Slashdot Mirror


Indiana Jones Gets Robbed

HotChk101 writes "Over 2000 production stills, plenty of sensitive paperwork including a complete production budget breakdown, possibly the script from Indiana Jones 4 and multiple computers were stolen from Steven Spielberg's Universal Studio office. The thief started contacting multiple entertainment websites including TMZ.com and offering the stolen goods for a sum of $2000.00."

227 comments

  1. New Movie Title by badenglishihave · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Indiana Jones and the Raiders of Indiana Jones"

    1. Re:New Movie Title by PriceIke · · Score: 4, Funny

      Steven Spielberg's office lies at the end long underground tunnel, protected by a series of trecherous and deadly booby traps. The thief narrowly escaped clutching the script, only to find himself lying on the Paramount studio lot surrounded by lawyers threateningly aiming pens at him.

      --
      It's not a lie. It's the truth with lossy compression.
    2. Re:New Movie Title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lmao nice.

    3. Re:New Movie Title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Raiders of the Lost Art

    4. Re:New Movie Title by iggy_mon · · Score: 2, Funny

      not only that but all he wanted was $2000!

      must have been the plans for the re-re-re-issue... now with 1.3 seconds of extra bloopers!

      --
      --iggy_mon - www.ananonymouskiller.com - Die Trying -
    5. Re:New Movie Title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      You mean walkie talkies right?

    6. Re:New Movie Title by pushf+popf · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In the immortal words of Bugs Bunny: "What a marooon!

      If it was a Linux laptop with disk encryption enabled, all he would have is a cool paperweight.

    7. Re:New Movie Title by IcyNeko · · Score: 3, Funny

      Look, dude, if the thief had to outrun a huge rolling ball, I think he earned what he stole. :D

    8. Re:New Movie Title by Scaba · · Score: 4, Funny

      He actually wanted $200,000 until he read the script.

    9. Re:New Movie Title by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 4, Funny

      He had only gotten that far because he remembered that in Latin, "George Lucas" begins with an "I."

    10. Re:New Movie Title by dapyx · · Score: 2, Funny

      Allegedly, after reading the script, the thief exclaimed "This belongs in a museum!".

      --
      I'm sorry, the number you have dialed is an imaginary number. Please rotate your phone 90 degrees and dial again.
    11. Re:New Movie Title by soundvessel · · Score: 1

      Steven Spielberg's office lies at the end long underground tunnel, protected by a series of treacherous and deadly booby traps. The thief narrowly escaped clutching the script, only to find himself lying on the Paramount studio lot surrounded by lawyers threateningly aiming pens at him.

      Marcus Brody: "You see... the pen is mightier than the sword!"

    12. Re:New Movie Title by cashman73 · · Score: 3, Funny

      I heard he just wanted $2, and he sent a young punk kid on a bicycle to collect it!

    13. Re:New Movie Title by MicktheMech · · Score: 5, Funny

      Marcus Brody: "You see... the pen is mightier than the sword!"
      Dr. Jones, Sr.: "I'll take the Penis Mightier..."
    14. Re:New Movie Title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't remember the rest of the joke, but you're mother's a whore.

    15. Re:New Movie Title by Bassman59 · · Score: 4, Funny

      I can't remember the rest of the joke, but you're mother's a whore.

      I'd mod this as Funny, but there's an egregious spelling error (you're instead of your). Nice try, though.

    16. Re:New Movie Title by PPH · · Score: 2, Funny

      Whereupon he exclaimed, "Snakes! I hate snakes!"

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    17. Re:New Movie Title by El+Cabri · · Score: 1

      And, you know, " the pen is mightier than the sword. "

    18. Re:New Movie Title by CodeBuster · · Score: 1

      And he remembered not to "choose poorly" and drink from George's coffee mug before attempting to cross the great Paramount seal.

    19. Re:New Movie Title by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Actually, he remembered that George Lucas only cares about "I"

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    20. Re:New Movie Title by elrous0 · · Score: 5, Funny

      One of these days, someone is going to come on /. and post an elaborate article proving that time travel is possible and giving exact specifications on how to build an actual working time travel machine. And on that day, half of the comments will be dedicated exclusively to criticizing his spelling and grammar.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    21. Re:New Movie Title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      suspect spot wearing a fedora leather jacket and a whip attach to his side

      Geoff "Mandrake" Harrison for President

    22. Re:New Movie Title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      And the other half would be saying that time travel is impossible, and use his uncorrected spelling and grammar errors as proof. Who needs an "Edit comment" option when you could just go back in time and whack your slightly-younger self on the back of the head every time they use an apostrophe incorrectly?

    23. Re:New Movie Title by Gizzmonic · · Score: 1

      But if you could really go back in time, wouldn't you be able to fix the mistakes so that the spelling/grammar nazi posts would never exist?

      --
      (-1, Raw and Uncut is the only way to read)
    24. Re:New Movie Title by Some_Llama · · Score: 1

      it would be cooler to go back in time and make you're the correct form of your.

    25. Re:New Movie Title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone mod this Insightful, please.

    26. Re:New Movie Title by XHIIHIIHX · · Score: 1

      That might be your correct your correct form of you're but who cares what you're your using in you're days of yore.

    27. Re:New Movie Title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, you'll see grammar comments on the article even before it is published.

    28. Re:New Movie Title by bizzarefall · · Score: 1

      This would cause a temporal paradox - people could die or maybe never be born... ~*twirl - twirl taaadaaaaa*~

      --
      'Witty Remarks Pending"
    29. Re:New Movie Title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One of these days, someone is going to come on /. and post an elaborate article proving that time travel is possible and giving exact specifications on how to build an actual working time travel machine. And on that day, half of the comments will be dedicated exclusively to criticizing his spelling and grammar. And the other half will be "f1r5+ p05t!"
    30. Re:New Movie Title by Lasertoast · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure that was the funniest response I have ever read... ...Perhaps it shouldn't have been that funny, but I laughed for a solid 5 minutes...

      Fantastic !

    31. Re:New Movie Title by spoco2 · · Score: 1

      Or... a windows one with the same feature enabled... it's available in more than just linux you know.

    32. Re:New Movie Title by toddestan · · Score: 2, Funny

      Naw, the other half would be complaining about the dupe since the exact same article was posted 5 years later.

    33. Re:New Movie Title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I think he meant a laptop running Linux is a nothing but a cool paperweight.

    34. Re:New Movie Title by StarvingSE · · Score: 3, Funny

      Asps... very dangerous. You go first.

      --
      I got nothin'
    35. Re:New Movie Title by initialE · · Score: 1

      Screw that, just go for UID #2

      --
      Starbucks, Harbuckle of Breath.
    36. Re:New Movie Title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh no you didn't!

  2. Episode 5: by wiredlogic · · Score: 1

    Indiana Jones and the Search for Spielburg's Stuff

    --
    I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
    1. Re:Episode 5: by alxkit · · Score: 0

      Indiana Jones and the Budget That Doomed

    2. Re:Episode 5: by moderatorrater · · Score: 1

      I'm just glad they didn't get the Ark. That would have been bad news for everyone involved.

    3. Re:Episode 5: by flitty · · Score: 2, Funny

      Obligatory:

      "I'm holding this ransom, for two, THOUSAND, dollars!"
      "actually sir, $2,000 by today's standards isn't that much..."
      "ok, two, THOUSAND.... Million, dollars!"

      --
      Whether or not there is some sort of god, I'm not supposed to say/god is a word and the argument ends there-Smog
    4. Re:Episode 5: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They should recruit OJ & Jonathan Frakes to join them on their quest!

  3. They should call me by HEbGb · · Score: 1

    Hell, for just $2k I'd buy the stuff, take a peek, and return it. :)

    1. Re:They should call me by Machtyn · · Score: 1

      Seriously... $2000? I'd expect at least one extra 0 on the end of that.

    2. Re:They should call me by Abreu · · Score: 1

      Exactly, this seems hardly worth the hassle of robbing the stuff...

      He should instead ask Spielberg for a cameo appearance or something, not that he will avoid doing some jail time.

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    3. Re:They should call me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The criminal is either

      (A) Ghetto and thinks $2k is serious money
      (B) Forgetting the American Dollar is turning into the American Yen.

    4. Re:They should call me by AcidLacedPenguiN · · Score: 0, Redundant

      isn't it obvious? The crook took a look through the script and realized it was only worth $2000. . .

      --
      disclaimer: I've been known to store numbers in my ass for which to dig out when quantities are required.
    5. Re:They should call me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hell, for just $2k I'd buy the stuff, take a peek, and return it. :)

      Yes, but $2 Klingon is worth $420,223,877,965 US. So, well, I WOULD TOO!!!

      (OK, IHBT. Damn!

    6. Re:They should call me by everphilski · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But no one else knows it yet! what an idiot :P

  4. Thats great! by CaptScarlet22 · · Score: 0, Troll

    Just delay the move even more....Fuck tards.....

    --
    It's left blank because I have nothing to say to you punks!
    1. Re:Thats great! by PriceIke · · Score: 2, Funny

      By the time Raiders IV is released, $2000 will get you a movie ticket and a small popcorn.

      --
      It's not a lie. It's the truth with lossy compression.
    2. Re:Thats great! by Oktober+Sunset · · Score: 2, Funny

      Small? You mean extra medium right?

    3. Re:Thats great! by durnurd · · Score: 2, Funny

      Raiders IV? I wasn't aware of a Raiders II or III.

      --
      --Edward Dassmesser
  5. $2000? by xmarkd400x · · Score: 5, Funny

    Who is this guy, Dr. Evil?

    1. Re:$2000? by pshumate · · Score: 1

      Hell, that'd be a good way to not get caught by Paramount's lawyers...

    2. Re:$2000? by Goffee71 · · Score: 1

      He grabbed the swag, dodged the big rolling ball, ran through the snake pit and fought the Nazi on the gate - give the guy some credit.

      --
      If he's the Walrus then can I be a penguin please?
    3. Re:$2000? by Aladrin · · Score: 1

      Exactly. I initially missed the dot and thought '$200,000... Nice.' ... Then I did that double-take thing (yeah, my head actually snapped back) and '$2000! WTF!' ...

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    4. Re:$2000? by ajs · · Score: 1

      $2000 is probably fair. The problem is that, much as many people would want this information, no legitimate news outlet is going to pay for what is known to be stolen goods, so they have to go to the Web sites and tabloids that are hungry enough to break the law. They, in turn, can't afford to pay much.

      If they had stolen a couple of things quietly, then they could have gotten more money, but this was clearly an amateur who just didn't realize that they were screwing themselves by taking too much, too noisily.

      I hope no one buys the stuff and they get caught. This kind of theft is certainly less harmful than stealing someone's life savings, but it's still criminal, and I'd still like to see justice done.

    5. Re:$2000? by drakaan · · Score: 4, Informative

      ...I hope no one buys the stuff and they get caught. This kind of theft is certainly less harmful than stealing someone's life savings, but it's still criminal, and I'd still like to see justice done.

      I'm reminded of a meme that's missing from the currently active slashdot poll, namely "RTFA".

      From the article:

      ...We have been told that the thief was apprehended by LAPD and the FBI with the help of a member of the online press that had been offered the stolen property. Sources tell us that an undercover sting operation was set in motion late last night with the help of the unnamed member of the online press...
      --
      "Murphy was an optimist" - O'Toole's commentary on Murphy's Law
    6. Re:$2000? by u-bend · · Score: 1

      Exactly. I will add however that that tiny little detail might have merited mention in the summary. It's slightly misleading as it is.

      --
      u-bend
    7. Re:$2000? by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      $2000 will buy a lot of cheap beer, cigs, and scratch tickets for your garden variety crook. Maybe the guy(s) thought that $2000 was the magic number that the victims would consider low enough to pay just to get it over with and without bothering to call the cops on them.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    8. Re:$2000? by p3d0 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Must be Canadian dollars. USD$2000 isn't very much.

      --
      Patrick Doyle
      I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
    9. Re:$2000? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Er, aren't Canadian dollars worth more than US ones?

    10. Re:$2000? by Dynedain · · Score: 1

      Well, $2000 should just about cover one night's tab at The Standard...

      --
      I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
    11. Re:$2000? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *Swoosh*

      That's what he said: $2000 US, that's nothing, but $2000 CAD, that's a wad :-)

    12. Re:$2000? by kd5ujz · · Score: 1

      OJ is now working for the LAPD and FBI.

      --
      -William
      God is everything science has yet to explain.
    13. Re:$2000? by ShatteredArm · · Score: 1

      I thought they hit parity just a few weeks ago?

    14. Re:$2000? by mchale · · Score: 1

      CAD are currently worth slightly more than USD.

    15. Re:$2000? by ajs · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'm reminded of a meme that's missing from the currently active slashdot poll, namely "RTFA" No.

      I'm sorry. I don't mean to be rude, but I read Slashdot because I don't have time to read a dozen articles about nonsense. I instead read a quick summary and fire off a comment if it strikes me as worth it. I've done so for many years, and will continue to do so.

      If article summaries can't be written clearly enough to convey the basics accurately, then I'll have a misleading idea about what's in the article, and may post less useful comments. There's not much I can do about that without adding a 25th hour to the day.
    16. Re:$2000? by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 1

      That made me laugh, then it made me sad.

      --
      I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
    17. Re:$2000? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or, you can save everyone some time by reading the summary, formulating your incorrect assumptions, and keeping them to yourself.

      No mis-posts, flames, snarky replies...just back to your busy life.

      Just a suggestion.

    18. Re:$2000? by LordSnooty · · Score: 1

      Pity, I'd like to see him get apprehended and for the script to turn up on thepiratebay.

    19. Re:$2000? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's a thought to the OP.. try reading a newspaper.. Enough with the 'Canada' currency jokes.. CAD is worth MORE then USD right now.. so perhaps i can say that the price was USD??

      I checked the rates:

      1 CAD = 1.003 USD

      A little behind the times are you??

    20. Re:$2000? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read it again, the joke is at the USA's expense because the dollar has fallen so far, causing the looney to rise.

    21. Re:$2000? by kayditty · · Score: 0

      I don't know, but why are you asking Dr. Evil?

  6. Only $2000?! by loafing_oaf · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Only $2000?! Wow, this guy should have at least gotten some training by watching Antiques Roadshow or The Price is Right or something. Then again, criminals are, by definition, lazy.

    --
    Always someone has power over you. The thing to consider is this: Is the power good, or bad?
    1. Re:Only $2000?! by zeromorph · · Score: 1

      Maybe he has read the script and estimated its value correctly? Sorry, just an idea.

      --
      "Hannibal's plans never work right. They just work." Amy/A-Team
    2. Re:Only $2000?! by timster · · Score: 2, Funny

      Uh-huh... because only real go-getters are watching TV in the middle of the day when The Price is Right comes on.

      --
      I have seen the future, and it is inconvenient.
    3. Re:Only $2000?! by WasteOfAmmo · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      I think the $2000 is what hits most people when they read the summary. This must have been a opportunist as opposed to a planned robbery. Reading the story and others related it looks like it was only after the thief discovered "what he had" that he started to look for a buyer.

      Updates state that the thief was quickly caught when he started offering the stuff for sale. Stories indicate that non of the upcoming movie info was lost either so this overall is no longer a story. The only story is the screw up and missed opportunity of the thief.

      -- Check out a great indi-band's music and help a girl win a guitar: Art of Dying

    4. Re:Only $2000?! by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 1

      Well how was he supposed to know how worthless the Indiana Jones IV script would be? To read it you have to steal it first.

      In any case it appears "the market" is expecting this movie to sell $2000/$8 = 250 tickets (assuming $8 per ticket). Basically the first theater audience will run out and tell everyone waiting in line outside just how bad it is. Maybe the movie is so terrifically terrible that your face melts when you watch it unless you close your eyes. That would certainly help get the word out.

    5. Re:Only $2000?! by Bwana+Geek · · Score: 1

      Then again, criminals are, by definition, lazy.

      I thought they were defined as "a superstitious and cowardly lot."

    6. Re:Only $2000?! by Neanderthal+Ninny · · Score: 1

      Stupid, to be more precise.

  7. $2000??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmm, sounds like a heist only Indiana Jones himself could have pulled off...

  8. Someone doesn't understand finances... by ShatteredArm · · Score: 0, Redundant

    You're going to risk going to jail, and your price tag is only $2000?

    But maybe that's why this guy is in this situation to begin with...

    1. Re:Someone doesn't understand finances... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People rob convenience stores for something more like $200. Criminals aren't usually very bright.

    2. Re:Someone doesn't understand finances... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The bright ones are easy to catch in the dark.

    3. Re:Someone doesn't understand finances... by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 1

      Ha ha, joke's on you- he wants it in Canadian dollars.

  9. New Subtitle... by pshumate · · Score: 1

    ...Indiana Jones And The Ineffective Security System.

  10. $2000?!?!? by Billosaur · · Score: 5, Funny

    One word: moron

    One more word: lawsuit

    Don't be surprised when they find this guy lying dead in his bed in his apartment, having been killed by whip-wielding maniac...

    --
    GetOuttaMySpace - The Anti-Social Network
    1. Re:$2000?!?!? by phantomfive · · Score: 5, Informative

      They caught him already. He tried to sell the stuff to a member of the press, who reported it to the police, and a sting operation was carried out. Read the article. :)

      Apparently one TV station actually did buy it and was about to reveal what they had found until Paramount's lawyers stepped in. Which although normally I'm rather opposed to lawyers, in this case I'm rather ambivalent about it; who wants to have the show spoiled for them anyway?

      --
      Qxe4
    2. Re:$2000?!?!? by Billosaur · · Score: 4, Funny

      If I read the article, I'd be well informed and able to make cogent comments... and that is strictly against Slashdot policy... ;)

      --
      GetOuttaMySpace - The Anti-Social Network
    3. Re:$2000?!?!? by tooslickvan · · Score: 1

      You're ambivalent about people buying stolen property? You do realize it's a crime to purchase stolen property?

    4. Re:$2000?!?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't be surprised when they find this guy lying dead in his bed in his apartment, having been killed by whip-wielding maniac... ... with a hat and a leather jacket? :-)
      Sorry, couldn't resist.

    5. Re:$2000?!?!? by jollyreaper · · Score: 2, Funny

      You're ambivalent about people buying stolen property? You do realize it's a crime to purchase stolen property? You're right. That's why I refuse to pay for anything I pirate.
      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    6. Re:$2000?!?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't know what ambivalent means, do you.

    7. Re:$2000?!?!? by TheVelvetFlamebait · · Score: 1

      Don't be surprised when they find this guy lying dead in his bed in his apartment, having been killed by whip-wielding maniac...
      Namely, his wife, for leaving two zeros off the asking price.
      --
      You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
    8. Re:$2000?!?!? by Oktober+Sunset · · Score: 1

      doubt anything will be able to spoil Indiana Jones 4.

    9. Re:$2000?!?!? by Cl1mh4224rd · · Score: 2, Funny

      If I read the article, I'd be well informed and able to make cogent comments... and that is strictly against Slashdot policy... ;)

      I don't RTFA, because I'm a nice guy. Reading the article robs others of the opportunity to clarify the story and increase their karma. :P
      --
      People will pass up steak once a week, for crap every day.
    10. Re:$2000?!?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I don't want the movie spoiled for me, and the first thing that I thought when I saw this headline was, "shit, now I can't go to ytmnd.com until the new Indy movie comes out." But, luckily, it looks like the script won't be leaked.

  11. Dr. Jones... by PlatyPaul · · Score: 5, Funny

    Again we see that there is nothing you can possess which I cannot take away.


    (source)

    --
    Misery loves company. Online misery loves unsuspecting random strangers.
    1. Re:Dr. Jones... by Mr.+Flibble · · Score: 2, Funny

      It belongs in a museum!

      --
      Try to hack my 31337 firewall!
    2. Re:Dr. Jones... by SterlingSylver · · Score: 1

      So do you!

  12. $2000? by jtroutman · · Score: 1

    Hell, I'll give him $2500. How can someone be capable of evading security, not only getting onto the lot, but getting the stuff off, and be so stupid to only ask for such a paltry sum for his loot? And then he tries to sell it to news people, who, surprise, contact the studio to say, "WTF, mate?". You have to move that kind of thing on the down low, not sell it to some internet news site. After all of that he goes and hangs out at The Standard? The Standard? Fer fuxake, why didn't he just walk down Hollywood Blvd. with a sign saying "Hi, I stole a bunch of stuff from Indiana Jones 4, anyone want to buy it?"

    --
    I stole this sig from a more creative user.
  13. Cue Dr. Evil. by Medievalist · · Score: 4, Funny

    "and I want... TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS!"

    "Uh, really? OK, sure."

  14. Small thinkers by Verteiron · · Score: 1

    $2000? No wonder they haven't had any takers. No one will believe that they can buy the script to IJ4 for such a low amount.

    --
    End of lesson. You may press the button.
    1. Re:Small thinkers by sa1lnr · · Score: 0, Troll

      Considering how bad 2 and 3 were compared to the 1st one?

  15. Caveat Idiot by dougmwne · · Score: 1

    Something tells me this guy is going to get caught pretty fast. I mean really... TMZ.com?

    1. Re:Caveat Idiot by AgNO3 · · Score: 1

      Yeah if you read the article you would see he was already caught.

      --
      OMG Ponies!!! with Glitter!!!! I miss Pink :-(
  16. Stole the wrong thing by cpt.hugenstein · · Score: 1

    He should have stolen something like the script for Gili. We would have all paid him to keep it.

  17. can't resist by Leemeng · · Score: 5, Funny

    "So once again, Jones, what was briefly yours is now mine."

  18. South Park did it by UbuntuDupe · · Score: 1

    There was already a South Park episode about this: Season 6, "Free Hat". So ... maybe the thief just stole it keep Spielberg from digitally removing the politically incorrect stuff? :-P

    1. Re:South Park did it by PlatyPaul · · Score: 1

      Sorry to burst your bubble, but that was the original master tape of "Raiders of the Lost Ark", not the upcoming final film.

      It's interesting to note that it may have actually had an effect on real-world plans for modifications....

      --
      Misery loves company. Online misery loves unsuspecting random strangers.
  19. I think the thief... by Dougmeister · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...misplaced his decimal point.

    1. Re:I think the thief... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's what the thief thinks anyway...

      Indiana Jones managed to steal it and then escaped unnoticed without losing his hat.

    2. Re:I think the thief... by PlatyPaul · · Score: 1

      Ok, then I guess they'd better step to it and get him his nice crispy $20.00 bill....

      --
      Misery loves company. Online misery loves unsuspecting random strangers.
    3. Re:I think the thief... by theantipop · · Score: 1

      Next thing we'll hear is him offering to sell for $20,000,000,000!!!

    4. Re:I think the thief... by oddaddresstrap · · Score: 1

      Given the numbers involved, they won't even be able to claim that Excel is the reason their demand is so pathetic.

    5. Re:I think the thief... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heck, several computers could be worth lot more than $2000 just for the hardware and software.

    6. Re:I think the thief... by necro2607 · · Score: 1

      Well, I guess... Maybe he was just using Excel 2007 to calculate the overall value of the goods he had stolen? ;)

    7. Re:I think the thief... by davidsyes · · Score: 1

      He.. will be.. a-decimated...

      --
      Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  20. Re:I got to know by king-manic · · Score: 1

    Indiana Jones belongs with Star Wars, Transformers, TMNT etc.. of things that were popular when we were young. Since geeks tend not to grow out of things we have this tingly nostalgia for these things. So it might fit. bedsides, he's an archaeologist.. their sort of pottery geeks.

    --
    "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
  21. Re:I got to know by PlatyPaul · · Score: 1

    I beg to differ. The new Indiana Jones movie shows up in all the big geek media, including on The Geekery.

    And, for what it's worth, this is a clear indication of the importance of offsite backups and strong encryption on the desktop.

    --
    Misery loves company. Online misery loves unsuspecting random strangers.
  22. Sounds good to me. by aadvancedGIR · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm ready to pay that price to make sure there is no jarjar or ewok-like caracter in the film, and if needed, the double to make sure Lucas is no longer involved in any artistic part of the production.

    1. Re:Sounds good to me. by Anomalyst · · Score: 1

      > make sure there is no jarjar or ewok-like character in the film
      You forgot mechanical sharks and blue fairies.

      --
      There is no right to feel safe thru security vaudeville at the expense of everyone's freedom, privacy and tax money.
  23. Marketing ploy? by tonyreadsnews · · Score: 2, Interesting

    We'll see. If the charges are dropped, then I say it was a marketing ploy. If not, well, then just a really stupid thief.

  24. talk about inept security... by PJ1216 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    multiple computers The thief (singular) walked away with multiple computers? That requires multiple trips into the office. The security is bad no matter how you look at it. Either
    A) One guy makes multiple trips back and forth to carry all this stuff... unless he's superman and can carry multiple computers.
    B) A group of guys gets past security. One guy getting past I can see, but an entire group getting past should make it easier to catch them.

    Has anyone given any thought to this being a publicity stunt? I mean, the information has yet to be leaked and for $2000, I would bet plenty of people would have found a way to get into contact with this guy and purchase it for themselves.

    Something just seems unbelievable here.
    1. Re:talk about inept security... by filterban · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It doesn't necessarily mean multiple trips. It would be pretty easy to carry five or six laptops at once.

      --
      rm -rf /
    2. Re:talk about inept security... by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      multiple computers

      The thief (singular) walked away with multiple computers? That requires multiple trips into the office. The security is bad no matter how you look at it. Either
      A) One guy makes multiple trips back and forth to carry all this stuff... unless he's superman and can carry multiple computers.
      B) A group of guys gets past security. One guy getting past I can see, but an entire group getting past should make it easier to catch them.


      I don't see anything that implies they have to be desktop PCs - they could very well be laptops. I mean, a lot of people use them as desktops now, and many people do leave them on their desks when they leave for the night. Last I checked, a normal person can carry away a nice collection of laptops in a single trip.

      This is especially so for the "creative" types who desire to have the ability to quickly jot down stuff while they're away from the office. They carry their laptops into meetings for notes and presenting their ideas, but other than that, it stays at the office since if they don't want to bring work home.
    3. Re:talk about inept security... by spiritraveller · · Score: 1

      I mean, the information has yet to be leaked and for $2000, I would bet plenty of people would have found a way to get into contact with this guy and purchase it for themselves. Yeah, except that unless they were buying the stuff to give it back to its rightful owner, they'd be guilty of theft by receiving. What would be surprising is if Speilberg or his company don't pay the money. It's probably worth millions to them, so why not pay a couple grand to get it back?

      Something just seems unbelievable here. Not really. This kind of criminal activity happens all the time. The only thing notable is that it was Spielberg's office. Otherwise, it's just garden variety idiot criminals trying to fence their stolen loot. Sounds like they are in over their heads and probably didn't plan on raiding Speilberg's office ahead of time.
    4. Re:talk about inept security... by BobMcD · · Score: 1

      In my days as a cable monkey and onsite tech I was often dispatched to go pick up hardware from people's offices. It was amazingly easy. Now this was several years ago, but even then I was amazed at how I could walk onto a hospital campus (just one example), into someone's office, and remove a computer. Only about 25% of the time was I even questioned about what I was doing. No uniform, no credentials of any kind, just a nerdy looking guy saying "I am here for so-and-so"...

      I found during this time that if you walk with purpose and smile with eye contact to everyone you pass, you could generally sail right on in and out.

      It might very well still be true.

      Social engineering of posture...

    5. Re:talk about inept security... by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

      Has anyone given any thought to this being a publicity stunt? I mean, the information has yet to be leaked and for $2000, I would bet plenty of people would have found a way to get into contact with this guy and purchase it for themselves. Publicity stunt? Shit, I know what I'd do if I was Speilberg: I'd greenlight Transformers 2 and make sure it's even shittier than the original! But if I was Speilberg and still had a soul, I'd write this guy into the script. He'd steal Indy's papers, there would be a huge chase, and Indy would then whip the shit out of him. I'd especially include the part about him trying to sell the collection for such an absurdly lowball price. This thing could easily be blown into an awesomely funny running gag.

      Back during the production of Babylon 5, the guys playing Londo and G'Kar pulled a nasty gag on the show's creator and head writer. His revenge was writing a steamy sex scene for the two of them to share in an upcoming episode. "You may have conquered my people, Mollari, but you have yet to conquer me," says G'Kar, stepping into the light and revealed to be wearing nothing but a frilly teddy. With production schedules being as crunched as they were, the gag seemed like it could be for real. "I'm working 12-hour days, you think I have time to spare for a fucking joke? That's the real script, start learning your lines."

      I'd keep this guy around and start giving him the most fantastically implausible bullshit to leak off the set, stuff that wouldn't seem right except it looks like official Indy material. Nazi zombies, aliens from the planet Transexual (they look like Ann Coulter and Tim Curry), Hitler in combat exoskeleton with dual gatling guns, lesbian mermaid vampires, Xenu and Krishna in a battle royale, leave everyone confused!
      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    6. Re:talk about inept security... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps he used some sort of high-tech hauling device to move them?

    7. Re:talk about inept security... by Henry+V+.009 · · Score: 1

      Most likely explanation: No computers were stolen. Probably nothing but information was stolen.

    8. Re:talk about inept security... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you ever heard of a cart and/or wagon?

    9. Re:talk about inept security... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you kidding? This is Hollywood. No matter how good their security system is, there are dozens of ways to defeat it, and everyone there knows all of them.

      For instance, picture this:

      FILM STUDIO INT.

      (SPIELBERG enters the security checkpoint.)

      SPIELBERG: Sorry Carl, I guess I left my access card at home today.

      CARL: No prob, Mr. S. (waving SPIELBERG through)

      (We follow SPIELBERG down the corridor to his office, which has a retinal scanner on the door. We see a closeup of SPIELBERG performing the scan; the door opens, and he goes inside. He rifles through some desks, then piles some laptops on a nearby pushcart.)

      FILM STUDIO EXT.

      (We see SPIELBERG loading the laptops from the pushcart into a van. As he gets into the driver's seat, we see a closeup of him removing a rubber mask to reveal that he is actually GEORGE LUCAS, who is clearly recovering from a recent eye transplant.)

    10. Re:talk about inept security... by jmdc · · Score: 1

      One person could have walked off with 2-3 laptops all at once.

    11. Re:talk about inept security... by Darthmalt · · Score: 1

      I agree, working on campus for the media center I was amazed at how dressed in street clothes I could walk into a classroom nod at a teacher and walk out with several hundred dollars worth of computers/tvs/projectors etc. carry them across campus and never be questioned. Reminds me of saying "You can go anywhere you want if you carry a clipboard and look busy"

    12. Re:talk about inept security... by davidsyes · · Score: 1

      Maybe he wore a costume, and had props, like put the computers in boulders? Or dressed up like Ford or Spielberg?

      Or, the thieves sent in scantily-clad whip-wielding women to (the wrong set to) distract the guards by Romancing Their Stones? Maybe they told the disguarded guards "Those briefs that were briefs-ly yours are now impermanently mine... It's entire not unpossible... to whip guards unto sub-mission...

      --
      Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
    13. Re:talk about inept security... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "A) One guy makes multiple trips back and forth to carry all this stuff... unless he's superman and can carry multiple computers."

      OR is was one guy *with a cart*...

    14. Re:talk about inept security... by Joe+the+Lesser · · Score: 1

      How about:

      One man achieves access to the office, and has enough time to remove the hard drives.

      --
      "I only speak the truth"
      Karma: null(Mostly affected by an unassigned variable)
    15. Re:talk about inept security... by binarybum · · Score: 1

      yeah, if you're a superman.

      --
      ôó
    16. Re:talk about inept security... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a group of Ninjas maybe?

  25. err, hello. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He/she is an 'alleged thief' until they are found guilty.

    1. Re:err, hello. by Toonol · · Score: 1

      Legally, that's true.

      But we are free to make our own judgments. OJ is a murderer, for instance. The legal system doesn't dictate our own thoughts and opinions.

    2. Re:err, hello. by crow · · Score: 2, Informative

      No. You are a thief from the moment you commit the crime. The media will say "alleged" because they don't want to make a judgement, especially if doing so can get them sued.

      Further, if there was a theft, then it was committed by a thief. Since they haven't accused someone, there is no alleged thief, but since someone did it, there is a thief.

      Of course, some have said that it is an alleged theft, because it may have been an authorized publicity stunt, so it may not have been stealing. (Though there would be an issue with filing a false police report or something like that.)

  26. It happened to Coppola, too... by BobMcD · · Score: 3, Informative

    A very similar thing happened to Coppola a few days back:

    http://www.zap2it.com/movies/news/zap-coppolascriptburgled,0,3773984.story

    1. Re:It happened to Coppola, too... by nurhussein · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This is interesting.

      Spielberg, Lucas and Coppola were known as "the three amigos" right? Could there be a connection?

    2. Re:It happened to Coppola, too... by geekmansworld · · Score: 1

      This sounds like a job for the Hardy Boys.... ... okay, not really. They suck.

      Still, it's a very interesting coincidence if that's all it is. Quite the supervillain collector if it isn't.

  27. this just in...data was backed up! by jaypaulw · · Score: 1

    I'm sure they have it "backed up," so is it worth even talking to the guy? Get lost and sell your stolen warez somewhere else.

  28. Not surprisingly by Ilan+Volow · · Score: 4, Funny

    Spielberg first realized the script had been stolen after the security system's boulder had crashed through the Universal Studios cafeteria earlier that day.

    --
    Ergonomica Auctorita Illico!
  29. Re:Stuff that matters ... by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

    Indiana Jones news is on topic for /. because Han Shot First.

    --
    A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
  30. It's not theft... by miskatonic+alumnus · · Score: 5, Funny

    it's copyright infringement. Oh, darn it. Wrong story.

    1. Re:It's not theft... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL! You, sir, made my day. Congrats!

    2. Re:It's not theft... by TheVelvetFlamebait · · Score: 1

      it's copyright infringement. Oh, darn it. Wrong story.
      It's that too! Mark my words: Universal will insisted that the thief pay licensing fees for possessing the Indiana Jones script without reimbursing the artists. That's on top of returning it, and any civil lawsuits/criminal prosecution.
      --
      You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
  31. FBI! by CoffeeIsMyGod · · Score: 1

    We have been told that the thief was apprehended by LAPD and the FBI with the help of a member of the online press that had been offered the stolen property.

    Why the heck was the FBI involved? Oh yeah, someone with money.

    1. Re:FBI! by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      he probablly tried to sell it to a website in a different state. Thats probablly enough justification for the FBI to get involved if they want to.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    2. Re:FBI! by Weegee_101 · · Score: 1

      If any of the sites he contacted weren't in California then it falls under the FBI's jurisdiction since it (loosely) qualifies as attempting to transport stolen goods through interstate commerce.

    3. Re:FBI! by CoffeeIsMyGod · · Score: 1

      I'm just wondering why they would care. Aren't they busy fighting child porn?

  32. Ide pay ANYTHING by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Theres one thing in Speilbergs office ide pay any ammount of money for.

    The original AURYN from The Neverending story.

  33. Re:I got to know by penguinchris · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure how you can be a geek/nerd without liking Indiana Jones... nerds are not just into science fiction. The Indiana Jones series contains my favorite movies, trumping all of the nerdy science fiction that I also like, including Star Wars. While Indiana Jones fans are not all nerds, a venn diagram would show circles that overlap quite heavily.

  34. As an Indiana Jones Fan.. by the+computer+guy+nex · · Score: 0, Troll

    .. I hope this guy gets the death penalty. Hope this doesn't affect the release date and I hope none of this information ever becomes public.

    1. Re:As an Indiana Jones Fan.. by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      I hope this guy gets the death penalty.
      You really need to get out more.
      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    2. Re:As an Indiana Jones Fan.. by Valdrax · · Score: 1

      Well, hell, I'm glad your entertainment is worth seeing someone killed. I mean, aggravated rape, child molestation, and other non-murder crimes we don't execute people for are nothing compared to delaying or spoiling your little fun.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  35. Call Connery! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    INDY! The Nazis have taken the lost script of Speilberg of Paramount! If they unlock it's secrets, they will find the Spear of Destiny and will raise an undead army of Biblical heros that will parade across the Earth, bringing death to all they see unfit!

    A great adventure begins...

    Meanwhile, one lucky Anthropoloy 101 class gets free A's

  36. Squandered potential by Applekid · · Score: 1

    What a waste. Had I stolen the script I would have returned it having made several additions and modifications.

    More hearts getting pulled out of chests.
    Nazis have a new catchphrase: "Uh oh, don't tell the fuhrer!" with a saucy grin.
    Cameo appearance by Tomb Raider's Lara Croft.
    Homage to the "Whipmaster" SNL sketch.
    What's better than the Raiders' big round boulder? Two of them. Two different directions.
    Blackjack. Hookers. Ahh, forget the whole thing.

    --
    More Twoson than Cupertino
    1. Re:Squandered potential by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "What's better than the Raiders' big round boulder? Two of them. Two different directions."

      I was picturing the giant Universal Studios globe breaking off and rolling down the street after the guy :-)

    2. Re:Squandered potential by Andrewkov · · Score: 3, Funny
      What's better than the Raiders' big round boulder? Two of them. Two different directions.

      You already mentioned Lara Croft!

  37. Re:I got to know by geekoid · · Score: 2, Interesting

    He is not an archaeologist, he is a treasure hunter...just ask any archaeologist.

    That's like saying Jaws is a nerd/geek flick. Or the Godfather. Yes, good movies but they are embraced by the general culture, not nerd/geek culture.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  38. I know who it was by Scratch-O-Matic · · Score: 1

    It was that guy who won "On The Lot," which included an office and job with Spielberg

    --


    Evil is the money of root.
  39. The likely culprits by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

    Obviously it was some kids trying to prevent a remake of the original Indiana Jones movies.

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  40. Re:What is it with the fucking haha tag? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let me guess, you are going to try to haxor into Slashdot to find out where everyone lives to shoot them and then to crash it. Oh wait, judging by the lack of grammar skills you must be using M$ Windoze. That tells me you can't even use a script let alone write one. Mods, mod parent down as low as the poster's IQ, -1.

  41. If you've got something worthless... by Loke+the+Dog · · Score: 2, Interesting

    put a high price tag on it, and watch the buyers flock. Try giving kittens away. Its hard, because when people evaluate if they should take one of your kittens, they will think of the problems of owning a cat. Now try selling kittens for 100$ each. Its about as hard as giving them away because the cost will draw attention away from the other problems, but it will also earn you money.

    Same applies here. For 2000$, the big issue for the buyer is that he's buying something illegal that might actually not contain anything really interesting. For 200 000$, the big issue is to get the cash.

  42. Movie Ripoff Script by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    This robbery comes right after Francis Coppola's data archive was robbed. "Who's Robbing the Great Directors of Hollywood" sounds like a great premise for a movie. Too bad it'll never be faithful to the original, As Seen on Slashdot.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:Movie Ripoff Script by BendingSpoons · · Score: 1

      "Who's Robbing the Great Directors of Hollywood" ... and why are they bothering Steven Spielberg?
      --
      For all we know the moon may be as conscious as a poet or a realtor, and extremely weary of its monotonous round. - HLM
  43. They by BooRolla · · Score: 1

    belong in a museum!

  44. Man OJ... by DaOne5 · · Score: 0

    Just thinks everything belongs to him.

  45. $2000?! by quaketripp · · Score: 1

    One of two things... A) he's a moron, doesn't understand money, etc. B) he reviewed the script, the computer files, and the stills and came to conclusion that it really is only worth 2000, and even asking 2000 is going to put them further in the hole. In this case, I wouldn't be surprised honestly, maybe it's just Phantom Menace with Indy super imposed over Anakin. I mean, Dr Jones did seem a little superhuman, ever seen a midi-chlorian count on him? Yeah we're doomed, and not in that awesome Calimah-Shok-D'Dey Temple of Doom kind of way, but in the way that Hayden Christensen's "acting" career is. Wait, where was I? Sorry, got lost in Hayden's eyes, they're so..... void of talent.

  46. Used to work on the Paramount lot... by C10H14N2 · · Score: 2, Informative

    ...so I'm getting a kick...

    No, really, once you're past the front gate, it is absolutely astonishing how little security there is. Unless you're obviously over-the-top out of place (like, say, streaking, maybe), people just leave you alone--and hauling a cart full of equipment back and forth to the parking lot is actually /less/ suspicious in that environment than wandering around with nothing in hand.

    I mean, just imagine what a nightmare a facility like that would be if they stopped and questioned everyone pushing a loaded dolly.

  47. steal the script? Not a bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1) Steal script
    2) De-crap-ify it, removing Short Stop, Jar Jar, and similar BS.
    3) Add in Lara Croft cameo somewhere. Why not?
    4) Compile re-written script
    5) Unsteal it
    6) ????
    7) Profit!

  48. Like Belloq said... by Lurker2288 · · Score: 1

    "Once again Dr. Jones, we see that there is nothing that you can possess which I cannot take away."

  49. Backup by kalel666 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Fortunately, everything was backed up on Francis Ford Coppollas hard drive.

    Oh, shit.

    --
    I HAVE CUBIC WISDOM THAT TRANSCENDS AND CONTRADICTS ONE DAY GODS
  50. Re:I got to know by aicrules · · Score: 1

    Strong encryption on the desktop? Or maybe better human security. I'm tired of strong encryption/other computer security bogging down the PC I work on, the network I use to work with files, etc...I'd rather have a security by fear (death by firing squad for offenders) so that it doesn't take me 15 minutes to open a file while anti-virus and other security software compete back and forth checking each other's attempts to check what's going on.

  51. I hope the thief enjoys his time in by shelterpaw · · Score: 1

    pound you in the ass prison.

  52. ha! by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    Nice one :)

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  53. but the people of hollywood are REALLY NICE. by Punto · · Score: 1

    I hope he kept backups.. I wonder if he is being asked if he'll leave los angeles because of this.

    --

    --
    Stay tuned for some shock and awe coming right up after this messages!

  54. From the Indy 4 script by Dachannien · · Score: 1

    Mola Ram: The computers are mine!
    Indiana Jones: You betrayed Spielberg! Oy, vey, lotta chutzpah that took! You betrayed Spielberg!
    The computers glow red hot and plummet into the gorge. Mola Ram grabs the last one, burns his hand, loses his grip, and plunges after them, only to be eaten by a rancor when he reaches the river below. Cue gratuitous ring explosion, roll credits.

    1. Re:From the Indy 4 script by griffjon · · Score: 1

      ...You left out "Georgia[1]," Indy's new humorous "side kick" with obvious merchandising appeal to the kids who accidentally tips the computers over the edge and says "ooops-a, was dat me-ah?"

      [1] Say it fast enough, it sounds a bit like ... you know.

      --
      Returned Peace Corps IT Volunteer
  55. FBI? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We have been told that the thief was apprehended by LAPD and the FBI with the help of a member of the online press that had been offered the stolen property. Well, the FBI and the CIA can't find Osama but it's good to know that they're always there to take down the Dr. Evil of professional crime.
  56. I bet it was Nazis. . . by uberjoe · · Score: 3, Funny

    I hate those guys.

    --

    The days of the digital watch are numbered.

    1. Re:I bet it was Nazis. . . by echucker · · Score: 1

      Were they from Illinois?

  57. Not Universal, Paramount and Dreamworks by Helevius · · Score: 1

    RTFA -- Spielberg doesn't work for Universal Studios.

  58. Is it that bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only $2,000 for the script ? Is the script that bad ?

  59. Another obligatory quote. by GMFTatsujin · · Score: 1

    "Throw me the paperwork, I throw you the whip!"

  60. Tyrone Bigguns? by photomonkey · · Score: 1

    So, sorry for not being up to speed on this, but how much crack or meth can you buy for $2,000?

    --
    Message contains 1 attachment: spam.gif
  61. $2000 and some Skittles. by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1
    The thief started contacting multiple entertainment websites including TMZ.com and offering the stolen goods for a sum of $2000.00."

    ... and "a pack of Tropical Fruit Bubblicious" and some "Skittles".

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    1. Re:$2000 and some Skittles. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First he asked for Eleventy billion dollars... but that got a good laugh, so he dropped the price, and also asked for some Tic Tacs. (In addition to the skittles...)

  62. Ambiguous, deliberately? :-) by crovira · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I don't plan on going either...

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
  63. I know who stole it... by corifornia2 · · Score: 0

    I'd check with George Lucas, he's notorious for stealing scripts...

    I just don't get why he'd steal something he owns the rights to...

  64. Poor Indiana.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. Indiana Jones rocks, this sucks.
    2. Spielberg and his crew would probably pay a heck of a lot more than a paltry sum of $2000 to get their IP and hard work back.

    I hope this doesn't damage the production.

    Ryan

  65. Hey. I'd pay money to see that... by crovira · · Score: 1

    I mean "Nazi zombies, aliens from the planet Transexual (they look like Ann Coulter and Tim Curry), Hitler in combat exoskeleton with dual Gatling guns, lesbian mermaid vampires, Xenu and Krishna in a battle royale," sounds like a friggin' comedy film.

    Where's Mel Brooks when you need him?

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
  66. Hotel room bust by RayHs · · Score: 1

    Soon to be disclosed, the unnamed online reporter was actually Steven Spielberg. Audio of the operation to be released: Don't let nobody out of this room. (Expletive.) Think you can steal my (expletive) and sell it?

  67. Somethings wrong with this story by specmac · · Score: 1

    May be nothing, but I'm surprised nobody noticed. The article says he was arrested at 4:00pm PST and implies it was today. As of the time of posting this message it is only 1:30pm PST.

  68. So by hcdejong · · Score: 3, Funny

    they lost the plot, then?

    1. Re:So by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This *is* the plot.

  69. Thief apprehended - in the future?!? by Caduceus1 · · Score: 1

    The article at IESB has apparently been updated - to say that the thief had been apprehended in a sting operation, at 4:00pm PST.

    Very interesting, considering that right now its 5:26pm EDT. That would make it 2:26pm PDT, and allowing for the timezone error, it would be 1:26pm PST. So he hasn't actually been apprehended yet.

    I wonder if this knowledge from the future will reach him in time to change his fate...

    --
    rm /dev/mem
    Sci-Fi Storm
  70. Disregard by Caduceus1 · · Score: 1

    The font was too small on the date...the article is in fact from YESTERDAY.

    Nothing to see here. Move along.

    --
    rm /dev/mem
    Sci-Fi Storm
  71. how about a conviction? by tacokill · · Score: 1

    The reason they say "alleged" is because you are innocent until PROVEN guilty in a court of law. Until a court of law convicts the perpetrator, there is no legal crime.

    It has nothing to do with being sued or not. It has to do with one of the founding principles of our country: innocent until proven guilty.

    Being arrested is not the same as being convicted. Big big difference.

  72. idea! by Unordained · · Score: 1

    We should turn slashdot into a wiki site -- not only can you post comments and moderate, but you can directly edit the topic summary as well! Maybe the entire discussion can be turned into a wiki -- constantly rebuilding itself into a summary of the opinions and argumentation of the various sides of the issue ... if you've got time to comment, you should have time to clean, classify, and arrange your argument into a larger context, cite sources, and most particularly: keep quiet if the basic point you're making has already been made. That'd be *awesome*.

  73. Some say this has already happened by pitu · · Score: 1

    ... and that he went back,[have been] had removed the grammar errors and while [beeing have] doing it decided to
      remove the article all together...

    1. Re:Some say this has already happened by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MOD +1 funny for the use of the time-travel tense!

      (with thanks to the HHG2G, no doubt)

  74. did we not just do this? by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1

    didn't we *just* go through this with Francis Ford Coppola? http://www.cnn.com/2007/SHOWBIZ/Movies/09/27/people.coppola.ap/index.htmlyou'd think that people would invest in better locks when they have that kind of thing lying about.

    --
    I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
  75. Re:I got to know by bckrispi · · Score: 1

    He is not an archaeologist, he is a treasure hunter...
    Let me guess, "Archaeologists don't follow maps to buried treasure, and 'X' never marks the spot?"
    --
    Xenon, where's my money? -Borno
  76. How he was caught... by Cervantes · · Score: 1

    The thief was smart enough to sneak past all the booby-traps and undead guards, but after he made it home with his ill-gotten gains, he paused to read the script. He was apprehended at the gate of the movie lot the next day, along with a heavily-rewritten copy of the script and some production stills he'd photoshopped to include himself in. Rumour has it he was shouting that he'd offer the rewritten script for $2000, but The Director turned down the offer as "overpriced".

    As an amusing aside, when the arrest happened and security began running all over, Ben Affleck was spotted running the opposite direction, and had to be stopped by screams of "Ben, don't worry, they didn't find any dead hookers today, you're ok!"

    --
    If I knew the wedgies I gave you back in 6th grade would have resulted in this . . . I might have taken a moments pause.
  77. Re:steal the script? Not a bad idea by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1
    De-crap-ify it, removing Short Stop, Jar Jar, and similar BS.

    That's Short ROUND. --And I thought several of the scenes he was in were classic! (His fight with the prince mirroring Indy's fight with the giant. I also liked the argument over poker while whatshername screamed at snakes and bats and such. Spielberg at his best.) Short Round was a fine addition to the "Bold Explorer of the 30's" pulp thing.

    Jar Jar was a baffling waste of screen time, though. The Phantom Edit did its best to take care of that.

    As for Indy IV. . .

    I'll probably watch it, but I don't have my hopes up. The third one left me scratching my head.


    -FL

  78. Re; Spielberg got robbed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Over 2000 production stills, plenty of sensitive paperwork including a complete production budget breakdown, possibly the script from Indiana Jones 4 and multiple computers were stolen from Steven Spielberg's Universal Studio office. The thief started contacting multiple entertainment websites including TMZ.com and offering the stolen goods for a sum of $2000.00.


    I guess this is sorta news. Of course it would have been *real* news, if back in the day someone had robbed stuff from Rod Serling that he'd ripped off from real authors. But is this is the Bushco era after all, or something like that.

    Check the guy's TV credits. Maybe he is the reincarnation of Rod Serling?
  79. an outrage! by adrianmonk · · Score: 1

    This is an outrage! They should do something about it! If there were only someone with connections to the Hollywood movie who they could get in touch with and who could help them out, help them go after those guys and get their stuff back. Someone strong... like maybe a former football player or something...

  80. Wow. by Valdrax · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm sorry. I don't mean to be rude, but I read Slashdot because I don't have time to read a dozen articles about nonsense. I instead read a quick summary and fire off a comment if it strikes me as worth it. I've done so for many years, and will continue to do so.

    You mean you're actually proud enough of spouting your mouth off in ignorance to defend it as the superior option to either (a) shutting up or (b) doing a little reading? Give this man a management position! He's obviously more important that the people who read his words.

    There's not much I can do about that without adding a 25th hour to the day.

    You know what would save even more time -- not posting. With all that not posting, you might actually find the time to read something -- especially if you're posting replies to other people's replies to your posts.

    Yeesh... What a disgustingly indolent and contemptuous attitude does it take to not be a little ashamed of being wrong because you didn't do your homework? I know I often shoot my mouth off on Slashdot without having read the article, but at least I have the humility to be a little ashamed when I'm caught at it and not fire off a comment about how I can't be bothered with it.

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    1. Re:Wow. by rtb61 · · Score: 1
      I sometimes find myself feeding the trolls and adding to off topic threads, whilst sometimes, somewhat justified, it is hardly contributing to the /. ethos and spirit.

      Whoops, done it again ;).

      Back on topic I found the follow on link to the article to be very interesting and well worth reading http://www.mcnblogs.com/thehotblog/archives/2007/10/when_it_gets_in_1.html. Mass media pilfering from the internet with out crediting the source, whoda thunk it.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    2. Re:Wow. by ajs · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry. I don't mean to be rude, but I read Slashdot because I don't have time to read a dozen articles about nonsense. I instead read a quick summary and fire off a comment if it strikes me as worth it. I've done so for many years, and will continue to do so.

      You mean you're actually proud enough of spouting your mouth off in ignorance to defend it as the superior option to either (a) shutting up or (b) doing a little reading? Let me ask you a question: when is the last time that you fact-checked one of the articles that Slashdot points to? I've done it, but it's something I've done an order of magnitude less often than my already infrequent browsing of the article itself. I would not presume to claim any authority over a topic just because I read the (usually atrocious) article that Slashdot linked to.

      No, the solution is to be broadly well read. Reading Slashdot is only one vector for such a regimen. Reading the Wall St. Journal infrequently; browsing Reuters headlines daily and reading summaries on other sites (like Digg) gives me a broad understanding of what's going on. I drill down for depth when I feel that my life will somehow be made more complete by understanding a topic more fully.