Slashdot Mirror


What Can You Do to Stop Junk Faxes?

olddoc asks: "I am having a growing problem with junk faxes. Unlike email, it costs me money when I get a fax so junk faxes really tick me off. A while ago, I gave my number to a removal number and now I am getting more junk faxes than ever." What options are there for dealing with this? If you've also had this problem, what did you do and how effective was it in stopping unwanted faxes?

156 comments

  1. Get with the times by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    And get rid of your fax machine!

    1. Re:Get with the times by Kamokazi · · Score: 2, Informative

      Or look at the google ad under the post (I'm seeing eFax there).

      We use that where I work and it's quite nice. It e-mails you when you recieve a fax and there is an application that you use to send them...you can send word documents, PDFs, or it interfaces directly with a scanner.

      Unfortunately I don't know how much the service costs, it was in place before I begain working there.

      We do persuade our customers and vendors to use e-mail as much as possible (sheet-feed scanners are not very expensive)...we used to have 20 numbers through eFax and have managed to remove five of them in a few months. If we had to, we could probably axe 5 more of them.

      --
      As our way of thanking you for your positive contributions to Slashdot, you are eligible to disable Slashdot 2.0.
    2. Re:Get with the times by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      get rid of your fax machine!
      I keep getting spam, should I get rid of my email? And telemarketers keep calling me too, should I get rid of my phone? How about door-to-door salesmen? Should I get rid of my house?
    3. Re:Get with the times by turbidostato · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "And get rid of your fax machine!"

      That's the right answer after all.

      The head says that fax is a problem for the poster because it costs him money, not like e-mail spam. That means to me he doesn't count his time as money.

      I'll make the assumptions that his "fax costs" come from paper and ink and that he owns at least a PC (or else he wouldn't mention e-mail spam). Well, then the answer is easy: don't use paper and ink. There're aplenty of "fax in your computer" solutions so you will see the fax on your computer screen prior to print it (if there's still the need to print it).

    4. Re:Get with the times by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I keep getting spam, should I get rid of my email?

      No, stop giving out your email address to every company that asks, and use a spam blocker (or an email service that uses a decent spam blocker).

      And telemarketers keep calling me too, should I get rid of my phone?

      Get a cellphone like everyone else. It's illegal for telemarketers to call cellphones. For the few that do, inform them of this and they'll take you off the list fast. I've had a cellphone (only) for years now, and it's extremely rare than I get a telemarketing call.

      For whatever reason, the rules are very different for cellphones vs. landlines.

      How about door-to-door salesmen? Should I get rid of my house?

      No, get yourself something called a "sign": it should say something like "No Trespassing", "No Soliciting", or both (mine does). Unlike electronic things like email and telephones, it's possible to warn solicitors with signs before they reach your front door, and it's illegal for them to ignore that sign; they can be arrested for doing so.

      The basic idea is that, when there's a simple technological measure available to avoid a lot of annoyance, why not use it? The only people who need their own fax machine these days are law offices and realtors, because of the backwards way in which they operate (e.g., faxes are considered legal documents, and people who use them are too dumb to know that it's easy to fake them with computers) and because they use them so much. For everyone else, who only needs fax capability occasionally, there's send2fax.com and efax.com.

      Plus, if you're a law office, you deserve all the fax spam you get, and more.

    5. Re:Get with the times by iamhassi · · Score: 1

      To stop junk faxes you can GOOGLE IT

      "stop junk faxes" or "how to stop junk faxes"

      the very first page that pops up:
      Basic information about junk faxes:
      Do you...Want to have them pay you at least $500 and as much as $1,500 per fax?

      "Many people get $2,500 per fax in small claims court. I recently got a judgment for over $40,000 for 16 junk faxes sent to me by an advertiser. The trial lasted about 15 minutes. Here's the proof it can be done: FirstChartered.pdf

      Federal law applies in all 50 states and cannot be superceded by state law. You can sue in your local small claims court in many cases."

      I only wish I had your problem of tons of junk faxes because I'd be a very rich man!

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
  2. Receive faxes to computer, then print by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I'd be surprised if there's not a fax machine with this capability already.

  3. Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Fax them back with a bunch of black paper taped into a loop.

    1. Re:Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Or send them an endless Tub Girl loop...

    2. Re:Solution by Ellis+D.+Tripp · · Score: 1

      Alas, the black paper loop isn't as effective a weapon against junk faxers as it once was. Nowadays, the best you can hope for is to use up their toner cartridge. Back in the days when fax machines used thermal printing, attempting to print a continuous black sheet could actually overheat and destroy the expensive printhead.

      --
      Remember "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters"? Help make it a reality again! http://soylentnews.org
    3. Re:Solution by Ucklak · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And using black tape to use toner that covers more than 5% of the paper isn't???

      Sorry but most thermal faxes worth half their weight have a high temp cutoff.

      Yield for a toner based printing device is based upon 5% of coverage per page.

      --
      if you steal from one source, that is plagiarism, if you steal from many, well, that's just research.
    4. Re:Solution by DarkFencer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'd imagine these Fax Spammers are using computers with modems to do the dialing so if a fax is 'sent' back to them (assuming they even receive faxes) they will probably go into the bit bucket - not cause an actual printout.

    5. Re:Solution by PetoskeyGuy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I verified the numbers were correct then try to send a fax with a sign that says "STOP SENDING ME FAXES" to the voice number of the sales pitch using the most repeats and shortest delay possible. I remember distinctly hearing one of the operators start crying through the little fax speaker. Faxes stopped shortly after.

      Remember it's the VOICE number in the FAX you want to attack.

  4. DNC by Ant+P. · · Score: 0

    Return the favour with a message to the effect of "take this number off your call list". If it continues, you can go to the authorities to get them fined for huge amounts. Supposedly.

    1. Re:DNC by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1, Interesting

      The DNC lists allow companies to call you if you've "done business" with them in the past (forgot how long). Depending on which removal service he used, and their terms of use, he may have no recourse against those additional faxes. Which is similar to the reason why so many companies offer free stuff for returning a card, so they can call you for like two years.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    2. Re:DNC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget to invert the colors on said message - make them run out of toner before you ;-)

    3. Re:DNC by LinuxGeek · · Score: 4, Interesting

      A friend with a couple of businesses had a fax spam problem and had requested that the worst (by far) offender please stop wasting their time and his by sending any more faxed offers. He made several more polite voice and faxed requests when they persisted in sending the faxes.

      Finally, he printed out a couple of pages with large letters asking to please remove his business from their list, giving his name, fax and phone numbers. He then taped the pages together into an endless loop and faxed his request to be removed. I think he said that his fax log showed that it sent for about two hours before cutting off. Amazingly, he got no more junk faxes from that particular spammer. :)

      --

      Kindness is the language which the deaf can hear and the blind can see. - Mark Twain
  5. PC FAX for receiving. by ViXX0r · · Score: 5, Informative

    At our office we turned off auto-answer on the fax machine proper and set up FAX receiving on a PC plugged into the FAX line to receive them. Now all the incoming faxes are just saved in the computer. The ones we want we print out, the spam you can just delete.

    --
    University - a box of academia nuts.
    1. Re:PC FAX for receiving. by boyfaceddog · · Score: 1

      Same here. My corp. offices set up a fax server (RightFax) and have an different 800 number for each office that wants one. Cut WAY down on the junk faxes, and since the email comes into a group mail box we can use standard filters (via phone numbers).

      --
      Here will be an old abusing of God's patience and the king's English.
    2. Re:PC FAX for receiving. by linzeal · · Score: 1

      Been doing this since my first decent 56k modem could handle 100 faxes a day.

    3. Re:PC FAX for receiving. by Steinfiend · · Score: 1

      We use RightFax also, we have 400 DIDs piped into it. We get probably 2 spam faxes a day per DID. Yes we can delete them, but they still take up times and space on the 8 channels we have coming in. They all come from one specific spammer (currently called My Hot Leads) who, according to (http://www.junkfax.org/fax/profiles/MyHotLeads.ht m) have been sued, are being sued, have been threatened with jail time, but still will not quit.

      I hate email spammers as much as the next guy, but I can do a lot to stop email spam before it costs me any significant time, money or resources. Fax spam however, by it's very nature has already cost me all of these for it to come into the building. I've never been an angry person, but if I ever find myself in Addison, Texas, I may have to stop in and see these guys. Just to say hi you understand, nothing else, certainly no fiber cutting involved at all...

  6. Artillery by Nimey · · Score: 2, Funny

    I've always favored artillery barrages. Gets the point across nicely.

    It's polite to use small guns (37mm to 75mm) as a first warning, then if they persist bring in the 155mm guns.

    The biggest troublemakers are no match to an Iowa-class 16" rifle.

    --
    Hail Eris, full of mischief...

    E pluribus sanguinem
    1. Re:Artillery by Arthur+B. · · Score: 2, Funny

      If everything fails they'll probably listen to Reason.

      --
      \u262D = \u5350
    2. Re:Artillery by the+phantom · · Score: 1

      "Reason" is what you call your 5 megaton thermonuclear device, I assume?

    3. Re:Artillery by rjforster · · Score: 1

      Yes. My first thoughts were "NTSFO ITOWTBS".

      The full version of the original begins "I say we take off and..", you can work out the rest.

    4. Re:Artillery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, you must be American...

    5. Re:Artillery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because he has persuasive arguments?

    6. Re:Artillery by theCoder · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think the OP was referring to Reason, the rail gun used in "Snow Crash". Everybody eventually listens to Reason.

      --
      "Save the whales, feed the hungry, free the mallocs" -- author unknown
    7. Re:Artillery by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      Right up until the last line I thought you were talking about Font sizes..

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
  7. Best option. by normuser · · Score: 0

    The best option I know of is to use a computer with a modem as a fax mechine. I have done this and it works rather well. you will also be able to "email" fax mechines with this setup.

    There are also some services to email your faxes to you, prices range from a couple bucks to $25 a month. I havent used eny of these so I cant say if one is better then another. But if your looking in that direction google for "internet fax service"

    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    XXX#######
  8. Get Rid of it. by Drexus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We had junk faxes to the amount that it represented 90% of what it was used for. Then we got rid of it. If they can't email it, mail it, or call us. Then we don't want their business.

    1. Re:Get Rid of it. by hazem · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's my thought exactly. Who really uses faxes any more anyway? It's about as relevant as an 8-track...

      In fact, I'm highly annoyed anytime I have to actually send a fax. My company's tuition reimbursement vendor requires faxes.. but get this... you have to go on the website to fill out and create a PDF form that you then download, print and fax back to them. And of course, when I go to use the stupid machine, its out-tray is filled with junk faxes.

      Who needs this crappy technology from the 70s anyway? Especially when it costs so much. Like you said, email, mail, or call.

      If it weren't the only way to get my tuition forms, I would never fax. It's the only thing I've faxed in years.

    2. Re:Get Rid of it. by mrcaseyj · · Score: 1

      I think the advantage of faxes is that they've been around long enough and they're simple enough that a significant number of people have learned to use them who still don't know how to do a scan and attach it to an email. I think there is also legal precedent for limited recognition of faxed contracts that may not apply to email attachments.

    3. Re:Get Rid of it. by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      Who really uses faxes any more anyway?

      We have a fax machine at work mainly because there are an awful lot of shops and businesses who do not have a networked computer nearby.
      If there is an issue with a document printed from our software, or an adjustment to the flow is wanted, its 1000's of times better to let them make notes on the printout and fax it to us than going through a whole list of hardware/software requirements and assuming the system is configured to work with it and that they know how to find and use the software and to be able to actually scan or export the document directly to file for emailing it over (after switching the internet on first).

      It really is simpler to just get them to fax, and there's not been a customer I have spoken with who *couldn't* just fax :)

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    4. Re:Get Rid of it. by Blkdeath · · Score: 1

      We had junk faxes to the amount that it represented 90% of what it was used for. Then we got rid of it. If they can't email it, mail it, or call us. Then we don't want their business.

      Every car dealership relies on the fax machine to expedite funding of deals. Sure, you can courier the documents to their funding centre but that delays funding by as much as 24 hours and costs a lot more than dropping them into the fax machine. When each deal requires upwards of 15-20 pages, averaging 5 deals delivered per business day that's a lot of paper to scan, save and e-mail. In the end it's a lot easier to drop them into the top tray, hit the appropriate speed dial button and press "Go".

      When you're getting anywhere between $50-500k per day with your fax machine, you tend to pay for the upkeep and put up with the junk faxes.

      --
      BD Phone Home!

      Shameless plug. Like you weren't expecting it.

    5. Re:Get Rid of it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The comment did not say "everyone should get rid of their fax machines"!
      It said the poster should get rid of his machine. It did so because he had a problem with junk faxes.
      When you make $50-500k a day with your fax machine, you probably don't have a problem with a junk fax or two, and the comment does not apply to you.

      Easy, isn't it?

    6. Re:Get Rid of it. by ajs318 · · Score: 1

      Faxes do have one advantage: you can use a pencil. Sometimes it's still the quickest way of getting a drawing together. If you're ordering some timber and you want to include a sketch with a cutting list, for instance, a fax is definitely the way to do it.

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
  9. Removal doesn't help by G4from128k · · Score: 2, Interesting

    By law, faxes in the U.S. must have a "call to remove" number. But I discovered that the number does not work via a little experiment. I called the removal line, entered a different number (a voice line that had never received faxes), and then (within a few days) started receiving fax calls on the voice line. It's just like the email spammers that use victim's unsubscribe notices to signal that they have a live recipient. I'm sure a legal-minded soul could use this behavior to honeypot the faxers, but IANAL.

    I've also thought about creating an autodialer script to call the fax removal line and submit every number in the phonebook to it. A simple script could send Hayes commands to a modem to dial the removal line, wait X seconds (or punch "1" to remove or whatever), and then send another dial command to submit bogus removal numbers. Poisoning their DB of faxable numbers would make the return per dialed number much much lower.

    --
    Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
    1. Re:Removal doesn't help by goodie3shoes · · Score: 4, Informative

      Here's the US FCC's info on junk faxes http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/consumerfacts/unwantedfaxes .html Interesting that the business advertised is liable even if they didn't send the fax. But this doesn't really help. Since the senders are scumbags, one can't be surprised that they don't follow the rules. Why couldn't software scan received faxes for telltale signs of junk such as "Cancun", "vacation", "To all Employees", and trash them as we do with email filters?

      --
      BSA: "Would you like a free Software Audit"? me: "No, thanks. My software is all Free".
    2. Re:Removal doesn't help by PPH · · Score: 2, Interesting

      By law, faxes in the U.S. must have a "call to remove" number. But I discovered that the number does not work via a little experiment. I called the removal line, entered a different number (a voice line that had never received faxes), and then (within a few days) started receiving fax calls on the voice line.

      Next time, put in the FCC's complaint line phone number.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    3. Re:Removal doesn't help by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Contrary to what a reasonable person may think, that won't move the FCC do anything. The FCC is *reactive*, not proactive. Personally, I use Congresswoman Pelosi's congressional office phone number when I respond to a "call to remove" number.

    4. Re:Removal doesn't help by davidbrit2 · · Score: 1

      Or better yet, 911. Instant fun.

    5. Re:Removal doesn't help by walt-sjc · · Score: 1

      I would bet that they don't allow a three digit number - probably the full 10 digit. Depending on their software, something like 911-234-1234 may work. Bet they filter to valid area codes however.

    6. Re:Removal doesn't help by Zadaz · · Score: 1

      In that case a trip to the "emergency services" numbers in the phone book would give a nice list.

      And make sure you add the office, home, and mobile numbers of all your political representatives.

    7. Re:Removal doesn't help by jpampuch · · Score: 1

      I like this approach, except instead of using your own number, start using numbers like FCC office, local phone companies, FBI, police, members of congress, etc.

    8. Re:Removal doesn't help by gjcamann · · Score: 1

      I worked at a defense contractor. The employees there were getting phone calls from a junk faxer that was searching for fax machines in the companies phone numbers. Eventually security got involved and shut this person down.
      I supposed you could call the removal number and give the security voice phone number for some defense contractor, airport security number, or other person of power, State Court House, Senator?
      Once that bum started calling these "sensitive" numbers someone with the proper means would shut that scumbag down.

  10. If in the UK... by KingDaveRa · · Score: 3, Informative
    http://www.mpsonline.org.uk/fps/ - the Fax Preference Service works wonders in stopping junk faxes. Same goes for the Phone Preference Service, and the Mail Preference Service.

    Not a lot of help if you're in the rest of the world, but still - this could be useful to somebody!

    1. Re:If in the UK... by bhima · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There was a guy around here that successfully sued a junk fax marketer for a few K.

      It was in his sig and journal for ages.

      If I recall he bought a new top end PowerMac and Cinema Display with it.

      --
      Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
  11. Sue. by i+kan+reed · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I imagine if you put your fax number on the "do not call" registry, there's some legal compunction not to perform any sort of unsolicited transactions using that number.

    1. Re:Sue. by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 1

      Junk faxes are already illegal with hefty fines for those who send them. That this does not deter the practice would imply that being on a "do not call" registry would have no additional effect. In fact - there are individuals who have a long history of operating shell corporations to side-step massive fines incured through their "business" practices.

    2. Re:Sue. by cdrguru · · Score: 1

      Sure, you can sue, but it isn't going to get you anywhere.

      No lawyer wants to waste their time with this sort of thing because most of the senders are nearly untracable. You can waste your own time on it, but very few people actually even get the senders to stop.

  12. I usually just sink the offending Junk by Timesprout · · Score: 1, Funny

    I keep a fleet of submarines specially for this purpose.

    --
    Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
    What truth?
    There is no dupe
  13. retaliate - fax them back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If your fax number is on a DNC list, you should have some legal recourse for businesses who ignore this list, but any resolution would likely not be a speedy one.

    OTOH, you could retaliate. Tape two or three pieces of black paper end-to-end, then these two ends together to make a continous loop of black paper in your fax machine. Send this black fax to them for awhile which should take care of their tonner/ink cartridge. (This won't t have a high quotient of annoyance if they are using an electronic fax service.)

    Also, you could publish their phone/fax number on the Internet. I've seen forums that where this is done, and it becomes kind of a DOS attach against businesses who appear to ignore the DNC list in their telephone spaming.

  14. Digital Fax Modem with internal memory or ... by Qbertino · · Score: 4, Interesting

    A USB fax modem with memory is handy for this sort of thing. Just delete the ones you don't want, archive/print/whatever the rest.
    A better idea is to install a tolled number as your fax number. You can actually do both. Fax modem *and* tolled number. 1/2$ per call. Then post your fax number everywhere. Instant profit. You'll have ROI for your fax modem in an instance. You get just get the best there is with no need to worry. Zyxel used to have some with internal memory that ran on their own with no PC needed. Refinance your real customers who fax you stuff in their next bills.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
  15. How Much do you need faxes? by rueger · · Score: 0

    I'd say that faxes are a disappearing technology. Last year I finally stopped maintaining a dedicated fax line. It had reached the point where I was receiving several junk faxes each week, and only one or two legitimate faxes each month.

    Between e-mail and PDF it just wasn't cost effective anymore.

    I now use the fax machine for outgoing once or twice a month, and if I really need to receive we just arrange a time when I'm sitting next to the machine and trigger it manually.

    I'd agree though that if you're one of those businesses that still has to receive lots of faxes (and there are better technologies now days) then the PC based solution makes sense.

    Can you even buy Winfax any more??

    1. Re:How Much do you need faxes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A signature in an email isn't legally binding. A signature on a fax recieved into a computer then printed out later might not be either.

    2. Re:How Much do you need faxes? by Dadoo · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'd say that faxes are a disappearing technology.

      As much as I'd like to agree with you (because I think there are many better solutions), I can't. I work for a company that processes insurance claims and many of our claims are submitted via fax. Until about 6 months ago, they had 8 or 9 fax machines receiving the faxes, but they could barely keep up. Then, I replaced them with a couple of servers - 16 lines each - running Hylafax. On average, we're receiving 800 to 900 faxes a day, but during January and February, we were averaging around 1400.

      --
      Sit, Ubuntu, sit. Good dog.
    3. Re:How Much do you need faxes? by Dadoo · · Score: 1

      A signature in an email isn't legally binding.

      While it is legal on a fax in many places, it shouldn't be. Haven't any of these legislators heard of Photoshop?

      --
      Sit, Ubuntu, sit. Good dog.
    4. Re:How Much do you need faxes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's the big deal? That's already covered as "forgery".

    5. Re:How Much do you need faxes? by Dadoo · · Score: 1

      That's already covered as "forgery"

      Okay... It's a lot harder to prove forgery on a fax, when a forged signature is indistinguishable from a fake one.

      --
      Sit, Ubuntu, sit. Good dog.
    6. Re:How Much do you need faxes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But what alternatives do you offer?

      If it's like most insurance companies I've seen, the only alternatives are "send it by post, and we'll get back to you in a couple months, maybe", or "send us all your personal info over unencrypted email, and we'll do it this week".

      When you give people no serious alternatives, yes, they're going to use faxes more. It's nobody's fault but your own.

  16. Uhhhhh..... by balance+one · · Score: 1, Funny

    What's a FAX?

    1. Re:Uhhhhh..... by Neeth · · Score: 1

      My Fax? Let me tell you about my fax.

      On your computer, you write a letter digital. Then you print it out analog, so you can feed it to the fax machine digital. The fax sends it over the telephone line using bleebs and hiss analog. The telephonecompany doesn't send sound, it sends bits. Your sounds gets converted to bits digital and back again to sounds analog. The recipients fax machine hears these sounds and converts them to a digital document digital. It then prints it out on paper analog. The recipient reads the fax, thinks it is important and scans to document to store it on the computer digital.

      That, my friend, is a FAX.

      --
      Yes, I am the one with the legendary sig.
    2. Re:Uhhhhh..... by balance+one · · Score: 0

      And here I'm thinking it's some sappy Christian TV channel... sheesh!

  17. I hope you don't pile on to those by artifex2004 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Also, you could publish their phone/fax number on the Internet. I've seen forums that where this is done, and it becomes kind of a DOS attach against businesses who appear to ignore the DNC list in their telephone spaming.


    How do you know the submitter is not a competitor or otherwise has malicious intent? Let the law handle it, don't do the same thing you're accusing them of doing. What's the difference between you? Intention means nothing when the actions are the same.
    1. Re:I hope you don't pile on to those by fredklein · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Intention means nothing when the actions are the same.


      Bullshit.

      Let's take a simple situation: Man 'A' pulls out a gun and shoots man 'B'.

      You mean to tell me there is no difference between the following scenarios:

      1) Man 'A' is mentally disturbed, and not taking his medication. He thinks man 'B' is an alien. Man 'A' pulls out a gun and shoots man 'B'.

      2) Man 'A' is a cop. He sees a punk (man 'B') beating up an old lady. he tells 'B' to dtop. 'B' reaches into his pocket and yells "I'll kill you, pig!" Man 'A' pulls out a gun and shoots man 'B'.

      3) Man 'A' is a punk. He's beating a little old lady when a cop (man 'B') shows up. Man 'A' pulls out a gun and shoots man 'B'.

    2. Re:I hope you don't pile on to those by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do you know the submitter is not a competitor or otherwise has malicious intent? I don't advocate virtual vigilantism. But where's the logic in the above question? If a [fax] spamer is advertising a business or service, how would they expect positive results if they obfuscate their contact information? It is just not where the incentive is.

      It's difficult to understand how it ultimately would benifit someone to promote a product or service, then proxy a competitor's contact information in their advertisement. OTOH, if it's a spamer's desire to just generate "noise" in a marketing channel, then the bigger the nuisance they are, I suppose the more successful their effort could be judged.

      In the end, it seems that almost every human activity is influenced by self-interest.
    3. Re:I hope you don't pile on to those by Blkdeath · · Score: 1

      How do you know the submitter is not a competitor or otherwise has malicious intent? Let the law handle it, don't do the same thing you're accusing them of doing. What's the difference between you? Intention means nothing when the actions are the same.

      Easy solution; phone the business (block your phone number first; *67 works here in Ontario, Canada), tell them you received an interesting fax about their business and gauge their reaction to it. If it's a positive "Oh, great, we were hoping that would work!" kind of reaction, feel free to publish their info on a "These People Are Scum Peddlers" website. If it's a "Oh, sorry about that, I don't know how it got there" kind of reaction you know where you stand.

      --
      BD Phone Home!

      Shameless plug. Like you weren't expecting it.

    4. Re:I hope you don't pile on to those by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      >I don't advocate virtual vigilantism. But where's the logic in the above question?

      The competitor is not advertising his *own* business (in the hypothetical scenario), it's just one of many ways to gain a slight advantage by costing the competitor resources. Anybody who sinks this low probably is doing other things as well.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  18. Simple by kmsigel · · Score: 2, Insightful

    My fax machine is only turned on when I'm sending a fax. If somebody wants to send me something they must do it through email.

  19. SPAM becomes CAPTCHA by tepples · · Score: 2, Informative

    Why couldn't software scan received faxes for telltale signs of junk such as "Cancun", "vacation", "To all Employees", and trash them as we do with email filters? Because faxes have to be OCR'd. Spammers would just use techniques similar to those used in visual CAPTCHAs to distort keywords, similar to the "CA|\|CUN" obfuscation performed by e-mail spam tools. Pump and dump spammers are already doing this with their stock pitches that they attach as an image.
    1. Re:SPAM becomes CAPTCHA by hazem · · Score: 1

      That's easy. If the OCR fails, just junk the fax as it's probably not readable anyway. If the sender really wants to you get it, they'll call.

      You don't support customers who want to send messages on an 8-track. Why support them on outdated and pointless technology like faxes?

    2. Re:SPAM becomes CAPTCHA by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      Why couldn't software scan received faxes for telltale signs of junk such as "Cancun", "vacation", "To all Employees", and trash them as we do with email filters?
      Because faxes have to be OCR'd.
      Given that we already have OCR technology working with SPAM filters that can detect even distorted text, it doesn't seem such an unreasonable idea.
      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    3. Re:SPAM becomes CAPTCHA by mountiealpha · · Score: 1

      A small machine shp in the area receives most of their RFQs, orders and prints as faxes. I suppose it could be possible to set up a computer to do what you suggest, but who has the time to do that?

    4. Re:SPAM becomes CAPTCHA by tepples · · Score: 1

      But how much CPU time does this OCR technology use for a server that manages several incoming fax lines?

    5. Re:SPAM becomes CAPTCHA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >That's easy. If the OCR fails, just junk the fax as it's probably not readable anyway. If the sender really wants to you get it, they'll call.

      That'll be interesting when you receive a copy of the quotes from each of the dozen electricians you called to get the electrics in the store fixed. None of then will be anything BUT handwritten. And so many other stores do that too.

    6. Re:SPAM becomes CAPTCHA by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Given that faxes come in at something like 14.4kbps max, I would suspect that even a modest PC could handle a lot of fax lines.

  20. Ummmm by phoenixwade · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Unlike email, it costs me money when I get a fax so junk faxes really tick me off. I'd debate the idea that junk email doesn't cost money.....
    --
    A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
    1. Re:Ummmm by Travoltus · · Score: 1

      Exactly. The costs are hidden in the infrastructure. Bandwidth isn't free.

      --
      --- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!
  21. Nice urban legend by zoikes · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Nice idea, but it never happened... i defy you to find a usable fax number on any of the junk faxes you receive.

    Another story in a similar vein is slapping those business-reply-by-mail envelopes on a brick -- recepient pays ALL necessary postage. :)

    1. Re:Nice urban legend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's called CALLER ID.

    2. Re:Nice urban legend by LinuxGeek · · Score: 1

      Nice idea, but it never happened...


      It did indeed happen. I know someone that actually did this, slashdot user RockClimb (235954) and good friend for over 20 years.
      --

      Kindness is the language which the deaf can hear and the blind can see. - Mark Twain
    3. Re:Nice urban legend by zoikes · · Score: 1

      ok -- i'll believe you... The fax spammer's gotta be a moron to include a return fax number
      but then again, they *are* spammers...

    4. Re:Nice urban legend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They don't need to include a return number- just check the Caller ID. No Caller ID? The fax machine doesn't pick up. Simple. Effective.

    5. Re:Nice urban legend by lanzz · · Score: 1

      Spoofable.

    6. Re:Nice urban legend by ajs318 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      No it isn't, at least not by an ordinary person. On a land line, the caller ID is sent -- from the called party's local telephone exchange -- after the line polarity reversal and before the first burst of ringing voltage. No circuit is established between caller and called party. The only way to spoof caller ID is from the called party's local exchange. If you're on ISDN and have multiple numbers, there's a message you can send down the D-channel to select one of them; but the remote exchange will actually check that the number really is assigned to you. Spoofing caller ID requires fairly high-level access, and the phone company know exactly who can do it.

      However, there may be a way you can apparently spoof it, if the far-end user is sufficiently dim-witted. But it will probably only work for phones, not faxes. Like any phorm of phreaking, this one relies on telephone company greed to succeed.

      The old Nynex / Cable and Wireless phone lines avoided patent issues (and coincidentally made sure their equipment would be incompatible with BT's; though manufacturers would soon see a gap for a phone with built-in caller ID display and include both systems in their phones) by using a different method of sending caller ID, which was a burst of DTMF tones between ringing voltage bursts. If someone's telephone supports such dual-mode caller ID (it'd've been labelled "BT and cable compatible"), then you can send DTMF digits from the calling end immediately after the line has been picked up and they will show on the screen.

      Obviously that won't work for most people, since it's usual to look at the caller ID on the phone first, then pick it up (or let it ring, as the case may be). The called party would have to be in a hurry, or expecting a call from a known person, to pick up the phone without checking. Furthermore, you can only spoof the number that appears on the screen of the telephone, not the number you hear when you dial 1471.

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    7. Re:Nice urban legend by jmorris42 · · Score: 1

      > On a land line, the caller ID is sent -- from the called party's local telephone exchange -- after
      > the line polarity reversal and before the first burst of ringing voltage.

      Sigh, people who haven't even seen shinola trying to explain the difference.

      All you need is a PRI circuit to spoof caller id. Because calls often originate at a different location from the terminal ID the call is leaving a pbx on most Bells (US at least) allow a PRI customer to put whatever they want in the fields that make caller id work. (Note that the caller ID info is NOT the same as the billing info, Ma Bell DOES know where that illegal telemarketing or junk fax call really originated but to protect their high volume PRI customer they won't tell you.) Including leaving them blank (unavailable) or stuffing in an 800 number. Most larger fax spammers are going to have enough phone lines banging away to justify a PRI, especially since they can just plug that puppy into an Asterisk box and let it spew faxes down all 23 lines at once. And if that isn't enough they just upgrade to a quad PRI card. Yup, 92 lines humming out faxes with a single PCI slot. Now you understand why their cost is so low they can spew em out blindly. And even IF you manage to get a call back to one of those numbers and if they have Asterisk configured to even receive faxes, all it will do is drop a .tiff or .pdf file so you can't waste their ink or toner.

      --
      Democrat delenda est
    8. Re:Nice urban legend by ajs318 · · Score: 1

      If you have a primary rate ISDN line, you can send a message over the D-channel to set your ident. However, the telephone company will check that the number you are requesting is actually assigned to you. If the number is not one of yours, then the ident will not be changed.

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    9. Re:Nice urban legend by jmorris42 · · Score: 1

      > However, the telephone company will check that the number you are requesting is actually assigned to you.

      Totally depends on a) whether your telco has enough clue for that and b) whether you really NEED such an ability. Sometimes a phone system can get really spread out and and hairy. In the end, the PBX - Telco barrier is pretty close to a Telco - Telco barrier and not enough thought has went into securing those, until fairly recently they were always between big corporate entities and everyone pretty much trusted the other not to do anything overly abuse or stupid.

      Plus there is what the phone company SAYS and what they DO. In theory they should be helping shut down rogue telemarketing and junk fax operations. In reality they value those high volume customers and will help them avoid justice.... just as long as their check clears every month.

      --
      Democrat delenda est
    10. Re:Nice urban legend by ajs318 · · Score: 1

      BT most definitely check what number you're identing as. If they didn't, anyone would be able to pretend to be anyone else. The whole point of caller ID is to let you see who is calling before you pick up the phone, so it absolutely has to be correct.

      We have two primary rate ISDN connections, i.e. 60 conversations plus two D-channels, and a few ranges of numbers (including some 0800 [free] and 0845 [old local rate, but you can't use any inclusive minutes on your tariff]) to go with them. These are plugged into an Asterisk PABX using a four-channel card (a third port is used "in reverse" for the Eicon Diva card in our Hylafax server ..... looks just like 30 serial ports with modems on them. But what's coming out of them is already just a bunch of zeros and ones, all time-domain multiplexed and ready to stuff into a primary rate ISDN line). However, due to a change of address, there were subtly different particulars on the order for the second E1 line and associated numbers (subtle enough not to prevent bills getting through; if only telephone companies devoted as much attention to keeping the network going as they do to getting their money in). As a result, we couldn't ident any calls going down the first group of 30 lines as originating from any number associated with the second group, and vice versa.

      Needless to say, this took some tracking down! At our end, we had to disconnect each ISDN line in turn to verify that the problem was with each line not being allowed to use certain numbers; and at BT's end, they had to check the full billing information, right down to the last punctuation mark, and realise that we were the same customer.

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
  22. hit em back by matsenerd · · Score: 2, Insightful

    My favorite technique is to respond with a "Do not call" fax, but make it white text on a black background. It will use up a lot of their toner and it gets the point across.

    1. Re:hit em back by cskrat · · Score: 4, Insightful

      For all the suggestions that eating their toner is a nice way to retaliate.

      I seriously doubt it. They are most likely using an auto-dialing script on a PC fax-modem so that they can cut out the cost and hassle associated with having a live person man the fax machine feeding it junk all day. And if you can actually get through to send a fax in the 1/2 second between numbers on the script, your fax will either be deleted, ignored or treated as a confirmation that your number works without ever going to paper.

      You can bet these spammers have put more thought into what you can do to them than you have and have even experienced attempts at retaliation from other persons like minded to yourself. As such don't expect them to be vulnerable to such naive attempts at breaking their system. The best recourse is going to be either changing your number, setting up electronic reception of faxes or contacting relevant and credible legal authorities.

      --
      My God! It's full of eval()'s.
  23. No, that's "polite request" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Reason is its big brother.

  24. What about when you don't have a fax machine? by santiago · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Does anyone have any good advice on what to do if you get junk faxes and don't even have a fax machine? Apparently my home phone number was once a business's fax line, and we periodically get what must be junk faxes at odd hours of the night. How do we deal with this crap if we don't own any fax machine (or even a modem) to waste time reading the messages and contacting the fake unsubscribe numbers that won't do any good anyways?

    1. Re:What about when you don't have a fax machine? by Nimey · · Score: 1

      Find some way of recording which number it's from, then do a reverse lookup on 411.com, then bring in a landshark.

      Else, get an X11 device or similar that will kill power to your answering machine between the hours of x and y.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    2. Re:What about when you don't have a fax machine? by phayes · · Score: 1

      I've heard of people who setup an asterisk server to take care of all their junk Fax/telephone calls. As asterisk can filter calls based on caller-ID, friends & family are passed through without encumbrance. All other calls get picked up by asterisk which shunts Fax calls off to a fax line or can store the faxes locally so that you can filter out the spam later.

      --
      Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
    3. Re:What about when you don't have a fax machine? by Nimey · · Score: 1

      Er, s/X11/X10/.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    4. Re:What about when you don't have a fax machine? by Skreech · · Score: 1

      My first inclination would be to attempt to receive the fax, not only is there a lack of ways to do so in your situation but it's quite a bit more trouble than you deserve for someone calling you with a fax machine...

      I don't know of a solution that doesn't cost money. I don't think the phone company will do anything for free. You could have your number changed, though depending on how long you've had it already it might be quite a bother and, again, more trouble than you deserve. You could disconnect your phone at night, which would be quite annoying and a hazard, I think. A good try would be to tell the phone company you've been "harassed" with phone calls at night, fax or human doesn't matter. Aren't records kept to allow them to see which numbers call? Should be... I wouldn't put it below them to try to sell you Caller-ID on the very same call. (Don't)

      But mostly I'm thinking of how I dropped having a land-line altogether as it's such a bother.

    5. Re:What about when you don't have a fax machine? by danlock4 · · Score: 1

      I had exactly that problem for a long time at my last residence. My number was one digit different from a local government fax number and I often had fax machines trying to call me.

      When I got a fax call, I activated my fax modem and downloaded the fax, which stopped the offending fax machine from trying to call my number (until the next time). It was kind of funny to receive "private" faxes that were covered with "for internal use only" messages, etc., but it was annoying when the fax machines kept calling back and wouldn't give up until I used the fax modem to receive the calls.

      Finally, I got frustrated with the annoyance and sent a fax back to the originating number which indicated that my number was not the one they wanted, etc., repeated several times.

      After that, I had no more offending fax calls. YMMV.

      --
      To .sig or not to .sig, that is the question.
    6. Re:What about when you don't have a fax machine? by DeanPentcheff · · Score: 1

      In most cases, I think your only alternative is to change your phone number (the phone company will do this without charge if you explain the reason).

      The problem is that the faxes are most likely coming in because of a typographical error in an advertisement (or business listing). That means that they come from multiple different sources, so you can't simply block the one source for all the faxes.

      We had this trouble because of a wrong area code posted for an insurance company's claim-filing fax machine. Dozens of calls from dozens of lawyers' fax machines. Of course, the new number we have is listed as the contact number for some scam artists (unknown to us) who generate regular bill-collection phone calls. But that's another problem...

    7. Re:What about when you don't have a fax machine? by QuasiEvil · · Score: 1

      I used to have the same problem, so I eventually installed a relay in the incoming phone line. Based on a timer, the relay would open the circuit between the hours of 10pm and 7am, disconnecting the internal phones from the telco. Thus, no annoying rings in the middle of the night to wake me up. The rest of the time (which is any time I'd call out or anybody reasonable would call in), everything worked normally.

      I figured no harm done, as in a real emergency, my friends, family, and wife would call my cell.

    8. Re:What about when you don't have a fax machine? by walt-sjc · · Score: 1

      I do. I also have it set so that your caller-ID has to be on a whitelist between the hours of 9pm-8am to bypass the "press 5 to speak with us" message. Any anonymous / 800# calls get that 24x7. Blacklisted calls get played a "this number has been disconnected or is no longer in service" message that I recorded from the telco. Then there are numbers in the "asshole" list that get played a Very special message.

    9. Re:What about when you don't have a fax machine? by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      My first inclination would be to attempt to receive the fax, not only is there a lack of ways to do so in your situation

      Presumably he has a PC. Connect the phone to a modem (you can get a used modem for very little or free now; especially a 28k or 14k, which are still fast enough for fax). Dig up some old fax software (a few minutes with Google; though many modems used to come with a bundle of software including Winfax or an equivalent). Set it to auto answer after a certain time.

  25. Easy... by HRogge · · Score: 1

    here in Germany there is an easy option. Phone calls are cheaper during the night, so just use a time to switch the fax of between 22:00 and 06:00... no spam faxes left.

  26. Live with it by cdrguru · · Score: 1

    Mostly, there are no alternatives other than something like changing your fax number or turning off the ability to receive faxes.

    If you can live with not getting purchase orders and the like faxed in, you can just turn it off. Email isn't a solution - it is unreliable. What is the difference between a company using email and a spammer, anyway?

    Legally, you would think that someone would be able to stop a business from sending illegal faxes. The problem is that you, as the recipient can sue but the police can't just step in an arrest and fine them. So to really make them stop you would need to get a large number of recipients together. A law firm was trying to collect on junk faxes this way years ago until they realized nobody was spending the time to follow through.

    Yes, junk faxes cost you money. Suing the sender will cost more time and more money. So much so that it is a better deal for most people to just eat the cost and ignore it.

    1. Re:Live with it by seebs · · Score: 1

      In my experience, it's pretty cost-effective, and it does noticably reduce the number of faxes you get.

      --
      My blog: http://www.seebs.net/log/ --- My iPhone/iPad app: http://www.seebs.net/seebsfrac/
    2. Re:Live with it by potat0man · · Score: 1

      I don't know about it taking too much time and too much money.

      Seems to have worked well for this guy: http://www.junkfax.org/fax/action/CA_how_to_sue.ht ml

  27. Take one for the team by Bronster · · Score: 1, Troll

    Find whoever is sending them and go kill them. Messily. Publically.

    You'll go to jail for a long time, but the chilling effect it has on the rest of the spammers out there will make you a fricking hero to the rest of us.

    (if you're lucky, "the rest of us" includes your parole board. If you're super extra lucky it includes your jury!)

    #include - this is Funny not Informative ok mods. Sheesh.

    1. Re:Take one for the team by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Find whoever is sending them and go kill them. Messily. Pubic-ly."

      There, I fixed that typo for you.

  28. Use a call blocker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The following product works like a charm for me at home with junk calls:

    http://www.privacycorps.com/products/

    I'm surprised that more companies don't sell things like this. If it were cheaper and sold in box stores everyone would probably have one. It's a little pricy, but I love the results.

  29. Old laptop with a fax/modem. by Wrenzo · · Score: 1

    The company I used to work for had a spare laptop with a fax/modem on it. It stored the faxes in a shared directory where everyone could get at them. People deleted the spam and printed the ones they wanted if they actually wanted a printout. We set the fax/modem to answer after fewer rings than the fax machine would, so in case the laptop crashed or something, the fax machine would be the fallback.

  30. A couple comments by slackmaster2000 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Junk faxes here really slowed down after coverage of the enforcement of junk fax legislation started to hit the mainstream media. I guess that was in the late 90s sometime. We still get a few from time to time. Although now that I think of it, this decrease also probably coincided with an increase in spam, which probably has more to do with it (cheaper, easier, wider base of victims).

    Here's a wikipedia page with information about what can be done legally against junk fax senders in the US, if it's bad enough that you want to take the time to go after them: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Junk_fax

    The solution, although not so much a solution as a better system, is to use fax server software or an online fax service. I run a local fax server here. Faxes come in and are routed via email to the secretary who was at one time responsible for pulling paper faxes off the old fax machine. This person then routes the fax to the appropriate person, and acts as a junk fax filter :) There are four major benefits to software faxing: 1) You'll save money because there are no consumables to buy, and because of this the cost of receiving a junk fax is the same as receiving a junk email as long as you don't pay per minute on your phone line. 2) Routing faxes through email is much more effective than tossing paper into a physical inbox, especially if you have to make copies of faxes for multiple people. 3) Many fax servers will enable your employees to send a fax by simply printing to a special fax printer on their computer, saving time, money, etc. 4) The quality of received faxes, and especially outgoing faxes, is considerably improved.

    I do sympathize with you. Especially if you're working with a lot of international companies (assuming you're in the US, if not sorry), sometimes you simply have to be able to accept faxed documents to keep customers happy. You might encourage them to start using email, perhaps by pointing out the financial benefits. Also, a lot of people might not know about simple tools like pdfcreator with which they can print and send a purchase order via email right from their existing accounting software.

    I do object to your comment implying that junk email doesn't cost anything. Perhaps if you're working for a small outfit with hosted email it doesn't appear to cost anything. My mail server here processes a hundred thousand spam messages per month, and we're a pretty small outfit. This definitely costs real money in terms of hardware and software support, and most importantly employee time (I guarantee that people spend more time going through their junk email or flagging email as junk than they do looking at junk faxes).

    1. Re:A couple comments by macdaddy · · Score: 1

      Could you describe your software solution in more detail? What package are you using. Does it run on Linux or is it a commercial Windows app? I'd be interested in setting up something similar. Thanks

  31. Can't Get Rid of it. by binaryspiral · · Score: 5, Informative

    Faxes are official legal copies of documents. Email attachments are not.

    Anyone who has to send a signed or legal documents quickly - a fax is the only option unless you send it via courier.

    1. Re:Can't Get Rid of it. by 0-9aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa · · Score: 1

      I'm a lawyer and I see a ton of .pdf emails with real signatures - aren't these valid copies? Does anyone know of any caselaw on this issue? I've presneted them to the Judge as such. No one has ever even questioned this.

    2. Re:Can't Get Rid of it. by MarkAyen · · Score: 1

      Every fax machine I've ever owned has had a very reliable blocking mechanism: an on/off switch. If you're using your fax machine to receive signed legal documents only (which, presumably, you're expecting) only switch it on when you know you need it. It shouldn't take too long for your correspondents to get used to calling when they're sending you a legitimate document.

  32. Solution - get new technology. by binaryspiral · · Score: 1

    Writefax or similar software on a PC will accept any faxes - then you can view them from any workstation, delete the junk and print the good ones. It doesn't even have to be a modern PC... any old Pentium 3 with a relative small amount of ram and storage will trump any modern fax machine.

    And even a bonus, this gives you a digital copy for easy archival to network backup, tape, optical media, or removable thumb drive.

    Seriously a fax machine is really only useful for sending faxes now a days.

  33. Removal number? by hansamurai · · Score: 1

    A while ago, I gave my number to a removal number and now I am getting more junk faxes than ever.
    That reminds me of the time my wife went through her spam mail, opened each one, and clicked the unsubscribe link in each one. That did nothing but tell the spammers, "hey, I actually read these!", and she only got more spam.
  34. TCPA by deblau · · Score: 4, Informative
    Read this. In particular:

    The FCC can issue warning citations and impose fines against companies violating or suspected of violating the junk fax rules, but does not award individual damages. If you have received a fax advertisement from someone who does not have an established business relationship with you or to whom you have not provided prior express permission to send fax advertisements, you can file a complaint with the FCC. You can file your complaint by completing the FCC's on-line complaint Form 1088 at: www.fcc.gov/cgb/complaints.html; e-mailing fccinfo@fcc.gov; calling 1-888-CALL-FCC (1-888-225-5322) voice or 1-888-TELL-FCC (1-888-835-5322) TTY; faxing 1-866-418-0232; or writing to:


    Federal Communications Commission
    Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau
    Consumer Inquiries and Complaints Division
    445 12th Street, SW
    Washington, DC 20554.

    --
    This post expresses my opinion, not that of my employer. And yes, IAAL.
  35. Get your fax number off of your webpage by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 1

    I used to have my fax number on my business's webpage (along with the other address information and whatnot). I started receiving a ridiculous number of junk faxes. I then took my fax number off of my webpage and about a year later (i.e. now) I receive maybe one junk fax every two months.

    --
    If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
  36. How about ... by Peaker · · Score: 1

    just sawing a limb off? :-)

    It should reduce sentence times but still have the same chilling effect.

  37. Faxes still have *some* usefulness.. by Rearden82 · · Score: 1

    Sometimes I need to send a document that I only have on paper, a signed contract, a copy of my photo ID, etc.

    Sure, fax machines are annoying. But it's nothing compared to firing up a scanner, previewing and setting it up to capture the right area, exporting to a PDF or other common format, attaching to an email, and hoping it doesn't get canned by their mail server's file size limit or attachment-blocking policies. And why spend 15 bucks to overnight a letter when it can be sent in 2 minutes for the cost of a phone call?

    Sure, email is superior in many ways, but fax machines will still be convenient and relevant until we all work in paperless offices. In other words, pretty much forever. Telling people to avoid junk faxes by getting rid of them altogether is about as helpful as telling someone to get rid of their phone if they are bothered by telemarketers.

    Anyway, we use a PC w/ a fax modem to receive faxes where I work. Deleting junk faxes is just as easy as deleting junk emails.

    1. Re:Faxes still have *some* usefulness.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think *stand-alone* fax machines might be on the way out for a lot of businesses.

      Modern (digital) photocopiers have a scan-to-email function. You walk up to your photocopier, enter the destination address and hit scan. Your paper is scanned and sent as a PDF attachment. If you're "faxing" the same people, you can usually program an address book and it's faster than genuine faxing.

      (Often conventional fax is an option on them too - and it wouldn't be hard for you to have a email-to-fax gateway internally.) Sure this doesn't deal with email-size-limits but it does deal with your other complaints, well, as well as a real fax machine would.

      Couple that with a fax-to-email gateway that converts incoming faxes to PDF and you're set!

    2. Re:Faxes still have *some* usefulness.. by walt-sjc · · Score: 1

      We are talking business use here mainly. Pretty much any reasonably modern (newer than 1999) office copier has the ability to "scan to email/network PDF." Few are actually configured to do it however. A page (which is black and white) works out to about 70K / page at 300 DPI (which is significantly better than a fax), so you should RARELY run into email limits unless you are sending hundreds of pages. I've never heard of a business that blocks PDF files via email. Ever. I've also never seen one that couldn't handle at least a 4M attachment.

      If your high-end copier really doesn't have scanning capability, go get yourself a $300 HP all-in-one and a hook it up to an old desktop dedicated to the purpose. All these modern all-in-one's have the "scan to email" capabilities which is no harder to use than a fax machine.

      I recently was dealing with a real estate transaction, and was "faxing" back and forth 10 page offer's / counter offers several times a day for a couple weeks. My agent was fully "email aware" and we did everything via scanner / email. The hard part was reading real faxes sent by other agents to my agent that my agent forwarded to me. Usually they were Very hard to read, and in many cases were partially unreadable. Fortunately we were dealing with standardized forms so I could always refer to a master copy.

      Real faxing is dead to all but the totally clueless. Set up right (which is EASY to do,) scanning to email is trivial.

  38. email now legal for some things in UK by pbhj · · Score: 2, Informative

    There was a change in the law here in the UK in the Civil Procedure Rules 1998 meaning that emails and electronic carriers with docs on could be accepted in certain circumstances by courts and tribunals (etc.). I think however that they can still specify fax as being the only allowed electronic mode of communicating a document.

    Which means that there are circumstances in which you are wrong.

    Indeed certain places like UKIPO request email in preference for eg post-grant amendments.

    FWIW.

  39. How can faxes be legal, if so easily spoofed? by KWTm · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I am not disagreeing with your assertion that, currently, faxes seem to have some legal standing.

    But do people not realize how easily they can be forged and spoofed? The facsimile machine is technology from the 80's that has no authentication mechanism. It would be so easily spoofed with a fax modem! You could set up a fax that would seemingly come from, say, the office of the CEO, with letterhead and fax header to correspond, and even a signature would be a simple matter to attach.

    Not long after Win2k came out, there was some situation where I had to send some fax with my signature on it to some company --something about giving written notice to my cable company that I really did want to stop my cable service, or something like that --I can't remember now. But I had no fax machine, just a digital camera. So I signed a blank sheet of paper, photographed my signature, pulled the photo into the computer and posterized it into some 4-bit grayscale with GIMP, stuck it into some OpenOffice.org letter, and then printed it to fax via Win2k. It worked, and after that I kept the PNG image of my signature around in case I had to use it for something similar.

    Does that still work? It's so easy to manipulate a digital image of people's signature nowadays. The signatures of some corporate executives are even freely distributed! You get junk mail saying, "Dear [insert your own name here]: I am writing to personally tell you how much we value you as a customer, [bla bla] signed Joseph L. Presidente, CEO, Fortune 500 Company" followed by their frigg'n signature. How hard is that to cut&paste into some fax to some hotel saying, "To Whom It May Concern: I verify that I, Joseph L. Presidente, have agreed to pay all accommodation expenses incurred by [insert your name here] during his stay," or something similar.

    The facsimile is a valuable tool, but the authority which people attach to them is misplaced. People need to get a clue about digital signatures, or deal with being a victim of social engineering.

    --
    404555974007725459910684486621289147856453481154 in hex is "You sank my Battleship?"
    [GPG key in journal]
    1. Re:How can faxes be legal, if so easily spoofed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >faxes seem to have some legal standing.

      Sure, they have legal standing in the sense that you can enter a fax as evidence if you have a witness that will testify as to its contents, origin, etc. In other words, just like any other document.

    2. Re:How can faxes be legal, if so easily spoofed? by binaryspiral · · Score: 1

      I was quoting U.S. law, sorry. I should have been more clear.

      And certainly faxes can be spoofed, but so can handwritten letters or typed documents.

  40. junk faxes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, if (1) it's illegal to send them, and (2) they add your number to all the junk faxing lists when you call to add your number to their "don't fax" lists, why not call the do-not-fax number and add all of the telephone and fax numbers you can find for the FBI, Department of Justice, FCC, IRS, state and local law enforcement, and any other appropriate government offices you can think of. The junkfaxers should find themselves nuked, folded, spindled, mutilated, shredded, stapled, and then jailed, within a couple of months.

  41. Here are some good places to start... by NewbieV · · Score: 2, Informative
    Courtesy of Google:
    --


    "For every right, an equal responsibility..."
    1. Re:Here are some good places to start... by seebs · · Score: 1

      I prefer junkfaxes.org (note the plural).

      --
      My blog: http://www.seebs.net/log/ --- My iPhone/iPad app: http://www.seebs.net/seebsfrac/
  42. Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 by Scutter · · Score: 2, Informative

    The Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 was not designed to prevent spam (although it's being used that way now). It was designed to stop junk faxes and it really works! Use it! Here's some good info.

    --

    "Tell me doctor, with all of your defenses, are there any provisions for an attack by killer bees?"
    1. Re:Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 by Guppy06 · · Score: 1
      "The Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991"

      ... was essentially rendered null and void by the Junk Fax Prevention Act of 2005, passed specifically to add the same "existing business relationship" loopholes previously enjoyed by telemarketers and spammers.

      Be sure to thank your members of Congress, perhaps by fax.

  43. Make a business of it! by NerveGas · · Score: 1


          One of the people in my neighborhood makes a living suing telephone-spammers. There are some tricks to actually getting a judge to rule in your favor - even when the company has clearly violated the law - but once you know them, it works well. And many don't even bother going to court, they simply send her a $500 check.

    --
    Oh, you're not stuck, you're just unable to let go of the onion rings.
  44. Legality..how did this get modded a 5? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Faxes are official legal copies of documents. Email attachments are not.


    Anyone who has to send a signed or legal documents quickly - a fax is the only option unless you send it via courier.



    You can't make a blanket statement like that about the law. In the U.S. alone, we have a minimum of 51 separate jurisdictions applying 51 different laws. If one is outside the U.S. then the jurisdiction again make a difference.


    So far as I know, in Ohio and in the 6th Federal Circuit, faxes are no better or worse than any other copy of a document, including an email attachment of it. If one is filing a document, then it can only be done electronically in the Federal Disctrict Courts in this Circuit. They will not accept faxes.

  45. A real solution by reneg8 · · Score: 1

    Lots of pithy comments in this thread, but here is something that will actually work; 1)Get rid of you physical fax machine 2)Get an efax account I've been using them for about 8 years now I guess, and I've yet to receive even a single junk fax. They must do some pretty hefty filtering on their end. Faxes come as email attachments which is convenient for filing, forwarding and later retrieval. It is cheaper than maintaining a fax line and machine too.

  46. Honeypot modem by Moray_Reef · · Score: 1

    How slow can you set a fax modem to receive? 1 bit per second sounds good... just trash the incoming faxes.

    --
    If you voted for Nader, THIS IS ALL YOUR FAULT!!
  47. You can sue them. by seebs · · Score: 2, Informative

    Disclaimer: I am not a lawyer, and this is not legal advice; rather, it is an account of my layman's perception of how things have worked.

    It's very simple.

    Unless they have prior express permission (or, thanks to a new enabling law, an "established business relationship" with many additional qualifiers), unsolicited faxes are categorically prohibited in the US. Penalty? $500, per advertisement, statutory damages, plus possible penalties.

    So sue.

    Call them up, find out who it is and what they're selling. Tape the call if that's legal in your area. Then sue.

    My share, after attorney's fees and costs (including copying, etc.), of my junk fax litigation has been about $38,000 over the last few years. Mostly mortgage brokers, many of whom are predatory lenders as well. Do not waste your time trying to identify "Mortgage Services" -- just get them to hand you to a local mortgage company, and sue the mortgage company. Generally, in my experience, a given 800 number is affiliated with a single customer, so you call the number, and then sue for all the faxes you've gotten with that number on them.

    I write about this stuff some in my blog. Largest total settlement was with Allied Telesyn, who paid $250 per ad to all the people who filled out claim forms, $5k to me, and probably more like $300k to some lawyers. Largest settlements for me personally have been on the order of $10k, but my friendly neighborhood lawyer gets about 35%, and there's filing fees and such.

    Just a few things to know:
    1. Junk faxers are dishonest. They will lie. They will tell you they didn't know it was illegal, they will lie to you about the law, they will say they didn't send the faxes, and so on. We see this all the time.
    2. If you are not comfortable representing yourself pro se, get a lawyer.
    3. Don't go to small claims unless you are absolutely SURE that your state won't let you do district court. Small claims judges are often unfamiliar with statutory damage laws.

    There are no damages to prove; the law sets the damages at $500, per advertisement.

    If you want to call remove numbers, go ahead, and write down which ones you called and when, but don't expect it to have any effect.

    --
    My blog: http://www.seebs.net/log/ --- My iPhone/iPad app: http://www.seebs.net/seebsfrac/
  48. Remove the paper from the fax by Otis_INF · · Score: 1

    Simply remove the paper from the fax. This then means the fax can't be delivered. We do that too and if someone wants to fax us, they have to call us and we put paper in the fax, we receive the fax and the rest of the paper is removed again. You can also simply unplug the fax and only plug it in when you want to use it.

    Though if I could, I would remove the fax altogether. Receiving faxes is rare these days...

    --
    Never underestimate the relief of true separation of Religion and State.
  49. filters by Oshkoshjohn · · Score: 1

    Install a rudimentary spam filter, as found in Gmail and Firefox. First, lose the FAX machine.

    --
    Goddamned kids! Get off my lawn!
  50. Software by RedBear · · Score: 1

    I have to second those who are recommending a computer/software solution. I happen to enjoy Macs these days, so I'll describe just how simple it is to set this up in Mac OS X.

    1. Open the Apple menu, go to System Preferences.

    2. Open the Print & Fax preference pane.

    3. Go to the "Faxing" tab.

    4. Check the box "Receive faxes on this computer".

    5. Fill in your fax number, set the number of rings before answering (depends on how you use the line)

    6. Choose any or all of the available receiving options:
                a. Save the fax as a PDF file to a folder you designate (if it's a shared folder anyone on the network can monitor incoming faxes)
                b. Email the fax to an address you designate
                c. Print the fax to any printer the Mac is set up to print to (local or network printer, either will work)

    7. Optionally, go to the "Sharing" tab and turn on printer sharing, then choose "Let others send faxes through this computer". This makes the fax modem available as a shared "printer" to any other Mac on the network, or any Windows XP computer with Apple's "Bonjour for Windows" package installed.

    If you're keeping your regular fax machine on the same line, set it to answer manually so that it doesn't pre-empt the computer. it's not actually necessary to keep the fax machine, but it is the simplest way to send faxes when you only have a physical document. Otherwise you'll need a scanner to pull physical documents in and then "print" them to the shared fax. This distributed direct sending method is kind of a bonus though. The main feature is the ability to receive faxes without using up fax supplies.

    I did this once already for a former employer, rerouting their incoming faxes to their laser printer, where printing is immensely cheaper than using up fax machine ribbon. If you have or get one of the new Intel Macs you'll also need one of the external Apple USB modems since they don't come built-in anymore. Other than that the process will be exactly the same on any Mac that is capable of running Mac OS X 10.3 or above.

    If the junk faxes are coming from a legitimate number you can also file a complaint with the FCC and/or possibly take them to court and get $1500 per incident if you can prove that there was a willful and knowledgeable intent to violate the TCPA. I read about somebody who did that a few years back. Of course there is always the tried and true faxing back an endless loop of black pages, although I can't imagine a spamming company these days who would actually be using a real fax machine that would be subject to having its ribbon used up by this little prank. Alternating the black pages with a huge "TAKE MY NUMBER OFF YOUR LIST IMMEDIATELY OR WE WILL BE FORCED TO FILE A FORMAL COMPLAINT WITH THE FCC" might work even better.

  51. be a vindicative bastard! by digitalsushi · · Score: 1

    it'd be nice if 90% of fax machines were a fleet of teergrube/tarpit style fax machines that could receive the data at about 8bps, requiring hours and hours to receive a single fax, tying that sender's line up the entire way ;)

    --
    slashdot: where everyone yells sarcastic metaphors to themselves to understand the issue
  52. Revenge by donak · · Score: 1

    I suggested this to someone the other day : if you get an unsolicited fax, and it has the originating number on the top edge, send a reply.

    Make sure it's on an extra long piece of paper, and once the leading edge feeds out of the scanner, flip it back over and sticky tape it to the bottom edge ... to form a loop.

    No idea how well it would work, but it's possible you could use up quite a lot of their paper before they cut it off, maybe a whole roll if you sent it in the middle of the night.

    --
    Don't blame me, it's usually 2 in the morning when I post ...
  53. Disconnect Tone by wonkavader · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's a commercial product and a helluva lot less satisfying than what you want. You WANT to take these guys out back and shoot them once in the head, but all you can really do is get them to stop calling.

    Get a telezapper or similar product. http://www.telezapper.com/

    It sends a "This number is disconnected" tone. Humans ignore it. Automated fax and telemarketer systems note it and remove your number from their database. Why call something which is known to be gone?

    It's cheap, and it works fairly well.

    Less mess in your local alley, too, though I'd still prefer the stronger solution.

  54. Hit yourself back! by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 1

    If you're sending them a paper fax then you're using the same amount of toner to print the white-on-black original.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
  55. You can however by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    "Accidentally" send faxes to the phone numbers in their advertisement.

    --
    Deleted
    1. Re:You can however by cskrat · · Score: 1

      True enough. Voice lines are a bit more vulnerable to DoS attacks.

      --
      My God! It's full of eval()'s.
  56. Change your number by serodores · · Score: 1

    Maybe I'm missing something... but wouldn't changing the phone # for your fax work too?

  57. Humans? this is for fax by phorm · · Score: 1

    This works fine if you're getting faxes to your voice-line, but if you're getting junk-faxes to your business-fax line, then it's going to disconnect legit callers as well as fax-spammers

  58. Glaring Market Hole by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    Why support them on outdated and pointless technology like faxes?

    Show me the $199 freestanding fax-to-PDF-e-mail gateway. Seriously, I have an AIO Brother that has all of the necessary parts inside, but there's no software stack to do it. I know HP has several nice units in the $1500+ range. $50 bonus for hooking up to an LDAP directory.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  59. Still costs lots of money by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    The ones we want we print out, the spam you can just delete.

    People are way more expensive than paper.

    (Not that I'm advocating printing faxes on people).

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  60. Junk Fax Recourse. by VariableGHz · · Score: 1

    As a recipient of junk faxes, you do have some recourse, but it usually isn't worth the effort. It usually boils down to how much time you want to spend on teaching someone a lesson. You will rarely, if ever, recover your time in terms of monetary value by taking the entity or person(s) to court. Nevertheless, should you choose to do so, the following State (California) and Federal statutes apply: Title 47 227(b)(1)(C)(II) California Business & Professions Code 17538.43(b)(2) You can make $500, up to $1,500 if the damages are trebled.

  61. Charge them. by Irvu · · Score: 1

    IANAL but At least in some states of the U.S. the practice of sending someone something that they do not want and then demanding payment or otherwize extracting use has been banned. This has been extended to making it possible for you to use junk faxxers on the grounds that they are using your fax. Probably this would be time consuming for any one person but if the laws of your place of residence allow it a class action lawsuit might be doable, even government funded.

  62. Asterisk + RxFAX/TxFAX by lancesnyder · · Score: 1

    Asterisk + RxFAX and TxFAX. I wrote a script that will send X amt. of total black pages to any number i choose, just in case i ever have to deal with this.

  63. Simple.. by hexed_2050 · · Score: 1

    Use a computer to accept your faxes. I wasn't aware that people actually still used real fax machines?

    --
    Valkyrie is about to die! Wizard needs food -- badly!