Slashdot Mirror


Chinese Worm Creator Gets High-Paying Job Offer In Prison

martinsslaves writes "The recently imprisoned creator of China's worst computer virus ever (worm.whboy) has now been offered a job paying millions of yuan from his prison cell. He's actually been offered several, and one of the companies that has offered him the position of Technology Director was actually affected by his virus. The General Manager there now believes the virus writer may have just been 'led astray'. The media is reporting that author Li Jun originally wrote the virus due to frustrations over being jobless. 'So far, about 10 network companies across the country have offered jobs to Li, whom they regarded was a "precious genius," the report said citing Li's lawyer Wang Wanxiong. Li's cyber bug, which earned him about 145,000 yuan after selling it to other hackers from December 2006 to February this year, can prevent infected computers from operating anti-virus software and all programs using the "exe" suffix.'"

148 comments

  1. This used to happen in the US by kill-9-0 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    In the 80's if you got caught hacking, you might get some jail time, and get your gear confiscated, but often you were also offered a job.

    --
    Liberalism...the next best thing to thinking.
    1. Re:This used to happen in the US by Opportunist · · Score: 2, Funny

      Not only in the US. There've been others who were found and offered the choice of jailtime or working for the company.

      I wonder how many look back and wish they'd have taken jail...

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:This used to happen in the US by Creepy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Not just companies - the FBI. One of the first major pirate groups busted in the United States had members that worked for the feds in lieu of jail time or juvenile hall (the Super Pirates of Minneapolis [SPM]).

          As a kid I went to church with an FBI computer crime guy (and his kid) and knew a good chunk of the group that replaced the SPM - a group called the Midwest Pirates Guild - from school friends and hanging out on BBS's, so I heard a lot of info from both sides. It was kinda weird knowing the "good guys" and the "bad guys" and almost humorous watching the FBI guy give computer crime talks and use cracks by people I knew as examples. All the people I knew personally that were involved moved on to respectable careers not involving crime, so it isn't always a bad thing to employ them (and many were involved in other crimes such as hacking and credit card fraud, the latter of which would make me want to string them up, having been a victim).

      If you've seen the movie "Catch Me If You Can" you'll see another criminal-turned-FBI informant.

    3. Re:This used to happen in the US by greginnj · · Score: 1

      Another way to interpret this is that China is catching up to us. It is another sign of the victory of capitalism, even in the labor market -- his skills are in demand, so job offers from Chinese companies are coming in; it doesn't matter that he's in prison. He's the Frank Abagnale ("Catch Me If You Can") of China.

      --
      Read the best of all of Slash: seenonslash.com
    4. Re:This used to happen in the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just got done rewatching the old "Hackers" Movie with Angelina Jolie. Wow! She's a sweet potato that one. I'm going to rewatch "Sneakers" with Robert Redford at the end of this week. It's interesting how these movies made hscking culture very accepted and cool. It's really made the geeky social awkward nerd become someone to be revered and valued. I highly doubt though that the amount of people who once got jobs committing cyber crime has climbed. It's easy for people to get the tools to do it but the wisdom and deviousness are a separate element from your average cyber voyuer. If you're a person who thinks they can garner a career in law inforcement by holding banks hostage or messing with government files and services; you''ve got another thing coming. Besides; instead of asking you how you did it?, they can make you tell by "other" means which can be a messy hack in itself.

      written by
      I'madinnerjacket

    5. Re:This used to happen in the US by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

      Isn't Shanghaidaily a communist propaganda source? People are biting the commi-bait bragging about how China is all caught up. How about them journalists in prison. No companies dare to hire them.

    6. Re:This used to happen in the US by bdulac · · Score: 1

      I must need to get my hacking skills back......looks like that's where all the work is. Who does a guy have to hack to get some respect around here?

      --
      Peace is not the absence of trouble but the presence of God.
    7. Re:This used to happen in the US by Dewin · · Score: 1

      Knowing the Slashdot crowd, I'd say hacking into Microsoft, Sony, or any MAFIAA member would definitely earn you a lot of respect. Well maybe not Microsoft, that's probably not challenging enough knowing their security history. But if you even think about touching Apple... don't. btw: Karma, meet toilet.

      --
      Of course nobody reads the FAQ! If people read the FAQ, the Questions wouldn't be so Frequently Asked.
  2. Oh god... I predict "resume spam" soon by erroneus · · Score: 4, Funny

    The more people like this get tremendous job offers, the worse I see things getting since they are ultimately being rewarded for their behavior.

    To that end, instead of "stocks" in images and PDFs, I predict the next round will be resumes flying around!

    1. Re:Oh god... I predict "resume spam" soon by Virgil+Tibbs · · Score: 1

      It's true...
      All these stories of ex-'hackers' getting highly paid jobs for multi-national corporations as security advisors is bordering between fiction and fairy tales.
      It doesn't work like that; it only happens to Kevin Mitnick and (IN)FAMOUS hackers...
      it wouldn't happen to you....

      perhaps I'm wrong though.....?

      --
      www.tdobson.net #### Dare to Dream #### blog.tdobson.net
    2. Re:Oh god... I predict "resume spam" soon by scubamage · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Are you kidding? This is HOW security comes into being. If no one compromises security, exploits holes, and shows people the errors that exist they will never get patched. That is why black, white, and gray hats exist. Its like yin and yang. Devs write something, black hats find holes, and the white hats fix it. If they can do it all in house, everyone is better off. Whose the one really to blame, the company who writes the shoddy software with gaping holes in it, or the guy who walks in through those holes?

    3. Re:Oh god... I predict "resume spam" soon by speaker+of+the+truth · · Score: 1

      I dunno. Let's ask victims of lock-picking burglars?

      --
      Using openSUSE instead of Windows since 9th of October, 2007 and liking it.
    4. Re:Oh god... I predict "resume spam" soon by MindStalker · · Score: 1

      It depends. If you go around picking random peoples locks you might get in a bit of trouble. If you go around picking random peoples locks and stealing their shit, expect to get in a lot of trouble.

    5. Re:Oh god... I predict "resume spam" soon by Nos. · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Its a little more complicated than you make it out to be. "Black hats" should never be offered a job by a company that gives a damn about its reputation. You don't reward people for committing crimes. Secondly, you don't have to be a black hat to look for security holes, and you don't have to look for security holes in other peoples' things.

    6. Re:Oh god... I predict "resume spam" soon by scubamage · · Score: 1

      I agree, I screwed up the nomenclature a little bit. Either way, someone who comes up with a creative hack should be rewarded for it. By exploiting the hole, he increased security. In the short term he cost people money. In the long run he most likely saved them money. The guy is serving his time in a Chinese prison which is no cakewalk. I am of the opinion that someone who has served their time has served their time. Maybe I'm too optimistic about human nature. The fact is, he came up with a nice hack, and hopefully he'll be coming up with other nice hacks in the future. Its a whole lot better than the one worm that had a hidden marriage proposal for Morgan "The ManJaw" Webb.

    7. Re:Oh god... I predict "resume spam" soon by Jarjarthejedi · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Better yet let's be a little more specific. Let's ask victims of lock-picking burglars who were caught (the burglars) if that burglar should be offered a job making sure that other, uncaught, burglars can't pick the locks of that company any more?

      I'd feel a lot safer if a burglar who was extremely good at lock picking was unable to pick the locks I was using. Same goes for security, if you have someone who is a professional hacker trying to penetrate your system you're going to find problems a lot faster than if you just have another White Hat, whose more concerned with patching holes than finding them, looking around.

      --
      There are two kinds of fool One says 'This is old therefore good' Another says 'This is new therefore better'- Dean Ing
    8. Re:Oh god... I predict "resume spam" soon by Nos. · · Score: 1

      Sure he came up with a nice hack. The fact that he sold that hack to people he obviously knew were going to do bad things with it is what concerns me. I work in IT security. My job requires a criminal record check. If I was looking for new people, and saw that one of my applicants did something like this, his resume immediately goes to recycling. He may be brilliant, but I can't trust him. And when you're talking about your IT security staff, if you can't trust them, you're in a lot of trouble.

    9. Re:Oh god... I predict "resume spam" soon by jollyreaper · · Score: 4, Funny

      The more people like this get tremendous job offers, the worse I see things getting since they are ultimately being rewarded for their behavior. CEO's get rewarded for ruining companies, isn't it time the same courtesy is extended to the IT set?
      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    10. Re:Oh god... I predict "resume spam" soon by db32 · · Score: 1

      Right... So by that logic it makes sense to hire a rapist to protect your daughter from other rapists right? Hire a criminal to protect against the criminal. I think I would rather pay someone who isn't a rapist for that job.

      Devs write something, black hats find holes do lots of damage and make some profit, white hats have to find the black hats using the holes and then fix it. Seems to make more sense to fix the problem at the Devs rather than hiring known criminals. This whole white hat black hat crap is just a convenient way to downplay "you are a fucking criminal, I don't care that you only wanted to see if you could break the hinges on my door and you didn't steal anything".

      As for your question...easy...the blame belongs to the guy who walked through those holes. How would you like it when you come home to find your entire family murdered and the cop says "Sorry, you didn't keep your doors locked, your fault." Just because your lock is broken, the door doesn't close, the windows won't latch, whatever, does not make it legal for me to waltz into your home and do as I please. At a bare minimum its trespassing.

      --
      The only change I can believe in is what I find in my couch cushions.
    11. Re:Oh god... I predict "resume spam" soon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'd have no problem then having a convicted child molester in charge of child protection services then?

    12. Re:Oh god... I predict "resume spam" soon by pimpimpim · · Score: 1

      I'll keep hammering on this, but this is why the recent anti-"hacking" law in Germany is one of the stupidest political ideas concerning IT ever to come to reality. It also shows a total neglect of the international state of the internet. By stopping "hacking" for Germans, the German IT systems just become less secure for the rest of the world. It's like an open invitation to break into our bank accounts and company networks. Swell! Not!

      --
      molmod.com - computing tips from a molecular modeling
    13. Re:Oh god... I predict "resume spam" soon by somersault · · Score: 1

      The skills required for rape aren't exactly in high demand..

      --
      which is totally what she said
    14. Re:Oh god... I predict "resume spam" soon by pimpimpim · · Score: 1

      Resume spam is already happening in the academic world. Any university researcher with a website offering positions will get a lot of job applications from people all over the world (probably mostly india/asia though) from totally irrelevant fields, either done by the applicant themselves or maybe there are companies that offer the addresses or send them around. They are written in a standard way, often not even mentioning the name of the addressee. Then again the same might happen for any job offer on monster, but I have no experience with that.

      --
      molmod.com - computing tips from a molecular modeling
    15. Re:Oh god... I predict "resume spam" soon by db32 · · Score: 1

      The skills required for catching or preventing rapists is in high demand. The argument goes that you should hire people who can commit the crime to protect against it. Only a serial rapist would know the details of the how and why of target selection and other important factors involved it commiting the crime. Now when you start hiring serial rapists for high paying jobs to try and catch other rapists, do you think maybe the number of rapes would go up as people try and land a high paying job? It is a dumb freaking idea and is not the way to go about business.

      --
      The only change I can believe in is what I find in my couch cushions.
    16. Re:Oh god... I predict "resume spam" soon by somersault · · Score: 1

      Yeah because it's really hard to work out who is more likely to be a potential victim for assault :/ Most people know that it will depend on your body language, and you would be better travelling with someone else, in well lit/'better' areas, etc.. you could probably just get advice from muggers/thieves rather than actual rapists..

      --
      which is totally what she said
    17. Re:Oh god... I predict "resume spam" soon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, escaped convicts should help design prisons too! Lets throw gobs of money at them! I'm sure they're trustworthy.

    18. Re:Oh god... I predict "resume spam" soon by Unkyjar · · Score: 1

      Actually a similar idea was turned into a Reality TV show for Discovery Channel called "It takes a Thief" where former burglers would be invited to break into people's homes and buisnesses and later would offer advice on how to better protect those places from buglaries. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/It_Takes_a_Thief_(2005_TV_series)

    19. Re:Oh god... I predict "resume spam" soon by Bearhouse · · Score: 1

      Easy fix for this. Since what he did could easily be construed as 'corruption' or 'fraud', (or a least conspiracy to do so, or to aid and adbet others), they should just string him up! That's what they do to 'corrupt' (are they not all?) party officials in China. The damage he did was easily as high-profile as what others have done...(sorry, too lazy to look up links for party boss from Shanghai who was executed for stealing 'millions'.

      Hey, while we're at it, we could extend this to to West, also... Could bring a whole new meaning to 'lethal' for the Hackerz...

    20. Re:Oh god... I predict "resume spam" soon by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      I'd have no problem with them acting in an advisory role, saying "Yeah, it's a bad idea to let the back door there unlocked" or whatever. Same kind of thing.

    21. Re:Oh god... I predict "resume spam" soon by bladesjester · · Score: 1

      perhaps I'm wrong though.....?

      You're wrong. I knew someone in the early 90's that finally got caught hacking into the systems of a security company after a decent amount of playing cat and mouse. They gave him two choices - work for us (at quite a nice salary) or sit in a cell.

      Needless to say, he chose the job.

      --
      Everything I need to know I learned by killing smart people and eating their brains.
    22. Re:Oh god... I predict "resume spam" soon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are a number of unpickable locks. You don't need a burglar to tell you to go out and buy one. Then again, burglars rarely break in through a locked deadbolt, Even if it's the standard piece of crap 5-pin quickset so many people have on their door, that's why no one thinks it's worth it to go out and buy a better lock.

    23. Re:Oh god... I predict "resume spam" soon by sholden · · Score: 0

      So instead you have all your locks designed so that a convicted burglar knows exactly how they are set up, how they work, etc, etc.

      What do you think happens when things get tight and he decides to return to his previous profession. Guess what locations are at the top of his list, with all the weaknesses already mapped out (and probably inserted intentionally in the first place).

      Seriously computer programmers put back doors in their code all the time, accountants steal from the clients, "professional hackers" leave some of the holes open for themselves later, someone with a criminal history is more likely to re-offend than someone without one is to offend.

      I know who I don't want designing my security system.

    24. Re:Oh god... I predict "resume spam" soon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dumbest thing I ever hear is crap like that. It's like cheaters in a game "once a cheater always a cheater" which is bullshit, same with hacking or other illegal activities. I've written gamehacks for one game while playing intenrational competitions fairly in others. I've written trojans while working as a sysadmin but does that mean I can't be trusted? Nope I work in banking now as a developer and I would never ever do anything to jeoperdize my workplace or myself, security in what my co-workers and myself write is one of the things I focus the most on and it's always been something that has intrigued and interested me more than anything, computersecurity. So for future reference if you actually get someone applying for a job at you but he has had some rough times or done some bad stuff in the past, atleast take the time and courtosy to chat with him and see if he is actually a stand-up guy. One should never judge a book by it's cover.

    25. Re:Oh god... I predict "resume spam" soon by sholden · · Score: 1

      And lawyers.

    26. Re:Oh god... I predict "resume spam" soon by Monchanger · · Score: 1

      Your idea of a White Hat isn't very flattering, and that deserves correction.

      The difference between White and Black hats is one of reliability. The White does not break the law whereas the Black does. You can hire a White Hat and give them permission to try break into your systems. If they are truly a White Hat, they'll disclose anything they find. The person you want for your doors is called a Locksmith. They're just as knowledgeable as the burglars, but they can actually be trusted.

      And don't confuse White/Black with skill. There are plenty of piss-poor Black Hats out there. They're called Script Kiddies.

    27. Re:Oh god... I predict "resume spam" soon by Jarjarthejedi · · Score: 1

      I never said they should design the security, just test it. I don't believe that a convicted burglar should be building locks, I'd feel a lot safer if the company that made locks had one on the payroll who got paid for discovering vulnerabilities in their locks. If things are handled right, and the correct burglar is chosen (don't go for the guy who stole for fun, get the guy who stole because he had to) then there's no reason for them to go back to their old profession.

      The Black Hat shouldn't be able to change anything in the code, just do what they'd be doing anyways, trying to find vulnerabilities. This time, however, they're on the payroll and told to report any vulnerabilities. If they choose not to report a weakness and try to exploit it then the companies in the same spot it would be without the guy, except they have a very good subject on their payroll.

      --
      There are two kinds of fool One says 'This is old therefore good' Another says 'This is new therefore better'- Dean Ing
    28. Re:Oh god... I predict "resume spam" soon by ArcticCelt · · Score: 1

      >(don't go for the guy who stole for fun, get the guy who stole because he had to) I don't see many cases where the black hat had to hack except maybe in that sad excuse for a movie called "Swordfish" when the main dude has a gun on is head and a head on his gun.

      --

      Yahh, hiii haaaaa! -Major Kong, from Dr. Strangelove
    29. Re:Oh god... I predict "resume spam" soon by scottv67 · · Score: 1

      So by that logic it makes sense to hire a rapist to protect your daughter from other rapists right? Hire a criminal to protect against the criminal.

      That's nonsense! That's like asking one serial killer for help finding another serial killer.

      You fly back to school now, little Starling.

    30. Re:Oh god... I predict "resume spam" soon by db32 · · Score: 1

      And that information is no different than saying things like don't run unneeded services, use a firewall, don't click on unknown programs, and so on. We already have plenty of general security advice that covers most of the bases without needing to hire criminals.

      --
      The only change I can believe in is what I find in my couch cushions.
    31. Re:Oh god... I predict "resume spam" soon by db32 · · Score: 1

      Oh no...you misunderstand. By all means...ask him how to better defend yourself from whatever crime while he sits behind bars. You just don't reward him for the behavior that got him there by giving him a high paying job doing that. There is a distinct difference. So long as you want to use the serial killer bit, Hannibal Lector (albeit a fictional character) was rewarded, escaped, and continued to commit crimes.

      --
      The only change I can believe in is what I find in my couch cushions.
    32. Re:Oh god... I predict "resume spam" soon by somersault · · Score: 1

      Well that works if all software is perfect, but not if there are holes. I wouldn't say we need to hire criminals, but 'white hat' type hackers have their benefits too. This guy wasn't very white though..

      I've occasionally wanted to learn more in-depth about security threats and how to compromise systems in order to be better protected against such threats, but obviously not to create a worm or virus (unless it was to patch up systems - vigilante law ftw!)

      --
      which is totally what she said
    33. Re:Oh god... I predict "resume spam" soon by db32 · · Score: 1

      I think the whole white/black hat concept is dumb. Criminal, not criminal. The whole hat nonsense tries to sugar coat the fact that they are criminals. Look if I own the systems I can code and exploit till the cows come home and there is nothing illegal or unethical about it. Even worm/virus for vigilante reasons should land your ass in a dark cell somewhere. Congratulations your vigilante worm has attempted to patch a computer monitoring a group of heart monitors in the hospital...too bad the exploit didn't execute cleanly...or maybe that patch hasn't been tested with that software...the system fails...patients code...no one knows because the monitors aren't working right...people die. As far as I'm concerned not only should you be charged with the various computer crimes, you should be charged with involuntary manslaughter.

      People just don't seem to get that computers aren't just for typing on. They run important systems, and then try to justify their bullshit with "its the companies fault the computers weren't secure" Yeah and its the victims fault they weren't wearing a bullet proof vest when they got shot by some dumbass kid right? The systems aren't yours, stay the fuck off them if you don't want to wind up in a dark cell with bubba probing your holes. You want to build a bunch of systems to exploit in your basement, your lab, whatever, knock yourself out, nothing wrong with it.

      You don't need to know how to commit a robbery to protect yourself from being robbed. The same goes in computers. The people who tell you otherwise are either trying to sell you something or think they are leet haxors themselves. Marcus Ranum has some really good papers on the subject.

      --
      The only change I can believe in is what I find in my couch cushions.
    34. Re:Oh god... I predict "resume spam" soon by somersault · · Score: 1

      Exactly, 'whitehats' aren't the sort that exploit public systems though, they would be the ones who do testing at home as you say and let companies know faults. That was my impression anyway. At this point in time I have no intention of learning to crack systems and become a vigilante anyway, but I think your example is going a bit overboard. Why would those systems even be connected to the net anyway? And how would disrupting a monitor kill someone? Why the heck is a hospital using Windows PCs to monitor patients in the first place? Etc etc.. that is your manslaughter right there..

      --
      which is totally what she said
    35. Re:Oh god... I predict "resume spam" soon by db32 · · Score: 1

      No, security professionals do the stuff at home. White hats is just another silly term to justify other colored hat hackers and try to legitimize silly buzzwords. But that is a terminology issue not so much the real issue at hand

      A great number of devices run from PCs and are connected to the net. That is how the MRI, CT scanner, ultrasound, x-ray machines, etc, etc, send images and information from one place to another be it on site or off site specialists. Disrupting the monitor would kill someone when the monitor doesn't set off the alarms that their heart stopped and the nurse on station thinks the patient is still sleeping. I only chose that because I really don't know enough on the medical end of things to describe how the other devices could harm or kill you. Though it does bother me when they take X-rays (dental in particular) they point the damned thing at your head, say its safe, put a lead sheild on you, and then leave the room to trigger the device. Now as far as Windows, some of the systems do run windows, some run varients of other OSs, but to pretend Windows is the only OS with vulnerabilities is a bit obsurd. While the using Windows is manslaughter is humorous to me as well, the reality is due to their monopoly most things run are Windows driven.

      --
      The only change I can believe in is what I find in my couch cushions.
    36. Re:Oh god... I predict "resume spam" soon by Th3Tron · · Score: 1

      Yes, and that brings in the hole theory of it takes a thief to catch a thief, right? While of course it makes perfect sense, I don't feel that rewarding illegal activity warrants someone to be given a job. It'd be like throwing a convicted murderer to the front lines of war, are they really going to do what you tell them to if you put a weapon back in their hands?

  3. Accomplices by just_another_sean · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Three of Li's accomplices were also jailed for up to two-and-a-half-years each yesterday. I wonder if they will get offers as well or do these companies want to stick to just the mastermind?

    (Oh and I for one welcome our burning joss stick wielding, cute and cuddly Asian overlor^W, um, IT guys...)
    --
    Creationist Textbook Stickers Declared Unconstitutional by CowboyNeal
  4. Pfft by thefear · · Score: 1

    <blockquote>can prevent infected computers from operating anti-virus software</blockquote>
    Don't all viruses do that nowadays, seems like a standard practice to me.

    <blockquote>and all programs using the "exe" suffix.</blockquote>
    so.... how did windows boot?

    --
    :(
    1. Re:Pfft by Applekid · · Score: 4, Informative

      and all programs using the "exe" suffix. so.... how did windows boot?

      IIRC, the virus modified the registry entries which tell Windows how to handle .exe files. Booting up is fine. Once the system's up, every time explorer tries to launch an .exe, Windows wound up checking the registry for what it should do with the file. The registry modification removed the "magic" that told it that it's an executable.

      I remember at work someone convincing me it was a good idea to copy the .exe registry class into another one, say, .myinitials, so if the .exe registry settings got clobbered I could always rename regedit.exe to regedit.myinitials and fix it.
      --
      More Twoson than Cupertino
    2. Re:Pfft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The worm loads after the windows kernel is loaded and the kernel doesn't have an exe-suffice.

    3. Re:Pfft by dcollins · · Score: 4, Funny

      Dammit. Screwed again.
      - Eugene Xavier Edwards

      --
      We know where leadership by an anti-intellectual "strongman" who scapegoats minorities and likes boisterous rallies goes
    4. Re:Pfft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember at work someone convincing me it was a good idea to copy the .exe registry class into another one, say, .myinitials, so if the .exe registry settings got clobbered I could always rename regedit.exe to regedit.myinitials and fix it. Better yet, use a boot cd until you can reinstall. You don't want to be working in an OS you know is already compromised.
    5. Re:Pfft by AlbertEin · · Score: 1

      Come on!!, this is funny, no informative, where are we? slashdot?

    6. Re:Pfft by l0cust · · Score: 1

      Erm.. ok here is my geek batch. Now can someone please point out the elusive reference in that post. Wikipedia and Google have failed me this time. :(

      --
      Politicians and Pedophiles: Two groups of exploitive bastards who are most dangerous when they're thinking of children.
    7. Re:Pfft by AntiDragon · · Score: 1

      The old virus SirCam did this too. It's going back a bit, but I had to manually remove that garbage from a couple machines once. Couldn't run a virus checker, couldn't edit the registry since I couldn't run any new processes.

      Dead easy solution though - just located regedit.exe, renamed it to regedit.com, fired it up and got fixing. ...Did I mention I prefer Linux and OS X now?

      --
      "...So I hung back and lurked. For 18 months. Can't beat a good old-fashioned lurking."
  5. Maybe not so new by east+coast · · Score: 4, Funny

    From the blurb: Li's cyber bug, which earned him about 145,000 yuan after selling it to other hackers from December 2006 to February this year, can prevent infected computers from operating anti-virus software and all programs using the "exe" suffix.'

    Navidad did kind of the same thing but it seems to be a coding mistake more then the intended purpose of the virus.

    Just for the record: I didn't read the article.

    --
    Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    1. Re:Maybe not so new by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1
      Moderation: +1 Informative.

      Just for the record: I didn't read the article.
      Now if you HAD read TFA, that would be informative. Default value for rtfa is 0, not 1, so stating you hadn't read TFA is redundant :)
      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    2. Re:Maybe not so new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      One guy wrote a virus that tricked users to think the virus was update to their windoze boxes.. After users installed the virus it wrote annoying messages to them all the time.

      He was hired later as a WGA expert-developer.

  6. well yeah by circletimessquare · · Score: 4, Insightful

    the only real way to ensure security is to have it constantly challenged. that's a job. and this guy did a good job of doing that. thus, he earned the income

    which means 2 things:

    1. there is no security in an environment where the security doesn't get challenged and defeated every now and then. or get's challenged, and the fallout kept secret

    2. go ahead and make virii and worms. just make damn sure the payload is harmless or simply annoying. if the worm this guy wrote did something really nasty, you can be sure he wouldn't be getting kudos and job offers

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:well yeah by somersault · · Score: 1

      1. There would also be no need for security if people weren't trying to break the system, but I know what you're saying.

      2. He sold the code to criminals who have no doubt used it for something 'really nasty'?

      I like to play devil's advocate a bit, but this guy really does seem like a prick rather than someone who wants to be helpful.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    2. Re:well yeah by db32 · · Score: 1

      So. Where should I send the bill when I break into your house and take pictures of you sleeping? I mean there is work there testing your security (physical security), observing your sleep patterns (doctors get big bucks for this work), and I didn't take anything myself. Oh, and just so you know, I am going to show everyone else how to do the same, so if they do anything nasty to you in your sleep I can't be held liable for that.

      I swear to God people need to get over this moronic idea that hiring hackers is a good thing. You are aware that computers run important things now right? Medical devices, manufacturing devices, and all manner of other things. People act like all of these worms and virii and whatnot are just little annoyances to office workers and nothing more. Boy I sure hope you aren't getting a MRI when some jackoff runs an exploit that causes it to do unpredictable things while you are in there. If you get lucky it will only fudge the data causing you to get improper treatment and maybe you will be ok, if you get unlucky it could do damage to you while you are in. I mean after all, the payload was just an annoyance so its ok right?

      --
      The only change I can believe in is what I find in my couch cushions.
  7. crime pays by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The lesson to be learned from this is that crime pays.

    1. Re:crime pays by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      in China apparently.

      of course they have other problems too

    2. Re:crime pays by Jackie_Chan_Fan · · Score: 1

      Same could be said of the Bush Administration and every politician known to man.

  8. What if he wasn't led astray... by Virgil+Tibbs · · Score: 1

    Though I'm sure he would like them to believe he was led astray,
    what if he wasn't and is just manipulating the authorities to get himself back online?
    what are they going to do if he creates another worm, while in prison?
    I would hope this is an unlikely scenario but it is one worth considering...

    --
    www.tdobson.net #### Dare to Dream #### blog.tdobson.net
  9. first thought by twoboxen · · Score: 1

    ...where he earns up to 7 cigarettes on a good day. I'm not sure what that would be here after cost-of-living adjustments, though.

    --
    TODO - Insert Creative/Witty Signature
    1. Re:first thought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given the current state of the US economy, 5 cigarettes?

  10. He did this because he couldn't get a job? by crivens · · Score: 1

    Was the virus technically fantastic, or did he download a virus kit from the web and just modify it's name before releasing it?

    He did this because he couldn't get a job? Maybe he should get a life instead.

    1. Re:He did this because he couldn't get a job? by speaker+of+the+truth · · Score: 1

      Had he gotten life the job offer would be less appealing I imagine.

      --
      Using openSUSE instead of Windows since 9th of October, 2007 and liking it.
  11. The familiar meme evolves by Dystopian+Rebel · · Score: 2, Funny

    1. Lose job.
    2. In despair, write a Windows worm.
    3. PROFIT.
    4. Get caught, go to jail.
    5. ???
    6. PROFIT.

    --
    Rich And Stupid is not so bad as Working For Rich And Stupid.
    1. Re:The familiar meme evolves by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      1. Lose job.
      2. In despair, write a Windows worm.
      3. PROFIT.
      4. Get caught, go to jail.
      5. ???
      6. PROFIT.


      But the "???" are not even needed here, which is the odd part.

  12. Bad idea? by GreyPoopon · · Score: 1, Interesting
    Am I the only one that thinks rewarding a virus writer in this manner is a really bad idea?

    However, he later learned from media reports that Li, who created the virus over discontent at his failure to land a job, may not be a bad guy and "just went astray," the report said.

    Sorry, but taking your discontent out on scores of innocent victims does not strike me as merely being led astray. At best, it shows a complete failure to consider the consequences of your actions. At worst, it shows that your personality is borderline sociopathic, in that you don't actually _care_ about the consequences of your actions.


    Maybe I'm wrong, but I would think that rewarding someone who did this would simply invite others to repeat the performance. At first glance, it may seem that the price of imprisonment should be a sufficient deterrent. But the dude got five years in prison, and he now stands to make over $133,000 per year on his release. $133,000 a year is a heap of money in China. If you told me I could "play nice" and make less than $10,000 for most of the rest of my life, or I could instead spend five years in miserable conditions but not paying anything for room and board and then make $133,000 per year afterwards and live like a king, the choice would be pretty easy.

    --

    GreyPoopon
    --
    Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

    1. Re:Bad idea? by pitu · · Score: 1

      Beeing offered a job is not a reward. A job is just a human right.

        theese times though, many people feel rewarded if they have the opportunity
        to be employed and exploited.

        =>he did not go astray... the society did - "the society is to blame" (c) Monty python

    2. Re:Bad idea? by GreyPoopon · · Score: 1

      A job is just a human right.

      On the chance that you weren't making a joke, I have to respectfully disagree. Keeping your citizens gainfully employed is a good idea for any government (otherwise anarchy and rebellion arise). However, I don't believe it's a human right. It is the responsibility of each person to strive to educate and locate themselves in such a way as to gain employment that takes care of life's necessities. It is the responsibility of society (if they have the means) to assist other members of society in this pursuit. It is not anyone's responsibility to provide a job for someone who has no interest in learning the necessary skills or performing the work required by the job.


      Also, I agree that being offered a job is not a reward. However, being offered a job that pays more than ten times the average white collar salary _is_ a reward.

      --

      GreyPoopon
      --
      Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

    3. Re:Bad idea? by pitu · · Score: 1

      I gather it's more of a human right because you can not refuse it to someone based on
      his origins, colour (put your custom discrimination here), nor because of one's criminal (and served) history.

      A man has a right to work and have a job, that's all, it does not mean governments should secure & offer it.

      now, a company says he rocks and offers 130k$. You say he'll feel rewarded as other sous-payed chineese suits get 10k$. ...or just maybe he'll still feel like shit because he's worth a lot more anywhere else & he's going for the world, not where you put him.

    4. Re:Bad idea? by dwye · · Score: 1

      > Am I the only one that thinks rewarding a virus writer in this manner is a really bad idea?

      Bad idea for whom? The Chinese get a good virus writer to make more, as munitions against someone. It encourages others to try. This is no different than England knighting or ennobling "pirates" who took the Spanish treasure fleets or the Silver Train from inland South America, back in Henry VIII's or Elizabeth I's reigns. For that matter, it is no different than pardoning a successful bandit and employing him in the nation's army, as many medieval or earlier rulers did.

      Of course, it is not particularly good for the victims of his earlier viruses (or of those he might later create for his employers), but then, we don't count in their accounting. Surely, you don't think that he is being hired for his database design skills?

      > $133,000 a year is a heap of money in China.

      It is rather a heap almost anyplace.

    5. Re:Bad idea? by vertinox · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but taking your discontent out on scores of innocent victims does not strike me as merely being led astray. At best, it shows a complete failure to consider the consequences of your actions. At worst, it shows that your personality is borderline sociopathic, in that you don't actually _care_ about the consequences of your actions.

      This is China we are talking about. The run by a different set of rules. Corruption is common and ethics is often considered when we are talking about the bottom line. You are talking about corporation who have no qualms employing slave like conditions for child laborers, letting men die in coal mines due to negligence almost on a monthly basis, and no qualms whatsoever of having poisons in pet foods and on child's toys.

      To be fair... The punishment for corruption in China is far worse. The equivalent of the head of the FDA in China was put to death for corruption. I doubt we would see the same response in the US other than a slap on the wrist and maybe some time in the ClubFed.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    6. Re:Bad idea? by GreyPoopon · · Score: 1

      Bad idea for whom? The Chinese get a good virus writer to make more, as munitions against someone.

      Good point, but even then, I still think it's a bad idea. Somebody like that will sell out to the highest bidder, which can easily turn a great asset into a traitor. It's kind of like making explosives. You know that at some point there will be an accident during production, and that it will be really bad. Are the risks worth the returns? You have to do the math.
      --

      GreyPoopon
      --
      Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

    7. Re:Bad idea? by P3NIS_CLEAVER · · Score: 1

      I could instead spend five years in miserable conditions but not paying anything for room and board and then make $133,000 per year afterwards and live like a king, the choice would be pretty easy.

      Sounds like graduate school.

      --
      Please sign petition to restore sanity to our banking system!!!

      http://financialpetition.org/
    8. Re:Bad idea? by GreyPoopon · · Score: 1

      Sounds like graduate school.

      Yeah, except the "live like a king" part afterwards.
      --

      GreyPoopon
      --
      Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

    9. Re:Bad idea? by ErikZ · · Score: 1

      I disagree.

      Back when the species could earn a living from farming, a job wasn't a human right. It was something everyone could do, and had to do to survive.

      Now what? Can you go off, buy a ridiculously priced piece of land and farm a living off of it? You have to be able to get a job.

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    10. Re:Bad idea? by serutan · · Score: 1

      Virus writer or not, I think letting anybody conduct business activity of any kind from prison is a bad idea. It defeats the meaning of punishment. A person in prison should simply be unavailable for all business purposes. They should have to appoint someone as caretaker of their assets while they are in jail, similar to what presidents in office must do.

    11. Re:Bad idea? by Raideen · · Score: 1

      At worst, it shows that your personality is borderline sociopathic, in that you don't actually _care_ about the consequences of your actions.

      That's not entirely true. I'm sure that he cared that he made 145,000 yuans, which is over 19,000 USD (according to Google convert). It's no more sociopathic than being a car thief. At least he gets paid better.

  13. The Chinese will learn, too, eventually... by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The "West" learned in the 80s. You do NOT want those people in your security department. Yes, they have the skill, but they don't have the ethics. And that's the big deal here.

    You will not get a job offer here for writing a virus. No reputable IT sec company will touch you with a 10 foot fiber cable. Yes, you obviously have the skill, but you lack the morals not to use it for what you've done.

    What is really lacking in today's IT world is lectures and courses about the topic. Do you see many universities teach you something about malware? How to exploit a system? How to look for security holes? Yes, very controversial topic, but it's necessary. I mean, where are you supposed to learn that? Self study takes a long, long time, time you don't have in today's IT sec world where what you learn today is dead weight in a month. And, well, self study is usually only done by people who have an interest in applying that knowledge, and rarely for good...

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:The Chinese will learn, too, eventually... by spleen_blender · · Score: 1

      But what recourse do disenfranchised hackers (of either hat colour) have for an industry that in one breath will tell you that skill in the trade is the most valuable thing, then in the other breath farm out your job to a programmer in India who barely knows how to use a hash table?

      All I am saying is that it is hard to decipher if the ethical concerns with an individual hacker were present before they had the skill or if the ethics are merely a result of happenstance.

    2. Re:The Chinese will learn, too, eventually... by clickety6 · · Score: 1

      Yes, they have the skill, but they don't have the ethics. And that's the big deal here.

      Yes, because every day we hear how ethical the big companies are here in the West. Our big companies would never abuse monopoly positions, would never swindle share holders, would never abuse their staff, would never seek every way possible to avoid paying taxes, would never rip off their customers, would never fix prices, would never use scare tactics, would never spread lies and disinformation about competitors, would never spy on competitors or their own staff, would never collude with their own government to break the law, would never work with an oppressive regime just for profits...

      yes, I'm constantly amazed at how ethical Western companies are... ;-)

      I'm not sure if I should tag this post as or !

      --
      ----------------------------------- My Other Sig Is Hilarious -----------------------------------
    3. Re:The Chinese will learn, too, eventually... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      It's not necessarily only a matter of your attitude towards the industry. If your malware only affected business targets, I could see that it's some kind of revenge to an industry that shipped your jobs to a country where the average coder asks you what he needs a hash table for, because he only needs one for coke.

      Malware, though, strikes predominantly "civilian" targets. And with the advent of botnets like the Storm net, the net itself. And, sorry, with this on the table, you cannot tell me that the ethics of people who write that are terribly high. If you strike against corporations who wronged you, that's one thing. If you lash out indifferently against the net as a whole, it tells me something about your moral code (or lack thereof).

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    4. Re:The Chinese will learn, too, eventually... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      I've said it in the comment above, I say it again, if you're pissed at companies, go ahead and bring them to their knees. But there's no excuse for launching an all out attack against everyone who uses the net because you're angry with a company or two.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    5. Re:The Chinese will learn, too, eventually... by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      It doesn't matter what the ethics are of the company as a whole. If they can't trust you as an employee they won't hire you since all organizations (whether you think they are corrupt or not) depend on trust. If they are cheating, they want to be the ones doing the cheating, not being cheated. Even an Enron wouldn't be in a rush to hire a convicted embezzler.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    6. Re:The Chinese will learn, too, eventually... by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1

      Our big companies would never abuse monopoly positions, would never swindle share holders, would never abuse their staff, would never seek every way possible to avoid paying taxes, would never rip off their customers, would never fix prices, would never use scare tactics, would never spread lies and disinformation about competitors, would never spy on competitors or their own staff, would never collude with their own government to break the law, would never work with an oppressive regime just for profits... Being able to trust your employees not to steal and sell hundreds of thousands of customer credit card numbers to the highest bidder has nothing to do with corporate morality or lack thereof.
    7. Re:The Chinese will learn, too, eventually... by dark404 · · Score: 2, Informative
      Do you see many universities teach you something about malware?

      Um... yes? Actually, where I go there's an entire CS Masters concentration dealing with the subject along with digital forensics topics...

    8. Re:The Chinese will learn, too, eventually... by spleen_blender · · Score: 1

      But what is the motivation for that behavior? It is financial for the most part, save a few renegade hackers who are living out some sort of Matrix fantasy, if I am not mistaken. So what is wrong with giving the ones with the skill the incentive to use their abilities for good? Shouldn't they be compensated according to value? Or is it too disturbing paying the lion to not eat you?

    9. Re:The Chinese will learn, too, eventually... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Care to share the secret which university would be that? And how long you had to search to find it?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    10. Re:The Chinese will learn, too, eventually... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      The problem here is when someone has already shown that he has no moral problems with launching some malware into the public, who tells a company its new hot coder won't backfire on them?

      The anti-malware community is a wee bit zealous. Sure, some might have written some kind of malware some long, long time ago in a life far, far away from the one they live now (talk about double standards, I know...), but as far as I'm aware, nobody ever did it for money. And a lot of them would eat you alive if you did that. So someone who wrote malware for money is by definition a pariah. Not to mention that, should it EVER become known that someone from your company actually created malware not for kicks or to create a PoC, but to actually try phishing or running a botnet, your company is in serious trouble. Nobody will cooperate or at least talk with you anymore. Your employee backfires right on you.

      That's a too serious risk for an anti-malware research company to take.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    11. Re:The Chinese will learn, too, eventually... by clickety6 · · Score: 1

      So who do they hire to do all this dirty work at the companies? Or do they just corrupt their current employees? Surely if you're going to run scam like Enron it's cheaper to hire pre-corrupted employees than have to train your own ;-)

      --
      ----------------------------------- My Other Sig Is Hilarious -----------------------------------
    12. Re:The Chinese will learn, too, eventually... by fmoliveira · · Score: 1

      Isn't that Mitnick guy making money with security now? Phoning someone and asking for the passwords or writing worms doesn't take a genius. These guys are just famous. And people giving them money are just lame.

    13. Re:The Chinese will learn, too, eventually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree all the way but I find your comment really funny because it's so ironic. The Chinese have always been known for being spiritual and being all for honor, respect.... deeper issues than the western society but here they are giving this guy praise for being the cyber equal to a drug dealer. Morrons!

  14. Offered a job for your crime by craigkup · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's like you robbed a bank, but you did it so well the bank wanted to hire you as security to protect them.

    1. Re:Offered a job for your crime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently some ex-felons are hired on this basis.

    2. Re:Offered a job for your crime by edrie · · Score: 1

      i dont think so..maybe you are hired as actor in OC 14 XD ~

    3. Re:Offered a job for your crime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that the whole point of robbing a bank is NOT to get caught, and to take off with the money. If you get caught, you don't have the money, and you did a poor job of robbery. If you didn't get caught, then you have the money, and you don't need a job from the bank.

      Or to look at it another way, your analogy is terrible.

  15. if I was chinese... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and I was going to be getting that much money, I would totally change my name to Suk Maidong.

  16. In communist China... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...prison attracts you!

  17. on hiring the insecure and the vengeful by westlake · · Score: 2
    The media is reporting that author Li Jun originally wrote the virus due to frustrations over being jobless.

    You hire a guy with a record with of lashing out against the world when he meets with life's frustrations. What next? Do you offer him lifetime job security and rebuild your IT infrastructure every time he twitches?

  18. Shoot them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People who write viruses and worms should be shot.

    1. Re:Shoot them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. Write a virus
      2. Get shot
      3. There's no #3
      4. ???
      5. PROFIT!

      I agree with the suggestion.

    2. Re:Shoot them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL!

  19. Something to be concerned about by Targon · · Score: 1

    Considering the changes in the computer industry over the past 20 years, it should scare people that this sort of thing is going on right now. There have been an increasing number of hacking attempts from China, and there are also an increasing number of businesses that are based around infecting computers with spyware/adware.

    As a result of this, paying hackers and cyber-terrorists(which is really what worm creators are) for their expertise in this sort of program is a VERY VERY bad thing. The culture in that part of the world is different from "western" nations, and as a whole tends to be more accepting of illegal activities(look at pirated software being sold on store shelves). Many people are worried about scams from Russia, but those are nothing compared to some of the scams that originate in Eastern Asia.

  20. Inspiration! by caesura · · Score: 1

    Excuse me while I go write a virus that will replace the boot sector on all windows-running computers with a small program that displays my resumé and contact information.

  21. Communism? by operagost · · Score: 1

    I thought this was a Communist country. What happened to "to each according to his needs?" Does a hacker need millions of yuan?

    --

    Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    1. Re:Communism? by budword · · Score: 1

      China hasn't been communist in a damn long time. Now they are just a one party dictatorship. Think Soviets without the good intentions. The funny part about it is the communist party isn't even embarrassed about it.

    2. Re:Communism? by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      China is now about as Socialist as the National Socialists, if you get the picture. More National than Socialist.

      Basically, China is an oligarchical state that gives lip service to the theories of people who are pretty much discredited: Mao, Lenin, Marx. For lack of a better mantra, they've stuck with it, since they can punish you if you argue with it and they've printed all the textbooks in Red already. There's nothing more comforting than being able to say you're a revolutionary without having to create another actual revolution. New revolutions get messy and people get lined up against walls. They're very profitable either.

      The Chinese have a very specific brand of morality, and they insist that you stick to it, but its not the same as in the West. They won't hesitate to employ a troublemaker, if they have real talent, because they can promise punishment and monitor them much more effectively than you could in the US. The real reason this guy was a threat was because he was unknown. Now that he's known, he's like an ameboa under a microscope. And he's been in a Chinese jail. He knows what's coming if he screws up again.

    3. Re:Communism? by edrie · · Score: 1

      dont think about communisme..all hacker need the money to upgrade their system XD ~ if u child also need money to buy the chocolate~

    4. Re:Communism? by PalmKiller · · Score: 1

      1 Million Yuan is 130K in US dollars which is good but not great for the title they are offering him. Now I do agree that is a lot considering that china's cost of living is low, but still not all that amazing in US terms.

    5. Re:Communism? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeup. It is just an oligarchy. A party that stays in power to keep itself alive. I'm sure every American political party that likes to toss the word "freedom" around would love to have that kind of power.

  22. Incentives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In general, people do what they are incited to do.

    If working within the system simply doesn't pay as well as working above it, then plenty of people will work above it. Whether or not this is "right" will not be very important to them.

  23. Industry, or government? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seems like such an individual would be very valuable to government espionage agencies...

  24. Give him a job only after... by Simonetta · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I believe in fairness. Everyone needs to work productively. So yes, give this guy a job.

        But only after he has spent MANY years in jail, and has reimbursed all the people who lost work and data directly resulting from the virus being on all the computers affected by this crime.

        So if this criminal has written and released a bit of secret code that wipes out data a hard drive, then he (always a he) should be required to compensate for the cost of collecting and entering this data. He must also be responsible for loss of income and profit in all the companies infected by his virus code.

        If he is still interested in coding after all the effort and expense that he must do to correct the bad effects of his deliberate action of writing and releasing a destructive virus, then he should be allowed to do so.

        But not until all the compensation has been made. It doesn't matter if this criminal is a coding genius, we can always get the same results from having more ordinary people working on the same coding problem as a lone genius.

        What I'm saying is that regardless of any individual's coding skills, if this individual causes millions of dollars of damage, he should not be allowed to work in this industry.

  25. It is a communist country by sonoronos · · Score: 1

    It's just not a Maoist communist country anymore. Deng Xiaoping changed everything.

  26. Chinese Worm Creator Gets High by CrazyJim1 · · Score: 1

    Anyone else misread the title at first?

  27. mod parent up by pimpimpim · · Score: 1

    It's insightful/funny/sad, because it's true.

    --
    molmod.com - computing tips from a molecular modeling
  28. Re:Pay by somersault · · Score: 1

    When you're working with Mr Wang Wanxiong, you pick up some good tricks!

    --
    which is totally what she said
  29. What? No military contract? by n+dot+l · · Score: 1

    I'm just surprised this guy wasn't hired by their government. A cyber-attack would be a pretty good start to their next war, especially against their highly industrialized (and networked) neighbors. You could disrupt their economy for days (or weeks, depending on how good the worm is) before launching an actual attack and nobody could really counterattack right off the bat because they'd think it was just another random teenager in his basement up to no good...

    1. Re:What? No military contract? by fire5ign · · Score: 1

      I'm just surprised this guy wasn't hired by their government.

      How do you know if he wasn't? In China, "business is politics and politics is business." China's economic model is what's known as 'Leninist Corporatism', and there are many for-profit corporations run by the government and the People's Liberation Army.
  30. What about next time he gets frustrated? by 1.000.000 · · Score: 1

    Would he then

    a) get over it?
    b) do something harmful?

    Good luck giving him access to your IT system.

    --
    This is a viral signature. You are now infected!
  31. Go to prison, win at life by cylcyl · · Score: 1

    So, committing a crime is a part of the recruitment process? Cool!

    Reminds me of the A-Team

  32. I've found it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Step 2 is go to jail

  33. Oblig "It's a Wonderful Life" by seven+of+five · · Score: 1

    Mr. Potter: "Merry Christmas to you - IN JAIL!"

  34. Why disable .exe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't that self-defeating? It makes the hijacked machine unusable, people will notice immediately and reinstall their OS.

  35. in my mind, breaking into a corporate computer system is slightly different from breaking into someone's bedroom, but i'm just a wacky guy that way

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:uh by db32 · · Score: 1

      Maybe that is the problem. The damages from breaking into a corporate computer system is FAR greater than breaking into someone's bedroom. And again, God forbid you exploit a system that actually does have a life or death purpose. Advocating not using computers for anything in the medical field instead of punishing criminal behavior rather than glorifying and rewarding it is just dumb.

      --
      The only change I can believe in is what I find in my couch cushions.
  36. And all companies are evil by microbee · · Score: 1

    The "virus" was not just a show-off job. Nowadays they are always tied to revenue. This virus in particular was used to earn click cash and they got like 10 million yuan a month due to its widespread infection.

    So the companies that are offering this kind of money are the companies that want to use spyware technology to boost their own revenues. In China, if you write a virus by your own, you are a criminal; if you write a virus as a company, it's called a "product".

    1. Re:And all companies are evil by wikinerd · · Score: 1

      In China, if you write a virus by your own, you are a criminal; if you write a virus as a company, it's called a "product".

      Only in China?

  37. You certainly are from the USA... by xtracto · · Score: 1

    ... because I believe that people in there have lost the fate in the "rehabilitation centre" which prisons are supposed to be. So what, this guy did such a bad thing with his knowledge. But if he pays his "debt" to society (be in jail and pay whatever millions he must) and he can be rehabilitated then society wins...

    Of course I do not expect people from the USA to understand... I mean, what can you expect from a country where murder is a "fair" punishment.

    --
    Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
  38. If there is a thing to blame... by FunkyRider · · Score: 0

    If there is a thing to blame, blame Windows. Blame how it handles system permissions. Blame why almost all desktop PCs running Windows XP runs in Administrator rights all the time. Blame the lame user management schema which frustrates users who try to run in normal User mode, so the single security breach in the web browser can ruin their entire system. The UAC implemented in Vista is also a lame mimic of sudo(s) in the *nix systems. It encourages user to click "Yes" for whatever dialog appears on their face. It is Windows who is allowing all this to happen!

    --
    just wonder why there are so many anonymous cowards in this world....
  39. Burglars and ethics by jesterzog · · Score: 1

    Better yet let's be a little more specific. Let's ask victims of lock-picking burglars who were caught (the burglars) if that burglar should be offered a job making sure that other, uncaught, burglars can't pick the locks of that company any more?

    Perhaps I'm different from you, but I'd feel much better knowing that a convicted lock-picking burglar had nothing to do with the design or manufacturing process of a lock that was on my house.

    Once they burgle someone, they demonstrate beyond any doubt that their ethics can be compromised, and I don't want someone like that involved in the design process.

  40. WRONG. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "we can always get the same results from having more ordinary people working on the same coding problem as a lone genius."

    WRONG. WRONG. WRONG. You don't hire a "genius" to do line level scut work. You hire him to create and find new solutions beyond what your common coder can do. Lemme compare it to music. Do you think a group of common composers would be able to come up with Mozart's body of work, just given enough time and bodys? No. You basically just posited the "group of monkeys + typewriters + time = Shakespeare" argument, which has already been proven false, thanks to the Net. Ten million Indian coders have also proven the Comp Sci equivalent.

  41. Lack of innovation in CHina... by sdguero · · Score: 1

    I have worked with dozens of Chinese engineers (electrical, thermal, software, and mechanical) with excellent credentials (MSs and Phds from the "MIT of China" etc...) over the past 5 years. None of them have ever produced what I would call creative solutions to engineering problems. I think it is related to Chinese culture. They have been raised and taught to assimilate, not innovate. Ever seen the movie Hero? The story is about giving up your own ideas and desires in favor of unity and conformity.

    I think this guy showed a little innovation with his virus. Something that is seriously lacking in China. The companies trying to hire him are willing to risk a security breach to get some badly needed talent.

    On the other hand, every dumbass with an stupid idea thinks they have the right to shove their retardedness down our throats in the US. I guess its give and take...

    1. Re:Lack of innovation in CHina... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >I have worked with dozens of Chinese engineers ... over the past 5 years. None of them have ever produced what I would call creative solutions to engineering problems.

      >every dumbass with an stupid idea thinks they have the right to shove their retardedness down our throats

      Oh, the irony!

  42. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  43. Wasn't a 'precious genius' before? by thatblackguy · · Score: 1

    If this guy was such a 'precious genius' why was he jobless and presumably reduced to writing worms for hackers?
    If he did go a college and learn his skills there this is a massive failing on the part of education system to be unable to get jobs for those qualified for them. I wouldn't be too surprised since I've seen plenty (almost all) education based on how well you can memorise and spit out something rather than innovate. The dumbass rote learners get jobs and the creative people are sunk unless they adapt.
    If was self-taught and he had other options to show off his abilities, like some sort of job fair or something this wouldn't have happened. It's good that someone did recognize his talents and unfortunate that he had to go to jail and fuck with a bunch of computers to do it.
    It's better to try to solve the cause of the problem rather than just minimise the bad effects.

    1. Re:Wasn't a 'precious genius' before? by dbIII · · Score: 1

      If this guy was such a 'precious genius' why was he jobless

      Probably the same old story - couldn't get past HR to talk to anybody with a clue.

    2. Re:Wasn't a 'precious genius' before? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If this guy was such a 'precious genius' why was he jobless and presumably reduced to writing worms for hackers?

      In the US there are 300+ million people, and for the sports
      crowd if your a geek or a nerd, your not very cool.

      so redneck sports culture has more of a foothold here than in china.

      In china, the person who is brilliant is revered, and rewarded,
      but they literally number in the Billions, about 6 times US population.

      So in a society with fewer IT jobs, 6 times the people, and its cool
      to be a geek/nerd the odds are stacked a bit against him.

      Also I tend to believe the hours they work there are a bit longer,
      so again less jobs to go around.

  44. Nice Guys Finish Last by ery_pk076180_uni10 · · Score: 1

    Reading this article made me confuse with the working world outside. I'm a student and going to enter the job world soon. Here we've been stress about being ethical and yet this Li Jun fellow create the worst virus in his country which is consider by my lecturer as a computer crime but yet he is making million out of it.

    I guess nice guys really finish last eh?

    This may raise a question do I have to hack other people computers to earn a high paying job? The university should introduce a new subject on how to hack a computer so that they can produce a high quality graduates. Good luck to the company for hiring him. He may be beneficial for the company or disastrous for them. Either way he's still a menace to the computer world. A rich menace I would say.