Slashdot Mirror


What Your Favorite Web Sites Say About You

Jimmy writes to tell us that CNET is running an article on what your favorite Web sites say about you. One example takes a look at the possible origins of Facebook readers; "The typical Facebookers are what you'd get if YouTube and Flickr went halves on a baby. Yes, the site was created to help university students connect and have a good time, but connecting and having a good time generally involves unruly, drunken behavior, which is inevitably caught on film and posted for your entire friends list to see.'" The article also takes a look at eBay, Flickr, Slashdot, and several others.

163 comments

  1. Not very interesting.... by BWJones · · Score: 4, Interesting

    From TFA: The average male Slashdot user probably looks a lot like our model -- but has more acne and bigger glasses. Users are 23 years old but look twice their age and steadfastly refuse to accept the fact that Windows is actually not a bad operating system. Far from being lovable dorks, the Slashdotters have a vicious streak. They hunt like spiders, awaiting the arrival of an article from their victims -- usually a hapless news reporter. The second moderators accept a story, they pounce -- pedantry, suspicion and anonymity their weapons of choice.

    If you read the other entries, it is less an info piece and more of a fluff piece for c/net to blow their own horn when you get to the end. How do articles like this get posted to Slashdot?

    That said, while there are those of us that have been around since '98 or so, many Slashdot users that started participating in this forum back have continued to participate and additionally have created their own blogs. All in all, I'd have to say that whether or not I visit a website says less about me than the content that goes into my blog does.

    --
    Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    1. Re:Not very interesting.... by everphilski · · Score: 2, Funny

      If you read the other entries, it is less an info piece and more of a fluff piece for c/net to blow their own horn when you get to the end. How do articles like this get posted to Slashdot?

      you think the mods made it to the /. entry? :)

    2. Re:Not very interesting.... by Jarjarthejedi · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yeah, cause it's not like being a geek has little to do with appearance. Whatever happened to the recognition that stereotypes are usually wrong?

      --
      There are two kinds of fool One says 'This is old therefore good' Another says 'This is new therefore better'- Dean Ing
    3. Re:Not very interesting.... by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Oh come on, it's obviously tongue in cheek.

      Did you read the bit about CNET?


      CNET.co.uk attracts a wide variety of users but they almost always have one thing in common: they're gorgeous. Oh, and they like technology. Sure, they use MySpace, Facebook and once, misguidedly, even created a Twitter account (but they're sorry for that last part).

      They're the best sort of people to be around. They're highly educated, well-travelled and they possess the sort of qualities every mother tries to instil in her child. They'll one day go on to broker world peace, cure the incurable and are the very reason we wake up for work in the mornings. They're great and we love them all. Even the ones who think we sold them something and ring us up to complain.


      Don't start trying to fact check a joke piece...Unless you're doing some meta-humor by living up to their "Suspicion and Pedantry" snark.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    4. Re:Not very interesting.... by Goaway · · Score: 1

      I can only assume you mean it's not very interesting because it is simply stating the obvious.

    5. Re:Not very interesting.... by Jennifer+York · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The reason this gets posted is because it's a list. The fscking "List" format blog posts are driving me mad.
      "10 ways to..."
      "6 not so smart cats"
      "30 things to do with..."

      The structure is so simple: The headline hook writes itself, and the content can be complete horseshit but once it hits digg, you've got a front page post.

      I challenge you to try it: go to flickr, grab ten random photos based on a meta tag. Assemble them in a list, with perhaps some witty comments, but even that's not needed. Get five friends to digg it.

      Wait for the traffic storm to hit.

    6. Re:Not very interesting.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      as an employer I look at ur bebo, myspace , facebook or neo-narcissist website du jour and this effects my judgement of you.

      Sorry but you cannot say whatever you like with impunity.

    7. Re:Not very interesting.... by metlin · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Precisely.

      The one thing that some of us who've been around long will remember is that apart from the dupes and the bad editing, Slashdot has changed a lot over the years.

      When it started out, it was for geeks of a certain age and demographic. Over the years, those users have grown up, and with them, so has Slashdot.

      Compare the number of actual technology articles from the older versions of Slashdot with the number of articles relating to business, politics and management of technology on today's Slashdot. Slashdot has broadened its horizons, and the discussions tend to be a lot more balanced (if you do not believe me, just go over to Digg and see the trolls and the flamebaits out there).

      And yes, the average Slashdotter was (and is) probably a geek or a nerd, but I think that as they have matured, so has the website? Do we see the occasional crap posting and foam-at-the-mouth zealotry? Of course. But compared to the amount of actual, sane discussion, the percentage of idiocy is surprisingly less.

      Secondly, Slashdot is not just about the main articles - it is also about the posters having their journals and having sub-communities of posters.

      Over simplification and stereotyping has been the bane of many an analysis, and this article (if it can be called that) is no different.

      Bleh.

    8. Re:Not very interesting.... by eln · · Score: 5, Funny

      5 ways to piss off Slashdot readers:

      1.) Post a question that is answered in the summary (or better yet, the title).
      2.) Use a Slashdot meme in an unfunny way.
      3.) Be kdawson.
      4.) Post obvious karma whores, such as "text of article in case of Slashdotting".
      5.) Write your comments in list form.

    9. Re:Not very interesting.... by seaturnip · · Score: 1

      Slashdot would have done better to remain narrowly focuses on technical stuff. Whenever any other topic is covered the comments are largely ignorant. For example, slashdot pop-science articles are filled with almost nothing but +5 Funny comments.

    10. Re:Not very interesting.... by cortesoft · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah! They are so wrong... I am a 24 year old male, thank you very much.

    11. Re:Not very interesting.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      The jap chick on the last page is pretty hot. You can almost see up her shorts!

    12. Re:Not very interesting.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It would have been funnier if they were harder on subjects like Flickr:

      The average Flickr user is a lover of life. They are never without their camera and waste no opportunity to capture the moment. They travel often, absorbing new cultures as they go. Their goal is primarily to create a digital record of their adventures, so that by the time they're older, they'll have access to an unlimited supply of photos with which to bore and embarrass their grandchildren at family reunions.

      Some might say the Flickr user has a dark side -- they can be show-offs, and often brag to their less financially fortunate friends about their adventures. "Look at me standing in the shadow of the Louvre!" is a common cry. "Don't you wish you could be as beautiful and happy as I look standing at the top of the Eiffel Tower?"

      For the most part, though, they live for the moment and are tolerant and embracing of new people and cultures. All in all, Mr and Ms Flickr are sweethearts. I mean, come on, the only downside of Flickr users is they are too elitist and brag about their travels, their looks, and their happiness a bit too much?

      I'd come up with something worse to say about them if I bothered to frequent the site, but to me, it's about as interesting as talking about Photobucket or ImageShack users (i.e. people who want a place to dump photos) with the added distinction of some weird bragging and commenting habits.

      I would expect about as much from a journalist though. Of course they're going to be more favorable to flickr than the average person. At least we didn't get to hear their opinions of a Blackberry site.
    13. Re:Not very interesting.... by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 1

      I know a bunch of professional photographers, and I check their flickr pages for the amusing crap that they shoot, which they can't really get published. That's about it though. Otherwise it is seriously over-arty for me, and I have a high tolerance for that stuff.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    14. Re:Not very interesting.... by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Bah! I only read Slashdot and Ghastly's Comic. And Ghastly hasn't been updating lately. I have no life.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    15. Re:Not very interesting.... by Gilmoure · · Score: 4, Funny

      ...are filled with almost nothing but +5 Funny comments.

      I use my +3 shield of suspicion and +2 helm of sarcasm to counter that.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    16. Re:Not very interesting.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      slashdot is balanced? Um, what about all the discussions on anything related to biology or evolution (you know, the theory)? Those are pretty much the *definition* of one-sided.

    17. Re:Not very interesting.... by kv9 · · Score: 1, Funny

      6.) ???
      7.) Profit!

    18. Re:Not very interesting.... by jc42 · · Score: 1

      It reminds me of an article that P.J.O'Rourke wrote years ago for the National Lampoon. It was a list of ethnic groups, with a nasty, insulting characterization of each group. My favorite was Canadians, who were described as being just like white Americans, only more boring.

      It can be fun to read such things, and recognize yourself in all the groups that you belong to.

      I am a bit puzzled by the comment that Windows is "not a bad operating system". By all the rating criteria I know of, it's easily the worst system that I've ever used. At least on a small computer. (I'd admit that IBM's mainframe systems, which once upon a time I was sorta forced to learn, are all good competitors for the title "worst computer system ever". But those are a totally different sort of beast, and comparing them with the likes of Windows, linux, Solaris, OSX, etc. would be like comparing an auto with a railroad locomotive. Such comparisons are rather pointless. ;-)

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    19. Re:Not very interesting.... by Ossadagowah · · Score: 1

      Slashdot has broadened its horizons, and the discussions tend to be a lot more balanced

      The articles also receive 1/5th to 1/10th the amount of reader responses that they used to. If traffic keeps declining, slashdot may not seem like such a viable idea.

      --
      anata sekai o kakumei surush ga nai deshou? Anata no susumu michi wa yoi shite arimasu.
    20. Re:Not very interesting.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1.) Post a question that is answered in the summary (or better yet, the title).
      2.) Use a Slashdot meme in an unfunny way.
      3.) Be kdawson.
      4.) Post obvious karma whores, such as "text of article in case of Slashdotting".
      5.) Write your comments in list form.
      also...
      6.) Repeat that which has been already been expressed.
    21. Re:Not very interesting.... by BWJones · · Score: 1

      Mod up. *Very* funny.

      --
      Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    22. Re:Not very interesting.... by Kelson · · Score: 2, Funny

      6.) Now I know you're going to mod me down for this, but...

      As far as #2 and #5 are concerned, in Soviet Slashdotistan, lists write you!

    23. Re:Not very interesting.... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Number three only works for those of you who haven't already blocked kdawson from the front page, and if you haven't then you deserve to be pissed off.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    24. Re:Not very interesting.... by teh_chrizzle · · Score: 1

      Whatever happened to the recognition that stereotypes are usually wrong?

      stereotypes are wrong about as often as they are right, we usually feel bad about applying them in either case.

      the question i have is this: does a stereotype come about because the target group often engages in one or more of those behaviors, or does the target group engage in one or more of those behaviors because of the stereotype?

      --
      sarcasm:
      -noun
      1. harsh or bitter derision or irony.
    25. Re:Not very interesting.... by sgtsqh2o · · Score: 1

      I didn't read the stuff on CNET... I'm too busy imagining/thinking/wondering/fantasizing if they intentionally made their female model pose that way to make male readers ogle over CNET. Does the laptop imply technolust?

    26. Re:Not very interesting.... by DeadChobi · · Score: 1

      She's reading in her underwear because they think that all us slashdotters are reading in our underwear. They want to imply that it's a wholesome and acceptable method of internet use, and to remind us that CNet.com(tm) and its subsidiaries are supportive of all different kinds of people. Also, they want us to identify more with the model, who supposedly works at a tech news site. The end result of that is that we identify more with the website.

      --
      SRSLY.
    27. Re:Not very interesting.... by robotoverflow · · Score: 1

      We don't like profit either.

      --
      % mkdir :
      % ls -dF :
      :/
    28. Re:Not very interesting.... by glwtta · · Score: 1

      Um, what about all the discussions on anything related to biology or evolution (you know, the theory)? Those are pretty much the *definition* of one-sided.

      It's a little hard to have a multi-sided discussion about the theory of evolution (as a whole), since there is currently no alternative theory for the "other side" to take. Specific aspects/new findings about the theory generate a lot of (often interesting) debate that is anything but one-sided.

      This sounds like the prevailing misconception on Wikipedia that their NPOV policy dictates that all viewpoints that have ever been raised, including the most outlandish fringe theories, have equal weight and deserve equal time. That is simply not the case.

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
    29. Re:Not very interesting.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "the percentage of idiocy is surprisingly less"

      What's so surprising about 1% difference? You're welcome to celebrate some small victory if it makes your day, but I have learned over 20+ years to not put too much stock in *any* site on the Internet - even my own site has its share of trolls.

      Confucius say: "The Internet is to idiots what shit is to flies."

      The main difference with Slashdot is, the trolls and flames tend to get squeezed out by the asstroturfers ramming a corporate-sponsored agenda down our throats. Ever rip the ads out of a magazine and end up with 3 pages of content? That's what Slashdot would be like without the corporate highbrow spam.

    30. Re:Not very interesting.... by Night+Goat · · Score: 1

      You forgot one, "Be Zonk."

    31. Re:Not very interesting.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the astronomy discussions are even worse! No-one every questions the heliocentric model of the solar system (you know, the theory)? Every article about NASA or spaceflight should mention that gravity is only a theory, and that many sane and reasonable people believe the "Intelligent Mover" is pushing around our spaceships exactly like a child would push around a little toy car.

    32. Re:Not very interesting.... by Macgrrl · · Score: 2, Funny

      The average male Slashdot user probably looks a lot like our model -- but has more acne and bigger glasses. Users are 23 years old but look twice their age and steadfastly refuse to accept the fact that Windows is actually not a bad operating system.

      Hrm.. looks down... yep definately breasts... and not man-breasts either...

      Looks at nick and sig file... they got it part right about the Windoze reference...

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
    33. Re:Not very interesting.... by svunt · · Score: 1

      BWJones, your spam is getting really annoying, can't you just go for a week without pushing your damn blog in the body of your comment? It's already in your sig, you get modded up plenty, ease up a bit.

    34. Re:Not very interesting.... by Excen · · Score: 0

      use my +3 shield of suspicion and +2 helm of sarcasm to counter that.
       
      I merely put on my coat and wizard hat . . .

      --
      "No beer until you finish your tequila!" -Leela's Dad
    35. Re:Not very interesting.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I for one welcome our unfunny meme using overlords.

    36. Re:Not very interesting.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you forgot one too, "BeOS."
      Just kidding. Of course, I meant, "Be Night Goat."

    37. Re:Not very interesting.... by __aapspi39 · · Score: 1

      the problem with stereotypes is that apart from anything else they are very difficult to shift.

      there is good evidence to suggest that whenever an individual encounters evidence that might contradict their stereotype, then instead of revising their beliefs, they will in fact ignore the evidence or even distort the evidence to support their initial belief.

      an example of this might be a racist who believes that all black people are lazy and as a consequence poor; when this person sees a black person driving an expensive car, instead of revising their initial stereotype, they might decide that they are probably dealing drugs or a thief.

    38. Re:Not very interesting.... by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      A typical CNet user likes to talk down users of other sites and praise himself.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    39. Re:Not very interesting.... by Kelbear · · Score: 1

      Or stereotypes can reinforce themselves, an asian can be loud and rude and he's just a loud and rude asshole. If a black guy is doing it, he's being a stereotypical black. The attribution of why he's loud and rude can end up going straight to the stereotype, without considering whether there's a difference between the first or the second person and the possibility of justification for their action.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Correspondence_bias#Why_the_fundamental_attribution_error_occurs

    40. Re:Not very interesting.... by teh_chrizzle · · Score: 1

      racial stereotypes are only mostly about bad stuff. it would be nice if people assumed that i was an awesome athlete with a big dick that was good at math and was successful lawyer. i would gladly change my name to shaquille takamura-steinburg.

      i think i could live with people assuming that i was a bad driver of stolen cars that doesn't tip.

      --
      sarcasm:
      -noun
      1. harsh or bitter derision or irony.
  2. My favorite site by paiute · · Score: 5, Funny

    My favorite site is one that posts noninsightful stories with titles designed to grab maximum nerd traffic and also lacks a print link to let said nerds bypass the ten pages of ads.

    --
    If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
    1. Re:My favorite site by jd · · Score: 2

      You're either looking at the adult pages or a commercial news website.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  3. Another child.. by jshriverWVU · · Score: 1

    personally I think a better example would be http://www.collegehumor.com/

  4. They bismirch /. Gasp!!! by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 4, Funny
    They claim slashdot users pounce on hapless writer or reporter and trash them using pedantry and anonymity according to that site. Come on guys, let us show them what is real ripping to shreds is. Show no mercy! Attack!

    Scotty load the missles.

    Aye Sir, fully loaded with 25 Gigatons of sarcasm

    Add pedantry

    Yes sir, 45 Teratons of pedantry added

    And some anonymity too

    Aye Sir, anothe 12457 Teratons of anonymity added

    Fire at the abominable site

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:They bismirch /. Gasp!!! by Strong+Anonymity · · Score: 1

      Pfft. You're stupid. You obviously don't know that 1000 teratons equate to 1 petaton.

      Er. We were to fire at their site? Oh.

    2. Re:They bismirch /. Gasp!!! by bersl2 · · Score: 1

      I prefer my quantities of abstract concepts in the *load system, you insensitive clod!

      You know, "buttload", "assload", "shitload", "fuckload"... you're only supposed to reach "butt-ton", "asston", etc. until after you exhaust all the *loads, and that's several orders of magnitude too much for just one article.

    3. Re:They bismirch /. Gasp!!! by jagdish · · Score: 1

      Why dont we just use our Forward Deflector Sheilds to generate a Tachyon Pulse and fire that through the torpedo bay?

  5. Pffft. by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 0

    Slashdot's tagline is "news for nerds", so no prizes for guessing what type of people visit the site. The average male Slashdot user probably looks a lot like our model -- but has more acne and bigger glasses. Users are 23 years old but look twice their age Hardly. I'm 35 and don't wear glasses. I do wear contacts, and have a backup pair of glasses, but these are compact, sleek designer frames.

    I do have a beard that makes me look maybe 4-5 years older, though.

    I dress professionally at work, but at home, I dress quite young and fashionably. My wife calls me a 'metrosexual', though somehow I'm not sure if this term fits.

    steadfastly refuse to accept the fact that Windows is actually not a bad operating system. Hey! I resemble that remark!

    But given your 'facts' about Slashdot users, I'd say your probably off on this 'fact', too. Then again, we all have opinions don't we? Nothin' wrong if someone else likes Windows, even though I don't.

    Far from being lovable dorks, the Slashdotters have a vicious streak. They hunt like spiders, awaiting the arrival of an article from their victims -- usually a hapless news reporter. Yeah, and you're next! Have at 'im, boys!
    1. Re:Pffft. by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      I do have a beard that makes me look maybe 4-5 years older, though.

      Me, too. Many people tell it makes me look five years younger than my actual age instead of ten or twelve.... At least now that I've hit 30, they've stopped carding me in theaters....

      *sigh*

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  6. 10 pages of advertisements? by farker+haiku · · Score: 4, Funny

    10 pages of advertisements, check
    no printer friendly page link, check
    no interest in reading this article, check.

    No thanks slashdot. Next?

    --
    Your sig(k) has been stolen. There is a puff of smoke!
    1. Re:10 pages of advertisements? by fbjon · · Score: 1
      10 pages of ads on the site, 10 pages of ads.
      Block one ad, but no printlink,
      11 pages of ads on the site.


      Resistance is futile

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
  7. Target Audience by psychicsword · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Every site has its target audience just like almost every corporation does. All this seems to be doing is defining the target audience. If Slashdot's website wasn't based on "News for Nerds stuff that matters" then I bet there would be less geeks and nerds on this site... that is what digg is for.

    The website doesn't make your personality your personality choses to revisit the website.

    1. Re:Target Audience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well if they were no hapless victims on slashdot some of those vicious geeks /nerds would get bored, you know who you are.

      The ones who read a book someday and give themselves the right to judge, the ones who cant make a difference between THEORY and FACTS and, since it's been said or written by someone with a large I.Q. it surely must be the whole truth even though it has not been proved, i wont say it but e=mc cough cough....

  8. IP Violation by Renaissance+2K · · Score: 5, Funny

    How the hell'd they get my prom photo for the Slashdot page?

    1. Re:IP Violation by Eberlin · · Score: 1

      Wait, you went to the prom? I'm not sure whether to be amazed, awed, or inspired by that.

      On second thought, I'm gonna have to ask you to turn over your geek badge.

    2. Re:IP Violation by eln · · Score: 1

      Now now, he never said he went to the prom with another person. He was in the A/V club, so he was helping out with the sound board.

    3. Re:IP Violation by Renaissance+2K · · Score: 1

      Aw, that's the second time in a week I've been asked to turn in my geek badge. The fake ID guy is getting suspicious.

    4. Re:IP Violation by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      I asked a girl to the prom but she told me she wasn't going. I worked that night at a pizza place, putting anchovies under the cheese of all the pizzas. Later, I found out she had gone to the prom, but had shown up with her girl friend. Apparently, everyone but me knew she was gay. Man, high school sucked.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
  9. Wow! by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 4, Funny

    OK, let me get this straight....

    A list of what I like says something about me.

    Truly, is there no bounds to what science can reveal?

    I am well and truly stunned.

    1. Re:Wow! by everphilski · · Score: 3, Funny

      Your new science intrigues me. Tell me again how sheeps bladders may be employed to prevent earthquakes?

    2. Re:Wow! by sconeu · · Score: 1

      No, no. Lists of what we like tell stuff about us, but only if the Earth is shaped like a banana.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  10. INSULTING PICTURE by cromar · · Score: 3, Funny

    The average male Slashdot user probably looks a lot like our model -- but has more acne and bigger glasses.

    How the fuck would they know? Aren't we all buff über mensch!?

    1. Re:INSULTING PICTURE by dal20402 · · Score: 2, Funny

      How the fuck would they know? Aren't we all buff über mensch!?

      On the Internet, no one knows you're a god.

    2. Re:INSULTING PICTURE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But everybody knows your mother dresses you funny. Then there are the cheetos stains.

    3. Re:INSULTING PICTURE by kv9 · · Score: 4, Funny

      How the fuck would they know? Aren't we all buff über mensch!? On the Internet, no one knows you're a god. on ze internets nobody noes your german
    4. Re:INSULTING PICTURE by kc2keo · · Score: 1

      I do not look like the guy in that picture at all. just visit link below and see my portraits page: http://mouyiosmachine.hopto.org:8080/assortedpics/portraits.php Going a bit offtopic... How does the web page design look? Still a work in progress. Wanna get opinions from other people.

    5. Re:INSULTING PICTURE by IdleTime · · Score: 1

      Who cares what people look like?

      I didn't come here to judge peoples comments based on their looks, but on the content itself! For all I care you can be purple with pink polkadots!

      --
      If you mod me down, I *will* introduce you to my sister!
    6. Re:INSULTING PICTURE by DeadChobi · · Score: 1

      It's okay, mate. Neither do I.

      If we get enough posts with this kind of response in them, we might just be able to buck that stereotype!

      --
      SRSLY.
    7. Re:INSULTING PICTURE by ncc74656 · · Score: 1

      On the Internet, no one knows you're a god.

      We now know, however, that you're dyslexic. :-)

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
  11. All of the above. by king-manic · · Score: 3, Funny

    If you frequent all of them would you then be an EMO, uber geek, trivia nerd, photographer, with an antique obsession, who enjoys poorly made video blogs, and gets smashed reguarly with your college buddies, while constantly chatting about nothing with low self esteem, whilst also enjoy shilling for a has been tech blog?

    --
    "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    1. Re:All of the above. by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 4, Funny

      If you frequent all of them would you then be an EMO, uber geek, trivia nerd, photographer, with an antique obsession, who enjoys poorly made video blogs, and gets smashed reguarly with your college buddies, while constantly chatting about nothing with low self esteem, whilst also enjoy shilling for a has been tech blog?

      There's a site for those. It's called "digg".

    2. Re:All of the above. by nEoN+nOoDlE · · Score: 1

      well.... aren't you?

      --
      Don't trust a bull's horn, a doberman's tooth, a runaway horse or me.
    3. Re:All of the above. by Kelbear · · Score: 1

      This list lacks 4chan.

  12. And finally, CNET readers: by ettlz · · Score: 2, Funny

    They're the best sort of people to be around. They're highly educated...

    and almost NSFW!

    1. Re:And finally, CNET readers: by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 1

      Why do I have a sudden craving for a roast beef sandwich?

      At least they have good taste in laptops. Thinkpads with the IBM logo (why is that still there?) Photoshopped out.

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
  13. AD-FREE VERSION by InvisblePinkUnicorn · · Score: 3, Informative

    Behold!, the article is slightly more reader-friendly. Still not worth reading, though...

  14. Am I a Karma whore, or what? by rts008 · · Score: 1

    here ya go, the only relevant page: (http://crave.cnet.co.uk/0,39029477,49292669-3,00.htm) if you want to see the photo referenced in TFA.

    "SLASHDOT
    What's the story?
    Slashdot is a well-respected science and technology news aggregation Web site. It lists user-submitted news stories with a bias towards geeks. Each story is vetted by a moderator before being posted, at which point visitors can leave their opinions in Slashdot's highly active forums. It was created in September 1997 by Rob 'CmdrTaco' Malda, who still runs the site.

    The first Slashdot submission was recorded on 31 December 1997. By 18 August 2004 it had recorded 10 million posts. During this time its users helped create a unique subculture that was responsible for the propagation of several Internet memes. Among these were Al Gore's spurious claim to have invented the Internet, Chuck Norris' refusal to use email because he comes from the cowboy generation, and countless hyperlink-related 'pranks' involving the Goatse phenomenon.

    Slashdot's core audience is thought primarily to be Linux users. Contrary to popular opinion, however, over half of its visitors use a Windows PC. Approximately a third use some form of Linux, with 10 per cent using Mac OS X.

    Did you know?
    Before Slashdot was Slashdot, it was known as 'Chips & Dips'. The site was launched in July 1997 but less than three months later it was renamed. The name Slashdot was allegedly chosen to confuse those poor souls who pronounce the full URL of the site ("h-t-t-p-colon-slash-slash-
    slashdot-dot-org"). You've got to love geek humour.

    What Slashdot says about you
    Slashdot's tagline is "news for nerds", so no prizes for guessing what type of people visit the site. The average male Slashdot user probably looks a lot like our model -- but has more acne and bigger glasses. Users are 23 years old but look twice their age and steadfastly refuse to accept the fact that Windows is actually not a bad operating system.

    Far from being lovable dorks, the Slashdotters have a vicious streak. They hunt like spiders, awaiting the arrival of an article from their victims -- usually a hapless news reporter. The second moderators accept a story, they pounce -- pedantry, suspicion and anonymity their weapons of choice."

    This was where I stopped reading.

    --
    Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
    1. Re:Am I a Karma whore, or what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Users are 23 years old but look twice their age and steadfastly refuse to accept the fact that Windows is actually not a bad operating system.

      Shows what they know, I'm 25 and Windows is terrible.

  15. Missing entry: 4chan.org by spellraiser · · Score: 5, Funny

    4chan.org
    What's the story?
    4chan.org is an increasingly popular hangout for those who call themselves 'Anonymous'. It breeds misfits, criminals, and The Internet Hate Machine, which is a term that is used to describe the collective processing power of the thousands of hackers on steroids who frequent the site.
    Did you know?
    Disturbingly, 4chan.org is the source of almost every popular internet 'meme' that has surfaced since 2004 or so.
    What 4chan.org says about you
    If your favorite site is 4chan.org, you're a terrorist who likes to blow up vans, and should be locked away for a very, very long time. You also like to say 'LULZ' a lot, which is a diabolical corruption of 'LOL', which means 'Let's Order Linguini' ... 'Linguini' being a street term for crack cocaine.

    --
    I hear there's rumors on the Slashdots
    1. Re:Missing entry: 4chan.org by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Rules 1 & 2...

    2. Re:Missing entry: 4chan.org by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lurk moar, there are no rules you fool.

      except rule 34 of course.

    3. Re:Missing entry: 4chan.org by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      What about LOL Cats site?

      What about Live Journal?

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    4. Re:Missing entry: 4chan.org by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And even if there were rules, 1 and 2 would still only apply to The Board That Shall Not Be Named (for fear of breaking rules 1 and 2), and not to 4chan as a whole.

    5. Re:Missing entry: 4chan.org by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh god, lets not start this again. I Can Has Cheezburger / LOL Cats started as a 4chan meme that they decided to capitalize on by making a website and selling ads/merchandise.

    6. Re:Missing entry: 4chan.org by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about The Hun?

      What about goatse?

    7. Re:Missing entry: 4chan.org by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only reason I clicked through all 10 pages of TFA was to see if they had the balls to mention 4chan.

    8. Re:Missing entry: 4chan.org by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have blown up 45 vans to this day.

  16. My sites says... by svendsen · · Score: 2, Funny

    I need major therapy and a healthier outlook on sexual fantasies....

  17. Even more by wanderingknight · · Score: 0

    The article states that more than half the traffic Slashdot gets comes from Windows machines and not from Linux ones... but seems to forget the fact that there are a lot of people who use Linux at home and are forced to use Windows at work.

    1. Re:Even more by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 1

      I use windows at work, at least for my desktop. Every now and then I have to fire up Access or Visual Studio or some crap, and the PHBs get ticky if I'm not running Outlook so they can send me those annoying meeting requests.

      I like linux, and I advocate linux, but I'm not a zealot. Use the tool that'll get the job done best.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    2. Re:Even more by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      Like me and, apparently, you. ;)

  18. What about the forbidden site? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I'm curious: what does goatse say about its visitors?

    By their standards, my guess is:

    Naive foolish n00bs who don't know basic online safety and heartless trolls whose goal in life is to make people go without eating for a couple of days.

  19. So... by moore.dustin · · Score: 1

    So, this is saying if you join a community/website then you are probably inclined to be interested or involved in whatever the subject matter that site is. What a shocker, people belong and participate in things that interest them. This has been true forever, give me a break. I wonder if everyone involved in drafting and signing the Declaration of Independence were into politics in some form?

    Another article aiming just to get hits while producing nothing that would be seen as being anything more than 'mildly entertaining'.

    1. Re:So... by Kelson · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So, this is saying if you join a community/website then you are probably inclined to be interested or involved in whatever the subject matter that site is.

      Actually, it's describing a caricature of each site's target audience. It's more of a humor piece than anything else.

  20. So.... by Chineseyes · · Score: 1

    So hypothetically speaking, if my favorite sites were 2 girls 1 cup, Goatse, and Tubgirl what would that say about me?

    Hypothetically speaking of course. NSFW!! I repeat NSFW!!

    --
    I think the invisible hand of the market has its middle finger extended

    --A wise old fart named SC0RN
    1. Re:So.... by kv9 · · Score: 1

      So hypothetically speaking, if my favorite sites were 2 girls 1 cup, Goatse, and Tubgirl what would that say about me? is that the fabled swap.avi I keep hearing about, yet did not dare to check out?
    2. Re:So.... by CommanderData · · Score: 1

      Well, I don't know what swap.avi contains, but unless you like scat then avoid 2 girls 1 cup at all costs. DO NOT WANT!

      --
      Urge to post... fading... fading... RISING!... fading... fading... gone.
    3. Re:So.... by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 3, Funny

      if my favorite sites were 2 girls 1 cup

      I'm disgusted!! Don't they know the difference between a cup and a tumbler?!?

      --
      Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
    4. Re:So.... by kv9 · · Score: 1

      Well, I don't know what swap.avi contains all you ever wanted to know about swap.avi but were too afraid to ask

      but unless you like scat then avoid 2 girls 1 cup at all costs. DO NOT WANT! thanks but it's a little late for that. I think I have already (rather violently) broke my swap.avi cherry already.
  21. Since slashdot is one of my favorite sites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I must be a mindless, complaining drone.

  22. What does pr0n mean? by Associate · · Score: 1

    And does it matter what kind?

    --
    Someone hates these cans.
  23. Mod article... by Kelson · · Score: 1

    They hunt like spiders, awaiting the arrival of an article from their victims -- usually a hapless news reporter. The second moderators accept a story, they pounce -- pedantry, suspicion and anonymity their weapons of choice.

    Hmm, it sounds like that should get the article modded -1 Flamebait! :-D

  24. CNET is so jealous! by BoyIHateMicrosoft! · · Score: 1

    I think CNET is just drinking a little too much haterade as of late. They might also just be jealous cause Slashdot readers can actually understand big words and stuff. I love how they say that people that read here must look like the dude in the pic. For one I'm female and two my glasses aren't taped, well they aren't today. They are superglued. Thank you very much!!

    1. Re:CNET is so jealous! by Xtifr · · Score: 1

      > Slashdot readers can actually understand big words and stuff.

      Got any evidence to support that claim? And if it does turn out to be true, do you suppose there's any chance we can pass on some of that knowledge to the (cough) "editors"? :)

  25. oh geez. by that+IT+girl · · Score: 1

    What Slashdot says about you: Slashdot's tagline is "news for nerds", so no prizes for guessing what type of people visit the site. The average male Slashdot user probably looks a lot like our model -- but has more acne and bigger glasses. Which is sexy.

    Users are 23 years old but look twice their age and steadfastly refuse to accept the fact that Windows is actually not a bad operating system. Well, I'm not 23, nor do I look twice that, but Windows...actually...yep, it is a bad operating system. Especially when you have options.

    Far from being lovable dorks, the Slashdotters have a vicious streak. They hunt like spiders, awaiting the arrival of an article from their victims -- usually a hapless news reporter. The second moderators accept a story, they pounce -- pedantry, suspicion and anonymity their weapons of choice. Why, thank you! :)
    --
    10 FILL MUG WITH COFFEE
    20 DRINK COFFEE
    30 GOTO 10
    1. Re:oh geez. by that+IT+girl · · Score: 1

      Oh, and sorry to reply to myself, but... hapless news reporter?? Couldn't they be compared to the most vicious of spiders themselves??

      --
      10 FILL MUG WITH COFFEE
      20 DRINK COFFEE
      30 GOTO 10
    2. Re:oh geez. by cez · · Score: 1
      Wow... OT, but I think this might be a first... two CONSECUTIVE comments on slashdot by women! That made my day... gotta love IT chicks ;)


      CNET is so jealous!(Score:1) by BoyIHateMicrosoft! (1044838) on Monday September 10, @02:16PM (#20542179)

      I think CNET is just drinking a little too much haterade as of late. They might also just be jealous cause Slashdot readers can actually understand big words and stuff. I love how they say that people that read here must look like the dude in the pic. For one I'm female and two my glasses aren't taped, well they aren't today. They are superglued. Thank you very much!!


      [ Reply to This | Normal Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant Insightful Interesting Informative Funny Overrated Underrated]


      oh geez.(Score:1) by that IT girl (864406) on Monday September 10, @02:22PM (#20542251)

      What Slashdot says about you: Slashdot's tagline is "news for nerds", so no prizes for guessing what type of people visit the site. The average male Slashdot user probably looks a lot like our model -- but has more acne and bigger glasses.

      Which is sexy. Users are 23 years old but look twice their age and steadfastly refuse to accept the fact that Windows is actually not a bad operating system.

      Well, I'm not 23, nor do I look twice that, but Windows...actually...yep, it is a bad operating system. Especially when you have options.

      Far from being lovable dorks, the Slashdotters have a vicious streak. They hunt like spiders, awaiting the arrival of an article from their victims -- usually a hapless news reporter. The second moderators accept a story, they pounce -- pedantry, suspicion and anonymity their weapons of choice.


      Why, thank you! :) --

      --
      Walk with Music;
  26. Insulted by Dan+East · · Score: 1

    I'm insulted. The geek pictured on the Slashdot page doesn't even have real glasses. In fact, they don't even have lenses!

    Now, if you noticed that as well, then yes, you are a geek too, and Slashdot is your favorite site to visit regularly.

    Dan East

    --
    Better known as 318230.
    1. Re:Insulted by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Can't stand movies that have glasses with flat glass in them. Can tell they're not real. Hell, if you can't start a fire with your glasses, you don't deserve to call them glasses.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    2. Re:Insulted by Reverend528 · · Score: 1

      In fact, they don't even have lenses!
      Lenses reflect light, making photography much harder. It's pretty common practice to use fake ones for photo shoots like this.
    3. Re:Insulted by russotto · · Score: 1

      If you're nearsighted, you can't start a fire with your glasses. (Well, not by focusing the light of the sun, anyway).

      And not only does that guy have fake glasses, he doesn't really have any acne either. And what's with the tie? Everyone knows Slashdot users wear T-shirts which have likely never seen the inside of the washing machine, no tie. He's a total poser.

  27. Tasty by 6Yankee · · Score: 1

    The typical Facebookers are what you'd get if YouTube and Flickr went halves on a baby.

    A plateful of bones?

  28. I'll tell you one thing by vtcodger · · Score: 1
    I can't speak for the whole article because I only struggled through about half a dozen pages before I got fed up.

    But I can tell you with reasonable confidence that crave.cnet.co.uk has roughly zero chance of becoming my favorite site until they clean up their web pages and put more substantive material and less junk on each page.

    Can't say that I thought all that much of the content either. Not very insightful and not especially funny. I don't think this is one of those little things that get's pasted up on cubicle walls and passed around in the office mail and email.

    Does that make me a vicious slashdotter hunting like a spider?

    --
    You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
  29. Slashdot is more diverse by athloi · · Score: 3, Insightful

    They hunt like spiders, awaiting the arrival of an article from their victims -- usually a hapless news reporter. The second moderators accept a story, they pounce -- pedantry, suspicion and anonymity their weapons of choice.

    I know you're just doing it for the laughs, guys, but that's short-sighted. Slashdot is one of the more diverse (in terms of opinions, not genetics and gender) web sites I've run across, much more so than myspace, for example. Libertarian Christians and Mac-using bisexual Buddhists can agree on the necessary traits for any BIND replacement here without much rancor.

    I think the article sells it short.

    1. Re:Slashdot is more diverse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Libertarian Christians and Mac-using bisexual Buddhists can agree on the necessary traits for any BIND replacement here without much rancor.

      Yeah right. Bind replacement? I say boost::lambda

    2. Re:Slashdot is more diverse by complete+loony · · Score: 2, Funny

      The best candidate for a BIND replacement? Definitely emacs.

      --
      09F91102 no, 455FE104 nope, F190A1E8 uh-uh, 7A5F8A09 that's not it, C87294CE no. Ah! 452F6E403CDF10714E41DFAA257D313F.
  30. Not very accurate either by an.echte.trilingue · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm 28, athletic, and my first +5 post (or at least, the first one I remember) was in defense of windows security, which indicates that at least 4 other people agreed that windows is OK as an OS. I don't wear glasses and I am married to a woman who is pretty high on the physical attractiveness scale (and yes, I have had sex with her).

    I think I am probably also pretty indicative Slashdotters. I think that the slashdot comment system is a pretty good way to hold authors accountable for what they write, and anonymity is no shield since the moderation system is pretty good at filtering bullshitters out (although not perfect).

    It sounds to me like this author is your typical tech journalist who graduated with a C average from some no-name school, has brought the same mediocre performance to his job, and has been called for it on slashdot. Now, he's bitter.

    --
    weirdest thing I ever saw: scientology advertising on slashdot.
    1. Re:Not very accurate either by Bastard+of+Subhumani · · Score: 1

      I am married to a woman who is pretty high on the physical attractiveness scale (and yes, I have had sex with her).
      Hate to break it to you like this, but you're new there too.
      --
      Only three things are certain; death, taxes, and apocryphal quotations - Ben Franklin.
    2. Re:Not very accurate either by heelrod · · Score: 1

      You're so full of shit! freakin nerd. Sim's lives dont count dude

    3. Re:Not very accurate either by db32 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Things to note. 1. "12oz curls" is not "athletic". Neither are any actions accomplished in a virtual sense. 2. +5 post can be +5 funny so maybe they were just laughing at you 3. Not wearing glasses doesn't mean you don't need them. 4. "high on the physical attractiveness scale" doesn't mean much if you do need glasses 5. I won't even touch the moderation system. 6. It sounds to me like this poster is your typical slashdot poster that didn't RTFA and realize the whole thing is a damned joke.

      --
      The only change I can believe in is what I find in my couch cushions.
    4. Re:Not very accurate either by pebs · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but someone with a million+ Slashdot ID is in no place to comment about what the typical Slashdotter is like.

      And yes, my ID isn't exactly low, but this is not my first account! ;)

      --
      #!/
    5. Re:Not very accurate either by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, you've gotta love the slashdotters who are so proud of themselves for "breaking" the geek stereotype because they married the first girl who would sleep with them twice.

    6. Re:Not very accurate either by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      Things to note. 1. "12oz curls" is not "athletic"


      If you ask me, 12oz curls is a sign you need to cut back on the hair gel, dude.
    7. Re:Not very accurate either by db32 · · Score: 1

      12oz curls being the act of lifting a 12oz beverage to your mouth in a repetitive fashion.

      --
      The only change I can believe in is what I find in my couch cushions.
    8. Re:Not very accurate either by DeadChobi · · Score: 1

      What if the beer comes in 16oz cans? Does that make me more athletic than everyone else? What about 24-oz cans of malt liquor, or the 40 of OE?

      --
      SRSLY.
    9. Re:Not very accurate either by db32 · · Score: 1

      Pft. I do at least 1.75L curls on glass rum bottles!

      --
      The only change I can believe in is what I find in my couch cushions.
    10. Re:Not very accurate either by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Daddy?!

    11. Re:Not very accurate either by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is by far the funniest thing I have read all week.

    12. Re:Not very accurate either by Puff+of+Logic · · Score: 1

      Sorry, And yes, my ID isn't exactly low, but this is not my first account! ;) There a lot of us in that boat, thus the user id number a person has is a poor indicator of how long they've been around. Hell, I've been reading Slashdot since '98, and have probably gone through six or seven different accounts because I'd lose interest for a while and promptly forget my login or password. Still, it is fun to see some low uids show up. The thread the other day in which people kept trumping each other with a progressively lower user number had me roaring with laughter. Silly stuff like that is most of why I come here.

      cheers.
      --
      P.P.S. I'm doing Science and I'm still alive.
    13. Re:Not very accurate either by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't wear glasses and I am married to a woman who is pretty high on the physical attractiveness scale (and yes, I have had sex with her).
      There is your problem. Go visit your neighborhood Lenscraft.

      Actually, don't bother. I can see that you'd be happier with crap vision. I'd do the same if I were you.
  31. Begin Infinite Recursion by sconeu · · Score: 4, Funny

    Whatever happened to the recognition that stereotypes are usually wrong?

    That's a stereotypical response.

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    1. Re:Begin Infinite Recursion by djh101010 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Whatever happened to the recognition that stereotypes are usually wrong?

      That's a stereotypical response.
      Yeah, yeah...your type always says that.
    2. Re:Begin Infinite Recursion by booyabazooka · · Score: 5, Funny

      Figures. Slashdotters always carry these jokes on far too long.

    3. Re:Begin Infinite Recursion by smparadox · · Score: 1

      Figures. Slashdotters always carry these jokes on far too long.

      That's a stereotypical response. Rinse. Repeat.
      --
      "I am become Gerund, Destroyer of Verbs"
  32. My faves... by Notquitecajun · · Score: 1

    http://www.askaninja.com/ and http://www.homestarrunner.com/.

    Sure, slashdot, maybe, but that's just so people can validate my sense of humor and I can troll liberals.

  33. What your grammar says about you: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    "The typical Facebookers are what you'd get if YouTube and Flickr went halves on a baby."
    Went halves on a baby? Went halves on a baby?!

    Listen, if you want to be "cool", don't make up slang! (In this case, for "...if YouTube and Flickr had a baby together".)

    This goes for every subject! Don't ever make slang up! Ever. No matter how appropriate you think it is, just don't do it. Some examples:

    Retro
    • Don't (make up slang): "Tie it up girl!"
    • Do (use the original): "Oh, behave!"
    Engineer
    • Don't (make up slang): "Whenever you lowchance it you get the lose."
    • Do (use the original): "If it can go wrong, it will."
    Teen girl
    • Don't (make up slang): "Shigoo!!! Lowtails!!!!"
    • Do (use the original): "OMG!!! Ponies!!!!"
    Digg
    • Don't (make up slang): "Viz or it wasn't!"
    • Do (use the original): "Pics or it didn't happen."
    Slashdot
    • Don't (make up slang): "Man, the scoremasters must be hitting the big one hard today."
    • Do (use the original): "Whoever mod'd this up is on crack."
    (Oh, and linkaloo. Would you in-room with these people?)
    1. Re:What your grammar says about you: by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      Actually, teen girl is the exception. In general, shows that make up vocabulary, like Buffy the Vampire Slayer and Kim Possible, tend to have their characters sound more like real teen girls than those who use "totally radical "slang.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    2. Re:What your grammar says about you: by Oktober+Sunset · · Score: 1

      well, there are no shows that accurately emulate teen girl speak as they wouldn't get away with just chaining the words fuck, slut, bitch and like for half an hour on TV.

  34. Did anyone else read it as this: by damburger · · Score: 1

    "The second moderators accept a story, they pounce -- pedastry, suspicion and anonymity their weapons of choice."
    Or are my old eyes starting to fail?
    --
    If we can put a man on the moon, why can't we shoot people for Apollo-related non-sequiturs?
  35. My favorite websites all say the same thing by Jack9 · · Score: 1

    I have excellent karma.

    --

    Often wrong but never in doubt.
    I am Jack9.
    Everyone knows me.
  36. whoa, dudes!! what a totally tubular by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and comprehensive list!!

    however, in an effort to save everyone from having to click that link and then read those words and then click another link to read even more words, here is the article summed up: If you have a favorite website, you are a worthless faggot.

  37. If your favorite is C|NET by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    You are a complete wanker, a moron who thinks he's intelligent, slogging through ten ad-laden "pages" with three paragraphs of content (if you call that shit "content") per "page".

    Fuck C|NET, I'm not reading any article that's three paragraphs on each of ten pages. Does anybody have a printable version?

    ...and the horse they rode in on. Anyway, here's page 3, slashdot. (picture of a jock wearing taped glasses and a necktie... what nerd wears a necktie? who would confuse C|NET with a nerd site or even a tech site? These asshats are clueless)

    SLASHDOT
    What's the story?
    Slashdot is a well-respected science and technology news aggregation Web site. It lists user-submitted news stories with a bias towards geeks. Each story is vetted by a moderator before being posted, at which point visitors can leave their opinions in Slashdot's highly active forums. It was created in September 1997 by Rob 'CmdrTaco' Malda, who still runs the site.

    The first Slashdot submission was recorded on 31 December 1997. By 18 August 2004 it had recorded 10 million posts. During this time its users helped create a unique subculture that was responsible for the propagation of several Internet memes. Among these were Al Gore's spurious claim to have invented the Internet, Chuck Norris' refusal to use email because he comes from the cowboy generation, and countless hyperlink-related 'pranks' involving the Goatse phenomenon.

    Slashdot's core audience is thought primarily to be Linux users. Contrary to popular opinion, however, over half of its visitors use a Windows PC. Approximately a third use some form of Linux, with 10 per cent using Mac OS X.

    Did you know?
    Before Slashdot was Slashdot, it was known as 'Chips & Dips'. The site was launched in July 1997 but less than three months later it was renamed. The name Slashdot was allegedly chosen to confuse those poor souls who pronounce the full URL of the site ("h-t-t-p-colon-slash-slash-
    slashdot-dot-org"). You've got to love geek humour.

    What Slashdot says about you
    Slashdot's tagline is "news for nerds", so no prizes for guessing what type of people visit the site. The average male Slashdot user probably looks a lot like our model -- but has more acne and bigger glasses. Users are 23 years old but look twice their age and steadfastly refuse to accept the fact that Windows is actually not a bad operating system.

    Far from being lovable dorks, the Slashdotters have a vicious streak. They hunt like spiders, awaiting the arrival of an article from their victims -- usually a hapless news reporter. The second moderators accept a story, they pounce -- pedantry, suspicion and anonymity their weapons of choice.
    We've all been not only misrepresented, but slandered. Most nerds are NOT dorks, most look NOTHING like the model (most of us are either overweight or underweight), do NOT look twice our age (I'd look 110; most people think I'm 40), and Windows is a bad operating system. I want the thirty seconds of my life back that I wasted clicking looking for slashdot in TSFA.

    -mcgrew
    1. Re:If your favorite is C|NET by Arimus · · Score: 1

      I'd really like to know roughly what the average of /. readers is... I suspect in 1997 it was probably around 20 but I'd guess now its around 30 as alot of us from the earlier days are still around...

      --
      --- Users are like bacteria -> Each one causing a thousand tiny crises until the host finally gives up and dies.
    2. Re:If your favorite is C|NET by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't hang around here no mo.

    3. Re:If your favorite is C|NET by saxoholic · · Score: 1

      Maybe they should make it a poll on the main page. That would be a great scientific survey of all /.ers

  38. Dear oh dear by replete+phoenix · · Score: 1

    There is a remarkable sense of humour failure going on here. I've been a slashdot user for many years, and I don't look anything like that picture. But you know what, my life is full enough for it not to bother me. I thought the slashdot thing was amusing, and it's really not supposed to be taken so seriously. Oh, and for the people that moan about ads. Come on, this is how the net works. Companies provide free content, which they pay for with adverts. It's not a new model, and bitching about it is a bit like moaning about having to watch ads on live TV. If you don't like it, some tech savyy geeks like you should be able to work adblock.

  39. What?! When did they start talking?? Oh God...... by notclevernickname · · Score: 2, Funny

    What are they saying?? Look it is not true.... It was only that one time, I was only looking for the failed Donkey Kong tv show... I didn't know that searching for "donkey show" in Google would bring that up....

    --
    Free porn, no Bullshit - thebestlinklist.com
  40. heh, yeah .. i got a full life, too. no big deal. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ain't no sweat off my back, dawg.

    sup, brah?

  41. Stereotypes are wrong? Please explain by tacokill · · Score: 1

    You make the assertion that stereotypes are "usually" wrong.

    Please explain and back that up. Because from where I stand, stereotypes can be dead on accurate. Not all, mind you, but enough of them to make the case there is some basis in reality.

    Case in point: women. The stereotype is that they are more emotional beings than men.
    ...and that is pretty well documented through the sociological and scientific studies in the area. It turns out that women DO think differently than men. So is that stereotype wrong? No, but it might be in some individual, specific cases.

    Another case: the stereotype of Fox news watchers is that they are uninformed (or, to be nice: "have misperceptions").
    ...and it turns out, that is correct. Are all of them that way? No, but enough have "misperceptions" that it is statistically significant.

    Stereotypes have been around for a long time, with good reason. They aren't "wrong" anymore than jealousy or anger are wrong. They just are.

  42. slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The name Slashdot was allegedly chosen to confuse those poor souls who pronounce the full URL of the site ("h-t-t-p-colon-slash-slash-slashdot-dot-org").
    If spoken, wouldn't that be, "h, hyphen, t, hyphen, t, hyphen, p, hyphen, colon, hyphen, slash, hyphen, slash, hyphen, slashdot, hyphen, dot, hyphen, org"?
    heh... As an added bonus, that URL also confuses web browsers.
  43. How about Orkut? by Stormwatch · · Score: 1

    They didn't include this one, so I'll do my take on it.....

    ORKUT

    What's the story?
    Orkut is an Internet social network service run by Google and named after its creator, Orkut Büyükkökten (sëë älsø: hëävÿ mëtäl ümläüt). It's something like Friendster and MySpace, but it also allows users to create "communities", that is, mini-forums about any theme you choose.

    Did you know?
    Orkut is not very popular in the USA, but it is extremely popular in Brazil. It was "invitation only" at first, which probably had something to do with it: Brazilian teenagers invited everyone and their dog. And no civilized person can stand a place with too many Brazilians.

    What Orkut says about you
    You're most likely Brazilian. Your English probably sucks, so you will write in Portuguese (usually with awful spelling and grammar nonetheless). You will do it even in communities that have English as their official language; and if anyone complains, you will cry persecution and toss insults at the opressive imperialist xenophobic gringos.

    1. Re:How about Orkut? by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 1

      And no civilized person can stand a place with too many Brazilians.

      Very true; the mere sight of a couple of Brazilians will often destroy any pretense of civilisation.

      Oh, you meant citizens of Brazil...

      --
      Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
  44. Facebook picture trick by d0rp · · Score: 1

    I've been using the trick they mentioned to see the larger versions of people's profile pictures for years, and now everyone is going to know about it (or at least the 3 people that read CNET)

  45. Mirth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAoh wait that's not funny read #2 again kthxbye

  46. NOBODY expects the Slashdot Inquisition! by Xtifr · · Score: 1

    Our chief weapon is pedantry. And...two! Our two chief weapons are pedantry, suspicion and... Three! Three. Our three chief weapons are...

  47. ObPenny-Arcade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  48. CNet? by ylikone · · Score: 1

    WTF?! CNet? Who the hell is addicted to CNet?! Nobody. What does it mean if I visit almost all these sites daily (excluding CNet and Twitter)? Also, this is the first time I ever heard of twitter, but it sounds relatively cool. CNet can suck it though.

    --
    Meh.
  49. Re:Stereotypes are wrong? Please explain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what a wa**er

    no you really are a complete ar****le, do you know that?

    so this is an example of anger, anger that "just is."

    anything wrong with that?

    ok, first off work out the difference between generalisation and stereotypes...

    secondly, you tend to lose more information than you gain when you classify someone in some way. people are quite complex

    oh and just because something "just is" doesn't mean it isn't dangerous or shouldn't be avoided.

  50. Re:Stereotypes are wrong? Please explain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How I read this reply:

    "[Insult, insult] That's not true! That is SO not true! That is ABSOLUTELY not true! BUT IF IT IS TRUE, SO WHAT???"

  51. waste of time by AlgorithMan · · Score: 1

    man, reading that boring pile of prejudices was a real waste of time...

    --
    The MAFIAA is a bunch of mindless jerks who will be the first up against the wall when the revolution comes