Slashdot Mirror


Goatse.cx Is For Sale

fm6 writes "The domain goatse.cx is being auctioned. Bidding, at the time of posting, has reached $15K after 109 bids (with 6 days to go). Some of you will recall that this site used to be linked in a lot of Slashdot articles, despite having only a few pages. Boing Boing, with their usual creativity, has managed to depict Goatse's most commonly linked photo while still remaining within the bounds of good taste."

211 comments

  1. Advertising by MichaelSmith · · Score: 4, Funny

    You could put google adds on it but I shudder to think what it would advertise. Probably make a lot of money, though.

    1. Re:Advertising by hankwang · · Score: 4, Informative

      You could put google adds on it but I shudder to think what it would advertise

      AdSense program policies: no pornography, adult, or mature content. But of course there are plenty of other advertising companies.

    2. Re:Advertising by bmgoau · · Score: 1

      For the current bid of $120 Trillion who wouldnt want to own a piece of internet history, i know i would. I'd just have to occupy the output of every human being and factory on earth for a few years...

    3. Re:Advertising by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 5, Funny

      They could always advertise Preparation H.

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    4. Re:Advertising by jorgevillalobos · · Score: 5, Funny

      They could always advertise Preparation H.

      I have to agree, Preparation H feels good on the whole.

    5. Re:Advertising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Probably make a lot of money, though.

      A buttload.

    6. Re:Advertising by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Funny

      They could always advertise Preparation H.

      Only if you find an "after" picture, because the first one is definitely a "before".

    7. Re:Advertising by davester666 · · Score: 1

      Somebody finally figured out a way to have 'goatse' and 'good taste' in a sentence, without the use of a negative such as "not", "isn't", "can't", etc...

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    8. Re:Advertising by ghostbar38 · · Score: 1

      But you don't need to put the pic, there's a lot of people going because of the links to that domain and they could find a website with only adsense ads...

      --
      ghostbar page.
    9. Re:Advertising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i know the guy that owns it. he got a new girlfriend, serious one this time.... had to do something before she found out

    10. Re:Advertising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Check out http://goatse.ch/ a mirror to goatse.cx. It has Google ads.

    11. Re:Advertising by TheQuantumShift · · Score: 1

      Damn. You.

      --

      Shift happens. Fire it up.
    12. Re:Advertising by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      $120 trillion?!?!?

      What is this, all the venture capitalists in the world banding together to try to save the Earth from imminent asteroid destruction?

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  2. Re:its bad enough by mushadv · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Like it or not, it's internets history. It's especially relevant to /. for the reason you stated (trolling).

  3. Yikes! by Per+Wigren · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Who the hell is paying over 30 million dollars for a stupid domain name??!

    --
    My other account has a 3-digit UID.
    1. Re:Yikes! by MichaelSmith · · Score: 2, Funny

      Who the hell is paying over 30 million dollars for a stupid domain name??!

      $30000050...even the number is funny. 30000000 to get attention, 50 being what it is actually worth. Probably somebody from around here :)

    2. Re:Yikes! by QuickFox · · Score: 1

      At the moment it's at $402402000050. 402 billion dollars. Something tells me the bidding isn't working quite the way it's intended to work.

      Either that, or Bill Gates is fulfilling a lifelong dream.

      --
      Terrorists can't threaten a country's freedom and democracy. Only lawmakers and voters can do that.
    3. Re:Yikes! by laejoh · · Score: 0

      A man getting ready to get his head up his ass?

    4. Re:Yikes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who the hell is paying over 30 million dollars for a stupid domain name??!

      When you've been around the internets a little longer, you'll find there's a subtle difference between "bidding" over 30 million dollars and "paying" over 30 million dollars. HTH.
    5. Re:Yikes! by sethstorm · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      No, that's this guy.

      --
      Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
    6. Re:Yikes! by CrazyTalk · · Score: 1
      No one. Those bids are fake.

      I do remember in the dot-com heyday, however, a client I worked for paying half a million dollars for a domain name. Not sure what the records was. Considering they sold the company 2 years later for $200 million it was a pretty good return on investment.

  4. Re:its bad enough by Broken+scope · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Sadly goatse is part of the history of the internet.

    --
    You mad
  5. Site seems to be down :-( by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 4, Informative

    Unfortunately, it appears the the goatse.cx site is down. Fortunately, there's a mirror available at goatse.ch and goatse.cz.

    --
    There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    1. Re:Site seems to be down :-( by MichaelSmith · · Score: 5, Funny

      I bet you have been waiting years for a chance to post those links.

    2. Re:Site seems to be down :-( by dsanfte · · Score: 2, Funny

      If ever there was the time for the Foe feature, this is it.

      I challenge thee to a duel of honour. Be our differences resolved in like fashion.

      --
      occultae nullus est respectus musicae - originally a Greek proverb
    3. Re:Site seems to be down :-( by cyrax256 · · Score: 1

      Is it possible to metamoderate the mods... +5, Funny? :-)

    4. Re:Site seems to be down :-( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well I walked right into that one.

    5. Re:Site seems to be down :-( by Xyrus · · Score: 3, Funny

      Somewhere, a demon in the 7th circle of hell just snorted battery acid and gasoline all over his keyboard.

      ~X~

      --
      ~X~
    6. Re:Site seems to be down :-( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh god my eyes!

    7. Re:Site seems to be down :-( by arron_nz · · Score: 1

      Phew!

      --
      garble
  6. Re:its bad enough by QuantumG · · Score: 2, Informative

    Clearly, seeing as he doesn't even know the difference between moderator and, *cough*, editor.

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
  7. Re:its bad enough by eneville · · Score: 1

    Clearly, seeing as he doesn't even know the difference between moderator and, *cough*, editor.
    i thought it was all done through firehose now. people rate the articles and they get submitted when the rating is high enough. i thought the editors were all replaced a long time ago?
  8. Re:its bad enough by MichaelSmith · · Score: 4, Interesting

    i thought it was all done through firehose now.

    No. If it was done that way there would be 6000 articles in the queue like on digg and it would be impossible to get anything decent posted.

  9. Unfair by Sam+H · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Anyone else finds it pretty unfair that the registrar took the domain back from its owner, then allows someone else to buy it for hundreds of dollars? Pretty close to stealing if you ask me.

    --
    God, root, what is difference ?
    1. Re:Unfair by Dogtanian · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Anyone else finds it pretty unfair that the registrar took the domain back from its owner, then allows someone else to buy it for hundreds of dollars? Pretty close to stealing if you ask me. If they did it once, they can do it again. Why would I want to pay out tens of thousands of dollars for a site when that could happen?

      Even if I got that money returned, I'd assume that someone willing to spend that amount of money would have spent more money on, or be receiving more income from the site which they *wouldn't* get back.
      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  10. Re:its bad enough by suv4x4 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sadly goatse is part of the history of the internet.

    You'll be surprised how many people, making millions on the Internet, have no clue what it is. The people familiar in details with all the shock sites are a certain subculture, and certainly doesn't make up the history of the Internet.

  11. Jokers appear to have hijacked the bidding by dfoulger · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Last I looked the bidding was up over $40 million. Worse, the pattern of the bids suggested that the bidders who are bidding can't possibly be serious. Bidder 20 was a head at 30m, then bid 40m without a counter bid. Bidder 19 had previously done something similar.

    --
    Davis http://davis.foulger.net
    1. Re:Jokers appear to have hijacked the bidding by Sam+H · · Score: 4, Funny

      Wow, you needed to look at the vote pattern to infer that the $20M bidders can't possibly be serious? :-)

      --
      God, root, what is difference ?
    2. Re:Jokers appear to have hijacked the bidding by MichaelSmith · · Score: 2, Funny

      I hope they did it anonymously. Puts me in mind of the episode where Homer Simpson donated $10 MUSD to a telethon.

    3. Re:Jokers appear to have hijacked the bidding by dfoulger · · Score: 1

      Well, there are nutso people in the world with more money than brains ...

      but no, I looked for the pattern because the numbers were so stupid. The pattern simply confirmed the obvious.

      --
      Davis http://davis.foulger.net
    4. Re:Jokers appear to have hijacked the bidding by nasta · · Score: 1

      Currently the bidding is on $402.4 billion...

    5. Re:Jokers appear to have hijacked the bidding by cshark · · Score: 1

      Seems likely that it's the original owner opening up an account and doing it anonymously. Possibly through a translator or a proxy for good measure.

      Makes sense. That's exactly what I would do.

      --

      This signature has Super Cow Powers

    6. Re:Jokers appear to have hijacked the bidding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Currently the bidding is on $402.4 billion...


      Wide open bidding war? Is the bidding spread around?
    7. Re:Jokers appear to have hijacked the bidding by Punto · · Score: 1
      sounds fair, since the register stole the domain from its original owner in the first place, why allow these guys to make a profit from it?

      I'm bidding as soon as I can get an account set up.

      --

      --
      Stay tuned for some shock and awe coming right up after this messages!

    8. Re:Jokers appear to have hijacked the bidding by Omestes · · Score: 2, Informative

      $1e+12 now...

      Wow... I am glad it does exponents...

      --
      A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
  12. Re:its bad enough by QuantumG · · Score: 2, Informative

    What, you think this is Kuro5hin? No, there's still people who are paid to read submissions and decide what best "represents Slashdot".. and yeah, they never read the site themselves, so they have no idea what is on Slashdot.

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
  13. Re:its bad enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I wonder what that other famous site would cost.

  14. the ancient cult of goatse.cx by circletimessquare · · Score: 5, Informative

    i was surfing about.com's list of religious symbols awhile back and found out, much to my shock and amusement, that the goatse.cx guy is an ancient celtic god

    (link is pretty safe for work)

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:the ancient cult of goatse.cx by MMC+Monster · · Score: 4, Funny

      Frankly, I wouldn't follow any links from this article. Last time I looked at the goatse.cx image was about 5 years ago, and it is still burned in my head. I can't go through that trauma again.

      --
      Help! I'm a slashdot refugee.
    2. Re:the ancient cult of goatse.cx by Glowing+Fish · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think my best goatse.cx memory is showing it to a guy who seemed to be the crude, dirty type and who had spent much much time on the internet's dark corner, and him responding "I have to go throw my hard drive in clorox"

      Yeah, it stays with you for a while...

      --
      Hopefully I didn't put any [] around my words.
    3. Re:the ancient cult of goatse.cx by NMerriam · · Score: 2

      Hey, say what you will about goatse.cx guy, he's a hundred times better than tubgirl.

      --
      Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.
    4. Re:the ancient cult of goatse.cx by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative
    5. Re:the ancient cult of goatse.cx by rark · · Score: 1

      um..goddess..and that's her vulva she's holding open

    6. Re:the ancient cult of goatse.cx by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, they actually have the pronunciation wrong. The gaelic 'Síla na Géige' sounds like 'sheela na gay-ge' rather than 'sheela na gig'. 'é' (e with a fada) gives a hard A sound. Whether that's a good thing or not in this case though...

    7. Re:the ancient cult of goatse.cx by fm6 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Dude, you need to learn the difference between a vulva and an anus. Getting them mixed up can really get you in trouble!

    8. Re:the ancient cult of goatse.cx by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Funny

      that the goatse.cx guy is an ancient celtic god

      With gods like that, who needs devils?

    9. Re:the ancient cult of goatse.cx by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      um..goddess..and that's her vulva she's holding open
      uhh... I think you meant "labia" (or at a stretch.... "vagina"). Back to Anatomy 101 for you, or your mom's basement Slashdotter! :-)
    10. Re:the ancient cult of goatse.cx by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Where do you think devils and demons come from? All of them started out as pagan gods. Classifying them as The Forces of Evil was how early Christians acknowledged competing religions without giving them equal status.

    11. Re:the ancient cult of goatse.cx by Raenex · · Score: 2, Funny

      Last time I looked at the goatse.cx image was about 5 years ago, and it is still burned in my head. I know you said you wouldn't follow any links, but I think this comic depicts your pain amusingly: http://www.vgcats.com/othercomics/?strip_id=10

      I got it from Wikipedia. It's safe. Trust me! No really, I'm not kidding, it's funny. Seriously, I'm not trying to fool you. Ah well, you'll never believe me :)
    12. Re:the ancient cult of goatse.cx by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      ...or in deep shit.

    13. Re:the ancient cult of goatse.cx by Soruk · · Score: 1

      or at a stretch

      *facepalm*

      --
      -- Soruk
    14. Re:the ancient cult of goatse.cx by SonicSpike · · Score: 1

      Gynecology and proctology; close but different!

      I don't understand why we have a sewer so close to a playground.

      --
      Libertas in infinitum
  15. Re:its bad enough by Broken+scope · · Score: 5, Funny

    That would be true if high schools didn't have computer labs. I know many who don't know the name, but it will be a cold day in hell before they will every be able to remove that particular image from their brain.

    --
    You mad
  16. Current bid amount : $4.5e+07 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    whats this, a nerd auction site? nothing like presenting your values in e notation to put off the average joe

  17. goatse on the cheap by dfoulger · · Score: 1

    I just checked with my registrar, and while the major goatse addresses (com, org, net, and biz) are all taken, there are open goatse variants, including goatse.us.com and goatse.eu.com. Get 'em while they're hot.

    --
    Davis http://davis.foulger.net
    1. Re:goatse on the cheap by masterzora · · Score: 5, Funny
      open goatse variants

      Did you really have to say "open goatse"? You're only making this worse!

      --
      Remember, open source is free as in speech, not free as in bear.
    2. Re:goatse on the cheap by mr_shifty · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Open Goatse" sounds like some sort of FOSS operating system, probably based on BSD.

      --
      And the circle of life continues to spin, occasionally wobbling on its axis thanks to the weighty presence of dumb.
    3. Re:goatse on the cheap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sadly, a goatse operating system already exists. (link is safe).

    4. Re:goatse on the cheap by 6Yankee · · Score: 2, Funny

      What if one were to buy all of them? Are they cheaper holesale?

  18. What's it worth? by Linker3000 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can't see a large opening for sites with names like this.

    --
    AT&ROFLMAO
    1. Re:What's it worth? by archeopterix · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I can't see a large opening for sites with names like this.
      I believe there is a wide gap between your assessment and the market value.
    2. Re:What's it worth? by Woy · · Score: 1

      The linked boingboing picture, however, shows why teamwork is not always the best solution.

      --
      "If God created us in his own image we have more than reciprocated." - Voltaire
    3. Re:What's it worth? by TempeTerra · · Score: 4, Funny

      I can't see a large opening for sites with names like this.
      I believe there is a wide gap between your assessment and the market value.
      So in your opinion, there is a void that must filled?
      --
      .evom ton seod gis eht
    4. Re:What's it worth? by Xyrus · · Score: 2, Funny

      Is that your final analysis, our do you need to do a wider search. You may need to dig deep, as assumptions are detrimental to ascertaining whether you have the whole truth or not.

      ~X~

      --
      ~X~
    5. Re:What's it worth? by gfreeman · · Score: 1

      And grab it with both hands when you do.

      --
      Ceci n'est pas un sig.
  19. teh interweb by owlnation · · Score: 4, Funny

    Is that the entrance to one of the series of tubes?

    1. Re:teh interweb by EnsilZah · · Score: 1

      Or the exit, depends on how you look at it.

    2. Re:teh interweb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that the entrance to one of the series of tubes?
      Eeew. Now I'll never be able to hear anybody mention the series of tubes again without getting a bad feeling.
    3. Re:teh interweb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or the exit, depends on how you look at it.
      Yeah, I guess the comparision between the Internet and a series of tubes actually came out of that exit.
  20. The end is near... by DrYak · · Score: 4, Funny

    I bet you have been waiting years for a chance to post those links.
    ...AND to get those links deliberately modded +5 Insightful by anyone with mod points : Priceless !
    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
    1. Re:The end is near... by Hal_Porter · · Score: 4, Interesting

      ...AND to get those [Goatse] links deliberately modded +5 Insightful by anyone with mod points : Priceless !

      I wonder if I can get modded up for pointing out the state of the art way to post goatse to slashdot is to put the obfuscated version of the URL with in a comment with a tempting bait like this?

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    2. Re:The end is near... by TheLink · · Score: 1

      tinyurl allows "previews" enabled - which means people can opt to see the URL first, rather than the site.

      A number of other url shortening sites don't support this feature.

      --
    3. Re:The end is near... by Raenex · · Score: 1

      Even easier is to not click on tiny urls. It was a neat idea, but I'd rather people just post the full link.

  21. Well isn't that sweet by iminplaya · · Score: 1

    Boingboing sent us all a Valentine's Day* card. Better late than never, right?

    *You all do see it, don't you?

    --
    What?
  22. Re:its bad enough by linvir · · Score: 2, Funny

    BAWWWWWWWW

    Awww, it's awright, I bwoughted your butt-medicine for you! Here, you take a liddel sip and then you go sleepy-byes!

  23. Your own goatse.cx by guacamole · · Score: 1, Funny

    Ah! A rich geek's dream cum true!

  24. .cx domains are worthless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Goatse was a culturally significant internet meme and the domain was suspended (revoked) because some kook at the registrar found the content tasteless. There's plenty of content I find tasteless online, Goatse was nowhere near as offensive to me as the GWB presidency yet I'm not about to start pressuring ICANN to withdraw the domains registered by pro-bush news sites.

    Dot cx (now CIIA) set a dangerous precedent in revoking the goatse domain, content regulation via DNS is nothing more than an abuse of power. cx domains are worthless, the registry has established it will pull domains if they don't like the content. Avoid.

    1. Re:.cx domains are worthless by imsabbel · · Score: 1

      Rant without sense.
      Then .com .org. net. or .gov would be worthless, too.
      Because they would also have pulled the image.

      Hint: there is a reason why even the most nasty porn-site has a more or less worksafe "i am older than 21" screen. And its not because they care about teenagers chastity.

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    2. Re:.cx domains are worthless by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Dot cx (now CIIA) set a dangerous precedent in revoking the goatse domain, content regulation via DNS is nothing more than an abuse of power. cx domains are worthless, the registry has established it will pull domains if they don't like the content. Avoid.
      Get. A. Life. CX is one of those useless little TLDs that nobody cares about. People who live on Christmas Island (which owns the domain) don't care about it, because they're really part of Australia — it's an accident of history that they have their own ISO code — and don't need their own national domain. Everybody else doesn't care about it because the fad for hosting your site on a confusing two-letter TLD ended years ago. If you want to get bent out of shape over something, try something that matters.
    3. Re:.cx domains are worthless by SonicSpike · · Score: 1

      And you sir are a true liberal that we need more of!

      Neoliberals are just as fascist as many neoconservatives. You however realize that although you may not agree with the message, you will fight for their right to say it.

      I consider myself classically liberal, or in modern terms, libertarian.

      --
      Libertas in infinitum
  25. Goatse is for sissies by bersl2 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Tubgirl is so much better than Goatse.

    And by "better", I mean "more thoroughly disgusting". The latter makes me laugh; the former turns my stomach.

    1. Re:Goatse is for sissies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Funny, I don't find tubgirl disgusting at all. If goatse isn't bad enough for you, then try lemonparty. That's like (goatse+tubgirl)^5000.

    2. Re:Goatse is for sissies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Tubgirl's gross-out value was slightly ruined for me after I found out it's actually an orange juice enema she's expelling, rather than liquid poop, which is the instinctive assumption.

    3. Re:Goatse is for sissies by dreamlax · · Score: 1

      Tubgirl's gross-out value was slightly ruined for me after I found out it's actually an orange juice enema she's expelling, rather than liquid poop, which is the instinctive assumption.

      I don't care what it is. It's flying out of her ass and into her face.

    4. Re:Goatse is for sissies by ZERO1ZERO · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hmmm Goatse makes you laugh? I present the 8 stages of Goatse: http://www.the-elite.net/ClarkPage/Phases/

  26. Re:its bad enough by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 4, Insightful

    it's bad enough when someone does a first post to goatse.cx, why the heck is this making news? internet shock sites should not be posted on popular forums, it's stupid, why do we get a news article about shock sites

    Methinks thou doth protest too much. That's really your ass in the picture, isn't it?

    i always thought the /. community of moderators were a little more mature.

    That's a joke, right?

  27. Nah... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's just Gates and Ellison in a bidding war.

  28. fun bidding.. by Magic+Fingers · · Score: 0

    Its fun bidding there, I've outclass everyone.. I wonder do I still need to buy if I won the bid :P -javaboy

    1. Re:fun bidding.. by QuickFox · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yes you do. They are very serious about that. They will track you down. If you don't have the money you can expect serious trouble.

      Good luck.

      --
      Terrorists can't threaten a country's freedom and democracy. Only lawmakers and voters can do that.
    2. Re:fun bidding.. by coredog64 · · Score: 1

      Jake: What are you going to do now, Mr. Hotrodder? The cops got your name, your address-- Elwood: Nope, they don't got my address. I falsified my renewal. I put down 1060 West Addison. Jake: That's Wrigley Field...

  29. I was looking for a joke... by Glowing+Fish · · Score: 1

    But they are too easy to be found.
    For example, you could probably turn most of the stories on the front page of Slashdot into goatse.cx jokes if you wanted. Wal-Mart begins massive push for HD-DVD...Microsoft finds home for barcode...and of course, the hundred million mile pipe organ. All are open to goatse.cx jokes.

    --
    Hopefully I didn't put any [] around my words.
  30. The auction seems doomed to failure. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Current bid amount: $5.02402e+11

    That's a ridiculous price even for such a well-respected domain name like this.

    1. Re:The auction seems doomed to failure. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Over 500 billion dollars????????? Who the fuck has that kind of cash?

    2. Re:The auction seems doomed to failure. by Vampyre_Dark · · Score: 1

      Cowboy Neal.

  31. Oh for the love of... by The+Bungi · · Score: 5, Funny

    So much for that deal with Satan specifying he could take me the day a post with a goatse link on Slashdot was modded +5...

    1. Re:Oh for the love of... by lysse · · Score: 1

      And suddenly I know exactly how the original photo came about...

    2. Re:Oh for the love of... by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Funny

      So much for that deal with Satan specifying he could take me the day a post with a goatse link on Slashdot was modded +5...

      Hope you like the Beowulf cluster of hells.

  32. $502bn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh! they're up to $502 billion.

  33. Re:its bad enough by mushadv · · Score: 3, Funny

    You don't sound like you're too up on your internets history, friend.

  34. Re:its bad enough by linvir · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The people familiar in details with all the shock sites are a certain subculture, and certainly doesn't make up the history of the Internet.

    As I understand it, back in the early days of the internet, the kind of enthusiasts who make up today's subculture were a significant proportion of the userbase. Just by being there, they were a target market, and helped the whole thing to grow. Just because AOL came along and reduced them to a subculture doesn't mean they aren't part of the internet's history.

    And besides, who cares about the internet's ability to concentrate even more wealth into even fewer hands? I can guarantee that in 300 years, the history teachers won't be telling their classes about how the internet was really profitable and made a select few very rich. They'll tell of how it connected the world and got us all communicating at an unprecedented level (assuming they even mention it at all).

    Sure, the signal-to-noise ratio sucks, and half the time all we're communicating is a picture of a guy stretching his ass with his hands, but at least that's more interesting than some dotcom's record quarterly report.

  35. The price has since gone up! by toetagger1 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Current bid amount: $5.02402e+11
    How awesome is that?
    --
    who | grep -i blond | date cd ~; unzip; touch; strip; finger; mount; gasp; yes; uptime; umount; sleep
  36. No one is paying by mangu · · Score: 3, Insightful
    It has now become a contest of who is able to write the largest number. I tried bidding 9!!!!!!!!! just to see if they understand what a factorial is, but it required me to log in. I'm not going to create a fake account just for that lame joke.


    Anyhow, there's a good moral lesson here. The .cx domain registrars revoked the site name just because they didn't like its content. Now who would want to buy a domain name they can lose anytime at the registrar's whim? As in any business, there is a question of trust here, if you can't trust the registrar the domain is worthless.


    Besides, it's not as if there didn't exist plenty of sick sites out there. I don't like those, but who am I to judge? As long as it's nothing criminal, let it be...

    1. Re:No one is paying by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      As long as it's nothing criminal, let it be...

      Yeah, but the determination of what is criminal involves a whole lot of conflicting legal and moral standards, even within the same nation.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    2. Re:No one is paying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      The .cx people didn't pull goatse.cx just because they didn't like the content. From my understanding, they pulled it after a formal complaint, from a Christmas Island resident (named Rhonda Clarke), who complained very specifically about one thing - the link to dolphinsex.org. Without said link there would have been no basis for it being pulled, but bestiality is illegal in .cx, thus this link contravened the T&Cs of domain registration, so it was pulled.

      *makes sure he checks "Post Anonymously"*

    3. Re:No one is paying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for that Dave2

  37. A bit pricy by cvb90ugnldgsf · · Score: 1

    Minimal offer $502402000050 There dies my dream.

    1. Re:A bit pricy by Starburnt · · Score: 0

      Me too. My limit was $502402000000.

  38. Re:its bad enough by mickwd · · Score: 2, Informative

    "You'll be surprised how many people, making millions on the Internet, have no clue what it is.

    Check out this set of pictures (or here) of people finding out exactly what goatse.cx is, while some nice person photographs the expression on their face.

  39. Current bid is $1e+12 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Following a few links, the auction site itself is http://www.seobidding.com/buy/bids_history/goatse. cx (SFW).

    According to it, the current bid at this time is "$1e+12".

    Probably not a real bid, but if it is, that's a hole lot of money...

  40. Hehe... by setirw · · Score: 0, Troll

    I wonder when Goatse.cz, the classic site's replacement will be sold, and for how much!

    P.S. Don't click the link; it's a complete mirror of the original Goatse.

    --
    This message printed on 100% post-consumer recycled electrons.
    1. Re:Hehe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Making a link with saying don't click is silly.

  41. Goatse.cx is everywhere by khendron · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Those Boing Boing links are hilarious.

    I've recently noticed that the Toastmasters (safe link) logo has more than a passing resemblance.

    --
    Life is like a web application. Sometime you need cookies just to get by.
    1. Re:Goatse.cx is everywhere by matlhDam · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've recently noticed that the Toastmasters [toastmasters.org] (safe link) logo has more than a passing resemblance.

      There's been more than a few people suggest that Westnet, an ISP here in Perth, could have thought through its new logo a little better, too.
    2. Re:Goatse.cx is everywhere by lordofthechia · · Score: 1

      How could we forget
      Disney Goatse ?

      --
      Georgia Tech, the leader in Chia(tm) technology.
    3. Re:Goatse.cx is everywhere by damncrackmonkey · · Score: 5, Funny

      wow, you guys are really stretching it

    4. Re:Goatse.cx is everywhere by a.koepke · · Score: 1

      The Westnet logo is much more appropriate: http://www.westnet.com.au/

      It is certainly a Goatse reference.

      --


      (\(\
      (^.^)
      (")")
      *This is the cute bunny virus, please copy this into your sig so it can spread
  42. Re:its bad enough by GeneralAntilles · · Score: 4, Funny

    Clearly, friend, you've failed in your attempts to stretch your sphincter as wide as the goatse.cx gentleman and are lashing out at us because of it.

  43. Re:its bad enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    On one hand, it should be obvious that his link directs to some kind of shock image. On the other hand, he just posted a Tubgirl picture to Slashdot and got modded interesting. Indeed.

  44. Re:its bad enough by W2k · · Score: 1

    i thought it was all done through firehose now. people rate the articles and they get submitted when the rating is high enough. i thought the editors were all replaced a long time ago?
    Not really, it seems the editors don't really care what the firehose thinks about a story. I've stopped using it since it seems to be quite useless other than as a toy for editor wannabes.
    --
    Quality, performance, value; you get only two, and you don't always get to pick.
  45. Enough by Jotii · · Score: 2, Informative

    $5.02402e+11 ought to be enough for anybody. It's $1e+12 now. Why do they even allow bids that big? It can't be serious.

    --
    [sig]
    1. Re:Enough by mkettler · · Score: 1

      Come on, you don't think someone's going to cough up 1 trillion dollars? I mean, thats just about 17 times what Bill gates is worth.

      Clearly some burger flipping pimply teenager can come up with more than that...

      --
      -Matt
  46. No Goatse guy by Jotii · · Score: 1

    Details: Domain name without content
    Saw that too late. Now I've bid $1e+12 and won't even get the goatse guy.
    --
    [sig]
    1. Re:No Goatse guy by UnCivil+Liberty · · Score: 3, Funny

      I've heard site maintenance is a real pain in the ass.

      --
      Distributed proteome folding @ WorldCommunityGrid.org
      Team Slashdot - Members:#1 Run Time:#1 Points:#1 Results:#1
    2. Re:No Goatse guy by Jotii · · Score: 2, Funny

      I've heard site maintenance is a real pain in the ass.
      It's open source.
      --
      [sig]
  47. Re:its bad enough by Professor_UNIX · · Score: 2, Informative

    internet shock sites should not be posted on popular forums, it's stupid, why do we get a news article about shock sites
    You apparently don't remember the good old days when you could still post inline images in Slashdot comments and there were no registered accounts, you just typed in whatever name you wanted to post under or just left it the default of Anonymous Coward.
  48. Re:its bad enough by mr_shifty · · Score: 2, Funny

    You must be new here.

    --
    And the circle of life continues to spin, occasionally wobbling on its axis thanks to the weighty presence of dumb.
  49. Money != Knowledge by Cid+Highwind · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You'll be surprised how many people, making millions on the Internet, have no clue what it is.

    The people "making millions on the Internet" right now tend to be pornographers, spammers, scammers, and botnet owners. They probably don't know anything about Vint Cerf, ARPAnet, the IETF, or BBN either...

    --
    0 1 - just my two bits
  50. A mole for a-hole $6.022x10^23 by davidwr · · Score: 1

    Will that be the final bid?

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  51. Anyone notice the seller? by FooAtWFU · · Score: 2, Informative
    It's being auctioned on SEOBidding.com - as in, Search Engine Optimization - not the nice, XHTML+accessibility+no-broken-links kind of SEO, but the scum-of-the-earth kind that snaps up a domain where the registration has lapsed, and puts up a site with a) ads and b) links to other sites, so they can steal the page-rank.

    As for the auction, I hope they choke on it.

    --
    The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
    1. Re:Anyone notice the seller? by Lehk228 · · Score: 4, Funny

      i hope their assholes get ripped open in the auction

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    2. Re:Anyone notice the seller? by bcmm · · Score: 1

      I think they *are* choking on it: surely no one actually has the current bid of "$1e+12". :-)

      Do they not have some kind of defence against blatant trolling, given that that's really what this auction is about?

      --
      # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i llama
      Damn, my RAM is full of llamas.
  52. ARTICLE? MORE LIKE, GOATSE.CX MIRROR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The "article" goes to
    The goatse.cx lawyer has informed us that we need a warning! So.. if you are under the age of 18 or find this photograph offensive, please don't look at it. Thank you!
    (image of goatse.cx man)


    That sure is an article, and not a gaping goatse.cx man's bum. I did not find it a very interesting read, unfortunately. In fact, I don't even think Richard Dawkins wrote that. I mean, it's a picture of a gaping asshole, not an article. It's kind of hard to read or write one of those.

  53. And your punishment is... by mangu · · Score: 4, Funny

    Living in this house for the rest of your life on Earth. After you die, well you know...

    1. Re:And your punishment is... by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      In my book, the following Holy crap is she smokin' link is definitely preferable to a house that gives every impression of having been screwed by a sperm whale.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    2. Re:And your punishment is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      a house that gives every impression of having been screwed by a sperm whale


      Well, if you had read the comments to the picture, you'd know the house wasn't fucked by a sperm whale. Chuck Norris did it!!!

  54. Re:its bad enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, and we would notice the difference, right? ... right?

  55. Pefrect timing for Political Camaign by failedlogic · · Score: 1

    If I were a campaign adviser in the upcoming US federal elections, buying goatse.cx would be perfect.

    TV AD:

    Voting for candidate A is bad.
    He'll raise taxes.
    Ruin the economy.
    And, he doesn't like children.
    Basically, he's a asshole.
    (cut to the infamous picture).
    On election day, don't vote for A.
    Vote for a candidate that cares. Vote for B.
    Brought to you buy: http://goatse.cx/

    1. Re:Pefrect timing for Political Camaign by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      forget all this garbage. Vote for the Lemon Party!

  56. Ya right. by electrosoccertux · · Score: 1

    Yes you do. They are very serious about that. They will track you down. If you don't have the money you can expect serious trouble.

    Good luck. How exactly are they going to get someone to pay $1,000,000,000,000?
    1. Re:Ya right. by QuickFox · · Score: 2, Informative

      They'll do what they always do when someone can't pay the entire sum that he owes. They'll get as large a portion as they can, by arranging personal bankrupcy, confiscation of assets with executory auction, confiscation of future income, and so on.

      Debt is a serious matter.

      --
      Terrorists can't threaten a country's freedom and democracy. Only lawmakers and voters can do that.
    2. Re:Ya right. by electrosoccertux · · Score: 1

      They'll do what they always do when someone can't pay the entire sum that he owes. They'll get as large a portion as they can, by arranging personal bankrupcy, confiscation of assets with executory auction, confiscation of future income, and so on.

      Debt is a serious matter. Does that include confiscating the domain and reselling it?
    3. Re:Ya right. by QuickFox · · Score: 1

      We're assuming that he can't pay for it. This is a very reasonable assumption, in my view. This means he won't own it. Thus they don't need to confiscate it. They get to confiscate everything he owns and all his future, and still they get to keep the domain and sell it again.

      Even if they did have to confiscate the domain before they sell it, in the executory auction the domain would only bring in a very small fraction of his debt. I'm sure you'll agree that it would bring in only a very, very small fraction.

      --
      Terrorists can't threaten a country's freedom and democracy. Only lawmakers and voters can do that.
    4. Re:Ya right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      How exactly are they going to get someone to pay $1,000,000,000,000


      Hmmm, let's see. How about starting with electric shocks? I'd say let the thousand cuts for later, don't you think so?

    5. Re:Ya right. by Magic+Fingers · · Score: 0

      .. but the question is how they will gonna track me? I don't have a name, I don't have an identity, I don't have a bank account and yes I don't exist!

    6. Re:Ya right. by QuickFox · · Score: 1

      Nobody is truly anonymous on the internet. You leave traces all over the place. Those traces may be spread over hundreds of log files, which are in turn spread among hundreds of computers, but if the police have suitable search warrants and are suitably motivated, they will gather all your traces until they find you.

      One example of suitable motivation would be a debt larger than ten thousand. Your debt is a hundred million times that sum.

      I hope you do have a trillion dollars stashed away somewhere.

      If you don't, I hope you can convince them that you're 95 years old and live penniless on the street, so that seeking you out isn't profitable.

      --
      Terrorists can't threaten a country's freedom and democracy. Only lawmakers and voters can do that.
    7. Re:Ya right. by QuickFox · · Score: 1

      Another solution might be if you can convince the judge that you're mentally retarded. In most jurisdictions the mentally retarded are not responsible for their actions.

      Unfortunately, acting retarded won't help. You'll need documentation.

      I don't know if recent documentation will be enough, or if you'll need documentation collected since childhood.

      Maybe you're thinking that you could convince the judge that bidding a trillion dollar is retarded. This might make the judge agree that it is indeed retarded, but unfortunately that will not in itself be enough to make you legally retarded, that is, retarded enough to be legally free you from responsibility.

      --
      Terrorists can't threaten a country's freedom and democracy. Only lawmakers and voters can do that.
    8. Re:Ya right. by QuickFox · · Score: 1

      Depending on where you live, it might help if you can convince the judge that you're a young child. I don't know about the US, but in most modern countries young children are not competent to stand trial, and are not legally responsible for their actions.

      In many cases, instead the parents are responsible for their children's actions.

      I seem to remember that in some US states children and the mentally retarded can be tried, and even executed. Very strange.

      Unless I'm mistaken the UK is not really modern in this respect, although most of Europe is. I think the UK jailed two small children for murder.

      Or maybe Europe isn't so modern, now that I think of it, or at least not my country, Sweden. Here children can't be jailed, but I seem to remember that Sweden does allow children to have enormous debts. I think this was debated some time ago as a mistake in the law.

      So, I would guess that this may vary quite a lot. IOW, YMMV. It may be worth exploring, if you're young enough.

      --
      Terrorists can't threaten a country's freedom and democracy. Only lawmakers and voters can do that.
    9. Re:Ya right. by Magic+Fingers · · Score: 0

      Sorry but I use Tor

    10. Re:Ya right. by Raenex · · Score: 1

      Oh get off it. Nobody is going to track down some idiot posting a joke bid via Tor. You May Talk Seriously and Sternly all you want, but it ain't gonna happen. And even if they did, they wouldn't hold him to a trillion dollar debt.

    11. Re:Ya right. by QuickFox · · Score: 1

      Of course you do. I'd be shocked if you didn't. In my comment about convincing the judge that you're mentally retarded I wasn't suggesting that you're literally retarded!

      When I suggested that the police might have to collect your traces from hundreds of computers, I was thinking of services like Tor. If you had connected directly, all they'd have to do would be to check Seobidding's logs and then ask your ISP. Nothing to it.

      Unfortunately, Tor can't eliminate your traces entirely, it can only spread them. Tor nodes have ISPs, and ISPs have logs. With a debt higher than ten thousand dollars, you will be traced. With a hundred million times the limit, well, I'm sorry.

      Their job would be much easier if all the Google hits on your nick were about you. Since tracing Tor is cumbersome, they'll try to find some instance where you slipped, some instance where you used your nick without going through Tor. I hope you've been 100% careful forever.

      But since your nick gives so many widely different Google hits, tracing you that way will be cumbersome too. Good for you. This may buy you some time. Maybe in the meantime you can find some solution.

      I'm a little surprised that you can post to Slashdot through Tor. I thought Slashdot blocked all the well-known anonymizers with that weird port checking that they do when you post.

      --
      Terrorists can't threaten a country's freedom and democracy. Only lawmakers and voters can do that.
    12. Re:Ya right. by QuickFox · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately I don't share your faith in humanity. Too many people stop being reasonable when there's profit to be made. Consider how they'll gladly ruin a kid's life just for sharing a few lousy music tracks.

      --
      Terrorists can't threaten a country's freedom and democracy. Only lawmakers and voters can do that.
  57. ...tubgirl... by Jerry+Smith · · Score: 1

    Excuse me while I claw my eyes out. Again. *shudder*

    --
    All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. Time to die.
  58. open goatse by BorgCopyeditor · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now the true significance of the BSD demon mascot is finally, terrifyingly revealed! His reign shall be merciless, and pointy! There shall be much wailing and frantic pressing of "Back" buttons, but it shall avail them naught, for even should they close one window will two more appear, and more, and more, until their screens shall be covered in it, such that all the lab may see. And they will laugh, or call campus security, or file a lawsuit. Yea, these are dark times.

    --
    Shop as usual. And avoid panic buying.
  59. A farewell tribute by Experiment+626 · · Score: 1

    One of the things I liked about goatse.cx is the clever wordplay... pronounce "goatse cx" and it sounds like "goat sex". Yet, it most references to the site, even the discussion on this thread, it's just referred to as "goatse". People don't generally shorten "del.icio.us" to "icio", because there is a realization that the domain name as a whole has special significance, yet the brilliant and subtle humor of goatse.cx is lost on so many Slashdotters. And with the domain up for sale, soon that comic genius will be lost to the world as well -- a sad day in Internet history. Goodbye goatse.cx guy, you opened up your orifice and our hearts, and made this world a little better place... for posting troll links anyway.

    1. Re:A farewell tribute by chrismcb · · Score: 1

      Uhhh. You mean lost on so many Slashdot.orgers?

  60. typo by fellip_nectar · · Score: 4, Funny

    If you click the 'Place Bid' button without logging in to the site you are instructed:

    "Please login to your accunt first."

    --
    Worst. Signature. Ever.
    1. Re:typo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AC Cunts don't have to log in. WTF is that page talking about?

  61. Re:its bad enough by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 2, Funny

    Theo, I herd u liek mudkips. If not, please make yourself an hero.

    --
    Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
  62. Just watched Idiocracy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    and found this quote appropos:

    There was a time when reading wasn't just for fags. And neither was writing. People wrote books and movies. Movies with stories, that made you care about whose ass it was and why it was farting. And I believe that time can come again!
  63. Oh no he didn't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Since the subject is offensive shock sites - have you seen these pictures of volcanic diarrhea or severed limbs? Disgusting...

  64. Meat Spin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Meat Spin, I find, gets people to freak out a lot faster than goatse.cx, lemonparty, or tubgirl: www.meatspin.com (Extremely not safe for work)

    What's your meat spin count?

  65. But which is it? I challenge you to answer! by Cafe+Alpha · · Score: 1

    Ok, I admit that I never spent any time perusing goatse, but I notice that the wikipedia article doesn't match what I read in slashdot threads. I remember a thread where some explainded that the "guy" at goatse was a hermaphrodite and that people were too shocked to realize that they were looking up a vagina, not up some deformed anus... But the wikipedia article say's that it's a photoshopped anus. Someone here must have the expertise to answer this important historical question!

    1. Re:But which is it? I challenge you to answer! by mangu · · Score: 2, Funny
      the "guy" at goatse was a hermaphrodite and that people were too shocked to realize that they were looking up a vagina


      Well, there's also the people who notice the guy has a wedding ring. Anyhow, examining the goatse picture closely enough to find remarkable details, well, I confess I haven't got to that stage yet...

    2. Re:But which is it? I challenge you to answer! by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      some explainded that the "guy" at goatse was a hermaphrodite and that people were too shocked to realize that they were looking up a vagina, not up some deformed anus...

      We need a new mod category: "-1 too much info".

    3. Re:But which is it? I challenge you to answer! by imsabbel · · Score: 1

      I remember that thread, too.
      But it was _wrong_.
      Its a perfectly fine anus, as easily visibly in the other pictures of the collection.
      (in case you dont know, the goatse picture is just one shot in a longer series. FEAR the way he actually gets the anus so wide).

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
  66. TOS by tepples · · Score: 3, Informative

    Anyone else finds it pretty unfair that the registrar took the domain back from its owner, then allows someone else to buy it for hundreds of dollars? If the original buyer agreed in the TOS that the domain can be seized and resold if obscene content is posted, then it's fair.
  67. Re:its bad enough by Khaed · · Score: 1

    Someone instantly calling another person an idiot doesn't have much room to bitch about others not engaging in legitimate discussion.

    PS. Asshole.

  68. Trifecta in play by Wabbit+Wabbit · · Score: 1

    ah...goatse, 4chan, what next?

    All we're missing is a fark reference. (yes I've been on a fark roll lately)

    --
    Nothing is inexplicable; only unexplained -Tom Baker, Doctor Who
    1. Re:Trifecta in play by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      boobies.

    2. Re:Trifecta in play by birdboy2000 · · Score: 0

      Ah, but you see, "Trifecta in play" *IS* a fark reference.

    3. Re:Trifecta in play by Wabbit+Wabbit · · Score: 1

      that was the point :)

      --
      Nothing is inexplicable; only unexplained -Tom Baker, Doctor Who
  69. Re:its bad enough by malkir · · Score: 1

    Wow, this is the second time I've seen Tubgirl/Goatse links modded up to five. I think hell is getting chilly ;P

  70. Re:its bad enough by Heembo · · Score: 1

    I'm sick of you retards parroting tired memes instead of engaging in legitimate discussion. Uh, like you are doing now? Get a grip (on your sphincter) buddy!
    --
    Horns are really just a broken halo.
  71. Heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Right mod : +5, Catch-22

  72. Re:its bad enough by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 1

    And I'm sure you do, Mr. 867045.

    --

    --

    WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
  73. Re:its bad enough by bazorg · · Score: 2, Funny

    from now on you can explain your grandchildren that there was a time when the internet did not have many ads, websites were made only of HTML and tubgirl was not mainstream.

  74. Re:its bad enough by theArtificial · · Score: 0

    Or perhaps http://www.bottleguy.com/ ? There is nothing quite like making coworkers fear links from you.

    --
    Man blir trött av att gå och göra ingenting.
  75. You poor, poor fool by abb3w · · Score: 1

    Y'see, my contract said his claim became null and void if such a post ever got so modded. Now, as long as it's still +5 at midnight, he also has to throw in a great boxed set of stake knives.

    --
    //Information does not want to be free; it wants to breed.
    1. Re:You poor, poor fool by tedrlord · · Score: 1

      I see Satan is a wise investor. He is a master of diversification.

      --
      [insert witty quote here]
  76. Interesting pic by Viceroy+Potatohead · · Score: 1

    Does the BoingBoing picture remind anyone else of a promotional picture for Ubuntu? Or is it just me?

  77. For once... by ndogg · · Score: 4, Funny

    For once, I wouldn't blame anyone for not RTFAing.

    --
    // file: mice.h
    #include "frickin_lasers.h"
  78. Gagh! by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

    WTFC.

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  79. Re:its bad enough by Paul+Crowley · · Score: 3, Funny

    Putting off registering an account as long as possible is probably just good sense.

  80. Don't Even Want to Know... by Greyfox · · Score: 1

    Where will they be storing the cash they get from this transaction?

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  81. HOLY CRAP by RyatNrrd · · Score: 1

    That's the first time I've ever seen a goatse link modded +5 informative!

  82. Hmm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Somerhing is smelly here. But I can't quite put my finger on it

  83. One day only.. Goatse.cx OT!! by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

    This is a good weekend topic.. think back to the old days... when Goatse.cx or tubgirl would get modded down in a heartbeat. But TODAY ONLY it's ON TOPIC!!!! Happens about once a year or so. Go with it!

  84. GoldenPalace.com by Le_Papet · · Score: 1

    GoldenPalace.com must be considering purchasing it. They love publicity stunts and this is bound to get a lot of attention.

  85. My contribution to history by Kaenneth · · Score: 1

    Goatse always made me laugh, and inspired me to create this. http://freeduiconsultations.com/kirbyse.gif (no visable anus)

  86. Good thing history is pretty open-minded then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Goatse IS apart of Internet history, most people simply don't know about it because they jumped on the bandwagon late and the vast majority of search engines and users steered the newbies away knowing that it was TOO extreme to use even as a prank. There are historians who focus on what the literacy rate was within a country and form entire thesis's on them.

    Goatse was a small, small part of internet but its hard to deny the fact that in its own twisted way, it helped shaped the modern internet. Goatse was a hazing ground for early internet users, people UNDERSTOOD that the internet was wild, untamed, uncontrolled territory. We would look away in anger and disgust, but then we'd come back, look at it again and laugh. Compare that to modern day extreme shock websites and you see oversized pictures of guns being pointed at the camera and violent acts 'too bloody for mainstream TV'. People refuse to accept the fact that the internet is a window to an outside world called 'reality.' You see this all the time with blogs. People rant on them, professing their loyalty to a political party/religious group/video game company and then act shocked when they get targeted by opposition groups.

    THIS kind of social change is historical evidence. And in 20/50/100 years in the future, they'll be writing about how much politically correct the internet became compared to when websites like Goatse were around.

  87. i saw a dude with a goatse license plate by lilgorgor · · Score: 1

    in rochester ny!

  88. Wait... by scire9 · · Score: 1

    What's goatse?

  89. levitra logo by SonicSpike · · Score: 1

    If you think that's bad, check out the levitra logo!

    --
    Libertas in infinitum
  90. Mods on Crack. by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately you don't know of the picture Ewing had sent out - man who shoved his head up his rear.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.