Slashdot Mirror


ATM Turns 40

01100111 writes "The world's first ATM was installed in a branch of Barclays in Enfield, north London, 40 years ago this week. Inspiration had struck Mr Shepherd-Barron, now 82, while he was in the bath. The machine paid out a maximum of £10 a time." It struck me there must be a way I could get my own money, anywhere in the world or the UK. I hit upon the idea of a chocolate bar dispenser, but replacing chocolate with cash.""

210 comments

  1. Wrong - Not the "first" ATM. by EveryNickIsTaken · · Score: 4, Informative

    From Wikipedia: A mechanical cash dispenser was developed and built by Luther George Simjian and installed 1939 in New York City by the City Bank of New York, but removed after 6 months due to the lack of customer acceptance.

    1. Re:Wrong - Not the "first" ATM. by Conor+Turton · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      Wikipedia...a completely reliable source...

      And it was hardly comparable.

      --
      Conor "You're not married,you haven't got a girlfriend and you've never seen Star Trek? Good Lord!" - Patrick Stewart
    2. Re:Wrong - Not the "first" ATM. by LordBafford · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yes, the first ATM was invented during medieval times, when they had a midget in a box dispensing gold coins when presented with a certificate of ownership. This was short lived due the midgets dieing frequently and some just being carried off in their boxes and robbed.

      --
      Today's Tomorrow is Yesterday's Future! --- "Where Ever You Go, There You Are" -- Diablo 1
    3. Re:Wrong - Not the "first" ATM. by elrous0 · · Score: 1, Troll

      Oh boy, here comes another /. "*WE* invented it first!" pissing contest between the U.S. and Europe. I should bring in my black nationalist friend to chime in with his "It was actually invented by a black man" routine too.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    4. Re:Wrong - Not the "first" ATM. by LordBafford · · Score: 2, Funny

      We all know Al Gore invented the first ATM.

      --
      Today's Tomorrow is Yesterday's Future! --- "Where Ever You Go, There You Are" -- Diablo 1
    5. Re:Wrong - Not the "first" ATM. by EveryNickIsTaken · · Score: 1

      Of course. And you just know he kept the funds in his magical lockbox.

    6. Re:Wrong - Not the "first" ATM. by dgmrdt · · Score: 1, Interesting

      An invention that fails is not an invention, it is an idea. For example, many people from around the world "invented" electric light before Edison, but Edison is credited with it because he made it work.

    7. Re:Wrong - Not the "first" ATM. by SpeedyRich · · Score: 0

      Don't forget the US also 'invented' the mobile phone.
      Oh, hang on. No it didn't - regardless of Wikipedia.
      Do please get over your nation's inability to think innovatively.

      --
      ## NB: Comment here
    8. Re:Wrong - Not the "first" ATM. by 228e2 · · Score: 2, Informative

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automated_Teller_Mach ine A mechanical cash dispenser was developed and built by Luther George Simjian and installed 1939 in New York City by the City Bank of New York, but removed after 6 months due to the lack of customer acceptance.[1] Thereafter, the history of ATMs paused for over 25 years, until De La Rue developed the first electronic ATM, which was installed first in Enfield Town in North London on 27 June 1967 by Barclays Bank. This instance of the invention is credited to John Shepherd-Barron . . .

      so a "MCD" isnt the same as an ATM? why didnt Luther get credit for the first "ATM"?

      --
      Since when does being a Socialist mean 'someone who has a different opinion than me'?
    9. Re:Wrong - Not the "first" ATM. by CodeArtisan · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      An invention that fails is not an invention, it is an idea. For example, many people from around the world "invented" electric light before Edison, but Edison is credited with it because he made it work. Except Joseph Swan 'invented' electric light before Edison and Edison basically made a copy of Swan's design to sell in the US. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Swan
    10. Re:Wrong - Not the "first" ATM. by hotdiggitydawg · · Score: 1

      Yes, the first ATM was invented during medieval times, when they had a midget in a box dispensing gold coins when presented with a certificate of ownership. This was short lived due the midgets dieing frequently... ...and it wasn't until 1935 that Schrodinger worked out why, paving the way for Shepherd-Barron...
    11. Re:Wrong - Not the "first" ATM. by Random+BedHead+Ed · · Score: 1

      That's nothing - in the Roman Empire they used monkeys instead of midgets. You had to present via a front-facing slot your request and a certificate of account ownership, each etched onto a small sheet of lead, along with a banana. Your coins would be deposited in the bowl beneath the ATM, if you didn't mind that they were mixed with monkey dung. If nothing came out, the monkey was dead. This was called 'kicking the monkey' and entitled you to a replacement banana from the bank. The one in Pompeii was discovered last year, with a fossilised monkey in situ. The switch to midgets was considered an improvement.

    12. Re:Wrong - Not the "first" ATM. by phantomflanflinger · · Score: 1

      "A mechanical cash dispenser was developed and built by Luther George Simjian and installed 1939 in New York City by the City Bank of New York, but removed after 6 months due to the lack of customer acceptance."

      Click the Wikipedia link; you'll see that none of the above is there.

      --
      shin phantomflanflinger
    13. Re:Wrong - Not the "first" ATM. by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Well, technological advances are inevitable. The midgets not only were faster, but they produced transactions that were 85% feces free.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    14. Re:Wrong - Not the "first" ATM. by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      The Shepherd-Barron design was not much closer to the modern ATM than Simjian's. It was electronic, but it didn't use a teller card or update in real-time like the modern machines. It used a token, which had to be manually collected by the bank.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    15. Re:Wrong - Not the "first" ATM. by PorkNutz · · Score: 1
      Apparently, humor is not something that reaches across borders to bind us all together.

      -----
      F#@k You Binary T-Shirt
      Funny Shirts @ ProStoner.com

    16. Re:Wrong - Not the "first" ATM. by cafucu · · Score: 1

      ATM is 40???? I didn't know that such advanced WAN protocols existed in the sixties.

      --
      :%s:work:/.:g
    17. Re:Wrong - Not the "first" ATM. by LordBafford · · Score: 1

      i think it was a vengeful troll mark because i used Where instead or wear in another post by mistake so now i get a troll mark. Kinda lame.

      --
      Today's Tomorrow is Yesterday's Future! --- "Where Ever You Go, There You Are" -- Diablo 1
    18. Re:Wrong - Not the "first" ATM. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How ironic then that a Mr Simjian was the one to switch back away from midgets.

    19. Re:Wrong - Not the "first" ATM. by Esion+Modnar · · Score: 2, Funny

      What's in your wallet?

      --

      They say the first thing to go is your penis. Well, it's either that or your brain. I forget which...
    20. Re:Wrong - Not the "first" ATM. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so a "MCD" isnt the same as an ATM? why didnt Luther get credit for the first "ATM"?

      Because an Automated Teller Machine has to be, you know, automated. From the description from the referenced material, it sounds more like a machine where you don't have to talk to the teller.

    21. Re:Wrong - Not the "first" ATM. by HullBreachOnline.com · · Score: 0

      No, he just invented the internetwork that allowed all the ATMs to connect between different banks. But we all knew that already.

    22. Re:Wrong - Not the "first" ATM. by westlake · · Score: 1
      A mechanical cash dispenser was developed and built by Luther George Simjian and installed 1939 in New York City by the City Bank of New York, but removed after 6 months due to the lack of customer acceptance.

      This doesn't tell me much.

      Did you buy tokens and get cash in return?

      This is still in the era of pen and paper and - perhaps in New York - punch-card accounting.

      In 1939 a trip to the bank usually implied a significant transaction - your monthly mortgage payment, for example, or a cash withdrawal to meet a payroll. You needed a teller.

    23. Re:Wrong - Not the "first" ATM. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Exactly. Don't quote Wikipedia. Instead quote the source used in Wikipedia and never mention Wikipedia at all. There's some stupid people here, and they will automatically assume that any information they don't like from Wikipedia was obviously something inserted by some kid and can't be correct. If you used the article from MIT that was used as a source in the Wikipedia article, you probably wouldn't have received those troll votes.

    24. Re:Wrong - Not the "first" ATM. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Way to totally miss the point.

    25. Re:Wrong - Not the "first" ATM. by bvimo · · Score: 1

      I thought the headline referred to Adobe Type Manager reaching version 40.

      --
      In either case, here at Microsoft, we feel standards are important. And we have fun, too. Doug Mahugh, Microsoft
    26. Re:Wrong - Not the "first" ATM. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought the barometric pressure was way up.

    27. Re:Wrong - Not the "first" ATM. by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1

      Actually whether or not Wikipedia is correct the Barclays machine was not the worlds first "ATM" because in the UK we don't call them that!

    28. Re:Wrong - Not the "first" ATM. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this is complete bullsh*t it was made in new zealand first

    29. Re:Wrong - Not the "first" ATM. by Jaidan · · Score: 1

      http://web.mit.edu/invent/iow/simjian.html

      Slightly better than wikipedia by your standards I assume.

    30. Re:Wrong - Not the "first" ATM. by Kalriath · · Score: 1

      No, we invented EFTPOS. Srsly.

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
    31. Re:Wrong - Not the "first" ATM. by dotgain · · Score: 1

      That's Extensive Field Targetting and Penetration Of Sheep for those not in the know.
      (and yes, I'm a Kiwi too)

    32. Re:Wrong - Not the "first" ATM. by Kalriath · · Score: 1

      Hey, the "of" is meant to be lowercase!

      Bloody hell, can't even get the acronym right!

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
    33. Re:Wrong - Not the "first" ATM. by dotgain · · Score: 1

      Well, in the "real" EFTPOS the "O" stands for "of" as well!

    34. Re:Wrong - Not the "first" ATM. by Paul+Carver · · Score: 1

      "nation's inability to think"???

      I think you're anthropomorphizing a bit there. No nation in the history of the earth has ever had a thought of any kind. Many people have had many thoughts while being citizens of various nations.

      Talking about what nation invented what items is silly. Now if you wanted to discuss what nations that various talented inventors prefer to live in that might be an interesting discussion or it might not.

      Don't get too wrapped up in your geographical proximity to talented minds unless you earned that proximity through objectively judged competition.

    35. Re:Wrong - Not the "first" ATM. by SpeedyRich · · Score: 0

      Quite. Thanks for spotting the obvious pisstake!

      --
      ## NB: Comment here
  2. And it just goes to prove by Rik+Sweeney · · Score: 4, Funny

    That everyone does their best thinking when they're in the bath.

    Or on the can.

    1. Re:And it just goes to prove by MyLongNickName · · Score: 4, Funny

      Which is why I go to the can in the shower. Double the inspiration power. Of course, the wife doesn't like the brown streaks in the tub, but you can't please everyone.

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    2. Re:And it just goes to prove by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Next time you're in there, you should invent duct tape so you can shut her up.

    3. Re:And it just goes to prove by sqldr · · Score: 1, Funny

      I tried something similar, but washing your hair in the toilet is highly impractical.

      --
      I wrote my first program at the age of six, and I still can't work out how this website works.
    4. Re:And it just goes to prove by AragornSonOfArathorn · · Score: 1

      The trick is to get two people (or one sufficiently strong one) to hold you upside down with your head in the bowl, and then you can lather up and flush/rinse with your free hands. This is known as the Assisted Power Swirly. Just beware of the Chocolate Swirly.

      --
      sudo eat my shorts
    5. Re:And it just goes to prove by bigredradio · · Score: 1

      By that logic, we slashdotters have the potential to be even more creative - if we were to start taking baths regularly.

  3. Sexual Reference. by richy+freeway · · Score: 3, Funny

    I would have thought people had been ATM'ing for hundreds of years...

    1. Re:Sexual Reference. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No wonder that he got the idea in the bath!

    2. Re:Sexual Reference. by Seumas · · Score: 1

      I'm relieved that I wasn't the only person who instantly thought going ATM had been more popular in recent years, but certainly had to be older than 40 years. At times, one needs to be assured that they aren't the only disgusting bastard around.

    3. Re:Sexual Reference. by SonicSpike · · Score: 1

      I'm a true /.er

      What's ATM'ing?

      --
      Libertas in infinitum
    4. Re:Sexual Reference. by richy+freeway · · Score: 1

      Never thought I'd be explaining this on /. Actually I'm not going to. I'll let Wikipedia do the talkin' http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ass_to_mouth Enjoy. :D

  4. Real Innovation by Ajehals · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Plastic cards had not been invented, so Mr Shepherd-Barron's machine used cheques that were impregnated with carbon 14, a mildly radioactive substance.... "I later worked out you would have to eat 136,000 such cheques for it to have any effect on you." Interestingly, this was arguably one of those inventions that is, in retrospect unbelievably obvious, it really has changed the world. It leads me to wonder what Mr Shepherd-Barron was paid for his idea, and if any attempts were made to limit the implementation of this innovative machine to a single company...
    1. Re:Real Innovation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      He was actually paid a lot of money, (but sadly he could only withdraw 10 pounds at a time).

  5. so.... by Himring · · Score: 1

    What's wrong with turning 40? huh?!?!

    Yep, I was born the same year. Thanks for the reminder.

    But, I hold on to the adage, "Men look as old as they feel. Women look as old as they are...."

    --
    "All great things are simple & expressed in a single word: freedom, justice, honor, duty, mercy, hope." --Churchill
    1. Re:so.... by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      What's wrong with turning 40? huh?!?!

      I'm looking forward to my 50th. ;-)

      I know it often seems Slashdot is infested with snotty-nosed 11-year-olds, but it ain't necessarily so...

  6. Asynchronous Transfer Mode? by niceone · · Score: 4, Funny

    I should get out more.

    1. Re:Asynchronous Transfer Mode? by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      Automated Teller Machine. I think it's an Americanism, though... the first people just called it a cash machine.

      I could be totally wrong, though.

    2. Re:Asynchronous Transfer Mode? by thejeffer · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's the first thing I thought as well. C'mon, this is slashdot. If it says ATM in the title, we sure as heck better be talking about the network protocol. It's news for NERDS.

    3. Re:Asynchronous Transfer Mode? by clickclickdrone · · Score: 1

      I thought it was Adobe Type Manager.

      --
      I want a list of atrocities done in your name - Recoil
    4. Re:Asynchronous Transfer Mode? by Ed+Avis · · Score: 1

      Bank of Scotland calls it an 'autoteller', which has the benefit of being just as obscure, but not possible to turn into a TLA.

      Probably a bit redundant to call it an 'automated machine'. Cue complaints about withdrawing '$100 dollars' from the 'ATM machine' using your 'PIN number' etc...

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    5. Re:Asynchronous Transfer Mode? by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      Probably a bit redundant to call it an 'automated machine'.
      Nah, sets it apart from the manually operated machines of the past, where you had to keep turning a crank to make it work.
      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    6. Re:Asynchronous Transfer Mode? by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      In Canada, some banks refer to them as Automatic Banking Machines (ABMs) because the tellers got mad that they were being "automated". My biggest problem is that now that the machines are so prevalent, it's takes forever to see a human. The only people who go see the tellers are the people with something that the machine can't do. This is usually something quite complex which means they speak with the teller for at least 15 minutes. On the other hand, if you're just going to get a couple rolls of quarters to do you laundry, it can take quite a while to see a teller because all the people in front of you are having long drawn out problems.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    7. Re:Asynchronous Transfer Mode? by supertsaar · · Score: 1

      I'm an ATM Nerd. Atm's are way nerdier that ATM :)

      --
      The Bigger The Headache The Bigger the Pill
    8. Re:Asynchronous Transfer Mode? by broggyr · · Score: 1

      I believe it's an "automated teller" machine, not an automated "teller machine"...

      --
      Irony? Yea, it's like goldy and bronzy, only it's made of iron!
    9. Re:Asynchronous Transfer Mode? by pcnetworx1 · · Score: 1

      And next you were going to say it has a "fortune you have" to account for, or a fortune "you have to account for" . Sheesh, my head hurts.

    10. Re:Asynchronous Transfer Mode? by thatnerdguy · · Score: 1

      Luckily, at some Bank of Montreal locations, there is a sort of coin roll vending machine which might come in handy for something like that.

      --
      I saw the Sign, and it opened up my eyes
  7. Protocols? by the_kanzure · · Score: 1

    What protocols do automated teller machines use to communicate with banks? And does anybody have their own schematics for building ATMs? HowStuffWorks has a video that goes inside ATMs and Wikipedia is informative re: the software aspects, but maybe there is more information out there?

    1. Re:Protocols? by dreamchaser · · Score: 1

      They used to use SNA (LU 6.2 as I recall, but it's been a long time). That was when most ATM's, at least here in the States, ran OS/2 and talked to Mainframes. Now most of them run embedded CE or other OSes, and I'm not sure if they are still using SNA or have switched to IP.

    2. Re:Protocols? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Ireland at least one of the major banks uses OS/2 Warp still, they run on NCR and AT&T machines.

    3. Re:Protocols? by _Shad0w_ · · Score: 1

      I believe they began switching them to IP; I seem to recall they were doing it using VPN tunnelling over the internet. It raised quite a few "wtf?" style comments.

      They've also used X.25 before now.

      --

      Yeah, I had a sig once; I got bored of it.

    4. Re:Protocols? by jimicus · · Score: 1

      I think it depends on the bank.

      I'd like to believe it's all secured and encrypted thoroughly, and transported over a network with no physical connection to the Internet. However, I've been told (don't know how accurate it is, so take with as much salt as you think it needs) that at least one country's banks have used plain, unsecured telephone lines.

    5. Re:Protocols? by dreamchaser · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My local ATM was never down when they had the old text mode OS/2 version running. They replaced it two years ago with a CE embedded (I think) Diebold machine and that one is down at least once a week.

      If it ain't broke, don't fix it.

    6. Re:Protocols? by wwmedia · · Score: 2, Informative

      believe it or not all bank of ireland atms use Windows, plenty of times u see the bootup screen or and odd blue screen of death

    7. Re:Protocols? by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      You see that is one thing I don't get. Why Windows? You are not going to run any commodity software on an ATM. Why not Linux, BSD, some flavor of Unix, or even an Embedded OS like QNX? I just don't see any benifit to using Windows or CE for an ATM. Maybe they use Visual Basic to write the code for them... Shuddderr......

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    8. Re:Protocols? by simong · · Score: 2, Informative

      A friend worked for Lloyds at the start of the 90s and ATMs were effectively terminals using SNA or X500 pads to mainframes. These days they all seem to use Windows so it's probably all over IP. ATMs in shops can still use ISDN or even good old fashioned modems - it's always a bit disconcerting to hear one dial up.

    9. Re:Protocols? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure at Diebold like too many other companies their programmers have no choice over what technologies they use -- management thinks windows is a good idea because they're familiar with it and so that's what their developers use.

    10. Re:Protocols? by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
      But maybe the OS/2 system did break down once and there was no way to repair such an old machine (maybe the heat sink on the CPU came loose one day and it fried itself and they don't make chips for that socket anymore), so they had to bring a new machine in, and it was more trouble to make the old software run on it than upgrade to new software. And maybe the old system had an exploit in its old and discontinued code base that wasn't going to be patched.

      If you can't fix it, break it and send for a warranty replacement. The replacement may break more often on its own, but you can get parts to fix it when it does.
      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    11. Re:Protocols? by Gidono · · Score: 1

      For the processing company I work for, many ATM's these days are still using dialup as a means to transport and using 3DES encryption, others using frame relay and other various forms of communication. Now 1DES is still being used but is very uncommon due to all the processing network regulations. These networks are shutting off these terminals (sometimes blacklisting entire ATM companies that own these machines) due to the security risk with 1DES.

    12. Re:Protocols? by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Okay except there has to be a manager that decides what to use. I am sure that at GM, Toyota, and Honda there are also managers but SOMEBODY with some some technical knowledge makes decisions about what technology goes into a product and why.
      IBM is pushing Linux right now but even discounting Linux they have AIX. Banks are comfortable with IBM on ATMs. They used OS/2 didn't they? So again why not AIX or Linux.
      Dumb management just doesn't make sense. There has to be a reason.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    13. Re:Protocols? by westlake · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I just don't see any benifit to using Windows or CE for an ATM. Maybe they use Visual Basic to write the code for them... Shuddderr......

      Microsoft has a very significant presence in the market for embedded systems. There are customized version of Visual Studio. You are not limited to Visual Basic. WindowsEmbedded

    14. Re:Protocols? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      The cash machine near my house rebooted a while ago when I was trying to use it. Not only did it boot into Windows, it then proceeded to run a batch file to download software updates and then start the UI. Well, it would have done, if the UI app hadn't caused the machine to reboot again as soon as it started...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    15. Re:Protocols? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      O/S2 is still developed and sold as eComStation. There hasn't been a release since the end of 2005, but there was a new RC out this month.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    16. Re:Protocols? by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      I know they have a significant presence but that doesn't answer why the benefits of Windows over power the drawbacks for this application.
      1 Windows being the most common OS also makes it the most vulnerable to attack. The fact that it is so common makes it a rich target.
      2. Windows was never intended to be secure. It is a single user consumer product by nature. High availably, stability, and security are not it's strengths.

      Windows strengths and it does have a lot of them just do not matter in the ATM market.
      1. Hardware support. For a device like an ATM you can pick an choose your hardware. No need to worry about people plugging in a XiHu 5000 network adapter they got on sale at BestCompMart.
      2. Software selection. An ATM should only run the ATM software. You don't need Word or the latest game to run on it.
      3. Familiar UI. You write the ATM's UI it doesn't work like Windows.

      The one place that Windows does have an advantage over Linux is in developer tools. Eclipse-CDT and Kdevelope are good but not as feature rich as VIsual Studio. I would say they are good enough but Visual Studio is better.
      Even if Visual Studio isn't better it is better known. It is easier to find Windows developers than Linux or AIX developers.

      To me I think it is a case of false economy. I have to wonder if this migration started before Linux became mainstream.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    17. Re:Protocols? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You're confusing Windows CE with desktop Windows. Windows CE is a whole different beast;

      1. CE is not the most common OS and most banks run their ATM network over a private network, not anything exposed to the world at large.
      2. CE isn't consumer; you can't buy it off the shelf. Uptime, stability and security are not the same as for Vista.

      ATMs running CE don't run Word, or have weird hardware, or have Windows UIs. So would you like to try constructing another straw man or two?

    18. Re:Protocols? by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      "You're confusing Windows CE with desktop Windows. Windows CE is a whole different beast;"
      No I believe that you are confusing Embedded Windows with Windows CE.
      I am pretty sure that the ATMs are using Embedded Windows which is a stripped down version of XP or 2000.
      http://www.microsoft.com/windows/embedded/default. mspx is a link to all of them.

      WinCE mainly lives on the ARM. I know Microsoft had an X86 version they called CE but I am not sure if it was really CE or Embedded Windows. Since the older ATMs used OS/2 I would bet on the new ones running Embedded Windows over CE.

      "ATMs running CE don't run Word, or have weird hardware, or have Windows UIs. So would you like to try constructing another straw man or two?"
      I guess you didn't understand my post.
      I was pointing out that Windows strengths, large selection of software, large base of supported hardware, and a familiar UI are not an advantage for an ATM!
      An ATM doesn't use Windows GUI, let people install strange new hardware, or run off the self software. So Windows isn't a big advantage.

      BTW Win's CE uptime is worse than a properly maintained Windows 2003 Server or even a Win2K server. I hear the latest version of Win CE now called Windows Mobile is better but I have not played with it.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    19. Re:Protocols? by Bender+Unit+22 · · Score: 1

      An alarming rate must be running over the internet as different internet outtages though time, brought a lot of them down.

      In the "good old days", we would not even rely on internet to transport WANs but these days everything gets connected to the internet and everyone expects 100% uptime from something they can't control.

    20. Re:Protocols? by SpinyManiac · · Score: 1

      WinCE will run on X86. Here's some info.

      --
      It's never too late to have a happy childhood.
    21. Re:Protocols? by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      So are they using CE or Windows Embedded? Since people have reported ATM BSOD and I have never seen CE BSOD I am guessing Embedded Windows.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    22. Re:Protocols? by SpinyManiac · · Score: 1

      According to Wikipedia WinCE can BSOD, but I agree, Embedded is more likely.

      --
      It's never too late to have a happy childhood.
    23. Re:Protocols? by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Back to the question of WHY Windows. The only answer that I can guess is simply they figure that there will always be a Windows OS. When OS/2 went south they where forced to migrate and develop new software from the ground up.
      That is the only logical answer I can think of.
      Then the next question is why the heck don't they have watchdog hardware to do an automatic reset when they do BSOD!
      A small micro with a network connection could notify the NOC when one went down and allow them to issue a reset.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    24. Re:Protocols? by SpinyManiac · · Score: 1

      I can only answer questions when I know the answers. The rationale for such a brain dead decision is totally beyond me. :D

      --
      It's never too late to have a happy childhood.
  8. Ob: PTerry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is noted that the ephebian Expression of Eureka has been translated as "bring me a towel"

  9. Mmmm, chocolate... by Dekortage · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I wouldn't mind the service fees so much if it dispensed chocolate bars with my money.

    Anyway, FTA: "Mr Shepherd-Barron came up with the idea when he realised that he could remember his six-figure army number. But he decided to check that with his wife, Caroline. 'Over the kitchen table, she said she could only remember four figures, so because of her, four figures became the world standard,' he laughs." This is a great example of how simple, even mundane decision processes can affect millions, even billions of people. Imagine if he'd stayed with six digits, and people felt it was too hard? Or if he had gone with three, and everyone's account was easily hacked (relatively speaking)?

    --
    $nice = $webHosting + $domainNames + $sslCerts
    1. Re:Mmmm, chocolate... by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      Well, most ATM cards i've seen give you 3 tries and then the card is disabled. Even if you only have a 3 digit pin, then you only get .3% chance of getting it right by guessing the pin before the card is disabled.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    2. Re:Mmmm, chocolate... by Aqua_boy17 · · Score: 1

      "Over the kitchen table, she said she could only remember four figures, so because of her, four figures became the world standard," he laughs.
      So she never memorized a phone number?
      --
      What if the Hokey Pokey really is what it's all about?
    3. Re:Mmmm, chocolate... by fbjon · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hah, that reminds me... When I was much younger, I wondered how the heck there could be only 4 digits in the PIN, since that gives only 10 000 combinations, while there are millions of different cards. There's bound to be a collision! Took me a while before I slapped my forehead...

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    4. Re:Mmmm, chocolate... by UbuntuDupe · · Score: 1

      Not many people in England had phones at the time, so the namespace for phone numbers only required four digits. *please mod flamebait, please mod flamebait*

    5. Re:Mmmm, chocolate... by Ed+Avis · · Score: 1

      It's true - I remember when my phone number was three digits long. For those interested, it was 583. However you would have to live in the same village as me.

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    6. Re:Mmmm, chocolate... by Malached · · Score: 1

      The old style ATM cards (without chip-and-pin), are more secure than the chip-and-pin ones. Here (Ireland) and in the UK, the PIN number was never recorded on the old style cards, so there was no way to read the pin from the card. Now the chip-and-pin ones have the number on the card (albeit encrypted).

    7. Re:Mmmm, chocolate... by digitig · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not many people in England had phones at the time, so the namespace for phone numbers only required four digits. *please mod flamebait, please mod flamebait* Too close to the truth for flamebait. Although plenty of people had phones, Subscriber Trunk Dialling (STD -- another ambiguous TLA!) was very far from widespread, so most calls went through an operator and the "number" would consist of an exchange name and the number on that exchange (my parents' number was "Penketh 5425"; I assume that the "Pennsylvania 65000" system in the USA was similar, although if the Glen Miller Orchestra is to be trusted the USA had bigger exchanges). And yes, the system did put a limit on the phones available; there was a waiting list of months or even years in some places to be allocated a number.
      --
      Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
    8. Re:Mmmm, chocolate... by doogieb · · Score: 1

      LOL, as a child, a friend's number was 642, which within a period of a couple of years got changed to 4642 then 840642 to merge the village's numbering into the nearest town.

      --
      Doogie. If you can read this, my sig fell off
    9. Re:Mmmm, chocolate... by UbuntuDupe · · Score: 1

      This is pretty interesting, that's exactly the same process that a few Indian grad student friends of mines said happened when they got phones for their villages. They had short numbers which then got longer.

      Although that was probably more in the 80s.

    10. Re:Mmmm, chocolate... by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      I know my parents had 4 digit phone numbers, and they are only around 50. Now I'm using 10 digit dialing. Whats really annoying is that we're on 10 digit dialing but there's only 1 area code. Some how the phone company tells me this creates more numbers. I'm note quite sure how. I guess they get to add a few extra prefixes that usually wouldn't be available (411,911,611,1xx,0xx) but it all seems really annoying to me. Anyway, I don't think they are really using up all the combinations.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    11. Re:Mmmm, chocolate... by Nexum · · Score: 2, Informative

      The key point you make here is that the PIN is encrypted. There are hardware failsafes too, that prevent people with sophisticated electronics gadgetry from trying to discern a PIN's location in memory on the chip, although people have tried to hack the cards using latent backchannels such as measuring tiny tiny power changes in consumption across the chip when it operates.

      In short - don't worry too much about the PIN number being on the card. You have other things to worry about if your card is in someone elses hands than them getting your PIN.

      --

      This sig has been deprecated.
    12. Re:Mmmm, chocolate... by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 1

      In Saskatchewan, up until about the mid-80's, everyone had a 7-digit phone number with an initial 306 at the front.

      306-123-4567

      306 was (and is) Saskatchewan. 123 was the town (exchange), and 4567 was your individual phone number.

      Within the same exchange, you could dial 3-4567.

      Then they change it so you had to dial the last digit of your exchange, so you dialed 3-4567.

      Now, for the past 20 years or so, you have to dial all 7 digits even when you are in the same exchange:

      123-4567

      --
      If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
    13. Re:Mmmm, chocolate... by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 1


      Within the same exchange, you could dial 3-4567.
       
      Argh. That should be 4567.
       
      It makes more sense that way.

      --
      If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
    14. Re:Mmmm, chocolate... by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 1

      Some how the phone company tells me this creates more numbers. I'm note quite sure how.
       
      Because you are required to use no less than 10 digits, there can be less overlap and more numbers become available.
       
      Assume that we want to use 123 as an area code.
       
      Dial 123-4567. Now, are we done dialing yet? Do you want to talk to 123-4567, or are you about to enter 7890 as well and call 123-4567-7890?
       
      If we know that you are required to enter a certain number of digits for a phone number, then we don't have to worry about what happens if you enter less digits -- the number is incomplete. We can tell when you are done entering numbers and start ringing the phone.

      --
      If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
  10. What a bastard! by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 1, Funny

    I hit upon the idea of a chocolate bar dispenser, but replacing chocolate with cash.
    Dammit, I could have had a chocolate bar!
  11. Alternately ;) by Moraelin · · Score: 4, Funny

    A man is only as old as the woman he feels ;)

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    1. Re:Alternately ;) by Himring · · Score: 1

      "Old age is the greatest surprise in a man's life." --Tolstoy

      --
      "All great things are simple & expressed in a single word: freedom, justice, honor, duty, mercy, hope." --Churchill
  12. UK not part of World by hoojus · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...anywhere in the world or the UK Wow I always though the english were a bit different :)
    1. Re:UK not part of World by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      They are, however you mean the British ;) not the English (who are just a small insignificant part of the UK, they can't even rule themselves given the number of german monarches and welsh or scottish PM's we've had, pathetic people! ;)

    2. Re:UK not part of World by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Wow I always though the english were a bit different :)"

      Well, of course that's true. But out of consideration for you poor foreigners, we try not to mention it much. It just slips out sometimes. Pardon us for our inate superiority!

      "To be born an Englishman is to have won first prize in the Lottery of Life" Cecil Rhodes.

    3. Re:UK not part of World by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Wow I always though the english were a bit different :)

      UK --> British old sport [1]

      Otherwise our Scottish/Welsh cousains get all upset :-)

      [1] Yes and Northen Oirish to, but they dont count :-)

    4. Re:UK not part of World by teh+kurisu · · Score: 1

      Written for an American audience perhaps, where America is the world, and ships fall off the edge of US territorial waters.

      Just to underline the fact that the UK isn't quite yet the 51st state.

    5. Re:UK not part of World by jez9999 · · Score: 2, Funny

      not the English (who are just a small insignificant part of the UK, they can't even rule themselves because of the number of german monarches and welsh or scottish PM's we've had, pathetic people! ;)

      There, fixed it for you.

    6. Re:UK not part of World by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Umm. More likely for a British audience. Hale Britannia, where memories of empire die hard.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    7. Re:UK not part of World by mike2R · · Score: 1

      Heh,the comic travel writer Bill Bryson says his favourite English newspaper headline was: "Fog in Channel - Continent Cut Off!"

      --
      This sig all sigs devours
    8. Re:UK not part of World by teh+kurisu · · Score: 1

      I find it amusing that Sky One was showing Braveheart on the day that Gordon Brown became leader of the Labour party.

      Okay, that's enough off-topic posts from me today.

    9. Re:UK not part of World by gsslay · · Score: 1

      And what's a work of fiction starring an Australian and filmed in Ireland got to do with anything?

    10. Re:UK not part of World by bvimo · · Score: 1

      I thought it was filmed in the Bridgewater Hall, Manchester ;)

      --
      In either case, here at Microsoft, we feel standards are important. And we have fun, too. Doug Mahugh, Microsoft
    11. Re:UK not part of World by Wizard+Drongo · · Score: 1

      Just to add, I can't think why he's done it, but there has been a really concentrated spin effort by Tony Blair in the last 10 years. This concerns how TB is in fact english. Yeah. Cause, I mean, it's not like he was born in Scotland, or spent his childhood here or anything.
      Point being, gordon can't do the same. The cats out of the bag for him. So TB has gone 10 years as "England's PM". Now GB has finally managed to kick him out, and TB's managed to leave him with a sting in the tail that is the english voters now think GB is some skirt wearing miserly scots git that cares not abut england, therefore should be disposed of ASAP.
      One might comment at this time why the english think it's fine to have an english PM that has no votes at all in Scotland or Wales (Maggie) do massive change to Scotland, and that's just democracy, but a scottish pm that changes the entire UK fairly equally would be terrible to have "forced" upon them.
      I wouldn't comment on such things however since I care not what the english think of Scotland, nor it's sons, although I personally hope that fat wee git (GB) and his grinning twat sidekick are spotted on the floor of their local JobCentre soon. Hopefully the people in Scotland, with the election of the SNP just there are finally starting to realise that they dont need London to tell them what to do anymore, and pretty soon, all them english that like to buy holiday homes here in Scotlnd, thus shutting out locals from the housing market, turning the entire area into an english holiday village, they'll need a passport to come here.
      Independence cannot come to soon for Scotland.

      --
      The truth shall always be free: Boris Floricic is Tron.
    12. Re:UK not part of World by teh+kurisu · · Score: 1

      At risk of going way off topic, it's interesting to look at the leaders of the current parties at Westminster. Gordon Brown, Menzies Campbell and Alex Salmond are Scottish. Tony Blair was born in Scotland and went to Edinburgh Uni. David Cameron has a Scottish father (and Cameron is a distinctively Scottish name), and last-but-not-least, Ian Paisley had a Scottish mother, meaning that the largest party in Westminster with a leader without an obvious Scottish connection is Sinn Féin. And they don't even take up their seats.

      I should probably say that I'm a Scot, I voted SNP at the last election, and I think that the only viable solution to the West Lothian Question is Scottish independence.

    13. Re:UK not part of World by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not British either. The full name of the UK is The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. The British are the people who live in Great Britain. As far as I know there isn't a word for the people who live in the UK.

  13. replacing chocolate with cash by niceone · · Score: 1

    replacing chocolate with cash

    And he got that idea when he stopped trying to stay on his wife's good side and go for hookers instead.

  14. Not quite the same as today's ATMs. by MROD · · Score: 4, Informative

    It should be noted that the ATM of that era wasn't quite what we have today.

    Instead of having a card with a magnetic stripe which you would get back after the transaction it was a small, plastic coated punched card which would be swallowed by the machine and then sent back to the account holder afterwards. In other words, it was an emergency "I need £10 of cash" card.

    I remember my Dad having one of these from the National Westminster Bank circa 1972. ATMs didn't really take off until the magnetic stripe cards came out in the late '70s/ early '80s.

    --

    Agrajag: "Oh no, not again!"
    1. Re:Not quite the same as today's ATMs. by butlerdi · · Score: 3, Funny

      I do not remember those cards, and I had one of the first accounts offered by Barclays. I do remember that you could go to multiple branches and get a few quid from each as they did not update in real time. A real help for poor students, until the bank manager caught up with you a few days later...

      --
      "If the King's English was good enough for Jesus, it's good enough for me!" -- "Ma" Ferguson, Governor of Texas (circa
    2. Re:Not quite the same as today's ATMs. by Ajehals · · Score: 2, Funny
      I posted it above - but:

      Plastic cards had not been invented, so Mr Shepherd-Barron's machine used cheques that were impregnated with carbon 14, a mildly radioactive substance.... "I later worked out you would have to eat 136,000 such cheques for it to have any effect on you." Although why you'd want to eat your cheques is beyond me, I just tried eating one and it didn't taste so good, maybe its the lack of Carbon 14 in them these days....
    3. Re:Not quite the same as today's ATMs. by beadfulthings · · Score: 1

      Hmm. Maybe people wanted to eat them because they were hungry and didn't get a chocolate bar??

      --
      "Here's what's happening. You're starting to drive like your Dad..." - Red Green
    4. Re:Not quite the same as today's ATMs. by rkww · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes, I remember being allowed to take my father's punched card to the bank to get out ten pounds for him when I was ten or so, which would have been 1971. And it was ten pounds in pound notes, neatly folded into a plastic holder. He still has some of the holders somewhere and I wouldn't be surprised if he still had a punched card. According to this timeline Lloyds launched an ATM using a magnetic strip card in 1972.

    5. Re:Not quite the same as today's ATMs. by johnw · · Score: 2, Informative

      The Barclays system wasn't quite the same. From Barclays you got six slips of slightly stiff paper - thinner than normal punched cards but thicker than a cheque. They were about the size of a cheque but with some holes in them. Each of them could be exchanged for £10, in a plastic clip.

      The process was as follows:

      You first typed in your six digit PIN. This caused the drawer in the centre of the machine to unlock and open a little.

      Then you pulled open the drawer fully and positioned your slip on some pins in the centre of the drawer.

      Then you closed the drawer and waited whilst the machine chugged and whirred a bit.

      Finally the drawer would unlock and open a little again. When you pulled the drawer fully open your slip would have disappeared and a plastic clip containing £10 in £1 notes would be sitting in its place.

      I can still remember my father's number - 08 75 86. I don't suppose there's much chance of identity theft by quoting it now.

      John

    6. Re:Not quite the same as today's ATMs. by david.given · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I remember my Dad having one of these from the National Westminster Bank circa 1972. ATMs didn't really take off until the magnetic stripe cards came out in the late '70s/ early '80s.

      My uncle was the project manager at Barclays behind the modern magnetic-stripe ATM project (I don't know if he was involved with these early prototypes). He used to tell all kinds of fascinating stories about trying the herd the vast numbers of people involved into moving in at least approximately in the right direction.

      One particular thing he talked about was the endless bickering between the connected-ATM faction (where the secret was stored centrally, and all ATMs communicated constantly with central servers via the phone line) and the disconnected-ATM faction (where the secret was stored on the card, and ATMs would only get updated at intervals). Needless to say, and thankfully, the connected-ATM faction won. It seems such an obvious decision these days...

    7. Re:Not quite the same as today's ATMs. by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Needless to say, and thankfully, the connected-ATM faction won. It seems such an obvious decision these days. Not so obvious. Disconnected-ATMs would have been a lot cheaper to deploy. Sure, an engineer would know they were insecure, but a manager would be the one making the decision...
      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    8. Re:Not quite the same as today's ATMs. by qzulla · · Score: 1

      And Monty Python never did a skit on this behind the scenes exchange?

      I am disappointed. It was great fodder.

      qz

  15. You still have service fees? by cliffski · · Score: 1

    This is the US right? in the UK they tried to introduce them and suffered a serious consumer revolt. I haven't seen one that charges fees for years. In fact, the first bit of text on the screen of almost all UK ATMS is "you will not be charged for this" such was the backlash.

    --
    DRM-free indie games for the PC and Mac: Positech Games
    1. Re:You still have service fees? by bestiarosa · · Score: 1

      Ah! Memories... One of the best things England had was being able to get your money from ATM's free of charge. Too bad once more in Italy we decided to follow the US example.

      --
      :(){ :|:& };:
    2. Re:You still have service fees? by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      I haven't seen one that charges fees for years.

      Try going to any motorway service station, or any ATM inside a convenience (corner) shop.

      And I agree with you, service fees on ATMs are disgusting. Banks make many billions/year, and their greed knows no bounds.

    3. Re:You still have service fees? by RMH101 · · Score: 2, Informative
      Up until about 5 years ago, some major UK banks charged people to use their cash machines if they weren't a customer of that bank. This, predicatably, ended up with those banks charging right back at the first banks customers. After a few rounds of this, it was decided that it made more sense, and would be more publically acceptable, for *no-one* to charge for their use.

      The ATMs that charge now tend to be owned by 3rd party companies, rather than the banks themselves - they put them in convenience stores, petrol stations, etc. These hook up to a phone line and work in a similar way to the Switch terminals in shops - instead of buying products, you're buying cash.

      Incidentally, the major company that operates these in the UK makes a tidy profit from doing so: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/4101075.stm...

    4. Re:You still have service fees? by johnw · · Score: 1

      Try going to any motorway service station, or any ATM inside a convenience (corner) shop. I had an odd experience on this front recently. I was driving a school minibus and the boys asked to stop to get some fast food. We stopped at a shopping area (not sure what else to call it) on the outskirts of Reading, and the boys rushed to use the cash machines before going for burgers. I stopped to read the notices on the 3 machines (which was more than the boys did). The middle machine of the three had a notice saying, "This machine will not charge", but the other two had much smaller notices saying that they did charge.

      I don't know whether it is a deliberate attempt to deceive punters. There was little about the machines to tell them apart, and it seems odd to have two which charge and one which doesn't. Who's going to choose the charging machines if fully informed about the situation?

      John
    5. Re:You still have service fees? by corbettw · · Score: 1

      I don't really see any problems with banks charging non-customers a nominal fee to use their ATM (it costs the bank money to service the ATM, normally that gets paid for by other account servicing fees, but if non-customers keep using it then the cost is borne solely by customers, which isn't fair to them). What pisses me off is when a bank charges its own customers a fee for using other banks' ATMs. This was one of the reasons I switched from Bank of America, who would charge me $2.50 for this, to Wachovia, who doesn't charge anything (and who reimburses me up to $6 per month in other bank's ATM fees).

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    6. Re:You still have service fees? by michrech · · Score: 1

      This is the US right? in the UK they tried to introduce them and suffered a serious consumer revolt. I haven't seen one that charges fees for years. In fact, the first bit of text on the screen of almost all UK ATMS is "you will not be charged for this" such was the backlash.

      I've used three banks in my years of having bank accounts.

      Wellsfargo, Bank of Kirksville, and USBank.

      Not one of the three charged for use of their ATM's. If I used the ATM of a bank I did not have an account at, there was usually a $1.25 charge by that bank, but I don't recall having been charged by my bank for doing so (though it's been a while -- I've been with USBank for some years now).

      --
      bork bork bork!
    7. Re:You still have service fees? by digitig · · Score: 1

      I understand that The UK banks have an agreement not to charge each other's customers, but there are lots of ATM's not owned by the banks and which do charge. Some of them are owned by companies owned by the banks, which is enough to get around the agreement and which leads to fairly clear-cut commercial decisions when installing ATMs away from bank premises. The ATMs in shops, pubs, motoway service stations, racetracks and so on nearly all charge -- at least, the newer ones do, the ones installed since the banks worked out this dodge to avoid the agreement.

      --
      Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
    8. Re:You still have service fees? by veganboyjosh · · Score: 1

      I picked up my mother once at the airport, and she had a bunch of luggage, so she wanted to rent a cart to carry it all. I stayed with the luggage, and she went to the machine to pay for the cart. Apparently, this machine had money accepter slots at both ends, but at one end--the end where the carts come out--the dispenser was "for donations only", and would take your money, but not loosen a cart in return. I can see tired travelers like my mom putting cash into a slot on a machine that would seem to be self explanatory without reading the (not-so) fine print.

    9. Re:You still have service fees? by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      One of the best things England had was being able to get your money from ATM's free of charge.

      I like your forensically accurate use of the past tense. I think just about all banks worldwide have now forgotten that it is YOUR money...

    10. Re:You still have service fees? by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      After a few rounds of this, it was decided that it made more sense, and would be more publically acceptable, for *no-one* to charge for their use.

      I wish their Australian counterparts had taken the lesson the same way.

      Instead, they all just take the fee. multiply it by a suitable factor, then slug the customer. They don't have to worry about how acceptable the practice is if no-one's going to call them on it.

      Like the so-called "clearing period" for direct transfers or cheques, when we all know the money has simply been acquired by the bank for its own purposes for that interval.

    11. Re:You still have service fees? by bestiarosa · · Score: 1

      I think just about all banks worldwide have now forgotten that it is YOUR money... Well, I intended it more as in, "when I lived there", but then you're right.
      --
      :(){ :|:& };:
    12. Re:You still have service fees? by Gidono · · Score: 1

      Most banks charge service fees for foreign terminals here in the US. There are some that even charge fees for their own cardholders to use their ATM's. Now most states have laws that international card holders cannot be surcharged here in the US. That is changing slowly to the point where all international card holders will be surcharged here in the US. All I can say is, stay away from casinos with their $10+ surcharges.

    13. Re:You still have service fees? by ssstraub · · Score: 1

      Wellsfargo charges $2 for each "out of network" ATM transaction. This is one of the reasons I will be leaving Wellsfargo soon.

    14. Re:You still have service fees? by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      And that major company is owned by the Royal Bank of Scotland (Natwest in England).

    15. Re:You still have service fees? by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      We don't generally have service fees for accounts in the UK. We do however get pretty poor interest rates on current accounts (checking accounts in US English).

      If you use a machine owned by another bank, your own bank pays them a small fee to cover the cost of the machine, so non-customers are not being subsidised by customers.

    16. Re:You still have service fees? by Kalriath · · Score: 1

      Ironic that here in New Zealand, YOUR Westpac and YOUR ASB (you know it as Commonwealth Bank of Australia) are the TWO banks that charge absolutely no fees whatsoever. No account maintenance fees, no POS card usage fee, no ATM fee, nothing.

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
    17. Re:You still have service fees? by TheDormouse · · Score: 1

      You wouldn't believe the number of banks and credit unions in the US that charge fees to walk up to a human teller and deposit *coins* into your account. Legal tender coins. Even if you roll them properly before you arrive.

      A friend of mine was closing his bank account a few years back because he was moving across the country where his bank didn't have any branches. He went to the bank several days early to let them know that he'd be withdrawing all his money (so that they could arrange to have the cash on hand). When he went to close the account, the teller told him he'd be charged a $20 fee for the certified check they would be giving him. He told them he's take cash instead of paying the fee. They claimed they didn't have adequate cash on hand and he'd have to take the check and pay the fee. He reminded them that he came in last week and told them to have the cash available. After several minutes, they finally handed him a certified check for his entire account balance and closed his account.

      It's incredible what fees the banks in this country get away with charging. What's more incredible is that most people put up with it.

    18. Re:You still have service fees? by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      and YOUR ASB (you know it as Commonwealth Bank of Australia) are the TWO banks that charge absolutely no fees whatsoever.

      Some people might be misled by this. The Commonwealth Bank of Australia is just as voracious as the rest of the banks in Australia, if not more so.

    19. Re:You still have service fees? by Kalriath · · Score: 1

      Ah yes, but they're terribly wonderful in New Zealand. Maybe we have more competition?

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
  16. Size by necro81 · · Score: 1

    And I can remember when ATMs took up whole rooms, and only had $1k of cash available! You really had to know your stuff to get anything out of them!

    1. Re:Size by wiredlogic · · Score: 1

      ... and you had to enter your PIN in octal.

      --
      I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
  17. Cute story... by rsmoody · · Score: 5, Funny

    My aunt and Mother were both working at a bank in Houston, TX that got the first ATM in the city (or so the story goes). One was inside the bank working on the internals of the ATM, and the other outside. As the wall was relatively thin, they could talk to each other and work on the problem. Well, after they got done, a customer arrived to use the new and fancy gadget. He began speaking to the ATM and telling it what amount of money he wanted. Always found that story to be funny.

    --
    45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
  18. demise of cash? by Orp · · Score: 2, Interesting

    FTA:

    "Money costs money to transport. I am therefore predicting the demise of cash within three to five years."

    Haven't we heard that before? Like, 20 years ago? Seems that cash is just as prevalent as it always was. I just got back from a vacation to the UK and loved the fact that I could use my debit card to withdraw cash without getting socked with a 3% 'foreign transaction fee' that comes with credit card purchases (rather, there was a $1.50 flat fee from my bank for every withdrawal - so for 200 UKP, or about $400 with today's exchange rate, that's about 0.37%). Along with the fact that *everyone* accepts cash, including that remote pub in Nowhere, Scotland, I don't see cash going away any time soon. Yay cash.

    --
    A squid eating dough in a polyethylene bag is fast and bulbous, got me?
    1. Re:demise of cash? by freedom_india · · Score: 1

      The market size of just pre-paid cards exceed 180 Billion dollars.

      Americans hold 2.6 Billion credit cards in their wallets.

      As of June 2007, more than 50.5% americans pay their bills by card.

      Websites like amazon accept only cards, not cash.

      And increasingly, even grocers who typically make sale of items less than $25 have begun to accept contactless cards as means of payment.

      Although none of these will replace cash ever, the incentive for totalitarian governments (like our Cheney-led US) to track even the last dollar will be huge.

      After all a cold greenback is untraceable (except maybe the funny RFID), while a card can be traced and you can then be branded as drug smuggler for buying "hash" in Sweden, even though in Sweden Hash means a type of food, just like Spam refers to meat.

      --
      "Doing what i can, with what i have." ~ Burt Gummer
    2. Re:demise of cash? by Rip!ey · · Score: 1

      I don't see cash going away any time soon.

      Give it time and it will. Governments lose a lot of potential tax money to the cash economy.

    3. Re:demise of cash? by elrous0 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I can tell you that cash (here is the U.S. at least) is no longer anywhere near as ubiquitous as it once was. I rarely even carry the stuff anymore (it's basically only useful for toll booths and vending machines). Even fast food restaurants take debit/credit cards now. I go for months at a time without even going to the bank or a teller machine.

      It would have been very hard to live without cash twenty years ago, or even ten. Now it's a given.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    4. Re:demise of cash? by Prof.Phreak · · Score: 1

      I think the problem is that everyone is trying to cash in on non-cash alternatives.

      Imagine if all fees went away, for both seller/buyer. Imagine there was a small little latch on your credit card that would allow payment, but would signal `anonymous' transaction (ie: it would show up as "CASH" in all statements, on both ends---and all other identifying records of it would be erased [by law] after 3 day clearing period).

      Banks could still make money just by the fact of not having to deal with cash and armored cars.

      --

      "If anything can go wrong, it will." - Murphy

    5. Re:demise of cash? by Mix+Master+Nixon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As long as there's a war on drugs, cash isn't going anywhere.

      --
      Oppressing an entire population is never cheap.
      --Jeckler (/. Beta IS GARBAGE!)
    6. Re:demise of cash? by FormOfActionBanana · · Score: 1

      We have hash in the US... it's potatos, meat and onions cooked together on a flat surface.

      I think it's wonderful, but some people serve it to their children for supper as a punishment!

      --
      Take off every 'sig' !!
    7. Re:demise of cash? by michrech · · Score: 1

      Americans hold 2.6 Billion credit cards in their wallets.

      That's a BIG wallet!

      --
      bork bork bork!
    8. Re:demise of cash? by Gospodin · · Score: 2, Funny

      ...just like Spam refers to "meat."

      Fixed that for you.

      --
      ...following the principles of Heisenburger's Uncertain Cat...
    9. Re:demise of cash? by nogginthenog · · Score: 1

      What always amazes me is the fact that cheques (er, checks) are still so common in the US. I haven't had a cheque book here in the UK for years.

    10. Re:demise of cash? by jb.hl.com · · Score: 1

      Funny enough, I lost my debit card the other day, and while Lloyds were farting about sending a new one out, my pay came in. On a Sunday (for Merkins, dunno if it's different in the USA but in the UK a huge number of people get paid by direct bank credit. Quite why the credit went through on Sunday I have no idea, but still.) And I needed to do some shopping, and I couldn't go to an ATM (for obvious reasons) and I couldn't go to the bank or the post office to withdraw cash. So I had to use cheques, which in the event were a lifesaver.

      Cheques are actually fairly common at the supermarket where I work (save your jokes), we get a fair few of them for...whatever reason. Presumably, a lot of people don't like debit cards, or just want to take advantage of float time. Or maybe want a paper record of their outgoings. I don't know. But they're a handy backup.

      --
      By summer it was all gone...now shesmovedon. --
    11. Re:demise of cash? by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and I always seem to end up in line behind four old ladies who still use checks, and write very slowly, and are even slower at finding their ID in their purse, and then argue with the cashier about their coupons...

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    12. Re:demise of cash? by jb.hl.com · · Score: 1

      In the UK, we can automatically print cheques so the payee only has to sign, and use cheque guarantee cards (i.e debit cards) to speed things up. So doing cheques here doesn't take that long, probably takes about 20-30 seconds. Considering most old ladies, as a rule, are a bit quicker at signing than they are pushing numbers on a keypad, this is a good thing.

      --
      By summer it was all gone...now shesmovedon. --
    13. Re:demise of cash? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1
      One thing that really helps in the USA is the relaxed rules for small transactions. Here in the UK, every credit or debit card purchase has to be verified by PIN. Sometimes this is quick, but sometimes the machine can take a while to respond, making cash a lot faster. For small transactions in (some parts of) the USA[1], they just swipe the card and hand it back, making it a lot faster than having to make change for a cash purchase.


      [1] This has only happened to me in Utah, but apparently it happens in some other places too.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  19. who invented the BSOD .. by rs232 · · Score: 1
    --
    davecb5620@gmail.com
    1. Re:who invented the BSOD .. by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      It seems kind of funny for an ATM to display any kind of error message such as BSOD. You'd think they could program the thing to reboot itself when it encountered such an error. Maybe even just display a nice "this machine is not in service" message. I find it really odd that they would have an ATM display the BSOD, or in the case of that last picture, what looks like a memory dump.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    2. Re:who invented the BSOD .. by WMD_88 · · Score: 1
      ATMs used to run OS/2 most of the time. Those were the days...I remember after Hurricane Wilma, an ATM down the street came back up before my block did, but it was displaying an error message: http://dognoodle99.cjb.net/bsod/atm.jpg
      The pic came out blurry, but the text was:

      Windows cannot start because the following file is missing or corrupted:
      c:\windows\system32\hal.dll
      Please re-install a vaild copy of this file.

      No idea why a power outage would cause hal.dll to disappear, but then again...Windows for ATMs?
  20. Now wait a minute by Deadstick · · Score: 4, Funny

    If you visit the island fortress/abbey of Mont Saint-Michel off the coast of France, one of the first things you see inside the gate is a stone wall built circa 1000 CE with an ATM set into it. So they've obviously been around since William the Conqueror...;-)

    rj

  21. First ATM I used was 50% chance by mckyj57 · · Score: 1

    The first ATM I used was with Rainier Bank in 1978 in Bremerton, WA. It was so unreliable that I had to have a backup plan if I really needed money -- it was no better than a 50/50 shot of getting cash.

    There was only the one machine, of course, and that was long before they were networked so that you could go to another bank's machine. So if you got lucky late at night, you could get the green stuff. Otherwise, it was borrow from a friend.

    I also seem to recall a little plastic cash holder that the money came in. That seems ridiculous nowadays, of course, but still that is what sticks in my mind.

    1. Re:First ATM I used was 50% chance by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      Ah...the good old days...

      Way back in my youth, the local bank got one of the first ATM machines. Dear ol' D2N2.

      The ATM had no idea how much money I had in my bank account--I was either allowed to take money out or not. So I learned pretty quickly that if I was a bit short of funds around the end of the month, I could go to the ATM and withdraw, say, $200 and it would let me. Of course, my account would be overdrawn, I'd pay a $10 penalty, and my ATM card would stop working. When my paycheck came in, I'd deposit it into the account along with whatever excess cash I had left.

      So if finances were tight, I knew where I could get a couple hundred dollars. Very handy.

      One day, though, I went to the ATM. It grabbed my card and told me to see the people inside the bank. They told me they wouldn't give me my card back unless I stopped doing that. So I agreed not to and they gave me my ATM card back and I was a good boy and didn't do it again.

  22. robot by slothman32 · · Score: 1

    I read years ago, I think in scholostic or something, that they called them "bank robots".
    I never found much of that phrase around though.
    Anyone else hear that?

    --
    Why don't you guys have friends or journals?
    1. Re:robot by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 1

      Around here some people used to call them a "titless teller". That's the only slang term I can recall hearing, though.

      --
      If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
  23. Maybe. by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

    the first people just called it a cash machine.

    When I first came across these devices (~1970), I immediately started calling them "Fraudpoints".

    I think I was ahead of my time... :-P

  24. Question: Patented by...? by zenwarrior · · Score: 2, Interesting
    So, who owns what might be considered the primary/essential/basic/etc. patent(s) for ATMs? NCR?

    I ask b/c I once worked with an inventor who showed me blueprints and a bona fide patent for what he considered to be (one of?) the first ATM(s).

    --
    /.'s Psychic-in-Residence: Psychic to the Geeks
  25. it was all a dream by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

    ATM! ATM! There's no place like home, there's no place like home...

    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  26. I got a hamburger from the 1st ATM I used by BBandCMKRNL · · Score: 2, Funny

    The Wendy's Hanburger chain was just opening in town and they had a promotion with the bank I used. Use the ATM and bring in your receipt for a free hamburger. I started transferring $1 from my checking to my savings and back just to get a free burger. Then I discovered that these ATMs used a pressure feed printer rather than a sproket feed one and that if I pulled quickly enough on the receipt as it was being printed, I could get several receipts at once.

    I ate WAY too many burgers during that promo.

    --
    Without the 2nd Amendment, the others are just suggestions.
  27. Over-romanticized by sacrilicious · · Score: 1
    Inspiration had struck Mr Shepherd-Barron, now 82, while he was in the bath. ... " It struck me there must be a way I could get my own money, anywhere in the world or the UK. I hit upon the idea of a chocolate bar dispenser, but replacing chocolate with cash.""

    The subtext to the above seems to be that this "invention" was some kind of genius. I disagree; this is an obvious and straightforward usage of technology that would have been "invented" by a hundred other people within the span of a few years had not someone else first done it.

    And the detail about replacing chocolate bars with cash just rings of the same mindset that has lead to so many patents of similarly obvious things, like "selling goods and services... OVER THE INTERNET! The idea came to me when I realized in a flash of inspiration that people could use the internet to communicate their desired purchases." What'll they think of next, phones that have a built-in organizer?? What an age we live in...

    --
    - First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then ???, then profit.
    1. Re:Over-romanticized by westlake · · Score: 1
      The subtext to the above seems to be that this "invention" was some kind of genius. I disagree; this is an obvious and straightforward usage of technology that would have been "invented" by a hundred other people within the span of a few years had not someone else first done it.

      The ATM like most inventions is both a social and a technical problem. It has to be understood and trusted by the customer, it has to be understood and trusted by the bank.

      The solution to the problem is not a trivial achievement.

    2. Re:Over-romanticized by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a typical Slashdot patent knowitall using ex post facto analysis and hindsight. Oh I could have thought of that.

      There is a significant technical problem to overcome in going from dispensing chocolate to money. In the chocolate machine, there is no requirement for security or ID validation, it just pushes out chocolate to whoever pays. A cash machine must validate the user first, hence the PIN and linking into account records. No-one had done that before. Arguably the guy had more to do with developing the PIN than the ATM.

    3. Re:Over-romanticized by sacrilicious · · Score: 1
      The ATM like most inventions is both a social and a technical problem. It has to be understood and trusted by the customer, it has to be understood and trusted by the bank. The solution to the problem is not a trivial achievement.

      Ok, but I'd think that that solution/achievement was realized with the involvement of many people, and by their orchestrating what amounts to a PR and marketing campaign. The technology involved was trivial, consisting of fundamentally minor modifications to existing appliances, and dwarfed in complexity by many other already-common things like the automobile. Yet the way it's framed here (the aha moment in the bath) invites the reader to suppose that the mere idea to do it was something great. I think that too many people worship themselves and others on the supposition that various ideas could only have come to those who were first on record to utter them, whereas in fact they simply happened to be the earliest to do all of (a) realizing something was needed, or hearing someone else realize something was needed (b) communicating that idea to the right people with the right funding and manufacturing capability and (c) happening to have the outcome be that the thing caught on. It's one thing to appreciate progress, but there's too much hero-worship and narcissism in the world that isn't warranted.

      --
      - First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then ???, then profit.
    4. Re:Over-romanticized by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      This is a typical Slashdot patent knowitall using ex post facto analysis and hindsight. Oh I could have thought of that.

      The above is the mindset of a typical USPTO employee. It hadn't been done before, therefore it never would have been done but for this oh-so-special person.

    5. Re:Over-romanticized by qzulla · · Score: 1
      This person obviously does not understand the Internet DID NOT EXIST FOR THE REGULAR people in those days.

      In those day it was dial-up BBS stuff. Google Tandem and banks. All dial-up ATMs in those days.

      The subtext to the above seems to be that this "invention" was some kind of genius. I disagree; this is an obvious and straightforward usage of technology that would have been "invented" by a hundred other people within the span of a few years had not someone else first done it.

      But it he did it. What have YOU invented today?

      And the detail about replacing chocolate bars with cash just rings of the same mindset that has lead to so many patents of similarly obvious things, like "selling goods and services... OVER THE INTERNET! The idea came to me when I realized in a flash of inspiration that people could use the internet to communicate their desired purchases." What'll they think of next, phones that have a built-in organizer?? Search the page. Where is Internet found? The ads. It is not in the article.

      What an age we live in...

      Yes, what an age we live where no one knows their history and no one knows their facts and no knows what *might* have been innovative when the intartubes was only in the hands of the govt.

      Where one knows only they are right because they don't know history.

      BZZT! You lose.

      qz

    6. Re:Over-romanticized by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      This person obviously does not understand the Internet DID NOT EXIST FOR THE REGULAR people in those days. In those day it was dial-up BBS stuff. Google Tandem and banks. All dial-up ATMs in those days.

      Great story, now tell us about how you had to use punch-cards, gramps. And the reason these super duper ATMs couldn't use phone lines was... was what?

  28. Yah, more fees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Frankly I'm happy with ATMs. They have been a cost driver for all of the banking industry, pushing up fees, enabling mass layoffs of once professional jobs. Now banking is as comfortable as going to McDonalds -- and leaves that same taste in your mouth. Technology is great.

  29. it's me by EspressoFreak · · Score: 1

    Whenever I'm in a game of DOTA, people would always call me an ATM.

    but i'm actually turning 46 in august.

  30. Good reason not to cite Wikipedia as your source! by williamhb · · Score: 5, Informative

    From Wikipedia: A mechanical cash dispenser was developed and built by Luther George Simjian and installed 1939 in New York City by the City Bank of New York, but removed after 6 months due to the lack of customer acceptance

    A good example of why not to cite Wikipedia as your source -- I followed your link when I read your comment (1830BST 25June2007), and there was no sign of Simjian or the Bank of New York on the page. But the page did list the invention by John Shepherd-Barron, which is the one you are disputing! I suspect many other readers had a similar experience. So either you were making mischief, in which case you've been found out, or it's changed since you cited in, in which case that'll teach you not to cite a publically editable source!

  31. The Japanese, of course, perfected it. by ashitaka · · Score: 1

    The ATMS (or ABMs) in North America at least are painfully limited compared the the ATMS in Japan.

    Back in the early 90's even I was able to:

    - Deposit and withdraw any amount down to units of 10 yen. Obviously coins as well as bills.
    - Carry out electronic transfers to any payee at any other bank. (Transferred the down payment on my car to the Toyota dealership this way)
    - Update bank books. (Common now, but it took until 5 years ago for my local ATMs to be able to do this.

    The downside was the ATMs closed at 5:00pm, Just 2 hours after the banks closed at 3:00pm. It was quite the event when CITIbank opened the first 24-hour ATM in Tokyo.

    --
    If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
    1. Re:The Japanese, of course, perfected it. by Ant+P. · · Score: 1

      I never did understand why getting a book updated required going into the bank here. All the teller seems to be doing is sticking it in a slot-loading printer like a card. Even then they don't always get it right (mine's got a page missing where they tried to print it as a different book format).

    2. Re:The Japanese, of course, perfected it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've spent a few months in Japan and have never seen an ATM that gives out coins. Given that a 1000 yen note isn't a lot of money and will work in a vending machine I don't know why you'd want that either, so perhaps they've got rid of all the old ones that do that now. Lots of ATMs do still close, which is still a royal pain.

    3. Re:The Japanese, of course, perfected it. by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1
      I was amazed to go into a 'bank' in Japan, and find that it didn't employ any humans, just a neat place to queue where you could then talk to a machine. Apparently they have similar machines in South Africa.

      I think they've largely missed the boat here though. I go to a cash machine when I need cash. Any other bank service I need, I use the Internet, which is in my house and therefore more convenient than going to a bank. Here in the UK, cash machines are starting to let you top up mobile phones in an attempt to justify their continued existence. If credit card companies waived the authentication requirement for small transactions (and cut fees to those comparable to debit cards[1]) then I don't think I'd have much use for cash at all.


      [1] Credit cards tend to charge a flat fee, while debit cards charge a percentage. This makes debit cards better for small transactions and credit cards better for large ones (from the merchant's perspective). If someone offered a credit card that let you pay for things under £5 without huge fees then they could scoop up a lot of the transactions that merchants insist on cash for.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  32. Re:Good reason not to cite Wikipedia as your sourc by EveryNickIsTaken · · Score: 1

    which case that'll teach you not to cite a publically editable source! Or, I can choose to not care. I merely pointed out that *technically* the ATM is older than 40 years. You guys can quabble all you want about the US vs. UK argument, but it matters not to me.
  33. Re:Good reason not to cite Wikipedia as your sourc by GetSource · · Score: 1
    I did find the precise information on Wikipedia when I went, and there was a link to the following page at MIT:
    http://web.mit.edu/invent/iow/simjian.html

    When Simjian initially came up with the idea of creating a hole-in-the-wall machine that would allow customers to make financial transactions, the idea was met with a great deal of skepticism. Starting in 1939, Simjian registered 20 patents related to the device and persuaded what is now Citicorp to give it a trial. After six months, the bank reported that there was little demand.
  34. Re:Good reason not to cite Wikipedia as your sourc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Simjian was Turkish, not American and not British. Read the very article to which you linked (http://web.mit.edu/invent/iow/simjian.html)

  35. More accurately by Flying+pig · · Score: 1
    A man is only as old as the woman he feels makes him feel.

    Some (many) /.ers have yet to discover this, but the quest is worthwhile.

    --
    Pining for the fjords
  36. Re:Good reason not to cite Wikipedia as your sourc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's your point? Who said he was American or British? His version of the ATM was first tried in America, but I don't see where anyone claimed it was invented by an American.

  37. To confuse archaeologists? by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1

    Although why you'd want to eat your cheques is beyond me

    Well, if they contain excess carbon-14 (all paper contains some!) then one reason would be to utterly confuse future archaeologists when they dig up your remains and attempt to carbon date them :-)

    1. Re:To confuse archaeologists? by StarkRG · · Score: 1

      According to carbon dating this guy died next year...

  38. 40 bytes ? by stud9920 · · Score: 1

    I guess it's not more foolish than 56 bytess...

    1. Re:40 bytes ? by stud9920 · · Score: 1

      I guess it's not more foolish than 56 bytes...
      oops, meant 53 bytes...
  39. ATM for teh Lunix fanz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hear ATM is really popular with CowboyKneel and whatever Slashdot Lunix fanboi he is banging this week.

  40. Fees in Australia by Chris+Pimlott · · Score: 1

    ATM owners don't charge users fees here in Australia, but nearly every bank will charge you $1.50 for using another bank's ATM to access your account.

  41. Still true in late 80s early 90s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Back in the late 80s/early 90s this was a well-known scam for Aussie & Kiwi backpackers in the UK. Because the cash machines never synched, people would, on the night before they left the UK for good, run around to every ATM they could find, load up on cash, and catch the next flight out. Nice way to finance a year's backpacking home to the Antipodes.