Slashdot Mirror


World of Warcraft's Brand New Rootkit

Captain Kirk writes "We all know that World of Warcraft has checked for hacks to ensure a safe game environment for all players. The latest version of these checks goes beyond anything seen so far in that what is being checked is now completely encrypted. Obviously this hits bot writers as can be seen from these complaints, But it also strikes at the privacy of all users. Now Blizzard has a tool that is encrypted and can run any type of scan, transfer any file or edit any document on your computer. That can't be right."

86 of 576 comments (clear)

  1. Recommendation for online gaming by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Insightful

    1 computer for gaming
    1 computer for everything else

    Sorry if you can't afford a second, but that's how I do it.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Recommendation for online gaming by ByOhTek · · Score: 5, Informative

      wow works great in Wine.

      use a very restricted account when running it in wine. Problem solved.

      --
      Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
    2. Re:Recommendation for online gaming by ByOhTek · · Score: 2, Informative

      Technically you don't need /any/ windows machines (WINE).

      Of course, if you go that route, you only need one machine...

      --
      Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
    3. Re:Recommendation for online gaming by spun · · Score: 2, Funny

      1 computer for gaming
      1 computer for everything else And one computer to rule them all, and in the darkness bind them?

      Seriously though, I have a Shuttle XPC for gaming and a laptop for everything else. Gaming is the only reason I have a desktop at all, and the Shuttle is still very portable for LAN parties and such.
      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    4. Re:Recommendation for online gaming by Gr8Apes · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That won't protect you if the drive contents are available to the first machine. Unfortunately with XP, MS finally can read multiple primary partitions. Of course, they can't read ext2... but then, Blizzard could implement a driver...

      So nope - must effectively have a second machine via HD hotswap/disable features. Then again, if a game is this invasive, I wouldn't touch it with a 10 foot pole.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    5. Re:Recommendation for online gaming by phasm42 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Or, stop playing WoW. More people should consider this option.

      --
      "No one likes working in a hamster wheel, and your shop smells of cedar shavings from here." - TaleSpinner
    6. Re:Recommendation for online gaming by EvilMonkeySlayer · · Score: 5, Funny

      But how would I make gold from selling clam meat then?

    7. Re:Recommendation for online gaming by ArsonSmith · · Score: 5, Funny

      Become a pimp?

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    8. Re:Recommendation for online gaming by CastrTroy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's how I do it too. My second computer is a Wii. Quite cheap.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    9. Re:Recommendation for online gaming by Admiral+Ag · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That's probably the best option. I'm a strong advocate of privacy myself, but I don't see Blizzard's actions as being particularly unreasonable. You aren't being compelled to play the game, and it's up to each individual to decide how much they trust Blizzard with this. If you don't trust them, don't play. It's quite common for people to be asked to reveal personal information in a voluntary exchange (like when you apply for a job or a bank account) and there is always the possibility that this information could be misused or abused, or that the power you give another person to access such information could be misused or abused. But these types of transactions are always voluntary, and it's really a case of caveat emptor. If you don't trust the company, then don't give them your money and your privacy will remain intact.

      Having said that, people like the author of TFA are free to object to Blizzard's policy and to attempt to persuade them to change it (like they did with the issue of gay-friendly guilds a while back). If it annoys enough of the playerbase, then it will go.

      I'm a recovering WoWaholic myself, and although I loved the game, the one thing that really bothered me (other than warlocks) was cheaters. I worked hard at the game, spent a lot of time grinding and crafting, and spent inordinate amounts of time learning the game and getting to know good people so that I could join a decent guild and progress. If cheating isn't aggressively policed, it ruins the sense of achievement for legitimate players by allowing others to free ride. I'd personally be willing to risk it to have less cheaters in the game, but YMMV.

      --
      "by that I mean people who don't sit on slashdot all day wondering why everyone else isn't building robots" DECS
    10. Re:Recommendation for online gaming by Domini · · Score: 2, Insightful

      1 ACCOUNT for gaming
      1 ACCOUNT for everything else

      Sorry if you don't have protected memory and proper permission set up.

    11. Re:Recommendation for online gaming by VJ42 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So do you use a third computer to run games that are not available for Wii? How would you recommend that independent game developers get their products onto Wii? I'm not the GP, but I do it a similar way; not available for Wii (or DS)? Then I go without (unless it's a quality RTS or a CIV game; personal preference means I have a Windows partition for gaming).
      If you want to get your game on the Wii I believe Nintendo require you to prove yourself on another platform. There are plenty of PC gamers out there, release your game on PC, distribute via the internet. If it's a hit Nintendo should have no problems letting you release it on the Wii, if it's not a hit well then you're unlikely to make Nintendo money so try again until you come up with a quality title.
      --
      If I have nothing to hide, you have no reason to search me
    12. Re:Recommendation for online gaming by SL+Baur · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Compare that to the number of people that would have a problem with Blizzard NOT doing everything possible to stop cheating and botting. I agree and they have made very visible progress in the year I've been playing WoW. The 2.3 patch is more of the same. Online gold sellers already have had their access to free advertising nuked. Leveling "services" have just been hit with Cheap Shot.

      Why would people pay for leveling services and what not? Because it takes a casual player so dang long to get from level 1 to level 60 or 70. Leveling between 20 and 60 (and apparently especially between 30 and 60) has been made significantly easier. They've also wiped out in one stroke some of the most irritating midlevel quests by nuking outdoor elites (I found it sad in a strange way to visit the underwater murlocs in the Vile Reef and see them only as typical irritating murlocs and not dangerous like they were last week).

      A more likely explanation of the general Azeroth nerf though, is that they want the vast majority of players to be in Outlands by the time they release the next expansion so that they'll buy it quickly.

      I have no visibility into what changes they've made with respect to bot detection, but I've noted that my UI addon (cosmos) is generating new error messages about actions being blocked. Actually, it's time for me to get rid of cosmos because Blizzard has just about implemented everything (the right way) that I used it for.

      Blizzard's doing the right thing for their customers by providing the best game experience possible. I truly believe that and it was most illuminating to me to play a few of the newly nerfed quests and compare the experience against the older harder versions. For all the difficulty, the older versions played better, but the new versions will just help (newer) people level faster. The UI changes also make it easier to find stuff on the ground and quest givers in an area. Those will help everyone. And, if you (still) think it's a lousy game ...

      You don't have to play it if you don't want to. Well said. There's a reason why there are 9.3 million subscribers and climbing, so let the rest of us have our fun. Competing against people who have used gold selling services and against bot-driven mat grinders is seriously un-fun. Anything which cuts into both of those activities is a Good Thing in my book. (People who have used leveling services and have gotten to Outlands or level 70 without learning how to play won't go any further anyway, so they're irrelevant).
    13. Re:Recommendation for online gaming by PitaBred · · Score: 4, Funny

      Belches a few times and then passes out. There are still some compatibility bugs to work through.

    14. Re:Recommendation for online gaming by turing_m · · Score: 2, Funny

      "How does it do on Beer?"

      Depends. If you were running it on wine first, never fear.

      --
      If I have seen further it is by stealing the Intellectual Property of giants.
  2. "That can't be right." by RandoX · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Then don't play. It really IS that simple. If you're having too big of a problem with that, put the mouse down and go join a support group.

    1. Re:"That can't be right." by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Then don't play. It really IS that simple. If you're having too big of a problem with that, put the mouse down and go join a support group. a) Whoever modded this troll is on crack, this is a legitimate point.

      b) This is exactly right. I don't have a problem with this personally, but I'm sure other people do, and the proper solution for them is to not play. By not playing (and letting Blizzard know why), you send a message to them that their behavior isn't acceptable to you, and, if enough people are upset about this, they'll do something about it. Complaining to Blizzard won't change anything, you need to take action.

      --
      "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
    2. Re:"That can't be right." by nacturation · · Score: 5, Funny

      A strange game. The only winning move is not to play.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
  3. Unbelivable by Tainek · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If i had a WoW account i would be cancelling it this second, no videogame has the right to violate the privacy of my computer

    1. Re:Unbelivable by daeg · · Score: 4, Informative

      I canceled when they started adding things to their detection kit. When I saw it reading registry keys (regmon) it had NO business reading, I canceled. Did it need to read the activation keys for Windows? Absolutely not.

    2. Re:Unbelivable by ajs · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I canceled when they started adding things to their detection kit. When I saw it reading registry keys (regmon) it had NO business reading, I canceled. Did it need to read the activation keys for Windows? Absolutely not. I'm sorry to hear that.

      Out of curiosity, how would you go about detecting keyloggers and/or bots without reading the registry? Or do you just feel that Blizzard shouldn't attempt to detect abuse? Myself, I'm a player and I WANT Blizzard to look for such abuse. If someone finds that Blizzard's bot is doing something that's actually wrong (e.g. sending personal data back to home base, not just reading the registry), then I'll be the first to pressure them to fix it. However, if they're just scanning for malicious software that doesn't actually seem like a problem.

      It is CERTAINLY not a rootkit according to any definition I've ever heard.
    3. Re:Unbelivable by MarcoAtWork · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If you had a WoW account, you would already voluntarily have given Blizzard your full name, snail address, email address, and credit card number.


      when I was playing wow I used prepaid game cards exactly for this reason... or aren't prepaid cards available anymore?
      --
      -- the cake is a lie
    4. Re:Unbelivable by TheLink · · Score: 4, Insightful

      He said activation keys for windows, so if the detection kit was really reading those then that's bad.

      Anyway why would a bot or keylogger need to write to the registry?

      Would be good if you could restrict the user account you use to run wow to only talking to blizzards IP range and local IP.

      --
    5. Re:Unbelivable by geekoid · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, they could use a better design.
      This whole problem is cause because gold is so important to the game.

      They could minimize these problems with a number of basic fixes.
      1) Don't allow the AH to sell anything for more then 5 times the vendor cost.

      2) Lower the cost of items. How you can charge 5000 Gold to learn to use a mount and not expect a spike in Gold selling and farming is beyond me.

      It's a root kit in that it can gain access to anything on your computer and send it to Blizzard. i.e. it has root to your system. Root kits don't have to be hidden.

      To trust warden is to trust that:
      they will never hire a bad dishonest employee,
      never hire someone with an alternative motive. Like if a memeber of Scientology was asked to get information for there religion.
      never be asked by a police agency to scan your system,
      and for the program to be bug free and not exploitable in any way by anyone else.

      Now that it's encrypted, you have no idea what they are sending.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    6. Re:Unbelivable by Dachannien · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I can't believe I'm forgoing a full complement of mod points to respond to you, but I get tired of seeing people go ape-shit whenever they use tools like regmon and filemon without having clue one as to what they're seeing.

      Pretty much any program will make tons of accesses to registry keys that would at first glance appear to have nothing to do with that program, because the program loads a bunch of Windows libraries that access those registry keys whenever they're loaded. The same goes for IE cookies, for any program that uses the IE rendering libraries to render HTML (including things like the frontend patchers for games like EverQuest), because those libraries go through your cookies just the same as IE does when it first loads.

      Sorry that you felt it necessary to cancel your WoW account because you didn't understand how your computer works, but at least it gives you a lot more spare time for making tin-foil hats.

    7. Re:Unbelivable by ajs · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well, they could use a better design.
      This whole problem is cause because gold is so important to the game.

      They could minimize these problems with a number of basic fixes.
      1) Don't allow the AH to sell anything for more then 5 times the vendor cost. Which results in artificial control of the market, which primarily impacts those who don't have enough gold to exploit the system, and results in anything that's unreasonably capped being sold player-to-player outside the auction house. Turns out economies (virtual or not) are quite resilient to this kind of ham-handed attempt at control.

      2) Lower the cost of items. How you can charge 5000 Gold to learn to use a mount and not expect a spike in Gold selling and farming is beyond me. Actually, they did the reverse, and it's worked VERY well. The only people buying gold now are typically the newbies who need 10-100 gold to get started. 5000g costs an astronomical amount of money because it takes so long for a low-level player to get.

      It's a root kit in that it can gain access to anything on your computer and send it to Blizzard. So can the World of Warcraft game itself. That's a rootkit too? Oh PS: rootkit != any invasion of privacy. Rootkits are specifically those programs that subvert the security of your system. This simply doesn't do that.

      To trust warden is to trust that:
      they will never hire a bad dishonest employee, You can replace "warden" in that sentence with the name of any software you've ever run.
    8. Re:Unbelivable by rawn53 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      When I saw it reading registry keys (regmon) it had NO business reading Poster didn't say that he was upset about it reading the registry, just upset about it reading parts that were completely unrelated, such as the Windows activation key. I'd have to say that I agree, if something needs to look in my registry for bots or whatever, it better stay away from the registry entries that don't matter.
    9. Re:Unbelivable by NekoIncardine · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This one actually does not work anymore; it's too easy to stealth processes (the Sony Rootkit debacle people keep bringing up ironically was exactly how botters did this for a while, since the rootkit stealthed ALL processes that started with $, not just it's own!). However, there's a point where you have to give up the ghost and go to other methods that I'm frankly amazed they didn't go to first - like having GMs actively patrol the servers, looking for bot-like behavior (because trust me, you can tell if it's a bot or human playing). More expensive, yes, but also more effective and less offensive (even if it leads to a few retard players getting accused constantly of using bots when in fact it's they themselves who are getting stuck on that rock).

      --
      Omeg La. Rofl Leh.
  4. Privacy? by Debello · · Score: 5, Funny

    You've already given up your life when you start playing WoW. What do you have to keep private?

    1. Re:Privacy? by king-manic · · Score: 2, Informative

      You've already given up your life when you start playing WoW. What do you have to keep private? No one must know iloveBoobs69 the smoking hot Night elf huntress is actually King-manic!
      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
  5. Then don't play by UDGags · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you don't like it then don't accept the TOS and don't play. It is really simple. I've played WoW since it came out at a very high level and I welcome Blizzard trying to stop the root kits/gold farmers/etc.

  6. This is a non-issue, as it stands by krog · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Summary of TFA: WoW Warden now selects one of many hash algorithms and uses it in server communication. Blog author gets his panties in a bunch because Blizzard could replace one of these hash algorithms with something that collects PRIVATE PERSONAL DATA, and NO ONE WOULD EVER KNOW. A misleading Slashdot headline and poorly-written blurb is generated, and the rest is academic.

    1. Re:This is a non-issue, as it stands by wattrlz · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Couldn't someone who's not Blizzard, but sufficiently clever replace the algorithm with such a mal-gorithm as well?

    2. Re:This is a non-issue, as it stands by krog · · Score: 2, Funny

      Anyone sufficiently clever could hackify any host program they wanted.

    3. Re:This is a non-issue, as it stands by Mister+Kay · · Score: 3, Funny

      Oh no! Blizzard is going to steal my credit card information and where I live and.... wait a second... they already have that... guess I'm safe

    4. Re:This is a non-issue, as it stands by doas777 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      your forgetting the Polymorphic nature of the warden code. since it obfuscates itself from the OS and from security tools, it can be used to load harmful software and provide it with the same "cloaking". there is no way I'd let an app that runs with system credentials to recieve commands from the internet, but that is what they want you to do. do you remember the malware that sprung up after the sony rootkit debacle of 2005? the malware had nothing to do with sony, but it used the rootkit/copy protection to hide itself.

    5. Re:This is a non-issue, as it stands by Goldberg's+Pants · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The article is absolutely retarded. It never ceases to amuse me when such grandiose claims are made about customers etc... Of the 7 million WOW account holders, I would bet that 6.999 million don't even know about Warden. And I'd bet that same number, if you made them aware, still wouldn't give a toss. He's probably just a disgruntled bot author, dressing up his complaints in the guise of the public service. I can understand being paranoid to a degree, but this is just ridiculous. The author clearly has delusions of grandeur, and ideas far FAR above his station.

      This articles headline is INCREDIBLY misleading, and whoever wrote it needs a slap for their melodramatic endeavours.

    6. Re:This is a non-issue, as it stands by ajs · · Score: 4, Informative

      Smart people don't just throw caution to the wind and say "well, they already have avenues of attack, so I just won't prevent new ones from springing up". Ah... no.

      No one is saying that. What we're saying is that Warden (what a horrible choice for a name) is that, in response to one specific "what if" question about some third party with access to your machine making Warden do something naughty, "if they have access to your machine, then the fact that they can modify Warden to do something naughty is moot... they can modify ANY program on your system to do something naughty."

      Your straw man needs to go see the Wizard....

    7. Re:This is a non-issue, as it stands by wattrlz · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I thought the point was that you don't need access to the machine to make Warden do naughty things. If you could spoof the Blizzard server you could insert any bit of code you want in for the hash algorithm and let the pwnage begin.

    8. Re:This is a non-issue, as it stands by krog · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I am not forgetting the polymorphic nature of Warden; I just don't give a shit. There are plenty of polymorphic programs around, and if a haxor wants to use one to house his malicious code, he's got a bunch of skeletons to choose from (like the Sony rootkit, for example).

      Since you mention a fear of such things, I would like to remind you that WoW itself runs with high privileges and receives commands from the Internet. I'd be a lot more afraid of Windows Update pulling crazy shit than WoW Warden.

    9. Re:This is a non-issue, as it stands by davidsyes · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hell, just buy a new, dedicated computer, or clone the disk and put the clone in a new computer, and use THAT only for gaming. Or, put the clone in a multi-select bay and boot it for gaming. Sucks, but if you remove all your apps except gaming and a/v, then maybe Blizzard (or Blizzard's backers) won't see the REST of the machine.

      Multitasking has its pitfalls. When are people going to learn not try try to do EVERYTHING on just ONE computer.

      --
      Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
    10. Re:This is a non-issue, as it stands by VGPowerlord · · Score: 2, Informative

      Since you mention a fear of such things, I would like to remind you that WoW itself runs with high privileges and receives commands from the Internet.

      Unless WoW has some privilege escalator that I don't know about, I run World of Warcraft fine as a Limited User. The only thing I had to change was the permissions on the WTF directory so that addons could save information.

      ...and no, that's not a "what the f'?"

      --
      GLaDOS for President 2016! "Well here we are again. It's always such a pleasure." -- GLaDOS, 2011
    11. Re:This is a non-issue, as it stands by jeremyp · · Score: 4, Funny

      Of the 7 million WOW account holders, I would bet that 6.999 million don't even know about Warden.
      Yep. That's me.

      And I'd bet that same number, if you made them aware, still wouldn't give a toss.
      Yep. That's me too.

      The thing is, since starting to play WoW my life has descended into a meaningless treadmill of levelling and grinding. There's no longer anything of interest about me that's worth stealing.
      --
      All I want is a secure system where it's easy to do anything I want. Is that too much to ask ~~ Randall Munroe
    12. Re:This is a non-issue, as it stands by s13g3 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      When EVERYBODY has $2000+ to spend on a good gaming computer that they are never going to do anything besides play one (lousy, imo) video game, and then another $600-$1000 computer that they use for their other tasks. By your line of thinking, they'll need a separate computer to open office docs in, another to do their accounting on, and yet another for basic safe web-browsing, since, G-d forbid any one of those programs where sensitive data might be entered could talk to any of those other programs, and most of them are capable of some kind of arbitrary code execution.

      The whole point of ever faster and more powerfully robust computers is that you *can* multitask, or would you have us just return to the command prompt days. Or you could buy a console that has no other purpose than videogaming.

      Regardless, people should be able to expect some level of privacy, as their computers reside within their homes, and I don't allow guests in my home to look in whatever closet they like, or just run my vacuum cleaner, read my mail, test my security system or turn up/down the air-conditioning at whim; I don't even let people in my home that I would vaguely suspect of doing such things, and I should be able to expect a similar level of civility from the people who make programs that they want me to pay them to use. They DAMN sure don't get an alarm code to my security system to just let themselves come and go at their whim, nor a camera to see what I'm doing just to make sure I'm not doing something they don't care for; when I leave my house and go over to THEIR home (i.e. log in to the game) then they are more than welcome to monitor what I do in THEIR home or place of business, but otherwise, all bets are off. I play PC games because they are so often superior to console games, but that doesn't mean I should have to give away control of my expensive gaming machine to play them, nor does it mean I should have to spend thousands of dollars in other computers just so one theoretically legit program can't take control of it. Just because I go play paintball at your place of business doesn't mean you get to put camera's in my home to make sure I didn't crank the PSI on my paintball guns above acceptable levels or freeze my paintballs - you discover those things via due diligence AT the painball place, and you kick the ass of anyone found cheating such a way, before you kick them out.

      --
      "Inveniemus Viam Aut Faciemus" 'We will find a way... Or we will make one!' --Hannibal of Carthage
    13. Re:This is a non-issue, as it stands by 0xygen · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If you can spoof the Blizzard server, there are much larger issues anyway.
      Post a fake game update, there are many other avenues of attack if you can reach this point.

    14. Re:This is a non-issue, as it stands by kiddygrinder · · Score: 2

      i think he's whining that because the data between warden and blizz is encrypted, there's actually no way of telling if warden actually is doing something naughty. i can understand this paranoia, and if it was any other company but blizzard i'd probably be worried too.

      --
      This is a joke. I am joking. Joke joke joke.
    15. Re:This is a non-issue, as it stands by Mike+Buddha · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Jenna: That's one way to become a hunted man: trust the powerful. Yeah man, Trust No One! They could give up on profits and become a tool of the man. I'm not sure companies are really in it for profits anyways. There must be a secret, sinister reason they do things. They can't be just in it for the money. And even if they were, I'm sure they'd roll right over to whatever government offered them enough money to offset the $135 Million+ they collect every month in fees from their customers. I'm sure they'd risk a mass exodus from their game because they could make a couple more bucks on the side selling information.

      Grow up, nincompoop. BTW, quoting lame science fiction != solidly prepared argument.
      --
      by Mike Buddha -- Someday the mountain might get him, but the law never will.
  7. Define rootkit by ajs · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So, now a "rootkit" is any program that does something we're not sure of?

    I thought a rootkit was a program designed to take control of a system remotely or offer access to that system? This is just an obfuscated program (encrypted is a bit strong for something that is "decrypted" on your own system where you can watch its behavior).

    Seriously, if this is the worst that Blizzard does, I'm a happy camper. They really do have serious problems with their users being exploited, and detecting these problems early is all good. In my case, they'll see everything that's in my virtual Windows environment under Wine.

    Now, if someone proves that they're reading personal files out side of the Windows system directory or the WoW installation, then we can talk. Until then, this is a non-issue.

    1. Re:Define rootkit by AvianM · · Score: 3, Interesting

      A rootkit is a piece of software that hides itself from the operating system, hiding running processes or files. It doesn't really matter if its malware or not, just the fact that not even the OS can see it while it's running makes it a rootkit. The wow system checker I don't believe hides itself, it just has to run or the game won't.

  8. How is this a root kit? by Bryansix · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Does the thing hide itself? Can't you just uninstall WoW? (Maybe you can't but maybe you need mental help.) Ya, you don't know what it is doing but you don't know what most programs are going unless you reverse engineer them. I think this is just the cheaters getting their panties in a twist. Especially because it means the end to a real source of income for those who harvest gold and sell it in the real world.

    1. Re:How is this a root kit? by ajs · · Score: 4, Informative

      Does the thing hide itself? No.

      Can't you just uninstall WoW? Sure.

      Ya, you don't know what it is doing Actually you know pretty well what it's been doing because with minor refinements, it's been doing just about the same thing for 3 years.

      I think this is just the cheaters getting their panties in a twist. Ding!

      Especially because it means the end to a real source of income for those who harvest gold Gold harvesting is easy. What's hard is maintaining your account for more than a week once you start trying to sell it online. This is why the pro gold farmers/sellers are all using level 1 accounts. At level 1 gold farming is a bit more difficult, so they have to abuse the game in order to profit. This program detects that kind of abuse, and THAT is why they're upset.
  9. Re:Draconian EULA by Pojut · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Actually, knowing Blizzard's history (and more specifically their history with WoW) it most likely is in their EULA and/or TOS somewhere. They wouldn't knowingly do something that isn't. All it would take is to update the EULA and/or TOS when the patch is applied, seeing as you have to accept the EULA and TOS everytime you install a patch. Not their fault if you didn't read it.

    They are an internationally-known company bringing in millions of dollars a month from the most popular online game in the world. I'm sure they pay attention to what is and isn't in their agreements.

  10. A bit sensationalistic by Zuato · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I play World of Warcraft. As a subscriber that plays this game I am ok with Warden as it stands. I want to play a game where hackers and cheaters are caught and banned. I know a lot of people despise the speed hacks and of course the gold farmers, so I don't see what the fuss is all about.

    The likely hood of Blizzard hacking or stealing personal data is very small. They know that they could lose their cash cow by doing anything malicious with this information/software.

    For those that fear credit card and personal information being lifted, I'm a little baffled. When you sign up for an account you enter most of the same personal info that is going to be on your PC anyway, and unless you are using game cards they already have at least one of your credit cards on file. All information that subscribers gave up willingly.

    That aside, I did read the article and find the technology fascinating.

    1. Re:A bit sensationalistic by ad0gg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What i don't get is why people would play a game where they need a bot to level themselves up. Is the game that tedious?

      --

      Have you ever been to a turkish prison?

    2. Re:A bit sensationalistic by Sparr0 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Bots are not just for leveling up. There are PLENTY of other extremely tedious parts of the game. When I still played WoW for fun, before I started farming gold full time, I used single-purpose "bots" to automate most of the tedious parts of the game. Travel (30 minutes of walking and waiting for boats/zepplins is not fun), harvesting trade skill resources (find minerals, right click, wait 10 seconds, repeat), and combat (both as a melee fighter and as a healer. bots make great healers, especially in raids), all good targets for automation.

    3. Re:A bit sensationalistic by Sparr0 · · Score: 2

      Organizing and maneuvering in raids, exploring the world, uncovering quest story lines. Combat that requires interaction (Blizzard take note!). Social aspects of the game. Auctions (somewhat automated) and other transactions.

      There are plenty of parts of the game that are fun and not tedious. But Blizzard is "forced" to insert tedious parts so they can make the game "worth" the $15/mo that they charge for it. Imagine how quickly end-game players would get bored if they could raid their zone of choice back to back without "having" to do the tedious parts in between.

  11. Re:Do this rootkit work on Linux/Mac? by ajs · · Score: 2

    It's not a rootkit, so it doesn't work anywhere.

    It's just an analyzer that's part of WoW. It checks for malicious software in the environments where WoW runs and reports back to Blizzard when you log in to their service. Malicious in this context being defined as malicious vs. the user (keyloggers are a major concern in the wow playerbase) and malicious vs. Blizzard (e.g. bots and such controlling the UI while the game is running).

  12. Re:Call me a fool but... by pak9rabid · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I trust Blizzard with my gaming computer. I would rather lose a bit of privacy and not have annoying crackers trying to game the game.

    Yeah...it's this type of reasoning that lets the US government get away with wire-tapping w/out a warrant and other similar privacy violating activities.

  13. Re:Draconian EULA by ajs · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Given the fact that the randomly generated hash algorithm can be replaced at Blizzard's sole discretion with any other algorithm, including ones that retrieve and use personal, private and/or otherwise confidential information, with only their server to be required to know about the changes, this should be considered a very scary thing for the rest of us. I'm not a WoW player and don't particularly know the ins and outs of it EULA, but I can't imagine that that is covered at all in the license. Would a class-action suit be possible for this? I would certainly hope so. A class-action suit for what? Blizzard has written a program that checks to see if the user running the game a) has a keylogger installed (a HUGE problem with WoW) or b) is using a bot to control the game. Neither of these is malicious or harmful. People are freaking out over nothing because the gold farmers are actively seeking to put pressure on Blizzard to relax their efforts to curb automatic control over the game. Let em whine.
  14. And all because they pooched their architecture by Rogerborg · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you start your architectural design from the assumption that the client is a malicious bot, then you can design out vulnerability. Blizzard chose not to do that. They thought that they could enforce trust on the client side, and let clients make decisions about (oh, just for example) player position. Well, that makes them idiots. Idiot savants, maybe, but idiots none-the-less.

    The client cannot be trusted. Clients request, servers decide and dictate. Let the client anticipate and drift its local world state all you like, but the server must never, ever, accept a state change from the client, only requests. That's the way it has to be, unless you - demonstrably - want to play catchup for ever and a day. And if you get caught in that hole, then you need a spade the size of WOW's playerbase and Blizzard's resources in order to keep digging it deeper.

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    1. Re:And all because they pooched their architecture by Cheesey · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The purpose of Warden is not just to detect cheats but also automated players ("bots").

      Bot prevention is an extremely hard problem. Warden gives Blizzard a way to send arbitrary code to the player's computer in order to carry out any "test for a bot" that they like. If the set of available tests were restricted to a defined interface, then bot authors would be able to fake the test results, and according to TFA, this is actually what happened: "previously, roughly 318 permutations of Warden existed per patch". Presumably the bot code would detect which version of Warden was in use, and use the appropriate Warden-faking code for that version.

      Now, many more permutations exist, so this type of attack is much more difficult. I find it particularly interesting to point out that Warden doesn't actually have any new capabilities: it has always had the ability to accept arbitrary code from Blizzard, and all that has happened here is that Blizzard have made their "test for a bot" more difficult to fake.

      --
      >north
      You're an immobile computer, remember?
    2. Re:And all because they pooched their architecture by MarcoAtWork · · Score: 4, Interesting

      all nice in theory, but workable only if your clients could all have 10ms latency. When you start designing games to be playable with 400+ms latency you need to make compromises, and it becomes REALLY difficult to get things working well (I know, in a previous life I've been a games network programmer for an fps, it was quite challenging).

      In wow (and fps games in general) player movement is not predictable, at any point a player can stop and turn with no inertia (so it's not like, say, a space sim game where you can do dead reckoning at even fairly high latencies and make things look decent) and if you've seen any wow pvp you know it consists of a lot of jumping around and running through each other to try to get behind the other player. Also several abilities need to be used with very tight timings, there is the gcd to take care of etc. etc. etc.

      You need to have some things running on the client side to make the game playable for as many people as possible (for example oceanic players on US servers), and the problem is what you do when the client and the server disagree on where you are and what you are doing: tilt the balance too much towards the client and you have easy exploits, tilt the balance too much towards the server and the game will start to feel 'sluggish' and sometimes outright broken (I was right on top of the other player, why did I get 'out of range').

      It's not an easy problem to solve for a game as complex as wow, if it was do you think that with all the money they're raking in they wouldn't have fixed it yet?

      --
      -- the cake is a lie
    3. Re:And all because they pooched their architecture by LiquidFire_HK · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Presumably when full palladium/TCPA/whatever is implemented on PCs and NT7 or whatever, you will be able to have a process (WoW for example) that is hardware-enforcedly inaccessible even to kernel debugger processes on the same box (if they don't have the right key). But then you could get hardware (and software) that pretends to enforce this, but doesn't actually. I guess you can never trust the client.
  15. Duh... what's new? by mortonda · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Now Blizzard has a tool that is encrypted and can run any type of scan, transfer any file or edit any document on your computer.

    You do realize that *any* software you install on your computer can do this? Unless you have read the full source code and compiled it yourself (Ignoring the possibility of a trojan'd compiler) there is a possibility that a program could do these things. So what's new?

  16. Re:What is worse? by Cheesey · · Score: 5, Informative

    Steam games have "Valve Anti-Cheat" (VAC), which is similar in principle to the Blizzard Warden. Other games use Punkbuster, which uses the same strategy to detect cheats. All of these programs scan your machine's memory and look for the signatures of known cheats. The mechanism used to carry out the scanning and report the results is deliberately obfuscated to make it difficult to reverse engineer the process and send fake results. All three of these programs are spyware. But you agree to the use of each within the EULA of whatever game you are playing.

    Warden has always had the ability to be updated with arbitrary code as you play. The observations of this article are nothing new: Blizzard has always been able to access files on your computer, just by sending the appropriate program to Warden. It seems that they have recently been sending more complex programs, generated for each client, so the current generation of programs that spy on Warden no longer work. The arms race continues.

    --
    >north
    You're an immobile computer, remember?
  17. Blizzard, their TOS, and you. by BrianRoach · · Score: 4, Insightful


    They clearly state in their TOS that they do this (Section 14)
    http://www.worldofwarcraft.com/legal/termsofuse.html

    Don't like it? Don't play the game. Very simple.

    And in fact, when you first sign up for an account, Blizzard gives you 30 days to return the game for a *full refund* if you don't agree to the TOS and don't wish to play. That seems pretty fair IMHO, and far more than most game companies will do.

    - Roach

    1. Re:Blizzard, their TOS, and you. by BrianRoach · · Score: 2, Insightful


      And the original TOS says they can change it at any time.

      If you're a paranoid git, that's the time to request your refund.

      If, on the other hand, you realize that any process running on your machine (with sufficient user rights and can access the internet) can steal your precious information and that WoW actually isn't, you can happily go on playing.

      Anyone that paranoid shouldn't have a lick of "sensative information" on a general use machine hooked to the internet, especially if the OS is windows.

      And if you really are a paranoid git ... partition drive, install windows, only boot to that partition for gaming. Problem solved.

      - Roach

  18. Re:Or... by nuzak · · Score: 5, Funny

    > why not organize and complain to Blizzard?

    Players: "Blizzard, your malware sucks, and you suck for using it!"

    Blizzard: "What? Sorry, these piles of money you keep forking over to us every month kind of muffle the sound in here."

    --
    Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
  19. Privacy by Eddy+Luten · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I simply do not understand some of the people's comments on this matter. "I feel more secure with this" isn't a very good argument. Games have bugs: if a game can access and modify your entire system, a bug exposing this would be very dangerous.

    Game developers have no right whatsoever to delve into your personal assets no matter what the intent might be. There are various examples known world wide such as in Argentina (1980's) when all of the communications were monitored by the government to "capture the terrorists." Hackers and cheaters are not even remotely in that realm, so my computer which holds very confidential information should not be monitored. (Though it might make an interesting paper comparing hackers to terrorists)

    When I drive on the South Florida roads I am constantly monitored by cameras at each stoplight, I don't particularly would like to be monitored in my own home where I still have the illusion of privacy. However naive that might sound.

  20. Re:Oh really... by pthor1231 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You keep all that information on your hard drive unencrypted?

  21. Re:Or... by Elemenope · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's hard not to be quite so cynical these days, but there is little call for it here. Sure companies like money, but the smart ones don't go about strangling the geese that lay their golden eggs. WOW won't last forever; it will soon enough look butt-ugly and lacking in interactivity when the next generation of MMOs arrive, as is the way of all software games development. When that happens, keeping its current customer base happy and making them feel they can trust Blizzard is huge in getting the next such offering onto the market. Burning those customers and ignoring those concerns would be monumentally stupid, given that fact.

    As I understand it, what Blizzard is doing now (albeit misguided) is in response to people complaining about cheats and bots that ruin the game experience for them. That is, plainly, evidence that Blizzard doesn't just care about the bottom line to the exclusion of the preferences and complaints of the customers. I imagine that if as many people complained about this rootkit-esque fix as complain about the problem it was intended to solve, Blizzard would respond accordingly.

    --
    All the techniques ever used to make men moral have been themselves thoroughly immoral... (Nietzsche)
  22. The end game is obvious by stewartjm · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The war will continue until the cheaters are forced to use the same interface(keyboard/mouse/monitor) the humans use. I.e. within 5-10 years you'll be able to buy a little box for $50 that will plug into your mouse and keyboard ports(with passthru of course) and point a camera at your monitor that will play the game for you. There will probably even be an open source powered version of this box :) At that point it will become impossible to differentiate cheating from playing and the cheaters will have won.

    This is the only way it can go down in the end. All of the current and future "anti-cheating" technology basically boils down to calling someone on the telephone and asking "are you cheating?" while expecting a truthful answer.

    Instead of wasting time with all this crap the game makers should be redesigning the games such that reflex augmentation(aimbots) and robotic automation(24/7 farming) do not provide the advantages that they currently provide.

  23. Re:Draconian EULA by Volante3192 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And all Sony did was install a program on their music CDs that ensured someone had a legit copy of the CD (copyright infringement is a HUGE problem with IP).

    (waves magic wand) Reducto ad absurdum!

  24. Oh noes! by 0xdeadbeef · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The program they tell me they're running to detect trojans and cheat-ware encrypts what it is doing to protect itself from the trojan and cheat-ware authors. THE SKY IS FALLING!

    If you don't trust Blizzard, why did you install the game? Why did you give them your credit card number?

    But I love this stuff. It means my non-technical guildies are less likely to be exploited, it means the gold farmers have it that much harder, and drives away the vocal, whiny morons, who are likely the same vocal, whiny morons in the game.

  25. You thought wrong. by apankrat · · Score: 3, Informative

    What you described is a backdoor.
    Rootkit is an OS-level subversion program.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rootkit

    --
    3.243F6A8885A308D313
  26. Can I return it now? by campnic · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If they have just changed Warden and I'm no longer happy to agree to their terms of service, can i return wow and BC for a full refund? Don't I agree to let them run what software is in the box when i agree to the ToS? If they change the software can't i change my mind?

  27. Re:Wine? by funaho · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Works fine under Wine, which is how I play. This just goes to show you it really isn't a rootkit despite what the sensational headlines are claiming. Yes it peaks at the registry, and the process list and the window list. It's looking for key loggers and bot software. These things hide themselves well so there is no way to find them without doing some semi-invasive digging around.

    I suspect a lot of the fuss over this is coming indirectly from the writers of bot software and from the gold farmers...and they can go to hell for all I care. First they started spamming people in-game with constant ads for gold and power leveling, and then when Blizz implemented anti-spam filtering they started creating dozens of level 1 trial characters and randomly inviting people to party, hoping you'll accept so that they can talk to you in party chat and bypass the spam filters. It's annoying as hell.

  28. Re:Or... by Elemenope · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't play WOW, I don't get why people are obsessed with it, and that has absolutely nothing to do with the point, which is this:

    1. Many people like playing WOW. It brings them happiness to play it.

    2. The provider of WOW has instituted a policy that is objectionable.

    There is no reason on God's Green Earth why 1 and 2 above need inevitably lead to:

    3. Therefore people should give up WOW that brings them happiness because there is a problem with how it is provided.

    Because, frankly, that's just stupid. Less extreme measures should be tried first, like salvaging that which is valuable by attempting to change that which is objectionable. Cutting your losses and running is, if ever, a last resort when attempts to fix the problem have utterly failed. Now, this is "just a game", and so it is reasonable for people to only put as much effort into salvaging it as pleasure they get out of it; it's not like fighting for your rights or anything. I just have a really hard time comprehending the general attitude around here being that as soon as someone (esp. a corporate entity) does something to find questionable that the only response is immediate and extreme measures(tm). Human beings who do care, if even fleetingly, about things other than money run these companies; they want people to enjoy their products, and would be fools not to listen to valid concerns even if only for self-interested reasons.

    --
    All the techniques ever used to make men moral have been themselves thoroughly immoral... (Nietzsche)
  29. Maybe I'm missing the point by Minwee · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Now Blizzard has a tool that is encrypted and can run any type of scan, transfer any file or edit any document on your computer. That can't be right."

    But, apparently, installing four CDs full of unsigned, unaudited third party code which can do anything on your computer is okay. And having third party software which is in constant communication with its authors is okay. And having it download and execute new code every Tuesday, with or without your approval, is okay.

    It's only _now_ that it's becoming a problem?

    If you don't trust Blizzard, don't buy their software and don't install it on your PC. How hard is that?

  30. This is where APT in Linux shines by Pausanias · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Ah, this is the often ignored genius of systems like the APT installation software in Debian flavored Linux distros. When you download software from a trusted repository, you are downloading binaries that have been compiled and digitally signed using the private key of people that you (implicitly) trust. This is a good thing, because the sources you are downloading have been checked by an expert third party that you believe capable of doing the job. This mitigates the need for trusting the software provider and/or checking the source code yourself.

    Not that this helps with WoW, but it addresses a common cynical criticism of free/open source software, where people claim it's useless since the average joe can't read source. Yes, the average joe can't read source, but he can decide to have a trusted third party for do so.

  31. Uhh the blog writer writes bots for a living by extra+the+woos · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So of course he's trying to make a fuss about it--It will hurt his ability to help people cheat. Slashdot has been trolled, sigh. Warden is good for us that actually just want to play the game and not have people cheating. If you are that concerned about it, please feel free not to play. No one is forcing you. It isn't being installed behind your back or hidden in any way. QQ moar, as we say in WoW. :)

    --
    replacing it with NEW Folger's Crystals! (lets see if they notice the difference)
  32. Re:Or... by Elemenope · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This was from my post:

    Now, this is "just a game", and so it is reasonable for people to only put as much effort into salvaging it as pleasure they get out of it; it's not like fighting for your rights or anything. I just have a really hard time comprehending the general attitude around here...

    And this was from yours:

    This is a video game. Finding another MMO to take up your excess time is a matter of $50 at worst, since just about all of them worth playing give free trial periods. Your friends that you met in WoW will still be your friends when you stop playing if they are real friends and not merely aquaintances. There is such a thing as instance messenger and voice chat. Gain some perspective.

    I've got perspective (tm). It is only a game, and as such, like I said, people who have a problem with how it is provided should raise a stink only so far as the enjoyment they get from the game is worth it to them. Since, after all, it is their money, and not yours or mine. Me, I prefer to read books, watch movies, chat (in meatspace) with friends, and post to /. for my entertainment. That's what brings me enjoyment. These folks, who like WOW, like other things than I do and spend money in ways consummate with that enjoyment. If one were to look at the publishing industry with a magnifying glass, one would see all sorts of hideous warts; the way they treat most authors is abominable, their editorial policies are groupthink L.C.D. crap, etc. etc.. And yet, I think it would be plainly idiotic to suggest to a person that they should just stop reading books because there are problems with the way books are provided as a product. There are other, better ways. They are harder, less self-satisfyingly smug, and not always successful. And yet, they are the ways that actually make things better, as opposed to the prevailing message which seems only to suggest that one try to insulate oneself from the world as it goes to shit around you.

    Look, the way in which people think and how they act when it comes to trivial matters reflects very well how they tend to react to important ones. People whose first reaction is cut and run from every negative thing tend to do so not just in MMO-land but also in politics. People complain a great deal about political apathy, but apathy comes from the mindset that the other methods I have been speaking about (e.g. organize, petition, complain) are ineffective and are thus never tried. Of course they fail; nobody does them. In many cases, they've forgotten how. The mindset here reflects the mindset in the wider landscape, and so if you think I fail to have perspective because it's "just a game", that may be because this attitude is corrosive wherever it appears and I find that way of thinking to be destructive in areas of life where it matters a damn well lot.

    --
    All the techniques ever used to make men moral have been themselves thoroughly immoral... (Nietzsche)
  33. Not a rootkit. by Maul · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I do not see any indication anywhere that this:
    1. Hides itself from the user.
    2. Remains on the system even after World of Warcraft is uninstalled.

    So while privacy concerns may be valid, I don't see how this is a "rootkit."

    --

    "You spoony bard!" -Tellah

  34. Unfounded paranoia by dave562 · · Score: 3, Insightful
    The author of the article trots out the straw man argument that an enterprising Blizzard employee could create some devious code that secretly steals credit card information. If I were that enterprising Blizzard employee, I'd be spending more time focused on stealing ALL of the credit card information that Blizzard has on file to do their monthly reoccuring billing with. I'm sure it's all sitting in a database on Blizzard's LAN, probably encrypted and probably protected by a firewall and some pretty gnarly security policies... but it's there and ripe for the picking if an employee has the right sort of access. I haven't seen anyone mention that yet.

    As a very casual WoW player (I only have 1 level 70 main toon and I only just started raiding Karazhan), I'm glad that Blizzard is doing what they can to combat botting. On another toon of mine I just got into a guild where one of the guys was talking about how his friend had botted 75,000 honor during AV weekend. That pretty much pissed me off. I don't care too much because I'm not playing the game in any sort of competitive manner, but it kind of irks me.

    I'd really like to see something like Warden being used to combat the problem of aimbots and wallhacks in FPS games. I stopped playing FPS games all together because of that issue.

  35. The Grinder (or sub, or hoagie) by anti-human+1 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Quest: Lunch.

    Collect 3 hams, return to butcher.
    Collect 5 turkey, bring to Nargold Queefbeater in Stormblaughw.
    Purchase 1 loaf Sourdough +1

    Reward: Delicious, Choose one:
    1 - Club Sandwich - +5 vit for 3 hours
    -or-
    1 - Broodwich - +50 mana, -20% HP for 3 hours

    Accept Quest?
    [Yes] [No]

  36. Re:I canceled my Blizzard Account after the first. by funaho · · Score: 2, Funny

    Wow, you might need a couple extra layers of tin foil. And try laying off the lead paint. :)