Not really. Brein so far has just threatened random bittorrent sites, and whenever there was an admin not willing to go to court the admin would take the site down and brein noted that down as a victory for them. It would actually be quite stupid for them to attack the Pirate Bay in the Netherlands, because they would go to court, and when that happens brein has zero experience unlike the RIAA.
There's unlimited, and there's Slashdotted. It is obvious which one is larger. At the time of writing that host wasn't down yet, but I wish your webhost best of luck.
I should've been more specific, true. In my opinion it's not the public who have to learn how the system works, it's those who design and defend it against the baddies that need to know the details first and foremost.
You also can't ever prove a paper election was done correctly, unless you count all the votes personally and then make sure you didn't make mistakes while counting either, if you insist on extreme examples.
Using the same argument, the same can be said about bypassing said security. In short, switching to electronic voting changes the game so that neither party has much experience with the new voting method. The people who use it aren't very familiar with it, but at the same time the people intending to crack it are also unfamiliar with it, so the levels of experience are roughly the same.
You could say the machines used are inheritly more unreliable than paper, but because they're machines adding reduncancy is trivial. Either way there's a chance of a vote going wrong, by miscounting or data corruption.
I can't see a convincing argument that makes paper voting clearly superior to electronic voting, or vice versa. The battle itself stays the same, only the place the battle is fought on changes. Whether that is a good or bad thing is something for philosophists to discuss, not engineers, ignoring the fact that they can never provide an answer, only different ways to look at the casus.
Of course, if they don't want to be understood, like you. Or a plain lack of social skills, which I would diagnose you with, especially since you consider bashing people that important.
That is often the excuse used. The forms of dyslexia which actually result in being unable to properly discern words at all are very rare. In most cases it just takes a little extra effort to properly read and write, especially for smarter people, because they tend to use their brain to create tricks to make reading/writing easier.
Dyslexia is the word used for every disability regarding language, mostly written language. Saying that having dyslexia results in being unable to spell is a generalization I'm not going to let you make. It's not an excuse.
And guess what, I've been diagnosed as having dyslexia too.
If the intend of terrorism is to inflict terror, or in other words cause fear, where exactly did the terrorists in general go wrong?
There's no need to plan anything solid, when after pulling just one stunt, anyone with power intends to use that fear for his/her/its own ends and magnify it. Only once the general fear dies down again do they need to cause major havoc again.
I do hope they're going after the people with power then, because that would be stupid. They would be killing the people who magnify the already irrational fear of terrorists to even greater levels.
Statistically speaking, the chance of dying in a terroristic attack is neglectable compared to the chance of dying while in traffic. I'm not worried at all.
As as sidenote, this is immensely annoying for other dog owners. These dogs get spoiled to hell and do whatever the hell they want, including attacking other dogs. And when you stop the fight, you're the one responsible... because that cute bastard anklebiter can't possibly be the cause of it. It gets worse when they're not anklebiters, but bigger, since they can very much kill your dog then.
Not really. At the age of 16 your parents are still financially responsible for you, and when they insist they basically own everything you think you own, even those things bought with money you earned yourself. Over here the limit for their financial responsibility is until 21, so they have until then to brainwash you and turn you into a willing slave.
I'm still disgusted by the notion that kids are not allowed to have privacy. On the other hand, I'm now less surprised why the general population allows their rights of privacy to be taken, because as kid they never had them in the first place. To me, growing up without privacy sounds like a scary thing, and yet it is becoming much more common.
And of course, the eye-for-an-eye syndrome. "As kid my privacy was invaded all the time, thus as parent I'm entitled to doing the same to my kids"
That's what I thought too, but politicians make the terms, I don't. Both indicate valid superiority, but since everything is scaled down to the lowest common denominator, it really doesn't matter in education.
It's actually called 'meerbegaafd' now, since 'hoogbegaafd' indicated superiority over other children (which they have!) and that wasn't politically correct.
But on the other hand, all we can see is light millions of years old. However impressive that photo is, it's only a glance at a small segment of the sky spanning billions of years in time, but still of the past. With my current knowledge on humankinds knowledge on the universe I say that we can't see the current universe, only the past.
Or, you just pronounced it wrong. You need to make it sound elevated and mighty, ergo not chuch latin. An approximation would be dayoes eks, kind of like jesus x, but completely different.
Slashdot Mirror
Ah yes, the pi rounding thing. An ongoing joke here is that biologists use pi = 3 and pi^2 = 10. I've been meaning to ask them, what is pi^3 then?
Not really. Brein so far has just threatened random bittorrent sites, and whenever there was an admin not willing to go to court the admin would take the site down and brein noted that down as a victory for them. It would actually be quite stupid for them to attack the Pirate Bay in the Netherlands, because they would go to court, and when that happens brein has zero experience unlike the RIAA.
There is never a EULA on a virus or trojan.
Now there's an idea.
There's unlimited, and there's Slashdotted. It is obvious which one is larger. At the time of writing that host wasn't down yet, but I wish your webhost best of luck.
I should've been more specific, true. In my opinion it's not the public who have to learn how the system works, it's those who design and defend it against the baddies that need to know the details first and foremost.
You also can't ever prove a paper election was done correctly, unless you count all the votes personally and then make sure you didn't make mistakes while counting either, if you insist on extreme examples.
Using the same argument, the same can be said about bypassing said security. In short, switching to electronic voting changes the game so that neither party has much experience with the new voting method. The people who use it aren't very familiar with it, but at the same time the people intending to crack it are also unfamiliar with it, so the levels of experience are roughly the same.
You could say the machines used are inheritly more unreliable than paper, but because they're machines adding reduncancy is trivial. Either way there's a chance of a vote going wrong, by miscounting or data corruption.
I can't see a convincing argument that makes paper voting clearly superior to electronic voting, or vice versa. The battle itself stays the same, only the place the battle is fought on changes. Whether that is a good or bad thing is something for philosophists to discuss, not engineers, ignoring the fact that they can never provide an answer, only different ways to look at the casus.
So what does mercilessly ganking a low-level player in Thousand Needles simulate?
Reality.
Your digitally saved prison sentence will be erronously divided by zero, due to an innocence bug nobody bothered to fix.
I look forward to the day I get mugged by a 90 year old granny. The future sure is wonderful.
The solution to the age old problem of generations dying: Stuff people in a Schrödinger's box. Goodbye 100% mortality rate.
Of course, if they don't want to be understood, like you. Or a plain lack of social skills, which I would diagnose you with, especially since you consider bashing people that important.
That is often the excuse used. The forms of dyslexia which actually result in being unable to properly discern words at all are very rare. In most cases it just takes a little extra effort to properly read and write, especially for smarter people, because they tend to use their brain to create tricks to make reading/writing easier. Dyslexia is the word used for every disability regarding language, mostly written language. Saying that having dyslexia results in being unable to spell is a generalization I'm not going to let you make. It's not an excuse. And guess what, I've been diagnosed as having dyslexia too.
Sounds like he'd make a perfect politician.
And what if a smart person is a dyslexic? It's not an excuse to not look at what you type.
If the intend of terrorism is to inflict terror, or in other words cause fear, where exactly did the terrorists in general go wrong?
There's no need to plan anything solid, when after pulling just one stunt, anyone with power intends to use that fear for his/her/its own ends and magnify it. Only once the general fear dies down again do they need to cause major havoc again.
I do hope they're going after the people with power then, because that would be stupid. They would be killing the people who magnify the already irrational fear of terrorists to even greater levels.
Statistically speaking, the chance of dying in a terroristic attack is neglectable compared to the chance of dying while in traffic. I'm not worried at all.
As as sidenote, this is immensely annoying for other dog owners. These dogs get spoiled to hell and do whatever the hell they want, including attacking other dogs. And when you stop the fight, you're the one responsible... because that cute bastard anklebiter can't possibly be the cause of it. It gets worse when they're not anklebiters, but bigger, since they can very much kill your dog then.
Not really. At the age of 16 your parents are still financially responsible for you, and when they insist they basically own everything you think you own, even those things bought with money you earned yourself. Over here the limit for their financial responsibility is until 21, so they have until then to brainwash you and turn you into a willing slave.
I'm still disgusted by the notion that kids are not allowed to have privacy. On the other hand, I'm now less surprised why the general population allows their rights of privacy to be taken, because as kid they never had them in the first place. To me, growing up without privacy sounds like a scary thing, and yet it is becoming much more common. And of course, the eye-for-an-eye syndrome. "As kid my privacy was invaded all the time, thus as parent I'm entitled to doing the same to my kids"
That's what I thought too, but politicians make the terms, I don't. Both indicate valid superiority, but since everything is scaled down to the lowest common denominator, it really doesn't matter in education.
It's actually called 'meerbegaafd' now, since 'hoogbegaafd' indicated superiority over other children (which they have!) and that wasn't politically correct.
'Unholy alliance'? I get the feeling this is all a game to him, a computer game to be exact. In reality he's just a computer game addict in denial.
But on the other hand, all we can see is light millions of years old. However impressive that photo is, it's only a glance at a small segment of the sky spanning billions of years in time, but still of the past. With my current knowledge on humankinds knowledge on the universe I say that we can't see the current universe, only the past.
Or, you just pronounced it wrong. You need to make it sound elevated and mighty, ergo not chuch latin. An approximation would be dayoes eks, kind of like jesus x, but completely different.