Slashdot Mirror


Russia Accused of Cyber-War Against Estonia

earthlingpink writes about the ongoing DDoSing of Estonia. The Guardian is reporting that Russia stands accused of engaging in a three-week-long series of cyber-attacks. Government, banking, and media websites have been targeted. It is unclear whether the attacks are sanctioned or initiated by the Russian Government, but Estonian authorities believe that to be the case. NATO has sent security experts to Tallinn to help beef up defenses. The Estonian defense minister said, "At present, NATO does not define cyber-attacks as a clear military action. This means that the provisions of... collective self-defense, will not automatically be extended to the attacked country... this matter needs to be resolved in the near future."

373 comments

  1. In Soviet Russia by saibot834 · · Score: 1, Funny

    In Soviet Russia, government cyber-attacks you.

    1. Re:In Soviet Russia by ArchdukeChocula · · Score: 2, Funny

      Differing from Soviet America how?

    2. Re:In Soviet Russia by Architect_sasyr · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Soviet America makes it seem like Soviet Russia is still to blame.

      WE'RE ALL M.A.D. I TELL YOU! M.A.D.

      --
      Me failed English...
      FreeBSD over Linux. If my comments seem odd, this may explain...
    3. Re:In Soviet Russia by Opportunist · · Score: 2, Funny

      Huh? How's the German military intelligence service connected to this?

      And yes, I do find the choice of the acronym highly ironic.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    4. Re:In Soviet Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In "Soviet America" the Government probably very rarely DDoS'es Citibank to smitherines, now does it? Or takes down the website of the Venezuelan President? How likely is that?

      It is a fact that some of the attacks have been successfully identified as coming from Russian state institutions. As a result, for instance the the two biggest banks in Estonia have been reduced to blocking foreign traffic to their servers.

    5. Re:In Soviet Russia by Andrew+Kismet · · Score: 1

      "The legal basis for the MAD is the MAD Law of 1990-12-20[1], as amended by Article 8 of the law of 2005-04-22"

      It seems some Wikipedia editors have a sense of humour after all...

    6. Re:In Soviet Russia by RexRhino · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      In your universe, two wrongs apparently make a right. Hitler + Stalin = Jesus.

    7. Re:In Soviet Russia by skarphace · · Score: 2, Interesting

      In "Soviet America" the Government probably very rarely DDoS'es Citibank to smitherines, now does it? Or takes down the website of the Venezuelan President? How likely is that?
      Would we even know if we are engaged in cyber warfare right now?
      --
      Bullish Machine Tzar
    8. Re:In Soviet Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod Parent Up! That's an excellent question.

  2. I can confirm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    As an American-Estonian (1/3 Estonian on my Mother's side), I can confirm that Russia has been attacking my programming project, making it impossible to debug. And THAT boss is why the project isn't done yet! What can I do when all of Russia is against me?

    Where did I hear about this attack? Uh.. slashd... an on-line news source specializing in technical news of course!

    1. Re:I can confirm by mfarah · · Score: 5, Funny

      As an American-Estonian (1/3 Estonian on my Mother's side),

      How can you be ONE THIRD something? I'd understand 1/2 or 1/4 or 1/8 (etc.)

      Or, perhaps, you're 1/3 SWEDISH. }:->

      (I know I'd be downmodded for this, but I HAD to say it)

      --
      "Trust me - I know what I'm doing."
      - Sledge Hammer
    2. Re:I can confirm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      1/3 is binary 0.0101010101... , so obviously his grandfather, great-great-grandfather, great-great-great-great-grandfather and (great-great-)^n grandfather are all Estonian, while the rest of his relatives are completely !Estonian.

    3. Re:I can confirm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because my Mother is 2/3 Estonian. Duh!

    4. Re:I can confirm by ichigo+2.0 · · Score: 3, Funny

      How can you be ONE THIRD something? I'd understand 1/2 or 1/4 or 1/8 (etc.)

      Ménage à trois? ;)

    5. Re:I can confirm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, you see, the GP indicates he's at least part American- we still haven't made that transition to the metric system, remember? In SI units, 1/3 Estonian converts to 250.0 millibaltics, or 1/4. That, or the GP is a freakish chimera.

    6. Re:I can confirm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      ..or to put it another way: if ten generations before his ancestors (in total 1024 individuals) included 341 Estonians his genetic makeup would consist of 33.30078125% Estonian genes, which is about 1/3. Furthermore, this doesn't take into account that not all genes have the same probability of being transmitted to the coming generations, e.g. if his grandmother had 1/2 Estonian genes it is possible that he himself inherited 2/3 of her Estonian genes making him 1/3 Estonian.

    7. Re:I can confirm by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      I think you can get a ratio of 1/3 through inbreeding. Not that I'm implying anything :)

    8. Re:I can confirm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      "The Conversation" in that family:

      Son: Daddy, where did I come from?
      Dad: Well son, when a man, and a woman, and another woman love each other very much...

    9. Re:I can confirm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      How can you be ONE THIRD something? I'd understand 1/2 or 1/4 or 1/8 (etc.)

      Key: person(%estonian)

      A(100) + B(000) begat C(050)
      C(050) + D(100) begat E(075)
      E(075) + F(050) begat G(063)
      G(063) + H(075) begat I(069)
      I(069) + J(000) begat OriginalPoster(035)
      35% is roughly 1/3.

    10. Re:I can confirm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While 1/3 is more likely an approximation, it's within the realm of possibility to be exactly 1/3 of something.

      2 parents +
      4 grandparents +
      8 great grandparents +
      16 great great gps = 30 people

      If 10 of those 30 direct ancestors are estonian and the other 20 are not, then there you have it, you are precisely 1/3 estonian.

  3. Re:Should a cyber war require a cyber retaliation? by Ngarrang · · Score: 1

    One could argue that the entire world is in a constant state of cyber-war.

    --
    Bearded Dragon
  4. Re:Should a cyber war require a cyber retaliation? by Mockylock · · Score: 1

    No, just slashdot.

    --
    "Please, shut up. Just when I think you can't say anything more stupid, you speak again." -Archie Bunker.
  5. China has been at cyber-war with US for some time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "At present, NATO does not define cyber-attacks as a clear military action"

    They need to - we've been under attack from China for years and they're getting away with it.

  6. Re:Should a cyber war require a cyber retaliation? by mdm-adph · · Score: 2, Funny

    And what kind of rations do you feed a cyber soldier, anyway? Do we need cyber medics, cyber support units, a cyber mess hall? An unending supply of coffee and some of those cool amphetamines they give to marines and fighter pilots should do the trick.
    --
    It is by my will alone my thoughts acquire motion; it is by the juice of the coffee bean that the thoughts acquire speed
  7. Re:Sexist/Agist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What...the fuck are you talking about? Please show me where they said this or even implied this or does being a feminist give you megical powers to find discrimination where there isn't any.

  8. Cyber rations? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mt. Dew, Snickers, Doritos, etc.

  9. Re:Should a cyber war require a cyber retaliation? by Mockylock · · Score: 1

    Just a group of people on slashdot.

    --
    "Please, shut up. Just when I think you can't say anything more stupid, you speak again." -Archie Bunker.
  10. Russia or Russians? by grev · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Are they accusing the Russian government of perpetrating this attack, or are they stating that this attack is coming from Russian soil?

    1. Re:Russia or Russians? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      The first attacks come from Russia's governmental institutions, but later from typical rented botnets. The big question is why would, say romanian cybercriminals waste their botnets for something like that. No gain. Of course it is very hard to prove that the Russian government is behind this (it could be also some rich "patriotic" russian mobster). Russia denies involvement, but then again they are not also imposing trade sanctions neither... NOT. Oil and coal transit has de facto stopped, estonian goods are banned from shops, border closed for big trucks etc.

    2. Re:Russia or Russians? by bockelboy · · Score: 4, Informative

      According to rumor, Russia has been up to a lot of subterfuge in Estonia lately.

      It didn't make US news, of course, but Estonia just had some of the first riots in their capital, Talin. Lately, the Estonian government has been removing Soviet war memorials because, well, they partly respresented the Soviets ruling their country. Just like the Russians have been doing in Moscow, they remove them all and have a single statue garden (they are historical, after all).

      However, when they removed one statue of a Soviet soldier in a cemetary, thousands of Russians living in Estonia started protesting. Now, maybe the Russian population just liked that particular statue, but there were rumors that Russian agents were stirring up trouble just to stir up trouble.

      Russia's been flexing its muscles across Eastern Europe again. They've been punishing "bad" countries which disobey them. First the riots (which were suspected to be caused by Moscow), now cyber attacks. Neither are outright military moves, but they sure as hell get the message across.

      Combined with the recent crackdown on free media and opposition in Russia, it sounds like life might get interesting in 5 years. It seems that, with America's short attention span focused on Iraq, Russia has been putting the pieces in place to recapture former glory.

      Do you think that after 50 years that Boris the Soviet simply retired to the countryside? Or has he just been waiting patient for the right opportunity?

      Maybe I just haven't had enough coffee this morning to make the conspiracy theories go away.

    3. Re:Russia or Russians? by niiler · · Score: 4, Insightful

      As an Estonian-American, I can confirm that we Estonians are a might bit riled up about the Russians. On June 13-14, 1941 huge numbers of Estonians were forcibly deported to Siberia. Another deportation occurred in 1949. Then Russians were imported to re-occupy many of the vacant households. Estonians view this as a sort of ethnic cleansing. Estonians were forced to speak Russian in the school system and all traces of their former nationalism were banned. To put it bluntly, many Estonians viewed the occupations under Stalin (and later) as being the worst thing to ever happen to the country (including the Nazi occupation). Putting up Russian war monuments on Estonian soil was insulting to boot. Now the Russians are riled that the Estonians want to move such monuments from their places of prominence (not destroy, mind you, but move). Considering what Estonians have suffered at the hands of Russians, we tend to think that the Russians have no ground to lodge any kind of complaint.

    4. Re:Russia or Russians? by Vicarius · · Score: 1

      The big question is why would, say romanian cybercriminals waste their botnets for something like that. No gain. Virus writers often have "no gain" either. Just because we do not see that "gain", does not mean that they are doing (or not) something for a visible material gain.

      Additionally you may not know the whole story of what and why is happening. Estonians pissed of Russia by removing one of old WW2 memorials - which is very touchy subject for many people over there. So what you got in the end is a lot of pissed off hackers with tons of free time. I highly doubt that Russian government needed to provide any incentive on top of what Estonians did.
    5. Re:Russia or Russians? by MightyMartian · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I think the general consensus among those who watch the geopolitical scene is that Russia is attempting to rebuild its empire. It views the Baltic states pretty much as China views Tibet, but because of their NATO membership, Russia can't just march the troops in, so it's using agent provocateurs from among the ethnic Russian minority in the country as well as defacto economic sanctions and cyber attacks to push its weight around. If you think what Russia is doing in Estonia is bad, look at the kind of games they're playing in the Ukraine, which is furiously trying to Westernize and shed its Russian colonial past. Christ, they poisoned Viktor Yushchenko to prevent him from gaining power. The KGB is still very much alive and well. Russia may have had a brief flirtation with friendly relations with the West, but they day is done, and now it wants its empire back.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    6. Re:Russia or Russians? by Vicarius · · Score: 1

      It didn't make US news, of course, but Estonia just had some of the first riots in their capital, Talin. Lately, the Estonian government has been removing Soviet war memorials because, well, they partly respresented the Soviets ruling their country. Just like the Russians have been doing in Moscow, they remove them all and have a single statue garden (they are historical, after all). Could you provide a quote/reference, where you got your misinformation about Moscow and removal of Soviet war memorials. Russians definitely removed many Lenin statues, but I do not recall them removing any war memorials.
    7. Re:Russia or Russians? by tomatensaft · · Score: 1

      Hey, it's Tallinn, not "Talin". Where the hell did you get this weird name from? :)

    8. Re:Russia or Russians? by tomatensaft · · Score: 3, Informative

      You got it all wrong! :) But well, since nobody here apparently reads neither Estonian, nor Russian-language sources, you can bullshit them as much as you like... :) The Soviet soldier, standing on Tõnismäe, was indeed a symbol of Soviet regime for some, but has been left untouched until now because it was a World War II memorial and also a place of a mass grave. Because of its nature (it's depicting a Soviet soldier after all), it became a place of political demonstrations by two extremist opposing forces: Russian pro-soviets, with some younger "national-bolshevik" exteremists and Estonian nationalists with a mix of Estonian younger neo-nazis. It was perceived as a threat to social stability and thus it was decided to exhumate the remnants of those buried there and move them to a grave, together with the monument.

    9. Re:Russia or Russians? by bendodge · · Score: 0

      I'm a high school student, and Dad tells me that I will see the rise of communism in my lifetime. I sure hope we get another president like Reagan who isn't afraid to denounce an evil empire.

      --
      The government can't save you.
    10. Re:Russia or Russians? by bockelboy · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I left that one kind of ambiguous. The point is that a lot of Estonians believe that Russians are stirring up problems.

      Russians have been moving a lot of statues to statue gardens, especially some of the old baddies (Stalin era folk). The Estonians were doing the same thing with a lot of old Soviet statues.

      The statue in question wasn't of anyone "bad" per se - it was just a soldier. The question is, does the statue represent a war memorial or a memorial of Soviet domination of Estonia? To an ethnic Russian, it might represent a war memorial; to an ethnic Estonian, it might represent the "bad old days" of Soviet domination.

      So, while the Estonian government thought they were moving statues as usual (just as Russia has done for many statues), others interpretted as moving a war memorial.

      One must be careful to recognize the the great contribution from the Russian *people* during the World Wars without glorifying some elements of the leadership.

      Of course, the question is whether people were really offended, or just acting up because they were being paid. Either way, almost no one in the US saw this news. The only thing you see in newspapers here are the daily body count in Iraq.

    11. Re:Russia or Russians? by bockelboy · · Score: 1

      Sorry for mistakes in the summary of the statue business - it wasn't the point of my comment. Thanks for the correction, I claim no special knowledge of Estonia other than what I remembered from BBC articles a month or two ago.

      The point still is that there are rumors that the Russian government is stirring up trouble in Estonia and other Baltic states. There's no hard proof, but this and the statue incident make things look awful suspicious. Is it past the conspiracy theory-type stuff yet? Maybe not.

      Is it close to being plausible? Sure

    12. Re:Russia or Russians? by jotok · · Score: 1

      Just like the US government granted independence to the Native Americans--from their land.

    13. Re:Russia or Russians? by Viol8 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Stalin was just undoing mistakes of his predecessors"

      How is deporting thousands of people to Siberia "undoing his mistakes"? Stalin was just a ruthless vile dictator and IMO the Allies would have done well to destrou the russian army after they'd destroyed the german army at the end of the 2nd world war. Then we wouldn't have had 50 years of idiot communists in Moscow oppressing half of europe and threatening world peace.

      Moron.

    14. Re:Russia or Russians? by tomatensaft · · Score: 1

      Well, I have to say, these rumors are pretty close to truth, since Russian TV channels have been engaged in a similar informational war with local (Estonian) media. The problem is that many Russians in Estonia are watching Russia's pro-government channels and listen to their arguing pretty closely.

    15. Re:Russia or Russians? by Cyberax · · Score: 1

      I meant that granting Estonia independence in 1918 was a mistake of the early communists. Stalin was merely undoing this mistake.

      As for 'vile dictator'... Europe would have been conquered completely if it was not for USSR.

      But there's no such thing as a gratitude in international politics. Russia understood this well in 90-s.

    16. Re:Russia or Russians? by dredre123 · · Score: 1

      "The big question is why would, say romanian cybercriminals waste their botnets for something like that."

      Fyi, Romanians are very anti-Russian nowadays, especially since joining the EU and NATO.

      NATO is helping repel the attacks, Romanian experts (maybe even reformed "cybercriminals") may actually be on the Estonian side.

      Given the press/forum rhetoric in Romania, even "cybercriminals" may be donating their own time just to frustrate the Russians.

    17. Re:Russia or Russians? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Copy-paste from another blog about Russia's involvement by some estonian (ignore bad grammar)

      ***

      Well, in Tallinn we managed to prevent a new "revolution" that was planned for may 9. There is a speculation that the pro-russia activists were planning a tent camp around the statue or something, but estonian authorities suprised them. Indeed, one main organizer who was quickly arrested, Mark Sirõk has close ties to "Nashi" (their only "commissar-coordinator" in Estonia). He was recruiting local ethnic russians to "guard the statue" (salary: 80 krons or about 6,5$ per hour), but it makes you wonder where does that money come from? Many Nashi activists were sent back from the borders due special orders from the authorities (Nashi symbols = ban). Another activist from a local pro-russia group called "Night Vigil" Dmitri Linter was also arrested. He and Andrei Zarenkov from the Constitution Party (a minor pro-russia political party, they got almost 1% of votes in march) were in direct contact with russian authorities -- they had regular meetings with embassy officials in weird places. Linter has personally met with many top youth activists in Russia, even Vladimir Putin and Estonia's authorities suspect that he has completed "special training" in Russia (agent of GRU/FSB/... ?).

      ***

      The plan was simple: create mass protests/riots and press hard (e.g. demand resignation of the government, massive propaganda war, trade boycott, cyber war) in order to get a pro-East government. You see, if the current pro-West government falls then the only alternative priminister is Edgar Savisaar. He is a leader of the Centre Party that is also sister party of United Russia (71.2% of votes). Edgar Savisaar is infamous for his secret meetings with Russia's policians. Last one took place on 30. april in Tallinn (after midnight) with Leonid Slutski (he was part of the Russia's delegation that demanded the resignation of the Estonia's government). Savisaar first denied that such a meeting took place, but later admitted (there were several witnesses) -- he claims now that he only said "Hi". Ain Seppik, a board member of the Centre Party had also a secret meeting with Slutski, but he didn't deny it and claimed that they "only talked about dogs". Finally it should be noted that several Centre Party members have been also arrested for organizing protests (for example one of them agitated schoolstudents to riot).

    18. Re:Russia or Russians? by khallow · · Score: 1

      How dare you call it 'occupation'??

      Let's see. It's a statement of the obvious. And there's no risk involved to the teller. What "daring" was needed to called it what it was?

      Stalin was just undoing mistakes of his predecessors - including giving independency from Russian Empire to Estonia in 1918.

      And the world would have been better off if those "mistakes" remained uncorrected. Also, Stalin was one of the biggest mistakes that the Soviets ever made. They should have killed him in the late 20's when they realized just how screwed up he was.
    19. Re:Russia or Russians? by crotherm · · Score: 1

      It didn't make US news, of course, but Estonia just had some of the first riots in their capital, Talin. Huh??? Why would you think that? I certainly heard about it. Stop spouting stuff you know nothing about.
      --
      "Those who make peaceful revolution impossible, make violent revolution inevitable" - JFK
    20. Re:Russia or Russians? by Cyberax · · Score: 1

      Sure, I agree with this.

      But I don't think that USSR could have won the WWII without Stalin's earlier industrialization of Russia.

      You can also say that Abraham Lincoln should have been shot for starting The American Civil War.

    21. Re:Russia or Russians? by Trent+Hawkins · · Score: 0

      Because Russia would have destroyed the US and it's allies if they tried to remove Stalin.

    22. Re:Russia or Russians? by ultranova · · Score: 1

      You can also say that Abraham Lincoln should have been shot for starting The American Civil War.

      I'm not American, so I could be wrong, but I seem to recall that he was in fact shot dead.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    23. Re:Russia or Russians? by Rurmo · · Score: 1

      Your posting unfortunately contains all the typical soviet-neorussian mentality signs. First of all, independence was not granted to Estonia but estonians fought for it. Read http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Estonian_War_of_Indep endence. Secondly, rehabilitation of Stalin because under his mindless rule Soviets along with allies managed to defeat nazis. Nobody ever asks, how many lives would have been spared if Stalin would not have "cleaned" his higher ranking militia on the 30-s. Or how much more motivated the neightbours of SU would have been to fight the Nazis if were hadn't been massive killings and deportations before german occupation. And third, russians still think that world owns them something. That hungary should say "thank you for the tanks". That polish should kiss their feet after Soviets and Germany occupied Poland as allies in the beginning of the war, not to mention Katyn massacre. Ukrainians should be on their knees and forget the Holodomor, artificially greated famine that killed millions. Russian Federation is the heir of Soviet Union, unfortunately they also inherited the Soviet time "retouched" history as well.

    24. Re:Russia or Russians? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      err.. "Granting independence" ?
      FYI - Estonia won a WAR of independence against soviet russia in 1917-1918. And a second war against the remains of a german Landeswehr army, also partly helping to achieve Latvian independence.

      Estonian independence in 1918 was not put down into some kind of "grant" put in a PEACE TREATY of Tartu.

    25. Re:Russia or Russians? by Rurmo · · Score: 1

      It has been proved that Russian embassy here had held several meetings with "Notsnoi Dozon" or nightwatch movement right before the riots. It is very pro-Moscow movement lead by people with very shady past. For example, one of the leaders was TASS (soviet main news agency) reporter during the USSR times but I personally know older people confirming his connections to KGB. After the riots I also personally realized one strange fact: as my route to work took me pass Russian Embassy in Tallinn every day, I started to wonder why in March there there so many "suits" talking to quite young people next to the embassy. One really paranoid person could say they were cooking something...

    26. Re:Russia or Russians? by moyl · · Score: 1

      No, it was Estonians who poisoned Yushchenko. At least there's as much proof. Please try to refrain from witch-hunting.

    27. Re:Russia or Russians? by khallow · · Score: 1

      But I don't think that USSR could have won the WWII without Stalin's earlier industrialization of Russia.

      Keep in mind that just because Stalin happened to be the one in charge, doesn't mean that it couldn't have been done better or far more competently by someone else. My take is that the USSR got really lucky in how the German buildup to the Second World War and leadership turned out. If the Nazis hadn't turned out to be so blatantly evil and murderous nor headed by such a completely out of touch, all-powerful psychopath (eg, who insisted on creating huge strategic disasters like Stalingrad), Stalin could have been their greatest asset on the Russian front due to his military incompetence, and ability to destroy the morale of Russian troops and leadership of the Russian army.

      You can also say that Abraham Lincoln should have been shot for starting The American Civil War.

      One could say that, but I have no idea why they would these days. And as pointed out elsewhere, he did get shot. Also, given the nature of the election cycle, Lincoln would have been out the door sooner or later. So even if it was a bad idea, the US has been far more effective in replacing leaders good or bad than the USSR ever did.
    28. Re:Russia or Russians? by Cyberax · · Score: 1

      He was not shot by a firing squad, he was assassinated. Completely different things.

    29. Re:Russia or Russians? by jlehtira · · Score: 1

      I recall seeing it in news that the estonians would have tracked these attacks to russian govt IP's, but now it's nowhere. Meanwhile, we do know that the russian administration has been up to a lot:

      A Russian State Duma delegation led by the former FSB Director Nikolay Kovalev has also arrived in Estonia, in what was described as a "fact finding mission".[78] While still in Russia, the chairman of the delegation had already made a declaration, asking Estonia's government (led by Andrus Ansip) to step down.

      at the Estonian embassy in Moscow: On Monday, April 30, Estonia's foreign minister Urmas Paet reported that "the situation had become much worse in the previous night.[97] The building is by now completely blocked."[98] Paet says that Estonia's foreign ministry had sent a note[99] to Russia's foreign ministry, due to Russia's apparent unwillingness and impotency to defend the embassy building and its staff (which violates Diplomatic law, especially the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations).

      In any case it was clear that if the russian government wasn't directly behind the riots or the ddos attacks (there's a rumor of somebody paying the rioters), they never condemned those.

    30. Re:Russia or Russians? by Cyberax · · Score: 1

      I'm speaking about earlier period (when Stalin did most of his 'purges').

      You see, in the end of 20-s the USSR had very little industrial power. Stalin managed to build up industrial base very quickly - see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Soviet _Union_(1927-1953)#Industrialization_in_practice with his ruthless methods. And I agree with historians who think that such a feat could not have been possible without Stalin's harsh measures.

      So it's not a clear-cut picture. Stalin was a vile dictator, but he did a lot of GOOD things for the country.

      As for WWII - Stalin's incompetence did result in some of great military blunders, but mostly he delegated authority to generals (and he was not destroying morale during WWII - on the contrary, he restored some of the older Orthodox Church). In the end, I don't think Nazis could have won over the USSR - the USSR had a lot more industrial power than Germany and a lot of strategic depth (Retreat a couple thousand kilometers? No problem - just read about evacuation of factories to Siberia).

    31. Re:Russia or Russians? by jlehtira · · Score: 1

      More about the statue on wikipedia: Bronze Soldier of Tallinn

      And there's the story of Kristjan Palusalu who was the model for the statue..

    32. Re:Russia or Russians? by Viol8 · · Score: 1

      "As for 'vile dictator'... Europe would have been conquered completely if it was not for USSR."

      You are talking about the same Stalin who sided with Hitler until Hitler made the mistake of trying to invade russia? Oh yes, we should all be grateful for stalins sense of self preservation and revenge!

    33. Re:Russia or Russians? by Viol8 · · Score: 1

      Very unlikely. The americans had the atomic bomb and were prepared to use it plus they could import as many fresh troops as they liked from the US mainland. The russian army however was almost dead on its feet at the fall of Berlin. It wouldn't have taken much for the allies to defeat the russians.

    34. Re:Russia or Russians? by asninn · · Score: 1

      I'm just speculating here, but I think it might also have to do with the fact that Estonia has been trying to strengthen its bond with the Nordic countries. Estonian as a language is closely related to Finnish, and Estonian culture is related to the culture of the Nordic countries as well. And don't forget that Estonia has been a member of the EU and the NATO since 2004, too.

      Here's an article (from the Finnish Helsingin Sanomat newspaper) mentioning that one of the worst agitators on Russian-language message boards is believed to have ties to the FSB (one of Russia's intelligence agencies), too.

      --
      butter the donkey
    35. Re:Russia or Russians? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1
      This is spot on, but you miss a few more connections. The current regime in Russia is essentially playing on whatever nostalgic feelings about the USSR that are left among the population. Those can be boiled down to "we were strong, feared and respected". This card plays well in the modern political game in Russia, so, obviously, it is heavily used. But to play it properly, you need an external enemy. Judging from what our (mostly state-owned) TV feeds us here in Russia, this position, vacant throughout the 90s - era of Yeltsin's rule - is now once again being filled by the West. Given that Putin's term ends in a year, the whole mess in Estonia is a godsend for our rulers - they twist and turn it, distort the facts, and thus presented, it nicely fits their presentation of geopolitics - that "the West dreams and sees of Russia brought back on its knees" (with an implicit assumption that, thanks to our glorious leader, Russia is no longer on its knees anymore).

      The hysteria thus goes from both sides. On one hand, we have the Russian government trying to declare the guy who died in the riots in Tallinn (stabbed to death during the looting of the shops, presumably in a fight over the loot) a national hero, a "martyr who died for the cause of his grandfathers". They're planning to name a street in Moscow after him. Regional governments are following the suit - in Tambov region, for example, a law has recently gone into effect which requites all shops to provide special labelling for Estonian goods, combined with a massive propaganda campaign to boycott everything Estonian. On the other hand, the Russians themselves catch up quickly - have a look. The text is in Russian, on the photos as well, but I'm sure there are enough people on /. who can read it to verify my claims. Basically, it's a plate on the entrance to a restaurant in Yaroslavl, which says "No dogs or Estonians allowed". Put there on the 9th of May, the Victory Day, as a response to the events in Estonia.

      So, who are the fascists, then?..

    36. Re:Russia or Russians? by psykl0n3 · · Score: 1

      I hope you do know that Boris Yeltsin is dead? He died like a month ago now.

    37. Re:Russia or Russians? by psykl0n3 · · Score: 1

      Just to be fair Estonians weren't the only ones on the receiving end of whatever Stalin decided and did. He promptly killed another 30 million Russians after the War ended... Another thing I don't understand is why then the Germans are not relocating such monuments? As far as I understand they should be no less troubled than the Estonians.

    38. Re:Russia or Russians? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a Russian, I can assure you that history between Estonia and Russia is indeed complicated. It's hard to focus only on things Russia has done in the past, without bringing Estonia's dark past into that as well. Things like near willing assistance to the Nazi's, Estonian units that joined German army to fight against Russians, etc.

      I do find it somewhat unfair that someone, especially a whole nation would focus on wrongs done to it in the past. By the same logic, it's possible for Russians to hate Germany and all Germans, I suppose, or Jewish people hating both Russians and Germans. Past is the past, you can' change it, no matter how much hiding of it can be attempted, including destruction or movement of monuments, or such.

      I think it's time to let go of the old hatreds and build a new relationship.

  11. Re:Sexist/Agist by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

    What?

    Paragraph and line number, please. It appears to me as though you've invented your accusation out of whole cloth.

    --

    Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
  12. Re:China has been at cyber-war with US for some ti by mdm-adph · · Score: 1

    Shh.... you shouldn't piss off the makers of our cheap plastic Happy Meal toys and inexpensive flat-screen TV's. I'm sure they're just searching for information on our networks that would enable them to get the price of a DVD player in Wal-Mart below $20.

    --
    It is by my will alone my thoughts acquire motion; it is by the juice of the coffee bean that the thoughts acquire speed
  13. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 0

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  14. Mod Parent Down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This isn't actually a quote from the article.

  15. The real outcome of the attacks by Mario21 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    By now, most of the sites under attack have been blocked to the outside traffic. That by itself means the attacks have been successful, information from Estonian government stays in the country.

    How would you you fight a DDoS attack and make sure all non-bot users have access?

    1. Re:The real outcome of the attacks by mdm-adph · · Score: 1

      How would you you fight a DDoS attack and make sure all non-bot users have access? Some sort of high-bandwidth gateway featuring a captcha?
      --
      It is by my will alone my thoughts acquire motion; it is by the juice of the coffee bean that the thoughts acquire speed
    2. Re:The real outcome of the attacks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> How would you you fight a DDoS attack and make sure all non-bot users have access?
      >
      > Some sort of high-bandwidth gateway featuring a captcha?

      Abbyy Software House is a world leader in OCR development (they maker the FineReader product family). They are based in Russia ...

      Caught ya ...

    3. Re:The real outcome of the attacks by Anon99 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually the Estonian response has been textbook example on how to fight DOS. Almost all pages that have been attacked have been in Estonian, and have been such that only someone living in country might have use for. So they have excluded outside traffic in favour of serving those who actually have use for the pages. Exactly the same I would do if I would be responsible of pages that have 99% of user base in same country. Sucks for those Estonians living outside of Estonia, but needs of many outweigh needs of few in this case.

  16. Re:Sexist/Agist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, like the leftist Guardian would insert that in there. Maybe you're reading the Daily Mail's article?

  17. Off topic... by thousandinone · · Score: 1

    There is only reason I even know where Estonia is. It's the first level in the original Command and Conquer. GG American Public Education System >.

    1. Re:Off topic... by Cinnamon+Whirl · · Score: 2, Funny

      Lets hope they've upped their defences since then.

    2. Re:Off topic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only reason I know where Estonia is from "Cheers". When I believe Woody was learning geography and tried to correlate places using songs. It went... Estonia, Estonia, it borders on the Adriatic(sung like "oh when the saints go marching in")...Wait now that I think about it, it was Albania. Still clueless.

  18. Re:Sexist/Agist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Wow, the naïvete of Slashdot moderators continues to amaze me. This is perhaps the most obvious troll I have ever seen(because the quote is a complete fabrication and feminism is fairly unpopular on Slashdot), obviously posted in a hurry to get first post, and it's moderated Insightful?

  19. reminds of by circletimessquare · · Score: 5, Insightful

    the Hainan Island incident

    before 9/11 in early 2001, a chinese jet fighter bumped a us spy plane it was trying to harass away. the chinese fighter crashed and the pilot was never found, and the spy plane was forced to make an emergency landing on hainan island, where the chinese stripped the plane of equipment and then returned the crew to the usa

    what happened for a few tense weeks was a lot of nationalistic chest thumping by chinese and american hackers: chinese hackers defacing poorly patched american servers, everything from small businesses to government systems, and american hackers defacing chinese servers: schools and government (i remember this well as i had a box that was hacked: my home page was replaced with a chinese flag and a "fuck usa", heh)

    the point is, it's probably not official, it's probably by an independent group of weakly organized russian hackers upset due to nationalistic pride

    the trigger for them is that statue that estonia got rid of in tallinn, which russians probably view as thousands of dead soldiers in the defense of estonia from the nazis, and estonia being ungrateful, and estonians viewing as an example of soviet domination, and a symbol of the past cold war era, and russians trying to retain their dominance

    regardless, i expect some pissed off estonian hackers soon to plaster "in soviet russia, estonia hackers hack you!" all over pravda.ru, or something

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:reminds of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      regardless, i expect some pissed off estonian hackers soon to plaster "in soviet russia, estonia hackers hack you!" all over pravda.ru, or something

      No that will not happen, because the only stupid, unlawful and sufficiently beast like people the live in Estonia are all amongst the 1/3 of the population that is made of Russians.

      I've been there, I have friends there, and every-time there is trouble, the trouble maker it's always a Russian, that lives there, thinks we are still in Stalin time and thinks that Estonia is a slave country of their Russia.

      If you don't believe me, read the news, the Russians living in Estonia, are talking about job discrimination because they force the people that want to get a state job to actually know Estonian ... yeah, what a discrimination.

      The Russians still live there all their lives and don't even care to learn the language of their home country ... really, I didn't knew someone could be that retarded, but the Russians always prove me wrong.

      If the Russians don't like to live in Estonia, why don't you all pack your stuff and go back to your stinking non-democratic Russia? I bet all the Estonians will be happy and the reasons of complaint for the Russians would be over ! Wake up, this is not the cold war time anymore, your country stinks !

    2. Re:reminds of by tokul · · Score: 1

      the trigger for them is that statue that estonia got rid of in tallinn, which russians probably view as thousands of dead soldiers in the defense of estonia from the nazis, and estonia being ungrateful, and estonians viewing as an example of soviet domination, and a symbol of the past cold war era, and russians trying to retain their dominance
      Don't confuse defense with attack. Memorial was unveiled in September 22, 1947. Russian Red Army entered Tallinn in September 22, 1944. These soldiers died not during defense of Tallinn in the beginning of WWII. They died when Russians fought with Germans in 1944. Russian call it "freeing of Estonia". Estonians call it "occupation of Estonia"
    3. Re:reminds of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The trigger was created by Moscow. Bronze soldier was not a trigger 3y ago, that means 12 years into independence.

      Massive defacement from estonian hackers is quite improbable. There has been one occasion, when a server, that served images for an anti-Estonia forum was hacked and the images were replaced with something similar to "I love Estonia".
      Defacements are improbable, because during the unrest Estonias government sent SMS to ALL Estonian mobile operators GSM-s pleading "please stay home, don't submit to agitations". Most estonians (unlike russians) are at the moment quite peaceful and allow the Moscow-s actions to damage Moscow itself.

      All the bronze soldiers thing was orchestrated by puppeteers (proof would be an offtopic paragraph), puppeteers of the masses. Now how can somebody claim that Moscow is not behind cyber attacs, when their ears were clearly visible from behind the increased hatred and unrests? Even if they are not yet attacking directly, then they are the puppeteers of the russian hackers. (could we claim that the puppeteers are not resposible?) Now it would be quite interesting for Moscow to test the more real cyberwar, after all the publicity. It is very expencive to defend against it.

    4. Re:reminds of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just on a side note, the statue was not "removed". It was relocated to a military cementary with all due consideration.

    5. Re:reminds of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not about defending Estonia from the nazis back then, really. Besides, what's so special about Estonia. Sovient Union was fighting Germans, you mean fight them everywhere else, but don't touch Estonia, leave 'em alone , let them build their little 3rd Reich there, sheesh
      What's more interesting though is the current nazis at power, the way they treat non-estonians, and EU being tolerant towards radical nationalism.
      All this monument issue just made things clear, it's probably the first time authorities openly and with great cynicism state the things, quite a few people (circa 1/3 of estonian population actually) are clearly not happy with.
      Authorities go like 'yes we feel like we've lost the WW2 and now we're after revanche', 'estonian nation has prevalence over ..erm certain other nations', 'we were squeezing russians out of our country for past 15 years', 'we'll be suppressing those that didn't get the point and didn't leave', 'and you know what? we won't be hiding anymore, because EU covers us no matter what'.
      As for all the whining, anything that pours water on their russophobic mill goes... I guess they expect NATO to bomb their eastern neiboughr and want to take part in it.

    6. Re:reminds of by meiemiiz · · Score: 1

      >the trigger for them is that statue that estonia got rid of in tallinn, which russians probably view as thousands of dead
      >soldiers in the defense of estonia from the nazis, and estonia being ungrateful, and estonians viewing as an example of
      >soviet domination, and a symbol of the past cold war era, and russians trying to retain their dominance

      Thanks a lot for the unneeded spin on the news. I would have to make a couple of corrections to your comment, so your point about the attacks being official or not will not be influenced by anything else.

      1) Estonia did not "get rid of" the statue - it was simply removed to another location, that is a war cemetery in Tallinn. As of late, the statue had been used for political platform and Russian nationalistic propaganda, which any independent country would not tolerate in the heart of their capital. There is a better place for war heroes and having a couple of hundred ex-Russian Army vets with red flags coming out and chanting pro-Russian slogans is not helping neither the Estonians or ethnic Russians living in Estonia.
      2) Estonia has not been "ungrateful" in any sense of the meaning - in 1940 our country was first occupied by Russians under Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact which divided up the Eastern Europe, just to be "relieved" by Germans a couple of years later and finally re-occupied by Red Army until we re-gained our independence in 1992. So our countrymen saw 3 conscriptions (non-voluntary, mind you) during the WWII and some even had even members within the same family fighting each other. So the country's policy as of late is that we denounce both Nazism and Communism as the cause of the death of tens of thousands within the country and we want to de-politicize anything relating to that. So mind you, there were Estonians as well on the Red Army side and we nobody is being ungrateful. If you do not understand the background, then please do not use strong terms like that.

  20. Re:Should a cyber war require a cyber retaliation? by thousandinone · · Score: 2, Funny

    And do we really want our tax money buying cyber prostitutes to give our cyber soldiers computer viruses?

  21. US too! Just ask the "war czar" by twitter · · Score: 1

    Feeling left behind in the new propaganda wars, the US military is working hard to catch up. I already thought the Air Force mission required the domination of cyber space, but it seems that's not enough. A newly minted "war czar" is going to expand and unite the mission for all branches. Czar? how fitting for this conversation. I'd prefer the title "war lord of mind fuck".

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  22. They forgot something. by rumith · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The summary doesn't mention that the attacks started after Estonia began excavating graves of Soviet troops killed during the World War II and vandalized the memorial devoted to them. Estonia is seen as a neo-fascist regime by Russia, and in my opinion, rightly so: you can't deny over 30% of your population [estimate of Russian population in Estonia] the most basic rights, including citizenship and education for children, based on their nationality, and be seen otherwise. Of course, Europe and the United States ignore this issue.

    1. Re:They forgot something. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Where do you get your facts from?

      Every last russian, who is willing to learn the national language is granted citizenship in Estonia
      Education is available (on all levels) in both Estonian and Russian

    2. Re:They forgot something. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      The summary doesn't mention that the attacks started after Estonia began excavating graves of Soviet troops killed during the World War II and vandalized the memorial devoted to them.
      Vandalized? Moved to cemetery where it belongs.

      Estonia is seen as a neo-fascist regime by Russia, and in my opinion, rightly so
      Russia is seen as imperialist regime by Estonia, and in my opinion, rightly so

      you can't deny over 30% of your population [estimate of Russian population in Estonia] the most basic rights, including citizenship
      You learn the language, pass one exam and voila - the citizenship is yours.

      and education for children based on their nationality, and be seen otherwise.
      We have schools for Russian-speaking children where most of the subjects are taught in Russian. Unbelievable, yes?

      Of course, Europe and the United States ignore this issue.
      And Russians ignore the reality. I'm sorry if you do not agree.

    3. Re:They forgot something. by LizardKing · · Score: 5, Informative

      Nope the starting point of this was the relocation of a large statue of a Soviet soldier from central Tallinn to a Soviet Army military cemetery on the outskirts of the city. The Estonians were occupied twice by the Soviet Union, once at the beginning of World War II and again at the end. The second occupation was billed as a liberation of Estonia by the Soviets, but both times large numbers of Estonians were deported to labour camps in the east of the Soviet Union, many to never return. As a result, the statue came to symbolise the occupation of Estonia, and it was felt it should not be in the centre of the countries capital.

      During the Soviet era, a large number of ethnic Russians were settled in Estonia and a program of Russification carried out that tried to extinguish Estonian language and culture. This was a common policy across the Soviet Union, as it was seen as a way of preventing a future break up of the union. The Putin government plays on the tensions amongst these former Soviet populations as a way of reasserting Russias importance in the region.

      The bodies that are often mentioned in the news reports are actually located some distance from the original site of the statue. They have been located (there was no sign of their presence above ground) under a tram stop and road junction. Excavation was carried out, and the coffins relocated to the same cemetery as the statue. This is in accordance with war graves agreements that are part of internation law.

    4. Re:They forgot something. by dgr73 · · Score: 2, Informative

      And the Russians, who are so indignant that their soldiers bodies were "desecrated" by moving them to a military cemetary, seem to forget one historical fact: They themselves cared very little for their own dead in WWII. Not that they cared too much for the living either. The road to Berlin is littered with unburied bodies.

      As to who is doing the "cyber attacks". It's hard to determine the origin of a DDoS attack, but the timing and context seems to point to Russian intervention. However, this is unlikely to be direct government intervention, but rather it uses a proxy organization such as the Putin Youth (Nashi). The same government sponsored (but nominally independent) group attacked the Estonian embassy. Correct me if i'm wrong, but could this not be construed as casus belli in an of itself (that is, if Estonia had such designs and the capability to carry them to a conclusion). If the Russians are willing attack an embassy, which results in no real economic damage to Estonia, but huge reputational damage to Russia, why would they shy from sponsoring DDoS attacks against Estonia to cause real economic damage?

    5. Re:They forgot something. by Zontar_Thing_From_Ve · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The summary doesn't mention that the attacks started after Estonia began excavating graves of Soviet troops killed during the World War II and vandalized the memorial devoted to them. Estonia is seen as a neo-fascist regime by Russia, and in my opinion, rightly so: you can't deny over 30% of your population [estimate of Russian population in Estonia] the most basic rights, including citizenship and education for children, based on their nationality, and be seen otherwise. Of course, Europe and the United States ignore this issue.

      Let me give you another perspective on this. You can decide whether or not you want to stick to your guns here. Are you by any chance married to a Russian woman? Because if you are, that will certainly inhibit your ability to see the other side.

      Estonia was under Russian control until 1918. It remained an independent nation until 1940, when the USSR invaded it. Germany occupied it from 1941 to 1944. During the 1 year or so of Soviet occupation prior to the Nazi invation, the Soviets did such nice things as kill the intellectuals and forcibly conscript Estonians into the Red Army. I can't say it's any wonder that as in Ukraine (where Stalin and his henchmen had killed and starved to death millions of Ukrainians in the 1930s), the locals viewed the Nazis as liberators and then found out that they were just as bad if not worse as the Soviets. Do note that the USA never recognized the Soviet occupation of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania. NEVER. It's important to know that for over 50 years, official US policy was that the occupation of these 3 countries was illegal.

      After WWII ended, Estonia was screwed. They were part of the Soviet Union. The Soviets moved hundreds of thousands of Russian speaking immigrants into Estonia in an attempt to "Russify" it and to dilute Estonian nationalism. Estonian freedom fighters fought a small scale guerilla war against the USSR into the early 1950s when they finally gave up and realized it was hopeless.

      During the USSR period, Russian was the official language in education. It was possible to have education in whatever the local language was (Krushchev made some changes that allowed this), but there was a catch - if you wanted to get a good job, you absolutely had to speak Russian well. Given that Russian and Estonian are about as closely related as English is to Polish, you might understand that Estonian parents had no choice but to send their kids to Russian language schools so as to give them the best chance to prosper in the USSR.

      Cut to 1991 when Estonia gets its independence. They now have a rather large Russian speaking population who they were forced to accept by a government that no longer exist. These people have never assimilated into Estonian society. In fact, they were encouraged immigrate there specifically to dilute Estonia's sense of national identity and to turn them into "good little Soviet subjects". These immigrants have never bothered to learn the Estonian language since Russian was the official language of the government prior to 1991. Now you have all these people who say "Screw you! We want to speak Russian!" in a country where the majority of citizens speak the local language, Estonian. They demand that everything be done in Russian so they can understand it. The Estonians never wanted to speak Russian to begin with, so they are promoting the use of their national language. Now you have about 26% of the population who refuses to "get with the program", demands that their language be given equal footing with the national tongue and even worse, feels that things were a lot better back when they were in charge and the stupid locals were taking orders from them. So given that Estonia never wanted the Soviets/Russians there to begin with and the Soviets weren't exactly enlightened when they ran the show, can you really blame them for not being real happy with Russia today? By the way, ethnic Russians can become Estonian citizens, but they have to take

    6. Re:They forgot something. by Cyberax · · Score: 1

      Be careful with your words.

      Russia lost 30 millions (yes, millions) of people in WWII - there's no WAY to recover all dead bodies, unfortunately. But there's still about 300 active salvage parties in Russia, they search for remains of dead soldiers, identify them and then rebury with military honors.

    7. Re:They forgot something. by Cyberax · · Score: 0, Troll

      The problem is that Estonia now behaves EXACTLY like USSR did.

      For example, about 30% of Russian-speaking people in Estonia do not have citizenship (they are 'aliens'). Russian schools are continuously pressured etc.

    8. Re:They forgot something. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live a few kilometers away from the statue/grave in question (it was a bronze statue underneath which some russian soldiers were buried half a century ago). To understand why it was removed, you have to understand estonian history.

      Russians see themselves as the heroes who saved Estonia (and the rest of Europe for that matter) from nazi Germany. And undeniably they were a major contributor to the downfall of Hitler. But what many fail to see, including rumith here, is the true nature of the bolshevik regime. During the II WW Estonia was occupied by both Germany and Russia. Firstly by russians (1940-1941). Then germans (1941-1944). Ss the war progressed and Germany got weaker, they were eventually forced to withdraw from Estonian soil. But did the defeat of the german regime mean freedom for Estonia? No, it meant another soviet occupation. Under the guise of protecting and rebuilding Estonia thousands of russian soldiers marched into the country again in 1944. The II WW ended and Estonia, like many other east european countries, was annexed by the Soviet Union. What followed was 50 years of brutal occupation and opression. After II WW had ended, tens of thousand of estonians were sent to Siberia to die. Russians quickly started to assmiliate estonian society with the influx of several hundred thousand russians. Any attempt to regain independence by estonians was brutally suffocated. Only after the Soviet Union collapsed 15 years ago did Estonia regain independece again.

      For russians that statue symbolized the soldiers who helped defeat Hitler. For estonians (and also latvians, lithuanians and other countries who share the same fate) it symbolized the soldiers who, while helping free Estonia from one occupation, replaced it with their own, equally oppressive one.

      And what concernes the alleged violations of civil rights in Estonia I urge you to consult studies made in democratic western countries instead of russian propaganda. The only major hurdle to obtain citizenship in Estonia is the requirement for the russians to learn the language.

    9. Re:They forgot something. by LizardKing · · Score: 1

      They were offered Estonian citizenship after the collapse of the Soviet Union and Estonian independence. Many ethnic Russians chose not to take it, but remained in the country.

    10. Re:They forgot something. by gorbachev · · Score: 1

      Wow, a Russian talking about human rights violations.

      Man, my ironymeter just went off the scale.

      --
      In Soviet Russia, I ruled you
    11. Re:They forgot something. by LizardKing · · Score: 1

      Be careful with your words too. While the post you were replying to failed to make the distinction between ordinary Soviet citizens and their leaders (Stalin and his cohorts cared little about the human cost of defeating the Axis powers), you state that 30 million Russians died in WWII. They were not only Russians but citizens from across the Soviet Union. This is why it's less likely that a statue that commerates the sacrifice of the ordinary Soviet soldier would be removed from the centre of somewhere like Minsk or Kiev. That said, the statues and other monuments that were erected in Eastern European countries and regions such as the Baltic did have an additional purpose. As well as commerating the dead, they were meant to be a constant reminder of Soviet power to people such as the Hungarians who were otherwise largely indifferent as to which side won WWII.

    12. Re:They forgot something. by Iloinen+Lohikrme · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Eh.. where are you getting this "information"? What you are saying and presenting is just false.

      After Estonia became independent all persons who's forefathers had been citizens of Estonia before Soviet occupation were granted automatic citizenship, this group also included Russians that had arrived before the occupation. In 1992 about 32% of peoples in Estonia didn't have any citizenship, these are the people who's forefathers became to the country Russianize the country. As Estonian government didn't want to do the same things that Russians (Soviet Union) did, that is to start mass deportations, they settled on making knowledge of Estonian language and history as a requirements on having a citizenship. To ease the task for population without citizenship, Estonian government organizes free language studies so that all willing can prepare and succeed on taking the test. In 2006 only 9% of population didn't have any citizenship and 7,4% had another citizenship. So nobody is denying Estonian citizenship, it's possible for individual to get it, some just or either lazy or stubborn. Also all children in Estonia are educated, they have a right to go to a school, and nobody is denying that. Those who's mother language is Russia get to study with their own language and they also teach Estonian as part of the curriculum.

      There is nothing that Russia and Russians can complain. People can acquire citizenship, many just don't want to, and there is education for all. If you look the situation in Russia, well you won't see same things as you see in Estonia or other CIVILIZED places. In Russia minorities are suppressed, in example Mari people who are natives and who's language belongs to Finno-Ugric family are been suppressed! They don't get any education in their language, they don't get anything. If Russia and Russians want to say something about other countries and nations, they should start by cleaning their own backyard. The only thing that Russia and Russians who are complaining and putting up Soviet style crap, are only making the rest of the world more hostile against Russia.

      PS. And btw. in the world you have the baddest situation with neo-nazis. In 9th of May, when you celebrate the victory on world war 2, foreign students are asked to stay inside dorms and not go out, same with other foreigners. Why? Well if you go then, or in any other day and if you are Black, Asian or Arab there is a big danger that you are beaten or stabbed. That is scary. Also how you have treated Georgians and bullied with them, just shows you that current Russia is just the fascist country that it accuses on others.

    13. Re:They forgot something. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wo! Slow down there a bit cowboy!

      I'm not sure whether you're logically or morally deficient, but doesn't the vast number of Soviet war dead on "the road to Berlin" indicate that they cared so much about human life that they were prepared to make such a great sacrifice in defeating the Nazi threat? How twisted of you to think anything else!

      I know this is a yankee website and that you guys don't have too good a relationship with the concept of history (you know...facts and figures and all that stuff that is often so incovenient to the way you view the world) but do at least try!

      If we can set aside the deluded Hollywood crap for a short while, shouldn't the estonians be grateful for the Russian sacrifice instead of constantly disrespecting those that gave their lives to save their sorry arses! Or maybe they wanted to be part of the Hinterland. Perhaps that is what this is all about. Either way, they deserve everything they get and more. At least until they learn to show respect.

      I mean can you imagine if after the freedom fries fiasco, the French moved the graves of those American servicemen that gave their lives so selflessly...all 5 of them!

    14. Re:They forgot something. by axia777 · · Score: 1

      Estonians have a good reason to hate Russians. They lived and died for decades under Russian rule. Fuck Russia. And the memory of dead Russian soldiers? HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! That is fucking hilarious! You mean the same soldiers that enslaved their nation, systematically murdered their people, destroyed their government, and stomped their country in to the ground? You are so damn ignorant it hurts. My family is from Latvia, just north of Estonia. Russia can piss off.

    15. Re:They forgot something. by Cyberax · · Score: 1

      No, they were not!

      They were required to pass Estonian language and history exam. They were NOT granted citizenship automatically.

    16. Re:They forgot something. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I want to mention something here. The GP was ofcourse a bit overreacting. However, Estonian attitude concerning Russia (understandable as it is, since what happened in the past) is not really fair.

      I know a girl from Estonia (and I know nobody from Russia btw), there is not a day when I talk to her when she doesn't mention Russia in a negative way. Its just anecdotal of course, but in a country that has been suppressed by the USSR but now has to live with a 30% Russian minority I would *expect* prejudices.

      To get on topic. It may well be that the attacks are not the work of the government (it seems a bit childish, I would think Russia has other means to pressure Estonia if they choose to do so), but of some random nationalist group. But I would completely expect the Estonian government to use it as a way to get the attention of the rest of the world to show how bad and evil the Russians are.

      Of course I know, just because you are paranoid doesn't mean they are not after you :)

    17. Re:They forgot something. by AdmiralWeirdbeard · · Score: 1

      Considering that at least some large portion of that Russian-speaking percentage of the population represents Russians brought in to fill the empty houses of Estonians shipped off to the gulags never to return, I'd say its rather understandable that official Gov. policy on the subject is, 'citizenship is contingent on moderate cultural integration.'

      Also, not really sure why it matters what Russia thinks of Estonia's government. At the very best that's a pot/kettle situation, but more likely its just blatant bullshit spun from a former world power grasping for some of its lost glory by bossing its former-subject neighbors.

      --
      Come read my stupid blagablog. Rants and Giggles
    18. Re:They forgot something. by NineSprings · · Score: 1

      Well said indeed!

    19. Re:They forgot something. by Cyberax · · Score: 1

      Russians made the biggest part of USSR army. Belorussians, Armenians and some Ukrainians were also referred to as 'Russians' in WWII.

      As for monuments... Well, Ukrainian nationalists in L'vov are going to remove Soviet war memorial: http://www.nr2.ru/lvov/118316.html (and already removed memorials to a famous Russian WWII spy). Poland also wants to remove all of the USSR memorials.

      That's why I think it's important to show to all estonias of this world that Russia does care about war memorials.

      BTW, Hungary was not 'indifferent' to which side won the WWII. They fought on the side of Axis for the most part of the war.

    20. Re:They forgot something. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you can't deny over 30% of your population [estimate of Russian population in Estonia] the most basic rights, including citizenship
      You learn the language, pass one exam and voila - the citizenship is yours.
      ... or just make russian a official language and problem solved. To wit, Finland has 2 official languages: Finnish (spoken by 92%)* and Swedish; Canada has 2 official languages: English (60%) and French(23%). So, it looks like the estonians are just racists.
      *data from wikipedia
    21. Re:They forgot something. by miscz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Russians were just another aggressive force during WWII, they've beaten nazis but were not a lot better, eastern Europe still remembers that Red Army troops were the mostly savages that raped, plundered and killed everything they saw. Of course there are exceptions but you can't blame, polish people for renaming Adolf Hitler Platz to the Slavic Frendship Square (example from my hometown) and removing other symbols of occupation, it's not illegal according to internetional law either. 30% of estonian population is not denied citizenship, AFAIK it's just that a lot of Russians didn't learn Estonian language even after living there for many years, they're not trying to be a part of this society.

    22. Re:They forgot something. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do have some sympathy.
      - almost 30% of the people is Russian. That's a lot. In many other countries, a 30% minority would be allowed to use their own language.
      - Estonian is not exactly an "easy" language.
      - According to wikipedia, quite a number of Russians did learn the language and take the test to get citizenship.
      - Do not judge people who live there now for actions of a oppressive government 50 years ago. Estonians seem to do this often. The start of your post makes it seem you do to. Unless you meant to make the point that Estonians are large prejudiced concerning Russians?

      Also, slashdot thinks i'm not human, but i think the script misreads the picture.

    23. Re:They forgot something. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Russians in Estonia want to have all the benefits of EU citizenship without doing anything to earn them. I have zero sympathy for them."

      It's interesting that on Slashdot, this opinion is acceptable while the analogous opinion regarding Mexican illegal aliens in the USA is considered somehow xenophobic and racist.

    24. Re:They forgot something. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the meantime, bulldozers recently "excavated" a grave of five ww2 russian pilots in one of the -russian- cities to make room for a mall.

      The corpses were "disposed off", not relocated to a cementary.

      Neither Mr. Putin nor "Nashi" (which increasingly appear to look like the brownshirts of 1930s Germany) reacted to the event.

      But then, it did not take place in an independent nation that was previously an occupied terriroty.

    25. Re:They forgot something. by ghoul · · Score: 1, Interesting

      The comparison with latinos in the US is a false comparison. Latinos born in the US are US citizens no matter what language they speak. They are not forced to undergo citizenship tests. That the EU would admit such a country which discriminates against a large minority is a sad reflection on the EU but then again having lived both in US and Europe I do know that Europeans are a lot more racist than Americans are. And since when is Estonia an independent country? It has never been independent in its history. Till WW1 it was part of the Russian empire. After WW1 a lot of artificial countries were created in order to punish the Germans and the Communists who had left the war early. Look at what happened to the artificial Czechoslovakia, East Prussia, Yugoslavia etc. Just drawing lines on a map does not a country make. Amongst the Baltic states only the Lithunians have ever been a real independent country. Estonia was a creation of politics. Just speaking a language does not make a separate nation. India has more than 800 languages and 8000 dialects Would you suggest India should be 800 countires? And yes most of the areas of India speaking even the non official languages are bigger than Estonia. Basically a country which collaborated with the Nazis wants to go back to its fascist past and it is inconvenient to have statues around reminding people that last time they tried to be good little Nazis the Russians kicked their butt. The insecurity of the Estonians manifests in their persecution of the Russian minority. What would the world say if Scotland was to put conditions on English residents of Scotland that they have to learn Scottish or be treated as illegal immigrants? Europe has a very murky past. There have been lots of wars and atrocities and lots of populations have moved around. To enforce language based citizenship wont work and is against the spirit of the EU. Also a common bugaboo of the fascist apologists is Stalin sent people to Siberia. Yes Stalin sent people to Siberia but it was to staff the industries which had been packed up and moved beyond the Urals to protect them from the Germans. This has been always considered a marvel of logistics and strategy as if Stalin had not moved the industries when the Germans captured them WW2 would be pretty much over with only the mopping up of USA left to do for the Nazis. So how can you compliment a leader for a great decision moving the factories and criticize him for moving the workers for those factories?

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
    26. Re:They forgot something. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's standard practice. someone who doesn't the history and language of a country he wishes to live in is hardly qualified to participate in public life there.

    27. Re:They forgot something. by at_slashdot · · Score: 1

      One question remains what are Russians doing in Estonia, why don't the go back were they came from?

      --
      "It is our choices, Harry, that show what we truly are, far more than our abilities." -- Prof. Dumbledore
    28. Re:They forgot something. by sosondowah · · Score: 1

      _The comparison with latinos in the US is a false comparison. Latinos born in the US are US citizens no matter what language they speak. They are not forced to undergo citizenship tests._

      majority of the countries in the world do not require tests from kids born in the country, unless the parents are citizens of another country that automatically grant citizenship to the child. estonia is no exception. so yes, latino comparison is accurate.

      you compare estonian language issue to indian dialects? buddy, the dialects have been there for ages. russians imported theirs 67 years ago. bit of a difference there. and speaking of which, estonian language has been spoken in the same region a long time before varangians led by rurik crossed the baltic sea. so in a sense, estonians have been longer around than russians. but well, that's beside the point here.

      point is, go get yer facts right

    29. Re:They forgot something. by dgr73 · · Score: 1

      At the risk of having this degenerate into a flamewar, i'll enter a few corrections, plus a few clarifications from the non-Russian point of view.

      1. 30 Million dead russians (as you state in your original message) is not just a death toll caused by the Germans. How many were killed in "friendly" hands?

      2. The policy of "Russification" was widely adopted during and after WWII. As stated in the original message titled "They forgot something", Estonia was one of the nations to suffer from this. The results of this policy can be seen in many countries and occupied regions. The natives of occupied Karelia are now a minority with their language all but extinct. And if you go to Ukraine, their language has been all but replaced by Russian.

      3. You say in your reply that there are 300 search parties recovering and burying bodies. That's fine, but I was referring to wartime and it's immediate aftermath.

      Considering point 2, why would you blame Ukrainian nationalists for tearing down the memorials of their oppressors? Or Estonians for moving the memorial out of the center of the city. I realize that for russians it's a memorial to great victory, but since it's not on their soil, how can they dictate how it should been viewed and treated? Is it not for an independent country to decide what to do in their soil?

      If your answer to the last question is "not in cases such as these" or something similar, I suggest you head off to Iraq and start putting up Saddam statues that have been torn down.

    30. Re:They forgot something. by init100 · · Score: 1

      They were required to pass Estonian language and history exam. They were NOT granted citizenship automatically.

      So? It does not seem to be wrong in the purportedly "Land of the Free" to require passing tests to acquire citizenship. Why would it be wrong for Estonia?

    31. Re:They forgot something. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Latinos is a bad comparison. Plenty of Spanish people, who are citizens, do not speak English. There are many exceptions to the exam, and the exam itself is simple. You have just to be able to say simple things like "My name is Rodriguez". Government agencies (especially in NYC area) provide forms in Spanish, as well as Spanish speaking personnel.

      Russians ruled Estonia since 1700, its a bit more then 67 years. 67 years were under Soviets. That's the fact.

    32. Re:They forgot something. by AndyElf · · Score: 1

      There are much more civilised ways of dealing with historical touchy points than the one chosen by (or suggested to) Estonian government. Look at their neighbors, like Latvia, for instance. A very much the same memorial hardly bothers anyone. It may also be advisable not to call Estonian SS batalion "liberators" either, cosidering the flags and masters they have been serving under. And as always, it is important to distinguish the doings of a ruling caste and people of a given country, same as seeing through who really is behind an activity like this DDoS attack.

      That said, since this is hardly a simple story of Estonia and Russia having a grave dispute over a bronze soldier and it has a whole cadre of inspirators, I'd say that Russia has taken the bait, the hook and the sinker.

      --

      --AP
    33. Re:They forgot something. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The situation is complex, but both sides try to picture it as simple. Each side has their own view.

      The ethnic Russians in Estonia, and elsewhere, were proud that they had helped defeat the Nazis. It was one of the last points of pride given the horrors of the Stalin era. And then the statue that represented the one of the best things they did in the last 80 years was moved. It was a serious blow. So resentment is natural.

      The Estonians in WWII were forced into a horrible choice. Side with Hitler or side with Stalin. There was no choice to be neutral Many countries had the same choice. Just because the USSR was one of the Allies did not make them one of the good guys. Siding with Hitler did not mean the Estonians were fascist (though some probably were, and some were probably socialist as well). It meant that they thought this was the best route to survival. So the statue put up immediately after the Soviets re-occupied Estonia was definately seen as a symbol of occupation; even more so when Soviet soldiers were buried on top of their own veterans who fought for independence earlier.

      So both sides have their natural responses. That said, it should have all died down quickly. A few formal protests, public debate, and so forth. All within Estonia's borders. But some groups in Russia have turned this into the cause of the day. Cries of fascism abound, the Estonian embassy is Moscow is blockaded while the police do nothing, denial of service attacks. Over what? Moving a statue. Not destroying it. The same way many other countries, including Russia, moved their Soviet era statues. And in a foreign and independent country, not a break away province. Where is all this hyped up nationalism coming from? The Russian government may not be creating this crisis, but they're certainly gaining political power over it (as happens anytime foreign enemies are created to divert attention from domestic issues).

    34. Re:They forgot something. by Cyberax · · Score: 1

      1. Not much. Somehow people forget, that it was a Nazi policy to exterminate Slavic people along with the Jews. And Estonia gladly took part in extermination, BTW (http://english.pravda.ru/mailbox/22/101/399/16745 _Baltic.html).

      2. Autonomous Soviet Socialistic Estonian Republic had Estonian as a state language even during the peak of Russification. People were not required to learn Russian. The Great Independent Estonia even denied citizenship to Russians.

      3. There's not much you can do to bury (mostly civilian) people killed by Nazi forces.

      I currently live in Ukraine (I have a double citizenship: Ukrainian and Russian). It's a complex subject, nationalists are mostly moved by revanchism.

      There's nothing wrong with Estonians wanting to move a memorial. But they should be prepared for consequences, and such actions in the past could have been used as a causus belli.

      And don't give me crap about 'sovereign nations'. There's no such thing - USA demonstrated this. Only power and force matters.

    35. Re:They forgot something. by Cyberax · · Score: 1

      There's a small difference. Russian-speaking people often lived for decades in Estonia, they were not immigrants.

    36. Re:They forgot something. by gnuman99 · · Score: 1

      Insightful? This is damn racist bullshit. For an example of a country where this also occurs, see Canada. One province is mostly French speaking and the rest of the country is English speaking. Should be split the country? Ship the French speakers back to France?? According to you, yes. Fortunately, most people have have the understanding that people speak different languages. What was done, CANNOT be undone. Period.

      The only normal solution for Estonia is to adopt *two* official languages. After all, their recent history had both at different points in time. Yes, government services should be offered in *both* in light of this fact. You can't ignore 26% of the population! If you try to marginalize them, you are *no better* than the "evil Soviets". You are even worse, because you can't even learn from their mistakes. (And even from an economic point of view, it makes sense to learn Russian as Estonian is not exactly known outside of Estonia).

      Of course you could have another solution. Just have a nice civil war and ethnic cleansing like some other bigoted countries.

    37. Re:They forgot something. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you can't deny over 30% of your population [estimate of Russian population in Estonia] the most basic rights, including citizenship
      You learn the language, pass one exam and voila - the citizenship is yours.


      That's just it...if you're a Russian-Estonian, you don't pass the exam. Some of you US guys just have no idea how corrupt the real world is out there.
      The Russians in Estonia have legitimate gripes - You know that if a Russian family lives in a house that was taken from an Estonian during the Soviet takeover, descendants of the Estonian family can just take it back? Can you imagine what sort of upset this caused to both Estonians and Russians?

    38. Re:They forgot something. by ctzan · · Score: 1

      My family is from Latvia, just north of Estonia.

      I don't believe you.

    39. Re:They forgot something. by crocodilexp · · Score: 2, Informative

      You make some good points from the Estonian point of view, but there is more to the issue. Most importantly, note that Staling was not Russian, nor did Russian people ever choose or elect him in any meaningful way. Soviet occupation of Estonia was indeed marked with arresting intellectuals and shipping thousands of people off to Siberia. Terrible, but not significantly different from what Stalin did in other parts of the USSR, including Russia itself. Indeed, it was Soviet policy to encourage Russians to settle all over the USSR, in order to unify and strengthen the country. I'm not defending the Soviets, but for a vast, multi-ethnic country, this policy does make practical sense. Not many of the Russians settlers deliberately chose to oppress Estonians, and many might not have chosen to move there -- it was a Soviet policy. When it comes to the citizenship question, your analogy with Spanish speakers in the U.S. is flawed. Most present-day Russians in Estonia were born there, and have no other land or citizenship. The situation to Estonia is more analogous to the hypothetical example of Canada stripping all Quebecois (French-speaking, natural-born Canadians) of citizenship until they passed an English exam. It would, of course, cause an uproar and be a significant human rights violation.

    40. Re:They forgot something. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...There's nothing wrong with Estonians wanting to move a memorial. But they should be prepared for consequences, and such actions in the past could have been used as a causus belli.

      And don't give me crap about 'sovereign nations'. There's no such thing - USA demonstrated this. Only power and force matters."


      Interesting thread, but your last sentence nails how utterly pointless to have discussed rights, wrongs, anything else besides, with you. If "Only power and force matters," why bother? Russia (or anyone else) does what it does, because it can. The end.
    41. Re:They forgot something. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because Russia can and do threaten Estonia and other small countries around unlike Mexico-US, you einstein. Besides, you use the word "illegal". Do you know what the word means?

    42. Re:They forgot something. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Citizenship is not a "basic right". It's something that has to be earned. Yes, even russians have to bow down and say "can I have it, please!". Understandably as representatives of former "master race" it can be difficult to do.
      To earn estonian citizenship you have to learn the estonian language and apply for the citizenship (and pass the exam). Not a big package to overcome, if you really want it. But then there's the attitude that stands in the way. They want to think of themselves as "liberators" and "culture bringers" but they are simply more like uninvited industrial immigrants. Brought into occupied territories violating the Geneva convention.

      Russians are renowned for labeling anything and everything as "facist" that does not comply with their view of the world. That way the other party has to start automatically defending themselves and proving they are not a camel...

      I wonder, do the russian immigrants in US call the US government "facist" as it does not automatically grant them US citizenship?
      Conveniently the russians also overlook the many facist movements with truly intimidating agendas, freely operating in Russia...

      Speaking of education for children. It is granted for all residents of Estonia. Citizen or no citizen. In fact it is compulsory to go to school until you're an adult. And yes, there are also russian-language schools (and not just a few!). All paid by the taxpayer. Saying basic or secondary education is not available for some resident of Estonia free of charge is just outright libellous. It's a lie. Period.

      Oh and the statue that was the center of all this activity was NOT DESTROYED NOR REMOVED, but nicely and peacefully RELOCATED to a war cemetery where it stands today unharmed. ( Come visit and see for yourself if you don't believe. )
      The graves were dug up (from near a bus stop, where they had been for 50 years..) by expert archaeologists and criminalistics experts and treated with proper respect. The remains have been dna-sampled in case any relatives wish to claim them and unless they are claimed, they will be reburied at the military cemetary.
        Unlike, as done in Russia, where in Himsk (near Moscow), a war memorial was lately dug up with excavators throwing bones left and right and a monument completely demolished. Demonstrators savagely beaten by the russian special militarized police force OMON.

      If anything was vandalized during the whole event, then a lot of shop windows. The thieves started by protesting (with slogans like "Russia! Russia!" and "Soviet Union forever!" etc) and then after the police dispersed the crowds, went on to steal Hugo Boss suites from smashed shops and potato chips from kiosks.
      ( Wanna see some photos? Go check out http://tuvasta.politsei.ee/eng/ - see the "political" youth robbing tampons from the kiosk and booze from liqueur stores. Btw. this is the official police website asking for help in idenfifying these criminals. )

      If anything it's the russian government that's facist (disguised sometimes as patriotist..), as the country is indoctrinating itself fast. Democracy in Russia is a mere facade these days as the opposition is persecuted. Bigger critics of the government get murdered ( see Anna Politkovskaja and other famous high profile political murders). The czar is back and want's to rule. Youth "movements" (more like hitlerjugend to the Putin administration..) that were allowed to vandalize the Estonian embassy in Moscow could protest all they wanted with no interruptions from the OMON. Why? Because they were on the payroll of the kremlin, that's why!

      In Estonia on the other hand, the newly elected government has plenty of support by the people. The government is at the top of it's popularity after relocating the monument and successfully putting down the riots. After the riots, when the police asked if anyone would like to be deputized in case the police needed extra help, a 1000 candiates stepped up in a few days.

      The DDOS attacks btw. are not a problem in everyday life in Estonia.
      It was more like an interesting opportunity for the data security specialists and a media buzz, than anything important.

    43. Re:They forgot something. by ultranova · · Score: 1

      There's a small difference. Russian-speaking people often lived for decades in Estonia, they were not immigrants.

      And in all those decades, they didn't manage to pick up enough language skills to pass a single test ? I find that rather strange.

      Oh well, I guess I should just be happy that Finland managed to repel the Russian "liberators", so we don't have this problem. Altought I have to admit being a bit worried watching the Soviet Union being apparently rebuilt right next to us...

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    44. Re:They forgot something. by layer3switch · · Score: 1

      That's not even vandalizing.

      Now, THIS is the way it is done, european friend!
      http://media.collegepublisher.com/media/paper919/s tills/wm70s19s.jpg

      --
      "Don't let fools fool you. They are the clever ones."
    45. Re:They forgot something. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I know this is a yankee website and that you guys don't have too good a relationship with the concept of history (you know...facts and figures and all that stuff that is often so incovenient to the way you view the world) but do at least try!
      "

      Yeah, at least we have a good excuse for fucking up now and then. What's Russia's excuse?

      And yeah, that must be why Russia is so enamored the world over.

    46. Re:They forgot something. by Cyberax · · Score: 0

      There's a large difference between 'pick up some basics' and 'pass advanced language test'. I don't have any problems with Finland (it's the birthplace of Linus Torvalds, after all) - you fought hard and managed to keep independence. But Estonian politicians just disgust me. Estonia never really fought for its independence, both time independence was granted and they surrendered to USSR without a fight.

    47. Re:They forgot something. by Jon+Kay · · Score: 1

      The problem is that Estonia now behaves EXACTLY like USSR did.

      Estonia has occupied Russia? Remarkable. I must pay more attention to the news.

    48. Re:They forgot something. by Cyberax · · Score: 1

      Well, Russian-speaking minority in Estonia can safely say that Estonia occupied them. For one, they were denied citizenship.

    49. Re:They forgot something. by Rurmo · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but that is a blatant lie. There are around 100K people without citizenship, that is less than 10% of the population. And that number is shrinking remarkably fast. Russian schools have to learn using the same programme set by state as all. But IN russian. Only few classes must be held in estonian, estonian language class among on of them of course. Almost all bigger private companies have russian as one requirement for service staff. If people don't want to learn estonian at the most basic level to gain citizenship, if they don't want to know anything about the local culture and prefer live in the "infosphere" of neightbouring country I cannot call that discrimination. I can call it disloyalty to the country they live in.

    50. Re:They forgot something. by Rurmo · · Score: 1

      Why should they have been granted free citizenship? It would be such a nice way: first you conquer the country for generation or two, move in ALOT of your people, then give it back the indepencence and then all those new citizens vote the country back to the arms of the occupier. Legal occupation, done :) Btw, if estonia would have given free citizenship to the all residents at 1991, there would have been 60% russians here. Meaning there would not have been Estonia but a province of Russian Federation.

    51. Re:They forgot something. by Cyberax · · Score: 1

      Lithuania granted citizenship to Russian-speakers as did Ukraine, Belorussia and generally all other xUSSR-countries. I don't see them rushing back into the Russian Federation.

      It's interesting to note, that Lithuania is also the only baltic country which has fought for independence in early 90-s: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vilnius_massacre

    52. Re:They forgot something. by Rurmo · · Score: 1

      That rule was put in motion by local german governers who here long before the russians... Russian cultural influences, mentality and population were completely insignificant before WW2

    53. Re:They forgot something. by meiemiiz · · Score: 1

      Latinos born in the US are US citizens no matter what language they speak Thanks for the FUD, but same applies for children born in Estonia - they have the citizenship. By the way, the all Russian-speaking non-citizens have all the rights as citizens within the Estonia (they have the so-called "gray passport"), with the only difference being that they can not vote at national elections. Everybody is free to vote in local though - does US grant its non-citizens the same rights? Nobody is "forced" to undergo anything. As long as you do not want to become a citizen, you can keep your gray passport.

      And since when is Estonia an independent country? It has never been independent in its history. Wow, Estonia is just an artificial country? Haven't seen this one before. By the way - just for you to remember, the way Estonia became independent in 1918 after 700 years of oppression was by beating Russia in a war. Go back and read your history - yes, a country with a population of around 1 million actually beat the hell out of a country with a population of 100 times that of Estonia (read more on it here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Estonian_Liberation_W ar).

      Yes Stalin sent people to Siberia but it was to staff the industries which had been packed up and moved beyond the Urals to protect them from the Germans. And why did he need to send my family to Siberia 4 years after the war was over? Of my grandparents and their 5 children only my grandma, my father and his 2 brothers returned years later. Especially vividly I remember a story that my grandma told me when she was still alive about Siberian winter when the camp's Russian guards would feed the pigs first and only if anything was left, they would give some of the grain to the people imprisoned there. To me Stalin is just as bad a war criminal as Hitler was, if not even worse. Hope you like your new dictator though, he seems quite promising.
    54. Re:They forgot something. by Rurmo · · Score: 1

      Erm... giving back the properties illegaly taken by soviet union from people is a sure sign of corruption. And of course you fail to mention that the houses were returned to the owner no matter the nationality. I happened to live in the house at the Narva Road where it was returned to a russian owner. Also, things were not just simply given back but several regulations were in place. Like the owner had to find you comparable replacement, etc.

    55. Re:They forgot something. by Rurmo · · Score: 1

      It cannot be racist as there is no single race of US citizens :) And xenophobic... well I would certainly not call that xenophobic. If people want to live in a country, they must be loyal to that country and respect it.

    56. Re:They forgot something. by Rurmo · · Score: 1

      First, you can read Wikipedia. Good. Read "83.6% of the Lithuanian population are ethnic Lithuanians". Estonia and Latvia didn't have that luxury. Also, estonia and latvia restored their republics. That isn't just a "hmm, let's see who we give citizenship today" game

    57. Re:They forgot something. by ghoul · · Score: 1

      Yeah I read the wikipedia piece. All I see is British Royal Navy, Danish and Swedish volunteers and anti communist russians fighting Communist Russians so yeah I repeat what I said Estonia was an artifical state created by western world powers in order to create a nuisance for Russia and yes they are doing a very good job of being a nuisance.

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
    58. Re:They forgot something. by Cyberax · · Score: 1

      Read a bit further into the history of Estonia. It was a part of Russian Empire before 1918.

      But still, most part of Ukraine is made from Russian-speaking people (I _live_ in Ukraine and I never had a problem with my Russian language - almost everybody understands it). Still, Ukraine is not a part of Russia.

    59. Re:They forgot something. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess *some* sympathy is justified whenever there's distress. But..

      - almost 30% of the people is Russian. That's a lot. In many other countries, a 30% minority would be allowed to use their own language.

      They're allowed to use it of course. Nobody's telling them to speak estonian to each other.

      - Estonian is not exactly an "easy" language.

      What, are russians too dumb to learn it, or simply too proud? ;)

      - Do not judge people who live there now for actions of a oppressive government 50 years ago. Estonians seem to do this often. The start of your post makes it seem you do to. Unless you meant to make the point that Estonians are large prejudiced concerning Russians?

      You know, I don't do that, and I used to have more sympathy towards russian-estonians before. But this stupid fuss over a bloody statue is what changed it completely. It seems clear now that the russians who live there *now* have no understanding nor sympathy towards estonians. They're still thinking it's okay to use violence and random destruction to pressure the majority into.. not moving a statue? Lunatics, I say.

    60. Re:They forgot something. by meiemiiz · · Score: 1

      What can I say, once I thought that there actually are intelligent Russians still around, but now it seems that that fear was groundless. Thanks for clarifying it for me. Another bright spot in all this is that you guys are dying out as a nation anyways and in a long run there will be "SinoRussia" across our borders. The new and improved/expanded China will be much preferred to the xenophobic and totalitarian sorry excuse for a state Russia is. Good luck using everything at hand fighting us instead of dealing with your real problems like alcoholism, poverty, xenophobia, nazism/nashism, corruption and so on. Hope it works, but be sure - the Baltic states nor the rest of the Eastern Europe is not yours to loot and rape any more. Times have changed and even the ethnic Russians within the reasons do not want back to Russia.

    61. Re:They forgot something. by LizardKing · · Score: 1

      I don't follow your logic. I can't see why the colonial language should have special status in a country that was once forcibly made part of an Empire. Anyway, as others have pointed out education in Russian is not banned in Estonian schools that are in areas with predominately Russian speaking populations. The mass media in the Russian Federation may say otherwise, but that's because their ownership is mostly in the hands of the state and its oligarchical sympathisers.

      As for Ukraine, the west of the country largely speaks Ukrainian - a language that is distinct from Russian. I recently attended a talk by Andrey Kurkov, a Ukrainian author of mixed Russian-Ukrainian descent, where he said that the reason he writes in Russian rather than Ukrainian is because the languages are so different and he doesn't feel able to express himself well enough in Ukrainian. He emphasised two points, firstly that Ukrainian is a distinct language (despite Soviet era propaganda that belittled it as a worthless dialect) and secondly that he saw himself as Ukrainian, albeit one with a partly Russian heritage.

      Returning to Estonia to the ethnic Russian situation would have been to make Russian an official language in the same way that Swedish was after Finnish independence. However, the recent history of each country and the resulting ethnic relationships made this rational approach much less likely. The Russo-centric regime in Moscow had tried to crush Estonian independence protests with force, and this didn't make any kind of rapprochement with an ethnic Russian minority a likelihood.

    62. Re:They forgot something. by Rurmo · · Score: 1

      So if people got killed, then they had to fight for their independence. And everything else not resulting in the loss of lives is not fighting? :) Lithuania had the smallest russian population at that time and they were unlucky country surronded by eastern block (i.e. away from western media attention). No wonder soviet army used guns most light-handed there.

      When they tried to took government by force in estonia, it wasn't done only using soviet army. It was mastered through local members of "Interfront" just they had done and tried to do here on 1940 and 1924. But at that time there was enormous unity between estonian people so "shields" of humans were used everywhere. For example, Interfront was made to leave government buildings just by gathering tens and tens of thousands supporters around the building. Estonians are quite numb people so our method of fighting was just to stand and maybe sing :)

    63. Re:They forgot something. by asninn · · Score: 1

      Given that Russian and Estonian are about as closely related as English is to Polish [...]

      Actually, Polish and English are much more closely-related than Estonian and Russian - it only makes your point even stronger, of course, but I still wanted to point it out.

      That being said, great comment.

      --
      butter the donkey
    64. Re:They forgot something. by LupusCanis · · Score: 1

      Officially if you're a Latino in the United States you are a US Citizen, however, how far you get in the world is fairly limited if you only know Spanish, unless you stick exclusively to areas with large Latino minorities. If you want to be succesful in the USA you need to know English, same applies in Estonia with Estonian, only it's codified. And guess what, most of the other countries in that area have this too, Latvia certainly does.

      The EU admits countries on strict criteria, one of which is that every single member state agrees to allow this country within the union, for instance, one of the stumbling blocks for Turkey's joining the EU is Cyprus threatening to veto any moves made because of the whole North Cyprus issue. You'd've thought that if this had counted as what you are claiming it is that one of the countries would have vetoed these countries joining, wouldn't you? There are people within the EU very enthusiastic about Russia, such as Italy's current PM (though on balance relations are not good), so I'm sure that that would have happened.

      Where did you live in Europe? Did you forget that Europe's a continent with many different countries and that attitudes are vastly different from area to area even within countries? Unless you've lived in over half of the EU's countries for a signficant amount of time, you're not qualified to make a judgement. Besides which, my experience, which is no more or less valid than yours, says the opposite. In the modern day, in all of the European countries I've been to (granted, scant few) there's been a lot of casual racism, in that stereotypes are used an awful lot usually in a jocular way and racist jokes are fairly commonly told, but very little serious racism (though there's more of this towards Pakistanis and Muslims because of the media...). What I've found with Americans based off their internet presence compared with those of Europeans is that they seem more inclined to serious racism, as in actually believing the stereotypes and hating people because of nationality etc. I haven't actually lived in America, but given that attitudes are different in different parts of the USA....

      Estonia's an indepdent country because it's an independent country. Czechoslovakia, East Prussia and Yugoslavia were independent countries because they were independent countries. And if lines on a map and governmental structures don't make a country, what does? By your logic (I'm assuming that you're basing this off ethnicity as it seems implied in your post, so sorry if this turns out straw-mannish if that's not what you mean) South Korea isn't an independent country but, say, Tibet is. The fact is that Estonia's an independent country and if it were part of a greater anything it would not be part of a greater Russia. It is not Russian ethnically, never has been. And who suggested breaking up countries into areas where different languages are spoken? So, some questions. Does Estonia have a government, does it have institutions, is it marked out with a black line on a globe? If all of these are true, it's a real country.

      What's your basis for claiming Estonia wants to go back to its fascist past? If you've been under the yoke of one country, an invader, no matter what it is, seems like a liberator.

      I would say that that'd be very odd given that they're a constituent country in the United Kingdom and not an indepedent state and their government isn't really devolved enough to make that kind of decision and that there's no language called Scottish (there's Gaelic (which is very much a minority language) and Scots (which is basically little more than a dialect of English with more Norse words) but most Scots speak English). At least choose a comparible example, the history is completely different beyond everything else I pointed out. Act of Union? i.e. we didn't conquer the Scots and send them to gulags.

      Of course Europe has a murky past, that's why the EU was set up. I mean, officially it was a mining community, but Churchill and other leader

    65. Re:They forgot something. by ghoul · · Score: 1

      Well Stalin was a Georgian and the Bolshevik party grew mostly out of the Baltic states to begin with and spread to Russia proper later so why are the Estonians pissed at Russians for Stalin's actions? And what does Stalin have to do with denying civil right to people even whose grandfathers were not alive when Stalin was. And frankly the gulags have been overdramatized in western media. The term is used to cover with a wide brush a lot of differnet kinds of things all the way from new cities set up in Siberia to exploit the Oil, mining towns, siberian training bases to prisons for common criminals to resettlement colonies of ethnic groups (while this might be questionable the aim was if the entire country becomes mixed in ethnicity it wont break up into parts. At least the Russians did not fight brutal civil wars like the US and UK to force subnations to stay when they wanted to leave). All of these places had high death rates due to the nature of frontier life but casualties were pretty high amongst the homesteaders in the American west too. There were a few political prisoners mostly the result of Stalin's paranoia about coups which was not helped by the west pouring in millions of dollars to ferment coups.

      Speaking of Cyprus that is another black mark on the EUs record. To allow in a country which kept on saying admit us in admit us in and the Turks will agree to a solution as they want in too and when EU agreed to let them in they turn around and reject a very fair Annan plan and leave the Turkish Cypriots in the lurch is just a sign of what kind of a country Cyprus is. Its a really racist place. If you are not white dont go out alone to the beach as you are liable to be set upon by gangs of youth who will beat you up all the time calling you Bloody Turk! (apparently the Greek education system teaches the kids that if you are not white you are a Turk and its OK to beat up the Turks) Its a sad day when the EU is so desperate to expand that it is admitting bad apples like Cyprus and Estonia.

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
    66. Re:They forgot something. by LupusCanis · · Score: 1

      Stalin was a Georgian who ended up running the USSR, of which the central and most powerful nation was Russia. It's irrelevant where he came from, it's like a Jew being upset at Germans for Hitler, even though Hitler was Austrian. Both of them came from countries inside the sphere of influence of the country they eventually lead, and both of them are remebered for leading that country rather than where they came from.

      Marxism came from Germany and the Germans weren't keen on having communism back in the day of the DDR. National socialism came from Austria and most Austrians aren't keen on fascism. Just because a school of thought comes from a country doesn't mean that they should like it, just because an event in a country through a massively long, indirect and impossible to predict series of events ended up impacting negatively on that country doesn't mean that the countrymen shouldn't feel bitter about it.

      You're thinking about it too logically here, you're not taking into account the fact that people are emotional beings. These kinds of fueds last longer than the lifetimes of the people involved, how many old people do you know who dislike the Japanese even though the Japanese people born since WWII have nothing to do with it? How many Irish people still have an instrinsic distrust of the British (those wounds are still very fresh)? Now. Given that Estonia became independent in 1991, and many people will remember the days of the USSR's occupation, and the older people will remember Stalin ... do you honestly not expect them to be irritated at what they feel to be the presence of an imperial agressor?

      I don't get my views on gulags from the media, I look them up. "The total deaths shown by the declassified archives in the GULAG from 1931 to 1953 amount to about 1 million in "corrective labor camps." Another archival document contains the number of roughly 1.6 million deaths in both "corrective labor camps" and "corrective labor colonies" during the years 1930-1956 (figures for colonies are included from 1935 onwards). These figures include deaths of political and common prisoners, but they do not include executions of camp inmates that occurred during various waves of terror. " - there, specifically in forced labour camps, which is what I was referring to with gulags, 1 million dead in 20 years. So, no, they were not exactly nice there. And the moving ethnic groups is hardly an ethically sound thing to do, is it? Yes, it may be better for supporting the country, but it broke up anyway, and there are plenty of morally dubious things which can be done for the good of a country. As Godwin's Law has already been fulfilled, I shall mention the actions of a certain ruler of Germany in 1933-1945 who revitalised the economy, rebuilt a ruined country, raised national pride and made people proud to be German who did a few morally dubious things in his time, to say the least.

      I'm not sure what you mean by subnation, so it's somewhat hard to argue against what you're saying on that front (do you mean like wars of independence?), but ... well ... although I hardly find myself approving of many of the US's and the UK's actions, I don't think that you can objectively place anything these two countries have done, including Dresden, including massacres in India, including Hiroshima, including Vietnam, including Suez. Let's just have a rundown of what Stalin did: gulags (which we've already discussed), came into a position of power by way of robbing banks for funds, masterminded the invasion of his own country, assassinated his main political opponents, had mass imprisoning of intellectuals in countries he invaded, caused mass famines in the Ukraine through his policy of collectivisation, executed scientists with dissenting views, razed most religious buildings and killed the monks, censored science and the arts, attempted to destroy the Ukrainian people and culture, held great purges of opponents, sent millions of pretty much every ethnic group ex

    67. Re:They forgot something. by ghoul · · Score: 1

      One thing on your sources - unless you translated them from Russian they have been produced by Western official agencies and are suspect.

      On Cyprus if you check the recent history you will see that when Britain withdrew from Cyprus Turkey asked Britain to return Cyprus to them as it had been part of Turkish empire and Britain only had a mandate on it due to a Turkish defeat in the 19th century. At the same time Greek terrorists started a bombing campaign to force unification with Greece. As a result a final decision was made to make it independent with right of the Turkish Cypriots as well as the Greek Cypriots guaranteed through a power sharing structure. To guarantee this a Treaty of Guarantee was signed which specifically said that if either side tried to take over completely it was the responsibility of the guarantor powers Britain, Turkey and Greece to intervene militarily. Then the Greeks became a military dictatorship and the Greek officers posted in Cyprus did a coup to try and force unification with Greece. They arrested their own Greek Cypriot prime minister Archbishop Makarios as he was not willing to commit genocide against the Turkish Cypriots. Turkey at that time pleaded with Britain to intervene as a Guarantor power but Britain was too busy so Turkey invaded to stop the massacres of Turkish civilians which was taking place. This was perfectly legal under the Treaty of Guarantee. After the invasion Turkey was willing to withdraw as long as power was shared between Greeks and Turks. But the Greek Cypriot side would not agree and the EU helped them by imposing a total economic blockade on the North. This has caused so much pain in the North that finally the North agreed to an unconditional surrender and unification with the South as long as they could join the EU and as a result the blockade would be lifted. This was one of the reasons South Cyprus had given to EU- they had specifically said if EU admits us in the North will be so eager to join EU they will agree to reunification. However once the EU guaranteed the admission of Cyprus when the referendum was held South Cyprus rejected reunification while North Cyprus overwhelmingly accepted it. So the net result is South Cyprus cheated the EU and the EU is still punishing North Cyprus through an economic blockade. I used to live in Cyprus and I know that its not just a few youth- the present generation of Greek Cypriots is very racist and they feel some kind of glee that they are in the EU but they managed to keep North Cyprus out of it. The older generation which grew up under power sharing are not that racist. As for Turkey's own admission to EU that is a separate issue but again South Cyprus is playing a spoiler role there. I frankly beleive the EU does not need these problem nations like Cyprus and Estonia and they should be expelled.

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
    68. Re:They forgot something. by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Just to add something, there's one more side to the Estonian citizenship. In late 80s in Estonia there existed the Committees of Citizens of Estonia, with the goal of restoring Estonian independence. It was they who compiled the list of descendants of pre-occupation Estonian citizens. But they also offered everyone who did not get into the first list to apply for citizenship right then. All Russians who did so, got Estonian citizenship without even a language exam once Estonia became independent. According to the official sources, a total of ~25,000 Russians got their citizenship this way. I think it is a fair deal - the people who openly supported the independence of their country when it was still far from certain, and when such support could lead to persecution, got their rightful reward. The rest, who either didn't care, couldn't be bothered due to danger, or supported the occupation, now have to prove their right to be citizens of the country.

    69. Re:They forgot something. by LupusCanis · · Score: 1

      Oh, come on! Firstly, a good deal of that data came from the Soviet archives, specifically the figures on how many people had died in the camps (which is surely more likely to be biased the other way), so, no, most of it hasn't been produced by Western official agencies. The rest are by independent historians, who, oddly enough, have no direct relationship with the kind of official agencies you're implying (I'm assuming you mean MI6, CIA type agencies). Two, I didn't translate from the Russian due to a couple of teensy problems, firstly my not having the source text in Russian and the second the fact that I can't speak Russian or read the Cyrillic alphabet (I can read the Greek one, though). Though I pose this to you - on your information on Cyprus, did you translate all of the official documentation from Greek and Turkish yourself? If you didn't it may have been interfered with by Turkish official agencies and are therefore suspect. *rolls eyes*

      History may favour the winners, but given that not every single one of the UK/US's enemies have been accused of killing that many people through history, I'm more inclined to believe it actually happened, seeing as the USSR was seen as a mortal threat, just like all of the other mortal threats that have existed in history. Also, don't you think that there'd be no records of atrocities commited on the side of Americans/Britons if official agencies had filtered history? I mean, people aren't exactly shouting on the rooftops about these things, but they're not exactly secret either.

      I am aware of Cyprus' recent history. The thing is that Turks only made up 18% of the population at that time, although that's a significant minority, it's not really a minority large enough for power sharing (in that context) to be viable, and under the system the Turks had disproportionate influence as well. This system also blocked off the idea of a seperate Turkish Cypriot state and reunification with Greece, and as almost all Turks wanted the former and most Greeks wanted the latter. The only thing they agreed over was that these restrictions were placed there by a a foreign power and were therefore not valid, and fighting promptly broke out in order to achieve their aims. Well, in a few years anyway.

      As it had happened the Turkish Cypriots had been abusing safeguards put there to prevent total Greek rule as a matter of course and the Greek majority was very much unhappy with this, as they were basically vetoing them. Amendments were suggested by the President, which fixed most of the issues which made the system unworkable at the time but also removed the safeguards that the Turks were using. Understandably this didn't go down well and this served as a catalyst to civil war, as the Turks shortly after insurrected to form a seperate state, the Greeks didn't appreciate this and counterattacked and what was lead to what was basically a small scale civil war. Consistutional amendments by a neutral mediator were proposed but Turkey refused to agree to these. At this time NATO peacekeeping troops entered Cyprus (including British troops).

      There was a coup against Makarios, yes, but that was performed by the Greek military junta and was put down by the Greek Cypriots, so you can't really blame them. Then Turkey invaded, but it's not as black and white as you make it seem as to the legality of their actions - "The guarantor powers (the United Kingdom, Turkey, and Greece) promised not to seek annexation or partition of Cyprus, and to assist their communities on Cyprus in the event of major clashes between the Greek Cypriots and Turkish Cypriots. It was the attempted July 1974 Greek-backed coup d'etat that made Turkey intervene militarily, arguing that the Treaty of Guarantee made their intervention fully legal. Some Critics counter that only the first stage of the intervention - the initial landings - is covered by the treaty. The second stage of the intervention - the occupation of 37% of the island - however, was condemned by UN Security Council resolutions." on the Tr

  23. ObPrisoner quote by Demona · · Score: 1

    "Russian."

    (pointedly) "Estonian."

    (smirk) "Russian."

    (glare) "_We_ don't think so."

    --
    Fuck Slashdot
  24. Re:Common Sense by LizardKing · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You haven't got a clue.

    A DDOS attack is basically an attempt to saturate the capacity of the target. The "distributed" part means that it is difficult to screen out the attackers because the machines are on so many different subnets. The flaws that a DDOS relies on are not in the attacked systems, but in the attacking ones which have been compromised and have had software installed that makes them a "bot". A network of these "bots" are then coordinated by the attacker.

    And if you think that shutting down the websites of pretty much every government institution, bank and commercial enterprise in a highly connected country like Estonia amounts to "a few eggs thrown over the fence" then just think what it would do your nations economy.

  25. Maybe by Infonaut · · Score: 2, Insightful

    the point is, it's probably not official, it's probably by an independent group of weakly organized russian hackers upset due to nationalistic pride

    Given that it is now Putin's Russia, I'm not so sure. I wouldn't be at all surprised if there were some winking and nodding coming from the Russian security apparatus.

    --
    Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
    1. Re:Maybe by egr · · Score: 1

      hehe, that's even more funnier than "Loose change" movie

    2. Re:Maybe by ghoul · · Score: 1

      Or maybe that now it is Bush's US a nod and a wink is coming from US. Since when does having a democratic elected president become a crime. Since when that President put the interests of his own country above those of US Multinationals. Luckily Bush will never be accused of putting the interests of US over Halliburton so the corporate media will never attack him as a dictator even if he says to the rest of the world My way or the highway

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
  26. Re:Common Sense by Moridineas · · Score: 1

    Wow, that's an incredibly naive point of view.

    Always depends on bugs? Well, that's sometimes true, but you make it sound like a piece of cake to eliminate bugs. We've had computers around for a good number of years now, and that hasn't happened yet! Even a project like OpenBSD has had several SEVERE flaws over its lifespan in the core software--not counting flaws in typical addon software. (This is not meant to attack OpenBSD because I think frankly it's the best we've got! I use it on my firewall..)

    Not to mention, an "attack" can be so much more than those things. Trojans. Physical security breaches. Social engineering.

    Look, if this stuff was easy, then there would be no one hack attacks, no ddos attacks, etc, EVER. There clearly are, so it's clearly not easy.

  27. Economix by packetmon · · Score: 1, Interesting

    This reminds me of 2001 Chinese hackers said Tuesday they have begun to hit American computer networks with denial-of-service attacks, and also claim to have placed mass-attack tools into four large American computer networks. A new alert from the FBI-led National Infrastructure Protection Center (NIPC) confirms that hackers have been particularly active over the past two days. The distributed-denial-of-service attacks on the Department of the Interior's National Business Center, the U.S. Geological Survey's site and Pacific Bell Internet Services are among the largest so far. (Is This World Cyber War I).

    Economics will eventually take a big hit in the future with regards to cyberwarfare. A lot of times I'll read articles and comments with "so what better computers then people". Often those commenting don't think about the repercussions that come from a collapsed economy... That will lead to a shoddier quality of life, more crime and eventually more violence. Isn't this the case for the gaming community with so called "Gold Farmers" from China waging off-line attacks now... Meaning people actually escalating a scenario to non Internet mediums...

    1. Re:Economix by jpop32 · · Score: 1

      Often those commenting don't think about the repercussions that come from a collapsed economy... That will lead to a shoddier quality of life, more crime and eventually more violence.

      Definitely. But, I'd say a web site brought down by an cyber-attack is in any case preferable to a building demolished by a car bomb. I've never heard of anyone who died under a collapsing web site. Which would probably be an interesting story.

  28. Re:Common Sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I agree that DDoS attaks depend on flaws in the network... but that network is Internet... and you cant just say "everyone c'mon... buy new routers!"

    What if Iran would take down all US banks, newssites (includeing this one) and goverment pages... thats what basically happened in estonia. It is not a direct act of war (by laws, yet) but it definately isnt compareable to throwing eggs over fence

  29. Enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They should make this an act of war. There is no excuse for stuff like this: http://curio.us/q2

  30. we must not allow a Cyber-War gap .. by rs232 · · Score: 1

    General "Buck" Turgidson: Mr. President, we must not allow a Cyber-War gap!

    Seriously though, the US should have allowed the commie bastards join NATO when they wanted, instead of creating the ideal conditions for starting WW3.

    --
    davecb5620@gmail.com
  31. Re:Sexist/Agist by mtm_king · · Score: 1

    I think it GP is Andy666. He/she has been posting about sexism lately.

    I know - off topic.

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  32. Re:Common Sense by Control+Group · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The problem is the flaws that are being attacked aren't necessarily resident on the machines being attacked - as you know, since you mention zombie computers.

    But that doesn't make cyber attack bullshit. That's like saying that land invasions are a made up boogeyman because they depend on flaws like "not having a giant impregnable wall surrounding your country." DDoS attacks, in particular, are problematic. A given target has no way to prevent zombied machines from participating in the attack.

    Besides which, a DDoS attack is just a bandwidth race. If my home PC were to be attacked like this, there's nothing I, personally, can do about it. My router won't pass any of the packets to my machine, but if there's 6 Mbps worth of incoming traffic, even if I drop it at the router, I still can't get much legit traffic through. I can call my provider, and see if they can stop it upstream, but then it's just a comparison of the bandwidth at the DSLAM to the bandwidth of the attacker. The only thing to hope for is that, somewhere up the chain, you can reach a node with enough bandwidth that the attacker can't overwhelm it. When you start getting up into backbone territory, this isn't a problem.

    But - if we hypothesize for the moment an actual planned assault by a country - odds are pretty good that the US DoD, for example, has more bandwidth than Iran.

    --

    Reality has a conservative bias: it conserves mass, energy, momentum...
  33. Deja vu! by porkThreeWays · · Score: 1
    --
    If an officer ever threatens to taze you, say you have a pacemaker.
  34. Re:China has been at cyber-war with US for some ti by radiomullet · · Score: 0, Redundant

    in mother russia, paper looks good on communism!

  35. Nothing to worry about by Nymz · · Score: 1

    Only in the movies do the bad guys cut off the electricity and phone (communications blackout) before breaking in with guns ablazing.

    Only by submitting this story through my Estonian proxy on the 16th, did it get rejected for this one submitted on the 17th.

    It's funny, laugh. Better yet, moderate me funny damnit!

  36. Oh yeah? by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    This means that the provisions of... collective self-defense, will not automatically be extended to the attacked country... this matter needs to be resolved in the near future. Does this mean that get a ping wrong and it's not simply packets that might be coming back the other way?

    --
    Deleted
    1. Re:Oh yeah? by discord5 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Does this mean that get a ping wrong and it's not simply packets that might be coming back the other way?

      That's why in Hunt for Red October, Sean Connery says "ping -c 1 sub.navy.mil" (or simply "One ping only")

      That joke worked so well in my head :-(

    2. Re:Oh yeah? by Control+Group · · Score: 1

      If it helps, I thought it worked pretty well on this end, too.

      I don't think, though, that it could have been pulled off verbally.

      --

      Reality has a conservative bias: it conserves mass, energy, momentum...
  37. O'rly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Without naming Russia, the Nato official said: "I won't point fingers. But these were not things done by a few individuals."

    I see no reason why this could not have been done by one person, one man and a dial up connection can have alot of fun (once they find a few vulnerable servers on T1 ;) ).

    Just what evidence does this nato official base his claims on? Political power seems to be inversely proportional to technical knowledge in the case of anyone with any political influence

  38. Actually this has happened before, to the USA by mungurk · · Score: 5, Informative

    The Guardian article is not correct, in stating "the first known incidence of such an assault on a state". James Adams published an article entitled "Virtual Defense" from Foreign Affairs, May/June 2001 that details a number of cyber-attacks on a massive scale, against the United States. Specifically the Pentagon, NASA, as well as private universities and research laboratories, and a number of military defense contractors were targeted and the security breaches were enourmous, with highly sensitive documents vulnerable. Here is a link to the article (brief preview, then they make it available for purchase - sorry) http://www.foreignaffairs.org/20010501faessay4771/ james-adams/virtual-defense.html According to Foreign Affairs: The U.S. government now believes that more than 30 nations have developed aggressive computer-warfare programs. The list includes Russia and China, volatile governments such as Iran and Iraq, and U.S. allies such as Israel and France...The hackers have built "back doors" through which they can re-enter the infiltrated systems at will and steal further data; they have also left behind tools that reroute specific network traffic through Russia. [end of excerpt] The danger here is very high, especially for small businesses, who certainly do not have the technical resources of the US military (and even that was breached). Many small businesses have military contracts, etc. In short, this is a genuine act of war, and the potential for breaches of security across small businesses in the US (or really anywhere) is very high.

  39. i might be inclined to agree with you by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    however, i like my tea to be polonium 210 free

    ehem, cough

    whistling nonchalantly, strolling away...

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  40. Racism in Estonia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    The Russian minority living in Estonia is discriminated against, so this does not surprise me in the least. Teens with botnets, DOSing hated government sites... Estonian government can only blame themselves for not allowing the russian minority to work and for the many discriminatory laws against them. What is laughable is crying for NATO to deal with script kiddies' botnets.

    1. Re:Racism in Estonia by axia777 · · Score: 1

      Uh, really? Not that Lithuania, Estonia, and Latvia have a REASON to hate Russians of anything. My family is from Latvia and Russians can go fuck themselves. Putin is just another Stalin in sheep's clothing. The three Baltic's know this. It is high time that all three Baltic Countries tell Russians in general to stuff it where the sun don't shine....

    2. Re:Racism in Estonia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Russia has been talking about discrimination in Estonia for a long time, yet the official EU specialists have, time and time again, concluded that there is no discrimination in Estonia (except of course for a small number of cases, which you can find in any country).

    3. Re:Racism in Estonia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are absolutely right. The Estonians are expecially evil because in over 40 years they didn't learn how it feels to be the discriminated victim. By now they should know why this is called immoral and shouldn't do that to others.

      Thats why Israel doesn't have ghettos for their beloved palestinian neighbours.

  41. Re:Why Is This In Politics??!!! by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The world does not evolve around America kiddy wink!

    The politics section originally started out I believe a year or two ago to cover the election and resulting aftermath of "ZOMG BUSH GOT LESS VOTES!" type story. It has since become a more rounded section and carries stories from all over the world under it's banner, because you know "Stuff that matters" is quite often political.

    I mean when people start having wars via the Internet (as this rather implies is happening in some twisted form) it starts to effect us geeks as well. So we discuss it on Slashdot and because it's political based they used the politics banner.

    I feel sorry for you if you can't see that the FAQ maybe outdated and this has been this way for a good few months (maybe 12+) now, so decide to grind your axe on a stone that's been here longer than you probably have (Anoncow has no ID so I can't tell from your number, but I have to assume you're new if you don't understand the politics section).

    --
    I like muppets.
  42. Re:Am I the only one... by jb.cancer · · Score: 1

    dude.. u need t spend more time with ur girlfriend

  43. Re:I, for one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nice neuromancer ref

  44. Re:Should a cyber war require a cyber retaliation? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    And what kind of rations do you feed a cyber soldier, anyway?

    High doses of caffeine, of course. Or what kind of person do you think would be a soldier in that war, huh?

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  45. hello brawling estonians and russians by circletimessquare · · Score: 4, Funny

    i would like to open this nationalistic chest thumping thread with an exhortation from the rest of us here at slashdot: please be extremely hysterical and hot-headed and entertaining

    please be accusing each other's mothers of various acts of bestiality and extreme promiscuity, and do not go lightly on the creative threats of violence, including skewering the eyes with pokers, and the twisting of testicles in various farm machinery. proper english grammar is optional, in fact, it is better if your english grammar is nonexistent

    ok, my popcorn is ready, any russian want to respond to the above estonian?

    go!

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  46. creating hostility by musicmaster · · Score: 0, Troll

    So we have an Estonian government that is playing the ethnic card and that in the process probably has caused hundreds of Russians to emigrate. And now we are asked to see that government as a victim because some Russian script kiddies got angry with them?

    1. Re:creating hostility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess the real war here is not *cyber* war, but *information* war, where governments work hard to get the public to their side (sometimes using half-truths as best as they can). This is where I think Russia has an edge: not only are they bigger, but Russian government controls their media more tightly than Estonia, which ranks very high on the press freedom index (see http://www.rsf.org/rubrique.php3?id_rubrique=639 ). And if the government gets their people angry, some sort of cyber war will happen by default, without government lifting a finger :)

      IMO, Russia has overly exaggerated the problem. Although, it is true that Estonia has made some mistakes (for example, at least the government could have informed Russians better -- many thought wrongly at first that the statue was going to be destroyed; it was only later when they found that that they were simply moving the statue from one place to another). Also the Estonian government did not make it very clear that one of the main reasons for moving the statue was to get rid of extremist protests in the middle of the capital, on both sides (e.g. with the statue gone, they don't have a place for gathering).

      Russia has acted with a force that is way out of proportion: Russian politicians were suggesting that Estonia was an enemy of the Russian people, asking Estonian government to step down, claiming that Estonian police was beating Russians, etc, none of which were ever proven. This has lead to the situation that now most Russians think of Estonia as a hostile country, even to the point that there are signs in some (although very few) Russian dining areas that say "Estonians not allowed to enter" and the like (pictures circulating in the internet).

      As has been said, it doesn't matter what really happens in the world, it only matters what people see on TV.

  47. Re:I, for one... by Lurker2288 · · Score: 1

    Just watch out for that black ice, man, or you might find yourself with half a face getting shot down in Finland.

  48. From the FAQ: Read it and Weep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    From the FAQ: This section is for news relevant to United States government politics.

    There it is, clear as day, no wiggle room whatsover. I win, you lose.

    It has only become more "rounded" because trolls like kdawson and zonk use this section as their own soapbox.

    Bottom line, slashdot shouldn't try to cover world politics, they are nitwits at that sort of thing.

    1. Re:From the FAQ: Read it and Weep by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 0, Troll

      Here's how /. works:
      You submit news, if they like it they post it. They're not going out and doing original research. Therefore, Slashdot isn't 'nitwits at that sort of thing' but YOU are, since you're not submitting quality news articles.

      I win, you lose.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
  49. Re:Common Sense by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Computer attacks rely heavily on human mistakes. Security is a minimum game of what the system(s) involved can and what the user(s) in front of them can. And the fun part about defending a computer is that ALL those parts have to be tight. Like defending a castle. Doesn't help jack if one side of your defense is made of solid rock when the other one is made of cardboard.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  50. Nice try by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I read on-line news sources specializing in technical news too.
    -Your boss

  51. dude by circletimessquare · · Score: 2, Insightful

    i am not vouching for the authenticity of one view or another, i am merely stating that there are two different views, a russian one, and an estonian one. obviously, both sides are very emotional about it

    bu if you ask you me anyways, my personal attitude is that you poor poles, lithuanians, latvians and estonians have been the battleground of the power struggle between berlin and moscow for centuries. i champion the underdog and the little guy, and that's obviously estonia in this case, so i'm with you:

    fuck the russians (and the germans). it's easy to pick on your small neighbors isn't it, you fucking autocratic assholes

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:dude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      If the French or Belgians started digging up American WWII cemetaries and moving them I'd be pretty pissed too. Lots of Russians died fighting the Germans in the Baltics in WWII and these countries aided and abetted the Nazis (including the holocaust). Size has nothing to do with the ability to be selfrightious so I don't see why size (or Germany in this case) has anything to do with it.

    2. Re:dude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the French or Belgians started digging up American WWII cemetaries and moving them I'd be pretty pissed too. There were a bunch of "war protestors" who tried to vandalize U.S. graves to protest the latest Iraq war. Fortunatly, they weren't very bright and vandalized Canadian graves instead (Canada, of course, didn't participate in the latest Iraq war).
    3. Re:dude by tokul · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If the French or Belgians started digging up American WWII cemetaries and moving them I'd be pretty pissed too. Lots of Russians died fighting the Germans in the Baltics in WWII and these countries aided and abetted the Nazis (including the holocaust). Size has nothing to do with the ability to be selfrightious so I don't see why size (or Germany in this case) has anything to do with it.

      Since you remind about holocaust, remember gulag. Millions of people from Baltic states died there. And deportations started one year before Germany attacked SSSR.

      Americans haven't occupied France and Belgium for 45 years. Russians haven't liberated Estonia. In 1944 Estonia one occupant was replaced by other. If Sadam's statue is erected in Kuwait, do people of Kuwait have to leave it in front of emir's palace after Iraqies are gone. Did Russians had to leave Stalin next to Lenin in Mausoleum after 1953.

    4. Re:dude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent up!

    5. Re:dude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *sigh* And where did those millions of deported Baltic nationals come from? Even now, there are about 4 million people in all three of them; given the growth of population rate, we can safely assume that this number wasn't higher than 2 million in the 40s. So... how can you deport millions from a region where there are only two of them? Exaggerating all along, right?

    6. Re:dude by andrei_r · · Score: 1

      You fail to understand that this is not a statue of Saddam or Stalin we're talking about. It's a memorial for fallen russian soldiers who died fighting nazism. Some people are just unable to understand that.

      While many people are connecting this memorial with communist oppression, it has nothing to do with communists! Some Estonians who served in SS are still alive today, and there are a popular view of SS troops as "liberators" and soviet soldiers as "occupiers" -- and it is wrong.

      You know that there is a memorial for SS soldiers in Estonia?

    7. Re:dude by Rurmo · · Score: 1

      There is actually. In private collection, not state funded of course. Well, technically, it's not SS soldier since it has none of the SS details on the uniform. However (as in Russia btw:)) SS items in private collections are not forbidden. Public SS attributes are. And who on earth told you that estonians (commonly, I don't speak for all estonians) see SS troops as liberators? We despise both sides.

    8. Re:dude by tokul · · Score: 1

      *sigh* And where did those millions of deported Baltic nationals come from? Even now, there are about 4 million people in all three of them; given the growth of population rate, we can safely assume that this number wasn't higher than 2 million in the 40s. So... how can you deport millions from a region where there are only two of them? Exaggerating all along, right?

      Today's Lithuania = 3.5 mln, Latvia = 2.2 mln, Estonia = 1.3 mln. 7 mln total. Rephrasing H.Grant - "these are small countries but they're great ones, too."

      More than one thousand, less than a million. Lots of people died in Siberia. Yes, I haven't checked exact numbers. But it does not change the fact that Russians had own version of holocaust in Siberia. You can't blame others for exterminating Jews and ignore the fact that NKVD exterminated Jews, Estonians, Latvians, Lithuanians, Poles, Ukrainians, German POWs and Russians. Mass murders are mass murders and it does not matter if you call them genocide or holocaust or deportation to Siberia or starvation to death.

  52. Re:Should a cyber war require a cyber retaliation? by owlnation · · Score: 0

    Cyber war, famine and death - lets say in something like Second life - is considerably preferable to actually killing people in real life. (ask an Iraqi which he'd prefer)

    If this is the future of warfare, then that's progress. Though, real peace and cyber peace would be the Utopian dream.

  53. Re:Why Is This In Politics??!!! by M.+Baranczak · · Score: 4, Funny

    The world does not evolve around America kiddy wink! Of course not. Real Americans don't believe in evolution.
  54. Do you really know what are you talking about ? by jbssm · · Score: 1
    Hummm ... how is Estonian government playing the ethnic card by removing a statue made the the occupying Russian government in honour of the Russian soldiers that died occupying Estonia?

    If Americans have got conquered by the Russians during WW II and remain like that until 10 years ago, and now you would be in government, would you like to keep the statues they would have erected in your country honouring the Russian soldiers that died killing the American soldiers and civilians during the invasion of your country?

    This is not playing anything, this is stating their independence ... I wonder if Israel did the something similar you would say that they were playing ethnic cards against Germany (and Germany actually regrets what they have done ... the Russians still think they had every reason to do so and never apologise to the Estonians and every other country in the former URSS block).

    1. Re:Do you really know what are you talking about ? by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 2, Informative

      in honour of the Russian soldiers that died occupying Estonia

      Nice try, it was put there for the soldiers that died freeing the country of the Nazis. What happened during the occupation is a different matter but don't try to rewrite history.

      Since you are using the "If the US..." metaphor then how about if US war cemetaries in France and Belgium were dug up and moved and the monuments carted off? I think we'd be pretty upset.

      Funny that you should mention Israel in your comment. Seeing as the Baltic states collaborated with the Nazis in exterminating Jews.

      I agree that Russia should face up to what they did after the war but to dismiss their sacrifices during WWII and to make the Baltic states look like innocent lambs is disgraceful. Don't lump one with the other.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    2. Re:Do you really know what are you talking about ? by mikerich · · Score: 1
      I agree that Russia should face up to what they did after the war but to dismiss their sacrifices during WWII and to make the Baltic states look like innocent lambs is disgraceful. Don't lump one with the other.

      I've never heard an apology from the Russians for the 2 years of collusion between Germany and the USSR brought about by the Nazi Soviet Pact, which resulted in the occupation and division of Poland, annexation of the Baltic States and mass deportations to the gulag. Not to mention the endless provision of war materiel to the Nazis so that they could prosecute their war against the West.

      The Russians like to portray their losses as a heroic battle against fascism, but the Soviet Union fed the monster that eventually turned against them. A little bit more criticism of their own actions would be useful.

    3. Re:Do you really know what are you talking about ? by Pecisk · · Score: 1

      Yeah, right, Baltic states which didn't exist at that time already for some years. Nice try buddy.

      --
      user@ubuntubox:~$ stfu This server is going down for shutdown NOW!
    4. Re:Do you really know what are you talking about ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is that the Russians don't face up to the past. There's a sense of national pride at work. So to them, it wasn't a matter of evil Nazis versus evil Soviets. Instead it's evil Nazis versus righteous defenders against fascism. That colors their viewpoints. So when Estonians and other eastern european countries allied with Hitler, that means they allied against the righteous Russians! They fail to see that they they allied with Hitler out of political necessity.

      Because Russians still wish to see themselves as the righteous defenders, they're shocked and amazed and hurt when someone doesn't see things the same way. Thus moving a statue infuriates them. Because they're the righteous defenders, those who are moving the statues must therefore be fascists they think. Parts of the US population also gets infuriated when parts of Europe don't follow along as they're told (ie, the whole "freedom fries" idiocy and such, when it was not uncommon to hear "we saved their butts in the war, and now those ingrates aren't pulling their weight in Iraq").

      Yes, the Baltic States had a bad deal. So what if they never had long periods of independence. Should Finland now be part of Russia because it's independence from Swedish and Russian empires was almost as short as Estonias pre-WWII independence? Just like Estonia, it was a small country in WWII between a huge evil Soviet army and a huge evil German army and no choice of remaining out of the fray was allowed. How long a country has had independence from an empire is unimportant, except to those who wish to keep their glorious history of empire alive.

      The Russians just need to accept that their government has done some pretty bad things in the past, and that the provinces, regions, and countries that have split away have very good reasons for doing so. If they really do love these pieces of land, then treat them with love and see if they come back.

      At the fall of the Soviet Union, the former states had some big problems. They of course had the right to break away, except to the most imperialist and nationalist of Russians who disagree. But these countries were also stuck with a very long period of Russification to get over. Russians had been transplanted there, leaving a sizable minority. Local customs, language, and culture had been repressed. The majority were not remotely happy with their long occupation. One route they could have taken was to deport all the ethnic Russians, their former hated occupiers. But they didn't do this. So instead, they try to figure out how to move forward together, majority and minority. They make some mistakes along the way. Of course they make mistakes, they're not perfect, they're just as screwed up and flawed as Russia is.

      (I note that last December, an Estonian lawmaker proposed a bill to make display of the hammer and sickle illegal, in the same way that making disply of the swastika illegal. As a proponent of free speech, I don't think either should be banned. I found it amusing that the Russian government responded to this proposed law with indignation that someone would think that the symbol of Soviet brutality would be equated with a symbol of fascist brutality. They're still stuck unable to see their own past for what it was. To them, being slightly less evil than the nazis means that they are the good guys.)

  55. Re:Should a cyber war require a cyber retaliation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Great, then next we could overstate everything until we completely lose our senses.

  56. Very good ... I wish I had mod points to mod up by jbssm · · Score: 1
    You are completely right.

    What people don't seem to understand is that this is happening in all the former URSS block, but Estonia is getting the worst part because they are such a small nation, the country only has 1.5 Million people and so the Russian keep coming with the argument that they are 1/3 of the population.

    But Russians, wake up, this is not Stalin time anymore! The Estonians go a long way to make Russians have the same opportunities, mostly everything is translated to Russian, and there are Russians schools ... but you should start realising that Estonia doesn't belong to you anymore ... if you don't like it go back to Russia and stop complaining, because after what you have done to Estonians in the past, they are playing really nice with you guys, so start to appreciate and be thankful !

    1. Re:Very good ... I wish I had mod points to mod up by axia777 · · Score: 1

      "but Estonia is getting the worst part because they are such a small nation,"

      You forgot Latvia and Lithuania.....

    2. Re:Very good ... I wish I had mod points to mod up by jbssm · · Score: 1

      No, actually I know about Latvia and in there the situation is similar although they are a bit bigger (Lithuania I don't really know what's going on there but I can believe is not much different).

  57. Re:Sexist/Agist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Shut the fuck up bitch! And get me a beer!

  58. Re:Why Is This In Politics??!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So I guess the USA doesn't have to pay any attention to NATO policy?

  59. Re:Why Is This In Politics??!!! by Applekid · · Score: 1

    Don't know about you but my address bar shows it.slashdot.org, not politics.slashdot.org. Therefore, the politics tag does not imply that a given story is in the politics section.

    --
    More Twoson than Cupertino
  60. Re:Common Sense by LizardKing · · Score: 3, Informative

    For the love of freedom, just patch the boxes and shut up!

    You just don't get it do you? A DDOS is not indicative of a flaw in the systems under attack, it is using the regular means of access to the systems (HTTP requests mostly) but doing it on a massive scale from machines around the world taht have been compromised. Or are you suggesting that Estonian sysadmins perform the impossible and patch all these lousy Windows boxes on various ISP accounts around the world?

    Unless you've experienced a large scale DDOS or read the detailed summary of how one was handled then all I can suggest is looking at some descriptions of what a DDOS is. Wikipedia is a good start. Our Payment Service Provider received a blackmail threat a couple of years ago, and then experienced a massive ten day long DDOS attack. Once it was over they provided us with a very detailed account of the attack. What impressed me was the sheer number of machines used in the attack and how evenly spread around the world they were. Trying to contact the relevant sysadmins or ISPs for these machines was simply not feasible.

  61. there are two themes playing here by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    one is russia reasserting its dominance on its smaller neighbors. the other is ingratitutde at world war ii era sacrifices

    i think the former is far more important than the latter, because the former is current, and the latter is dim and fading history (albeit emotional)

    and yes, i think the usa would be raising an outcry if france were moving the cemetaries of its war dead. however, i also think that vichy france doesn't represent all of french attitude at the time, nor do i think that the usa is currently engaging in the hostile and imperialistic undermining of france, nor do i think 1/4 of france's population is composed of nationalistic americans

    the issue front and center is that although the soviet empire is dead, russia is waking up again and flexing its muscles, and becoming increasingly nationalistic dictatorial authoritarian and bullying to its little neighbors, and that's orders of magnitude more important than echoes of world war ii

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  62. Cut Russia off the net by gorbachev · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've said this again, but until Russia (and other Eastern bloc countries) start taking cybercrime seriously, it should just be cut off the net entirely.

    Most of the botnets in the world are controlled by Russian mafia. The rest of the world is spending an insane amount of time, money and effort defending against these attacks that orginate 90% from one part of the world. It's like criminally created welfare program, and we're all paying.

    --
    In Soviet Russia, I ruled you
    1. Re:Cut Russia off the net by Renraku · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Problem is this could be a slippery slope.

      So if we cut their IP blocks off from the world beacuse of botnets, what other excuses could we use? Well, China supports terrorism, so lets cut them off too. And both Koreas. And the entire middle east. Etc.

      Also, the hackers would end up proxying through another set of IPs and getting to where they need to be anyway. And could write up their bots to do the same.

      That said, don't use technical solutions for social problems. The problem is the governments of the countries in question don't care. They can deny involvement but still watch their enemies writhe. It should be treated as if a stream of foreign nationals marched out of their country and into ours, guns drawn. And that their government is doing nothing to stop them.

      --
      Job? I don't have time to get a job! Who will sit around and bitch about being broke and unemployed then?
    2. Re:Cut Russia off the net by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree, Russia has third-world law and first-world telecom, a distortion that reflects its status as a mafia-controlled sovereign state.

      The Chinese govt had a "people's assembly" or some such denounce that country's blacklisting by most of the SMTP servers in the world. When they were ignored, they eventually realized that their email servers would only be respected if that country had basic enforcement against spam in place.

      I think that the net effect (pun intended) of Russia being connected to civilized countries is a negative one, and they should be tapped with a rolled-up newspaper.

    3. Re:Cut Russia off the net by Fred+Ferrigno · · Score: 1

      Problem is this could be a slippery slope. So let it slide. If I don't want Russia, China, Korea, etc. to have a route to me, why should they have one? IMO, Estonian banks, businesses, etc. should simply "fork" the Internet so that only trustworthy Estonian ISPs have a route to them. Sure, it costs them something in not being able to do business internationally, but it would guarantee service for their local customers.
    4. Re:Cut Russia off the net by Ceriel+Nosforit · · Score: 1

      Also, the hackers would end up proxying through another set of IPs and getting to where they need to be anyway.

      Can't proxy anywhere without a route.

      Traceroute your connections for a while as you connect over the world and you'll see some reoccurring names. Those are backbone owners, and they make contracts with each other to route traffic through their nets. Say my country fails so bad at keeping me in check online that my entire country gets its routes cut off, I can't connect to the rest of the world because somewhere down the pipe someone applied the scissors to the fiber.
      There might be another backbone which will still accept my traffic, and I might find a proxy somewhere along their routes, but it ought not take long before that backbone starts losing contracts if I keep misbehaving.

      There's a whole lot of non-govt politics involved in international routing. Tricky business.
      --
      All rites reversed 2010
    5. Re:Cut Russia off the net by Renraku · · Score: 1

      Intra-continental routing is also full of its own politics.

      Playing host to DDOS-bots is one of those 'you just sent troops to shoot up a trailer park' moments and is definately frowned upon. Its like the USPS delivering a thousand or more letters of spam to your house in one day.

      Eventually pressure on the USPS would cause them to stop accepting 1000 messages at the same time for EACH ADDRESS IN THE CITY. They should do this. Don't RBL their IPs, but if repetitive traffic like this keeps coming out, throttle or tempRBL them.

      --
      Job? I don't have time to get a job! Who will sit around and bitch about being broke and unemployed then?
    6. Re:Cut Russia off the net by gorbachev · · Score: 1

      The difference between what the Russian (Bulgarian, whatever) mobsters are doing and state sponsored terrorism is that the cybercriminals are directly attacking the network infrastructure itself, and supporting terrorism is not (directly).

      Cutting Russia off the net is not a way to punish the criminals or the authorities looking the other way, but to protect the very network they're destroying. If the Russians aren't doing it, the victims must.

      --
      In Soviet Russia, I ruled you
    7. Re:Cut Russia off the net by Ceriel+Nosforit · · Score: 1

      You know, that sort of thing could actually be like an add-on service you could subscribe to with your ISP, both hosting and home-users... That way you could cut right past the ethics of who filters what in who's traffic.

      --
      All rites reversed 2010
    8. Re:Cut Russia off the net by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot the Internet is DESIGNED TO RESIST cutting-off.

    9. Re:Cut Russia off the net by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with your overall point, but how does China support "terrorism?" (unless you widen the definition of the term).

      But more closer to home (for me), "both Koreas?" True, North Korea have done its share, but why the South Korea? How do they support terrorism?

    10. Re:Cut Russia off the net by asninn · · Score: 1

      This suggestion reminds me of an anecdote my English teacher once related to us in school in order to illustrate the attitude of the British towards Europe; according to that anecdote, when, at some time in the 19th century or so, the telegraph lines that connected Britain to mainland Europe were destroyed by a particularly heavy storm or something similar, newspapers in London had the following title the next day: "Telegraph lines destroyed - continent cut off!"

      Whimsical, isn't it? The attitude that was (supposedly; I'm not sure just HOW true it is) being illustrated here, of course, was that the British didn't think of *themselves* being cut off from the mainland, but rather as the mainland being cut off from them.

      What you're advocating reminds me of that, too. If you start cutting off all countries that don't take cybercrime "seriously" from the Internet, then I'm wondering if the end result won't be that you've isolated yourself and a few others while the entire rest of the world continues to exchange data just fine.

      In other words, have you really cut them off, or have you cut yourself off? And what's more, will you realise what you've done, or will you insist that it's the continent that was cut off from you?

      --
      butter the donkey
  63. Neuromancer by PHAEDRU5 · · Score: 1


              "Too young to remember the war, aren't you, Case?" Armitage ran a
    large hand back through his cropped brown hair. A heavy gold bracelet
    flashed on his wrist. "Leningrad, Kiev, Siberia. We invented you in Siberia,
    Case."
              "What's that supposed to mean?"
              "Screaming Fist, Case. You've heard the name."
              "Some kind of run, wasn't it? Tried to burn this Russian nexus
    with virus programs. Yeah, I heard about it. And nobody got out."
              He sensed abrupt tension. Armitagc walkcd to the window and looked out
    over Tokyo Bay. "That isn't true. One unit made it back to Helsinki,
    Case."

    --
    668: Neighbour of the Beast
  64. bullshit by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    if estonians were so superior and above all this lowly nationalistic nonsense, they wouldn't have cared about removing the statue. the truth is of course that estonians are deeply insulted by the statue, and it is a point of estonian pride to remove it

    fine, i don't have a problem with that. remove the staute, go ahead. i don't side with the russians, i side with the estonians, the little guys in this fight

    but don't think for a moment think you sit high in your ivory tower completely clean and unlike the actions of the russians. you are down in the mud, playing their same game: nationalistic pride

    so don't be a hypocrite, or maybe i'll find the russian position more attractive, because the russians at least aren't pretending to be above it all, they know they are playing the chest thumping game of tribalism. the same game you are playing, but won't admit to

    be honest with yourself and what motivates you, or find that you have less friends on the international stage, because you think raindows and sunlight shine from estonian assholes. they smell just as bad as a russian assholes

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:bullshit by Anon99 · · Score: 3, Interesting
      >if estonians were so superior and above all this lowly nationalistic nonsense, they wouldn't have cared about removing the statue. the truth is of course that estonians are deeply insulted by the statue, and it is a point of estonian pride to remove it

      The statue has also practical meaning.

      It has become focus point of Russian nationalists in Estonia who are Estonian version of neo nazis. Given any excuses those nationalists used to gather near the statue, get drunk and start breaking places, and in many cases also people, including tourists.

      The problems did get bad enough that Finnish tourists were advised to steer clear of the statue during night.

      And since tourism is important income to Estonia, it is clear that the statue had to go. They could have picked better time to do it, like couple months after victory day celebrations.

  65. YHBT. YHL. HAND. by spun · · Score: 1

    There's been a sexism troll making the rounds lately.

    To stop those trolls 1-2-3
    Here's a fresh new way that's trouble free
    It's got Paul Anka's guarantee...
    (Guarantee void in Tennessee)

    Just don't look!
    Just don't look!

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
  66. Re:I, for one... by Bugs42 · · Score: 1

    Just watch out for that black ice, Tsk tsk! I'm gonna have to ask you to hand in your geek card for that one... Willis Corto and the rest of Screaming Fist were taken down by an experimental EMP weapon, not ICE.
    --
    Programmer: an ingenious device that converts caffeine into code.
  67. Re:Why Is This In Politics??!!! by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 1

    One could argue there is no such thing as an American, only Earthlings.

    But just to invalidate your point. America is a continent, to be born there makes you American, the common American-usage is someone from the United states of America. But either way, believing or not believing in Evolution is not something needed for an American passport, nor American citizenship, which would be two very big features of being American.

    --
    I like muppets.
  68. Re:Should a cyber war require a cyber retaliation? by stonecypher · · Score: 2, Funny

    lest they end up in a cyber quagmire.
    Alllllll right. Giggidy.
    --
    StoneCypher is Full of BS
  69. Its not racism,its xenophobia & comes from Rus by jbssm · · Score: 1
    Can you please tell us what are the discriminatory laws the Estonian government has against Russians ?

    Ohhh, I see, they want Russian people that actually live in Estonia since they were born to actually know how to speak basic Estonian in case they want a state job ... oh the shame ... you are right, they are racist persons them all !

    You know what? I think Mexico should make a DoS against California as well ... stupid racist people wanting Mexicans to actually know English in order to work in their state !

  70. Re:Common Sense by boyfaceddog · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    "Or are you suggesting that Estonian sysadmins perform the impossible and patch all these lousy Windows boxes on various ISP accounts around the world?"

    As a matter of fact, yes, I am suggesting that. More or less, I would either like everyone in the world to patch the systems OR see MS take responsibility for the giant macro-economic mess they've created. I shouldn't have to suffer whatever problems the US has in store becasue Gates & Co. can't get their act together.

    --
    Here will be an old abusing of God's patience and the king's English.
  71. Welcome to the New War... by jmichaelg · · Score: 1

    ...same as the Cold War.

    Murdering dissidents and instigating unrest in various parts of the world.

    The question is how we'll finance our side of the war this time around what with Baby Boomers getting ready to suck the federal tit dry and a feckless Congress that can't stick to a war when the going gets tough.

    1. Re:Welcome to the New War... by axia777 · · Score: 1

      feckless Congress that can't stick to a war when the going gets tough.

      You mean a war based on false intelligence and lies? A war started on false pretenses? That would be funny, if it did piss millions of Americans off so damn much.
    2. Re:Welcome to the New War... by jmichaelg · · Score: 1

      Lies? Care to document them? What exactly did Colin Powell lie about in his speech to the U.N.?

  72. Re:Should a cyber war require a cyber retaliation? by coulbc · · Score: 1

    Maybe they can just feed out of a bit bucket?

  73. Re:Common Sense by Deanalator · · Score: 1

    Rock on, except grandparent is 100% correct, and somehow you got the +5 and he got the -1? Machines these days (even when there is an entire botnet after you) don't have the power to simply "flood" an opponent's pipe. In any DoS or DDoS, you need to find the minimum amount of traffic you need to send out to tax one of the opponents' critical resources (cpu, memory, connect queue, whatever). Often times attackers will take advantage if a flaw in some server code to do this. More often, however, people just resort to the syn flood, since the protocol itself is pretty weak.

    I also believe the reference to "a few eggs thrown over the fence" wasn't a claim that these attacks are insignificant, just that they are common, and there plenty of ways to mitigate them. I will agree that if the Russian government is actually to blame for this, that is pretty lame.

  74. Re:Should a cyber war require a cyber retaliation? by Foochee · · Score: 2, Funny

    NATO should tread cautiously on this one, lest they end up in a cyber quagmire. And what kind of rations do you feed a cyber soldier, anyway?
    Well isn't it obvious.. unlimited supply of Hot Pockets®
  75. Man, what a manipulative way of putting things ! by jbssm · · Score: 0
    Are you really that dumb, or are just playing to get attention ?

    So the nice humanitarian Russians entered Estonia just to free them?...Yeah, the nice humanitarian Russians that started the war on Hitler side.

    Russian entered Estonia because it was the opportune time to invade it with the excuse that they were fighting the Nazis, when in fact what they really wanted was to capture Estonia in order to have a very profitable and strategically important sea route to the Baltic...and if you know so much you probably know that but choose to leave it out.

    Second, the Americans left Belgium and France after sending the Nazis out ... so don't try to compare the 50 years or Russian occupation, pillage and killing to that.

    Third and the worst of all you said is simply a very lame way of manipulating the date, because ALL the Nazi occupied countries collaborated in the extermination of Jews, because they were occupied and couldn't go that much against it, so don't try to make it look that they were in the side of the Nazis willingly, cause it simply isn't true by any perspective.

    Russia didn't make any sacrifice during WW II, just just did what they always do, they played the side and role that would give them the most profit out of the situation!

  76. exactly by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    they could have picked a better time to do it

    but they didn't

    because estonians are proud people

    and they have every right to be

    look, i am on estonia's side on this issue, but please stop pretending nationalistic pride is only something that fuels the russians. it fuels the estonians as well

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:exactly by Anon99 · · Score: 1
      I am still not convinced that it was only the national pride that prompted removal of the status just before victory day.

      Maybe Estonian government has just had enough of unrest and did not want to see a single drunkfest more in downtown Tallin. Boy how wrong they were on what response they would get.

    2. Re:exactly by ultranova · · Score: 1

      look, i am on estonia's side on this issue, but please stop pretending nationalistic pride is only something that fuels the russians. it fuels the estonians as well

      It could be nationalistic pride, or it could be hatred of Russia. After all, I'm not even 30 yet and I remember when Soviet Union fell and the Baltic states were freed. Chances are that there are many estonians who also remember what it was like to live behind Iron Curtain; in fact there are likely to be many who remember what it was like to have their loved ones "disappear".

      If someone spent decades oppressing you, and then you were freed, would you want to keep mementos glorifying their reign ? And if you didn't, would that decision be fueled by pride, or by the desire to get rid of anything that reminded you of the bad old times ?

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

  77. Re:Common Sense by Strange+Ranger · · Score: 1

    When I worked for a large financial institution "getting websites shut down" would be the least of our worries during a serious DDOS attack (though that is straight from TFA). The folks in the data centers would get a bit testy though. I'm sure it's the same for government institutions as well.

    "getting websites shutdown" is straight from the article though.
    Does anyone really believe we're talking about websites here?

    What do they teach in news reporter school?

    --

    Operator, give me the number for 911!
  78. prelude to a newer world order by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All the signs are there for a renewal in an expansionist Russian foreign policy. Putin has made himself the second most powerful man in Russian history, I think it is approaching the time when he will begin wielding that power abroad a lot more explicitly than polonium-laced tea. I have little doubt that we will see a pro-Russian coup in Estonia and several other countries within the next few years, and we will see many countries which have been looking towards the US and EU to redirect their gaze to Moscow.

    1. Re:prelude to a newer world order by VagaStorm · · Score: 1

      That is an interesting and utterly scaring thought to have pro Russia countries within both NATO and EU. That could effectively prevent those organization from tacking action against an aggressive Russian government.

  79. Putin = Another Facist by axia777 · · Score: 1

    Russia is going down the road it has been down before. Putin is well know for messing with elections in ways Bush could only wish to do. Now they are fucking with the same States that they used to rule. Teenagers are doing this? Yah sure guys, just like it is teenagers making cyber attacks on America's network systems from China, right?

    It is a damn good thing that Latvia, Lithuania, and Estonia are part of the EU.

  80. NATO and EU role. by jbssm · · Score: 1
    Well, the thing that is becoming more and more obvious, is that if the former URSS block countries didn't have the actual treaties they have with NATO and didn't become part of the EU, in the next 10 years they would probably be occupied by Russia once more.

    Because this is not only happening in Estonia, the reason Estonia is more in the news, is because it's a very small country with only 1.5 million people and so we keep hearing the argument, that 1/3 of the population is Russian and they feel discriminated (when actually Estonia goes a great deal to provide education in Russian language and practically everything is translated ... but still Russians feel that although they live in Estonia since they are born, is too much to ask from them to actually learn Estonian in order to get a state Job).

    But the thing is that Estonia and Latvia are the major routes of Russian goods to Europe and so the Russian government keeps exerting a great deal of pressure into submission the Estonian and Latvian state to a non completely free statues in order to keep controlling those routes, and now that most of the former URSS block countries are finally stating without doubts that Russia doesn't have any power left there anymore, Russia, like always does in this cases is recurring to force to make their point stand. After all we all know that Russia is not really a democratic country, and that they have no problems in going out of the law to keep the press under control and to keep their secrets inside.

    So, yes, NATO should start to consider DoS attacks as a minor aggression, cause the reason the Russians used it was simply because it was the only way to circumvent the treaties Estonia as with NATO and EU without getting any sanction ... and like Russia will willingly do this without any problem again in the future, so will any country in similar situation.

  81. Well said. by Viol8 · · Score: 1

    The russians are very good at telling others what to do but they're not very good at being told themselves and then they start complaining and acting like spoilt school children if they have to do something they don't like (you know , like learning the native language of the country they're living in).

    If the russians want to make a big deal out of those statues the estonians moved , perhaps the estonians should ask the russians - where are the statues for the estonians your government deported to siberia??

    1. Re:Well said. by moyl · · Score: 1

      It would be rather strange for Russia to build statues of Nazi collaborators, who those deported Estonians were, don't you think?

    2. Re:Well said. by Viol8 · · Score: 1

      "Nazi collaborators,"

      Yes , that was Stalins convenient excuse and typical russian revisionist history thinking. Going by the amount of people from eastern europe he sent to the Steppes you would think half the population were collaberators. Makes you wonder why the germans needed to use tanks to invade doesn't it?

  82. Ya think? by NineSprings · · Score: 1

    ...you can't deny over 30% of your population ... the most basic rights, including citizenship and education for children, based on their nationality, and be seen otherwise. That would be enthnicity, not nationality.

    And there are plenty of Estonian nationals which are ethnically russian. What Estonian government is trying to do is to make sure that its citizens can

    (a) speak the language of the country they want to be citizens of (no, it ain't russkiy), and

    (b) that the future Estonian citizens will have loyalty to their country first, and not to the former eastern overlord.

    I would hardly call Estonia a neo-fascist regime. I for one feel that it is the only way for them to break away from the former colonial ruler and set the course towards a modern society. And they are getting there at a good pace too. I wish that more Eastern European nations that broke away form Mother Russia (Ukraine, for one) would have the guts to do the same.

  83. Re:I, for one... by Darlantan · · Score: 1

    Personally, the black ICE doesn't concern me. Slamhounds, on the other hand...

    --
    Fill in your four or five-letter word of wisdom here _ _ _ _ _.
  84. Nitpick about Estonian:Russian::English:Polish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good post.

    English and Polish are actually more closely related than Russian and Estonian. Russian, Polish, and English are all Indo-European languages, and are genetically related to each other.

    Estonian is a member of the Finno-Ugric group of Uralic language family, (specifically in the Balto-Finnic subgroup). Like Finnish (to which it's closely related), Estonian is unrelated to the surrounding languages - it's more similar to Hungarian (though it's a distiant relationship, at best) and some of the languages of Central Asia.

  85. Re:Why Is This In Politics??!!! by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

    Of course not. Real Americans don't believe in evolution.

    Which is why unfortunately the GP was wrong, and the world is evolving around America. :)

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
  86. i'm certain by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    a lot of estonians were racist nazi assholes

    a lot of germans were too (duh)

    but we can talk to germans nowadays without thinking of them as nazis, and i think we can do that with estonians too, right?

    however, today, right now, russians are getting rather imperialistic over their little neighbors

    do you think the crimes of russia from today are excused by crimes of estonians from yesterday?

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:i'm certain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Crimes... show me today's Russia's crimes in regards of Estonia.
      IT wars... aka blocking the shit out of Estonia's internet communications...DOS attacks... kids (Russian patriotically feeling punks from /.) who jams and defaces Estonian's internet communications... don't want to defend their actions... because there are plenty of 25 to 55 year old KGB agents who just pretends to be those punks.

      Anyone can identify any Russian empire crimes against Estonia??

  87. well by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    being that nationalistic pride is a fault of every single country that currently exists and ever has existed, i think you need to readjust your blind spot on the "incorruptibility" of estonia

    there is nothing wrong with supporting estonian nationalism in the face of russian nationalism

    there is everything wrong thinking estonian nationalism doesn't exist

    russians are nationalistic and estonians aren't? bullshit

    nationalistic pride is an equal opportunity idiocy, it does not discriminate based on race or religion or country of birth. nationalism, ethnocentrism, and bigotry are crimes of every nation on the planet

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  88. tell that by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    to the russians

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  89. Re:Man, what a manipulative way of putting things by miscz · · Score: 1

    While I agree with you, there was (and still is) a lot of antisemitism in central/eastern Europe, or at least here in Poland. I bet most of collaboration with nazis came from genuine jew haters. It's easy to blame just some faceless nazi-machine but the truth is, a lot of people are guilty.

  90. Wake uå by Anon99 · · Score: 1
    >being that nationalistic pride is a fault of every single country that currently exists and ever has existed, i think you need to readjust your blind spot on the "incorruptibility" of estonia

    Hello, this is reality calling.

    World is not just black and white, as I said I refuse to believe that national pride would be the only motivation. All decisions, especially political ones are combination of several factors and several motivations.

    You are accusing me of having blind spot, while on the same time you are focusing only one motivation.

    You are free to concentrate on a single aspect of the issue all you like, but please don't make the intellectual folly of assuming that world is as simple as you would like it to be.

  91. Yuschenko and the CIA revolution? by ghoul · · Score: 1

    I see when the CIA pays street thugs to protest against a legitimate election and get it overturned its called an Orange revolution. Maybe Orange is for the color of the Euro notes handed out by CIA operatives to fund it. But when people protest the removal of war memorials commemorating millions of soldiers who died fighting the Nazis and protecting Estonia its Russian agents? How would you react if somehow a Latino president comes to power and orders the demolition of the Alamo as it represents Yankee colonialization of traditional Mexican lands?

    --
    **Life is too short to be serious**
    1. Re:Yuschenko and the CIA revolution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is enough proof to say that some protesters in Tallinn were payed about $6.50 an hour (through a pro-Putin youth movement called "Nashi"). Several organizers have been arrested.

    2. Re:Yuschenko and the CIA revolution? by niiler · · Score: 3, Informative

      While it was no walk in the park, so long as you were neither Jewish nor Romani, life was quite a lot better under German occupation than under Russian occupation. (Jews and Romani had it as bad in Estonia under the Nazis as anywhere in occupied Europe.) Here in the West, we view Hitler as the arch villain. In Estonia, it is Stalin who is viewed as such. Therefore when you make a statement alluding to how "millions of soldiers died fighting the Nazis and protecting Estonia" you display an ignorance of history. It is like saying that the wolf is protecting the rabbit when it drives off the hawk. Truly the Estonians wanted neither the Russians NOR the Germans as overlords.

  92. Cases with Finland and Canada are very different by Iloinen+Lohikrme · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In both Finland and Canada when they became independent, the minorities both Swedish and French had been there for relatively long and they were well integrated to the majority. In Estonia the case is very different, most of the Russians were transported there to colonize the Estonia and transform it to be a part of Russia. In Estonia minority wasn't well integrated to majority, majority was by force tried to integrate to minority.

    PS. In Finland there has been much discussion about making Finnish the only national language and giving Swedish official minority language status. Times change, statistics change and needs change. In Estonia there is need to support the Estonian language and culture after 50 years of oppression. For this it's only natural that Estonia's only official language is Estonian. Luckily for you Russians, Estonians have been tolerant and not banned Russian language, they have assured same right to all, they have given education to all even in Russian. So shut the fuck up, and fix first problems in Russia.

  93. Re:I, for one... by mdm-adph · · Score: 1

    Off-topic? What the hell? Jeebus, I thought it was a requirement to have read Neuromancer at least once before being allowed to post in Slashdot...

    --
    It is by my will alone my thoughts acquire motion; it is by the juice of the coffee bean that the thoughts acquire speed
  94. shakespeare: by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    "methinks the lady doth protest too much"

    why does the idea bother you so much? why do you have trouble admitting estonian nationalism?

    the issue is not that i press nationalism as a motivation over the tallinn statue, the issue is that you fail to admit it

    why not just admit that estonian nationalism exists and is part of the motivation?

    unless you believe that estonian nationalism doesn't exist, or is in someway beyond reproach

    all you have to do is admit it exists as a motivating factor, and i have no argument with you

    why is that difficult for you? it is something all nations suffer from, why do you think it is bad to admit that estonia is like every other country on the planet in this respect? are estonians human beings? or are they gods above us all in some teutonic superior plane of existence?

    to not admit a simple human weakness we all suffer from is to reveal a colossla arrogance on your part, and perhaps the worst kind of nationalist arrogance of all

    the fact you can't admit a simple human foible speaks volumes to me about a flaw in your character: you think your shit smells like roses. you are above it all. hubris, arrogance, hypocrisy

    makes me wonder. maybe i should side with the russians

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  95. What Eastern Block? by andersh · · Score: 1

    ..(and other Eastern bloc countries) start taking cybercrime seriously, it should just be cut off the net entirely
    The former Eastern Block countries that were under Soviet occupation are now all part of the European Union and NATO. The countries you seek to "cut off" are part of your greatest ally, trade partner(s) and defense alliance!
  96. Russia has really been acting up lately by Anon99 · · Score: 1
    Estonia is not the only country that has been feeling increased nationalistic pressure lately.

    Finnish company Container finance is building cargo terminal in Kronstadt in Russia.

    And now couple weeks after Estonian incident st Petersburg city decided that the land is immediately ceded to Rosstroi dam works as storage area.

    Of course this is breach of all contracts and serious breach of international contract law. So something really strange is going on in Russia

    More info:

    http://www.hs.fi/english/article/St+Petersburg+cal ls+off+extension+of+Finnish+cargo+port+/1135226958 211

  97. Ahem, please read to what you are replying to by Anon99 · · Score: 1
    >why not just admit that estonian nationalism exists and is part of the motivation?

    And why don't you read posts before you reply to them?

    I have already said following in two previous posts

    "as I said I refuse to believe that national pride would be the only motivation"

    Notice the word only, it means that I do agree that national part is a part of the motivation. But it is not the only one.

    Some reading comprehension would help, if you don't want to look like total dolt in conversation.

  98. (snicker) by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    you should be a lawyer. you have a wonderful way of manipulating the words that are written and suddenly deliver a meaning that did not exist in the previous context

    and i probably am a dolt. better a dolt than a closet nationalist

    i'm not the one who seems to be so so bothered by my insistence on the existence of estonian nationalism

    and i need no quote to support that assertion. i merely need to point out your continued existence this deep in this thread

    if the idea i am presenting to you didn't bother you, you wouldn't respond. since you respond, my point has been made, loud and clear:

    "methinks the lady doth protest too much"

    so keep arguing, keep making my point

    xoxoxoxoxoxoxoxox

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  99. Estonia really exists?? by Dretep · · Score: 0

    I thought Estonia and Estonians were only a fictional place and people in Dilbert Comics.

  100. I give up by Anon99 · · Score: 1
    It is impossible to have a conversation with you.

    I give up.

    It does not matter whether I agree or disagree with you. You just keep repeating the same song all over.

    You truly are able to see only your own words. I hope that you grow up some day.

  101. A different Estonian perspective by piggydoggy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Here's another Estonian perspective, to complement the "official" line above:

    - The memory of WW2 is, hopefully obviously for most Slashdotters, very very important for all Russians wherever they may live.

    - The monument in question was the prime memorial spot, primarily for the Russian population, to commemorate the war and the victory, in the country.

    - The monument in question - quite inoffensive statue of a mourning soldier in Soviet uniform - had stood at its spot for 60 years, including all of Estonia's reindependence, with respect and dignity, without any problems, or almost anyone associating it with Communism.

    - Some hardcore nationalists (some of whom could be considered neo-nazis) apparently disagreed, and had staged some earlier acts of vandalism against the monument, which in context, made it all the more dearer for those who held it dear for the local Russians.

    - After another provocation on the 9th of May last year, the government basically simply assumed the so far ultranationalist stance, protesting not the provokers, or people who might be using the memory of WW2 for propaganda, but claiming that the *monument*, which had stood there just fine for many decades, had somehow, overnight, turned into a horrible symbol of Soviet repression, removal of which is supposedly a matter of honor and principle. Basically, very foolishly and irresponsibly, pitting the respect of WW2 against the respect for the country.

    - Transferring a statue from one place to another might not seem to be such a big deal, but it's all about the context. The government basically agreed to the same stance the few neo-nazis in the country had, yet didn't make the slightest attempt to address the concerns of those (mainly Russians) who legitimately saw it as a symbol of defeat over Nazism, and had done so for decades. On the contrary, the honorers of the monument were smeared in the media and portrayed as drunks who use the war as an excuse to drunkenly dance on graves and to glorify the Soviet power. This ignorance and disrespect towards things the Russians hold dear, resonated deeply with other political issues, and the local Russians' feelings of inequality and guilt-tripping for things Stalin did before most of them were even born.

    - As the government would *still* go on with the oh-so-inconsequential plan of transferring that sad statue to its new place, somehow figuring that using riot police and tear gas on the thousands protesters was justified... in order to appease a nationalist frenzy the government themselves had spun up. Rioting, looting and vandalism ensued. Not because of the statue, not because of the history, but out of hate for the government which, by removing the monument, the presumptions, excuses and justifications for doing so, demonstrated utter contempt and disregard towards the local Russian community, which then essentially responded with "f..k you".

    Anyway, what I wanted to say as far as Slashdot is concerned:

    Great majority of Russians are GENUINELY p...ed off against Estonia, not because of history, not because of the statue, but because of the hateful, spiteful attitude the government has displayed and keeps displaying towards its Russian countrymen, and which the removal of the statue, despite countless pleas, debates, warnings for the whole year, was a glaring testament of. According to the latest polls, only 6% of Russians on either side of the border agreed with the Estonian government's actions, and a whole lot more people are more upset than that.

    Hence, it is more than likely that the DDOS attacks are in fact spontaneous activism, and not sponsored by Kremlin, which has different and less obvious means at its disposal.

    1. Re:A different Estonian perspective by jlehtira · · Score: 1

      WW2 is history, Estonia is a country today. Present day must be more important than history. The "victory" meant "defeat" for the Estonians from the very first day as they lost independence. If soviets would have "liberated" them, they'd have withdrawn after the nazis were beaten, no? I can appreciate your Victory Day, but I'm still celebrating our Independence Day when we wrested our invaluable freedom from russia.

      somehow figuring that using riot police and tear gas on the thousands protesters was justified...

      Rioters used Molotov cocktails.. 'nuff said.

      Hence, it is more than likely that the DDOS attacks are in fact spontaneous activism, and not sponsored by Kremlin, which has different and less obvious means at its disposal.

      As Kremlin is not doing anything to the DDOS attacks (illegal activity), as they were not doing anything to the Estonian embassy riots, they're guilty of taking sides and letting crimes happen.

  102. Some historical background by parchedhusk · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    I think a lot of people here are making a lot of judgements based on a very narrow and incomplete knowledge of the problem. Why would Estonia make the decision to remove the monument to the Soviet unknown soldier? After all, the Soviet army liberated Estonia from Nazi Germany in 1942. But it's an uncomfortable truth for Estonians that they collaborated very readily with their Nazi occupiers, and contributed to the many crimes perpetrated against Jews, Russians and other Slavs, etc. So the Russian minority (a sizable minority - on the order of 1/3 of the population of Estonia is Russian), feeling already discriminated against on a linguistic basis, is additionally frustrated by the Estonian political elite's attempt to rewrite history, treating the Soviet occupation as an enslavement, and the Nazi one as something akin to a liberation. Furthermore, there is simply no evidence that this response is orchestrated by the Russian government. In fact, they have much more effective and painful measures of retribution (such as shutting off the gas valves), which makes one wonder why they would bother with something so petty as DDoS. This is much more likely a spontaneous reaction by Russian hackers sympathising with their Estonian compatriots, but more to the point, it's an illustrative example of what kind of reactions are produced when you deny a minority the means to determine their lives through democratic processes. A useful example in how sometimes, the little guy is not necessarily the good guy.

  103. Re:Man, what a manipulative way of putting things by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1
    No need to get hysterical. I'm just differentiating between the average soldier and Stalin and the later occupation. Would you have preferred the Nazis to stay there?

    so don't try to make it look that they were in the side of the Nazis willingly, cause it simply isn't true by any perspective.

    The all-volunteer Estnische SS-Legion was created in 1942. The unit, ultimately called 20th Waffen Grenadier Division of the SS (1st Estonian), finished its way in May 1945 in Czechoslovakia. The division's soldiers carried stripes with the Estonian national colors and images of three lions[1].

    Russia didn't make any sacrifice during WW II

    Millions of Russian (and other post-USSR countries) veterans would disagree.

    They should leave the momument where it is or at least build a resonable memorial and instead push for Russia to admit the crimes committed during the occupation and maybe a memorial to that.

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  104. here is my paranoia scenario by Walter+Carver · · Score: 1

    NATO is paying Russian bot-herders (the media calls them "hackers") to DDoS Esthonia in order for Esthonia to ask the help of NATO. The rest of easy to think of.

  105. WTF???? by axia777 · · Score: 1

    Are you serious? "Estonian political elite's attempt to rewrite history, treating the Soviet occupation as an enslavement, and the Nazi one as something akin to a liberation." Is this some kind of joke? Sure they messed up by going with the Nazi's, but after getting crapped on the the Russians for so long what were they to do being a small country? And what do you mean by saying "treating the Soviet occupation as an enslavement,"? That is just crazy. It was enslavement. That is what Stalin did you know. He was IMO more evil than Hitler, and in some historians opinion, killed more people than Hitler too. Where do you get off talking such trash?

    1. Re:WTF???? by axia777 · · Score: 1

      Oh yah, those damn Russians were moved there AFTER the Russian government moved as many Estonians to the depths of Siberia to be a SLAVE WORK FORCE.

      And I did not mean to justify the Estonians bad behavior with the Nazi's, but that does not justify the Russians coming for the second time and enslaving their Nation. Same goes for Latvia and Lithuania...

    2. Re:WTF???? by parchedhusk · · Score: 1

      How about we turn down the emotional pitch and try and discuss this like adults? I'm not trying to justify anything, I'm just trying to explain it.

      Perhaps it would be a useful exercise for you to try and imagine the situation from the Russian point of view. You've got a tiny nation on your border, which suddenly decides to remove a monument to your soldiers which died trying to liberate this country from the Nazis, thereby tacitly giving an endorsement to its own quisling past. What do you feel is an appropriate reaction?

      The shameful thing for us is that we've turned a blind eye the rising tides of fascism in the Baltic republics because of their strategic importance. (We did not extend the same courtesy to, for instance, Croatia, but thanks to that Croatia's native fascist tendencies have been reduced. In the Baltics, we've merely stoked them).

    3. Re:WTF???? by axia777 · · Score: 1

      If the Russians had liberated the Baltic Countries, then left in peace it would all be cool. But no, they "Liberated" them just to then take them over themselves and screw them over. That is not liberation by any means of the word. And I don't giver two shits what the Russians think. Really, I have many family members that were murdered by the USSR's so called "liberators" in Latvia. My grandmother had to run from for her life from her homeland because of the "Liberators". It is like us Americans "Liberating" Iraq and then enslaving it's people and then asking them to thank us for it. And last I checked, all three Baltic's are democracies, something that Putin and his thugs cannot abide by.

  106. Re:Man, what a manipulative way of putting things by Pecisk · · Score: 1

    You should update your historical resources, not only read Soviet propaganda (and use heavily edited Wikipedia articles from Soviet-and-glory-past-of-Russia-lovin editors who claims that everything else they don't agree with is nazi propoganda and should be banned as references - read Talk pages for your referenced pages). SS-Legion WASN'T voluntary at all, Nazi wanted to look it so, but all their documents - and oral histories from legionnaires - claims different picture. They didn't had choice - be in SS-Legion or be gone, literally. Also already in aftermath all legal institutions involved in judging SS-Legions claimed that they weren't voluntary and that they didn't act in any of shootings of Jews (you could avoid a spin about that and could point out that lot of Eastern Europeans shot Jews, including some several hundred very Nazi thinking people from Estonia, then I could agree with you in that. But you should also point out that it was all arranged and coordinated by Hilter guys themselves).

    Soviet Union, as far as I have seen reading after all sources, didn't leave them much choice, because it is no hyperbole that occupation of Baltic States where called Year of Horrors - you should read more about that. What your nice "daddy" Stalin did to us, and in fact also lot of Russians, left with no choice for Estonians than fight in SS-Legions against Soviet army and trying to avoid second occupation. Two armed-to-teeth, nutty, murderious nations and you and your nation between them - guess what kind of choice it is.

    In fact, that you utilize "red flag" syndrome using SS brand without quite understanding what it actually means leaves me little doubt that you just trying to push your agenda here.

    --
    user@ubuntubox:~$ stfu This server is going down for shutdown NOW!
  107. Aren't Computers a Creature Comfort? by Arnlod · · Score: 1

    I'd like to throw this out there. How would, say, an African country like Chad or Somalia deal with an DDOS attack? Hmm...they would shrug their shoulders and continue on like we have been communicating for the last 100,000 years. We all have our comfort blinders on here. There's a very simple solution for people to get to Government info instead of the web. Call the embassy! If a website for a store goes down, get off your lazy ass and go to the store! That's why I don't think that this should be considered an "act of war". It's like saying that your mom grounding you for 2 weeks with no TV is an act of war. Silly...

    1. Re:Aren't Computers a Creature Comfort? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While that might be true for a country like Somalia or Chad, it isn't so for most of Europe and certainly not for Estonia, Estonians do most of their daily affairs online, if the online banking system stops (as it did for some days) there are major economic losses to be had. People not paying their bills, transactions not being made. Mail servers were down, newspapers and state sites were down. It is not the end of the world, but it does disrupt you're everyday living, as much as having a fleet of battleships standing guard by your harbors.

  108. Re:Man, what a manipulative way of putting things by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1
    Sorry, no agenda here beyond the fact that no country came out of WWII clean (I'm not Russian at all by the way). Stalin was a genocidal maniac who treated the Baltics no better than the rest of the USSR. I just object to this claim of being completely innocent. Of course everyone said they were just following orders. Even the German soldiers said they had no choice. I truly doubt that the atrocities, such as Lithuanian death camp guards (i.e. Majdanek), were done without any choice. Obviously the Nazis and Soviets were the driving force behind the worst events but they needed some willing participants to do so.


    Since you consider Wikipedia Soviet apologist propoganda:
    Monument to Estonian SS Veterans put up and removed
    Simon Wiesenthal war crimes campaign in Baltics
    Report on the Holocaust in the Baltics

    I'm done. Take care

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  109. mod parent funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hilarious!

  110. provocation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The reason for this DDoS against Estonia was Soviet Soldier-liberator monument dismantle, the common US-Estonian provocation against Russia. It seems the american US Military Evil Empire decided that Yogoslavia and Iraq intervention is not enough, now they build US antimissile defense in Europe(hey wtf?) near Russia and help Georgia and Estonia invoke provocations against Russia. It seems that yankee want World War III.

  111. DDoS attacks have been a great practice for them by sgraphics · · Score: 2, Informative

    You obviously aren't from Estonia.

    If you are talking solely about Estonian history then yes Nazi troops were nothing compared to soviet terror when about 10% of the population was deported, families torn, culture destroyed, people arrested, killed, houses pillaged by Russian soldiers etc. Read up:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occupation_of_Baltic_ Republics
    http://www.historycommission.ee/temp/pdf/conclusio ns_en.pdf

    The problem with this bronze soldier issue is that
    1) Estonians hate their soviet occupation period and want NOTHING to remind them of it. Especially red flags appearing every year (9th of May) in the city center by the Bronze Soldier (now moved to cemetery) provoking both sides and creating more hate.
    2) Russia has great pride and thinks of themselves as the leaders of all. And also they think of them as saviors of the world of Nazis. This all makes this monument important to them.

    There is truth to both sides.

    The thing is this all should actually have nothing to do with Russia and it is unfortunate how they keep shitting on their small neighbors.

    About all the oppression talk: you can get Estonian citizenship really easily. I think there is zero oppression of the Russian minority in Estonia. They have had 20 years to learn Estonian, exams are easy as hell, all the biggest newspapers, internet sites, tv news are translated. The second biggest political party is very Russian friendly.

    Also I have many friends that are Russian and they are doing exceptionally well in their field of business here (btw they all have learned our language) and they think Estonia to be their fatherland. Damn, I had a Russian girlfriend :)

    Stop messing with our country, Russia.

  112. Ridiculous, really by hifisoftware · · Score: 1

    That's ridiculous. The statue in question is clearly for people who died fighting Fascists. I am pretty sure that it even has a label to state that. It's not for NKVD or for Stalin or for Beria (chief of NKVD - the secret police who executed the deportation). The comparison to Sadam does not make any sense at all either. First of all nobody is erecting a new statue. Secondly and most importantly this statue was not for some dictator. It was for people who liberated Estonia from Fascism. The fact that Estonia was not a free country is correct, but it has nothing to do with this sculpture. Nobody would've complained if Estonia removed the status for Stalin. This is just a resurrection of fascism in Estonia plain and simple. Trying to create wrong analogies is just not going to hide that.

    1. Re:Ridiculous, really by Rurmo · · Score: 1

      Wrap your head around this: people against the actions of Red Army are not automatically pro-Nazi Germany. So take your fascism and stick it to your ... Typical if you are not with us you are our enemy mentality. Also read some non-soviet history books. By the time Soviet Army "liberated" our capital, it wasn't the flag of germany raised to the Long Hermans' tower. Nazis were already retreated to germany. Your vojevik-osvobiditel fought against estonians defending their briefly redeclared independence.

    2. Re:Ridiculous, really by hifisoftware · · Score: 1

      fought against Estonians defending their briefly redeclared independence. Where they the same Estonian guards that just finished killing off prisioners?
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Klooga_concentration_ camp

      From what I can see if it was not for the Soviet Army, Estonians guards would just keep guarding and killing of people there. Go tell to the people who were killed there that they were killed for Estonian independence.

    3. Re:Ridiculous, really by Rurmo · · Score: 1

      No, those were army people trying to stop people who did http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Katyn_massacre . Ask thousands who were deported and managed to not lose their lives in Siberia both before and after German occupation.

      Germans and Soviets always found collaborators in occupied countries, scum has no nationality. Even the "liberator" Russia had collaborators, read http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrey_Vlasov. And since Soviets did so much history "retouching" (see http://www.englishrussia.com/?p=710 just for a photo editing example) we probably know just a tip of the iceberg of the Soviet crimes.

    4. Re:Ridiculous, really by hifisoftware · · Score: 1

      Man Aren't you brainwashed. In Estonia support for Nazis is one of the most proud parts of their history. Estonia did not not have anti-Nazis insurgence (like was the case in Poland, France, Belorussia, Ukraine, Russia, or any other normal country). In Estonia Nazis were and still are admired (except Estonia call SS executioners, "freedom fighters"):
      Read here about proud history of Estonian SS-soldiers: http://www.topix.net/forum/world/estonia/T9QB9D3OM K90ILNFF
      Fascism supported in Estonia at government level and removal of the monuments is the sign that this process is only accelerating.

    5. Re:Ridiculous, really by Rurmo · · Score: 1

      Heh, proudest period? Brothers had to fight brothers (one in nazi army, one in red army) and you call this our proudest period? You mindless soviet product. Only process that is accelerating is bringing Soviet crimes to the daylight and giving Soviet regime as despicable judgement as to nazi regime. And that ise the main reason, why russians would call us nazis, fascists (even then they don't know the meaning of the word) and whatever else. We are shattering their heroic illustions of the history of WW2 and boy, they get hysterical if someone tries to do that.

    6. Re:Ridiculous, really by hifisoftware · · Score: 1

      Soviet crimes to the daylight and giving Soviet regime as despicable judgment as to Nazi regime

      I completely agree that Soviet regime was criminal. I completely agree that millions of people who died under that regime prove that it was horrible, but that does not make Nazism nice. I am starting to the the connection between two regimes. Estonian prime minister was a Soviet leader (right?) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrus_Ansip. Not that he can't abuse people using Soviet ideology he has switched to Nazis ideology. To him abuse is abuse. I hope that Estonians are smart and will vote against this Nazi supporter on the next election.

      He removed the monument to people who fought against Nazism. He is cynical enough to claim that it has something to do with Soviet regime (the regime that he supported. The regime that abused millions of Estonian, Russian and whoever lived in Estonia. The regime that deported and killed millions of people from Estonia, Russia and I am sure from many other places).

  113. The statue by v3rm0n · · Score: 1

    When russians occupied Estonia then they blew up all of Estonian monuments and now when estonians move one monument to a slightly different place where it belongs they start crying and saying that estonians do bad thing to russians all the time. Maybe we estonians should apologize to russians because taking thousands of people thousands of kilometres away from home was really exhausting not to mention blowing up monuments and making estonians learn russian. And sorry that everyone has to learn estonian when they want to be citizens of Estonia, i know it doesn't make any sense:D

    1. Re:The statue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > When russians occupied Estonia

      Russian haven't occupied Estonia! Russian have released Estonia from fascists with the help of Estonian, Ukrainian, Belarussian, etc Soviet people during war against German invaders.

      > then they blew up all of Estonian monuments

      Are you sure that the Soviet Army destroyed those monuments intentionally? There was a war, don't you forget?

      > now when estonians move one monument to a slightly different place

      What was the reason to do that?! And why do your government do that just before the holiday of the 9th of May, the Day of Great Victory in War against Hitler Germany? Isn't that the provocation? Sure it is. And the immediate Condoliza Rise and NATO support shows that this action was carefully planned in US and Estonian just executed what was ordered by their US bosses. Do you like to live in the US colony?

      > Maybe we estonians should apologize to russians because taking thousands of people thousands of kilometres away from home was really exhausting not to mention blowing up monuments and making estonians learn russian

      Do you prefer to learn German and serve Hitler in fasists Nachtigal and Galitchina SS Forces?

      > And sorry that everyone has to learn estonian when they want to be citizens of Estonia, i know it doesn't make any sense:D

      Actually we here in Russia usually don't even care about Estonia, although you may think there that evil Russians gonna attack you. But those provocations such as regular unpanished SS Legion celebrations in Estonia and Soviet Soldier-Liberator monument removal much offended soviet veterans and ordinary inhabitants.

  114. This is not another perspective by hifisoftware · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is a one sided history lesson. Interesting, but wrong and off-the topic. The fact is that Estonian population embraced Nazis, happily run concentration caps and helped execute thousands of civilians. It is the rebirth of Fascism that drove the removal of this monument. It has nothing to do with "Soviet occupation" or anything else. I quoted occupation because Estonian helped to install Soviet rule in Russia. If they felt that it was good for Russia, why was not it good for them? This monument was not for Stalin, it was not for NKVD (secret police) Chief Beria, not for NKVD soldiers. It had nothing to do with occupation. It was for people who gave their live to go west and liberate people from concentration caps. It might not be understandable for some. When you run concentration camp it's hard to see how troops which came to open it up are liberating anybody, but trust me for people who where inside it was indeed a liberation. For these who were scheduled to be gazed, tortured and killed it was the liberation. Try to talk to these people who were in concentration camps and you will understand. Do you really want to say that that Jewish medic lady who died pulling soldiers from the battle was buried under this monument died while trying to occupy Estonia? What a bunch of gibberish, really. It's the rebirth of fascism in Estonia, plain and simple.

    1. Re:This is not another perspective by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      The fact is that Estonian population embraced Nazis
      After one year of Soviet rule, they would embrace everyone who wouldn't be worse than that. For Estonians, the Germans certainly were better.

      happily run concentration camps and helped execute thousands of civilians.
      This is a trickier issue than it seems. Yes, Estonia has a dubious privilege of being the only country declared entirely "Judenfrei" by the Nazis during WW2. However, it had about ~4000 Jews overall, and 75% of them retreated with the Soviets, which puts a number of victims at ~1000. For comparison, the first year of Soviet occupation of Estonia (June 1940 - June 1941) the number confirmed executed, conscripted, or deported is minimally estimated at 59,732.
  115. Great post. Mod parent up. by hifisoftware · · Score: 1

    Great write. Some Estonians (definitely not all) try to twist the history. Sure Soviet rule caused them harm, but lets not forget that they helped to install Soviet rule in Soviet Union to begin with (supporting red army against white armies who were pro Tsar armies). They complained that they were not liberated, while forgetting that unlike for instance Poles they did not fight Nazis, they helped them. If Estonia wanted to be independed so much, why didn't they fight Nazis? This one sided view helps them justify current actions of Estonian government. The problem is that in real historical content it's obvious that there is that clear rebirth of fascism in Estonia. Trying to find external enemies might help them hide this fact for some time, but truth will always come out at the end.

  116. it's a high level ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..net/tech/security story and as such is relevant. It might also turn into a good MS versus Linux bashfest, if we can determine what all the poor servers are running and what the attackers are using for their zombots.

    When you are talking about the net, there are no national boundaries of any importance. They get *ignored* for the most part by most everyone who uses the net.

  117. Re:Man, what a manipulative way of putting things by Rurmo · · Score: 1

    Anti-semitism in Estonia is ... what anti-semitism? First of all, hate needs passion and that is the metric most of estonians completely lack of :) Other reason is that jews, apart of many soviets (note that I don't use word russians), are generally really intelligent people not infected by "great motherland" syndrome so they learn the language and extremely respected for that(Estonians due to the really small population and decades of russinification really love their funny language). Russia of course sees it otherwise, I bet none of their propaganda channels, oops national TV channels, reported recent Shimon Peres visit to the Estonia where he showed solidarity with Estonia and also gave positive judgement to the relocation of the Bronze Soldier.

  118. It's just wring by hifisoftware · · Score: 1

    Estonia should be held responsible for it's behavior. Baltic countries (including Estonia) played a big role in establishing the Soviet rule in Soviet Union (see Latvian Strelki for the best example, but Estonian fought as well). The Soviet rule that killed millions of Russian, Ukrainians, Poles and many others all around the Europe. They conveniently forget their help and instead twist it around as if they were against Soviets, while history clearly shows otherwise. Many of them were collaborated with Nazis and helped run concentration camps. They could talk all day as running a concentration camp is some kind of show of independence. Now instead of dealing with rebirth of fascism, they try to hide it by finding and loudly fighting imaginable foes from outside. It's a sad situation when a nation can see it's past as only pro-Nazis, and tries to emphasize it's independence by attempting to destroy monument for people who fought against fascism That Jewish medic lady who is buried under that monument were not fighting to "occupy" anybody.

    1. Re:It's just wring by Rurmo · · Score: 1

      Dude, what do you smoke? I want it too. So I can envision how estonia established soviet rule and how ru... i mean estonia has all the enemies around us.

  119. Re:Man, what a manipulative way of putting things by miscz · · Score: 1

    Well, I wasn't saying that there is antisemitism in Estonia today but it's a fair guesstimate to say that there were some of those sentiments at that time. It was pretty widespread in Europe back then.

  120. Re:Common Sense by KevinIsOwn · · Score: 1

    Well tough shit: You do. Deal with it and face the realities of security, or your ideas will never be relevant.

  121. Leave US alone by hifisoftware · · Score: 1

    Just to let you know Mexican who were born in US but do not know English are US citizens. And so are people of any background who were born in US. Surprised? US is not Estonia. US does not discriminates against their own people, so please stop comparing. It's very insulting. If you think that discrimination is part of proud history of Estonian nation that's fine, but leave US alone. Next time you want to compare Estonia, please choose something more appropriate (maybe Iraq during Saddam rule, he also divided people of Iraq into 'good' deserving citizenship and 'bad' who he gazed?) that way you'll make a good point.

    1. Re:Leave US alone by jbssm · · Score: 1
      What about learning how to read mate?

      Does US give state jobs to Mexican citizens born in USA that don't know how to speak English? No? What a shame ... cause that's the exact comparison here!

      And btw, did Mexico invaded USA, and sent their citizens there in order to annihilate your culture? .... Humm, yeah mate, you make a really good point here.

      Estonia Fascist? Are you retarded, look at your own country before starting to say such stupid stuff.

      And if you enjoy to compare Estonia to Iraq does that mean that uncle Sam will invade them like you did to Iraq ... oh no, stupid me, Estonia doesn't have oil resources that you can steal.

    2. Re:Leave US alone by Rurmo · · Score: 1

      To compare US (truely multinational land that is made up of 99% immigrants) and Estonia (national state) is utterly ignorant. Also, it might come as a suprise for you but different countries have really different citizenship policies. I suggest you read http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jus_sanguinis and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jus_soli In short: there are countries who can afford the citizenship right-by-soil and there are countries who can't. In estonia, if we allowed right-by-soil, we would probably loose our independence in 20 years to Soviet.. I mean Russian Federation who just would have to bring here pregnant women en masse.

    3. Re:Leave US alone by hifisoftware · · Score: 1

      Again, US does not discriminate. I know many people who can't speak English (and by the way if you can't speak you can't read it either) and they are citizens. And as a citizen they can vote, they can work, and any of them can be elected a president. There are no laws against people in US just because they do not speak English. None.

      No democratic country would discriminate against it's citizens like that. You're suggesting that your feel that Estonians have the right to discriminate. You definitely have the right to feel that way, but please understand you can't discriminate and call Estonia a democratic country... Soviet Union discriminated based on language and so does Estonia, but US does not and please stop comparing as it's insulting. If you feel that Estonia discriminates just like Soviet Union I will agree, they neither Estonia nor Soviet Union have anything to do with democracy. If you feel that what Estonia is democratic I can only say that I feel sorry for you. Please come over to US, you'll defiantly see something new for you here.

    4. Re:Leave US alone by jbssm · · Score: 1
      I though that people like you only appeared in South Park to make fun of USA and in your talk shows ... but after all they are real.

      Look,do you know any president of the USA that didn't knew how to speak English? Hummm, no. Ok, any senator? Hummm, no. Ok any mayor at least? No. For christ sake, what about a cleaning lady that works in a city hall? ... Ahh, glad we could find something.

      Estonians are not discriminating anyone, in fact they are helping like the USA doesn't do. The USA don't have any law against it, but the fact is that if you don't know English you are screwed. In Estonia, everything that is important (even in public services) is translated to Russian ... now can you say that in USA the same applied to Spanish? No, you can't, so what about thinking before you write?

      USA democratic? What are you man, retarded or something? You live in a capitalist dictatorialship ... you are not discriminated about your language ... you are discriminated about how much money you have! and if you are poor, you will die cause you don't have money to pay for medical care.

      Me going to USA? Are you crazy? I'm a citizen from European Union, why the hell would I want to live in your pitfull country?

      And by the way, I'm not Estonian, I'm Portuguese and I presently live in Netherlands ... so excuse, but I think I know what a free country is much better than an American like you, and having been in Estonia for several time as well, I can say that Estonia e a pretty democratic and free country ... they are just not hypocrite like the Americans and have laws (or don't in this case) that in fact are never applied.

    5. Re:Leave US alone by hifisoftware · · Score: 1

      Sorry this is baloney... I do not buy your explanation of why discrimination is necessary in Estonia, as there can never be any good explanation. It defies the concept of human rights and it's actually undermines the prospect of Estonia independence in the long term. If country is democratic (which means it cares about minorities as well), then how and why would it loose its independence? People of all background would defend it's independence not fight it... People revolt only when they are oppressed. The democratic system in US is a best guarantee for a stable system. Estonia would be stronger by not discrimination, not weaker. Even Soviet Union with how bad it was granted the citizenship to all people who were born there. Of course depending on the time a few thousands were arrested and executed from time to time, but there were no discrimination there. Russian, Ukrainians, Poles, Estonia's, and others were all treated and arrested about the same (although Russian and Ukrainians suffered a bit much more then others, or so it seems) Ok Estonia is not a Soviet Union and does not execute people like that, but you have to agree that in language discrimination you went even beyond what was done in Soviet Union.

    6. Re:Leave US alone by jbssm · · Score: 1
      If you are so smart, and want to think the USA doesn't discriminate, what about USA giving me USA citizenship right now!

      And btw I also want one USA citizenship for my mom ... she doesn't know how to speak English, but it doesn't matter right? After all since USA are a non discriminating country they will not care that she wasn't born there and doesn't know how to speak the mother thong ... right mate ? Or else that would be a form of discrimination.

    7. Re:Leave US alone by Rurmo · · Score: 1

      I never justified discrimination but a different view to a country. But when looking at your naive views on Soviet Union, I can see clearly that you haven't lived in the small country occupied by big one. I've lived half of my life in USSR and tales you tell are just a nice fairytale. "Even Soviet Union with how bad it was granted the citizenship to all people who were born there" Yes, and if you tried to give it up, it was considered treason. Of course all were given SU citizenship. All there also very strictly bound to not leaving SU even for a tourist trip. Cheap tricks like not letting parents take their children with them were used if by some obsene luck you got tourist visa. "but there were no discrimination there" You clearly have no idea what discrimination is. Supressing freedom of speech, freedom of leaving USSR, living even in another member state, constant KGB surveiliance - that is not discrimination? "Russian, Ukrainians, Poles, Estonia's, and others were all treated and arrested about the same (although Russian and Ukrainians suffered a bit much more then others, or so it seems)" Wrong. Russians were always highest ranking and always had policies supporting them. "but you have to agree that in language discrimination you went even beyond what was done in Soviet Union" It was basically impossible to now know russian and to have ANY kind of decent job. Today one of the most rich people in Estonia are russian businessmen who still don't speak a word of estonian. Also, learning russian was obligatory from the 4th or 5th grade. Don't talk about things you only know fairytales about.

    8. Re:Leave US alone by hifisoftware · · Score: 1

      Wrong. Russians were always highest ranking and always had policies supporting them. I have met a number of Russians who's parent where send to Siberia or Kazahstan back in 1930-1950 (sometimes in that area). You should talk to them and tell them that a trip to gulag was actually a way for Soviet regime to, wait how did you put it? Yes, right supporting them Solzhenitzyn was also send to support him, right? If execution and gulag was a way to support then I guess Estonian were also send to gulag and executed as a supporting measure.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Famines_in_Russia_and _USSR The second Soviet famine happened during the collectivisation in the USSR. In 1932-1933 confiscations of grain and other food by the Soviet authorities[2] caused a famine which affected more than 40 million people, especially in the south on the Don and Kuban areas and in Ukraine, where by various estimates from 2.5 to 4.8 million may have starved to death.

      Close to 5 mil dead, talk about the support. I guess Russian and Ukrainians should thank the Estonians (but even more http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Latvian_riflemen) for supporting red army during Russian revolution, and for giving them this support.
      I never argued that Soviets were just of fair (to put it mildly) to people under the control of the regime (including Estonians). But to try to emulate them, to promote the same level of discremination is just wrong. Don't you see it?

    9. Re:Leave US alone by Rurmo · · Score: 1

      "I have met a number of Russians who's parent where send to Siberia or Kazahstan back in 1930-1950 (sometimes in that area)." The fact that russians were sent to Sibera as well doesn't mean they had overall higher status. Logic, my friend. Policies favoring russian immigrant were strongly implemented on social level (apartments, cars etc). Also, in the higher ranks of any organization, russians were favored. That was all part of the great russification plan. "I guess Russian and Ukrainians should thank the Estonians (but even more http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Latvian_riflemen)" I really don't see the connection you make from Latvia to Estonia. Or is the all same Baltics to you? And tell me, were do you see the "emulation" and "same level of discrimination" as in soviet union. If still don't get it: russian speaking people have exactly the same rights as estonians do. I've told several time why couldn't we grant citizenship to all residents: majority issue, restoration of first republic and also the aspect that we would have in legal language said "look, there was no occupation". Our citizenship rules are quite soft, russians as minority can handle their own business including education in russian including using services of private companies (telcos, banks almost always have people speaking good russian) What on earth do you suppose still do that discriminates people?

    10. Re:Leave US alone by hifisoftware · · Score: 1

      Also, in the higher ranks of any organization, russians were favored.
      Strange and I always though that Stalin (does it get any higher then that?) and second man Beria were both Georgian, (as in country Georgia, not the state)...

      First you told me that there are good reasons for discrimination in Estonia (not allowing to vote is indeed a primary way to discriminate): I've told several time why couldn't we grant citizenship to all residents:, then you say that there is no discrimination: What on earth do you suppose still do that discriminates people?

      Americans put it the best as to why it's discriminatory: No taxation without the representation.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_t axation_without_representation

      For people who were born in Estonia, this is their home. This is where they live. To deny them a right to vote (even if it's because they do not speak the language that you wanted them to speck) is indeed a form of discrimination. If you told me that anyone new coming in Estonia would need to prove first that she/he can speak Estonian I would agree, because in that case people have a choice. If they want to keep their culture, their language they can choose not to come. But when your house is already there, when you grew-up in there, when it's your country (even if government hates you), then it's discrimination. If you still see it's differently, we'll just have to agree to disagree.

    11. Re:Leave US alone by Rurmo · · Score: 1

      "Strange and I always though that Stalin (does it get any higher then that?) and second man Beria were both Georgian" Not only those two men run the country and not only Stalin ruled during the Soviet era. Next you would probably throw in Khrushchev and Breznev, who were Ukrainian. But for example, Breznev started to declare really early in the 50-ies that he is Russian. I wonder, why...

      "But when your house is already there, when you grew-up in there, when it's your country" That is the MOST typical mentality of immigrant or a person living in the country where immigration is the main source of growing and developing community. Do you think it is coincident that gaining citizenship via right-by-soil is mostly common to northen and southen america? You can be born and grow up in UK, you still have to gain citizenship via naturalization. And UK is also extremely multicultural. Germany has same rules, they for example require 6 years of prior residential status (for statless person) compared to Estonian 5. So all countries not following right-by-soil in your opinion are true discriminators?

    12. Re:Leave US alone by hifisoftware · · Score: 1

      So all countries not following right-by-soil in your opinion are true discriminators?

      No, but I do believe that any country that creates laws that designed to suppress minority, to make sure that minorities will never be able to express their voices is discriminating. You said previously that Estonia has this law to prevent Russians from undermining independence (I think you said "first republic" whatever it is). I understand that due to the rather inhuman policy where lots of Estonians were forced out and lots of Russians were forced in there is a complex reality in Estonia. Yet I also think that the best realistic way forward would be for Estonia to create a society where every part of society is appropriately represented. That way, nobody would ever think of undermining Estonia's coherence. And I think while Estonia's independence is guaranteed, it's coherence is not, mainly because of policies of current Estonian government. I must follow-up by saying that I do not think that Russia would ever want to join, append, conquer (or however you want to call process of adding) Estonia to itself. Russia was already forced to supply gas, oil and coal almost for free during Soviet time to many of "republics". I can't imagine any country wanting to repeat it again. Soviet Union was different. It wanted to add as many countries under Soviet flag as possible to make Soviet political system more appealing (less countries to compare to, more military might to throw around). So the removal of monument (clearly dedicated to all fighters of Nazis and not representing anybody or anything else) is hard to see as anything other then pro-Nazi (I know you disagree but you have not convinced me) and definitely not positive for Estonian society and country as a whole. Combine it with Estonian government support for former SS soldiers and Nazis collaborators in general it is only logical to assume that Nazism is being celebrated (if not reborn) in Estonia.

  122. Re:Its not racism,its xenophobia & comes from by Rurmo · · Score: 1

    You won't receive any reasonable answer to the discrimination question from russians. I've tried that so many times and in the end it comes down to (if it comes down) "why do we need to speak Estonian to gain citizenship" or "if I was born on estonian soil, why isn't citizenship automatically granted for me". Or in some rare cases it is "I don't feel respected here".

  123. Re:Man, what a manipulative way of putting things by Rurmo · · Score: 1

    That I agree. I also don't think 100% pure of heart estonians of that time. I'm sure there were collaborators. But I would not put two great bads, Nazism and Stalinism to the balance. Both were extremely evil reigns and if one defeated another it doesn't make either of them better somehow. It's like having two robbers first fight with each other so that the winner can rob you and say "look, I saved you from the REALLY bad guy".

  124. Re:DDoS attacks have been a great practice for the by parchedhusk · · Score: 1

    I think your point about "zero oppression of the Russian minority" is mistaken. If I were to say, there is no oppression of the African-American minority in the States, after all there are black politicians, black business leaders, I even had a black boyfriend, or whatever, that is missing the point.

    Clearly there is institutional and systemic discrimination against Russians in Estonia. Just as a for instance, not a single member of PM Ansip's cabinet is an ethnic Russian. It would be unimaginable for a Canadian cabinet to contain no French Canadians, even though they compose a smaller proportion of the Canadian population than Russians do in Estonia. In fact, it's a furthering of this uncomortable truth that Estonia's political class is composed largely of the descendants of various Nazi collaborators who were driven out by the Soviets in 1942, but who continued fostering their ideas in exile, then returned in full force once independence was achieved. Of course this last thing was not so uncommon in the entire Eastern bloc, but was more heavily scrutinised by the West in some countries (Croatia) than in others (Estonia).

    Finally, let's not forget the realpolitik of this situation - Estonia cannot possibly hope to take such a historical-revisionist view of its neighbour with impunity. If some small Central American nation were to erect a monument to Castro or something, you can bet the American reaction would be swift and decisive. Russia's small neighbours , as you call them, cannot seriously expect to take overtly anti-Russian actions and then complain about the inevitable backlash.

    Please don't misconstrue this as my endorsement of Russia's heavy-handed foreign policy approach. I just feel like the Estonian side has been well represented in the Western media, and Russia's not at all.

  125. Where is Barat 2? by hifisoftware · · Score: 1

    Statement like that really deserve second version of Barat: Barat 2: Cultural Learnings of America for Make Benefit Glorious Nation of Estonia Seriously if you want to understand how people can live without discrimination I highly recommend visiting (or at least reading about) US. In Los Angeles people are not discriminated based on which language they speak, and many US citizens are indeed citizens despite the fact that they do not speak English. They can vote and they can work. And guess what? US is doing just fine. To believe that country must discriminate to be independed is more then silly, it just ... Rurmo with statements like that you can easily come up up with scenario for Barat 2 (change running of Jews with Running of Russian and so on)...

    1. Re:Where is Barat 2? by jbssm · · Score: 1

      ...US is doing just fine.

      LOL No really, were do you find these guys? I guess you are seeing too much CNN mate.

    2. Re:Where is Barat 2? by Rurmo · · Score: 1

      I haven't been to the states but as far as I can remember you have one de facto official language and it is the one I'm using right now. Except Hawaii, but sure you agree it doesn't stand up in comparison. Also, if I can remember correctly you have to take English exam to gain citizenship via naturalization? And you also had some english limitations on the state jobs. And suprise: you don't have to speak estonian as well to be a citizen, you get your citizenship automatically if one of your parents is a citizen. Another suprise: people with living permits can vote here on local elections. So what should I come to see there, exactly? Maybe you should visit places outside US instead and understand that everything outside US is not like in Borat movie, not even in Kazakhstan :)

    3. Re:Where is Barat 2? by hifisoftware · · Score: 1

      French language is still very popular in Louisiana. Many people spoke only French long after US bought it from France. Nobody created any laws that forced people to learn English. There was not paranoia about "Ohh they will run back to France if we do not force them to speak English". As you can see Louisiana is very much a US state... As I said it before and I'll say it again: discrimination is not necessary. It's harmful to the very idea of independence of Estonia. If you think that by discriminating against Russian minority in Estonia you will have a stronger country I am sure you are wrong. Never oppression and discrimination hold a country together as an independent entity for very long. Why did Soviet Union felt apart? It was not because people were not oppressed enough.

    4. Re:Where is Barat 2? by jbssm · · Score: 1
      Man, are you actually reading the information in the posts?

      The Russians in Estonia were actually sent there with incentives by the Russian govnerment to occupy the houses and the lands that belonged to the Estonian people (that were killed or sent away to gulags ... 10% of them) in order to dilute the Estonian population amongst the Russian and make Estonia loose their national identity.

      The Russians there always considered themselves, and still do, a part of Russia not of Estonia.

      And now that is not acceptable anymore since Estonia is an independent country and all Estonia asks is that they actually at least learn how to speak the country language ... and unlike people in the USA, they don't sent people that don't have the prerequisites for citizenship away, even not knowing Estonian they can stay in the countries and vote in the elections.

      Besides the Russians living in Estonia are considered by Russia, Russian citizens but they can go back to Russia any time ... but they don't, you know why? Cause Russian is a fascist regimen where they actually don't want to live and because they are not retarded and kind of like to have an EU passport.

      Now, stop speaking about what you don't understand and go back to see your state controlled CNN there in USA.

    5. Re:Where is Barat 2? by Rurmo · · Score: 1

      Where do you get the idea that I accept the fact of dicrimination or the dicrimination itself? Nobody forces people here to speak estonian. You need to know estonian to become a citizen. Just as you need to know english to become the citizen of US. That of course, if you are not granted citizenship via birth. I already stated citizenship policies roughly fall into two categories in different countries. Countries with liberal immigration policies (like US which basically IS pure immigrant country) policies can allow citizenship-by-soil. But it really works with the few countries which have been "multicultural" for a really long time. Or from the start like US. I admin, I'm admired how good different nations get along in US and that it still "ticks". In europe, liberal immigration policies have brought mostly trouble to all countries. Immigrants are always in the constant state of unrest for a first 3-4 generations, it has been proved in several research i believe.

  126. Re:Man, what a manipulative way of putting things by Rurmo · · Score: 1

    While I agree with you that people can be scum no matter the nationality, I would like to point out that mr Wiesenthal isn't the most reliable source when it comes to Estonia. He made a lot of noise here but then he got one veteran to the court, he lost. Latter he has constantly spread the lie that estonian authorities rejected to collaborate with him on this matter i.e. he rarely (if ever) mentioned that he lost the court case.

  127. Re:Sexist/Agist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dude, that's not even feminist. It's saying women aren't technicall [sic] able. It's just a really stupid troll.

  128. hi, brigadnik by Jon+Kay · · Score: 1

    The problem is that in real historical content it's obvious that there is that clear rebirth of fascism in Estonia.

    Hello, there, brigadnik. I can't say I welcome you, though. Link, please? Please to somewhere other than .fsb.ru?

    Isn't this propaganda point rather dated? I mean, it's not like Russia is Communist anymore. Now that Russia is fascist, shouldn't you be talking about the gathering Commie shadow instead?

  129. Clogged both modems? by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

    Wooo, some Russian 5kr1ptk1dd13 clogged up both of Estonia's phone lines?

    --
    Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
    1. Re:Clogged both modems? by v3rm0n · · Score: 1

      Estonia is more advanced than whatever country you come from regarding IT. I definately cant say the same thing about other areas:D Can you vote on the net? Is your country covered with wireless internet? You dont even have to carry your drivers licence with you because police can check everything from their computers. Estonia is very little but techologically advanced. I think being little helps too(Covering USA with wireless internet is not that easy:D)

  130. Re:Should a cyber war require a cyber retaliation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mention not such unworthy imitations. Pirogy is what you are thinking of, the pride of Slavs.

  131. Atheist Fights for Democracy in Russia? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    If anyone needs more information about Russian tyranny against the Eastern Europeans, just visit a unique Russia-related discussion forum at "The Washington Post". The Russians might dare to blockade the Estonian web sites, but the Russians would never dare to blockade the web site of the most prominent news organization in America.

    This Russia-related discussion forum at "The Washington Post" is unusual because the forum has an obssessed, anonymous person who has tirelessly collected and posted Russia-related information from reputable Western sources across the Web. This anonymous person calls herself "Atheist", and none of the Russian KGB agents has been able to locate her and to "terminate" her.

  132. Re:Common Sense by ShooterNeo · · Score: 1

    There's a TRIVIAL way to rearchitect a network to stop DDoS cold. At a major backbones would be located simple logon scripts that only route packets that come from verified users of the website in question. To become a verified user, the user might have to answer a captcha or something simple, just enough to make a bot army attack impractical. Only users that pass this test would have their packets routed farther in. A physical wall is different. No matter what materials are used, weapons exist that could cut through it. A digital wall can be absolutely impregnable.

  133. Re:DDoS attacks have been a great practice for the by sgraphics · · Score: 1

    I just feel like the Estonian side has been well represented in the Western media, and Russia's not at all. How can you say this. Russia has a far more better propaganda machine, they can get anything over to anywhere in the world. Their propaganda machine is one if not the best in the world. Most news agencies report only what is allowed by Putin. You cannot deny this. And also there have been NUMEROUS foreign spectators to Estonia, looking into all kinds of oppression accusations that Moscow has made. Nothing has been found. Our government institutions are very transparent and law is very unbiased. And as I mentioned the second biggest party is Russian friendly. And didn't you read my post... I said there are two sides and I understand both. Now you try to understand Estonian.
  134. There's no right perspective by jlehtira · · Score: 1

    Are you saying there were concentration camps in Estonia? Can you please provide proof for that claim? And how many civilians did the USSR execute, by the way? I hear it's in the millions.

    That said, I'm happy that Finland "embraced" the Nazi Germany and thus managed to defend itself against the soviet oppressors who would have raped this land as they did Estonia. Germany wasn't all bad, and USSR wouldn't have been any better. Are you accusing Finland of nazi sympathies too?

    Open your eyes, man. Liberation is a nice word for propaganda, but that's never what really happens in a war. What happens in war is death and the best thing you can do in war is kill. There's no glory whatsoever in sending unprepared troops to die as USSR did. Never in history have the soviets actually cared about their soldiers.

    Stop yelling fascism and stop to think for a moment. Try for a short moment to think how Finnish or Estonian feel about USSR and why.

    The only perspective you'll ever find in any of this is here: it is a statue, a trivial amount of stone and metal. Oppressing a piece of metal is not exactly great fascism.

    1. Re:There's no right perspective by hifisoftware · · Score: 1

      Can you please provide proof for that claim? It's a public knowledge that Estonian happily served in Nazis SS (extermination unit). Here is your camp (search for Estonia): http://history1900s.about.com/library/holocaust/bl chart.htm

      That said, I'm happy that Finland "embraced" the Nazi Germany Happy? Are you an Estonian by any chance? You can be happy all you want, but normal people of the world hate pro-Nazis scum like you.

    2. Re:There's no right perspective by Rurmo · · Score: 1

      Dude, of course there were consentration camps here. How unfortuante it is, now Russia has everlasting right (at least in their heads) to destroy, rape, murder, claim and call everybody fascist here. It will be always like

      Estonia: you occupied us. Russia: no we liberated you.
      Estonia: you deported, murdered and killed tens of thousands. Russia: you had nazi concentration camps.
      Estonia: you supressed our language, culture and freedom. Russia: Germany would have done the same.
      Estonia: Stalin was a criminal. Russia: but he did win the war.

      In other words, being part of Allies and winning the war gives them excuse for everything. We have a saying what translates to "winners are not judged". Russians take for granted that winning WW2 redeems all their horrible deeds before and after the war.

    3. Re:There's no right perspective by jlehtira · · Score: 1

      It's a public knowledge that Estonian happily served in Nazis SS (extermination unit). Here is your camp (search for Estonia): http://history1900s.about.com/library/holocaust/bl chart.htm

      I stand corrected. Vaivara "was apparently established in 1943 as a camp for Soviet prisoners of war" .. "by the Nazi regime" (wikipedia), for the purpose of "Concentration/Transit" (your link).

      Happy? Are you an Estonian by any chance? You can be happy all you want, but normal people of the world hate pro-Nazis scum like you.

      No, I'm finnish, and I'm happy that I was born in a free, independent and successful country. I'm happy I didn't have to learn russian and I'm sorry that our estonian neighbors are so much worse off because of the russian occupation.

      Call me names all you want but trust me - I will be against any racial prejudices, concentration camps and fascism. I'll raise my voice against them if I see them, be it in my home country, Estonia or Russia. Moving a statue and hurting somebodys feelings falls a lightyear short from being a condemnable "nazist" act.

      It's the Russia I am worried about now. The government is strengthening its power, oppressing opposition, lessening press freedom. Then there's Putin-jugend.. Russia is the country that's taking the steps Germany took a hundred years ago.

      Of course the people don't want war. But after all, it's the leaders of the country who determine the policy, and it's always a simple matter to drag the people along whether it's a democracy, a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism, and exposing the country to greater danger. -- Herman Goering at the Nuremberg trials

    4. Re:There's no right perspective by hifisoftware · · Score: 1

      So first you happy for Nazi collaboration: That said, I'm happy that Finland "embraced" the Nazi Germany
      Then you claim that I will be against any racial prejudices. Not a typical statement for somebody who support Nazis... Do you know hat Nazism is? Do you know what Nazis stand for? If you think that that it stands against any racial prejudices you should learn more about it.
      Once you figure one what it is really that you stand for, what it is really that you are happy about please let us know.

    5. Re:There's no right perspective by hifisoftware · · Score: 1

      Did you ever tried to learn history? In 1939-1945 there was no country called Russia. Which war are you talking about? WW2 was in 1939-1945, do you even know that?

      Russia appeared in 1990: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russia

      You making stuff up, do you really think you need to do that?

    6. Re:There's no right perspective by jlehtira · · Score: 1

      Um, let me clarify. I'm not happy about nazism, far from that. But, I'm happy that Finland was an ally (more or less) of Germany in World War 2. Any other option (allying with USSR, or trying to stay independent) would have seen Finland end up in russian hands. We were lucky to have a strong friend in the war, and we were lucky that the same friend went down in flames and could not oppress us afterwards.

      Nazism stands for nationalism. More spesifically, usually the word means things like the german nationalist party did before and during WW2..

      Predicting what would have happened is always hard, but I find it probable that Finland would be better off under nazi oppression than the same from soviets. No jewish here really, and they kinda liked us. So they wouldn't have deported people to siberia or concentration camps, and they probably wouldn't have moved in hundreds of thousands of german people and insist their language on us.

      Like it or not, nazism would have been the lesser of two evils compared to russian-style communism. For us - maybe not for others.

  135. Re:Common Sense by Control+Group · · Score: 1

    Not to put too fine a point on it, but no.

    Implementing web site captchas at the backbone level would be anything but trivial, for one thing. For another, adding some kind of login script overhead to every packet a backbone router handles would practically be a denial-of-service attack. I really don't think it's "trivial" for Level3, say, to replace all their networking equipment to implement login scripts for every web site that comes across their network.

    Now, maybe when you say "backbones" you don't mean what people commonly refer to as the internet backbone, and you're thinking of implementing this closer to the edge. That makes implementation feasible, but it won't solve the problem. Once you start getting closer to the edge - close enough that the people trying to defend themselves have the ability to implement this solution - you'll be vulnerable again. Sure, your routers may not route the bad packets, but your routers have to look at the packets to determine they shouldn't be routed. That eats up bandwidth.

    --

    Reality has a conservative bias: it conserves mass, energy, momentum...
  136. Re:Should a cyber war require a cyber retaliation? by Obsi · · Score: 0

    Food: pizza, hotpockets, Chinese, etc. Drink: Bawls, Jolt, cappuccino, etc.

  137. mod parent troll by lunaticLT · · Score: 0

    you insensitive clods

  138. Re:Cases with Finland and Canada are very differen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Funny that you assume I am in Russia. I lived in Latvia for 10 years and know exactly how latvians 'were tolerant and did'nt ban Russian'. Russians in Latvia are second-sort citizens, despite some living there for 50 years - how much more integration do you need? In Latvia, language became the tool of discrimination under auspicies of 'saving culture'. If russian-speaking people are not allowed to vote, how can they integrate, smart-ass? I know for a fact that in Latvia during 'oppression' there were Latvian-language schools on par with Russian-language ones and other languages. I would extrapolate that the same treatment was in Estonia, since they were part of the same system.

    So shut the fuck up, and fix first problems in Russia.
    There is no need to fall into adolescence. Yes, Russia has huge systemic problems, but estonians spitting on russians by removing the army hero monument is not helping in building up a relationship between the two countries. If you don't want any relationship with Russia at all, then may be you should stop buying oil and gas from it. Maybe then you will realize Estonia cannot be fully independent from anybody. You think they are equal partners with the rest of EU? They are even worse bitches then during the 'oppression'. Read (or better yet talk to farmers) about how EU destroys agriculture in the Estonia/Latvia/Litva with there draconian refulations.
  139. Re:Cases with Finland and Canada are very differen by rynoski · · Score: 1

    If russian-speaking people are not allowed to vote, how can they integrate, smart-ass? They can integrate by learning the language of the country they live in and become citizens (and vote), smart arse.
    --
    There are two types of people in the world: 1) those that can extrapolate from incomplete data.