Slashdot Mirror


MS Awarded "Best Campaigner Against OOXML"

HansF writes "Microsoft itself is the surprise winner of the FFII's Kayak Prize 2007, offered by the FFII in its call for rejection of Microsoft's OOXML standards proposal. The software monopolist is honored as 'Best Campaigner against OOXML Standardization.' FFII president Pieter Hintjens explains, 'We could never have done this by ourselves. By pushing so hard to get OOXML endorsed, even to the point of loading the standards boards in Sweden, Denmark, Switzerland, Portugal, Italy, and beyond, Microsoft showed to the world how poor their format is. Good standards just don't need that kind of pressure. All together, countries made over ten thousands technical comments, a new world record for an ISO vote. Microsoft made a heroic — and costly — effort to discredit their own proposal, and we're sincerely grateful to them.'" If Microsoft doesn't send a representative to claim their 2500-Euro prize at the FFII General Assembly in November, FFII will give the money to Peruvian earthquake relief.

190 comments

  1. Y'know.... by Cleon · · Score: 5, Funny

    In addition, MS has helped IT security improve more than any other company.

    --
    Gifts for Geeks - Stuff that really matters!
    1. Re:Y'know.... by Eevee1 · · Score: 4, Funny

      And their CEO is a sane, rational man that is well respected by us of Slashdot.

    2. Re:Y'know.... by O('_')O_Bush · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think they should be given the "Most Improved Award". It's not really an award, it just says you don't suck as much as you used to.

      --
      while(1) attack(People.Sandy);
    3. Re:Y'know.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Which one is he? The sweaty one or the idea thief?

    4. Re:Y'know.... by charlieman · · Score: 1

      And it has keeped lots of chair companies away from bankruptcy.

    5. Re:Y'know.... by renegadesx · · Score: 1, Funny

      The sweaty one, he's currently getting a degree in idea theft. He failed his last exam so he copied his classmate (he'll pass in no time)

      --
      Make SELinux enforcing again!
    6. Re:Y'know.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like winning the 'Special Olympics'?

    7. Re:Y'know.... by Phisbut · · Score: 1

      In addition, MS has helped IT security improve more than any other company.

      Correction: MS has helped the IT security industry more than any other company. Only because of MS are Norton or McAfee in business.

      --
      After 3 days without programming, life becomes meaningless
      - The Tao of Programming
    8. Re:Y'know.... by jcr · · Score: 1

      I don't think you're being fair to the people who participate in the Special Olympics.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    9. Re:Y'know.... by Hatta · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Oh! ...and his personal hygiene is beyond reproach.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  2. I wouldn't be too smug by earthforce_1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They nearly won, and it isn't over yet - there is another vote coming up in Februrary.

    --
    My rights don't need management.
    1. Re:I wouldn't be too smug by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, the BRM in Geneva will be interesting.

      Unfortunately I think they'll win too unless IBM/Sun start playing dirty too. The reason I think they'll win is that OOXML (DIS29500) only needs a few countries to change their votes.

    2. Re:I wouldn't be too smug by eerok · · Score: 1

      They nearly won, and it isn't over yet - there is another vote coming up in Februrary.


      There's no way they can win. OOXML is a joke, as everyone knows, and it's naive to think that MS could pull this off without huge repercussions.


      --
      "The happiness of credulity is a cheap and dangerous quality." -- George Bernard Shaw
    3. Re:I wouldn't be too smug by Vexorian · · Score: 1

      The way I see it, if ISO approves OOXML it would lose significance, then whatever format is standard will not mean anything at all, thus it won't matter that OOXML is an standard...

      --

      Copyright infringement is "piracy" in the same way DRM is "consumer rape"
  3. Comments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I wonder how many of those comments are duplicates. Oh well, as long as they're technical comments upon which constructive changes can be made then they are a good thing. It's a learning process.

    1. Re:Comments by counterfriction · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think the sheer volume alone is illustrative of the weight of the outcry against it.

      --
      Sig free's the way to be.
    2. Re:Comments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > constructive changes can be made

      The standard was written by ECMA with the (MS) requirement that it be 'what MS Office 2007 does'. In fact Office doesn't actually implement the standard, but nevermind, the standard won't/can't be changed regardless of the comments because MS will _not_ change Office 2007.

      MS Office 2007 files are what they are, the ECMA document sort-of descrbes that, and that is what MS wants ISO to be. They won't fix the standard, they won't fix the program, they will fix the vote.

    3. Re:Comments by NMerriam · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I wonder how many of those comments are duplicates.


      I think duplicate comments would be even worse than unique ones. If a huge number of the reviewers see the same failings in the spec, then obviously the spec is clearly broken and should have been worked on more before even being submitted, much less before being considered for a fast-track approval.
      --
      Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.
  4. Thanks by gQuigs · · Score: 1

    ...but this is not enough! Please MS step it up!

  5. You bastards !!! by unity100 · · Score: 1

    that kind of humor makes one go jump with joy for having chosen IT field to work in

  6. Some have already sipped the Kool-Aid... by tech10171968 · · Score: 5, Informative

    I've already started seeing .docx format attachments in my email at the office. Never mind the fact that my office is nearly 100% Linux/FOSS (except for the sole Windows machine running proprietary apps requiring outdated API's); I'd figured that since the vast majority of companies I've seen haven't (yet) started to migrate to Office 2007 then maybe sending .docx fils to everyone might not be such a smart move. For now we simply kick these emails back along with a friendly reminder that we don't do .docx or OOXML here, and will never accept anyhting in that format. Microsoft says the 'O' in 'OOXML' stands for "open". My ass...

    --
    This space for rent!
    1. Re:Some have already sipped the Kool-Aid... by Mattintosh · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I opened a .docx file in a text editor the other day, just to see what it looked like.

      It was plain ol' HTML with a funky DOCTYPE (with a -strict.dtd in it, so maybe, finally, MS is gonna support strict compliance to something).

    2. Re:Some have already sipped the Kool-Aid... by Shados · · Score: 4, Informative

      thats an Office 2003 doc XML (not quite the same thing). You'd have had to unzip the docx first if it was actually one, and then would have a crap ton of files and stuff... which I beleive is similar-ish to the "competition".

    3. Re:Some have already sipped the Kool-Aid... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speaking as a (reasonably) small business owner myself, I would be highly upset if my 'IT guy' if such a smug email were sent out. Think of how that must sound the recipient - here, I've sent some requested some piece of information, only to be rebuffed because of some anonymous IT guy's personal crusade I neither have knowledge of and care not a wit for? This sort of attitude, which I unfortunately see applauded here on slashdot, seems the very thing leading to so much contention between virtually every department and IT.

      IT's job, as I see it, is to just make the technical stuff work under the hood so my team of engineers can focus on, you know, engineering. The same goes for whatever business you care to run - without any sort of condescension, I best compare IT to wait staff. Now, I have the utmost respect for wait staff - my sister is a bartender, in fact, so I well aware of the miserable sorts of treatment inflicted upon them by the public - but when I dine, it is the wait staff's responsibility to translate my requests to the cooks in the kitchen. This does not demean the person who waits upon me in the least - rather, it is his job, for which he is being well compensated by both tip and wage. If I prefer my steak well done, please prepare it so even if individual preference and general consensus is rare.

      In our instance, we run a very mixed, very expensive bag of hardware and software: chemical engineering modelling and simulation programs on the Mac, assorted number crunchers on AIX, custom lab software on linux and office productivity apps on Windows. We do this because each, in its own way, is the right tool for the job at hand - if, and when, a better tool is available, I'll find out the pros and cons of switching and make my decision based on the facts at hand and the recommendations of those I trust.

      So please, Sherry in IT, since I know you are a fan of slashdot as well!, if we should receive a new attachment type tomorrow and you need something to transmogrify it into the familiar, come to me with a plan for how to integrate it and its information into our business. You're good at what you do; I've every confidence you can do this, too!

    4. Re:Some have already sipped the Kool-Aid... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      "open". My ass... That's the idea, yes.
    5. Re:Some have already sipped the Kool-Aid... by FishWithAHammer · · Score: 0

      Except they don't exist except on a Windows platform. In a Linux/FOSS office, that doesn't work.

      I can't find any tools that parse a DOCX and will output a DOC (or other usable) file format on Linux, and I can't even find a back-converter for Windows (admittedly, I didn't look very hard, but I still can't find one).

      --
      "You can either have software quality or you can have pointer arithmetic, but you cannot have both at the same time."
    6. Re:Some have already sipped the Kool-Aid... by TemporalBeing · · Score: 4, Informative

      thats an Office 2003 doc XML (not quite the same thing). You'd have had to unzip the docx first if it was actually one, and then would have a crap ton of files and stuff... which I beleive is similar-ish to the "competition".
      Not necessarily. There is a plug-in for Office 2003 - provided by Microsoft to certain organizations[1] - that allows Office 2003 to produce OOXML natively through the normal methods - i.e. more natively supported than PDF and ODF.

      Also, I believe Office 2003 uses a normal ".xml" extension[2] for its version of OOXML, while OOXML from Office 2007 uses the normal Office extensions with an appended "x" or "m" (the "m" is if you have macros embedded) - e.g. ".docx" and ".docm".

      [1] Last I knew it was not available publically, however, a Google search turned it up (3rd result).
      [2] Search for "OFFICE" and you'll find a number of "OFFICE11" paths.
      --
      Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away. - Elvis Presley (source: imdb.com)
    7. Re:Some have already sipped the Kool-Aid... by pallmall1 · · Score: 1

      if, and when, a better tool is available, I'll find out the pros and cons of switching and make my decision based on the facts at hand and the recommendations of those I trust.
      Why don't you ask your sister the bartender? I'll bet she'll be serving a lot of tonics to your IT staff as they struggle to implement the unimplementable for their clueless boss who views them as "wait staff".
      --
      3 things about computers: they're alive, they're self-aware, and they hate your guts.
    8. Re:Some have already sipped the Kool-Aid... by garnetlion · · Score: 2, Informative

      The plug-in is only for Windows machines. Mac users are SOL.

    9. Re:Some have already sipped the Kool-Aid... by Shados · · Score: 4, Informative

      That plugin is for Office 2003 and XP to use OOXML natively, correct. It works quite well, it IS available publicly, and its quite commonly deployed (well, relative to the amount of environments using 2007, not in absolute terms).

      And the Office 2003 using XML is for a totally different format, which was also available in a previous version of office (though with less features), which is literally the Office 2003 format but in XML instead of binary, and is a totally different deal than the docx format from 2007, and existed years before Office 2007 came out. It is, for example, the format that is often used to generate Office documents through XSLT. It was used a "long" time ago, and I personally still use that format since it is simpler to generate document with for internal, short term purposes compared to docx, since it doesn't require the additional operation of putting the files together and zipping (which isn't a big deal, but its nice to be able to simply invoke an XSLT processor with no additional steps).

      The plugin above will use the virtually the same docx format, used the same way, as Office 2007.

    10. Re:Some have already sipped the Kool-Aid... by Musrum · · Score: 1

      Nice plug-in. Unless you have a corporate security model that uses "protected" worksheets in Excel.
      If so, then MS has just opened you up to any lee7 Hax0r that has access to powerful tools such as WinZip and Notepad.

      --
      In Soviet Amerika the ballot boxes YOU!
    11. Re:Some have already sipped the Kool-Aid... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Typical bad attitude again - when you can't provide a counter argument, you turn to some partial ad hominum.

      I just want YOU the admin to do the things I hired you to do so I can do the things I need to do. You make communications gear work, and I respect that. I design chemical reactors, and I expect you to respect the need for tools to support our company's normal operations.

      Regardless of your liking it or not, MS Office 2007 is out there - and people will be using it, increasingly more so as time goes on. You can stick your head in the sand and pretend it's not so, but even so, some hapless customer will save his latest contract draft in Word and email it to me for review - personally, I'd like to read it. I don't care how you in IT make that happen, but is it an unreasonable request? I think not. Is sending back a smug reply - we don't take your kind here - acceptable? Again, I think not.

      And yes, I do view IT as wait staff. They are charged to take user requests and turn out solutions - how else should I view them? What are you thinking about wait staff that's so biased you don't care for the analogy? IT seems to have some sort of ego problem - as if we 'mere mortal' users should grovel before you for simply doing your jobs and failing miserably in the ethics department while doing so. Having worked as an admin while in college, I can say with a high degree of confidence I understand much of what you need to do, and while the exact technologies change, that would be part of why I'm paying you to stay up on those things.

      Sorry to sound like the one with the ego problem, but in a statement of fact, I know I could do your job if I were to take the time to learn the state of the industry - but since the average 'IT guy' can't design reactors and doesn't own a business besides the occasional side job removing viruses and reinstalling Windows for coworkers, I do that instead.

    12. Re:Some have already sipped the Kool-Aid... by grcumb · · Score: 1

      "open". My ass...

      Change the punctuation a bit, and that's Microsoft's game plan in a nutshell....

      --
      Crumb's Corollary: Never bring a knife to a bun fight.
    13. Re:Some have already sipped the Kool-Aid... by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      It was plain ol' HTML with a funky DOCTYPE (with a -strict.dtd in it, so maybe, finally, MS is gonna support strict compliance to something). According to their 6000 page spec, the only thing it can be in compliance with is to the Office 2007 implementation.

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    14. Re:Some have already sipped the Kool-Aid... by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      Regardless of your liking it or not, MS Office 2007 is out there - and people will be using it, increasingly more so as time goes on. You can stick your head in the sand and pretend it's not so, but even so, some hapless customer will save his latest contract draft in Word and email it to me for review - personally, I'd like to read it. I don't care how you in IT make that happen, but is it an unreasonable request? I think not. Is sending back a smug reply - we don't take your kind here - acceptable? Again, I think not. Microsoft has designed that format so that the only way to view it is to use Office2007. So buy Office2007. Their spec cannot be implemented (hence the mess at ISO). Best case, the text may be extracted. Of course if you don't happen to run a supported platform (i.e. anything other than a recent version of Windows), you're screwed.
      You're confusing "staff" and "wizards".
      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    15. Re:Some have already sipped the Kool-Aid... by TrancePhreak · · Score: 1

      Not true. There is a plugin for Office 2003 to use the new formats, as well as a viewer. http://support.microsoft.com/kb/925180

      --

      -]Phreak Out[-
    16. Re:Some have already sipped the Kool-Aid... by Max+Littlemore · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You can stick your head in the sand and pretend it's not so, but even so, some hapless customer will save his latest contract draft in Word and email it to me for review - personally, I'd like to read it.

      This argument cuts both ways and highlights the importance of open standards. I don't have windows at home, and my wife (definitely non techie - doesn't know the difference between a binary and its icon) doesn't want windows at home. Businesses that insist on communicating via windows specific technology get marked down.

      Her indoors is currently doing an online course with a private company that specified that she submit all work in doc format - after she had signed up. She asked if pdf was okay and the instructor said yes. A while into the course, her instructor changed and the new one couldn't even figure out how to open a pdf. She insisted on word documents.

      The ball and chain insisted on her money back if she couldn't submit in pdf, because nowhere in the advertising material or documentation did it mention having to buy software from a foreign monopoly to participate in the course until after the money was paid - my words, not hers.

      Her instructor knows how to open a pdf now.

      In my personal dealings with companies that want my business, I press save in open office and send the resulting file. If they can't read them, I ask them how they want them saved. I then usually save them as word documents and suggest they upgrade their office suite to one that can communicate with people who don't have word.

      If MS just bit the bullet and adopted ODF, interoperability would be so good. I understand they want to monopolise the desktop, but seriously, at home, why the fuck should I pay a foriegn company for an operating system? I support the machines myself, it's not like it's a corporate environment where support contracts are important. I refuse to pay Microsoft for their crap, and I don't particularly see the need to spend the crap loads of unjustified markup on OSX (even higher and less justified in Australia then the rest of the world).

      OOXML is not an implementable spec and ODF is so if businesses want to communicate with the widest possible range of customers, use a format accessible to everyone.

      Send only ODF and include a link to a free ODF import/export plugin for word.

      --
      I don't therefore I'm not.
    17. Re:Some have already sipped the Kool-Aid... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huh ? So, Microsoft forces Word users to buy OSX ? WTF

    18. Re:Some have already sipped the Kool-Aid... by JohnBailey · · Score: 1

      Sorry to sound like the one with the ego problem, but in a statement of fact, I know I could do your job if I were to take the time to learn the state of the industry - but since the average 'IT guy' can't design reactors and doesn't own a business besides the occasional side job removing viruses and reinstalling Windows for coworkers, I do that instead. So basically.. you are the cook.
      --
      It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his job depends on not understanding it.
    19. Re:Some have already sipped the Kool-Aid... by Bert64 · · Score: 2, Informative

      You could always bypass "protected" worksheets in excel, most other spreadsheets would simply ignore the "protection" when opening the file.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    20. Re:Some have already sipped the Kool-Aid... by Bert64 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      // if, and when, a better tool is available, I'll find out the pros and cons of switching and make my decision based on the facts at hand and the recommendations of those I trust.

      Exactly, a file format should not be able to dictate what you switch to... Your devision of what to use might boil down to "we need to open files in format x, only y supports x so we must use y", regardless of so many other important factors like cost, performance, usability, stability, long term support etc.

      Without proprietary formats, you would be free to choose what truly is the best tool for your needs based on the actual pros and cons.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    21. Re:Some have already sipped the Kool-Aid... by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Novell's patched version of OpenOffice supports DOCX and runs on linux...

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    22. Re:Some have already sipped the Kool-Aid... by aproposofwhat · · Score: 1

      Speaking as a (reasonably) small business owner myself, I would be highly upset if my 'IT guy' if such a smug email were sent out. Think of how that must sound the recipient - here, I've sent some requested some piece of information, only to be rebuffed because of some anonymous IT guy's personal crusade I neither have knowledge of and care not a wit for? This sort of attitude, which I unfortunately see applauded here on slashdot, seems the very thing leading to so much contention between virtually every department and IT.

      Sorry, but you're missing the point.

      It's not some 'personal crusade' that would lead one to politely request the information in a readable format, it's simple practicality.

      This is why we need standards - to provide a document (or data file, or graphics file, or ...) format that is easily exchanged between the systems that need to access the information.

      To use your restaurant analogy, if you were to request your well-done steak in some hip slang not well understood by either the waiting staff or the kitchen, I would expect most waiters to politely request that you rephrase your request in English, in order that they may serve you correctly.

      Now do you see?

      --
      One swallow does not a fellatrix make
    23. Re:Some have already sipped the Kool-Aid... by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      Not true. There is a plugin for Office 2003 to use the new formats, as well as a viewer.
      http://support.microsoft.com/kb/925180 Still Windows only and very restricted. Not much help to a lot of users.
      Outside of large corporations, I find that a lot of people have stuck with Office 97 for example (and I'm moving quite a few of them to OOo).
      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    24. Re:Some have already sipped the Kool-Aid... by noddyxoi · · Score: 1

      Novell is a trojan for MS.

    25. Re:Some have already sipped the Kool-Aid... by suckmysav · · Score: 1

      Didn't both Novell and Microsoft both admit that the OOXML converter for openoffice would not (and never will) actually do conversions with 100% fidelity?

      One wonders what the point of it is.

      --
      "You can't fight in here, this is the war room!"
    26. Re:Some have already sipped the Kool-Aid... by jeanph01 · · Score: 0

      > I don't have windows at home, and my wife (definitely non techie - doesn't know the difference between a binary and its icon) doesn't want windows at home. You don't have windows in your home, how can you see the light ? ;-p

    27. Re:Some have already sipped the Kool-Aid... by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      Novell's patched version of OpenOffice supports DOCX and runs on linux... With MS patents which may hit those naive companies the time when they least expected.

      I don't see why an IT department choose Suse after recent happenings and MS puppet guy being manager there. Want a competing product which is supported very well? Go with IBM stuff. Hard to manage? No it needs real admins only.

      What is left from Suse Linux except a MS puppet in charge and shadowy agreements with a company which still have chap 11 rumours on various finance boards?

      It is the standard suggesting companies job to sit and code a damned converter, not their puppets BTW. I bet that "patched" version does lack some critical feature or will lack. I know how MS works, it works as a spoiled kid, not a real serious company.

    28. Re:Some have already sipped the Kool-Aid... by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      Not true. There is a plugin for Office 2003 to use the new formats, as well as a viewer.
      http://support.microsoft.com/kb/925180 Where is at least OS X viewer? They are the largest software company in Mac scene you know? Macs are the king on DTP and they already code for Mac, happily sell $400 Office and doesn't code a damn viewer.

      You know, they could fire XCode, would click couple of "Office Frameworks" to be included, start some Cocoa viewer project and release it just tomorrow if they wanted to.
    29. Re:Some have already sipped the Kool-Aid... by insanemime · · Score: 1

      For all the MAC users out there, I have found that NeoOffice (www.neooffice.org) is able to open and edit .docx format. It is a little weird on printing the format, but if you "save as" to an earlier format like word 6, then it opens and prints fine.

    30. Re:Some have already sipped the Kool-Aid... by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

      Or if you wanted to be more PHB compatible just site DMCA issues with the encryption used on the document (since that is what the format is basically)

      --
      Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
    31. Re:Some have already sipped the Kool-Aid... by TemporalBeing · · Score: 1

      That plugin is for Office 2003 and XP to use OOXML natively, correct. It works quite well, it IS available publicly
      I noted that that was the last I had checked. When my work first deployed it, I searched for it and was unable to find it. I believe MS distributed it to certain their enterprise customers before making it publicly available. In searching for it again for that post, I discovered that it had since become publically available. This was more just a note than anything else.

      And the Office 2003 using XML is for a totally different format, which was also available in a previous version of office (though with less features), which is literally the Office 2003 format but in XML instead of binary, and is a totally different deal than the docx format from 2007, and existed years before Office 2007 came out. It is, for example, the format that is often used to generate Office documents through XSLT. It was used a "long" time ago, and I personally still use that format since it is simpler to generate document with for internal, short term purposes compared to docx, since it doesn't require the additional operation of putting the files together and zipping (which isn't a big deal, but its nice to be able to simply invoke an XSLT processor with no additional steps).
      Yes, I am aware of that. I was primarily noting the difference in extension. Office 2003 used a ".xml" extension, which Windows would then run through Internet Explorer to determine what program to use to open it - thus it was very annoying to double click on the Office 2003 XML Word Document, see Windows open IE, and then open Word 2003. (Probably one reason why the format didn't take off.) It did, however, amaze me that the Office 2003 XML format was larger for a blank document than previous Microsoft Office formats. (It was something like 19KB in XML versus 7kb in binary.) However, it was also a good format in terms of using it for version control system (e.g. CVS, SVN) as it was pure text that is easily managed and diff'd.
      --
      Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away. - Elvis Presley (source: imdb.com)
    32. Re:Some have already sipped the Kool-Aid... by garnetlion · · Score: 1

      Oh, good to know, thanks.

    33. Re:Some have already sipped the Kool-Aid... by Elektroschock · · Score: 1

      with an appended "x" or "m" (the "m" is if you have macros embedded) - e.g. ".docx" and ".docm" [filext.com]."

      Ah, now I understand why OOXML makes it easier to detect Macros... See Knowlton video who explains how OOXML improves security.

      How stupid do they believe we are?
    34. Re:Some have already sipped the Kool-Aid... by Shados · · Score: 1

      I wonder if they updated or if it was always like this, but on both my XP and Vista machines, clicking on an Office 2003 XML opens in Word directly. The icon is even different (even if the extensions are exactly the same), meaning the shell itself knows before you even try to open it.

      Now that, I don't know if it was always that way, but it was for me. Take with a grain of salt.

    35. Re:Some have already sipped the Kool-Aid... by Shados · · Score: 1

      Oh right, now I remember: its the Office XML format from Office -2000- that opens in IE or something first. The format from -2003- opens in Office directly, even though they both have the same extension.

    36. Re:Some have already sipped the Kool-Aid... by TemporalBeing · · Score: 1

      wonder if they updated or if it was always like this, but on both my XP and Vista machines, clicking on an Office 2003 XML opens in Word directly. The icon is even different (even if the extensions are exactly the same), meaning the shell itself knows before you even try to open it.

      Now that, I don't know if it was always that way, but it was for me.
      I'm guessing they updated something as when I first had Office 2003 - under Win2k mind you - I did try using the new format and it was that way. So far as I am aware, WinXP did the same at that time. However, supposing they did update something, unless the update was to get Windows Explorer to utilize Internet Explorer for that without having to display the Internet Explorer window - that just goes to show how much Microsoft is abusing their monopoly.
      --
      Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away. - Elvis Presley (source: imdb.com)
    37. Re:Some have already sipped the Kool-Aid... by TemporalBeing · · Score: 1

      Oh right, now I remember: its the Office XML format from Office -2000- that opens in IE or something first. The format from -2003- opens in Office directly, even though they both have the same extension.
      Actually, Office 2000 still used a binary format. It wasn't until Office 2003 that Microsoft introduced an XML format into their Office software.

      Perhaps you are referring to Windows 2000 instead? Unless Office remapped the XML file extension, Windows would have to open the XML document first before it could decide to open it with Microsoft Office - be it Word, Excel, or Powerpoint. That's just the nature of how Windows handles file extensions. As I said in this post - it may be the Microsoft updated something in Windows to give the appearance it was opening directly into Office wrt to the ".xml" formatted office files or they were abusing their monopoly position to do otherwise.
      --
      Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away. - Elvis Presley (source: imdb.com)
    38. Re:Some have already sipped the Kool-Aid... by FishWithAHammer · · Score: 0

      Novell. Think about that one for a second, bud.

      --
      "You can either have software quality or you can have pointer arithmetic, but you cannot have both at the same time."
    39. Re:Some have already sipped the Kool-Aid... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the point - if the answer is 'buy Office 2007' - then we'll buy Office 2007.

      There's no confusion, sir.

    40. Re:Some have already sipped the Kool-Aid... by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Out of curiosity, if a customer were to send you files in ODF what would you do?

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  7. Darwin Award by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe if they keep up the work they've been doing lately, they might just win a Darwin award.

    1. Re:Darwin Award by Oktober+Sunset · · Score: 1

      Unless they are trapped in a burning building and the only way to call for help is by sending an OOXML document saying "Send the fire Brigade to [address]", and no one they send it to can open it, I don't envision them actually killing themselves by their failure.

  8. you did the icon wrong by FudRucker · · Score: 2, Funny

    the foot should have been on top of gate's head...

    --
    Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
  9. Microsft? A hero? by WK2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Microsoft made a heroic -- and costly -- effort to discredit their own proposal, and we're sincerely grateful to them.

    If I see an armed mugger robbing two women, and then run away screaming, and the robber looks at me for a second, giving one of the women enough time to open a can of woop-ass, that doesn't make me a hero.

    --
    Write your own Choose Your Own Adventure. http://www.freegameengines.org/gamebook-engine/
    1. Re:Microsft? A hero? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I see an armed mugger robbing two women, and then run away screaming, and the robber looks at me for a second, giving one of the women enough time to open a can of woop-ass, that doesn't make me a hero.
      It worked for Sam Houston.
    2. Re:Microsft? A hero? by Dak+RIT · · Score: 4, Funny
      A but you see there's no third party in this situation... the robber and the hero are one in the same.

      A better analogy would be the Yen Buddhists, who believe that the accumulation of money is a great evil and a burden on the soul and they therefore, regardless of personal hazard, see it as their unpleasant duty to acquire as much money as possible to reduce the risk to innocent people.[1]

      [1] With apologies to Terry Pratchett

  10. True... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who would've known the true evil potential of distributed malware networks without Microsoft?

    Or why simplicity is such an important element of security (vs. 8,000 different file security attributes and complex kludg^W special case interactions)?

    Or how bad an idea it is to put things on the network that were never designed to be there?

    1. Re:True... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously the companies in question didn't. Dipshit.

  11. Wrong site... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This belongs to the site formerly known as thedailywtf...

  12. The medium is the message by DeepBlueDiver · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'd figured that since the vast majority of companies I've seen haven't (yet) started to migrate to Office 2007 then maybe sending .docx fils to everyone might not be such a smart move. Each time MS releases a new Office version, many corporate assholes^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H managers set a policy of using the new format on any communication. They don't care if you can't read the content, in fact, they hope you cant.

    Their message is "I am cool. I use the newest stuff. My dick is bigger than yours".
    1. Re:The medium is the message by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Their message is "I am cool. I use the newest stuff. My dick is bigger than yours"."

      However, we all know that the real reason why they're using the newest stuff is because it's actually smaller.

    2. Re:The medium is the message by Nintendork · · Score: 1

      Really? What corporations? I've worked in several and this is new news to me. If you meant to say that many companies using MS software also purchase Software Assurance, then they upgrade to the newer version of the software (That's what SA gives them) after a pilot run, then sure. I agree.

      You and 90% of the other responses I've seen modded "Insightful" should just stop the reverse-FUD. You're only scratching each others backs and doing nothing to educate others of the benefits to alternative solutions. If anything, you only hurt the cause by diminishing the positive image OSS has.

    3. Re:The medium is the message by fritsd · · Score: 1

      Well duh! That's because It's deflated.

      --
      To be, or not to be: isn't that quite logical, Slashdot Beta?
    4. Re:The medium is the message by TheVelvetFlamebait · · Score: 1

      Their message is "I am cool. I use the newest stuff. My dick is bigger than yours".
      Prove it. Prove that managers are just corporate bimbos drunk on penis envy. It doesn't seem exactly plausible on its own, so you'll need to prove it. I mean, it isn't unreasonable to stick to a standard like MS Office. They know that there will be many people using it in the future, and they don't want to fall behind in the communications. They may also get decent tech support for it. But naturally, since they don't choose open source over MS Office, they are corporate assholes, and idiots, and they want you to fail in reading their messages, and they're insecure in their penis size, and... and... and... they're smelly!
      --
      You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
    5. Re:The medium is the message by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Prove that managers are just corporate bimbos drunk on penis envy. It doesn't seem exactly plausible on its own, so you'll need to prove it.

      Really? That doesn't seem plausible? Not even a little?

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  13. They could win another award by Rolman · · Score: 4, Funny

    If OOXML finally dies, shall we give Microsoft a Darwin Award? Or perhaps a Richard Dawkins Award since it's a dying meme?

    --
    - Otaku no naka no otaku, otaking da!!!
    1. Re:They could win another award by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As someone said elsewhere, has microsoft grown so large that they've started fighting themselves?

    2. Re:They could win another award by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 0

      If OOXML finally dies
      What makes you think OOXML will die? As long as most business uses MS Office, which is not going to change in the next ten or even 20 years, whatever format MS wants, they will eventually get.
      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    3. Re:They could win another award by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Goverments will prefer to adopt the ISO standard than a non-standard format. Several private enterprises do business with goverments and by proxy, should use odf to interoperate.

      And the domino-effect continues...

    4. Re:They could win another award by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1

      Goverments will prefer to adopt the ISO standard than a non-standard format.

      I wish this where true, but it's not reality, I can't see how you can say it is. Facts are that many (perhaps even most) governments have "standardized" on Microsoft and Adobe. They may end up regretting it, but facts are facts.

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    5. Re:They could win another award by init100 · · Score: 1

      Many governments have stated that they intend to convert to a format that is approved by ISO as an international standard in the near future. This is the entire reason why Microsoft is so keen on pushing OOXML though the ISO process. Because if they fail, they'd have to either implement native support for ODF or they would no longer be an option for many governments.

    6. Re:They could win another award by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1

      Many governments have stated that they intend to convert to a format that is approved by ISO...
      We hear this over and over. It usually doesn't happen.
      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
  14. NO!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Don't send the money to MS!!! Send it to me - I trolled bravely and gratuitously against/for whatever the thing is, and I've already send my money to Peru. Email me here to get contact info:

    ac@slashdot.org

  15. A ploy? by Ryukotsusei · · Score: 1

    What prevents them from modifying odf to whatever they want in the future anyway? They may have given up OOXML, but that doesn't mean they don't have enough power to make odf proprietary either.

    1. Re:A ploy? by RightSaidFred99 · · Score: 1

      That's what people don't get. In the end, it's the market leader who sets the "standards", not bodies of people who claim to set standards.

    2. Re:A ploy? by allthingscode · · Score: 5, Insightful

      History only partially backs you up on this one. Remember Microsoft's numerous attempts to define a networking standard so that they could crush the TCP/IP network protocol? NetBUI anyone?

      But yes, it can be hard to overcome the market leader. But, then again, if Microsoft were really sure that they controlled the market, why go through the trouble of standardizing? Because large parts of the world were looking elsewhere, especially governments.

    3. Re:A ploy? by jthill · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Just like Microsoft's Java corruptions set that standard, and their C corruptions set that one, and their HTML corruptions set that one, and (as pointed out above) their TCP/IP alternative set that one, and ... um. In their dreams. They haven't corrupted the language that far yet. Standards, see, standards are written documents everyone can consult to implement products that meet them. Microsoft's entire business model fails in the presence of actual standards.

      --
      As always, all IMO. Insert "I think" everywhere grammatically possible.
    4. Re:A ploy? by EvanED · · Score: 2, Informative

      Remember Microsoft's numerous attempts to define a networking standard so that they could crush the TCP/IP network protocol? NetBUI anyone?

      In MS's defense, TCP/IP wasn't a great option at the time either. MS was working with NetBEUI before DHCP came on the scene for instance.

      Sure, they could have put the effort they spent in developing NetBEUI into fixing their objections to TCP/IP, but there was also plenty of work done on NetBEUI by that point already as well, so I don't think it was clear at the time that TCP/IP was going to win out even on LANs.

    5. Re:A ploy? by drsmithy · · Score: 1

      Remember Microsoft's numerous attempts to define a networking standard so that they could crush the TCP/IP network protocol? NetBUI anyone?

      Uh, no. Perhaps you'd like to tell the story of how Microsoft supposedly tried to "crush" TCP/IP with a broadcast-heavy, unroutable network protocol designed for small, unmanaged workgroups ?

    6. Re:A ploy? by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      did MS ever create thier own protocol that was suitable for large routed networks (afaict TCP/IP on small lans is mostly a side affect of the internet).

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    7. Re:A ploy? by Nintendork · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hooray for reverse-FUD! NetBEUI (Yeah, that's how it's spelled) wasn't made by Microsoft or even made for Microsoft. They adopted it as the default networking protocol when TCP/IP was still a little immature, the internet wasn't mainstream or readily available, and small business LANs were all the rage. It was actually a good choice for the time. Not that most people here really care about truth. Just post "Fuck M$ and WINDOZE" and you get modded as insightful.

    8. Re:A ploy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck M$ and WINDOZE

    9. Re:A ploy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nintendork, you lied!

    10. Re:A ploy? by doctorcisco · · Score: 1

      Remember Microsoft's numerous attempts to define a networking standard so that they could crush the TCP/IP network protocol? NetBUI anyone?

      Umm, no. NetBUI was developed for IBM in 1983; originally the LAN technology had a hard limit of under 100 machines. Token Ring was an evolution on the hardware side, designed with a protocol like NetBUI in mind, and got you toward more like 250 machines on a ring. Obviously, MS had to support whatever network protocol IBM chose.

      The IBM world was the mainframe model with a few PC's thrown in. In that world, there was deterministic polling instead of random access to the network medium. NIC's are smart (beaconing, tracking upstream/downstream neighbors, etc.), and the network infrastructure is dumb -- no routing, no IP-style any-to-any internetworking.

      TCP/IP was relatively new. It was used in the academic world, not in business. It couldn't talk to big IBM iron. SLIP on a PC was a pipedream -- early dialup internet was dialling into a UNIX box as a terminal. There were no ISP's selling internet access. BBS's, Compuserve and AOL got you something like email and online community. In the later 80's, Novell IPX/SPX was the network protocol choice if you wanted file and print services on a LAN on x86 hardware. Appletalk did much the same for Macs.

      MS products give me as much heartburn as anyone. But in the early and middle 1980's, Apple was the overpriced upstart visionary monopolist trying to corner the market, and IBM was the bigger, less overpriced, "PC's are text-based like our mainframes" monopolist. IBM tried to monopolize the market by suing anyone who cloned the BIOS, the only proprietary part of the IBM PC. That worked until Phoenix a) Clean room reverse engineered the BIOS, and b) had $gazillion in litigation insurance from Lloyds of London to discourage IBM from suing them into oblivion.

      MS had no hardware business. Once the PC was cloned, MS fuelled cheap computing by selling to anyone, and giving you instant access to same apps IBMs ran. (In the early 80's, CP/M ran on more hardware than DOS, including IBM and non-IBM-BIOS 8086 hardware, but there weren't many decent apps for it.) 20-25 years ago, if you wanted non-monopoly-dominated personal computing, you were running MS software on Compaq or Taiwanese knock-off hardware. (There was, AFAIK, no *nix option at all before the 386, since the 8086/8 and 286 couldn't multitask.) The other choices -- Commodore, Atari, Timex-Sinclair, Radio Shack TRS-80, were also proprietary platforms, and died when PC's got cheap enough to take the low end of the market.

      doc

  16. On behalf, by sumdumass · · Score: 5, Funny

    I just got off the phone with Mr Bill. He said I am supposed to accept the award for Microsoft. The only problem is that I am busy on the night it would be awarded. I could make a teleconference appearance but sadly would need assistance in getting the money back to Microsoft. If it is wired to me, I couldn't get through customs and we all saw that movie with tom hanks who had to live in an airport.

    If anyone with a valid checking account could help with this, I am willing to give them a small convenience fee of 10% plus any expenses. Please down load my personal instant messaging program and shoot me a message. If you have difficulty installing it, you can email me directly at 419 at nigeria.embasy Notice I used the "at" instead of the "@" sign in the email address to avoid spammers and scammers.

    Thank you in advance to anyone able to help.

    1. Re:On behalf, by RuBLed · · Score: 1

      I see that you're in dire straits now. I'm a very helpful person and would happily comply to your requests, I had even installed your program in my laptop and I like it. I would also like you to know that I'm very good at handling family fortunes, if you wont mind I could take care of your family's wealth. I'd even send you my laptop too, how about it?

    2. Re:On behalf, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    3. Re:On behalf, by Dragonslicer · · Score: 1

      I just got off the phone with Mr Bill. No, Mr. Hand! Noooooooo!

      Maybe we should change that foot icon?
  17. Vista makes me smile. by Erris · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I don't think the ISO organization will allow M$ to damage their reputation that way. The OOXML vote is an international scandal and the people who count are not going to forget it. The whole business has already been damaging to ISO and they would do better to bury ooxml.

    Just the same, I don't feel smug about how easily they damaged ISO. When I want to feel smug, I contemplate Vista's failure and what that means for the whole next generation of M$ crap and lock in.

    Vista is one of the best things that ever happened to free software. It's later, more restrictive more expensive and less functional than anyone could possibly have imagined. There is zero enthusiasm for it and a plenty of rejection.

    --
    DMCA, Hollings, Palladium. What might have sounded like paranoia is now common sense.
    1. Re:Vista makes me smile. by suv4x4 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Just the same, I don't feel smug about how easily they damaged ISO. When I want to feel smug, I contemplate Vista's failure and what that means for the whole next generation of M$ crap and lock in.

      I'm not sure why it looks "easily" to corrupt ISO to you. It did take a lot of effort behind the scenes, give them credit where it's due.

    2. Re:Vista makes me smile. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Soviet Russia, using sockpuppets to get around your deserved moderation actually pays off.

    3. Re:Vista makes me smile. by Technician · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Vista is one of the best things that ever happened to free software. It's later, more restrictive more expensive and less functional than anyone could possibly have imagined. There is zero enthusiasm for it and a plenty of rejection.

      One of the best parts is WGA. Microsoft doesn't have the users who build their custom machines, but decide against the cost of the MS retail boxed version taxes. Spending $600-1200 on a custom box build soon finds the cost of an OS and Office suite a good part of building that can no longer be migrated from the old box. Alternatives to expensive restrictive software are now part of the cost decision.

      I used to upgrade hardware re-using my legal copy of Windows 98. XP and Vista have ended that process. XP now simply means it is residing on the oldest slowest machine in the house as it is not upgradable (without playing mother-may-I with Microsoft who may say no way). Vista is the same dead end. I am test driving Ubuntu Dapper Drake (the long term support distro), Fiesty Fawn (newer but has issues), and Freespire (out of the box rich Web browsing with codecs and flash) on my new home built hardware. XP will retire on the hardware it arrived on. In it's lifetime it only got a hard drive repalcement due to hardware failure and a memory upgrade. It won't be moving on to a Core 2 Duo box simply due to the EULA, vendor hardware specific recovery disc, and WGA to enforce it.

      Thank You Microsoft for closing the door on software re-use, right of first sale, and encouraging me to expand my horizons. I have learned the advantages first hand of not runing with administrator privilages, Software not vendor tied to hardware, open standards, community developement, GNU GPL, and no longer dealing with a per seat restrictive EULA.

      Thank You Red Hat, Caldera (pre SCO), Novell SUSE, Mozilla, Sun Microsystems, IBM, ODF, EFF, Adobe, and everyone else who made this possible.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    4. Re:Vista makes me smile. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well said Sir, I agree wholeheartedly! :)

    5. Re:Vista makes me smile. by Aladrin · · Score: 1

      I have to ask... What issues does Feisty Fawn have that Dapper Drake didn't? I found it to be solid and usable, and I ran it on 3 systems at once. (Work, home, and home 'server'.) I ran Dapper on 2 of them prior to that, and while it was stable, I find Feisty more useful. (Eyecandy, packages Drake doesn't have in the repos, etc.)

      I've got Gutsy installed at home now, and the 'server' off (just using the desktop for that as well), but Feisty at work still... SO looking forward next month to when I can justify installing Gutsy at work. Compiz works a LOT better from what I've seen at home. Very solid on Intel graphics, at least.

      As for Windows being stuck to the original box... I think your fear of calling MS is unfounded. The phone people are tools and getting your registration updated is as simple as saying 'This is the only hardware this OS is installed on.' when they ask. Even if it's not. I've converted a ton of systems (worked at a shop) and never had WGA fail because of this. (Have had it fail straight out of the box, never installed on another system, though.) Generally if it's been long enough since the first install, you don't even have to call them, the internet registration will simply work.

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    6. Re:Vista makes me smile. by Technician · · Score: 1

      What issues does Feisty Fawn have that Dapper Drake

      If you don't use the eye-candy and set it up from the default 2 desktops to 4 or 6, then you get desktops without toolbars. It's hard to switch desktops if you don't know the keyboard shortcut and the toolbar is missing. The networking is a little changed for SMB workgroups, so I can log into my server and transfer files just fine on my Dapper Drake box, but for some reason my Fiesty box hangs in a transfer. It crashes one Simple Share NAS of mine every time. On the other one, the transfer starts at 0 bytes transfered and the estimated time for the transfer just climbs past 30 hours till it fails.

      Internet connectivity through my router and downloads are great. It's just the local LAN that has trouble. Someday, as I learn it, I may figure out what the bug is, but till then, I can't save files to my backup drive. I have to use a thumb drive then save them from the Dapper machine as a temporary work around.

      Other than those minor annoyances, Fiesty has been great. The native support for video capture cards (I use the PVR150 MCE) and it's connectivity to popular portable music players has been outstanding.

      Getting stuff off the box onto my backup has been a problem.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    7. Re:Vista makes me smile. by Aladrin · · Score: 1

      I suspect you use Gnome and not KDE, eh? I think that may be the difference for interface... I'm not sure there's even a way to make KDE only show the taskbar on the primary desktop.

      As for the NAS... That's really odd. I've only rarely tried to connect to an SMB share from Linux... Mostly I'm hosting them. Afraid I can't be much help with that.

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    8. Re:Vista makes me smile. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As much as people here on /. complain about MS, and talk about how cool they are with their linux distros - none of that matters. Microsoft doesn't make it's money off of the hobbyist, it makes it's money from Corporations who blanket-install 10,000 copies. The side effect of which is that all of that corporation's non-hobbyists and non-enthusiasts also run Windows, because they use it at work, and are familiar with it.

      So, no, you might be fuzzy in your own little world, but your switching to Linux has zero impact on Microsoft. In fact, you might actually be helping them by decreasing their antitrust pressure without really affecting their bottom line. You da man, you rebel, you.

    9. Re:Vista makes me smile. by Crayon+Kid · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure why it looks "easily" to corrupt ISO to you. It did take a lot of effort behind the scenes, give them credit where it's due.
      In GP's defence, yeah, in some parts of the world it was ridiculously easy to pass OOXML. Microsoft didn't have to do much.
      --
      i ate crayons when i was a kid and now i have two braincells and the blue ones taste nicer
    10. Re:Vista makes me smile. by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

      And it still wasn't enough. But I can't stop assuming that Microsoft just wasn't competent enough and next time it will be much easier with all the experience they gathered.

    11. Re:Vista makes me smile. by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      without playing mother-may-I with Microsoft who may say no way

      Have you called them? They approve the reactivation 100% of the time, even if you tell them you're blatantly breaking the license. (I've had them refuse Office once, again when I was blatantly breaking the license, but never Windows.)

    12. Re:Vista makes me smile. by db32 · · Score: 1

      The funny thing is when I explain half of these things to people they just proudly assert "I can do that with Windows" explaining that they just have to do illegal things. I for one am thrilled that WGA and the draconian crap is getting tighter. People will start to see the noose around their neck.

      My only encounter with WGA was watching illegal copies not get flagged or otherwise harassed while my wife's legitimate copy on her Dell flagged and MS explained that we would have to wipe the drive and reinstall from scratch to fix it. Thankfully people with a clue actually had nice instructions on what files and registry keys the monstrosity mucked with and I was able to rip it back out.

      --
      The only change I can believe in is what I find in my couch cushions.
    13. Re:Vista makes me smile. by ericrost · · Score: 1

      If you're running all Linux boxes, why use a backwards engineered Microsoft network protocol?

      Move everything over to NFS and use rsync for backup.

      Works like a charm, no matter what version of ubuntu or any other distro you're using. Break the paradigm in your network storage just like you broke the paradigm in your OS choice.

      Just a suggestion.

    14. Re:Vista makes me smile. by Technician · · Score: 1

      Move everything over to NFS and use rsync for backup.

      Agreed as soon as I install it. For some reason Ubuntu came with SMB client installed but not NFS client.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    15. Re:Vista makes me smile. by ericrost · · Score: 1

      That's because of bug #1 unfortunately :)

      https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1

    16. Re:Vista makes me smile. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet you don't smile so much when you try to post with your karma-clobbered sockpuppet account, twitter.

  18. FFII? by Speare · · Score: 3, Funny

    Is this the Japanese numbering of Final Fantasy II, or the USA releases?

    --
    [ .sig file not found ]
    1. Re:FFII? by qcomp · · Score: 4, Informative

      Is this the Japanese numbering of Final Fantasy II, or the USA releases?
      actually, the abbreviation stands for the Foundation for a Free Information Infrastructure, a not-for-profit organization that has campaigned (in Europe), among other things, against software patents, excessive "intellectual" "property" rights and for open standards.

  19. Chairstorm at Microsoft by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm imagining a hailstorm of flying chairs in an office somewhere.

  20. Re:shills make me smile. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ah, each time I see a link to that post, I regret to have started it by "Well, they clearly are"... such is life...

    Thx man. Will twitter==erris be the next /. meme ?

  21. hey ms by sh3l1 · · Score: 1

    Hey, microsoft... if you don't want to pick up your prize, because you are too embarrassed, i can do so for you.

    --
    Help Me! I'm trapped in the tubes! Oh noes! Here comes a internet!
  22. Re:Please help by MrNaz · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yay somebody finally found out where AC lives and is going to sort out the problem of trolls and frist posters once and for all!

    --
    I hate printers.
  23. New Country Tune by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

    "YEE-HAW!!! Let's go buy us some votes!!!" by The Redmond Cowboys

  24. Unfortunately... by vegiVamp · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The problem is that this doesn't change much.

    They're still going to deploy it as the default document format for the new Offices. Lots of small and large companies are still going to upgrade their software at some point. OOXML is still very likely to become the new de facto standard due to common usage.

    --
    What a depressingly stupid machine.
    1. Re:Unfortunately... by Xtifr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      OOXML is still very likely to become the new de facto standard due to common usage. Whatever they came up with was likely to be a de facto standard of sorts. But blocking this from becoming a de jure standard is still a somewhat surprising victory, and we should celebrate winning a battle, even if the war is far from over.

      For that matter, for all its flaws, MSOOXML is an improvement over MS's older formats. While it may not be transparent like ODF, it is, at the least, fairly translucent compared to their earlier, opaque formats. The fact that they've gone as far as they have towards transparency is another sizable and often-overlooked victory.
    2. Re:Unfortunately... by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      The problem is that this doesn't change much.

      They're still going to deploy it as the default document format for the new Offices. Lots of small and large companies are still going to upgrade their software at some point. OOXML is still very likely to become the new de facto standard due to common usage. For it to happen, they should do some guerilla coding. MS refuses to ship viewers for competing systems? Code a Cocoa (OS X), native Windows 95/98 (yes, old) and a JRE 5 application and make sure it is the easiest thing ever to install and use.

      What they do instead? They completely misunderstand Mac business scene, announce Aqua version will be stable in Q4 2008 and lag the 2.3.x OS X/X11 release a week or more while "Windows" version is released on time.

      I can't understand why OS X version is lagged? First there is a complete FreeBSD running inside, Vendor supplied and supported X11 which is even opengl accelerated and colour corrected, the OS itself uses the frameworks they code on.

      OOXML could be in lot better shape, a company which has no clue about Desktop is the main supporter, that is the problem. Poor Java, their own invention suffered from them too. They couldn't figure why they shouldn't create massive HD activity chaos just to show couple of animations in pages. See Adobe Flash took over the entire embedded video market while there were JVM 1.1 applets doing same thing and even better.

      I have gave up on them and purchased iWork 08 family edition. I launched iWork's advanced word processor, "Pages", it took exactly 0.5 seconds to launch and become usable. Now imagine if OpenOffice was something like that? MS could have shaken very bad.

  25. Re:Please help by Macthorpe · · Score: 1

    Congratulations on managing to post AC without power.

    You need a bit of a rewrite on that troll and then you can give it another try. We'll still be here, promise.

    --
    "It does not do to leave a live dragon out of your calculations, if you live near him." - Tolkien
  26. And then there were none... by Osrin · · Score: 1

    For all the noise they made it was the FFII who publically put money on the table, in the form of this award, with the goal of recruiting people to subvert the standards process. It is good to see that they have seen sense and chosen this route of getting out of their fix, good to see a little humer from them as well.

    1. Re:And then there were none... by qcomp · · Score: 1

      if you had read the press release you would have seen that there were indeed numerous genuine candidates (i.e., noOOXML-campaigns in several countries), which said they didn't need the money - and which, for all their activism and ingenuity, didn't manage to create the same level of disgust with the format that Microsoft schieved with all the committee stuffing and other shenanigans and the total lack of reasoned argument for the proposed standard.
      The best way to show that someone is an idiot is often to just let him babble...

  27. No, they're not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >> They're still going to deploy it as the default document format

    No, they're not. There will be a fork between MS-OOXML and ECMA-OOXML, since ECMA has to address the technical comments from the ISO national standards bodies if they are to have any hope of ISO certification. Brian Jones of Microsoft has stated that MS will not guarantee support of ECMA-OOXML, but the Microsoft variant only. As the only complete implementer of the proposed standard (the documentation has been shown to be unusable to achieve non-Microsoft implementation), MS is essentially saying that the ISO certification is merely a marketing tool to avoid being shut out of government contracts. They will not commit to actual support of ECMA-OOXML if and when it becomes an ISO standard.

    The cynicism is appalling.

  28. Best Chair Thrower by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe they'll introduce that award/competition one year. Maybe they'll release a "Microsoft Decathlon" special edition as well.

  29. MS is experienced in shooting their own foot by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Let's face it, folks. MS had the OS market in a stranglehold. They could've gotten away with pretty much anything. Bundling with hardware? No problem at all. Actually made the Average Joe user happy. Crappy bundled software like players and browsers? Zero problem either. Who doesn't know that there's better alternatives is happy with what he got. Mandatory registration? Already a bit of a nuisance to the average user (especially if he doesn't have internet access), but still bearable. Anyone will make a single phone call to use his computer.

    But then they stepped across the line where the average user grins and bears it. After a major repair, another call. After a few more, the spanish inquisition starts. People start to get nervous. They didn't do anything wrong, yet they feel as suspects for copying software. Software they bought honestly. People also care whether they can do what they used to do. Now DRM is hanging over their heads, and they start looking at their friends who use Linux, who don't have to call, who don't have to register, who get tons of software for free and legally so, and with the various installers the distributions have, it's also only a mouseclick away.

    People start to look around for alternatives. Being the moderator of a "non-geek tech board", I got a pretty good idea what bugs the "Average Joe" users and what direction they take. For about a year now, we have had a vastly increasing number in postings containing questions about Linux, which distribution to take, how to install it and how to get it going, quickly followed by quite happy notes how easy it was.

    I've been trying to talk them into it for a few years now. Until recently the response was mostly "What for?". Now there's a reason. So if anyone helped Linux become more of a mainstream system, it's MS.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:MS is experienced in shooting their own foot by SavedLinuXgeeK · · Score: 1

      I agree with what you are getting at, but most users, who participate in online forums, I wouldn't consider "Average Joe" user. I would say that on a non-tech forum its closer to "Average Joe", but not the same.

      --
      je suis parce que j'aime
    2. Re:MS is experienced in shooting their own foot by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Ok, then let's say "clueless, but interested". Mostly in "how do I get X to work after downloading it", at least at first. Takes usually one or two "gentle" reminders that we're not your local cracking board but help with genuine problems at solving issues with your hard- or software (i.e. frequent crashes, bluescreens, drivers going bonkers, that kind).

      So maybe it's not the average Joe without any clue, but people who would fit into the "intermediate" slot. They got a computer, they generally don't want to do much more than browse and play with it, not interested in development or becoming the next guru, they want what most people want: A "working" computer. I.e. one that does what they want to do (which, in turn, is browse&play).

      Until about a year ago, few if any were interested in touching Linux, being a "geek system" that requires far too much tinkering to get going. Now it seems they start to find out that Windows is at the very least as much tinkering, if only for other reasons. Linux is getting more user friendly and less techy with every release. udev means you don't have to care too much anymore what kind of hardware you have (provided you have at least remotely common hardware in your crate), standard kernels, while bloated, support pretty much all there is (and if not, recompiling isn't as intimidating as it was 5 years ago). Windows, on the other hand, is getting more and more user unfriendly with mandatory registration and constant snooping, with malware flying low and with DRM and other limitations cluttering the system.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:MS is experienced in shooting their own foot by QuietObserver · · Score: 1

      I am very much in agreement with you, and I think that Ubuntu will help with this as well; it may not be perfect, after all what is, but it's designed to do almost everything hardware related on its own in a manner very similar to the way the Mac OS does it. I've used Ubuntu for nearly six months now, since just after Feisty came out, and I've been very happy with my decision. I'm very disappointed that Corel is essentially sitting on WordPerfect and not releasing it to the world the way they should, and I really find Open Office annoying in comparison, as WordPerfect is a much more solid product, but aside from that, there was nothing keeping me locked into Windows. I've heard the complaints about WordPerfect, but I can positively say that I ran WordPerfect 9 for at least seven years and rarely had a major problem; crashes were infrequent, and WordPerfect generally recovered quite effectively after those rare failures, so I rarely lost more than a few minutes of work. Sorry, I meant this to be more of an agreement with you on your comments, but I am very passionate about WordPerfect, so sometimes I go off on huge tangents. Anyway, what I meant to say was that I've found Ubuntu to be very stable (crashed only once, and even then it wasn't a complete crap out) and reliable, which I never, ever found Windows to be.

  30. .doc remains dominant, odf will gain momentum by slashbart · · Score: 1

    The installed base of older Office versions is so gigantic, that the new docx format is being refused. People will return mails with docx attachments saying "I can't read this, just send it as .doc will you!".

    This forces the Office2007 users to learn how to "Save As".

    I predict the "doc" format will stay with us for a very long time, and that as governments start using odt, the docx format will slowly fade away.

    Bart

    Hope my Cassandra skills are up to it today :-)

    1. Re:.doc remains dominant, odf will gain momentum by vegiVamp · · Score: 1

      > This forces the Office2007 users to learn how to "Save As".

      You're being very optimistic here :-)

      I can't tell you the number of times I've seen people just copy/paste entire documents into an email.

      --
      What a depressingly stupid machine.
    2. Re:.doc remains dominant, odf will gain momentum by giorgiofr · · Score: 1

      It gets even better, loads of users use Word as their file management tool.

      --
      Global warming is a cube.
  31. Bill Gates is a... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    spoony bard.

    I know, sorry...

  32. OOXML is just to confuse with Open Office XML by noddyxoi · · Score: 1

    OOXML is just to confuse with Open Office XML. People known that Open Office is the free suite, so they assume that OO stands for OpenOffice XML format. Wise move, that shows how cunny this pricks are.

  33. Oooooo.... by Mystery00 · · Score: 1

    If Microsoft doesn't send a representative to claim their 2500-Euro prize at the FFII General Assembly in November, FFII will give the money to Peruvian earthquake relief.

    Now they're going to have to go and claim it.

    --
    "we've got trenchcoats and bad attitudes" - John Constantine, HellBlazer
  34. MS could recover by shish · · Score: 1

    by turning up to collect the prize, then donating it to charity for themselves?

    --
    I mod down anyone who says "I will be modded down for this", regardless of the rest of their comment
  35. corrected link for ODF plugin by SgtChaireBourne · · Score: 1

    Here is the correct link to the free ODF import/export plugin. The one at sourceforge is the one sponsored by MS and has only recently started work. The Sun plugin has been ready for a while now.

    They jury is still out as to whether MS will fund the sourceforge project to completion or even allow it to be completed. Seeing as MSOOXML can't be implemented without full details of some undocumented, proprietary, legacy specifications, full implementation is contingent on a lot of help and heretofore unavailable information from MS.

    --
    Beta is broken and the link to classic doesn't work. Stop wasting our time or there won't be anybody left here.
  36. Re:Vista WGA by Technician · · Score: 2, Informative

    I think your fear of calling MS is unfounded. The phone people are tools and getting your registration updated is as simple as saying 'This is the only hardware this OS is installed on.' when they ask.

    That may be OK for a retail boxed version that comes with an install disk. This isn't OK for the OEM factory installed system. Just try to use a Dell recovery DVD on a homebuilt box. The EULA forbids the OS transfer and the recovery DVD program won't recover to another machine. With that in mind, the WGA hasn't actualy been tested. I just figured it was registered with a genuine Dell model XXXXXX and anything else is "Not Genuine".

    Therefore I didn't even try when I built a Core 2 Duo box to play with. I just stuck Feisty on it and enjoyed it.

    --
    The truth shall set you free!
  37. Re:Vista WGA by Aladrin · · Score: 1

    Ah, so you aren't mad at MS, you're mad at Dell/Gateway/etc. I worked for a small shop and we bought OEM disks and there was none of that problem. In fact, I use the same disks with a (legal) Dell OEM code to reload Dells without the cruft and have no problems. I've done it for dozens of boxes, each with their own Dell OEM code from the release of XP until just recently, and never had an issue. I've also used that dell OEM code to install XP on a replacement box for dead Dells and never had a problem.

    Microsoft isn't the limiting factor, it's Dell.

    --
    "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
  38. Re:Please help by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    he could be on a laptop with a wireless broadband card, dont doubt him, foo!

  39. Re:Vista WGA by Ephemeriis · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Just try to use a Dell recovery DVD on a homebuilt box. The EULA forbids the OS transfer and the recovery DVD program won't recover to another machine.

    I'm not sure what recovery DVD you're referring to... Perhaps something for Vista, or Media Center Edition? All of the Dells I've seen in the last year or two come with a recovery CD that works just fine on any machine. It's basically a regular WinXP install CD with a Dell label on it.

    We've got a bunch of these Dell recovery CDs floating around the office (Win2k, WinXP Home, WinXP Pro) that we use when we don't have recovery media for a machine (like the wonderful HPs with the recovery partition - hose the HDD and lose your recovery media too!).

    Obviously the licensing is tied to the machine. You can't transfer an OEM license from one computer to another. What you need to do is enter the OEM license from the sticker on the PC you're reloading. Generally speaking, it will activate online just fine. If it doesn't, just call Microsoft and tell them what happened. They don't generally ask a whole lot of questions, especially now that Vista is the hot item to have.
    --
    "Work is the curse of the drinking classes." -Oscar Wilde
  40. What if both you and GP are right? by Lonewolf666 · · Score: 1

    Then the techies will increasingly migrate off Windows while the user-only types stay with Windows for now. Result:
    Third party/hobbyist software development will grow thinner on Windows (except fully commercial projects) and richer on Linux/BSD/whatever.

    I'm pretty sure Microsoft won't be happy with that, because having the greater variety in software has so far been an advantage for Microsoft. There is a reason why Ballmer tends do dance around shouting "DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS" ;-)

    --
    C - the footgun of programming languages
  41. Slashdot awarded "Best Campaigner Again Microsoft" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    obv

  42. Re:Vista WGA by Technician · · Score: 1

    Perhaps something for Vista, or Media Center Edition? All of the Dells I've seen in the last year or two come with a recovery CD that works just fine on any machine. It's basically a regular WinXP install CD with a Dell label on it.

    XP home edition on about a 5 year old Dell. I'll have to grab the disk. I haven't used it since the hard drive was replaced. I thought it was a Norton Ghost hard drive image, not an install disk.

    What you need to do is enter the OEM license from the sticker on the PC you're reloading.

    You missed the point. It's the move from an older machine to the new white box I make that is forbidden. Has this changed? Can I take the old Dell disc when I retire the Dell an install XP home on the Core 2 Duo PC I just built? I didn't think that was permitted which is the point I was trying to make. If I am wrong, then I'll move XP to newer hardware instead of having it die with the older hardware. In short, I'm not reloading the original PC. I'm building a newer PC and do all the time. Re-using XP from an OEM Dell on the new hardware is forbidden last time I checked.

    --
    The truth shall set you free!
  43. Re:Vista WGA by Ephemeriis · · Score: 2, Informative

    You are correct, I did miss the point.

    If you're moving to a new home made whitebox then you cannot move your licensing. OEM licensing is tied to the hardware itself.

    --
    "Work is the curse of the drinking classes." -Oscar Wilde
  44. Re:Vista WGA by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

    Either your information is way out-of-date, or you're buying computers from Alternate Universe Dell instead of the Dell in our universe.

    Dell has included the full OS CD/DVD with every computer they've sold since Windows XP came out. That's the main reason I buy from them and not their competitors. (And I think it contributes a good amount to their success.) The "recovery CD" that came with your Dell doesn't include Windows, it includes all the machine-specific drivers only. The Windows CD/DVD that came with your Dell will work on any piece of hardware as long as you have a valid OEM number. Technically, OEM numbers aren't transferrable between computers, but in reality Microsoft will always re-activate it if you ask.

  45. *Kayak* award? by GogglesPisano · · Score: 2, Informative

    Point of order:

    This is a kayak.

    These are canoes.

    That is all.

    1. Re:*Kayak* award? by pieterh · · Score: 1

      You're absolutely accurate. In fact this morning someone asked me "why does the site not have a photo of the kayaks?" and I answered, "because we used canoes, not kayaks, but we liked the sound of 'kayak' better. And, if I put up a photo, some smartass is going to point and say, 'dude, those are canoes, not kayaks'".

      I just love being right on a rainy Brussels afternoon.

    2. Re:*Kayak* award? by merchant_x · · Score: 1

      mmm Brussells, send me some beer.

  46. Re:Vista WGA back on topic by Technician · · Score: 1

    I'm building a newer PC and do all the time. Re-using XP from an OEM Dell on the new hardware is forbidden last time I checked.

    This is why I thanked Microsoft. Instead of biting the bullet and throwing away a copy of XP with the Dell and then buying a new copy of XP for the new hardware, I tried the alternative. WGA and the tie of XP and Vista to the OEM Dell, HP and other machines is good for Open Source. You can migrate your data, but not your Microsoft OS. Thanks again for the nudge out of the nest.

    --
    The truth shall set you free!
  47. Re:Vista WGA by ericrost · · Score: 1

    I didn't know that, since I had a dell OEM copy running on a homemade white box for a year before I moved over to Edgy... Never had an issue.

  48. Re:Vista WGA by Technician · · Score: 1

    The "recovery CD" that came with your Dell doesn't include Windows, it includes all the machine-specific drivers only. The Windows CD/DVD that came with your Dell will work on any piece of hardware as long as you have a valid OEM number.

    This I didn't know. It has been about 3 years since the hard disk failure and re-install.

    Technically, OEM numbers aren't transferrable between computers, but in reality Microsoft will always re-activate it if you ask.

    It is prohibited in the EULA. It was a big part of the "Education Campaign" for WGA and one of the points of pirated copies in the BSA attacks. I saw the tied to a single box of parts as a WTF??? and started looking at more user friendly alternatives. WGA, BSA, EULA, Single seat non-transferrable all suck. Even if playing "Mother may I" with MS to get a case by case exception to the non-transferrable OEM install of XP is permitted, it's just not worth it. There are better legal software licenses out there.

    --
    The truth shall set you free!
  49. Re:Vista WGA by Technician · · Score: 1

    I worked for a small shop and we bought OEM disks and there was none of that problem. In fact, I use the same disks with a (legal) Dell OEM code to reload Dells without the cruft and have no problems.

    Tell me more about reloading OEM Dell XP without the Cruft! Can it be done with the discs that shipped with the PC, or do you have to buy a replacement copy from Dell sans cruft?

    --
    The truth shall set you free!
  50. Re:Vista WGA by Ephemeriis · · Score: 1

    ...I had a dell OEM copy running on a homemade white box for a year...
    Some of the older Dell discs do not even ask for activation. On the newer discs there is nothing preventing you from typing in the license key on the sticker attached to your Dell box...or someone else's Dell box...or looking up a valid license key online...or bypassing WGA entirely... But none of that makes it legal. OEM licensing is supposed to be tied to the hardware.
    --
    "Work is the curse of the drinking classes." -Oscar Wilde
  51. Re:Vista WGA back on topic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You use the word 'migration' very conveniently here. You essentially built yourself a new PC (so now you have an old Dell and the new PC) and wanted to get windows on it for free. You should thank your own cheapness instead of thanking MS.

    If you feel that once you consider the price and features, Linux was the way to go for your new computer -- fair enough, and nobody should be able to tell you otherwise. But to claim it's because the licensing scheme is unfair is pretty low. The whole legitimacy of your 'migration' depends on what you did with your old Dell -- do you still use it, did you resell it to someone with the OS intact, or did you trash it? MS has no way of knowing. That's why OEM OS installs are tied to the machine. That's also why they're deeply discounted compared to retail box sales. It's not that unreasonable, just as it's not unreasonable for you to want to run Linux. The only thing unreasonable here is you complaining about it as if you got screwed in the deal.

  52. Re:Vista WGA by Technician · · Score: 1

    I didn't know that, since I had a dell OEM copy running on a homemade white box for a year before I moved over to Edgy...

    I didn't know it would install on other hardware. I'm so used to all the other Norton Ghost disks that are vendor specific that fails on anything that isn't the genuine model it was made for.

    I'm going to try Edgy when it's out of Beta. Maybe at the rebuild, I'll dual boot to run Turbo Tax.

    --
    The truth shall set you free!
  53. Re:Vista WGA by ericrost · · Score: 1

    Gutsy is in beta, Edgy is one release back (6.10 = Edgy = Released October (the 10) 2006 (the 6)), Feisty is current (7.04 = Feisty = Released April (the 04) 2007 (the 7)), Gutsy is coming out this month (7.10 = Gutsy = Released October (the 10) 2007 (the 7)).

    This has been brought to you by an Ubuntu user.

  54. Re:Vista WGA by Aladrin · · Score: 1

    Just get a generic OEM disc... I don't think Dell provides those at all. We buy them from NewEgg for customers that wish to purchase a new PC. A copy of the discs doesn't have any hidden codes embedded or anything, so will work with any matching OEM code.

    Dell Windows XP Home OEM codes will work with any Windows XP Home OEM disc, etc. This is not entirely true, actually, as they ran out of codes and now you need the new Home OEM disc with all the new codes to guarantee new codes will work, and I don't have one yet. The shop might, I haven't been in for a while. But anything older than a year will work fine for sure.

    Anyhow, if you can't find someone with a real disc, just download it off the net. It's not illegal as it's the license you purchase (with the keycode) and not the bits on the disc. I recommend keeping a Home OEM and Pro OEM copy around at all times, just in case, and just use the legal code from the PC Case to do the reinstall.

    I've never actually done it with Media Center Edition, so it may not work for that one. (MCE is actually a modified Pro, so it should work, but... Who knows.) And I've never tried it with Vista at all.

    --
    "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
  55. Re:Vista WGA by Technician · · Score: 1

    I recommend keeping a Home OEM and Pro OEM copy around at all times, just in case, and just use the legal code from the PC Case to do the reinstall.

    It's not legal for me to have both the Home and Pro copies. I'll have to check into the price of the OEM discs. I presume they are priced for the media only and contain no license as the license is in the sticker on the machine.

    --
    The truth shall set you free!
  56. Re:Vista WGA by Technician · · Score: 1

    Gutsy is in beta, Edgy is one release back

    My bad. I mixed up the names. I skipped Edgy and simply went from Dapper (still running) and put Feisty on the new Core 2 Duo box. I'll try Gutsy when it's out of Beta later this month. Maybe it will play nicer with my NAS.

    --
    The truth shall set you free!
  57. Re:Vista WGA by ericrost · · Score: 1

    Could be, I don't have any NAS stuff running in my house, the only network storage I use, I mount through NFS so it looks local.

  58. Re:Vista WGA by Aladrin · · Score: 1

    No, they come with a license key. As I said, the license is what you pay for, not the bits. It's not illegal to have the bits, it's only illegal to install them without a valid key. (Having a Pro disc when you've never owned Pro is a bit of grey area, I'll admit, but they can't make you throw away the disc, or copy of the disc, if you lose your keycode. You still paid for the license and are legally entitled to it.)

    --
    "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
  59. lol by Edy52285 · · Score: 1

    This is actually too funny to laugh at

  60. Re:Vista WGA by Technician · · Score: 1

    No, they come with a license key.

    I'm not looking to buy (Pay another MS tax) another copy of XP. I was looking for the ability to transfer the one I already have minus the cruft. As it stands, XP dies with the machine it rode in on. I have no reason to buy another license key for XP.

    if you lose your keycode. You still paid for the license and are legally entitled to it.)

    Not according to the BSA and the WGA education sites. Windows is not genuine without the sticker attached to the case of the computer on which it is installed on. Lost sticker, lost keycode, lost receipt.. all are items which the BSA will use to consider an installation pirated.

    Directly from the Microsoft website regarding counterfeit copies...

    Certificate of Authenticity (COA) is a label that helps you identify genuine Microsoft software. A COA is not a software license - it is a visual identifier that assists in determining whether or not the Microsoft software you are running is genuine. However, without it, you will not have a legal license to run Microsoft software. A COA should never be purchased by itself without the software it authenticates.

    In short, no sticker = counterfeit copy.
    http://www.microsoft.com/resources/howtotell/content.aspx?displaylang=en&pg=coa

    --
    The truth shall set you free!
  61. Re:Vista WGA by Aladrin · · Score: 1

    Well, this is the point where I say that I don't give a rat's ass what MS thinks, they can't force you to stick -anything- to your case. And they can't call you a pirate just because you lost your key. Total bullshit.

    --
    "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
  62. Re:Vista WGA back on topic by Technician · · Score: 1

    If you feel that once you consider the price and features, Linux was the way to go for your new computer -- fair enough, and nobody should be able to tell you otherwise. But to claim it's because the licensing scheme is unfair is pretty low.

    Migrate as retire one and part it out for some parts re-use. My cheapness is part of the cutting edge. I often re-use my existing case, keyboard, monitor, etc. My current Core 2 Duo running Feisty is using an second hand (I repaired the power supply) Dell flatscreen monitor which is only 2 years old. The floppy drive is re-cycled. It works, why replace it? The keyboard is the oldest part. I don't need a Windows key and I like the clacky IBM keyboards, so right now I am using a IMB Model M clacky keyboard manufactured in June of 1996. I just couldn't migrate Windows XP due to it's restrictions. This moved the cost from a re-usable part to a disposable part requiring re-purchase to use, unlike my keyboard, mouse, monitor, floppy, case and such. At no time did I say make an illegal copy of the operating system. I said migrate off obsolete hardware.

    If that makes me a cheap bastard, so be it. Instead of the family fighting for time on one PC, we are able to build several and spread the joy. As a family, we have a budget. Being able to build that Core 2 Duo machine was a sweet deal, but it only happened with a few recycled parts as are all my major upgrades. Only the Dell is considered non-upgradeable and disposable. The other machines may get a new motherboard and CPU at any time. The Dell XP machine will never see a Quad core motherboard. XP dies with the Pentium 4. I may save the case if I can fit in another power supply and motherboard later, but it won't have XP or a Vista upgrade then.

    --
    The truth shall set you free!
  63. Re:Mod parent up ;-) funny by Technician · · Score: 1

    I wish I had the ability to mod you up. For those who didn't follow the link, here is the jucy part..

    I followed the link to see what that unknown bug was in NFS and rsync.

    Bug #1 (liberation), first reported on 2004-08-20 by Mark Shuttleworth
    Microsoft has a majority market share

    --
    The truth shall set you free!
  64. Re:Vista WGA back on topic by PitaBred · · Score: 1

    No, he wanted to MOVE his already purchased copy of XP. He didn't want anything for free. Just because it came with a computer doesn't mean anything. Do you expect to not be able to sell your old car radio if you take it out, just because it came with your car? Or even just use it in another car? He did get screwed in the deal, he bought a product and then is unable to use it because of artificial limitations that were not stated before his purchase (I guarantee you neither Dell nor Microsoft told him that the license couldn't be transferred before he paid for it, whether it's "common knowledge" or not is immaterial). You're either a troll or a moron, but quite possibly both.

  65. Who failed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    After 10 years, your operating system (I assume you're a linux zealot by your demeanor) still has a lower market share than Windows 98. Vista has been out for nine months and already has a larger market share then Windows 2000, OS X and Linux combined.

    Who's failing again?

    1. Re:Who failed? by zenhkim · · Score: 1

      > After 10 years, your operating system (I assume you're a linux zealot by your demeanor) still has a lower market share than Windows 98. Vista has been out for nine months and already has a larger market share then Windows 2000, OS X and Linux combined.
      >
      > Who's failing again?

      Hmmm.... Do I smell astroturf?

      Seriously, you might want to take a lesson or two from Dr. Hatsumi, who was featured in a story right here on Slashdot:

      http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/04/28/153201

      Two of the many pieces of wisdom Dr. Hatsumi teaches to his students are "Either you leave the fight happy, healthy, and able to walk home ...or you don't" and "If you think the only way to defeat your enemies is to destroy them, then you have already lost."

      To put this in context, the numerous but small Ninja clans faced an extremely powerful enemy -- the Samurai warriors, who were given orders by Japan's daimyo lords and the Shogun warlord to oppress and kill the Ninja and their families. To fight such an enemy in conventional toe-to-toe warfare would have been suicidal, so the Ninja adopted the survivalist hide-hit-and-run strategy that made them notorious and even revered throughout the land. The Ninja's goal wasn't to wipe out the Samurai and topple the Japanese government, but to always thwart their enemies' efforts at exterminating them.

      In the end, the Samurai lived long enough to see their warrior class abolished by their own government -- while the Ninja continued to survive and endure to modern times. Even now, Dr. Hatsumi is greatly sought by military forces and security agencies as a valuable instructor in the fighting arts.

      By comparison, the great Gates Mega Software corporation (empire) is on the record for having declared Linux and its various distros (clans) as The Enemy:

      http://www.catb.org/~esr/halloween/

      So, Micro$oft wants to wipe out Linux, while Linux wants to survive. Therefore, if Micro$oft hasn't wiped out Linux, they haven't won. If Linux is surviving, it hasn't lost.

      "But Linux will *never* be as big and powerful as Micro$oft, so haha!" Yes, and the Ninja were *never* as big and powerful as the Samurai. Thing is, the Samurai are no more. The Ninja are still here:

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WhhkgMu7adk&mode=related&search=

      Victory by default, last man standing wins.... call it what you will.

      --
      "All hands, BRACE FOR IMPACT!"
    2. Re:Who failed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      This has got to be the funniest thing I've ever read on Slashdot. Before it was Ghandi quotes, but now you're a ninja fighting the good fight against the evil samurai.

      Thanks for the chuckle.

    3. Re:Who failed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Hmmm.... Do I smell astroturf?

      Yes, of course. Bill Gates himself pays me to argue with morons on Slashdot about "Micro$oft".

      Victory by default, last man standing wins.... call it what you will.

      Good luck with the ninja crusade.

  66. Re:Vista WGA by afedaken · · Score: 1

    MCE will install from the PRO disc, but will fail unless you have the second disc in the set, which contains all the media center specifics. The same is true of XP Tablet Edition.

    --
    If there's a castle floating upside down in the sky, then there's a castle floating upside down in the sky.
  67. and it was risk free. by Erris · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ... in some parts of the world it was ridiculously easy to pass OOXML.

    In the US, the Wintel press has cranked up nonsense about how ooxml's demise was "political", which spins everything upside down. A company that owns it's own broadcast network, a sizeable number of newspapers, and spends a billion dollars a month in advertising does have it easy when it comes to blanketing the world with it's opinions.

    The attack was also easy because there is little downside to it from their persective. They hate all reasonable standards so the controversy's damage to ISO is a win even if they lose. They also think that the only people who will notice are people who hate them anyway. That's a gamble they have been losing more often and the crowd of people turned off is growing because of it.

    --
    DMCA, Hollings, Palladium. What might have sounded like paranoia is now common sense.
  68. Re-use of MSFT OEM licenses by DragonHawk · · Score: 1

    I used to upgrade hardware re-using my legal copy of Windows 98 ... XP will retire on the hardware it arrived on.

    Purely FYI, this always violated the terms of Microsoft's license agreement. OEM licenses are considered "married" to the machine they are bought with. They are not transferable. If the machine dies, the license dies with it.

    Note that I'm not saying this is a fair or reasonable practice by Microsoft, or even that it's legally enforceable; I'm just saying it violated the terms of their EULA. One more reason to hate Microsoft, in my book.
    --

    dragonhawk@iname.microsoft.com
    I do not like Microsoft. Remove them from my email address.
    1. Re:Re-use of MSFT OEM licenses by Technician · · Score: 1

      Purely FYI, this always violated the terms of Microsoft's license agreement.

      Purely FYI, that was a retail copy, not an OEM copy.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
  69. This is awesome by codingmasters · · Score: 1

    More and more proof that Microsoft sucks big time. I really really hope that the money goes to Peru, because MS is the last organisation that needs cash.