Slashdot Mirror


African Americans and the Video Game Industry

An anonymous reader writes "African Americans spend more money and time playing video games than whites, yet only 2% of game developers are black. This past week, MTV's Multiplayer blog interviewed five black game industry professionals for their perspective on race in the industry. Intelligent Gamer summarizes and highlights portions of this lengthy series of interviews."

96 of 646 comments (clear)

  1. Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Really?

    Who cares?

    I never knew there had to be any specific percentage of "African-Americans" participating in any activity.

    And yes, "African-American" is a downright stupid appellation. Can you call a black child born in Denmark "African-American"?

    1. Re:Who cares? by spintriae · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Can you call a black child born in Denmark "African-American"? No. Can you point out where in the article any African-Dane was referred to as an African-American?
    2. Re:Who cares? by Dr.+Cody · · Score: 5, Funny

      I don't know, but there was a Danish documentary on the subject.

    3. Re:Who cares? by explosivejared · · Score: 2, Funny

      I believe the proper term is jorka-borka-ellthing-jafrikaner-schmorker. However, I always did do poorly in Danish class. Either way, I am a fan of affirmative action. It helped quell the riots in the seventies. Ask yourself, what could be worse for your MMO than a pissed off black panther guild?

      [Eldridge Cleaver Tone] We grind and we grind all day long only to have our gold stolen from us by these white pig 'developers'. They are afraid of an empowered, 31337 black guild. They are afraid of a dark Azeroth![/Eldridge Cleaver Tone]

      Promote African-American programmers! Save Azeroth!

      --
      I got a catholic block.
    4. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      And yes, "African-American" is a downright stupid appellation. Can you call a black child born in Denmark "African-American"? Oblig Maddox. Read and agree, or read and be wrong.
    5. Re:Who cares? by SL+Baur · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This is a dumb article. The vast majority of *top* game designers/programmers are Japanese. With few exceptions the best games are all Made In Japan. Do I care if there may not be a single gaijin of any color employed in a Japanese game company? Nope. So why should it matter in the US (where the games are nearly all crap anyway)?

    6. Re:Who cares? by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There's no such thing. They'd be called Danish.

      Only the US has a peculiar obsession with separating its population into ethnic groups.

    7. Re:Who cares? by Miseph · · Score: 3, Insightful

      As far as I know, "black" is acceptable most of the time, but a little on the blunt side. I use it, and despite being a scrawny white guy I've never gotten my ass kicked for saying it or even gotten a dirty look.

      --
      Try not to take me more seriously than I take myself.
    8. Re:Who cares? by Miseph · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A certain percentage of the US population is black, therefore it is expected that an equivalent percentage of American game developers are too. If they are not, it indicates some sort confounding variable that might (and in this case almost certainly does) indicate some sort of social inequity that needs to be addressed. The importance is not, in this case, the statistical anomaly itself, but rather in the reason for it.

      --
      Try not to take me more seriously than I take myself.
    9. Re:Who cares? by Culture20 · · Score: 4, Funny

      I always did do poorly in Danish class. Mmmm, Danish class
    10. Re:Who cares? by urbanriot · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I agree completely. The US has so many problems with race, because they seem pay so much specific attention to racial differences and continually bring up 'problems' or 'insight' into these differences. It's especially amusing when groups that don't belong to these minorities are the ones discussing these 'issues'.

      Who cares?
    11. Re:Who cares? by jmpeax · · Score: 5, Insightful

      blocks of people in your country who have a separate culture and separate rules that they want to live by And what culture/rules do the people labelled as African Americans live by?

      Classifying people in such a way doesn't make sense. The only thing you can generalise about African Americans is that their skin is black. Grouping them into a sub-culture based on their ethnicity is really stupid, and a testament to the persisting prejudice that runs through the US. This is a perfect example of modern, widely practised, racism.
    12. Re:Who cares? by Culture20 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A certain percentage of the US population is X: white, therefore it is expected that an equivalent percentage of American Y: Chinese Restaurant owners are too. If they are not, it indicates some sort confounding variable that might (and in this case almost certainly does) indicate some sort of social inequity that needs to be addressed. Maybe it's not not social "inequity", but personal choices made by all parties involved. Sure, with different values of X and Y, your mileage may vary.
    13. Re:Who cares? by spintriae · · Score: 2, Funny

      So true. There's no distinction between race in the UK, is there? Black, Irish, German and French people in English probably don't even realize they're immigrants. And the British aren't even familiar with those words. They were just invented by Americans to satisfy their obsession with the classification of ethnicity.

    14. Re:Who cares? by Ucklak · · Score: 2, Informative

      To be African-American by definition means to be born in Africa then become naturalized in the Americas.
      Therefore, being born in Ethiopia and naturalized a Columbian makes one African-American.

      Any other definition erodes the common language we rely upon. To simply call one an 'African-American' because of skin color implies that 'African-American' is a color which it is not but a hijacked term for what it really means. Might as well call people 'Red Armadillos', 'Striped Rhinos', or 'Musky Badgers' because they're neither.

      --
      if you steal from one source, that is plagiarism, if you steal from many, well, that's just research.
    15. Re:Who cares? by Dogtanian · · Score: 4, Interesting

      And yes, "African-American" is a downright stupid appellation. Can you call a black child born in Denmark "African-American"? Silly example of this in an interview with black British athlete, Kriss Ababusi.
      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    16. Re:Who cares? by Blkdeath · · Score: 4, Insightful

      As far as I know, "black" is acceptable most of the time, but a little on the blunt side. I use it, and despite being a scrawny white guy I've never gotten my ass kicked for saying it or even gotten a dirty look.

      I've told my Ethiopian (and decidedly black) boss that the clients I'm expecting are black, or reminded him that it was the black couple I'm refering to, not the Filipino or Chinese or White couples he saw me with earlier.

      What other distinction am I supposed to make? "The tall people with dark hair and brown eyes"? From his office 40' from the front door he can observe their skin colour and estimate their height but their eyes are a tad more tricky.

      --
      BD Phone Home!

      Shameless plug. Like you weren't expecting it.

    17. Re:Who cares? by jmpeax · · Score: 4, Insightful

      To simply call one an 'African-American' because of skin color implies that 'African-American' is a color which it is not but a hijacked term for what it really means. Language evolves. The term "African American", like it or not, is applied to people who are black - true geo-ethnic heritage rarely comes into it (and your example is purposefully misleading - the term "African American" is not just confined to people who have been born in Africa, but also used to describe descendants of African immigrants).

      Besides, you miss the point: by classifying people in this way, we presume that they share commonalities (such as culture or "rules" as the GP puts it) when in fact these things are stereotypes.

      Put simply, why is an American with African heritage an African American, when a white American with European heritage is simply American?
    18. Re:Who cares? by xigxag · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Your link misses the entire point of the term "African American," which is not a fancy P.C. word for "black people," but a term used to identify people in a specific cultural group, with certain overall traditions, customs, and apparently gaming habits. It's come into commonplace usage because it's a unique phrase which sets that group off from other cultural, ethnic and racial groups in America. Exactly like Pennsylvania Dutch, who are called "Pennsylvania Dutch" even though they aren't really Dutch and don't all live in Pennsylvania. And, check it: someone might actually be from the Netherlands and move to Pennsylvania, oh no, what do we call them?

      Regarding black Americans and the notion of "well, let's just call them black Americans." True, you could do exactly that. But how is it more accurate? I'd venture to say that there are extremely few black people who are truly "black" skinned, and lots who are on the pale side of brown. They're just called "black" by convention, even if it's not 100% precise. Furthermore, America doesn't equal the USA, it's two continents. We call USA-ians "Americans" also by convention. There's no escaping it, we're stuck using a non-precise moniker one way or another. "African American" is just one more, and happens to be the one that people generally find less offensive when compared with Negro, Afro-American and nigger. It leads one to wonder, is the constant self-righteous outrage over the term "African American" based on logic (I've argued here, no) or based upon an anger that the blacks among us have the gall to object to being called whatever the hell we feel like calling them?

      To answer the parent post's question directly, obviously black people in Denmark aren't African-Americans, just like Russians aren't Poles, even if they wind up in the same country. But if by chance a black person from Denmark moves to the US and gets called African-American, it's not going to cause the universe to self-destruct. Real world categories are heuristic, not absolute.

      As for the pic of Chiwetel Ejiofor, who cares? Oops, maybe some ijit misidentified him as African American. What does that prove? I accidentally called my Scottish friend Irish one day, According to Genius Maddox, I guess my dumb mistake means that Scotland and Ireland don't make any sense.

      Now, on to people of color. No argument from me: that's nauseatingly P.C.

      --
      There are two kinds of people: 1) those who start arrays with one and 1) those who start them with zero.
    19. Re:Who cares? by t0rkm3 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, they were invented as a means to create separation so that benefits can be awarded based on a particular racial profile.

      I'm Native American therefore I am _entitled_ to certain benefits. African-Americans, Asian Americans, Native American (Non-Polynesian) are all ethno-types that are treated differently by college scholarships, gov't jobs, gov't benefits, and EOE demographics.

      Maybe if we didn't have to categorize ourselves for this that and the other, then we wouldn't spend so much time worrying about which bin we belong in.

    20. Re:Who cares? by nomadic · · Score: 4, Insightful

      In Australia we really dont care too much.

      Would we get that same viewpoint from an aboriginal?

    21. Re:Who cares? by Moridineas · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Only the US has a peculiar obsession with separating its population into ethnic groups. Wow, that's utterly insane. Please, what country are you from? Would you care to describe how your country is different? Heck, anything to support your statement would be nice.

      Since Denmark was mentioned, maybe you should read some news--there have been some major riots and political happenings there over religion/race within the past month!

      I'm by no means claiming the US is perfect--it's not. But look at Australia--beach riots a year or two ago over Muslims. Look at France--ghettoization and discontent from Muslim/African populations that is hard to find an equivalent of in America in the last several decades. Balkans--banned from soccer matches for racist taunts. Chinese--discrimination against Uighur and Tibetan citizens. And where I've come across the most openly racist (against black Africans) people--Egypt. People don't even pretend.

      Hell, if there is one constant across the world it's racism..

      FWIW, I've heard Cuba actually has a remarkably egalitarian society--at least with regards to race--but it's so hard to hear reliable things about Cuba that I don't know..
    22. Re:Who cares? by empaler · · Score: 4, Funny

      Actually, as a Dane, I'd usually go with "black", or quite a lot more likely, their name. In one specific instance, I'd go with 'aunt', but I know that's cheating, on account of her being my aunt.

    23. Re:Who cares? by k3r3nsky'sr3v3ng3 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hmm. I'm not really sure how it is in the north (I live in AL) , but we had this black speaker come for our black history month assembly in February and talk to us for about three hours about "heroes of the African-American community". He, who claimed to have a degree from Tuskeegee on civil rights, always referred to blacks as "African-American". Of course, we got the usual droning on about the history of slavery and civil rights (but oddly enough, affirmative action was never mentioned). The thing that got me was that Lyndon Johnson, despite granting blacks their civil rights, didn't get mentioned once in the speech. Of course, most ordinary people still refer to blacks as blacks and whites are referred to as whites and hispanics (whose population is rapidly growing in the south) are referred to as Mexicans. Unfortunately, many of the people, black, white, or otherwise, do a very poor job of disproving stereotypes of their particular ethnic group. Many blacks drive cars with big ass rims blaring terrible rap/r&b music. Many whites drive their full-size trucks with the stars and bars stickers and straight-pipes blaring some awful country music. It seems to me that ethnic groups are compartmentalized and stereotyped because many among them do their best to be as distinct as possible. Usually its just the media and activists that try to snuff-out any intelligence by using hyphens. Its almost a double standard, people want their hyphens and recognitions and affirmative-action benefits, but they get all pissy about stereotypes.

      --
      "We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security." Dwight Eisenhower
    24. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting
      A famous biologist recently got in trouble for saying this, as it was blown out as a racist statement, while he was merely making a scientific observation. I shall repeat it here, not necessarily with the belief that it is true (I don't know whether it is or not), but because it may account for the statistical discrepancy in a completely valid form:

      There is a common expectation that all races of humans of people have equivalent intelligence. There is no scientific basis for this assumption. If you feel unconvinced by it, replace the word "intelligence" with "athletic ability" and see how you feel. I do hope that this does not bring the racists out.
    25. Re:Who cares? by H0p313ss · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I thought someone would bring that up. :P Some Aboriginals still live out in the bush in their own little clusters. Thats their choice. But if you see a aboriginal you dont think "Hey there is a aboriginal". They are just another person. Along with the asians, indians, europeans, americans, etc...

      One of my classmates from high school spent five years in Alice Springs doing AIDS counseling for the local aboriginal population. He'd say you're full of it.

      You might find that the young urban population is relatively tolerant. But from everyone I've talked to non-urban Australia is one of the most racist societies out there.

      However, this is all word-of-mouth and hearsay so it proves nothing

      --
      XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
    26. Re:Who cares? by Malekin · · Score: 2, Informative

      I don't think you're right, even if I wish you were.

      From the abstract of this study:
      http://dspace.anu.edu.au/manakin/handle/1885/41761?show=full

      "About 15 percent of Australians have experienced racism within institutional settings like the workplace and in education. About one-quarter of Australians report the experience of âeveryday racismsâ(TM)."

      Ignoring racism and claiming it doesn't exist is not the best way to make it go away.

    27. Re:Who cares? by Blkdeath · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Language evolves. The term "African American", like it or not, is applied to people who are black - true geo-ethnic heritage rarely comes into it (and your example is purposefully misleading - the term "African American" is not just confined to people who have been born in Africa, but also used to describe descendants of African immigrants).

      False. Ask someone from the West Indies if they're "African American" and see what they say. It's a stupid politically correct catch-phrase invented by whites too afraid to say the word "black" or "negroe" and who thought "coloured" was too passe (and overly generic).

      --
      BD Phone Home!

      Shameless plug. Like you weren't expecting it.

    28. Re:Who cares? by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 5, Funny

      I work with a guy that's African. Came to US for college straight from Ghana.

      He has no problem being called black.

      He also has no problem walking into bars declaring: "Where are da white wimmen at?". He thinks this (and the whole movie) is hilarious.

      Only once did we run into trouble. Some 2nd generation+ born in America African descendants decided he wasn't "African enough". Some native tongue (No clue what it was) and some bouncers quickly ended that.

    29. Re:Who cares? by Ambidisastrous · · Score: 5, Informative

      Fact: Black activists in the 1960s started calling themselves "African-American" instead of Negro in order to connect their fight for civil rights to the various independence movements in Africa happening at the same time. It caught on more over time. Malcolm X noted the term in his autobiography.

      The term "African-American"

    30. Re:Who cares? by Blkdeath · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Fact: Black activists in the 1960s started calling themselves "African-American" instead of Negro in order to connect their fight for civil rights to the various independence movements in Africa happening at the same time. It caught on more over time. Malcolm X noted the term in his autobiography.

      Fact: That still doesn't mean everybody with black skin is African-American or that the term is any less nonsensical or over-used.

      --
      BD Phone Home!

      Shameless plug. Like you weren't expecting it.

    31. Re:Who cares? by MightyYar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're both right. If you need to describe someone on appearance alone, most people in the US would not object to the word "black". A certain subset of people who would be described as "black" choose to identify themselves as African-American.

      It is no more complicated than that.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    32. Re:Who cares? by Minimalist360 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah like cos it doesn't work if I'm white and from South Africa, and then I come to the US.

    33. Re:Who cares? by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      With few exceptions the best games are all Made In Japan.

      Wow, that's stirring up a hornet's nest. I'm calling BS, or at best "matter of taste", on that one buddy.

    34. Re:Who cares? by phreakincool · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Most PC people would call me African-American. I'm an American. However, if I were pushed toward a label, I would prefer either Black or Afro-American. And technically, my skin ain't black. It's a light tan color. The funny thing is that most people think I'm Hispanic or Somoan. So, I guess my point is that people have to put labels on things to make sense of the world around them. In my youth and adult life, I have had friends of all races and nationalities. I don't refer to any of them by those names. They are just my friends. Thank you.

    35. Re:Who cares? by Hijacked+Public · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And I'm a white guy who was born in Africa and is now an American citizen. I have no problem referring to myself as African-American just to see the look on a person's face. Or being called white, or telling American born blacks who refer to themselves as African-Americans that they aren't 'African' enough.

      I don't know that I've vocalized it but I've often wondered where the white women were at when I walked into a bar.

      --
      "Sacrifice for the good of The State" - The State
    36. Re:Who cares? by Hucko · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Direct hit. I'm a taxi driver and while I had a negative opinion of the welfare benefactors I had the same opinion as gp until I began taxi driving. Australia is racist... unfortunately. I am forever having people hop into my cab and begin a conversation with a phrase similar to "How do you put up with the Aboriginals?" I now respond in kind with a simple "Aboriginals? Nah, they are pretty good most of the time. Every troublemaker I've had with has been trouble with the Caucasians... much like yourselves..."

      --
      Semi-automatic amateur armchair Australian philosopher; conjecture ready at any moment...
    37. Re:Who cares? by Kamel+Jockey · · Score: 4, Funny

      ... what country are you from?

      What!

      --
      In case of fire, do not use elevator. Use water!
    38. Re:Who cares? by donscarletti · · Score: 4, Funny

      Fact: anyone who prefaces a statement with "Fact:" sounds like an arrogant jerk, even if they are right.

      Any argument is implicitly presented as a truth, stating that it is fact is redundant.

      --
      When Argumentum ad Hominem falls short, try Argumentum ad Matrem
    39. Re:Who cares? by Miseph · · Score: 2, Informative

      He must be famous for being a shitty biologist: there's no biological foundation for the social institution of race. Over a century of famous post-Darwin biologists conducting research trying to prove that race is real and scientifically significant has proven only that the entire concept is completely meaningless.

      --
      Try not to take me more seriously than I take myself.
  2. Let's devolve everything down to race. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why must everything be devolved down to race? I do not care if developers are black, white, green, purple, etc.. as long as they make a good quality product. The question should be, are the developers putting out a quality product? In my honest opinion, game developers fail in this task 60% of the time. It may sound like I do not want Diversity, on the contrary, I want diversity. Diversity is what helps keep things fresh and new. I just think we spend too much time worrying about race and not enough on quality. This is my opinion, like any opinion, it may not please everyone. No offense is intended or meant.

    1. Re:Let's devolve everything down to race. by Criliric · · Score: 3, Funny

      whoa whoa whoa, lets not get to hasty here.... I don't think those weird purple people have EVER made anything decent

  3. Is this really surprising? by pokerdad · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Isn't this the natural result of the socio-econic situation of said racial group in the US, the high cost of college in the US, and the fact that most employers in said industry want a college degree?

    1. Re:Is this really surprising? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Exactly. More african-americans are poor, and video games are a very cheap form of entertainment. Also, poor people have less educational opportunities.

      This is not about color, this is about money.

      If you want to talk about race, talk about why more african-americans are poor. The games thing is just a symptom.

    2. Re:Is this really surprising? by Blkdeath · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Isn't this the natural result of the socio-econic situation of said racial group in the US, the high cost of college in the US, and the fact that most employers in said industry want a college degree?

      Nonsense. I'm in Canada and the High School I went to was full of lower class people living in bad apartments and rooming houses. The people who moved on and did something with their lives were the ones who showed motivation and determination; nothing to do with skin colour.

      Man do I ever get tired of hearing these stories about how the poor blacks can't afford college because society is holding them down. I went to school with Blacks (African and West Indies alike), Whites, Asians, Indians (both from India and the Native Canadian variety), Sri Lankens, Pakistanis, Europeans and a whole host of every other "ini" and "ean" you can imagine. Some had their parents paying their way but most were there through part time work, savings, grants, scholarships, loans and student lines of credit. I don't care where you're from or what your background - if you want something you work for it. If you don't, sit around and complain about how unfair life is.

      But hey, let's make sure to placate "visible minorities" by giving them specialized scholarships! Or, if you're not dark enough but you have the right set of genitalia you could always apply for a scholarship for women! When did scholarship money become about what a person looks like rather than their drive, ambition and abilities anyways??!

      --
      BD Phone Home!

      Shameless plug. Like you weren't expecting it.

    3. Re:Is this really surprising? by timeOday · · Score: 2, Insightful
      That's what being poor means.

      Me, my dad was an engineer, and coincidentally(?) I did pretty much the same thing, went through college, and now make a middle-class living. It never really occurred to me to be a politician, or an entrepreneur, or a pro athlete. Even now I don't have a clue how one becomes those things. Could I become something different if I plunged in and figured it out? Probably (except pro athlete), but - and here's the point - I didn't. I traveled the road that was before me (which luckily put me at about the 90% percentile of earners in the US). What if I'd been born poor? How about you?

    4. Re:Is this really surprising? by Blkdeath · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sure, you are outraged by this, but yet you don't speak out on such things as alumni preference (at many schools it is officially part of the weighting that if your parents went to school there, you get a better chance). This has been directly shown to cause a sort of affirmative action for white people; but of course you wouldn't care about that; it isn't convenient for your argument.

      I didn't speak out on such things as book costs, transit routes or the mascots chosen by the institutions because it wasn't relevant to what I was discussing either. So for your strawman I present a book of matches.

      Now, to address what you've said; so? People in higher educational facilities prefer to have people in them who form some sort of heritage, or people who help fund the school and donate "wings" and libraries and the like. So?

      Do you think it's unfair that retail businesses also offer preferential treatment to their existing client base?

      A small hint for you; if you go looking for it, you can find various forms of discrimination everywhere you go. Keep looking; I'm sure you're only helping the cause.

      Rather than championing small changes, why not champion a total overhaul of your country's education system? Force the government to redirect a portion of their military budget toward education. How many people could the war in Iraq have sent through post-secondary over the same time frame? Would the country be better or worse for it? Forget any other factors; allow people to continue through the system based solely on academic proficiency.

      --
      BD Phone Home!

      Shameless plug. Like you weren't expecting it.

    5. Re:Is this really surprising? by Blkdeath · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If life isn't unfair you shouldn't complain about it?

      Complaining is intended to achieve what, exactly? Is it going to make people realize the err of their ways and usher black people into the gaming industry and anywhere else they feel slighted? Or is it intended to them give extra incentives to blacks and other minorities so that when they do enter the work force they're resented by their co-workers? "Oh, (s)he's an affirmative action hire."

      Or life isn't unfair for black people in the USA right now?

      Strawman. Life is unfair for everybody starting the moment you're born. Get over it. You have two choices; sit and moan or get up and do something to make your life more fulfilling, for whatever definition of fulfilment you may have.

      What, centuries of racism just vanished in the last 40 years when lynching became embarrassing?

      Oh boo hoo. There are still ignorant people out there. I'll ask again; does affirmative action help, or hurt the cause of minority acceptance in the work place?

      Have you ever heard an otherwise racially neutral person utter a phrase like "Yeah, it's easy to get a job if you're a ${racial_slur}!"?!? Is it more fair to swing the pendulum in the opposite direction and discriminate against the Anglo Saxon Caucasian Males because we've had it so good up 'till now?

      --
      BD Phone Home!

      Shameless plug. Like you weren't expecting it.

    6. Re:Is this really surprising? by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 3, Insightful

      >A small hint for you; if you go looking for it, you can find various forms of discrimination everywhere you go. Keep looking; I'm sure you're only helping the cause.

      As a Canadian, I don't think you could even begin to know. I invite you to come down to South Carolina and see it for yourself. We do things like redistrict black people so that their votes don't even count.

      --

      --

      WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
    7. Re: Is this really surprising? by PAKnightPA · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I would disagree. I think you imply that listening to music about "rape, robbery, murder, and obscene materialism (bling bling)" makes one desire to drop out of school, join a gang, etc. This is not true. For example, A very large portion of my music library is this kind of music. I personally like it a lot. I would go so far as to call some of Dr. Dre's work classic. Yet I attend an elite university, and certainly wouldn't ever think of committing violent felonies.

      What you are saying is the same thing Jack Thompson says about violent video games. Rap music doesn't turn you into a gangbanger any more than playing Counter Strike trains you to be a violent killer. Frankly, I am surprised you were modded up by the same people who would probably mod you way down if you were agreeing with Mr Thompson. Oh well...

    8. Re: Is this really surprising? by neuromancer23 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Well, I wouldn't agree with Jack Thomson, but your analogy is not very good. Music and video games are fundamentally different in the ways that they effect the nervous system. While playing video games can be addictive due dopamine being released during the process[1], they do not have nearly the same subconscious effect that music does. Furthermore, it is much easier to distinguish between fantasy and the real world during a video game since the images are all artificial. When listening to music, you get to fill in your own script to the soundtrack with whatever is going on at the time (i.e. it is much more real).

      This is a field of research that has gained a lot of attention in recent years, and a lot of good books have been done on the subject.

      This is an up-and-comer:

      http://www.amazon.com/Sweet-Anticipation-Psychology-Expectation-Bradford/dp/0262582783/ref=pd_sim_b_title_4

      There have been several studies done verifying that listening to complex, harmonious music (i.e. beethoven, bach, mozart, iron maiden, gnr etc.) sparks intelligence and creativity, while listening to someone talk over a one beat drum machine (e.g. Nelly, NAS) lowers intelligence and dulls creativity. Playing a musical instrument is even better for you. Just do a quick search:

      http://www.google.com/search?q=music+makes+you+smart

      As a matter of fact, Beethoven's 5th and 6th symphonies (opus 67 and 68 respectively) were written back to back and demonstrate the process of intelligence increase in musical form, with the crisis starting at the knocking of fate at the opening of opus 67 and traversing through the ex-stasis experience and ending in harmony in the pastoral symphony. The fact that listening to Beethoven dramatically increases intelligence has been proven time and again (http://www.amazon.com/Breakthrough-Thinking-Principles-Creative-Problem/dp/0761506489).

      People are creatures of habit and their personalities are shaped by the things that they do. You will become your rituals(see: wilson's 23rd law). Of course, your personal experience will be different from everyone else, but chances are that if you are listening to this on a constant basis it's going to have a deep, life-long effect on your personality.

    9. Re:Is this really surprising? by MightyYar · · Score: 3, Informative

      Does (1) your socio-economic situation affect the music you listen to, or does (2) the music you listen to affect your socio-economic situation, or is it (3) more complicated than that?

      You seem to be saying (2), but I'd argue (3) with an emphasis on (1).

      I know from personal experience that one can listen to gangsta rap and be a doctor or lawyer. Hell, you don't even have to be black. That's only one data point, but there you go. My daughter watches Dora but that doesn't mean she's going to be an explorer.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    10. Re:Is this really surprising? by Starrk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's troll because it isn't politically correct. Factuality be damned. There is more than mild political incorrectness in that post.

      If you're filling your head with fantasies about rape, robbery, murder, and obscene materialism (bling bling) on a 24x7 basis, it's no wonder that you turn out violent and illiterate." Since he's talking about the wealth of black people as a whole, the implication here is that black people as a whole are likely to be violent and illiterate. Not sure if that's what he meant, but it comes across as a gratuitous insult. Which would be trolling.
    11. Re: Is this really surprising? by MightyYar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Playing a musical instrument is even better for you. Just do a quick search:

      http://www.google.com/search?q=music+makes+you+smart [google.com] I did. That search returns just as much information contradicting your point as supporting it. This one says:

      Here's where the Mozart madness began. In 1993, the journal Nature published an article by scientists at the University of California-Irvine. In their experiment, students listened to a Mozart sonata, a relaxation tape, or nothing at all for ten minutes, and then took a spatial reasoning test. ...

      And even after a 1999 review showed that 12 subsequent studies had failed to verify the famous 1993 one, people still believed in the magic of Mozart.
      ...

      That's right. There's a catch. In a University of Toronto at Mississauga study, music has been shown to increase IQ points in six-year-olds who took weekly singing or piano lessons. If your kids learn to sing or play an instrument, they just might become smarter.

      So, yeah, PLAYING an instrument may increase your intelligence - but most of the links in your search trying to link listening to intelligence are (surprise!) selling classical music products.
      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    12. Re:Is this really surprising? by Starrk · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Oh and if you believe gangster rap causes a lot of real-life violence, I hope you believe many video games also cause real-life violence. After all, both claims are based on the same "logic".

    13. Re:Is this really surprising? by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 2, Informative

      Every state redistricts people that way. It has nothing to do with race and everything to do with which party people in a given neighborhood vote for.

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
  4. Re:Yes please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm "african american", even though I was never alive in africa. I also develop games and program as a hobby.

    The funny thing about the geeks of my generation, is that most of us don't really care about race. You're a noob if you don't know how to recompile your kernel, not because you happened to be born a specific hue.

    Didn't everyone get the memo that the media doesn't really represent the people anymore? There isn't much to get over.

  5. Here we go. by UseCase · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As I read some of the post here "N#$%^ are stupid" etc.... I can't help but to think that the real reason is that the development industry in general is skeptical of a person of color's capability to design and develop software. I currently work as a senior software engineer on a few key development project in the telecom industry and to tell you the truth it has been a battle to get where I am. No matter what I want to believe about merit and talent, there is an underlying "how did you get in, here?!" sentiment floating around the development industry when it comes to blacks doing design and engineering work. It is a real shame that we as an industry can't just be above all of this a hire people based on there capability. Sad world......

    1. Re:Here we go. by Swift+Kick · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The reason you find skepticism in any industry for the capabilities of a colored person is because of the bang-up job the so-called 'civil rights leaders' have done yelling and screaming about how minorities cannot achieve anything without assistance.
      It is exactly what affirmative action has turned into; rather than give those a real opportunity to those who work hard for it, it became just another way to 'milk the system', so instead of having those most capable, you end up favoring those who are the loudest (regardless of color).

      You may refer to this as the 'soft bigotry of lowered expectations'. You might think that it's yet another racist thing, but can it be really racist when those directly responsible for it are your from your own race?

      As long as you have 'reverse discrimination' (which is what affirmative action effectively is), you cannot and should not complain that you're not evaluated on your own merits. Don't blame the industry; blame the Jesse Jacksons and Al Sharptons.

      --
      "We'll need 2000 crickets, 4 cans of Easy Cheese, and the fluid from 18 glowsticks for this plan to work...." - ph0n1c
  6. here we go again by EllynGeek · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Racism, just like sexism, is so deeply ingrained in most people they're totally blind to it, and even worse, are just like the first commenters to this article- self-centered clueless twits who would rather die than listen to a different point of view, especially from someone pointing out a problem or trying to correct a wrong. (I have to wonder why y'all take it so personally, and always twitch like a gaffed fish when these subjects come up? Guilty conscience?) Nobody is asking for racial quotas, though there is always at least one guaranteed slashtwit to bring it up. Most of us would settle for you fine members of the "there is no problem, just quit whining" club to shut up and keep out of our way, instead of filling the heavens with your complaining over the audacity of anyone who has been mistreated to actually stand up for him or herself, and try to make some changes.

    --

    we will end no whine before its time

    1. Re:here we go again by syousef · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Most of us would settle for you fine members of the "there is no problem, just quit whining" club to shut up and keep out of our way, instead of filling the heavens with your complaining

      Have you listened to yourself lately? We need a -1:Hypocrisy modifier.

      You could make the same point with less words....
      A: Shut up!
      B: How dare you tell me to shut up. You shut up!
      A: No you shut up!
      B: No you!!!
      A and B: SHUT UP!!!!

      How about we let EVERYONE have their say. Depending on the intent, the point of view that this is a waste of time may be just as valid as the point of view that something ought to be done about it. Quit telling people to shut up and state your case effectively to convince the maximum number of people that there is actually an issue. Sure would beat childish rants, even if they are modded up.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    2. Re:here we go again by EllynGeek · · Score: 2, Insightful
      ""What the hell is wrong with a community that instantly rejects any suggestion of racism?"

      NOTHING. Nothing is wrong with them, because a) we're all tired of hearing it, b) the situation is changing, gradually, but it is changing, c) the problem is often somewhere else, like equal quality of education, d) many of us "young adults" live in multi-cultural and multi-ethnic societies, and in the tech industry work with people of many races, and it is the older generation who insist on repeatedly highlighting what they see as racism, thus further fueling the segmentation of groups of people based on race and creating barriers.""

      Wow, so much wrong, so little time...I'm soooo sorry you're tired of hearing about it. You know why you're hearing about it? Because it is still a problem. The people affected by racism don't have the luxury of going "oh, I'm so sick of this! So I won't pay attention to it any more!" I love your claim that bringing attention to a problem exacerbates it. Good logical geek thinking there!

      Yes, it is very slowly changing. Very very slowly. Change comes because people work for it and don't shush because the tender sensibilities of people like you can't handle it. Why did you even read the article, since it's not a subject you want to hear about? Or waste your time commenting? It makes you uncomfortable. But you'd rather blame people than ignore it or say "yeah, it's a problem." Nobody expects YOU to try to change things for the better- the least you can do is shut your ignorant mouth and keep out of the way.

      You did not RTFA nor do you have an open mind, because if you had you would have seen there was no rhetoric of any kind. Just thoughtful expressions of personal experiences. And here you are, and a hundred other idiotic slashdotters, claiming those personal experiences are all wrong, and you are right. That's some world-class arrogance, don't you think? Why is it so hard for you accept that people are treated poorly for extremely stupid reasons like skin color? Why does it bother you so much that you tie yourself in knots denying it? It is not a solved problem.

      --

      we will end no whine before its time

  7. stupid by pak9rabid · · Score: 4, Interesting

    And? If we truly want to live in a society of racial equality, we need to stop calling attention to stuff like this. Who gives a shit what whites, blacks, hispanics, asians, etc do. As long as we're not fucking each other over, who gives a shit..

    1. Re:stupid by Shados · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, TECHNICALLY, all the racial issues will go away once we ARE fucking each other over... as in, literally so :)

    2. Re:stupid by Arccot · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And? If we truly want to live in a society of racial equality, we need to stop calling attention to stuff like this. Ignoring possible inequality does not lead to equality. Pointing out places where racism may be occurring allows us to look and see if that's the case, or if there is another underlying reason for the result. From there, we, as a society, can decide what to do, if anything, about it.
  8. Stop with this racial coddling by DigitAl56K · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I don't want to read one more article about how african american people are under represented in this, that, or the other. It makes me angry even to see such headlines because yes racism exists but we only fuel racism by carving out sectors of society by race and speaking to how disadvantaged they are. Why are we not discussing how there are too few Indian characters in modern-day computer games, or Phillipino's, or any other race? Because blacks are a racial crux that we like to fall back on and discuss whenever matters of race and equality come into play.

    I personally work with people of all races from all over the world, and though I can't say I have absolutely no prejudices whatsoever I certainly do not consciously discriminate against anyone because of their ethnicity. And I think a very large percentage of the current/next generation are the same - we're growing up in multi-cultural environments with mixed ethnicity and we're learning to value our differences rather than look on them negatively. It is the older generation who still wants to talk about the past, who still wants to talk about stereotyping and martyrdom. TFA does nothing to break from the conventional mold, and it's infuriating to me.

    In college [Computer Science] courses, I was typically one of maybe four black students, and I was certainly the only black female. In the industry, the makeup is pretty much the same. It's intimidating at times. I'm one of a handful, but I don't let these things hold me back. It's intimidating at times? Is it really? Were you singled out at college, or because you were too aware psychologically of your ethnicity did you single yourself out and limit your interactions between the other black students? Today, do your coworkers look at you funny when you walk down the hallway? Does the conversation stop at the water cooler when you arrive? Do you have to use a specially designated bathroom? No. Why is it intimidating? It's intimidating because you are all too aware of your race and concern yourself with the possibility of prejudice, not because it necessarily exists.

    On counting the number of black women at GDC: "The grand total was six, including myself, and I hear that [the Game Developers Conference] had an attendance of over 18,000 this year." And how many white women were there? I hazard a guess at not too many, based on the industries history of mainly male developers. Yes, women are still under-represented in certain industries, too. But if they work as hard as men and are equally qualified over time the situation finds a more natural balance.

    I think a lot of folks are just now starting to see it as a career choice. Young people are starting to realize that game development is something you can make a real living at. It's not like running off to join the circus. There are curriculums that are centered specifically around it, and the industry is looking for talent above all else. A-ha! Some intelligence. There may not be a lot of african american developers because we're only now promoting it to those teens as a viable career choice!

    I could go on. If we want to end racial bias and under representation, I support the free market model: Provide people equal opportunities not by artificially advantaging one group above another or by continually highlighting racial under-representation, but through a good education across all people, and simply let things work themselves out over time. The problem will obviously not go away tomorrow, but does that really mean we have to keep highlighting it today, over and over, repeating the same old talking points?
    1. Re:Stop with this racial coddling by Emru · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I don't want to read one more article about how african american people are under represented in this, that, or the other. It makes me angry even to see such headlines because yes racism exists but we only fuel racism by carving out sectors of society by race and speaking to how disadvantaged they are. If you don't talk about it, how will people know? Talking about the problem isn't the problem; it's how people react to it. (You even seem to agree with that, in principle. As you say, "repeating the same old talking points.")

      And like everything else, discussions about under-representation aren't always economic. Right now I'm directly affected by a form of ethnic under-representation: I'm in need of a bone marrow stem cell transplant, and as a black person I have a much lower chance of finding a matching donor than a white person -- the odds of two people's human leukocyte antigens (HLAs) matching are much greater if they're of the same ethnic background, and blacks are severely under-represented in the Canadian, American and UK bone marrow donor registries.

      So should I not bring that up because it's somehow racist? It's a fact, and people can't fix it if they don't know about it. This has a direct bearing on my life, and the lives of other black people (and Asian, and Indian, and...) waiting for transplants, so I want to see more headlines about this kind of under-representation, not fewer.
    2. Re:Stop with this racial coddling by Roxton · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Your proposed solution does not demonstrate a complete understanding of the problem.

      I'm white, and was raised in a good middle-class home. My use of language, my body language, my preferred attire, my attitudes, my ethics, and my social expectations are all in line with what professional white employers are looking for, because I was raised in a similar environment to them. There's a generational difference, but it's one that any competent employer is expecting.

      People underestimate how much implicit learning goes into making someone behave the way they do. You can't just change use of language, etcetera overnight. And why should you? It's elitist and wrong to assume that someone should abandon their culture in favor of the culture that is in power.

      Now, black is not a culture, but blacks in America happen to be composed of dramatically different cultural constituents than white, so it's a useful if imperfect marker for cultural differences.

      The unintended subtext of your suggestion is that the weaker cultures will eventually be abandoned in favor of the larger, more profitable cultural hegemony.That solution may work, but I don't think it's a good one. We need to change the attitudes of the employing class towards people who are different, and we need to make it possible for different people to become a major part of the employing class.

      That's not the whole picture of course - not by a long shot - but I think it raises an important point that you've either disregarded or implicitly handled inappropriately. You have to keep driving home that a problem exists before attitudes will change.

    3. Re:Stop with this racial coddling by Stellian · · Score: 4, Insightful

      racism exists but we only fuel racism by carving out sectors of society by race and speaking to how disadvantaged they are. No amount of wishful thinking and pretends will make race inequality go away by itself. If there is a strong correlation between race and academic success - when common sense dictates that there should be no such correlation - we need to know why the hell it's that way: talking about it is a first step into fixing it.
      You position is basically like saying, disabled people in our town choose not to use the subway - the fact that there's no wheelchair access in the station has nothing to do with it.
      If there's no disabled person to be seen in the subway, and no black in a cube farm, we need to ask ourselves some questions - and simply asking the questions is not fueling discrimination, but helping us understand the problem, if there is one.
  9. Single elven female warrior by someme2 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    How much longer are we going to rely on the bald space marine? Or how much longer are we going to rely on the Elven female warrior whose armor barely covers her breasts? Is that all we can do with this medium or is there more that can be done?" I think some people just don't push themselves hard enough.

    I think it's pretty obvious that the problem is not people pushing themselves to softly... 95% of all characters in any popular media are heavily clicheed. Even though every single game designer, author, movie director, musician and whatnot would really like to do better. But you don't get project funding for better, you get funding for dependable and predictable sales. As "they" say: It's a hit driven business (with "it" being just about everything).

    Characters must always meet expectations so that no one changes the channel because they don't understand the plot anymore after fetching beer from the fridge. Consequently any clearly identifiable group is badly misrepresented in popular media.


    Also, Slashdot readers, you just have to love this quote from the article:

    I mean, there's hip-hop in Cuba, there's hip-hop in Poland, there's hip-hop in the Soviet Union;

    Knock yourselves out...

    --
    You can attach boosters to anything. It just costs more. -
    Anonymous Coward on Sunday November 07, @12:26PM
  10. Re:who cares by g0dsp33d · · Score: 3, Funny

    Oh, and all lazy persons must be stupid huh? You productivist.

    --
    lol: You see no door there!
  11. What a crock of **** by Viol8 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "programmers typically seem to be socially-stunted and have personality and mental issues"

    Who modded this crap insighful? Where did you get that , Cliched Quotes R Us? I know plenty of coders who are perfectly normal people , in fact I don't think I've ever met one who was the alleged stereotype aspergers and I only ever met one who I'd have called socially stunted.

    "In comparison, most black people and women I've come across, tend to be more outgoing and sociable."

    Women tend to be more outgoing than men. Black people ? It varies just as much as whites or asians. Are you just making this up as you go along? sounds to me like you've never mixed with anyone and are just going by the lyrics on your Craig David albums,

    "because there are a lot more interesting things to do in this world if you don't mind interacting with regular people."

    Yeah , like not posting trite made up crap you pulled out of your arse on slashdot.

  12. Obviously by fishyfool · · Score: 4, Funny

    They'd rather play than develop. Can't say I blame them.

    --
    Enjoy Every Sandwich
  13. Not a suprising result by prefec2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In the US black people are over represented in the lower class. This means, the percentage of black people belonging to the lower class in relation to all black people in the US is high than compared to the whole US society. In the lower class it is more common that young especially young male humans have an interest in gaming. This does not mean that in other classes young male do not game. It just says that the possibility that you like gaming and additionally do it quite often, increases when you are in a lower class. In Europe you get similar results. In Germany for example you can make the same analysis and you will get as a result: Turkish people are unrepresented in the gaming industry. But over represented in the gamers league. The cause is quite similar. If you are poor you get worse education. This is a institutional problem. Means schools treat you different when you are poor then when you are rich. So you get bad grades, which isn't helpful in getting to university or college. At least their is a way out of it. The Scandinavian found it. They help every kid. And they help the parents. But they are not on the "competition trip" like the USA, UK or Germany.

  14. The take on GTA by IorDMUX · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So "GTA III," -- a Mafioso stereotype with a huge amount of cinema fiction to support that. It's sort of a cultural joke. We all know that Italians aren't like that but we know Mafioso gangsters are. Do we remove race from it? No, they're just gangsters. "Vice City" is just '80s "Miami Vice." So even with the Cubanos and Latinos we know all Cubanos aren't like that. "San Andreas" gets scary because it's basically what people think black people are.
    So... he's saying that blatant stereotypes are okay, as long as they are not of black people? Am I missing something?

    I've seen all three games. I'm Italian. My wife is Latina. And I'm not offended by any of it. But this interviewer seems to be saying that my lack of offense is because there is some fundamental difference in the race portrayals... I thought it was that I can choose to be offended or to be entertained by any of these blatant, joking, stereotypes.

    I don't get it.
    --
    >> Standing on head makes smile of frown, but rest of face also upside down.
    1. Re:The take on GTA by Veggiesama · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So... he's saying that blatant stereotypes are okay, as long as they are not of black people? Am I missing something? Yes. He's saying that most of us recognize that the idea of the "Italian gangster" is built upon layers and layers of shared cultural fiction. We go see movies about the Mob because our culture likes some of the themes that dwell under the surface--living the independently wealthy life, creating passionate alliances and rivalries, doling out vigilante justice ("Hey, nobody backstabs Tony and gets away wit' it!"), and so on.

      Most people recognize that the "Italian gangster" is mostly a fiction. We aren't afraid of getting hit by the Mob. Having a big, greasy-haired guy come up to our business demanding "protection money" is just laughable. Even old Bugs Bunny cartoons parodied the hell out of the Mob. It's become a sort of "cultural joke." Given that Italian-Americans are now pretty well-integrated in America (though it certainly wasn't the case at first), all the way to the upper echelons of business and government, even they aren't threatened by these silly caricatures. Most Italians I know love Mob flicks.

      We see the stereotype for what it is, and the GTA series does a wonderful job at parodying and satirizing concepts like the "Italian gangster."

      However, I do not believe that the majority of Americans are able to clearly differentiate reality and fiction when it comes to the portrayal of African-Americans. Our characterization of the African-American is so inextricably tied to ideas like crime, poverty, violence, saying naughty words, and so on, that we have a difficult time seeing parody when it's staring at us in the face.

      The interviewee thinks that "San Andreas gets scary because it's basically what people think black people are." While whites might laugh off the "Italian ganster," many of us whites are positively terrified of black men. He fears that we won't get the jokes, since our prejudices tell us that the jokes are funny because "that's how black people act, lol!", rather than the jokes being funny because they're overblown stereotypes of how we white people think black people act. So essentially, many of the jokes are at the white audience's expense, when you think about it.

      Take the scene where CJ and the gang narrowly survive a Ballaz drive-by and are forced to escape. While you're driving, two of the characters use their uzis to defend the car. The last character, Big Smoke, won't fight until he finishes his fast food meal, and he spends the entire time in the back seat, bitching about his food. The scene pits two black stereotypes against one another--random drive-bys and large consumption of fast food--and forces you to escape while listening to this inane, absurd argument about whether Big Smoke should eat or shoot. I about died from laughter. (Link here if you're curious) Why is this funny? To me, it's funny because I'm forced into thinking about this competition between two ridiculous cultural stereotypes, both of which are paraded around through some parts of our country as spoken-under-your-breath truths: Black people love killing each other. Black people also love fried chicken. The question the scene raises is, which do black people like more: killing or eating? The very idea of asking such a bigoted question is repulsive to most of us, yet we laugh despite ourselves.

      I loved GTA: San Andreas. I am sad that the original interviewee never completed the game, because I thought it was certainly the strongest title in the series. I will admit that the preview trailers and first hour of the game discouraged me from playing, because I was worried that Rockstar was undercutting themselves by relying too much on modern-day blaxploitation to encourage new audiences. Maybe they were, in some ways, but overall I felt that San Andreas had the most interesting and likable characters of the series, by far.
    2. Re:The take on GTA by philmack · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Having a big, greasy-haired guy come up to our business demanding "protection money" is just laughable. You've never tried to operate a restaurant or small business in New York.
      The people are not necessarily big or greasy-haired. But extortion is common, and it sickens me that this happens while at the same time police are spending time and taxpayer dollars in speed traps and prostitution stings.
      ~Phil
  15. Well... by khristian · · Score: 2, Interesting

    When I entered the CS course (Brasil), along with me came a guy from Africa. He spent a year on it, and then changed to Law school. I guess they don't want to work "underground" as programmers (it's pretty dark where I work) or something like that, they want to be recognized. Even if you come with the "they are poor", it's a public university we're talking about here. And a lot of the funding goes for students who can prove they are poor.

    Apart from that, I don't think anyone should be offended by being called "black" or "white". How would it look if I, being white as a candle, wanted to sue someone for calling me white, or even whitey?

    --
    http://derkosak.blogspot.com - That's a blog.
  16. Rationalized view on things by G3NE · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Copied this insightful comment from the article link. I took the liberty to post it here for some additional views (I apologize in advance for any copies I posted by accident as "Anonymous Coward").

    Author: Areala

    Any time you bring race or gender bias into any particular medium, there's going to be problems. And while I can certainly see that there is a disparity, the first thing one has to look at is that numbers don't tell you everything.

    Being female, when I was growing up, I heard all the time about how women were paid less than men, and how terrible this was. And while the numbers are true, they don't tell the whole story. Women, by and large, simply tend to go after jobs that traditionally pay less. Female teachers outnumber male teachers in every school in the US, for example--this is not because men are being "held back" from teaching by an elite group of high-powered females in schools and universities, it's because there are more women interested in the job than men, and fewer males are getting their degrees and licenses than females are. Numbers alone are meaningless without a reason to go along with them.

    On the subject of ethnicity, the only counterpoints I can offer to the subject of "bias" against any particular ethnicity are as follows. First, the majority of gamers are male, and the majority of game developers are male; this isn't surprising considering that males (especially in the teenage demographic) are statistically more interested in gaming than females. We're not the rare birds we once were, but we're still not as common. Boys use video games as bonding experiences and social experiences. By and large, girls tend to bond and socialize in other ways. Men are more apt to enter the field of game design because, statistically speaking, they are more apt to be interested in it than their female counterparts are (remember the teacher analogy). It's not that the top-tier of every gaming company is conspiring to keep women out, it's that they're having a hard time finding any who are at all interested in the field period. Black or white, asian or european, it's going to be guys right now who are filling the ranks. And gaming isn't the garage-based hobby it was twenty years ago--with budgets of games in the next generation hovering in the double-digits of millions of dollars for a major, AAA title like Final Fantasy, Grand Theft Auto, or Gears of War, and gaming revenue surpassing Hollywood in terms of dollars generated, gaming companies are only interested in hiring the best people for the right positions. If you can't program, or you aren't as good a designer as somebody else, or you lack the experience a company is looking for, it doesn't matter what colour your skin is or whether you have two X chromosomes: the job will not be yours. Plain and simple.

    Point two is something that an awful lot of people seem to forget about gaming when this topic comes up for discussion, and that is that video games are all about fantasy. There's a reason why Microsoft has not made a multi-platinum-selling video game about a geeky programmer who works a 9-5 job programming the next iteration of Windows; it's a fantasy that appeals to so few people that those who would be interested in playing the game are already doing it in real life.

    Fantasy in games is all about getting to do things that you can't do in real life, either because of physical, social, ethical or legal ramifications or because the universe we inhabit is not the same as the universe of a video game. No matter how hard we might want it, none of us will be able to be Joan of Arc leading an attack on the English in an effort to restore France's deposed dauphin to his rightful place on the throne. Unless we play a video game.

    Since gaming is all about fantasy, it stands to reason that the things we want to fantasize about most are the things we will never, ever get to do in real life. There's a reason Madden NFL sells millions of copies with each year's release: there are millions of people all over the world

  17. What about blonde-haired developers? by sahonen · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Quick, do a study about how many blonde-haired people play games vs. develop them. The video game industry is blondeist! Seriously, why do we still use race as a primary factor in surveys when what they're looking for is economic and social factors? That's where the racism is happening, not in the hiring practices of developers.

    --
    Make me a friend and I'll mod you up
  18. Not enough white's in rap music by Maestro485 · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Made up statistic:

    Despite the fact that a large percentage of rap music fans are white, only about 2% actually produce rap music! Seriously, who the hell cares? Some people like products of different cultures, whether music or games or anything else. This is a good thing.
  19. Re:who cares by Danny+Rathjens · · Score: 2, Insightful

    And being a "hacker" has nothing to do with breaking into computers. Give it up. You can't change the definition of a word yourself. The overwhelming majority of English speakers have already decided the definition; and that definition most definitely has something to do with race. :)

  20. Hint: you're CANADIAN. by ZombieRoboNinja · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Believe it or not, race DOES play a different factor in a society with a huge black minority that's been systematically oppressed for most of the past 3 centuries.

    I'm guessing the black people you grew up with, poor and otherwise, didn't grow up in an entirely-black-and-Latino ghetto, weren't marked by heavy urban accents, and probably didn't even have to grow up in an area with utterly failed justice and education systems.

    If you honestly think that your initial economic situation doesn't have any impact on educational level and success in life, you're a moron.

    1. Re:Hint: you're CANADIAN. by Blkdeath · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Believe it or not, race DOES play a different factor in a society with a huge black minority that's been systematically oppressed for most of the past 3 centuries.

      So you believe placing further stigma on a person's race relative to their career is going to help, or hurt this cause?

      I'm guessing the black people you grew up with, poor and otherwise, didn't grow up in an entirely-black-and-Latino ghetto, weren't marked by heavy urban accents, and probably didn't even have to grow up in an area with utterly failed justice and education systems.

      I'm not going to get into a pissing match over who has the worst schools because that could go on all day. Justice systems? Ditto. As for urban accents? Yes, I've seen people cling to ghetto slang to the point where they steadfastly refuse to speak anything approaching proper English. I've seen these people fail miserably. I've also seen many people from "urban ghettos" emerge with a fair to excellent command of the English language succeed in life.

      So how is it exactly that oppression is holding these people back? Are there really droves of white men going around forcing these people to call every one of their peers "bro" or "niggah" or "homie" and thereby preventing them from entering the workforce in a meaningful way?

      If you honestly think that your initial economic situation doesn't have any impact on educational level and success in life, you're a moron.

      The implied ad hominem aside; didn't you read the part where I said I completed high school in a lower class area? Socio-economic progress to these people was installing a CD player in their $200 car, if they could afford a $200 car in some cases.

      Yes, I watched groups of people who preferred to smoke drugs, skip classes or become sports obsessed jocks and also groups of people who worked hard and avoided all that nonsense. Guess which group broke free from their poor socio-economic upbringing and guess which ones now serve hamburgers (or reside in jail)? Hint: Many of the aforementioned have served me various foods and beverages since commencement. I'm sure that means I'm oppressing them, right?

      --
      BD Phone Home!

      Shameless plug. Like you weren't expecting it.

    2. Re:Hint: you're CANADIAN. by Blkdeath · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, but it probably means you're a self-serving, materialistic asshole that has no problem stepping over people to make money.

      Actually I've been slowed in my own career advancement because I take the time to impart my gained knowledge and wisdom on new employees rather than furthering myself, but that's really immaterial to your ad hominem approach so we'll move right along.

      Nothing personal, just my observation. Those who succeed aren't smarter, nor do they work *harder*.

      So success is nothing more than exploitation? Has nothing to do with knowledge or ability to work smart or hard? Interesting.

      It's always convenient to blame poverty on behavior. The problem is I hear you saying - "If you just sell out your soul, your ethnicity, your language, your culture, and everything that makes you an individual person, you too can succeed!"

      Did I say people had to sell out their soul or their ethnicity or language? Funny, but I don't recall making that claim. However there are certain things that make people "an individual person" that are simply barriers to success in the work force. Lack of personal hygiene can be a pretty big barrier. A person's chosen vernacular and the frequent use of profanity is a distinct barrier to entry in most business and retail sectors. Is that really a problem? Seriously? You mean I should be able to approach a client and ask them "Yo mo'fucker, what's up wit' choo today niggah?" Really? Amazing. I had no idea how deeply I was involved in this systematic persecution.

      --
      BD Phone Home!

      Shameless plug. Like you weren't expecting it.

    3. Re:Hint: you're CANADIAN. by phantomfive · · Score: 2, Informative

      So how is it exactly that oppression is holding these people back? Are there really droves of white men going around forcing these people to call every one of their peers "bro" or "niggah" or "homie" and thereby preventing them from entering the workforce in a meaningful way? You are right, there is nothing holding anyone back in America but themselves. The problem is a lot of them have the perception that they can't succeed, because of who they are. Everyone around them has the same perception, and no one is there to help them break out of it.

      For an example, go down to Union Square in San Francisco sometime. You will see a bunch of rich white people, a bunch of rich Asian people, and a bunch of poor black people. Imagine if you were a black kid growing up in that neighborhood. What are you going to think?

      So on the one hand, the problem isn't that racism is holding people back, but on the other hand there IS a problem that needs to be solved.
      --
      Qxe4
  21. White/Black/Whatever by lorg · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Is it just me or are all these "problems" only problems in areas where "white" is the dominant (or substitute "white" for "male" and compare it to female)? Just let everyone do whatever it is they do that they are good at and enjoy. Nothing gets better cause you use somekinda quota to get more people in from different groups just for the sake of diversity.

  22. Re:Yes please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Saturation, not hue. Everyone's skin is pretty close to the same hue, but the amount of melanin changes the saturation, making it lighter or darker. This has interesting consequences for computer vision, and is also pretty much entirely offtopic.

  23. Simple Answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful
    If you don't have/want a job, you're gonna play a lot of video games. This sounds racist, but it isn't, there are a lack of job opportunities in low income areas with a heavy black population. Sell some drugs, steal from your neighbors, and you'll have enough money to buy a console and some games. But, why then would you not go to work in the video game industry? Why bother? It's too much work, too much school, and you'll have to move away from all of your best friends. It's all really a lot harder than it sounds, most people from low income areas don't want to pack up everything and set out on a dream, which is essentially what entering the video game industry is. It's a pretty silly argument, talking about lack of opportunities in the video game industry, it all stems back to lack of opportunities in elementary schools in low income ares.

    All of that being said, I would love to hear a story about a group of black men and women who had brilliant game ideas and started their OWN game development studio in a basement and went on to make millions. It will happen eventually, with these numbers of blacks playing games it statistically must happen, it's only a matter of time. I'm kind of excited now.

  24. what? by Punto · · Score: 2, Funny

    now I'm supposed to know if the person who programmed some game is black or white? I honestly don't care, and I prefer to keep not caring.

    I wouldn't mind having more women around the office tho :p

    --

    --
    Stay tuned for some shock and awe coming right up after this messages!

  25. so?? by mattkime · · Score: 2, Insightful

    the vast majority of rappers are black, but the majority of rap fans are white.

    --
    Know what I like about atheists? I've yet to meet one that believes God is on their side.
  26. Re:Yes please by nomadic · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So a lot of the people who it actually occurred to are probably dead?

    You're joking, right? You think your grandparents' economic and educational opportunities have no effect on where you are now? Poverty is usually multigenerational.

  27. Re:Yes please by MoneyT · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Depends on who you're talking to. What gets lost in these discussions is that many of the white (and other ethnicity) people that you see today were not slave owners but rather descendants of immigrants, people who came here with little or nothing. And certainly relatively recently. Many people you see today are only 3rd generation americans, if that, and those immigrant ancestors certainly did not come to a land of sunshine and lolipops. They came to a land of uncertainty, hatred, discrimination, poverty and hard work. But these people managed to rise in just 3 generations and quite successfully. Now of course YMMV and things do not always translate from one group to another perfectly. But one would expect to see a rise at least equivalent to that of most second generation americans.

    --
    T Money
    World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
  28. Re:Someone call the waahmbulance by FiloEleven · · Score: 2, Funny

    Oh gosh I don't even know where to start with this one. Perhaps with some line breaks?

    =)
  29. Re:African American? by AlgorithMan · · Score: 2, Informative

    Yes! and LEARN OUR LANGUAGE when you come to our country, damnit!
    Especially the indians!

    --
    The MAFIAA is a bunch of mindless jerks who will be the first up against the wall when the revolution comes
  30. Re:Yes please by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 2, Informative

    Okay, here's the complete story on skin color: First for the base. Human skin in and of itself is fairly translucent. Blood, however, is fairly red, leaving a pinkish hue. There's a brown pigment (melanin) and a yellow pigment. It's the presence of the yellow pigment that changes the hue between east Asians and Europeans, and the degree of melanin that changes the saturation.

    --
    In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199