Slashdot Mirror


Lenovo Looking to Buy Seagate, May Raise Political Concerns

andy1307 writes "According to an article in the New York Times, Lenovo has expressed an interest in buying Seagate. This has raised concerns among American government officials about the risks to national security in transferring high technology to China. From the article: 'In recent years, modern disk drives, used to store vast quantities of digital information securely, have become complex computing systems, complete with hundreds of thousands of lines of software that are used to ensure the integrity of data and to offer data encryption.'"

255 comments

  1. Oh my god, it's the Red Scare! by r_jensen11 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Quick! Where's McCarthy when we need him?

    Honestly, they're raising the same fuss as when IBM sold off their PC and laptop divisions to Lenovo. There's no reason why we should be paranoid about stuff this. It's business.

    1. Re:Oh my god, it's the Red Scare! by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      I understand being paranoid about it. What I don't understand is why they don't simply write into all those wonderful governmental contracts "Must not be manufactured in China", which would simply cut out a HUGE market for these companies that outsource.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    2. Re:Oh my god, it's the Red Scare! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      s/McCarthy/Bush/g
      s/communist/terrorist/g
      Closer than you think
    3. Re:Oh my god, it's the Red Scare! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's just an excuse to cheat in global competition. If the gov't gets too adventurous, they'll get punished by the WTO like they did for illegal steel tariffs. oh wait.

    4. Re:Oh my god, it's the Red Scare! by nurb432 · · Score: 0

      No, its not 'just business' when you directly invove a government like china.

      And yes, ANY business in that country is directly controlled by the government. Thats how it works there.

      Paranoia is healthy at times. As the world becomes more and more 'tech-bound', this is a far worse long term risk then us continuing to rely on oil provided by people that want to see our way of life ended.

      Scary times ahead.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    5. Re:Oh my god, it's the Red Scare! by Kjella · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Honestly, they're raising the same fuss as when IBM sold off their PC and laptop divisions to Lenovo. There's no reason why we should be paranoid about stuff this. It's business.

      Yes, it is. And when those Chinese-owned leaders get certain hints to store certain things in "bad" sectors who might suddenly resurface in "slack" space seeded with a salt to look like random noise or risk being shut down, that's also business. Or there's a kill code that they can send out to wipe itself and bring down military systems in an emergency situation. No, it's not just a gag China does just to pull off something like that, they're certainly in it for the business. But when business and government go hand in hand like they do in China, you'd also be naive to think they don't further each other's goals. It's not like that the lust for money is mutually exclusive with the lust for power, quite rather the opposite.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    6. Re:Oh my god, it's the Red Scare! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's no reason why we should be paranoid about stuff this.

      Except for the fact that China will be running the world in a decade or two.

    7. Re:Oh my god, it's the Red Scare! by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      You're assuming that the US Government really cares that much about secrecy, national security, or any of that crap.

      By manufacturing stuff in China, corporations are able to save lots of money, and make much bigger profits. Corporate profits are far more important to the elites in Washington than national security.

      Plus, the free-trade crowd would be angered by such a move, as would the anti-government waste crowd, who would whine about the government paying 10 times as much for something that they could get made in China cheaply.

    8. Re:Oh my god, it's the Red Scare! by WindBourne · · Score: 3, Interesting

      wow. You need to study history. The business world is used heavily to spy or screw on each other. For example, Xerox copiers as well as pipe controls come to mind. And yes, this still occurs. I wrote about this earlier, but it bears repeating. In a start-up that I was part of, we had a Taiwanese who wanted to invest in us. Only he wanted access to the machine that we had (it was hard to send it even to Britain or Canada, china was out of the question). Turns out that he wanted to take the device to China. Said that he could get 100's of millions for it (no doubt). And that is just one story. America has been selling off far too much business. For something like this, it needs to stop.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    9. Re:Oh my god, it's the Red Scare! by megaditto · · Score: 1

      Inquiring minds wish to know: what kind of a machine from an American startup would China pay "100's of millions" for?

      --
      Obama likes poor people so much, he wants to make more of them.
    10. Re:Oh my god, it's the Red Scare! by GaryOlson · · Score: 1

      Mod +1 inventive. Mod -1 paranoid. Mod 1 qubit -- both mods are equally true.

      --
      Every mans' island needs an ocean; choose your ocean carefully.
    11. Re:Oh my god, it's the Red Scare! by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      One that sells to DOD and No Such Agency.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    12. Re:Oh my god, it's the Red Scare! by tftp · · Score: 1

      Inquiring minds do not have the need to know. Besides, any US startup can raise funds and buy almost any machine, even one that requires ten times its weight in paperwork to ship to Canada. See ITAR for details.

    13. Re:Oh my god, it's the Red Scare! by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      depending on the era, a Y-MP comes to mind, as one example.
      For quite some time Tektronix scopes were controlled technology as the IF filters were the same as used on submarines.
      MerCad detectors are still controlled technology, even though they are at least 10 year old tech.
      I used to work with ASICs that handily were barred from export to *any* country.

      There's a few for you.
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    14. Re:Oh my god, it's the Red Scare! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $600 toilet seat?

    15. Re:Oh my god, it's the Red Scare! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you are simply a stupid fucking moron plus paranoia

    16. Re:Oh my god, it's the Red Scare! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting. Thanks.

      Is this why they stopped making those analog scopes? Current models suck so much; you got to push the damn menu buttons ten times to get what you could get on an older model with a single press.

    17. Re:Oh my god, it's the Red Scare! by iminplaya · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Where's McCarthy when we need him?

      He's everywhere. In the white house, the halls of congress. He's running the FBI, DHS, DEA... He's listening to your phone calls, reading your mail... He lives on the west coast, the east coast, the middle coast, down the block, right next door... He has penetrated your collective soul. He is everywhere.

      --
      What?
    18. Re:Oh my god, it's the Red Scare! by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      If I was a smuggler, I would be all for that kind of prohibition. In fact, I would be for all kinds of prohibition.

      --
      What?
    19. Re:Oh my god, it's the Red Scare! by kestasjk · · Score: 4, Funny

      I didn't know the US government trusted Seagate with their military systems and classified data. What "certain things" are you talking about here? What private information gets stored on a hard disk? Like the US government aren't going to bother with encryption.

      And since when can hard disk manufacturers send out messages to specific hard disks?

      Chief! We're intercepting a message from the Chinese! It's coming through now: "This is Red Dragon to SEAGTE-#1938-391283-2934; the US government's warranty has just run out. Crash Crash Crash! Over."
      Dear God! It'll be like Pearl Harbor all over again, except with hard disk drives instead of our navy!

      --
      // MD_Update(&m,buf,j);
    20. Re:Oh my god, it's the Red Scare! by Divebus · · Score: 1

      Different thought: If the Chinese Government decided to threaten the U.S. effectively ending Western foreign trade, how long until all the Chinese manufacturers and workers end the Chinese Government? It would be over in three days with a brand new Chinese Government. Period. Chinese manufacturers are filthy Capitalists, just like us Americans, with billions of workers who like to eat.

      --

      Most of the stuff on /. won't survive first contact with facts.
    21. Re:Oh my god, it's the Red Scare! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      No, it isn't. Bush has never accused members of the government of being terrorists.

    22. Re:Oh my god, it's the Red Scare! by mikiN · · Score: 1

      I hope you're not being sarcastic about this, or else I'm sorry for spoiling your joke. Your example is EXACTLY the way a manufacturer can target an individual device, any device that is in the "network data path" for that matter. Put the text of your example in an email message, then consider what will happen when a user retrieves it on a computer containing a 'primed' hard drive (let's assume data is stored unencrypted, for simplicity), and you will see.

      --
      The Hacker's Guide To The Kernel: Don't panic()!
    23. Re:Oh my god, it's the Red Scare! by LostInTaiwan · · Score: 1

      Free trade with free nation. China is not free. US is not doing so well these days but at least every 4 year we get a chance to vote the dictator out of office.

    24. Re:Oh my god, it's the Red Scare! by aqk · · Score: 1

      >>>...store certain things in "bad" sectors who might suddenly resurface in "slack" space seeded with a salt to look like random noise or risk being shut down, that's also business. Or there's a kill code that they can send out to wipe itself and bring down military systems in an emergency situation

      Shhhh! Obviously you are taking about the methods that the US & Seagate are now employing already, to of course bring down the Chinese empire.
      Do you think the Chinese might have finally caught on? Oh Noooooo..!


    25. Re:Oh my god, it's the Red Scare! by Sergeant+Pepper · · Score: 0

      Bush has never accused members of the government of being terrorists. No, but Dick Cheney has.
    26. Re:Oh my god, it's the Red Scare! by couchslug · · Score: 4, Insightful

      McCarthy's excesses didn't make opposing Mao and Stalin wrong.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    27. Re:Oh my god, it's the Red Scare! by kestasjk · · Score: 1

      Sounds like the US needs to start using encryption then. I live in Australia not Europe by the way, but whatever.

      --
      // MD_Update(&m,buf,j);
    28. Re:Oh my god, it's the Red Scare! by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Heh. I was watching Bill Maher, and he said something to the effect that America's desire to buy stuff as cheap as possible is the reason they're made from poison, mud and shit.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    29. Re:Oh my god, it's the Red Scare! by kestasjk · · Score: 1

      But doesn't that mean you have to worry about correspondence from Lenovo making it onto your hard disk? In a high security system I just can't see that happening, and it does still rely on no encryption being used.
      It would also be Lenovo's undoing, in the likely event that they got caught. It would also be a massive political mistake on the part of the Chinese government.

      Also don't forget that China owns ~30%, a Texas company owns ~%10 and public shareholders own ~%50. It's hardly a business that's a puppet of the Chinese government.

      --
      // MD_Update(&m,buf,j);
    30. Re:Oh my god, it's the Red Scare! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's "just business" for you because your shallow.

    31. Re:Oh my god, it's the Red Scare! by Tweekster · · Score: 1

      Actually since China has in fact worked hand in hand with business for corporate espionage the paranoia is well justified.

      In the paper shredders in the hotels, they had scanners also that would scan the paper.
      Or how about the US bugging tiawanese chips that caused that gas explosion in the cold war...

      It isnt something to go red scare over, but it is absolutely idiotic to pretend it couldnt happen

      --
      The phrase "more better" is acceptable English. suck it grammar Nazis
    32. Re:Oh my god, it's the Red Scare! by fbjon · · Score: 1

      And yes, ANY business in that country is directly controlled by the government. Thats how it works there. Your use of "directly controlled" is pretty flawed. If the chinese government "directly controlled" all business, there wouldn't be any business, there'd be a nation in flames.
      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    33. Re:Oh my god, it's the Red Scare! by GrahamCox · · Score: 1

      But when business and government go hand in hand like they do in China, you'd also be naive to think they don't further each other's goals.

      This is different from America in what way?

    34. Re:Oh my god, it's the Red Scare! by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      I spent over two hours trying to see where in my post is the implication that it did. If anything, his excesses tried to make opposing the U.S. government in any fashion wrong. I suppose opposing all tyranny, no matter where it comes from, is kinda whack. I believe my comment was more about his methods than anything else.

      --
      What?
    35. Re:Oh my god, it's the Red Scare! by Yvanhoe · · Score: 1

      I, for one, completely support decisions that could lead to such a catastrophic outcome. This looks like the only way to have leaders and law makers to understand the value of openness in the technological world.

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    36. Re:Oh my god, it's the Red Scare! by darthflo · · Score: 1

      Bush has never accused members of the government of being terrorists.
      Dude would you please stop being so mean to George? It's pretty obvious he's not too much of a good reader/pronouncer and putting TWO ten-letter words into ONE sentence would be a bit too much, don't you think?
    37. Re:Oh my god, it's the Red Scare! by darthflo · · Score: 1

      I, for one, welcome your new E-Mail sending chinese red communist seagate lenovo overlords.

    38. Re:Oh my god, it's the Red Scare! by darthflo · · Score: 1

      ...and in office. Just like Prezeldent Bush who was definitely elected and re-elected by the majority of the U.S. population.

    39. Re:Oh my god, it's the Red Scare! by weekendli · · Score: 1

      This is really ridiculous. What us government said is that only us companies can buy business in China, but not the other way around. The reason for that is Chinese companies are states own, instead of they are so call privated. However, if they are scared of the concept of states own business, why they are so enthusiastic about buying banks in China, which of course are state own.

    40. Re:Oh my god, it's the Red Scare! by Half+a+dent · · Score: 1

      When it comes to hard drives wouldn't McAfee be more helpful?

    41. Re:Oh my god, it's the Red Scare! by krygny · · Score: 1

      "Quick! Where's McCarthy when we need him?"

      Charlie or Joe?

      --
      Research shows that 67% of those who use the term "research shows", are just making shit up.
    42. Re:Oh my god, it's the Red Scare! by couchslug · · Score: 1

      Your post was innocent in that respect.
      My reason for responding is that "McCarthyism" is normally invoked and discussed without the background context.

      "If anything, his excesses tried to make opposing the U.S. government in any fashion wrong."

      No, they tried to make opposing Tailgunner Joe's CAREER wrong.
      Let's remember that he was frequently attacking people in government and the Army.
      The other fallout of his antics is that because they were largely directed against the wrong people, they did serious damage to legitimate anti-Communism.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    43. Re:Oh my god, it's the Red Scare! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The business world is used heavily to spy or screw on each other."

      Several years ago the British Secret Intelligence Service (neé MI6) approached UK firms advising that their espionage skills were for sale...

    44. Re:Oh my god, it's the Red Scare! by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      I would be surprised if that happened that recently. I believe it has been going on for years. CIA would locate new "toys" and turn them over to American (and sometimes British or Canadian) firms to be replicated. Even now, the CIA got caught trying to find out info about Russia's high speed torpedo.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    45. Re:Oh my god, it's the Red Scare! by orasio · · Score: 1

      Paranoia is healthy at times. As the world becomes more and more 'tech-bound', this is a far worse long term risk then us continuing to rely on oil provided by people that want to see our way of life ended. They never said that. They said they want you out of the middle east. Only if your way of life includes vacationing in Dubai.

    46. Re:Oh my god, it's the Red Scare! by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      You arent paying attention then.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    47. Re:Oh my god, it's the Red Scare! by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      I don't understand. How does being a smuggler help with the government contract?

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    48. Re:Oh my god, it's the Red Scare! by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      Your language does wonders to render your comment worthless from the start.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    49. Re:Oh my god, it's the Red Scare! by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      Ohhh, I don't know... Maybe this could offer up a few pointers.

      --
      What?
    50. Re:Oh my god, it's the Red Scare! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's also the law that software used in high security government applications needs to be written on American soil.

      Look at the example of Snort. Snort is used in top secret Govt organizations and this blocked the sale of Sourcefire to an Israeli company. They didn't want to lose their #1 customers and without them the deal wasn't quite as rosy for the buyer.

      Being sold to a foriegn company guarantees that Seagate drives will no longer be used in military or top secret applications.

      Paranoia doesn't figure into it. Whether or not Seagate/Lenovo care about losing the business is the deciding issue, not direct government intervention.

      No ones opinion really matters, just the procurement rules of the government.

      -AC

    51. Re:Oh my god, it's the Red Scare! by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      I still don't understand- Iran/Contra wasn't a legal government contract. In what way does restricting say, the FCC from using Seagate hard drives, help smugglers?

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    52. Re:Oh my god, it's the Red Scare! by darkmeridian · · Score: 1

      Did you make your own tinfoil hat? Otherwise, the American Aluminum company might have rigged a brainwashing foil at the behest of the U.S. government.

      --
      A NYC lawyer blogs. http://www.chuangblog.com/
    53. Re:Oh my god, it's the Red Scare! by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      Oh c'mon! How does any prohibition help smugglers? Contract or no contract? It doesn't matter if it's legal or not. The point is the deal was done, and lots of money passed hands. It works in the same way that airlines put bogus parts on their aircraft.

      --
      What?
    54. Re:Oh my god, it's the Red Scare! by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Oh c'mon! How does any prohibition help smugglers? Contract or no contract? It doesn't matter if it's legal or not. The point is the deal was done, and lots of money passed hands. It works in the same way that airlines put bogus parts on their aircraft.

      Unlike you, I actually work for a government that does due diligence on contracts. If we were putting bogus parts on bridges, it would turn into a three ring media circus in no time flat. Heck, a while back we had a few maintenance shop people getting under $100 gifts for buying cleaning supplies from a certain supplier- that ended up with 5 people losing their jobs with Oregon Department of Transportation and the supplier getting blacklisted to the point where they went out of business, as every one of the 50 states and several Fortune 500 companies stopped buying from them. Tell me, how does a smuggler help a supplier like THAT to survive?

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    55. Re:Oh my god, it's the Red Scare! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or there's a kill code that they can send out to wipe itself and bring down military systems in an emergency situation.
      Dude, US are doing exactly the same. Large hw company was bankrupted after the fact popped up, that their chips have killswitch and it was used in recent war against us enemies.
      But when business and government go hand in hand like they do in China
      And in US is not exactly the same? Really, which planet do you live on?

    56. Re:Oh my god, it's the Red Scare! by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      Unlike you, I actually work for a government that does due diligence on contracts.

      Yes, that's all very quaint, but this is how the big boys play.It's a smuggler's paradise. More prohibitions will make it true heaven.

      --
      What?
    57. Re:Oh my god, it's the Red Scare! by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, well, that's the difference between a real democracy and the federal government. A real democracy is so transparent that a teenage hacker can find the patterns and become the whistleblower, 10,000 miles away from the action.

      Once you include the requirement in a formal RFP, it makes it very hard for the smugglers.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    58. Re:Oh my god, it's the Red Scare! by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      I guess that's why "real" democracy will always be small potatoes. The minute you start moving real money, all that goes up in a puff of smoke and the pirates will take control.

      --
      What?
    59. Re:Oh my god, it's the Red Scare! by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Depends on what you consider real money- ODOT did pretty well with $2.5 billion and only one disputed contract recently. And even that disputed contract was due to geology, not smuggling. The idea of a publicly visible bidding process is certainly worth pursuing if the aim is reduction of corruption, even if it means that it adds regulations to the system.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    60. Re:Oh my god, it's the Red Scare! by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      The idea of a publicly visible bidding process is certainly worth pursuing if the aim is reduction of corruption, even if it means that it adds regulations to the system.

      Absolutely right. The key is "publicly visible" and open. If we can accomplish that, then we could put a real dent in the corruption. Here again, I put the blame squarely on our own shoulders for not demanding such openness. Proper management is our responsibility. But in the grand scheme we have simply handed to power over and have gone back to sleep until the next election comes up. The government says "Trust us", and unfortunately that's exactly what the public does. We're now hearing more about the corrupt people "donating" to the Hillary campaign, and yet she still leads by a wide margin. Everybody is still ignoring Whitewater and her insane national insurance proposals from her first "term". Lord only knows what kind of scams she has pulled off up there on the east coast to acquire the power she has. This should not be, so I am not holding out much hope for any changes for the better in '09. May as well keep Bush. I can assure you that the entire current crop of front runners are no better. The smugglers and pirates will have another good five years, at least.

      --
      What?
    61. Re:Oh my god, it's the Red Scare! by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Thus my original point- the way to deal with the danger of smugglers and corruption is to do the following:

      1. Hold an open bid system.
      2. Write into your RFP specific exclusions for what you're afraid of.

      In this case- drives with encryption manufactured in China should *not* be a part of any federal government computer purchase contract.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    62. Re:Oh my god, it's the Red Scare! by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      And that comes back to my original point that the smugglers make the rules. They create the regulations to keep the competition out, not for any particular public interest. On a small scale you might have open bidding. But, as always, people will succumb to temptation. Until they effectively shun the the pirates, and resist their false promises of personal prosperity, that's the way it will go. And people like George Bush and Hillary will continue to win elections. We are in a true quagmire because democracy doesn't work, and there are no benevolent dictators.

      --
      What?
  2. Who says it's lenovo? by Tragek · · Score: 5, Informative

    The article says nobody will say WHICH Chinese tech company wants to buy.

    1. Re:Who says it's lenovo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The submitter misread the article and claimed it was Lenovo. And of course the editor did not verify anything in the submittal.

    2. Re:Who says it's lenovo? by andy1307 · · Score: 5, Informative

      The editors changed my post. I submitted this 2 days ago and no company was named.

    3. Re:Who says it's lenovo? by sortius_nod · · Score: 1

      Who cares who buys it... so long as they don't screw Seagate like Maxtor did Quantum (or Western Digital did to themselves). For me, there is only 1 HDD manufacturer that I really trust now, and that's Seagate.

    4. Re:Who says it's lenovo? by pantherace · · Score: 1

      First: Are you talking about their (expensive) scsi drives, or their standard drives? Because frankly, there's a big difference. One is highly reliable, the other... not so much. I had Seagate's RMA on speed dial for a while.

  3. So don't buy Seagate by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So a Chinese Company wants to buy a Canadian (?!?!?) company that makes hard drives. Fine. Stop buying Seagate for the NSA, and move on with our lives.

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    1. Re:So don't buy Seagate by QuantumRiff · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but think about how many Semi trailers of hard drives a day they must get at the NSA for all their "wiretapping" needs.. That could be a huge chunk of revenue!

      --

      What are we going to do tonight Brain?
    2. Re:So don't buy Seagate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only the software division of Seagate was Canadian (Crystal Reports) and that has been divested and sold off to Business Objects.

      Seagate itself is a US company, though being purchased by a Chinese company probably wouldn't make much of a difference, all the hard drives I have bought from them recently were manufactured in China anyways.

    3. Re:So don't buy Seagate by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but think about how many Semi trailers of hard drives a day they must get at the NSA for all their "wiretapping" needs.. That could be a huge chunk of revenue!

      And by having their own factory, they can have economy of scale PLUS being able to sell their own proprietary back door drives to the public.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    4. Re:So don't buy Seagate by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Thus raising the question- why the heck is the government buying from them to begin with? Or did they miss the fact that all the drives were "Made in China" with the fine quality control (or lack thereof) that implies?

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    5. Re:So don't buy Seagate by 2ms · · Score: 1

      Hey storage tech master, are you really so naive as to think that it's Seagate-only tech that's at issue and that all the US govt would have to do to make the the Seagate tech useless is to hot-swap to all Maxtors or something?

    6. Re:So don't buy Seagate by WallaceAndGromit · · Score: 2, Informative

      I don't know if you knew this, but Seagate acquired Maxtor a while ago.

      http://www.seagate.com/maxtor/

      --
      Name: Mr. Anon E Mouse; SSN: 555-55-5555
    7. Re:So don't buy Seagate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since when is Seagate a Canadian company?

    8. Re:So don't buy Seagate by Yvanhoe · · Score: 1

      Anyway, Chinese manufacturers already hijack Vista DRM mechanisms to erase anti-governmental "spywares"
      Hey, it COULD be true !

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    9. Re:So don't buy Seagate by dk.r*nger · · Score: 1

      And that's why they don't want to sell Seagate...

    10. Re:So don't buy Seagate by aliquis · · Score: 1

      But you forgot that the terrorists will get hold of this new harddrive technology and beat the shit out of USA!

      Just like they did with the PS2s!

      Don't ask me how you bomb someone with harddrives thought, fill them with explosives and use as grenades? Strap them around your body?

      Americans are a weird people, stop beliving that everyone else are terrorists, and that technology only come from the USA and that noone else can invent/use it. If they want some encryption method WHY go after harddrives?!! Are that the easiest way? What's wrong with gpg and aes?

    11. Re:So don't buy Seagate by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      No, my point is more of a generic one. If you don't like the action the free market is taking, find another supplier or become a new supplier. Those are the appropriate responses to this, not "the sky is falling let's try to stop it."

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    12. Re:So don't buy Seagate by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Since I got it mixed up with Business Objects, which was once also called Seagate. Seagate Software, maker of Crystal Reports.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    13. Re:So don't buy Seagate by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Nah, that would take Indians working in Microsoft Hydrabad Research Center.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  4. Isn't it a bit late to worry? by tftp · · Score: 3, Insightful
    This has raised concerns among American government officials about the risks to national security in transferring high technology to China

    I think the horse has not only left the barn, it's off the planet by now. What were those "government officials" thinking for last decades? And this process is not [easily] reversible - China has all the factories now, and rephrasing Mao, "Power comes out of the gates of the factory." This much we see already.

    1. Re:Isn't it a bit late to worry? by refactored · · Score: 1
      Look, you have your economy in hock. China has much more than enough dollars. So the time has come to Pay up in hard goods or your currency suddenly isn't worth the paper its printed on.

      Yup, it's way too late for worrying....

      You yanks should move on a little towards the PANIC NOW stage.

    2. Re:Isn't it a bit late to worry? by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

      exactly!!! All the drives are BUILT in China right now. When the Chinese want to, they will do whatever they want to spy on us and we won't be able to stop it!

    3. Re:Isn't it a bit late to worry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But my book has the words 'DON'T PANIC' inscribed in large friendly letters on its cover!

    4. Re:Isn't it a bit late to worry? by Grishnakh · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The problem with your panicking concept is that, at least for now, China's economy is highly dependent on the USA's. After all, we're the ones buying most of the junk their factories make. In exchange, they're getting a bunch of our green paper currency. So I would have to assume that China is not interested in our currency devaluing rapidly any time soon, because then they'll have sold us all that stuff and done all that work for nothing, and they'll have a much smaller market to sell to.

      So basically, since Dollar bills are basically IOUs, we're in debt to China. In a normal trade relationship, they would be using those dollars to buy stuff back from us. The problem here is that we don't really make much to sell to them. I know Buicks are really popular there for some strange reason (bad taste? Are the Chinese going to start dying their hair blue and wearing really ugly clothes next?), but that's not enough, plus those Buicks are probably made in Chinese factories anyway.

      What's the endpoint of this? Honestly, I don't know. I'm an engineer, dammit, not an economist. But it doesn't look good to me. I guess, if nothing else, China will wind up with lots of great technology, and spiffy new factories to build it with, and while we're sitting around with worthless currency trying to figure out how to survive when we've all forgotten how to do anything practical because we were too busy studying marketing and law, China will be self-sufficient. Does China have expansionist of imperialist aims? Would they be interested in conquering the USA and enslaving us while stealing our resources? The way we've been acting, we probably deserve it.

    5. Re:Isn't it a bit late to worry? by tftp · · Score: 1
      The problem here is that we don't really make much to sell to them.

      And to make things worse, ITAR stops many US companies from selling some high-tech stuff that China would love to have, but which has dual use or military use. And much of US export is military and high-tech stuff. The USA can't compete with China on rice, for example, or on metals; not even on cars - China flooded Russia with cheap cars, and if anyone wants something better then Honda and Toyota are just a ferry ride away, and always glad to sell.

    6. Re:Isn't it a bit late to worry? by GPL+Apostate · · Score: 1

      And to make things worse, ITAR stops many US companies from selling some high-tech stuff that China would love to have

      You're free to think of that as 'making things worse' if you like.

      Me, I'd rather the Chinese had all kinds of paper money and printed certificates and paperwork they can't utilize in weapons systems.

      --
      Microsoft says legacy (serial/parallel) ports are bad. They don't obfuscate the hardware enough.
    7. Re:Isn't it a bit late to worry? by tftp · · Score: 2, Informative
      I don't believe for a moment that China has no access to the technology that it should not have. That's what spies are for, and it's not that hard to find a spy if every 5th man on the planet is Chinese.

      IMO the ITAR restrictions are not always productive. They are like that restriction on export of strong encryption products with keys longer than $n. Can anyone honestly say that those regulations stopped any country in the world from using the latest encryption? There are probably more PhDs in China than americans on the whole planet :-) Surely one of those PhDs could just read a math paper and write 100 lines of simple code that AES, or DES, or any other strong cipher requires. The tables and the proof and the reference implementation are published, and in reality if Chinese government wanted PGP 2.x (which was not allowed for export) it could always ask one of its diplomats to download the code within the USA (and to lie when the server asks if you are a foreigner - the server has no way to check!) and bring it in on a floppy. Big deal, spies do worse things every day. And now a 10-minute download wrecked the whole sector of US software industry, and as a "bonus" you can be sure that Chinese use the clean PGP, without any backdoors or "forgotten" NSA keys.

      Ineffective laws like that only prevent US companies from selling what the USA excels in, while not really impeding the progress of the other side. It could be even making things worse. For example, Iran has a lot of american airplanes (F-15 or something.) Pentagon put the stop on selling parts, and the Iran's airforce is suddenly in tatters. But imagine that Iran could not buy those F-15s back then. Iranians would then buy from China, from Russia, from France - or if all else fails they'd make their own, not as good but 10 times as cheap (and plentiful) and now all of a sudden you have no leverage, no spare parts to pull from the market, and no control whatsoever. How would that be better?

    8. Re:Isn't it a bit late to worry? by refactored · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I suspect an engineer does better than an economist.

      An economist dreams that fancy accounting can fix things, an engineer tends to think in terms of conservation laws, reservoirs and pressures.

      What's the end game?

      I'm not sure, the things I have been reading about China suggests it may not be what Americans think it is...

      You see China is Old. China is old old old and utterly massive.

      It has basically been way overpopulated and resource depleted since about 1900....

      America is just waking up to thoughts of Resource Depletion.

      China has been living them for over a century.

      Now you have sold your real world economy to a mammoth hungry maw for dreams of "Intellectual Property". (Something the Chinese only believe in if the wind is in their favour)

      Last I heard the Chinese had bankrolled a grand shopping spree....what they buy will be very very interesting...

    9. Re:Isn't it a bit late to worry? by dragonturtle69 · · Score: 1

      The true concern, I think, is about control/ownership at the country level.

      Is manufacturing ownership or if the magic of IP law is ownership. Some would argue that those who physically create items have ownership of them. In very simple times years and years ago, this would have been true, but then societies dreamed up ownership and the concept of property law.

      Consider a serf or sharecropper tenant; while they may actually perform the physical labor, the owner of the land actually owns the harvest. The smarter owners kept their serfs happy enough to prevent revolt and kept as much of the harvest remainder for themselves. The few truly noble ones were more like good managers, always looking to keep everyone as happy and taken care of as possible.

      With a "global economy", in quotes since I mean one truly global economy instead of the current global economy that is the sum of the local economies, substitute the factory for the land and IP holders for the owners. The serfs are replaced by the current value of $Humans_That_Are_Cheapest. Production is then outsourced when higher profits and EPS result. The U.S.A and China trade debt for products (as an aside, anyone else notice P.R.C showing up as the country of manufacture on more items?).

      But, control of the IP remains with the owner who may move production at anytime. A country may nearly instantly impact the production of a company headquartered on their soil, but may have legal problems impacting production of a company headquartered overseas. And what is ownership in the end but control?

      --
      "What luck for the rulers that men do not think." - Adolph Hitler
    10. Re:Isn't it a bit late to worry? by hazem · · Score: 1

      So basically, since Dollar bills are basically IOUs, we're in debt to China. In a normal trade relationship, they would be using those dollars to buy stuff back from us.

      As you said, the US does not have much that China can buy with all its dollars. There are two things that help keep that from being a problem. Currently a vast majority of oil is bought and sold in $US, and China needs a lot of oil to fuel its economy.

      So, the US buys lots of cheap Chinese stuff with $US, and China uses those $US to buy lots of oil from the Middle East. Now, how does the US get those dollars back (and keep from being extorted by having too much of its money out of its control?)? By selling very expensive weapons systems.

      The big risk here is the worry that major oil producers may start selling oil in other currencies besides dollars, because if that happens, the demand for dollars decreases. This is the VERY thing that Saddam was threatening to do with a huge chunk of the world's oil reserves and production - selling it in Euros. There is already a fledgling petro-euros market but it's tiny and stays that way with Iraq not joining it. I don't have ready access to sources (nor the time to find them), but there is speculation that this was one of the key reasons for the invasion of Iraq - to keep its oil from going Euro and posing a huge threat to the $US.

      Another interesting part of the mix is the use of $US for the wholesale international drug trade. I haven't followed this for years, but when the Euro came out, one of the more interesting benchmarks for its success would be the percentage of the international drug trade that would get traded in Euros instead of $US. It's a black-market economy to be sure, but it's large enough to have a significant impact on the value of the dollar. This is coming out of my own head now, but considering that Afghanistan is a major source of Opium and that after the US action there that production has increased tremendously, it makes me wonder if there is an economic benefit for the dollar to have that increased production happening in $US.

      I'm not an economist either but I find these things fascinating. Even with billions of people, I'm not too worried about a Chinese invasion of the US. Actually taking over a country and occupying it is so 19th and 20th century (look how well the US is holding up in Iraq - just like Britain some 60 years earlier) and quite expensive (Plus, while Americans tend to be pretty apathetic, I think we'd actually get a charged up a bit over an actual invasion - we'd just have to pitch it like a big football game or "American Idol: Sniper".). I'm actually more worried about economic dominance and subtle economic warfare. The Chinese, as a people, have a long history of thinking and acting in the long-term, much unlike the people of the US. We Americans will gladly sell out our local industries to get a cheaper pair of shoes today, not realizing the precarious situation we put ourselves in. What happens when China starts making weapons that are good enough for the middle east and lots cheaper - they no longer need the dollar to trade for their oil. At that point they can start dumping their dollar reserves and deliver serious shocks to US economy. The scary thing to me about the steady increase in oil prices isn't about oil production or scarcity, but that it's an indication that the dollar is weakening in the world. The price of oil has no choice but to increase.

      I think the thing to watch for will be a growing Chinese military-goods export industry because that will mark the beginning of the end of its reliance on the $US. That line of thinking puts that recent destruction of a satellite into an interesting context - was it really a drum-beating "look what we can do" or was it a slick "look what we can sell you"?

      Confessions of an Economic Hitman gives some interesting details about the US and its use of economic leverage against other countries. I don't think there will be many non-USians crying a lot if the same kinds of leverage are used against the US.

      Back to topic, isn't Seagate already made in China? Even if final assembly isn't done there, how many of the components are already made there?

    11. Re:Isn't it a bit late to worry? by hazem · · Score: 1

      So basically, since Dollar bills are basically IOUs, we're in debt to China. In a normal trade relationship, they would be using those dollars to buy stuff back from us. The problem here is that we don't really make much to sell to them.

      See my previous post - it's a 3-way process. We buy tons of cheap stuff from China using $US. They buy tons of oil from the middle east using those $US, and then we sell expensive weapons systems to the middle east to get those $US back.

      The thing to watch in this tenuous situation is the growing Chinese weapons industry. If they can start selling their own weapons systems to the middle east countries then their need for $US drops a lot.

    12. Re:Isn't it a bit late to worry? by bjourne · · Score: 1

      China will be self-sufficient. Does China have expansionist of imperialist aims? Would they be interested in conquering the USA and enslaving us while stealing our resources? The way we've been acting, we probably deserve it.

      How can they be self-sufficient when their economy is totally dependent on exports? They don't have a significant home market so if some countries decided not to buy from them or add trade tariffs, they would be pretty much screwed. One billion DVD players is only worth something if someone buys them. On the other hand, the way the US is going, they are losing their own market due to reduced purchasing power of the population and increasing economic inequalities. That is, it is much more a threat to the US economy that the standards of living is increasing in China because when enough Chinese can afford to buy DVD players, they don't need to sell them to the West.

    13. Re:Isn't it a bit late to worry? by darthflo · · Score: 1

      [...] a bunch of our green paper currency.
      Actually, it's green cotton, not paper.
    14. Re:Isn't it a bit late to worry? by ninevoltz · · Score: 1

      Exactly. What about the BIOS in every motherboard on the market (made in China)? Put a trojan in the BIOS. Is someone actually looking through the hex code in the BIOS to make sure nothing is going on there? When I was in the US Navy, we had civilian contractors coming in and changing out CPU boards and other stuff in classified equipment. Nobody was interrogating them and checking out their stuff. The removable SCSI hard drive for one was classified secret (required two-man integrity to handle it), but the computer it plugged into was not protected. This is kind of ignorant in my opinion.

      --
      Death is life's great reward. R. Hoek
    15. Re:Isn't it a bit late to worry? by KudyardRipling · · Score: 1

      Hasn't anyone here heard of Wen Ho Lee? W88 warhead? National Nuclear Security Administration? The proverbial equine has already passed Pioneer 11.

      The eradication of bigotry will be at the cost of American sovereignty.

      --
      Submission as evidence constitutes plaintiff and/or prosecutorial misconduct.
    16. Re:Isn't it a bit late to worry? by bloobloo · · Score: 1

      That's like saying your jeans are made of cotton and not denim.

    17. Re:Isn't it a bit late to worry? by enrevanche · · Score: 1

      While this cycle is true, you misrepresent it as a balance. The trade imbalance to China alone far exceeds the total of all US arms exports (of which a good part is paid for by "foreign aid"). In fact the arms exports cannot even balance one or two months of oil imports. The trade imbalance this year already exceeds $400 Billion.

    18. Re:Isn't it a bit late to worry? by enrevanche · · Score: 1

      I'm sure we can just have them print their own dollars.

    19. Re:Isn't it a bit late to worry? by homer_s · · Score: 1

      An economist dreams that fancy accounting can fix things,

      Economists, like engineers, vary greatly in their abilities and knowledge. And unlike medicine and engg, people do not see economics as a real science that requires some education - they see economics as something obvious that does not require great thought.

      But like any other science, economics is needed to throw light on things that are counter intuitive:

      - it looks like the sun revolves around the earth, but it doesn't.
      - it is "obvious" that a minimum wage helps poor people, except it doesn't.
      And this is precisely why you need science.

      But since most people do not grasp this, there are many economists who take the easy route and just support the popular opinion. These are the kinds of economists that you deride in your post - people whose logic does not add up and who resort to phrases like "the Fed injects liquidity" (injected it where? where did the liquidity come from?), "the Fed cools down an overheating economy" (what is 'overheating'? how did that happen?) or "the Fed cuts rates to help the economy" (then why doesn't the Fed keeps the rates at 0% all the time?).

      But there are other economists like Mises, Bastiat, etc whose theories have as much science behind them as any engineer's design. These people were not afraid to voice unpopular opinions and hence are not very popular. But if you take the time to read their theories, a lot of things which are "obvious" to you may end up being not so obvious.

    20. Re:Isn't it a bit late to worry? by tftp · · Score: 1
      But, control of the IP remains with the owner who may move production at anytime.

      Yes, that's the lullaby that outsourcing US corporations like to sing to themselves. However they are one USB thumb drive away from losing even this last sliver of ownership. The rest is already overseas. Besides, the factories that now bake CPUs for us can continue doing so for a long, long time - and if our Asian overlords want they can completely deny Intel and Motorola access to their own factories (because, as they say, possession is 90% of the law.) Where would you move the production to? There are no spare semiconductor fabs, and there are no suitable low-cost 3rd world countries left to move into.

      What then those suddenly fabless semiconductor companies will do? Build a new factory in the USA? You'd need equipment that is made in Asia, and if it is not sold then it's just too bad. The proper answer to "what to do" is just this: to rebuild the indigenous high-tech industry from the bottom up. How long do you think this will take, considering that US has only brains, and very little in terms of hands? Decades, and you'd have to start with schools. By the time US has that done where do you think China and India will be, after having such a head start? They already have more engineers and scientists just because their population is so much larger, and in this business only the absolute number of scientists matters (as opposed to doctors, for example.) China just doesn't want to rock the boat yet, but they'd be fools if they don't consider hundreds of possible scenarios, short- and long-term.

    21. Re:Isn't it a bit late to worry? by refactored · · Score: 1
      it is "obvious" that a minimum wage helps poor people, except it doesn't.

      Having lived in a third world country with no minimum wage and no social benefit, and now in a second world country with both.... I can say...

      You are being slightly "economical" with the truth.

      A minimum wage and no livable benefit is against poor peoples interests.

      A minimum wage and a livable social benefit makes a huge difference.

      I know some nice garbage heaps for you to pick whilst you sort out your logic.

    22. Re:Isn't it a bit late to worry? by enmane · · Score: 1

      China only depends on the US to buy their products until India (300 Million US vs 1 Billion Indians) starts buying Chinese products; usually the first thing that a growing middle class does is buy "stuff." So, China won't "need" the US nearly as much in about a decade or two. China only depends on the US to buy their products until Europe starts buying more CHinese stuff. Currently, they don't buy as much as the Europeans I know tend to buy quality hardware and keep it in the family for as long as they can - not the US way of doing things (e.g. typically buy & dump and buy again). But that's the Western Europeans that I know. I wonder if the Eastern Europeans are the same or not. Anyhow, to me - I'd bet that China will start calling in their "loans" over the next couple decades. I've seen India growing and seen the wealth spreading. It won't be long before China gets tired of the US and moves on to other nations.

    23. Re:Isn't it a bit late to worry? by homer_s · · Score: 1

      Having lived in a third world country with no minimum wage and no social benefit, and now in a second world country with both.... I can say...

      Well for what it's worth, I'm from India, now living in Chicago. I worked in a subway restaurant for a year for min wage while studying here.

      A minimum wage and no livable benefit is against poor peoples interests.
      A minimum wage and a livable social benefit makes a huge difference.


      Can you explain why? Who pays for the "livable social benefit"?

      I know some nice garbage heaps

      I'm sure you do.

    24. Re:Isn't it a bit late to worry? by refactored · · Score: 1

      Who paid your minimum wage as a subway wage slave? The subway customers... most of whom weren't minimum wage workers themselves. Take away the minimum wage, and the employers go on a "race to the bottom" of what the employment market will bear.

      In the absence of a social benefit, in a place where all the resources are controlled by the rich, and in the presence of a desperate need to eat and feed your family.... the bottom can be very very very low indeed.

      So it is clear who pays for a lack of social benefit, the very poor, and the lower middle class exposed to increased crimes of desperation.

      Taxes being generally redistributive, means the upper middle class pays for the social benefit. (The super rich generally, having the most options, generally escape quite a lot of taxation.) (My current favourite economics related Author is Nicolas Nassim Taleb, author of "The Black Swan" http://www.fooledbyrandomness.com/) As he points out, wealth, unlike weight, is from Extremistan.... the wealth of the richest person in a randomly selected group significantly affects the average.

      The fact you made it from India to Chicago means you are rich. Rich in strength, talent and drive. So you probably would have done quite well (relatively speaking) in India or anywhere. ie. You are intrinsically fortunate, but spare a thought for your children, they may perhaps not be...

  5. I'm no expert, but by Bombula · · Score: 2, Insightful

    the statement that, "the risks to national security in transferring high technology to China" referring to hard drive technology just sounds a bit silly. I'd bet dollars to donuts that any technology latent in a commercial hard drive that the Chinese might be after can be reverse engineered right off the shelf. The only exception might be the encryption component, but - someone correct me here if I'm completely wrong - as I understand it 128-bit encryption is no longer restricted by the US government, presumably because they can break it, and that is why 128-bit is also the current 'limit' or whatever on commercial encryption products.

    --
    A-Bomb
    1. Re:I'm no expert, but by click2005 · · Score: 1

      It wouldn't surprise me if the hard drives, or at least some of the components are constructed or assembled in China anyway.

      --
      I am a free slashdotter. I will not be modded, blogged, DRM'd, patented, podcasted or RFID'd. My life is my own.
    2. Re:I'm no expert, but by Tackhead · · Score: 1
      > the statement that, "the risks to national security in transferring high technology to China" referring to hard drive technology just sounds a bit silly. I'd bet dollars to donuts that any technology latent in a commercial hard drive that the Chinese might be after can be reverse engineered right off the shelf. The only exception might be the encryption component, but - someone correct me here if I'm completely wrong - as I understand it 128-bit encryption is no longer restricted by the US government, presumably because they can break it, and that is why 128-bit is also the current 'limit' or whatever on commercial encryption products.

      When all else fails, question your initial assumption.

      From TFA:

      "Seagate would be extremely sensitive," said an industry executive who participates in classified government advisory groups. "I do not think anyone in the U.S. wants the Chinese to have access to the controller chips for a disk drive. One never knows what the Chinese could do to instrument the drive."

      Allow me to attempt a translation: "Seagate would be extremely sensitive", said someone who may have had a need to know more about hard drives than you or I do. "I do not think anyone in the US wants the Chinese to have access to the controller chips for a disk drive. One never wants the Chinese or the US public to know what we're already doing to instrument the drives."

      To put it another way... if the 128-bit encryption standards, as publicly documented, aren't a concern for reverse-engineering, there are plenty of sorts of things hidden in the bowels of the firmware that could be.

      The US government is wise not trust a Chinese implementation of those standards for its data, because the US government can't guarentee the absence of Chinese-added backdoors.

      Unfortunately, that same logic leads to only one conclusion: The US consumer is wise to trust neither Chinese nor American implementations of standards for its data, because the US consumer can't guarantee the absence of Chinese- or US-added backdoors.

    3. Re:I'm no expert, but by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      The US government is wise not trust a Chinese implementation of those standards for its data, because the US government can't guarentee the absence of Chinese-added backdoors.

      So stop buying from Seagate and put a few tax dollars back into manufacturing hard drives here. You provide jobs for Americans *and* data security for the federal government. Win-win to me.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    4. Re:I'm no expert, but by Tackhead · · Score: 5, Funny
      > > The US government is wise not trust a Chinese implementation of those standards for its data, because the US government can't guarentee the absence of Chinese-added backdoors.
      >
      >So stop buying from Seagate and put a few tax dollars back into manufacturing hard drives here. You provide jobs for Americans *and* data security for the federal government. Win-win to me.

      Sure, that's better than selling our secrets to the Chinese, but where's the win to the American hard drive user?

      Geek: Have you got anything without added backdoors?
      NSA: Try that Hitachi Deathstar, it doesn't have that many backdoors in it since the Japanese bought IBM's hard drive division.
      Geek: I don't want any government's backdoors!
      CIA: Can't hd have the Western Digital? Hasn't got as many backdoors in it as the Hitachi Deathstar!
      Yankees (Singing): Back-door-back-door! Back-DOOOR! For Homeland and more!
      Geek: How about this old IDE drive and this 8-bit ISA-bus IDE controller?
      Everyone: Eeeew!
      Geek: What do you mean 'Eeeww'? I don't like backdoors!
      Yankees: Lovely backdoors! Wonderful backdoors!
      DHS: Shut up! Bloody Yankees! You can't have an IDE without the controller card, and you can't have the controller card without the backdoor! Unless he wants to go back to MFM/RLL, and then we can recover everything even after a low-level format! The very first backdoor!
      Geek: I don't like backdoors!
      DHS: Sshh, citizen, don't cause a fuss, or we'll have your backdoor! We love it. Mmm, backdoors, CALEA for the telephone switches, backdoors, the Clipper Chip for the phones, backdoors in newfangled BIOSes, TPMs, DRMs, backdoors into the backdoors, it's backdoors into everything!
      Yankees (singing): Back-door-back-door! Back-DOOOR! Lovely backdoor! Backity door! Safety galore! For homeland and more! Backdoor! Lovely backdoor! Backity door! For the children and more...

    5. Re:I'm no expert, but by InvalidError · · Score: 1

      Who cares if the NSA has found a way to solve AES128 in a timely fashion? Many of the AES candidate algorithms can be extended to arbitrary key lengths and some 4096bits variants are currently out in the wild. Rijindael (today's AES) itself supports 128, 192 and 256bits as standard (required by NSA) and 160/224 as common extras. With more rounds and larger S-tables, larger keys could be supported. The main parameters that really limit key lengths of most AES candidates is throughput and implementation complexity: among other things, AES had to lend itself reasonably well to both software and hardware implementations.

    6. Re:I'm no expert, but by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      "I do not think anyone in the US wants the Chinese to have access to the controller chips for a disk drive.

      This is an interesting statement, since Seagate drives are all already made in China.

    7. Re:I'm no expert, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The US consumer is wise to trust neither Chinese nor American implementations of standards for its data, because the US consumer can't guarantee the absence of Chinese- or US-added backdoors.
      That's only really sensible for someone storing data that merits being absolutely sure there aren't back doors. These would be back doors that would be highly classified in either government and would be reserved for retrieving very sensitive information. They're not about to let those back doors be used to retrieve anything that any normal consumer would put on a HD, even if it were a criminal case.

      So yes, there may be back doors, but they'd be back doors with a pretty hefty lock keeping pretty much everyone except the creator out. If you're stealing classified documents or developing some weaponized virus, by all means be paranoid. But if you're just using the drive to store warez, porn, music and other illicit file-sharing downloads, you're probably fine.
    8. Re:I'm no expert, but by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      +1 piss my pants funny.

      I'll warn you though, I don't like my backdoor messed with.

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    9. Re:I'm no expert, but by GPL+Apostate · · Score: 1

      Geek: How about this old IDE drive and this 8-bit ISA-bus IDE controller?

      I don't think you realize how rare 8-bit ISA-bus IDE controllers are and were. There were really almost none of them ever produced (the 8-bit machines used good old ST-506 interfaces for the most part) and even fewer of them in existence today. I have one or two, but know nobody else who does.

      --
      Microsoft says legacy (serial/parallel) ports are bad. They don't obfuscate the hardware enough.
    10. Re:I'm no expert, but by Tweekster · · Score: 1

      Do you know how easy it would be to make several components operate together in a certain manner to bug a system. Hint, it is easy. Do you know how difficult it is to spot? its nearly impossible.

      We did it to the russians many times, it also was the cause of the gas explosion during the cold war.

      --
      The phrase "more better" is acceptable English. suck it grammar Nazis
    11. Re:I'm no expert, but by Izmunuti · · Score: 1

      The vast bulk of Seagate's manufacturing is not in the States but in Singapore and Malaysia.

      A lot, but not all, of the design is in the States (Colorado and Minnesota), but that's moving offshore too.

      Seagate's incorporated in the Cayman Islands, not the States.

      So, what great "American" company are we worried about? I don't see one.

  6. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 0

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  7. Double Standard by pembo13 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The US Government will gladly take/steal technology however they can, but they always have this hissy fit when when another country is trying to advance their own technology, directly, or indirectly.

    --
    "Thanks for all the money you paid to us. We've used it to buy off ISO among other things" -Microsoft
    1. Re:Double Standard by IthnkImParanoid · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and did you know the US Government spends all this money on roads and military and social programs for itself, but the highway from Tongjian to Beijing needs a couple potholes fixed or the Chinese army needs a couple new QSZ-92s and suddenly they get all stingy! Like pursuing their own interests is so important, as if!

      --
      It's nothing but crumpled porno and Ayn Rand.
    2. Re:Double Standard by chuckymonkey · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Aaaaannnd? Really how is that any different than any other country. Let me break it down Technology=Power Governments like power so naturally governments want to keep power and get more power. So advancing technology is in the best interest of the country and giving it away is not. Of course there's going to be a double standard, as long as there's war (SPOILER ALERT: with humans there always will be until we destroy ourselves) it's in every country's best interest to hoard technology/power and keep it away from potential enemies. I know it's great to slam the US, it's a pretty popular hobby lately what with how much of an ass GW can be, but with this one it's not just the US any country with the resources to do so would do it too. Do you really think that China are altruistic and benevolent? Really? I would love to have this ideological view of the world where everything is fluffy bunnies and every human is out to help other humans, but that's just not the case. When it comes down to it every country is out for its best interests, I don't care where they're from or what kind of people live there.

      --
      "Some books contain the machinery required to create and sustain universes."-Tycho
    3. Re:Double Standard by phantomcircuit · · Score: 1

      Of course there is a double standard.

      The United States government's main objective is to look out for the poeple of the United States (or it should be...)

      The same people who say that government should be minimized and removed entirely from that market (complete free economy) also know that it is not to there advantage to do so.

    4. Re:Double Standard by GPL+Apostate · · Score: 1

      You'd have a point if anybody, anywhere, could point to an instance where the US Government coveted anything 'High Technology' from China and stole it.

      --
      Microsoft says legacy (serial/parallel) ports are bad. They don't obfuscate the hardware enough.
    5. Re:Double Standard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just wait 15 years, or less - indigenous Chinese technology will soon become competative or superior to Western technology, and it will be like the arms race with the Russians all over again. Only this time, the competition will not only be about arms, but about consumer technology as well.

      Say what you will about them, but the Chinese aren't stupid, they aren't lazy, and they aren't ignorant of the opportunity in front of them.

  8. hundreds of thousands of lines by pabrown85 · · Score: 1

    Isn't that the job of the OS? If not, wouldn't dban, et al, take care of it?

  9. The irony of it all by v3xt0r · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This government, the same one who has no problem allowing China to take hundreds of thousands of jobs away from Americans simply by our failed international trade policies, wants us to worry about national security issues related to 1 corporation. What about all the other national security issues that are caused by trade w. China, or any other socialist/communist country for that matter? What about all the (60%+) staff @ Los Alamos?? Lenovo is the least of my concerns, at this point.

    --
    the only permanence in existence, is the impermanence of existence.
    1. Re:The irony of it all by ClamIAm · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What about all the other national security issues that are caused by trade with ... any other socialist/communist country for that matter?

      Oh shit! Linus Torvalds must be an undercover spook from the Finnish government!

      Seriously though, I'm guessing that you're an American, which means your idea of "socialism" is probably something like Soviet Russia. Which is absurd. Socialism encompasses a very broad area of political thought, and should not be treated like some extreme ideology.

    2. Re:The irony of it all by w000t · · Score: 1

      WTF? When did "socialist" and "communist" became interchangeable words around here?
      I guess we can expect the preventive wars against Sweden or Norway anytime now...

  10. If they buy, the big question is: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What will be the impact on their upcoming frash drives?

  11. Lenovo Laptops by lmnfrs · · Score: 1

    At least the government seems to realize there is a potential risk before they buy Chinese hardware. It was rather silly when they bought Lenovo's laptops then spent thousands auditing them.

    But, then again, how else could they manage to waste money on bulk purchases of computer hardware?

  12. hehe National what??? by xednieht · · Score: 4, Insightful

    China buys blocks and blocks of our national debt, and they're concerned about the Seagate purchase? pfft

    With their ownership of US debt, China is probably as concerned about our national security as we are.

    --

    Hope is the currency of fools
    1. Re:hehe National what??? by davidsyes · · Score: 1

      I love the sweet irony you raise.... Bitter and SWEET. China IS as worried about US security as the US supposedly is...

      Captcha: Crystal, hehehe (crystal clear?)

      --
      Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
    2. Re:hehe National what??? by TheLink · · Score: 1

      China might be more concerned about your national security than your leaders are ;). Seriously look at what the US leaders do to "take care" of the USA.

      In China they've executed top ministry officials who screw up big time, maybe that's too harsh but they're under greater constraints - poorer, 1 billion people, less arable land, the "legacy" of Mao.

      Anyway, while it's a strange game - US buying Chinese goods, China buying US bonds, US using that "money" to buy more stuff, but so far the players have been playing it longer than the previous games. Still throwing pots of the "money" into Iraq isn't likely to make that game last longer.

      --
  13. Extent of the legit concerns? by neapolitan · · Score: 3, Interesting

    We (the US) have long had a ban on the export of 'strong' (>40 bit, now >64 bit key) technology to foreign governments / citizens. I've long wondered about this.

    It seems to me that:

    - All concerns regarding exporting of technology that is not guarded as a trade secret is ineffective. If China wants a technology that is freely available over here (USA), just have one of their numerous graduate students download the technology and send it over there. AFAIK, no American internet provider actively prohibits strong encryption connections to Chinese IPs (their "great firewall" may be different).

    However, my second immediate thought is:

    - Seagate likely has numerous trade secrets that are *not* public domain, and thus can now be exclusively owned and operated by the Chinese. Imagine if DES had a backdoor (or Seagate's equivalent), and my organization uses Seagate's out of box encryption (not likely ;) -- now a foreign government controls this. Legitimately scary.

    As for the 'manufacturing techniques' -- as long as there is an oligopoly of storage makers, I'm not concerned. We have bright minds here coming out of graduate school and going to work at Seagate as well as Western Digital, IBM, Intel, etc.

    All the more reason to use published cryptographic standards, and not rely on any proprietary solutions -- they can never fall exclusively into the "wrong hands."

    --
    Slashdotter, ID #101. UIDs are in binary, right?
    1. Re:Extent of the legit concerns? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DES has a backdoor, it is purposely weak enough so that standard PC can break it in few hours.

    2. Re:Extent of the legit concerns? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Close but not entirely correct. Try to break DES with a "standard" PC in 1976. Good luck. DES was deliberately strong enough to be beyond the standard PC of the day, yet capable of being cracked easily within hours if implemented in raw hardware. The NSA supposedly has (had) such a machiene.

  14. If you're *really* concerned about the future... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Learn to speak Mandarin. If not, just buy from Western Digital, a company name that no self-respecting commie would want.

  15. War of Quality by BillGatesLoveChild · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Seagate have given me years of rock-solid hard drivers. Own many, but never lost one due to failure.

    Now Lenovo wants to buy them out? For all that is holy, stop them. China just doesn't get quality, and the hard drive is one place more than anything else in a PC where quality counts.

    1. Re:War of Quality by eclectro · · Score: 1

      China just doesn't get quality, and the hard drive is one place more than anything else in a PC where quality counts.

      But would we really care if they put lead in the hard drives??

      --
      Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
    2. Re:War of Quality by McNihil · · Score: 1

      I wholeheartedly agree. My knee jerk reaction was actually to hand in my resignation for anything to do with IT period if the deal goes through.

      I for one count my blessings on hard drive up time.

    3. Re:War of Quality by BillGatesLoveChild · · Score: 1

      > But would we really care if they put lead in the hard drives??

      Memo to self: When my new Lenovo hard drives fails outside of its 7-day warranty period, do not give to kids as 'toy'.

    4. Re:War of Quality by Alex+Zepeda · · Score: 2, Informative

      You're kidding, right? My last Seagate ('Cuda.10 - 320GB) was made in China.

      --
      The revolution will be mocked
    5. Re:War of Quality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Same here. I couldn't believe it when I pulled my nifty new 300 GB Seagate hard drive out of the box last year and it said MADE IN CHINA.

      So far so good though.

      It seems like everything is made in China now. There's just no way to avoid it any longer. Although I'll tell you this, the stuff coming out of China today is cheaper than the stuff from Japan, Taiwan, etc.. that was made 10 ~ 15 years ago.

      The last time I bought a CD player a couple years ago the $100 ones looked as cheaply made as the $30 ones. It's actually rather sad how much quality has fallen. Not only is the labor cheap now but they also make everything cheaply there. Not that I'm saying China is at fault. In most cases it's the foreign companies who either contract with companies in China to make this cheap crap for them or they buy Chinese designed products and just re-brand them.

      Re-branding of Chinese products is so common now it isn't even funny. When you buy a "name brand" there's always a good chance that they didn't even design it!

      Although one cool thing we now have because of China. The dollar store! I can't believe the stuff the Dollar Tree can sell for a buck! It's amazing! I'm in there every week.

    6. Re:War of Quality by BillGatesLoveChild · · Score: 1

      > You're kidding, right? My last Seagate ('Cuda.10 - 320GB) was made in China.

      NOOOOO!!!!!!!!

      Seriously, bummer. The good news is The Samsung Corporation have entered the HDD market to good reviews. I have two of their drives, and yes, they're made in Korea: http://www.anandtech.com/storage/showdoc.aspx?i=30 31

      Noticed since HP switched PC manufacture to China they've been getting shoddier quality too. Bad News, so I reach for my security blanket: http://news.top100.biz/shopping/Made-in-China-blan kets-withdrawn-in-New-Zealand-Australia

    7. Re:War of Quality by Choad+Namath · · Score: 1

      Have you seen a Thinkpad from the last few years? They're the same as they were before the handover. Most electronics are made in China, it generally comes down to who makes them and how much oversight there is. If it's some random cheap company, then it probably will be crappy. If it's a legitimate company (like Lenovo), then the quality will generally be higher. Seeing as Seagate drives are already made in China, I don't see why this would be a big deal.

    8. Re:War of Quality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here Here! I was just going to post the same thing until I came across your's.

      China poisons our pet food, children's toys, toothpaste, and who knows what else and we want to trust them with our hard drives?

      This nation is screwed because China bought all of our politicians.

    9. Re:War of Quality by BillGatesLoveChild · · Score: 1

      > Most electronics are made in China, it generally comes down to who makes them and how much oversight there is. Companies are moving manufacturing to China only for three reasons: Price, Price and Price. Western companies contracting to China need to keep an eye on quality, or their names will go to mud. Seagate obviously have a strong eye for quality at the moment (my racks of Seagate HDDs are testament to that! not *one* failure!) But if Chinese Management (no offense, China) takes over, will they keep an eye on quality? I suspect the corporate culture is very different, and contrary to what the China thinks is expected of it. Walmart is filled with Chinese-made crap because it's cheap, not because it's good. > Have you seen a Thinkpad from the last few years? They're the same as they were before the handover. If they have, that's good. Personally used them and never had a high opinion of their quality. IBMers told me they called them "Stinkpads". > If it's a legitimate company (like Lenovo), then the quality will generally be higher. IBM's death in the HDD business began when they moved HDD manufacturing to Eastern Europe. The Desk Star series (aka "Death Star" Series) The quality was appaling, and worse because IBM denied there was a problem when they full well knew they were selling customers units with a high-defect rate. I had two of these drives. Absolute lemons. IBM ended up abandoning the business, selling it to Hitachi. In the end, depends on who buys Seagate. Depends on corporate culture. HP's Chinese made PCs too a dive in quality, but other companies like Toshiba have managed to hold the grade. (BTW Fujitsu is the only Japanese PC company that still makes PCs in Japan). > Seeing as Seagate drives are already made in China, I don't see why this would be a big deal. Well, despite this story on Slashdot, no fighting it. Companies will keep moving operations to China: It's the new land of opportunity. I hope Seagate stays American owned, but with Samsung producing nice drives at least we have a choice.

  16. Consolidation in hard drive market? by bomanbot · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Wasnt Seagate the company that bought Maxtor not too long ago? And will the buyout end there or will we see the great consolidation in the hard drive business as well, so that in the end it may look like the CPU market, especially for x86 processors?

    I mean, there are not that many hard drive companies left anyway, the big players are Seagate/Maxtor, Hitachi, Western Digital and Samsung and thats about it. Let Seagate be bought and maybe merge another company or two and the hard dirve market looks an awfully lot like AMD/Intel or ATI(AMD)/NVIDIA, which may not be as beneficial as we think....

    1. Re:Consolidation in hard drive market? by PsychoSlashDot · · Score: 1

      Ages ago, Seagate bought Conner, who made good drives. Later, Maxtor bought Quantum, who made good drives. Recently, Seagate bought Maxtor. These days the real players are Seagate, Western Digital, Samsung, Fujitsu (SCSI only I believe) and Hitachi.

      --
      "Oh no... he found the .sig setting."
    2. Re:Consolidation in hard drive market? by ClamIAm · · Score: 1

      Magnetic platter-based drives are still the storage medium of choice in PCs, but these days I think you need to include flash memory in the discussion. This means the list of companies making "hard drives" is not as small as you state.

  17. Lenovo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm still pissed off at IBM for selling out to Lenovo.

    It has nothing to do with Lenovo as a company or the country its based in. I loved the colored IBM logo and the T41 line had no windows key right up until the point Lenovo bought it which made it much easier to hit control-alt and map another key to windows if necessary.

    So if Lenovo gets rid of the window keys and those stupid finger print readers I wouldn't much care if they bought Intel, HP and SGI.

    IMHO hard drives are redicuously cool most people don't realize that the read heads hover just *nanometers* from the platters. Its incredible that they work at all.

  18. Securely? by The+Null+Repeater · · Score: 1

    In recent years, modern disk drives, used to store vast quantities of digital information securely

    I don't know of ANY hard drive that natively stores information securely.

    A far stretching thought: "They" don't want Lenovo to make hard drives because Lenovo would probably make a hard drive that does store information securely through cryptographic means. Then "they" could no longer read your HDD. Yes, yes, I know there are full hard drive encryption programs out there but you pay a larger performance hit than you would if it was implemented in the HD's hardware.

    1. Re:Securely? by Logger · · Score: 1

      Seagate does sell a drive with hardware based encryption, but "modern disk drives" is an exageration.

      http://www.seagate.com/www/en-us/products/laptops/ momentus/momentus_5400_fde.2/

      From what I've found, only Seagate and one company I've never heard of offer drives with hardware based encryption.

      http://www.full-disk-encryption.net/Full_Disc_Encr yption.html

      Of course, you can always go the route of a host controller that has hardware based encryption, and then you don't have to trust the drive at all.

  19. National debt is intrinsically worthless. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    National debt is intrinsically worthless. It only has value because people believe it has value. It's much like IP.

    Hard drives, on the other hand, are not. Even if just for scrap, they have intrinsic, physical value. The manufacturing facilities also have intrinsic value. Seagate's development staff and their knowledge offers intrinsic value.

    So, yes, it does make sense to get worried when actual value is being sent overseas. On the other hand, it's not really worth getting worked up over the transfer of intrinsically-worthless debt.

  20. (Way OT) by lmnfrs · · Score: 1

    I've had very mixed experiences with WD drives. I know people who have always had good experiences with them, but I've noticed that some don't work with certain drive controllers.

    Twice I have had WD drives that were functional stop working, randomly or when connected to a different motherboard/controller. Through testing on other motherboards/controllers, in both cases, I found that the drive was not recognized at all by some controllers (major brand names, that detected other Seagate, Maxtor, and WD drives with no problems). I was eventually able to find a PCI card that did recognize the drive.

    Based on my first experience I stopped buying them, but helped a friend several years later with his drive that had randomly failed. It was SATA instead of PATA and had the same weird incompatibility. It worked on a Silicon Image based controller that is known to have a slight deviation from the SATA spec. (and it cost him an extra $35).

  21. Re:Damn it by ivan256 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    [Insert country name here]'s products are hit or miss to. That's why most people judge product quality on reviews and the reputation of the individual maker rather than the region in which they are manufactured.

    Now if you have political reasons for not giving business to a particular country or government, that's another story, and is perfectly respectable.

  22. Fuck nationalism, what about quality? by pavon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Seagate is pretty much the only computer componets company that hasn't wavered much in quality over the years. IBM, Western Digital, and Maxtor have all gone through phases ranging from good quality to absolute crap, while Seagate has continued to put out consistently good products.

    I understand that theory that larger companies can decrease overhead and thus be more efficient, but that never seems to happen. The success rate on mergers looks almost as bad as on startups. But this stupid economic model that is the stockmarket rewards growth (even artificial growth) over all else - quality, efficiency you name it. We created this system, and the laws that govern it, and then we act shocked, just shocked, when the market consolidates to the point of a monopoly. What is the point of even having anti-trust laws when we not only allow but encourage consolidation at every turn.

    Sorry, I'm just so tired of seeing all these mergers that decrease the amount of competition in the field and end up destroying everything that was good about the company to begin with.

    1. Re:Fuck nationalism, what about quality? by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

      But this stupid economic model that is the stockmarket rewards growth (even artificial growth) Actually, this is a feature of the monetary system. It is now based on debt. Debt which increases at 5% per year, which is an exponential function. The monetary system now requires companies to grow... Change the monetary system and you'll change business behaviour.

      --
      Deleted
    2. Re:Fuck nationalism, what about quality? by darkwhite · · Score: 1

      Seagate is pretty much the only computer componets company that hasn't wavered much in quality over the years. IBM, Western Digital, and Maxtor have all gone through phases ranging from good quality to absolute crap, while Seagate has continued to put out consistently good products. My experience is quite the opposite. The only company whose drives have never failed on me is Maxtor (not a small sample size, either). My Seagate drives have failed more than once.

      Every single assignment of drive reliability by manufacturer I've seen has been very anecdotal and not supported by my own experience. So you shouldn't have stated what you did unequivocally.
      --

      [an error occurred while processing this directive]
  23. China Seagate by hackus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Question: These people allowed all of our technology such as computers...etc....out of the country and NOW they have a problem with simple storage devices?

    Whats wrong with this picture?

    China already owns Taiwan all nice and legal like.

    The Chinese already HAVE everything they need to build anything they want.

    The Chinese OWN the United States. China has been buying our treasury bills to float the home mortgages everyone has for christ sake, along with those credit cards everyone on average owes like $5K on!

    NOW they have a problem with moving a relatively simple technology like drive storage out of the country?

    Gimme a beak!

    -Hack

    --
    Got Geometrodynamics? Awe, too hard to figure out? Too bad.
    1. Re:China Seagate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "China already owns Taiwan all nice and legal like."

      , in reality it's the other way round, the growth in China is strongly due to heavy investment from Taiwan over the years, which makes this problem mute anyway as Taiwan has excelled in tech for the last 30 plus years, and many of it's hi tech companies outsource to china anyway.
      If you look at many of the large businesses in China its Taiwanese Money, which btw is not China and has a completely independent Government which China is incredibly hostile to. Having lived in Taiwan for a while, a huge swath of the population are very pro maintaining or increasing their independent status.
      Also never quote Mao on anything to do with Economics, as Mao's policies retarded China's development a good 30+ years, as he is conveniently forgotten about in China. to a large extent.

  24. Re:Damn it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where exactly do you think they make most hard drives today? Detroit perhaps?

  25. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  26. NO by unity100 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    excuse me, im no racist, but i dont want chinese in control of seagate. seagate is some firm that works exceptionally good. i dont want any mishaps happening after some other corp buying it and "restructuring". mergers and acquisitions thing is one of the most harmful concepts in business world.

    1. Re:NO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YOUR A RACIST!! At the drop of a hat, Slashdotters will label you a racist! Are you backpedaling yet?

    2. Re:NO by unity100 · · Score: 1

      being cautious as to a corporation which is under a strictly tight government's rule buying out the biggest, most important hard drive maker in the WORLD, is what it is - cautious.

      its not a european country or a japanese company or american or canadian or even brazilian - its a COMMUNIST country's company. which will do whatever they are told, without excuses if government orders.

      curious though, despite im not afraid to say what i mean to say without hiding my identity, some people like you post as anonymous cowards. why is that ?

  27. It may be Great Wall by SpaceLifeForm · · Score: 1
    --
    You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.
  28. Momentus 5400 FDE.2 by pjcreath · · Score: 1

    On-disk encryption is why the U.S. government would be nervous about Chinese ownership of Seagate. They'd be afraid of a back door in their "secure" hard drives.

  29. inevitable by operato · · Score: 1

    things like this is inevitable. grow big or be bought.

  30. Remember... by Jon.Laslow · · Score: 1

    ...just because you aren't paranoid doesn't mean the whole would ISN'T out to get you.

  31. Outside the U.S. by smurfsurf · · Score: 1

    > Imagine if DES had a backdoor (or Seagate's equivalent), and my organization uses Seagate's
    > out of box encryption (not likely ;) -- now a foreign government controls this. Legitimately scary.

    So you are saying that currently every state besides the U.S. should be scared?

    1. Re:Outside the U.S. by polar+red · · Score: 1

      &So you are saying that currently every state besides the U.S. should be scared? Yes we are, but not because of encryption, more because of the random gun slinging.
      --
      Yes, I'm left. You have a problem with that?
  32. China's reasoning and the planned US response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Buying up all that debt helps ensure a market stays around for their goods until their economy grows enough to start providing a market for their manufacturing.

    Our so called leaders in Washington are actually very well educated people who are well aware of the history of Roman civilization, ancient Greek civilization, and some in the government, of even older civilizations. It's a historically established fact that the US is in decline, and war is the most effective way of staving off and reversing such decline. So...they're using it as a opportunity to line their pockets. Sell off whatever businesses they can to China, and prepare for a war against them.

    I hear you say, "that's nuts, China has nukes."

    The thing is, the government has a long history of developing working military technology, then canceling the project, declaring it a failure and a waste of money. I recall one by the name of Star Wars Strategic Defense.

    Yes, in all likelihood we have orbiting lasers and particle weapons, and nukes up in orbit, and probably have for well over 20 years, upgraded from time to time. Provided they're believed to be effective in downing most of what China can send our way, and war is the logical conclusion of a doctrine of using preemptive aggression "to ensure another world power never surpasses the United States."

    Finally, consider we have either a madman or an occultist as president, (take your pick,) and the pieces of the puzzle rapidly fit together.

  33. I think a fair amount of concern is warranted here by LoofWaffle · · Score: 1
    China buying Seagate doesn't mean that they only get access to storage devices

    From Wikipedia:

    Seagate was traded for most of its life as a public company under the symbol "SGAT" on the NASDAQ system, then moved to the NYSE system under the symbol "SEG" in the 1990s. In 2000, the company was taken private by an investment group composed of Seagate management, Silver Lake Partners and Texas Pacific Group in a 3-way merger-spinoff with Veritas Software; Veritas merged with Seagate, which was bought by the investment group. Veritas was then immediately spun off to shareholders, gaining rights to Seagate Software Network and Storage Management Group (with products such as Backup Exec), as well as Seagate's shares in SanDisk and Dragon Systems. Seagate Software Information Management Group was renamed Crystal Decisions in May 2001. Seagate re-entered the public market in December 2002 on the New York Stock Exchange as STX.


    The US has every right to be concerned.
    --
    You know, Custer had a plan.
  34. in reality it's the other way round by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hehehehe, you should ask the U.N., the WHO, the Olympic and see how independent Taiwan is.

    There is a lot of Taiwanese business in China and China is all too happy to encourage this. If not for the restrictive policy the current administration in Taiwan, Taiwan business would invest even more in China. Taiwan is choking itself for not trade with China directly. Its economy was the best of Asia not long ago but now has fallen far behind while China has grown.

    Taiwanese are Chinese. You may not like this but you don't get to choose you parents.

    1. Re:in reality it's the other way round by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      So Americans are British?

      Sorry, no. We used to be British, then we told them to fuck off, and now we're independent. That's how it works. It doesn't matter what happened in the past; the people's current desires are what's important. If the people in a geographic region want to be an independent country, that's the way it should be. Otherwise, most of Europe would still belong to Italy.

    2. Re:in reality it's the other way round by fliptout · · Score: 1

      Most Taiwanese are *ethnically* Chinese. You sound like another mainlander who has never been to Taiwan. Taiwan has a seperate government, military, currency.. This adds up to a *de facto* independent Taiwan. The Mainlander military will have a hard time invading Taiwan with their Audi A6s, I bet.

      --
      A witty saying proves you are wittier than the next guy.
    3. Re:in reality it's the other way round by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... the people's current desires are what's important.

      No to be pedantic, but I think you'll find what's important is the actions of the people - not simply the desires.

    4. Re:in reality it's the other way round by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I'm just concerned here with what's right and just. If the people want to be independent, then the right thing is for them to be independent. It's not right to force people to be part of a country they don't want to be in. It might be the way much of history has happened, but that doesn't make it right.

  35. Horse, cart, barn door, etc etc etc. by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

    This has raised concerns among American government officials about the risks to national security in transferring high technology to China.

    Why start now?

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  36. Too late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They already do all their manufacturing in China, anyway.

    What I want to know is why all, or nearly all, manufacturing of consumer products has gone to China in the past fifteen years. Is the price advantage really that big? Have North Americans forgotten how to run factories, and how to work in them? There are inherent advantages to owning your own factories: you avoid giving a percentage of your profits to a third-party firm, and you can do quality control &tc much more effectively (see the Mattel recalls). The PHBs at our companies should stop focusing on buying each other out, and start looking at how to bring down the cost of manufacturing in their own companies. Then, if there is a 1/$ price differential with Chinese goods, they can slap a big flag on the box and say 'Made in America'. By now, that should be worth something - at least for any American who's been watching the news.

  37. No wonder the US$ is in free fall by gvc · · Score: 1

    Americans like to buy Chinese stuff with their greenbacks, but refuse to honor them when the Chinese attempt to purchase anything of value.

    1. Re:No wonder the US$ is in free fall by Ironsides · · Score: 1

      Americans like to buy Chinese stuff with their greenbacks

      Not really, it's just hard to find stuff that ISN'T made in China.

      but refuse to honor them when the Chinese attempt to purchase anything of value.

      Two responses come to mind:
      We're glad to sell the stuff. Just not companies. Cars come to mind.
      We'll sell them something of value when they finally sell us something of value.

      --
      Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
    2. Re:No wonder the US$ is in free fall by amightywind · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Americans like to buy Chinese stuff with their greenbacks, but refuse to honor them when the Chinese attempt to purchase anything of value.

      When was the last time the Chinese government allowed the purchase of a Chinese company? Never. China trade is not reciprocol. China is free to overbid for Seagate if they want. But with the gross trade imbalance, currency manipulation (which costs US jobs), and export quality problems they would be unwise to pervoke a labor friendly congress anymore than they have. The US economy in free fall grows at a rate of 4%/yr. China will have to grow at 10% for the next 100 years to equal it in size. Good ruck!

      --
      an ill wind that blows no good
    3. Re:No wonder the US$ is in free fall by pangloss · · Score: 1

      When was the last time the Chinese government allowed the purchase of a Chinese company? Never.

      What I know about finance might fit on the tip of a pencil eraser, but it's ridiculous to claim that a Chinese company has never been acquired by a foreign firm. There's a giant banking & legal industry in China around the foreign acquisition of Chinese firms. Depending on the source (e.g., IMF vs Beijing Communication University), foreign investment accounts for as little as 10% of total investment to as much as 75% control of industry in China.

      Beer being a subject nearer and dearer to my heart, I find it makes discussions of finance a little more palatable: In 2004, Anheuser-Busch acquired 99.7% of Harbin Brewery for USD 600 million. That same year, Interbrew (i.e. InBev, i.e., makers of Stella Artois, Beck's, etc.) acquired 70% of Zhejiang Shiliang Brewery for USD 53.2 million. In 2003, Interbrew acquired 50% and 70% stakes in Kaikai Beer Group and Golden Lion Beer, respectively. Also in 2003, Carslberg acquired 100% of Kunming Huashi Brewery.

      Ganbei!

    4. Re:No wonder the US$ is in free fall by red_gnom · · Score: 2, Informative

      "The US economy in free fall grows at a rate of 4%/yr. China will have to grow at 10% for the next 100 years to equal it in size."

      Your calculation is incorrect.
      US GDP in 2006 was 5 times of China.
      With your assumption that US economy grows 4%/yr, and Chinese 10%/yr.

      5 * (1.04)^n = (1.1)^n
      n = number of years = 29

      Therefore with those grow rates it would take China 29 years to overtake US economy.
      In reality the difference in their GDP grow rates is greater, so it should happen much sooner.

  38. just don't lick them... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For you geeks that don't have lights in your basements, it is no longer safe to determine computer parts by taste due to lead content in hard drives (because, you know... no electronics have EVER contained lead!)

  39. Too Little, Too Late by YetAnotherBob · · Score: 1

    The time when this could have been done was in the 1970's. now, with Globalization, the technical 'secrets' are spread out all over the world.

    Quick, somebody lock the door, the horse just go out of the barn!

    --
    Everybody knows 3 people with my name.
  40. No Double Standard by chebucto · · Score: 2, Informative

    In both cases, the US Government is looking out for the interests of the US - as it should. It's good for the US if it can steal others' technology; it's bad for the US if others steal its technology. Any successful country will do the same; unsuccessful ones will end up like Russia in the 90s - making others richer while it gets poorer.

    --
    The English word fart is one of the oldest words in the English vocabulary.
  41. Re: Thinkpad? Thinkagain. Lenovo Customer Service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lenovo has at least done well at keeping up the high quality standards that IBM started with the Thinkpad laptops. Customer service however is another matter entirely.

    I recently purchase a Thinkpad directly from Lenovo, only to be lied to by one of their customer care reps, which resulted in my being completely screwed over. To sum it up, Lenovo lied to me, stole my money and told me to go away. (If anyone's interested, more details regarding this Lenovo customer service tragedy can be had here: http://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/0/269/RipOff02 69581.htm)

    Which is a damn shame, considering how fantastic the thinkpad line of laptops are, it's a veritable tragedy that the customer service is being handled by outsourced call centers in far off lands where people are being paid pennies on the dollar. I'm all for people having jobs in India, but as far as I'm concerned, they should be paying said India call center reps the same wage(s) they would be paying someone stateside - this would result in a higher quality of living and boost the entire economy for the region that they outsource calls to. To top it off, it would ensure that people in these call centers take pride in doing their job properly because they cared about the work they were doing and they paycheck they would receive because of it. I know that in my particular situation, if the person I spoke to cared about her job, she would take the time to memorize the proper return procedure.

    I'm not alone in any of this either, (If you do a google search for "Lenovo lied to me" all sorts of horror stories pop up.) heres another report about how someone else entirely had a somewhat similar problems in their dealings with Lenovo: (http://consumerist.com/consumer/complaints/consum ers-speak-lenovos-tricky-customer-service-144702.p hp) And that article was from 2005! So all these 'miscommunication' problems, and people being flat out *lied* to by Lenovo is an ongoing problem that no one inside Lenovo cares enough about to address properly.

    If Lenovo succeeds in buying out Seagate, I for one will never be purchasing another Seagate hard drive, which again, really sucks, as I've always thought Seagate to be far more reliable than Maxtor and most other HD manufacturers.

  42. Cisco by Presto+Vivace · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I thought the Chinese already owned Cisco, or am I misinformed?

    1. Re:Cisco by pantherace · · Score: 1

      Nah, they still use college student labor.

      Though cost cutting will probably result in them moving down a link or two.

  43. Outrage? by king-manic · · Score: 1

    You do know a large amount of drives are made in Taiwan. Which is within arms reach of Chinese technology spies. I can't imagine sea gate has much technology that China hasn't already stolen.

    --
    "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    1. Re:Outrage? by GPL+Apostate · · Score: 1

      Tons of stuff has been assembled in plants all over the world, for a long time.

      Just because something is assembled in China doesn't mean the critical IP is under the control of Chinese interests. With chips, for instance, there have been integrated circuits for decades that say 'Made in Sri Lanka' or 'Made in Hati' on them. Haiti, for cripes sake. All that means is that the final assembly and packaging was done in Haiti. Silicon wafers were produced somewhere in the US and shipped to Haiti for the labor intensive process of slicing them into dice, wire bonding, and packaging.

      --
      Microsoft says legacy (serial/parallel) ports are bad. They don't obfuscate the hardware enough.
    2. Re:Outrage? by mikiN · · Score: 1

      How can you be so sure that the silicon on those dies actually came from the US? Not unlike the current problem of fake drugs, in (embedded) electronics, there have been numerous cases of fake chips. Perfect lettering and logo on the package, performing like 'advertised' on cursory inspection, but containing entirely different hardware, only to be detected by more in-depth testing.

      --
      The Hacker's Guide To The Kernel: Don't panic()!
  44. Future merger ideas... by supremebob · · Score: 1

    Perhaps they should buy Hitachi Global Storage instead, and then pick up Lexmark as well. Do that, and they've basically rebuilt a Chinese version IBM's former hardware division!

  45. Pfff... NON-sense. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just about all Seagate drives are currently made in Singapore, China, Taiwan, and one other south-east Asian country that escapes me. I deal with an insanely high volume of seagate drives in my profession. This is complete FUD imo.

  46. interesting, *yawn* by perlchild · · Score: 1

    Just how many slashdotters went "yawn" another attept at politicians to hide how they sold us out?...
    I mean, the next door neighbour might be fooled, but the average slashdotter might know it's been owmed and manufactured in china for years...

    I'm not saying it's bad, just that in no fucking way is it news...

  47. Ok, you are completely wrong. by Generic+Player · · Score: 1

    Export of "Strong crypto" (which includes symmetric cipher using 128 bit keys) is still regulated by the US government. Its not as bad as it was, but its still a very complicated mess of regulations and you do have to get products reviewed. Exporting crypto to "the bad guys" is totally forbidden, like selling any device that contains a web browser capable of TLS to someone in Iran would get you into trouble for instance.

    And there is no limit on commercial encryption products key size, you can get 256 bit AES support in lots of stuff.

    And the idea that they can just universally break any 128 bit cipher is pretty dumb. They don't have the resources to make brute forcing 128 bit keys reasonable. Its very unlikely that they are aware of significant weaknesses in every symmetric cipher that exists.

  48. Dead tech? by Temkin · · Score: 1



    How many more years will we be using rotating magnetic media for storage? Flash disks are just around the corner. A generation or three of development, and this kind of disk media will likely be dead.

    Not a certainty, but something to think about...

    1. Re:Dead tech? by Vr6dub · · Score: 1
      http://news.com.com/8301-10784_3-9764589-7.html

      According to the link Seagate is ready to cover their bases. I remember reading a Forbes article several months back with the CEO of Seagate talking about jumping in the flash game.

    2. Re:Dead tech? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Won't happen. Use a flash mass storage device as a database container on a highly accessed (both reads and writes) DB, and watch the drive fail in days. Flash only has a low number of read write cycles (even with load levelling) before it goes bad.

  49. National security? by JanneM · · Score: 1

    If owning harddrive manufacturing (the actual process which, note, is already taking place in Asia) is "national security" worthy, then pretty much everything is.

    For instance, Japan and Europe could - and perhaps should - argue that food production certainly is "national security", both in terms of being self-sufficient so nobody can choke off the country, and in terms of risking evil foreigners secretly poisoning the food supply, and promptly choke off any import of any food that is also produced in country. OMG! GM crops could secretly have been made to spread and disable homegrown varieties!

    You could just as plausibly argue that spreading ideas and framing issues is national security, and restrict import and distribution of foreign tv-programs, movies and other media. And how about those foreign-built airplanes and cars, operating systems and essential software - how do we know there isn't a secret function in the software to disable it in case of a conflict?

    Silly? no more so than this.

    I'd wish for a tit-for-tat arrangement, frankly. If foreigners, Swedes, say, are restricted from owning stuff in the US, US individuals and corporations would be similarly restricted in Sweden. If foreginers need to register fingerprints and risk body cavity searches coming to the US, so should Americans when going abroad. The expense, the inconvenience and the lost business would soon make sure that only those restrictions which really are important will remain while a lot of the pointless theatrics would disappear.

    --
    Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    1. Re:National security? by onesandzeros · · Score: 1

      > I'd wish for a tit-for-tat arrangement

      Considering how 'free trade' isn't really working from the point of view of the US or any other already-wealthy western nation, I'd wish for it too. Rather, I /do/ wish for it. The Asian exporters aren't engaged in trade as much as they are in currency transfer or something to that effect. They're willing to sell us everything but buy next to nothing from us. Because of all the attention China's getting these days, the Japanese are very quietly slipping under the radar, but this is an old game which they invented and are still playing very well.

      And, citing your example of reciprocal immigration inconveniences, the US isn't the only country playing that game: http://www.japanprobe.com/?p=2281 .

  50. Is this how they will defeat us? by AmazingRuss · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Seems like they are trying to create a couple of generations in our country that have no idea how to design or manufacture anything, by undercutting us and removing any incentive to learn.

    If they can keep this going, the US will eventually become a nation of realtors and barristas. Could be they aren't interested in the paper we give them at all.

    1. Re:Is this how they will defeat us? by ClamIAm · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Seems like they are trying to create a couple of generations in our country that have no idea how to design or manufacture anything, by undercutting us and removing any incentive to learn.

      If by 'they', you mean 'China' or 'the Chinese government', I'm pretty sure this is incorrect. The Chinese and their government certainly have more (economic) power now than before, however this power has come at the cost of giving even more power to those who are already the winners of Global Capitalism.

      Also, regarding education in the US, I suggest reading John Taylor Gatto's essay "Against School". In it, he documents how the US education system was designed to mold children into people who do what they're told and won't fuss when the ruling class pulls tricks like outsourcing, "free" trade agreements, wage/benefit reduction, labor suppression, etc.

      To steal a term used by free-market apologists, basically what we have here is the invisible hand of the ruling class doing whatever they can/want to increase their power and riches. It has nothing to do with some evil Chinese plot to destroy America.

    2. Re:Is this how they will defeat us? by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Your own management did this - I suggest cutting off their cocaine supply instead of blaming China.

    3. Re:Is this how they will defeat us? by canuck57 · · Score: 1

      If they can keep this going, the US will eventually become a nation of realtors and barristas. Could be they aren't interested in the paper we give them at all.

      Too late. I haven't seen a hard drive made in the US (or Canada for that matter) in over 10 years. Not even assembled here. Even 25 years ago, the chips came from Malaysian factories.

      Like TVs, soon cars...they will not be made here.

      It isn't going to change unless management, unions and engineering come together and get real about business. We need to kick the Dilbert principle out of the work place. Management needs to be sharp and working for the company without the multi million dollar parasite contracts for incompetence. Unions have get real with their expectations and help dysfunctional management get productivity up along with quality and reduce costs out of the process. Or their members will be unemployed. Engineering has to get off their a$$es and automate the factories without stupid price tags and bring back ingenuity and not SOYA (Sit On Your Ass).

      But for most it is not going to happen.

    4. Re:Is this how they will defeat us? by RevHawk · · Score: 1

      Let's not forget about the terrible cost of industrialization in China! Their environment in many urban places is being DESTROYED - utterly. Even if China becomes the next superpower, it's going to have serious health, economic, and environmental concerns to contend with.

    5. Re:Is this how they will defeat us? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      It isn't going to change unless management, unions and engineering come together and get real about business. We need to kick the Dilbert principle out of the work place. Management needs to be sharp and working for the company without the multi million dollar parasite contracts for incompetence. Unions have get real with their expectations and help dysfunctional management get productivity up along with quality and reduce costs out of the process. Or their members will be unemployed. Engineering has to get off their a$$es and automate the factories without stupid price tags and bring back ingenuity and not SOYA (Sit On Your Ass).

      Don't blame the engineers; we're just doing as we're told. (Yes, this is a valid excuse as long as you're not following orders to kill people or anything like that.) If we don't do as we're told, we get fired.

      Unions? What unions? How many unions do you think we have left in this country? We have unions in the domestic automakers' very few remaining US factories, but these factories are getting closed as fast as possible so they can open factories in Mexico instead, where there are no unions. The Japanese and German automakers have been building car factories here in the USA, but they put them in the South and refuse to work with unions. The unions don't have nearly as much power as they used to.

      Engineers aren't allowed to use ingenuity; management isn't interested in that. Ingenuity comes from the Marketing department; they figure out how to convince suckers to buy cheap crap at vastly inflated prices. Engineering is pared down as slim as they can make it, so there's only enough time to do support duties.

      If you haven't figured it out yet, the problem, as always, is with management. The person at the top is always responsible for problems under him; this is a principle that hasn't changed with time, yet somehow some people choose to forget this. It's the same with companies. Management makes all the decisions.

      I work in a company where we produced a chip with lots of promise for its market, and we were way ahead of the competition, and had buyers lined up. As soon as the first revision of this chip came out, and was hurried out because of an artificial deadline set by management with no regard to reality, and thus had many bugs which needed to be fixed, management LAID OFF the design team! Why? Because they planned to outsource all the upcoming development to India. Well, this chip as I said had tons of bugs, but now all the people who had designed it were gone, so there was no one to fix the bugs. The Indian team took a look at this and said "we don't have the resources or time to do this". Eventually, an Israeli team took up the project, and managed to fix most of the bugs after a couple of YEARS. Of course, the Israeli team cost MORE than the US team, so there was no cost savings here whatsoever. Now, this market has matured a lot. We could be the market leaders, with several different chips, if we had kept the momentum and expertise we had before. Instead, we're floundering, and our competition has caught up. We went through yet another round of layoffs after that first one. I don't expect to be employed here in another two years.

      I have no idea how anyone expects to "kick the Dilbert principle out of the work place." The people in charge ARE the PHBs, and they're certainly not going to kick themselves out. The Boards of Directors that hire the Executives are all PHBs too. Everyone is out for a quick buck, and apparently has no idea how to run a successful company in the long term any more; all those people are dead or on death's door, and their stupid kids in the Baby Boomer generation will never measure up to them.

      The thing to do now is figure out where we're headed, and start preparing for the worst. For some, that means learning Mandarin. For others, that means buying a bunch of guns and some very remote property.

    6. Re:Is this how they will defeat us? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't be so sure.

      The US produced lots of pollution during its industrialization too. Large parts of the East Coast are still highly polluted.

      But what's the harm in some (or a lot of) pollution? So it might make people's lives shorter, and unhealthier. So what? That'll generate some work for medical workers, and as long as China doesn't go to socialized medicine, it won't affect their economy too much. Shorter lifespans isn't much of a problem either; just make sure all those factory workers have their 1 kid while they're in their 20s, and by the time they're dying of cancer, the kid should be at or near adulthood, ready for a factory job.

      This may sound callous, but I'm just looking at it from the point of view of the people in power. They surely don't care about whether the working class lives to be 90, or if they have clean cities to live in. The elites don't care about these things, because they don't have to live in those conditions. From a purely economic point of view, pollution and environmental concerns aren't very important.

  51. I bet by iminplaya · · Score: 1

    This will go over like a lead balloon.

    --
    What?
  52. There goes the quality. by liftphreaker · · Score: 1

    Seagate already does a ton of manufacturing in China but they are ultimately held accountable to their American overlords when it comes to quality and cost. Once it goes to China, I bet their quality will approach Maxtor's or even that of Excelstor. Throw a billion cheap low cost drives at the market and they will continue to have buyers.

  53. This is correct by Newton+IV · · Score: 1

    No industrial production should remain in the USA, except MBA's blueshirt bullshit.

  54. Funny. by TheLink · · Score: 1

    China already makes those drives, so they already have the tech.

    As for "data encryption" maybe they're afraid that China will no longer put US backdoors in Seagate crypto (and perhaps put their own backdoors) ;).

    Because if you do it right, the US Gov should be holding the private keys and not Seagate. A partial/full copy of the symmetric key(s) used to encrypt the data would be encrypted to the public key and stored so that whoever has private key can get them. Lookup Lotus Notes for such an example.

    Anyway, what do the US leaders actually care about? It's obviously not the security of the USA, otherwise they'd be catching whoever it is who did 9/11 instead of wasting lives and resources in Iraq. They scare their citizens about the evil terrorists/China, make laws and take actions that undermine what makes the USA the USA.

    They're the ones destroying/endangering the USA.

    --
  55. Re: Thinkpad? Thinkagain. Lenovo Customer Service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I assume you paid with a credit card, have you contacted your card company yet? They do not take kindly to merchants who rip off their customers and tend to come down pretty heavily. Even the simple threat of calling your card company may be enough to get vastly better treatment from Lenovo, because they'll get hit with pretty big penalties on top of losing your money if the card company decides in your favor. And if the threat doesn't move them, go ahead and talk to your card company. Another advantage is that once the card company is involved your work is basically complete. You get to sit back and let them do their thing and all you'll have to do is not pay such a large credit card bill.

  56. Put up or Shut up. by wellingj · · Score: 1

    The free market solution would be that if the US government values Seagate as such resource,
    they should just buy Seagate. It wouldn't be the dumbest investment our government could make.
    The other issue with that though is what company would trust Seagate Drives after that?
    I don't know about you guys but I think maybe IBM should get in to the disk market again...

    1. Re:Put up or Shut up. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      free market solution...US government...should just buy Seagate. Whoaaa. What kind of Libertarian are you??? A government owning a corporation? The horror. The horror.
    2. Re:Put up or Shut up. by wellingj · · Score: 1

      Where does it say in the Constitution that the government can't own a business?
      As long as they make a legitimate and ethical profit on it to justify the initial investment, why should I care?
      But I do agree with you in some regards. Can we actually trust the government to make a legitimate and
      ethicalprofit. As it stands they can barely justify the hole they are digging.

      Oh well... I'm going to work tomorrow and the government is going to take 30% of my wage for the day,
      and make my employer give them about that much too. So you can equate that to me working for the
      government for 2.5 hours tomorrow. oh joy!

  57. Made in the USA by simontek2 · · Score: 1

    Are hard drives even made in the USA anymore? Hell I am sure most drives are made in china. my seagate says product of Singapore. any real difference? Its like the difference of item made in canada vs the US.

    --
    SimonTek
    1. Re:Made in the USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you kidding? The drives made in Singapore by Seagate are generally rock solid. Singapore has always been a country focussed on quality and high-tech. Besides, it looks like you've even forgetting that Singapore is generally speaking an ally of the US, whilst effectively dissing it. Besides, what's the rationale behind your saying its the same thing as China? It's geographically kind of nearby? So I guess, uh, let's say a Russian-made BMW is the same as a German one huh?

      Interestingly, when Seagate bought Maxtor a lot of the Seagate OEM drives coming to market started being made in the ex-Maxtor Chinese factories, and I had 3 of 3 of those die within a year (bought at separate stores with big intervals - so not just a bad batch).

  58. Re:Care to elaborate? HE'S A SOUTHERN BOY! by aqk · · Score: 2, Funny

    heh heh... Dont worry about him... He still thinks Good ol' boy GM cars are made in America, while those crappy little Toyotas and Hondas are made in Japan.
    He probably also thinks that the world's best golfer is still a white man... ;-)

    But at least Budweiser is still the world's best beer and the best racing drivers in the world are in NASCAR, where, thank goodness they don't let in that cheap inferior Toyota and Honda junk!


  59. Exploding hard drives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When the Chinese take over building Seagate drives I'm sure they'll include the top secret 'self destruct' feature they build into Dell laptops. When a government with the motto of "do all evil" wants to buy your favorite HD manufacturer it makes you feel so blue :-( Maybe if they buy enough companies they can sponsor their own human atrocities olmypics in Beijing.

  60. Re: Thinkpad? Thinkagain. Lenovo Customer Service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yep, I already tried to do a chargeback, but according to my CC company, the way that this Lenovo rep had me send back the laptop (return to sender) left me without a tracking number. I was TOLD by the Lenovo rep that the old tracking number would just be re-used and that I could track my package going back to them with it, but that (just like everything else that rep told me) was a lie... Anyway, my credit card company is telling me I'm completely at the mercy of Lenovo, and should they deny the chargeback request initiated on behalf of me by my credit card company, I'm completely screwed out of my laptop and my money. (This is the first time in my life I've ever had to file a chargeback, and I honestly expected way more protection from these sorts of things from my CC company, but apparently this is how it works.) Oh, and the lady within Lenovo who is staving off my credit card company's attempt to do a chargeback is based out of Brazil, so I can't readily call her, and she won't answer my e-mails.

    I figure the least I can do is warn others as to this absolutely sickening experience, because it really looks like I'm just out of luck. According to Tony Bumarch in Lenovo Executive Customer Relations, (direct phone #: 919-543-6681 & e-mail: bumarch@us.lenovo.com) no one within Lenovo is to blame for flat out lying to me, and it was my responsibility to be more familiar with Lenovo's return procedures than an actual Lenovo employee. I haven't even been able to get a simple "I'm sorry one of our reps mis-informed you" out of them!

    A pretty sorry excuse for customer service if you ask me... so the moral of all this is buyer beware when dealing with Lenovo I guess.

  61. And the U.S: would not do it ? by aepervius · · Score: 1

    Get real. If such things was doable or was done, then the U.S. military already did it and this is the only reason they protest. Which means for the rest of the world it is the choice between the "red scare" and the "cow boy scare". And seeing how many country the US invaded recently under spurious reason, I would rather chose the red scare.

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
  62. freedom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it's really sad to see that the "champions of freedom", as they like to see themselves, don't even respect basic economic liberties.

  63. The problem is not what the Chinese can add... by scsirob · · Score: 1

    Don't be naive in thinking that the threat is China adding spy stuff.. I think it's a lot more realistic that Seagate will need to clean up their firmware base before a sell to remove the routines that are *already* there 'on request of certain agencies'. I would not be surprized at all if today's drives accept specific undocumented command sequences that can either disable the drive and/or disable any encryption in place.

    --
    To Terminate, or not to Terminate, that's the question - SCSIROB
  64. Christ ... The Red Paranoia by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    Seems like they are trying to create a couple of generations in our country that have no idea how to design or manufacture anything, by undercutting us and removing any incentive to learn. They are trying to make better lives for their people and themselves. They are trying to get rich. You do that through trade, and all they've done is set their currency so that they're cheap (at anything, as long as it brings in business). They have a billion people to drag out of subsistence living.

    Do you want to know the truth? Your problem is that the US dollar is the world reserve currency. This means that there's huge demand for it from other countries to buy stuff like oil. It makes you lazy because all you've got to do is print some and you can buy what you like. It makes you expensive because you gave yourselves massive pay raises compared to the rest of the world using the free money. You (Nixon) did this to yourselves.

    The outsourcing of manufacturing, the apathy, is all American.
    --
    Deleted
    1. Re:Christ ... The Red Paranoia by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Do you want to know the truth? Your problem is that the US dollar is the world reserve currency. This means that there's huge demand for it from other countries to buy stuff like oil. It makes you lazy because all you've got to do is print some and you can buy what you like. It makes you expensive because you gave yourselves massive pay raises compared to the rest of the world using the free money. You (Nixon) did this to yourselves.

      Actually, I'd like to know a little more truth than this. You're just telling me the past; I want to know the likely future. As I said before, I'm no economist or political expert. The Dollar might be the world reserve currency right now, but as the Dollar loses value (you can't just print all you want and expect the value to remain the same), this situation must change. So I'm trying to figure out how this situation is going to wind up, so I can prepare for it.

  65. takes one to know one.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  66. China owns hundreds of billions of US debt by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1
    But the dollar is sliding and that debt isn't a good deal any more. They need to diversify. That means selling the debt and buying other stuff... Like Lenovo and Seagate.

    An economist dreams that fancy accounting can fix things, Depends on the economist. Read Mises.

    --
    Deleted
  67. Wake up. China isn't communist by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    China, or any other socialist/communist country for that matter? They haven't been communist for decades. Your idea of them is something out of the 1970s.

    China is an authoritarian capitalist country and they're eating your lunch.

    --
    Deleted
  68. Completely off topic - your siggie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    -- The phrase "more better" is acceptable English. suck it grammar Nazis Acceptable is not the same as it being good language use.

    "This girl is acceptable. I shall marry her!"
  69. It was already produced in China by WoLpH · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So what will change? Perhaps some manager will move but for the rest it's exactly the same as before.

  70. Screw 'em. by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    By manufacturing stuff in China, corporations are able to save lots of money, and make much bigger profits. Corporate profits are far more important to the elites in Washington than national security. Explain to them that the downtime caused by the inferior quality would cost more over time in service.

    Plus, the free-trade crowd would be angered by such a move, as would the anti-government waste crowd, who would whine about the government paying 10 times as much for something that they could get made in China cheaply. Screw 'em - they've done enough to product quality. Then repeat that the inferior quality would cost more over time.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  71. ...and have them wake up to a nice light show. by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    China is an authoritarian capitalist country and they're eating your lunch. A well placed "export" of arms and/or a strong policy against trading with countries of that profile would take care of that problem nicely.
    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  72. Re:If you're *really* concerned about the future.. by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    I'd rather just take the route of starving that country out - or remove the problem altogether.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  73. Sounds like the film business to me. by yanagasawa · · Score: 1

    This sounds to me as if the Chinese had wanted to buy Kodak's film business in 1998.

  74. Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they're all made in china anyway.

  75. Slashdot: Too many Tin Mods by BillGatesLoveChild · · Score: 1

    Sheesh. Hey Lords of Slashdot: Anyone who uses Slashdot for a while without a -ve karma becomes a moderator, right? Well it's not working. We're seeing more and more tin mods who don't understand the different between disagreeing or modding someone down. How about actually enforcing the moderator guidelines? Meta-moderating doesn't work.

  76. American components, russian components... by uncreativeslashnick · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...all made in Taiwan!

  77. Re: Thinkpad? Thinkagain. Lenovo Customer Service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well that's pretty terrible. I hope you keep trying with both Lenovo and the card company, as both of them should be treating you better and one of them ought to give eventually. I never heard of a company being able to refuse a chargeback, I thought the whole point was that they got used against companies that were being uncooperative.

    In any case, best of luck in getting your money back, and thanks for the cautionary tale.

  78. Seagate by eples · · Score: 1

    Seagate is pretty much the only computer componets company that hasn't wavered much in quality over the years. IBM, Western Digital, and Maxtor have all gone through phases ranging from good quality to absolute crap, while Seagate has continued to put out consistently good products.
    Umm.. Yeah except for during the 80's. They had quite a few bad products for some time IIRC.
    --
    I'm a 2000 man.
  79. The penultimate "They" by AmazingRuss · · Score: 1

    By THEY, I meant their government, not their people. Yes, their government has set their currency artificially cheap, which gives their people an advantage over ours in pretty much anything that can be manufactured and exported. Yes, the dollar is, (for now at least) the world reserve currency, and has had its value propped up by the fact that it was the only currency used to purchase oil for the past 30 years, which is adding to the problem.

    Does that prove that the Chinese government does not have a long term plan to hollow out the United States industrial and technical base that supports our military superiority and propensity to invade other countries? No.

  80. Like the Chinese can't buy the same hardware by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

    right here in the US - or even put spies in Seagate's tech development department - and get the stuff anyway.

    This is just stupid shit intended to talk up the "huge threat" China is to the US economically and militarily.

    Sure, you don't want to give China our tiny nuclear warhead plans. That's about it for "technology transfer" as a security threat.

    The rest is bullshit. You don't become a strategic threat to somebody by having the same technology they do.

    --
    Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  81. cosco, perhaps by nido · · Score: 1

    I think you might be thinking of COSCO - China Ocean Shipping COmpany.

    As for this thing about objections to lenovo wanting to buy seagate: nothing like closing the barn door after the horses have all left. Whoops. Should've thought about these things when our government was printing money to bomb the vietnamese back in the 60's and 70's, or when Reagan was printing money to beat the soviets in the cold war, or when Clinton let the Fed cut loose the money hose to spark the tech bubble circa 1995, or when GWB let the Feral Reserve Bank turn up the money hose even higher to spark the housing bubble of 2003-2006.

    Probably should have turned the fan off before the shit hit it. Now We the People have a big mess to clean up, and some politicians to turn into Neo-Convicts.

    --
    Learn the rules so you know how to break them properly.
    www.teslabox.com
  82. And then the Loose Cow sells shares... by mnemotronic · · Score: 1

    What an amazing coincidence ... Seagate pres. Watkins mentions that the Chinese have not made an offer to buy the company, which the media morons translate as the Chinese may have made an offer, or might be thinking about it. Then motormouth Jim Cramer climbs on the bandwagon. All this serves as a bump in the price of the stock (cost - nothing). Three days later, chairman Steve Luzco (and presumably the other vulture capitalists, like Texas Pacific & Silver Lake, that own much of the stock) have prearranged stock sale dates. Could the two events possibly be connected? Certainly not. Nothing to see here. Move along.

    --
    The Russians have won. They have made the world a cesspool of distrust, greed, fear and hate.