Slashdot Mirror


Black Hole Blasts Neighbor Galaxy with Deadly Jet

butterwise writes to mention that astronomers have, for the first time, witnessed a super-massive black hole hitting a nearby galaxy with a "death-star-like" beam of energy. The story also has a video with simulations, pictures, and explanations. "The 'death star galaxy,' as NASA astronomers called it, could obliterate the atmospheres of planets but also trigger the birth of stars in the wake of its destructive beam. Fortunately, the cosmic violence is a safe distance from our own neck of the cosmos."

222 comments

  1. Phew, good job it's far away by Finallyjoined!!! · · Score: 2, Funny

    Imagine that on a Boeing, you wouldn't have to worry about collateral damage, there'd be nothing remotely collateral left :-)

    --
    If I had an Ass, I'd call it Fanny Bottom, then I could slap my Ass; Fanny Bottom, on the Arse.
    1. Re:Phew, good job it's far away by cytg.net · · Score: 1

      Imagine that on a Boeing, you wouldn't have to worry about collateral damage, there'd be nothing remotely collateral left :-) - thats like, not, funny. If scientists are trying to manipulate hostile weather conditions today, and lets just imagine for a sec that THAT could have military applications... You cant help but think, what will scientists be trying to manipulate in a 100.000 years.
    2. Re:Phew, good job it's far away by brunokummel · · Score: 1
      --
      What is best in life? To crush your enemies, to see them driven before you and to hear the lamentations of their women.
  2. He Who Smelt It Dealt It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Black hole denies farting; blames it on nearby neutron star.

    1. Re:He Who Smelt It Dealt It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wish I had mod points 'cause that's funny :D

    2. Re:He Who Smelt It Dealt It by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'd have blamed it on Sirius.

      --
      Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
    3. Re:He Who Smelt It Dealt It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'd have blamed it on Uranus

    4. Re:He Who Smelt It Dealt It by nofx_3 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Me: "I'm sorry, Anonymous Coward, but astronomers renamed Uranus in 2620 to end that stupid joke once and for all."
      AC: "Oh. What's it called now?"
      Me: "Urectum. Here, let me locate it for you."

      -kap

      --
      Visualize Whirled Peas
    5. Re:He Who Smelt It Dealt It by nofx_3 · · Score: 1

      er, I meant to give credit there to Futurama in my P.S.

      --
      Visualize Whirled Peas
    6. Re:He Who Smelt It Dealt It by davidsyes · · Score: 1

      I'd blame it on a big fiery, black-ass hole in space. (Any uranus-sized Pepto-Abyssmal or Tums for that?)

      --
      Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
    7. Re:He Who Smelt It Dealt It by DeadDecoy · · Score: 4, Funny

      It must've been silent but deadly.

    8. Re:He Who Smelt It Dealt It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'd have blamed it on Sirius. Oh sure, the old "blame it on the dogstar" routine.
    9. Re:He Who Smelt It Dealt It by PCM2 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Me: "Urectum. Here, let me locate it for you."

      Urectum? From the sound of it, u probably killed em.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    10. Re:He Who Smelt It Dealt It by Splab · · Score: 1

      anyone not knowing where that quote came from should have their geek status revoked.

    11. Re:He Who Smelt It Dealt It by chaoticzen · · Score: 0

      Sounds like the galactic equivalent of a "dutch-oven" prank.

      --
      Reality is for people that can't handle drugs. So do your part, just say no to reality!
    12. Re:He Who Smelt It Dealt It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uranus-sized? Those aren't suppositories.

    13. Re:He Who Smelt It Dealt It by davidsyes · · Score: 1

      Isn't this shaping up to be the BIGGEST witnessed case of .... "astro-turfing", by a "jet stream"?

      --
      Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  3. Way to be taken seriously.. by stormguard2099 · · Score: 1

    If you want to be taken seriously as an astronomer then might I suggest not comparing your research to fictional works

    --
    http://greenobyl.com/ please.... think of the children!!
    1. Re:Way to be taken seriously.. by TheLazySci-FiAuthor · · Score: 0, Troll

      Well, they do call them the "heavens" and we all know the fictional works that term comes from.

    2. Re:Way to be taken seriously.. by Dachannien · · Score: 5, Funny

      Besides, the ability to blast an entire neighboring galaxy with a gamma ray beam is insignificant compared to the power of the Force.

    3. Re:Way to be taken seriously.. by Veinor · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Yeah, we all know that scientific nomenclature is serious business.

    4. Re:Way to be taken seriously.. by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      the physics term is pronounced "kwork"
      Well, I have a degree in physics and I've never heard it pronounced "kwork", everyone pronounced it as it's spelt, as "kwark". Maybe it's a UK/US thing?

      Speaking of quarks though, I like the names - charm, strange, up, down, top and bottom (which were called truth and beauty at first; I still think they should have stuck).

      Anyway, scientific nomenclature is a serious business - but scientists are people too...
    5. Re:Way to be taken seriously.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I have a degree in physics and I've never heard it pronounced "kwork", everyone pronounced it as it's spelt, as "kwark". Maybe it's a UK/US thing? Yes, indeed it is. Most Americans I have come in contact with pronounce it "kwork", whereas the Brits (including my lecturer in experimental particle physics) pronounce it "kwark". And btw, I have a PhD in physics too.
    6. Re:Way to be taken seriously.. by dgatwood · · Score: 2, Funny

      Both are correct as long as you mean kwork as kw-orc. If you mean that like kw-irk, then that's the word quirk, which has a very different meaning.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    7. Re:Way to be taken seriously.. by Chris+Burke · · Score: 2, Funny

      I have no idea if it's right, but I pronounce it like the name of the Ferengi in Star Trek: Deep Space Nine.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    8. Re:Way to be taken seriously.. by Architect_sasyr · · Score: 1

      Chalk one up for "kwark" from an Australian with a Physics Degree.

      --
      Me failed English...
      FreeBSD over Linux. If my comments seem odd, this may explain...
    9. Re:Way to be taken seriously.. by Radres · · Score: 5, Funny

      Don't try to frighten us with your sorcerer's ways, Dachannien. Your sad devotion to that ancient religion has not helped you complete your Q2 deliverables on time, or given you clairvoyance to know when your boss won't notice that you're reading Slashdot...

    10. Re:Way to be taken seriously.. by cHiphead · · Score: 1

      Chalk one up for "kwark" for an American that took a physics class back in high school.

      Cheers.

      --

      This is my sig. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    11. Re:Way to be taken seriously.. by scheme · · Score: 1

      Yes, indeed it is. Most Americans I have come in contact with pronounce it "kwork", whereas the Brits (including my lecturer in experimental particle physics) pronounce it "kwark". And btw, I have a PhD in physics too.

      Most of the ATLAS and CMS people I've spoken with have pronounced it kwark. I'm in the US so these are mostly americans as well.

      --
      "When you sit with a nice girl for two hours, it seems like two minutes. When you sit on a hot stove for two minutes, it
    12. Re:Way to be taken seriously.. by Surlyboi · · Score: 5, Funny

      I find your lack of karma disturbing...

      --
      Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine...
    13. Re:Way to be taken seriously.. by Crypto+Gnome · · Score: 1

      Chalk one up for "kwark" from an Australian with a Physics Degree.

      I realize this (pronunciation of scientific terms) isn't a democracy, however I (a humble innocent-bystander without a degree in physics) have always believed that

      quark rhymes with "phark!"

      (as spoken by a truly broad Australian accent) for the most obvious of reasons.
      --
      Visit CryptoGnome in his home.
    14. Re:Way to be taken seriously.. by Architect_sasyr · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't have a farking clue what yore talking about mate ;)

      --
      Me failed English...
      FreeBSD over Linux. If my comments seem odd, this may explain...
    15. Re:Way to be taken seriously.. by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well I'm a particle physics professor and the overwhelmingly common pronunciation is 'kwark'. Although I have heard the occasional 'kwork' but only from US people and that only rarely....so now that re-education campaign has worked we just need to get them to pronounce the name of the Z ('zed') boson correctly! :-)

    16. Re:Way to be taken seriously.. by budgenator · · Score: 1

      Well President Jimmy who was a guberment train Nukular Ingineer told me it was pronounced kwork so there.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    17. Re:Way to be taken seriously.. by d'fim · · Score: 1

      "three quorks for muster Mork!" just doesn't sound right.....

      --
      Adherence to the truth is a form of disloyalty.
    18. Re:Way to be taken seriously.. by MadUndergrad · · Score: 1

      Stephen Hawking specifically claims it's pronounced like "kwork", though I don't know how his voice box says it.

    19. Re:Way to be taken seriously.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Out of the English languages, we pronounce it "kwork" for males and "kwark" for females stars respectively.

    20. Re:Way to be taken seriously.. by fbjon · · Score: 3, Funny

      On the contrary, the karma-bonus modifiers are strong in this one.

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    21. Re:Way to be taken seriously.. by Zhe+Mappel · · Score: 1
      Oh, really? Well, if you don't want the fundamentalist Christians to surround your office with torches calling for your Evil Mr. Scientist head I suggest comparing your research to even simpler fictional works.

      Just tell them: Jesus made a devil galaxy go away.

    22. Re:Way to be taken seriously.. by Capt+James+McCarthy · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Don't try to frighten us with your sorcerer's ways, Dachannien. Your sad devotion to that ancient religion has not helped you complete your Q2 deliverables on time, or given you clairvoyance to know when your boss won't notice that you're reading Slashdot..."

      And how is that women are not turned on by statements like that, I'll obviously never know...

      --
      There are no loopholes. It's either legal or it's not.
    23. Re:Way to be taken seriously.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Save for the Japanese nobody pronounces karaoke properly either. Don't get me started on Aloha, Oregon.

    24. Re:Way to be taken seriously.. by SleptThroughClass · · Score: 1

      Also, implying that we're safe because that blast is far away merely means that we haven't seen what is coming. We do have to get out of our nest.

    25. Re:Way to be taken seriously.. by db32 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, because we know that all of those science geeks didn't grow up on those very same fictional works.

      --
      The only change I can believe in is what I find in my couch cushions.
    26. Re:Way to be taken seriously.. by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 2, Funny

      though I don't know how his voice box says it.

      Since hackers got at it, it now pronounces it as 'penis'.

      Who said physics was boring?

    27. Re:Way to be taken seriously.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shut the fuck up, you tedious cockwiper.

    28. Re:Way to be taken seriously.. by hcdejong · · Score: 1

      "Rom"? Hate to break it to you, but that's way off.

    29. Re:Way to be taken seriously.. by alienmole · · Score: 1

      You have that backwards. The term "heavens" originally referred to the sky and all it contains, including planets, stars, etc. ("heavenly bodies"). The religious meaning followed from that.

    30. Re:Way to be taken seriously.. by Chaymus · · Score: 2, Funny

      System 3C321 Major: Stellar Nursery, I am your father....

      Stellar Nursery: NOOOOOO!!!!

      System 3C321 Major: Come to the Event Horizon side, it is your density

    31. Re:Way to be taken seriously.. by sticky.pirate · · Score: 1

      I have mod points, and after reading your sig, I find myself sorely tempted to mod you "Overrated", just to see what happens...

  4. One flaw... by downix · · Score: 3, Funny

    When those pesky x-wings fly down and shoot the exhaust vent....

    --
    Karma Whoring for Fun and Profit.
    1. Re:One flaw... by QuantumG · · Score: 2, Funny

      Dude, it's no bigger than a womprat.. there's no way.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    2. Re:One flaw... by shadowbearer · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but can you imagine trying to find something as small as a womprat in hidden somewhere in billions of cubic light years? ;)

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    3. Re:One flaw... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
      > Yeah, but can you imagine trying to find something as small as a womprat in hidden somewhere in billions of cubic light years? ;)

      Yeah, but can you imagine missing anything at the bottom of a gravity well formed by a supermassive black hole? The womp rat winds up at the same place as the torpedoes, and the singularity's infinitely not-bigger-than two meters!

    4. Re:One flaw... by budgenator · · Score: 2, Informative

      that two meters on the outside could be a whole galaxy on the inside, add in frame-dragging and it would be like shooting a whomp-rat from a billion lightyears away

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    5. Re:One flaw... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But the closer you get, the more its like hitting a womprat of infinite size.

  5. Also received in the footage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Was a barely heard whisper of "Ooops, I'm sorry. Ate too many beans."

  6. The astronomers explained by circletimessquare · · Score: 5, Funny

    that they could not nail down the exact nature of the exotic object giving off the deadly beam, but they did offer that "that's no moon"

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:The astronomers explained by cromar · · Score: 1

      OK. That is hilarious. Good one :)

    2. Re:The astronomers explained by jd · · Score: 1

      I'm more concerned with the fact that they describe the Jet protocol as deadly.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  7. Eminent domain... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is what happens when you're not willing to move your galaxy out of the path of a new intergalactic highway. Please don't complain about not knowing about it. The drawings been available in the next galaxy over for ages now.

    1. Re:Eminent domain... by shadowbearer · · Score: 1

      And now that the next galaxy over is a whole lot closer, it's not like it's a long trip anymore. Lazy sentients.

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
  8. Crap. by gl12 · · Score: 0

    Next thing you know we'll hear about Ewoks and from there it's just a tiny step to Jar Jar and the franchise is ruined!

  9. Old news by jonfr · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is old news, this did happen 1.4 billion years ago.

    1. Re:Old news by shadowbearer · · Score: 4, Interesting

      And considering that the major damage to any inhabited planets that may have been there would have been radiation effects, one has to wonder if there's any intelligent species over there digging up 1.4 billion year old, relatively undamaged artifacts on their planets surfaces right now ;)

        (Disclaimer: I'm not saying we've found any here on Earth, just that it's interesting to speculate about)

        We'll never know...

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    2. Re:Old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be new here.

    3. Re:Old news by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      This is old news, this did happen 1.4 billion years ago.

      That probably means there's already dupes on their way also.

    4. Re:Old news by FranklinDelanoBluth · · Score: 1

      This is /., so where's the dupe?

    5. Re:Old news by CapnJ0nes · · Score: 1

      So it happened a long time ago in a galaxy far, far away? Sounds familiar for some reason...as if millions of voices suddenly cried out in terror and were suddenly silenced.

    6. Re:Old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A long time ago in a galaxy far, far away...

  10. Muppets by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

    Sharks in Spaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaace!

    Or was that pigs?

    --
    liqbase :: faster than paper
  11. Won't someone think of the aliens?!! by Mistshadow2k4 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Fortunately, the cosmic violence is a safe distance from our own neck of the cosmos.

    That doesn't help the poor aliens living in that neck of the cosmos, you insensitive clod!

    --
    I dream of a better world... one in which chickens can cross roads without their motives being questioned.
    1. Re:Won't someone think of the aliens?!! by davidsyes · · Score: 1

      Since your sig file brings up Santa and oral sex in the same breath... a joke for you:

      ---

      Santa was caught by surprise when delivering gifts to a house.

      "Hey little girl, what are you doing awake at this hour?"

      "Oh, Santa, I've been waiting all year for you. Please stay a while."

      "Ho-ho-ho, gotta goooh gotta goohh. Gotta deliver these toys you know?"

      She played with her night gown, pulling it tight... "Please, Santa, don't go..."

      "Ho-ho-ho, gotta goooh gotta goohh. Gotta deliver these toys you know?"

      She played more with her night gown, pulling it tighter... In sultry voice, she said, "Please, Santa, don't go... I need you, so bad... Won't you stayyyy...?"

      "Ho-ho-ho, gotta goooh gotta goohh. Gotta deliver these toys you know?"

      She slinked up to Santa and slithered up and down his leg, purring, "But, Santa, I really, really need you...Ahhhh..."

      "Ho-ho-ho, gotta goooh gotta goohh. Gotta deliver these toys you know?"

      "Santa, ohhhh, Santa...."

      "Hey, hey, hey... Gotta stay, gotta stay. Can't go up the CHIMney my DICK this way!"

      (My brother told me this one when we were teens, like ages ago... I think he learned it at Catholic School when I was in the 7th grade...)

      --
      Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
    2. Re:Won't someone think of the aliens?!! by parnasus · · Score: 1

      Fortunately, the cosmic violence is a safe distance from our own neck of the cosmos.

      That doesn't help the poor aliens living in that neck of the cosmos, you insensitive clod! The next thing you know, we'll have Sally Struthers asking us to help "for just pennies a day"
      --
      --If you code for the exceptions, the rules fall into place
  12. Oh no... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cue the "That's no moon" comments

    1. Re:Oh no... by oblivionboy · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Thats no moon!

  13. Obligatory by Zephurus · · Score: 0, Redundant

    That's no moon..

    1. Re:Obligatory by dotgain · · Score: 1

      ... as if on cue.

  14. Message Beamed across the Universe by EEPROMS · · Score: 0

    "Sucks to be you"

    1. Re:Message Beamed across the Universe by Wonko+the+Sane · · Score: 1

      Or as they say around here: "Sorry 'bout your bad luck"

  15. Dude, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Say it, don't spray it.

  16. Re:That is no Blackhole by gnarlyhotep · · Score: 1

    It's a trap!

  17. No anomalies detected by Stan+Vassilev · · Score: 2, Interesting

    That would indirectly suggest that in this galaxy there was no sufficiently advanced life that would detect, and try to protect itself, or stop, said "death ray".

    Some people believe the universe is chock full of life, but this one is score for the skeptics. I remain a cautious optimist.

    1. Re:No anomalies detected by magarity · · Score: 4, Insightful

      sufficiently advanced life that would detect, and try to protect itself, or stop, said "death ray"
       
      If there's a civilization that can shut down supermassive black holes at will then we'd know about it by now. Either because we're on the menu or we're needed to help clean the sewer mains on the black-hole-shutting-down supership.

    2. Re:No anomalies detected by QuantumG · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Riight. Who says this black hole blasting a galaxy isn't exactly the kind of megaengineering we've been looking for?

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    3. Re:No anomalies detected by Shados · · Score: 1

      Well, the Earth is pretty chock full of life, and if that thing aimed for us, we'd be amazingly screwed.

      Maybe its not even technologicaly and physically possible to protect yourself from something like that. At best, if there was a super high tech civilisation in that galaxy, they got their alien asses out of there. But even then, someone correct me if I'm wrong, but even if you have a ship capable of light speed, you better have had that technology LONG before the ray hit the galaxy to make it out in time...

      Unfortunately, the universe has constraints, some of which, assuming we are right about them, can't easily be defied through technology, theoriticaly speaking..

    4. Re:No anomalies detected by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Simple, really. You just need a ring made of scrith.

    5. Re:No anomalies detected by Mopatop · · Score: 1

      you better have had that technology LONG before the ray hit the galaxy to make it out in time... Not really. They could have detected it long before it. I believe you can observe these bursts directly, and if you can't, there are other ways in which they could have known about it.
    6. Re:No anomalies detected by Xerloq · · Score: 1

      I detected it, and I left. Seriously though - given that we are the most advanced civilization we know of (narcissists), what are we doing to evade all the NEOs that can/will hit the Earth. Using the same logic, there must not be any intelligent life in Hawaii, as parts of that island are routinely destroyed by molten lava. Just goes to show you.

    7. Re:No anomalies detected by flappinbooger · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of an old "outer limits" episode where this astronomy-geek kid finds a seti-type signal which causes all teenagers to mutate in such a way to protect them from some change in the sun which would have otherwise killed them. Yeah, that's a long sentence.

      --
      Flappinbooger isn't my real name
    8. Re:No anomalies detected by Chris+Burke · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That would indirectly suggest that in this galaxy there was no sufficiently advanced life that would detect, and try to protect itself, or stop, said "death ray".

      Um, dude? That "death ray" has a significant scale relative to the size of a galaxy, all of it traveling at (x-rays, gamma rays) or close to (electrons) the speed of light. For one any species caught in its path wouldn't see it until it hit them, and two even if they knew about the beam it isn't clear that they could do anything about it except hide underground for thousands of years or bug out to another part of the galaxy, which itself would require faster-than-light travel. To actually redirect or shield themselves from the beam at a degree that would be visible in our telescopes would require technology on a scale that we can't even dream of.

      I find it highly odd that you would be skeptical of the existence of life arising elsewhere in the universe (which while we have no idea what exactly it takes, we know is possible because it has happened at least once), because of the apparent lack of faster than light travel (which according to our current theories is impossible) or even more miraculous feats of what amount to complete science fiction. We can't say that it could ever even be theoretically possible to be "sufficiently advanced" to pull off what you propose, much less if humanity could ever attain it.

      Have you seen the Hubble Deep Field? That's an extremely narrow view of the sky, and it's completely stuffed with galaxies. And because this one particular galaxy has not, as far as we can tell, birthed a civilization with Q-like powers, you're questioning whether there could be life anywhere else out there at all? That's literally the oddest form of skepticism I've ever heard.

      Unless this is just dead-pan humor. I'll admit that I have problems detecting it when done with subtlety.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    9. Re:No anomalies detected by Shados · · Score: 1

      No, maybe I wasn't clear in what I meant: what I mean is, even if you know about it. From the time you know its going to hit you, to the time it ACTUALLY does... you need to build enough ships (or something) to get out, and -actually- get out... we're talking potentially several lightyears. So even at speed of light, to get out of the blast and of its effects (stars going supernova, etc), it will take years.

      So you need to detect that not only it exists, but also that its going to hit you, research lightspeed travel technology (if you don't already have it, thus my original point), actually build enough crafts to get a reasonable amount of people out, then actually get out, and find a safe location to get out -to-.

      Even for an heavily advanced civilisation, thats no small feat.

    10. Re:No anomalies detected by budgenator · · Score: 1

      if your ship was capable of doing the speed of light or even a significant portion of it then the radiation from the blackhole jet might be red-shifted enough that it would be easy to shield; instead of gamma radiation it might red-shift down to red light and not even have enough energy to power your solar cells decently.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    11. Re:No anomalies detected by graffix_jones · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That deep field photo is humbling beyond words. It really gives you perspective on just how insignificant we are, in the philosophical grand scheme of things.

      To paraphrase Carl Sagan's Contact, if there isn't any intelligent life out there, it sure would be an awful big waste of space.

    12. Re:No anomalies detected by AhtirTano · · Score: 1

      If they could take care of black holes at will, you'd think they'd be able to take care of their own black holes without help.

    13. Re:No anomalies detected by ultramutalisk · · Score: 1

      I think it's perfectly possible for an advanced civilization to survive in that energy beam. A an engineer, one way I would approach the problem would be to use this deadly beam as a ultra massive energy resource. With that much energy coming one's way, I'm sure it's possible to create a massive electromagnetic field around the planet that would divert all harmful sub atomic particles. All it would require would be research and economic resources to pull it off.

    14. Re:No anomalies detected by osu-neko · · Score: 1

      That would indirectly suggest that in this galaxy there was no sufficiently advanced life that would detect, and try to protect itself, or stop, said "death ray".

      Huh? Why would this suggest that? The fact that the "ray" is there says no one tried to stop it, but I can't see why any sufficiently advanced life would bother trying. There's no evidence here that they didn't try to protect themselves, and indeed I would assume that any sufficiently advanced life would be in no danger from such a beam. They're probably sitting happily on their worlds admiring the pretty light-show as the radiation blasts bounces harmlessly off their shields.

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    15. Re:No anomalies detected by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      That would indirectly suggest that in this galaxy there was no sufficiently advanced life that would detect, and try to protect itself, or stop, said "death ray". Some people believe the universe is chock full of life, but this one is score for the skeptics. I remain a cautious optimist.

      That galaxy is relatively far away. This means that it is not a very common occurrence, otherwise we'd have much closer galaxies in which to observer this phenomena, with better pictures. Of course, there's other things that can go wrong, such as nearby supernova's baking a planet, which may even account for some of Earth's 8 or so mass extinctions.

      As Abraham Lincoln would say, some planets get screwed all the time, and all planets get screwed some of the time, but never are all planets screwed all the time.....er...well..something like that.

    16. Re:No anomalies detected by trawg · · Score: 1

      Heh, that was my first (depressing) thought. This sounds like it would be the ultimate weapon in interstellar combat!

    17. Re:No anomalies detected by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And because this one particular galaxy has not, as far as we can tell, birthed a civilization with Q-like powers

      OK, I have to ask. How exactly do you think you would be able to tell that?

    18. Re:No anomalies detected by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      This isn't the kind of megaengineering you've been looking for.
      </handwave>

    19. Re:No anomalies detected by splutty · · Score: 1

      I think what he meant was: There might be life in other galaxies, but this one's roasted for sure.

      --
      Coz eternity my friend, is a long *ing time.
    20. Re:No anomalies detected by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      OK, I have to ask. How exactly do you think you would be able to tell that?

      I don't, that was kinda the point.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    21. Re:No anomalies detected by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If there's a civilization that can shut down supermassive black holes at will then we'd know about it by now.

      "If you'd quit giving our transmitters dumb names like "pulsar" and instead listen to the dang things, you might learn a thing or two."

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    22. Re:No anomalies detected by rk · · Score: 1

      If there's a civilization that can shut down supermassive black holes at will then we'd know about it by now. Either because we're on the menu or we're needed to help clean the sewer mains on the black-hole-shutting-down supership. I think it's more likely we'd sanitize their phones.
    23. Re:No anomalies detected by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Because if Q lived there, he'd have averted the threat by turning it into a giant tomato or something. Although it's possible he does live there and this is his way of spring-cleaning.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    24. Re:No anomalies detected by the_rtb · · Score: 1

      But on the other hand, all we can see is light millions of years old. However impressive that photo is, it's only a glance at a small segment of the sky spanning billions of years in time, but still of the past. With my current knowledge on humankinds knowledge on the universe I say that we can't see the current universe, only the past.

    25. Re:No anomalies detected by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That'll teach them that "Get off my lawn!" means "GET OFF MY LAWN!!!"

  18. Real Leap forward: Telescopes by writerjosh · · Score: 5, Interesting

    We often take for granted when we see these cool renditions of distant space that these images are only possible when based on the leaps and bounds made with various telescopes over the last 50+ years:

    "Only now by combining the images of radio telescopes, the optical and ultraviolet eyes of Hubble Space Telescope and the Chandra X-ray Observatory, can researchers put together the entire violent story about this intergalactic mugging.

    The coordinated use of such an array of diverse and powerful telescopes is one of the unheralded triumphs of modern physics, Tyson said. "This is an example of the triumph of that exercise." http://dsc.discovery.com/news/2007/12/17/galaxy-black-hole-02.html

    Just the fact that we can observe such a dramatic event is awe-inspiring.

    1. Re:Real Leap forward: Telescopes by TheLazySci-FiAuthor · · Score: 1

      Our eyes are so amazingly beyond any other organism's, that I say humans have abilities which are truly cosmic in scale. Think of the most powerful biological eye - probably a hawk or eagle's - and then compare the light-gathering and resolving power of it to the resolution and light gathered from an astronomical observation. It is a truly stellar distance, the separation.

      Yes, the biological human eye does not compare, but I consider our technology to be a part of us. After all, humans aren't really that well equipped by default - we don't survive without our technology and therefore I consider our technology to be as much a part of us as a colony is a part of the ant organism.

      And yet with this power of sight, this ability to see the dangers of this universal landscape, we still seem to lack the foresight to compare. I guess it is easier to increase our vision than to have increased vision.

    2. Re:Real Leap forward: Telescopes by shadowbearer · · Score: 1

      In other news, a clandestine Rebellion broadcast announced the deployment of a Super-Super-Super-Super-Super-Super Death Star in response to the Imperial deployment of the Super-Super-Super-Super-Super Death Star. Unfortunately, life thruout the galaxy was snuffed out before any official Imperial comment on the claim could be *NO CARRIER*

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    3. Re:Real Leap forward: Telescopes by shadowbearer · · Score: 1

      Dangit, this was supposed to be a reply to this post http://science.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=391860&cid=21732750

        That's the third time this month :(

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    4. Re:Real Leap forward: Telescopes by gardyloo · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Though, of course, each instrument has its special field of applicability.

        Human eyes are amazing, but really only have much acuity in the fovea centralis (thus microsaccades). Horses' eyes don't have the acuity we do in the center of their visual fields, but their relatively high-resolution field extends considerably father than ours. We don't have tapeta; many other animals have much better night-vision than we do. Many birds can see a ways into the ultraviolet regions; many insects and other arthropods can see farther. Pit-vipers are sensitive to infrared radiation; sharks, skates, and rays can sense nearly DC fields; migrating birds may be able to do something similar. Crabs (if I remember something I read a long while ago), due to their 10^4 compound eyes, may be able to sense movements as slight as that of the sun's movement across the sky.

            To each his own. Naturally (sic) you may argue that we've incorporated all of these amazing sensors into our own technologies. To even be able to recognize the animals' abilities we much have at least partially achieved them ourselves.

    5. Re:Real Leap forward: Telescopes by shadowbearer · · Score: 1

      The capabilities of our technology are leaping far ahead of our understanding. There, shortened that for you :)

        Technology is fast, evolution is slow.

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    6. Re:Real Leap forward: Telescopes by TigerNut · · Score: 1

      Unfortunate that at least some of that coordinated effort is slated to be decommissioned in the next little while... with both the Hubble and Arecibo (the latter not specifically named, but they did use the VLA radiotelescope) being punted, how much of this capability will we lose?

      --

      Less is more.

    7. Re:Real Leap forward: Telescopes by gardyloo · · Score: 1

      Luckily, you said, "In other news...". Therefore, any mods which think you're off-topic are automatically wrong! You've done a brilliant thing.

    8. Re:Real Leap forward: Telescopes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "hink of the most powerful biological eye - probably a hawk or eagle's - and then compare the light-gathering and resolving power of it to the resolution and light gathered from an astronomical observation."


      OK, now get that telescope to fly, find its own electricity in nature, self-repair, find a mate, reproduce and make a new telescope starting with a self-contained package the size of an egg. Not so amazing anymore, the telescope, eh?

  19. Could you imagine ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a Beowulf cluster of these energy spouting supermassive black holes ?

    1. Re:Could you imagine ... by callmetheraven · · Score: 2

      No, but I can imagine Beowulff Shaffer flying the Long Shot to go have a look at one.

      --
      You can have my SIG when you pry it from my cold, dead hands.
  20. It could happen to us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    http://people.roma2.infn.it/~aldo/dar01.pdf

    Eta Carinae - a large blue variable star in the Carina constelation, more than 100 times as massive and 5 million times as radiant as the Sun ... If pointing in our direction a GRB from Eta Carinae, ... would devistate life on Earth.


    Since we are moving around within our galaxy, it is possible that we will move into the line of fire of something like this. Of course, I am much more worried about being mowed down by a drunk driver than being zapped by a nearby star.
    1. Re:It could happen to us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the difference betwenn Eta Carina and the death galaxy is that the size of the blackhole is much larger than the resultant Eta blackhole would be, and hence would be unable to beam that much energy torwards us.

    2. Re:It could happen to us by chmod+a+x+mojo · · Score: 1

      So you are saying it is better to be microwaved on "low" than the "high" setting?
      At least on "high" you would probably not feel it as much.

      --
      To err is human; effective mayhem requires the root password!
  21. Re:That is no Blackhole by Zalbik · · Score: 1

    Full reverse! Chewie, lock in the auxiliary power.

  22. That was the "kawoosh" of a super stargate the ori by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 0

    That was the "kawoosh" of a super stargate the ori may be coming are way.

  23. Wrong, astronomers use fiction all the time ... by AHumbleOpinion · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you want to be taken seriously as an astronomer then might I suggest not comparing your research to fictional works

    Your suggestion is laughable, astronomers use fiction all the time. Consider the names of the planets, some constellations, etc. I apologize if you believe in the greek/roman gods, you have to consider that most of us consider them fictional. ;-)

    1. Re:Wrong, astronomers use fiction all the time ... by shadowbearer · · Score: 1

      In addition, some astronomers even write science fiction. :)

        (That begs a question: Do theoretical physicists write science fiction? Outside of work, I mean? ;-) )

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    2. Re:Wrong, astronomers use fiction all the time ... by flosofl · · Score: 1

      Robert L. Forward comes to mind.

      --
      "This calls for a very special blend of psychology and extreme violence" - Vyvyan "The Young Ones"
    3. Re:Wrong, astronomers use fiction all the time ... by budgenator · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Asimov was asked questions about his fictional work "The Endocrinic Properties of Resublimated Thiotimoline" at the oral defense of PhD thesis.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    4. Re:Wrong, astronomers use fiction all the time ... by shadanan · · Score: 1

      Begging the question is a logical fallacy in which the proof of a hypothesis is shown by assuming the hypothesis to be true. It seems the use of the statement "to beg the question" is changing meaning because so many people misunderstand the statement. A little off topic - sorry about that.

    5. Re:Wrong, astronomers use fiction all the time ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever heard of Satellites? Arthur C Clarke?

      I guess it does depend on what fiction you look at too.

      And wasn't Carl Sagan a smart astronomer? Wow Contact!!!! Awesome fiction.

      --Sir.nofan@gmail.com

    6. Re:Wrong, astronomers use fiction all the time ... by ShadowOfMe · · Score: 1

      Fictional, like any other god for that mater, not just the Greek and Roman ones.

  24. So this is the space version of a facial? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can just see the movie title: "Black Holes and White Galaxies who Like Being Spurted On".

  25. the universe could get caught in a drive-by by mrpeebles · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The space age is great. It lets us all see that we live on the same small world. One that could, in princple, be accidently blown up by a careless, nearby black hole.

    1. Re:the universe could get caught in a drive-by by fm6 · · Score: 0, Troll

      Dude, this black hole destroyed a whole galaxy. If that happened in our galaxy, having colonized a few extra planets would do nothing to ensure the survival of the species. Let's focus on the threats we can do something about. Which are mostly the threats we ourselves created!

    2. Re:the universe could get caught in a drive-by by o'reor · · Score: 1

      Dear moderator(s), quit smoking your crack. Parent post does not qualify for "-1, Troll" in any way.

      --
      In Soviet Russia, our new overlords are belong to all your base.
    3. Re:the universe could get caught in a drive-by by master_p · · Score: 1

      If it happened to us, we would consider it the wrath of God and fulfillment of the prophecies. Now that it did not happen to us, it's just a space phenomenon.

    4. Re:the universe could get caught in a drive-by by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Yes it does! "Troll" means "STFU!" I thought everybody knew that!

      The truth is, I'm proud to be modded down. If you're not pissing people off, you're not saying anything that really matters.

    5. Re:the universe could get caught in a drive-by by Raenex · · Score: 1

      If it happened to us, we would consider it the wrath of God and fulfillment of the prophecies. Beware, you homosexual infidels!
  26. Alternative viewpoint. by palegray.net · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you want to relate to the masses, instead of assuming everyone who might be interested in your work has a degree in astrophysics, you might compare your research to fictional works easily recognized in society.

  27. tag: ohshi by xyph0r · · Score: 0

    How long before something like this happens in our 'neck of the cosmos'?

    --
    SQL programmer goes to a bar. Walks up to two tables and says 'Excuse me, may I join you?'.
  28. It's an evil scientist! by Eternal+Annoyance · · Score: 1

    What better hideout to build your death-ray then a black hole?
    Granted, things might be a bit crammed... but that shouldn't be much of a problem.

    1. Re:It's an evil scientist! by OnlineAlias · · Score: 1

      We shall call it, "The Alan Parson's Project..."

    2. Re:It's an evil scientist! by rikkitikki · · Score: 1

      Forget the hideout. The true evil scientist would figure out a way to aim it.

  29. In Russian, "Black Hole" means... by 7String · · Score: 1

    exactly what you think it means. I guess it was interstellar "fajitas night" or something.

    --

    It isn't a memory leak. It's an object life-span issue.
  30. I'll tell you what else... by palegray.net · · Score: 1

    Quote: Just the fact that we can observe such a dramatic event is awe-inspiring.

    I find the ever-increasing application of computing power to analyzing these sorts of problems, coupled with the incredible global communications flexibility we have today, to be pretty awe-inspiring. We've come a long way from dialing into BBSes; I can't wait to see what the next 10 years brings for research.

    1. Re:I'll tell you what else... by davidsyes · · Score: 1

      And, depending on where one grows up, or from where one obtains an astrophysics degree, it can be....

      Aw(r)e-inspiring....

      And, to 7String's

      "exactly what you think it means. I guess it was interstellar "fajitas night" or something."

      It might have been intergalactic "Tacar Tacar Tacar Tacar Tacar Tacar Tacar Tacar Tacar-Bell", or

      "Tacar Tacar Tacar Tacar Tacar Tacar Tacar Tacar Tachyon-Bell" (The old 80's Taco Bell TV advert...)

      --
      Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
    2. Re:I'll tell you what else... by Wonko+the+Sane · · Score: 1

      We've come a long way from dialing into BBSes; I can't wait to see what the next 10 years brings for research.
      Porn
    3. Re:I'll tell you what else... by palegray.net · · Score: 1

      Research like that can lead to all sorts of sticky situations.

  31. Possible names for the galaxies? by bark76 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Terrence and Phillip?

  32. I give it 48 hours before we feel the effects... by jpellino · · Score: 1, Funny

    ...which will consist of Rush Limbaugh figuring out a way to pin this on the Clintons, and Dennis Kucinich formulating a plan to deal with it...

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
  33. Re:That is no Blackhole by bckrispi · · Score: 1

    -1 "Telekinetic Force Choke" for botching one of the most well-know lines in cinematic history...

    --
    Xenon, where's my money? -Borno
  34. 1.4 billion light years by ConcreteJungle · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The article states: Both galaxies are situated about 1.4 billion light-years away from Earth.

    and then goes on with: The offending galaxy probably began assaulting its companion about 1 million years ago...

    If the distance is 1.4 billion light years, light from the event should be taking that much time to reach us, and something that happened only a million years ago should not be visible yet.

    What am I missing here?

    1. Re:1.4 billion light years by Mopatop · · Score: 1

      The ability to apply common sense? The assault started 1.401 billions years ago. I hope you're just being facetious.

    2. Re:1.4 billion light years by shadowbearer · · Score: 4, Informative

      The collision began about 1.5 billion years ago, about one million years before we observed it. The estimate is based off the two galaxies motion relative to each other.

        It's just imprecise language. :)

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    3. Re:1.4 billion light years by shadowbearer · · Score: 1


        I run into this question a lot, so I don't think he was being facetious.

        (Usually I don't answer it wrong, doh, thanks) ;0

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    4. Re:1.4 billion light years by davidsyes · · Score: 0, Troll

      I'd say that was QUITE an offensive ass-salt. Would the charges be:

      -- assault and battery?
      -- purge-ery
      -- gassing (gas panic)?

      --
      Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
    5. Re:1.4 billion light years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A basic high school education?

    6. Re:1.4 billion light years by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1

      It depends on your frame of reference. For example, in the frame of reference of the photons we're detecting from this event, the photon hits the telescope on earth the same instant that it emerges from the galactic jet.

    7. Re:1.4 billion light years by budgenator · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm sure what they really meant to say was that the galactic events we are seeing happened 1.4 billion years ago and had been occurring for 1 million years before we noticed it.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    8. Re:1.4 billion light years by Edward+Ka-Spel · · Score: 4, Informative

      Not 1.5 billion, 1.401 billion years ago.

    9. Re:1.4 billion light years by shadowbearer · · Score: 1

      Yeah, see my other post. Whups :(

        Moderators certainly failed it tho...

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    10. Re:1.4 billion light years by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      "It's just imprecise language. :)"

      Or a sophisticated understanding of light cones and simultaneity. Since it's a news web site We'll go with yours as more likely though.

    11. Re:1.4 billion light years by gekkakitsune · · Score: 1

      More like 1.401 billion years ago. It's just imprecise math :-)

  35. Bad tag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't tase me, dude?

  36. ummm by quickpick · · Score: 1

    butterwise writes to mention that astronomers have, for the first time, witnessed a super-massive black hole hitting a nearby galaxy with a "death-star-like" beam of energy.
    Meanwhile Icantbelieveitsnotbutter states that all astronomers are starwars geeks but not all starwars geeks are astronomers.
    The story also has a video with simulations, pictures, and explanations.
    OK I made a mistake, all astronomers are starwars uber-geeks...

    He who hath smelt it may have dealt it, but thou shalt remember that which is silent may also be violent.

    1. Re:ummm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can categorically state that all astrophysicists are not Star Wars nerds!! I'm one of them and had to Google "death star" to figure out what it was! Sorry 'bout that!

    2. Re:ummm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a Star Wars nerd and you had to google "Death Star"? I question your nerd credentials.

      Tricky language, English.

      Captcha: empire

  37. WTF ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    ... is "jet from supermassive black holes"?

    I always thought no particle/energy can escape the event horizon of a black hole.

    Please explain.

    1. Re:WTF ... by CroDragn · · Score: 4, Informative

      You're correct, they can't (though lookup black hole evaporation for a way matter "exits" a black hole w/o actually crossing the event horizon). However, as matter circles the black hole prior to actually falling into it's event horizon it becomes superheated and a great deal of radiation is shot off from both the holes poles prior to the matters actual disappearance into the event horizon.

  38. Carl Sagan didn't take that into account... by rholland356 · · Score: 1

    Dang. One black hole can blast an entire galaxy?!

    It's a wonder we are here at all...

  39. Re:I, for one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yawn

  40. I dunno, man.... by hanakj · · Score: 0

    I've got a bad feeling about this.....

  41. Radix! by Nyago · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Woah! This is exactly the premise of A. A. Attanasio's Radix! A line of energy from a black hole hits earth (after having passed over countless other worlds) and interferes with its magnetic field, eventually leading to mass mutations. Brilliant book. :D Out of print, though, as far as I can tell. :(

    --
    Reality is fluffy!
  42. Meanwhile, Muslim "science" is still dedicated... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...to to the pressing business of eradicating their mortal enemy, the Jews. How come you never hear of a mainstream Muslim scientist or organization finding a new discovery or a new technology that isn't somehow related to the destruction and hate of anything non-Muslim, especially Jews. It's funny that the tiny desolate patch of land where Israel is (and it's minute compared to the whole of the Arabian region), nobody in all of Araby cared one camel's shit about, UNTIL the Jews actually developed and made something of it. Now all of a sudden every able-bodied Muslim seems to think that this tiny patch of previously worthless desert must be reclaimed to add back to all of Muslim-a-bad. And every waking thought of this hatred-mongering people is dedicated to this very task. Never mind that AIDS, hunger, poverty, etc are still rampant, the reclamation of this .005% area of the Arab region must be free of the infidel Jews. If space aliens took pity on us and relocated every Jew to Alpha Centauri, the Muslims would see this as some a kind of insult against Islam for letting filthy Jews live there first, and would somehow find a way to travel space just to go fight them over it, even if it took eons. If the Aliens do exist and they reveal themselves to us, I would be very surprised if the first claim of an alien insult to Islam didn't happen within one week.

  43. Stephen Hawking appeared in Star Trek by AHumbleOpinion · · Score: 1

    In addition, some astronomers even write science fiction. :) (That begs a question: Do theoretical physicists write science fiction? Outside of work, I mean? ;-) )

    They sometimes appear in Star Trek TV episodes, Stephen Hawking.

  44. That is No Deathray Kids by g16n · · Score: 3, Funny

    This is what happens when a seductive mama galaxy spins in close proximity to an excited papa galaxy.

    1. Re:That is No Deathray Kids by kehren77 · · Score: 1

      I like to think of it as "Hot Galaxy On Galaxy Action"

  45. A true weapon of mass destruction? by tchdab1 · · Score: 1

    Is it possible that advanced civilizations are having it out with super powerful weapons? Using the mass-destroying power of a black hole to wipe out an enemy galaxy?

    If so, then I for one welcome our galaxy-destroying overlords, at least for now.

  46. Could be worse... by FernandoBR · · Score: 1

    ... it could be aiming Uranus.

    --
    -x- Sorry my bad English. I'll have him tarred and feathered. -x-
  47. Kucinich's plan by Quila · · Score: 1

    will of course involve increasing taxes to make the problem go away. We don't know how that will make the problem go away, but such people always seem to think that upping taxes magically solves problems.

    1. Re:Kucinich's plan by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      Funny, that. It seems that the current president seems to have the same approach to the middle east.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  48. Think of all the dead people by rastoboy29 · · Score: 1

    My personal feeling is that probably many trillions of sentient beings probably died when that jet first hit.

    Makes you think.

    1. Re:Think of all the dead people by Maximum+Prophet · · Score: 1

      You presume that it hit quickly, rather than ramping up in power allowing the beings to evolve or leave.

      TFA mentions that it's hitting the edge of the galaxy, so some of the planets would see it hit their neighbors many years before their part of the galaxy rotated into the beam.

      --
      All ideas^H^H^H^H^Hprocesses in this post are Patent Pending. (as well as the process of patenting all postings)
  49. Re:You don't say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    speaking of gay niggers, what happened to Jaime McCarthy?

  50. In related news by Falstius · · Score: 2, Funny

    In a speech today, Bush promoted renewed investment in the space agency. "See, we've finally found the WMD and they're in another galaxy, see. It is imperative we develop the technology to impose regime change as quick as possible. 9-11."

  51. Confusing Statements by theonlyaether · · Score: 1

    Maybe someone can help me out here, according to the article:
    Both galaxies are situated about 1.4 billion light-years away from Earth.
    And then in another paragraph:
    The offending galaxy probably began assaulting its companion about 1 million years ago
    and goes on to say that it's recent, etc etc.
    Is this simply a huge oversight on the author's part with respect to the speed of light, or am I missing something here?
    My understanding is that it must have happened about ohh 1.5 billion years ago, right?

    --
    Graduate students and most professors are no smarter than undergrads.
    They're just older.
    1. Re:Confusing Statements by theonlyaether · · Score: 1

      Never mind, insert foot in mouth, someone else already covered this a dozen or two comments ago...

      --
      Graduate students and most professors are no smarter than undergrads.
      They're just older.
  52. Youtube oblig by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    "Don't taze me, galatic bro!"

  53. Galactic Wife: by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    "I told ya to put the toilet seat up. You sprayed all over our yard, you big glipnorf!"

    1. Re:Galactic Wife: by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      or we could be witnessing a galactic Bill Clinton at "work".

  54. What, no Muse references? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    C'mon, 151 comments already...

  55. Maybe they found a different solution by gr8dude · · Score: 1

    Maybe their solution was to get out of there (colonize other planets, flee into another dimension, etc) because they were able to formally prove there is no way to master a black hole?

    Alternatively, they may be taking advantage of this phenomenon, using the radiation somehow.

  56. Galactic pwnage! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Victim-galaxy : OMG stop TK'ing u fag!

    Death-galaxy : Lol, nub.

  57. Re:SLASHDOT SUX0RZ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If your penis looks like that you really aught to see a doctor.

  58. anachronism by rasputin465 · · Score: 1

    [a little off-topic, i know] That just reminds me of something striking in the original quote, "...has not helped you conjure up the stolen data tapes..."

    So let me get this straight. They have hyper-space interstellar travel, blaster guns, light sabers, intelligent robots, hover cars, space stations the size of a moon.... and they still store data, on TAPE ?

    1. Re:anachronism by jahudabudy · · Score: 1

      Maybe that just refer to them in that way for the sake of tradition. Kind of how I "dialed in" to work last night, via my broadband connection.

      --
      ...sometimes, in order to hurt someone very badly, you have to tell that person terrible lies. - PA
    2. Re:anachronism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Never underestimate the bandwidth of an astromech droid full of tapes.

    3. Re:anachronism by Jasin+Natael · · Score: 1

      How do you know that we won't go back to some form of tape in the future? As long as the electronics (or storage substrates) involved are flexible enough to be spooled, who's to say we won't have meters-long glass-fiber ribbons filled with trapped electrons? Or RF-powered flash chips deposited inkjet-style onto a polymer strip, and read into memory sequentially as the tape advances, bringing a fixed number of non-interfering circuits out of the shielded spool area?

      It's a question of reading and writing the maximum amount of data with the smallest / fewest possible read elements, and I'd say that a single strip that can be wound and unwound is (apart from long seek times) a pretty elegant solution to that problem. In fact, if computers could read books, I dare say we might even go back to binding books as scrolls.

      --
      True science means that when you re-evaluate the evidence, you re-evaluate your faith.
    4. Re:anachronism by rasputin465 · · Score: 1

      How do you know that we won't go back to some form of tape in the future?

      Well I don't of course, but I'd say it's unlikely. However many spoolable storage media you can think of, I think that there's certainly a trend in electronic technology to go with fewer and fewer moving parts. You just can't achieve that with any sort of tape drive.

      How did we get on this topic again?

  59. Combat ? You're thinking way to martial. by Ihlosi · · Score: 1

    That other galaxy is just in the way of new intergalactic superhighway. What's blasting a whole galaxy to smithereens compared to reaching all the interesting places in less that a billion years ?

  60. Think of EVENTS in spacetime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So if we were to look 1 million years ago (if we could) we would see the formation of this problem. Or, RIGHT AT THIS INSTANT, a star system 1 million light years from us along the same line would RIGHT NOW be seeing the precursor of this jet event.

    Our language was invented to tell the other monkeys where the banana was. It doesn't work too well when we're talking relativistically. So imprecision is possible. However, given that you know that 1 million years cannot fit with a precursor to an event 1.4 billion years ago should help you come to the conclusion that the precursor was 1 million years BEFORE THE JET. All that was missing was the implied object, and English does that all the time.

    1. Re:Think of EVENTS in spacetime by theonlyaether · · Score: 0

      Right, my interpretation of the statement equated to something akin to "the light representing the time the jet first hit the galaxy reached our earth 1 million years ago". I was just surprised that the language in the article was so imprecise. I suppose they expected that anyone reading the article would be smart enough to understand, it still struck me as something that shouldn't have made it past the proof read though...

      --
      Graduate students and most professors are no smarter than undergrads.
      They're just older.
  61. A Hypothesis: What if ... by fygment · · Score: 1

    ... remnants from a similar jet is what Earth is currently passing through? As a result our ozone layer has been subjected to some depletion and other atmospheric effects have led to a slight global change in climate. Yeah, yeah. A hypothesis riddled with weak points BUT before you slag it with "why it can't ....", what if we extend our minds a bit and see if it could happen THEN slag it.

    What if say, our companion dwarf galaxies have somehow redirected a bit of a similar jet from our own galactic black hole and Earth's just started swimming through it?

    Or what about the POV of some planet in the affected galaxy that might well have noticed the effects of the onset of the jet but not had the technology or scientific principles to deduce the source eg.they had no black hole theory or no inclination for astronomy. What would their deductions have been and what courses of action might they have been inclined to follow as they saw their atmosphere changing?

    Or, with all the hypothesizing about Dark Matter and Energy, is it possible that Dark Jets exist? If so, what might those be and what might they entail? Anyone on the cutting edge of this field?

    --
    "Consensus" in science is _always_ a political construct.
  62. not "dude" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Whomever tagged the story "donttasemedude", stop smoking ganja, at least while you're reading news. Idiot. The quote is "Don't tase me, bro!" Now don't fuck it up by spreading an incorrect version. This is how stupidity is created.

  63. It is NOT the same plan by Quila · · Score: 1

    Bush prefers to throw it on the credit card instead of making us pay for it now. :)

  64. Re:Meanwhile, Muslim "science" is still dedicated. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This all just really boils down to the root cause of all problems, which is niggers.

  65. Cool! A Minnie Driver/Anne Hathaway love scene. by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    Note that civilizations there might be scared, thinking they were being exterminated by an angry god.

    They'd be wrong of course.

    Though if they were right, woe be to us all. Fall on your knees and worship Him!

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  66. And so, we have discovered... by Jasin+Natael · · Score: 1

    The spectre of Vesuvius for our modern age. It seems that no matter what the scale or scope of your civilization, natural disasters just don't go away. Looks like we'd better colonize outside our galaxy as quickly as we can. Since the danger is electromagnetic, this is a case of not seeing the bullet until you've already been shot. Without faster-than-light communication and some monitoring posts quite a distance from Earth, there's no possibility of an early-warning system.

    --
    True science means that when you re-evaluate the evidence, you re-evaluate your faith.
    1. Re:And so, we have discovered... by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      It's no big loss if we're wiped out from the universe. Some other organism will adapt the take our place. What is the purpose of establishing tenable immortality when we already know our existence is impermanent.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  67. Katamari anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The 'death star galaxy,' as NASA astronomers called it, could obliterate the atmospheres of planets but also trigger the birth of stars in the wake of its destructive beam. Sounds like another job for the Prince of All Cosmos..
  68. Wrong galaxy, guys by sm62704 · · Score: 1
    Uranus? Are you Sirius?

    I submitted this yesterday afternoon, I guess butterwise beat me to it. My link was to New Scientist Galaxy fires powerful particle beam at neighbour"

    A new weapon of intergalactic war has been found. A jet of hot gas and high-energy particles is shooting out from the core of a galaxy called 3C321 and hitting a neighbour, a new study reveals.

    Galaxies have been known to ram into each other, but this is the first known example of attack by particle beam.
    -mcgrew
    --
    mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
  69. Al Gore wants to talk to you... by Dareth · · Score: 1

    ... and I hear he is bringing a really big pot and a frog suit!

    --

    I only look human.
    My mother is a halfling and my dad is an ogre, so that makes me an Ogreling
  70. Question for dot heads... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Didn't this already happen 1.4 billion years ago. We're just now seeing it since the light took 1.4 billion years to get here, right?

  71. Sounds like an illegal alien problem brewing by Rockin'Robert · · Score: 0

    IANL, but: Guilty as charges?
    What about: Provocation? Justifiable Response?
    An idea whose time has come?
    RR