Slashdot Mirror


500-fold Increase in Data Flow from SETI Telescope

coondoggie brings us an article from Networkworld about a flood of new data for the SETI@home project. We discussed something similar a few months ago when a new telescope array went live. The vast amount of processing power required to handle the new data is prompting the SETI@home team to make a plea for more volunteers. Quoting the press release: "What triggered the new flow of data was the addition of seven new receivers at Arecibo, which now let the telescope record radio signals from seven regions of the sky simultaneously instead of just one. With greater sensitivity and the ability to detect the polarization of the radio signals, plus 40 times more frequency coverage, Arecibo is set to survey the sky for new radio sources."

62 of 346 comments (clear)

  1. sounds like by Laebshade · · Score: 3, Informative

    Sounds like a good time to re-install BOINC and start up SETI.

    1. Re:sounds like by Trouvist · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yes, and I personally found it to be much much better than the BOINC system they use now.

    2. Re:sounds like by Almost-Retired · · Score: 2, Informative

      Only if BOINC has learned to be a good neighbor. I took it off my machine about 2 years ago because it thought it had an unlimited right to every cycle my cpu had. Setiathome NEVER ran that piggish. The planetary folks have so far ignored all pleas to run it at about nice 20 so we could have our machines back. The old setiathome client always ran at a high niceness.

      I got the plea to rejoin the effort, and told them exactly the same, no way Jose till its fixed. No reply, as if I expected one.

      --
      Cheers, Gene
      "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
        soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
      -Ed Howdershelt (Author)
      Wishing without work is like fishing without bait.
                                      -- Frank Tyger

    3. Re:sounds like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Hmm, a few months ago, I threw a recent boinc client onto my Debian box (Kubuntu 7.10, to be more precise). It runs its crunching programs at niceness 19, which means that powernowd does not step up the CPU frequency.

      This is, I think, a very good compromise between energy usage (the machine consumes 5 +/-2 Watts more energy when boinc runs) and processing power. If I stop powernowd and run boinc at the highest speed the machine can deliver (which seems to be what most participants do), power consumption rises more than 18 Watts. Of course, it is not a good idea to have the machine run longer than it would without boinc...

      So, perhaps you should simply try again instead of complaining here?

    4. Re:sounds like by Toad-san · · Score: 2, Informative

      Darned right! I've been offline for a while (something went wrong with my BOINC configuration). But the new install (just done) was totally painless, and I'm up and running!

      I, for one, welcome our new SETI overlords!

      Toad

    5. Re:sounds like by SETIGuy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Informative? BOINC has always run applications at nice 19 on unix and at low priority on windows. It also has the option of watching every tty and the mouse for input in order to stop processing if anyone is in an interactive session. The parent poster has no idea what they are talking about.

  2. FoldingAtHome by perspectival · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Protein Folding should take precedence over pointless searches for noise-in-patterns.

    1. Re:FoldingAtHome by TeknoHog · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Protein Folding should take precedence over pointless searches for noise-in-patterns.

      So what are you doing here, wasting your important CPU cycles?

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    2. Re:FoldingAtHome by jafiwam · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Protein folding is important, however discovery of ETI ranks up somewhere along with; fire, wheel, tools, calculus.

      Find a protein, you change many lives for the better.

      Find ET, and you change the course of the human race forever.

      I will choose what to do with my extra CPU cycles myself, thank you very much. To me, ET is more interesting.

      (Yes, I should know, it was my computer that discovered the candidate object for SETI@home back in 2004. Got on TV and weekly reader for that. What have YOU done with your spare CPU cycles?)

      My only regret is BOINIC runs so crappy and is so hard to manage (come on, install a program that crashes upon resume, gotta dig out the right profile, gotta figure out how to sign up for projects = fail).

    3. Re:FoldingAtHome by penrodyn · · Score: 2, Funny

      > Protein Folding should take precedence over pointless searches for noise-in-patterns.

      Exactly, you're a hypocrite.

    4. Re:FoldingAtHome by penrodyn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Do you think as lay people, we should tell federally funded scientists what to work on? I for one would like to see research done on many fronts, we can afford it as a society given the vast sums of money society spends on a worthless war. It is ironic though that many of the techniques being used to investigate cancer today were developed from work done in the 50s and 60s on viruses that infect bacteria. Now if you were in charge, I presume this work would never have been funded, let's be honest who really cares whether bacteria get infected or not, better tackle cancer first then worry about other areas of research?

    5. Re:FoldingAtHome by SETIGuy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Protein Folding should take precedence over pointless searches for noise-in-patterns.

      Distributed computing isn't an either/or proposition. Right now the BOINC infrastructure hosts at least 42 projects, and at least three of those are health related (malariacontrol.net, rosetta@home, predictor@home). When a volunteer starts BOINC and joins a project, they are presented with a list of many projects.

      If SETI@home gets the 3 to 5 fold increase in volunteers that they hope for, it's a very good bet that every other BOINC based project will see significant increases in their volunteer base.

      There are certainly far more than a million internet connected CPUs that are on and idle tonight. Anyone want to guess at the actual number? 10 million? 50 million? 100 million? A few percent of those would more than do all of the jobs that are available on all of the distributed computing projects that are out there.

    6. Re:FoldingAtHome by Dirtside · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yes, I should know, it was my computer that discovered the candidate object for SETI@home back in 2004. Got on TV and weekly reader for that. What have YOU done with your spare CPU cycles?

      Congratulations! You accomplished nothing and yet managed to get on TV for it. You're right up there with Paris Hilton.

      We're obviously each free to choose whatever project we want to donate our spare CPU cycles to (or none at all, if we so choose). Nonetheless, I would encourage people to support projects like Folding@Home over projects like SETI@home, mostly because even if we do discover the existence of ETI, the consequences are unpredictable; assuming they're not close enough to visit or communicate with in a reasonable timeframe, then the sole effect of the discovery would be to cause chaos amongst humanity (how many religions would go berserk apeshit if they discovered that Earth isn't God's special place after all? -- on the other hand, maybe a lot of religion would go away once people realize that We're Not Special, and that'd be a nice side benefit -- but still, very unpredictable).

      It's also exceedingly unlikely that SETI will ever find an ETI, regardless of whether there are any ETIs out there. F@H, on the other hand, has already provided us with a lot of useful information about biology, and is clearly advancing the cause of science toward the specific goal of curing diseases. As a result it seems like a much better investment in MY long-term health for me to be spending my cycles on F@H.
      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    7. Re:FoldingAtHome by TrappedByMyself · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Protein folding is important, however discovery of ETI ranks up somewhere along with; fire, wheel, tools, calculus.

      Yes, but spending your spare cycles on protein folding will actually accomplish something.

      --

      Help me take back Slashdot. When did 'News for Nerds' become 'FUD and Conspiracy Theories for Extremist Nutjobs'?
    8. Re:FoldingAtHome by wmac · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ET is more interesting to you until a very near relatives comes up with a serious illness like Cancer, AIDS, ... Then you will regret the priorities you set.

    9. Re:FoldingAtHome by SnowZero · · Score: 3, Funny

      Too bad we can't natively run BOINC on our amd64 FreeBSD boxes. FreeBSD is dying, SETI confirms it.
    10. Re:FoldingAtHome by AGMW · · Score: 2, Informative
      ET is more interesting to you until a very near relatives comes up with a serious illness like Cancer, AIDS ...

      Some poster mentioned it earlier: If you priorities is to spend youd budget on the best way to save lives then research into Cancer or AIDS isn't the best place to put it, even within the medical research field. There are other diseases that kill far more people but get far less research dollars than Cancer/AIDS already! The money goes into areas where the research companies think there will be the best return on the investment!

      That said, it is a fallacy to suggest that SETI might also result in a cure for all known ills by finding the aliens who already have the cures! Again, from another poster, the best thing SETI could do is offer a wake-up call to the religiously infatuated, perhaps providing some coffee flavoured smelling salts at the same time.

      FWIW, I used to run SETI, before and after BOINC. I also ran a number of other BOINC clients, including:-
      SETI,
      Folding,
      Climate Prediction,
      Einstein searching for gravitational waves,
      LHC helping with the Large Hadron Collider,
      Predictor trying to predict protein structure from protein sequences,
      QMC,
      Rosetta,
      Stardust,
      yada yada yada
      but removed it a year or so back as it did seem to get in the way rather too often.

      BOINC was just too clunky. Why did you have to register individually with each BOINC project, be given yet another HUGE number, have to search for the interesting projects yourself. BOINC should have taken care of the registration once, then offered a drop-down of active projects. Selecting something interesting would do all the install stuff for you and allow you to control the shares from the Client - currently (or at least when I left it) if you wanted to alter the share of one particular project got you had to go to each Project's website rather than just set it within the client. Just clunky!

      Anyway, I moved on, but I'd have to say I'm sort of interested again and may fire up SETI again for a while to see how things have progressed since I last offered some cycles!

      --
      Eclectic beats from Leeds, UK
      handmadehands.co.uk
  3. Left seti when they went to bonic by huxrules · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If they want more people then they should get rid of that silly bonic thing. I never liked it.

    1. Re:Left seti when they went to bonic by zrq · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Me too. Last time I used it the Linux install involved way too many steps. It is packaged as a 'generic' Linux binary, and left up to the individual to tweak it to fit their particular system. I am quite happy to contribute spare cpu cycles to the project, but at the moment I don't have the spare sys-admin cycles required to setup, configure and babysit the software.

      If they want more people to install it, they need to do something like create a RPM installer and setup a yum repository. If the installation was as simple as 'yum install bonic' plus a simple Python configure script to set the project URL, then ReadHat could/would probably add it to Fedora. Which would mean that 1000's of people would see it listed in the install options, and some of them would probably give it a go.

      The other reason I left was the change in the way that stat were reported. When I started, their website showed a headline figure of number of CPU years in the last 24hrs. To me, seeing that figure increase as the project gained more users was a real incentive to add machines and contribute more to the project. It gave you the warm fuzzy feeling that we were all contributing to what was at the time one of the largest computing projects in the world.

      Now everything is listed as teams competing for 'credits', whatever they are. I didn't join to earn 'credits', I joined to participate in one of the largest collaborative computing projects in the world.

    2. Re:Left seti when they went to bonic by gsn · · Score: 4, Informative

      If they want more people to install it, they need to do something like create a RPM installer and setup a yum repository. If the installation was as simple as 'yum install bonic' plus a simple Python configure script to set the project URL, then RedHat could/would probably add it to Fedora. Which would mean that 1000's of people would see it listed in the install options, and some of them would probably give it a go. It is on the Ubuntu box I'm sitting in front of at the moment.

      gnarayan@munin|~> apt-cache search boinc
      boinc-app-seti - SETI@home application for the BOINC client
      boinc-client - core client for the BOINC distributed computing infrastructure
      boinc-dev - development files to build applications for BOINC projects
      boinc-manager - GUI to control and monitor the BOINC core client
      kboincspy - monitoring utility for the BOINC client
      kboincspy-dev - development files for KBoincSpy plugins

      There are plenty of tools to convert debs to rpms

      The other reason I left was the change in the way that stat were reported. When I started, their website showed a headline figure of number of CPU years in the last 24hrs. To me, seeing that figure increase as the project gained more users was a real incentive to add machines and contribute more to the project. It gave you the warm fuzzy feeling that we were all contributing to what was at the time one of the largest computing projects in the world. You can still see this - login to your account (from boincmgr) and it shows you that - if anything today you get more stats - I know how many total users there are - it still is very much one of the largest computing projects in the world. I also know what the highest position I stood in the world is (if only that was my slashdot UID), where relative to my team, where relative to my country, how much credit I got from each work unit, how much credit I got on a day to day basis...
      --
      Reality must take precedence over public relations, for nature cannot be fooled.
  4. Parent is right. by LingNoi · · Score: 2

    Although you're probably going to get marked troll you're right.

    The cancer and other medical projects your can donate your processing power to are far more important then a fruitless search for aliens.

    1. Re:Parent is right. by nschubach · · Score: 3, Funny

      I guess it depends. You could always argue that An alien race was found and they were technologically advance or already found a cure for many of the diseases and were willing to share. Or they were a warlike race bent to destroy Earth cause we spied on them... Either way, you might not have to worry about cancers and disorders anymore.

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    2. Re:Parent is right. by brentonboy · · Score: 2

      except that alien races discovered would likely be hundreds of light years away, or more. so unless they happened to be broadcasting their encyclopedia galactica, we wouldn't necessarily learn much, even if we could make sense of it. and they wouldn't know that we had received their transmissions until hundreds of years later--or thousands, depending on exactly how far away they really are.

    3. Re:Parent is right. by Duncan+Blackthorne · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Probably true -- except that if there are other intelligent races out there, they've probably been unwittingly transmitting their equivalent of radio and television entertainment out into space for at least as long as we have, and the way things are going here it's very likely in that case that their entertainment is orders of magnitude higher in quality than what we've been turning out for the last few decades. ;)

    4. Re:Parent is right. by __aaqvdr516 · · Score: 2, Funny

      While it is undoubtedly higher in quality, it also comes laden with galactic DRM courtesy of your favorite Motion Picture Association of the Milky Way (MPAMW) and the RIAMW.

  5. YETI@Home by Charles+Dodgeson · · Score: 4, Funny

    All my spare cycles are working on Yeti@Home

    --
    Prime numbers are exactly what Alan Greenspan says they are -S. Minsky
  6. Arecibo Shutdown? by XPisthenewNT · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I thought they were going to shut down Arecibo or move to an array of smaller antenna's or something? Did the plan change or am I making this up?

  7. To sum up what this increase in data will bring: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Six hours nineteen minutes right ascension, fourteen degrees twenty-two minutes declination ... no sighting.
    Six hours nineteen minutes right ascension, fourteen degrees twenty-three minutes declination ... no sighting.
    Six hours nineteen minutes right ascension, fourteen degrees twenty-three minutes declination ... no sighting.

    etc. ad infinitum

  8. Re:Not trying hard to keep what they had... by fm6 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    These folks have millions of compute nodes. And very little resources, which is why they set up this network in the first place. You really think they have time to go chasing after silly little bits of data that matter only to you? Next you'll be wondering why GW Bush never returns your calls.

  9. are the cycles really "spare" by atarione · · Score: 4, Insightful

    i was kinda interested in this at one point then when I installed SETI@home i realized that it made my proc max out 24x7 and shoot up to it's load temps (obviously) and of course use more electricity. i decided that I wasn't willing to stress my equipment or pay for the electricity to run this type of software ( I do of course realize you can set the amount of cpu it uses.. but still) I think that all these distributed projects kinda try to gloss over the fact that it isn't free to participate ... and given the $100+ a barrel oil at the moment people that chose to participate should probably be made more aware of what the costs and wear and tear impacts really are.

    --
    actually I am happy to see you, however that is in fact a banana in my pocket.
    1. Re:are the cycles really "spare" by Xelios · · Score: 5, Informative

      The difference between idle and full load power use on processors nowadays is on the order of 20W (though admittedly this is more like 60W on processors like the Core 2 Duo if you have SpeedStep enabled). 50 hours at full load before you've used a kilowatt more energy. Given an average energy price of $0.13 per KWh that's a pretty small amount, on the order of $2 per month. It's still something, but to me the work done for SETI or Folding@Home is at least worth the price of a cappucino every month.

      Processors are also built to run at full load, as long as it holds a good steady temperature (say 50C) you might see its lifespan decreased from 30,000 hours to 20,000 hours. What they're not built for is constant temperature cycling between load and room (off) temperature. Turning your PC off at night will likely have the same affect on its lifespan as constant load does. Again, to me at least, it's worth it. I replace the CPU every 2-3 years anyway and have yet to see one KIA.

      I do think, though, that Folding@Home is a better investment than SETI. Not that I'm not curious about finding life out there, but there are more important things to do here first.

      --
      Murphey's fighting Occam, and we're in the stands.
  10. carbon footprint? by Doppler00 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm just curious how much energy the SETI project has used with zero results thus far. Is the amount of resources and time they are contributing to this cause really worth the incalculable chance they get a signal from an alien civilization? Having millions of PC's running at 100% doing pattern searching seems like a huge waste of energy. I'll run distributed clients myself like folding@home that actually have research results. Usually, only during the winter though (since electric heat is my only option anyway).

  11. Parent is wrong by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 5, Insightful
    People should have a free choice about the causes they donate to. If you made everyone pick Protein Folding, it would be akin to just another tax.

    Just because you think you know what people should do, doesn't mean you do.

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
  12. Arecibo? I thought they were closing it? by filbranden · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Arecibo? I thought they were closing it? At least they recently lost around 75% of their fundings.

  13. oh I dunno by Quadraginta · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There's a logic error here, I think. By this logic, we should do nothing except the very highest priority thing in our life, and society should pour all of its resources into the very most important priority. For example, we should all live in a thatched hut, eat weeds and grubs, wear the untanned raw skins of animals (or just go naked), and slave 18 hours a day so all our labor and energy can go into....whatever the single highest social priority is...curing cancer, fighting war 'n' injustice, whatever.

    Which is silly. The goal of life is maximize overall satisfaction, not accomplish one single highest goal. It's important to rank your priorities, of course, both as an individual and as a society. But the notion that because A is "more important" than B implies ipso facto that A should get all the resources and B should get none is maximally silly.

    Indeed, it's kind of OCD obsessive to always be focussed on pursuing the Top Goal, the kind of thing that when we see people doing it in practise -- giving up everything, including enough sleep and good nutrition, to, say, play World of Warcraft and become the biggest baddest player -- we conclude they need to do some growing up.

    1. Re:oh I dunno by tekiegreg · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'd wholeheartedly agree with you, so then my life's great priority list is as follows

      1) Breathe
      2) Sleep
      3) Procreate
      4) Eat
      ...
      1444) Find Cure for cancer
      ...
      2137832) Find extra terrestrial intelligence

      Ergo when I have some computing power to spare I'll devote some to the cure for cancer, when I have the United States's entire Internet worth of computing power, I'll spare a little to extra terrestrial intelligence :-)

      --
      ...in bed
    2. Re:oh I dunno by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Spoken like an ignorant minded bigot. As your GP said, Grow up. If everyone gives up one anything considered by others as pointless, nothing in this world would ever get done. While you consider this pointless, others do not. I would rather do both protein folding and SETI.

      I might also argue that protein folding is pointless since all you're doing is saving the life and therefore the DNA of an "inferior" person with a genetic disease. Why save them so they continue to pass on bad DNA? Why not let them die and keep track of their offspring so they don't procreate? As you've said, "It's pointless."

      Well, fortunately, not everyone thinks SETI is pointless, nor does everyone think protein folding is pointless. We would have achieved nothing if people didn't continue their "pointless" pursuits. Remember Gallileo? He said the Earth was round. At the time, others else believed it to be flat. His views were rather pointless too. Why pursue the facts when no one else found value. At the risk of his own life, Gallileo continued his "pointless" pursuit of convincing others that the world was round. Before you start to interject that we know the fact that the Earth is indeed round, I say to you that hindsight is 20/20.

      What may appear pointless to you now may lead to something more important than you can imagine. I say you need to grow up and accept the diverse views that everyone else has. There's room for all that research out there.

    3. Re:oh I dunno by missing000 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Remember Gallileo? He said the Earth was round.
      No, he said the earth was not the center of the universe. Buy a history book. The ancient Greeks accurately measured the circumference of the earth about a millennia before that.
    4. Re:oh I dunno by bdjacobson · · Score: 5, Interesting

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_dilemma

      Finding this in the parent's post is left as an exercise for the reader.

    5. Re:oh I dunno by Cassius+Corodes · · Score: 2, Informative

      While SETI just looks for aliens, it also finds abnormalities or unusual signals which then further our understanding of cosmology.

      --
      Control is an illusion, order our comforting lie. From chaos, through chaos, into chaos we fly
    6. Re:oh I dunno by HermMunster · · Score: 2, Informative

      I used seti@home when it first came out. Ran it for a couple years. Then I had reinstalls and other issues and other priorities, so I stopped. When I decided to give them some more time I found that their new client, BOINC, was cryptic and difficult to get established so that I got credit for my prior packets. They also changed the way they calculated things. I liked it better when I completed a packet and got credit for that packet.

      After having upgraded to so so many more modern computers (I must have 20 here at the shop that could help), I found that their new client bogged down my system and that often it was backed up to the point that I had packets completed but I couldn't send the results nor could I get new packets. If I was going to do it I wanted to be able to complete a packet and move on to the next with little interference from backed up servers.

      So, all in all, they are very inefficient, they have servers that are bogging down, and their new client is un-optimized and causes drag on my computer, even though they say it won't.

      --
      You can lead a man with reason but you can't make him think.
    7. Re:oh I dunno by Rakshasa+Taisab · · Score: 2, Funny

      How will you ever manage to procreate if you keep falling asleep before you even get started?...

      --
      - These characters were randomly selected.
  14. How wasteful is SETI? by Darth_brooks · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Fine, I'm burning cycles running a project that may (heck, when it comes to SETI, probably) won't see any tangible results.

    But how is contributing to a project that was the basis for mainstreamed distributed computing any more wasteful than blowing 9 hours a night on WoW? I'd love to see a breakdown of the increased energy usage from a high-end CPU and a good video card vs. a PC that's on anyway and running BOINC when it's idle.

    Screaming "carbon footprint!!" about something as trivial as BOINC is the real waste. Here, I've swapped 80% of the lights in my house for CFL's, and I burned 10 bucks worth of electricity last month (with an electric heater and 4x computers in the house no less!) does make me green enough to spare some processor cycles now?

    --
    There are some people that if they don't know, you can't tell 'em.
  15. No, You're Wrong by perspectival · · Score: 5, Informative

    Did I say that people's spare CPU cycles should be mandated to SETI? As if that were feasible or even possible?

    When I say that Protein Folding *should* take precedence over SETI, I'm simply making an appeal to people's personal priorities--and mine favor understanding and curing diseases over inconclusive alien signal-hunting every day of the week.

    Yes, you're free to choose for yourself what cause you want to help out. As you should be. And I'm free to try to persuade others to help a very worthwhile cause:

    http://folding.stanford.edu/
  16. Fucking ignorant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "Oh, but it uses my precioussss energy!"

    Of all the things in the world that monumental amounts of energy are 'wasted' on each day (powering bin Ladens dialysis machine,lighting the creationism museum,all the power used by all the dictators and oppressors of the world who shouldn't be allowed to LIVE let alone use resources), 'wasting' a few of them LOOKING FOR FUCKING EXTRATERRESTRIAL LIFE doesn't even come CLOSE to being classified as a 'waste'. FUCK! Am I at the wrong site?!!

  17. Not a waste of energy by mailseth · · Score: 2

    Distributed programs like this aren't a waste of energy when you're trying to heat your home. Electric heat costs just as much when you get it from a computer as when you get it through a base-board. From a pure heating standpoint, useful computer calculations are pure byproduct. 200W of heat from a processor costs the same as 200W of heat from the heater. Funny how this should come out in the middle of winter (for most of the 'net connected population).

  18. Re:Is SETI even needed? by hibji · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I guess it depends on what you really care about. Personally, knowing that there are intelligent beings out there would affect me a whole lot more than a cure for cancer. It changes the way I think about myself and my place in the universe. Think about all the crazy things that will happen with the world's religions. That alone would be worth it to me. Of course, right now, I don't have cancer nor anyone close to me. Like anything else, I reserve the right to change my mind.

    I agree with you about Prime95 though.

  19. 700% increase by flyingfsck · · Score: 4, Funny

    My first thought was that some aliens discovered spam...

    --
    Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
  20. come on, people! by commodoresloat · · Score: 4, Funny

    Amen. I stopped using SETI once they moved to BOINC. With that kind of attitude, how do you expect us to ever find the aliens?!!
    1. Re:come on, people! by packeteer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      SETI is important not just because it could find aliens. There is the distinct possibility that we are alone in the universe (not that likely in my opinion). A positive result would be more interesting than this constant negative we have been getting but it is important that we find out what is going on. Just because we may never see a positive doesn't mean we should stop. Having the evidence that we are indeed alone is just important as having evidence that life exists out there.

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
    2. Re:come on, people! by blacklabelsk8er · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually taking causality into account, haven't we already found them? Now we're just all falling toward the singularity that moment created in the future ::raises pinky to corner of mouth December 21, 2012 anyone?

    3. Re:come on, people! by cheater512 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Its a distinct possibility that we'll never find the aliens.
      All the evidence says that us being alone in the universe is next to impossible.

  21. What seems to be overlooked about SETI by doggod · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I almost never see anyone take note of what I deem to be the only to-date achievement of SETI -- defining a larger and larger region of space where it is known that there are no radio signals indicating intelligent life. Everyone seems to be focused on the expectation -- seemingly bordering on the religious -- that ET life will be found because it just HAS to be there.

    I would note that there is no fundamental reason for this axiomatic proposition, and it makes much more sense simply go with the data rather than stubbornly cling to a belief for which there is so far not a shred of evidence -- much as the creationists do with regard to geology and archaelogy, I would note.

    Maybe sometimes some evidence will appear for ET life. That will be interesting, if so. In the meantime, we have a rapidly growing contrarian body of evidence, so we should accept as our tentative conclusion that we are, in fact, the only life in the universe.

    1. Re:What seems to be overlooked about SETI by doggod · · Score: 2, Interesting

      2. A negative result in science can be as important as a positive one. If we're the only intelligent life in this part of the galaxy, it might be crucial to know why.
      An anthropologist I spoke with a couple of months ago surmised that our current evolutionary adventure with intelligence is likely to demonstrate soon that it is a dead end. We're rapidly approaching a collision between the vestigial brain function requiring religion (apparently a necessary byproduct of the evolution of the intelligence attribute) and the ecological demands that require us to function rationally -- the antithesis of religion. He believes that, despite the best efforts of those who are aware of the problem, there will be no way to disempower the religion impulse in time to head of the catastrophe that is sure to result from its continued existence.

      If he's right, then the absence of evidence for other intelligent life is, so to speak, a no-brainer.

      That's not to say that it isn't worth striving to avert the catastrophe. After all, what do we have to lose! With that in mind, I've made it my life hobby to constantly look for and implement ways to subvert religion. Sadly, I can't report much success so far, but since I have nothing better to do I'll just keep trying anyway.
  22. Benefit of SETI by spineboy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They started and demonstrated that distributed computing was a viable way to solve huge problems. SOmetimes basic research doesn't have an immediately applicable product - but sometimes the groundwork they lay provides for fruitful endeavors - e.g. Apollo program. No one thought electricity would be terribly important when it was first discovered, or the phone either. Give it a chance - maybe finding aliens might make us put aside our petty differences as countries.

    --
    ..........FULL STOP.
  23. Aliens vs. Foldator by deft · · Score: 2, Funny

    I dont know, who wants to bet Seti finds an alien race with obviously advanced technology that will cure cancer faster than we can find the cure?

    wow, really seems like 50/50 to me...

    --

    There's nothing Intelligent about Intelligent Design.
  24. Seti Growth explosion yet to come by darrenadelaide · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Seti's current data explosion is just a small step, once the Paul Allen (Co Founder Microsoft) new array of telescopes and research centres comes online, the data requiring processing will go up by several magnitudes (dont know how they are going to solve that one, maybe ask Larry Page and Sergey Brin if they could "borrow" the spare clock cycles from all the googleplex data centres), unless Paul has also provided a few millions for their own setiplex.

    We Live in Interesting times.

    Darren Stephens
    Adelaide, South Australia

  25. BOINC better be inobtrusive! by Vadim+Makarov · · Score: 2, Informative

    I tried to install BOINC and could not find a way to hide the tray icon. It seems to be not running unless it displays the said icon. When I tried to install it as a service, I could not figure what username and password to supply so it doesn't fail to initialize the service (yup, I'm not a geek).

    Come on, I want to install the client, configure the SETI task and settings ONCE, then forget about it completely and forever, let it run in background without reminding me of its existence, ever, period. I do NOT want my desktop cluttered by an extra tray icon. I've ditched it.

    The old SETI screensaver did not display anything on the desktop while not running.

    --
    17779 eligible voters in a district, 17779 'vote' as one. This is Russia.
    1. Re:BOINC better be inobtrusive! by Wolvie+MkM · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ahhh I see, you can probably get away with putting in a fake password for the moment then after the install is complete, go in to services (Right click My computer -> Manage, then look for Services) and find and open the BOINC service.

      click the "Log On" tab, then select the "Local System Account" option, click apply, ok,etc... You can start the service now, or just reboot and let Windows do it for you.

      This will have it run as "SYSTEM" instead of your local account, it's handy for me in a corporate environment where we need to change our passwords now and then.

      But I'd highly suggest that you put a password on your account just as a common sense security measure! :)

      Hope that points you in the right direction!

      --
      I Like Pie...
  26. Aliens won't use radios... by cylcyl · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It just occurs to me that SETI by using telescopes looking for radio data is a dead end because doesn't it assume that the alien will use some form of radio based technology for communication? However, if it's an intelligence we're interested in (ie. one capable of interstellar FTL travel), it probably would not use sub-light tech like radio. Radio might have been a transition tech for a phase of the civilization. So, we're assuming, in SETI, that we're looking into a period of time in that uses that transition tech. Isn't that even more unlikely to succeed than initially thought?

  27. I hope people realise by 4D6963 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I hope that people realise that by covering 7 regions of the sky instead of one, and 40 times as much spectrum bandwidth as before, assuming that aliens are as likely to emit on any of these frequencies (which after all is not such a bad assumption considered we don't know a thing about them), statistically that will make us discover alien signals 280 times faster than before.

    Very basically, that means that if we were say 1,000 years from finding an alien signal with the previous setup (which you can't say sounded so unlikely, I mean we barely listened for 40 years, and not always with the means we have now), we are now 3 years and a half away from that instead.

    --
    You just got troll'd!
  28. Folding at Home Costs me a Job by Yergle143 · · Score: 2, Insightful


    This structural biologist offers the following insight. I looked
    over the papers published by the FOLDING@Home guys and I didn't
    see a lot of medically important results. Actually it looks like
    the computational equivalent of naval gazing. I wonder why
    the authors don't just get dirty and use crystallography
    and/or NMR to solve their structural questions. I looked at their
    recent paper trail, no (ok 1) Science/Nature papers...

    I guarantee that if SETI@home finds a signal in the static the
    authors will get the cover of science/nature (and a trip to Sweden).
    Maybe beyond:
    http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0118884/

    Save my job -- don't do FOLDING@Home
    ---537