Slashdot Mirror


Robot Composed of "Catoms" Can Assume Any Form

philetus writes "An article in New Scientist describes a robotic system composed of swarms of electromagnetic modules capable of assuming almost any form that is being developed by the Claytronics Group at Carnegie Mellon. 'The grand goal is to create swarms of microscopic robots capable of morphing into virtually any form by clinging together. Seth Goldstein, who leads the research project at Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, in the US, admits this is still a distant prospect. However, his team is using simulations to develop control strategies for futuristic shape-shifting, or "claytronic", robots, which they are testing on small groups of more primitive, pocket-sized machines.'"

168 comments

  1. By Any Other Name by RobertNotBob · · Score: 5, Funny
    I, for one, welcome our new replicator Overlords.

    --
    ___ I don't respond to Anonymous Cowards, and I Never Mod them UP.
    1. Re:By Any Other Name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      was thinking same thing...

    2. Re:By Any Other Name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By any other name, it's also known as Chodenji Mashin Borutesu Faibu - Super Electromagnetic Machine Voltes V.

      Let's Volt In!

    3. Re:By Any Other Name by aled · · Score: 1

      we are doomed I tell you. Doomed.

      --

      "I think this line is mostly filler"
    4. Re:By Any Other Name by Pollardito · · Score: 3, Funny

      ...but i suggest to our future overlords that Voltronic is a much snappier name than claytronic

    5. Re:By Any Other Name by sempernoctis · · Score: 2, Informative

      I do feel compelled to note that every time something like this is developed in a movie or TV show, it ends up nearly killing everyone within the scope of the show. Stargate. Star Trek. Terminators 2 & 3. Hell, even Dr. Who had to stop them in the first season of the new series.

    6. Re:By Any Other Name by G-funk · · Score: 3, Funny

      And of all slashdot stories, *this* doesn't have "whatcouldgowrong"....

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
    7. Re:By Any Other Name by Marcos+Eliziario · · Score: 2, Funny

      Doomed? You, maybe.
      Me, being a trusted slashdot personality, am sure our new overlords will see how convenient to have someone like me at their side.
      I, for one, welcome our new t1000 overlords! Be their reign long and fruitful!

      --
      Your ad could be here!
    8. Re:By Any Other Name by dimeglio · · Score: 1

      ...and don't forget Lexx.

      --
      Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of the author.
    9. Re:By Any Other Name by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      Doomed? You, maybe.
      Me, being a trusted slashdot personality, am sure our new overlords will see how convenient to have someone like me at their side. Sure, I can see it from here :

      T1000 : Are those the slashdotters ? Right, sort yourself by karma ! ...
      T1000 : Quicksort please ! ...
      T1000 : T100, take the half at the back away for recycling.

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    10. Re:By Any Other Name by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Well, how boring would it be to have a peaceful and harmless civilization of self-replicating cubes in a TV show?

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    11. Re:By Any Other Name by Xaositecte · · Score: 1

      ...Or the Sylandro probes.

    12. Re:By Any Other Name by Lt.Hawkins · · Score: 1

      Wow. Nice reference, Pkunk.

      --
      -- My Sig is a P228.
  2. Tag by snl2587 · · Score: 3, Funny

    I suggest the tag "Prey", for all of you Michael Crichton fans.

    1. Re:Tag by MrSteveSD · · Score: 1

      I thought they were supposed to have been making that into a film.

    2. Re:Tag by pi415 · · Score: 1

      Except for the fact that prey bots can self-reproduce, are based on biotech, and evolve on their own! Doesn't seem like a good tag to me.

    3. Re:Tag by spun · · Score: 1

      How about "Christmasbush" for all the Robert Forward or Hans Moravec fans.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    4. Re:Tag by Hawkeye05 · · Score: 1

      They don't technically reproduce on their own, they need a host thats why they found that "nest" with the dead bodies. But Great book, and scary article i just by this becomes mainstream all homes have positive pressure.

      --
      Http://Stineomite.org (Yeah Thats Right I'm An Organization)
    5. Re:Tag by honestmonkey · · Score: 1

      All five of them thank you.

      --
      Everything you know is wrong, Just forget the words and sing along.
    6. Re:Tag by morcego · · Score: 1

      I suggest the tag "Prey", for all of you Michael Crichton fans.


      Why ? Aren't "greygoo" and "predprey" good enough ? :)
      --
      morcego
  3. Obvious comment by rakuen · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Transformers! Robots in disguise!

    1. Re:Obvious comment by cayenne8 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Maybe this is a prototype for the liquid metal T2000??

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    2. Re:Obvious comment by nysus · · Score: 1

      Aw, you beat me to it! Curse you, you are just as uncreative as me.

      --

      ---Technology will liberate us if it doesn't enslave us first.

    3. Re:Obvious comment by Zymergy · · Score: 1

      Actually, first thought was that of the robot 'SID v6.7' from "Virtuosity". http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0114857/

    4. Re:Obvious comment by B3ryllium · · Score: 1

      That was a fun movie :)

      I wish they would do a sequel ... imagine it with current-generation Denzel and Crowe, and some better writers? :)

    5. Re:Obvious comment by LuxMaker · · Score: 1

      or Transmorphers! Movies in disguise! Worst movie ever if you have not seen it.

      --
      I regret that I only have one mod point to give per post.
    6. Re:Obvious comment by clem · · Score: 1

      If by "Transmorphers" you mean "Alien vs. Predator: Requiem", I wholeheartedly agree.

      --
      Your courageous and selfless spelling corrections have made me a better person.
    7. Re:Obvious comment by colmore · · Score: 1

      And acting, they've both gone on to do great stuff (I personally don't understand why American Gangster wasn't higher on critics' lists), but sheesh.

      Seeing that movie with my dad when I was what... 12 or 13 is somehow a very distinct memory.

      --
      In Capitalist America, bank robs you!
  4. Emergence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Emergence is a lovely thing.

  5. Oh no, it's the Replicators! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like the Replicators from the "Stargate" TV series(es).

    1. Re:Oh no, it's the Replicators! by mabhatter654 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Asgard replicators or Ancient replicators?

      As long as they evolve into an evil robot Sam Carter!

  6. Any relation? by Debello · · Score: 2

    Any relation to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utility_fog utility foglets?

    1. Re:Any relation? by KublaiKhan · · Score: 1

      I could use a few of those, and the associated programmer...I can think of a lot of things I could use 'em for.

      --
      In Xanadu did Kubla Khan
      A stately pleasure dome decree
    2. Re:Any relation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're not nanobots... Much bigger.

  7. Replicators!!! by alta · · Score: 5, Funny

    Oh my goodness, those people obviously never watched stargate! They're making replicators! They are swarms of robots that can assume any form. The only way to stop them is for MacGuyver to stick his head in some ancient machine to gain their knowledge. Then he'll develope a super weapon that looks like a BFG3000 that will shoot waves at them causing them to disassociate with each other and fall to the ground like a pile of leggos. But that's only enough to stop a few of them, the REAL solution is to link all the stargates together at once (anyone seen baal?) and then send said 'waves of magical energy' through the one closest to T'ealc.

    Someone shoot them before they doom us all!!!

    --
    Do not meddle in the affairs of sysadmins, for they are subtle, and quick to anger.
    1. Re:Replicators!!! by grantek · · Score: 1

      ...and even [i]THAT[/i] didn't work (cf. Atlantis)

    2. Re:Replicators!!! by wizardforce · · Score: 2, Insightful

      either that or they end up using our "inferior" alloys instead of those fancy asguard alloys that don't rust. there's a reason they didn't compromise the hull integrity of that nuclear sub or the asguard ships. They are vulnerable to heat and apparently anything that damages the alloys they've used to make themselves out of.

      --
      Sigs are too short to say anything truly profound so read the above post instead.
    3. Re:Replicators!!! by grantek · · Score: 1

      Hmm, it appears the lolcatoms are upgrading my brain, and haven't got around to restoring the distinction between HTML and square-bracketed forum code :/

    4. Re:Replicators!!! by redtetrahedron · · Score: 1

      I think maybe someone watches too much Stargate... although the same thought did cross my mind, I don't think I could've come up with all the references in the series off the top of my head in four minutes...

    5. Re:Replicators!!! by JustOK · · Score: 1

      it's pronounced T'ealc

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    6. Re:Replicators!!! by Dachannien · · Score: 1

      It's all okay, though. On Atlantis, McKay can just reprogram them.

    7. Re:Replicators!!! by chord.wav · · Score: 1

      Great!! Now I don't need to watch it! You saved me what? 2 complete seasons? Thanks for saving my time man!!

      I can tell you about Lost to compensate you. The 3 full seasons.

      And no, I'm not being ironic, I truly and sincerely mean it.

    8. Re:Replicators!!! by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

      First Replicators and now Cybermen? WE'RE DOOOOMED!

    9. Re:Replicators!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Atlantis replicators were independently developed replicators to the Milkyway replicators in the plotline. Similar technlogy of course, but no reason weapons effective for one would be guaranteed effective for the others.

    10. Re:Replicators!!! by veganboyjosh · · Score: 1

      i can has zwix armey niphee, ducked tape, and gum rappr?

    11. Re:Replicators!!! by ArcherB · · Score: 1

      Oh my goodness, those people obviously never watched stargate! They're making replicators! They are swarms of robots that can assume any form. The only way to stop them is for MacGuyver to stick his head in some ancient machine to gain their knowledge. Then he'll develope a super weapon that looks like a BFG3000 that will shoot waves at them causing them to disassociate with each other and fall to the ground like a pile of leggos. But that's only enough to stop a few of them, the REAL solution is to link all the stargates together at once (anyone seen baal?) and then send said 'waves of magical energy' through the one closest to T'ealc.

      Someone shoot them before they doom us all!!! ...and even [i]THAT[/i] didn't work (cf. Atlantis) If they only had a deflector dish to reroute those waves through, it just might have worked!!

      --
      There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
    12. Re:Replicators!!! by wizardforce · · Score: 4, Informative

      it's about time someone had that point straight- milkyway replicators != Pegasus replicators! the first set basically destroyed the civilization that created reese who created the original replicators as "toys". the pegasus replicators however were created by the ancients to fight the wraith, later the ancients destroyed most but not all of their creation leaving the last surviving replicators to rebuild their "civilization" modeled after the ancients themselves with the exception being that they couldn't modify their own code [damned proprietary software!] and had a "nasty temper" rivaling that of the wraith. here's a more in depth explaination:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Replicator_(Stargate)

      --
      Sigs are too short to say anything truly profound so read the above post instead.
    13. Re:Replicators!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, I could have easily done that! But I would not have actually have done that, like the grandparent tried to do. A simple one-line replicator joke would have sufficed. Explaining it all in detail for those non-Stargate-watching readers took all the humour away.

    14. Re:Replicators!!! by Libertarian001 · · Score: 1

      Why are they doing Skynet's work? We really don't need a T1000 running around. Someone needs to tell these guys that "The Sarah Connor Chronicles" is not a reality show.

    15. Re:Replicators!!! by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

      the darn writers nearly screwed that logic up last episode though... they tried saying O'Neill got the Ancient idea because it was in the database left over from the Pegasus galaxy. OK that's believable. They got dangerously close to saying the Asgard "borrowed" that tech for their replicators. Grrr.

    16. Re:Replicators!!! by sempernoctis · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, I'm developing PWARWs in my basement :)

    17. Re:Replicators!!! by naoursla · · Score: 1

      But once you get machinery that small there ends up being a single optimal design. The original replicators encountered by SG-1 were primitive in comparison to the Pegasus replicators. But after modiyfing themselves for many thousands of years in the time dialation field, the Milky Way replicator hardware converged to the same design as the Pegasus replicators.

      As always, the hardware became commodity while the new and valuable changes occur in software.

    18. Re:Replicators!!! by meatspray · · Score: 1

      *stocks up on lantern batteries and large nails*

    19. Re:Replicators!!! by corsec67 · · Score: 1

      As always, the hardware became commodity while the new and valuable changes occur in software.


      And that would be why the x86 architecture has lasted for as long as it has.
      But, the AMD64 architecture is here, creating a gradual changeover from x86.
      --
      If I have nothing to hide, don't search me
    20. Re:Replicators!!! by jay-be-em · · Score: 1

      NERD ALERT

      --
      "Orthodoxy means not thinking--not needing to think. Orthodoxy is unconsciousness." --Eric Blair
    21. Re:Replicators!!! by psychicsword · · Score: 1

      Remember the replicators where originally developed by an android(who thought she was human) and was for protection. Then she lost control of them and all hell broke loose. So they arn't replicators yet but they are getting there.

    22. Re:Replicators!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh right because rather than getting laid you're posting on slashdot good point,

    23. Re:Replicators!!! by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      If they only had a deflector dish to reroute those waves through, it just might have worked!! Shouldn't they have reversed the polarity first ?

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
  8. Re:Awe gee-whiz... by eln · · Score: 5, Funny

    In Soviet Slashdot, tired meme jokes are in before YOU!

  9. And that's why... by martinQblank · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...The best part of being a Super Villian is the Doomsday devices!

    1. Re:And that's why... by CrazyJim1 · · Score: 1

      They could form into any shape. Maybe it could be both a doomsday device and villianess.

  10. It's the T-1000! by BillBrasky · · Score: 1

    Well, at least it can only form sharp, stabbing weapons. I just hope they're creating another robot to save us from it.

    1. Re:It's the T-1000! by ivanmarsh · · Score: 1

      Beat me to it.

      "Have you seen this boy?"

  11. mod parent insightful (no msg) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    lameness filter fodder here

  12. Terminator II here we come! by Jtmoney528 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Terminator II here we come!

    1. Re:Terminator II here we come! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hardly! T-1000 used a mimetic polyalloy - liquid metal to the layman - not nanobots.

  13. Catoms? by StCredZero · · Score: 5, Funny

    Oh Hai! I haz a covalent bond?

    1. Re:Catoms? by Dirtside · · Score: 4, Funny

      Nooo! Iz MAI lectron shell. I no share lectrons wit u.

      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    2. Re:Catoms? by PlatyPaul · · Score: 1

      Ur joke, it haz a flavr:

      Geek comedik fail!

      --
      Misery loves company. Online misery loves unsuspecting random strangers.
    3. Re:Catoms? by MP3Chuck · · Score: 2, Funny

      Noooo, dey be sharin' mah electrons!

    4. Re:Catoms? by LandDolphin · · Score: 1

      Haha, this gave me a good laugh.

      --
      Spelling and Grammar errors have been added to this post for your enjoyment
    5. Re:Catoms? by CptNerd · · Score: 4, Funny

      DO NOT WANT!

      --
      By the taping of my glasses, something geeky this way passes
    6. Re:Catoms? by westcoast+philly · · Score: 1

      Easy. just use DEAD cats. you can do whatever you want with them that way.

    7. Re:Catoms? by zennyboy · · Score: 1

      Miow! Atoms made from cats - excellent!

  14. Herds of Cat Robots! Cool! by billstewart · · Score: 2, Funny

    Herds of tiny cat robots? Cool - that'll go well with the Evil Laugh and the Monocle!

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  15. MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OK, now that's funny!

    1. Re:MOD PARENT UP by 4D6963 · · Score: 4, Funny

      OK, now that's funny!

      No it's not! You want funny? Here's funny : There's two hookers in a lift. One goes, "It smells like cum in here". The other one replies, "Oops sorry I just farted".

      Tada! Mod points please...

      --
      You just got troll'd!
  16. Just think of it by DreadfulGrape · · Score: 1

    Bisexuals could have a robotic, hermaphroditic sex partner.

    Yeah, I know, I'm a sick puppy.....

    --
    sig has been sent away for a few small repairs...
    1. Re:Just think of it by Boronx · · Score: 1

      If they are replicators, there's no reason not to have one of each sex.

  17. Thus proving creationism.... by Urger · · Score: 1

    Obviously Longcat created the universe using Catoms only for it to be corrupted by the evil Tacgnol.

  18. Shiver by umbrellasd · · Score: 1

    Anyone that has read Alistair Reynold's Revelation Ark sees a disaster coming with this little buggers.

    1. Re:Shiver by foniksonik · · Score: 1

      They are called the Inhibitors... but in his mythos they were created by a long dead race during the dawn wars, millions of years before humanity sprang up.... and whose purpose was to stop new life from becoming space-faring species...

      not that I read sci-fi books or anything ;-p

      --
      A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
  19. assuming almost any form by uniqueUser · · Score: 1

    capable of assuming almost any form that is being developed by the Claytronics Group at Carnegie Mellon
    How many forms are being developed by the Clatronics Group?
    --
    GENERATION 25: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation. Social exper
  20. For Christ sake... by chord.wav · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Don't welcome these overlords. We can cut that joke already don't we? I mean, it was fun at the beginning but not anymore.
    Thanks

    1. Re:For Christ sake... by ANCOVA · · Score: 1

      And with that settled, we can now welcome Jesus Christ the true overlord?

    2. Re:For Christ sake... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I, for one, welcome our tired-of-overlord-joke overlords.

    3. Re:For Christ sake... by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      Maybe evil Repli-Jesus.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
  21. Multi Meme Heaven by sam_paris · · Score: 4, Funny

    T-1000 Cat is watching you masturbate! >.

    1. Re:Multi Meme Heaven by rasputin465 · · Score: 1

      someone with mod points mod this guy up

    2. Re:Multi Meme Heaven by flyneye · · Score: 1

      Till kitty gets a taste of my EMP gun.
        Dammit,I will have privacy when I wax the dolphin.

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
  22. Nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As the tags to this story say, those are LOLcatoms.
    Not the same thing at all, really.

  23. pokey pokey by Stanistani · · Score: 4, Funny

    Wha... "claytronic" robots?

    I never foresaw that the machines that take over the world in the future would look like Gumby...

    1. Re:pokey pokey by Akira99ex · · Score: 1

      I ALWAYS knew Gumby was up to no good...

      --
      The greatest pleasure in life is doing what people say you cannot do.
  24. Not that impressive by moogied · · Score: 1

    Surely it would be a visually impressive sight. Other then that though, it would be worthless. The AI is simply not there to make it as we might think..

    --
    So basically, -1 troll/offtopic is really slashdots way of saying "I hate that you thought of something before me."
    1. Re:Not that impressive by Kazrath · · Score: 1

      It does not need to be an AI directly. You could make a reactive type repair system for things like boats/planes. Hole opens up in the hull and this makes an automated patch over it for the short term.

      There definitley could be many other uses for this technology down to the least useful: Artistic value.

    2. Re:Not that impressive by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

      Well none of the technology required is there yet to make this happen, isn't that why the researchers are working on it? Regardless, I think the AI is the last thing they need to worry about. Even dumb "catoms" would make for an incredible useful material.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    3. Re:Not that impressive by Marcos+Eliziario · · Score: 1

      You don't need too much inteligence to go out there on a killing spree. Quite the opposite, may I say.

      --
      Your ad could be here!
  25. Plague... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Just finishing the book "Plague Year", in which a cancer cure prototype made up of nano-machine instead become a self-replicating flesh eater. Take this article, and the earlier one about nano-tubes with cancer cures and...dang, I think I might be reading a book of prophecy. And thus ends another species...

    1. Re:Plague... by colmore · · Score: 2, Informative

      Whenever the self-directed technological apocalypse comes, be it army of soldier bots, self-aware ICBM control systems, nanocancer, servant droid rebellion, a world banking AI (that one is mine), or whatever, there's one thing we will not be able to say

      and that is "we didn't see this coming."

      Sci-fi has been predicting this for seventy years, and I'm starting to really believe that it might be on the list with satellites and lasers of stuff that's actually going to happen in our lifetimes.

      --
      In Capitalist America, bank robs you!
    2. Re:Plague... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      there's one thing we will not be able to say and that is "we didn't see this coming." Sci-fi has been predicting this for seventy years
      Sci Fi has also been predicting (among other things) flying cars, personal jetpacks and invasions by interstellar creatures running the gamut from iguanas to double-trunked elephants.
      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    3. Re:Plague... by cytg.net · · Score: 1

      And this is EXCATLY why we need backups.
      Name of first backup is Mars. Cannot happen fast enough.

    4. Re:Plague... by m_hemaly · · Score: 1

      a world banking AI A jewish AI? (ducks)
    5. Re:Plague... by colmore · · Score: 1

      Sure, but it's also predicted things that have happened.

      Thinking of our power relationship with technology as a random walk, we can win as much as we want and we're still destined to lose by basic mathematics. It's called the gambler's ruin.

      --
      In Capitalist America, bank robs you!
    6. Re:Plague... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Sure, but it's also predicted things that have happened.
      I don't know if you're joking or you don't grasp statistics.

      I can predict the toss of a coin perfectly if I'm allowed to make three predictions and choose among them later.
      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  26. Holographic Video, Batman! by commisaro · · Score: 3, Insightful

    One of the coolest potential applications of this is for Holographic-type communication. Perhaps not the 3D light-type display envisioned by Star-Wars and the like, but these could potentially mimic the form of someone for the purposes of communication. Also, games!

    1. Re:Holographic Video, Batman! by Akira99ex · · Score: 1

      Because nobody would abuse robots that could mimic humans.

      --
      The greatest pleasure in life is doing what people say you cannot do.
    2. Re:Holographic Video, Batman! by ANCOVA · · Score: 2, Funny

      I can't believe you didn't mention anything sex related.

    3. Re:Holographic Video, Batman! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What kind of games do you think he meant?

    4. Re:Holographic Video, Batman! by hkfczrqj · · Score: 1

      these could potentially mimic the form of someone for the purposes of communication Since this is /. , by communication you mean sex, right?
    5. Re:Holographic Video, Batman! by sempernoctis · · Score: 1

      Also, Uma Thurman

    6. Re:Holographic Video, Batman! by nanostuff · · Score: 1

      Yes, that's exactly what's going to happen, we will transmit visual information with billions of robots instead of stereoscopic video. Forget reading books, have your billions of robots assemble into textual information instead.

  27. I want... by www.sorehands.com · · Score: 2, Funny

    I will destroy the world unless you pay me $1,000,000^h^h^h^h^h^h^h^h^h^h^h0,000,000^h^h^h^h^h^h^h^h^h^h $10 billion dollars.

    1. Re:I want... by Marcos+Eliziario · · Score: 1

      Dear Dr.
      May I, as your humble financial advisior, sugest you to ask for euros? or (even better) gold?

      --
      Your ad could be here!
  28. Claymation by Dynedain · · Score: 2, Funny

    Unfortunately they'll only be able to make one incredibly small movement ever 6 hours or so.

    --
    I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
  29. Isaac Asimov's Robot City by ambulatorybird · · Score: 1

    This sounds a lot like the cellular morphing robot technology introduced in Isaac Asimov's Robot City (which predates Stargate by one or two decades, I believe).

    1. Re:Isaac Asimov's Robot City by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  30. Mercedes-Benz SilverFlow by jamrock · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This sounds like the clarketech* that the Mercedes-Benz SilverFlow concept has been waiting for. At the 2057 Robocar Design Challenge in Los Angeles last year (wherein car manufacturers touted concepts for cars 50 years from now), Mercedes showed off "SilverFlow", a shape-changing car that melts into a pool of liquid metal when not in use. The vehicle's shape would be tailored for different usage scenarios through programming, and the entire concept revolves around micro-particles that combine in varied ways. But is this really feasible though? I suppose that it's within the realms of possibility, but are there any serious deal-breakers that could derail this vision? Any thoughts?

    *From Arthur C. Clarke's well-known aphorism about sufficiently advanced technology being indistinguishable from magic, "clarketech" refers to tech so advanced that we don't know as yet how it would work. Love the term.

    1. Re:Mercedes-Benz SilverFlow by amRadioHed · · Score: 4, Funny

      Mercedes showed off "SilverFlow", a shape-changing car that melts into a pool of liquid metal when not in use. I used to have a Chevy that sorta did that. I mean not the shape-changing thing, but it did form a big pool of liquid wherever I parked it.
      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    2. Re:Mercedes-Benz SilverFlow by Bones3D_mac · · Score: 1

      Can you imagine a collision in one of these things? Say you're about to plow into a wall at 60mph, only just before it happens, the car suddenly goes liquid around you and creates a jelly-like crumple zone at the front, while the rest of the car reconfigures itself to push your body as far to the back as it can possibly go, before finally encasing you in a solid immobilization shell that self repairs any damage it takes until the energy of the impact has dispersed.

      Kinda makes the foam filling car from Demolition Man seem childish by comparison...

      --


      8==8 Bones 8==8
  31. Electromagnetic modules? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Invisible force!

  32. specialization beats generalization every time by Quadraginta · · Score: 1

    The evidence from living systems is that you get more success designing several specialized but simple and robust systems than one generalized but complex and fragile system.

    Come to think of it, this is the lesson most people seem to have drawn about robotics, too. Maybe even for electronics, inasmuch as we're increasingly seeing people get a collection of specialized consumer electronics (MP3 player, PDA or smart phone) rather than try to program their microcomputer to do it all.

    Apparently it's so dazzling a prospect constructing a system that can Do Anything that folks routinely overlook the fact that in the real world the ability to Do Anything slowly, unreliably and expensively loses routinely to a small collection of abilities to Do Something quickly, reliably, and cheaply.

  33. Well duh, this is /. by hermit_tries_virtual · · Score: 1
    The general thought processes are as follows:

    Paranoia,bad quotes, lazy humor, bad tagging, trolling,THEN sex, and finally, reading the article....

  34. don't worry about Prey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sure they weren't stupid enough to involve e. coli in the manufacturing process......

  35. Legobot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, this might be better than Lego. *drool* When can I buy it in stores?

  36. Replicators != Comedians, SID 6.7 = Comedian by kalieaire · · Score: 1

    The Replicator Overlords maybe powerful, But SID 6.7 can at least tell you a joke before you die.

  37. Their critical weakness by shindrak · · Score: 1

    At least everyone will already know how to deal with them if they go bonkers. All you need to do is have your bodyguard T-101 freeze them with liquid nitrogen, shatter them, and then drop them into a vat of molten steel. What could be easier?

  38. Catoms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    How in the hell do they expect to build anything out of Catoms? Ever try to herd Cats? Trying to build anything orderly out of them would be impossible.

  39. I'm left unimpressed by r_jensen11 · · Score: 1

    Until they can replicate Scarlet Johanson or Natalie Portman, it sounds pretty worthless to me.

  40. In your dreams... by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Terminator II here we come!

    Well, we'd need two types of nanobots, or give them a double function: One type can bend and expand like a muscle cell to provide mobility. The other type needs to function as a skeleton (exo or endo, you choose).
    How will you supply the energy to nanobots? And how is that energy going to be transmitted to different parts of the body? How will it be stored? And if it's in the form of liquid, you'll need blood vessels too. Also, if the design of the form that you're going to emulate isn't well thought, you could end up wasting LOTS of energy in moving the robot (and guess where that energy will go? Then we come to the subject of overheat prevention. You're gonna need a very good ventilation system. And the list could go on and on...

  41. Resistance... by arizwebfoot · · Score: 1

    Is Futile!

    --
    Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy.
  42. Yay! Tomorrow is CATURDAY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
  43. Catoms, schmatoms by Swampash · · Score: 1

    They're obviously "Trillions".

  44. Anyone else reminded by Velocir · · Score: 1

    of Clayfighters? That was an awesome game :)

    1. Re:Anyone else reminded by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      In fact, I was. I think I can even remember the title song.

      Clayfighter, Clay-Clayfighter... Okay, that's about as far as I get. Still, great game.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
  45. lul wut? by Philomathie · · Score: 1

    Robot Composed of "Catoms" Can Assume Any Form Composed of "Catoms" Can "Catoms" Cat ... Mrowl :3

  46. AHH!! Its the Terminator! by anexkahn · · Score: 1
    --
    Curious about Storage and Virtualization? Check out
  47. Your post is disproved by its own existence :) by Non-Huffable+Kitten · · Score: 1

    the ability to Do Anything slowly, unreliably and expensively that's a pretty good description of conscious thought as opposed to instincts. Seems like the former turned out to be not so useless after all ;)

    Disclaimer: Yes, the human brain is specialized, but much less than that of most animals.
    --
    Medium cat is MEDIUM.
    1. Re:Your post is disproved by its own existence :) by Quadraginta · · Score: 1

      Seems like the former turned out to be not so useless after all ;)

      Well, first of all -- has it? What's the evidence that conscious thought has powerful survival potential? Human beings have been successful for a mere 50,000 to 100,000 years, and eyeblink on the time scales of evolution. Cockroaches and crocodiles have every right to regard us as Johnny-come-latelies who might yet blow themselves to smithereens and disappear, proving consciousness to be the Betamax or 8-track tape of the biological world, an idea that seemed clever at the time.

      Secondly, I don't actually agree that consciousness is designed as a general ability engine. It functions that way, yes, but only very, very slowly and inefficiently compared to all its other functions. Just look at how long it takes us to consciously solve a quadratic equation, compared to the speed (milliseconds) within which we can solve it unconsciously -- by putting our hand in the right place to catch a thrown baseball.

      My suspicion is that general-purpose conscious reasoning is a weird accidental by-product of something (consciousness) which was designed for entirely different purposes. It's like using your feet to paint, or your teeth to open jars. It's certainly not without its uses and pleasures, but it's not at all obvious that it has been a major force in human success, and still less obvious whether it will, ultimately, prove a decisive advantage over other animals that lack it.

    2. Re:Your post is disproved by its own existence :) by Non-Huffable+Kitten · · Score: 1

      Well, first of all -- has it? What's the evidence that conscious thought has powerful survival potential? Human beings have been successful for a mere 50,000 to 100,000 years, and eyeblink on the time scales of evolution. Cockroaches and crocodiles have every right to regard us as Johnny-come-latelies who might yet blow themselves to smithereens and disappear, proving consciousness to be the Betamax or 8-track tape of the biological world, an idea that seemed clever at the time.

      I think all but the most ardent relativists would agree that human consciousness has already proved to be a very large influence on the world. Whether we'll misuse that power to off ourselves is another question (IMHO we probably won't).

      Secondly, I don't actually agree that consciousness is designed as a general ability engine. It functions that way, yes, but only very, very slowly and inefficiently compared to all its other functions. Just look at how long it takes us to consciously solve a quadratic equation, compared to the speed (milliseconds) within which we can solve it unconsciously -- by putting our hand in the right place to catch a thrown baseball.

      Well, that's comparing quite different things. Consciously solving the equation comes with this nice extra feature of reflection, which leads to developing more advanced algebra. On the other side, when catching a ball I wouldn't say that you're solving a mathematical problem - your brain is just performing an activity that can be described on a more abstract level with quadratic equations. The map is not the territory.

      Yes, conscious thought may be slow, but actually I'm amazed at our ability to develop powerful intuitions on things most removed from our prehistoric origins (theoretical science, programming, ...).

      My suspicion is that general-purpose conscious reasoning is a weird accidental by-product of something (consciousness) which was designed for entirely different purposes.

      I don't really know the evidence in detail. But one major adaptive use of consciousness is the ability to predict (e.g. the behaviour of others). This would seem to require an internal model of the world, which is already getting pretty close to "consciousness".

      --
      Medium cat is MEDIUM.
    3. Re:Your post is disproved by its own existence :) by Quadraginta · · Score: 1

      I think all but the most ardent relativists would agree that human consciousness has already proved to be a very large influence on the world

      Mmmm, no. First of all, do not conflate conscious action with all human action. We do a great deal from instinct, and use our conscious reasoning powers to rationalize it afterward. For example, it's unlikely any significant part of our sexual behaviour derives from conscious reflection, and our sexual instincts and drives underly a great deal of our general behaviour. Without doubt, human beings have had a huge influence on the world. But has their consciousness? Open to question.

      Secondly, I was not talking about our "success" in terms of how much we modify Earth over the short term, but by whether we persist as a species for the average time, say about 10 million years. If we do not, and the reason is something arising from conscious behaviour, then consciousness, whether or not it has a strong "transient" effect on the Earth (an effect lasting a mere 10,000 years) is not a successful evolutionary strategy. Averaging over the length of time which life exists on this planet, our species could reasonably be ignored by an alien biologist as a short-lived meaningless fluctuation.

      Consciously solving the equation comes with this nice extra feature of reflection, which leads to developing more advanced algebra.

      I don't think so. Reflection is perfectly capable of operating on behaviour that is not conscious at all. Leonardo can reflect on the flight of birds and derive insight into aerodynamics. Freud could reflect on the unconscious behaviour of himself and of his patients and, well, come up with the idea of the unconscious. That is, the solution of problems and reflection on the solutions to problems are two different things, not necessarily connected.

      when catching a ball I wouldn't say that you're solving a mathematical problem

      I think your distinction is philosophical hair-splitting. By the same logic, one would argue that a computer algebra program isn't "solving" the equation either, because it's just "performing an activity" [pushing electrons around] "that can be described on a more abstract level as solving a quadratic equation," and furthermore because it isn't capable of reflecting on the result. But this seems a little specious to me. The reductio ad absurdum of this position is that any "solving" that isn't, at every step, conscious, isn't solving at all. What is the role then of the intuitive guesses (or unconscious reasoning) that plays so large a role in the discoveries of the greatest of mathematicians and scientists?

      But one major adaptive use of consciousness is the ability to predict

      Surely not. Pretty much all animals much above the level of insects can do that, and I hope you wouldn't argue that they're all conscious. Dogs, for example, can often predict the behaviour of humans they know very well.

      You might argue that consciousness gives us the ability to predict more complex and abstract phenomena than lower animals can. To some extent, this is undoubtably true: only we can predict the consequences of the equations of general relativity, and the ability to do things like that is the greatest triumph of conscious reasoning. But it is undoubtably also very slow and inefficient. It takes years of study to even be able to start.

  48. Wormhole Extreme by naoursla · · Score: 1

    Can we just give up the game, please? This is obviously an advance introduction of the replicator technology gathered from the off-world explorations of our "stargate" program. Yes, just like SG-1 which was produced to created "plausible deniability" in case information leaked.

    Yes, I realize that was a plot on one of the shows -- creating a show about the "real" stargate program, but that plotline was only created to create "plausible deniability" in case information about the real effort to create plausible deniability was ever leaked.

    And do I even need to mention that doing replicator research on Earth is a really bad idea. It isn't even that great of an idea if you do it off-world. Seriously, entire civilizations have been destroyed messing with this stuff.

    1. Re:Wormhole Extreme by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please remain where you are. The Government is sending stormtr...professionals to take you to Guantan...a medical facility for punish...re-education.

  49. Sladek's "Mechasm" by pohlman0 · · Score: 1

    aka "The Reproductive System" ... I used to think it was a funny book until I saw this. His wasn't the first use of this idea but it's still my favorite.

  50. Just a word of warning by kcbanner · · Score: 1

    Some folks I know had encounters with a similar device, you might learn from their...adventures. Fortunately I was able to combat the devices quite easily. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Replicator_(Stargate). Just thought I'd let you guys know.

    -Rodney McKay

    --
    Obligatory blog plug: http://www.caseybanner.ca/
  51. Awesome! by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

    Now I can finally punch people in the face over the phone!

    --
    USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
  52. Smartwheels? by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

    This could allow new kinds of wheels - I'm thinking of the smartwheels from Snow Crash. Depending on how fast the stuff moves one could even coat the entire underside of a car in it and have the car move by rippling it to the back, being in contact with the ground across the entire floor. It would essentially work like a combination between Sargeant Schlock and The Luggage.

    (Three entirely different pop culture references in one post. Way to go making myself ununderstandable...)

    --
    USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    1. Re:Smartwheels? by jamrock · · Score: 1

      Your concept was called the "Slugdrive" some years ago; they postulated a cruising speed of 300 mph or thereabouts. Forget where I read about it. And I got two of your three pop culture references, by the way. I loved the idea of the smartwheels in "Snow Crash" and I'm a huge fan of Schlock Mercenary (does it go without saying that I'm in love Dr. Bunnigus?); but what was "The Luggage"?

    2. Re:Smartwheels? by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      A minor character/object/psychopathic murderer from Terry Pratchett's Discworld novels. Effectively a living chest with dozens of small, pink feet. Very protective of its owner, to the point of eating anyone who threatens him. Wikipedia has a rather exhaustive article.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
  53. I worked on this. by JimXugle · · Score: 1

    I worked on this with Seth through Prof. Rudich's Andrew's leap program last summer. Interesting stuff. Sure, what my group and I were working on wasn't exactly nanotechnology (in fact, we were working with balloon-based models over 1m cubed, one of which I still have), but hopefully some of the data that was collected will ultimately help produce catoms on a more useful scale. Weather I'll see catoms in my life is debatable, but it's still an interesting field to explore.

    --
    -jX

    Don't you just love politics? It's like a comedy of errors.
  54. Reminds me of a GURPS game I ran by Datamonstar · · Score: 1

    ... which involved a shape-shifting cyborg sex-tox that had been retro-fitted reprogrammed with combat AI and arms and was composed of smart dust that could formed an indefinite amount of shapes around a centralized core CPU. She was a piece of ass that could kick ass.

    --
    The eternal struggle of good vs. evil begins within one's self.
    1. Re:Reminds me of a GURPS game I ran by sapphire+wyvern · · Score: 1

      That simultaneously encapsulates everything awesome and awful about GURPS.

  55. How will power be provided? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will the micro-bots have micro-batteries? What happens when they run out?

    1. Re:How will power be provided? by Lewrker · · Score: 0

      For every micro-node we provide you with a wonderful offer of $80 a year for iVil Overlord Insurance.

  56. I gaev u electron by davidwr · · Score: 3, Funny

    Cation sez:

    I gaev u electron.

    Wut moar u wants?

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  57. I, for one, welcome our teenage robot guardian! by Chris+Tucker · · Score: 0
    --
    Guaranteed! This comment 100% Anthrax free!
  58. OK.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But, I also want sharks with laser beams.

  59. A day at lunch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    *Picks up his sandwich of the plate and takes a bite*
    *billions of microscopic robots begin to alter their form breaking away from the shape of a sandwich*
    *they cover his face in a matter of milliseconds, his body writhing in pain as he falls backwards on his chair kicking and screaming*
    *carefully they dissect him atom by atom and build more of themselves, retaining his form*
    *he goes back to work as if nothing happened and lays a piece of gum still in the wrapper on the table*

    who will be next.

    ya good idea guys.... wait till this falls into the wrong hands

  60. ESD by Nullav · · Score: 1

    I don't think I'd want to be made out of these nanobots. Just imagine what it would be like to lose an arm in mid-handshake.

    --
    I just read Slashdot for the articles.
  61. Porn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No comments about the porn possibilities? Is this Slashdot?

  62. Batteries will save us by sensationull · · Score: 1

    It ok, one thing will save us all from the onslaught of terminator style robots. Batteries not included, we cant even make independent walking robots that don't require external power to last for any real amount of time. Our crappy battery technology will save us all.

    1. Re:Batteries will save us by d+cobalt · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah the same thing happened in the matrix, wait...

  63. Thanks for the nightmare, guys by smchris · · Score: 1

    As if people didn't have enough on their plates worrying about the rats and boa constrictors coming up their toilets.

  64. Robot law by Benjamin_Wright · · Score: 1

    As robots come to pervade our society, legal issues will arise. Legal agreements will be one tool for regulating robot bad behavior or unwanted spying.

    --
    Benjamin Wright, Dallas, Texas, benjaminwright.us
  65. You know what this means? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Transformerrrrs...

  66. Pittsburgh by drwho · · Score: 1

    "...he research project at Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, in the US..." - I am very glad that the poster clarified which Pittsburgh CMU was in. The uninformed person, who might not have known where CMU was located and would therefore have to reason out whether this was a Pittsburgh in the USA, the one in Japan, in Mali, or the one in Germany (The German city is a suburb of Cheeseburgh)

    The question is, which Pittsburgh is it located in, in the US?

  67. It it can look like... by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

    ...Summer Glau, I for one welcome our new hottie killbot overlords.

    --
    Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!