Slashdot Mirror


India's Successful Commercial Satellite Launch

An anonymous reader writes "Yesterday India successfully launched an Italian astronomical satellite. A BBC article (view video clip) notes that the launch grants India membership in the exclusive group of nations that can sustain commercial satellite launches. India's launch vehicle has less overall capacity than the competition — up to 1,500 kg to orbit — but the country plans to sweep the low end of the market by offering the lowest cost per launched kilogram for smaller payloads."

168 comments

  1. Next superpowers... by Skippyboy · · Score: 1

    I have read a lot of Sci-Fi books (even the Firefly series on TV) and the general consensus is that the next superpowers will be India and China.. I guess this just fits right into the timeline...

    1. Re:Next superpowers... by vivaoporto · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Well, I don't know if in a multilateral world (as opposed to the Bi-polarized Cold War world) there is space to the concept of "Superpower" anymore, but if there is (along with India and China), Brazil, South Africa and Australia stands a chance too. A lot of economic and technological development happening barely unnoticed south of the equator too.

    2. Re:Next superpowers... by spun · · Score: 1

      I'd put the EU in that list as well. Was the EU left out because it is just assumed they will be a major player, or because they are so socialist and it is assumed they won't be?

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    3. Re:Next superpowers... by vivaoporto · · Score: 2, Informative

      I left E.U., Japan, U.S. and Russia out because they are already major players.

    4. Re:Next superpowers... by spun · · Score: 3, Funny

      That's the reason I hoped you had left them off, rather than the typical US "dang soshlist ferners cain't do nutin' right!" reasoning. ;-)

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    5. Re:Next superpowers... by DogDude · · Score: 1

      The US won't let any other superpowers emerge. If anybody gets too powerful, the US will just bomb the hell out of them.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    6. Re:Next superpowers... by vivaoporto · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Good lucky bombing big and populous countries like:

      • China: Most populated country, 3rd biggest country in territory, 2nd GDP
      • India: 2nd most populated, 7th biggest in territory, 4th GDP
      • Brasil: 5th most populated, 5th biggest in territory, 10th GDP


      Even if indiscriminately nuking these countries (all of them reportedly with nuclear capabilities) would not ensure Mutual Assured Destruction, the aftermath of this unlikely event would be disastrous for U.S. and worldwide economy in general, and the current politic of alliances would pit the world in another World War, but this time involving the southern hemisphere too. Just think about it: any of these 3 countries mentioned above are bigger than the whole Europe (minus Russia).
    7. Re:Next superpowers... by bheekling · · Score: 1

      Brazil has nuclear weapons? I think not.

      --
      "..."
    8. Re:Next superpowers... by Semptimilius · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And the reason you put Australia on the list but left off Canada? Assuming it would be absorbed into the US?

    9. Re:Next superpowers... by vivaoporto · · Score: 1

      I said *reportedly* nuclear capabilities.

    10. Re:Next superpowers... by vivaoporto · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Canada is also already one of the big players, and a very nice one too. One of the biggest economies of the world, fierce enough to have entered both world wars as soon as Britain did, but peaceful enough to stay out of most of the conflicts the rest of the world got involved afterwards.

      I didn't mentioned the current top dogs because then can't go higher, they are already at the top. But Brasil, India, China, Australia, South Africa, all these countries still have an unfulfilled potential, and I hope that in the next decades they will get their act straight and rise to the place they are supposed to be.

    11. Re:Next superpowers... by heinousjay · · Score: 0, Troll

      Oh, is that the typical reasoning? Is that anything like the typical US bashing you just demonstrated? Or is the smiley supposed to negate it?

      --
      Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
    12. Re:Next superpowers... by bheekling · · Score: 1
      The first line of your link says

      "Based on Brazil's history, it is believed that the country does not possess any weapons of mass destruction."

      Also, If you scroll down, my link lists Brazil under "States formerly possessing nuclear programs".

      Sure, you could say "What idiotic country would dismantle its entire nuclear arsenal", and you're probably right, but thats assuming they actually had nukes in the first place, at which point both of will us run out of evidence to back either of our claims and this conversation will degenerate into something not worth having.

      Hence, lets just drop this highly debatable and forever-non-conclusive thread right here :)
      --
      "..."
    13. Re:Next superpowers... by spun · · Score: 1

      You don't think people in America have a knee-jerk reaction against socialism for the poor? I say socialism for the poor because our country is founded on the principle of socialism for the rich.

      The smiley negated nothing, and here is a raspberry just for you :-P

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    14. Re:Next superpowers... by weekendli · · Score: 1

      US can bring DEMOCRACY to them

    15. Re:Next superpowers... by Oktober+Sunset · · Score: 1

      Socialism for the rich is an contradiction in terms. So is socialism for ehe poor, socialism is for everyone, that is the point of it, it is meant to eliminate both rich and poor and make everyone equal. If not, it's not socialism.

    16. Re:Next superpowers... by vivaoporto · · Score: 3, Informative

      Well, good lucky bringing democracy to Brasil. Because (don't they teach history and geography around there? wherever there is), Brazil is already a democracy, and a strong one too. The current president, Lula, just won the second term receiving impressive 58.2 million votes, after winning his first term with 56.7 million votes, for a population of around 180 million people.

      Compare that with 50.4 million votes for Bush on his first term, and 62 million votes on his second term, to measure the strength of Brazilian democracy, taking in account that, differently from U.S.A, not only there are more than 2 effective parties in Brazil but any candidate from any party appears equally on the ballots in the whole federal territory.

      Add that to a nationwide deployed electronic voting system (even in the middle of the amazon forest there is electronic voting) that really works, and you can understand how much Brazilian people trust the electoral process there, unlike U.S.A.

      I cannot speak for India (that happen to be a democracy too, afaik), but at least Brazil needs no help from U.S. Actually, the more far away U.S. gets from Latin America democracies, the better (go lookup "Operation Condor" and "Escuela de las americas" to understand how U.S. undermine Latin American democracies in the past).

    17. Re:Next superpowers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Australia has a tiny population, with a pretty good gdp per capita. Exactly what unfulfilled potential are you talking about? Will they put kangaroos to work?

    18. Re:Next superpowers... by anand78 · · Score: 1

      You must be Kidding right! India is the largest democracy in the world. At least Indians are 10 times more free than US counterparts.

    19. Re:Next superpowers... by Old+Benjamin · · Score: 1

      Yeah. It does. But how does the US do? Russia? Europe? Do India and China Cooperate? Or Nuke war?

      --
      "The quickest way to end a war is to lose it" -Orwell
    20. Re:Next superpowers... by EtherealStrife · · Score: 1

      Assuming it would be absorbed into the US?

      The coming ice age should take care of them. Along with those pesky EU socialists, and nutjob USians. Viva la Mexico!

    21. Re:Next superpowers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Brazil, yes, but Australia? Come on, there's only like 20m people there. Don't know about S. Africa.

    22. Re:Next superpowers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, the 10 little Indians...

    23. Re:Next superpowers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't you know the 'mighty' Americans and their allied forces are getting fucked right and left in Iraq by insurgents and suicide bombers. Geez! I didn't know when morons started posting comments in here.

    24. Re:Next superpowers... by 16384 · · Score: 1

      In Brazil voting is mandatary, and if you don't vote you have to pay a fine.

    25. Re:Next superpowers... by vivaoporto · · Score: 1

      Yes, that's true, but just in theory. In practice, if you want to vote for nobody you can cast a blank (or void) vote (on your own electoral district) and, if you don't want to vote, you can fill a form to justify your absence, for free, anywhere, until 60 days after the election, providing any reason except "I didn't want to vote". Usually people choose the "I was out of my electoral district" even if it would mean being out of town, or in the other side of the town. And, even if you don't do it and choose to pay the fine, it is less than 5 dollars.

      Besides that, in Brazil, voting day is always Sunday, so nobody has to skip work to vote. Mandatory voting is a clever strategy to ensure that laziness will not stand on the way of the democracy. There is something there that U.S. could learn from.

    26. Re:Next superpowers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At about 6:17 AM, looks like.

  2. W00T! by eviloverlordx · · Score: 1, Insightful

    It's a good thing to see another country getting into space. Pretty soon we'll have Bollywood 24/7, but I hope that the Indian government can use their own satellites to help improve the lives of the average Indian citizen.

    --
    'Loose' is when your pants are three sizes too big. 'Lose' is when you misuse 'loose'.
    1. Re:W00T! by namityadav · · Score: 5, Interesting

      No government spends all it's money on sanitation first before looking into something more progressive like Space research. I appreciate it when a country looks towards the future, and not just the immediate short-term solutions.
      The somewhat betterment of the conditions (And I do not turn a blind eye to the fact that these betterments are still only on the surface) in India is largely because of it's new-found IT power, opening of market to the west and getting more exposure to the outside world. Not because India was employing more people in the Sanitation department. Continuing in the same direction will have a good enough trickle-down effect to eventually help sanitation too (I know that you used sanitation only as an example. I am also using it only as an example).

      Moreover, unlike most other space agencies, the Indian program still focuses a lot on educational broadcasting and remote sensing. Better than launching those "Spy" satellite, IMHO.

    2. Re:W00T! by tim620 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      ...or they could turn into fat mindless slobs who sit in front of their satellite TV's. Then they would be just like an average American...

    3. Re:W00T! by mrokkam · · Score: 1

      Actually, the Indian government has launched many satellites to help it's own people.

      India does not really have many known spy satellites. What it does have many of is: Weather and Remote sensing satellites to help farmers through rainfall prediction, actual land usage and study etc.
      India also has launched the INSAT series of satellites for communications, telephone lines, Television broadcasting. Some transponders on these satellites have been reserved for distance education programs so that universities like the IITs can broadcast classes to the remote areas.

      Indian satellites also supply some of the cheapest high resolution photographs. The IRS series were the first to allow public access to satellite pictures of as high resoltion as 3.5m till the IKONOS was launched in 1999...
      Soo... It's a good thing:).

    4. Re:W00T! by gawdang · · Score: 1

      The future is turkey jerky! Forget satellites... "Would you be liking some jerky today?"

    5. Re:W00T! by The+Cydonian · · Score: 1

      India is the only country in the world to use satellites for agricultural research. (National Geographic, June/July 1997, if you'd like a reference)

  3. Centre of solar system by Russ1642 · · Score: 1

    Astronomical satellite? Are the Italians still trying to prove that Earth is at the centre of the solar system and the universe?

    1. Re:Centre of solar system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not exactly. It's something about gamma-ray and x-ray analysis afaik.
      Aside your poor humour, it's a satellite like many other: The news, I guess, it's about the India Launch.

    2. Re:Centre of solar system by Russ1642 · · Score: 0, Troll

      It took them until 1992 to formally apologize to Galileo. I'll maintain my scepticism of Italian science for the time being.

    3. Re:Centre of solar system by Nyeerrmm · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually the Italians have what seems to be a productive (if low budget) space agency. While they don't run many of their own high profile missions, they have payloads attached to both the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter and the Casini-Huygens mission.

      Not to mention that the top orbital mechanics professor in my department is an Italian, and the Italian grad students I've gotten to work with have been wonderful. Plus of course Galileo himself was Italian as well, even if his government and church weren't the most supportive.

    4. Re:Centre of solar system by CyberLord+Seven · · Score: 1

      It wasn't "Italian science" it was the Pope and his Catholic Church that waited so long to apologize.

      --
      We have always been at war with Eurasia!
    5. Re:Centre of solar system by giorgiofr · · Score: 1

      even if his government and church weren't the most supportive And the understatement of the year award goes to... Nyeerrmm!
      --
      Global warming is a cube.
    6. Re:Centre of solar system by Russ1642 · · Score: 1

      Do you think that maybe, perhaps, that was my point or do I have to draw you a picture? Really kills a joke when you explain it that way. So here goes: Yes the Italians employ great scientists. They have a history of great science. They also have a history of oppressing and denying that work. Usually this bit of irony is rather funny but not on /. I guess. I promise to be dull and make no attempt at humour in the future. Of course the same joke could be made about the present day USA. (Oops, I broke my promise)

    7. Re:Centre of solar system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As an italian, I'm biased, but ok. I should point out that i'm a very critical person with respect to my nation, so I could be biased in the opposite sense.

      That said, italian scientists are smart. Really smart. They have a broad range of knowledge, and they are very malleable when comes to finding solutions to new problems. Nevertheless, Italy is damn far from the top in terms of research, innovation and production. why?

      so many reasons:

      1) first of all, a PhD gets paid around 880 eur per month. this is barely sufficient to sustain yourself in a small city, and it's impossible to sustain yourself in Milan or Rome. This means that most people do their 3 years PhD at a loss. This makes very difficult for the smart guys to continue, because they have no money in their bank account to wait for an available research position, and they leave. This is even more annoying if you consider that a confirmed researcher (a researcher in the position for at least 3 years) earns 1800-2000 eur per month, while a professor earns 4000-6000 or more.

      2) Corruption is endemic in the Italian universities. Grants are made "ad personam", questions for the PhD exams are passed by the professor to the students. Professors also behave as barons, they want to keep control of everything, and they harass and stop research, funds and grants to smart people that could represent a menace to their stronghold. Also, professors maintain their position until they are 75 years old, limiting the entrance of fresh ideas and people.

      3) we have the pope, very stupid politicians that obey what the pope and his congregation shout every day (you wouldn't believe the crap we are forced to hear every day by our TV news... "the pope did this, the pope said that" every day) and very stupid people that also support them. With the pope, any research involving biology is almost impossible. We also have environmentalists, causing a lot of trouble (read: you have to have a lawyer to buy or dispose something as simple as acetone) for every research involving chemistry, nuclear medicine. Let's not talk about any need of reactants that could potentially be used for cocaine or explosives production... many laboratories spend an awful amount of time and resources dealing with this crap

      4) there's no coordination and control of students and PhDs. They are left alone most of the time, so either they learn to swim by theirselfes, or they go down. This limits the skills due to lack of mentoring, but sometimes produces some interesting genius, and in general teaches a strong do-by-yourself attitude.

      For these and many other reasons, all the smart italian researchers look for an opportunity outside of italy as soon as possible. I'm one of those. And for this reason, I always say that the typical, stereotypical italian resides in italy. The atypical italian resides outside of italy, but in general is proud and consider himself to be a _real_ italian.

    8. Re:Centre of solar system by TheCybernator · · Score: 1

      FYI ..... Mr. Aryabhatta had discovered the Solar System at least a thousand years before some nuts asked Mr. Galileo to apologize for what he rediscovered.

  4. I can hear it now by Intron · · Score: 2, Funny

    ISS: Houston, we have a problem.

    New Delhi: Hello, please spell your name and give me your complete customer ID.

    --
    Intron: the portion of DNA which expresses nothing useful.
    1. Re:I can hear it now by arcite · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      You forgot, (in faux american accent):

      Hello! My name is Marry-Beth, how may I help you!? :)

    2. Re:I can hear it now by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 1, Troll

      "Have you tried rebooting your spacecraft?"
      "Do you have your Emergency Repair CD?"
      ...long, forehead whapping, circular conversation, going nowhere...
      "I am most sorry that I am unable to help you with your meteorite damage problem."
      "Is there anything else I can help you with?"

      --
      No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    3. Re:I can hear it now by zcubed · · Score: 2, Funny

      SpaceCo: Thank you for calling SpaceCo technical support, my name is David (pronounced Dahveed) how may I help you?
      ISS: I am having trouble with my 2nd lab computer
      SpaceCo: What I need you to do is make sure the power cord is plugged in. I will wait while you check.
      ISS: Yes, it is plugged in! The mouse pointer isn't moving when I touch the touch pad.
      SpaceCo: Ok, now what I need you to do is to plug the power cord into a different device to confirm that is is working correctly. I will wait while you check.
      ISS: WTF? I just told you that the mouse pointer isn't moving! The computer is powered on and I can see the screen!
      SpaceCo: Ok, now what I need you to do is make sure that the lights are green on the monitor and computer. I will wait while you check.
      ISS: Listen skippy this shit isn't funny. The computer is powered on and everything seems fine except for the mouse!
      SpaceCo: Ok, now what I need you to do is...

    4. Re:I can hear it now by ackthpt · · Score: 1

      First Alu Muttar in orbit! w00t!

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    5. Re:I can hear it now by Deeply_Pipelined · · Score: 1

      This just goes to show how immature your views are and how narrow your mindset is. Indian graduates represent the majority of the international student population graduating from MIT, Stanford and Berkeley put together when it comes to CS and EE. IMHO this statistic extends to other schools as well.

    6. Re:I can hear it now by Deeply_Pipelined · · Score: 1

      Also, you should take such drivel elsewhere, and not turn Slashdot into another place for making fun of each other.

    7. Re:I can hear it now by Deeply_Pipelined · · Score: 1

      For the record, I am Indian. This is the trash-talk people like you resort to when you can't compete with us in graduate schools, and for jobs in Silicon Valley. And then you cry about it.

    8. Re:I can hear it now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was just a cheap little jab, not some serious insult, and it'd have been better if you took it with grace and perhaps dish it back a bit - I know Indians have a great sense of humor.

      Anyway, congratulations! A great accomplishment.

    9. Re:I can hear it now by Deeply_Pipelined · · Score: 1

      Its easy for you to say that, ain't it? Anyway, on another matter, when people talk about "Intelligent Design," I always wonder what sort of a God would create stupid, parochial brains like our own. Instead of celebrating diversity and culture, most of us make fun of other customs and people. Its a shame to call ourselves the most evolved species on the planet.

    10. Re:I can hear it now by boredguru · · Score: 1

      I am an Indian too. Just for the record i thought the jokes were funny.
      Come on we are capable of taking things in our stride and to laugh at ourselves.

      Though i would have understood the jokes if it had been pronounced better, like in T for Tango, F for Foxtrot etc

    11. Re:I can hear it now by Intron · · Score: 1

      Hope you realize that my original joke was not meant as a slur against any nationality. Some of my best friends are ... er ... never mind.

      --
      Intron: the portion of DNA which expresses nothing useful.
  5. YEIGH! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    GO INDIA! Seriously.

    1. Re:YEIGH! by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      Yah, I'm big against outsourcing and all but when it comes to space delivery == cheap AND reliable, I say "Go India" -- if they can do it, FWAG**.

      **Fine, well and good

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
  6. Re:Small payloads? by leather_helmet · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Oh, you mean Little Superstar

  7. Re:Small payloads? by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

    First Quickie Mart in space?

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  8. Re:Small payloads? by namityadav · · Score: 4, Informative

    I think that this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_Space_Research _Organisation article has some good details about the Indian Space program, for those interested.

  9. Does anyone know... by CyberLord+Seven · · Score: 1
    ...how much their atom bomb weighs.

    Wonder what Pakistan thinks of this?

    --
    We have always been at war with Eurasia!
    1. Re:Does anyone know... by Timesprout · · Score: 4, Funny

      Their bomb is very touchy about its weight you insensitive clod. And no it's not fat, it just has an alternative structural framework.

      --
      Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
      What truth?
      There is no dupe
  10. pun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I hope this will help them to curry favor with other space-industrialized nations.

  11. Or, for ICBMs... by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I hope that the Indian government can use their own satellites to help improve the lives of the average Indian citizen.


    Or, at least use the rockets for ICBMs to mess up the lives of the average Chinese/Pakistani citizen. Remember, one of the goals of the original space race was to show the enemy that anything could be dropped on them at any time.

    I wonder if the U.S. will turn a blind eye to such things (like we did with our recent fissionable materials agreements) because India is currently our friend...

    1. Re:Or, for ICBMs... by bommai · · Score: 3, Interesting

      While I am sure India would like to have a deterrant against China and Pakistan in a military context, satellites in India have been put to good use. Most of rural India can get accurate weather forecasts that helps them figure out when to plant, and harvest their crops. It also predicts weather patterns and climate changes. Television and other broadband communication is also possible. India has several satellites in orbit. The Geosynchronous satellites were all designed and made in India but were launched from French Guyana (typically) from a EU made rocket. With India getting better at making launch vehicles, they could build and launch satellites on their own as well as provide launch support for other countries. I am glad they are doing this and I am glad that gives hope and aspirations to generations of Indians. Remember, hope and aspirations count for a lot in the betterment of a country.

  12. Re:Small payloads? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you are such a karma wh0re

  13. Nice, but not important by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    There more important launch is that of Chandrayaan, India's Lunar Probe. That will show them getting out of Earth's well, as well as ability to send a probe elsewhere. That helps everybody WRT to understanding what is on the moon esp at the poles. Do not get me wrong. I am not trying to be glib about India's success. But they have done numerous other LEO (and I believe a couple of GEO) launches. So other than being commercial, it is nothing.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  14. Holy Cow... by Notquitecajun · · Score: 3, Funny

    What CAN'T you outsource to India?

    And there's a "thank you, come again" joke around here somewhere...

    1. Re:Holy Cow... by Jerry+Rivers · · Score: 1

      Not sure this has anything to do with outsourcing, but it appears to have everything to do with good old fashioned commercial competition. Good for India.

      --
      The pursuit of absolute tolerance leads to the most rigorous and ludicrous intolerance. - REX MURPHY
  15. Re:Small payloads? by namityadav · · Score: 2, Interesting

    No, my dear friend, I am an Indian. And I want people to get to know more about the Indian program before they claim that the money could have been better spent on "sanitation" instead :-)

  16. This summary seems a bit odd by zappepcs · · Score: 0, Troll

    "Yesterday India successfully launched an Italian astronomical satellite [CC]. A BBC article (view video clip [CC]) notes that the launch grants India membership in the exclusive group of nations that can sustain commercial satellite launches [CC]. India's launch vehicle has less overall capacity than the competition -- up to 1,500 kg to orbit -- but the country plans to sweep the low end of the market by offering the lowest cost per launched kilogram for smaller payloads." From what I understand, if you would give these guys a license http://www.space-rockets.com/arsa.html they would probably launch satellites for a 12 pack and some bragging rights, especially on that 'low end of the market' sector.
  17. Re:Small payloads? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Haha, very funny and so very relevant. Try not to be an ass next time.

  18. conjecture? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...but the country plans to sweep the low end of the market by offering the lowest cost per launched kilogram for smaller payloads.
    Could the /. rocket junkies comment on that? I'm not up to date. I would have thought there is more cargo to launch than launch capacity.

    Having a lower cost would smooth attracting clients to a new player, and make that player most attractive for expansion, but are they really going to "sweep" (replace) the competition in this weight class?

    The statement sounds like marketing to deflect attention from having the lowest single-load capacity. ie, 'Our tech isn't the biggest, but it's the most efficient; we know what we're doing - we're not a half-assed national pride effort.'
  19. list please? by tverbeek · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It is too much to ask, that a link labeled "nations that can sustain commercial satellite launches" might actually include information about which nations can sustain commercial satellite launches?

    --
    http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    1. Re:list please? by Palmyst · · Score: 3, Informative

      "India is the fifth entry into the commercial satellite launch business after the US, Russia, China, Ukraine and the European Space Agency", says http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200704/s19047 77.htm and many other reports.

  20. PSLV- lite by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 2, Informative
    The PSLV I remember was a 1500Kg class vehicle and the summary said it is on the low end. The article clarifies that in this mission they launched it without the six strap-on boosters that nominally forms the zero stage. Here they have launched 530 Kg in to 550Km orbit. Not bad. But the base vehicle is not the low end of the market. What ISRO has demonstrated is its flexibility in using PSLV to launch 1500Kg sattelites or PSLV-lite to launch 500Kg sattelites.

    It is a good job, but launching rockets is not rocket science. One dark possibility is that they are having problems with the six strap on booster configuration and are trying to salvage a reduced capacity vehicle from the detritus of a failed project. I remember the crash of ASLV (a fore runner of PSLV, two strap on booster on their basic SLV-3). My prof was in the post martem committee and was ranting on and on about how dumb their simulation of booster rocket was. "Thrust is 100% for 45 seconds and 0% after that? Why didn't the stupid hacks code up the table of thrust vs time from the static firing?" or something along those lines.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:PSLV- lite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The reason that the 6 strap-ons were not used is because they were not required to launch something of this weight class. This satellite weight 530kg; WTF do you think they need a full configuration that hauls 3 times the weight?

      "launching rockets is not rocket science"
      "One dark possibility..."
      "... salvage a reduced capacity...."
      "...detritus of a failed project..."

      You think PSLV is a failed project? This is fuckin' hilarious! You must be Indian --- only Indians take as much pride in running down an immensely successful Indian project with such fancy words, without checking any facts. Do you write for an Indian newspaper? That would explain everything!

    2. Re:PSLV- lite by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1
      The strap-ons are cheap. Six strap-ons together costs less than the first stage of a PSLV. ISRO would have gotten a bigger bang for the buck, by adding the strap ons and putting 1500Kg in the orbit. Cost goes up by some 25%, payload goes up by 300%. Why didn't they?

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    3. Re:PSLV- lite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Launch what 1500kg? The contract was for a 530kg satellite, and no other payload was needed to be launched with this vehicle (except for an avionics test package). Should they hump up 1000kg of ballast just so that they could use the strap ons? PSLV is a configurable launcher, and of course they are going to use the optimal configuration for a given mission.

      Did you try even try to read ISRO's PSLV-C8 mission page?

      So before you tell me what a strap-on costs vs a first stage, could you first give any evidence of your claim that PSLV is a "failed launcher"? I guess nine successive successful launches (including one that launched four satellites on the same mission) isn't good enough.

      And, BTW, foolish ISRO is planning to use the same "detritus" of a PSLV to launch India's moon mission Chandrayaan-I. Quick ... send them email and tell them what fools they are.

    4. Re:PSLV- lite by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1
      Indians have this digital mode of admiration. If Dhoni hits a century the install him as a minor God. India crashes out of world cup, they go demolish that poor guy's home. When things are going well with ISRO, fanbois pile on and attack any one daring to cast aspersions on their apple of the eye. If the next rocket blows up in the launch pad you guys will high tail. The time to ask tough questions is when things are going well. That is the time, hangers on and side kicks strut in the reflected glory. The time to show support is when things go wrong. Someday you will realize that. Someday you will learn the difference between praising the effort and worshipping success.

      You may have the last word.

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    5. Re:PSLV- lite by dbIII · · Score: 1

      It is a good job, but launching rockets is not rocket science.

      Von Braun's body is a moulderin' in the ground and we aint got the moon no more.

      If it was easy there would be a more capable US launch vehicle than the Saturn V or the capability to actually build another one in a short time frame. Russia has one that may be as capable as the Saturn V but the proof is actually building it in it's full configuration and launching it - which is still some years away.

  21. And when you need help... by christoofar · · Score: 1, Funny

    and you call the control center that is monitoring the satellite's orbital decay, you get a Bangalore employee named "Bob" who asks you to reboot your PC.

  22. In other news.. by plasmacutter · · Score: 1

    india will be sending another covert operative over the pakistan border to "Fireworks-R-Us" to resupply for their next space launch..

    thank you thank you i'll be here all night!

    --
    VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
  23. Quandry by fishthegeek · · Score: 1

    Do you suppose they have to call the US for technical support with the satellite and then complain because they can't understand our accent?

    --
    load "$",8,1
  24. Old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    India had launched commercial satellites way back in 1999 "IRS-P4 (OCEANSAT), launched by Polar Satellite launch vehicle (PSLV-C2) along with Korean KITSAT-3 and German DLR-TUBSAT from Sriharikota (26 May 1999)." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_Space_Research _Organisation

  25. Elite Club? by Magic+Fingers · · Score: 0

    Huh. Will this help in reshaping Indian shrewd politics?

  26. fantastic news by symes · · Score: 1

    I love Indian cuisine. And now I rejoice in the knowledge that should I ever make it into orbit I can send for a curry!

  27. Only PolySci and SocialWork use "betterment" by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...in the betterment of a country.


    Only political science and social work majors use "betterment" when the rest of the English-speaking world would use "improvement".
    1. Re:Only PolySci and SocialWork use "betterment" by paeanblack · · Score: 3, Funny

      Only political science and social work majors use "betterment" when the rest of the English-speaking world would use "improvement".

      Why? It's a perfectly cromulent word.

    2. Re:Only PolySci and SocialWork use "betterment" by bommai · · Score: 1

      Well said, and I am an engineer and I find betterment entirely agreeable ;-)

    3. Re:Only PolySci and SocialWork use "betterment" by sconeu · · Score: 3, Funny

      Proper use of "betterment" embiggens the language.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    4. Re:Only PolySci and SocialWork use "betterment" by ozbird · · Score: 1

      Only if you assume that "betterment" and "improvement" are synonymous.
      For example, Soylent Red and Yellow are an improvement over algae soup (or whatever preceded it); Soylent Green is a "betterment" over the "tasteless, odourless crud" that is Soylent Red.

    5. Re:Only PolySci and SocialWork use "betterment" by Kelbear · · Score: 1

      It makes m'flow "mo' betta'".

  28. Re:Small payloads? by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 3, Interesting

    for those interested.
    Move along. Most of the people here who get modded up seem to be more interested in poking fun at the Indians because of their food, the way they talk, a fictitious character in The Simpsons, or some done-to-death jokes about outsourcing. But I'm sure they'll stop laughing when they realise that the unipolar world centered on Washington hasn't materialised, and finally gotten the concept of people with dark skin doing something clever.
    --
    Drill baby drill - on Mars
  29. New Indian Satellite Retrieval Vehicle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here is a picture of the multi-arm craft:
    http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/8/8d/Gana pati.jpg

  30. Racism acceptable on /. where India is concerned by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I've all but stopped reading /. threads on Indian technical developments. The predictable torrent of snide little stereotypical racist comments that seem to get modded 'funny' is a bit off-putting, and they usually outnumber any vaguely interesting or informative comments by about 7 to 1. The /. crew needs to grow the hell up.

    --
    Drill baby drill - on Mars
  31. smaller payloads? by Skapare · · Score: 1

    the country plans to sweep the low end of the market by offering the lowest cost per launched kilogram for smaller payloads

    So, more orbital debris. But at least this will be smaller stuff.

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  32. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  33. But are they competitive? by Palmyst · · Score: 3, Interesting

    According to various reports, they charged the Italians USD 11 million for the launch of the 350 kg satellite. Roughly $30k per kg while international norm is 10-15k per kg for LEO. Also the launch cost them $15 million. So the launch is still subsidized by the Indian government and they are charging the customer more than the market rate. How is this "commercial", and how is it competitive?

    1. Re:But are they competitive? by vvmaha2 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Source: http://www.hindu.com/2007/04/24/stories/2007042414 931500.htm While the international rates for launching a satellite ranged between $10,000 and $15,000 a kg, Antrix Corporation Limited (The marketing agency of the Department of Space, India) charged more because Agile had to be put into a specific orbit of about 550 km at a low inclination of 2.5 degrees to the equator, Mr. Sridhara Murthi said. This was a difficult orbit and inclination to achieve, and hence the premium rates.

    2. Re:But are they competitive? by Palmyst · · Score: 1

      That makes an attempt at addressing the price itself, but it is not clear what is so "special" about this particular orbit that it deserves double to triple the price. I remain skeptical. It still doesn't address the fact that the launch cost 50% more than the price (which itself looks inflated) charged to the customer.

    3. Re:But are they competitive? by freakxx · · Score: 1

      As far as my understanding goes, there is nothing special about the orbit...rather, what is important is that how precisely they are put. I remember some article in this regard saying that the satellite was put somewhere between 549~551 km, high order of accuracy. Same is true with the inclination angle...2 degrees. I think this preciseness was the requirement of the Italians and that is done only after paying extra attention to, say, control system etc....and that is why the high cost.

    4. Re:But are they competitive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The high launch cost could be because they also launched one of their own satellites along with the Italian satellite. It was an Advanced Avionics Module satellite weighing 185 Kgs.

      http://www.isro.org/pressrelease/Apr23_2007.htm

    5. Re:But are they competitive? by univgeek · · Score: 1
      weirdly, ndtv is carrying widely varying figures.

      http://www.ndtv.com/convergence/ndtv/story.aspx?id =NEWEN20070009135

      ISRO was not keen to name figures but indicated they were charging around 30 per cent less than the regular international price of $15,000 to $20,000 per kg of payload to make things commercially attractive to the customer.

      ''The cost is about Rs 80 crore usually. If you remove the six strapons, it will come down by Rs 12 crore.''

      ''The cost of launch was negotiated on a commercial basis. We have to keep confidentiality to win a market. We are not losing anything. We are making what we are spending and more,'' said Madhavan Nair, Chairperson, ISRO. Which makes no sense - Rs 68 Crore = $16 Million.
      353kg @ $15K/kg = $ 5.2 Million.

      So either the numbers are out of whack, or Madhavan Nair's quote is incorrect or out of context.
      --
      All bow to his Noodliness!! His Noodle Appendage has touched me!
    6. Re:But are they competitive? by univgeek · · Score: 1

      Got information from a reporter who was on site during the launch. Apparently ISRO charged the Italians $29000 per kg. And the reason for the high price is the high accuracy of the PSLV and the low inclination from the equator required. The latter is aided by the closeness of Sriharikota to the Equator.

      This allows for little to no use of on-board propellant in the satellite - increasing its orbital life-span significantly.

      Third, there was another satellite launched with this payload - 185 kg.

      Taking the launch cost as $15K per kg for this satellite (it may not have required such a precise orbit), and keeping in mind that the full capacity of the PSLV is 1 tonne, I'd say this launch is quite price competitive.

      Ref:
      (for the 1 ton capacity)
      http://www.chennaionline.com/colnews/newsitem.asp? NEWSID=%7B293BBF69-290B-459A-B16A-A53FFFF5CA05%7D& CATEGORYNAME=NATIONAL
      (for the $29K figure)
      http://www.hindu.com/2007/04/24/stories/2007042404 981200.htm

      --
      All bow to his Noodliness!! His Noodle Appendage has touched me!
  34. Sounds sort of like IT by Tyr_7BE · · Score: 1

    "the country plans to sweep the low end of the market by offering the lowest cost per launched kilogram for smaller payloads"

    And why not? It's been working VERY well for them so far. Replace "launched kilogram" with "line of code" and "palyoads" with "projects" and you have the very foundation of the Indian tech boom.

  35. Cheap Low Orbit by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 1

    Can we put a beowulf cluster up there?

  36. Not so subtle difference by DynaSoar · · Score: 1

    "nations that can sustain commercial satellite launches."

    More accurately, "nations that can support the launching of commercial satellites". If a nation's support is required, it's not a commercial launch, it's a government launch. The parent's wording is misleading. That doesn't matter to most people. It does to those interested in commercial space development.

    Governments do these things using peoples' money whether or not they want their money used that way. Companies do things with their own money and make more money by selling it to people who want it. There's no competitive market forces acting on a government, and so no expectation of profitability or even reasonable cost, which depends on being affordable to end users.

    --
    "I may be synthetic, but I'm not stupid." -- Bishop 341-B
  37. Outsourced, again! by hoggoth · · Score: 1

    > the country plans to sweep the low end of the market by offering the lowest cost

    Oh great. I just switched careers from programming to aerospace because my programming job was outsourced to India.

    Porn industry, here I come!

    --
    - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
  38. Re:Racism acceptable on /. where India is concerne by EMeta · · Score: 2
    First, if something gets modded funny by more people than mod it overrated, than it is funny. /.'s mod system is as good as anything else at defining humor, and better than a lot of TV network panels, if you ask me. They're certainly not perfect, but funny is not something individuals can pick so well. Can something be funny and insulting? Sure, but if you're going to get offended by something in that vein, I'm not sure /. (or many public message boards) are for you.

    Second, the Indian customer service phenomenon, which is the majority of cultural humor on this topic, is a big deal in India; has made a huge impact on life there--and they have their own sitcom about it!* Do the jokes get cliched and watered down after a while? Certainly. And some are much better than others. But I for one am glad that they are there.

  39. Re:Racism acceptable on /. where India is concerne by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    First, if something gets modded funny by more people than mod it overrated, than it is funny. /.'s mod system is as good as anything else at defining humor, and better than a lot of TV network panels, if you ask me. They're certainly not perfect, but funny is not something individuals can pick so well. Can something be funny and insulting? Sure, but if you're going to get offended by something in that vein, I'm not sure /. (or many public message boards) are for you.
    Oh, so not only is racism funny, but /. is now a racists-only zone? Thanks for clearing that up.

    Second, the Indian customer service phenomenon, which is the majority of cultural humor on this topic, is a big deal in India; has made a huge impact on life there--and they have their own sitcom about it!* Do the jokes get cliched and watered down after a while? Certainly. And some are much better than others. But I for one am glad that they are there.
    Well bully for you. Personally I think that racist jokes are as inappropriate as they are cliché and irrelevant to the topics that provoke them. How would you like it if every story submitted about the US space program was met with a deluge of wisecracks about redneck moonshine-distillers, John Wayne, a gun-toting population, and your half-educated president? You'd start to wonder if it were possible to have a sensible discussion on anything, wouldn't you?
    --
    Drill baby drill - on Mars
  40. Re:Racism acceptable on /. where India is concerne by bheekling · · Score: 1

    How would you like it if every story submitted about the US space program was met with a deluge of wisecracks about redneck moonshine-distillers, John Wayne, a gun-toting population, and your half-educated president?

    <confused>I thought they already were... </confused>
    --
    "..."
  41. Implications for SpaceX? by DeafScribe · · Score: 1

    I'm wondering how this will affect Elon Musk and the SpaceX effort. They've intended to target the low-end of the launch market, and now they're up against a major nation. I would guess SpaceX can rely on some domestic military and academic research contracts, but that could rapidly become a competitive market as well. I wish both the Indians and Elon well, and hope to see vigorous competition that drives down the price per pound/kilo and delivers safe, reliable access to orbit.

  42. hmm... by d3m0nCr4t · · Score: 1

    ...the lowest cost per launched kilogram for smaller payloads... What would be the price to get my 67kg mother-in-law into orbit ?

  43. Now Gates Has No Excuse Not to Fly PSLV! by Baldrson · · Score: 1
    As I said two weeks ago:

    India has a "home grown" polar satellite launch vehicle now so if Gates wants people to take his stand in favor of unlimited H-1b engineers imported to the US seriously, he should launch himself to space on that vehicle.
    Come on, Gates! Fly PSLV!
  44. can you blame them? by plasmacutter · · Score: 1

    slashdot is a news site for techies.

    the tech field has been outsourced out from under them, and what has not been outsourced from under them has been cut off or smothered by the dmca.

    indians need to realize that while theyre getting the snyde jabs theyre also walking away with all these people's jobs.

    --
    VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
    1. Re:can you blame them? by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1

      indians need to realize that while theyre getting the snyde jabs theyre also walking away with all these people's jobs.
      So, because they're so competitive, they deserve to be the butt of racist jokes?
      --
      Drill baby drill - on Mars
    2. Re:can you blame them? by plasmacutter · · Score: 1

      if by competitive you mean undercutting first world by living in "developing" conditions, settling for income which wouldn't qualify to pay for a refrigerator box in the middle of highway 1 let alone raise a family, then yeah.. it's competitive.

      so lets see here.. youre really sensitive to racism but youre perfectly ok with the dispossession of the middle class of an entire nation for the sake of another which should be building its own middle class without draining the wealth of another... im confused as to what political affiliation youre supposed to have.

      --
      VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
    3. Re:can you blame them? by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 4, Insightful

      if by competitive you mean undercutting first world by living in "developing" conditions, settling for income which wouldn't qualify to pay for a refrigerator box in the middle of highway 1 let alone raise a family, then yeah.. it's competitive.
      Damn straight it's competitive. It's less than what you earn, more than what he would earn without outsourcing and therefore makes life better for him. If you can't compete, get another job. Innovate. Start a business. Get off your ass and do something. Don't just sit there expecting some communist-style subsidy or GW Bush-style protectionist tarriffs to keep your standard of living inflated to such dizzy heights while half the world squats in poverty. I know you'd just love to keep all that wealth to yourself but there are about 6 billion other people in this world too you know. If they can raise their income at the expense of a certain gas-guzzling nation that burns up 25% of the world's resources but only has 5% of the world's population, then fair fucks to them.

      youre really sensitive to racism but youre perfectly ok with the dispossession of the middle class of an entire nation for the sake of another which should be building its own middle class without draining the wealth of another... im confused as to what political affiliation youre supposed to have.
      Your justification of racism is noted. And I'm a bit confused as to why you think the USA is entitled to keep all the world's wealth to itself. Is that part of your 'manifest destiny' or something?
      --
      Drill baby drill - on Mars
    4. Re:can you blame them? by plasmacutter · · Score: 1

      first, troll, stop contradicting yourself. youre either for the communist ideal of wealth redistribution or youre not. if youre for it you cant use "communist" as a derogatory term, and if youre not you have no right to assert the rights of other nations to steal american's jobs.

      if india wants the freaking jobs, they should start their own companies and create their own job market rather than destroying the american job market.

      --
      VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
    5. Re:can you blame them? by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 4, Insightful

      stop contradicting yourself
      Wait until I start contradicting myself and I'll think about it. "Troll" indeed!

      youre either for the communist ideal of wealth redistribution or youre not. if youre for it you cant use "communist" as a derogatory term, and if youre not you have no right to assert the rights of other nations to steal american's jobs.
      "Steal?" That would be an illegal thing. Here is the news. Open markets and free trade are LEGAL! Outsourcing is LEGAL. "Theft" has shit all to do with it. Communism is all about putting artificial constraints on the market. Free trade is the opposite, leading to a better distribution of wealth. Better distribution of wealth isn't an ideal exclusive to communists, free marketeers would like to see it too. But feel free to redefine free trade as 'communism' for the purposes of your argument if you want.

      if india wants the freaking jobs, they should start their own companies and create their own job market rather than destroying the american job market.
      Oh here we go! So you're another protectionist "keep the jobs in the hands of good, white, god-fearing christian folks y'hear" merchant? What makes your country so special that you're entitled to hang on to all the world's cool jobs when there's a bunch of people elsewhere who can do the same work for less, hmm? Anything to do with skin colour? Or is it a nationality thing? Something to do with your 'manifest destiny' or something?

      Here is the news. There's a big bad world out there and it's got COMPETITION for you. If you don't compete, you get eliminated. So you either do it right (i.e. do a better job than the Indians) or get out of the heat of the kitchen and do something else. It's very simple.

      And in the meantime, you might also want to think about fixing that little racism problem.

      --
      Drill baby drill - on Mars
    6. Re:can you blame them? by plasmacutter · · Score: 1, Troll

      Open markets and free trade are LEGAL! Outsourcing is LEGAL. "Theft" has shit all to do with it. Communism is all about putting artificial constraints on the market. Free trade is the opposite, leading to a better distribution of wealth


      "free trade" leads to "better distribution of wealth" in the same way "union busting" leads to "better distribution of wealth". The aristocracy gets all the profits, the middle class disappears, and you end up with neo-serfdom. Of course if you actually educated yourself in economics instead of reading propaganda you'd know that.

      What makes your country so special that you're entitled to hang on to all the world's cool jobs when there's a bunch of people elsewhere who can do the same work for less, hmm?


      how about.. we founded and grew our own economy.. hmm? We didn't pull this crap of draining the wealth of other nations to build our own. We invented and exported the majority of what makes today's world modern.

      There's a big bad world out there and it's got COMPETITION for you. If you don't compete, you get eliminated. So you either do it right (i.e. do a better job than the Indians) or get out of the heat of the kitchen and do something else.

      it's called selling below margin, also covered under unfair competition laws. When your "competition" lives below minimum compassionate standards that's not competition, that's extortion. Apparently "doing it right" means living like hatian peasents. Fuck you pal. "do something else" you say? so we've invested between 40 and 80 thousand dollars in a very skilled technologically oriented profession, and now we're supposed just "have faith" they wont offshore the next skilled profession we spend the next 40-80 thousand on? then the next? then the next? if theyre offshoring a profession that requires 4-8 years of university training there isn't much that's safe beyond minimum wage at the sizzler.

      This outlook is either naive or sadistic. Which are you? Are you the 15-17 year old son/daughter of rich parents who will never have to worry about getting a job at daddy's firm, or a canadian/european who has a pro labor government and "hates americans" because of an idiot a zealous minority here elected?

      And in the meantime, you might also want to think about fixing that little racism problem.

      there's a difference between irrational unfounded discrimination and rightful enmity toward a group of people who contribute to your dispossession.

      --
      VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
    7. Re:can you blame them? by thrawn_aj · · Score: 1

      If by competitive you mean undercutting first world by living in "developing" conditions, settling for income which wouldn't qualify to pay for a refrigerator box in the middle of highway 1 let alone raise a family, then yeah.. it's competitive. so lets see here.. youre really sensitive to racism but youre perfectly ok with the dispossession of the middle class of an entire nation for the sake of another which should be building its own middle class without draining the wealth of another... im confused as to what political affiliation youre supposed to have. Yes. They should just refuse these jobs and insist that the American middle class be given a fair break first. That's a yuppie wet dream that obviously doesn't stand up under turnabout.

      The income from these jobs is sufficient for a middle class family in India to live quite well, if not in the lap of luxury. Of course, they probably won't be able to afford a big house with a lawn, annual vacations, flying everywhere and maintaining their children in the extravagant lifestyle that American kids are accustomed to. Oh wait, that's not a "living on highway 1" lifestyle, that's a non-idiotic lifestyle. When the American middle class learns how to live within their means, perhaps they will realize just how the American worker has priced himself/herself out of the global workforce.

      Also, if you claim to be living in a democracy, perhaps you'll explain why the Government has done absolutely nothing about a problem that allegedly undercuts the majority of the American population.

      By the way, the most wicked irony of all this is that the US pressured India a few decades ago to open up its market and when the (then socialist) Indian Govt. resisted this in order to protect the Indian manufacturing sector, India was reviled as anti-capitalist by the same class of people who today have their bile up in self-righteous fury over the sheer moral OUTRAGE of it all! Well, India finally bowed to the will of the US and voila, it actually did them good and the people who could dish it out in those days obviously can't take it now. Labor unions especially seem to have a short memory in this respect :P.

      Sure you're entitled to feel angry about it all. Who wouldn't? Just don't degrade yourselves by calling this a moral problem. It's straight up economics and it ain't gonna be solved by sappy platitudes. When you take a moral stand that you won't work for a company for less than a certain amount, that's very heroic. Just don't complain if that job goes overseas and your moral outrage goes unnoticed.

      I should mention in passing that I am NOT an IT person and don't have an iota of personal stake in the whole issue. I do feel the racism thing is a valid point as NO ONE and I mean NO ONE in the US could get away with racially mocking African Americans over, say the Affirmative action issue. Try some jokes about athletic scholarships and see how fast you get IMUS-ed :P. The simple fact is that the racist Indian jokes exist here and elsewhere because you can get away with them. Hell, I find them just as amusing as any American because there's nothing more foolish than underestimating an entire nation by stereotyping them as is usually done. They're the ones laughing all the way to the bank :P.

    8. Re:can you blame them? by plasmacutter · · Score: 1

      first off.. the american government has not worked at the behest of the people in almost 40 years, second and more specifically all the "pressure to 'open markets'" comes from multinationals looking to screw americans just as bad.

      second, IT requires just as much education as any other sector, and the fact that IT is going overseas should be the canary in the coal mine for people like you. I did not specialize in IT either, but i see the writing on the wall for other skilled professions.

      hell, microsoft recently built r&d labs offshore. How much more credentials can you get than those necessary for high end r&d pal.

      so yeah.. go ahead and think it was the american people who wanted this and that its poetic justice.. in the mean time we will continue to make cracks at the expense of people pillaging our lifestyle wholesale, both the corporates and the indians, and racism has nothing to do with it.

      --
      VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
    9. Re:can you blame them? by downwardspiral · · Score: 1

      thats the price u pay for serving in a capitalist society

    10. Re:can you blame them? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rather interesting exchange going on here. Permit me to butt in if I may. "it's called selling below margin, also covered under unfair competition laws. When your "competition" lives below minimum compassionate standards that's not competition, that's extortion." I am now really confused. I thought that the fundamental method in which capitalism created its efficiencies was by rewarding the supply of goods and services at the lowest cost through an unfettered market. Further, your "competition" here (presumably Indian companies like Infosys, etc.) does not live below any "minimum compassionate standards". In the Indian market, their employees make salaries that put them in the upper middle class, or even the upper class (in quality of life terms). I am not Indian myself but have plenty of Indian colleagues who have informed me over the years that these are some of the best paying jobs in India. Given a look at their lifestyle, I would not be surprised if in comfort of life terms they were not doing better than you or me. What you are complaining about really is that the cost of doing the same task in India, comfortably above a living wage in Indian economy, is a lot lower than it is in the US. I am afraid you are then not talking about unfair competition, but about being unable to match your Indian counterpart because of the massive US welfare state that raises taxes sky high, increases the costs of medical care (highest in the world), insanely high insurance premiums, high costs of almost every consumable. Each of these costs has a trickle down effect as these costs have to be passed on somewhere. One of my old grad school friends from India had told me that in terms of loaves of bread, the US is about 5 times more costly than India. I do not know if it was true then or if it is true now, but I would not be surprised if it is. Seen in purely economic terms, the US economy, saddled with all these extraneous costs, is simply not as efficient as the Indian and Chinese economies in some areas of activity. Unfortunately for you, you happen to be in one of those areas of activity. Losing one's job is a horrible experience, but it is hard to make the kind of case you are making. FWIW, I am not some crazed tax cut obsessed Republican, but facts of life are such. There is no running away from them.

    11. Re:can you blame them? by univgeek · · Score: 2, Insightful

      how about.. we founded and grew our own economy.. hmm? We didn't pull this crap of draining the wealth of other nations to build our own. We invented and exported the majority of what makes today's world modern. Err, your American economy was based on the destruction of the Native American economy. Secondly, European expansion and growth was mainly funded on colonial profits. Find out about the enormous amounts of wealth siphoned out of Asia and Africa over the last 500 years.

      You guys have had a good time for the past few hundred years. The rest of the world (the 'South') hasn't. Arguments for free-trade have been made and have been accepted both by China and India. And now that BRIC are competing with the Europeans and the US on an equal footing, suddenly free-trade isn't what you want. And a closed economy is what you want. Sorry guys, your corporates aren't listening to you any more.

      And we're not going to stay quiet about 5% of the people taking 25% of the resources for much longer. We want our share to be reasonable too.

      Learn to 'innovate'. Learn to be more efficient. Or we will take your jobs and your resources, and then you'll have no choice but to be more efficient.
      --
      All bow to his Noodliness!! His Noodle Appendage has touched me!
    12. Re:can you blame them? by plasmacutter · · Score: 1

      what native american economy? you want to argue conquest then every nation alive today is guilty and we should commence the nuclear annihilation.

      the US isnt part of europe, it was one of those colonies they were siphoning, it broke away and used its own resources, stop lumping the US in with europe to satisfy your own desire to cloak your hatred of the middle class in reighteousness.

      We did "innovate", we grew our own economy from scratch. If you want more wealth make it yourself, you have no right to drain it from us.

      and was that a threat? if you drain enough of our tidbits away we'll overthrow our corporate happy government, seize the assets of the corporations funneling our cash to you.
      Then again.. most developing nations depend on US stability to maintain their wealth, while they funnel away the wealth and contribute to economic destabilization.. sounds like a recipe for mutual destruction to me. You guys horde dollars, and when the US population gets fed up and rebels you'll be sitting on toilet paper.

      --
      VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
    13. Re:can you blame them? by plasmacutter · · Score: 1

      I am afraid you are then not talking about unfair competition, but about being unable to match your Indian counterpart because of the massive US welfare state that raises taxes sky high, increases the costs of medical care (highest in the world), insanely high insurance premiums, high costs of almost every consumable.


      this is because in india and china farmers live below the poverty line, and so do half the population. The people in india live at US comfort levels because they do so on the backs of the impovershed masses.

      the us middle class is not maintained in the same way, and this is the reason the us cost of living is higher.

      It's not a matter of inefficiency, its a matter of china and india refusing basic standards for their lower classes and in the process "pricing below margin".

      my point about lack of compassionate living standards stands.
      --
      VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
    14. Re:can you blame them? by mrokkam · · Score: 1

      This is an interesting view... and what makes it even more interesting is the book "Confessions of an International Hit Man" that I just started reading. This is an autobigraphical NON-FICTIONAL account of an american hired secretly by the government to control other nations by giving them huge "loans" to develop themselves (and pay American firms for that) and when they default on those impossible loans, the US would get various concessions from the nation. Of course, the nation would continue to repay as much as it could. So, the US is literally stealing their money as the loans mostly end up remaining in the US itself. Now, believe it or not, this IS true. So, the actual "innovation" that the US did was in developing it's technique of stealing other countries' wealth. So quit complaining about another country taking away your money and jobs. This is the real world. Deal with it. It is a global economy. Noone is taking away your jobs. The jobs just go where the competition is best. The US still has the best higher education system and thats why a large percentage of R&D takes place here. Let the US continue to innovate instead. There are plenty of jobs that americans can still do. P.S. I have no interest in the debate on racism. I find jokes on Indian call centers just as funny as most other ppl... and I also agree that many of my friends and classmates respect the Indians that are their colleagues despite the fact that many of them have funny accents.

    15. Re:can you blame them? by Kelbear · · Score: 1


      Free trade in and of itself is not good.
      Isolationism in and of itself is not good.
      Capitalism in and of itself is not good.
      Communism in an--you get the picture.

      All of the above are not intrinsically good. The above terms are definitions for an extreme end of the spectra. When dealing with extremes in economics you have to watch out for diminishing returns. How do you deal with such diminishing returns in all these factors? Going straight to the extremes undercuts total benefit due to the diminishing returns. You look for a point in the middle that brings the largest benefit.

      The principle goal is to use resources effectively. What does effective mean? That depends on the context. Who is trying to gain from an effective economy? The individual? The people? The business? The government? Etc.

      Free trade produces more overall GDP, but as all economists know, GDP is an imperfect measurement of economic health. They use multiple measurements because GDP says nothing about industry distribution, wealth distribution, purchasing power, etc.

      Protectionism well, protects. Some parts of an economy need defending for whatever reason because even though something can be good for an economy, there are /people/ who are trying to live in it. It's also bad because it's a restraint on efficient resource allocation.

      Why are some nations poor and others rich? Don't bother giving a simple explanation because you're going to be wrong. The global economy is not a simple system. This topic has been thoroughly researched and there are a large number of theories with good evidence and it's likely that all of the theories are a factor in play. For example: "Indians should just start their own companies in India, instead of dragging down ours", that's only possible if there is capital available, and abundant enough to be distributed at survivable rates for the entrepeneur who needs the loan. A country needs capital to modernize. It also needs educated citizens to operate the industries. Education requires either people who can economically afford schooling or a government efficient and powerful enough to legislate free schooling. Owning property also requires security(why work harder to get nice things if a thief/a company/a government can take it away from you?) The list goes on and on.

    16. Re:can you blame them? by i · · Score: 1

      And to add:

      The American Economy started with copying and stealing patented (and later also copyrighted) methods, ideas and constructions from European companys and individuals.
      The widespread use of slaves also gave US companys an economical advantage.

      You see, US' laws didn't complied with European or International laws and even in the cases where it existed applicable laws (in US), the implementation of these were very lax...
      Does this remind You of something today...?

      Later, when US started to produce and sell products also invented in US, the congress were more interested in patent laws. Etc.

      --
      Mundus Vult Decipi
    17. Re:can you blame them? by plasmacutter · · Score: 1

      . The jobs just go where the competition is best. The US still has the best higher education system and thats why a large percentage of R&D takes place here. Let the US continue to innovate instead.


      wow what a republican rationale.. apparently selling below margin when it comes to nations is perfectly "ok". pushing wages through the floor and waging war on the middle class is called "competition", and no, just because the individuals directly hired make middle class income doesn't mean they aren't pushing the standard of living through the floor. Their cost of living is lower over there because they don't have compassionate income standards for 50+% of their population. they "compete" by making half their residents live like haitian peasents; i suppose you want the US to do the same? maybe we should just do it with the whole world until the labor forces have "competed" themselves into neo-serfdom.
      --
      VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
    18. Re:can you blame them? by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1

      The aristocracy gets all the profits, the middle class disappears, and you end up with neo-serfdom. Of course if you actually educated yourself in economics instead of reading propaganda you'd know that.
      You talk about how the developing world is ending up in serfdom and you talk about 'propaganda?'

      We didn't pull this crap of draining the wealth of other nations to build our own. We invented and exported the majority of what makes today's world modern.
      Oh please! Pass the sick bag. Do you recite the pledge of allegiance every morning? Looks like you've been reading revisionist American textbooks that claim everything was invented in America. Some history:
      • Jet Engine - Invented by Frank Whittle, and Englishman
      • Automobile - brought to you by Benz & Daimler, Germans
      • Freeways/Motorways/Autobahns - German invention
      • Electronic Computer - Invented in Manchester, England
      • Television - Invented by John Loggie Baird, a Scot
      • First TV station - The BBC

      When your "competition" lives below minimum compassionate standards that's not competition, that's extortion.
      Your 'competition' is improving his quality of life. He may not live in a big suburban McMansion like you do but it's an improvement on what he had before. Look it up. Globalisation leads to upward pressure on local wages in the developing country. It makes life better for your friends with funny accents that you love to make racist remarks about.

      Which are you? Are you the 15-17 year old son/daughter of rich parents who will never have to worry about getting a job at daddy's firm, or a canadian/european who has a pro labor government and "hates americans" because of an idiot a zealous minority here elected?
      I'm a 32 year old European son of manual labourers. I ran up debts to get an education, and I got my degree in Manufacturing Engineering after four years. By the time I graduated, most of the UK's manufacturing industry had been shipped out to Asia and it was no longer worthwhile becoming a production engineer, so I taught myself how to build web pages, became a developer, and I now work in Silicon Valley as such where I make 80k/year. If this line of work ever dries up then I'll train myself up to do whatever else is lucrative. I won't come on to /. posting whiny racist comments about the people who 'stole' my job.

      there's a difference between irrational unfounded discrimination and rightful enmity toward a group of people who contribute to your dispossession.
      Racism is racism. Racists are the lowest of the low. You, sir, are a racist. A disgusting, disgraceful racist. Want fries with that?
      --
      Drill baby drill - on Mars
    19. Re:can you blame them? by thrawn_aj · · Score: 1

      "pressure to 'open markets'" comes from multinationals looking to screw americans just as bad That's hardly a profound truth. My point is that the labor force (of any country) doesn't seem to mind expanding markets via multinationals when they are the ones who gain from it (due to increasing jobs in the parent country). THAT was the point I was trying to make with the India example. The irony was simply a bonus.

      Also, considering the selective vision of \. (or /. :P) users, I'm not surprised that you missed my comment that it IS a problem and the solution is economic/political. It is NOT a moral problem and pseudo-patriotic Union horseshit like "buying American" is NOT going to solve it, simply because people aren't stupid when it comes to shopping around - as the whole Ford/GM vs. Toyota debacle shows.

      Also, I notice that the tired old cliche that "the american government has not worked at the behest of the people in almost 40 years" has arisen again. I am well aware of that fact and perhaps when you can change that, things might actually change. And before the flood of "BBbut the US is the strongest democracy in the world today" posts begin, I can assure you that I am on board with that :P.

      hell, microsoft recently built r&d labs offshore. Hmm, I guess I could always emigrate to those countries and live that lifestyle. Wouldn't kill me :P. If it's worked for the Indians who emigrate here, perhaps the reverse can hold true.

      mean time we will continue to make cracks at the expense of people pillaging our lifestyle wholesale, both the corporates and the indians, and racism has nothing to do with it. You absolutely have a right to do so. And no "PC" should stop you. I just wanted you to know that after a point those kind of jokes just make you look like a whining tool :P. It IS racism when an entire nation is ridiculed (and incompetently too :P, at least improve the quality of your jokes) for the actions of what is a tiny minority of its workers (who are hardly in a position to demand more wages or benefits). Meanwhile, I will say (using the same non-PC right) that this kind of economic dislocation happens every time a non-competitive and complacent labor force runs up against the tough reality of choosing between a lifestyle that has gotten increasingly bloated and having to keep your job.

      The worst act of the labor Unions that just turned around my view of them as a positive force in the corporate structure was when they started spewing all that moral outrage over the sweatshops as if they really gave a shit about the oppressed workers. If they can stoop so low and hijack a genuine human rights problem for the LESSER purpose of saving their workers' jobs, I can't imagine what else they're capable of.

      In passing, a tidbit that will give you vicarious thrill no doubt (or at least a dubious pleasure :P): Labor force complacence is a generic problem that eventually afflicts ALL markets. As a result, (and as is already the case), the lowest tier jobs are already being further outsourced away from India. It won't be long before Indians are making the same tired old jokes about Bangladeshis or some other small country on the subcontinent. Also, the IT boom in India has led to massive inflation as the newly emancipated upper middle class throws money around like confetti.

      Coming back to the thing that started all this, do I think that racism in jokes is a sufficient reason to dub them unfunny? Not at all. Lack of intelligence and creativity in humor IS. And if nothing else, the moderators' assignment of "funny" points to these hoary old cliches that I have seen on /. (or is it \. ?) for the past YEAR simply speaks of the frustrations (probably legitimate) of the IT community here. Sorta like a bunch of schoolgirls.

    20. Re:can you blame them? by smithmc · · Score: 1

        if india wants the freaking jobs, they should start their own companies and create their own job market rather than destroying the american job market.

      That's exactly what they've done. The companies have names like Wipro, Infosys, Tata, and Satyam. They are Indian companies, employing Indian people, in India. What's the problem?

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
    21. Re:can you blame them? by ShankarAnand · · Score: 1

      First of all know all the facts before arguing. You basis of argument is that India is forcing people to live below standards so as to cut costs and sell below margin. This is totally FALSE and WRONG.

      The American cost of living (in $) is NOT comparable to the Indian cost of living (in Rupees).

      Indians working in call centres are earning pretty well, much more than what they would have earned in the outsourcing industry was not there. So in fact outsourcing is making their standard of living better.

      Internet has made it fairly simple for anyone to do any work from any part of the world. Unfortunately there are people who are willing to do your job for lesser than your pay but actually which is more than their current pay. They are not to be blamed for the cost of $ vs cost of Rs.

  45. Re:Racism acceptable on /. where India is concerne by starkravingmad · · Score: 1

    In the /. view of the world, India consists of two kinds of people - one who make curry and the other who answer phones. Obviously the rocket scientists who helped launch this were answering phones at night..or making curry in your local Indian restaurant.. it's funny even if it's repeated ad nauseam.

    Oh and I love how Microsoft are anti competitive and the RIAA are bullies but /.'ers think nothing of constantly making disparaging remarks about Indians when it's their jobs that are being threatened. For the record I don't like the RIAA or Microsoft, but I don't like hypocrisy either.

  46. Could be very important... by fantomas · · Score: 1

    I am sure if India establishes itself as a commercial player and can start making a profit from launching satellites, this could prove to be *very* important. If not to the rest of the world (though I am sure the other commercial launchers are watching closely) then at least to India's domestic space program. I am sure the Indian government is far more likely to listen to their scientists requests to send up costly science experiments into space if the space program is closer to financial self-sufficiency.

    Obviously the military will be more than happy if a large number of successful launches go ahead as a result: this will be a clear message to potential aggressive neighbours that India has a reliable delivery system to anywhere on the planet for 1000kg nuclear warheads.

  47. Re:Racism acceptable on /. where India is concerne by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, they already are. But overall, they are in big minority. But when it comes to India, any discussion if full of 'funny' posts.

    And _that_ is racism, what the GP was pointing to.

  48. Re:Racism acceptable on /. where India is concerne by bheekling · · Score: 1
    1. s/if/is/g
    2. I ran out of mod points yesterday else I would've modded the GGP "Insightful"
    3. I am an Indian
    4. Its called humour. Look it up.
    --
    "..."
  49. Irony? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Holy Cow...

    What CAN'T you outsource to India?

    Well for one: hamburgers

  50. If they can perfect the costs issues by recharged95 · · Score: 1
    OSC will be out of business in no time (aside from classified work).

    Can someone please have India or China outsource my soul? I'm sure they would be able to live my life better than me currently.

  51. Re:I'm still not thinking superpower... sorry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some facts about 100 yr old steam trains. Their railways system does not consist of 100 year old steam engines but mostly of electric engines running on electrified tracks and diesel engines in other areas. Steam engines are a thing of the past and are only used for luxury trains or demo purposes. While being the largest gov department in the whole world, they carry a huge volume of passengers every day. And they also have to make sure that the railway service is affordable even for the poor section of society. With the number of trains running on their humongous system, delays happen quite often. However, in this field too they have improved a lot in the last 25years. Their Railway system isn't perfect, but they are working on improving it.

    I agree they need to work on other social aspects but that doesn't mean they should remain oblivious of other technological aspects that they should work on. Plus another thing to take into consideration is the inertia involved in starting any kind of development project in a country like India. Oh and did I forget to mention that bureaucracy and corruption all over the place!!

  52. Re:Racism acceptable on /. where India is concerne by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1

    I am an Indian
    Yeah, right! Anyway, some black people refer to themselves with the 'N' word. Does that make it okay for whites to do the same?
    --
    Drill baby drill - on Mars
  53. Re:Racism acceptable on /. where India is concerne by bheekling · · Score: 1

    Just google my name, go ahead, do it.
    And don't forget to click on the first result.

    --
    "..."
  54. The answer must lie... by TeckWrek · · Score: 1

    ... somewhere in the market dynamics and complexity of operation.

    Next invalid speculation... Did India also muscle the Italians into paying more than the market rate or REALLY, are the Italians paying more money than market can demand because the Italian born Sonia Gandhi is the leader of a large (in power?) political party!!

    1. Re:The answer must lie... by freakxx · · Score: 1
      Did India also muscle the Italians into paying more than the market rate or REALLY, are the Italians paying more money than market can demand because the Italian born Sonia Gandhi is the leader of a large (in power?) political party!!


      Seriously...this may be a possibility to support her party through back-channels. Elections are going on in few states there and also, she is accused of having close contacts with an Italian broker Ottavio Quattrocchi, who is among top in the most wanted list in India. Their close relations are visible time to time nowadays also. Few days ago, Quattrocchi's bank accounts were freezed in London because of suspicions that the money poured there might have come from illegal sources involving that notorious bofors gun deals when Sonia's husband, Rajiv Ganghi, was prime minister of India. As soon as the Indian counterpart was notified about it, Sonia sent an high rank official to London to convey the reverse and within 2-3 days, the money was released (and also, withdrawn).

  55. bad idea by yoprst · · Score: 1

    Low end of the market is saturated by ex-ICBMs. A space launch is a better way of getting rid of an old ICBM than a usual burning of fuel on the ground. So ICBM launch is a gain even if there's no payload. How are they going to top that?

  56. Re:Racism acceptable on /. where India is concerne by Mike89 · · Score: 1

    Does that make it okay for whites to do the same?
    It should. If they can call each other it, why can't everyone, regardless of colour? Otherwise, that in itself is racism.
  57. Gravity is less in India by atamido · · Score: 1

    Ironically, an atom bomb in India would weigh less than most other places. If you look at a gravitational map of the world, you will see that the Southern tip of India actually has a lower gravitational pull than most other areas in land. Almost 5% less than the norm.

    For space travel, this means that they can actually shoot off rockets for cheaper than other places because they need to use less fuel for a lighter load. I'd be curious to see what this translates to in real world cost savings.

  58. Re:I'm still not thinking superpower... sorry by redblue · · Score: 1
    Yet another sure sign of USA's rise as a technological nation, however I think all the talk of a "superpower" is a bit premature. True, the country has come very far and is not a major producer of technology and the de facto place to have outsourced technical services done. However, it's important to remember that the nation also has some of the worst abject poverty in the world and while they are launching satellite in one area, there are others where people cram onto wasteful hundred year old technologies like cars.

    Hopefully, as time passes the standard of living will increase across the board, but as this happens, the price of labor will also increase, which will temper further growth. There are right now people willing to work on burger flipping, professional sports, show business and other highly dangerous jobs for pennies a day. That labor force is part of what has made USA successful in modern times. The population is huge and while good education exists, it's not available enough to all people or areas of the country.

    Whether or not it is wise for a nation like USA to invest in space systems and other high tech projects is subject to debate. On one hand, there are a lot of smaller local projects which the money could go to, but at the same time, diving into the world of high technology, electronics and aerospace may be the best bet for bringing such a country to the forefront.

    They've come a long way, but lets not forget that they still have a long long way to go. Hopefully countries like USA can become a model for how third world nations can rapidly improve their economic and social situations.

  59. Dank u for calling Dell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First call center on the moon in 18 months!

  60. Re:I'm still not thinking superpower... sorry by lifeone · · Score: 1

    With all due respect,India doesnt have "STEAM" trains:) We electrified or use Diesel Electric locomotives for almost 30 yrs now. You are right however in your overall assessment that India still have many challenges left and still poor farmers are committing suicide in some states and there is a huge lack of adequate infrastructure specially in roads and energy for rapid high intensity industrialization. However it is improving and peoples' quality of life has improved and continues to improve. When India became an independent nation after 200 yrs of slavery to Brits and 700 to muslims, it had 20% people over proverty line, 44% infant mortality rate and 35% literacy. In roughly 50 yrs they achieved, 75% over poverty line, 21% infant mortality rate and 65% literacy with many states like Kerala and West Bengal with 100% literacy. They launched a 100 days of guaranteed work per year program for poor workers in villages that is being copied by countries like China and Brazil. And while the festering problems with head in sand nations like Pakistan continues, India lifts more and more people out of poverty every hour. Considering it was only 50 yrs and they didnt have a Marshall Plan and billions of dollars to spare, I think they have done well and are on the right track. These miniature space launches are just morale boosters, since any enslaved country requires such acts like going to space or blasting a nuke or landing on moon to feel equal, its in my humble opinion has not much to do with others as it has to do with the people in India itself.

    --
    In a perfect world, there should be no Bushes
  61. the myth of independent US industrialization by vakibs · · Score: 1

    Hi buddy I feel your anguish about outsourcing. But you need to set your facts straight. Without colonization, neither Europe nor US would have been industrialized. It is basic mathematics - automation/industrialization makes several workers redundant and they would lose their jobs.The question would be whether the economy continues to grow so as to permit them to find new jobs. If you don't have colonies, the surplus produce cannot be sold and thus the economy *cannot* grow. India was the secret of Europe's industrialization. Lots of Indian farmers/artisans have died out of starvation to make this happen. USA is nothing but an *usurped* country which was needed to settle down Europe's unemployed population. It did not have to face the population pressures and economic stagnation - because a *huge* country and its natural resources were just stolen to begin with. The Americans also had the advantage of an European upbringing which introduced them to industrial-level education. USA cannot wash itself away off the European sins of colonization. USA had been an obvious necessity to thwart off the pains of unemployment that industrialization created in Europe. It is seriously childish to believe that a country can somehow industrialize by itself. Who would buy the products, my friend ??? Now, the current process out globalization is very much necessary to the economic upliftment of the rest of the world. Atleast, it is a relatively humane process unlike colonization. The important fact that should be noted is that US economy *continues to grow* thereby potentially creating more avenues of employment. We guys in India did not have that option during those 300 years when we were pillaged off our natural resources.

    1. Re:the myth of independent US industrialization by plasmacutter · · Score: 1
      Wow what a bunch of nonsense, but feel free to continue with the right-wing slashdot groupthink.

      The US developed primarily in isolation all the way into the late 1800's. The companies in the US became wealthy because they produced and marketed to americans. The american economy grew by americans for americans and on american resources. American "colonies" were not points of economic pillaging like their european counterparts; they were strategic force projection points.

      If by "continues to grow" you mean the US economy keeps hemmhoraging skilled jobs overseas while creating unskilled minimum wage (below poverty) jobs then yes, the american economy is "expanding". Economic expansion does not indicate standard of living because the primary indicators consist of corporate profit.

      Now, the current process out globalization is very much necessary to the economic upliftment of the rest of the world. Atleast, it is a relatively humane process unlike colonization

      whatever propaganda you have to believe to justify what is being done to the middle class of developed nations for much less gain in india. If you call sentencing an entire generation to crushing debt by removing the benefits of a 40 to 80 thousand Us dollar education humane then i guess anything can pass as humane. Contrary to popular world belief that kind of money was never easy to come by in the US, and now we've reached a point where entire educational tracks are disappearing (computer science) because offshoring depressed the wages so badly people are unable to repay their student debts.
      --
      VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
    2. Re:the myth of independent US industrialization by vakibs · · Score: 1
      I am not right-wing !! I consider myself centrist, but have been accused several times of being left-wing. You are seriously pulling my leg :)

      What point of USA not having to deal with population pressures of industrial revolution did you not understand ?
      • Take a land mass the size of a continent, with mighty rivers and mineral resources.
      • Kill all the native inhabitants
      • Start populating the country slowly from east to west
      • If anybody loses a job due to industrialization in New York, award him wheat fields in Kansas or diamond fields in California

      If you give me this alternative, I don't need any colonies to make industrialization happen. Good strategy huh ? You are kidding yourself. Most people immigrated to the USA because they lost their jobs in Europe. They could not face the population pressures that were developing there. Hmm.. Do I have the same option in India now ? Don't think so.

      Globalization is indeed creating a lot of opportunities in India. The middle class is rapidly growing in purchasing power. It is already one of the biggest markets in Asia. In comparison to the USA, Indian people are less hungry for energy per capita, more tolerant of other races and more respectful of family-values. Very soon, we will be welcoming European/American brains to work in India by offering decent paychecks. And you will not be facing any shouting crowds of angry rednecks, but only warm welcome and sincere friends. Will be something of a change. Huh ?

      International trade is still heavily biased against India. Our farmers cannot sell their produce and our artisans cannot sell their handicrafts. If you say we educated people can't sell our services, what are we left with ? I think the world owes something to India in return. For five thousand years, we have been the cradle of civilization and culture. Not to mention the number of Indians serving USA now in medicine, science and research.

      If a guy who received a 80000 USD education cannot find a job for himself, of what good is he ? Do you have any clue how difficult it is in India to receive that kind of education ? Only the top 100 out of 150,000 applicants can get admitted to a college with such facilities.

      You people are too unwilling to adapt and too unwilling to relocate. Even today, the best of all jobs computer science are in the USA. I guess what you people should fight for is reasonable unemployment insurance and learning opportunities. Or try looking for an option with better job security. Don't cry like old wags that Indians are stealing your jobs. Try being a sensible democracy for a change and elect a government which can create better work opportunities, instead of one which spends billions $$$ on fighting useless wars.
    3. Re:the myth of independent US industrialization by plasmacutter · · Score: 1

      it's not about the guy who spent 80k on education not being able to find a job.. its about the guy who spent 80k (80 freaking k) on that education not being able to find a job that lets him recover those debts and still live the same lifestyle the indian counterparts live

      I don't know what you think of america, but the vast majority of americans are very tolerant when theyre not having 80k and years of their lives at a time usurped by people who only have to pay 1/10th that for their living and education expenses (because their own poor are not properly cared for like they are in the US).

      "adaption and relocation"? relocate to where. any place that has jobs that pay what indians receive nominally has 3 to 5 times the living expenses of places that dont have jobs period. Housing in the good places (meaning the 65% of the nation not crawling with idiot fundie bible beaters) costs twice what it did at any other time in the past century. (starts at a whopping half a million and goes up from there.

      and dont pretend there isn't racism and particularly anti-american sentiment in nations like india. For instance, in china they have separate price lists for english speakers at 5 times market. I dont know many places that teach hindi in their curricula and even if i could find a place as a patron of the arts i know i'd lose pretty much everything i care about by moving to a nation without english.

      when the median standard of living in india involves actually owning 4 walls with sheetrock finish i'll start considering it fair competition.

      --
      VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
    4. Re:the myth of independent US industrialization by vakibs · · Score: 1

      I do not think it is hard for a country like the USA to provide insurance for the education of its citizens. It is the least you should demand from your government (if not something like a reasonable job security). In fact, you should be able to obtain some form of compensation from your employers too, if they can fire people like the way they do.

      Don't think India is not doing anything for its poor. We have a huge welfare state and a very vibrate left-wing section in politics. Moreover, the media is extremely free. And guess what, we are a democracy. People do vote for the policies that they want. All the political parties know well that they cannot alienate the majority of the people.

      India is not like China. For one thing, we speak English. That's why we are getting call centres right :) You would not find any prejudice here, especially in cosmopolitan cities like Bangalore. The culture of India is historically very tolerant. We have 25 official languages in India, so we guys end up speaking with each other in English. In fact, I hardly know any Hindi (it is not my mother tongue)

      We don't yet have any jobs that can interest American intelligentia. It is mostly mundane work that gets outsourced to India. But there are a few good positions, even research positions.

      In India, the government actively encourages IT industry with free land grants, less taxes etc. I think the US government should offer similar incentives to the US industry - especially to offset for the high prices of real estate etc. You people should fight for the right kind of policies. USA has always had a competitive edge with respect to a high profile industry such as software. It is difficult to lose it. But we cannot be sure !!

    5. Re:the myth of independent US industrialization by plasmacutter · · Score: 1

      We already have a "corporate welfare" state.. more incentives to businesses would mean paying them to locate here.

      As for insurance on education, there is a very strong centralized cabal of people who propagate the myth of the "welfare leech" and have been not only stonewalled such policies, but rolled them back over the past 15 years.

      The drawback of democratic politics is "the tyrrany of the majority", especially when that majority is being effectively brainwashed by an increasingly consolidated corporate news machine (there are currently 9 major news outlets period, and there is a de facto triopoly between CNN, FOX, and NBC.. in other words 2 corporate schills and 1 corporate schill who believes in intelligent design).

      don't get me wrong.. i dont blame indians for the outsourcing, but i object to the accusations of racism being flung about when the real cause is tension over and experiences with this issue, which is a major threat to increasingly skilled portions of the american labor force, and i really object to the characterization of outsourcing as "fair competition" when its just not the case.

      --
      VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
    6. Re:the myth of independent US industrialization by univgeek · · Score: 1

      i really object to the characterization of outsourcing as "fair competition" when its just not the case. Do we lack the average standard of living in the West? yes.

      Is it deliberate? Hell no.

      Can the whole world survive if everyone uses the same resources the average American uses? Hell No.

      Given that we must use less resources, we will provide cheaper labor/services.

      When America exports cheap things due to abundance of cheap power/land it's fine. But when we export cheap labor/services due to abundant people power, somehow it is unfair competition?
      --
      All bow to his Noodliness!! His Noodle Appendage has touched me!
  62. Re:Racism acceptable on /. where India is concerne by adolf · · Score: 1

    I'm from a part of Ohio that suffers from a general lack of black people, but we sure do have plenty of niggers. They talk like niggers, act like niggers, and look like niggers. They even drive niggermobiles like only a nigger can: Up high on polished 24s, all leaned over the center console so their head looks to be almost in line with the rearview mirror but yet somehow tilted back so far that they're nearly sitting in the back seat, hanging onto the steering wheel with one limp-wristed hand wrapped up in a heavy gold bracelet, with a stereo booming atonally, just loud enough to attact attention.

    (Alternatively, there is the poor nigger, in a middle-90s Oldsmobile that is either off-white, maroon, or teal with a cracked tail light, a failing headliner, a dent in the side, and unusually high levels of body rust. The posture and jewelry are the same, though.)

    It really is the funniest fucking thing, watching these pasty white niggers roll around town. It's even funnier to watch them try to walk, yammer into a cell phone, and try to keep their pants from falling the rest of the way down - all at the same time.

    The point is: Just because a word is used in racist speech does not mean that the word itself is racist. My stereotypical Ohioan whiteboy nigger is just one example of that, as the term applies equally to the few black niggers that we have, too.

    To me, at least, the word has got nothing to do with skin color, but is instead about my perception of people's personal choices and actions.

  63. te old clichee of last will be first by sbohmann · · Score: 1

    I'm not entirely sure why people always seem to think that if a country is relatively poor and underdeveloped as of now, and at the same time quickly catching up in some aspects, whereby of course profiting from the availability of cheap labor as a result of underdevelopment, it by some kind of necessity must overtake today's highly industrialized nations at some time in the near future.

    Underdevelopment might be a momentary boost but has never been a guarantee for unlimited development, as, a some point in the process of catching up, it starts wearing off.

    Afer all, underdevelopment is NOT an economic advantage.

    By the way, back to the topic: When are the US going to build ordinary, economically sound, simple rockets again? The space shuttle is probably the most expensive tool in existance for bringing devices to an orbit, so where are the cheap, unmanned alternatives? Is the private sector going to take this part in the near future?