Slashdot Mirror


Stolen US Military Equipment Being Sold On eBay

I Buy These From eBay points out a Washington Post story about how stolen military equipment has ended up on eBay and Craigslist. Undercover investigators reported being able to purchase defense-related items with "no questions asked." Let's hope the sellers don't get their hands on any retired rebellious robots. From the Post: "Among the items purchased include two components from F-14 fighter jets, bought from separate buyers on eBay. The warplanes, now retired by the military, could easily be purchased and transferred to the Iranian military, which is seeking its components, the report said. Investigators couldn't determine where the sellers had obtained the F-14 parts. They also purchased from a Craigslist seller a used Nuclear Biological Chemical protective suit, other protective accessories as well as an unused chemical-biological canister, which contained the mask filter used to guard against warfare agents. The property was likely stolen from the Defense Department, the report said."

173 comments

  1. Why not buy a Gripen by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

    I believe they are available in kit form from Ikea in Teheran.

    --
    echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    1. Re:Why not buy a Gripen by Praedon · · Score: 1

      If I am correct, a Gripen is made by Saab... which also makes, well, cars, and a crap load of other stuff that is completely unrelated to cars, like for instance radars and underwater systems for detecting mines and such. I'd love to see a Saab car come equipped with all their other products they make : )

      As for the fun happy stuff on eBay and Craigslist, this isn't the first time stolen military equipment was placed on eBay... I can't find the article right now, but it's been happening off and on for the past 3 years. What's even more fun, is the fact that one time it happened, I remember seeing that someone from Afghanistan won and received the auction for a bazooka that slipped through the cracks and was too late by the time eBay let alone customs found out.

      --
      Just me
    2. Re:Why not buy a Gripen by m.ducharme · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah, but they take 20-30 years to assemble, and if you lose the special Allen key, you're fucked.

      --
      Rule of Slashdot #0: You and people like you are not representative of the larger population. - A.C.
    3. Re:Why not buy a Gripen by gripen40k · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hey! My name finally gets mentioned in /. !

      I think the underlying point of your message though is that Iran is more than capable of buying jets from other military hardware producing nations. The trick is finding one that wouldn't mind selling them the stuff. Maybe the French?

      --
      Har?
    4. Re:Why not buy a Gripen by Cecil · · Score: 1

      I suspect Russia, Pakistan, or China would be more than willing to supply them all the aircraft they might need. Or they could just build some more of their own planes.

      Not that they're really in dire need of more. They're pretty well equipped as it is.

    5. Re:Why not buy a Gripen by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      Actually France is on message now with Sarkozy in charge so probably not.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    6. Re:Why not buy a Gripen by budgenator · · Score: 3, Informative

      I thought that that GM bought the automotive division from Saab and everything else remained.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
  2. F14...HAH by p51d007 · · Score: 0

    Wouldn't do them any good. Most of their 14's have been in storage, probably stored improperly. Even if they were able to get them to fly & fight, they would be shot out of the sky easily.

  3. Not smart by saibot834 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Ebay policy prohibits sale of stolen items and parts of a F-14 are obviously stolen if on Ebay. So, consequence one will be removal of the auction. Consequence two is, that now Ebay has the IP-Adresses of those people and they properly will give it to the military. They better used Tor or live in a country far far away.

    This behavior is IMHO incredibly stupid. If you manage to steal such items, one would think that you also manage to sell them somewhere else than on Ebay.

    1. Re:Not smart by Kuroji · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Among the items purchased include two components from F-14 fighter jets ...

      I think someone wasn't paying attention down at eBay, but the summary would imply these things were in fact bought.

    2. Re:Not smart by peragrin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If memory serves they were radio annetenna's. not turbine parts, or gear parts but turbine.

      Also if Iran was smart they would have mothballed everything, and disassembled at least one plane. from there they could duplicate all the mechanical parts, and would only then have to figure out the electronics. Though I highly doubt that those planes are in flying condition anymore. Planes that old need to have every nut and bolt checked.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    3. Re:Not smart by Kuroji · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hey, that's how the Soviets did it.

      If the Iranians are smart, they would have torn the planes down in the eighties and made replicas then. Somehow I doubt this is the case, however - they probably went for the lowest bidder as most militaries do when it comes down to something that isn't related to intercontinental bombers.

    4. Re:Not smart by penix1 · · Score: 4, Informative

      And this is something new?!?! Government surplus has been with us as long as government procurement has.

      http://www.govliquidation.com/list/c7007/lna/1.html

      Get just about any aircraft parts directly from the government. Everything from engines to rotary blades for helicopters to complete aircraft shells. Nothing new here...

      --
      This is a sig. This is only a sig. Had this been an actual sig you would have been informed where to tune for more sigs.
    5. Re:Not smart by Konster · · Score: 5, Insightful

      A lot of things can be replicated on a lathe or whatever. You can replicate its dimensions, but you cannot replicate alloys...get the alloy wrong and the part doesn't work at all. Beyond that, there's the manufacturing technique that needs to be reverse engineered, too. This is not a trivial task. Screw up the process of manufacturing and you've got nothing.

      Beyond all those hurdles, you've got to consider the lubricants as well, screw that up and the parts don't work.

      Screw up anything in the chain and nothing works.

      There's a reason why countries like Iran or whatever aren't flying around in replica F-14's and F-15's. While they may have the dimensions to replicate a part, they don't have the huge amount of engineering required to make that part work, and work reliably.

      The engineering know-how that goes into a sophisticated bit of military hardware spans most hardcore sciences spanning many decades of research, know how, genuine talent and knowledge. This cannot be reverse engineered or reproduced on a lathe.

    6. Re:Not smart by bberens · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There's a reason why countries like Iran or whatever aren't flying around in replica F-14's and F-15's. While they may have the dimensions to replicate a part, they don't have the huge amount of engineering required to make that part work, and work reliably. You're talking about a country which my President has told me has a nuclear weapons program. Something tells me if they're capable of getting nuclear engineers, they can figure out how to make a half-decent fighter jet if they really needed to.
      --
      Check out my lame java blog at www.javachopshop.com
    7. Re:Not smart by Albert+Sandberg · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The scary thing is that this might be the top of the iceberg, how much of the militarys material is stolen each year?

      When I served in the army here in sweden it was more or less custamory to "lose" some stuff and keep it for yourself. Normally this was t-shirts or similar stuff but it was still pretty normal.

      Then I lost stuff (which you do) you couldn't help to feel guilty about it as if you would have stolen it because it was that common, and I can safetly say that the only thing I "stole" was a few empty shells to keep as souvenirs from the whole experience.

    8. Re:Not smart by Crayon+Kid · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Or buy one. F15 is not the only model in the world. Nor are all fighter planes made by the US.

      That's not the point. It's not about getting war tech, it's about studying current american war tech to find weaknesses.

      Stuff like this surfacing on eBay is silly for many reasons. Frankly, I'm doubting the entire story, or at the very least the angle.

      The WP article is full of inflamatory speculation, slapping together possibly unrelated information to make a troll. Every other paragraph has dubious points in it. What exactly are those "plane parts"? They're not saying. Who bought them? Not a peep, so then why finger Iran if there's no evidence? They say they couldn't figure out where the parts came from, yet they "must" be "stolen", because that's how they automatically define selling certain kinds of Army items.

      Granted, any piece of knowledge about the US army may be useful for any foreign power. But if the US army doesn't want stuff to end up on eBay they should guard it more careful. Since they didn't, there's either major incompetence at play, or it wasn't such sensitive material after all.

      Seriously, do you really think that truly useful information or material of this kind would be sold on eBay? When there are professional arms dealers and spies out there? Let's give those Hollywood movies a rest, shall we.

      If I were to take this article at face value, I'd say it's an attempt at sticking it to the army for not taking better care of its stuff. While I'm all for that, it stops being funny once non sequitur allegations are made about certain foreign countries. Then it becomes a transparent attempt at instilling paranoia among the public. "Oh noes, Iran is buying our planes on eBay! How low have we sunk! We're doomed!" Please.

      --
      i ate crayons when i was a kid and now i have two braincells and the blue ones taste nicer
    9. Re:Not smart by an.echte.trilingue · · Score: 5, Informative

      This behavior is IMHO incredibly stupid. If you manage to steal such items, one would think that you also manage to sell them somewhere else than on Ebay. You would be surprised how easy and wide spread this is. I got out about a year and a half ago, but it was already pretty common. We had a guy in our commo unit who stole a projector and got caught because he sold it on Ebay. My battalion's head cook was selling MRE's on Ebay and got caught. Our sister unit had a First Sergeant whose wife (also an NCO) was mailing stolen equipment out of Iraq and got caught by selling it on Ebay. Of course, for everybody who gets caught, 10 get away with it. I once did a report of survey for a lost light amplifier (the sensitive piece of night vision goggles) and we wrote it off as a loss. It could have been the unit armorer or XO, it could have been the maintenance specialist, it could have been the maintenance NCO; there was just no way to tell. I heard through the grape vine a couple months later that CID had recovered it off of Ebay, but the original seller/thief was a mystery.

      People like to use the US's phenomenal military budget as evidence of the country's militarism, but in my admittedly limited experience, it has more to do with massive lack of accountability on an institution-wide scale. Anybody I have ever spoken to who has been in military logistics for a long period of time can tell you about the time he watched a million dollars get wasted in a day.
      --
      weirdest thing I ever saw: scientology advertising on slashdot.
    10. Re:Not smart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Typical media.... "Investigators couldn't determine where the sellers had obtained the F-14 parts.".. which would imply they don't know if the parts are stolen, but sensationalists won't have a story without a headline saying the parts are stolen. And now everyone is excited and creating conspiracy theories and Iran is going to take over the world with 3 f-14 parts they bought... whatever.

    11. Re:Not smart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, they contract most of the hard stuff out to Russia.

      The middle east consists entirely of a bunch of chattering monkeys. Left to their own devices, they don't accomplish much.

    12. Re:Not smart by laddhebert · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      You know..a lot of people have this image of Iranians being Arab and without any technical, mechanical, or engineering aptitude, but that couldn't be further from the truth. The fact is, the Iranian people are actually Persian (Aryans) and probably have more of the aptitudes listed above in their genetic makeup than most people. I think they could reverse engineer pretty much anything.

      Another interesting fact is that Iran's Saegheh fighter jet is on par with the F-18.

      /-l

      --
      Don't Panic.
    13. Re:Not smart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Take your political rhetoric and cram it. You anti-Bushies are just as bad as the "Bush can do no wrong" ilk. When you have 9,000 centrifuges you essentially have a nuclear weapons program.

    14. Re:Not smart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Basic nuclear weapons were developed in the 40's. The F14 was developed in the late 60's.

    15. Re:Not smart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man, you'r smart, good job. I totally agree with you.

    16. Re:Not smart by elguap0 · · Score: 4, Informative

      A quick search shows that the Saegheh is simply a copy of the US Air force's F-5 from the 1960s! And who says it's on par with the F-18? Why, Iran of course! I'm not saying that Iran doesn't have some smart engineers, but the Saegheh doesn't seem to be proof of that.

    17. Re:Not smart by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      iran has supposedly reverse-engineered northrop f-5e for building the hesa azarakhsh. f-14 would be the next step.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    18. Re:Not smart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're talking about a country which my President has told me has a nuclear weapons program. That President fellow tells us a lot of things. For instance, he told us Iraq had WMD. I ain't too sure it's a good idea to go around citing his wisdom.

    19. Re:Not smart by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Something tells me if they're capable of getting nuclear engineers, they can figure out how to make a half-decent fighter jet if they really needed to.

      They likely could, but it's still difficult and requires more than just some smart engineers. As has been pointed out, it's a manufacturing / design / maintenance chain that's complex and expensive. In addition, one or two nuclear weapons constitutes a "win" in this game. One or two reverse engineered F14's constitutes target practice for the Israeli Air Force.

      The modular nature of aircraft makes it more useful to find spare parts wherever you can rather than make expensive, complex modules. You still have the non trivial task of putting the things together and keeping them their. And there are lots of used F14's out there. The Ebay stuff is a pretty marginal market for this kind of thing.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    20. Re:Not smart by budgenator · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not everything can be taken apart in a way that preserves dimensions some pieces of the airframe for example may take 2 pieces of different aluminum alloys, glued together with high-strength epoxy and held together with rivets until the epoxy cures; good luck getting that apart. Often the order of assembly can change a brain numbingly difficult step into a totally impossible one; how many times have you had to redo step 12 correctly so you could do step 27 when putting together one of the pressed saw-dust board entertainment centers for WallMart! Like the entertainment center the parts have to be assembled correct and often in the correct order because just they will not go together out of order, also like the entertainment center, the individual part are often very fragile and easy to break, they are only strong when put together. Even more difficult, aircraft like high-performance fighter can have part at wildly different temperature a leading edge might be 600-700 C, a foot back on the wing might be -50, everything not only has to be put together but stay together as the aircraft cycles through those temperature range every flight.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    21. Re:Not smart by WhoBeDaPlaya · · Score: 1

      Exactly. You wouldn't say people like Behzad Razavi is stupid, would you? ;)

    22. Re:Not smart by clichescreenname · · Score: 1

      You know..a lot of people have this image of Iranians being Arab and without any technical, mechanical, or engineering aptitude, but that couldn't be further from the truth. The fact is, the Iranian people are actually Persian (Aryans) and probably have more of the aptitudes listed above in their genetic makeup than most people. I think they could reverse engineer pretty much anything. Am I missing something, or did this racist POS post just get modded up as being "informative"? Please, somebody, mod parent down.

    23. Re:Not smart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      You all have never seen the black market operate overseas. You can get anything! Some of it is sold right out in the open like a flea market. These guys are lazy

    24. Re:Not smart by laddhebert · · Score: 1
      Ah, I'm sorry, it is good to see that you have become such an expert on Iranian military aircraft by doing a few searches on the internet and making such an educated decision on what the Saegheh is, or its capabilities. Thanks for enlightening me. The truth of the matter is, Iran engineers and manufactures ALL of their military equipment in house and tends to be very tight lipped about it.

      The intent of my original post was to point out that the Iranians are not stupid people, they do not have a weak military force, and they are far from being inept in the engineering of military machinery (or machinery of any type for that matter).

      /-l

      --
      Don't Panic.
    25. Re:Not smart by Keebler71 · · Score: 1

      Nuclear weapons were first developed in the 40's. As such it might be more reasonable to assume that if they have engineers capable of building a nuclear weapon - then they should be able to make a nice piston engine fighter.

      --
      "It takes considerable knowledge just to realize the extent of your own ignorance." - Thomas Sowell
    26. Re:Not smart by laddhebert · · Score: 1
      Wow..did you just play the race card on me? I'm really not following your logic there...

      /-l

      --
      Don't Panic.
    27. Re:Not smart by budgenator · · Score: 1

      Government Liquidators are a private auction company commissioned by the USG, we've gotten a few things from them, bought a whole lots to get one or two items for less then the item would sell for on Ebay. Sometimes you get total junk, sometimes you get something that has never been used. Stuff from the Navy and Air Force is usually in the best shape, Army stuff is usually used to death. You also have to be careful to include shipping costs which can be considerable at times.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    28. Re:Not smart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Racist how? It says Ayrabs are thick, which they are. Not that being a bit less thick than them is much to brag about.

    29. Re:Not smart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well, obviously they can learn a bit from the german military.
      they may receive a condom per soldier (both m/f) per month, but will have to return the used ones...
      also, german military does have a tendency for increasing equipment available while on a training or mission - they occasionally returned with more than what we had when we left.
      however that turns up, is the question still...
      but thats still not as worse as with the german fema equivalent.
      missing your bus-stop or phone booth ? har har.

      the stupid article says stolen military tech is for sale - on ebay... I need names, numbers, prices !
      just kidding - anonymously for a reason :*)
      some one from the united states of lawyers might just have no humour...

    30. Re:Not smart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      piston engine????

    31. Re:Not smart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Am I missing something

      Yes you are. HTH

    32. Re:Not smart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's true. Apparently Boeing can't put together a working 787, and they've even got the blueprints.

    33. Re:Not smart by Memnos · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I agree. I was involved in the construction of F-14's in th '70s, and the engineering requirements for the construction process were as complex as for the aircraft itself. Try doing high precision manufacturing with finicky Titanium, just to name one example.

      --
      I don't trust atoms -- they make up stuff.
    34. Re:Not smart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The items may not have been stolen, officially they are now. Through the government liquidation process you can buy all sorts of things, they may have just been throwing the stuff away. It amazes me that we sold Iran the f-14's in the first place, you'd think for 20 million a pop they would come with a warranty. Now we sell other military items. I think I would make more of a big deal out of the arm's that are being sold as new to our allies, in 30 years we will be reading about raptor parts going to taiwan.. They don't even say what these parts are on the f14, cockpit handle? decal? SPDT switch?

    35. Re:Not smart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Burn!

    36. Re:Not smart by Memnos · · Score: 1

      No need to apologize. I AM an expert on military aircraft, and the Saegheh is NO match for an F/A-18E/F Super Hornet. Not in speed, dogfighting, avionics, ordnance, targeting, support infrastructure or ancillary systems such as AWACS and MILSTAR. Sorry, but it's a slightly improved F5-E with a twin tail and 80's avionics. I does maneuver well, since the plane the design for it was stolen from also did.

      --
      I don't trust atoms -- they make up stuff.
    37. Re:Not smart by Torvaun · · Score: 1

      Nope, I'd never say that. I conjugate properly. :P

      --
      I see your informative link, and raise you a pithy comment.
    38. Re:Not smart by couchslug · · Score: 4, Informative

      "If I were to take this article at face value, I'd say it's an attempt at sticking it to the army for not taking better care of its stuff. While I'm all for that, it stops being funny once non sequitur allegations are made about certain foreign countries. Then it becomes a transparent attempt at instilling paranoia among the public."

      You are quite right!

      The list of stuff isn't impressive. We should be impressed by a fucking used NBC suit? Literally millions of the things have been produced from the Cold War onward. They are not classified. The "used" (= charcoal no workee no more, washed multiple times so it doesn't stain your uniform black) suits are in every G.I.s NBC training bag and many surplus stores and are NOT illegal to possess!

      Neither are uniforms, with the caveat that you must buy them or be issued them and not (no shit) steal them. Anybody who wants to can buy them (or nicer private brands) online at U.S. Cavalry, Brigade Quartermasters, etc. G.I.s often spend hundreds or even thousands of dollars on aftermarket gear.

      Wanna legal mask?
      http://www.approvedgasmasks.com/msa-mcu2p.htm

      Whole NBC ensembles?
      http://www.approvedgasmasks.com/mask-kits.htm

      I'm sure some illegal gear ends up on Ebay (SAPI plates, etc) but it would be nice to see WHICH "F-14" parts were there. Just because a National Stock Number crosses to an F-14 doesn't make it strategic material.

      Wanna see everything that's for sale legally from Uncle Sugar? You can even bid online:
      http://www.govliquidation.com/

      I did 26 years (Comm/Nav. Engines,Crew Chief) in the USAF and am familiar with aircraft, parts, supply, and buying stuff outta surplus even before it was outsourced to GovLiquidation. The WaPo piece is IMO bullshit fearmongering and reflects their dislike for the military.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    39. Re:Not smart by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1

      piston engine???? If you look at the warplanes of WW2, you find a handful of primitive experimental jet aircraft, and a whole lot of piston engined aircraft. B-17? Piston engined. P-51? Piston engined. Me-109? Piston freakin' engined.

      Do you seriously not know world history well enough to know that WW2 was the age of piston engined aircraft?
      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    40. Re:Not smart by djdavetrouble · · Score: 1

      I recently read a wire news piece about an LA gang that got busted with a rocket launcher.......
      linky

      --
      music lover since 1969
    41. Re:Not smart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IAAM (I am a machinist)

      I agree with you for the most part, but nowadays, the barrier to entry in hi-tech manufacturing is steadily getting lower.

      Hi tech alloys and composite materials can be purchased from a number of countries that are less scrupulous than the western world when choosing a buyer. Sure, you won't get that cool classified radar absorbing paint, but titanium and such are easily obtainable.

      As for the skill required to make to make this stuff - with the plethora of relatively inexpensive and accurate machine tools and tooling it gets easier all the time.

      The actual R&D engineering and technical trades work are the highest hurdles, IMO, but you'll notice they are very few if any controls on who gets trained as machinists and engineers, and if the money is right there are always folks willing to work for unscrupulous employers.

      Another poster mentioned Iran is enriching uranium - if they are at the stage to start doing that, they already have the manufacturing expertise.

      I think the biggest danger is the actual engineering drawings and solid model files getting stolen and used - with proper drawings, it gets ALOT easier, no reverse engineering guesswork required.

    42. Re:Not smart by pjt33 · · Score: 1

      Not entirely. The Soviets had a massive section of their espionage devoted to science and technology, Directorate T of the KGB.

    43. Re:Not smart by pjt33 · · Score: 2, Funny

      My battalion's head cook was selling MRE's on Ebay Wait. People were buying MREs?
    44. Re:Not smart by laddhebert · · Score: 1

      I went back and read what I posted, and I guess it could be taken out of context. I should have said, "people think they are Arab, when in fact, they are Persian (Aryan). People also think they may lack in ..., but they are actually quite adept in those areas". I should have paid closer attention to the "A woman with out a man is nothing" lesson (A woman: without, a man is nothing). I apologize for the confusion. /-l

      --
      Don't Panic.
    45. Re:Not smart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I was in the service, I saw plenty of stuff go missing. Two of the people I worked with packed entire sea bags with firefighting gear, rescue equipent, chem suits and masks. Some how they thought this stuff would be useful on the civilian world--these guys were all going to be firemen once they got out. One guy was going to take a full emergency cutting kit but couldn't fit it in the duffel bag.

      Aircraft parts are one thing, but masks and suits? Everyone in the military is issued these things. If you take your eyes off of it or didn't lock it up, it could go missing instantly. Hell I've seen them in pawn shops.

    46. Re:Not smart by n3tcat · · Score: 1

      I once saw a rack full of MREs in the Commisary. They were for sale at $6 each. The rack stayed full for like two weeks before being removed.

      I guess military meals just don't hold the same novelty value with those who are experienced with them. ;)

    47. Re:Not smart by Mumia · · Score: 1

      My uncle stole a shipping container full of MREs after the first gulf war and sold them. Survivalist, campers, backpackers, etc. buy them as fast as he could get them. He was turned in but they didn't prosecute and he was allowed to retire about 8 years later. Treasury agents told me they wanted him to turn himself in because they had better things to do. Those "better things" turned out to be burning women and children to death at Waco soon after investigating my uncle. Good news though, he's now a police officer and just shot a man to death who had a toy gun. See, things do balance out in the end. Hey, wait a minute...

    48. Re:Not smart by lareader · · Score: 1

      It's for those awkward dinners with relatives - no one has the heart to tell Grandma that her carrot-cake with rabbit stew isn't edible, and hasn't been for the last twenty years.

      So everyone gets MREs so they don't starve to death.
      Either that, or people want food that doesn't spoil, or is impressed by the military aura or whatnot.

    49. Re:Not smart by internetcommie · · Score: 1

      Sounds like things have been tightened up a bit since I left the service 15 years ago. Back then theft was so common some soldiers were afraid of taking their gear out of their locked lockers even when they needed to use it, and sometimes vehicles wouldn't start in the morning because the starter had been removed. One NCO in my unit used to leave base in a military vehicle (against regulations, but nobody were willing to stop it) at lunch every day. When he left the back of the truck was full of boxes; when he came back it was empty. The motor pool sergeant used to order extra parts, some for vehicles or equipment the unit didn't even have. When it arrived it just disappeared. Every time we went to a range a truckload of MREs disappeared, and so on. And that was just in peacetime on a fort in the US. When we went out to play war, equipment disappeared at such a rate I don't think any unit in the battalion was combat ready at any time. We had whole trucks just disappear. Weapons and ammunition were disappearing. Uniforms, battle rattle, NBC suits, gas masks, whatever was in the Army's inventory disappeared all around us. And the quartermasters all had money like the rest of us had sand in our underwear. A few items off decommissioned fighters sounds pretty innocent by comparison, and those NBC suits may just be the last of those my old supply sergeant had in his basement after leaving the service.

    50. Re:Not smart by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Nuclear weapons were first developed in the 40's. As such it might be more reasonable to assume that if they have engineers capable of building a nuclear weapon - then they should be able to make a nice piston engine fighter.

      Could you please explain why place any prop-driven plane has in a dogfight today?

      One or two HE 20mm cannon rounds and anything like that is going to drop right out of the sky. And because it's basically standing still compared to any fighter jet, it has basically no chance to even score a hit. F-14s can launch missiles at something like eight independent targets; others can usually handle less but still multiple targets.

      The only weapon really useful to an underdog nation is a nuke. Everything else is bullshit, or weren't you paying attention when we just ran over and bombed the shit out of Iraq? Several times, recently?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    51. Re:Not smart by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Try doing high precision manufacturing with finicky Titanium, just to name one example.

      I personally know a guy who lives in Santa Cruz county who does this in his garage. He used to make parts for NASA. Last I talked to him he was working on a project to make and install titanium valves and seats in his harley sportster so that it might be reliable.

      These people are out there in the world. Give them the right motivation, and they'll make your parts.

      Depending on the complexity of the part, it might be easiest just to let the computer do the machining, too. You can get a used bridgeport 2.5d CAM mill for $3000. I'm betting that you could get something useful for this type of work for less than $300,000. Which, let's face it, is pocket change when you're talking about a military scale.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    52. Re:Not smart by Memnos · · Score: 1

      You're correct, and it has gotten easier and the mills are far more cheap and capable than back in the day. But, building even a 70's era fighter jet required a big complex infrastructure, of which working with Titanium was but one part. Precision turbine blades were/are another. Getting all the damn pieces to actually work together w/o blowing up is another. But on your point, you're right, and the guy you spoke of is certainly more of an expert on that aspect than I was.

      --
      I don't trust atoms -- they make up stuff.
    53. Re:Not smart by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

      You're talking about a country which my President has told me has a nuclear weapons program. Something tells me if they're capable of getting nuclear engineers, they can figure out how to make a half-decent fighter jet if they really needed to. A basic nuclear device is cutting-edge 1940s technology. They haven't been really high-tech since television has been in color. That they're not widely available is a testament to the economies of scale necessary to produce the nuclear material, and (much, much less so) the efforts on the part of countries that already have them to discourage other countries from acquiring them. (And also the disinterest of many countries who would be capable of producing them, if they really wanted to; a list that includes almost every developed nation.)

      The F-14 represents the pinnacle of aviation technology, circa 1972 or so. There's a ~30 year gap there, and that represents 30 years in which the United States made some pretty significant leaps in engineering technology.

      So in short, just because a country can build a bomb, doesn't mean they could build an F-14.

      And even if they could build an F-14, it doesn't mean it would be much of a match for more recent aircraft, which have a further 20+ years of development behind them. (Although I think you could argue that the pace of development slowed down dramatically after the end of the Cold War, at least in major weapons systems.)
      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    54. Re:Not smart by Keebler71 · · Score: 1

      I think you missed my point entirely. The GP had suggested that if they have smart enough engineers to build a nuclear program, they should have the ability to build jet fighters as well. My point was that historically that is not the case -that historically nations developed prop fighter technology in about the same period as they developed nuclear programs.

      --
      "It takes considerable knowledge just to realize the extent of your own ignorance." - Thomas Sowell
  4. Should have suspected something....... by edwardpickman · · Score: 5, Funny

    When the same guy kept driving off with a different Humvee each day with F-14 parts stuffed down his pants.

    1. Re:Should have suspected something....... by ozmanjusri · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Is that an AIM-54 in your pocket, or are you just happy to see me?"

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    2. Re:Should have suspected something....... by MrNaz · · Score: 1

      ...says the MiG to the F-16

      --
      I hate printers.
    3. Re:Should have suspected something....... by DarkOx · · Score: 1

      Hey he must have done it

      "One pice at a time so it didn't cost him a dime"

      He could have easily stuck the parts in his big lunch box. Johny Cache claims in to gotten a free car out GM that way in one of his songs...

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    4. Re:Should have suspected something....... by Killjoy_NL · · Score: 1

      Damn big lunchbox then ;)

      --
      This is the sig that says NI (again)
  5. I wonder by AndGodSed · · Score: 1

    If one could steal something like this, what else is available on the black market... a nuke!?

    1. Re:I wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      one can already 'acquire' nuclear weapons from the stockpiles left in former soviet countries.

    2. Re:I wonder by Councilor+Hart · · Score: 1

      Aren't the Russians missing a few suitcase size nukes? Or was that just fear mongering from the 90's?

    3. Re:I wonder by budgenator · · Score: 1

      Missing doesn't always mean the something as stolen, they might have been cannibalized
        for repair parts to repair others or decommissioned and the serials numbers not deleted, or sitting in a bunker somewhere and the transfer paper work lost as well as thew more likely physically stolen

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
  6. And this is on the Internet.... by blankoboy · · Score: 1

    what other US mil weaponry do you think is being sold in the black market that doesn't even show a blip on the radar? Yeah, that's the stuff that should be keeping you all awake at night. With all the stockpiles of nuclear weaponry, you know something's going (or already) has gone missing/unaccounted for.

    1. Re:And this is on the Internet.... by jo42 · · Score: 1

      In other news, Investigators found that screw drivers, hammers, screws, nails, chunks of wood, bits of metal and fabric, memory chips, CPUs, hard drives and computers cases with windows, now retired by the military, could easily be purchased and transferred to the Iranian military, which is seeking these components, the report said.

  7. Fear mongering? by bkraptor · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What's this called? (hint: fear mongering?) Why was the Iranian military mentioned in the article? Are Iranians the only ones out there that can possibly hurt the US? No, anyone can buy that stuff and damage other countries. The US isn't the only country on this planet. Please, for the sake of the future, stop acting like everyone is out to get you.

    1. Re:Fear mongering? by trash+eighty · · Score: 2, Informative

      As some of the parts were for F-14 fighters and Iran are the only operators of the type now why not mention them? There wouldn't really be much point Al-Qaeda or North Korea buying F-14 spares, unless they were going to throw them at GWB's head.

    2. Re:Fear mongering? by bytta · · Score: 1
      So true.

      If you treat everyone like they're out to get you, in the end many of them will want to...

    3. Re:Fear mongering? by MrNaz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Please, for the sake of the future, stop acting like everyone is out to get you.

      I think a more appropriate request would be "stop doing things that make everyone want to get you".

      --
      I hate printers.
    4. Re:Fear mongering? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      besides Iran probably can MAKE F14 parts if they really want them... it's not like other country's military respects patents.

      The F14 is a 30+ year old EOL aircraft. It's too bad there are so many fear-mongers out there because nobody will be able to keep a few birds flying for air shows and such. After WW2 & Korea you could buy excess 2 1/2 ton trucks, flack jackets, guns, & prop planes by the dozen. Even retired Howitzers and Shermans made their way parked in front of many VFW posts. Army Surplus in the 60's, 70's, & 80's was the big thing. Some of that stuff is still used by guys like the "Michigan Militia" (not associated with the state)

      Nothing is like going to an air show and seeing those old B17's or B25's or P51's or the old "heuey" choppers that somebody scavanged from the scrap heap and worked hard to hand make parts for. After 9/11 people started harassing even the VFW people for those inoperable cannons and tanks they have out front. That means nobody will keep any of that history alive for fear of the paranoid and the govt spooks. That is sad.

    5. Re:Fear mongering? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the point is that they are not allowed to legally purchase those parts.

    6. Re:Fear mongering? by jcnnghm · · Score: 1

      You don't think that someone stealing and selling military hardware on the Internet is a problem? It was explained why Iran was mentioned in the very first line of the article, because they've been actively seeking some of the parts that were available for sale. Burying your head in the sand doesn't make your problems go away.

      --
      You don't make the poor richer by making the rich poorer. - Winston Churchill
    7. Re:Fear mongering? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is not so much fear mongering as an inaccurate assumption that everyone knows that in the late 1970's the US exported a fleet of F-14s to Iran. Obviously when the current government came into power we stopped exporting parts to them, so they are probably one of the few countries that would actually be more threatening if they got their hands on some random F-14 parts.

    8. Re:Fear mongering? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, I don't think it's a problem. I hope the seller made some good money and that the buyer has fun with the parts. There you go.

    9. Re:Fear mongering? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well the Iranians are mentioned because IIRC they are the ONLY country that operates the F-14.

    10. Re:Fear mongering? by fermion · · Score: 2, Insightful
      If I were a major government I would have much more sophisticated methods of acquiring stolen property than ebay. Ebay has not privacy guarantees, and has no incentives to keep any particular customer or seller happy. If one goes another will take the place.

      It is fear mongering. If the Iranian government can get machinery to refine nuclear materials, then why not an plane. And what are they going to do with one plane, other than use it create other planes, in which case they need a whole plane to begin with, not bit and pieces.

      To put it plainly, Ebay may be where someone like the Eric Rudolf and the Army of God might buy stuff to kill women and children. And while a group like that could use an F-16, I do not see the US administration monitoring radical US traditional churches, just people whose beliefs disagree with their own.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    11. Re:Fear mongering? by Null+Perception · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Far more terrorist related deaths have occurred in countries other than the US. Everyone should stop referring to a single incident as if it is the defining moment which makes all fear-mongering justified.

      --
      Great new book on Evolution: The Greatest Show on Earth by Richard Dawkins
    12. Re:Fear mongering? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. Whoever wrote the original article is largely misinformed and probably incompetent. The Iranians DON'T have a military. Everyone knows the most powerful countries in the middle east are Israel and the U.S. The only threat Iran poses is that of an ant to a boy (the US) with a magnifying glass on a very sunny day.

    13. Re:Fear mongering? by optimistic_cynic · · Score: 1

      First of all, I'd seriously doubt the equipment was stolen. Our government doesn't have particularly stellar accountability for its property. Particularly the Department of Defense and Justice. Does anyone remember the number of laptops the Justice Dept. "lost"? Not to mention the weapons the FBI "loses" on a regular basis. The items that were supposedly listed on E-Bay could concievably have been purchased legally through the Defense Reutilization and MARKETING Office (DRMO). As for the comment about Iran, can we all say "fear mongering?" sure we can

    14. Re:Fear mongering? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not just after Korea. Surplus 6x6 M35 2 1/2 ton trucks are available for about $5-10k these days, depending on mileage, model and condition. These cold-war trucks are currenty being replaced by a different model. That makes the idiot down the street with a hummer look even dumber imho.

    15. Re:Fear mongering? by jcnnghm · · Score: 1

      What do you think is meant when these departments report losing inventory? That they collectively misplaced it? I suppose the loss prevention teams at major retailers are there to make sure large quantities of merchandise aren't being misplaced around the store as well. Or perhaps the massive employee theft and internal fraud problems that plague the private sector also exist in government, and hot high ticket items fall off the back of trucks or leave the office with someone and never come back.

      You are delusional if you believe that there aren't people at every organization that will try their best to rob the place blind. The corollary to that is, you're also delusional if you believe there aren't countries and world leaders that given the opportunity, wouldn't do you harm. Pull your head out of the sand, remove your rose-colored glasses, and get real.

      --
      You don't make the poor richer by making the rich poorer. - Winston Churchill
    16. Re:Fear mongering? by optimistic_cynic · · Score: 1

      Yeah, well, there are undoubtedly people in cloaks carrying daggers creeping around stealing equipment that is readily available at most, if not all, military surplus stores, but it still boils down to the absolutely lack-luster attempt the government makes to protect its property. How much of the m(b)illions of dollars of equipment we simply left behind in...oh say..Viet Nam, Afganistan, Iraq, Grenada, Panama, and God know how many other "clandestine" operations all over the world do you honestly think didn't end up in the hands of "someone" who could do harm to another human, be it me or anyone else? For God's sake we can't even keep track of nuclear warheads that fly across the country illegally. If my head is in the sand, it seems as though we share the same sandpile.

    17. Re:Fear mongering? by Piazzola · · Score: 2, Interesting
    18. Re:Fear mongering? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think they mentioned Iran because they have F-14s which are capable of firing nuclear missiles. They were given to Iran during the reign of the Shah. Since then obviously the US hasn't given them anything to maintain their equipment for fear it will be used against them; the Iranians are trying their hardest to maintain the jets, apparently going so far as asking Russia for similar parts that they can fix up their F-14s with. Also since it looks like the US MAY go to war with Iran; it would obviously be very helpful if they didn't have jets launching nukes at the US military.

    19. Re:Fear mongering? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Far more terrorist related deaths are still occurring in countries other than the US, maybe they should get a clue.

    20. Re:Fear mongering? by tade · · Score: 1

      I think it's pretty fair call seeing how the Iranians are the only country with F-14 still in active service http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F-14_Tomcat. I highly doubt that they are able to buy spare parts from the Northrop Grumman directly.

    21. Re:Fear mongering? by cgreentx · · Score: 1

      No, but they are the primary country with a stable of ancient F14's and an embargo preventing them from getting parts for them.

  8. Stolen parts by Wowsers · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm sure that they could get the stolen parts back, don't Paypal have an excellent record for helping all sides in disputes?

    --
    Take Nobody's Word For It.
  9. Nothing new here by Hojima · · Score: 4, Informative

    People have been selling military equipment from the US for years. Ever seen "Lord of War"? Not all of it was fiction you know. Probably the only surprise is that it was sold on ebay. And chances are that the military equipment wasn't stolen either. Many parts from scrapped vehicles are given or sold to boneyards to be sold again. Hell, the old motors from Vietnam's apache helicopters are actually in use on speedboats up to this day.

    1. Re:Nothing new here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Uhmmm we had apache helicopter's in Vietnam? wow.. :) And if I recall right, most of Lord of War was actually based off of a true story.

    2. Re:Nothing new here by Mumia · · Score: 1

      Vietnam? AH64 production began in 1982.

    3. Re:Nothing new here by Hojima · · Score: 1

      yea you're right, I thought it was the apache but I'm not sure which one now. I do remember that it was that twin rotor helicopter transport helicopter, because it was a really strong engine. In fact the reason it was the motor of choice was because the torque it supplied for the boat would hardly strain the engine.

  10. More fearmongering? by ParaShoot · · Score: 5, Informative

    The Register has their usual perspective-giving article up, for those of you who might be inclined to start screaming OMG TERRORISTS as the US Government no doubt wants you to.

    1. Re:More fearmongering? by kman · · Score: 1

      The Register's article is definitely a much more detailed (and entertaining) account of the GAO Report...which The Washington Post conveniently forgets to link up. But here it is for your reading pleasure:

      http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d08644t.pdf

  11. Which is scarier? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The fact that stuff is been stolen from the military or the fact you can buy it all from Ebay of all places?

  12. They got the F-14 from there Pepsi points but they by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

    They got the F-14 from there Pepsi points but they where sent out part by part.

  13. Fines involved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Copy a single song recorded in 1950 and not heard on the radio for decades so that you can practice it on your guitar? WIth these new laws being proposed, you could owe the publisher millions in fines and fees.

    Sell stolen US F-14 parts for profit to anyone, so that you can buy some crack? Misdemeanor.

    1. Re:Fines involved by Null+Perception · · Score: 0
      Simply referring to copyright law is copyrighted! We'll see you in court.

      Yours Maliciously,

      MafIAA

      --
      Great new book on Evolution: The Greatest Show on Earth by Richard Dawkins
    2. Re:Fines involved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I read that, a Johnny Cash song got stuck in my head ("One Piece at a Time").

  14. It seems clear that there is a problem.... by 3seas · · Score: 1

    ... with US security of military supplies.

    Certainly this is more serious than any supposed terrorist country or terrorist group buying such property.

    Play with matches and you will burn yourself.

  15. What a crock of shit by AIFEX · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "The property was likely stolen from the Defense Department, the report said."

    Ok, probably the F-14 parts, but being ex-forces I myself have about 3 NBC suits and a box full of respirator canisters, amongst god knows what else, from clothes to tins, helmets, gortex. It's all just surplus you pick up during your time in. Half of it you can buy and any army surplus store/warehouse anyway.

    --
    Biomech
    1. Re:What a crock of shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly! The person buying the suit is most likely another soldier who lost his in the field and has to turn one in to clear the post before leaving the military or for another assignment - not some terrorist.

    2. Re:What a crock of shit by shawn(at)fsu · · Score: 1

      I think what they are trying to say is that if you have it and didn't give it back when you out processed "technically" it's stolen. It might not be a nefarious thing such as "Hey lets steal this so we can sell it online, but it is something that they were supposed to give back. Selling it just makes it look worse.

      --
      500 dollar reward for tip(s) leading to the arrest of the person(s) who stole my sig.
    3. Re:What a crock of shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Never mind that. You can get all that fancy "nuclear/biological protective gear" by opening an ordinary scientific supply catalog and ordering it. There are dozens of companies. And, my god, most of those companies also have ordering ON THE INTERNET!

    4. Re:What a crock of shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's the thing though, if you just turn in an extra set some other soldier can't get a replacement for the one he needs to clear. It's better off sold to the off-post military surplus store so when someone needs to clear they can run off post and buy it rather than fill out forms and over-pay for new equipment to replace the one some do-gooding soldier turned in already. Also it's not really like it's theft as long as it stays within the food chain of the u.s. military. Most likely the buyer of these lost items is responsible for their own set of lost items...it's a one for one. Consider the profit from these sales a finders fee for returning a lost item.

      I'm speaking from experience here too, I lost something and had to buy it when I cleared. I'm thankful someone found something and sold it to the off-post surplus store.

    5. Re:What a crock of shit by AbraCadaver · · Score: 1

      What I found interesting is the total lack of understanding about the technologies involved. NOTHING that was listed is "high-tech" in terms of only being available to the US military. For instance, infrared cameras, both near and far, have been in use around the world for the last 10-15 years. You can modify most any CCD camera to see in the near infrared range by removing the filter element that blocks IR. For far IR you can use the CCD cooling kits available in astronomy magazines (along with suitable optics). I don't know about AIFEX, but the CBR suits they dragged out of storage for us to use were about 10-15 years old and not in that great of shape. I'm sure much better suits can be had abroad from chemical supply companies. One of the reports I read also brought up the attacks where forces dressed up in stolen US uniforms to bypass security and initiate an attack inside a base (I forget which). Because we all know the opposition forces inside Iraq are using EBay and Craigs List to buy US Army uniforms shipped from the states, instead of having an agent swipe them out of a warehouse INSIDE Iraq. Same with the IR goggles, MREs, CBR suits, etc if they wanted 'em. I have to agree with the posters that mentioned this as being a fear-mongering attempt. The problem is, the frumpy old non-technologically inclined representatives of our government will agree with this nonsense when spoon-fed to them by "experts", and will follow right along with the party lines of "something needs to be done!". I expect any day now they'll react in shock and dismay to the revelation that Iran has access to "them there inter-tubes" as well.

    6. Re:What a crock of shit by NoisySplatter · · Score: 1

      The best part is that the summary specifies a used NBC suit. good thing they have a useful life of like 24 hours once out of the wrapper. If the military never asked for it back is it really theft? Everyone in the military takes stuff, you have to because they bust your balls if you lose a damn glove let alone a $400 sleeping bag.

      --
      In Soviet Russia meme tires of you!
    7. Re:What a crock of shit by Mr.+Shotgun · · Score: 1

      Funny, when I went through out processing if I didn't have anything that I needed to turn in I got to sign a statement of charges, in other words I payed for what I lost. How would it be considered stealing if I payed for it? Furthermore if after paying for it I should come across the items in the back of my closet or whatever, I would think that ownership would in fact be mine. Meaning I can do with it whatever I want, including selling it.

      --
      Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the (supposed) good of its victims may be the most oppressive
  16. FUD by Missing_dc · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is all FUD, I did a search on ebay and this is what I got:

    0 items found for: stolen military equipment

    How do they expect us to believe an article if we can't verify the sources ;)

    --
    How amazed would you be to suddenly find that you just forgot what I wrote and you needed to reread my post.... again.
  17. NBC Suit loss is common by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Every soldier is issued an NBC suit (including mask and filters) and they are one of the first things to get lost on field deployments - not a major theft of some military secret equipment.

    1. Re:NBC Suit loss is common by budgenator · · Score: 1

      wish I had a dollar for every M17 mask turned in for a lost M17A2

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    2. Re:NBC Suit loss is common by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1

      wish I had a dollar for every M17 mask turned in for a lost M17A2 Hah! Been there! Another good one is helmets. When my unit deployed to Afghanistan, some of us had old PASGT helmets issued due to inventory shortages on the ACH. Amusingly, despite enough ACHs being issued in theater to replace nearly all the PASGTs, when it came time to turn equipment back in, a surprising number turned in PASGT helmets. One particularly humorous one was even a rare early "Mk I" PASGT, 1.5x as thick and heavy as the "full production" version that saw widespread issue. It was probably worth MORE than an ACH solely for its collectors value!
      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  18. Goos invenrory keeping by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >>> To correct the problem, the Army started a program in 2006 to account for all of its inventories. To date the Army has accounted for more than 20,000 items worth more than $135 million, she said.

    So they can account for 20000 items with 1,426,713 active members in the army ? Sounds like they can't even account for all their uniforms.

  19. Don't know about the US army but... by ZeroExistenZ · · Score: 5, Interesting
    .. My grandfather always has these kindof stories from when h e lead different sections in the Belgian army. Mostly it was because of the paperwork. I recall him telling about an inspector asking for a specific vehicle. My grandfather would look it up in the logbooks and reported it being at a certain base. After his reporting, he got a reply asking wherever he was "really sure". So he sent out a soldier to verify it, he came back, reported the vehicles present in that base. But the guy never checked the chassis numbers and such. He just confirmed there were vehicles of that type present.

    Turned out, the bordercontrol had arrested some guys who'd stolen some vehicles. Officially they weren't gone as they weren't reported missing.

    Same with selling overstock; Every month a train came by bringing soldiers' cigarettes. They were picked up from the town and brought to base. At a certain point the soldier ordered to pick them up reported the shipment being picked up by "unknown" individuals. (so some Germans have been imposing as an army unit to pick up the shipment cigarettes). Since then my grandfather was put in charge for a new order, with the order to order 20% extra "just in case".
    Instead of piling up the 20%, they devised a plan to sell it consistently through an external contractor and the profits where split. Until bordercontrol noticed an unusual high amount of soldiers going home for the weekend and they've searched some vehicles.

    This is all post-WW erra with a bloathed army with paper reporting, but still. I can imagine there are still people trying to make a profit like this or the same logistic problems.

    Oh yea, my grandfather went on trail for that and got away clean because they had to sign a statement they couldn't sell "their own" rations. He stated he didn't, he had sold overstock. After that he was put in charge of all logistics instead of his own regiment and the statement was adjusted.

    --
    I think we can keep recursing like this until someone returns 1
  20. Re:Not smart - obviously??? by rubycodez · · Score: 4, Informative

    Obviously stolen? the F-14 has been scrapped. they're in junkyards here and abroad. entire decommissioned aircraft like the Harrier have been sold on eBay, perfectly legal. There's a hobbyist market for the parts for all manner of aircraft too. You can buy decommissioned howitzers, tanks, jets...parks and VFWs have them. And uniforms and MRE, anyone can buy those, perfectly legal.

  21. Feedback by base3 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Great F-14, kills infidels wonderfully. Allahu Ackbar! A++++++

    --
    One CPU cycle wasted on digital restrictions management is ONE TOO MANY.
    1. Re:Feedback by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Would buy again, but died in suicide crash.

      Posting anon^H^H^H^Hposthumously for obvious reasons.

    2. Re:Feedback by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wonderful, he probably means by having those infidels fly the godfearing birds with cheap copy parts from stolen goods.

      pray god these people have a quick and mercyful death. ... knights chaaaaaarge, for the pope and the cross !!!

  22. don't let the truth spoil a good story by petes_PoV · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Given the headline that says the items were stolen, how come later it says they were "likely" stolen and also that "the investigators couldn't determinewhere the sellers had obtained ..."

    It mentions a couple of "components" from F14's - what? Nut and bolts or complete avionics - there's a huge difference. I would expect that if it had been anything significant, they wouldn't named them - so my money is on a few small pieces of easily machined metal.

    The article then makes the subtle leap from talking about buying these F14 spares to say "The warplanes, now retired by the military, could easily be purchased and transferred to the Iranian military, which is seeking its".

    Pardon me, but nowhere are they claiming to have actually *bought* the planes. They just seem to be sowing FUD in the readers mind.

    It's a pity these guys couldn't find any journalistic integrity for sale on eBay - or maybe that's where theirs went.

    --
    politicians are like babies' nappies: they should both be changed regularly and for the same reasons
    1. Re:don't let the truth spoil a good story by Repossessed · · Score: 1

      Iran is the logical endpoint for black market F-14 parts actually, since Iran owns actual F-14s, and needs parts for maintenance.

      --
      Liberte, Egalite, Fraternite (TM)
    2. Re:don't let the truth spoil a good story by hkz · · Score: 1

      Plus, the Iranians could buy some pretty good fighter jets from the Russians if they wanted. It's not like the US has a monopoly on fighter jets.

  23. I do not remember seeing any F-14 parts by Reconmax · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I was in the army 15 years ago and the pawn shops around post were full of military equipment. Not just the stuff that soldiers are expected to buy for their job either. I remember soldiers who lost their NBC (nuclear/biological/chemical) mask would go buy one at a pawn shop so they would have something to turn in when they PCS (Permanent Change of Station). However, I do not remember seeing any F-14 parts...

  24. Why does Iran want F-14 parts? Iran threat? No. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 4, Informative

    Exactly. Thanks for adding some reason to the discussion.

    Quote from the Slashdot story: "The warplanes, now retired by the military, could easily be purchased and transferred to the Iranian military, which is seeking its components, the report said."

    Why does Iran want F-14 parts? I'm guessing that is because the war industry in the U.S. sold the Iranian government F-14s, with the permission and the aid of the U.S. government. Presumably that happened when the Shah was in control. The Shah was a U.S. government puppet, installed in 1953 after the U.S. government destroyed the administration of the democratically elected President Mohammed Mossadegh". That's right, those who control the U.S. government were against democracy, for violence, for interference in the operation of other countries, and they put profit above all other issues.

    Also, Iran is not the threat that is being presented to U.S. citizens. Those who control the U.S. government are trying to demonize Iran the way they demonized Iraq. They want a war, and the entire reason they want a war with Iran is the same as the reason they wanted war with Iraq: to make more money. Those who control the U.S. government have a sickness about money. They will do anything to get more money, even lie and kill other people.

    At the beginning of the first U.S. government-Iraq war, U.S. weapons companies were still delivering weapons to Iraq, under a long-term contract. Those who control the U.S. government and weapons companies want war, continous war.

    The U.S. government is the biggest promoter of violence in the world. Don't say "we" when talking about war. There is no "we", unless you are part of the group that makes the profits, while stealing from U.S. taxpayers.

    If you love your wife, and she is having a difficult time, you don't turn your back on her. You get involved and try to help. It's the same with your country. If you love the U.S. like I do, you will help stop the violence.

    1. Re:Why does Iran want F-14 parts? Iran threat? No. by Dun+Malg · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The Shah was a U.S. government puppet, installed in 1953 after the U.S. government destroyed the administration of the democratically elected President Mohammed Mossadegh". Nice propaganda, but it isn't true. The US has indeed fomented rebellion and installed puppet dictators, but the Shah of Iran was not one of them. Shah Pahlavi was the last in a line of Iranian kings that goes back hundreds, and arguably thousands of years. The Shah, as head of the constitutional monarchy removed Mossadeq from his position as head of parliament after he 1) demanded full control of the military, 2) moved to abolish anonymity in popular voting, and 3) moved to dissolve parliament, a power reserved for the Shah. It was, in fact, Mossadeq who was trying to install himself as dictator. All the US did was strongly encourage the Shah to act within his power as head of state in removing a populist would-be dictator from a dangerous position. Now, Shah Pahlavi was no saint, to be sure, and the wisdom of our involvement in the region is debatable (see Pakistan today); but the popular myth that it was any sort of "coup" fails in the face of fact. Even the hideously anti-US slanted wikipedia entry admits that "Operation Ajax", the so-called "coup", was nothing of the sort:

      "The plot, known as Operation Ajax, centered around convincing Iran's monarch to use his constitutional authority to dismiss Mossadegh from office"

      Ah yeas, spreading stories about Mossadeq and lobbying the constitutional leader of the country to act within his powers to remove a man contrary to our interests, yes, that's the same as arming revolutionaries to storm the presidential mansion! In that case, anyone who's ever written a letter asking congress to impeach Bush, they are also attempting a "coup".

      Really, if you want an example of US malfeasance, go look at that asshole Kissinger with regard to Chile and Pinochet. Iran just ain't fuckin' it, no matter how much airhead intellectual leftist tell each other it was.
      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    2. Re:Why does Iran want F-14 parts? Iran threat? No. by glitch23 · · Score: 1

      Also, Iran is not the threat that is being presented to U.S. citizens. Those who control the U.S. government are trying to demonize Iran the way they demonized Iraq.

      You have a point. The threatening Iran is unfortunately not being represented properly in the US media and therefore it seems that Iran is not a threat. The nice, sweet Iran is what is portrayed in the media. However, if you look at the video coming out of Iran (but not replayed in the mainstream US media) you will see that Mahmoud Ahmadinejad wants war with the US. They want the US destroyed. They propagandize on their side to make their people hate the US. But of course you won't see that in the mainstream media in the US. Everything is hunky dory as far as most people know.

      The U.S. government is the biggest promoter of violence in the world. Don't say "we" when talking about war. There is no "we", unless you are part of the group that makes the profits, while stealing from U.S. taxpayers.

      I think you need to study the behavior of Islamic extremists, specifically those in Iran, before you state that the US government is the biggest promoter of violence in the world.

      --
      this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom. -- Lincoln, Gettysburg Address
    3. Re:Why does Iran want F-14 parts? Iran threat? No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with your sentiment... however, I don't believe profit was the sole reason the US got involved in Iran in 1953... we (US) was lead astray by the British in a convincing tale of communism for Iran if we didn't intervene.

    4. Re:Why does Iran want F-14 parts? Iran threat? No. by rtechie · · Score: 1

      Shah Pahlavi was the last in a line of Iranian kings that goes back hundreds, and arguably thousands of years. Pahlavi's claim to the Iranian throne was always suspect. His father overthrew the previous Shah and he himself was appointed by the West to replace his father. Monarchs, who are dictators, have no valid mandate to rule anyone. Monarchies are inherently tyrannical.

      The Shah, as head of the constitutional monarchy removed Mossadeq from his position as head of parliament after he 1) demanded full control of the military, 2) moved to abolish anonymity in popular voting, and 3) moved to dissolve parliament, a power reserved for the Shah. It was, in fact, Mossadeq who was trying to install himself as dictator. Except that the Shah was also a dictator who was moving to overthrow him.

      The real issue was the fact that parliament, and Mossadeq in particular, nationalized the British oil company (now BP) that owned the Iranian oil industry. The population of Iran overwhelmingly supported nationalization and therefore they supported Mossadeq. Mossadeq refused to negotiate with the British to give them a share of Iranian oil profits. In response, the British prevented all oil exports from Iran by blockading the country. In fact, the British threated to invade if Mossadeq was not overthrown.

      It's considered a US "coup" because the US backed the Shah with money and other resources (in part to stave off a British invasion). So, at the very least, they intervened on the Shah's side in a civil war in a quid pro quo for oil concessions.

      yes, that's the same as arming revolutionaries to storm the presidential mansion! In fact, this is EXACTLY what the CIA did in Iran.

      The USA has publicly admitted on numerous occasions that they organized a coup against the Shah. This is simply not controversial.

  25. Nevermind ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...checking up on F-14 parts, make sure all that Coltan is accounted for.

    Priorities, people!

  26. Its not all stolen... by missileman · · Score: 4, Informative

    Heaps of guys in the hobby have built home sims using parts from real jets. F15s, F16s, A7Es etc. There *are* legitimate ways of getting hold of cockpit parts that aren't stolen. Since the F14 is no longer in service it would not be a stretch at all to find bits of a broken up one for sale. One guy got a whole F15 cockpit for his project. http://www.f15sim.com/index.html

    He got it from the Olympia Air Museum. Prior to that it was PURCHASED from McChord AFB in Tacoma after being struck off the register. It was used for training battle damage repair.

    Aircraft parts from wrecked, scraped airframes often legitimately come up for sale on Ebay, IMO this report / article is just a way to promote an agenda. Congress are probably planning some new bill defining everyone who possesses ex-military equipment a terrorist. I guess I'm a cynic.

  27. Used? by shadow42 · · Score: 1

    Don't worry about it. The new owner of the used radiation protection suit probably won't have a chance to use it for very long.

  28. Stockpiling Ammo and Guns by failedlogic · · Score: 1

    Its been long known that some soldiers, etc. have been keeping guns and ammo for themselves including rifles and machine guns. In Canada a few years ago some soldiers robbed a bank and were armed to the teeth: C7s, handguns, flashbangs.

    I wouldn't be surprised that high explosives and such are also stolen. I've gone to military bases before and you seriously don't want to mess with the military police. I don't even want to think what would happen - or who would go after you - if you stole F-14 parts or chem-bio suits with the special filters in the gas masks.

    I certainly hope, that there's more of a crack down on stealing equipment. At the least, stealing guns and ammo poses a serious risk to the public at large.

    1. Re:Stockpiling Ammo and Guns by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      Its been long known that some soldiers, etc. have been keeping guns and ammo for themselves including rifles and machine guns. Some? I shouldn't say all, and I'm not military my self, but from my understanding soldiers who want to bring ammo home is the sort of thing that might be encouraged as it gives them a chance to enjoy target practice during their off hours. I would think that this is the sort of thing that should be encouraged to a degree.

      High explosives? Grenades? That's there I would draw the line.
      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    2. Re:Stockpiling Ammo and Guns by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1

      Its been long known that some soldiers, etc. have been keeping guns and ammo for themselves including rifles and machine guns. Known by whom? They keep a pretty tight accounting of firearms in the military, at least in garrison. Now, in theater you can take your pick amongst the AKs, RPKs, ever old M-16A1's at the local hadji market, but bring it back here to the US? No way.
      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    3. Re:Stockpiling Ammo and Guns by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1

      I'm not military my self, but from my understanding soldiers who want to bring ammo home is the sort of thing that might be encouraged as it gives them a chance to enjoy target practice during their off hours. I would think that this is the sort of thing that should be encouraged to a degree. Yeah, you've obviously never been in the US military. When you leave the firing range or come out of a combat zone, they just about make you turn out your pockets to make sure you don't have any stray ammo that you might shoot someone with. Back when I was with the 7th Light Infantry, they not only wouldn't let us have bayonets in garrison (might stab each other), but they took away our E-tools (shovels) because a couple infantry guys got in a shovel fight!
      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    4. Re:Stockpiling Ammo and Guns by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      Yeah, you've obviously never been in the US military. When you leave the firing range or come out of a combat zone, they just about make you turn out your pockets to make sure you don't have any stray ammo that you might shoot someone with. /me looks at his tins of .30 caliper ammo and scratches his head.

      Seriously I would like to know when the US changed their attitude on ammo. I'm not military but I know that I have ammo that was fetched from the shotting range some decades back, and have spent time with military types who seem to have endless supplies of ammo that they pretty much nicked from uncle sam.

      While I never presumed it was official policy to give solders free ammo... there seemed to be much of it floating about, something I didn't object to as it's their job to shoot things.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
  29. Re:Not smart - obviously??? by SydShamino · · Score: 1

    They're scrapped, but they're not in junkyards. The government is specifically destroying them all rather than risk selling them off in any form, because the only buyer besides hobbyist collectors or museums is Iran.

    http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/pentagon_spending_900000_to_destroy_f_14_tomcats/

    --
    It doesn't hurt to be nice.
  30. Re:Not smart - obviously??? by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

    Typically the DoD sells war items for scrap under a license that specifically forbids the buyer from selling on any item whole or in part as a usable piece of equipment. There was an ex Blue Angels F-18 that made it to Ebay because the DoD had disposed of it in an irregular manner (legitimately, just not the normal way they did it) and they didn't get the buyer to sign the agreement. The F-14s are heavily scrutinised precisely because Iran still has active aircraft - the DoD went so far as to have several museum pieces removed from display and disposed of because of lax security.

  31. "Likely stolen" by menace3society · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The DoD spokesjerk says the kit was "likely stolen". These guys have been misplacing shit for years, and they have the audacity to assume some junk sold on the internet is stolen?

    I saw an documentary on the war in Iraq. One segment focused on a particular base where various units would be stationed temporarily before being moved on to somewhere else. Any material or equipment that they didn't want to take with them at the end of their stay just got dumped because they didn't want to do the paperwork to return it to the quartermaster. It all just ended up being a big pile of junk in the middle of the desert, and there are apparently dozens of these across Iraq. You expect me to believe that no one just picks that stuff up takes it home?

    If the Defense Department wants to stop this stuff being sold online, they should stop misplacing it in the first place. They have no one but themselves to blame.

  32. Awesome. by Zero_Independent · · Score: 0

    I'll take an M16, an M4, a Desert Eagle, and a NBC protective suit.

    1. Re:Awesome. by NoisySplatter · · Score: 1

      Would you like bombs with that?

      --
      In Soviet Russia meme tires of you!
  33. "could be" is news now? by superwiz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What's next? A virus "could" come about that wipes out humanity? A company "could" decide that it will destroy humanity for profit? This could happen and that could happen is not news. It's not even speculation. It's just fud.

    --
    Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
  34. Alarmist crap by FeatherBoa · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The story is just alarmist garbage making sound like people are scoring RPGs or artillery pieces in back alleys. The stuff is the same surplus gas-masks, boots and canteens you've been able to buy since Moses was a boy. The "F-14 parts" are dashboard lightbulbs and tire-valve caps. Oooh a MILSPEC 3876783-4786478-3478647 instrument cable! wow!

  35. military surplus by CompMD · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Working in the aerospace field has exposed me to tons of interesting surplus. I have an F-14 canopy, various B-57 parts, and a ton of clothing and tools. A friend of mine owns a P-51 fighter that he keeps hangared at our local airport. It replaces another fighter from his collection, one of the last surviving F4F Wildcats that he sold to a museum. There are tons of Aero Vodochody fighter trainers flying around the US. And if you've ever flown in a Cessna Citation, that's technically a dual use aircraft; some eastern European countries have retrofitted Citations with missile pylons. Heck, the Learjet 25 was *designed* to be a fighter.

    If you count foreign military surplus, all of my firearms are military surplus, including Mosin-Nagant rifles, a Nagant revolver, a Romanian AK-47, and Sig Sauer and Tokarev pistols.

    There's a good story about a rich guy who bought a MiG-23 from Poland (I think) and had it imported. It would have been totally legal except for one problem: when the aircraft was pulled off the flightline, it wasn't disarmed. In the shipping crate, were armed air-to-air missiles, the Russian equivalent of a Sidewinders, and in the nose section the gun was still loaded and armed. US Customs took exception to this and confiscated the aircraft. Shortly thereafter it was given to the Air Force and is now on display at Wright Patterson AFB.

    So, bottom line, is there are legal ways to own all kinds of military equipment.

    1. Re:military surplus by kaszeta · · Score: 1
      Working in the aerospace field has exposed me to tons of interesting surplus. I have an F-14 canopy, various B-57 parts, and a ton of clothing and tools.

      Same here. Amongst my collection of items gotten through legitimate surplus channels (DMRO, Govt Auctions, or auctions from government suppliers), I've got a rather healthy collection of geiger counters (Texas Department of Health surplus), kevlar vests, first aid kits in nice pelican cases, helmets, gas masks, tools (including a nice titanium crowbar), etc.

      Sure, all sorts of stuff gets nicked from the military and ends up on ebay, but there are all sorts of legitimate channels for most of this stuff as well.

  36. No problem by Rui+del-Negro · · Score: 4, Funny

    When you add the eBay and PayPal fees, it's actually cheaper to develop this stuff from scratch.

  37. Re:Not smart - obviously??? by BitZtream · · Score: 2, Insightful

    While you are partially correct, you left out some important information.

    Buying an F-14 airframe has been something thats been possible for years. You will however, not find an air ready F-14. They get stripped of many things, like avionics and turbines.

    Without the avionics, the F-14 won't fly. You can hack together a lot of things to make it somewhat flight ready, hell you may be able to even get it in the air if worked hard enough. But what you put in the air, would in no way be a fighter jet other than its look.

    While the airframe is an extremely important part of the aircraft, obviously, it is not everything and most of our ability to kick ass in the air comes from avionics and pilots.

    Coming up with skilled pilots is for an F-14 is not easy, but far from impossible. Coming up with compariable avionics that have been designed and refined to make the F-14 (when thinking of the Top Gun aircraft) what it is, thats another story. Its not like the first attempt to make the F-14 an evil killing machine was perfect, the systems were refined continually and upgraded over the years.

    Good luck buying those components. If you can get your hands on them, you're not dumb enough to eBay them, there are far more profitable people who would want to get their hands on such items.

    I can't remember who it was, I'm sure someone else can chime in with it, but there was a band which had one of its members buy a tank to drive in England, perfectly legal ( the purchase, not the driving down the streets part ). But its not like the thing would fire a shell.

    --
    Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
  38. Re:Not smart - obviously??? by gad_zuki! · · Score: 1

    >, I'm sure someone else can chime in with it, but there was a band which had one of its members buy a tank to drive in England, perfectly legal

    Youre probably thinking of Richard D. James of Aphex Twin. He doesnt own a proper tank. Its a Daimler Ferret Mark 3 armored scout car, which looks like a mini tank. He also bought a working russian submarine recently for 40,000 pounds.

  39. The Smuggler's Market by FromTheHorizon · · Score: 1

    Ex military hardware being sold - that's nothing new. On the outskirts of Peshawar in Pakistan, 50km away from Afghanistan, is the Smugglers Market, where you can buy a variety of USA Army "surplus" - training manuals, ration packs and various un-interesting hardware. As a foreigner this is all that I was able to find - I wasn't able to enter the section where they sold the weapons!

  40. should drug test GIs by jclaer · · Score: 1

    The Afghanis did a good job of getting Russian soldiers heroine addicted, likewise US soldiers, according to a lady friend of mine doing charitable work in Kabul. Just outside Bagram air base are many little shops where you can purchase a wide variety of US military gear.

  41. Saegheh on par with what?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Saegheh is a modern derivative of the F-5. They have kept essentially the same basic airframe, moved the wings above the intakes and put on a twin tale. There are some aerodynamic changes, but claims about it being on par with the F/A-18 are pure hyperbole...unless they mean the first production block from 30 years ago. Building a modern aircraft that can fly is merely half the battle with a combat aircraft. The avionics, armament and pilot are the other parts of the equation.

  42. NOT an honest account. See these details: by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    Protest: Your recounting of the story left out the most important details.

    1) The CIA, a secret organization, acted in a hidden way to interfere with the political operation of a sovereign nation.

    2) The hidden, sneaky U.S. government action had ONE purpose: To help private groups, oil companies, make more profit.

    3) The Iranians elected President Mossadegh in a democratic manner, believing they had some control over the political future of their country. The U.S. government's secret departments destroyed their democracy, only to help private groups in the U.S. and the U.K. make more money.

    4) The people of the U.S. believed that they had democratic control over the future of their country. However, the secret agencies of the U.S. government acted, and continue to act, in the interest of private groups, completely without the knowledge of, and against the wishes of, the people of the United States.

    5) The people of Iranian paid heavily for the U.S. government's action. They had to live under a dictator that was often violent toward them, and who stole their money for himself.

    6) The people of the U.S. paid heavily for the U.S. government's action. The U.S. government's violent actions toward Arabs and Muslims are the reason for the present violence. The CIA calls that "blowback". Blowback is viewed favorably inside the CIA, because if there are more negative consequences of U.S. government action, there is more money for the CIA and for promotions inside the CIA.

    7) The hidden actions of the U.S. government in Iran were the beginning of a new, much larger level of corruption inside the U.S. government.

    8) This behavior continued and continues intensely. See, for example, Coups Arranged or Backed by the USA.

    You said, "... to remove a man contrary to our interests ..."

    Did YOU make money from the action? If you didn't, then don't use the word "our".

  43. Some give... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cheney his cut please.

  44. They view their threats as efforts to defend Iran. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    Iranians I've met in the United States, U.S. citizens living in the city where I live, agree that leaders of Iran are sometimes very de-centered. Nothing I have said is intended to indicate an acceptance of violence.

    It helps understanding of the situation that officials of the U.S. government have publicly discussed bombing Iran. They view their threats as efforts to defend themselves.

    Quote from a March 5, 2007 New Yorker article, The Redirection:

    "Still, the Pentagon is continuing intensive planning for a possible bombing attack on Iran, a process that began last year, at the direction of the President. In recent months, the former intelligence official told me, a special planning group has been established in the offices of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, charged with creating a contingency bombing plan for Iran that can be implemented, upon orders from the President, within twenty-four hours."

  45. Build your own by maroberts · · Score: 1

    I strongly suspect that
    a) American front line aircraft have substantially better avionics than the F-14s sold to the Shah in the 1970's.
    b) if the Iranians did have a spare parts problem for their aircraft, the advance of computers, avionics, CNC lathes etc would make it substantially easier to fabricate spare parts. The only problem, and I do accept it is a big one, would be getting any alloy composition right, but again I'm willing to bet chemical analysis is up to the job nowadays.

    Iran in any case got a whole load of (Soviet) equipment flown in to them by the Iraqis at the end of Gulf War I. I get the impression the Iranian Air Force is now primarily Soviet based equipment, but potentially moving onto "home grown " kit soon.

    --

    Donte Alistair Anderson Roberts - hi son!
    Karma: Chameleon

  46. I Buy These From eBay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can attest to that, the difficulty is in distinguishing the stolen part from the legitimate parts

  47. not exactly accurate... by pointbeing · · Score: 1

    I'm a federal geek providing technical support to the agency that sells this stuff.

    Defense Reutilization and Marketing Service is the DoD agency that gets rid of damaged and excess military equipment. They sell all kindsa stuff to the general public. If you want to buy a whole pallet of old computers or uniforms or something they're the place to go.

    That said, they also used to sell F-14 parts that had been through or didn't require demilitarization to the general public - but DRMS no longer sells F-14 parts. They quit doing it after the GAO caught some sensitive equipment being sold and DRMS is well aware of Iran's interest in F-14 hardware.

    --
    we see things not as as they are, but as we are.
    -- anais nin
  48. Looking for Guidance computers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If anyone has seen any, I need them so I can reverse engineer them to retro-fit them to a SAM launcher we've built. First of it's kind, a civilian use SAM, or CUSAM (We call it "kuh-zam"). For use in shooting down spy drones that the US government is starting to use on us.

    Thanks. :D

    Just send any info you have on missile guidance systems to my email manowar8211 -AT- yahoo -DOT- com!!

  49. This isn't uncommon. by Phil_at_EvilNET · · Score: 1

    First of all, anyone that's been in the military was probably at one time or another issued a "used" NBC suit for training purposes. It's nothing more than an overgarment with a layer of activated charcoal in it. The canister is basically the same. In the 80's when I was in the Army you could come across these things a dime a dozen in any supply room and most of us had two of everything: One for the field and one for inspections. Field gear we kept tucked away either in a spare duffle or on our tank (I was an M1 driver in Germany back then). We had spare flack jackets, spare boots, spare lanterns, cases of MREs (I hear they're better now.) and if we could get spare tools we'd have them too. Since none of the "spare" stuff was ever on the books (it wasn't like our BII was issued with 2 of everything) whatever we had when we'd PCS would follow us to our next duty station, and eventually home. As for F14 parts, that's a bit scary, but if anyone's ever taken a look at Grassroots Motorsports, there's a corvette in there that actually uses an M1 engine cooling fan for a suction device to make the car stick to the track. I guess if you can buy surplus M1 parts you can get F14 parts somewhere too.

    --
    To avoid corruption, one must remain dishonest.
  50. Re:Not smart - obviously??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've seen a pic...for his no-tech hacking speech at Defcon last year Johnny Long had a slide with an F-14 sittin in a junkyard. If he can figure this out, why can't investigators?

  51. Re:Not smart - obviously??? by rubycodez · · Score: 1

    that makes good press but the truth is pentagon has already sold thousands of F-14 parts publically and legally: http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2007-08-01-f14parts_N.htm

    we sold Iran their F-14's too

    what's the point?