Slashdot Mirror


MS Seeks Patent On Virtual Fuzzy Dice

theodp writes "Microsoft just published a patent application for an adaptive heads-up user interface for automobiles. It covers, among other things, virtual fuzzy dice that appear to move with automobile movements."

173 comments

  1. Air freshener by mattb112885 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Did they patent a virtual air freshener too? Because I really need one.

    1. Re:Air freshener by jo42 · · Score: 1

      Be happy no one has patented The Wet Fart(c)(tm)...

    2. Re:Air freshener by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      something definitely smells fishy about this...

    3. Re:Air freshener by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      You want to look like you smell like an artificial tree?

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

  2. Obviousness Criteria by ThosLives · · Score: 4, Informative

    Hopefully this will fail the new obviousness criteria; note that it is still just an application. Basically, they are combining existing technologies in their obvious functionality: methods to change configuration information and display various information to vehicle operators.

    I don't see any innovation here at all; they are combining elements and the result is the expected result for combining those elements.

    --
    "There are a dozen opinions on a matter until you know the truth. Then there is only one." - CS Lewis (paraprhase)
    1. Re:Obviousness Criteria by PinkyDead · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This sucks:

      GM/Ford/BMW (or whoever) patents putting information on the windscreen -- Hmmm useful.

      Microsoft [attempts to] patents putting more information on the windscreen -- WTF?!

      Wasting the patent office's time should be a crime. I wonder could patent a bigger wheel - I'd make a fortune.

      --
      Genesis 1:32 And God typed :wq!
    2. Re:Obviousness Criteria by GIL_Dude · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm not sure it would even be that useful if GM/Ford/BWM or whoever did it. It would probably be ad-supported anyway. Can you just imagine?

      Hey, driver - you need new wiper blades. Check out the specials at Pep Boys (tm)! While there, get an oil change!

      I just hope that never comes true!

    3. Re:Obviousness Criteria by conspirator57 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      My dell here does that for me. It's let me know for the past 6 months that my battery "is still working, but nearing the end of its useful life." The same notice provides a handy "come on down to the web dealership..." notice and link to dell's shop. It does this each time the laptop starts. Oh, and the laptop is one year old, so it was six months old when it started this crap.

      --
      "If still these truths be held to be
      Self evident."
      -Edna St. Vincent Millay
    4. Re:Obviousness Criteria by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Elite Plus for RiscOS had a set of virtual fuzzy dice. They were quite useful, since they gave a good indicator of your current roll speed, without having to look down at the roll indicator. I wonder if they would count as prior art for this. The only difference is that the input for a real car comes from a sensor, rather than a simulated environment.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    5. Re:Obviousness Criteria by COMON$ · · Score: 1
      I don't see any innovation here at all;

      Oh come on this is Microsoft we are talking about, we dont expect innovation. MS hasnt been all that innovative since win 95 and maybe NT.

      Even there it had been done before. But to ward off the flame modders I have to put this stipulation in. What MS is really good at is taking existing proven technologies and putting them into an attractive package. I am a mostly M$ shop with about 1/5 being Mac and some linux servers splashed around here and there. If you want innovation you are looking at the wrong company, innovation comes from companies like Nintendo, Apple, Sony, Toshiba and the like who get burned here and there but keep the industry moving forward due to taking risks.

      Personally I think MS has the opportunity to combine a lot of tech they control in this patent and make a pretty damn good product. Although I would expect someone like Magellan to come out with a much more innovative product.

      --
      CS: It is all sink or swim...oh and did I mention there are sharks in that water?
    6. Re:Obviousness Criteria by sqldr · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hopefully this will fail the new obviousness criteria

      I, on the other hand, hope that all of microsoft's other patents fail, and this is the only one they're left with in their entire portfolio. Fluffy dice.

      --
      I wrote my first program at the age of six, and I still can't work out how this website works.
    7. Re:Obviousness Criteria by djh101010 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Oh, and the laptop is one year old, so it was six months old when it started this crap.

      Seems to me, that'd be a great time to call Dell for a warranty replacement of the battery. Make their advertising scheme cost them. "Your app tells me that my battery, which is only 6 months old, is already crap. Send me a new one."
    8. Re:Obviousness Criteria by Repossessed · · Score: 1

      Dell will in fact send you a battery in this condition. Call *before* a year is up please. I'm sick of getting calls from people whose batteries died within warranty waiting 6 months and then trying to get a free one. (And quite literally the day after the one year is up, they won't do a thing for you except make sure you're AC adapter is working right, those go bad nearly as often as the batteries)

      --
      Liberte, Egalite, Fraternite (TM)
    9. Re:Obviousness Criteria by conspirator57 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      except the battery is fine. There's just some damn bit stuck somewhere that it's reading and setting off this ad/nag ware. My beef, and the GGP's beef is with the ad/nagware. I don't want it there, and I can't find a control panel item or other overt way to disable it, though it hasn't gotten annoying enough to send me registry hacking yet.

      --
      "If still these truths be held to be
      Self evident."
      -Edna St. Vincent Millay
    10. Re:Obviousness Criteria by gigne · · Score: 1

      It should be an easy fix. Start->Run msconfig Click "Startup items" tab and then remove the offending crapware. Either that or use the PC decrapifier

      --
      Signature v3.0, now with 42% less memory usage.
    11. Re:Obviousness Criteria by Paul+server+guy · · Score: 1
      And prior art, I have been working on this very thing, (And it publicly known.) for some ten years now, and have produced several working prototypes, (With out the whiz bang techie gear) and included some tech that they didn't. (Like FLIR, But I ripped that of Cadillac.)

      This is becoming my biggest bitch about patents, it is way to easy for the big companies to throw crap on the wall, and because their Microsoft, it will probably stick, and I would have to sue against their gigabuck lawyers to defend it. That or loose all of the work I have put into this. The concept certainly seemed too obvious for me to patent, I mean, of course, Adaptive displays have been for a very long time, so because you put it a car for the same reason they are on other displays in a car, it is now patentable? I didn't think so. But then again, I don't have the gigabuck lawyers to crank these out like crack...

      It has gotten to the point that you can just claim anything and sooner or later something will get bitten, and some poor inventor gets screwed again... It's happened to me more times than I can count.

      --
      Your Moon, Your Mission, Get involved! http://www.openluna.org
    12. Re:Obviousness Criteria by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      Oh come on this is Microsoft we are talking about, we dont expect innovation. MS hasnt been all that innovative since win 95 and maybe NT.
      What exactly was innovative about Win95 and NT?
      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    13. Re:Obviousness Criteria by Frenchy_2001 · · Score: 1

      It's not obvious, It's done with a computer!
      It's kinda the magic sentence to get your patent approved these days...

    14. Re:Obviousness Criteria by dknj · · Score: 1

      So did this 1993 32-bit arcade game, Gale Racer

    15. Re:Obviousness Criteria by COMON$ · · Score: 1
      the proof that you could make a 8 year old sit for 4 hours with 3.5 diskettes in hand just to see a pretty blue screen :) Sure xerox did it first but I didn't spend hours with corrupt diskettes trying to install their OS.

      But notice my follow up statement Even there it had been done before. The just took something interesting and made it appealing to the masses.

      --
      CS: It is all sink or swim...oh and did I mention there are sharks in that water?
    16. Re:Obviousness Criteria by COMON$ · · Score: 1

      but of course I was quite a bit older than 8, and my ADD was in full force by the time of win95 so the innovation of the concept to make people go through extraordinary lengths to get something they don't need or really want was impressive.

      --
      CS: It is all sink or swim...oh and did I mention there are sharks in that water?
    17. Re:Obviousness Criteria by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      Windows 95's GUI was a busted ripoff of the OS/2 2.x GUI. It ran Windows 3.1 apps more poorly and with less stability than OS/2 2.1. Microsoft's true revolution with Chicago/Windows 95 was in having all those friendly publications out there publishing artists renderings a year or more before anything resembling the final product appeared, touting vaporware and somehow convincing consumers to stick around with Windows 3.1 in the meantime.

      They didn't start getting it right until Windows 98SE, four years after the release of Windows 95. One gets a sense that Microsoft's development and marketing model is nothing more than "Get this shit out, and we'll worry about making it work later." Windows Vista seems a confirmation of this approach to software.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    18. Re:Obviousness Criteria by ksd1337 · · Score: 1

      Well, at least it wasn't a Sony battery.

    19. Re:Obviousness Criteria by gigne · · Score: 1

      I know the feeling. Sued twice and counting. You try and do something to make a few £ to supplement your income, and before you know it you have a slick lawyer knocking on the door. Someone should start a club for inventors that have had their fingers burned.

      --
      Signature v3.0, now with 42% less memory usage.
    20. Re:Obviousness Criteria by djh101010 · · Score: 1

      except the battery is fine. There's just some damn bit stuck somewhere that it's reading and setting off this ad/nag ware. My beef, and the GGP's beef is with the ad/nagware. I don't want it there, and I can't find a control panel item or other overt way to disable it, though it hasn't gotten annoying enough to send me registry hacking yet.
      Ah, you may have missed my point. I'm not defending the nagware, or saying the battery is crap, I'm saying that if their nagware is going to claim that the battery is crap, then they should have to pay (literally) for making the bad decision to inflict said crapware on their customers. Besides, free battery? You kidding? Why not.

      (and I say this as a minor shareholder in Dell)
    21. Re:Obviousness Criteria by Phroggy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Then they can either send you a new battery any, or tell you how to fix it. Or both (if they send you a new battery and that doesn't solve the problem, then they can tell you how to fix it).

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    22. Re:Obviousness Criteria by DaleCooper82 · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily. It could be used to project data from installed GPS/navigation there. I'd like that... D

      --
      :: There is no light at the end of a tunnel. There is a tunnel after a tunnel : Thom Y. ::
    23. Re:Obviousness Criteria by Bob+Ince · · Score: 1

      [quote]They were quite useful[/quote]

      I LOL you.

      As the author of those fluffy dice, I can tell you there was no intention of be (a) in any way useful or (b) anything I thought Microsoft would ever want to copy, let alone patent...

    24. Re:Obviousness Criteria by fireylord · · Score: 0

      yes, the ubuntu install cd would clear that up for you nicely ;)

  3. I'll say! by ClayJar · · Score: 5, Funny

    Did they patent a virtual air freshener too? Because I really need one. I'll say. I can virtually smell you from here. :D
    1. Re:I'll say! by DirtyFly · · Score: 0, Troll
      hummm smell

      'The smell, you know that gasoline smell, the whole hill. Smelled like... BULLSHIT. Someday this war's gonna end...'

      Jorge

  4. I have some... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I have some fuzzy dangling things that they can try and patent.

    1. Re:I have some... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      You can't patent man-breasts.

    2. Re:I have some... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      Yes, I suspect Mr. Ballmer has already claimed that particular goldmine.

    3. Re:I have some... by CrtxReavr · · Score: 5, Funny

      If you'd wipe better, you wouldn't have so much prior art.

      -CR

      --
      "So is the BSD licence even more 'free' (than GPLv2)? Yes. Unquestionably." --Linus Torvalds (TinyURL.com/2vugzl)
  5. Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Just what we need from a heads-up display: something which conveys no useful information and serves only to distract the driver from their main job of keeping the car on the road. This strikes me as a perfect example of the rule that, simply because you can do something, doesn't mean you should.

    1. Re:Great by somersault · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Simply because you can do something, doesn't mean you should."

      I thought that was one of Microsofts' main beliefs.. simply because they can put out (largely) pointless new versions of Office and Windows, they do. They also charge insane amounts for little extra functionality, just because they can. At least people are catching on a bit with Vista.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    2. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just what we need hanging from the rear-view mirror: something which conveys no useful information and serves only to distract the driver from their main job of keeping the car on the road. This strikes me as a perfect example of the rule that, simply because you can do something, doesn't mean you should.

      Just what we need sitting on the dash: something which conveys no useful information and serves only to distract the driver from their main job of keeping the car on the road. This strikes me as a perfect example of the rule that, simply because you can do something, doesn't mean you should.

    3. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes.. except now when the Chinese government's mercenary botherders assume control of your vehicle and crash it into their high-profile targets, you'll be the one in Guantanamo.

    4. Re:Great by Kazymyr · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I, for one, welcome our massive spam sending car-botnet overlord.

      --
      I hadn't known there were so many idiots in the world until I started using the Internet -Stanislaw Lem
    5. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So should radios and CD/MP3 players be eliminated from vehicles too?

    6. Re:Great by scatters · · Score: 1

      I'm sure many pilots would disagree with you about the usefulness of HUDs. The idea is that you can see critical information (speed, remaining fuel, etc) without having to look down at the instrument cluster, which requires that you take your eyes of the road momentarily and refocus your eyes.

      I'd be totally in favor of a well designed HUD, but I'm not sure that Microsoft is the right company to provide it (Vista anyone?), and it should /never/ have unnecessary 'features' such as swinging dice...

      --
      A One that isn't cold, is scarcely a One at all.
    7. Re:Great by mulvane · · Score: 1

      Some people just don't see the usefulness of a visual horizon monitor. I must say, driving a Yukon (3 kids, a wife, and living in the country its not just for fashion), being the slightly top heavy vehicle it is, I watch my drinks and the tassel I have hanging from my rear view mirror. It gives me a good idea of how much more I can give it before I become to top heavy and roll.

    8. Re:Great by slashname3 · · Score: 2, Funny

      The other issue is that we finally get to experience the punch line to that old joke, stopping the car every 100 miles to reboot it.

      And just think of all the accidents when the blue screen of death obscures the entire windshield...

    9. Re:Great by Locutus · · Score: 2, Funny

      Didn't you know that they had promoted the designer of Microsoft BOB to the auto research department?

      LoB

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
    10. Re:Great by Max+Littlemore · · Score: 1

      It reminds me of some new car stereos I looked at.

      When I went to the shop there were two of interest. One of them, $150.00 au, has excellent amps, plays mp3 and wma, cd, radio and has an auxillary input on the face plate. It also has a really cheap looking old fashioned blocky LCD display. The other has all the same features, except for lower quality amps but a photo realistic full colour display with animations depicting not only a vu meter, but also groovy little "this is the source you have selected" things. $900.00 au.

      Hmmm, car stereo - do I want a basic unit that sounds excellent but looks a bit basic, or do I want to spend the extra $750.00 on a unit that sounds crap but will ensure that I cause at least one fatality if I ever actually take the time to appreciate it while driving.

      Fuck it, I thought, get the fancy display for my car. All the extra car accidents will boost the economy through smash repairers, lawyers, medical practitioners and funeral homes. It's our civic duty to buy this kind of useless shit.

      --
      I don't therefore I'm not.
  6. What will they patent next... by downix · · Score: 3, Funny

    I can't wait till the virtual dancing hula girl arrives.... She could probably even dance to show you the direction to turn when plugged into your GPS.

    --
    Karma Whoring for Fun and Profit.
    1. Re:What will they patent next... by Andrewkov · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You should patent that before someone from Microsoft reads your post!

    2. Re:What will they patent next... by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 2, Funny

      Virtual bobbing chihuahua head. It detects when someone is tailgating and then, while bobbing up and down, it flips the driver the bird.

    3. Re:What will they patent next... by Locutus · · Score: 1

      I've already( just ) filed the patent for the virtual bouncing doggie head. I called she Rover.

      I've also just filed the patent on the virtual bouncing girlfriend head. Well, virtual back of head and there's support for theming too. ;-)

      LoB

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
    4. Re:What will they patent next... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Me, I am waiting for the Minesweeper game. The bombs should be the other cars and you must drive your car by navigating it without clicking the bombs (driving into the other cars). If MS hasn't patented this concept, I call dibs on this one.

    5. Re:What will they patent next... by insertwackynamehere · · Score: 1

      insightful? the mods must be on crack today

  7. Mandatory... by Enleth · · Score: 1

    And what if Microsoft made cars? Soon we will see...

    --
    This is Slashdot. Common sense is futile. You will be modded down.
    1. Re:Mandatory... by UbuntuDupe · · Score: 1

      Equally mandatory: If Linux made cars.

      (Actually, freely-downloadable car assembly instruction sets, but same concept.)

  8. queue microsoft crash jokes by 192939495969798999 · · Score: 0, Troll

    And all the microsoft-crashes-your-car jokes start in 3...2...1...

    I'll throw in one: Does the blue screen block my view of the road for when the dice program crashes?

    --
    stuff |
    1. Re:queue microsoft crash jokes by mwvdlee · · Score: 5, Funny

      Will there be a GPS-based clippy that gives directions to places you don't want to go?

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    2. Re:queue microsoft crash jokes by somersault · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah - you can't use your brakes until you answer his questions.

      The questions use Microsoft's excellect speech recognition technology :) ( http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-112322121 7782777472 )

      --
      which is totally what she said
    3. Re:queue microsoft crash jokes by Kazymyr · · Score: 2, Funny

      Gives a new meaning to "Where do you want to go today?"

      --
      I hadn't known there were so many idiots in the world until I started using the Internet -Stanislaw Lem
    4. Re:queue microsoft crash jokes by Andrewkov · · Score: 3, Funny

      "You appear to be in an accident, air bags are about to deploy. Cancel or Allow?"

    5. Re:queue microsoft crash jokes by somersault · · Score: 2, Funny

      Heh.
      "You appear to be crying out in pain, do you wish help writing a complaint to the manufacturer?"

      "You appear not a DMV certified driver, HUD functions will be limited to wanted stars and health levels"

      --
      which is totally what she said
    6. Re:queue microsoft crash jokes by alx5000 · · Score: 1

      - Allow, dammit, allow!!
      - 'Let's set so double the killer delete select all' doesn't seem to be a valid answer. You appear to be in an accident, air bags are about to deploy. Cancel or Allow?

      --
      My 0.02 cents
    7. Re:queue microsoft crash jokes by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      Has anyone come out with a meaningful, reliable statistic as to how much of a "replacement" this is? Sounds like your spewing some pro-MS FUD. So how much does Redmond pay for lackeys to pound on Linux and praise their products on Slashdot these days? Aren't you frightened that someday you're going to wake up and not see your reflection in the mirror anymore?

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    8. Re:queue microsoft crash jokes by Lodragandraoidh · · Score: 1

      Gives 'Blue Screen of Death' a new meaning...

      --

      Lodragan Draoidh
      The more you explain it, the more I don't understand it. - Mark Twain
  9. Wonder if they will assist.. by CIANCHAMBLISS · · Score: 5, Funny

    First Clippy, now Dicey?

    1. Re:Wonder if they will assist.. by Billosaur · · Score: 1

      And pretty soon... Andrew "Dice" Clay, "Dice-K" Matsuzaka, and the Diceman.

      --
      GetOuttaMySpace - The Anti-Social Network
    2. Re:Wonder if they will assist.. by kimvette · · Score: 1

      That would be redundant; everything coming out of Redmond lately is already pretty dicey. ;)

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    3. Re:Wonder if they will assist.. by vegiVamp · · Score: 1

      It looks like you are trying to start your car. Would you like me to:
        - Adjust the mirrors and seat to your wife's preferred positions ?
        - Navigate you to the nearest Microsoft outlet ?
        - Drive straight into the wall ahead?
        - Blow up the engine ?

      --
      What a depressingly stupid machine.
  10. Horn by ciroknight · · Score: 1

    ..is more necessary. Nothing sucks more than traffic jams on the Information Super Highway. No way to signify that better than being as absolutely obnoxious as possible

    --
    "Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is." G.W.Bush
    1. Re:Horn by MoriaOrc · · Score: 1

      I think I might be able to find some prior art for "Being obnoxious on the Internet," though...

    2. Re:Horn by MrNiceguy_KS · · Score: 2, Funny

      Don't forget Virtual Middle Finger! (tm)

      --
      Redundancy is good And also good.
    3. Re:Horn by ehrichweiss · · Score: 1

      I heard AOL has examples of said prior art dating since the early 90's.

      --
      0x09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0
    4. Re:Horn by fractoid · · Score: 1

      ..!.,
      Does that qualify? :P

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    5. Re:Horn by MrNiceguy_KS · · Score: 1

      Ah, prior art.

      --
      Redundancy is good And also good.
    6. Re:Horn by focoma · · Score: 1

      traffic jams on the Information Super Highway Interesting thread here, but everyone knows the Internet isn't a highway. It's a series of tubes...

      --

      - Francis Ocoma

      Please wait while Sig Request is being processed...

  11. Patent Coverage? by OctoberSky · · Score: 2, Funny

    Does this patent cover anything that sways when hung from a virtual car and virtually sways?

    I'm really concerned about the virtual nutsack I have hanging from my virtual trailer hitch on my virtual truck.

  12. Even scarrier than patants by Ukab+the+Great · · Score: 1

    Vista Riceboy Edition

    1. Re:Even scarrier than patants by Nimey · · Score: 1

      I think you mean "Vista Type R". It comes with a big sticker that's good for an extra 200 MHz.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    2. Re:Even scarrier than patants by Kazymyr · · Score: 1

      And a body kit that adds 1463 points to the 3DMark score.

      --
      I hadn't known there were so many idiots in the world until I started using the Internet -Stanislaw Lem
    3. Re:Even scarrier than patants by insertwackynamehere · · Score: 1

      And a button that says "click for spoilers" and when you click it, your back window displays a 3d plastic spoiler stapled to your trunk

  13. Great by epseps · · Score: 1

    Now cars will become part of a massive spam sending botnet.

  14. Virtual Fuzzy Dice? by Chineseyes · · Score: 1

    Microsoft is getting into the porn industry?

    --
    I think the invisible hand of the market has its middle finger extended

    --A wise old fart named SC0RN
  15. Arcades by Gyga · · Score: 1

    I once played an arcade racing game where you race trucks and one of them had purple dice that showed up on screen and bounced around in your view.

    --
    I don't preview or spellcheck.
    1. Re:Arcades by Neon+Spiral+Injector · · Score: 3, Informative

      Sega's Rad Mobile had a virtual, fuzzy, Sonic dangling from the rear-view. He bounced and swayed with the movements of the car.

    2. Re:Arcades by earthforce_1 · · Score: 1

      I remember seeing a big rig transport driving game that has been around for years and had objects in the rear view mirror that bounced and swung as your truck ran over or bumped into objects. I can't recall the exact name of it right now.

      --
      My rights don't need management.
    3. Re:Arcades by Captain+Spam · · Score: 1

      I'd guess you're thinking of 18 Wheeler: American Pro Trucker. Sounds about right, but I think it also had objects on the truck's dashboard sliding back and forth as you turned, as well as dangly things hanging from various knobs, all depending on which truck you were driving.

      All in all, more argument for prior art.

      --
      Demanding constant attention will only lead to attention.
  16. So THIS is what delayed Vista! by jpellino · · Score: 1

    At least at Apple, OS revs get way-layed by iPhones. But this...

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
  17. Prior art by Kazymyr · · Score: 2, Funny

    I have had fuzzy dice that move with the car movements for as long as I can remember. And it's a mechanical device too, not your fancy digital dice. Now excuse me, I gotta go put holes in some punchcards.

    --
    I hadn't known there were so many idiots in the world until I started using the Internet -Stanislaw Lem
    1. Re:Prior art by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      REAL prior art exists as well! (well real virtual)

      http://www.arcade-equipment.com/assets/images/18_w heeler.jpg

      The virtual fuzzy dice were the best part!

  18. Another driver's distraction! by G4from128k · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Just what the motoring public needs, another source of distraction. I can see it now. People will hack the fuzzy dice to do all sorts of amusing things, notice them while driving, and crash (physically, not in the software sense).

    On the plus side, I would imagine this "feature" will get the device banned under California's no "entertainment" video displays in sight of the driver whilst the car is in motion.

    --
    Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
    1. Re:Another driver's distraction! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People will hack the fuzzy dice to do all sorts of amusing things All sorts, no. Boobs, yes.

      One good thing though, when Bazzer dumps Sharon for Na-alee, he'll just have to edit his registry settings.
    2. Re:Another driver's distraction! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Virtual displays? Who needs 'em? Why, when I was young, you were lucky to have a windscreen at all, let alone a roof over your head. And these fancy 'automatic' transmissions. Who needs 'em? And now they have six, seven, even eight speeds! Why, we only had three, four of you counted reverse, and you had to select them yourself using a stick that came up through the floor boards. Why, the clutch was so heavy, my left leg was near twice the size of my right. And power hydraulic brakes, we had good steel links running to our drum brakes and they worked fine! Sure they would fade out on a long hill and leave you hanging on the horn hoping nobody pulled out in front of you while you zipped through town, but we liked 'em just fine! Intermittent wipers? We had 'em! Those old vacuum motors were about as intermittent as you could get! Stomp on the gas going up a big hill and the manifold would drop to zero and wipers would just freeze, leaving you charging up the hill with water streaming across the windscreen, if you were lucky enough to have one, the whole world a blurry mess. Of course, if you didn't have a windscreen, you could just wipe your glass goggles with the chamois back of your driving gloves, if you were lucky enough to have them.

    3. Re:Another driver's distraction! by hoggoth · · Score: 1

      > Just what the motoring public needs, another source of distraction. I can see it now. People will hack the fuzzy dice to do all sorts of amusing things

      I can't wait to hack into these remotely and turn ALL the pixels opaque black!
      Or better yet, have a virtual motorcycle turn into your lane and head straight for you!

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    4. Re:Another driver's distraction! by Zwack · · Score: 1
      we had good steel links running to our drum brakes and they worked fine!

      So you've been in my car then? Actually, it's my wife's Mustang, but it has four wheel drum brakes. They are hydraulic, but doing a mechanical linkage would be kind of interesting given the way they work... (The hydraulic pressure created by you pushing a piston into a cylinder with your feet pushes two pistons out of another cylinder in each wheel which pushes the brake pads against the inside of the drum. The parking brake is a mechanical linkage, using a cable that only applies one of the two pads in the two rear wheels...

      Still, it's an improvement on that leather block on the end of a lever that they used to use...

      Z.

      --
      -- Under/Overrated is meta-moderation, and therefore is Redundant.
    5. Re:Another driver's distraction! by insertwackynamehere · · Score: 1

      the whole thing crashes and the windshield goes black.. turns out it wasn't a HUD displayed on clear safety glass but a monitor that used video cameras to show the road outside on a layer below the HUD

    6. Re:Another driver's distraction! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ford was one of the last to go from steel linkages to hydraulic brakes. Not sure when they changed but my dads '36 Ford V8 had the steel linkages. Ford used to advertise "the safety of steel from pedal to wheel", eg claiming as a virtue what was actually an inferior technology.

      A good drum brake actually provides better feel, but they are heavier and more prone to fade. Also more expensive. And of course not all of them were good.

  19. Distractions by sjaguar · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Okay, if done nicely, I wouldn't mind a heads-up display (HUD). But does the general driving population need more driving distractions? Also, would other drivers be able to see it (say from behind)? Other vehicle's TVs and crap dangling from the rearview mirror always bugs me.

    --
    If at first you don't succeed, call it version 1.0.
    1. Re:Distractions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To me your comment raises the real issue. HUD's have been around for a long time hence there's nothing innovative about this patent. It should fail. It may be an innovative use of microsofts products but it's not in anyway a new concept or idea.

    2. Re:Distractions by Locutus · · Score: 1

      what is really silly is they hung the virtual dice from a virtual rearview mirror. If you think people have trouble understanding and using rear/side view mirrors now, just wait til they not only have the real one, but Microsoft thought everyone should have a virtual one too.

      It's like having a freak'n titlebar on a QVGA PDA/handheld computer screen. WTF?

      LoB

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
  20. Dig that law firm name by ciaohound · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    SHOOK, HARDY & BACON L.L.P

    Granted, that's not exactly Dewey, Cheatum, and How, but would you be able to tell your friends, with a straight face, that you had enlisted the services of the law firm Shook, Hardy, & Bacon? If you answer yes, well, then I offer you a laurel, and hardy handshake, and I hope they don't shake your bacon too much.

    --
    Oh, yeah, it's not easy to pad these out to 120 characters.
    1. Re:Dig that law firm name by fractalboy · · Score: 1

      Two words (and a punctuation device):

      Hiscock & Barclay (http://www.hiscockbarclay.com/home/)

      I dunno about Barclay, but Hiscock must be pretty impressive (not to mention respected) to achieve named partner status in a law firm....

    2. Re:Dig that law firm name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They so should have named that firm "Barclay and Hiscock".

  21. Virtual.... by JeremyGNJ · · Score: 2, Funny

    I cant wait to get one so I can have...

    My own....
    Virtual......
    Jesus

    1. Re:Virtual.... by Dr.+Eggman · · Score: 1

      That's not a bad idea. They should give it an animation, mood sensing technology, and make it say "What would Jesus do?" everytime you scream at the other cars.

      --
      Demented But Determined.
    2. Re:Virtual.... by herbapet · · Score: 0

      Someone to hear your prayers,
      someone who (virtually) cares

      --
      Beer.
    3. Re:Virtual.... by Zordok · · Score: 2, Funny

      If it's virtual, how can you "reach out and touch faith"?

  22. WTF? Dice? Nobody will pay for that! by Colin+Smith · · Score: 2, Funny

    A huge finger on the other hand...

    --
    Deleted
  23. I don't care if it rains or freezes... by Internet+Ronin · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... as long as I got my digital Jesus, riding on the dashboard of my car.

  24. Finally... by mvanvoorden · · Score: 1

    ..."Where do you want to go today" is about to make sense

    1. Re:Finally... by Alioth · · Score: 2, Funny

      There'll be DRM, so it should really be "Where will we allow you to go today?"

    2. Re:Finally... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *shudder*

      Integrated with A.I. driving, "Where do you want to be taken today?"

      *twitch*

    3. Re:Finally... by Locutus · · Score: 1

      it made sense when they first came out with it. It means Microsoft has no idea what the future holds so they must use an ad asking you what you want to do today as a way to make you think they know what you need. Even Bill Gates' book, "The Road Ahead" has the metaphor for the future( the road ) quickly veering off to the right and out of view. Someone else is building that road and providing options for where the future can go.

      That ad, "Where do you want to go today?", always reminded me of a pig with a nose ring. Not only can it be lead to slaughter easier but it's normal everyday life, rooting, is greatly restricted. So, where do you want to go today little piggy? We're Microsoft and we don't have a clue but we'll drag you around for a while and take your money for doing so.

      LoB

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
  25. Virtual Fluffy Dashboard by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

    Hey, where is my virtual fluffy dashboard and virtual coffee can conversion?

    --
    Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
  26. Wow, virtual fuzzy dice. How useless by xgr3gx · · Score: 1

    There are already heads up displays in some cars. Just another "Me Too" Microsoft Innovation that they probably bought from some startup.
    I'm not putting out some flame bait, I'd think Linux powered fuzzy dice were lame too.
    How about we develop better combustion technology, and better renewable resource technology, not more electronic crap to further distract the driver.
    The virtual fuzzy dice idea is about as good as replacing the airbag on the steering wheel with a flat screen TV.

    --
    Shameless plug alert: Game server control panel
    1. Re:Wow, virtual fuzzy dice. How useless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The virtual fuzzy dice idea is about as good as replacing the airbag on the steering wheel with a flat screen TV.

      That's a great idea, as long as they include a razor wire seatbelt with the TV option. Time to start thinning the herd... ;)

    2. Re:Wow, virtual fuzzy dice. How useless by goldenrod3 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Better combustion technology, efficiency etc. blah blah, that would be far too sensible! How about a fast, small footprint, reliable, secure operating system with a clean, responsive interface? Instead we have Vista!!

    3. Re:Wow, virtual fuzzy dice. How useless by xgr3gx · · Score: 1

      Hahaha, loved both those comments! Great stuff. HA!

      --
      Shameless plug alert: Game server control panel
  27. How about a targeting system? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hopefully this will include a targeting system with cross hairs and frickin' virtual lasers I can use to blow up the car in front of me with virtual fireballs.

    1. Re:How about a targeting system? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do they HAVE to be virtual?

    2. Re:How about a targeting system? by Drgnkght · · Score: 1

      Yes, the last thing you want while driving on the freeway is to have to dodge incompetent drivers and their flaming wreckage.

      Besides, road conditions are bad enough without every clueless driver on the road shooting at it.

    3. Re:How about a targeting system? by Sciros · · Score: 1

      Actually, I have wanted a missile launcher button on far more occasions than I have wanted a car horn. See, when some moron almost runs you off the freeway by merging right onto your vehicle, and speeds away at 100 mph, a car horn just won't do. A missile on the other hand, will teach him a lesson he'll NEVER remember!

      --
      I like basketball!!1!
    4. Re:How about a targeting system? by Drgnkght · · Score: 1

      True, I don't disagree. It would be very satisfying. Just remember that you're shooting at things in front of you. In all likelihood your missile just blew a crater in the road ahead of you. You now have to dodge it. Care to guess what the odds are that someone else is going to want to take out the idiot blowing holes in the road and swerving into their lane? ;-)

  28. Question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Question... Is virtual gravity patented yet? If not, I'm going to do it...

  29. So... What's Next? by blcamp · · Score: 3, Funny


    A patent on Virtual Flying Chairs?!

    --
    The problem with socialism is that they always run out of other people's money. - Margaret Thatcher
  30. When will they patent... by weaponx86 · · Score: 1

    ...digital trailer hitch dangling testicles?

  31. Adaptive means by wardk · · Score: 1

    that this covers anything anyone else makes that does anything, see it's adaptive.

  32. ah, technology. by that+IT+girl · · Score: 1

    Back in my day, we had REAL fuzzy dice, not these fancy fake moving pictures you kids have these days.

    --
    10 FILL MUG WITH COFFEE
    20 DRINK COFFEE
    30 GOTO 10
    1. Re:ah, technology. by harlemjoe · · Score: 1

      So wait -- do physical fuzzy dice count as prior art in patent challenge? I thought obviousness was a grounds for dismissal. Although the need for "virtual fuzzy dice" is far from obvious, the patent proposal itself slaps you in the face. I mean, it's the same concept as a bloody "digital" speedometer or fuel guage isn't it? Then again, one could hardly have foreseen the popularity of a "virtual" solitaire. Thank God the US Supreme Court seems to agree

      --
      shooting is not too good for my enemies
  33. er... loophole? by camperdave · · Score: 1

    While the patent obviously covers fuzzy dice, it also covers dangling CDs, native american dream catchers, and other things that are hung by a string. It does not cover things like Hawaiian leis, or for all you single guys out there, wedding garters.

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  34. Nothing new here by Gazzonyx · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Unfortunately, consumerism isn't driven by the "ability does not dictate necessity" mentality. Just take a look at the cars on the road to see this in action. How many SUV's do you see? There would be no Escalades if people didn't want lots of "chrome". We're all guilty of feeding this cycle, as I see it.

    --

    If I mod you up, it doesn't necessarily mean I agree with what you've said, sorry.

    1. Re:Nothing new here by somersault · · Score: 1

      Not that many SUVs in the UK, but I get your point. The thing is, that Microsoft (and car manufacturers, though cars do rust over time, while software only goes 'out of style') kind of forces this on consumers by only selling the latest and 'greatest' versions of their products. All software companies do this, but with Microsoft the effect is a lot stronger because so many people use their software, and the formats aren't great for backwards compatability.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    2. Re:Nothing new here by Gazzonyx · · Score: 2, Interesting
      That's a very good point; I think that companies 'forcing' software on people is the other half of the viscous cycle - if they don't, their competitors will.


      I think we're all partly responsible for Microsoft being what it is. And I'm saying this, mind you, as a Linux user. If Microsoft didn't 'push' software on us, Apple would; if Apple didn't, IBM would... Sun... Novell... your friends neighbors brothers nephew ("...and everyone says he's a real whiz with computers, and he's writing this software that...").


      Sometimes I think we deserve this monster we've built. Everyone is falling over themselves to get our money, and we walk to the slaughter like the cattle we are. As a fan of irony, and an esoteric dichotomy, I should note that while I complain about this, I've also used it for my own gain on several occasions. I guess that's just part of my inner turmoil.

      --

      If I mod you up, it doesn't necessarily mean I agree with what you've said, sorry.

    3. Re:Nothing new here by somersault · · Score: 1

      After thinking about it a bit more, he vicious cycle that you mention - which I guess we can basically just call 'progress' - is in the end a good thing because you do get genuine benefits occasionally. Even in Microsoft Office I guess, which is my favourite product to get pissed off at when people want to upgrade just for the sake of it (next in line would be Windows, and then comes the CAD programs the engineers use here). Through the last few versions of Office the only thing I've noticed being different (apart from things like PST formats >.
      The vacuousness of our natures does show up in all parts of life, and we all do encourage it, things like wanting a new shape on our car, or wanting shinier graphics in our games. I love shiny graphics too, but I'd take gameplay over graphics anyday. Well, okay.. 9 out of 10 days - you have to be able to go "oooooh that's cool" occasionally ;) 90% substance, 10% style seems like a good balance!

      --
      which is totally what she said
    4. Re:Nothing new here by Locutus · · Score: 1

      Microsoft product updates, 90% substance, 10% style? Me thinks you have got those numbers reversed.

      LoB

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
    5. Re:Nothing new here by somersault · · Score: 1

      No, I was saying that's what I'd prefer. Microsoft products are 1% style, 0.8% substance and 98.2% bugs. That's only a rough estimate.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    6. Re:Nothing new here by somersault · · Score: 1

      A sizable chunk of my comment was lost due to the fact that I did a '>.' smily while my comment was submitted in HTML format.. *sigh* could have made it a bit more understandable!

      --
      which is totally what she said
  35. Curious by goldenrod3 · · Score: 1

    Microsoft love their eye candy don't they. Will the pretty fluffy dice be a cover up for a rather sluggish and bloated underlying system? I wonder what kind of OS they will be using for the heads up display, and if you don't connect to the activation server after 30 days will it put your car into enhanced reduced functionality mode?

  36. Ooh, how many sides? by The+Iso · · Score: 1

    I hope they offer an icosahedral version.

    --
    "You don't need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows." - Bob Dylan
    1. Re:Ooh, how many sides? by MrNiceguy_KS · · Score: 1

      Oh, that's brilliant! I've got a rabid RPG-playing friend with a birthday coming up. I'm going to make him a pair of fuzzy d20's to hang in his truck.

      --
      Redundancy is good And also good.
    2. Re:Ooh, how many sides? by Killjoy_NL · · Score: 1

      heh if he's rabid, why don't you take him to the doctor for his bday, pretend it's a quest to cure him of lycanthropy :)

      (if that doesn't make sense, don't kill me, I never played pen & paper AD&Ds)

      --
      This is the sig that says NI (again)
  37. Yo home? by iviv66 · · Score: 1

    I whistled for a computer and when it came near the license plate said fresh and had a dice in the mirror If anything I could say that this program was rare But I thought now forget it, yo home to bel-air

  38. Rear window heads up display by ArcadeX · · Score: 1

    I want a heads up in the back, facing outward, so I can put 'get off my (picture of someone mooning)' for tailgaters... I can't wait till people start playing GTA on this thing and get a little confused... Or playing halo, hop in a warthog and do some real 'war driving'... here's to hoping they never had more capability in graphics than needed, to keep creative hardware hackers from being a road menace.

    --
    An I.T. motto in the hands of an idiot is a dangerous thing...
  39. That's the Dumbest Fucking Idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    since I've been at Microsoft.

  40. Copied from Rad Mobile? by DruggedBunny · · Score: 1

    The old Sega arcade game Rad Mobile featured a real-time dangling Sonic which swung with the movements of the car: http://www.planet-xbox.de/img/articles/2635/Sonic- Mega-Collection-Plus-2.jpg

  41. MS knows how to sell. by RomulusNR · · Score: 1

    Sadly, great technological advances such as this always seem to require useless, utterly stupid gimmicks like that in order to achieve wide adoption.

    --
    Terrorists can attack freedom, but only Congress can destroy it.
  42. Reasoning by ashpool7 · · Score: 1

    This is Microsoft's attempt to block access from other manufacturers who want to make computers that go in your car. They are slowly going in this direction with things like BMW's iDrive.

    Patents on the basic application of this technology in a car will keep out any upstarts who are faster and smarter than Microsoft. It might not be valid, but any challenger (Apple, probably) will have to spend some time and cash in order to compete.

    Kind of like spreading tacks on the road...

    1. Re:Reasoning by Locutus · · Score: 1

      I thought BMW was dumping the Windows based iDrive for a Linux based iDrive some years ago. They had so many problems with it they sent out a press release stating such. IIRC, they mentioned that iDrive for the 7xx class cars would continue using MS based iDrive for something like 5 more years while all the other models would be getting the udated version. This, I figured, was probably due to a contract they had with Microsoft since the 7xx class vehicles were the first to get iDrive.

      BMW got some really bad press when their systems were crashing and 7xx series cars where stopping suddenly, trunk lids opening unexpectedly and even door locks not unlocking. IMO, it just showed how foolish companies are to think that it would be a good idea putting a Microsoft OS in control of mission critical processes. And doing it in a car is just plain stupid. Microsoft must have paid them well to use Windows.

      LoB

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
    2. Re:Reasoning by ashpool7 · · Score: 1

      If there was a press release, they buried it. I don't see a thing (official) about it searching Google for "idrive linux bmw".

    3. Re:Reasoning by Locutus · · Score: 1

      I didn't see anything definitive either but did find this related item:

      http://images.businessweek.com/ss/06/02/open_sourc e/source/7.htm

      I also would not doubt that Microsoft's contract with BMW requires they not publish anything negative or otherwise regarding their Windows based iDrive systems. Microsoft sucks as a technology company but is number one in legal and marketing contracts, publications, and PR.

      LoB

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
  43. To quote Cake by Vexor · · Score: 1

    "And large fuzzy dice hang like testicles from rearview mirrors"

    --
    ~Vexed and loving it!
  44. Hmmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the UK, strictly speaking it's illegal to have things hanging around in your car which might obstruct your view of the road -- maybe even a large pair of virtual fuzzy dice on a HUD could fall into this category...
    This innovation could give a whole new meaning to 'Blue Screen of Death'.
    Nice one Microsoft!

  45. First Virus: by josquint · · Score: 1

    Road Kill. Displays random large animals on display to try to get driver to swerve.

  46. Car HUD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MS Bashing aside, I've often envisaged the uses of a HUD in a car. Some ideas:

    * Overhead schematic display, showing your car in the center and the cars immediately surround you. Helps with the "blind spot".
    * Proximity warning - if distance between (say) the side of your car and another object passes a certain threshold. Useful if you're about to merge on top of someone.
    * Integrated GPS guidance (e.g. prompt you to turn right ahead)
    * Airspeed .... I mean vehicle speed indicator - no longer have to waste time glancing down at the speedometer.
    * Integrated warnings of traffic conditions. If systems are set up to indicate that there are delays, you can get info on them right in front of your eyes.
    * Improved night sight. When driving at night, the HUD can highlight road contours and lane markings. Also possibly straight-up night vision.
    * Bingo fuel...I mean low fuel warnings as well as prompts where nearest gas station is. (Ok, ok, so I played too many flight sims as a kid)
    * Road surface warnings - if there's a large pothole or dead animal or crate, they get highlighted in red so you know in advance when they're coming up.
    * Road condition warnings - for people too dumb to realize that driving 80 on a wet highway is *bad* idea.
    * Motorcycle warnings - the biggest cause of Motorcycle accidents is car drivers not seeing the motorcyclist - they kind of become invisible. When one approaches or is near, the fact is communicated visually (again warnings), so that the driver is more careful.
    * Integration with emergency vehicle alarms - if there's a paramedic, first responder, or ambulance coming up, there's a warning so you get off the road. No, this is not a radar against cops - it would warn only if the cop was actually flashing lights.

    I'm sure there are others - this is just the list I've kept so far.
    It would be an awesome technology to have. Just as long as it doesn't black out on the highway. "BSOD" takes on a whole new meaning in this context :-)

  47. Can they .... by PPH · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...display virtual loose bits of paper, assorted junk and fast food wrappers that slide back and forth on my dashboard as I go around corners?

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  48. Prior Art by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have prior art on this from early in 2003.

    In a VR class in college I made a game where you could drive my '64 Imperial around a parking lot doing donuts and hit rubber cones. It was complete with images of MY pink fuzzy dice hanging from MY rearview mirror, above MY dashboard. The graphics weren't up to today's standards, of course, but it is still the most awesome software I've ever written.

  49. Based on Vista? by Micah_H · · Score: 2, Funny

    You are attempting to brake at a stop sign. Cancel or Allow?

  50. As usual... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... the /. title is misleading as it tries to paint pictures of much harsher situations than are actually there, and everyone reads the headlines and feels the need to respond to only that.

    The only place the term "fuzzy dice" is used in the application is as an example of what might occur. Saying things move with the motion of the vehicle is in no way stupid as 99% of car GPS systems do exactly this and is related only by example to how fuzzy dice move in a car. It mentions nothing about them actually patenting virtual fuzzy dice in specific.

    The only thing REALLY being patented is MS's own system for doing this... likely an OS for Automobile manufacturers to buy into to get their blue screens to go.

  51. This really may be an improvement. by darkonc · · Score: 1
    I think that they're talking about a system where, for example,
    When it notices that you've just had an accident (as indicated by a triggered airbag), the speedometer is replaced by a huge 'hazard light' switch..

    If this occurs just as you're reaching for where the hazard light was, then it'll switch the hazard light back to it's usual position -- just as you're reaching for it in the normal speedometer position. ... ad-infinitum, until the ambulance crew shows up and admits you to the psych ward.

    --
    Sometimes boldness is in fashion. Sometimes only the brave will be bold.
  52. I'll patent your idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thanks! I'll patent your idea and make millions out of it! Cool idea!

  53. Fuzzy Dice Prior Art...??? by tmasman · · Score: 2, Funny
    Um, isn't that already in use in a ton of other games already?
    I know I saw it in Crazy Taxi (on the Dreamcast)...

    Ug... This patent crap has gotten out of hand.
    We should just scrap the whole pile of fuzzy dice & start over with a shorter available protection period & an easier means of shooting down invalid patent apps to begin with.

    --
    Oh! And this one time, at band camp...
  54. Re:Great - More useless software by bornwaysouth · · Score: 1

    There is an obvious social utility. By swapping the dangling dice for a 'toddler_on_the_road' image, you could cause a driver to swerve into an oncoming mega truck. These lawyer-free relationship terminations could be called microsoft divorces. Of course you wouldn't be able to get the software direct. It would have to be a Mafia Supplied (MS) killer app.

    The toddler image would be best converted into a cubist image after say 3 secs so that forensic work would have difficulty distinguishing jiggling dice from dicing with death.

    Sorry. Jiggling dice does mean dicing with death. Shouldn't we allow idiots to embrace Darwin and all his works.

  55. Re:Great - More useless software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Speaking about dicing with death...
    Can one suggest a candidate for a Darwin Award, even though he didn't die?

    http://youtube.com/watch?v=7azOmoZz1n8

  56. None by sweetandy · · Score: 1

    No similarity to Dashboard, I reckon. *rolleyes* I can't believe these weirdos.

  57. I recall writing about this idea in the 70s by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    I claim prior art - all of MSFT's profits are belong to me.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  58. 70's throw-back by Droid+Rot · · Score: 1

    Article title should read, 'MS seeks patent on bad taste'. BTW, whats Microsoft doing getting into the motor trade? Is this Bill's idea for pimping his 959?

  59. Streets of SimCity by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

    Brings to mind a fake advertisement clip from Streets of SimCity:

    "Fuzzy dice accessories: Chew toys for your car."

  60. Let's hear it! by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

    For those masters of innovation at Microsoft!

    Fuzzy dice - a Bill Gates invention!

    60 million sold in the first six months!

    Fuzzy Dice Service Pack 1 will soon be released!

    Meanwhile, Secunia released a study today that says Fuzzy Dice can be "pwned" in seconds...

    --
    Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  61. Blue screen? by jsiren · · Score: 1

    Blue Screen of Death just got a literal meaning.

    --
    Usage: km/h for speed (kilometers per hour); kph for very slow impulses (kilopond hours).
  62. Why I don't like this by jsiren · · Score: 1
    I read the linked patent application, and I'm not very fond of the idea.

    While driving, I need the following information:

    1. A good view of surrounding traffic, assisted with mirrors where necessary.
    2. Indication of conditions that require my attention in the near future (e.g. directional indicator is on, high beams on, handbrake engaged, fuel is low, oil pressure has suddenly dropped...), i.e. the usual warning lights, plus fuel and temp gauges.
    3. Knowledge of my current speed, i.e. speedometer, to stay within posted limits.
    That's all. A tachometer is nice to have to optimize performance and economy, but not a necessity.

    What I watch while driving, in order of frequency:

    1. The road in front.
    2. The mirrors.
    3. Speedometer + tach every now and then.
    4. The rest of the instrument cluster every now and then, to check fuel level. Any warning lights will be noticed at this time, or while checking the speed.
    My car is old enough (1999 Ford Focus station wagon) that heating and A/C can be adjusted by touch (rotary knobs). Also, the radio has controls in the steering column, so it can be controlled without looking. I don't use a mobile phone or change CDs while driving.

    If there's information being distributed about something blocking the road... well, that's why I have the RDS radio.

    For me, any additional information in the field of view would only be clutter, especially if it's moving or changing shape. In my view, it's a benefit of the traditional instrument cluster, as well as a traditional HUD, that every display component has a fixed location which can be memorized. This memorization can go so far that one does not need to focus to the instrument cluster; when I see a blue light in the dashboard, I know it means my high beams are on.

    Analog gauges don't require exact focus for an approximate reading, and the most frequent indicator lights are pretty soon memorized. I can see a benefit in a HUD that displays the speedometer + active warning lights information while driving, but not in one that has moving or shifting elements (which only take the driver's attention off the road), or one that would be used while parked (a conventional display would work better, as it doesn't depend on lighting conditions outside).

    --
    Usage: km/h for speed (kilometers per hour); kph for very slow impulses (kilopond hours).
  63. Re:Great - More useless software by jibjibjib · · Score: 1

    You can get an honorable mention for doing stupid stuff that could have killed you but doesn't.