Slashdot Mirror


Egypt Calls for Bandwidth Rationing

I Don't Believe in Imaginary Property writes "Egypt's Ministry of Communications and Information Technology has called upon its citizens to ration their internet usage. This comes after two of its three undersea fiber optic links were recently severed. The cut cables have caused communication difficulties for millions of people throughout the Middle East. Ministry spokesman Mohammed Taymur was quoted as saying, 'People should know how to use the Internet because people who download music and films are going to affect businesses who have more important things to do.'"

182 comments

  1. These cables were cut on purpose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The cables in the mideast have all been cut on purpose. When they were first laid out, we did not have as good interception equipment as is now available. However, going down and installing equipment capable of intercepting, duplicating, and analyzing their traffic without increasing latency in the slightest would require an unexplained interruption in service while it was being installed. While the lines are being repaired, further up in a difficult-to-reach location or hub, the NSA is now installing this equipment. Afterwards, they can copy all data sent through the cable without raising any eyebrows. There will be no proof.

    1. Re:These cables were cut on purpose by darkmeridian · · Score: 4, Interesting

      There's no need to do that with these cables. They have at end somewhere, right? So what the NSA/bad guys do is to tap the ends of the wires. The ISP sometimes helps.

      --
      A NYC lawyer blogs. http://www.chuangblog.com/
    2. Re:These cables were cut on purpose by kestasjk · · Score: 5, Funny

      That would leave proof, and that would totally ruin the fun of coming up with some elaborate baseless conspiracy theory. What good is a conspiracy theory if there's a way to disprove it that doesn't require a submarine?

      --
      // MD_Update(&m,buf,j);
    3. Re:These cables were cut on purpose by ta+bu+shi+da+yu · · Score: 4, Funny

      Are you seriously saying a Chinese mini-sub didn't kidnap an Australian prime minister?

      Harold Holt would be turning in his grave.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    4. Re:These cables were cut on purpose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Whose to say it was the NSA? Maybe it was Islamic fundamentalists cutting the cable because they did not want their countryment access to western influences?

      It would seem that previous history of the NSA indicates their desire for no detection, as compared to an obvious interrruption.

    5. Re:These cables were cut on purpose by Nocterro · · Score: 1

      Wasn't there some article a while back about sniffing fiber optics by bending the cable to a certain extent (or something)?
      In any case, I suspect assuming you know what security agencies can do is like assuming you know what will happen tomorrow; probably fairly close but never 100%, and always the possibility of something drastically different.

      --
      [clever sig]
    6. Re:These cables were cut on purpose by Fatal67 · · Score: 1

      Pretty sure that was the main plot of one of Tom Clancy's book.

    7. Re:These cables were cut on purpose by Erpo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If that is how you feel, you should be encrypting sensitive information. There is never a guarantee that someone isn't looking at information you send in the clear over the Internet.

    8. Re:These cables were cut on purpose by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1

      What kind of a lame attempt was this?
      It was Hagbard Celine in the golden submarine with a glitch in FUCKUP that can only be described as self-referential.

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    9. Re:These cables were cut on purpose by s74ng3r · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well, for submarines, maybe no. But if your conspiracy theory involved something like sharks with freakin lasers, now that's a conspiracy. :)

    10. Re:These cables were cut on purpose by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1

      Y'all hush!
      If at first you can't stay out of the conversation, then at least ensure the opposition estimate of capabilities is way off.
      Remember: the NSA are bumbling fools that couldn't lead two nuns in one minute of silent prayer.

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    11. Re:These cables were cut on purpose by Vectronic · · Score: 1

      Or maybe it was Dolphins just playing a joke... or maybe... you guessed it... sharks with lasers...

    12. Re:These cables were cut on purpose by Zymergy · · Score: 1

      The US is most likely using its Nuclear Submarines (USS Jimmy Carter, et al) for something other than mere 'deterrence'. Cool.
      We read about this here before:
      http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/05/23/2142216 and
      http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=00/11/20/235216
      http://www.google.com/search?num=50&hl=en&safe=off&q=US+Submarine+cable+tapping&btnG=Search

    13. Re:These cables were cut on purpose by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Nuclear submarine refers to the propulsion, the ones for deterrence are the SSBNs which carry nuclear missiles. It'd be pointless to send one with missiles to do infiltration jobs, subs without missile launchers are smaller and probably less trouble if they hit a rock and sink.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    14. Re:These cables were cut on purpose by muzicman · · Score: 3, Funny

      Have you been seeing black helicoptors since you have written this post? You do realise that just because you are paranoid, doen't mean their not out to get you!

      --
      -1 disagree is not a modifier for a reason. -1 troll, flamebait, redundant, overrated are NOT acceptable substitutes.
    15. Re:These cables were cut on purpose by phillct · · Score: 1

      Hey, that's completely plausible. The ship explanation that's been offered is probably true. When you're in the middle of the ocean, generally there's a ship involved (or a movie starring Tom Hanks). I hope for the sake of irony it was a cargo ship full of OEM Vista upgrades headed for their customer service centers in India. On that subject, isn't the writing on the wall a bit here? I'm a US based programmer, I happen to be a citizen, but regardless I'm authorized to work here and I live here. Thus, anything that demonstrates that off-shoring anything is scary, especially technology, is a fan of mine. The cable will falter again. Whether it's perceived as a conspiracy to invade privacy, a true accident, or corporate espionage, it will chip away at the confidence of those who believe one can rely on other nations to deliver one's technology solutions, from blogs to finance to the business of war. Having said that, my heard does bleed; I hope the citizens of all affected countries get the bandwidth they deserve, albeit, I hope it's overwhelmingly downstream bandwidth they're using when routing through the network to the US.

    16. Re:These cables were cut on purpose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well , the sub-hoe (relative of backhoe), Jimmy Carter is, now. The harbourmaster has a map of no-go zones, and where cables, and other hazards are. This is no 'accident'. If the satellite photos were good enough, may be able to see things clearer.

    17. Re:These cables were cut on purpose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you're right. I have drawn a nice editorial cartoon of the prophet Muhammad slicing through the cable with his fork shaped tongue. Hope I can get it published.

    18. Re:These cables were cut on purpose by Wylfing · · Score: 1

      Mynocks.

      --
      Our intelligent designer has never created an animal that we couldn't improve by strapping a bomb to it.
    19. Re:These cables were cut on purpose by digitalchinky · · Score: 1

      While you didn't say this - someone a couple of posts above you did. "Remember: the NSA are bumbling fools that couldn't lead two nuns in one minute of silent prayer" Speaking as a disgruntled ex 3 letter agency drone, I have to say that the conspiracy theories make for good movies, books, drunken late night stories, and that is all they do.

      It's not necessary to make any assumptions, just a little critical and rational thinking will get you 90% of the way. Is it possible is a better question. Could a 3 letter agency have a large black tube that wraps around a bit of fiber and soaks up the noise of strained photons losing some energy by banging around a sharp bend? Does anything remotely similar exist in the commercial world? Have any physicists ever published papers on the subject? Can I buy a kit to do the same thing from radio shack yet?

      Surprisingly, google, along with much corporate salivation at huge gravy train government contracts, has resulted in a lot of product specifications becoming well within easy reach of the comfort of ones computer. People don't keep secrets very well.

      New and non-conforming will easily buy you a few years in the world of government bureaucracy and the child like stupidity of upper level managers. Always.

    20. Re:These cables were cut on purpose by Petersson · · Score: 3, Funny

      Or maybe it was Dolphins just playing a joke

      As in 'So long, and thanks for all the fiber'?

      --
      I'm not insane. My mother had me tested.
    21. Re:These cables were cut on purpose by The_reformant · · Score: 1

      Ok well here's one for you there are 2 stories on the frontpage posted by soulskill with I dont beleive in imaginary property as the submitter. These are both linked to Iwouldn'tsteal.net . A quick whois revelas this is registered by Lasse Nilsson of Oderland Webbhotell AB. Make of that what you will.

      --
      I have discovered a truly remarkable sig which this post is too small to contain.
    22. Re:These cables were cut on purpose by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      Except there's no need to cut a wire in order to tap it. Ever heard of induction?

    23. Re:These cables were cut on purpose by Nocterro · · Score: 1
      Yeah, my bad for not including the link. I'm in no way arguing that any security agency has anything to do with this, simply that it's possible to sniff fiber without breaking the link. Which is in itself an argument against the "NSA did it!" paranoia - why would they bother disrupting it. This site (Warning! Informative non-conspiracy site!) describes the simple details of fiber-optic coupling by bending one fiber.
      Radioshack does fall regrettably short in network sniffing equipment, but a quick google search will find you hundreds of companies selling splitters and couplers, albeit not ones designed to be attached covertly. This company will happily quote you.

      If you're going to debate, at least do a five second search to establish the facts.

      --
      [clever sig]
    24. Re:These cables were cut on purpose by jo42 · · Score: 1

      So your saying that the 3 letter agencies have no advanced technology and buy their kit from Radio Shack? Next you'll be telling us there is no Santa Claus, Easter Bunny or Jesus!

    25. Re:These cables were cut on purpose by kamatsu · · Score: 1

      Yeah, except Fibre optic cables don't make use of electromagnetic fields. Induction will get you a fat lot of nothing.

    26. Re:These cables were cut on purpose by afidel · · Score: 1

      Ever heard of induction?

      In fiber?!? That would be one giant leap in science. Now from what I've read the NSA does have a way to tap fiber, but when they used it on the Russians they didn't need to disrupt service.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    27. Re:These cables were cut on purpose by darkmeridian · · Score: 1

      Haha. Well, United States military subs have been specially modified to tap into undersea lines for a long time now. For example, Operation Ivy Bells was exactly this kind of mission. And there are special purpose-built subs, if I remember correctly, that can allow a team to work in a dry area with a wire brought within a sub. The thing is that tampering with a fiber optic lines is readily detectable because operators can sense the slightest change in quality (either in length, signal strength, etc.)
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Ivy_Bells

      --
      A NYC lawyer blogs. http://www.chuangblog.com/
    28. Re:These cables were cut on purpose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The cables in the mideast have all been cut on purpose. When they were first laid out, we did not have as good interception equipment as is now available. However, going down and installing equipment capable of intercepting, duplicating, and analyzing their traffic without increasing latency in the slightest would require an unexplained interruption in service while it was being installed. While the lines are being repaired, further up in a difficult-to-reach location or hub, the NSA is now installing this equipment. Afterwards, they can copy all data sent through the cable without raising any eyebrows. There will be no proof.

      Not only a paranoid kook, you're an idiot.

      The USA has submarines that can go down to the ocean floor, splice into a fiber cable and tap it without interruption. They have done this many times, primarily for spying on the Soviets.

      Further, the USA gives Egypt over two billion dollars cash every year. Clinton gave Egypt a factory to manufacture M1 Abrams tanks. You don't think the USA has a little leverage with the Egyptian government? It's not like Egypt respects human rights - Mubarak would be quite happy to tap these cables onshore and share the analysis with the US government.

    29. Re:These cables were cut on purpose by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

      Nice to know that real-deal, Reddit-grade conspiracy bullshit has finally come to Slashdot!

    30. Re:These cables were cut on purpose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Israel cuts off food and water to Palestinians in the Gaza Strip. The wall to Egypt is blown up. Millions of hungry and thirsty people run to Egypt to buy supplies. Israel asks Egypt to stop the Door Busting shoppers. Egypt refuses and stands idly aside. Mysteriously, two out of three physically disparate fiber links are cut by a possibly passing ship's anchor? Doubtful. One is an accident. Two is retaliation. Even with 31 CCIE's in the country to change the BGP attributes, cutting the available bandwidth by 66% is going to hurt for a while. Whah! I want my Mummy.

    31. Re:These cables were cut on purpose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but right now there's a spook trying to figure out if the red wires with a white stripe go to the white wires with a red stripe, x 100,000.

      He might be there a while.

    32. Re:These cables were cut on purpose by Schraegstrichpunkt · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This site (Warning! Informative non-conspiracy site!) describes the simple details of fiber-optic coupling by bending one fiber.

      A few things:

      • Undersea cables are big bundles of fibre, not single fibres, right?
      • When you bend a fibre, there is an increase in the attenuation visible at the receiving end. This might interfere with reception, but even if it doesn't, both sides likely have an optical time domain reflectometer, which will can tell them where the bend is.

      The NSA could do it, but would likely be detectable. On the other hand, if they cut the cable, then later installed a sniffer at the break while repairing the cable, then the people on each end would ignore the spike in the OTDR plot, because they would say "oh, that's just a break that has been repaired. It's always been there.".

    33. Re:These cables were cut on purpose by Schraegstrichpunkt · · Score: 1

      If that is how you feel, you should be encrypting sensitive information.

      ... and authenticating it!

    34. Re:These cables were cut on purpose by oodaloop · · Score: 1

      Neither the NSA nor anyone else did this on purpose. A ship dragged an anchor and accidentally severed the line, period. I work in the Intel community and saw this in our daily brief. If we did it, it wouldn't have been there at all (I'm not read onto those programs). And I would have posted this sooner, but our connection in Iraq is seriously degraded because of this.

      --
      Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    35. Re:These cables were cut on purpose by bdjacobson · · Score: 1

      That would leave proof, and that would totally ruin the fun of coming up with some elaborate baseless conspiracy theory. What good is a conspiracy theory if there's a way to disprove it that doesn't require a submarine? It's really not that far fetched seeing as they've already done it in all the major AT&T switching centers-- PBS did a story on an ex-employee of AT&T who figured this out on his own and wasn't under a NDA.
    36. Re:These cables were cut on purpose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wherever that be..

    37. Re:These cables were cut on purpose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there's no way this could happend in UE, we have privacy laws unlike "some" patriot act , but some corrupt policeman at egipt can let it happen .

    38. Re:These cables were cut on purpose by tmosley · · Score: 1

      How's this for proof? http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/7222536.stm

      The third cable was cut in a completely "unrelated" incident.

      Yeah, I'm sure it was nothing but a random anchor. Move along now, nothing to see here.

    39. Re:These cables were cut on purpose by Zymergy · · Score: 2, Informative

      IMHO, I respectfully disagree. Any propulsion system other than Nuclear would just not be very feasible for extended undersea cable tapping operations and Seal incursions, etc...
      The USS Jimmy Carter's battery of 50 Tomahawk (nuclear warhead capable) cruise *missiles* are deterrence in my opinion. (But conventional warhead Tomahawks are scary as well.)
      To also modify a nuclear submarine design to be 100 feet longer in order to accommodate more Seal Teams & "gear" is also deterrence. Deterrence is a matter of opinion though.
      Strictly speaking, yes, only boomers (SSBN's) have ICBM capabilities. But to me, the USS Jimmy Carter's *known* capabilities are formidable and would certainly deter me (were I a US adversary) from provoking the United States further (especially if intelligence told me it was hiding somewhere off my coast and I had recently severely pissed-off the US.)

      Additional info in these Wiki articles: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seawolf_class_submarine http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Jimmy_Carter

    40. Re:These cables were cut on purpose by STrinity · · Score: 1

      A communications disruption can mean only one thing -- invasion.

      --
      Les Miserables Volume 1 now up with my reading of
    41. Re:These cables were cut on purpose by cayenne8 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      "Ministry spokesman Mohammed Taymur was quoted as saying, 'People should know how to use the Internet because people who download music and films are going to affect businesses who have more important things to do.'"

      Ok..so exactly when was the internet created and instantiate PRIMARILY for the use of businesses? Oh..that's right...it wasn't.

      Thank Goodness!!

      Thankfully, it was created so that any computer hooked to it..was just as important as any other...a peer.

      I'm all for businesses using it, makes things convenient for many, but, I get irked when you hear things now that sound like the internet IS there primarily for businesses, and that the common user is a tolerated menace.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    42. Re:These cables were cut on purpose by dedalus2000 · · Score: 1

      I'm surprised at you, it's obvious the Professor cut the cables in an attempt to call for help after they washed ashore during a hurricane.

      --
      My keyboads not woking popely.
    43. Re:These cables were cut on purpose by CodeBuster · · Score: 1

      But if your conspiracy theory involved something like sharks with freakin lasers, now that's a conspiracy. :) They were trained to cut the cables with their freakin laser beams by the evil doers. It is a vast conspiracy of such brilliant precision and global scope as to be worthy of Dr Evil himself.
    44. Re:These cables were cut on purpose by g8oz · · Score: 1

      Ah, but avoiding tapping the endpoints frees you from needing the co-operation of a hostile country's ISP. Would Iran's ISPs really help the U.S tap its voice & data traffic? What if you want to tap the traffic going from Iran to another non-cooperative country?

    45. Re:These cables were cut on purpose by Idiomatik · · Score: 1

      Uhhh businesses from a government POV are more important than free pron. I can't see anyone putting up a reasonable debate that pron > economy ....

  2. Yeah by TheLink · · Score: 1

    Like read Slashdot :).

    --
  3. Business more important than my porn? NO! by node159 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    One would think that those businesses affected who depend on their network connection would see its value and have the appropriate SLA. Otherwise they should fall under the rest who need to fight over the limited data cause by a lack of investment of inferstructure. I have no sympathy, if line failure means a reduced capacity, that isn't a backup.

    God talking heads piss me off some times. Get a clue.

    --
    GPLv2: I want my rights, I want my phone call! DRM: What use is a phone call, if you are unable to speak?
    1. Re:Business more important than my porn? NO! by klingens · · Score: 2, Informative

      The (possible) SLAs are exactly the point: chances are, the telecommunications company, and probably the cable too, is directly owned by the government. This is a usual arrangement in most islamic countries so any payout or loss of revenue due SLAs is directly hurting the government of which this minister is an officer.

    2. Re:Business more important than my porn? NO! by zappepcs · · Score: 1

      The trouble with that thought is that there are companies that know a cable cut could hurt them, but there are no viable alternatives in the event of a cable cut. Does anyone remember when one of the comms satellites went missing? If they had bought dishes that can be pointed remotely, there was a standby bird, everyone else had to visit all their sites to repoint dishes.

      In this case, say you are a large ISP, what do you do? Especially if your connection is provided by the government, and mandated by law? Even though it seems tin foil hattish, I'm with the people that don't think this is an accident.

    3. Re:Business more important than my porn? NO! by pla · · Score: 1

      Business more important than my porn? NO!

      Y'know, at first I thought the same thing - Where the hell does this guy get off telling people not to use the net so oh-so-special "business" users can have priority access to bandwidth?

      Then on thinking about it a bit deeper - That really does make sense, and not just for the "screw you, I pay for it too and will damned well use it" reason.

      Without Aziz Sixpack using the net, these businesses have no use for it. "The Internet" doesn't magically equal profit (or so I thought we all learned from the dot com bubble bursting). It can help your paying customers get to your products and services easier, but without those customers, the net by itself does nothing at all for you.



      God talking heads piss me off some times. Get a clue.

      Ditto. "Utterance of official stupidity" should count as a crime punishable by death.

    4. Re:Business more important than my porn? NO! by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      everyone else had to visit all their sites to repoint dishes.
      Couldn't they just get someone who was already on site to do it?! repoining a dish can't be that hard.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    5. Re:Business more important than my porn? NO! by Peeteriz · · Score: 1

      If you usually have 100 units of bandwidth, and due to some accident now you have 10 available, then instead of having 'congestion', you just have full bandwidth available to the important customers (tehse important businesses with SLA's, guaranteed links), and throttle the less important ones to near zero, or cut them off at all (and deal with the consequences there). What else can be done?

    6. Re:Business more important than my porn? NO! by screeble · · Score: 1

      Go to all 27 satellite stations. Uphill. In the snow. Both ways. In a rented CRX.

      1) pull cap off rf sample port
      2) attach coax to port
      3) attach other end of coax to dc block
      4) attach dc block to spectrum analyzer
      5) get a gps reading
      6) calculate azimuth and elevation
      7) account for magnetic deviation
      8) get out the hand tools
      9) loosen bolts
      10) manually swing dish to approximate position and snug bolt
      11) take some compass and degree readings
      12) repeat 10 and 11 a few times
      13) tighten bolts
      14) look at spectrum for signal
      15) probably go back to 10 a couple of times
      16) tune fine adjustments for highest signal
      17) polarize receiver
      18) possibly go back to 10 again a couple of times
      19) replace cap
      20) call noc
      21) start over twice
      22) clean up

      Not hard at al! Of course I probably forgot a few steps but it's been years.

    7. Re:Business more important than my porn? NO! by zappepcs · · Score: 1

      Well, if you happen to have someone on site at ALL 4500 of your sites, yes, that would be a viable option. Of course that never happens. Imagine someone being on site at every cell tower and you begin to realize the magnitude of the problem.

  4. No more pr0n by Ours · · Score: 0

    No more pr0n for Egypt. Or 2-6 pics per person per day. Poor chaps.

    --
    "You superiour intellect is no match for our puny weapons" - The Simpsons
    1. Re:No more pr0n by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      They'll just have to share ;-)

    2. Re:No more pr0n by Loke+the+Dog · · Score: 4, Funny

      If they don't keep a stored reserve for emergencies like this, they deserve to be frustrated. With HDDs so cheap these days, there's no excuse for not having a few gigs of porn.

    3. Re:No more pr0n by eiapoce · · Score: 4, Interesting

      No more pr0n for Egypt. Or 2-6 pics per person per day. Poor chaps. You didn't mean PORN, you meant SEX!

      That's accordin to google labs, porn is for UK, New Zealand and Australia where getting sex isn't a problem while sofisticated porn is difficult to see http://www.google.com/trends?q=porn&ctab=0&geo=all&date=all&sort=0 - Sex is clearly what Egiptians are looking for http://www.google.com/trends?q=sex&ctab=0&geo=all&date=all&sort=0
    4. Re:No more pr0n by sakdoctor · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This might be a more useful comparison. This plot of porn and sex, ranked by sex, shows the countries that are most affected.

      And yes, Egypt ranks first, followed by India.

      http://www.google.com/trends?q=porn%2C+sex&ctab=0&geo=all&geor=all&date=all&sort=1

    5. Re:No more pr0n by jargon82 · · Score: 1

      I find this one even more interesting... sure reinforces a few concepts I've heard over the years... http://www.google.com/trends?q=sex%2C+sheep&ctab=0&geo=all&date=all&sort=1

    6. Re:No more pr0n by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that is true , even reserved gigs of sex have been depleted..now we are having riots in the streets by porn-addicts looking after "natural" sex pics , poor we are! help us and send us porn-filled-HDD by planes I say , it is worse than what happened in Katrina!

    7. Re:No more pr0n by jiggerdot · · Score: 1

      What I really like about this plot is the fact that there's a spike around the holiday season EVERY SINGLE YEAR.
      It's nice to know I'm not the only one getting hornier around that period :-)

      --
      "can't run, can't hide...oh well, return 0"
    8. Re:No more pr0n by dens · · Score: 1

      There's a sheep joke in there somewhere.

    9. Re:No more pr0n by netdur · · Score: 1

      the real reason, in Egypt, people just wanna look at porn, but they are mostly uneducated Arab, only doesn't know English well, uses "sex" keyword, once they discover that "porn" is better keyword (it is?) they will use it instead

      --
      "Steve Jobs invented the world" -- Bill W. GATES
  5. Who is it more important to? by hoojus · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I think it is pathetic to say that big business internet usage is more important than that of a home user. I for one work from home and my internet usage is closely tied to my pay. So to me it is definitely more important that corporate office people sending chain emails.

    I do admit that the curbing of music downloading for personal use may be helpful... but there are musicians who require this for their income as well.

    No way I would drop my usage at all.

    1. Re:Who is it more important to? by siyavash · · Score: 1

      hm... your internet connection IS for business use if you work from home... :)

    2. Re:Who is it more important to? by EvilGrin5000 · · Score: 1

      I think you're missing the point.
      Your examples are actually using home-based businesses (work from home, musicians doing whatever). So I think you actually proved my point that if your usage is required for work or for something you personally need, then by all means, go ahead and do it! They simply appealed to the public's common sense to hold off on the big media downloads for a few days.

      --
      A black cat crossing your path signifies that the animal is going somewhere. -- Groucho Marx
    3. Re:Who is it more important to? by hoojus · · Score: 4, Interesting

      appealed to the public's common sense Never heard of this what is it? Even so just because the public are using it for entertainment purposes this is no less important than business use. If these people are paying the same amount then they should have equal use. If business are paying more and the contracts (to ISPs) specify selective throttling then I have no problem. But I know that my ISP has no signed contract with me that allows them to put other customer's needs before mine. Make no mistake whether big business or home user they are both customers and should be treated equally.
    4. Re:Who is it more important to? by QuickFox · · Score: 3, Insightful

      appealed to the public's common sense Never heard of this what is it? Why are Americans so parochial? Just because the public in the US has no common sense doesn't mean it's the the same in the rest of the world.
      --
      Terrorists can't threaten a country's freedom and democracy. Only lawmakers and voters can do that.
    5. Re:Who is it more important to? by hoojus · · Score: 1

      I am not an American so I get to ignore that one :) It was also said tongue in cheek.

    6. Re:Who is it more important to? by 1u3hr · · Score: 4, Interesting
      But I know that my ISP has no signed contract with me that allows them to put other customer's needs before mine. Make no mistake whether big business or home user they are both customers and should be treated equally.

      Good luck with that.

      A year ago some cables running south of Taiwan were cut by an earthquake. In Hong Kong the immediate effect was to slow down access. But a few hours later, they had reconfigured it so that domestic users, like myself, working at home, got ZERO connectivity, as they gave almost all the capacity to their business clients. I couldn't even check my email, on Yahoo, for a week. And you know that businesses were just sending the same bloated powerpoint files and videos to each other.

      IMHO, they should give a minimum connectivity to everyone so you can use email, the most vital of all services. But when they have their big customers screaming at them about how slow their service is, they'll cheerfully cut off home users completely, knowing most have no alternative.

    7. Re:Who is it more important to? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well if you work on a so-called "global" team. You get to find this out first-hand. Americans are perhaps not the most common-sensical people on the planet, but they certainly have second place.

      Middle east is simple : you do what your dad does. If he was a nobel laureate and you failed kindergarten, you head the university. Needless to say, this arrangement has it's problems. Never ask anyone in Egypt why they have a job. They are very open about this you know.

      In kuwait the "senior technical designer" of the local telco did not know what a router was. "how do I recognize one ?" - no joke. And I had to explain to the last pakistani that called that just connecting your pc to an -unconnected- router is not going to get you on the internet. Then we got started on bgp. Needless to say, it took a while.

    8. Re:Who is it more important to? by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      But I know that my ISP has no signed contract with me that allows them to put other customer's needs before mine.
      Does your contract with them actaully gaurantee anything? If so then you are almost certainly on a buisness class connection. If not get ready to be ignored when the crunch comes.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    9. Re:Who is it more important to? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry. Speaking as a Canadian who has been to various places in Western Europe (and is capable of watching BBC Newsworld) ... yes, a deficiency of common sense is a HUMAN TRAIT not an American one. People often do things against their own interests because they're too pre-occupied to look 5 minutes down the road (so to speak, though it's also true literally).

      Sure, you could continue torrenting, or the business you work for could have VoIP access to continue doing business... Hmm, I wonder which the individual would choose ...

      Oh and while I'm ranting, Look Ottawa, I know you love your Senators, but you don't have to drive like fucking lunatics just because it's a game night. All my way home (driving east no less) last night was plagued with jackasses running lights, cutting people off, tailgating, etc. Christ, it's just hockey [and they played miserably anyways!].

      Captcha: Loosely. As in my rant is loosely on topic.

    10. Re:Who is it more important to? by notnAP · · Score: 3, Funny

      appealed to the public's common sense
      Never heard of this what is it?
      Why are Americans so parochial? Just because the public in the US has no common sense doesn't mean it's the the same in the rest of the world.
      This "rest of the world" you refer to...

      Never heard of this what is it?

    11. Re:Who is it more important to? by afidel · · Score: 1

      But I know that my ISP has no signed contract with me that allows them to put other customer's needs before mine. Make no mistake whether big business or home user they are both customers and should be treated equally.

      Quite the opposite I'm sure, the ISP almost assuredly has a contract with you that specifies that they guarantee nothing more than a signal. Now with at least some of their corporate customers they probably DO have hard SLA's requiring certain minimum bandwidths and certain availability levels, that's why a T1 costs so much more than your home line with more bandwdith.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    12. Re:Who is it more important to? by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      Why are Americans so parochial? Just because the public in the US has no common sense doesn't mean it's the the same in the rest of the world.

      Honestly? Because, historically, they could.

      America, through a happy accident of history, has never really been invaded. Never really been subjugated. As one author who's name I forget, but it's something French, puts it, they never had to kill their King; the American Revolution was a lot less personal, than, say, the French.

      Nor has America ever really needed another country's help, mostly as a consequence of having never really been invaded. But boy, America's done a lot of bailing other countries out.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    13. Re:Who is it more important to? by ethanms · · Score: 1

      appealed to the public's common sense Never heard of this what is it? Why are Americans so parochial? Just because the public in the US has no common sense doesn't mean it's the the same in the rest of the world. Yeeeaaahh... let me know how that works out for you... particularly in the middle east, an area that is just chock full 'o common sense and rational ideas.
    14. Re:Who is it more important to? by JThundley · · Score: 1

      This "rest of the world" you refer to... Never heard of this what is it? Mexico below, Canada above, duh.
    15. Re:Who is it more important to? by jasonjacks0n · · Score: 1

      As one author who's name I forget, but it's something French, puts it, they never had to kill their King;

      Clotaire Rapaille.

      http://www.randomhouse.com/broadway/culturecode/
      --
      This space intentionally left blank.
    16. Re:Who is it more important to? by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      That's the one! The Culture Code is indeed the book, and it's a pretty interesting read.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  6. "More important things to do" by Wiseman1024 · · Score: 1

    Who's that guy to say what's more important to do? Porn and fansubs are more important than business to me, and I'm a citizen as good as and equal in rights to any businessmen. That idiot would like to hear about the series of tubes.

    --
    I was about to say 13256278887989457651018865901401704640, but it appears this number is private property.
    1. Re:"More important things to do" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      That's a stupid and ignorant view. Those companies might seriously rely on their Internet connections for business, which helps the economy (could be small or big business). They're actually contributing something to the society - you jerking off however to some fansubs isn't, so society doesn't really care.

      Just like with the power outage on the East coast in North America, in times of temporary resource shortage, it is expected that everyone try to help out so that society as a whole does better.

      Otherwise, while your jerking off to your fansubs, the local economy might experience some serious problems.

      However, that's not to say that the premise of bandwidth "rationing" itself is ignorant - if this was a truly serious emergency, the government could step in and allocate a certain amount of bandwidth to business. Or they could pass some legislation to force ISPs to start throttling users who are using too much bandwidth during peak times.

    2. Re:"More important things to do" by darthflo · · Score: 1

      Those companies might seriously rely on their Internet connections for business[.]
      That's what business-class internet connectivity is being sold for. No matter how important their business thingies are to them; as long as they chose to pay the same amount of money for the same class of residential uplink as I did, I have the right to use as much bandwidth as they do.
      The only scenario where this plea for rationing is appropriate would be ISPs so moronic they don't prioritize guaranteed-rate business traffic over cheapskate residential lines. Should this be the case, moving there with a few peering agreements and some sat uplinks for emergencies could turn out to be a goldmine.
    3. Re:"More important things to do" by Wiseman1024 · · Score: 1

      Those companies might seriously rely on their Internet connections for business, which helps the economy (could be small or big business) No, they help businessmen's economy, hardly mine. They would help mine if I were working for one of them. (Admittedly, I do work for one of them in my country.) And still, I wouldn't feel like it's more important that my employer gets away with it than me having my stuff. And I'm a citizen as good as my employer, and have the same rights.

      If you had a water shortage, would you take water from the poor to make sure businessmen aren't thirsty and can continue to grow their businesses? To me, all citizens would count equally. Don't mistake me for a LSD-taking, long-haired communist hippy; I'm fine with business, but stuff owned or regulated by my state, which is ran by everyone, should be for everyone.

      They're actually contributing something to the society - you jerking off however to some fansubs isn't, so society doesn't really care. I'm as much "society" as you are.

      Just like with the power outage on the East coast in North America, in times of temporary resource shortage, it is expected that everyone try to help out so that society as a whole does better. And how do you measure if it does better? It does better for me if I'm happy. So it may for many others. While for others, it does better if they make more money, or the rich get richer.

      the government could step in and allocate a certain amount of bandwidth to business So, Internet is only good to make rich people richer, not to learn, have fun or communicate?

      Or they could pass some legislation to force ISPs to start throttling users who are using too much bandwidth during peak times. I'm glad you're not ruling anything.

      You're probably the kind that likes the "series of tubes" guy, while I'd hang him.
      --
      I was about to say 13256278887989457651018865901401704640, but it appears this number is private property.
  7. doomed to fail by IKILLEDTROTSKY · · Score: 1

    If they start telling everyone there is a shortage then they will start hording, soon they'll have old ladys with 323 gigs of Murder She Wrote and Matlock.

    1. Re:doomed to fail by Yetihehe · · Score: 1

      If they start telling everyone there is a shortage then they will start hording, soon they'll have old ladys with 323 gigs of Murder She Wrote and Matlock.
      But if they start telling everyone "No, there is absolutely no shortage, that's unpossible" it will be much worse.
      --
      Extreme Programming - Redundant Array of Inexpensive Developers
  8. A-ha - I smell a new *aa strategy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'People should know how to use the Internet because people who download music and films are going to affect businesses who have more important things to do.'

    Uh-huh...

  9. Let the market sort it out.. by WarwickRyan · · Score: 0

    Give everyone a basic cap, then let the rest of the bandwidth go to the highest bidder.

  10. Internet the new water food and shelter... by psychicsword · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It seems that Internet is now making its way up with water food and shelter for human necessities :P

    1. Re:Internet the new water food and shelter... by noidentity · · Score: 1

      Food, shelter, communication. It's the new primary form of communication when people aren't in the same room.

    2. Re:Internet the new water food and shelter... by jamesh · · Score: 1

      I can just imagine the ads we are going to see on TV... images of fat Egyptians sitting at their computer screens with 'taking too long to respond' messages on their browsers. A voice-over asking us to please donate all our unused bandwidth to these poor unfortunately souls... cut to one of the previously shown Egyptian kid, in a cold sweat with a crazed look in his eyes, talking about how much he has suffered in the 48 hours that he's been unable to update his facebook site.

      Seriously though, are any of the countries that call centers and programming are commonly outsourced to being affected? And how much?

    3. Re:Internet the new water food and shelter... by jdjbuffalo · · Score: 1

      Seriously though, are any of the countries that call centers and programming are commonly outsourced to being affected? And how much? Yes, it has directly affected India (call center capital). They are reporting 60% loss in capacity.

      Our India office is using a backup line as a result. I'm sure many other company's are having to do the same.
      --
      We have four boxes with which to defend our freedom: the soap box, the ballot box, the jury box, and the cartridge box.
  11. I see it already... by thrill12 · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... next thing they do is giving away "bandwidth-stamps".
    I am sorry sir, your bandwidth-card is full ; you will have to wait until next month to renew your bandwidth.
    Here you go ma'm, one bandwidth stamp for 100 MB worth of data.
    Sir, you are hereby under arrest for trying to fraud with bandwidth-cards, you sir are a "bandwidth pirate", a "megabyte thief", a "bit ripper" !

    --
    Slashdot: stuff for news, nerds that matter, matter for news, stuff that nerd
    1. Re:I see it already... by mikael · · Score: 2, Interesting

      With French Pay-As-You-go 3G Sim cards for mobile internet (Mobicarte), you top up your account by purchasing scratch cards from your local supermarket. Scratch the card to reveal a security code, then use SMS to send the code to the account managers. No need to use or disclose your credit card details.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    2. Re:I see it already... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, you guys are still using scratch cards to do that? Over here (UK) we use a plastic card that you can connect with your pay-as-you-go phone and then swipe and pay at the counter. No credit card details, no names involved and no need for scratch cards (unless you really want to but they're hard to find these days).

    3. Re:I see it already... by mikael · · Score: 1

      Having swipe cards is a more efficient system, but you have to associate a credit card or other banking account with that card - the money has to come from somewhere. Mobicarte is really designed for use by high-school kids; Discount hours for SMS and calls are outside of school hours, with the main goal being that there are no surprise bills at the end of the month.

      Depending upon your mobile operator in the UK, you can top up simply by calling a five digit service number or just by using an ATM, thus eliminating the need for swipe cards altogether.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    4. Re:I see it already... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL @post as Anonymous Coward..
      yea as If i have excess bandwidth to create an account..
      Anyways,, I wanted to tell you sir That Limited internet is already present in Egypt..
      there are billing systems for you to pay for a definite bandwidth i.e speed of connection and a definite download quota,, Which ranges from 7 to 15 GB per month.. :S
      in case you see it already.. I saw it already :D

  12. Egypt Slashdoted... by psychicsword · · Score: 0

    Looks like Egypt just got Slashdoted the WHOLE COUNTRY went down.

  13. Adding to the problem... by Statecraftsman · · Score: 5, Funny

    Though I've never looked for an Egyptian site before, my curiousity may have added a little to the problem:

    The server at www.egypt.gov.eg is taking too long to respond.

    1. Re:Adding to the problem... by nfractal · · Score: 1

      Why'd you ever post this ??
      I <i>HAD</i> to try it now ....

      <b>The server at www.egypt.gov.eg is taking too long to respond.</b>

      Sometimes I hate myself :(

    2. Re:Adding to the problem... by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 5, Funny

      Have we ever slashdotted an entire country before?

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    3. Re:Adding to the problem... by Kjella · · Score: 1

      Well, I do remember an article about Sealand (a "country" that's an abandoned oil platform outside the UK) which was planning on setting up some sort of data center outside traditional states. That was completely slashdotted, but I don't remember if it actually went over their link or if it was just some hosting provider onshore.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    4. Re:Adding to the problem... by owlstead · · Score: 1

      I got the title, here it is:

      Helpful, isn't it?

    5. Re:Adding to the problem... by toddian · · Score: 1

      It works fine for me, but I'm in Australia.

  14. Same Story by nfractal · · Score: 1

    Here's the oft repeated story again, instead of trying to improve infrastructure and services (like backup lines for instance) the consumers are the ones left holding the bag. In fact they're already using the word 'rationing'. Why is it that almost always its the consumers who bear the burden of whatever boo boo's made by the service providers ?
    On the other hand though the statement is worded unsurprisingly inept, i guess the sentiment here might be to take stock of the usage and avoiding unnecessary bandwidth hogging for a while. Though what's unnecessary should be left to the consumers to define for themselves.
    A simple request for 'help' and 'understanding' would have been more useful without generating all the negative publicity that I'm sure this will generate.
    shucks ..

    nf

    1. Re:Same Story by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Here's the oft repeated story again, instead of trying to improve infrastructure and services (like backup lines for instance) the consumers are the ones left holding the bag. In fact they're already using the word 'rationing'. Why is it that almost always its the consumers who bear the burden of whatever boo boo's made by the service providers ?

      This isn't a private company, it's the entire country's connection to the rest of the world. As in, the government. And there are redundancies, that's why they can still connect. Two of the three main cables (each over a mile apart) failed simultanously.

      On the other hand though the statement is worded unsurprisingly inept, i guess the sentiment here might be to take stock of the usage and avoiding unnecessary bandwidth hogging for a while. Though what's unnecessary should be left to the consumers to define for themselves. A simple request for 'help' and 'understanding' would have been more useful without generating all the negative publicity that I'm sure this will generate.

      That's pretty much what they did. They said there was limited bandwidth, and asked people not to download music and movies because it would eat up bandwidth that might be needed for contining business purposes.

      If you read all his comments, it is quite polite and understanding of individuals' rights. You might not think it was polite because it was translated from Arabic. Egypt is a different country than the United States. Many other countries speak languages besides English.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
  15. Next up... by Icarium · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...they'll be asking road users to give way to trucks and business executives on the roads.

    Thier concern over how this could impact thier commerce is understandable, but this is not the answer.

    1. Re:Next up... by Zorque · · Score: 5, Insightful

      All it's asking is that people try and refrain from heavy downloading (music, movies, etc) for a little while until the lines are fixed. They're not asking people to give up the internet entirely. It would be pretty stupid of them to have a large portion of their economy collapse just so people could torrent.

    2. Re:Next up... by Nullav · · Score: 1

      This has nothing to do with trucks; it's a series of tubes!

      --
      I just read Slashdot for the articles.
    3. Re:Next up... by Rogerborg · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hey, Ibrahim, how's our bandwidth demand? Sharply down, you say? So, our expenditure is down as well, right? And our revenue? Still constant. Hmm.

      Say, Ibrahim, about those cables. If you felt like taking some vacation time before fixing them, that'd be OK with me. See you in April.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    4. Re:Next up... by cornicefire · · Score: 1

      Oh come on. Downloading free music is a human right! Don't you care about fair use? Eeewwwww. You make me sick.

    5. Re:Next up... by Alioth · · Score: 1

      That's already done pretty much everywhere! Severe weather, or a major accident on a highway? Guess what - you're often advised to "only use that road for journeys that are extremely necessary".

      They aren't telling home users to get stuffed, they are requesting that they limit their internet access to stuff that's essential until the problem is fixed.

    6. Re:Next up... by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 1

      It would be pretty stupid of them to have a large portion of their economy collapse just so people could torrent.

      I never thought I'd see that on Slashdot! I wonder if Sweden agrees :-)

  16. Why not? by Misanthrope · · Score: 4, Funny

    Aziz Bandwidth!

    1. Re:Why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Aziz... Bandwidth...
      *makes another mark on paper*

    2. Re:Why not? by Edgester · · Score: 5, Funny

      * cables fixed *
      Ah, thank you aziz.

  17. Ah, good times by istartedi · · Score: 2, Interesting

    When I was in dial-up tech support in the late 90s, we would occasionally get customers who were furious because "my business depends on the internet". Of course we couldn't tell customers what we really thought, so we would all stand outside on break, and be like "your business ha-hah, depends on ha-ha, the INTERNET???". "Well then, you should not have depended on a single provider, if it was really that critical".

    It's one thing for some idiot pre-bubble day trader who fancied himself a "business man" to not understand that. In this case, it's a whole region. OK, maybe I'm being a bit harsh. Maybe they're where we were in the 90s. It seems like the whole network would go dark every few weeks or so back then. In the call center they would put up a big sign that said something like "MAE East is down". I haven't seen anything like that for a while. Maybe they'll put in some redundant routes after this, which is probably what happened here.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    1. Re:Ah, good times by MrMickS · · Score: 4, Informative

      Maybe they'll put in some redundant routes after this, which is probably what happened here. Erm ... there are redundant routes. Two of them, 2km apart, have both been severed the result being that they are down to a single route. Given the political nature of the area it wouldn't be a surprise for the redunancy to not be as high as possible with inter-country connects.
      --
      You may think me a tired, old, cynic. I'd have to disagree about the tired bit.
    2. Re:Ah, good times by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Not every country can afford the redundancy mate. It's called being poor.

    3. Re:Ah, good times by Taelron · · Score: 1

      RTFA... There are three major internet backbone lines connecting them, sepperated 1.8km apart. Two main use and one backup (redundant) line. The two main lines were both severed off the coast of Egypt. Different news outlets are offering conflicting stories, though the most prominent so far is that several ships were anchored in the wrong area and their anchors were dropped on the lines severing the lines in multiple places.

      The lines are constantly getting damaged by dragnet fishing operations in other parts of the world, so not to surprising this happened off the coast of Egypt. Though it is curious to lines almost 2km appart were both damaged.

    4. Re:Ah, good times by darthflo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      First of all, "poor" applies to people. Natural people, you see? Businesses are legal people. Just like there's no welfare for businesses, there's no "poor" businesses. (Obvious exemption: Gov't-subsidized public services. They're not poor, they're simply not competitive but the government deems them to be important enough not to die.) Either a business makes money, is using up stockpiles (including credits) of money or it's bankrupt. An internet-dependent business unable to afford basic redundancy is, however evil this may sound, badly led.

    5. Re:Ah, good times by ethanms · · Score: 1

      When I was in dial-up tech support in the late 90s, we would occasionally get customers who were furious because "my business depends on the internet". This.

      I worked from a dial up ISP in the late-late 90s and it was amazing to me how many people, who were signed up for home user accounts (i.e. no SLA), and would be screeching into their phones about how they were "losing money by the minute" because they couldn't get online and they had no access to email, or whatever... Anecdotally I'd say that the vast majority of the issues were typically with the customer's own equipment, and had nothing to do with our end.

      Riiiiiight, and you chose this $9.99/mo dial-up ISP because you've got such a mission critical application where you lose all this money when not connected???

      If you have the potential to lose actual money on a regular basis you owe it to yourself to have two sources of connections. I work from home a handful of days per week... and I've got a Sprint EVDO card and a cable modem... chances are good that if one is down, the other will be working... same thing applies to cell phones, I've got Cingular and I've got Verizon... typically if both are not working it's the result of a major public problem.

      Doubling up in my case does not add huge costs... it's under $100/mo for my 2nd set of providers.
    6. Re:Ah, good times by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      Whereas the average income in upper Egypt is around $2,600/yr, and even in Cairo it's only $19,200/yr. $100 is nothing, though.

  18. This just in! by CCFreak2K · · Score: 3, Funny

    Cut cable causes communication catastrophe! Dismal disaster dooms denizens!

    --
    "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master."
    1. Re:This just in! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Egypt bleeds badly?

    2. Re:This just in! by HisMother · · Score: 1

      Egypt experiences electronic ennui!

      --
      Cantankerous old coot since 1957.
    3. Re:This just in! by game+kid · · Score: 1

      This was obviously stolen from the SimCity 3000 Wacky Internets expansion pack.

      --
      You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
  19. It happens by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

    they'll be asking road users to give way to trucks

    I can't remember who told me this but apparently they were in Egypt and asked the hotel people where they could go to rent a car and look around for a bit in the evening and they were told no way to you do that because big trucks drive around at night and nobody makes them use lights.

    Closer to home (for me) I was in Tasmania, which is the most redneck state in Australia. They have signs on logging roads saying that this is a public road but if you get hit by a logging truck then the onus is on you.

  20. No Doubt by CranberryKing · · Score: 1

    The NSA being a simplification. I believe an Int-Er-Na-tional Conspiracy is at work. But I can't be sure..

    What a huge undertaking. Thank god I'm not on that project. Good work if you can get it, I guess. A boondoggle.

  21. These conspiracies were posted on purpose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gee a conspiracy post marked as interesting instead of -1:tabloid. Sure puts my faith in the citizen press movement.

  22. Somehow... by hyperz69 · · Score: 1

    Even with all that rationing, they will probably get better service and speed then most Comcast users ;)

  23. Solution: raise the price by noidentity · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    People should know how to use the Internet because people who download music and films are going to affect businesses who have more important things to do.

    Unless people get it for free there, can't they just raise the price on bandwidth, now that it's more valuable there?

    1. Re:Solution: raise the price by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      Afaict they probablly can't do that at least not quickly because most ISP contracts are structured such that service levels are not gauranteed but price rises require a certain ammount of warning.

      we are talking temporary disruption here not a permanent reduction in capacity.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    2. Re:Solution: raise the price by noidentity · · Score: 1

      Afaict they probablly can't do that at least not quickly because most ISP contracts are structured such that service levels are not gauranteed but price rises require a certain ammount of warning.

      OK, so effectively raise the price by lowering service level to non-business customers. Just odd that they'd ask home users to avoid using lots of bandwidth whcn that can be arranged using a technical solution.

      (WTF is up with the mod as flamebait? whatever...)

  24. Re: Network neutrality again by neutrino38 · · Score: 1

    Ah, this is exactly the kind of situation that demonstrate how the network neutrality dogma is hurting. To have a per packet fair policy is just fine when existing infrastructure can wistand the load.

    Now with the wonderfull IP / TCP whatever protocol, not beeing able to diffenciate traffic per user and per session end to end in the network lead the following situation: When the capacity is reduced (such incidents, maintenance, etc) or if traffic increases (chrismas, special events, etc.) where everybody get hurt instead of nicely rejecting the overflow and let the other users enjoy the network use.

    I am a long time advocate of the demise of the so called "stupid network" in favor of an more advanced IP usage (V6? V7? V9?). where we could finally manage the bandwidth and the session per user end to end in the network. This would remove the need of "deep packet inspection" to do fair traffic shaping and reassure the privacy concerns. For ISPs, such an "intelligent IP network" would enable a sound capacity management.

    Note that I do not caution any of the unfair tricks of US ISP that tend to favor their own content.
    Emmanuel

  25. self regulating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Surely many downloaders will know or soon realise that downloads are going to be slow and unreliable and will hold off downloading for a few days. I often find my ISP is slow at times and will try downloading a few hours later, I suspect the same will happen here.

    1. Re:self regulating by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      the thing is the really heavy downloaders tend to use automated downloading applications. If things slow down the automated apps don't care they just keep going slowly.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    2. Re:self regulating by neil-ngc · · Score: 1

      I think one thing that's being missed is the internet in Egypt isn't exactly speedy to begin with. Even small downloaders would be used to starting a download and leaving it for a long time.

  26. What if.... by NJVil · · Score: 1

    Downloading music and movies is your business, hmm?

    1. Re:What if.... by NeuralSpike · · Score: 1

      Or more appropriately, what if you download music and movies and you are all business?

  27. Re:Wednesday - MI5 complain ; Thursday - cables cu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Friday - I'm in love.

  28. Re:Wednesday - MI5 complain ; Thursday - cables cu by c6gunner · · Score: 1

    Ah, but you see, that's how the Zionist Space Lizards operate! That's why the 9/11 "truth" retards can, with a straight face, claim that the Project for a New American Century published a report containing their plans for global domination, as well as their intention to carry out the 9/11 attacks. Because, as we all know, the NWO always publish all their evil plans on the internet before they actually carry them out.

  29. lol by Shivetya · · Score: 1

    the day any of the world has common sense is the same day we don't read/hear about starvation and bombing.

    until keep living under the delusion that somewhere else is better than some other place

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
    1. Re:lol by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      the day any of the world has common sense is the same day we don't read/hear about starvation and bombing.
      So what you're saying is that if the newspapers had any common sense, they wouldn't write starvation and bombing? I don't know, man. Bad news sells!
  30. Do your bit by jlebrech · · Score: 0

    To help Egypt add their ip range to your blocklist for p2p.

  31. Compromise by MBHkewl · · Score: 1

    Why should those citizens who can often barely afford subscribing to the Internet, or have no means of reaching a better connection, compromise for businesses that can afford backup links? (Satellite anyone?)

    Reminds of how kings in the old lived: by having the poor suffer.

    --
    Mod points are a dangerous tool. Abuse them wisely.
    1. Re:Compromise by ps236 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Oh come on. How many companies anywhere in the world have a satellite link 'just in case'? Never mind the problem of being able to afford to actually use it.

      Most companies will have one DSL connection. Possibly they'll have an ISDN or second DSL available as backup - but that wouldn't help in this case. All that WOULD help would be a satellite link.

      The businesses could well be paying more for their Internet link than individuals anyway - we pay about 6 times more for our DSL than a 'home user' account costs. That gives us a lower contention ratio, plus a basic SLA.

      Even in the UK, if two of our transatlantic links were severed at the same time, things would slow to a crawl as data gets routed through Germany etc instead. I remember one failing not too long ago and it was very noticeable.

      Two out of three failing at the same time is an exceptional event so you can't really expect a developing country to have more than one redundant link available for their two normal ones. How would your region handle the case where **all** their 'normal' Internet links out of the region were severed and they had to fall back to their redundant links???

      They're not asking individuals to stop using the Internet at all, just to cut back on all the movie downloads. One movie download is a few hundred thousand emails after all (most of which will be spam..). Also, using the Internet within the country itself would not be a problem

    2. Re:Compromise by MBHkewl · · Score: 1

      I never said "stop", I said "comprommise."

      I live in Kuwait, so being part of those affected, ISPs here did the logical thing to do: Give priority to VIPs, then normal businesses, then let home-users scrape off the pool of bandwidth.
      On the first day, I was downloading some documents (PDF) at a constant rate of 1.7kB, suggesting that the ISP had capped the bandwidth. The next day, things got better as they have switched to redundant links.

      I'm glad I wasn't denied Internet access as a home-user, but rather temporarily crippled (downstream & upstream). I was to barely do some searches on Google, but accessing my GMail was not an option.

      So, even though I was downloading multimedia files, no one was affected, because I was capped anyway, which is NOT the case in Egypt (hence, the minister's request.)

      --
      Mod points are a dangerous tool. Abuse them wisely.
    3. Re:Compromise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pass a law to require the BitTorrent protocol be used for all image files. Share the bandwidth.

    4. Re:Compromise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, and how many companies satillite providers on the provider side are also currently offline?

    5. Re:Compromise by jdjbuffalo · · Score: 1

      How many companies anywhere in the world have a satellite link 'just in case'? Mine does. But that's not what you wanted to hear.

      Granted, my company is a really big and the Internet is a vital component...
      --
      We have four boxes with which to defend our freedom: the soap box, the ballot box, the jury box, and the cartridge box.
    6. Re:Compromise by MBHkewl · · Score: 1

      Regarding the satellite link, I meant that ISPs would have a backup satellite link, and companies would have signed in the contract to pay more for that sort of backup in case something went wrong.
      So, the company get fed from the satellite link from the ISP.

      --
      Mod points are a dangerous tool. Abuse them wisely.
    7. Re:Compromise by ps236 · · Score: 1

      Has your company done that? I don't know of any ISPs in the UK which have a 'satellite backup plan' you can sign into (you can get your own satellite link, but no one but big companies would even consider that). I doubt any in Europe or the USA would either. Maybe ISPs on islands would, but you just don't expect 2/3rds of a cables for a large chunk of the world to be cut at almost the same time.

  32. Backups not always efficient by CarpetShark · · Score: 1

    By definition, having a redundant backup system means inefficient use of systems. When there's an infinite demand, such as there is with bandwidth, this means there's no point in having backup links at the same high capacity. Instead, what you do is guarantee some minimum access and a good coping/recovery strategy. Seems that the good strategy is the part missing in this case.

  33. Yes by CarpetShark · · Score: 1

    Tuvalu was probably slashdotted a long time ago.

  34. Cut the spam, save the bandwidth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they'd turn off the spam bots over there, they'd have plenty of bandwidth to go around. I'm actually enjoying the 90%+ drop of spam in my inbox. I say, leave the lines off; nothing good (internet wise) comes out of that region anyway.

  35. Mentioned on the BBC World Service by terom · · Score: 1
    They mentioned this yesterday on the BBC World Service as well, roughly paraphrased:

    "The authorities there have called on private internet users to stop downloading videos and music, to leave bandwidth for business users"
    Quite an amusing thing to say.
  36. Re:In other news... by PatrickThomson · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I can't help but find it ironic you make a wank joke that depends on circumcision, about the egyptians. Because those guys just love israel.

    --
    I am one of many. My idea is not unique, nor do I expect my voice alone to sway you. I speak in a chorus of opinion.
  37. Cut Against Net Neutrality and "Piracy" by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1
    Maybe they were cut on purpose, but maybe not (only) for installing tapping equipment:

    People should know how to use the Internet because people who download music and films are going to affect businesses who have more important things to do.


    That argument will absolutely certainly be brought by the US telcos (especially AT&T) now demanding to set up gear that violates Network Neutrality, and that polices Internet content for "piracy". They'll claim it's only for an emergency like this one, when they must filter content to prioritize essential traffic.

    And then they'll find those emergencies happen all the time, so they can demand more subsidies to expand bandwidth. It's a neverending downward spiral with these corporate welfare monopolists.
    --

    --
    make install -not war

  38. Re:In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, both the Jews and Muslims mutilate their children.

  39. Re:Javascript renders slashdot unreadable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How is that redundant? In order to find that out, you need to disable javascript, play hide and seek for a tiny link in white text on a light grey background, then reload the page one more time using the old form. That link is not in the least redundant. You as a moderator however are.

  40. Re: Network neutrality again by Andrewkov · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Absolute power corrupts absolutely. True in politics, and bandwidth allocation. ISPs cannot be trusted to police Internet traffic.

  41. Re:Javascript renders slashdot unreadable by Nimsoft · · Score: 1

    As long as I'm logged in it looks pretty much identical, all messages displayed as nested, they way it should be :)

    (If I'm not I only get an annoying 25 messages and I have to keep clicking more before I can start reading else it's an imcomplete discussion, is that what the parent is referring to?)

  42. And distribute the key how? by professorguy · · Score: 1
    If every fiber is tapped, how do you propose to distribute the keys? Having a man in the middle means your encrypted communication is not safe.


    For now, I think you have to hand deliver any key you want to use. Not exactly convenient, but look at the lengths our enemies (i.e., our governments) will go to install men in the middle. We must be willing to go to lengths as well.

    1. Re:And distribute the key how? by Raenex · · Score: 1

      If every fiber is tapped, how do you propose to distribute the keys? Public-private key encryption.
  43. RESEARCH! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    This certainly isn't out of the question. If we really want to know what happened, some investigation/research will be necessary:

    What was the ship's name?
    Who owned it?
    Who was controlling it at the time?
    What interests are they looking to protect?

    is it reasonable for a ship's anchor to drag on the ground for 2+km? how many of these questions do you think can be answered with a few online searches?

  44. Re:These cables were cut on purpose - Terrorism? by the_povinator · · Score: 1

    Of course that's a wacky conspiracy theory. But what about terrorism? Now that a 3rd one has been cut, it does look less possible that it's just chance.

    --
    The .sig is dead, and I believe I had a hand in killing it.
  45. FOUR cables cut so far! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, first there were two cables cut (Alexandria, Egypt and Marseille, France):
    http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/31/business/worldbusiness/31cable.html?_r=1&ref=business&oref=slogin
    Then a third (link between UAE and Oman):
    http://mparent7777-2.blogspot.com/2008/02/third-undersea-internet-cable-cut-in.html
    Then a FOURTH cable (link between Suez and Sri Lanka)
    http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/third-undersea-cable-reportedly-cut/story.aspx?guid=%7B1AAB2A79-E983-4E0E-BC39-68A120DC16D9%7D

    Coincidence my a**!
    Middle East is basically cut from Internet, and we can enjoy only the officially sanctioned news from the mainstream. If something BIG is about to happen (remember, Iran is in Middle East too), then we cannot know what actually happens there (unless you believe what you are told by officials... which I don't).

  46. Re:Wednesday - MI5 complain ; Thursday - cables cu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    XD

    Brilliant.

  47. No WoW!!!!! by Professor+Fate · · Score: 1

    I thought patch Tuesday was bad. A week without the World of Warcraft could lead to some severe withdrawl issues. I know one mom who's kids suffer greatly when the servers are down. This is a humanitarian issue here!

    I can get use a phone instead of email or video conferencing. I can drive into the office instead of using a VPN. I could get my news from the cable folks. I can only play WoW over the internet.

    It's not up to the carriers or anyone else to decide who's internet usage is more important. Excluding online retailers, most 'business functions' on the internet are for convienece anyway, not necessity.

    --
    Push the button, Max!
  48. Business have more important things to do? by ghostbar38 · · Score: 0

    I'm not so sure... Most of this business could be downloading porn, but he may be right, porn may be more important than videos and music.

    --
    ghostbar page.
  49. Egypt Home Users No Longer Have Connectivity by MBHkewl · · Score: 1

    An Egyptian colleague today informaed me that home-users in Egypt have lost their connections and businesses are the only ones with connectivity, but at low speeds.

    --
    Mod points are a dangerous tool. Abuse them wisely.
  50. No. That's the point. by professorguy · · Score: 1
    No. That doesn't work and that's the point.


    If there's a man in the middle, I send you my public key. They intercept, store and replace with their own. The other end uses the MITM's key to encrypt, and the MITM can easily read it. They then re-encrypt with your stored key and no one's the wiser.

    Public key isn't safe when there's a man in the middle!

  51. Re:No. That's the point. by Raenex · · Score: 1

    Well you said "tapped", you didn't say "filtered". Public key encryption still helps in this regard, because you can publically broadcast your key in as many ways as possible. You can put it on a web page, call everybody you know on the phone, print advertisements in newspapers, etc. The man in the middle would have to be in the middle everywhere. You can also build up a "web of trust".