Downsizing by tepples · · Score: 1

      If that's true, your job really blows. Flipping burgers blows more.
    3. Re:Downsizing by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Because it's totally a binary choice.

      Look, it's very comfortable to feel all oppressed, and act like you've got no choices. Problem is, that is the way to guarantee you that you won't have any choices.

      Your life, your deal. Good luck.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    4. Re:Downsizing by Magada · · Score: 1

      Flipping burgers at least is a job with clear-cut work-hours and zero responsibility. Also, it takes not more than the intelligence and dedication of your average parakeet over the space of say six to eight months to become a senior burger flipper (shift manager as they're called). Don't ditch it until you've tried it.

      --
      Something bad is coming when people are suddenly anxious to tell the truth.
  67. Re:It's really easy. Follow these steps. by dbIII · · Score: 1
    In which case everyone can be saved a lot of hassle and expense if you don't have one at all.

    The last of my friends to get a mobile phone is a lawyer who had no intention of being able to be contacted at any time and had no work responsibilites that extended after hours.

    However - if you have any responsiblities that extend after hours and your workplace has given you one of these things so you can fulfil those responsibilities it is irresponsible to turn the things off. It's also irresponsible for people to contact you on them for work trivia instead of things you are expected to do after hours. I don't want some cretin ringing me up when I'm driving to try to talk me into "lending" them some MS windows install disks to use at home but I do want to know if there is a foot of water in the server room.

  68. What's so hard about congugating "to get"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gah, ignore this if you're not a native speaker of English, but if you are, you're a fucking moron. What's so hard about correctly congutaing the regular verb "to get"? Is your stupid Blackberry causing some sort of a moron tumor?

  69. Dicipline by arhhook · · Score: 1

    Along with many others who have commented, I believe that dicipline is the most important thing to using these products. If you are assigned "Emergency Dudy" as some were at my company (salaried employees), then you should probably keep the thing on. If you don't really need it, go ahead and turn it off. It just feels better to be disconnected for a bit.

    I should take my own advice...

  70. Correlation does not imply Causality by sheepweevil · · Score: 1

    those with Blackberrys are more likely to work longer hours and feel like they have less personal time than those without. Or maybe those who work longer hours and feel like they have less personal time are more likely to own a BlackBerry.
  71. How to prevent being called in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As soon as you are asked to come in, ask if they really want someone who has just imbibed two alcoholic drinks to be on the clock.

  72. Mandatory "Soviet" Line by ForMeToPoopOn · · Score: 2, Funny

    [speaking with thick rrrrrusian accent] In capitalist USA Blackberries OWN YOU hahahahahrrgh!!!

  73. Back to front? by clickclickdrone · · Score: 1

    Maybe it's just that people who work long hours like to have Blackberries?

    --
    I want a list of atrocities done in your name - Recoil
  74. easy solution by docpaul_uk · · Score: 1

    I've had a crackberry for a few years and in my view the best feature is the timed off / on!
    Mine turns on at 8:30 and off again at 17:00. So am I bothered? No.
    If I need to mail or receive somthing in an emergency - I turn it on again. So easy.

  75. It all depends on your hobbies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a blackberry.

    I have on call time.

    When I am on call, I am available as I can make myself.

    When not, I have many other things I do. Have sex with the wife. Stroke my cats. Go sailing.

    Blackberries aren't good to answer during sex. Their ringing alarms the cats, and they're useless offshore.

    I have made it abundantly plain that when I am out of the office and not on call, that I am not going to bother staying in coverage, near a computer, and sober. The boss seems to cope.

  76. I never turn off my Blackberry. by Mr_Silver · · Score: 1

    I never turn off my Blackberry.

    Mainly because there is some simple functionality in it that means at 7pm it turns off automatically and doesn't wake up until 8am the next morning. Even then, after 6ish I generally exercise some restraint on whether I read the email when it arrives or not (more often than not I don't bother).

    This is almost as silly as the "Powerpoint dumbs down presentations" argument that is occasionally trotted out. If people are stupid enough to shackle themselves to their device or produce crappy presentations then that is the fault of them and not the technology.

    --
    Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
  77. I wouldn't mind being constantly connected by Paulrothrock · · Score: 1

    Just as long as I got overtime for it.

    Yet another example of why we need an IT union. Someone's sig says "IT workers are the teamsters of the 21st century."

    --
    I'm in the hole of the broadband donut.
  78. Work for free Jan 1 - Feb 23 by badzilla · · Score: 3, Interesting

    UK figures show that, on average, employees put in an amount of unpaid time over the period of a year that is equivalent to working for free up until Feb 23. That date every year is "Work your proper hours day" when employees are encouraged to do just that. Trade unions usually also take the opportunity to nag employers to stop taking advantage.

    http://www.worksmart.org.uk/workyourproperhoursday /

    --
    "Don't belong. Never join. Think for yourself. Peace." V.Stone, Microsoft Corporation
  79. Make up your mind... by aardwolf64 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Make up your mind... is it "Blackberries" or "Blackberrys". Using both in the same blurb is just irresponsible.

  80. What really *sucks* about blackberrys... by p8nt · · Score: 1

    When your boss calls you as your woman is doing, ummm, things to you. Yeah that killed the moment. THANKS JIM! *grumbles*

  81. My blackberries do not rule my life by idji · · Score: 1

    My blackberries do not rule my life. They grow wild behind my house and are only pickable in August-September, which means 10 months of the year I don't have to concern myself with them at all. I also only pick when I am at home and the weather is nice and my kids pester me for them. I never pick at night because I don't want to lose an eye or perforate myself if I fall off my "picking-plank". My productivity has however now decreased also in May - June because I planted a strawberry bed with 8 different varieties. The blueberries will take 3 to 4 years before they yield fruit.

  82. My take: by mtrupe · · Score: 0

    http://fromthemorning.blogspot.com/2007/02/i-dont- want-blackberry.html

    I'll stick with my paper planner. It doesn't beep at me when I'm relaxing.

  83. No "prisoners' dilemma" by CrazedWalrus · · Score: 1

    I hate to keep preaching it...but one way to cut that 'my company owns me and can call me 24/7'...is to get away from being a direct, salaried employee. I love contracting....my motto is "I never work for free".


    If they have to PAY you for ever single hour you work...they will think twice on interfering with your free time...

    I emphatically agree. I think the most important aspect is knowing that you are not in a race for promotion, because you work for someone else (myself, in my case). It removes most of the politics from the equation, of which lots of overtime is really a manifestation.

    Really -- I'd wager that most people don't work overtime because they love their jobs so much, or because they honestly want to "put one in for the team". They work it because they're trying to keep up appearances -- either that they are responsible enough for that next level position, or that they are "more dedicated" than that other guy, who's competing for this year's bonus/raise/promotion. (In the latter regard, it's sort of a prisoners' dilemma.)

    Being a contractor frees you psychologically, as well as physically getting you out the door on time. Now that I've experienced it, I'd be loathe to work any other way.
  84. correlation != causation by PMuse · · Score: 1

    From TFA, ". . . survey results showed that those who owned a BlackBerry were, in fact, more likely to work long hours than those who didn't. 19 percent of BlackBerry-owning survey respondents reportedly worked more than 50 hours a week, compared to only 11 percent of the general population."

    So, tell me, did the crackberry cause them to work more? Perhaps those who already worked more are the ones who adopted crackberries.

    To accurately assess whether the BB increases workload, the survey would need to compare BB users to non-BB users doing the same job.

    --
    "We reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals." --The American President (20.1.2009)
  85. Keeping it in check by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I were Mr. Blackberry user, I'd adopt what I call the Dr. Pepper schedule for checking email: 10, 2, and 4. (Some of you youngsters may not remember the old Dr. Pepper labels. See here for an example). Three times a day ought to do it. If it's so important that an immediate response is necessary, they'll call instead of sending an email anyway. Of course, I don't use a cellular phone while at work but for email that policy seems to work fine. As usual, YMMV.

    I carry a pager for work. It was a requirement for my position. Since I don't have a backup (that's much help to most people, anyway), I've been "on call" since forever. However, I don't wear the darned thing when I'm at home. It sits on the desk in the den where, if it goes off, I can still hear it. There are times when I don't take it with me. If I want to go out for a 2-3 hour bike ride, the pager stays home. (After all, it's not like I'm going to be much help if someone pages me while I'm 10-15 miles away from home on a bike.)

    Now there's one group of folks at work who were issued cellphones in lieu of pagers. They feel like thay can't go to the bathroom without having it with them and turned on. One member of that group was amazed that I a.) didn't have a cellphone for work and that b.) I didn't want one. Why? Well, for one the group with cellphones seem to relish having their little cellular ball and chain. I sincerely believe that they think their only worth to the company is being available 24 hours a day. They also seem to enjoy being in "crisis-mode" much of the time. I guess you look real important when you're putting out a fire while talking on your cell-phone. You absolutely cannot have any sort of productive meeting when these folks are in attendance as they're interrupting the flow of any discussion whenever their farking cellphone goes off and they need to excuse themselves to answer the damned thing. (Or even worse, take the call in the meeting for all to hear.) It's especially bad when they're the ones who called the meeting.

    Slight aside: Some years ago, I was working in a bank where one of the senior developers, when needing to make a change to a production task, would send you an email marked "Urgent". (By then, I'd already adopted the 3X/day email checking schedule so a so-called urgent email was considered an oxymoron.) Then, perhaps 10 minutes later, she would leave you a voice mail telling you that she'd sent you an email. If you hadn't responded to her voice mail within a short period, usually less than a typical bathroom break, she'd page you. More often than not, she'd show up at your desk no more then five minutes after sending the page and stand over your shoulder while you copied her vital code changes over to production. The hell of it was that her urgent production change would, nine times out of ten, fail in some spectacular way and she'd be calling you at 11:00 PM to reverse the change and possibly wind up working with the night support crew to do a restore from tape. That just might explain why I have little desire to make myself available electronically 24 hours a day. People abuse that availability. (I thank $DIETY this was before the widespread use of cellular phones.) Systems? If they go down, I still respond but just because some bozo wants to work until the wee hours or all weekend and couldn't be bothered to work out an arrangement, in advance, for any support they might need? Ha! My manager will have a little chat with their manager.

  86. Re:It's really easy. Follow these steps. by Chas · · Score: 1

    Note where I said "If you're off work, and not supposed to be working".

    If you're SUPPOSED to be on-call, or available 24/7, yeah, leave the damn thing on.

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  87. Re:It's really easy. Follow these steps. by dbIII · · Score: 1
    Looks like I didn't explain it very well.

    Well - there's being on call and there is also responsiblity for dealing with the unexpected on rare occasions. If the organistation is large enough to have 24/7 contact lists to cover everything then it's fair enough - but if it's small enough that a critical flaw in something or an accident will really create chaos on Monday morning if it it not dealt with sooner and you have responsibility for that area then it is best to act responsibly and not cut yourself off without warning for a couple of days. As I tried to point out before - it is also up to anyone with your contact number in this situation to act in a mature manner and not bother you with trivia just becuase they can't get a paticular bit of paperwork done at the last minute instead of having to put in extra time on a working day.

  88. Charge Triple-Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, if they are paying you $50/hr for your normal 7am-4pm work schedule,
    anything outside of that is triple time - $150/hr.

    If you are accepting anything less, your company is getting a free ride at your expense.

    Personally I have never found it enjoyable to donate my time and money (one in the same) - to Multi-million dollar transnational corporations.

    What is a couple hours of delay worth to your corporation? $1,000 $100,000 ? $1,000,000?

    It is so important it needs done right now, than it is so important they can pay top dollar for it too.

    Don't worry - they can pay it - so politely demand it.

    Or find a better place to work that wont screw you.

    You're life is finite. You're time on Earth is limited.
      The corporation is 'immortal' - so it should make sure you get well paid to keep it alive.

    No grave stone says "If I Only Had Spent More Time In The Office!"

    Respect. Get Some.

  89. Re:It's really easy. Follow these steps. by Chas · · Score: 1

    Again: If you're in an organization that small, it's usually understood that you're on call 24/7 for massive emergencies. Therefore, it in no way violates my notion of "If you're off work, and not supposed to be working".

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!