Slashdot Mirror


Diebold Leaks 2008 Election Results

samzenpus writes "With all the scrutiny that Diebold has received in past few years you'd think that they would be more careful but apparently due to a malfunction in some machines, they have leaked the results to the 2008 presidential race early. Hopefully this will be the nail in Diebold's coffin. Surely we have another company in this country that can run a sham election better."

196 comments

  1. end of the internet by Fusen · · Score: 5, Funny

    Wow, embedding a flash movie directly on slashdot. Considering 90% don't RTFA this is going to be the worst /.ing that's ever happened!

    1. Re:end of the internet by Firehed · · Score: 1

      Must I append "WTFVITS"* to my sig?

      *watch the effing video in the summary, of course.

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    2. Re:end of the internet by Skuldo · · Score: 1, Informative

      You're posting on the politics site..

    3. Re:end of the internet by PReDiToR · · Score: 1, Funny

      Oh, that greyed out box with the NoScript logo is a Flash movie?
      Glad it got caught by NoScript rather than FlashBlock!
      Yet, I wonder. Would AdBlock Plus have caught it if those two were disabled?

      --

      Do not meddle in the affairs of geeks for they are subtle and quick to anger
    4. Re:end of the internet by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Or, not. Cause, you know, it's not an ad. And it doesn't auto-play, so it's not hurting anyone.

      I swear, some people miss no opportunity to smugly mention their ad-blocker.

      --
      "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
    5. Re:end of the internet by orclevegam · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I swear, some people miss no opportunity to smugly mention their ad-blocker. I don't use an ad-blocker, I use a flash-blocker. The fact that it sometimes catches ads is just a bonus.
      --
      Curiosity was framed, Ignorance killed the cat.
    6. Re:end of the internet by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "What Flash? Oh, you must mean the one I just blocked. Make your ad blocker of choice block this..."

      I don't have to use the adblocker.

      They don't allow Flash here at work. It is a bummer....keeps us out of other sites too.

      :-(

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    7. Re:end of the internet by Fast+Thick+Pants · · Score: 1

      Nope... not with the standard EasyList filter subscription, anyway.

    8. Re:end of the internet by DirtyHerring · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They don't allow Flash here at work. It is a bummer....keeps us out of other sites too.

      Where do you work? Smart decision makers there.

    9. Re:end of the internet by tverbeek · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure that electronic voting involves technology.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    10. Re:end of the internet by thomas.galvin · · Score: 1, Insightful

      More to the point, why does Slashdot seem to be joining the whole "audio and video" trend? I had hopped that we were still a fairly literate group of people... if I want video and pics, I'll go to digg. I come here to read.

    11. Re:end of the internet by v1k · · Score: 5, Funny

      Adobe.

    12. Re:end of the internet by Angostura · · Score: 1

      I don't use an ad-blocker, I use a flash-blocker.


      Hmmm, you say that as if it were a good thing.
    13. Re:end of the internet by kalirion · · Score: 4, Funny

      No-Script works well enough for me.

    14. Re:end of the internet by TheVelvetFlamebait · · Score: 3, Funny

      I had hopped that we were still a fairly literate group of people
      Yeah, I had hopped over that hurdle two.

      OK, sorry guys, that was just lame...
      --
      You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
    15. Re:end of the internet by pebs · · Score: 1

      Wow, embedding a flash movie directly on slashdot. Considering 90% don't RTFA this is going to be the worst /.ing that's ever happened!

      What Slashdotter doesn't at least use Flashblock if not Adblock and NoScript?

      --
      #!/
    16. Re:end of the internet by Vicarius · · Score: 2, Funny

      More to the point, why does Slashdot seem to be joining the whole "audio and video" trend? I had hopped that we were still a fairly literate group of people... if I want video and pics, I'll go to digg. I come here to read. I would prefer a transcript of a video, than watching a silent show. Yes, I'm like most of you wasting my time at work and don't want to be caught by enabling audio on my workstation.
    17. Re:end of the internet by cmacb · · Score: 1

      Pls post as podcast, u use 2 big words.

    18. Re:end of the internet by mhall119 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs? Prefetch?
      --
      http://www.mhall119.com
    19. Re:end of the internet by mhall119 · · Score: 5, Funny

      I swear, some people miss no opportunity to smugly mention their ad-blocker. What smug comment? Oh, that's right, I don't see them because I use the Smug-Block extension.
      --
      http://www.mhall119.com
    20. Re:end of the internet by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      I swear, some people miss no opportunity to smugly mention their ad-blocker.

      You mean like those people who don't own a television and find ways of working it into unrelated conversations.
    21. Re:end of the internet by veganboyjosh · · Score: 4, Funny

      I don't own a single television.

      I own three.

    22. Re:end of the internet by tweek · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not sure if you're being sarcastic or not but from a pure time wasting and proactive security standpoint, it makes perfect sense. I can't think of one site that uses flash for something that is actually productive or necessary to most core business functions. Sounds like an easy way to block the myriad video sites that pop up left and right.

      --
      "Fighting the underpants gnomes since 1998!" "Bruce Schneier knows the state of schroedinger's cat"
    23. Re:end of the internet by cleatsupkeep · · Score: 1

      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?

      My guess was always that it wasn't /. itself, but for a site to be on /., it must be at least somewhat popular and on other news sites (I can think of countless times I've read stories before there were posted here), and this is what can bring a server down.
    24. Re:end of the internet by KillerBob · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not sure if you're being sarcastic or not but from a pure time wasting and proactive security standpoint, it makes perfect sense. I can't think of one site that uses flash for something that is actually productive or necessary to most core business functions. Sounds like an easy way to block the myriad video sites that pop up left and right.


      Been to http://www.dell.com/ lately? Or any other vendor, for that matter? Sure, the site can be done without flash... but in a business where people make buying decisions based on how something is presented, with bonus points for being "sexy", having something like well-designed and well-implemented Flash applet on the website can make a *huge* difference to your bottom line.

      You're making the mistake of thinking like an engineer, not a consumer.
      --
      If you believe everything you read, you'd better not read. - Japanese proverb
    25. Re:end of the internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      What?! Where did my comment go?!

    26. Re:end of the internet by Imsdal · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'm not so sure that's the case when Diebold is invlved.

    27. Re:end of the internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The premise of the submission is that people RTFA, or at least want to RTFA. (Let's not argue the premise, ok? :-) The purpose of the submission is to get /. readers to disable their blockers. If /. starts running things-that-look-like-ads-but-aren't as its content, then readers end up having to make a choice. Apparently Taco has just made a guess as to what the most popular choice will be.

    28. Re:end of the internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Prefetch only works on links specially flagged as prefetchable. If you had set your browser to ask you about accepting cookies, you may have noticed that only some pages of google search results will ask you about setting a cookie for the first result, because the prefetching flag is only set if google considers it to be very likely that you will actually visit that page.

    29. Re:end of the internet by Rosy+At+Random · · Score: 1

      I don't own a TV, and I don't miss a thing.

      I just use my landlord's.

      --
      Would you like a slice of toast?
    30. Re:end of the internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Noscript: Temporarily allow [this that and the others]...

      what in gods name to i have to "Temporarily allow", or is this slashdotted?

    31. Re:end of the internet by Itninja · · Score: 1

      NoScript stopped the video, but didn't remove the giant yellow placeholder. I use both ad blocker & noscript it enjoy a ad-free Internet (almost)

      --
      I judt got a nre Kinesis keybiartf so please excusr ant egregiou typos.
    32. Re:end of the internet by unitron · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah, I had hopped over that hurdle two.

      How'd you do with hurdles one and three?

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    33. Re:end of the internet by Phurge · · Score: 1

      for this article do you even need to view the video? All I needed was to see the topic " Diebold Leaks 2008 Election Results" and the source - The Onion, to raise a couple of chuckles.

      --
      I'll see your hokum and raise you a boondoggle.
    34. Re:end of the internet by linguizic · · Score: 1

      I don't own three televisions, I own one that's bright enough to be seen through any wall in my house.

      --
      Does this sig remind you of Agatha Christie?
    35. Re:end of the internet by wvmarle · · Score: 2, Funny

      I don't own a single television. Same for me. Mine is married.

      Wouter.
    36. Re:end of the internet by Martin+Blank · · Score: 1

      I don't, but I also don't have Flash installed in Firefox at all. For those times when I simply must use Flash, I open IE, use the site, and close it.

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    37. Re:end of the internet by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      No, he's right. As a business owner, you wouldn't want your people basing purchasing decision based off of flashy presentations. Dell.com can use the flash for regular people but in a business world, it is typically the same waste which is why you can get around without flash at their site.

      Your confusing consumer needs with business needs. They were talking about blocking flash at work and flash not serving any "necessary to most core business functions". I don't think he is saying get rid of flash for everyone everywhere. Although it would be nice if that was possible.

    38. Re:end of the internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The internet entertains our phone staff. Without it to distract them between calls they would probably go nuts. It is a key to morale. A lot of people play yahoo games or something similar. My personal view is if they aren't playing a game that is time sensitive, making them ignore the phone, it is all good.

    39. Re:end of the internet by Meski · · Score: 1

      Sigh. See foot.

    40. Re:end of the internet by RobNich · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, Grand Central uses Flash for just about everything, from listening to voicemails to placing a call. And it's a damned shame, because it would be so much better without the Flash.

      --
      Hello little man. I will destroy you!
    41. Re:end of the internet by SeaFox · · Score: 5, Funny

      I just use my landlord's.

      You know she prefers you call her mom like you did when you were little.
    42. Re:end of the internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If your phone counselors are sitting around bored, your call center is overstaffed.

    43. Re:end of the internet by jafuser · · Score: 1

      Maybe Smug-Block could be an add-on for StupidFilter. =)

      --
      Please consider making an automatic monthly recurring donation to the EFF
    44. Re:end of the internet by jeephistorian · · Score: 1

      Was doing fine until hurdle six when I has to stop because seven eight nine! Sheesh....

      --
      Huh?
  2. And this isn't in idle...why? by Volante3192 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Funny, probably, but does it really belong in what's supposed to be a serious section?

    1. Re:And this isn't in idle...why? by dal20402 · · Score: 1

      I had no idea Sam the Eagle had the computer skills to not just post, but login to, /. . Congratulations, birdbrain.

    2. Re:And this isn't in idle...why? by pembo13 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think we would first have to argue if Politics (at least this specific form of politics) can really be considered serious in the first place.

      --
      "Thanks for all the money you paid to us. We've used it to buy off ISO among other things" -Microsoft
    3. Re:And this isn't in idle...why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny, probably,
      Spoken like a true Nerd.
    4. Re:And this isn't in idle...why? by Maxmin · · Score: 1

      Because it's April F ... uh, nevermind.

      --
      O lord, bless this thy holy hand grenade, that with it thou mayest blow thine enemies to tiny bits, in thy mercy.
    5. Re:And this isn't in idle...why? by Threni · · Score: 1

      This is Slashdot - what do you expect? Someone should do a story about the amount of crap they've fallen for here over the years.

    6. Re:And this isn't in idle...why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, it's serious. It's just not taken seriously.

  3. Thats bad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    With the votes leaked the raw data is out...so there was no time to apply "democracy" to the data.
    This way if X won...u cant say it was because there was inner agreement and tempered data.

  4. Yum by DoubleDownOnEleven · · Score: 0, Redundant

    A deliciously onion-y story.
    Damn, they got me too. I was calling my co-workers over to see the latest Diebold mistake :(.

  5. Since when was this Digg? by Stuart+Gibson · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I didn't realise /. had started posting links to things the submitter happened to find amusing today.

    --
    It's all fun and games until a 200' robot dinosaur shows up and trashes Neo-Tokyo... Again
    1. Re:Since when was this Digg? by djupedal · · Score: 1

      ./ has successfully climbed out of the social toilet and firmly landed in business sector muck - how common.

    2. Re:Since when was this Digg? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since about 2002.

      You must be new here.

    3. Re:Since when was this Digg? by LarsWestergren · · Score: 4, Informative

      I didn't realise /. had started posting links to things the submitter happened to find amusing today.

      Then you honestly can't have been here very long. The foot icon appears at least a couple of times a week on the frontpage and indicates a "funny" story submission. If it displeases you, you can filter away these stories in your preferences.

      --

      Being bitter is drinking poison and hoping someone else will die

    4. Re:Since when was this Digg? by crossmr · · Score: 5, Funny

      Ron paul 2008!!! digg me down haters!!!

    5. Re:Since when was this Digg? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree, /. is serious business. :)

    6. Re:Since when was this Digg? by MC+Negro · · Score: 1

      I didn't realise /. had started posting links to things the submitter happened to find amusing today. I'm not quite ready to call this Digg until I see at least THREE separate marijuana legalization stories in the RSS feed, each sandwiched between a Ron Pa,er,Obama-worship/Hillary-bashing article, and every other post calling America a fascist police state.

      Seriously though - I'm not crazy about this embedded video business. I hope this isn't a trend Slashdot embraces.
      --
      "You and your third dimension."
    7. Re:Since when was this Digg? by ultranova · · Score: 4, Insightful

      every other post calling America a fascist police state.

      Yeah, it annoys me too. America is not a fascist police state; America is a plutocratic police state. The difference is that under fascism, economy booms, while under plutocracy, economy goes kaboom.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    8. Re:Since when was this Digg? by Stuart+Gibson · · Score: 0, Troll

      Not as long as some with 4 digit UIDs but enough years and enough karma to burn to know amusing stories show up but they are amusing REAL stories. It's a small step from this to amusing-crap-found-on-youtube. I spend more time on Digg these days because of the higher turnover rate for stories, but I stay with /. because it promotes real stories of real news and promotes real discussion. This example, however, was blatant ego spamming by an editor.

      --
      It's all fun and games until a 200' robot dinosaur shows up and trashes Neo-Tokyo... Again
    9. Re:Since when was this Digg? by brkello · · Score: 1

      I am really guessing all of you people posting negatively got fooled by the article despite the giant foot and the fact that it doesn't even make sense. We have funny mods here, so I don't know why people can't relax and have a sense of humor about an article here or there. It is easy to filter these out. And of all things you felt the need to post. Go make your own site where pretentious jerks can look down on other sites and squash anything humorous before it makes someone smile.

      --
      Support a great indie game: http://www.abaddon360.com
    10. Re:Since when was this Digg? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Funny" doesn't displease me. The fact that the story appears genuine, apart from the small foot icon, does. I mean, the track record of both Diebold and the US electoral system doesn't make it entirely unlikely that something like this could have happened. The story borders between satire and shouting fire in a crowded theater.

    11. Re:Since when was this Digg? by jc42 · · Score: 1

      I didn't realise /. had started posting links to things the submitter happened to find amusing today.

      Then you haven't been paying very good attention. I've been reading /. for several years now, and when I first stumbled across it, there were articles labelled "It's funny, laugh!". Go back and look in the archives. The editors here have always had a sense of humor.

      Of course, you can always filter out the humor, if you prefer. Several others have explained how to do it, so I won't repeat their explanations.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    12. Re:Since when was this Digg? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh christ, please *please* go back to Digg. I thought all the fuckwits had already left, but apparently a few are a still hanging around. Go. GO!

  6. It's asinine to post Onion satire as news here by parboy · · Score: 0, Troll

    What is this, April Fool's Day? Don't waste our time with this trash.

    1. Re:It's asinine to post Onion satire as news here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Guess we know who woke-and-boke this morning. In the future, hit the bong after you've posted to /. for the day.

    2. Re:It's asinine to post Onion satire as news here by justkeeper · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You're on slashdot so your time can be wasted.

    3. Re:It's asinine to post Onion satire as news here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Problem is that I already had spread that around the office today, at least 35% though it was real and were outraged.

      Most people dont pay attention, and simply believe what is fed to them. Like the submitter.

    4. Re:It's asinine to post Onion satire as news here by spiffyman · · Score: 1

      Most people dont pay attention, and simply believe what is fed to them. Like samzenpus. There, fixed that for you.
      --
      So you can laugh all you want to...
    5. Re:It's asinine to post Onion satire as news here by geminidomino · · Score: 5, Funny

      Guess we know who woke-and-boke this morning. In the future, hit the bong after you've posted to /. for the day. Says the guy who actually just used the 'word' "boke"
    6. Re:It's asinine to post Onion satire as news here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently jokes are permitted on days between April 2nd and March 31st.

  7. It's not who votes that count by caluml · · Score: 5, Funny

    http://satirica.net/wp-content/uploads/2007/06/stalin_voting.jpg
    It's not who votes that count - it's who counts the votes. - Josef Stalin

    With apologies to the poor soul whose server I've linked to. :)

    1. Re:It's not who votes that count by Von+Helmet · · Score: 1

      It's not who votes that count - it's who counts the votes. - Josef Stalin

      Yeah, well, he would say that. After all, he was in Soviet Russia.

    2. Re:It's not who votes that count by Mycroft1964 · · Score: 1

      > With apologies to the poor soul whose server I've linked to. :) You're forgiven...this time. Just don't make a habit of it, eh?

  8. are we seriously reading this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hurrrr let's link to the onion and pretend it's news!

    Good God, why is this garbage on the front page?

    1. Re:are we seriously reading this? by unitron · · Score: 1

      Hurrrr let's link to the onion and pretend it's news!

      Good God, why is this garbage on the front page?

      Back in January 2001 The Onion ran an article about a (totally fictitious and made up by them) Bush televised address about what to expect from his administration. It was titled "Bush:'Our Long National Nightmare Of Peace And Prosperity Is Finally Over'". Looking at it today it reads not like satire but like an incredibly accurate prediction of what actually happened, so I wouldn't be too quick to dismiss this latest Onion offering as not being news. After all, if Slashdot can offer subscribers news from the mysterious future...

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    2. Re:are we seriously reading this? by unitron · · Score: 1

      Foobar of Borg, may his (or her) tribe increase, came up with a working link to that 2001 article which can be found when you read this post.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  9. Uhh - this was on the Onion two days ago??? by nickull · · Score: 0, Redundant
    --
    "Question everything, including this!" - http://technoracle.blogspot.com/
    1. Re:Uhh - this was on the Onion two days ago??? by BridgeBum · · Score: 1

      Congratulations, you duplicated the link in the article.

      --
      My UID is the product of 2 primes.
  10. Samzenpus is an idiot for posting this. !news by mw13068 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is not news, it doesn't matter, it's not /.

    Start spamming /. with this stupid shit at your own risk.

  11. LOL... So with 9 months to go... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The dems are already preparing an excuse just in case the improbable happens and they actually manage to lose this presidential election. The sad part is that a lot of people will believe in it.

  12. Holy mother of Moses! by sunami88 · · Score: 1

    Everybody saw that too, eh? Embedded video in a summary? Someone's playing a trick on us, mark my words. We've all seen deceptive/wrong headlines before, but this is freakin ridiculous.

    --
    Sex. Drugs, and Unix.
  13. wrong but that does not matter by dario_moreno · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This time the media (not Diebold) are going to have an apparently nice democrat elected, since Bush went a little too far but it should be obvious that once again it won't make any notable difference. Kucinich, Paul or Nader would have, but this would be against so many interests....

    --
    Google passes Turing test : see my journal
    1. Re:wrong but that does not matter by stinerman · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Meh, I actually think that Obama has a small chance of being a once-in-a-lifetime figure that might get *some* good done. He's certainly the best Democrat since I've been alive (but that isn't saying too much).

      I might actually vote for him in the general if he doesn't throw away half his issues like most politicians do after the primary. The Libertarians and Greens are both going to run unpalatable candidates, and Nader will be lucky if he gets on more than a handful of state ballots.

      Now in a Clinton-McCain race, all bets are off. I could see myself writing in some joker or just leaving the ballot blank.

    2. Re:wrong but that does not matter by geekoid · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Do you really think those guys would have made a difference?

      Really, there not king, they need other people to agree on things,. have two parties not liking you gets exactly nothing done. Granted, getting nothing done would have made the last 7 year much better.

      Of course the media screwed Edwards. I didn't want him to win, but the media just ignored him and tried to makes it a Race/Woman thing. frankly I applaud both candidates for not rising to that bait.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:wrong but that does not matter by 0p7imu5_P2im3 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Don't give up your vote just because the Republicrats limit you to two bad candidates. Men fought and died to get you that vote. Leaving a ballot blank is the modern day equivalent of burning the US flag.

      If you really want to show them who's boss, and prove that they cannot limit your vote, vote for a third party that offers a candidate that is closer to your values than the Republicrats. I'm not a Libertarian shill, but the Libertarians are a freedom-based compromise between the Republicrats. Personally, I was really hoping Ron Paul would run third party or independent, but that football team mentality of "my party first, the country second" runs deep. And there's also Nader, but don't vote for him unless he has enough states such that he could possibly win (same goes for the Libertarians, but they usually get enough states).

      --
      Resistance is futile. Your technological distinctiveness will be added to our own. You will become one with the morgue
    4. Re:wrong but that does not matter by TemporalBeing · · Score: 1

      Meh, I actually think that Obama has a small chance of being a once-in-a-lifetime figure that might get *some* good done. He's certainly the best Democrat since I've been alive (but that isn't saying too much).

      I might actually vote for him in the general if he doesn't throw away half his issues like most politicians do after the primary. The Libertarians and Greens are both going to run unpalatable candidates, and Nader will be lucky if he gets on more than a handful of state ballots.

      Now in a Clinton-McCain race, all bets are off. I could see myself writing in some joker or just leaving the ballot blank. Personally, I think I might vote for CowboyNeal just to vote for someone that might do some good. I really don't like _any_ of the candidates. Obama would be better than Clinton, but McCain is no better than either. Oh well...





      The sad this is that I really am not even half-joking. The candidates are just so abysmal this go round.
      --
      Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away. - Elvis Presley (source: imdb.com)
    5. Re:wrong but that does not matter by JrOldPhart · · Score: 1

      Many states do not allow you the chance to vote for any real alternative. Oklahoma for one. So the blank ballot is the only method of statement.

      --
      Nothing is foolproof, fools are too ingenious. - Murphy
    6. Re:wrong but that does not matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I completely agree. And lean to the right. It's Obama or bust!

    7. Re:wrong but that does not matter by pla · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Do you really think those guys would have made a difference?

      In eight years, one man in that office took us from having a strong economy and reasonably decent foreign relations, to the pariah of the world with an economy so weak even the CANADIAN dollar beats our own.

      So yeah, the right person in that office could certainly go a long way toward improving things. Not to say I consider any of the named people that impressive (I liked RP, but don't know that he would have had the cooperation to even start to undo Bush's damage), but as proof of concept, you have to concede the point.

    8. Re:wrong but that does not matter by brkello · · Score: 1

      Funny how whenever the candidate people want to win drops out they blame it on the media coverage. If Edwards did better in the polls, inspired more people, won primaries, then there would be more of a focus on him. With the exception of one state, Edwards placed third. This is the fault of his campaign, not the media. The media just follows whoever is most popular. As much as people don't want to believe it, the people elect the candidate and the media follows whoever has that momentum. Fundamentally, they are a business and they want to have as many people as possible watching their show...therefor it makes sense that the most popular person is the most newsworthy and gets seen the most.

      --
      Support a great indie game: http://www.abaddon360.com
    9. Re:wrong but that does not matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh come on. You are so certain that the President has that much power?

      Economy is hurting because:

      A housing bubble imploded, and because fuel costs are high. NOTHING a President could really do about those.

      Fuel costs are high. Fuel costs come from instability in the middle east, so I guess some other President might have made the middle east more stable somehow... the only two ways I can think of are (A) let the local dictators do whatever they want to their people, as long as they keep selling us oil, and put up with the occasional terrorist atrocity; (B) really turn the military loose, have them wreck and destroy everything until the USA is completely feared (and hated of course). I don't think our current course is ideal but I do think its long term will be better than either of those two options.

      Government continues to grow. I'll grant you this one; a different President could have vetoed more stuff. Ron Paul certainly would.

    10. Re:wrong but that does not matter by dangitman · · Score: 1

      So, why are other countries doing well, despite having the same conditions to deal with?

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    11. Re:wrong but that does not matter by pla · · Score: 1

      A housing bubble imploded

      The entire subprime market, if every single person defaulted, amounts to only $650 billion - A drop in the GDP bucket. In reality, the current numbers look like only around 10% of those will default... So about the same cost as a month in Iraq.


      Fuel costs are high. Fuel costs come from instability in the middle east

      Considering that we (in the US) get most of our oil from South America, the Middle East has little to do with the price of fuel at the pump. The price of crude depends on nothing more than speculation (supply and demand influences that, but at the end of the day, the magic price-per-barrel you hear on the news comes from Wall Street, not Opec). And the price of refined grades of fuel and heating oil - Well, Exxon didn't make record profits the last few years by benevolently buffering the world through the ups and downs in supply and refining capacity...


      let the local dictators do whatever they want to their people, as long as they keep selling us oil

      That still looks pretty much like our policy, with the added clause "and let us have a military base in their country". We let royal sponsors of 9/11 keep their little theocratic regime, while deposing a man who managed to keep three groups that hate each other more than they hate us, together under relatively peaceful conditions. More people die in the new-and-improved Iraq each month than died in the entirety of Saddam's rule.

      I just can bring myself to call that "better".

    12. Re:wrong but that does not matter by 0p7imu5_P2im3 · · Score: 1

      No write-ins at all? I'd think that to be unconstitutional.

      --
      Resistance is futile. Your technological distinctiveness will be added to our own. You will become one with the morgue
    13. Re:wrong but that does not matter by JrOldPhart · · Score: 1

      Anyone can write all they want. But they are not counted unless your state allows write in votes.
      Ballot Access Wiki down a couple pages for the US. Then there is Ballot-Access News where you can get more info on the battle to allow we the people to have a little bit of a real vote. Not just the pretend selection between the two.

      After all, give me all of your money now or half now and the other half before I leave, are not real choices. Yet that is how I see the current voting structure. You can select this D-crook or this R-crook.

      --
      Nothing is foolproof, fools are too ingenious. - Murphy
  14. Mod points with nowhere to go by kenj0418 · · Score: 3, Funny

    I have mod points today -- but unfortunately theres no way to mod-down a submitter.

  15. Re:Avoid ./ fees... by Firehed · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    = = = = = = = = =
    Mods please note: This is simply an exercise to determine how to lower karma - if you're just looking to burn points, don't bother wasting them...there are better alternatives than making my day, thanks.

    Translation: "My karma is teetering on the brink of going negative. Don't mod me down, bro!"
    --
    How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
  16. It's not April 1st by suprcvic · · Score: 1

    ...so why is this on the front page?

    1. Re:It's not April 1st by Kifoth · · Score: 1

      It's not on the front page any more, but at the time of posting, it is still showing up on the front page's RSS feed (and yes, I did refresh the feed just before posting this...).

      Bug?

  17. Whoops. by Damocles+the+Elder · · Score: 1

    Is it just me, or did and editor confuse the Slashdot submission form with the idle.slashdot submission form?

  18. Well, now that The Onion is being cited... by rickb928 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    /. is pretty flushed down the toilet.

    Secretly, I'm proud of the Onion gang. They succeed at being seen as legit, relevant, newsworthy, true (!), and just plain really neato. The best TV news is still the Jon Stewart stuff. Life goes on.

    Glad also to see someone else gets duped. I haven't been taken by The Onion ever, but the Washington Post has caught me a few times...

    And since when has it been a wast of OUR time to revel in the delightful agony of a fellow /.'r getting completely fooled, or fooling us in the bargain?

    --
    deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    1. Re:Well, now that The Onion is being cited... by dougmc · · Score: 1
      I doubt the submitter was fooled.


      Personally, I liked the piece.

    2. Re:Well, now that The Onion is being cited... by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 1

      Can't believe someone actually modded you insightful. Scratch that, if one person out of a couple of thousand can be idiotic enough to miss the foot icon, 3 people can too.

      The only one who is looking like an idiot is every last person complaining about flash, (flashblock), specific stories (filter) or the quality of posters (Pot, meet Kettle).

      Now get off my lawn.

      --
      Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
    3. Re:Well, now that The Onion is being cited... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody here has been duped, with the possible exception of you.

      Notice the foot icon beside the story on the main page? That represents a fictional story that might be good for a laugh or two. You can opt to hide these stories in your preferences, if you have no sense of humor and don't want entertainment ruining your Slashdot experience. ;-)

  19. hahaha by Jerzakie · · Score: 1

    Man I watched this on the TiVO Onion News Network last night, this is some seriously funny stuff.

  20. WTF FTW! by meist3r · · Score: 1

    Come on, really? The Onion news on slashdot? Who approved this post or did I just miss some invisible winking emoticons? And If Diebold had really f*cked it up, no one in the world would be allowed to even know about this -don't you think?

  21. Ha! by interval1066 · · Score: 0

    And my karma sucks.

    --
    Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
  22. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  23. This is a bit early... by Wolfger · · Score: 1

    ...for April Fool's. So much for any pretense Slashdot had of being "news".

    1. Re:This is a bit early... by Wanado · · Score: 1

      Yep, looks like Slashdot was the premature one covering a video article from The Onion before April 1st. Oops.

      --
      Somehow along the way I made a bad choice in life and now must live with 0 Karma.
    2. Re:This is a bit early... by orclevegam · · Score: 1

      I think slashdot may have just jumped the shark... with frickin lasers.

      --
      Curiosity was framed, Ignorance killed the cat.
    3. Re:This is a bit early... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot hasn't been news since 1999.

  24. WTF? by GoodNicksAreTaken · · Score: 1

    WTF? The Onion.. someone at /. woke up with their shoulders between their thighs today!

  25. Are we digg now? by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1

    Seriously, if I wanted embedded videos about non-tech subjects, that would be my first stop...

  26. Ahhhhh, NoScript. by FrameRotBlues · · Score: 0

    Thank You, NoScript, for not wasting my bandwidth. I knew I installed you for good reasons.

  27. Before I saw the 'Onion' tags... by martinQblank · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...I had a brief moment where I seriously considered that it could, in fact, be true. Hmmm.

    1. Re:Before I saw the 'Onion' tags... by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      Yeah. This stuff is excuseable on April 1st. It's a long running gig on Slashdot and is part of our culture.

      But, for all the crap that gets posted, I still expect this to at least TRY to be a "news" site. By simple virtue of this NOT being April 1st, when I first read this I was like "OMG - there's gonna be a shit storm on the news tonight!". Then when I moused over the link and saw "theonion.com" I was just left puzzled as to WTF the editor was thinking - particularly disturbing is that he was both the editor AND submitted. If this guy actually is a paid employee of Slashdot, he should be canned immediately.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
  28. Weirdness with CSS??? by nickull · · Score: 1

    I actually didn't see any earlier link to the Onion (using Safari Version 3.0.4 (5523.15) (webkit engine), Intel MacBook Pro, Leopard 10.5.2) however viewing with FF it shows up. I have screenshots. Bug?? Nevertheless, very funny. The Onion guys must be ROTFL.

    --
    "Question everything, including this!" - http://technoracle.blogspot.com/
  29. Best quote, with /. standard by JackStraight · · Score: 1

    "If you can't trust your shadowy overlords to keep a secret, what it the purpose of voting in a puppet democracy?"

  30. Fark by _14k4 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    When did this site become fark? This was on _that_ page yesterday, and to top it off, did not involve an embedded flash movie.

    That's two posts in one day that have those flash movies in them. One of the reasons I read /. is because there is little network traffic during the visit. I suppose that's not very true anymore, unless I go to the text only theme.

    1. Re:Fark by cheesekeeper · · Score: 1

      Are you paying by the byte? Or is someone looking over your shoulder?

      --

      Best read in good ol' Monaco 9 point.

    2. Re:Fark by _14k4 · · Score: 1

      You're kidding, right? You do realize that "time to display in the browser" is a function of the amount of data transmitted, no? Also, I'd rather spend the cpu time, and therefore electricity, on rendering crap I want to read.

    3. Re:Fark by edschurr · · Score: 1

      It looks like the flash player is only 6% of the page. A JavaScript script makes up most of the bulk.

    4. Re:Fark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd rather spend the cpu time, and therefore electricity, on rendering crap I want to read. and yet you bother to render and read (and now reply to) the above ./ comments? *confused*
  31. Funny excerpt by guruevi · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "This country is based on the fantasy that the government is the voice of the people"

    Best quote, ever, and true as well.

    --
    Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
  32. I agree!!! by astro128 · · Score: 1

    This is not news!!! Humorous, yes but this is a news site and fake news doesn't belong here.... especially when its a video!

  33. The most amusing thing is... by th3rtythr33 · · Score: 0

    How stuck up you all are. QQ some more. Thank you for approving this. It made my day.

  34. Off topic by mcsqueak · · Score: 1

    Can a tag this whole 'news' story as offtopic? A fake frickin' VIDEO in the news section?!

    Seriously, if I wanted Onion 'news', I'd go to the Onion's website. There is a reason that Slashdot, the NY Times and NPR are on my toolbar as quicklinks... and it isn't because I want fake news.

  35. Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go into Help & Preferences. Look under the section "Your Preferences." Under the subsection "Index," select the "Authors" preferences. Uncheck samzenpus.

  36. THIS JUST IN by Gay+for+Linux · · Score: 4, Insightful

    BREAKING NEWS STORY: Comments posted on a slashdot thread earlier today indicate its readers are a bunch of humorless, whiny fags.

    1. Re:THIS JUST IN by Toonol · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Exactly. I'm a bit disappointed in my fellow Slashdot participants today. This is an obvious joke; Slashdot is not CNN, they can post jokes occasionally. That's a good thing. The flash video doesn't load and play automatically, so it's not a significant waste of bandwidth. If you are insulted at the mere suggestion of flash... well, you get insulted too easily.

    2. Re:THIS JUST IN by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Don't get disappointed or upset at people who took the tag line "news for nerds , stuff that matters" seriously. I mean sure, it's all fun and games but some people have come to expect certain things that have been represented here. That is why the onion and other sites are well, other sites. If you want your humor goto them, it you wanted news and stuff that matters to you, you used to goto slashdot.

    3. Re:THIS JUST IN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is why the onion and other sites are well, other sites.

      By that logic, since every article links to "other sites", then why do you come here at all?
  37. not news to YOU maybe by Dahamma · · Score: 1

    I'm sure it was an honest mistake. I don't think Samzenpus realized it was fake. Those Onion guys can be pretty darn tricky!

    1. Re:not news to YOU maybe by geekoid · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If Samzenpus viewed that, an actually thought it was a real news item then they should be immediatly banned from the internet..hell, anything with a computer.

      It does belong on /., but under humor because it was pretty damn funny.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  38. voting tech IS tech by jahknow · · Score: 2, Insightful

    To the "why is this here on /." replies, I humbly submit the following: Please note that this IS a geek/tech-related post. Note the explicit warning of humor, as exhibited by the big monty python foot icon. If anyone takes offence (sp) at this being yet another US-centric post, well, I'll give you that, but just remember that US political and technological affairs do affect everyone -- just ask an Iraqi... or an Afghani, or an Iranian, or a Cuban, or a Vietnamese... I'm too lazy to link to the 12,000 non-humorous /. posts on the sad state of e-voting in the states, but I'm sure you've already ignored those posts once. That said, the video itself was stale, predictable Onion humor -- you really needn't read past the headline, as there's not much more too it.

    --
    ^^
  39. In other news...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In a reaction to The Onion news flash China orders 10 million voting machines.

  40. Text only: Doesn't work by wowbagger · · Score: 1

    Sorry, but I am using the text-only theme, and the Flash is STILL there. Of course, Adblock Plus and Flashblock took care of that, but....

  41. Ok, I've read all of the comments to this point by SpaceLifeForm · · Score: 1

    And, of course, I could not RTFA.

    So, tell me, who is going to win?

    --
    You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.
    1. Re:Ok, I've read all of the comments to this point by Wanado · · Score: 1

      There really isn't an article, it's the video also shown on this page. To make it even more abhorrent, the video makers have McCain winning with 48% of the vote. Not sure how a Diebold machine is supposed to know the results of the entire electoral college across the US to determine a winner though. But it's supposed to be funny.

      --
      Somehow along the way I made a bad choice in life and now must live with 0 Karma.
    2. Re:Ok, I've read all of the comments to this point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not sure how a Diebold machine is supposed to know the results of the entire electoral college across the US to determine a winner though.
      Der... I's just don'ts gets its...
  42. Re:Avoid ./ fees... by djupedal · · Score: 0

    ...bump...see above, thanks.

  43. Re:The Onion on /.? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Take a look at the "topic" icon - that foot thingy? If you hold the mouse over it for a second or two, it'll give you a secret message about the reason the article was posted.

  44. Depressing.. by StarfishOne · · Score: 1

    Seeing the title of this 'news' item in my RSS reader, I actually thought: 'finally proof that things are not being played in a fair way'. Too bad...

  45. They just thought... by an.echte.trilingue · · Score: 1

    I think it is part of a clever ploy to DOS the onion. What better way to bring their server to a crashing halt than to embed a multimedia element directly into the summary?

    This ranks right up there with the time kdawson linked to 84 gigabyte digital photo from the summary a couple years ago.

    Or at least, the video appears /.'ed for me.

    --
    weirdest thing I ever saw: scientology advertising on slashdot.
  46. Burried by fulldecent · · Score: 1

    ... oh wait

    --

    -- I was raised on the command line, bitch

  47. Umm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You say that as if it would be a bad thing... :-)

    1. Re:Umm... by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      It would be if this was the reason.

      Imagine the damage that could be done to you from a joke on something you do.

  48. Am I the only one- by Steauengeglase · · Score: 1

    -who hasn't been able to laugh at recent Onion articles?

    First it was the one about the nation being happy voer the Patriot's Super Bowl loss and now this. They are slowly becoming the most honest news source out there.

  49. Re:Samzenpus is an idiot for posting this. !news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    rofl, at your own risk? OH NO I might awaken DIRE NERD RAGE

  50. hmm by thatskinnyguy · · Score: 1

    I couldn't watch much after the 50th time they mispronounced Diebold. It's Dee-bold! Not Die-bold!

    --
    The game.
  51. Re:Avoid ./ fees... by djupedal · · Score: 1

    ...bump - see above, thanks.

  52. Where am I? by pjludlow · · Score: 1

    Did my bookmark take me to Digg somehow with a Slashdot theme? I wouldn't have expected any story from "The Onion" to make frontpage /. material.

  53. Am I the only one that appreciates it? by jfbilodeau · · Score: 1

    I like a good laugh from time to time, and I'm glad /. does not take itself too seriously. I'm sorry and surprised at the amount of people bitching at /. for dropping a bit of humour in my day (that is not MS centric). Cheers, J-F

    --
    Goodbye Slashdot. You've changed.
    1. Re:Am I the only one that appreciates it? by Anonymous+Psychopath · · Score: 1

      I'm with you. I don't check Fark, Onion, Digg, etc., so I don't get all pissed off when something posts here that was already there. I got a laugh out of the video, and no one stood behind me with a gun to my head making me watch it.

      This is off topic, but the zillion "Upgrade Vista by switching to XP" posts that get modded +5 funny are? Get a grip, people.

      --

      Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.

  54. And probably the Democratic Party with it by alexhmit01 · · Score: 1

    The Media's favorite candidates look like they are winning, which likely is going to result in a GOP victory... it'll be a close race, but Nadar is right, the Democrats SHOULD be able to blow this one out of the water. Unfortunately for the Democrats, the media destroyed the emotional GOP favorite (Huckabee) by dismissing him, and the potential run away player (Romney) by focusing so much on the Mormon issue that people who wouldn't have cared got nervous.

    McCain may piss off the GOP's hard right, but he is the most purely electable candidate in the field when the field tips to the Democrats (in a year tilting rightward, like 2000, a Huckabee or Romney was a stronger candidate).

    Here is a quick question, name the LAST Democratic that wasn't a Southern White Male to win the White House... That's Fighting Conservative Democratic Candidate, JFK, and before that was New Yorker FDR.

    Granted, those two Democratic Presidents were the transformational, generational candidates... so the Democratic Party needs to ask itself, are either Hillary Clinton of Barrack Obama those transformational candidates that we'll be talking about 30 - 50 years later. If so, give them the nod (I'd suggest that Obama MIGHT be, Hillary certainly isn't)... otherwise, should have gone with the Southern White Male.

    Clinton won in 1992 in part because with two southern white males on the tickets, the Democratic Party started out with two "leans GOP" states in their corner. While the election didn't come as close as 2000 and 2004 were, by putting those states in the Democratic pocket, the GOP had to fight in states that they might have ignored to make up for it, which changes the stakes.

    So in the 20th century and early 21st century, the Democrats win when they run a generation changing transformational figure, or a southern white male. The GOP wins by either racking up wins with their base and using their electoral college advantage (same thing that gives them an edge in the states), or running a candidate from California.

  55. More Depressing.. by kbielefe · · Score: 1

    I was taken in the exact opposite way. I subscribe to The Onion in my RSS reader, but thought at first from the headline two days ago that it was a serious slashdot article.

    --
    This space intentionally left blank.
  56. Re:The Onion on /.? by Shakrai · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Mod the parent up.... this is actually the most insightful comment I've seen in this discussion.

    "It's funny, laugh"

    --
    I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
    We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
  57. What the??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Running a "story" from "The Onion" on Slashdot, and not prefacing it with the fact that it is from "The Onion", and fake?

    This is supposed to be "news" for nerds, not "fake propaganda BS" for nerds!

  58. It's the Onion by namoom · · Score: 1

    Read and watch the onion, it is a well recognized paper here in colorado for a good reason! All of the stories are false to bring out opinion and actual thought from the readers. Through their humor they actually wind up being more credible on what's really going on than many papers

  59. SAGE by LiquidDeath · · Score: 1

    SAGE

  60. Thanks by thorkyl · · Score: 1

    I needed that...
    Now for some real news...

    --
    -- I am the NRA, enough said...
  61. Obama's support base goes asymtotic by caywen · · Score: 2, Funny

    I have finally devised the complex equation of Obama's increasing support, and I found that though his support is skyrocketing in Texas, it becomes asymtotic at around March 4. On that day around 2:42pm, his support goes to infinity and will form a black hole that will kill us all. Support Hillary before it's too late.

    1. Re:Obama's support base goes asymtotic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You racist mofo. "and will form a black hole". Nobody considers white holes dangerous, do they? DO THEY?

  62. Re:Samzenpus is an idiot for posting this. !news by Taevin · · Score: 5, Informative
    Instructions for those who have a anti-humour cattle prod stuck up their ass:
    1. Click the Help & Preferences link at the top of the page.
    2. Click on the Sections link under the Index subsection of the Your Preferences section.
    3. Select the Never radio button for the Entertainment category.
    4. Click the Save button.
    Congratulations, you have successfully filtered humour from your life. No longer will your boring life be terrorized by "this stupid shit."
  63. and my submissions were rejected? by misterich · · Score: 1

    Jeez. If I knew that I only had to make someone laugh, I would have started copy-pasting stuff from the onion years ago.

    1. Re:and my submissions were rejected? by vespacide2 · · Score: 0

      Judging by the fact that you can't even see why this is more than humor, I'm guessing your suggestions were rejected because you're mentally retarded.

      --
      Mever nind the typos.
  64. funny by ezwip · · Score: 0

    Well, that's a funny post. Even if this did really happy I don't think it would move beyond the blogosphere. Most people would simply accept it and then it would blow over. Next up... Britney litters!

    --
    "I guess I'm gonna fade into Bolivian."
  65. Why is this here? by SoTerrified · · Score: 1

    The only reason I'm glad to see this post is because it's vindication. Long ago, before the general population, including myself, were concerned about voting machines and Diebold, the facts were right here on Slashdot. Several folks put a lot of time and effort to explain why they were so dangerous, and convinced many, again including myself, that Diebold really was a threat to honest democracy.

    So if there's any joy to be gained from this post, it's simply that it started here, and now it's so well known, it's fodder for humour.

  66. Re:Avoid ./ fees... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Did you know you are a stupid troll?"

  67. Onion Get It Right by Foobar+of+Borg · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Actually, the sad thing is that the Onion tends to predict things more accurately than the pundits. I mean, they even predicted how the Bush presidency would go back when it began. For instance, this article from January 17, 2001. Perhaps William Kristolnacht should write for the Onion and let some of the Onion people write serious news.

    1. Re:Onion Get It Right by unitron · · Score: 1
      Thank You, Thank You, Thank You!

      I've been trying to find a working link to that article. I saved the page to my hard drive a few years ago from Dan Chak's reprint of it, but it's not on his site anymore and The Onion's search thingie just choked when I tried using it.

      It's scary how accurate that article's predictions were.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    2. Re:Onion Get It Right by pimpimpim · · Score: 1

      That and the 5-blade gilette. I think there were even more.

      --
      molmod.com - computing tips from a molecular modeling
  68. Yes, we pay by the byte by lennier · · Score: 1

    "Are you paying by the byte? Or is someone looking over your shoulder?"

    Yes, many of us who use the Internet *do* pay by the byte (in gigabyte blocks). It's how cable Internet is charged in New Zealand. It's actually a very fair system that makes all the 'net neutrality' congestion/filtering strangeness just go away, and should be adopted by all ISPs. You pay for the data transfer you use.

    --
    You are not a brain: http://books.google.com/books?id=2oV61CeDx-YC
  69. Re:Samzenpus is an idiot for posting this. !news by Chris+Burke · · Score: 3, Funny

    Do you have instructions for removing the cattle prod? Because I laugh a lot, and those shocks fucking hurt!

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
  70. Gratuitously now, folks... by gondwannabe · · Score: 1

    ...if you responded with only a hint of seriousness, your /. account was terminated, yes? That firehose is really doing its job, eh?

    --
    Guns don't kill people, bullets kill people!
  71. Re:The Onion on /.? by PopeGumby · · Score: 1

    My understanding is that the Monty Python foot icon was for when funny things happen, not when funny things are written

    Does this mean we can expect a slashdot article for every Penny Arcade or Ctrl-Alt-Del comic?

    I can see it now, "Gabe and Tycho poke fun at Mass Effect", and an image link to the comic.

  72. And as for the REAL news by sgt_doom · · Score: 1
    But this does allow for me to make the following, judiciously pertinent comment:

    The 2008 American presidential election WILL be decided by the four major voting machine companies which are supposed to record and tabulate over 100 million votes:

    Hart InterCivic, Premier Election Systems (Diebold), ES&S and Sequoia Voting Systems. Now whom do you suppose owns these four companies? Don't know? Don't even know the origins and connections between the four? Don't know all the myriad connections among these four, and SAIC, and Accenture and the Pentagon? Well, guess who will decide that 2008 presidential election?

    Hint: It won't be the voters.....

  73. Re:The Onion on /.? by mgblst · · Score: 1

    I use slashdot lite, you insensitive clot.

  74. Holy Shit by vespacide2 · · Score: 0

    You're retarded!

    --
    Mever nind the typos.
    1. Re:Holy Shit by thatskinnyguy · · Score: 1

      Retarded? Excuse me? My grandmother, uncle, cousin, and father all worked for Diebold. I think I know how its pronounced... Retard!

      --
      The game.
  75. Onion should know better by mitchellzone · · Score: 1

    Diebold is pronounced as if German, i.e. "Deebold". Kinda spoiled the suspension of disbelief for me. If you're gonna fake the news, at least get all the stuff right that you're not making up. Still funny, though...

  76. Its funny that... by KingCZAR · · Score: 0

    this was believable for a second.

  77. Already decided? by the_olo · · Score: 1

    ...leaked the results to the 2008 presidential race...

    So it's over 8 months to the election day, and the winner has already been decided? Didn't know it's that bad with democracy in your poor little country already!