Slashdot Mirror


360 And Halo 3 Push Past the Wii's Sales

GameDaily has the NPD numbers for September, and they're impressive if only because for the first time in months Nintendo isn't dominating the top of every list. Total sales across the industry hit $1.36 billion (a 74% bump over last year), mostly fueled by Halo 3 sales. The game (across all skus) sold some 3.3 million units, while Xbox 360 platforms hit about 528,000 units sold last month. Ironically, the Wii had its second best month ever and the DS sold big numbers thanks to Phantom Hourglass. "Nintendo's Wii, despite not really having any significant new software releases, was close behind with 501K units sold. The DS handheld also did quite well, selling another 495.8K. Looking at Sony's platforms, the PS3 sold just 119.4K units, while the surging PSP sold 284.5K and the PS2 maintained healthy sales at 215K." The piece also offers up analysis from an NPD researcher, who feels Microsoft is likely to maintain some good momentum through the holidays.

309 comments

  1. Great news for MS! by machinecraig · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sounds like MS can keep their lead as long as they release a Halo-class game every month! If only they had thought of that sooner!

    1. Re:Great news for MS! by Gravatron · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Isn't it a bit odd that Sony or MS have to release a major game to increase sales, but nintendo can sell on it's hype alone? I mean, the wii's game drought is worse than Sony's, but they still beat them in sales. And Poor MS can bring out game after game and still not catch up most weeks.

      I owned a wii, and sold it a few months later. It just wasn't as good a console as the hype made it out to be. My ps3 and 360, on the other hand, more than paid for themselves since I got them in the summer. Not being able to play galaxy or smash brothers hurts, but thats made up by the titles on the other two.

    2. Re:Great news for MS! by aichpvee · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Shouldn't be too hard, they churn out mediocre games all the time.

      --
      The Farewell Tour II
    3. Re:Great news for MS! by b96miata · · Score: 5, Funny

      Paid for themselves? Are you making money off your consoles?

    4. Re:Great news for MS! by ArtDent · · Score: 5, Informative

      Seriously. And that's just in America. They'll need to do it every two weeks to win worldwide.

      What you just heard was the sound of Microsoft rather unimpressively blowing its load.

      They just released what will probably be the biggest game ever on the console (or is there going to be a Halo 4?), and only managed to squeeze past Wii by 27,000 units (about 5%). And this in the 360's strongest territory.

      Worldwide, Wii outsold 360 in September, 1,075,000 to 735,000. The 360 managed to hold a lead over Wii for a mere two weeks and is now trailing again.

    5. Re:Great news for MS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I still don't get why everyone's comparing the $2 special, Gen1.5 "Wii" against true "next-gen" (Gen2.0) consoles?

      On a technological basis, the Wii is more accurately compared to a PS/2 and/or Xbox than either the PS/3 or 360... The machine is vastly subpar on spec, and it's kitschy. Neither of which makes it good, and since it's 4+ yr old tech under the hood, they can virtually sell them in dollar-stores... Gee, I wonder why it's selling out? -- It's b/c everybody who can scrape two-bits and a shoelace together can buy one and con themselves into believing they're part of the "Gen2.0" set...

      -AC

    6. Re:Great news for MS! by Pojut · · Score: 2, Informative

      I still don't get why everyone's comparing the $2 special, Gen1.5 "Wii" against true "next-gen" (Gen2.0) consoles?


      Maybe you are just super-young, or maybe you just aren't as hopelessly nerdy as me, but the Wii/360/PS3 is considered the 7th generation....GC/Xbox/PS2 were considered 6th...
    7. Re:Great news for MS! by JCSoRocks · · Score: 1

      Heck yes 7th Generation... Generation 2.0? what? Is he crazy? that makes ps2/game cube/xbox Generation 1? What, did Microsoft officially start console gaming so they're Generation 1? Comedy...

      Why did wii sales spike? Probably because parents got to the store where they were going to buy an Xbox 360 for their kids and then they saw the price tag and then the sales guy told them about the "red ring of death" and they thought... screw that! I'm buying a wii and a million games for the price of just the Xbox 360 (and no, I'm not counting the 'basic' version of the XBox as the cheapest, no one buys that thing). Plus, although it's winter I don't need another space heater.

      --
      You are using English. Please learn the difference between loose and lose; they're, there, and their; your and you're.
    8. Re:Great news for MS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Difference class of systems, what did you expect? They're not competing directly. I could fart more power than the Wii has.

    9. Re:Great news for MS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MS has been beating Nintendo in game sales for a long time now, and this trend doesn't look likely to reverse. Last month they completely dominated the sales charts for games. Nintendo may be selling lots of systems, but they are not keeping up with game sales.

    10. Re:Great news for MS! by Pojut · · Score: 1

      Plus, although it's winter I don't need another space heater.


      I bought my 360 at launch...It didn't me long to realize that it would heat up the entire room rather quickly. In the summer, this sucks complete monkey balls.

      In the winter (due to where I live) it's CHEAPER to run the 360 to heat the family room to "comfort" status than it is to use our central heating system...go figure.

      I would have to say that the heat output is really the only complaint that I have about the system (well, that and the fact that it blows as a DVD player...can't read 1 out of 10 DVD movies I put in there)...RRoD and all that noise, I've never had a single issue with any of the three 360's that I own (knock on wood)...two of those 360's are tucked away inside a media center, no less!
    11. Re:Great news for MS! by morari · · Score: 1

      They just released what will probably be the biggest game ever on the console True, but very sad. The Halo series is such an uninspired one. It's too bad the masses can't manage to latch onto something not so overrated.
      --
      "He who can destroy a thing, controls a thing." --Paul Atreides, Dune
    12. Re:Great news for MS! by Gravatron · · Score: 1, Insightful

      it's an expression. Just saying the amount of hours i've put into gaming with them justified their purchases in my mind.

    13. Re:Great news for MS! by Gravatron · · Score: 1

      Alot of the games are good, just not steller. I had fun with resistance, obivian, and Sigma, nto to mention graw2 and vegas, despite thier also being on the 360. Warhawk is fun as well, as is folklore. Also plannign on picking up rachet and eye of judgement this month, both of which have me drooling. Everyday shooter is grand as well, both gameplay wise and in it's experience. At Any rate, it's giving me more games to play than my wii did back when I still had it. I've yet to get some of the back catalog games like motorstorm, but i'll just get them when they become greatest hits or something. More looking at the upcomming list and trying to budget out all my purchases.

    14. Re:Great news for MS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Resistance Fall of Man
      Warhawk
      Heavenly Sword
      Ninja Gaiden Sigma (ya... looks better on the original XBox... riiiiiiight)
      coming out -
      Haze
      Little Big Planet
      MGS4

      I'm sure you'll come back saying "what only 3?" but you asked for a list, so I provided what my mind could dream up in 10 seconds or less. Or that HS is too short (Quality over Quantity, isn't that what Wii fanboys say?)

    15. Re:Great news for MS! by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Ah, but if they did, your hipster-ism and built-in hatred of anything popular would then force you to hate that game! Then in a few years (once Halo became 'retro' enough to be cool again), you'd decry "too bad the masses latch on to MegaKill and not something so overrated, like Halo." Then you could adjust your tinted glasses and ironic t-shirt and move on to hating popular movies instead.

    16. Re:Great news for MS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't it a bit odd that Sony or MS have to release a major game to increase sales, but nintendo can sell on it's hype alone?

      Much odder that such dreck can get modded up.

      Wii hasn't had sustained success for 11 months now because of "hype". It's fun for people who don't typically enjoy video games, and that's proven to be a HUGE new market segment.

      Your personal experience as a hardcore gamer who blows money buying every system in existence doesn't extend to the rest of the world's. Grow up, and look outside your own perspective once in a while.
    17. Re:Great news for MS! by Burning1 · · Score: 5, Funny

      He's counting the money he saved by playing video games rather than going out on dates. ; )

    18. Re:Great news for MS! by supermank17 · · Score: 1

      Out of curiosity, what games are there that are decent for the PS3? I have both a Wii and a 360, and have tons of games for those (Metroid, Zelda, Paper Mario, Bioshock, Halo, etc.) but I haven't seen much for the PS3 thus far that's interested me. Have there been some releases that I've missed that have made the PS3 more attractive? I've thus far avoided it because of the lack of games, but if that's turning around...

    19. Re:Great news for MS! by bealzabobs_youruncle · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Too bad the Wii has shit for games, so it is more an overpriced dust collector than a game console. I don't want a console desgined to appeal to my grandparents... ever.

    20. Re:Great news for MS! by enderjsv · · Score: 1

      Blakey Rat, never before has someone been able to form the words I wished to say but was never articulate enough to express. Sir, you complete me.

    21. Re:Great news for MS! by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 2, Informative

      Personally, I think the feature set of the Xbox should put it in the "current generation" (or generation 7 as you call it), rather than the last generation.

      Like the other current-gen consoles (Xbox 360, PS3, Wii), the Xbox has:
      * Integrated storage, no requirement to buy memory cards
      * Integrated network connectivity, not a plug-in widget to provide it
      * Online service to assist in the hosting of multiplayer games
      * Online game-purchasing/download service

      The Dreamcast, PS2, and Gamecube had none of those. The Xbox, Xbox 360, Wii, and PS3 have all of them. Seems like an obvious place to draw the line.

    22. Re:Great news for MS! by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      Hate to reply to my own post, but you can also add:

      * HD video quality support (HD being designed as "higher than 280p")

      To that list.

    23. Re:Great news for MS! by Pojut · · Score: 1

      The dreamcast actually had a built-in modem...now, you could replace it with a FASTER modem, but it did come with a modem built-in...

      No integrated storage though.

    24. Re:Great news for MS! by morari · · Score: 1
      I enjoy plenty of popular games. Halo doesn't deserve its popular status however, thus it is overrated. The gameplay is stale, the story even more contrived than usual, the graphics always sub-par, etc. It's a simple trend of console kiddies having never seen or played a truly polished FPS before.

      I do, however, hate most popular films. It's too bad your reasoning is so far off base.

      --
      "He who can destroy a thing, controls a thing." --Paul Atreides, Dune
    25. Re:Great news for MS! by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't call a modem "network connectivity," personally. But, you could easily re-word that first point to say "broadband" or specifically "ethernet."

    26. Re:Great news for MS! by theantipop · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Wait, so you ditched you Wii after a few months of ownership and compare it to the PS3 a year after it was released? Maybe you don't like the games available for the Wii (from the ones you listed it sounds like you wouldn't), but to claim there is a game drought or there are no quality games available is ridiculous.

    27. Re:Great news for MS! by theantipop · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Have you ever thought maybe the Wii isn't selling on hype alone? That poeple might actually enjoy playing games on it? Sounds crazy, I know, but it's possible.

    28. Re:Great news for MS! by Pojut · · Score: 1

      On the contrary, the Dreamcast was regarded as the first console that came out of the box with some form of network connectivity...Granted, there was Xband and all that noise prior to the Dreamcast, but the Dreamcast was still the first to have it built in...also, keep in mind that at the time the Dreamcast was released, market penetration for broadband was next to nothing in the US

    29. Re:Great news for MS! by Yahweh+Doesn't+Exist · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      >so I provided what my mind could dream up in 10 seconds or less

      what if I paid you for 10 hours to come up with a list? how much longer would it be? ...

      exactly.

    30. Re:Great news for MS! by TemporalBeing · · Score: 1

      but nintendo can sell on it's hype alone?
      I've played a Wii. Don't own one yet, but can't wait until I do. Regardless, I would not say that the Wii is selling due to hype at all. Every claim Nintendo made about it is coming true, and people are seeing it. That's not hype.

      Additionally, the Wii is portable enough that people take it around places and show it to others, so then others taste it and then get in line to buy it too. (I've known I was going to get one when it was still called Revolution, but that is still the case for the average person.)

      I just wonder what Wii sales will be like when they do get a big release out for it. If PS3/Xbox have to have a big release to get people to buy, and Wii doesn't - then that big release may make it all the bigger.

      On the other hand, the Wii is going for a different market - one that isn't necessarily going to go out and buy the latest games. So it probably has a lower game sale threshold, but a greater market capacity - capacity that has yet to be filled. So even that lower threshold will probably be good competition for PS3/Xbox.
      --
      Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away. - Elvis Presley (source: imdb.com)
    31. Re:Great news for MS! by DeepZenPill · · Score: 1

      People like you are why (and me, and many others) are why all of this talk of a "winner" this generation are pointless. The Wii may sell many more consoles, but it's not going to capture the hardcore gamer segment without games with substance. Hardcore gamers buy games. They buy a lot of games. Casual gamers, on the other hand, the ones lured to the Wii because of its novelty and low price, really aren't likely to buy many games. They're not going to wear themselves out on Wii Sports and want to fill the void with dozens of other games because gaming isn't a priority in their lives.

      I want to play Smash bros, Mario Galaxy, and Kart, but those titles alone aren't enough to justify buying another system when my current one has no shortage of good games.

      Fortunately for Nintendo, they're also making a profit on the hardware, but I'm going to make the wild prediction that they don't sell nearly as many games as their two competitors. They're going to be a profitable company and whether they're #1 in system sales or not is irrelevant. The only question left is whether MS and/or Sony can actually make a profit this round, and that absolutely depends on the strength of the library. Take a look at the ratings and sales numbers and it's clear who is winning that war.

    32. Re:Great news for MS! by Frenchy_2001 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Could it be that (shock and surprise!) you are not the target market for the wii?

      The usual gamers and most people that spend lots of time on video games and expect deep engaging contents are NOT what Nintendo is aiming the wii at. I know it is disappointing for that crowd to not be the focus of the biggest console maker, but this is the choice Nintendo has made this generation: instead of targeting gamers and competing with the other 2, they went for the casual market and brought back gaming as a family activity.

      I agree to everything you say on the Wii. It does have a lot of hype and it lacks new games. But this does not takes its qualities away. It is a perfect game for casual gamers. It is the only console where you can get anyone to play with you, from 6 to 80 years old. I've gotten my 6 year old niece to play wii sport (she loves the bowling game) or wii play (she likes fishing) and even my step mother (age 60+) played wii sport with us.

      The people buying are not "gamers". They just enjoyed so much wii sport at a friend's house, that they are looking for one for themselves. The wii so far is pretty much a wii sport machine, but most of those people have been brought up on Mario and they will probably take the jump when galaxy is released.

      I would not be surprised if the wii trailed the 2 other consoles on software/machine, as the people will really concentrate on a few games only, but this is not a real problem for nintendo, as they are making money on the console itself. 3rd party will need to understand their market to make money (look at ubisoft and rayman), but there will be potential for it.

      So, the difficulty of finding a wii is not so much due to the hype than to the viral effect (about 20% coming to play with us at home want to get one afterward). Supply is only now catching up with the demand (a YEAR later!).

      Oh, by the way, although MS is doing great sales with Halo3, This might be the only quarter they will get a positive cash flow again (on the xbox1, the quarters they released halo1 and halo2 were the only positive ones). This is the fact that worries me most about MS' future in the game market. So far, it is a money pit for them (about $2 billions per generation).

    33. Re:Great news for MS! by 3choTh1s · · Score: 1

      Worldwide, Wii outsold 360 in September, 1,075,000 to 735,000. The 360 managed to hold a lead over Wii for a mere two weeks and is now trailing again.
      And this is why I hate articles like this. What is this some kind of freakin contest? Wii sold blah. 360 sold more blah. And then the Ps3 is blah behind. Who cares! I surely don't care who is in the "lead" as long as the consoles I have still put out decent games. Both the Xbox 360(which I own) and the Wii(which I want) have very solid exclusive titles. Sometimes I want to wave around a stick to feel immersed in the game and sometimes I don't. Tennis? Sure move that thang. Street Fighter 4? ummm no, do not make me do a Shoryuken just so that one of my fighters can beat the computer. Gah. People please get over the numbers and just play the game.
    34. Re:Great news for MS! by d34thm0nk3y · · Score: 1

      Heh, check out Gravatron's posting history...

    35. Re:Great news for MS! by cornface · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I see this factoid tossed around quite a bit. Is there any actual evidence that it is selling to people who don't normally enjoy video games rather than last-gen console owners who wanted something new to play while they were waiting for the 360 and PS3 to come down in price?

      I have a lot of trouble believing that a mediocre game library and a magical remote control are convincing non-gamers to spend several hundred dollars on games, who weren't previously swayed by the hugely broad libraries and discounted prices of the PS2 and Gameboy.

      Even a link to a consumer survey would be nice. I'm not saying it isn't true, but saying it doesn't make it true.

    36. Re:Great news for MS! by ThePhilips · · Score: 1

      I have a lot of trouble believing that a mediocre game library and a magical remote control are convincing non-gamers to spend several hundred dollars on games, who weren't previously swayed by the hugely broad libraries and discounted prices of the PS2 and Gameboy.

      Well, there is a difference between "games" and "entertainment". Wii is entertainment - accessible to anybody. At $250 with included WiiSports it is already a good deal for most of not-cash-constrained casual demographic. Say, 5 visits to local bowling at $50 each - that already makes it a "great deal". Because Wii is like bowling in your own house. (Though most gaming teenagers do have problems understanding the "going out" thing. It's pure adult thing.)

      It's not about "games" - you teenagers used to play for 8+ hours per day. It's about "entertainment" - something to break a daily routine.

      to spend several hundred dollars on games

      Wii sells right now solely as entertainment machine. Because there is only a handful of real "games" for it - what is absolutely irrelevant to casual demographics which is fine with WiiSports. As well as it was reported numerous times that Wii has quite low attachment rate. Casuals do not buy games - WiiSports for 80% of people is more than enough.

      P.S. Disclaimer: Wii owner. Enjoying Zelda, WiiSports, Excite Truck and MySims. Probably will take a look a Metroid when it hits Europe next week.

      --
      All hope abandon ye who enter here.
    37. Re:Great news for MS! by Khaed · · Score: 1

      The usual gamers and most people that spend lots of time on video games and expect deep engaging contents are NOT what Nintendo is aiming the wii at.

      I don't know, Zelda was pretty freaking deep.

      Thing is, how many of the "deep" games for the other consoles are first party? The reason there aren't matching games for the Wii: Nintendo lost developer support after the N64. It'll come back now that they're making embarrassingly large amounts of money, but "deep" games don't just pop up overnight.

      I don't think Nintendo is abandoning the hardcore gamer, at least not entirely. I just think they're putting more effort into new gamers right now.

    38. Re:Great news for MS! by nuzak · · Score: 1

      > Could it be that (shock and surprise!) you are not the target market for the wii?

      Fine. Then can we stop comparing them with sales figures for other markets?

      --
      Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
    39. Re:Great news for MS! by tholomyes · · Score: 1

      The gameplay is stale, the story even more contrived than usual, the graphics always sub-par, etc.

      While I agree on all of those points, except for maybe the nebulous "etc.", Halo delivers in an replay value that's self-perpetuating: the online modes are plentiful, the "sub-par" graphics (leagues beyond where anything was ten years ago, but, eh) keep the frame rates up, and its own success ensures that when you go online, if your friends aren't already there to play it with, there will be a few hundred thousand other people to play with.

      I enjoyed going through the campaign on co-op, but I probably wouldn't replay it solo. I'm also not a huge fan of their online compared to, say, Team Fortress 2, but it's a lot easier to find a game.

      Plus, it keeps these annoying console kiddies who are screaming profanities from a wholesale invasion of the other XBox Live games I find enjoyable (read: skate. ;) ).

      --
      When did the future switch from being a promise to a threat? -C. Palahniuk
    40. Re:Great news for MS! by sg3000 · · Score: 1

      > Personally, I think the feature set of the Xbox should put it in the "current generation" (or generation 7 as you call it), rather than the last generation.

      > Integrated network connectivity, not a plug-in widget to provide it

      The PS2 has built-in Ethernet

      > Online service to assist in the hosting of multiplayer games

      PS2 games have this on a per game basis, but nothing that requires a subscription. Microsoft definitely changed the model by offering this, but note that Sony didn't follow suit for the PS3; they still don't charge. The subscription service part of the XBox is the main reason I'm not interested.

      > HD video quality support (HD being designed as "higher than 280p")

      The PS2 supports 480p for some games and even 1080i (for some parts of Gran Turismo).

      So the PS2 meets many of the requirements you set up.

      As for the other features, I think those are a matter of choice for the console, rather than elements of a "next gen console" (or 7th generation console). We could set up other requirements that exclude the XBox 360. For example, one could say that integrated next generation media (i.e., Bluray) is a requirement, as the Xbox 360 only supports HD-DVD as an add-on.

      It's probably simplest to categorize console's generations by their release year, since that's one of the pure objective ways of doing it.

      --
      Insert simplistic political, ideological, or personal proselytization here.
    41. Re:Great news for MS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see this factoid tossed around quite a bit.

      Yes, most often by Nintendo themselves.

      Is there any actual evidence that it is selling to people who don't normally enjoy video games


      Is there any actual evidence that Wii is selling based on "hype" or "being a fad" any of the other lame alternative explanations that, after 11 months of sustained success, are getting silly and stale?
    42. Re:Great news for MS! by magus_melchior · · Score: 1

      For that matter, can we stop promoting articles featuring sales comparisons?

      --
      "We are Microsoft. You shall be assimilated. Competition is futile."
    43. Re:Great news for MS! by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      Isn't it a bit odd that Sony or MS have to release a major game to increase sales, but nintendo can sell on it's hype alone?

      Of course what you meant to say is that "but Nintendo can sell based on its existing game library alone?"

      Or are you seriously suggesting that the Wii is selling based on hype, but Halo 3/Xbox360 is not ... despite the huge marketing campaign designed to hype the game.

      The bottom line is that regardless of whether you personally like the Wii or not, many, many people do like the Wii and are going to buy one and find the existing library of games very fun.

      What this really means is that there were a lot of people who didn't find the Xbox360 interesting enough to buy until it got its own Halo game.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    44. Re:Great news for MS! by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      The PS2 has built-in Ethernet

      Mine doesn't... did I get ripped off?

      PS2 games have this on a per game basis, but nothing that requires a subscription. Microsoft definitely changed the model by offering this, but note that Sony didn't follow suit for the PS3; they still don't charge. The subscription service part of the XBox is the main reason I'm not interested.

      My understanding is that the Sony "Home" Second Life-alike environment is supposed to provide this. I don't have a PS3, personally, so maybe somebody else can confirm this.

      The PS2 supports 480p for some games and even 1080i (for some parts of Gran Turismo).

      "Some parts?" Like your car enters the final stretch and the TV resolution changes? :)

      As for the other features, I think those are a matter of choice for the console, rather than elements of a "next gen console" (or 7th generation console). We could set up other requirements that exclude the XBox 360. For example, one could say that integrated next generation media (i.e., Bluray) is a requirement, as the Xbox 360 only supports HD-DVD as an add-on.

      From a "duh" viewpoint, it's pretty common sense that the Xbox 360 is in the same generation as the PS3 at least. If you define things so that it isn't, you're not going to have a lot of people using your classification. Personally, though, I think the Xbox is vastly different from the PS2/Gamecube, and it wouldn't be nearly so "duh".

      But oh well.

    45. Re:Great news for MS! by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Halo doesn't deserve its popular status however, thus it is overrated.

      On the contrary, I think Halo deserves its popular status if only so that Bungie can be appreciated for what they accomplished with Marathon, a woefully UNDER-rated game.

      I still think you're just a typical Slashdot hipster who must hate everything popular/mass media.

      The gameplay is stale, the story even more contrived than usual, the graphics always sub-par, etc.

      Gameplay: It's so stale, that must be why virtually every other FPS has ripped-off Halo's 'recharging shield/lifebar' design concept. And why half of those FPSes have also ripped-off Halo's 'carry two weapons only' design. If you don't think Halo has been influencial to the industry (the opposite of stale), then you're sadly mistaken.

      Story: Perhaps contrived, but they're working within a medium (FPS games) in which nearly every storyline is contrived. That aside, at least it's pretty damned original, which is a lot more than you can say for, for instance, Gears of War. In addition to that, it does a pretty job of getting the player into the game, at least players who aren't as jaded as you.

      Graphics: Sub-par compared to... what? Given, Halo 2 didn't exactly blow people away, but Halo 3 looks as nice as anything else on the market right now, and the original Halo definitely raised a few bars in the console world, if not necessarily the PC world.

      It's a simple trend of console kiddies having never seen or played a truly polished FPS before.

      Oh yeah, a "polished" FPS like Battlefield: 2142? A product so buggy that merely entering the actual game is a small miracle. There are polished console games and unpolished console games. There are very polished PC games and extremely unpolished POS PC games (like aforementioned Battlefield.) If anything, I'd say console games have the edge if only because at least the unpolished ones actually *work*, which isn't necessarily true of unpolished PC games.

      But making a claim that all PC games are more polished than all console games, that's just stupid.

      I do, however, hate most popular films. It's too bad your reasoning is so far off base.

      Is it? Considering you've given either wrong or vague reasons to dislike Halo, and you admit that you hate popular films, I think my reasoning is dead on.

    46. Re:Great news for MS! by MilenCent · · Score: 1

      It's an insightful point you make about the Wii's game drought. The only really big Wii titles have been Wii Sports (which was a surprise; we still play it even now), Zelda and Metroid. There are some other games that are sorta interesting: we've gotten surprising play out of Wii Play's Tanks and Billiards modules. But nothing really meaty. The only thing that really offsets it is Virtual Console.

      Once Mario Galaxy and Smash Brawl make it out, though....

    47. Re:Great news for MS! by jma05 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > The gameplay is stale

      How so? The covenant were some of the most enjoyable enemies to fight. I came to console games after I decided that I played too many FPS, RTS games and wanted to try different genres. Halo is the only shooter I enjoyed on the console since and I probably played it more than any other single shooter on the PC.

      I think Halo has fantastic replay value in Solo alone. It can get quite addictive if you give it a chance. I think the constant weapon switching and duck for shield recharging mechanic keeps a player quite well engaged than the shooters before it. The AI enemies have much more distinct combat personalities too. Halo looks "sub par" to you only because, they focussed on gameplay. Halo 3 was very well funded and took enough time. They certainly did not lack the skill or money to produce better textures.

      > the story even more contrived than usual

      Somehow, contrived stories are common in "Sagas". Take Soul Reaver series for instance.

      > the graphics always sub-par

      But always very acceptable at the time of release. Don't we see good gameplay past the graphics.

      > It's a simple trend of console kiddies having never seen or played a truly polished FPS before.

      Turns out that Halo is the official game of my gym class (everyone over 27). Everyone with an XBox plays Halo and almost nothing else on it. We don't play online. But 4 player death matches are a norm at our socials.

    48. Re:Great news for MS! by scot4875 · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but if you're going to pass up Smash Bros: Brawl, Mario Galaxy, and Mario Kart (and presumably, Metroid Prime 3 and Zelda: Twilight Princess), you fail at being a hardcore gamer.

      --Jeremy

      --
      Jesus was a liberal
    49. Re:Great news for MS! by morari · · Score: 1
      Normally I would not make a post which breaks down and addresses each individual point, but in this case it seems best. It seems to me that I hit a nerve with you when it comes to Halo, as your textual tone seems to indicate quite a lot of personally inaccurate insults. I'm all for persons subscribing to differing tastes of entertainment, but a lot of what I state as Halo's faults aren't a simple process of whether or not I enjoyed it. I made the claim that it was overrated, not that it was a waste of a game. Now, in hopes of clarifying my position, I shall follow in suite...

      On the contrary, I think Halo deserves its popular status if only so that Bungie can be appreciated for what they accomplished with Marathon, a woefully UNDER-rated game.

      Halo very well may deserve a level of popularity, but being touting as the world's best game it does not. Furthermore, I don't think that Marathon is necessarily underrated so much as not well known.

      Gameplay: It's so stale, that must be why virtually every other FPS has ripped-off Halo's 'recharging shield/lifebar' design concept. And why half of those FPSes have also ripped-off Halo's 'carry two weapons only' design. If you don't think Halo has been influencial to the industry (the opposite of stale), then you're sadly mistaken.

      Virtually every other FPS? Hardly. Just off of the top of my head, I can only think of a few. Call of Duty now features regenerating health , which like Halo, makes the experience easier than it should be in most situations. As far as a limited carrying capacity, FEAR stands out as being one. Halo's "influence" on the industry isn't necessarily because its mechanics are better. Halo sells well, so most developers will naturally try to be more like it. In the cases stated however, limiting the amount of weapons one can carry has added a nice angle to gameplay.

      Story: Perhaps contrived, but they're working within a medium (FPS games) in which nearly every storyline is contrived. That aside, at least it's pretty damned original, which is a lot more than you can say for, for instance, Gears of War. In addition to that, it does a pretty job of getting the player into the game, at least players who aren't as jaded as you.

      Exactly why I mentioned that it is "more contrived than usual". Video games, and the FPS genre specifically, tend to have rather lame plots. I don't think that it pulls the player in any more than other high-profile titles though. Besides, Halo has some of the most annoying enemies every. Not annoying because of their tactics either, but because of their personalities.

      Graphics: Sub-par compared to... what? Given, Halo 2 didn't exactly blow people away, but Halo 3 looks as nice as anything else on the market right now, and the original Halo definitely raised a few bars in the console world, if not necessarily the PC world.

      I was never particularly inspired by the graphics. I'm certainly not one that subscribes to a game simply because of graphics either. I only bring it up because people attempt to tout how great they are. While the open environments were fairly impressive (especially for a console title), I felt that most of the textures suffered from a lack of detail and almost all of the animations were hideous. More generally speaking however, the enemies and weapons lacked a lot of visual distinguish from one another.

      Oh yeah, a "polished" FPS like Battlefield: 2142? A product so buggy that merely entering the actual game is a small miracle. There are polished console games and unpolished console games. There are very polished PC games and extremely unpolished POS PC games (like aforementioned Battlefield.) If anything, I'd say console games have the edge if only because at least the unpolished ones actually *work*, which isn't necessarily true of unpolished PC games.

      But making a claim that all PC games are more polished than all console games, that's just stupid.

      I

      --
      "He who can destroy a thing, controls a thing." --Paul Atreides, Dune
    50. Re:Great news for MS! by cornface · · Score: 1


      Is there any actual evidence that Wii is selling based on "hype" or "being a fad" any of the other lame alternative explanations that, after 11 months of sustained success, are getting silly and stale?


      No, which I never claimed was the case...My point was that I haven't seen any concrete evidence one way or the other. Just a lot of what appear to be baseless assertations.

    51. Re:Great news for MS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just a lot of what appear to be baseless assertations.


      Only if you ignore Nintendo as a creditable source.
    52. Re:Great news for MS! by cornface · · Score: 1

      Well, I suppose asserting that anyone who likes playing video games is a shut in teenager is just one of many ways a person can act like a douche on the internet while joyously farting in the face of reality, considering that less than 30% of the game playing market is under 18.

      If that is what floats your condescending boat down the mighty River Smarmy, you might as well go with it.

    53. Re:Great news for MS! by cornface · · Score: 1

      I don't ignore them as a credible source, and appreciate the link to their financial report if it is you that posted it, but I didn't see any demographic data supporting their assertation.

      It is possible I missed it, or that it exists only in an underground bunker at Nintendo HQ.

    54. Re:Great news for MS! by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      Normally I would not make a post which breaks down and addresses each individual point, but in this case it seems best. It seems to me that I hit a nerve with you when it comes to Halo, as your textual tone seems to indicate quite a lot of personally inaccurate insults.

      I'm not able to read your "textual tone" very well because the smug condescension seems to be overpowering everything else...

      Halo very well may deserve a level of popularity, but being touting as the world's best game it does not.

      That's good, because nobody in this discussion ever touted it as the world's best game. You just made that up.

      Virtually every other FPS? Hardly. Just off of the top of my head, I can only think of a few. Call of Duty now features regenerating health , which like Halo, makes the experience easier than it should be in most situations. As far as a limited carrying capacity, FEAR stands out as being one. Halo's "influence" on the industry isn't necessarily because its mechanics are better. Halo sells well, so most developers will naturally try to be more like it. In the cases stated however, limiting the amount of weapons one can carry has added a nice angle to gameplay.

      Yada, yada, the point is that Halo's mechanics are not "stale" as you originally stated. If they were, there would be NO innovation for Call of Duty and FEAR to rip-off at all, because stale games do not do anything new or different. (Besides the point of how popular ripping-off Halo elements is.)

      Video games, and the FPS genre specifically, tend to have rather lame plots.

      Yes they do, but the entire point here is that Halo doesn't have a "rather lame plot." It actually has a relatively refreshingly original and creative storyline behind it, in a not-at-all-vague internally-consistant universe. Which is a lot more than you can say for Half-Life 2 and Gears of War, for instance.

      I only bring it up because people attempt to tout how great they are. While the open environments were fairly impressive (especially for a console title), I felt that most of the textures suffered from a lack of detail and almost all of the animations were hideous.

      Are you talking about Halo 1 specifically here? You're speaking in the past-tense here, and not acknowleding that Halo is a series of three games (each having its own graphics engine), so I really have no clue what exactly you're referring to.

      More generally speaking however, the enemies and weapons lacked a lot of visual distinguish from one another.

      What game are you comparing it to, here? Compared to almost every other title I've tried, the enemies and vehicles in Halo are remarkably varied. (There's no way to be looking at an Elite and confuse it for a Hunter, for instance. Although I suppose from a distance Brutes and Elites look a bit alike.)

      Animations in Halo 1 were not great, but they were on-par with other games that came out at the time. You can't fairly compare animations from Halo 1 with, say, Lost Planet.

      This is where I start to suspect you haven't even played Halo 2 & 3.

      I can't say that I've played it. All of the Battlefield games I have experienced have had an unfinished feel to them however. The series did start off as a World War II cash in though, so it's not surprising. I will agree that unpolished console games are typically better than unpolished PC games. I think that is more due to the nature of the hardware than anything though. You know what you're getting with a console and don't have to plan for various conflicts that might arise with differing PC configurations. Macs have this benefit as well.

      Yada, yada. The point is you're admitting now that PC games can be as, or more, unpolished as console games, which pretty much nullifies your earlier point. You don't need to write this many words to communicate, "boy howdy, I said something downright stupid!"

      The amount of sheer coverage and praise that Halo receives is ridiculous though, espe

    55. Re:Great news for MS! by TheVelvetFlamebait · · Score: 1

      Quality over Quantity, isn't that what Wii fanboys say?
      What else would you say? It's not like you're going to own every single game out for a single console. What would I care if there were a hundreds of decent games (over the console's lifetime) if I'm only ever going to buy around 20?
      --
      You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
    56. Re:Great news for MS! by LarsWestergren · · Score: 1

      It IS a pretty mediocre game though in my opinion (and yes, I have played it). Not bad by any means, just.... nothing special. The Zero punctuation review sums up my opinions pretty well.

      --

      Being bitter is drinking poison and hoping someone else will die

    57. Re:Great news for MS! by seebs · · Score: 1

      I sort of disagree.

      I am a serious, devoted, gamer. I have put in plenty of 80+-hour weeks of gaming. I have written games. I have written patches for games. Bioware liked my bug reports (think "over 180 bugs with detailed citations to rulebooks and/or reproducers") so much that they gave me a free copy of BG2. I own about a dozen console systems, and an average of about 15-20 games for each of them.

      I love the Wii. It's the best thing I've seen in video gaming in at least twenty years.

      This is not just for casuals; it's just that it's not aimed at the very narrow market (18-24 year old boys) that MS and Sony are fighting over -- the "hardcore" gamers who play a couple specific genres a lot, and feel like they'll attract more girls if they are violent and play games with a lot of cussing.

      There's a lot of good games out for the Wii right now. If you like 2D fighters (and what "real" gamer doesn't at least sometimes?), Guilty Gear is a solid choice. There's lots of games. Some of them aren't exactly smack dab in the middle of a well-established, well-understood, genre. That's okay! They can be fun without being easily categorized.

      I have a dozen Wii games and two PS3 games. About ten of those Wii games are more fun than either of the PS3 games, thus far.

      So... While it's true that many people buying Wiis aren't "gamers", many of them are. Perhaps more importantly, since a gamer is just someone who plays games, they are becoming gamers, and they are enlarging the overall game market. Everybody wins. (BTW, I have to dispute your age range; our nephew has loved the Wii since he was about 3 1/2. He has even made us take him real-bowling, despite the fact that he isn't strong enough to roll a ball fast enough for it to actually make it down the lane.)

      --
      My blog: http://www.seebs.net/log/ --- My iPhone/iPad app: http://www.seebs.net/seebsfrac/
    58. Re:Great news for MS! by Chibi+Merrow · · Score: 1

      he Wii may sell many more consoles, but it's not going to capture the hardcore gamer segment without games with substance.
      Hardcore gamers are a very small percentage of the available market. Very small.

      Casual gamers, on the other hand, the ones lured to the Wii because of its novelty and low price, really aren't likely to buy many games. They're not going to wear themselves out on Wii Sports and want to fill the void with dozens of other games because gaming isn't a priority in their lives.
      Nintendo doesn't need them to buy games, they've already made their money. And yet, the software/hardware ratio on initial sales for the Wii was much higher at launch than any of the other consoles in recent memory, probably due directly to the cost of the console...

      The only question left is whether MS and/or Sony can actually make a profit this round, and that absolutely depends on the strength of the library.
      I'd say it more depends on their financial reports, which are absolutely abysmal. Nintendo is the ONLY one turning a profit. Microsoft/Sony each lost about $1.9 Billion last fiscal year while Nintendo almost cleared $2 Billion in profits.

      Take a look at the ratings and sales numbers and it's clear who is winning that war.
      If I offered to sell everyone who gave me $10 a $20 bill, I assure you I'd top sales charts. That doesn't mean I'm "winning" anything by any stretch of the imagination.
      --
      Maxim: People cannot follow directions.
      Increases in truth directly with the length of time spent explaining them
    59. Re:Great news for MS! by crazzeto · · Score: 1

      Not at all actually... First, the Wii appeals to casual gamers, so right there they're getting a major bost from people who would otherwise not consider buying any game console at all considering buying a Wii. Next, consider Wii's price, $250 since launch. It wasn't until microsoft dropped the price of the Core/Arcade system (which are hard to find sku's) that 360's started moving. The next thing to factor in is the incredible job Nintendo did hyping up Wii's BC capabilities (this was the earliest and most hyped feature). The fact that you could (potentially) be able to play every nintendo game back to the original NES was very appealing, combined with the price this serves to make the Wii look like one heck of a value... Then factor in parents who want to keep kids active, and with the Wii's control system kids will almost certainly be spending a good a amount of time jumping up and down and such all while plaing their fav. video game titles... Overall excellent stratege... Now, if Nintendo would only get sane and start letting you download VC content to SD cards rather than crippling the SD card slot feature and making it "archive/mp3 only"... Nintendo really needs to take a page out of the MS strategy here... Download content to whatever storage unit you want, who cares? Just tie the VC games to the console and they'll be fine... So far I haven't heard of rampent piracy of x-box arcade games, I doubt Nintendo would have any bigger issues than MS.

    60. Re:Great news for MS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously, have you seen the Wii's games? They suck.

    61. Re:Great news for MS! by ThePhilips · · Score: 1

      [...] considering that less than 30% of the game playing market is under 18.

      In part, statement was made to be slightly inflammatory.

      I would correct you quote for your: "considering that more than 90% of the gamers got their first console under 18."

      The bunch of never growing up people (actually I belong by myself too) doesn't really change it.

      What is pretty sad image: guy at 35 playing games for 15+ years, going out rarely and living with parents. Bit stereotypical generalization - yet valid. I can hardly classify such people as adults. It's OK to group them with teenagers, because their habits and manners are of teenagers.

      --
      All hope abandon ye who enter here.
    62. Re:Great news for MS! by Quino · · Score: 1

      personal stories aside (I've got a few of my own), there's this retirement community with a wii bowling league and tournament:

      http://www.ericksonblog.com/ericksonsports/

      I'm pretty sure these folks are not and will not ever be in the market for an XBOX nor a PS3, so yeah, I'd say Nintendo is reaching new markets.

    63. Re:Great news for MS! by raydenvm · · Score: 1

      XBox 360 can become the best console in a half of year, I would say

    64. Re:Great news for MS! by MemoryDragon · · Score: 1

      I mean, the wii's game drought is worse than Sony's Actually no, the wiis releases are pretty solid. Since its beginning more than a dozend really good titles have been released and probably about the same amount of shovelware. The PS3 really has a drought, the wii definitely does not. What might cause that impression is that people tend to look at Nintendo only releases and then only those who are mildly interesting for them.

    65. Re:Great news for MS! by LKM · · Score: 1

      I mean, the wii's game drought is worse than Sony's

      Except that this isn't true at all. The PS3 has what, 4 good exclusive Bluray games (Motorstorm, Resistance, Heavenly Sword, Warhawk) and a bunch of good online titles? The Wii's current lineup simply looks better than the PS3's, and is less hardcore-oriented.

    66. Re:Great news for MS! by LKM · · Score: 1

      I've seen them, but it seems you haven't. Zelda, Resi 4, Metroid Prime 3, Super Paper Mario, Madden, WarioWare, Trauma Center, Mario Strikers, Rayman, Wii Sports...

    67. Re:Great news for MS! by LKM · · Score: 1

      The NES had many of these, too. Does that make the NES a current-gen console?

      Hint: Generations imply birth (i.e. launch date), not features. The obvious place to draw the line is not a place, but a time.

    68. Re:Great news for MS! by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      Which of those points did the NES have?

      Wow, you're so full of crap *my* head hurts.

    69. Re:Great news for MS! by SethraLavode · · Score: 1

      Wii sells right now solely as entertainment machine. Because there is only a handful of real "games" for it - what is absolutely irrelevant to casual demographics which is fine with WiiSports. As well as it was reported numerous times that Wii has quite low attachment rate. Casuals do not buy games - WiiSports for 80% of people is more than enough.

      Correction: It was not reported that the Wii has a low attach rate. It has been claimed by many, without any real evidence. However, Nintendo's quarterly report from July (I believe; I can't access it currently from work) indicates a world-wide attach rate of around 4.3 and a North American attach rate of just over 6. That does include Wii Sports, but that's still tracking ahead of where the Xbox360 was at a comparable time -- Microsoft reported in February that they had an attach rate of around 5.5.

    70. Re:Great news for MS! by LKM · · Score: 1

      First of all, the insult was quite unneccessary. How old are you? Second, to your point:

      Which of those points did the NES have?

      * Integrated storage, no requirement to buy memory cards

      There was an NES which played games stored on floppy discs. These games could rewrite their data, so it's very similar to integrated storage; no memory cards needed.

      * Integrated network connectivity, not a plug-in widget to provide it

      Well, I'm not sure if there ever was a NES with integrated network connectivity, but there were modem add-ons providing connectivity.

      * Online service to assist in the hosting of multiplayer games

      I'm not sure whether actual online gaming was available, but there was definitely an online service for the NES in Japan.

      * Online game-purchasing/download service

      Yep, that it had, too.

    71. Re:Great news for MS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever notice how all those "I bought a Wii and didn't like it" posters sound exceptionally smug? This guy is proud of not liking a genuinely entertaining system with broad appeal. He thinks it makes him a connoisseur.

  2. I wonder... by ZiakII · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I wonder if people are still having a hard time finding the Wii? I sucked it up and bought one on ebay, but I wonder if the Wii's availability is playing into effect of how hard the system is to find?

    1. Re:I wonder... by PlatyPaul · · Score: 1

      Well, where I live it's still extremely hard to find Wiis around. That said, I managed to buy 2 in the past 2 weeks (one for a friend, and one for my parents), but only by physically visiting dozens of stores (and, accordingly, learning from the stock staff when their typical shipments arrive). I still think I got lucky on it, too.

      I expect that it will become impossible again when Mario Galaxy drops. I'm still wondering if I should preorder that one to make sure I get a copy....

      --
      Misery loves company. Online misery loves unsuspecting random strangers.
    2. Re:I wonder... by sho222 · · Score: 5, Funny

      but I wonder if the Wii's availability is playing into effect of how hard the system is to find?
      Did you think about that statement before writing it?
    3. Re:I wonder... by jimstapleton · · Score: 1

      I bought mine two or three months ago. At the time, I wasn't seriously trying to get it, I just figured if I stopped in a store and if they had one, I might buy it. I think I ended up going through three or four EB/GameStops and Targets (don't laugh... too hard) before I saw one. I thought for a few, and figured since they were non-trivial (not quite hard mind you) to find, I'd get it.

      They aren't hard to find, you just have to do a bit of leg work.

      --
      34486853790
      Connection too slow for X forwarding? Try "ssh -CX user@host"
    4. Re:I wonder... by rizzo420 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      yes, people are still having a hard time finding it. none of the stores i've been in have it around here (target, walmart, best buy, etc). i don't shop at places like eb games or gamestop very often, so i don't know about them.

      i assume when you said

      but I wonder if the Wii's availability is playing into effect of how hard the system is to find? that you meant "is the wii's popularity playing into effect of how hard it is to find?" the answer to that question is an obvious "yes". the wii is loved by the elderly, the young, the middle aged, the hard core gamer, the casual gamer, while the 360 and PS3 are mostly for people looking for good graphics and games like halo 3.

      i was surprised to see that the PS2 had better sales than the PS3. that should say a lot to sony.
      --
      please me, have no regrets.
    5. Re:I wonder... by trdrstv · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I wonder if the Wii's availability is playing into effect of how hard the system is to find?

      Yes it does. Thank you Capt. Obvious.

    6. Re:I wonder... by ZiakII · · Score: 1

      Did you think about that statement before writing it?

      Sadly I reread it twice and it seemed to make sense in my tired little head......

      slightly off-topic... but have any one who quit smoking have problems sleeping when they quit? (going cold turkey)

    7. Re:I wonder... by Pojut · · Score: 1

      I didn't...but I switched from smoking one substance (which is legal but shouldn't be) to smoking a different substance (which is illegal but shouldn't be)

    8. Re:I wonder... by aesiamun · · Score: 1

      I've had really good luck with Target in Greece and Target in Irondequoit. I bought 4 in one day between those two stores. I have family on the other side of the state and it's even more difficult to find them there...

    9. Re:I wonder... by PlatyPaul · · Score: 1

      Well, if you need more, the Target by Marketplace Mall gets shipments early on Sunday mornings and is typically stocked by around 11AM. Cheers!

      --
      Misery loves company. Online misery loves unsuspecting random strangers.
    10. Re:I wonder... by Fx.Dr · · Score: 1

      NyQuil - become good, close friends with it. It saved my sleepless butt countless times back when I quit, and best of all, no hangover.

    11. Re:I wonder... by giafly · · Score: 1

      I was not surprised to see that the PS2 had better sales than the PS3. That should say a lot to Sony.
      Fixed.
      --
      Reduce, reuse, cycle
    12. Re:I wonder... by jZnat · · Score: 1

      You're almost guaranteed to find a video game no matter how popular it is on release due to the relative ease of manufacturing DVDs compared to any other sort of hardware. If SMG was a cartridge-based game, sure, I'd recommend that you pre-order it, but there's generally never a shortage of games when they come out.

      --
      'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
    13. Re:I wonder... by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

      but I wonder if the Wii's availability is playing into effect of how hard the system is to find? Did you think about that statement before writing it? He just opens his mouth and words fall out.
      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    14. Re:I wonder... by rootofevil · · Score: 1

      aye, thats the ticket. addicted to cigarettes => addicted to nyquil.

      have you heard the dennis leary bit about nyquil? i think you should find it. its about alcoholics and nyquil, but just as applicable.

      --
      turn up the jukebox and tell me a lie
    15. Re:I wonder... by Jarjarthejedi · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I always ask myself when I see these questions where in the world the people asking them are. Over here in the SW I could right now leave my house and drive down to one of my local gamestops (there are 3) and buy a Wii, all three have them in stock (or at least had at the time Halo 3 came out when I last visited them). Best Buy has had them on the shelves since around April, Circuit City had them last time I went there (over the summer). There's no shortage of Wii's where I am, so I'm always curious that there's apparently still a shortage elsewhere...

      --
      There are two kinds of fool One says 'This is old therefore good' Another says 'This is new therefore better'- Dean Ing
    16. Re:I wonder... by Nazmun · · Score: 1

      Theres also ebayers that buy up every single Wii as soon as they pop-up. Most sellers take pictures of their stockpiles of the wii system and show them on ebay.

      I wonder how much the scarcity is playing into the popularity of the wii (omg it's not available it must be awesome!). That might be another reason for nintendo to not be producing any more units then they had per month. If it is true it has to be working since the hype for the system is the strongest since release.

      --
      Hmmm... Pie...
    17. Re:I wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about World of Warcraft?

    18. Re:I wonder... by spirit+of+reason · · Score: 1

      The 360 and PS3 are also better suited for anyone looking for a shred of complexity in their games (though not by design; that's just how Nintendo has chosen to market their machine) -- that is, games that try to effect a more complete simulation. You just don't find games like Virtua Fighter 5 or Forza Motorsport/Gran Turismo on the Wii. And sure, the 360 also has Halo, but you wouldn't get anywhere without somenstream games, right?

    19. Re:I wonder... by rizzo420 · · Score: 1

      i'm in rhode island and i know that the stores here, as well as the stores nearby in massachusetts and connecticut don't have them. i've had one since january, so i'm not out looking for them, but whenever i'm in a store that would sell them, i check. they don't have them.

      --
      please me, have no regrets.
    20. Re:I wonder... by Amouth · · Score: 1

      that is the "No Cure for Cancer" album.. very good.. highly recommend it..

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    21. Re:I wonder... by spirit+of+reason · · Score: 1

      that last line should read "some mainstream games"

    22. Re:I wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that should say a lot to sony. like... the ps2 has more and better games than the ps3
    23. Re:I wonder... by rizzo420 · · Score: 1

      or the PS3 is overpriced, even after dropping the price?

      --
      please me, have no regrets.
    24. Re:I wonder... by edwdig · · Score: 1

      The last Smash Bros game was near impossible to find if you didn't pre-order it. I waited a little bit to get it and had to check about 10 stores to find a copy.

      Remember, Manufacturing DVDs still takes time. Nintendo, Sony, and Microsoft manufacture ALL the games made for their systems. There's a huge demand to get games manufactured at Christmas. They're not going to make more copies of a game than they think they can sell as it would take away from their ability to manufacture 3rd party games. Remember, a first party game makes Nintendo money when it's sold, but a 3rd party game makes them money when it's manufactured.

    25. Re:I wonder... by CaptKilljoy · · Score: 1

      >that you meant "is the wii's popularity playing into effect of how hard it is to find?" the answer to that question is an obvious "yes".

      Are you guys under the impression that Nintendo has to dig it's consoles out of underground mines, sifting through tons of dirt to find just one rare Wii or something?

      Nintendo could flood the channel with Wii's anytime they darn well please just by contracting out to additional manufacturers. They don't because they know the lack of availability gives them good hype and gullible people will keep lapping it up. "Oh, gawrsh, it's been so hard to find for so long therefore it must be super-popular. I just gotta have me one too!"

    26. Re:I wonder... by rizzo420 · · Score: 1

      they're super popular because they're great game consoles. nothing more needs to be said about them. people of all ages, even senior citizens, love them. my fiancee's aunt and uncle just got one and they've never been into video games before. it's popular because it really is the gaming device for the masses and not just people who like gaming.

      --
      please me, have no regrets.
    27. Re:I wonder... by CaptKilljoy · · Score: 1

      Hey, I didn't say they weren't great. I said the the fact that it's scarce doesn't have anything to do with whether it's great or not.

    28. Re:I wonder... by enderjsv · · Score: 1

      Well, that depends. If you're looking for a blue-ray player, its actually a good deal. If you want it to play first rate, exclusive game titles, then yeah, it's still overpriced. God I hope they get some games soon.

    29. Re:I wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everyone I know with a Wii is trying to sell it ROFL. They bought into the hype and were disappointed.

      Sony's whole problem with the PS3 is price. Nobody needs (or even wants) a blue ray player and you have to buy one as part of the console, jacking the price of the console up to insanity levels.

      Sony did it to themselves by forcing potential PS3 owners to be part of their marketing plan for another format that will bomb.

      Their only saving grace is that they are now lowering prices to match the 360. In the process they will take a huge loss on those blue ray players. Maybe it will pay for itself one day... I'll get one when they come down to $500. For now the XBox 360 is still stellar and I have 0 (zero) urge to get a PS3.

    30. Re:I wonder... by tgibbs · · Score: 1

      Nintendo could flood the channel with Wii's anytime they darn well please just by contracting out to additional manufacturers.


      I doubt it. Game companies such as Nintendo get manufacturers to produce the console cheaply early on based on the prospect of large manufacturing volumes down the line. Which means that Nintendo very likely has contractual commitments to its current manufacturers that would prevent Nintendo from adding additional manufacturers.
    31. Re:I wonder... by TemporalBeing · · Score: 1

      I always ask myself when I see these questions where in the world the people asking them are. Over here in the SW I could right now leave my house and drive down to one of my local gamestops (there are 3) and buy a Wii, all three have them in stock (or at least had at the time Halo 3 came out when I last visited them). Best Buy has had them on the shelves since around April, Circuit City had them last time I went there (over the summer). There's no shortage of Wii's where I am, so I'm always curious that there's apparently still a shortage elsewhere...
      At least in South Western Pennsylvania - they are typically out of stock. I've heard of one store (Circuit City) that might have them in stock, but everyone else in the town I am in is out. (I also refuse to go to Circuit City because of their stocking policies with respect to sales.)

      Closer to Pittsburgh I did see a Target that had 'em in stock - 3 - but the other stores I visited in that area didn't have them. At the time I didn't have the spare cash for it, so we didn't get it then. Still waiting. Will buy one though.
      --
      Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away. - Elvis Presley (source: imdb.com)
    32. Re:I wonder... by feepness · · Score: 1

      that you meant "is the wii's popularity playing into effect of how hard it is to find?" the answer to that question is an obvious "yes". the wii is loved by the elderly, the young, the middle aged, the hard core gamer, the casual gamer, while the 360 and PS3 are mostly for people looking for good graphics and games like halo 3. You know what? I fall into a couple of those categories.

      And you know what else? Please don't try to speak for me.
    33. Re:I wonder... by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      I waited a bit and got a copy from a store that had so much surplus they marked it down a bit...

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    34. Re:I wonder... by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      That happens when you eat a book.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    35. Re:I wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are you smoking? Nintendo probably has a contractual commitment for a mniminum number of units from each manufacturer and nothing else. It would be insane to limit the number of units they can build or manufacturers they can hire.

    36. Re:I wonder... by tgibbs · · Score: 1

      What are you smoking? Nintendo probably has a contractual commitment for a mniminum number of units from each manufacturer and nothing else. It would be insane to limit the number of units they can build or manufacturers they can hire.


      I don't think that we can make assumptions about Nintendo's contractual obligations. But I can certainly see how an exclusivity agreement could seem reasonable if they got a very good deal on per unit pricing, and thought the capacity would be sufficient to handle the anticipated demand.
  3. I doubt the 360 will be ahead. by webmaster404 · · Score: 1, Redundant

    At least here in the US, it is a challenge to find a Wii, most places are sold out of them I have only seen one when I was looking around in tech stores and the discount stores (Wal-Mart etc.) are sold out of them too, 360s are found in almost all of the stores same with Halo 3, lots of boxes, sure the Wii hasn't had a "Killer Hit" yet like the 360 has with Halo 3 but the games that are released are fun to play and with Brawl and Fire Emblem Radiant Dawn coming this winter, I would imagine that Wii sales will be way up this Christmas season, also, Nintendo is making a killing with the Virtual Console, something that still makes sales go up because there still will be games available for purchase that you won't be able to get for the 360 and PS3. Nintendo has exclusive first party titles that are strong, the PS3 and 360 really don't have as much, and I for one welcome our new Wii masters.

    --
    There is no "disagree" moderation, and troll, flamebait and overrated are not valid substitutes
    1. Re:I doubt the 360 will be ahead. by jlf278 · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you really want a Wii for retail and live anywhere near New York City (or know someone who does), Nintendo World in Rockefeller Center rarely runs out of stock.

    2. Re:I doubt the 360 will be ahead. by apdyck · · Score: 1

      I'm inclined to agree that the Wii will pull ahead during the holiday season. How many parents will be buying a new console for their child for Christmas? Now, I don't know about anyone else, but I have recently been pricing out both a Wii and a 360 (the girlfriend wants both), and I noticed that they both have similar base prices (with the 360 still being more expensive), however the Wii is the only one that will work the way I want it to out of the box for that price. Buying a 360 requires the additional purchase of an external hard drive, and I see no point to buying the base system. That, in combination with Microsoft's incredibly large SKU catalogue, mean that it is rather difficult to decide which system to buy. The Wii, on the other hand, requires only the purchase of a nunchuck controller, and includes a game in the box. When confronted with this, how many parents will say "It's cheaper, it has a game, and it's designed for the whole family", and then purchase the Wii?

      The real question, though, is will Nintendo have the supply to meet the demand for their system? I would imagine, given the comments so far, that they may be having supply issues. If they were able to meet demand, who would be in the lead?

      Then again, you'll get the suckers like me who buy a Wii AND a 360, bowing to pressure from outside sources (namely my girlfriend). I guess Microsoft is going to get my money either way, but I won't contribute to them being in the sales lead!

      --
      .sig
    3. Re:I doubt the 360 will be ahead. by Endo13 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Just an FYI.. the Wii package does in fact come with a Nunchuck controller. The only reason you'd need to buy anything extra is if you need a second controller or want the Classic controller for virtual console games.

      --
      There is no -1 Disagree mod. Slashdot.org/faq defines mod options. USE IT.
    4. Re:I doubt the 360 will be ahead. by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      While it is definitely a little difficult to find them (you don't just walk into a store and expect to buy one), it's not really THAT difficult for somebody wanting to buy one. I stop in the local Wal-mart 2-3 times per week during my lunch break just to look around and kill time (small town - not much else to do). 90% of the time I go look around the electronics department for a while, and though the Wii is USUALLY out of stock, in the last few months on 4-5 occasions I've found one (or in one case, 3) units available for purchase. I still haven't bought one myself. Maybe eventually, but having tried it, I still find the Wii-mote gimmicky. I'm just more of a gamepad type player (well, I do like DDR, but that was for a single game - if they tried to apply that jump mat as a control method to every game I'd probably not like it either).

      I will admit though, that the Xbox 360 and PS3 are always in stock. Haven't bought either of those either, but I think Mass Effect is finally gonna push my stubborn self into buying a 360.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    5. Re:I doubt the 360 will be ahead. by apdyck · · Score: 1

      See, now that's why I need to do more research. When the Wii initially came out, it did not include the nunchuck, and now they do. I know that they didn't, because my brother bought one the day they came out, and was complaining bitterly about it. That being said, that makes the Wii even more attractive as a system to buy this Christmas. Of course, I would want to get a second controller and a classic controller, but I'm still going to need additional controllers when I buy my 360, too.

      --
      .sig
    6. Re:I doubt the 360 will be ahead. by ShapeGSX · · Score: 1

      All of the new 360 SKUs have games included in the box.

      The $280 Arcade model has a 256MB memory card for game saves, now has a wireless controller, and includes 5 arcade games (Boom-Boom Rocket, Pac-man, Uno, Feeding Frenzy, and Luxor 2) on a DVD.

      The $350 Pro model includes Forza 2 and Marvel Ultimate Alliance.

      The $450 Elite model also includes Forza 2 and Marvel Ultimate Alliance.

    7. Re:I doubt the 360 will be ahead. by lalas · · Score: 1

      The retail package from launch has included 1 controller and 1 nunchuck.

    8. Re:I doubt the 360 will be ahead. by Zelos · · Score: 2, Informative

      The Wii definitely always shipped with a Nunchuk, your brother must have got a mispackaged console.

    9. Re:I doubt the 360 will be ahead. by Wdomburg · · Score: 1

      My wife bought two on pre-order. Both came with a nunchuck.

    10. Re:I doubt the 360 will be ahead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and with Brawl and Fire Emblem Radiant Dawn coming this winter

      Haven't you heard the news? Brawl just got delayed/pushed back to 2008
    11. Re:I doubt the 360 will be ahead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haven't you heard the news? Brawl just got delayed/pushed back to 2008 Haven't you heard the news? Winter lasts through February now
    12. Re:I doubt the 360 will be ahead. by batkiwi · · Score: 1

      The person you're replying to has a .ca domain...

      I'm in Australia, and we DO NOT get the nunchuck packed in with Wiis. What you get at best buy is not always what the rest of the world gets.

    13. Re:I doubt the 360 will be ahead. by Hadean · · Score: 1

      And .ca is Canada, which has had the nunchuck controller from day one, so the GP is correct.

    14. Re:I doubt the 360 will be ahead. by Locomorto · · Score: 1

      Well I got one a launch in australia (pre-order), and it came with a nuchuck :). I know two other people that also got one with a nunchuck as well.

      --
      Stopping Content Restriction Annulment and Protection means not calling it DRM.
    15. Re:I doubt the 360 will be ahead. by miro+f · · Score: 1

      well I am also in Australia and my Wii came with a nunchuck. Definitely did because all I purchased was the Wii and Zelda, yet somehow I managed to play it.

      --
      being vague is almost as cool as doing that other thing...
  4. Wow so by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the ps2 is outselling the ps3 at almost 2:1? Wouldn't this be like the gamecube outselling the wii or the xbox outselling the xbox360? And nobody thinks that's slightly odd for Sony?

    1. Re:Wow so by Endo13 · · Score: 3, Funny

      the ps2 is outselling the ps3 at almost 2:1? Wouldn't this be like the gamecube outselling the wii or the xbox outselling the xbox360?

      Yeah.

      And nobody thinks that's slightly odd for Sony?

      Not really. Everyone's used to it by now. Been that way since about the second month after launch.

      --
      There is no -1 Disagree mod. Slashdot.org/faq defines mod options. USE IT.
    2. Re:Wow so by paranode · · Score: 2, Interesting

      PS2 is still the most played game console and has an immense library of games to choose from. There is a very large market for affordable game systems with fun games. This is why the Wii is dominating right now. The PS3 suffers from a smaller selection of good games and the price being too high for all but the serious gamer.

  5. Microsoft will win next generation by JeremyGNJ · · Score: 1, Funny

    Microsoft is in a great position to WIN the next generation of gaming consoles.

    This generation couldnt have played out better for them. Sony made all the proper mistakes to allow XBox to reign supreme, and the success of the Wii is a blessing in disguise, because it gives microsoft....ideas!

    XBox has the best name recognition now for "modern gaming" amoung both techies, because of all the successful mod'ing, and more casual users because of Microsoft's excellent marketing. The fact that the Wii was so successful only means that Microsoft now has a new target in casual gamers. Already they've announced the "XBox arcade Version" to target casual users.

    Microsoft Next-Gen: Our console does everything in a familiar interface. We have a TON of downloadable games, both free and micro-payment versions. Oh and one more little thing.....our new motion-sensitive remotes will work on your XBox AND your Windows PC.

    Game over.

    1. Re:Microsoft will win next generation by Endo13 · · Score: 1

      That looks like a really nice VR you're living in. Now all you need to do is find some way to make the GSOD show up later rather than sooner. Best of luck.

      --
      There is no -1 Disagree mod. Slashdot.org/faq defines mod options. USE IT.
    2. Re:Microsoft will win next generation by Seakip18 · · Score: 1

      XBox has the best name recognition now for "modern gaming" amoung both techies, because of all the successful mod'ing, and more casual users because of Microsoft's excellent marketing. The primary reason for these mods is because people see the good the console can do, but disgusted by microsoft's policies. Take for instance the Hard drive on the 360. Is it necessary to apply a proprietary connection for what is already standard data storage and THEN charge a person out the ass for it?

      I'm not even going to get into how bad the media center extender works. Unless Microsoft suffers a stroke and suddenly lets people view videos in whatever codec they want, your essentially locking people into that. Otherwise, people continue to HAVE to innovate just to get the thing to meet their expectations.
      Sheesh, might as well just get a project called Gbox and GBox360 with all the work the community has to pick up, thanks to microsoft.

      So in conclusion, shill, go beat your bongo drum in another circle.
      --
      import system.cool.Sig;
    3. Re:Microsoft will win next generation by JeremyGNJ · · Score: 1

      I'm hardly a shill, i dont even own a console except for the Wii that my wife and daughter mostly play with. I'm into more complicated PC games.

      I understand your point about the mods being done because "they have to be", but that's what techies like. To modify stuff to suit their needs. If you gave a techie two machines, one that did EVERYTHING, but they didnt like the UI, and one that lacked features (but could be modified to have them) and a nice interface.....they would chose the later. They (we) get off on it. That's why i still build my own PC even though the price difference of brand name is very little.

      My point is just that microsoft has a formula that almost always works, and seems to be working here: Generation 1 = laughable. (embrace) Generation 2 = up to par with features but still not quite right (extend). Generation 3 (extinquish)

    4. Re:Microsoft will win next generation by spxero · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Wow.... just wow. The Wii's success is a blessing? I would say that's more of a curse, as Nintendo is not only making money on software sales, but on hardware sales as well. How much money is the 360 bringing in? Not as much, seeing as how the 360 is not going to be profitable until 2008. (And this is despite shipping and selling almost a year ahead of time)

      And with 8.19 Million units sold vs. the 360's 6.72 million units sold I think it's a little easier to tell who the winner is.

      Console mods for the 360 may be successful, but they're also being blocked from the main reason for having a 360.


      I hate responding to trolls like you, but come-freaking-on. Does it hurt to lie through your teeth like that?

    5. Re:Microsoft will win next generation by Seakip18 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Disclaimer: I actually have an Xbox360 in my living room right next to a gamecube...RE:4 ftw.

      By that same logic, shouldn't Vista be a dominating force then? I don't mean to be rude, it's just that I think your overestimating Microsoft's ability to listen and change.

      Since you stated in your example, Microsoft by no means wants you to mess with their stuff. If that were so, then why are not seeing more third-party controllers for the Xbox 360? I mean, currently, $45 dollars for a wireless controller? I'm not saying other console makers are different(yet).

      I do agree with your point about the techie will build a system to fit his/her needs, but there is a point where they say "fuck it." and go a different route, say a media pc running MythTV or the such. At that point, xbox is good for your haloz and occasional viva pinata (sorry, to lazy to find the right characters.)

      I will say, their online service, while very pricey to someone who has been a pc man, is refreshing to use. I wish Nintendo would roll with something similar but not as a expensive.

      The move to separate Xbox into it's own division was a blessing of sorts. But what is going to happen when Halo 3 excitement dies down and stops pushing xboxes? Bungie is now on their own, freeing them to pursue other projects and other consoles.

      --
      import system.cool.Sig;
    6. Re:Microsoft will win next generation by JeremyGNJ · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Microsoft is good, excellant....maybe even the BEST at defeating a known business opponent. What they're NOT good at is emerging into new markets on their own.

      The Wii is a blessing because it gives Microsoft someone to beat. Not only that, but a competitor OTHER than Sony. If it were not for the success of the Wii, the Sony would have continued it's dominance of the console market, and Microsoft would have still been "number 2 of 2".

      Now they're "number 2 of 3", with their previous opponent behind them....and a new one who isnt used to playing in the big leagues.

    7. Re:Microsoft will win next generation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where on earth are you getting those numbers in the links you provided? The Wii is ahead, but it's actually more like 12.4 million for the Wii and 11.8 million for the 360 (source: www.vgchartz.com).

      I'm a Wii fan too but it's not right to misrepresent things like that.

    8. Re:Microsoft will win next generation by SethraLavode · · Score: 1

      If you're going to comment on misrepresentation, you might want to stop using vgchartz as a reference, as they are fond of the "make shit up and then retroactively adjust the numbers after reliable ones come out" method of accounting.

    9. Re:Microsoft will win next generation by Endo13 · · Score: 1

      Nevertheless, the numbers he quoted sound a lot more accurate than the ones posted by GP. IIRC, Xbox360 had sold some 8 million units by the end of last year already. Frankly I'm surprised to see Wikipedia so inaccurate.

      --
      There is no -1 Disagree mod. Slashdot.org/faq defines mod options. USE IT.
    10. Re:Microsoft will win next generation by Endo13 · · Score: 1

      Ah. His numbers were for US sales only (which he failed to mention). No wonder they seemed too low. Incomplete data FTL.

      --
      There is no -1 Disagree mod. Slashdot.org/faq defines mod options. USE IT.
    11. Re:Microsoft will win next generation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're on Slashdot, please fucking stop using "ftw" bullshit here. Thanks a lot.

    12. Re:Microsoft will win next generation by ivan256 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The game isn't over yet, and the PS3 isn't all that far behind the 360...

      If this generation should tell Microsoft anything, it should be that beating the PS3 with the 360 doesn't guarantee them beating the PS4 with the Xbox3.

      My prediction for the next generation? We won't know who's going to win it until at least 18 months after the last gen-8 console is released. Hell, we're not even going to know who wins *this* generation until well into 2008. Can Nintendo hold on as the leader when HDTV adoption increases over the lifespan of this console generation? Will the PS3 stay at the back of the line when some good games come out? Can Microsoft hold on to second place if they only have strong sales in one region?

      A new generation is a clean slate. A successful previous-generation machine means almost nothing. Sony had two winners in a row because they were both the best system+games combination in the market; not because the PS1 won market share in advance for the PS2. This generation's winner will be chosen the same way, as will the next. If Microsoft has the best selling box this generation, and that makes them think - even for a second - that it means they're assured the lead for the following generation too, Sony, Nintendo, and maybe some other company we haven't heard of yet will eat their lunch next time around.

    13. Re:Microsoft will win next generation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your still looking at this the wrong way. Nintendo is not even competing in the same relm of Xbox 360 consumers, they are going for a competely different market. And if they pick up some of the traditional consule users along the way, all the better. But that not the target area. The target area is every one who doesn't play consule games right now.

      And that market is a hell of alot bigger then people who do play consule games. Hell, with Nintendo's pricing they probably LIKE it when some one buys a 360. Buying a 360 means you are pretty much into consule gaming, and are more inclined to pick up the Wii down the line with the various Nintendo only games.

      Microsoft and Sony are in a foot race to get as many people to get gamers to buy their consule. Nintendo is out for a fun sunday drive picking up as many people who want to come along.

    14. Re:Microsoft will win next generation by brkello · · Score: 1

      Does it hurt to not be able to tell when someone is joking?

      --
      Support a great indie game: http://www.abaddon360.com
    15. Re:Microsoft will win next generation by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 1, Troll

      Sure, giving Microsoft a target gives them a goal, but it isn't like Microsoft has shown the ability to leap past a continually advancing target. There are plenty of examples where Microsoft is always behind the competition:
      vs Google in search
      vs Apple in MP3 players (now phones)
      vs Nintendo in consoles...

      If Xbox 420 is anything like the Zune 2 or the reboot of the Live services it will be:
      A Wii, but black, slightly larger, and HD.

      Meanwhile Nintendo will release, if the DS and Wii are any predictors of future design:
      Download only games; add-on optical drive for backwards compatibility
      HD (duh)
      Lightweight wireless heads up see through monocles
      Paired Wii-motes (one per hand) play, up to a total of 16 remotes (for 16 player games)
      The ability to hook up 4 LCDs (1 per 4 people) or the ability to network 4 consoles together with a single game
      Built in projector or projector add-on to reduce the necessity for 4 HD sets (perhaps limited to 720p)

    16. Re:Microsoft will win next generation by mcsqueak · · Score: 1

      Wow.... just wow. The Wii's success is a blessing?

      Yes, it is. In a business environment, multiple strong competitors are always a good thing. It DRIVES the company to do better. Nintendo knew they sucked it up last generation, and came out with something that is simply a joy to play (full disclosure, I own a Wii). Without competition we'd get something like what Microsoft has in the operating system world... not pretty.

      Sony, on the other hand, thought they had this whole generation wrapped up. I'm sure their business development meetings are REALLY fun these days, what with being beat by a "kiddie console". ;)

    17. Re:Microsoft will win next generation by toolie · · Score: 1

      If that were so, then why are not seeing more third-party controllers for the Xbox 360? I mean, currently, $45 dollars for a wireless controller? Completely and totally off-topic here, but what the hell, I'll ask anyway.

      Is there a reason that a third party hasn't produced a controller for the PS3 that swaps the left analog stick and the control pad? Does Sony not allow that kind of modification? I think I'd be more willing to play more games on the PS3 over the 360 if the controller was better designed. I pre-ordered Assassin's Creed for the 360 simply because it doesn't hurt my hand like the PS3 controller does. GH3 and Rock Band are going on the PS3, though, because I don't have to use the God forsaken controller.

      I guess it probably has something to do with brand image. Is the brand image worth having a less ergonomic controller though?
      --
      -- toolie
    18. Re:Microsoft will win next generation by spirit+of+reason · · Score: 1
      Not that it really matters, but I should point out that you used the worldwide sales of the Wii vs the US sales of the 360. The worldwide sales figure for the 360 is 11.6 million, according to your source. So 8.19 million Wiis vs 11.6 million 360s worldwide, or 5.13 million Wiis vs 6.3 million 360s in the Americas*

      The Wii almost certainly has greater sales, but that's just basic, fundamental marketing. The Wii has a much broader appeal, but with the current offerings, there's definitely still room for the 360. The Wii just does not have the types of games I like, for example. Also, I don't really care for their half-baked design for the Wiimote. In the games I've played, the little bit of lag in the response was jarring for motions I knew would be right in reality (e.g. I play tennis, but the response in Wii Tennis is really finnicky). They ought to try incorporating more reference sources, too -- two references creates an unsolvable system for pointing, so their zapper is just going to be a shell (not something you can use to actually aim).

      Uh...looks like I rambled on a bit. Anyway, here's hoping the Wii+1 makes that Wiimote interface perfect. Then Nintendo will really have an interesting system out there.

      *the 360 figure is only for the US, it seems

    19. Re:Microsoft will win next generation by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      Ok, I post this every time it comes up, and it still comes up so I'm going to post it again.

      Why should we, as consumers, give half a crap whether the Xbox/Gamecube/Wii/toaster over is "profitable" for the company making it? Does that seriously enter into your purchasing decision? Seriously?

    20. Re:Microsoft will win next generation by I'm+Don+Giovanni · · Score: 1



      It can also DRIVE a company to screw itself over, as Sony has done. Sony, in attempt to compete, threw in everything but the kitchen sink, which caused them to price themselves out of the market.

      --
      -- "I never gave these stories much credence." - HAL 9000
    21. Re:Microsoft will win next generation by Seakip18 · · Score: 1

      Here is an old article about. You can find a couple of wired third party ones that are slightly different. Why no bunch of wireless controllers? No clear reasons, but why would microsoft want to give up any more money? Remember, they SOLD these consoles at a loss.

      --
      import system.cool.Sig;
    22. Re:Microsoft will win next generation by yanos · · Score: 3, Interesting

      ...and a new one who isnt used to playing in the big leagues.
      We're not talking about the same Nintendo, me thinks.
    23. Re:Microsoft will win next generation by spxero · · Score: 1

      Actually, I used the US and Japan sales for both, omitting worldwide sales. The reason for this is that the only sources I have seen for the 360 indicate US and Japan, not other markets. So, 6.3M (US) and .4M (JP) for the 360 is 6.7M units sold. 11.6M is the number of units shipped, not sold. Whereas the Wii has 11.2M units sold worldwide, with 8.19M of that in the US and Japan. So, the 360 has sold more in the US by 1M, despite being available for a year longer.

      On a more personal note, I currently own a PS2, X-Box, and Game Cube. I have resisted upgrading until I purchased a new TV, but since I have that TV now, I am part of the market that all three are trying to grab at some level (male, mid-20's, gamer). When it comes down to it, I will be getting a Wii. After playing a fair amount on the 360 and the Wii, there are more games that have longer playability on the Wii (that I have found). In addition, ALL of my old GC games work with it, allowing for extended playability beyond the current titles. And at a sub-$300 price point for a complete setup, it's a better value than what the others are offering.


      For those interested, the sales and shipping figures come from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wii#System_sales and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xbox_360#Sales

    24. Re:Microsoft will win next generation by Turken · · Score: 1

      You should care, because in general profitable consoles for the parent company lead to better (or at least more diverse) games for the platform.

      Complex hardware is expensive. Sony and MS sell their consoles at a loss, because they expect to make back a profit on licensing of the games. The game publishers then are forced with increasing fees and hardware complexity, and their general response is to either increase the prices of the games, only invest in games with a guaranteed return on their investment, or both. The publishers would be crazy stupid to NOT react in this way. So, the end result for the customers is that we get to privilege of paying more each generation for the same old sequels. The publishers all know that despite how much we may whine and complain online, at the end of the day we'll still go and buy the same crap over and over again because we're familiar and comfortable with it.

      Yes, Nintendo is also guilty of creating numerous sequels for their more popular franchises (again, it's good business, and they would be stupid to not do so). But, at the same time, the amount of risk associated with developing on their systems is much lower, in no small part due to the way in which the hardware was designed to be profitable (simpler) from the get-go. As a result, they and other publishers have the freedom to try out new things. Sure, most of the attempts will be flops and/or shovelware, but given enough games to sort through there will also be some truly delightful and innovative games. Look back at the last generation, where the PS2 was the cheap and easy platform to develop for. There were lots and lots of crap titles developed for it, but it was also where we found many games that were initially considered risky but are now covered in heaps of praise... Katamari Daimacy, Okami, Psychonauts, Guitar Hero (and DDR and the rest of the music/rythm genre), etc. I could keep going on, but the point is that cheap development leads to better games. However, cheap development only comes when financial risk is minimized, and until a console can be sold at a profit the console manufacturer cannot even begin to consider subsidizing that risk.

      Now, as to the question of whether company profits affect my (or anyone else's) purchasing decisions... directly, no. But when I go to the store and see shelf after shelf full of games for one system, and only a handful for another, I will tend to go with the system with more (and cheaper) choices. And I'm pretty sure that I'm not the only person out there that considers quantity and/or quirkyness availability as a strong deciding factor on when or what game system to buy.

    25. Re:Microsoft will win next generation by enderjsv · · Score: 1

      Why would you wait for a new tv to buy a Wii. I guarantee, the Wii would work just fine on the same tv you had your Gamecube hooked up to.

    26. Re:Microsoft will win next generation by mcsqueak · · Score: 1

      It can also DRIVE a company to screw itself over, as Sony has done. Sony, in attempt to compete, threw in everything but the kitchen sink, which caused them to price themselves out of the market. Indeed. I think the saying goes something like "jack of all trades, master of none".
    27. Re:Microsoft will win next generation by realthing02 · · Score: 1

      I think MS has done pretty well in the office productivity software realm... but i could be wrong.

    28. Re:Microsoft will win next generation by MadUndergrad · · Score: 1

      Lightweight wireless heads up see through monocles If they include an electrode-studded top hat neural interface with the monocle I think I'd have to personally blow their good-idea guy, whoever that is.
    29. Re:Microsoft will win next generation by Ant+P. · · Score: 1

      Oh and one more little thing.....our new motion-sensitive remotes will work on your XBox AND your Windows PC. Wow, you mean just like my wiimote works with ut2004?

      No reason to go out and buy more of the same then.
    30. Re:Microsoft will win next generation by spirit+of+reason · · Score: 1
      Ahh, I see now. It's still not exactly a fair comparison when you're talking on the whole, since the 360 is having some large problems marketing to the Japanese (if you believe Sakaguchi; given how some things just don't translate well and how MS is known for stupidity and oversight, it seems plausible ^_^).

      In any case, I think we just have different preferences. I have much more fun with 360 titles, but I tend to enjoy more complex titles that try to get closer to reality (sort of to be in a fantasy where I had taken some different route or was in a different environment). The Wii offers more to those that like short*, social gaming, and in general, the longer playability comes from the atmosphere surrounding the game, rather than from any inherent length created in the game itself. For me, it's just that it wasn't all that fun even the first few times (for the games I tried) -- felt too simple.

      As far as old games go, that applies if you had a GC (which is not a benefit many have). I went with the GC and PS2 in the last generation, so I kind of benefited from having the list of compatible games, haha. I started off with used Xbox games (13 over 6 months), so while not all of the old library works, there's still a significant amount there.

      $250 is still $250 too much if it doesn't have what you want (lol, sorry, PS3 fans, that things didn't turn out so well). So all I'm saying is, there's a place for both. I don't think we'll see one really crush the other.

      *short: as in, a game that you can just pick up and play for however short or long you want, and you aren't worried about progress

    31. Re:Microsoft will win next generation by spxero · · Score: 1

      The TV purchase was not for the gaming system, but for HD in general. And since I have had the TV, friends have come over with their Nintendo Wii's, and the quality is quite good- good enough that I don't need an HD gaming system yet.

    32. Re:Microsoft will win next generation by spxero · · Score: 1

      I think you are absolutely right about the Wii's "short" games. I've reached that point in my life to where spending 20-40 hours a week to perfect a game in order to compete online just doesn't cut it for me. It sucks, I know. I love FPS's (GTA series, Jedi Knight series, Delta Force series, 007 series, Time Splitters, Halo (to a lesser extent.. it's far from being a great FPS), and the 360 and PS3 platforms appeal to this. But I think we're going to see a few more non-wiimote oriented games soon, and because of that the Wii is a little more versatile for me. But that's just me.

      There is place for both, but if the chips were to fall right now, I would put it at Nintendo, then MS, then Sony. Sony really dropped the ball on this one (it hurts, especially since I love the PS2), but proclaiming MS the winner (as the OP did) is just foolish. And my assertion of using the Japanese market was intended to poke fun at the OP's comment that MS's marketing was highly superior to the other platforms. To most people it is an unneeded comparison, but sometimes fanboi's (like the OP) need to be put in their place ;-)

    33. Re:Microsoft will win next generation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " Will the PS3 stay at the back of the line when some good games come out? "

      So they're releasing Duke Nukem Forever for the PS3, too?

    34. Re:Microsoft will win next generation by gamer4Life · · Score: 1

      You say it like you think it's a good thing.

      That's one of the reasons I want Microsoft to lose when it comes to the Zune vs iPod, XBox vs PS3, and everything else it does. Because once it gets a monopoly, it ties it in with Windows - you can already see this happening with the XBox and Windows gaming.

      It's beyond me to see why people want Microsoft to win.

    35. Re:Microsoft will win next generation by coolhandlucas · · Score: 1

      If they include an electrode-studded top hat neural interface with the monocle I think I'd have to personally blow their good-idea guy, whoever that is. Please rate parent "funny as hell"
    36. Re:Microsoft will win next generation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nintendo is in the best position right now. If MS tries to pressure it's competitors by pushing another early release cycle, Nintendo has the cash to roll with it. Sony however, has their backs up against a wall expecting the PS3 to be relevant for a decade.

    37. Re:Microsoft will win next generation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nintendo aren't used to playing in the big leagues? Where have you been, the past 15 years?...

      And I'm sure the Microsoft executives see the Wii as a blessing in disguise...I can picture it now:

      Executive 1: Oh, thanks Nintendo, for making us lose money on our 360 for the next few years!
      Executive 2: Do you think we could just ....you know- buy Nintendo?

    38. Re:Microsoft will win next generation by sjelkjd · · Score: 1

      Not really sure where you got your numbers from, as they don't actually match the pages you linked to.

    39. Re:Microsoft will win next generation by spleen_blender · · Score: 1

      I still fail to see why this dick measuring even matters. If you are making enough money to cover your costs and build capital for future development, then what does your percent share in the market matter? Seems like if these companies looked inward and simply MADE CONSOLES and took up an attitude of be and let be (which seems like Nintendo is closest to doing), then both the producer and the consumer would be much happier.

      To sum up: profit is profit is profit and loss is loss is loss.

  6. Tit for tat... by Aphrika · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Figures like this are expendable - just wait until you get the sales figures for Wii vs. 360 after Mario Galaxies is released...

    1. Re:Tit for tat... by Floritard · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily, if only because of supply shortages. It isn't as hard to find as it used to be, but I still routinely see Wiis sold out at local gameshops. When I ask the clerk out of curiousity (I have one already), they often give me the "we get shipments on x-days and y-days, try and be here when the store opens" reply. If Mario Galaxies sparks any interest at all, the supply ceiling will be hit again in no time.

      All that said, as a Wii owner I am starting to get a little apprehensive about the future game library of this little machine. I'm not so loudly bemoaning the current vacuum as some, perhaps it's all the recent PC game goodness I've been enjoying. I'm really not interested in any of the recent console games on the PS3 or 360 either, but then again I won't be getting Force Unleashed or GTA4 on my Wii. Myself, I can still see a metric shit-ton of cool ideas for the wiimote, gimmicky as people are more recently wont to call it. The thing just works when used properly. However there does seem to be a real dearth of third party software even in the pipeline, despite all the rumblings of companies switching focus to the platform, which all too much resembles the two previous consoles Nintendo put out. I still feel burned for buying an N64 back in the day, and I skipped the Gamecube altogether because of that. I still like the wiimote (RE4/Metroid is great), and the machine is plenty pretty for me when devs put the time into it (Galaxies looks nice), but who knows if this was all just another Nintendo launch bubble. If Galaxies does anything this holiday season, it will just stave off the concerns for the console's future that people like myself might be pondering.

    2. Re:Tit for tat... by wilbz · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, there probably isn't going to be a significant shift in Wii sales simply because they are already selling out continuously . The only thing you will see after Super Mario Galaxy is released is lots of sales of Super Mario Galaxy, the Wii numbers will not shift significantly.

      Having owned a Wii since early 2007, and having just recently purchased a 360, I couldn't be any more excited about the upcoming Holiday season. The only real question is how I'm going to afford giving anyone else any gifts after I give so many to myself.

    3. Re:Tit for tat... by toolie · · Score: 1

      Having owned a Wii since early 2007, and having just recently purchased a 360, I couldn't be any more excited about the upcoming Holiday season. I counted up nine games I'm definately going to buy in the next two months and one maybe (Stranglehold - not sure about that one, yet). I am definately excited about the new releases this season. Only problem is trying to find the time to play each one. The spending spree is going to start with Guitar Hero 3 and not slow down until December at the earliest :/
      --
      -- toolie
    4. Re:Tit for tat... by brkello · · Score: 1

      I predict Halo 3 will easily sell more than Mario Galaxies. And you can't see a sharp spike for the Wiis since they are sold out and Nintendo seems to be doing nothing to increase production.

      --
      Support a great indie game: http://www.abaddon360.com
    5. Re:Tit for tat... by tepples · · Score: 1

      When I ask the clerk out of curiousity (I have one already), they often give me the "we get shipments on x-days and y-days, try and be here when the store opens" reply. When does a 24-hour Wal-Mart store "open"? The only time the Wal-Mart store "closes" is on December 24 at 1800 hours, after which it "opens" on December 26 at 0600 hours. By then they're probably sold out anyway.
    6. Re:Tit for tat... by Floritard · · Score: 1

      I could have swore I said "local gameshops." I don't shop at Walmart, I'm not yet that dead inside.

    7. Re:Tit for tat... by Endo13 · · Score: 1

      Not in the long run. Halo3 might outsell initially, but then when it's done it's done. Meanwhile Mario Galaxies will still be selling five years from now when the Wii is in the same bargain bin the GC has been the last couple years. Not to mention the virtual console sales for the Wii's successor. NES and SNES games are still chalking up "new" sales, while XBox games aren't even available any more except on the used market.

      And that's the difference between the 'flavor of the month' games vs. the true classics.

      Of course no one can tell for certain yet that Galaxies will be another classic, but given the track record of the past Mario games, it's a pretty safe bet.

      --
      There is no -1 Disagree mod. Slashdot.org/faq defines mod options. USE IT.
    8. Re:Tit for tat... by rbarreira · · Score: 1

      Nintendo is stockpiling a huge amount of Wiis for the holiday season. They have said so at least twice.

      --

      The AACS key is NOT 0xF606EEFD628B1CA427BEA93A9CA9773F
    9. Re:Tit for tat... by brkello · · Score: 1

      Then Nintendo is stupid. Why would you stockpile something when it is selling out now? So you can sell it out months from now?

      --
      Support a great indie game: http://www.abaddon360.com
    10. Re:Tit for tat... by rbarreira · · Score: 1

      No, I think it's for at least these two reasons:

      1- Outselling the competition during the holidays will get them a load of free publicity
      2- During the holidays, some customers just have to buy a console (i.e. as a present for the kids). If said customers don't find a Wii, some of them will choose another console. That's less likely to happen outside the holiday period, hence supply should increase to avoid this problem.

      --

      The AACS key is NOT 0xF606EEFD628B1CA427BEA93A9CA9773F
    11. Re:Tit for tat... by brkello · · Score: 1

      Like what, Sunshine? Though, that isn't really fair considering how poorly the Gamecube sold. I think the main problem with your theory is that people who are buying the Wii right now aren't the type of people who buy many games. They basically got the Wii for Wii Sports and they aren't going to get anything else until there is Wii Sports 2 or some other game that is more casual/social. Mario games aren't really casual games (unless they totally re-design it to be which would totally alienate their core). And it doesn't seem like people have as much nostalgia with games post-NES era as they did with the NES and the Atari.

      I am not saying Galaxies won't deserve to sell more (who knows since it isn't even out anyways). I am just saying that most Xbox360 owners are going to get Halo3 while a lot of people with Wiis will still be playing Tennis.

      I really don't think Halo can be considered a flavor of the month. I know it isn't very popular on this site since everything Wii == good and everything MS == bad (and that people here hate FPSs for some reason), but you have to give the game credit that it deserves...even if it isn't your thing.

      But we will see. The Mario platformers got a bit old for me years ago. Though I still like the Zeldas and Metroids.

      --
      Support a great indie game: http://www.abaddon360.com
    12. Re:Tit for tat... by LKM · · Score: 1

      I think Halo 3 will sell 70-80% of its total sales within the first month. That's the usual sales pattern for hardcore FPS. Halo 3 will be sold for 20 bucks within half a year.

      Galaxy, on the other hand, will keep selling for the lifespan of the Wii, and will retain its launch price for years.

      Given the installed base of the two consoles, and sales histories of the two franchises, I would bet quite a bit of money on Galaxy outselling Halo 3.

    13. Re:Tit for tat... by LKM · · Score: 1

      1) New Super Mario Bros is the second-best selling Mario game ever
      2) Attach Rate on the Wii is higher than on the PS3 and on par with the 360 at the same time in its life span

      The whole "new Mario games don't sell" and "Wii owners don't buy games" memes quite simply don't match the actual numbers.

    14. Re:Tit for tat... by LKM · · Score: 1

      They have said no such thing. What they have said is that the Wii is guaranteed to sell out come Christmas.

    15. Re:Tit for tat... by rbarreira · · Score: 1
      They really have! Look at the following:

      Reggie Swears Life Upon "Unprecented Wii Supply" for Holidays in North America

      Source: http://tinyurl.com/3cro8k

       

      9:17 a.m.: Been making more Wii systems. Demand continues to surprise Nintendo. Consumers will still have to "hustle" to find the system this year. Will have about two times the product they had last year.

      Source: http://tinyurl.com/2ue39n
      --

      The AACS key is NOT 0xF606EEFD628B1CA427BEA93A9CA9773F
    16. Re:Tit for tat... by LKM · · Score: 1

      Yes, but that is very likely a result of their increasing of production capacity, not of stockpiling. I doubt they're stockpiling; otherwise, sales would go down, but they're keeping steady and even increasing a bit world-wide.

    17. Re:Tit for tat... by DaveCBio · · Score: 1

      Totally wrong. What will give Halo 3 long legs is the multiplayer. Until H3 came out the biggest game on Xbox Live was Halo 2 and that's years after release. The pattern you mention is really only applicable to single player games like Bioshock or games with weak multiplayer that no one bothers with. Halo 3 will continue to sell well through 2008 at least.

    18. Re:Tit for tat... by rbarreira · · Score: 1

      Sales being steady doesn't mean they haven't been stockpiling... It's possible they increased production a few months ago already, and are stocking part of it for the holiday period. It's a common strategy when there's high demand for a product.

      Anyway, the effect should be the same for the holiday period. If supply decreases immediately after, we'll know they were stockpiling.

      --

      The AACS key is NOT 0xF606EEFD628B1CA427BEA93A9CA9773F
    19. Re:Tit for tat... by SethraLavode · · Score: 1

      You are using two completely different sets of numbers to support your position.

      The fact that a number of people were continuing to play Halo 2 on Live has little relation to the number of copies of Halo 2 that were continuing to be sold. In fact, there's an argument to be made that ongoing online play of a popular title could retard sales of other, newer titles.

      Yes, Halo 3 will continue to sell modestly through 2008. The holiday season will see brisk sales and there will probably be another small bump in sales when the next significant price drop for the 360 is announced. However, there is nothing from the sales patterns of previous Halo games to indicate that Halo 3 will continue to sell significantly beyond the holiday season. It might come close to the sales of Halo 2 (8 million), but the price differences between generations (hw + sw) are probably too much to overcome.

      Nintendo, on the other hand, has mastered the art of the long tail sale. Galaxy will probably end up selling more than Halo 3, by all indications. You're probably not aware of the fact that New Super Mario Brothers is the second best selling Mario title of all time, are you? Yet, it's sold over ten million copies, and continues to do so.

    20. Re:Tit for tat... by LKM · · Score: 1

      Yeah, time will tell :-)

    21. Re:Tit for tat... by LKM · · Score: 1

      Most people who play Halo 2 years after it was released are hardcore gamers who bought it the day it came out.

    22. Re:Tit for tat... by DaveCBio · · Score: 1

      You are obviously oblivious to the number of unique players playing Halo 2 and now Halo 3. Word of mouth alone will continue to drive sales. Halo 2 sold incredibly well and so will Halo 3, but your Mario colored glasses won't allow you to conceded that Halo 3 is a hit and will continue to have brisk sales for quite some time as Halo 2 did. And please don't try to argue that Halo 2 number will impede Halo 3 sales because most of those people that were hardcore fans have already transitioned to a 360 and now Halo 3.

  7. How long since the quit? by BitterAndDrunk · · Score: 2, Informative
    If it's the first few days, yeah, you'll have that.
    Your body's going through withdrawal symptoms and keeping you awake.

    Your sleep should return to normalcy in a week or so.

    --
    You better watch out, there may be dogs about . . .
    1. Re:How long since the quit? by the_wishbone · · Score: 1

      Hmm...I was wondering why, for the first time ever, I was having trouble sleeping...since I normally have trouble staying awake. Didn't even think about the fact that I had quit cold turkey...makes sense. Luckily it's back to normal...although I seem to get pissed off easily and I'm only on my third week...haha

  8. Apples and Oranges by Akaihiryuu · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So they compare a month in which the 360 had a "big" game released and the Wii didn't have any major releases, and saying that the 360 sold more than the Wii in that particular month is news somehow? Plus, the Wii is still having supply issues (at least in the US)...for the most part you still can't go into a store and pick one up off the shelf, whereas there are piles of 360's everywhere, this has to play a part too.

    1. Re:Apples and Oranges by steveo777 · · Score: 1
      Not so sure it's apples and oranges. Maybe Fuji apples vs Golden Delicious. Games are going to continue to drive 360 sales all the way through the holidays into Christmas. Remember that Halo 3 is the biggest game for the 360 right now. Hotly anticipated. But in November we'll see the release of Assassin's Creed and Mass Effect. Sales will increase for those games, and just because it's the coming up on the holidays. Yeah, the Wii and PS3 will experience that as well, but you don't have a lot 'A' games coming out on those systems, either. Just my two cents.

      Personally I cannot wait for Fire Emblem on the Wii, and Mass Effect for the 360. It's going to be a sleepless November for me...

      --
      This sig isn't original enough, it's time to come up with something witty...
    2. Re:Apples and Oranges by iainl · · Score: 1

      It may have taken the release of Halo 3, but the 360 outselling the Wii for the first time is still a valid news item, I believe. Microsoft should have been pretty worried if it _hadn't_ happen, but plenty of people were curious to see if it would be the case.

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
  9. The Real Story by Applekid · · Score: 1

    360 surpassing Wii by only a couple dozen thousand units isn't nearly as interesting as the 360 outselling the PS3 5:1. Sony's gotta be hurtin'.

    Now, if Smash Bros. and Mario Kart weren't pushed back, and if Wii wasn't in such short supply, I wonder if the 360 would keep it's lead. Either way, can the 360 sustain the current lead for the next 3 months?

    --
    More Twoson than Cupertino
    1. Re:The Real Story by ravenshrike · · Score: 1

      If the 360 was outselling the PS3 5:1 when games like GT5, FFXIII, etc... etc... were coming out, you MIGHT have a point. As it is, the PS3 had no major releases, while the 360 had literally the biggest new release of it's history, and only managed to boost output 5 times over the PS3. Not too impressive. Whereas the Wii would have readily outsold the 360 had units been easily available.

    2. Re:The Real Story by Liquidrage · · Score: 1

      Not too impressive? Get back to me when the PS3 outsells the 360 5:1 when the PS3 has a major release.

      Not to mention that 360 has been out much longer and the market is already more saturated with 360's. Not to mention the 360's been outselling the PS3 anyways all along.

      The PS3 just doesn't offer anything other then blu-ray player. They can't compete with the casual fun of the Wii. And it can't compete with XBL. Sony had everything going for them after PS2 and blew it.

    3. Re:The Real Story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, it's fantastic that two years into this generation, the 360 is only outselling the PS3 by 500%. One day, someone's going to make a good game for the PS3, and I'm telling you, things will change then!

    4. Re:The Real Story by Qfour20 · · Score: 1

      360 surpassing Wii by only a couple dozen thousand units **head explodes**

      All kidding aside, I couldn't agree with you more. I really think that all of the "sales numbers" that compare ps3 to wii or x360 to wii or caribou migration to wii are meaningless at this time. These statistics are comparing apples to oranges. What is really being compared is:

      How many consoles microsoft/rootkit (err... sony) can SELL
      to how many consoles nintendo can manufacture

      -q
    5. Re:The Real Story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't hold your breath for it, but this generation is still very young.

      The 360 is FAR from the be-all-end-all game console. You have to be a complete stooge to think it is. A PS3 offers much more than just a Blu-ray player, crawl out from under that rock and take a look.
      The market is not "more saturated" with 360s, whatever that means. The market is not saturated with anything next-gen right now. I don't suppose you've thought about what will happen when those who bought PS2s over the last year decide to upgrade to a PS3 should the price keep falling. Sony still has a VERY strong presence, more than both XBox generations combined.

    6. Re:The Real Story by Liquidrage · · Score: 1

      Oh right, the PS3 also offers games. Some that look as good as 360's. Some that don't.

      And it has nothing to compete with XBL.
      I eagerly await you dissing XBL as if 6,000,000+ people haven't used it. Yes, it must suck. The idea of have a $5 a month gaming community service that most people who use it love, will just never work.

      And of course the market isn't "more saturated" with 360's. Whatever that means. Because there are far more PS3's sold, right?

      I really wonder what will happen to all those PS2 buyers. I really do. Because we all know they're going to get a PS3. Because it's just more fun then the Wii. And does a much better job of getting you playing with your friends then the 360.

      No dumbass, the only reason to get a PS3 over the other systems is blu-ray. That's it. Everyone knows it. It's why they don't sell for crap.

      Sometimes you just shouldn't post. And you AC, shouldn't have posted.

    7. Re:The Real Story by xhrit · · Score: 1

      60 does not compete with the ps3. It competes with the ps2.

      Is it really interesting that the 360 is just now in the last 3 months surpassing the ps2? Not nearly as interesting as the fact that the 360 went a full year getting soundly beaten by a 5 year old system.

      Ov course, the xbox3 will be out before the 10 million ps2 owners decide to upgrade to a ps3. I guess MS can claim a moral victory.

      :)

    8. Re:The Real Story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True, makes sense since MS said they would release their console early to jump-start the next generation

    9. Re:The Real Story by xero314 · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that 360 has been out much longer and the market is already more saturated with 360's. You are totally correct with this statement, but you don't realize that this is not a good thing for the 360.

      The reasonable expectation of total sales of 360s would be a moderate improvement over previous generation sales. Last generation the XBox sold less than 24 million units world wide, meaning the current 12 million units 25% (significant growth) To 50%(no growth) of the total expected sales of the console this generation. This is a significant in comparison to market saturation and means future sales will be much slower than current.

      On the other hand the PS3 has reached very little toward market saturation as its current 5 million units is less than 5% of the reasonable expectation, and even less when your realize it's predecessors market is still growing.

      The Wii has actually gone and carved it's own new market, which seems to be having little effect on the other market, that may or may not have room for considerable growth so it's saturation point is entirely unpredictable.
    10. Re:The Real Story by elrous0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      the PS3 had no major releases
      That pretty much sums up the PS3's entire first year
      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    11. Re:The Real Story by elrous0 · · Score: 2, Funny

      n the other hand the PS3 has reached very little toward market saturation as its current 5 million units is less than 5% of the reasonable expectation,
      Uh, you think the PS3 selling over 100 million units is a "reasonable expectation?" Are you on frakkin drugs?
      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    12. Re:The Real Story by xero314 · · Score: 1

      Uh, you think the PS3 selling over 100 million units is a "reasonable expectation?" Anyone that does not is just holding on to hope that some other console manufacturer will be able to crack Sony's dominance. The Prior 2 generations have be completely dominated by Sony, more so than any other console maker in history has done. This is not a guarantee of future dominance but when factoring in the current generations sales you can see that 100 million is the most likely outcome for the PS3.

      The Last Generations total console sales were 164 million units so far, with Sony the only manufacturer still selling significant numbers of previous generation units. Of those 164 million units, over 60% of the sales (split among 4 manufacturers) a attributed to the PS2. This means that a stagnant market can support 160+ million consoles. So far this generation has seen just around 25 million units sold, which means the vast majority of units in consumers hands are still the last generation. It will still be some time before the still remaining 115 million PS2 owners decide to upgrade to the current generation and it is very safe to say that they will be likely to choose a console from a brand they already use and trust. Recently Wii sales have noticeably dropped off, 360 sales are up and PS3 sales have stayed even and happen to match pretty close to the growth rate of last generation.

      I know it's nice to think that Sony is failing and that this is some sort of payback for their root kits, exploding batteries and other such nonsense, but in reality (A.K.A. off of slashdot) most people do not know about or care about these issues and are just waiting for the PS3 to have a larger library and a lower cost. As of the end of this year they will have both of those, so we will probably some change in sales at that point.
    13. Re:The Real Story by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      XBL would be great if you didn't have to deal with the multitude of retards on XBL. In the meantime, it's about the same as all those other crappy online services.

    14. Re:The Real Story by Liquidrage · · Score: 1

      What on Earth are you smoking right now? 100 million sales for a console that is seriously trailing the other two consoles? It's overpriced, underperforms, and certainly has no hope in the near future of competing with either of the other two systems.

      "it is very safe to say that they will be likely to choose a console from a brand they already use and trust"

      What? You're smoking crack. They'll choose what has the best library. And unless you can magically fix the PS3's woes here compared to the Xbox. Or the Wii's domination of the "fun factor", it aint going to be the one they choose. They choose the PS2 because of the library and it being the one everyone said they should have, because it had the games they'd heard about and wanted to play. That is certainly not the PS3.

      And no, the PS3 is now way behind the PS2 in sales based on week. Initial launches almost all look alike since it's production limited. Past the first few weeks is when you get your real look, and VG Charts clearly has the PS3 lacking compared to last gen.

      I trusted and loved the PS2. Not a chance in hell I'd waste my money on a PS3 right now. The games just aren't there. The community just isn't there.

    15. Re:The Real Story by xero314 · · Score: 1

      What? They'll choose what has the best library. Quantifying "best" is a difficult task, but being as the PS3 has more Triple A titles available than the other 2 systems, as long as you factor in backward compatibility, then currently it looks like the PS3 takes the Best library issue hands down. Both the 360 and the PS3 have a extensive list of titles that are highly anticipated, and the Wii seems to have a slightly smaller list in this category.

      People will also chose the system that they already have a large library for, which that is hand down the PS3 as well since the number of PS2/1 game units sold is staggering compared to the other systems. The PS2 had an abysmal library until well into it's second year.

      And no, the PS3 is now way behind the PS2 in sales based on week...Past the first few weeks is when you get your real look, and VG Charts clearly has the PS3 lacking compared to last gen. You need to understand a few things about market cycles and how they compare for weekly sales of products. The only reasonable comparison is for a complete production run and even then over a long enough time frame. Prior to the 42 week of sales the PS2 and PS3 were nearly neck and neck. At around the 42 week the PS2 had a large market push and a number of relatively high profile releases. In the 50 something week (what ever week this is) the PS3 has had a significant price drop and a number of high profile games being released in short order. You will see in the next few weeks that the PS3 sales will jump ahead of the PS2 production run sales for the same number of weeks of production. On average they will remain nearly identical.

      In general you sound much like the Dreamcast supporters who thought their 10 million unit head start would amount to success in the last generation when in reality it ended with a complete dead last and to demise of the manufacture, as a console manufacture. Predictions about this generation will not even be close to accurate for another 16 months or so. You will see significant changes in the rankings as of this holiday season.

      The XBox just made it's only stab at dominance, and as much as Halo 3 will boost sales it's certainly not enough to be on the top of the market after the 5-7 span of the generation. The Wii is having impressive sales but is showing serious signs of that pattern not lasting long.The PS2 has the largest fan base of GH players (having had 3 releases) and many of those fans are going to want to upgrade to a new system so they can have downloadable content and they will, in many cases, dare I say the majority, mean purchasing a PS3 to play it on (not to mention Rock Band which leaves the Wii out in the cold and the million strong R&C fan base). You can make any prediction you want but counting the PS3 out as a contender for this generations top seller is just being ignorant of markets and market strategy.
    16. Re:The Real Story by LKM · · Score: 1

      XBL sucks because it costs money. I like to play a few online matches from time to time, but not nearly enough to pay 60 bucks a year for it. It's one of the reasons I don't (yet) own a 360: I would not be able to play any of the games online.

      There, I've said it.

      Many of the PS2 buyers (a huge number of whom bought it for stuff like SingStar or Buzz) will buy a Wii.

    17. Re:The Real Story by LKM · · Score: 1

      Anyone that does not is just holding on to hope that some other console manufacturer will be able to crack Sony's dominance.

      Newsflash: Aforementioned dominance has gone from "waiting to be cracked" to "lying dead and rotting in a gutter." This generation is over for Sony. They can count themselves lucky if they capture 25% of the market this time. In total sales, I doubt they'll even reach 40 millions.

    18. Re:The Real Story by LKM · · Score: 1

      Quantifying "best" is a difficult task, but being as the PS3 has more Triple A titles available than the other 2 systems

      Except that it does not. The newer PS3 versions do not even feature backwards compatibility anymore.

      If people chose the system they had a large library for, Atari would rule the console market.

      Yeah, the PS2 had a bad library for its first year, but it had developer support, and the PS3 does not.

      I know it hurts to accept that you've basically wasted 600 bucks. Get over it like the rest of us.

    19. Re:The Real Story by xero314 · · Score: 1

      I know it hurts to accept that you've basically wasted 600 bucks. Screw it. I don't need to defend Sony, and I certainly don't need to be explaining the detailed workings of market economics in a web forum. We will see were everything is in the Next 5 years. My bet is that there will be a lot of happy 360, Wii and PS3 owners and all three manufactures will be announcing their next entry into the game console market (With the possible exception of Microsoft, who is showing signs that they are considering pulling out of the market, but I certainly would not make that prediction just yet). At around 50 million total units we may start to see a clear winner emerge but the one things that looks pretty certain is that it won't be a total blow out like the last 2 generations, and some people seem to think this is good for the market. I only hope that it is.

      I will end up chosing the console that is bound to have the games I like, but so far I am in with the majority of the gaming market and have not seen a reason to get a current generation system (therefor I have not wasted $600 or even $1)
    20. Re:The Real Story by LKM · · Score: 1

      We will see were everything is in the Next 5 years

      Indeed we will :-)

      My bet is that there will be a lot of happy 360, Wii and PS3 owners and all three manufactures will be announcing their next entry into the game console market (With the possible exception of Microsoft, who is showing signs that they are considering pulling out of the market, but I certainly would not make that prediction just yet). At around 50 million total units we may start to see a clear winner emerge but the one things that looks pretty certain is that it won't be a total blow out like the last 2 generations, and some people seem to think this is good for the market. I only hope that it is.

      I agree with everything you've said (except that I'm quite sure that more viable consoles are better for consumers - the PS2 lineup of games was one of the most uninspired I've ever seen; now that I own a PS3 and can play all the PS2 games that interest me, I bought a grand total of 16 PS2 games. Already, the Wii and PS3 have provided more interesting stuff in under a year than the PS2 did in all of its life).

      I used to think the PS3 would place second. Given what I know now - performance so far, games announced - I now think the PS3 will be this generation's Gamecube: Great first-party support, crappy third-party support. I own a PS3, and I know I'll be a happy owner once Little Big Planet hits. I also don't expect much from EA (what the hell, EA? Skate is the best you can do with framerate?), Activision and other devs, just like I didn't expect much from them when I owned a Cube. I was happy with my Cube due to Nintendo's games, and I'll be happy with the PS3 due to Sony's games, but I have no hopes that the PS3 will be able to compete with the 360 sales-wise.

  10. Halo 3 move 3.3 million units by brokeninside · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That's quite a few units. If I remember the numbers correctly, the latest version of Madden didn't sell that many units across all of the platforms its on the first month hit was out. It looks like about 1 out of 3 XBox 360 owners purchased Halo 3.

  11. MS vs Wii by ObiWanStevobi · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I still fail to see how MS or PS3 are competing against the Wii. Maybe the fact that they all play games, but MS and Sony are the two really competing for a similar market.

    Anyway, Halo was huge for the Xbox and will continue to push sales for a while. The downside of this seems to be that alot of other really good games are being drowned out. The Orange Box hit the 360 with very little fanfare and poor marketing, despite being one of the best collection of games I've ever seen. In November, Assassins Creed, Blacksite, and Mass Effect will be released. Although Blacksite initially looked really good, I can't see buying it now that I have Halo 3 and 3 updated Half Life titles.

    1. Re:MS vs Wii by Liquidrage · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The 360's greatest selling point is Live.

      While it's often dissed here. Live is truely fantastic and next-gen in service and application.

      I can download movies, TV shows, new games, demos (free), trailers for upcoming games. If it weren't for the fact I'm a sports junkie it would be cheaper for me to ditch digital cable and only download my shows and movies off of XBL.
      I can keep track of my friends, invite them to games or get invited into their games. It keeps track of achievements and a lot more.

      I run a major hockey site. On our hockey site we have a video game subforum. In there I have a dynamic Xbox Live leaderboard. Any member of our forum can go into our site, add their XBL gamer tag, and be included in the list. We can do friends invites right from our hockey forum. I can actually send a message from our hockey forum to one of our members while they are in Xbox playing a game. It also shows what games they're playing, what they've recently played, and we can compare achievements easily. *for privacy folks, you can choose to hide all this stuff so others can't see it*

      the Wii has it's niche as the casual party machine. The Xbox has it's niche due to live. It isn't competing with the PS3 any more then it is the Wii. In fact, XBL Arcade is probably closer to the Wii in terms of competition then what the PS3 offers. XBL just works. Easy to use, lot's of content to offer. The PS3 doesn't have a real niche and it's why no one buys them. Anyone that buys a PS3 for anything other then a blu-ray player is nuts.

    2. Re:MS vs Wii by pokerdad · · Score: 1

      I still fail to see how MS or PS3 are competing against the Wii.

      They are competing for the finite money that consumers have to spend, and they are competing for the finite money developers have to invest. (also, in homes where non-gamers parents are buying a system for gamer children, the differences you note between the systems are irrellevant; most of these homes will get only one system, meaning the products are competing directly)

      Perhaps most importantly the three systems are competing for consumers' time; for those gamer that only have 5 hours a week to game, any one system provides more than enough to do. (making a second or third system superfluous)

      Mini-vans are about as different from SMART cars as 360s from Wii, but in both cases consumers may weight one versus the other and make a choice. (in fact I made both of these choices this year)

    3. Re:MS vs Wii by Immerial · · Score: 1

      "The 360's greatest selling point is Live.

      While it's often dissed here. Live is truely fantastic and next-gen in service and application."

      I agree with you that Live is well done but the dissing is appropriate here. It's another Microsoft proprietary world full of DRM on a subscription model. Basically a Microsoft dream come true. I love the privacy note you added... what you are missing is the fact that you are trusting Microsoft with that privacy. What I don't like is that I am already paying for my internet connection and I have to pay XBL on top of that. What would be great is some open version on MBL. Don't get me wrong... I love playing on MBL but it is evil!

    4. Re:MS vs Wii by Liquidrage · · Score: 1

      I would agree with you but Live to me *is* that type of service DRM should be for. I really don't mind a service with micro-payments letting you pick single episodes or movies, giving them to you in digital downloads, and not letting them be transfered off to other devices.

      I think the cost of some of the shows should still come down. Though I'd still save a ton of money if it wasn't for sports. I basically watch Family Guy, House, Lost when it's new, and some documentaries. I can get all that on Live for less then $10 a month on average. It's a la carte programming to the extreme.

      I don't complain that movie theaters charge me a ticket but don't let me record a show. I actually like indemand on Comcast, and I don't complain that I can't burn the shows off of that without DRM. I actually support the rights of content producers to protect their copyrights. What I don't support is neverending rights like Disney has. Or not being able to burn my own CD to my computer to make it easier for me to watch. Since I consider this almost exactly like inDemand, but only without the need for cable itself (only internet) I actually don't mind one bit having DRM in it.

      And also, where do you get off that DRM is MS's dream? MS wants you to be able to rip and burn to your hearts content. It's not their content you're burning. It's their stuff your using to burn it. DRM is not MS's toy.

      As to the cost, obviously some see it as not needed. To me it's a service, and I don't mind paying for it because I use it enough to warrant it. It's working pretty well so obviously many see it was worth it. But like anything else, if you're not playing games, or the TV/Movies isn't enough to warrant it, clearly it wouldn't be worth it.
      Though I do see a day where it's ad supported enough, or even subsidized off the games/console to make it free. That's probably a few years away though.

    5. Re:MS vs Wii by DeepZenPill · · Score: 1

      I agree with you there, I'm a huge Halo fan and lost a good amount of sleep after the release but I haven't touched it since the Orange box came out. Looking forward to all of the other highly anticipated games, I almost want to bury my head in the sand and avoid any gaming news at all because there's going to be such a glut of good games. It's one thing to have your game out before the holiday season, but you would think that a little more of a staggered release schedule would really help individual titles and system sales overall.

    6. Re:MS vs Wii by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I still fail to see how MS or PS3 are competing against the Wii. Maybe the fact that they all play games... Gee, do ya think?

      All three are competing for the same market - people who want a home video game console. End of story.

      The whole "We're not competing" line resulted from Nintendo's marketing judo against Sony's "We don't acknowledge them as a competitor". I'm tired of seeing it trotted out as though it actually meant something.

      Every article like this is proof that competition between each of the Big Three is hot.

      D.
    7. Re:MS vs Wii by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 1

      +1 to that. Live is really well done, and for me it was the primary reason I got an XBox Live. I have some friends back in my home country, and playing XBL games with them is a good way to keep in touch. There's tons of demos to download, and the XBL Arcade basically solves the party game niche I was considering a Wii for. I'm a big Nintendo fan, and own a DS, but the Wii doesn't have a comparable online experience (and even if it did, it doesn't have my friends on it ...)

    8. Re:MS vs Wii by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yes, it's DRM on subscription, but solving that problem is really outside Microsofts scope. Believe me, NO software company wants to waste time writing and defending DRM software. They do it because the alternative is not being able to sell stuff, and in some cases (like video games) there is no equivalent of the open source model to fill in the gaps with alternative revenue streams.

      Seriously. DRM is just a time and money sink. It's necessary because it pays for itself many times over, when done correctly (note: a cracked drm that requires exotic and annoying workarounds will still fulfil its goal). If everybody could be trusted to buy the things they use, it wouldn't be necessary, and the time spent on it would be spent on improving the product instead. But we don't live in such a world.

      If we had an economic model in which anybody could copy to their hearts content, and the content creators still got paid commensurate to their products popularity - then you wouldn't need DRM. But it's pretty hard to imagine how that'd work.

    9. Re:MS vs Wii by ObiWanStevobi · · Score: 1

      Offtopic, but: About the Major hockey site, what is it? I'm a fan of NHL games. I generally craft my franchise teams of all former Gopher and UMD players. Many can be found in the minor rosters that the newer games now include. I grew up with and even played (sat the bench) on teams with many of them. (Adam Hauser, Gino Guyer, Andy Sertich, Adam Johnson, Beau Geisler, Josh Miskovich, Marco Peluso)

    10. Re:MS vs Wii by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

      If we had an economic model in which anybody could copy to their hearts content, and the content creators still got paid commensurate to their products popularity - then you wouldn't need DRM. But it's pretty hard to imagine how that'd work. What's that bit about getting "paid commensurate to their products popularity" doing in there? You don't need that. It takes the same amount of work to make the content, no matter how many people eventually end up using it, so there's no natural reason for more popular content to result in bigger payoffs. The obsession with getting paid based on the number of people who use your product, instead of based on the costs you actually incurred to make it, is based on nothing but greed.

      Just pay people for making the content in the first place, and then you won't need DRM - they won't need to control copying because they've already been paid for the time they put into the product. For an example of how that can work, look at Sellaband, or the model for some open source projects: set a financial goal and say "here's what we have in mind, we're going to need $X to make it, so click here to contribute as much as you want".
      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    11. Re:MS vs Wii by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 1

      Yes, there is. If people didn't get paid relative to popularity, then how do you decide how much a particular thing is worth? These debates get to the heart of what "value" is and how the creation of it should be rewarded. How much is a particular "piece" of "content" worth? $10? $100? $1000? If JK Rowling had been paid $100 per Harry Potter book max, do you think she'd have written seven of them? Yet these books (and movies) have brought immense entertainment value to our society, which is a fancy way to say, lots of people enjoyed them.

    12. Re:MS vs Wii by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

      Yes, there is. If people didn't get paid relative to popularity, then how do you decide how much a particular thing is worth? It's worth whatever people will pay for it, like anything else. Good authors can charge more for their time than bad authors.

      How much is a particular "piece" of "content" worth? $10? $100? $1000? Each copy is worth approximately zero, since copies cost approximately nothing to make. The value is in the original act of writing it.

      If JK Rowling had been paid $100 per Harry Potter book max, do you think she'd have written seven of them? You don't think her time is that worthless, do you? Why would you, or anyone else, offer only $100 for writing an entire novel?

      The act of writing a Harry Potter book is worth exactly the same no matter how many people end up buying a copy. If one person buys a copy and shares it with a million friends who all enjoy it, why should Rowling get paid any less than if a million people each bought their own copies? She did exactly the same work and used exactly the same amount of talent.
      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
  12. The Numbers Are Skued by chrisG23 · · Score: 1
    What does across all SKU's mean? That across all stores that are selling it, the sum total of their individual inventory system and internal designations for the game equal the total number sold? Why not just say that the game sold X number of copies.

    I must be new here. In Soviet Russia the state welcomes your new SKUlord masters. I should get out, onto a lawn.

    1. Re:The Numbers Are Skued by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      What does across all SKU's mean? It means there were 3 versions of Halo for sale. Regular, collector's edition, and legendary (with the cat helmet). All 3 of those combined sales are reported in the figures.
    2. Re:The Numbers Are Skued by toolie · · Score: 1

      It means there were 3 versions of Halo for sale. Regular, collector's edition, and legendary (with the cat helmet). If that helmet fits your cat, don't piss it off. He's liable to eat your face and is probably a baby tiger rather than a house cat.
      --
      -- toolie
    3. Re:The Numbers Are Skued by chrisG23 · · Score: 1
      It means there were 3 versions of Halo for sale. Regular, collector's edition, and legendary (with the cat helmet). All 3 of those combined sales are reported in the figures.

      So why not just say that sales were x Gazillion across all versions, or across all packages, or just say simply sales were x Gazillion. Your average person in the English speaking society I live in does not know or care what a SKU is. I know what a SKU, only from reading Slashdot. The only other time I've encountered the term was when I friend of mine, who works in retail, used it, correctly, in context to a STORE KEEPING UNIT.

  13. Re:Nintendo will win next generation by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You forget one crucial component:
    Nintendo will have the $249 next gen HD capable console (that will also be profitable) and compatible with the Wii and it's extensive install base.
    Nintendo will continue to have MORE ideas, and will poach the great ones from Microsoft as well.

    You think Microsoft will win because they can copy Nintendo?
    That's like saying Microsoft's Zune will win because they copied the iPod... and then the iPod Touch gets released. Oops.

  14. PS2 outselling PS3. by gravis777 · · Score: 1

    Kinda see now Sony's decision to remove backwards compatability from the PS3. With the PS2 still selling as strong as it is, the PS3 would be a direct competitor to their own product. Let's drop backwards compatability and then sell both consoles

  15. Troll huh by JeremyGNJ · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I almost cant believe it. I make a post with an opinion and make various points to back it up and people mod me as trolling?

    The slashdot community need to grow up.

    1. Re:Troll huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be new here.

    2. Re:Troll huh by zsouthboy · · Score: 3, Funny

      We're going through puberty, you insensitive clod!

    3. Re:Troll huh by Endo13 · · Score: 1

      Excellent post, should be modded up.

      --
      There is no -1 Disagree mod. Slashdot.org/faq defines mod options. USE IT.
    4. Re:Troll huh by enderjsv · · Score: 1

      "Excellent post, should be modded up" gets modded up to 3? I think he was talking about the parent post, not his own post.

    5. Re:Troll huh by realthing02 · · Score: 1

      What about the demographic that likes consoles and wants to play online? Or the demographic with the HDTV sets? Or jsut people who might not be interested in a "gimmicky" control scheme?

      I'm not saying the wii is bad, or that everyone thinks the control scheme is a gimmick, but certain people do, and it extends far beyond the spoiled kids and bone headed athletes, as you say. I'd pay a lot more attention to your points if they weren't so laced with bias and slant.

      Lastly, your point with vista has no relevance to the xbox. To be sure, vista has to deal with a lot of legacy issues, security issues, etc. And do you know how Microsoft word was developed? it wasn't the first product of it's kind, but it absolutely did well on it's own merit. not by FUD, not by stabbing others in the back, by, gasp, being a good product.

      I know it's fashionable to bash MS, but just because they've screwed up some things, doesn't mean they've screwed up everything. And I'll even leave this one open for some obvious joke.

  16. Finding a Wii by tgibbs · · Score: 1

    yes, people are still having a hard time finding it. none of the stores i've been in have it around here (target, walmart, best buy, etc). i don't shop at places like eb games or gamestop very often, so i don't know about them.


    I've never seen one on the shelves. But list price non-bundled Wii's do pop up occasionally on the web sites of major retailers like ToysRUs and Sears. I was clued in to order one from ToysRUs by the WiiTracker web site

  17. Explore other market with this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NEW Windows Vista with HALO3 integration! Shoot folders,run over progress bars Blow up BSODs.

    1. Re:Explore other market with this by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

      Not new.

      Google for psdoom...

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  18. Re:Nintendo will win next generation by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

    You forget one crucial component:
    Nintendo will have the $249 next gen HD capable console (that will also be profitable) and compatible with the Wii and it's extensive install base.
    Nintendo will continue to have MORE ideas, and will poach the great ones from Microsoft as well. That's the point I never understood, how could backwards compatibility be considered anything but crucial? Especially during a launch, one of the biggest selling points of the new system is you also have access to all of the old system's libraries. If a new customer is coming over to your side, say Sony's, and they never had the previous system, you've just sold them on getting a chance to play the whole library of old games, too. There was some excuse for incompatibility issues back in the days of carts. With today's optical media, there is no excuse whatsoever.
    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  19. Wii selling out by Taulin · · Score: 1

    Since the Wii is still selling out, isn't its sales figures just a number on how many units they shipped? I know it is pretty close since I can't find them in Austin, and even my relative in Illinois can't either. Because of this, you can't really compare numbers since Wii sales are capped currently.

    1. Re:Wii selling out by Chosen+Reject · · Score: 1

      Not that it really matters anyway. Seriously, I was looking at vgchartz.com and according to their numbers, the Xbox360 outsold the Wii for only two weeks. During that two weeks, it sold about 25,000 more units than the Wii. However, the first week after the Wii regained it's weekly sales lead, it outsold the 360 by 16,000 units, and the week before it lost its weekly sales lead it outsold the 360 by over 45,000 units. Seriously, those two weeks that the 360 outsold the Wii are irrelevant. MS has had it's day (or two weeks I suppose), but when the fastest selling game can't get your console above a "number two console", then you have to start eating some humble pie. I guess that's why he left.

      --
      Stop Global Warming!
      Just say no to irreversible processes!
    2. Re:Wii selling out by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't assume it's selling out everywhere anymore. I don't think Austin is typical, we have higher than the normal geeks-per-capita. There's plenty of anecdotal evidence of people in cities who find them readily. It would probably be safe to say that it is selling -nearly- the amount shipped. In either case Nintendo's accountants at least probably aren't worried about the difference. :)

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    3. Re:Wii selling out by Solokron · · Score: 1

      They are sold out mostly everywhere here in the Seattle area as well. I was over in Minnesota last week and they had them available all over.

      --
      30% off web hosting. Coupon code "SLASHDOT".
  20. Hopefully they get meta'd correctly by Liquidrage · · Score: 1

    You have a valid gripe.

    Even if they don't agree with your point, you at least tried to make one.

    It's a MS story so people here often are complete idiots about it unless you make a case for why MS sucks.

    1. Re:Hopefully they get meta'd correctly by enderjsv · · Score: 1

      Pay no attention to the modders. Most of them are on prescription pain meds. They get cranky.

  21. Re:Nintendo will win next generation by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

    "Nintendo will have the $249 next gen HD capable console (that will also be profitable) and compatible with the Wii and it's extensive install base.
    Nintendo will continue to have MORE ideas, and will poach the great ones from Microsoft as well."
    That is my perdiction as well. But betting on more super winning ideas... That is risky.
    What everybody seems to have forgoten is that the Video Console game if changing for Microsoft and Sony.
    I keep feeling that they don't care about games at all. They are just a way to get the console into the home. I get the feeling that they are both aiming at IPTV.

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  22. Re:Nintendo will win next generation by brkello · · Score: 1

    Yes, because the people who make the console that sells the most in one generation, sells the most in the next generation. Oh yes, and Nintendo has never made mistakes in the past. Right?

    --
    Support a great indie game: http://www.abaddon360.com
  23. Re:Nintendo will win next generation by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 1

    That logic applies to all the consoles. PS1->PS2, for example, and the PS3 is a flop.

    Of course Microsoft has never been on top...

  24. The wii is a blessing by Darkfred · · Score: 1

    I Agree with Jeremy. The Wii is a blessing for MS.

    People are buying the Wii rather than PS3. This is good for MS because the Wii is not setup for a lucrative product life.

    A. The only profitable games on the Wii are 3 nintendo developed and one remake. Publishers are reluctant to spend big budgets on a platform with an average sell through of 4 games per console. Two of which come bundled. The casual market is simply not profitable for boxed games. Nintendo is piling the cash in vaults but the third party market is hurting.

    B. The Wii is not a next-gen console. Given a choice between a Wii version of a game and a 360 version the consumer will pick the better looking one. Nintendo knows this and is encouraging wii exclusive games with motion control. Unfortunately they are getting a lot of ports. Which brings us to b2.
          b2) wii has no franchise market. By nature the wii specific games are mostly new IP. All the big franchises are multi-platform and consumers will go with the real next-gen version.

    C. (Speculative) The wii-mote clone. Being that games cost so much to develop any huge 3rd party hit for the wii is going to eventually be ported to the 360 and PS3. Someone is eventually going to bundle a 360 clone of the wii-mote pointer. Red Octane has proven that a controller bundle can be profitable. And you can see where it goes from here. Next-gen graphics + next gen controller = perfect love and harmony.

    Regards,

    --
    ----- 70% of all statistics are completely made up.
    1. Re:The wii is a blessing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is good for MS because the Wii is not setup for a lucrative product life. OK, I wasn't going to reply, but I just couldn't stop laughing after reading this one. Not set up for a lucrative product life? Oh no, Nintendo stock (and profits!) have doubled in the last year because the Wii is so terrible at profit. Maybe you are unaware that it prints money?

      People are buying the Wii rather than PS3. Oh yeah? How many months was it before the Xbox 360 outsold the PS2? Oh, is the PS2 still doing better? The xbox360 is the direct competitor to the PS3. People are buying an Xbox360 instead of a PS3. People are buying a Wii because it is fun. Some people even buy an Xbox360 or a PS3 AND a Wii. Not many people buy a PS3 and an Xbox360.

      wii has no franchise market. By nature the wii specific games are mostly new IP This is awesome. ROFL. ROFLMAO. ROFLMAOASTC. What about Mario? Zelda? Super Smash brothers? Mario Kart? Nintendo has the OLDEST franchises around. In fact, you may not remember this, but one of the major criticisms against the gamecube was exactly that gamecube ONLY HAD GAMES MADE BY NINTENDO, which are by nature exclusive.

      Given a choice between a Wii version of a game and a 360 version the consumer will pick the better looking one. No, they will choose the one that runs on the console they own, and at the rate it's going, not many people are going to own a 360 compared to the Wii. Heck, maybe not even compared to the PS2.

      The whole point of your post is that third-parties won't want to develop for the Wii. But this is blatantly false, inasmuch as a number of developers have already announced their intentions of developing for that very platform. You've fallen into the common trap of, "I like the X better, therefore everyone will like it." But people are different than you; they like different things. you haven't yet realized what people like about the Wii, and what they don't like about the Xbox360 that will make the first one popular and the latter less so.
    2. Re:The wii is a blessing by phantomlord · · Score: 1

      A) There is one game bundled, not two. As for this average of 4 games per console, I'm broke, haven't owned a console since the SNES and I'm already up to 7 quality titles on my shelf with several more that I'm waiting for and I haven't even bought all the games I want that are out now.

      As for profitable games... Yeah, the first party titles are like printing cash. GOOD third party titles are profitable too (see Resident Evil 4... what did that cost to port? Raymonds sold well too). The developers not making money are the ones pitching shovelware or movie tie-ins. A turd doesn't sell regardless of what platform it's on. It's also cheaper to make games for the Wii. 360 and PS3 games, according to the reason for the $10 price increase this gen, are just too expensive to make. I'll take 20 hours of Metroid 3 rather than 5 hours of Heavenly Sword for my money, thanks.

      B) Given the choice between buying a game for a console they already have or a new $400 console for the same game (in addition to the game), people will buy the one for the console they already have. Nintendo is already beating the 360 and PS3 in this gen cumulative sales despite the 360 having a year head start.

      As for the Wii not having a franchise market... WTF are you smoking? Zelda, Smash Bros, Metroid, Super Mario, Mario Kart, etc. Half the Wii haters bitch that all Nintendo is is a franchise market producing the same games over and over. Serious gamers buy a 360 or PS3 AND a Wii to get the Wii franchises.

      C) Next-gen graphics ($1000 tv and $400 console) + next gen controller (I'll toss it in free) = a lot of people who aren't going to shell out that kind of money for games. The Wii is trying to target a new market. Go play your PS360 and quit whining because the Wii is winning.

      PS - The Wii isn't set up for a lucrative product life? They're the only console making money with each sale. They're already way ahead in profit.

      --
      Don't leave your mind so open that your brain falls out. Don't close it so much that you cut off the blood.
  25. Says a lot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i was surprised to see that the PS2 had better sales than the PS3. that should say a lot to sony. Yup, like "as we lower the price of the PS3 and release next-gen sequels to popular PS2 games, we will grab boatloads of PS2 users."

    Sony still has a bigger piece of the pie. I like how XBots overlook that. Sony last-gen outsold Microsoft next-gen for how long? Take a guess how many active PS2s there are vs. 360s and XBoxes combined.
    1. Re:Says a lot by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      SONY releases sequels to PS2 titles? Last I checked most of those games were made by other companies and it's up to those other companies to make those sequels. From the looks of it many of them are opting for a multiplatform release. If it was up to Sony there would be a next-gen Dragon Quest on the PS3 but Dragon Quest is going to the Nintendo DS. Sony would probably love to keep their PSP system seller Monster Hunter but after being initially announced for the PS3 the third game in the series went to the Wii instead. Sony used to have limited exclusivity on GTA but now Microsoft has made sure that GTA4 will be released on the 360 the same day.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
  26. Re:Nintendo will win next generation by lonesome_coder · · Score: 1, Funny

    Oh yes, and Nintendo has never made mistakes in the past. Right? Nope, Virtual Boy was the sh*t. *runs*
    --
    If you'd just do what we tell you and quit yer gripin' everything would be chocolate sprinkles and rainbows! -AC
  27. Significant new software by FriendOfBagu · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Nintendo's Wii, despite not really having any significant new software releases, was close behind with 501K units sold.
    That seems a little misleading to me. Maybe the Wii didn't have any huge releases in September, but Metroid Prime 3, perhaps the Wii's most anticipated non-launch game, was released less than a week before September started.
  28. Re:Nintendo will win next generation by xhrit · · Score: 1

    How is the ps3 a flop? It has sold 1/2 as many units as the 360, but has only been out for 1/2 as long. Given that the ps3 has a longer product life, it is almost certain that the ps3 will end up beating the 360. The xbox360 has only started outselling the PlayStation 2 in the last 3 months.

  29. Plenty of Wii's to be had. by MaWeiTao · · Score: 1

    I'm curious to know in what part of the country people are having a hard time finding a Wii. Here in the Northeast Wii are everywhere. I can go into any retailer and find plenty. Target has had a good 10 boxes on the shelves since the middle of the summer. It's essentially the same at Walmart. The other retailers are also consistently stocked up. It doesn't seem to be any different in neighboring states.

    At this point I can pretty much go into any store around here and find one. If anything I'd say there are fewer DS's available. They're everywhere too, but the supplies for DS's seem to run lower than the Wii.

    By no means do I point this out to claim that the Wii isn't selling well. I'm simply surprised that people apparently still have trouble finding them.

    And I don't understand the need to tear down the Xbox360. Halo 3 spurs sales of the Xbox360 and somehow it's spun into a bad thing. You'd think every Wii came packaged with a bar of gold the way people lavish praise on that system. I get the impression that many Wii games are from more negative reviews merely because of the unconventional control scheme. The game is crap, but I can wave this controller around to do stuff and thus it's not actually that bad a game.

    I've played the Wii a bit at a friend's house. It's a lot of fun, but honestly, I don't really see it being any more fun than any of the other consoles. To many of the games for the Wii seem to be little more than flash games with fancy graphics. When comparing price value you can't beat a Wii, but it's not the revolutionary console some make it out to see.

    I'm not really a Halo fan, not having played the previous games, and I have a tendency to get bored with FPS games. I really have no desire at all to get an Xbox360, or any of the other consoles for that matter, but then I'm probably not the guy developers are trying to sell to. Nevertheless, it's only reasonable to give credit where it's due. Halo 3 is a damn good game.

    1. Re:Plenty of Wii's to be had. by gotem · · Score: 1

      maybe they are hard to find near the south border, with all the taxes a Wii costs around 450 USD in Mexico

    2. Re:Plenty of Wii's to be had. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To many of the games for the Wii seem to be little more than flash games with fancy graphics.

      Please tell me where where I can get the Flash equivalents to Zack&Wiki, Battalion Wars 2, Super Mario Galaxy, and Nights, because that way I could save a good chunk of change in the next month or so.

      I'd also appreciate knowing where I can find Flash equivalents of Resident Evil 4, Metroid Prime 3, Twilight Princess, and Excite Truck, cuz then I could sell back some of my existing games and buy some of whatever you're smoking..

    3. Re:Plenty of Wii's to be had. by tm2b · · Score: 1

      Until about a month ago, they were hard to come by in Austin, TX.

      The supply seems to have finally caught up now but I can easily see it lagging in other parts of the country.

      --
      "It is our blasphemy which has made us great, and will sustain us, and which the gods secretly admire in us." - Zelazny
  30. Don't Wanna Bust Anyone's bubble but... by br4nd0nh3at · · Score: 0

    PS3 is doing fine, i don't see why people think it's doing bad. 360 didn't have that many exclusive games out for it in it's FIRST year. If you compare PS2 (from when it first came out) and PS3 sales the PS3 sales are greater. Wii IS a monster however with many new games that people see they see them and then look at which systems they are comin gout for PS3 360 and PC NO Wii, also the Wii is not in hd or offers any upscaling after awhile Wii is going to fade and fade fast.

    1. Re:Don't Wanna Bust Anyone's bubble but... by BarneyL · · Score: 1

      The difference between the PS3's position now and the 360's position a year ago is that most of the 360's potential owners didn't already own a next gen console.
      Regarding which system's future games are going to sell the hardware I see Mario Galaxy, SSB, the next Mario Cart, Metroid 3 (due out soon in the UK), Rayman Rabbids 2 and a bundle of others and now I made the right choice in buying a Wii.
      Very few people care about HD, the Wii looks fine on my 40" HDTV and most people won't be upgrading to something like that for years, this is particularly true for the Wii's core market of casual game players.

    2. Re:Don't Wanna Bust Anyone's bubble but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Very few people care about HD"

      Maybe in EU ... here in US one can hardly find a decent size TV that is not HD in one way or another.

      My 360 looks fine too on a regular TV, but it is a completely different story on a 50" plasma ( downstairs :-))

      So , no fucking way, no more non-HD consoles for me.

    3. Re:Don't Wanna Bust Anyone's bubble but... by Chibi+Merrow · · Score: 1

      Maybe in EU ... here in US one can hardly find a decent size TV that is not HD in one way or another.


      Yeah because we change TVs in the US like we change clothes, amirite?

      Dude, seriously, people hang on to TVs for FIFTEEN YEARS or more. The number one reason to buy a new TV for most people is because the old one burned out, not because you're upgrading. SD televisions still adorn the livingrooms of probably 90% of American households, I'd bet.
      --
      Maxim: People cannot follow directions.
      Increases in truth directly with the length of time spent explaining them
    4. Re:Don't Wanna Bust Anyone's bubble but... by BarneyL · · Score: 1

      I did not entirely mean that no one wants an HDTV, over in Europe the only thing you are likely to buy is an HDTV too.
      What we watch on it though is SD broadcasts or upscaled DVDs and the vast majority of us aren't staring close enough at the screen to care about the pixelation, we just want a nice big (future proofed) screen.
      If you use a Wii on a big screen in 480p you'll know it looks just fine (I'm using a 40" LCD), the games are designed with the console's limitations in mind so the big bold colours of for example Wario Ware or Paper Mario don't need those extra pixels.
      The Wii is all about the gameplay not the graphics which is as I and the rest of it's target market like it (if I want the kind of gritty high rez graphics the Wii can't do then I'll get them at 1900x1200 on my PC).

  31. Re:Nintendo will win next generation by CelticLo · · Score: 1

    480p isn't HD capable. By that reasoning my old Atari Jaguar is HD capable as my HDTV can display it.

  32. New IP? by tepples · · Score: 1

    wii has no franchise market. By nature the wii specific games are mostly new IP.

    There is no new IP. There is only unallocated IP.

    Assuming that you expand IP as "intellectual property", U.S. law[1] does not recognize a single "property" (exclusive) right in "intellectual" creations. It recognizes exclusive rights in works of authorship, which are separate from the exclusive rights in inventions, both of which are separate from the exclusive rights in distinctive marks. Which do you mean?

  33. Re:Nintendo will win next generation by tepples · · Score: 1

    With today's optical media, there is no excuse whatsoever [for lack of back-compat].

    Software emulation is imperfect, except perhaps when the host and target are three generations apart (like NES on GameCube or Super NES on Wii). Would you want to have to include the complete chipset of the last few generations of your company's consoles in the new hardware? Concrete example: why can't a new PC that comes with Windows Vista or Windows XP run CD-ROM games from the DOS era? It's an optical disc; per your comment, there should be no excuse.

  34. Re:Plenty of Wii's to be had. NOT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Baloney. Either that or you need to define 'northeast' better. And it's not like driving to another state is a trivial matter, even in the northeast.

    I had been waiting months to buy a Wii retail to avoid stupid online bundle vendors, and every month when I called, the sales people would laugh at me, saying I could maybe come in early on Sunday when the truck arrives, and maybe have a chance at maybe getting a voucher, or some such crap. So I bought a bundle and have not been sorry.

    And it's not about being able to "wave this controller around to do stuff", it's about people having fun, and when people of all generations can do it (yes, I have seen it), it's a big win.

  35. I know why. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's the frat boy gamers, they're always buying stupid shit like halo and madden 20xx whatever the fuck game.

    Also, they're spoiled rotten, so they're guaranteed a copy of every rehash that exists.

  36. Wii Software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Me thinks the Wii would sell even more if it could be used to watch all the networks tv shows online instead of just Flash 7 based Youtube and the ilk. Course they'd have to kick Adobe into releasing an SDK for Flash 9 first.

    Add in an external drive support for the USB ports and you've also got a nice DVR option.

    Could the Wii hardware even handle Flash 9?

  37. Let's be fair... by rbarreira · · Score: 1

    To be fair to MS, it's just impossible to keep up with the Wii now... It's the best selling console of all time, and apparently it doesn't need software to sell out, not yet at least. To sum up:

    - MS's Xbox 360 did quite well with Halo 3
    - The Wii always does great no matter if there are software releases or not
    - The PS3 is the exact opposite of the Wii

    --

    The AACS key is NOT 0xF606EEFD628B1CA427BEA93A9CA9773F
  38. If you want a Wii, look during the holiday period! by rbarreira · · Score: 1

    At the same conference in which the delay of Super Smash Bros Brawl was announced, Nintendo announced that during the holiday period supply will be twice as big as in the last holiday period... That means that they're stockpiling millions of units which they'll release soon!

    --

    The AACS key is NOT 0xF606EEFD628B1CA427BEA93A9CA9773F
  39. Re:Nintendo will win next generation by trdrstv · · Score: 1

    Yes, because the people who make the console that sells the most in one generation, sells the most in the next generation. Oh yes, and Nintendo has never made mistakes in the past. Right?

    Nah, it's on Par with console History.

    Atari led the consoles for about 8 years (approximately 2 generations worth), then hit the retard button, and the crash of 83 happened.

    Nintendo lead for 2 generations, hit the retard button, and created their newest biggest competitor.

    Sony lead the pack for 2 generations, then hit the retard button and now (coming full circle) Nintendo's eating Sony's lunch.

    The Wii, despite being supply constrained is still the #1 console this generation world wide. Not only have they sold more units in less time than any console in history, they sell more than their competitors nearly every week. It's a difficult argument to make that they will somehow be marginalized and end up in last place this gen. It looks like the Wii will be the PS2 of this generation.

    Moving forward, they will have a very large user base that will be very receptive to the "Nintendo Snufalufagous" or whatever they call it. Which will position themselves very favorably (but not guarantee #1 market position) next gen.

  40. PS2?????? by theolein · · Score: 1

    Apart from all the other platforms, what really utterly blows my mind is that the PS2 is still selling so well. I would love to know the reason why. Is it the huge game library plus the extremely low cost? What is it?

    1. Re:PS2?????? by Arctic+Dragon · · Score: 1

      Zellers was selling PS2s for 100$CAD this week, and some PS2 games can be found for under $20 at many stores.

      And as you mentioned, the PS2 has a massive game library, including Guitar Hero, Gran Turismo and Grand Theft Auto. It's affordable and fun entertainment.

  41. Console sales isn't everything. by slyn · · Score: 1

    Halo 3 will bring MS into profitability, not necessarily because of console or game sales, but because hundreds of thousands of people experienced Xbox Live when they bought halo 3. Like 2 days after H3 came out (at least the highest I saw personally) was 1.3 million people playing halo 3 at the same time. Now that all those people have tasted Live, it will spur sales of the service, and at $50 a year, thats bank for MS. And that is not to mention games like TF2 also enticing people to Live.

    Thats where MS will make 1 bajillion profit a year from.

  42. Canada by Rob+Simpson · · Score: 1

    I've never seen a single one in an actual store. But thanks for reminding me, Future Shop just got a bunch in...

  43. Enormous overlap between their markets by Chuck+Chunder · · Score: 1

    I still fail to see how MS or PS3 are competing against the Wii. Maybe the fact that they all play games,
    Of course they are competing. There is enormous overlap between the markets the Wii and 360/PS3. The Wii also targets a (large) additional market of non-traditional gamers which the 360/PS3 don't really address. The 360/PS3 also targets a (smaller) market of HD gamers that the Wii doesn't. However there is still an enormous proportion of the traditional console market who will buy one console in any generation
    --
    Boffoonery - downloadable Comedy Benefit for Bletchley Park
  44. Happy Xbox Day! by Translation+Error · · Score: 1

    The crowd is waiting anxiously, hoping to catch a sight of Microsoft's famous Xbox 360. Wait, something's stirring... Yes, the Xbox has nosed its way to the top of the console race for the month! It's peering around, unaccustomed to the bright light... it's seen Halo 3--and it's been spooked! It's running back home! Six more months of Nintendo dominance!

    --
    When someone says, "Any fool can see ..." they're usually exactly right.
    1. Re:Happy Xbox Day! by DaveCBio · · Score: 1

      Too bad the attach rate for the Wii is abysmal compared to the 360. In the long run that's where the money is made. It doesn't help Nintendo to have a few millions Wii's out there that are used for Wii Sports and nothing else.

    2. Re:Happy Xbox Day! by SethraLavode · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately for your argument, from all indications the Wii is tracking ahead of the Xbox 360 in terms of attach rate. The attach rate for the Wii as of this July was around 6 (in NA), while the 360's attach rate was 5.4 as of February 2007.

    3. Re:Happy Xbox Day! by DaveCBio · · Score: 1

      Don't know where you are getting your data, but in North America the attach rate for the Wii is much lower than that. The last numbers I saw was around 3 for the Wii and close to 6 for the 360.

  45. Re:Plenty of Wii's to be had. NOT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Heh, when I got mine, I couldn't even find bundles from online stores, just $%@! eBay. But then I found a modchip site selling pre-modded Wii consoles. Still cost less than eBay bundles...

  46. The wii is a blessing for Sports games especially. by trdrstv · · Score: 1

    B. The Wii is not a next-gen console.

    Currect. It's now "Current Gen" along with the 360 and PS3.

    Given a choice between a Wii version of a game and a 360 version the consumer will pick the better looking one. Nintendo knows this and is encouraging wii exclusive games with motion control. Unfortunately they are getting a lot of ports. Which brings us to b2. b2) wii has no franchise market. By nature the wii specific games are mostly new IP. All the big franchises are multi-platform and consumers will go with the real next-gen version.

    Not true. Consumers will gravitate to "the best version"; to some that is "teh Pretty", to some that's "Need control". I owned a Wii since launch (November 19th). On November 20th I put my former tennis and golf games on ebay as I wasn't going back to "teh buttons", when superior control is available.

    I own all 3 "current gen systems", and already the Wii has stripped away the Sports genre entirely from the competition. Tiger Woods on the Wii is superior to the other versions . I'm playing it on a 96" screen (from an HD projector) and despite the graphics being "PS2-Tastic", the game is far more immersive and enjoyable than the others. Hell I took a few strokes off my regular golf game because it helped me straiten out my swing!

    When done correctly, the motion controls add a new element that makes it better despite better looking versions elsewhere.

    A few more examples... Harry Potter: The Order of the Phoenix - The Wii-mote is Harry's wand and you cast spells using motion controls.

    The Godfather - Physically throttle, or stab someone with the motion controls. They work well and can be crazy fun.

    Madden - Far closer to a simulation than any other Madden to date. You simulate a game a game of "double touch" football in your living room.

  47. Why has it become 360 Vs Wii? by rufu · · Score: 0

    I just find it interesting that all the comments here basically are about the 360 Vs Wii. Isn't the bigger news that PS3 continues to be an irrelevance? Have all the PS3 fanboys become Wii supporters in an attempt to detract attention from their consoles miserable performance. I have to say that this generation I see room for both the Wii, as a cheap/innovative/invite your friends round console, and either the 360 or PS3, as a complex graphics/multimedia/online multiplayer console. At the moment it looks like the conclusion is Wii60.

  48. Re:Nintendo will win next generation by brkello · · Score: 1

    So despite disagreeing with me...you agree with me in the end when you say that it isn't guaranteed that they will be #1. That is the only point I was trying to make. Being a leader in one gen doesn't mean you get a free pass the next gen.

    --
    Support a great indie game: http://www.abaddon360.com
  49. Nintendo will win this & the nextgen but not a by trdrstv · · Score: 1

    So despite disagreeing with me...you agree with me in the end when you say that it isn't guaranteed that they will be #1. That is the only point I was trying to make. Being a leader in one gen doesn't mean you get a free pass the next gen.

    I agree that it isn't a guarantee, but historically there is the same market leader for 2 generations, then in the third generation they (market leader) will do something stupid, and a new contender will do something smart and dethrone them. The writing is already on the wall this gen, the Wii will retain market leader position. I'm betting (based on historical trends) that they will take this gen & next gen with their Backwords compatible HD (even if only 720p) system and enhanced function wiimote.

    Then they hit the retard button and a purging fire will clear the forest for renewal.

  50. Me like big grafics! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Me big boy in generation 2! Me like paying more for games! Me no like cheaper games!

  51. FUCK SKU by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So why not just say that sales were x Gazillion across all versions, or across all packages, or just say simply sales were x Gazillion.

    Because the GameStop and Target employees want to standardize their jargon on geek sites since there is a slight overlap in interest.

    That's the only reason.
  52. I Can Lower Myself To Your Level Too! by morari · · Score: 1

    I've played through the entirety of Halo and most of Halo 2, while only a little bit of Halo 3. I can't say that owning an Xbox is very high up on my lists of things to to before dying, and buying up Halo discs is even lower. One does not need to play the entire series, since only minor things change throughout (though, to be fair, the specifics of my graphical gripes were aimed at the first two installments). The only real value I can see in Halo is perhaps multiplayer, and even that stands as inferior to many other first person shooters. Then again, I find the very fact that you have to play said FPS with a slow and clunky gamepad to be inferior to begin with. Because as we know, though available on the PC, Halo and Halo 2 tend to be buggy and certainly overshadowed by their Xbox cousins.

    But hey, what do I know? I'm not some smarmy coward on the internet, racking up "insightful" points for what is essentially a series of insults. You fail to grasp simple words within sentences that keep them from meaning what you'd like them to, and then proceed to put words in my mouth and assume that I am changing my argument whilst explaining and expanding upon such for your benefit. I'm glad that I could be such a waste of time for you though, while ultimately only passing otherwise wasted time of my own.

    --
    "He who can destroy a thing, controls a thing." --Paul Atreides, Dune
    1. Re:I Can Lower Myself To Your Level Too! by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      I'd actually just like you to name a couple games so I could try them out.

      The only real value I can see in Halo is perhaps multiplayer, and even that stands as inferior to many other first person shooters.

      Like which ones?

  53. Re:Nintendo will win next generation by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

    Concrete example: why can't a new PC that comes with Windows Vista or Windows XP run CD-ROM games from the DOS era? It's an optical disc; per your comment, there should be no excuse. But that's just it, you can in emulation.
    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  54. Wii has no effect on PS3 by Chibi+Merrow · · Score: 1

    Seriously, the existence of the Wii has nothing to do with lousy PS3 sales and EVERYTHING to do with the PS3 being overpriced. We weren't quite willing to submit to disciplined life in Kutaragiland...

    --
    Maxim: People cannot follow directions.
    Increases in truth directly with the length of time spent explaining them
  55. Re:Nintendo will win next generation by tepples · · Score: 1

    But that's just it, you can in emulation. With how much slowdown? Not all PC operating system incompatibilities happen over the course of enough years to allow new hardware to emulate older hardware accurately and in real time. Any emulation one generation apart will either include title-specific hacks, in which case it'll have the compatibility level of Xbox 360 or PS3 without EE when playing the previous system's titles, or possibly not run at full speed.
  56. Re:Nintendo will win next generation by scot4875 · · Score: 1

    Concrete example: why can't a new PC that comes with Windows Vista or Windows XP run CD-ROM games from the DOS era? It's an optical disc; per your comment, there should be no excuse.

    The rest of your post was also nonsense, but this bit's easy to reply to: try DOSBox. Oh wait, you artificially limited it to "a new PC that come with Windows Vista or Windows XP" -- Maybe because Microsoft doesn't make any money off of helping play old DOS CD-ROM games?

    --Jeremy

    --
    Jesus was a liberal
  57. smoking by Quino · · Score: 1

    congrats, keep it up. Physical withdrawal is supposed to peak in the first 3 days or so, and should get easier after that. :)

    Before you know it, you'll be amazed that you smoked at all (as is, "why the hell did I do it for so long?! Why didn't I quit before?")

  58. PS3 good for Sony by LKM · · Score: 1

    I think the PS3 will fail miserably. Not even FF and MGS will be able to save it. And this is a good thing for Sony. The PS3 is like the Virtual Boy, the N64 and the Gamecube all put into one: A healthy shock for a company used to success. I have no idea what Sony will do next gen, but they will definitely not make the same mistakes again.

    Microsoft, on the other hand, is screwed. They had the advantage of time, of a games library, and of price, yet the 360 sold not nearly as well as it should have, and they lost a shitload of money. Not sure what they could do better; apart from hardware quality, they did everything right, yet they still did not win the market.

    As for Nintendo, who the hell knows what they'll next come up with. I only know three things: It's going to be entertaining, it's going to make them money, and it's going to feature Mario.