Slashdot Mirror


NBC to Create Programs Centered on Sponsors

explosivejared writes "It sounds farcical when you first hear it, but NBC has teamed up with an ad agency to produce actual feature programs that are centered around promoting the products of the network's sponsors. The network has already begun production on one sci-fi program entitled 'Gemini Division,' which will act as a platform for products from Microsoft, Intel, and Cisco. The programming will be broadcast via the network's 'digital properties,' e.g. the NBC web site. I guess it was only a matter of time for something like this to come along after product placement became the norm."

286 comments

  1. Wrong way round by jmpeax · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Product placement is, at best, a necessary evil to fund content that is expensive to produce. Normally, product placement is worth the effort because the content is very popular - for example, the promotion of brands like Apple and Cisco in 24.

    The significant point, however, is that the show comes first. By reversing the creative process and using product promotion as a starting point, not only is the quality of content likely to suffer, but the effectiveness of the advertising along with it.

    What's worse, it seems these plans will give the brands involved an unprecedented level of influence over the content. From TFA:

    [It will be] a unique way of giving brands a seat at the table with writers and producers in developing episodic programming that ties directly to brand needs
    1. Re:Wrong way round by Kamokazi · · Score: 4, Interesting

      So what you're saying is, it's a win-win for the TV networks....they can continue to not exert any creative effort and produce crappy shows no one likes, and make money on it like it was moderately successful.

      And I don't mind product placement in shows as long as it's subtle. The giant-sized HP logos on laptops always makes me chuckle, but ruins the immersiveness of the show (seriously, they're bigger than the emblem on the 9040 monster printers we use).

      --
      As our way of thanking you for your positive contributions to Slashdot, you are eligible to disable Slashdot 2.0.
    2. Re:Wrong way round by Original+Replica · · Score: 4, Interesting

      What's worse, it seems these plans will give the brands involved an unprecedented level of influence over the content. From TFA: [It will be] a unique way of giving brands a seat at the table with writers and producers in developing episodic programming that ties directly to brand needs

      I'm not sure how that is so different from magazines with "product reviews" that are directly funded by the producers of the products they are "reviewing". As long as they don't marketing start producing the Evening News or writing content taught in schoolrooms, it won't be any worse than most of the mass market tripe that passes for entertainment. I find it far more disturbing when marketing is presented as a factual news program than when presented as a key part of a fictional storyline.

      --
      We are all just people.
    3. Re:Wrong way round by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they can continue to not exert any creative effort and produce crappy shows no one likes, and make money on it like it was moderately successful.
      You're living in a fantasy world if you honestly think that nobody likes the shows that they're currently producing. The average Joe wants to watch ridiculous reality shows, sports and bottom of the barrel sitcoms. The overwhelming popularity of these shows proves it.
    4. Re:Wrong way round by peragrin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      that's just it unpopular shows don't get watched.

      it becomes lose lose, as they lose both ad revenue, and viewers.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    5. Re:Wrong way round by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I don't mind product placement in shows as long as it's subtle. The giant-sized HP logos on laptops always makes me chuckle, but ruins the immersiveness of the show (seriously, they're bigger than the emblem on the 9040 monster printers we use). When I saw the summary, my first thought was how advertising was done when TV first came out. One sponsor would pay for the whole show, and you would get "The Coca-Cola Variety Hour", or something like that. There would be regular interruptions to hawk the product of that particular company, or if it was a contest, the winners would get the advertiser's featured products. As things got more expensive, more sponsors shared the expense, and today you have the modern commercial. Radio was like this as well. Obviously, at that time, advertisers had a lot of power over content (to ensure proper placement).

      Things almost look like they're coming full circle.

    6. Re:Wrong way round by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The significant point, however, is that the show comes first. By reversing the creative process and using product promotion as a starting point, not only is the quality of content likely to suffer, but the effectiveness of the advertising along with it. Italian TV had solved the problem some 50 years ago with the "Carosello"/Carousel formula: just after dinner time the show had short sketches produced by the sponsors. Their duration was around 2 minutes. But the sponsored product could not be named or described until the last 30 seconds. So the sketch aimed to entertain people until the product could emerge. It was a huge success until it was axed in the last part of the seventies. I recall some episodes, and recognise its influence on later italian tv shows.
      Plus it was the perfect way for new talents to go public with something.

    7. Re:Wrong way round by hardburn · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Maybe not, though I don't think the truth is necessarily any more favorable to the "average Joe". People forgot that there before TV, people would read, have hobbies, take a walk, have a picnic, etc. Now people put on American Idol and say how much they hate that show. When asked why they still watch it, they respond that there's nothing else on.

      --
      Not a typewriter
    8. Re:Wrong way round by dpilot · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Years/decades ago I read a science fiction story set in a time when this ad-as-show trend had played to its logical conclusion. In this world, all music was commercial jingles, and musicians would play the popular "coms" for their live shows. The protagonist of the story was a musician who began creating music for its own sake. Queue the obvious, add a dash of O'Henry, bake until done.

      Title, author forgotten.

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    9. Re:Wrong way round by Goldberg's+Pants · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Isn't this largely what TV was back in the 50's? "The Colgate Comedy Hour" etc... It's just TV going full circle and back to the pitiful whores they were in the first place.

      Primetime infomercials basically.

    10. Re:Wrong way round by CSMatt · · Score: 1

      Then they are hypocrites. I hate American Idol and its clones with a passion, and don't watch them as a consequence. If there really is "nothing else on," then they are waiting for the show to come to them. Inform these people that you shouldn't be watching something just because everyone else is.

    11. Re:Wrong way round by skuzzlebutt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      My first thought was "30 Rock"...that's basically a shill for NBC and SNL, but IMHO a very decent sit-com. It's not just self-depracating, but they do actually mention GEs other ventures on the show, if only in jest; but that's the point, right? NBC can make fun of GE all they want as long as you remember that they make sitcoms AND toaster ovens. And lightbulbs. And jet engines. And financial services.

      They sure have a lot of shit to sell.

      --
      My debut novel AMITY now available: http://jeremydbrooks.c
    12. Re:Wrong way round by Powys · · Score: 1

      Who here wants to watch a 60 minute Microsoft commercial?

    13. Re:Wrong way round by NuclearError · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Would the show suffer so much if it was sponsored by Victoria's Secret, Smirnoff, and Trojan?

      --
      Nuclear engineers build weapons. Civil engineers build targets.
    14. Re:Wrong way round by knightperson · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Am I the only one who remembers the Saturday morning cartoons from the 80's that were thinly-disguised adds for plastic toys? Transformers and Go-Bots are the ones that come to mind, but I know there were more. Has anybody been stuck in a room with a TV playing Yu-Gi-Oh? It's a show about people playing the card game, although they have some obscure explanation for why the stuff is "really" happening to the characters playing it. Pokemon is another example, but I'm less sure about it because the show might have come before the toys. Somebody must think that kids who grew up on this garbage and didn't recognize it for what it was then won't recognize it when the toys being sold are more complicated.

      Sadly, this is almost a necessary evil. The old way of paying for the production of the content with commercial breaks doesn't work so well because DVR's let people skip the commercials entirely. If we want low-cost television programming, we've got to pay for it somehow, and this is one way. The writers' guild clearly hates it, and I don't blame them, but the money has to come from somewhere. The only other option is premium programming like HBO, which not enough people pay for. I'm one of the ones who doesn't pay for it, but it wouldn't surprise me to find that product placement is rampant there too.

    15. Re:Wrong way round by martin-boundary · · Score: 1

      Product placement is, at best, a necessary evil to fund content that is expensive to produce.
      I don't know. If it's expensive to produce, maybe it shouldn't be produced in the first place?

      When a show's production is more expensive than the actual profit it generates, that's a message from the market that things aren't working out. If nevertheless more money is poured into it to keep said show afloat with product placement, a better term than necessary evil would be an unnecessary evil: The market has spoken, let the show die already.

      In a properly efficient world, shows are self funding, and as a byproduct, the feeback from the market culls the potential crap early, so the overall quality of what survives matches better what most people want to watch.

    16. Re:Wrong way round by scottrocket · · Score: 2, Interesting
      all music was commercial jingles

      Sounds like a predecessor to "Demolition Man"

    17. Re:Wrong way round by mattack2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      While it's not exactly what you say, network news started with http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camel_News_Caravan

      They would smoke during the broadcast and had a big sign with the sponsor's name during the whole thing.

    18. Re:Wrong way round by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      I believe they had forced product placement in the show, but totally made fun of it too (e.g. Snapple).

      Letterman mentions a lot of products the last few years, and I'm not sure if they're product placement. Often they're making fun of the product, but not always.

      Personally, I hate regular ads (for well over 15 years I've recorded virtually everything I watch so I can skip ads.. it's just easier with Tivo or other recorders than with multiple VCRs), but product placement doesn't bug me most of the time. Even the worst cases (usually on Survivor), just barely irk me.. They're much less bad than the bugs on the screen or the regular ad breaks.

    19. Re:Wrong way round by CastrTroy · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      I do that all the time when I'm waiting for my computer to boot up.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    20. Re:Wrong way round by Yez70 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Not really. Back then they had a show and did live commercials for the toothpaste or whatnot. Now the show will be abut toothpaste, as a topic.

    21. Re:Wrong way round by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      I say they should just skip all the broadcast TV, and just have the shows available for download on the interent. I've seen a couple show's available in this manner, but I think the price is all wrong. Usually about $2 an episode. A full season would come out to the same as most DVD seasons. If they brought it down to $0.50 an episode, they could get everyone downloading it, and then also buying the DVD set if they really liked the season, like people do already.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    22. Re:Wrong way round by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      Product placement is, at best, a necessary evil to fund content that is expensive to produce.


      No, the business of commercial "broadcasters" (including those who "broadcast" online) is not to produce quality content, which is supported to the extent necessary by sponsorship, it is to sell advertising, a goal to which the creation of content that attracts eyeballs is a necessary supporting chore.

      Its the paying customer that drives the business.
    23. Re:Wrong way round by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You obviously didn't watch 1980s cartoons, because if you did you would remember that shows like Transformers, whilst totally awesome to me even today, were giant vehicles for selling toys. The question is more whether the producers will take the product placement to obscene heights, or just use it as background for an otherwise strong story.

    24. Re:Wrong way round by smellotron · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Demolition man is a direct descendent of Aldous Huxley's Brave New World. Even down to the character names (John the Savage = John Spartan, Lenina Crowne = Lenina Huxley).

    25. Re:Wrong way round by tsotha · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure the brand influence will be "unprecedented". Advertisers used to pay for just that kind of access, requiring, for instance, the main stars to smoke in every episode of I Love Lucy. Sounds to me like television is going back to its roots.

    26. Re:Wrong way round by smellotron · · Score: 1

      When considering most of the drivel on TV today, I agree with you. However, I find a lot of shows on e.g. PBS/WTTW interesting, but I wouldn't expect them all to be self-sufficient. I would be happy funding a fair amount of those shows with tax dollars, since 1) they serve an education purpose in a way that meets the most viewers, and 2) they're not spoon-feeding laugh-track drivel, which I already "pay" for by the ubiquity of advertisements littered around the city.

    27. Re:Wrong way round by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

      Somebody (slashdot friendly) figured that a show is about $1.50 in revenue to the broadcasters & producers thru the pipe. Once you "own" the show, that continued revenue stream diminishes quickly. $2.00 is about right per show. If you figure how many shows you actually watch for your $100 subscription to cable that's a lot of iTunes per month.

    28. Re:Wrong way round by Goldberg's+Pants · · Score: 1

      It's still going back to a more sponsor driven medium.

      To be quite honest, if the show is actually good, I don't care if it is designed to pimp MS, Intel etc... Of course the chances of it actually being good, given it's on network TV, are fairly slim.

    29. Re:Wrong way round by __int64 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This has been going on already, corporate donated textbooks and televisions in Indiana schools. Everyday before school the kids have to watch a 10 minute program with corporate created content, that as I recall, also included explicit advertising. The schools accept the TV donations to improve their classroom's tech level and sign away the minds of the students to corporate influence. The content is largely repacked syndicated content and CNN stock footage as I recall, but I'm sure the contracts with the schools included verbiage to alter and include whatever embedded messages they saw fit.

      The infrastructure to network a whole school and provide it with large screen TVs and DVD players isn't cheep, and shows the value of guaranteed access to young impressionable minds, even for only 10 minutes a day.

      How much more would a full 8 hour days worth of access be worth? Enough for a corporation to establish a fully subsidized "private" school? One that payed and/or subsidized the parents normal public school taxes, essentially creating totally free schooling? The quality of education is obvious but to me this looks like the logical next step in corporate control.

    30. Re:Wrong way round by Skybyte · · Score: 1

      Yu-gi-oh was a comic before it was a card game, which is why many of the rules in the early parts of the show aren't part of the real life game.

    31. Re:Wrong way round by scottrocket · · Score: 1

      And as I recall, they referred to John Spartan as a "Caveman" (as in, "So easy that a...:))

    32. Re:Wrong way round by lluBdeR · · Score: 2, Funny

      that's just it unpopular shows don't get watched.

      it becomes lose lose, as they lose both ad revenue, and viewers. It becomes lose lose win, since they get to blame piracy in the end.
    33. Re:Wrong way round by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My favorite part is the "Arnold Schwarzenegger Presidential Library".

    34. Re:Wrong way round by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      FTSummary:

      NBC has teamed up with an ad agency

      We've already established what kind of girl you are; now we're haggling about price.

      When does this work its way down to the evening news? Will Katie Couric show up with only her Maidenform bra above the waist? What the hell do you expect now that the once-proud (and once well-supported) news departments of all major networks are under the control of entertainment companies?

    35. Re:Wrong way round by bit01 · · Score: 1

      And I don't mind product placement in shows as long as it's subtle.

      Sucker. Unless you take subliminal advertising seriously the whole point of an ad is to be noticed. The only subtle ad is one that isn't working, and that's unsustainable.

      ---

      "Advertising supported" just means you're paying twice over, once in time to watch/avoid the ad and twice in the increased price of the product to pay for the ad.

    36. Re:Wrong way round by bit01 · · Score: 1

      Product placement is, at best, a necessary evil to fund content that is expensive to produce.

      No, it's an unnecessary evil, just a primitive form of micropayment that hides the true cost of a product from the consumer. Advertising pays for nothing. Who do you think pays marketer's salaries? You do.

      ---

      "Advertising supported" just means you're paying twice over, once in time to watch/avoid the ad and twice in the increased price of the product to pay for the ad.

    37. Re:Wrong way round by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least NBC news anchors and variety show hosts won't be hawking Lucky Strike cigarettes on the air. Oh wait... weren't they doing that 40 years ago? Come to think of it, didn't Little Orphan Annie and Captain Midnight routinely take time off from saving the world to speak to the listeners about the nutrition in a mug of rich, malty Ovaltine? Shocking.

    38. Re:Wrong way round by Bartab · · Score: 1

      I would be happy funding a fair amount of those shows with tax dollars, since 1) Mostly, it's not my money anyways!

      Fixed for you.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo.
    39. Re:Wrong way round by smellotron · · Score: 1

      Mostly, it's not my money anyways!
      Fixed for you.

      Too true—I provide a very small fraction of the total tax revenue of the state and federal governments; but last I checked, suffrage in the US was independent of tax revenue, so it doesn't matter too much. Besides, it's tough to argue about the cost/benefit ratio of public TV programming when it's completely dwarved by other things the US federal government spends money on, like Vietnam^H^H^H^H^H^H^HIraq.

    40. Re:Wrong way round by Baricom · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Interestingly, it's more full circle than you might initially realize. The primary reason that spot advertising became popular was not the expense of television shows, but the desire for the television networks to break the control of advertisers on network programming. Spot advertising was first introduced on NBC by president Pat Weaver. Prior to that, shows were typically produced by the advertiser, not the network.

    41. Re:Wrong way round by sefa · · Score: 0

      Pure Prostitution

    42. Re:Wrong way round by mcrbids · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Isn't this largely what TV was back in the 50's? "The Colgate Comedy Hour" etc... It's just TV going full circle and back to the pitiful whores they were in the first place.

      You whiner.

      I just don't get the NEGATIVE ATTITUDE that comes from this. I mean, 24x7, you're getting shows that cost a TON OF MONEY to create for FREE. How about "gee, thanks!"??? You could go and support local community theater, but we all know that's something you go to because you think community theater is a "good idea", or because you know somebody in it, not because you'd actually want to go see it every night after dinner.

      Don't like the show? Go do something else! Learn to play the guitar! Take your bored dog for a walk! Go have sex with your partner! Or, go find a partner to have sex with! Read a book! Study differential calculus! Learn to cook Mahi-Mahi Flambe.

      But, you don't want to do that, and you don't like advertising? Well, you could PAY FOR THE SHOW. You know, buy season DVDs and only watch those. Don't bother with the advertising supported television! No commercials! Somewhere along the line, somebody's got to pay the bill.

      The truth is, this is a natural response to the rise of the DVR. I've been wondering how long it would be before this would happen - I haven't watched a standard TV commercial in a long, long time. Any shows that count me as an advertising "eyeball" are lying to their advertisers. And while I appreciate the free ride in the short term, the long term is that this situation is simply unsustainable, as the cost of DVRs drop and adoption continues to climb.

      --
      I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    43. Re:Wrong way round by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now the show will be abut toothpaste, as a topic.

      Better than a show about nothing.

    44. Re:Wrong way round by pipingguy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Now the show will be abut toothpaste, as a topic.

      As Seinfeld demonstrated, you can probably get at least 2 episodes out of that concept. And refer back to it at least 7 times successfully using the laugh track.

    45. Re:Wrong way round by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Normally, product placement is worth the effort because the content is very popular - for example, the promotion of brands like Apple and Cisco in 24"

      When people start thinking that shows like "24" are popular, the society that produces them are doomed.

      Look in the mirror, America. Why aren't you gagging?

    46. Re:Wrong way round by flyingsquid · · Score: 2, Insightful
      My first thought was "30 Rock"...that's basically a shill for NBC and SNL, but IMHO a very decent sit-com.

      I don't think they're trying to sell Saturday Night Live; it's a case of "write what you know". Tina Fey spent a lot of time working at SNL as a writer and performer, so creating a sitcom about a fictional comedy show at a major network made sense for her. The irony is that 30 Rock is currently much better than SNL, the show it is based around. I guess that at some point she must have looked at the sorry state of SNL, and the drama and crazy shit going on behind the scenes, and realized that the real humor was behind the stage, not in front of it. SNL occasionally has moments of genius but its best days are behind it. It's like a dog which has lived a good, long life, but to let it go on any further is just cruelty, and it should be put down.

    47. Re:Wrong way round by hazem · · Score: 1

      or if it was a contest, the winners would get the advertiser's featured products.

      It will be "even better" because the cheapest shows are already the "reality" shows. But now, instead of the contestants on Survivor having to stand on top of a boring old log until the last one stands, you'll get:

      "only 2 contestants are remaining atop their towers of delicious ice cold coca cola. Who will last the longest and get to drink all the wonderful bubbly, all American drink?... OH! She almost fell! .." [smash-cut to coca cola commercial]

    48. Re:Wrong way round by Omniscious · · Score: 1

      In the end the consumer will decide whats the right way round. Nobody has to watch these shows. And if this happens certainly nobody will invest money in these shows.

    49. Re:Wrong way round by justthinkit · · Score: 1

      As long as they don't marketing start producing the Evening News

      You haven't been paying attention...TV news is controlled and selected from start to finish, and if the advertisers aren't completely happy, they go elsewhere. That Doctor guy on CNN is making a lot of drug and medical companies happy everytime he offers medical advice to Joe and Jane Public.

      or writing content taught in schoolrooms,

      Ok, I get it now -- you don't have children. Our children dutifully bring home mini-Time magazine, and watch me throw it out immediately. They also _have to_ bring home and bring back to school these massive advermagazines -- hawking who knows what, I certainly don't want to find out. At first the kids thought I would actually look at the products, and they had their own suggestions for things they wanted. Now they recognize trash as trash.

      --
      I come here for the love
    50. Re:Wrong way round by Grayswan · · Score: 1

      Clearly, the Tivo effect is causing this. With the ubiquitous DVR, everyone is skipping the regular add breaks, so the ads have to be mixed in with the content.

      --
      If you open your mind too wide, people will throw trash in it.
    51. Re:Wrong way round by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      I seem to recall a Philip K. Dick story along the same lines, although I can't remember the title either.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    52. Re:Wrong way round by dpilot · · Score: 1

      That might be the very story I'm talking abiut.

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    53. Re:Wrong way round by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How on earth did this get modded insightful?

      "you're getting shows that cost a TON OF MONEY to create for FREE."

      No you are not. You are paying higher prices for the products you buy so to cover the advertising expenses, whether you watch the shows or not.

      The rest of your rant merely states, "please yourself". Well duh!

    54. Re:Wrong way round by Kamokazi · · Score: 1

      Well it depends on how the revenue is viewed by the TV network, and that is the problem...if they're just seen as a little extra side revenue, then it's fine...but if they're seen as a major funding souce, then they are going to need to be more 'in-your-face'.

      Subtle placement (ie. all cans of soda are Coke, all cars used are GM, etc) can make sales, but you're right, they're not as effective...but they still are effective to a degree, and worth paying something for.

      --
      As our way of thanking you for your positive contributions to Slashdot, you are eligible to disable Slashdot 2.0.
    55. Re:Wrong way round by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoa you're awesome!

    56. Re:Wrong way round by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds to me like television is going back to its roots. Making it that much easier to bury. Works for me.
    57. Re:Wrong way round by batquux · · Score: 1

      Would the show suffer so much if it was sponsored by Victoria's Secret, Smirnoff, and Trojan? In Soviet Russia, commercials have TV shows.
    58. Re:Wrong way round by mrmeval · · Score: 1

      In the beginning there were shows that were wholly funded by a single sponsor. "Soap Opera"'s were selling soap. In one episode of "The Dick Van Dyke" show he's seen smoking a cigarette and praising it and in another commenting on how good a carton is as a Chrismas gift.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pSpNViOJpL8

      --
      I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
    59. Re:Wrong way round by Walt+Dismal · · Score: 2, Funny
      Top five product-centered shows:

      5. 'Hair Club for Men's Animal Adventures'

      4. 'Cheaters, Best Buy Edition'

      3. 'CSI McDonalds'

      2. 'Tampax Space Patrol'

      1. 'Taco Bell Emergency Room'

    60. Re:Wrong way round by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about season DVDs when product placement becomes the norm? Then I'll be paying to see ads. Maybe we'll build DVRs for DVDs and make software to blur out the branding!

    61. Re:Wrong way round by camperslo · · Score: 1

      ...you're getting shows that cost a TON OF MONEY to create for FREE

      No we're not. Even if we don't watch, we're covering those costs in most of our purchases.
      If we think of opportunity cost, poor programming costs us by contributing to damage to society.
      If if we don't watch the programming personally, bad programming alters the people around us and society as a whole. Whether it makes them more ignorant, fat, flatulent, violent, polluting or worse in any of many ways, the secondary effects come back to degrade life for all of us.

      And we certainly have a right to complain if broadcasters - which are supposed to be trustees of the public interest - fail to serve their local communities well.

      When the FCC degraded interference protection on the FM band allowing more stations to come on the air (docker 80-90 IIRC), Most of these stations licensed to smaller communities ended up being presented as being from nearby larger communities. Besides the signals being a bit marginal, that approach which caters more to wide-area advertisers, puts local businesses and the jobs that go with them at a disadvantage. Ads on programs distributed over larger areas or nationally do that even more. Are our communities better served by these big-box and national chains that rarely provide much in the way of jobs locally?

      Lax regulations permitting infomercials, much more advertising per hour, drug and ambulance-chaser ads and more have given large corporate broadcast operations more profit while degrading what our communities are given.

      The damage is deep and widespread. The phrase "you are what you eat" comes to mind.
      Part of what we and those around us becomes depends of what we watch, or didn't watch.
      Do you ever feel like you're surrounded by idiots? Ask yourself why.

      Contrast the quality of foods and consumer products in the U.S. with the E.U.
      Ask why there isn't more outcry over what is happening.

      "give the masses food and circus and they will not revolt"
      Seen any overweight or ignorant people lately? How much tv do they watch?

    62. Re:Wrong way round by Slithe · · Score: 1

      Of course if the company did not advertise and therefore did not sell as many products, then you would likely pay even higher prices, or if the product maker could not sell enough and went out of business, you could not buy the product at all. So advertising is the least evil in this situation.

      --
      ---- "XML is like violence. If it doesn't fix the problem, you aren't using enough."
    63. Re:Wrong way round by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1

      Ah, Demolition Man - not a good movie, but there's a good movie in there trying to get out. Sort of like The Running Man.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    64. Re:Wrong way round by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1

      Of course if the company did not advertise...if the product maker could not sell enough and went out of business, you could not buy the product at all

      What, you really think if there were no TV ads for cars, computers, and the like, no one would buy them?

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    65. Re:Wrong way round by Weedlekin · · Score: 1

      Pervasive and continuous advertising even when people were asleep was a common feature of Dick's stories and books.

      --
      I'm not going to change your sheets again, Mr. Hastings.
    66. Re:Wrong way round by pespeslash · · Score: 1

      It's just a return to the roots of television - all shows started out as a production for a sponsor - it IS free to watch, remember..

    67. Re:Wrong way round by Damned · · Score: 1

      [...][T]his is a natural response to the rise of the DVR. Quite so. Neilsen has been issuing ratings numbers on how many people actually watch commercials, and advertisers are using those numbers to determine how much they are willing to pay. If the networks want ad money at the same rate, they need to deliver the attention of the audience to the advertisers' products, and, as other posters have noted, we go back to something akin to television at its inception.

      --
      "I swear I won't break you if you let me take you where the willows never weep" -- Switchblade Symphony
    68. Re:Wrong way round by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      Who here wants to watch a 60 minute Microsoft commercial? That depends. Will there by flying chairs?
      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    69. Re:Wrong way round by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The Tunesmith" by Lloyd Biggle, Jr.

      I have it in Biggle's anthology "The Metallic Muse".

      It's currently available in a Tor Double with something or other by Orson Scott Card.

    70. Re:Wrong way round by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A lot of people pay for a dish or for cable. Guess what? The dish and cable company pay channels PER SUBSCRIBER to carry the channels. I *AM* paying for shows.

  2. So Easy! by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Funny

    Make TV shows from ads?! That's so easy a caveman could do it!

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:So Easy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And what a piece of crap it was. It could have, and should have, been better. I watched it once. Fortunately, it didn't last very long.

    2. Re:So Easy! by jd · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Or a sailor, or a bunch of turtles. Commercials and infomercials disguised as regular TV programs are old-hat, but not necessarily on the scale being talked about, and certainly not by the IT industry. However, I guess it was inevitable. With the exception of publicly-funded TV stations, funding - and therefore control - has been from advertising. Costs are going up but the time available for regular adverts is constrained by the need for regular programming. The obvious solution is to make adverts that are regular programs, thereby getting both more time and more control than would otherwise be available (as far as the advertisers are concerned) and more income (as far as the TV station is concerned).

      Freedom to do this is fair enough. I've no problems with the concept. What I have problems with is the fact that there are no significant alternatives in the US. PBS is massively underfunded and relies so much on commercial sponsorship that it cannot be considered an alternative. It also doesn't produce much in the way of range in programming. As far as I know, there are no other non-corporate, non-profit TV stations of any significance. Oh, there are some small operations that do local stuff, but you can't seriously expect those to produce anything to rival the BBC's 90's production of "Pride and Prejudice" or Paramount's "Deep Space Nine". I seriously doubt any independent non-profit operator would even have the budget for something on the scale of Gerry and Sylvia Anderson's "Space: 1999".

      Why is it important that it be non-profit? A commercial operator could do any of the above. Yes, they could, but if it is more profitable to produce commercials in the form of programs than to produce dramas in the form of programs, you can't expect businessmen to put art before money. Art is expensive and risky. Commercials are paid for by someone else and the income is guaranteed because it's paid for by the person doing the advertising. In addition to high expenses just for operating, many have shareholders to placate. Shareholders might enjoy relaxing, watching a good TV show, but they are going to enjoy watching their stocks go up in value even more.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  3. 50's here we come... by vanyel · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Like they say, nothing new under the sun...

    1. Re:50's here we come... by TheWanderingHermit · · Score: 4, Informative

      Thanks for that point. People seem to forget that product placement used to be the norm. It was also done in many cases in radio shows. Listen to the old Jack Benny show (you can find episodes at the Internet archive: http://www.archive.org/details/oldtimeradio). They mentioned the sponsor quite often in shows and even joked about it. I can't remember the show, but in early TV there was a detective who would often stop in a tobacco shop during the show and talk about his favorite brand of cigar or cigarette with the people in the shop. It was an ad, but done as product placement. TVLand did a service a while back by showing an original (yet updated) version of the original "I Love Lucy" pilot and during such shows the stars would often do the ads themselves or the ads were integrated into the show.

      It's not new and it's tiring to see all these people that think it is.

    2. Re:50's here we come... by vanyel · · Score: 1

      There were also the sole sponsor shows too, just like this latest round: Kraft Television Theater, Philco Television Playhouse, etc...

    3. Re:50's here we come... by techno-vampire · · Score: 1

      It wasn't new then. I've heard episodes of Fibber McGee and Molly, and there was one character who's only reason for showing up was to turn the conversation into a commercial for Johnson's Wax. Sometimes Molly would "try" to keep him from changing the subject, or make a joke out of it, but he'd always get his commercial in. I'm sure that wasn't the only show doing it, but it's the only one I've heard.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    4. Re:50's here we come... by merreborn · · Score: 3, Funny

      It's not new and it's tiring to see all these people that think it is.
      Are you suffering from frequent fatigue? You may be a victim of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. Have you tried new Sleepitrol? Sleepitrol: from the makers of Spleenhance. 4 out of 9 doctors agree, it probably won't kill you!
    5. Re:50's here we come... by Digi-John · · Score: 1

      Sometimes when they're doing a Twilight Zone marathon on the Sci-Fi Channel (yeah, low-brow channel, but the Twilight Zone rocks), they play the 'teasers' for upcoming episodes, in which Serling stands there smoking, tells you a little bit about the next episode, then explains how he always smokes cigarette brand X. Great stuff, reflects a different, less "THINK OF THE CHILDREN" time in history.

      --
      Klingon programs don't timeshare, they battle for supremacy.
    6. Re:50's here we come... by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 1

      Heh. I mentioned this very show in a comment elsewhere. Other shows aren't as good as Fibber McGee and Molly. I actually look forward to the Johnson's Wax spot, they always have fun with it. Other shows are more straightforward and intrusive.

    7. Re:50's here we come... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree this is definitely not new, but old time radio and infomercials are totally different animals. I can't really describe the difference except perhaps for the irritation factor. The brilliant thing about product placement within the show however, is that you can't zap the commercials without losing content. Muahha. No really, I had ads as much as the next guy, but think of how white your shirts could be.

    8. Re:50's here we come... by techno-vampire · · Score: 1

      OK, to continue down this tangent, why did the audience always break up when Beulah came on?

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    9. Re:50's here we come... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about the Price is Right? This isn't a new concept. I was expecting something like a sitcom or something based on corporate at Pepsi or something. Sort of like how 30 Rock is.

    10. Re:50's here we come... by Bwana+Geek · · Score: 1

      From Wikipedia:

      The most unusual character might have been the McGees' black maid, Beulah. Unlike the situation on The Jack Benny Program, where black actor Eddie Anderson played "Rochester," Beulah was voiced by a Caucasian male, Marlin Hurt. The character's usual opening line, "Somebody bawl fo' Beulah??", often provoked a stunned, screeching sort of laughter among the live studio audience; many of them, seeing the show performed for the first time in person, did not know that the actor voicing Beulah was neither black nor female, and expressed their surprise when Hurt delivered his line.

    11. Re:50's here we come... by dr_dank · · Score: 1

      In a few TZ episodes, you can see where sponsors logos were blotted out. I can't find the site at the moment, but they had stills of the credits from the original airing versus the credits with the logos blotted out in syndication. I believe "Black Leather Jackets" was the episode where it was really noticable in the end credits with a big black bar.

      --
      Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
    12. Re:50's here we come... by martin-boundary · · Score: 1
      Remember the guy who edited out JarJar from Episode 1? What's going to stop people from editing out the product placements from shows before sharing them on the internet? They already do this for ads.

      The most likely effect of widespread product placement is to get more people to download shared shows a couple of days later than the air date.

    13. Re:50's here we come... by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      That's where the term "soap opera" comes from. They used to play soap commercials during the breaks in those shows, so that the women advertising would buy the soap.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    14. Re:50's here we come... by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

      Thanks for that point. People seem to forget that product placement used to be the norm. It was also done in many cases in radio shows. Listen to the old Jack Benny show (you can find episodes at the Internet archive: http://www.archive.org/details/oldtimeradio [archive.org]). They mentioned the sponsor quite often in shows and even joked about it. I can't remember the show, but in early TV there was a detective who would often stop in a tobacco shop during the show and talk about his favorite brand of cigar or cigarette with the people in the shop. It was an ad, but done as product placement. TVLand did a service a while back by showing an original (yet updated) version of the original "I Love Lucy" pilot and during such shows the stars would often do the ads themselves or the ads were integrated into the show. Can you just imagine how difficult it would be to write scripts around certain products? Tobacco, fine. Beer, sure. Cars, that's a natural. But how could you work in tampons? Preparation H? I'd love to see the context they come up with for "astro-glide."
      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    15. Re:50's here we come... by krotkruton · · Score: 1

      Everyone seems to be missing the more obvious shows which were what a generation grew up on: G.I. Joe, Transformers, and others. These shows were created to ramp up action figure sales. While it's true that the shows became a great source of revenue, that wasn't their original purpose. They were the ultimate shows created specifically for a product.

    16. Re:50's here we come... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wish someone could edit JarJar from my memory, but a suitably diabolical product placement cannot be edited out without screwing up the plot.

  4. Wow.. by rastoboy29 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Another great reason to continue avoiding network tv.

    1. Re:Wow.. by azuredrake · · Score: 5, Funny

      I need a mod -1: Bad Font. :(

      --
      Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
    2. Re:Wow.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a Freudian font - small, insignificant, and easy to ignore!

    3. Re:Wow.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's really tempting to abuse my mod powers, but I'm going to resist...

    4. Re:Wow.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amen. Courier is acceptable for code. Otherwise, no thanks.

    5. Re:Wow.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you read the article, it said it will be on the "NBC Universal digital properties, such as web sites". It doesn't say anything about it being on network TV.

    6. Re:Wow.. by Hunter-Killer · · Score: 1

      Why resist? I make it a point to mod posts like his -1, Overrated. When you're skimming through comments, a different font catches the eye, in effect screaming "hey everybody, read this post!" IMHO, this isn't any different than drawing ASCII arrows pointing to your post--an attention-seeking gimmick. With no community-benefiting reasons to "think different," and clear reasons not to (disrupts readers, steals attention from other worthy posts), I have no qualms about negatively moderating his posts. Read his post history; it's not like he posts anything insightful in the first place.

    7. Re:Wow.. by smellotron · · Score: 1

      For some reason, that triggered the thought of a mod -1: Bad Command or File name.

    8. Re:Wow.. by Nazlfrag · · Score: 1
      1: Open Tools->Options->Content
      2: Click on the Advanced button in the Font section.
      3: Select another font for 'monospace' (I like Lucida console myself)
      4: ???
      5: Profit!

      *Results may vary depending on browser.

    9. Re:Wow.. by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      Changing which monospace font to use doesn't help the fact that this post should not be using a monospaced font.

      Selecting a variable-width font to use for all monospaced fonts would be even worse, because that would mess up any posts that really should be monospaced.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    10. Re:Wow.. by GXTi · · Score: 1

      -1 Depressing Smiley

  5. Who didn't see this coming? by flanksteak · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I guess it was only a matter of time for something like this to come along after product placement became the norm.

    And after the DVR makes commercial-skipping so much easier. The business model must evolve. Unknown if it will survive. And while I know everyone will say that this will turn most viewers off, the truth is if it's entertaining people will watch.

    I love this quote:

    The collaboration ... offers a unique way of giving brands a seat at the table with writers and producers in developing episodic programming that ties directly to brand needs.

    BSOD jokes aside, I'm trying to figure out how you can communicate helpful technical product information in a science fiction drama show. Is it going to be like the time Jeff Goldblum used Mac OS 9 to take down the alien computer systems? Or is Rosario Dawson going to chase aliens and time travel with a Zune and an MSDN subscription? It's one thing to have a Coke can sitting in plain view, it's another to show how the protagonists succeed using shrinkwrapped software.

    1. Re:Who didn't see this coming? by DarkOx · · Score: 4, Funny

      No Scifi makes perfect sense, only in scifi could the protagonist succeed using Microsoft and Cisco products.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    2. Re:Who didn't see this coming? by Tore+S+B · · Score: 1

      I seem to recall a "way into the future" sci-fi movie having monitors with VERY visible SGI logos.

      --
      toresbe
    3. Re:Who didn't see this coming? by calebt3 · · Score: 1

      I can see where the "Fiction" part comes in, but I can't see where "Science" comes in with that.

    4. Re:Who didn't see this coming? by calebt3 · · Score: 1

      It's one thing to have a Coke can sitting in plain view, it's another to show how the protagonists succeed using shrinkwrapped software. It's not shrinkwrapped, but here you go:
      http://nmap.org/movies.html
    5. Re:Who didn't see this coming? by hardburn · · Score: 1

      Or Blade Runner with Atari, or the first season of Earth: Final Conflict with MCI. I seem to recall a Zima sign somewhere on Babylon 5, too.

      --
      Not a typewriter
    6. Re:Who didn't see this coming? by hardburn · · Score: 1

      SF is in a tough position. Its fan base is the group most likely to either TiVo the commercials away or just bittorrent the whole thing. The problem with product placement is that it's usually hard to work any meaningful placement into a SF story. Cylon skinjobs would be a lot more conspicuous if they came with an "Intel Inside" on their forehead.

      I suspect commercials are going to be something that people choose to watch, like Superbowl commericals, or the "Will it Blend?" guy.

      --
      Not a typewriter
    7. Re:Who didn't see this coming? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BSOD jokes aside, I'm trying to figure out how you can communicate helpful technical product information in a science fiction drama show. Special Emmy should be given to the writer who first manages to write a meaningful scifi-drama with today's products as a centerpiece. Then again, how about a cyberpunk thingy, with the companies mentioned fighting company wars with leagal, military and commercial means, while exploiting the weak and the innocent? The products and logos would be shown literally everywhere!
    8. Re:Who didn't see this coming? by WilyCoder · · Score: 1

      You mean Macs aren't handcrafted from alien angels? No wai..... .... just bought my first ever Mac, a black macbook ;-) ....

    9. Re:Who didn't see this coming? by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      ...except the next step after the PVR is the media server and there's
      more than enough "legacy" content keep you occupied for a lifetime
      without even getting into piracy or network television.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    10. Re:Who didn't see this coming? by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Yet ads for the channel itself (Scifi that is) are a perfect example
      of commercials that you are prone to jump back to and go out of your
      way to watch. A PVR doesn't necessarily do in commercials entirely,
      it just makes the ad agencies job harder. Instead of being able to
      kid their clients with the common myth that people care, they may
      be forced to make decent commercials again.

      HELL, just opening up the vaults and showing "retro-mercials"
      in place of their current prime-time commercials would be a
      massive improvement.

      If goal of the modern day ad man should be to create a commercial
      that people will want to download and watch all by itself.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    11. Re:Who didn't see this coming? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's a preview. In this one they are trying to sell Vista. You'll notice that this user's experience is much better than that of the normal Vista user.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NGFF_aFxE18&NR=1

  6. piracy by timmarhy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So when i pirate this quality content, are they going to try sue me? after all marketing is the entire point of this.

    --
    If you mod me down, I will become more powerful than you can imagine....
    1. Re:piracy by Alarindris · · Score: 1

      Haha! A truly good reason to support this. As soon as this comes out I'm gonna seed the hell out it, on all my computers, non-stop. I'd love them to take me to court for it.

      And for that reason they won't :(

    2. Re:piracy by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 2, Interesting
      are they going to try sue me?

      Of course they can, even content-less commercials are copyrighted.

      However, if this model becomes popular, you can just side-step the networks and distribute direct.

      A few years back there was a BMW series of movie shorts that were unabashedly product placement pieces, but they were quite enjoyable.

      In fact, I just found them again

      Of course, fast cars are inherently entertaining to many folks. I can hardly wait for the next episode of Kleenex Man!

      --
      This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
    3. Re:piracy by silvermorph · · Score: 1

      It might not be worth it for them to sue you, but pirating the show wouldn't automatically benefit them in the way you'd think. If they don't control the distribution, they don't know who they're actually reaching, which skews their marketing data.

    4. Re:piracy by capologist · · Score: 1

      So when i pirate this quality content, are they going to try sue me? after all marketing is the entire point of this.

      Probably. Remember adcritic.com?

      For those who don't: It was a website that hosted television commercials and allowed users to comment on them. However, they didn't have permission from the copyright holders of the commercials.

      The copyright holders sued and shut the site down.

      Interestingly, YouTube today is host to tons of television commercials apparently without any problem. Maybe the ad agencies have rethought their position.
  7. wait... by owlnation · · Score: 1

    A sci-fi show centered around MS?

    Too many jokes...too many jokes...

    Danger, danger... overload, overload...!!!

    1. Re:wait... by jd · · Score: 1

      You didn't hear? The show is centered around a group of humans on Earth in the 23rd century who discover an alien technology so advanced that it can even run the next service pack reliably. Their purpose is to save their civilization from the two groups of deep space colonists who are returning to Earth by means of vessels running alternative operating systems. The group will be run by a Captain Jack lookalike as it has become increasingly important to be beyond the Government.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    2. Re:wait... by taustin · · Score: 1

      Sci-Fi? Hardly. More like fantasy. In Sci-Fi, you have to have stuff that's plausible within the known laws of the universe.

    3. Re:wait... by Deathlizard · · Score: 3, Funny

      If its The Microsoft Matrix" I'd watch it.

    4. Re:wait... by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      You mean, things like Heisenberg compensators, Dilithium crystals which can withstand antimatter, malfunctioning transporters which split a person into a good and an evil part, ...?
      And in case you complain that this is all Star Trek, well, the idea of using humans as batteries isn't exactly plausible either: Where do those humans get their energy from, and why can't the machines get it from the same source directly?
      Or maybe you're a Star Wars fan? So where's the plausibility of the force?

      Face it, a lot of SciFi is far from plausible within the known laws of the universe.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    5. Re:wait... by jd · · Score: 2, Informative
      That's why a lot of "purist" sci-fi fans prefer to use the more generic label of SF, as that includes "Science Fantasy", which most of the shows you mentioned could reasonably be listed as, and "Speculative Fiction".

      Science Fiction is usually reserved for programs or stories that are "close to" the known laws (but can violate one or two for dramatic purposes). Star Wars' "force" could be considered a single violation, their hyperspace the second, so that's still within what could be classically called Science Fiction. The third category, Speculative Fiction, is reserved specifically for programs that do not violate any known law and could plausibly occur if the context and situation described arose in practice. Given the limits of knowledge at the time the original book of "Contact" was written, this could be considered Speculative Fiction. It pushed the limits a bit, but was arguably within the bounds of what was known at that precise time.

      Other "SF" categories probably exist, but those are the Big Three. By using SF rather than Sci-Fi, you avoid the problem of misrepresenting either a story or a category. Most people use Sci-Fi as the generic label anyway - Worldcon does, for example - so most people understand it as the generic form rather than the specific form, but the confusion that can cause is avoidable.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    6. Re:wait... by Harker · · Score: 1

      I was just thinking that they wouldn't be able to save much money this way. I mean, how many times are they going to have to do re-shoots because of a blue-screen?

      H.

      --
      When VCR's are outlawed, only outlaws will have VCR's.
    7. Re:wait... by Naturalis+Philosopho · · Score: 1

      Nice summary. To add to it just a hair, I've always used "SF" to mean "Science-fiction and Fantasy". That way I encompass any interpretation of what may be speculative vs. purely fantastic as well as good old storytelling. That way I can call BSG SF instead of a just a soap opera, I'd feel dirty using the word "science" around that show (one of my favorites!) otherwise.

    8. Re:wait... by taustin · · Score: 1

      Everything you mention is, in fact, science fantasy (and most of it bad science fantasy). Even if it's good science fantasy, that doesn't make it science fiction.

  8. ABC Family and WB have been doing this for years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kyle XY and Smallville have clearly sponsored content.

  9. sooo..... by hurfy · · Score: 3, Funny

    So that means Knight Rider was picked up as a series?

    1. Re:sooo..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Instead of seeing a two tone colored high end performance piece of machinery, the ad companies will now be pasting or painting their logos all over K.I.T.T. like you're typical NASCAR.

    2. Re:sooo..... by endlessoul · · Score: 1

      So that means Knight Rider was picked up as a series? You know, that burns me a little. I loved the original Knight Rider and by God, I liked the new movie (gasp!).

      But did the movie need to be one giant Ford ad? I still can't acclimate to KITT being a mustang. Oh, and the lame, dull and irritating Mike/KITT commercials into the breaks were completely unnecessary. Damn you, NBC.

      The GMC truck meeting a messy end was a nice touch, too.

    3. Re:sooo..... by John+Newman · · Score: 1

      That was the first thing that came to my mind, too. Like this is a new thing - Viper, anyone?

  10. Save the Bandwidth for SciFi by retech · · Score: 1

    That'll be an easy show to compress and send. Just do a single blue pixel and have it expand to full screen for 30 minutes. Genius I tell ya!

  11. They haven't already? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    You mean they haven't already? Nissan Versa Like it was a coincidence that Hiro Nissan Versa really wanted that Nissan Versa from the car rental agency.

    Nissan Versa

  12. This shouldn't be a surprise by Damon+Tog · · Score: 1

    This sort of thing shouldn't be a surprise at a time where people expect their entertainment to be free and will jump through hoops to avoid advertisements.

    A similar thing is happening in the music industry. Musicians are beginning to sell their albums exclusively to non-music-related businesses (such as general retailers or newspapers). The businesses then either resell the album exclusively at their store or bundle it with another product. Prince, Ray Davies, and the Eagles have all done this. Considering the state of the music industry, expect more to follow.

    There used to be a time where this sort of thing would be greeted with outrage by the public, but it looks like the public is content to allow their culture to become even more crass and commoditized if it means that they can continue to download stuff for free.

  13. Vaporshows by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    These adshows are perfect showcases for all the vaporware Microsoft and Intel are always promising, but never delivering.

    Cisco doesn't pitch vaporware so much, so I'm a little disappointed they're going to start defining themselves into that category for the mass market.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:Vaporshows by AlHunt · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If I had mod points today, you'd be insightful or funny. I'll have to settle for reminding the group of Mr. Data'somment in ST:TNG episode 126 (The Neutral Zone) that television died as an entertainment medium early in the 20th century.

      Scifi has a long history of correctly predicting the future.

      --
      1 in 4 Maine children in struggle with hunger.
    2. Re:Vaporshows by Mr.+Jaggers · · Score: 1

      They own LinkSys, remember? That's their entire line of consumer products. Perfect for product-placement, wouldn't you say? That way they can advertise their shiny new Vista-compatible drivers!

      --

      When I grow up, I want to have Christopher Walken hair.
    3. Re:Vaporshows by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 2, Funny

      Do you mean "early in the 21st Century"? Because even on Star Trek TNG, incorrectly predicting the past != correctly predicting the future. Even in the TV Show at the Edge of Being Entertaining.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    4. Re:Vaporshows by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      But the LinkSys products aren't vaporware, so I don't know if it's a fit.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    5. Re:Vaporshows by AlHunt · · Score: 1

      Humph ... so much for going to all the trouble of finding the correct episode number only to muff the quote.

      --
      1 in 4 Maine children in struggle with hunger.
  14. And the truly pathetic part is that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    many people will undoubtedly watch them (see 'info'mercials).

    1. Re:And the truly pathetic part is that... by Steauengeglase · · Score: 1

      I'll agree that with today's marketing tactics much of this will be nothing more than infomercials. Somehow producers and marketers seem to think this is more sophisticated or something. The good thing is that people are a lot smarter than they are given credit for. If the content becomes nothing more than a you-must-love-product-A-and-hate-product-B situation people will feel insulted, shortchanged and they will quit watching. People want something for their time and they can generally know shill when they see it.

  15. Easy response by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Click!

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
    1. Re:Easy response by maxwell+demon · · Score: 5, Funny

      You are trying to switch off a Microsoft sponsored show. Cancel or Allow?

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    2. Re:Easy response by thehickcoder · · Score: 1

      You are trying to switch off a Microsoft sponsored show. Cancel or Abort?

      There... fixed that for you.

  16. Nothing new here. by Steauengeglase · · Score: 4, Informative

    This was the norm on old radio programs.

    Jack Benny centered who knows how many of his jokes on Jello. In the Whistler, people were always pulling into Signal gas stations. Sometimes going miles to fine one of those "fine signal gas stations". Fibber McGee & Molly even made the Johnson Wax pitchman the crux of their plots.

    With lower costs in producing this kind of stuff it makes perfect sense. Everything old is new again.

    1. Re:Nothing new here. by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      Yeah, why not? At the very least it'll tie a show directly to a sponsor and not a shady, secretive, manipulative, hard-to-reach advertising agency. Go for it, I say.

  17. We've come full circle. by Seor+Jojoba · · Score: 3, Informative

    They aren't really trying anything new so much as going back to the old ways of advertising. Ever heard the Jack Benny Program (also called "the Lucky Strike Program", "the Chevrolet Show", and other sponsor-reflecting names)? The show would seamlessly include little bits where the entertainers themselves sell you on the benefits of their sponsor's products. And the sponsors were definitely "at the table" affecting content in the shows.

    I can't blame the networks. They have to get the money from somewhere.

  18. "It sounds farcical when you first hear it, by Threni · · Score: 1

    Because...well, it IS farcical!

  19. Haven't any of you seen REALLY old tv shows? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I remember seeing several old shows where the product sponsor was woven well into the plot... One in particular where Jell-o took a highlight spot... it's not a new thing, just coming back into favor.

    "I guess it was only a matter of time for something like this to come along after product placement became the norm"... Again... look back at some of the earliest tv shows - particularly variety shows and their radio show predecessors. You'd think nothing before 1980 happened the way some people talk....

    I know to many people that think everything should be done because it's cool and fun and money shouldn't be an issue - it does cost to produce programming and if they can continue to do FREE broadcasting by product placement then GOOD for them.

    KNOWING that the product placement is going on is enough to know what their "bias" is.

  20. Gemini Division by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    re: Microsoft, Intel, and Cisco

    So the heroes, they fight these companies then, right? Because with their collective ethical track record, to put them on the side of good would be...

    Well, kind of fun actually. Like seeing darth vader sing a jaunty polka.

  21. Obviously a dystopia by Baldur_of_Asgard · · Score: 1

    Obviously a dystopian future if it's based around Microsoft products.

    Well, what do we expect from the Nazi Broadcasting Company?

  22. Everything old is new again by JSBiff · · Score: 2, Informative

    Granted, the networks and advertisers are kind of taking this to a whole new level, but this isn't such a new idea.

    Ever listen to old time radio? I often find myself driving home from work in the evening at a time when my local NPR station plays an hour of old radio shows. Instead of cutting from the show to commercials, they often had commercials built in as part of the broadcast of the show. Burns & Allen, Bob Hope, Jack Benny, etc all often had their skits transition directly into an announcement from Maxwell House Coffee, Crisco, Kellogg's Cereal, Kraft Foods, or any one of dozens of other brands. Even outside of the comedy/variety show, sometimes scifi and horror shows would have some 'built-in' commercials, and shows from all kinds of genres.

  23. Coming soon to Fox... by zamboni1138 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Just wait, the "Mattel and Mars Bar Quick Energy Chocobot Hour" can not be far off. Check your local listings.

    It might actually be an improvement over current Fox shows.

  24. Oh My God by FranTaylor · · Score: 2, Funny

    Between that thing they called a debate and this, I'm beginning to feel like I am living on the set of the movie 'Network'.

    1. Re:Oh My God by elloGov · · Score: 1

      Agreed mate! Corporate America will not stop until they hold meetings in my living room.

    2. Re:Oh My God by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      "Network"? I feel like I'm living on the set of "Max Headroom"! Next up: Blipverts!

  25. Obligatory Simpsons Reference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Narrator: "It's the Mattel and Mars Bar Quick-Energy Chocobot Hour!"
    Leader Chocobot: "Gooey, Nutty, Coco, put down those *entertaining* Mattel products. Colonal Ka-Taffy is up to his old tricks again!"

  26. This WAS "the norm" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Until the mid-60's or so it was common for a show to have a single sponsor, often with no other products hawked during commercial breaks.

    It's not that much better or worse in my opinion. One sponsor means one corporate censor and one product base not to offend. Many sponsors means means censors and worrying about offending just about everybody. Either way, most broadcast TV (and basic cable) will be crap, mostly crappy talent and reality shows. And some gems will filter through, no matter who the sponsor is.

  27. Sad thing is... by Secret+Rabbit · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... that I don't think that people will notice. I mean, with the crap that's on today people are used to sub-standard programming. And that's given story centric shows. So, if you're masochistic, try imagining the raging pieces of crap that are product centric.

  28. Just a small step from the present by teslatug · · Score: 1

    I remember how disgusted I was with the movie Transformers. Advertising was all over the place. I couldn't suspend disbelief and enjoy the movie as all I could think of was GMC, Mountain Dew, etc.

    1. Re:Just a small step from the present by glasshalfemptylc · · Score: 1

      iRobot was even worse, they actually worked Converse shoes into the script.

    2. Re:Just a small step from the present by Digi-John · · Score: 1

      Although the robots in I, Robot looked like some sort of Apple product (pale, shiny, thin), I think you have just increased Asimov's rate of in-grave rotation by spelling it like that. Assuming he didn't already reach a top speed at about the time that movie came out.

      --
      Klingon programs don't timeshare, they battle for supremacy.
  29. I Look Forward To This by rsmith-mac · · Score: 2, Funny

    Bring on the The Mattel and Mars Bar Quick Energy Chocobot Hour! I know that what I really want in TV is amazing advertising and a by-the-numbers plot, not cruddy shows where the writers are unconstrained by advertisers and free to write based on the artistic merit of their ideas.

    Now if they'd just replace the news (it's depressing and boooring) with this kind of quality programming, TV may be worth watching again.

    1. Re:I Look Forward To This by sexconker · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      +5 for someone finally posting this reference.

  30. ABC beat them! by Doug52392 · · Score: 1

    Anyone ever hear of that Cavemen sitcom on ABC? The one that was completely based on the Geico car insurance company's "So easy a caveman can do it" ads? It was ALL over the news when they announced that show, so ABC and Geico got a whole shitload of publicity.

    Now could we see a show that centers completely on President Bush or far right-wing people on Fox????

    1. Re:ABC beat them! by MacDaffy · · Score: 1

      And the sitcom died a quick and merciful death... one which the company now makes light of in a "What were they thinking?" commercial campaign.

  31. Not a new idea by Beef+Supreme · · Score: 1

    Other networks have been doing this for some time. They call them "infomericals".

  32. FYI by denzacar · · Score: 1

    The original show was created to promote the toys, so...

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  33. Standards war conspiracy prediction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Forget the content of the show. I predict it will only be available in Windows Media format.

    Bonus prediction: After the current round of iTunes-must-scan-for-piracy noise from NBC, we'll be treated to a round of iTunes/iPods-need-to-support-WM-to-get-our-cool-shows noise from NBC.

  34. If you've ever wondered why we're in the by sizzzzlerz · · Score: 1

    kind of trouble we're in, this concept should clear up that confusion right away. Frankly, the mass of US citizens are morons, willing to park themselves in front of the TV to watch shit like this and, with mouths agape, say Thank sir, may I have another. This used to be the stuff of parody. Its now the reality.

    Scary.

    1. Re:If you've ever wondered why we're in the by Digi-John · · Score: 2, Funny

      Us Slashdot readers are far more intelligent, parking ourselves in front of a WoW screen with fly agape, saying "Thank you, Blizzard, may I have another month of grinding? Here's your cash".

      --
      Klingon programs don't timeshare, they battle for supremacy.
  35. Is "Gemini Division" set in the future? by seandiggity · · Score: 1

    'Cuz Microsoft definitely won't be around then. Maybe they'll find an ancient, evil artifact: a "Windows Vista Capable" PC.

    --
    Geeks like to think that they can ignore politics, you can leave politics alone, but politics won't leave you alone.-rms
  36. But Will It Blend!?!!! by Bored+MPA · · Score: 1, Funny

    A blender show is about the only one of these I'd watch. And only if it lasted under three minutes: Two minutes of "wow this product is awesome!"

    followed by frappe.

  37. yeah. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    tv has always been a vehicle for the sponsors - we all know it. i love lucy sucked, tv still sucks today. peace

  38. They should try this on the broadcast network by taustin · · Score: 1

    Maybe they could set a new record for the fastest cancellation of a series ever. CBS just cancelled a "reality" show after one episode, but that, of course, has happened several times.

    No, the record they're going for was set by the TV show in Australia ("Australia's funniest home videos of animals having sex", as I recall - seriously), that was canceled at the first commercial break ("We are having technical difficulties, but only until the next show comes on").

    I'm hoping for it to be canceled before the opening credits are complete.

    1. Re:They should try this on the broadcast network by Leebert · · Score: 1

      the TV show in Australia ("Australia's funniest home videos of animals having sex", as I recall - seriously), that was canceled at the first commercial break ("We are having technical difficulties, but only until the next show comes on"). Holy cow, you aren't kidding about that.

      http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0267151/
  39. ROT13 in hell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    B-e--s-u-r-e--t-o--d-r-i-n-k--y-o-u-r--O-v-a-l-t-i[a][r]

  40. Mutual of Omaha's Wild Kingdom. by khasim · · Score: 3, Interesting

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wild_Kingdom

    You don't even need to go back to the 50's. And it was a GREAT show.

  41. Nothing new for Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    1. Re:Nothing new for Microsoft by Ayavaron · · Score: 1

      I was so inspired by that promotional video that I actually wrote a poem about Joystick Johnny. It's sort of in-jokey but here goes:

      "The Most Feared Video Game Warrior in All the Territory"

      You know, this sounds kinda strange
      But I think I'll miss Joystick Johnny.
      Wore a helmet when he rode his bike
      He would ride it indoors,
      'Cross office porcelain floors,
      Had a rear-view mirror, see what the past looked like.
      And he thought he was the future,
      But his tie-dye shirt said otherwise.
      And when he's gone he,
      Well, I think I'll miss Joystick Johnny.
      Most feared in all the land,
      Are you man enough for some 3D pinball?
      Up in his room, that video gamer,
      He thinks he's a warrior
      But at least he plays one on TV,
      And nobody calls Joystick Johnny a coward,
      So let's let him imagine,
      That he'll play Jen Anniston,
      And beat Bill Gates at his games.
      For that nostalgic nerd
      Won't stay true to his word,
      But at least it makes a damned good story.
      And a guy like that won't be immortalized with glory,
      So I guess I miss Joystick Johnny.

  42. No more commercials? by psychosol · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So if you base a show entirely around a product or set of products, wouldn't that eliminate the need for commercials? At this point I would rather watch an entire show with an integrated product then try and watch the 10 minutes of "actual TV" sqeezed between 20 minutes of nonsensical commercials.

  43. Actually, you have that backwards... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    This is part of their war on piracy: make things so terrible that no one will want to download them.

  44. I am reminded of this for some reason by Null+Nihils · · Score: 1

    When deep space exploration ramps up, it will be corporations that name everything. The IBM Stellar Sphere. The Philip Morris Galaxy. Planet Starbucks. -- Fight Club

    1. Re:I am reminded of this for some reason by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      That may be risky, however.

      "New calculations by scientists reveal the unexpected result that the comet Microsoft Vista will crash into the Intel Mars base ..."

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  45. i like it by the+brown+guy · · Score: 1

    Better than some of the shit they have now. Personally a show based entirely around sponsors sounds alright, as long as there is a show sponsored by the Canadian Government, where it would be a bunch of eskimos chilling (pun intended) in our nations capital of toronto, chugging beers and smokin aboot 3 maple syrup flavoUred joints each. yeee

    --
    Orbis terrarum est non altus satis
  46. Quick! Somebody who runs.. by novalogic · · Score: 1

    a dildo company sponsor some shows on NBC. This could get good.

    --
    --
    1. Re:Quick! Somebody who runs.. by Datamonstar · · Score: 1

      So... you want to see some fake dicks. Go you.

      --
      The eternal struggle of good vs. evil begins within one's self.
  47. It happens by AnotherFangirl · · Score: 0

    SciFi Channel's Eureka has Cisco pasted all over their office equipment. No one seems to mind. Product placement can work if it's done right. I watched a very amusing Japanese show, about an ad agency that was tasked with making commercials for the brands that sponsored the show. The commercials that aired during the show featured the show characters. I would love to see this sort of show on American TV, but doubt what NBC is pushing will be that meta.

  48. If done well, they can work. by DrEldarion · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The problem is, they have to be done REALLY well. Some great examples of advertisements in programming adding to show quality rather than detracting from it can be found in 30 Rock and The Colbert Report.

    Examples against it are, well, most everything else.

    1. Re:If done well, they can work. by bjackson1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Example from 30 Rock:
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d36wUmJGzvA

      They also did quite a nice one with Snapple but I can't seem to find a video of it anywhere. Unfortunately most 30 Rock clips get taken down by NBC.

      The Colbert Report's parody of a presidential campaign sponsored by Dorrito's was also quite hilarious.

      Going from product placement to television is almost certainly a bad idea. I don't even know how that will work:
      "Wow, I love packet shaping with my Cisco router using QoS!" "Me too, also my Intel Core 2 Duo is so fast, it blows women's clothes off" "Hey that was a blatent ripoff of the Italian Job, unlike Microsoft's Windows Vista that in no way stole anything from OSX....."

  49. Fibber Mcgee and Molly by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I've been listening to old radio shows on Sirius satellite when I take long drives, and I have come to look forward to the Johnson Wax spot on the Fibber McGee and Molly show. They usually did a pretty good of working it in more or less naturally; for instance, when getting a spare room ready for a boarder, the sponsor's guy comes for a visit and marvels at how good the floor looks because of its Johnson Wax coat. Part of the fun of it is them not pretending it's not a sponsor's spot. Usually Fibber will make some comment to the audience about cover your ears, once he gets going he doesn't know how to stop, and there's always some good natured ribbing. In fact, I end up looking forward to them. I imagine it was much the same for the listeners back in the day.

    If sponsors could do their promos like that old show, it wouldn't be half bad. But most of the others were not nearly so slick.

    1. Re:Fibber Mcgee and Molly by jollyreaper · · Score: 5, Funny

      If sponsors could do their promos like that old show, it wouldn't be half bad. But most of the others were not nearly so slick. Guy 1: Wow, that is one ugly turd.

      Guy 2: You said it. But we need to get it polished up right proper if we're to meet the deadline.

      Guy 1: You know what this calls for.

      Guy 2: Sadly, yes. Hey, Bob!

      MS Bob: Did somebody call?

      Guy 1: Yeah, we've got a turd that needs polishing.

      MS Bob: No problem! Vista is a cutting edge operating system for your cutting edge lifestyle--

      Guy 2: No, wrong turd, Bob.

      Guy 1: We need to work your magic on this.

      MS Bob: Gee, I don't know if I can do that. This polish is only licensed for Microsoft products. I might get in trouble.

      Guy 1: Don't worry, I cleared it with tech support. They say it's totally cool if we do this.

      MS Bob: But only just got a new chair in my office, I don't want to lose it.

      Guy 2: What's this I see in front of me? Am I looking at a mangina? Gonna cringe and cry at the thought of a little harsh language?

      MS Bob: Ok, fine, I'll do it! Now what do you want me to polish?

      Guy 1: Got it right here, Operation Enduring Justice.

      MS Bob: But this is an invasion plan! It says Iraq here but you crossed out the 'q' and wrote in an 'n'.

      Guy 1: Told you we needed some help.

      MS Bob: I think I need more polish.
      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    2. Re:Fibber Mcgee and Molly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      the elitist side of me says that its simply because the dumbing down of america through woodrow wilsons dream education system has made it such that you dont have to pretend not to treat the customer as idiots, because the largest consumer base now...is stupid.

      I think many marketers feel that if they made things more subtle or even indirect in its approach, that they'd lose total sales and so its better to market as though everyone is completely unable to think.

      Mileage may vary in markets outside the US and Ontario, Canada.

      Course, since thats an arrogant standpoint it cant possibly be considered as possible. No one wants to be called stupid.

    3. Re:Fibber Mcgee and Molly by CSMatt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They can get away with that because Sirius is primarily funded by subscriptions, not advertising.

    4. Re:Fibber Mcgee and Molly by cipher1024 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I agree, the old radio commercials are a lot more tolerable than todays commercials. They where more straight forward and honest. "We think our product is great, you should try it" is better than "we've got 5000 psychologists with PHDs and we're going to manipulate you into being our corporate bitch". These days they're either trying to mind intercourse you, or Billy Mays is absolutely SHOUTING AT YOU - jerk. Those old commercials were more respectful.

    5. Re:Fibber Mcgee and Molly by ToastyKen · · Score: 1

      I remember seeing an episode of The Office (US) do something similar, where they decide to have a meeting at Chili's because that's the cool place to go these days. Sort of gentle ribbing about the product placement while still doing the placement.

    6. Re:Fibber Mcgee and Molly by symbolic · · Score: 1

      Isn't that how cable started? Now it's a mess.

    7. Re:Fibber Mcgee and Molly by tom's+a-cold · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I suppose in an odd way it's comforting to know that the mass media in the 1950s were just as patronizing and insulting to the intelligence of listeners/viewers as the modern version, and just as bought off by its corporate drone paymasterrs. The main difference now is more tits and ass and less overt political posturing due to the phony "fairness doctrine" that meant that they had to pretend to be impartial while still being right-wing.

      I shut off my TV three or four years ago and find that I now have much more time to do things that are more satisfying, like socializing and playing music. Quit feeding them and they'll go away.

      --
      Get your teeth into a small slice: the cake of liberty
  50. Three words: The Pocket Fisherman by servodave · · Score: 1

    So...This is how we hear that Ron Popeil has been hired to run NBC? Prime time infomercials. Yummy. This just might work if it's staffed like Baywatch was... Too bad I don't even actually *care* as long as the internets keep working.

  51. Yeah because this totally worked last season by shoptroll · · Score: 1, Troll

    Isn't NBC the same network that gave us the wonders of that Geico derived Caveman sitcom?

    As much as I enjoy Heroes and the bits of Law & Order (and it's various spinoffs) that I've seen, I can't believe their execs are this stupid.

    --
    Insert Sig Here
    1. Re:Yeah because this totally worked last season by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    2. Re:Yeah because this totally worked last season by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't NBC the same network that gave us the wonders of that Geico derived Caveman sitcom? As much as I enjoy Heroes and the bits of Law & Order (and it's various spinoffs) that I've seen, I can't believe their execs are this stupid. No, ABC ran "Cavemen". Believe it or not, there is more than one network in the US! Shocking, I know!
  52. Lisa Catera by ewhac · · Score: 1
    This kind of nonsense was tried on Chicago Hope, when they formed an unholy partnership with Cadillac and introduced a character named Lisa Catera ("Lease a Catera"). The result was pretty much about what you'd expect, and is widely acknowledged as the shark-jumping point for the show.

    This sort of thing just doesn't work. Everyone ends up resenting it.

    Schwab

  53. I hope they do by kpainter · · Score: 1

    It's just more shit I won't be watching. Knock yourselves out NBC. Sounds pretty desperate to me! They have been dead for a long time, the corpse just doesn't know it yet.

  54. I like cool music, funny faces and silly dialogue by Kamineko · · Score: 1

    Will this mean there'll be more shows like Pokémon and Yu-Gi-Oh! where the entire premise of the show is to sell crapola, but the show itself doesn't make any blasted sense, giving way to daft anime tired-as-hell translator humour?

  55. Product placement ads are like new taxes by biznaz · · Score: 1

    I had originally hoped product placement would replace the ~20 minutes of commercial breaks during an hour of network TV. But after a lengthly debate with a friend, I've come to realize that product placement is like a new tax; however unpalatable it may be, once they get the public to accept it and start seeing the additional money roll in, it's there for good.

    1. Re:Product placement ads are like new taxes by robo_mojo · · Score: 1

      Except unlike tax, you have the option to decline it.

  56. Obligatory Futurama by CSMatt · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Tonight the world watches in horror as an Earthling is eaten alive on network television. This grim scene of unimaginable carnage is brought to you by Fishy Joe's. Try our new extreme walrus juice. 100% Fresh-Squeezed Walrus. Ride the walrus!"

  57. Yay! by rrohbeck · · Score: 1

    Finally we get rid of the pesky "content" around the commercials.
    Going to the bathroom will never be a matter of timing any more and we can drink as much beer as we want. Finally.

  58. lawl by Legion303 · · Score: 1

    Wait, are you implying there are shows that *aren't* centered around promoting the products of the network's sponsors? Where might I find these rare gems?

    1. Re:lawl by maxwell+demon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, I've found a show where there's absolute no advertising whatsoever, not even hidden. It's obviously very old, from the time when there was no sound, and no colors. Indeed, it's so old that even white was not yet discovered; the screen is just black. That show seems to be sent 24 hours a day without a single advertising break, and no product placement either. It's not easy to find, because they didn't put it on those numbered buttons you usually use to select your channel, but they put it on a separate button, which they labelled "OFF" (I guess that's the broadcaster's name). I can only suggest that channel.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    2. Re:lawl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have one of those, only it's sponsored by Sony.

  59. Sounds like Noah's Arcade. by rugner · · Score: 1

    #$%@#%@ says what?

  60. Dear Mr. Bay by Tsaot · · Score: 1

    See what you started! If you had actually spent the time creating a movie that was centered around character development rather than clever product placement, last summer would have been much more fun, and this travesty wouldn't be on our doorstep. I hope you're happy, 'cause Microsoft, Cisco, and Intel sure are.

  61. Look on the bright side by jrothwell97 · · Score: 1

    This may actually be a good thing...
    it may be the first time we see even semi-accurate depictions of technology in television drama in the USA!

    --
    Those using pirated Tinysoft signatures(TM) are a real threat to society and should all be thrown in jail.
  62. The Lone Gunmen The Movie by keneng · · Score: 1

    "The Lone Gunmen" could be revived as a movie this way if they could talk to [place geeked-loved companies here]. IMDB: movie name: Lone Gunmen The Movie sponsors: Coca Cola, Pepsi, Tide, Kraft, Monsanto, Proctor & Gamble, The Carlyle Group, Jilin Jaer Seed Company, Nestle, McDonald's, KFC, Tim Horton's, Au Tarot and Schwartz's. actors:... ... Summary: All this ad placement is so exciting that I don't want to give away the story or how it ends. Rating: 20 stars out of 10 stars

  63. Sounds good by insllvn · · Score: 1

    It sounds like Fahrenheit 451 with a dash of The Network thrown in. If you, or anyone else, remembers the title of the story, I would like to try and track it down. Please leave the title or author as a reply. Thanks.

    1. Re:Sounds good by dpilot · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, it's just a complete blank. I enjoyed the story a long time ago, read it once, and it was in an anthology. But other than some more plot points that would be spoilers... oh, what the heck...

      ****** SPOILER ALERT **********

      After the protagonist has brought music for music's sake back to life, the forces of commercial music have their revenge on him. They get him sent to some sort of place (how, where, and "official why" forgotten) where the ambient noise is loud enough that he loses his hearing. After he comes back to society, he can't hear what he has done.

      There was something else in there... this was commercial music, including subliminal effects with subsonics, supersonics, etc. Then he put all of that into his music, one of his favorites was "sex music."

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
  64. Eventually shows will become "demos" of products. by Neanderthal+Ninny · · Score: 1

    I noticed that several movies I went to that there are so many "products placements" on them they begin to look like product demos.

  65. Soap Opera. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obviously no one has a significant other that watches the Soaps. Soap Opera is one of the first radio programming that was sponsored by soap manufacturers. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soap_opera

  66. Is this really so awful? by silvermorph · · Score: 2, Insightful
    This... doesn't seem that bad to me.

    If the experiment fails and the shows suck, then you have more evidence for the notion that sponsor control corrupts the medium. If it succeeds, it will do so by being genuinely entertaining - and we've essentially created a new medium for creative expression. I think that'd be a good way for big corps to spend more cash subsidizing the arts, even if only indirectly by giving more artists a day job that will give them the funds and experience to support and improve their real work.

    So where's the downside? A generation of people who are emotionally invested in brands? We've already got that with the Apple crowd or the Coke vs. Pepsi debate. If this is dislike of legitimizing a long-form commercial, well, people claim to watch the Superbowl "just for the commercials". If it's entertaining, it's serving the same purpose as regular TV and popular commercials.

    And it's not like you're being forced to watch these shows. The worst that can happen is that the sponsored shows don't really catch on, so they try it again by adding it to and ruining already popular shows. But then you people get angry and things go back to normal. Or, better, if it turns people off to TV, maybe they'll find something productive to do.

  67. Yeah, sure by Duncan+Blackthorne · · Score: 1

    that's going to work, sure it will. What a bunch of dumbasses.

  68. Soap Companies by dunc78 · · Score: 1

    Before long soap companies are going to start hosting the modern day equivalent of operas for the housewives of America to watch.

  69. Choice abounds, if you liberate airwaves. by twitter · · Score: 0, Interesting

    The problem you should have is the waste of spectrum on broadcast. Real change must come sooner or later.

    Commercials as programs will be the only way to advert sponsor fund programs when NBC and friends are just another site on the internet (as they should be) and copyright law has been reformed for digital freedom. Will anyone watch? I doubt it. Every highschool and college in the world makes plays - these will be transformed into regular programming and distributed for free over the liberated spectrum.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:Choice abounds, if you liberate airwaves. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      twitter, I thought you were going to take the time to talk with your sockpuppets some more.

  70. Need new meme by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

    This goes beyond shark-jumping. I suggest a new meme: cock-scarfing. "NBC has totally scarfed the cock on this one."

    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    1. Re:Need new meme by Gigahurt · · Score: 1

      Best. Meme. Ever. I will be adding this to my vocabulary. Alot. Thanks.

  71. One thought by iMachias · · Score: 1

    One thought comes to mind when I read this "It's W-W-W-W-WIndows-Ww-w-Windows-Windows/386!"

  72. Everything old is new again by gelfling · · Score: 1

    This is how TV operated in the golden era 1948-60.

  73. Soap Operas by Xaroth · · Score: 2, Informative

    You know, they're called "Soap Operas" for a reason. It's because the early dramas were funded primarily by detergent manufacturers in some of the earliest - and most effective - product placement programs.

    This is a very, very old idea that seems to make the rounds every so often. No doubt, this will get tiresome after a couple decades, and the next generation will have this "radical" new idea to encapsulate the advertisements in separate spots rather than integrating them into the programs, and everyone will scoff at what a ludicrous suggestion that is. I mean, won't people just turn off the radio? Er, TV? Er, webpage?

  74. It would be okay with me if... by OSXCPA · · Score: 1

    ... the network made the placement / sponsorship unobtrusive and made the programs available in a non-DRM-ed format for download with no commercial interruptions. I completely understand shows cost money,and I am willing to play ball. If I can download, say, Battlestar Galactica or Law and Order to use as I see fit, but there are branded placements in the episodes and there are no dialog kludges ("Gee, lieutenant, have a Coke!") I would not only watch, such a move would make me less vehemently negative about advertising. Right now, I actually avoid buying items I am aware of advertising for, unless I go looking for them. Studies show advertising works, even if we think it doesn't, but I can tell you this - if you make a conscious decision to avoid advertisers' products, it is possible. No coke in my house, nor Anheiser-Busch, and I've been buying Volkswagens since before they even advertised on television in the US (my first VW was a '76 Rabbit). Why? Because I don't believe in rewarding annoying or anti-social behavior, which most advertising is, IMHO.

  75. The Program Lifecycle by NetSettler · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I can understand how shows like Night Court (in which Harry Anderson, playing Judge Harry Stone, always had a Macintosh in his office) could feature a product without having it get in the way of a show. And certainly there are car companies that have had cars featured on shows or in movies, such as James Bond. But those were never central to the plot, so they didn't manage to drag things down like the proposed sponsor-centric content promises to. Even the show-within-a-show of The Truman Show didn't seem to have the nasty property they're talking about, since the plot focused on the character... the ads were just incidental ways to add revenue, kind of like hyperlinked ads in and around web articles or the hypertext-captioning of the Interstellar News Network on Babylon 5.

    The significant point, however, is that the show comes first. By reversing the creative process and using product promotion as a starting point, not only is the quality of content likely to suffer, but the effectiveness of the advertising along with it.

    Your putting it this way made me realize--it's not just the creation but the ongoing generation of new episodes, not to please a fan-base but to exploit a fan-base. Moreover, as the product evolves, the show has to evolve to match... not just as the starting point of the series but for each episode. This means they can't take it where the show wants to go, they have to take it where the product wants to go, and that's going to reach a divergence. It also means that if the product is upgraded or sold or someone wants a "fresh angle", the show is going to be canceled on a dime without any regard for what the public wants. Because shows are about "what viewers want" and ads are about "what we want viewers to want".

    This divergence of purpose bodes ill.

    I used to write regular parodies of The Young and the Restless (out of irritation for where the writers were taking the show). In the process, I found that writing for characters that viewers understand is something where you can't "lie" in the writing. If you do, you lose the viewers. I'd start to write something trying to make it go a certain way and the voice of the characters would tell me "No, you have to go another direction. That direction is not true to my character." And it worked best to just roll with it and see where the characters would naturally take me. I came to a belief that what makes good writing is when the characters are alive like that in your mind, and the characters are writing a "true" story--not in the sense of non-fiction, but in the sense of following how life would really go. Sort of like method acting but for writing... (Ah, I see. There are no new ideas in the world. Google tells me that the term method writing I just made up is an already elaborated theory. But yes, like that. Count me an instant believer that there is merit in this line of thinking.) Anyway, my point is that the kind of cynical "we can make it go where it needs to go" writing is quite suspect...

    --

    Kent M Pitman
    Philosopher, Technologist, Writer

    1. Re:The Program Lifecycle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your putting it this way made me realize--it's not just the creation but the ongoing generation of new episodes, not to please a fan-base but to exploit a fan-base.

      Are you serious? You'd have to be pretty naive not to realized before now that that's how any advertising funded service works, including Google and Slashdot. That's how advertising funded services has always worked.

    2. Re:The Program Lifecycle by badboy_tw2002 · · Score: 1

      Given his homepage, ballyhooing of usenet, and only late 80's-early 90s pop culture references its quite obvious that Kent has just stepped out of his time pod to see what the world has become in 15 years. Welcome to the future Kent! FRACK OFF! (That's how we say hello now, and should be returned in kind with a hearty "FRACK YOU TOO!")

    3. Re:The Program Lifecycle by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      You had me there, right up to the point where you wrote, "I used to write regular parodies of The Young and the Restless".

      Perhaps my assumption that you were actually *watching* that show for fodder to write your parodies is wrong though.

    4. Re:The Program Lifecycle by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      This divergence of purpose bodes ill.

      I'd say it bodes well. Not for the quality of the shows themselves, I agree, but for broadcasting as a whole.

      Put it this way. Television has been losing ground to the many other activities that attract our eyeballs these days, things that didn't exist back in the heyday of broadcast TV. Internet access, Youtube, videogames, cell phones, texting ... there's lots of attractive timewasters available nowadays. At one time, broadcast TV reigned supreme in that area, but no more.

      Apparently, the only response that the networks have to those competitive threats is to make their products even less appealing to the viewing public. If that's truly the case, they're fundamentally incompetent and deserve to go the way of the dinosaur and the Dodo bird. Nobody will mourn them, and perhaps something better will come along to use the spectrum currently being wasted by these fools.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    5. Re:The Program Lifecycle by NetSettler · · Score: 1

      Perhaps my assumption that you were actually *watching* that show for fodder to write your parodies is wrong though.

      It's drifting slightly off-topic, so I removed my own karma bonus to respond, but since you asked: I got hooked on Y&R about 10 years earlier because a friend was watching it and watched it pretty faithfully for about 10 years before I started writing the parodies.

      In fact, I think soap operas have a lot of (often unfulfilled) potential as an artform, exactly because they have the screen time needed to tell a story in the kind of detail that other kinds of shows don't. At their best, such dramas offer real chances to inform people about subtle effects of one person's actions on another in ways that packaged one or two hour dramas often can't do. Admittedly, they don't do that every time. But as with all of life's endeavors, it's what you make of the opportunity. And the Y&R writers were fully capable of delivering on the promise of the medium, they just often seemed not to care to on a regular basis. When they were "on", they were very good. But they seemed to slack a lot. My parodies, in what I like to believe is the best tradition of social commentary, were intended to remind them that more was possible if they were willing to work harder. Each "episode" was accompanied by a "moral" (a rationale for writing it, based on what was happening on the show).

      So no, I wasn't reading to get fodder for the writing. I was part of the loyal fanbase that wanted to see the characters have a proper life of their own, and who did not want to see the characters as a mere platform for the delivery of products. We all had no doubt they wanted to sell us products, but that was mostly an issue of demographics, and it didn't creep much into the moment-to-moment of the show itself... except in the way plots were stretched to make certain plotlines peak during sweeps week, etc.

      For myself, I have never been short of things to write about. If anything, my reason for eventually stopping was that I couldn't afford so much time spent on such a frivolous end. Especially if it wasn't making me any money--which comes back to the point about money as a risk to establishing priority. I'm not saying money shouldn't be involved, of course. I'm just saying it's hard to ignore its power, and so you have to acknowledge its power and confront it directly.

      --

      Kent M Pitman
      Philosopher, Technologist, Writer

  76. Consider the Disney Model by hanshotfirst · · Score: 2, Interesting

    (Have young kids, can't help but watch sometimes) Disney Channel - few, if any, traditional ads, but the whole bloody channel is an ad for itself and its Disney products - Hanna Montana, Kim Possible, High School Musical out the WAZOO. I can't think of a single commercial for something that is not a reciprocal ad for something on the channel itself. While it seems like show A sponsors show B sponsors show A (how could either make money if that were all), what ends up happening is each show's brand is built - and then they make a bazillion dollars on clothing, toys, posters, and concert tickets. While I'm not that impressed with the production value much of the time, the marketing approach's success is hard to deny.

    --
    Why, oh why, didn't I take the Blue Pill?
  77. The SlashDot Dildo-reffic Ass-Travaganza! by stratjakt · · Score: 1

    Check local listings

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  78. With one minor change by dreamchaser · · Score: 4, Funny

    Except that 'Allow' will be greyed out.

  79. It could work but they will fuck it up by llZENll · · Score: 1

    They will try it, and it won't work at all, and they will wonder why, and it will probably be because they continued to show normal commercials in addition to the product placements. I could live with one or other, but not both.

  80. Re:00's here we come... by acvh · · Score: 1

    radio is getting into this act as well. our classic rock station has sold themselves to ATT, and now a jock's story about meeting someone famous goes into, "and I took pictures of them you can see on our website. I used my ATT camera phone, and I gotta tell you, this is an awesome phone with awesome service. you should check them out."

  81. Oh yeah! by Puffy+Director+Pants · · Score: 1

    It's time for the Texaco Star theater! With Milton Berle!

  82. Big shock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who need quality content when you can have content the AD agency wants....

  83. Some things are more plausible than others. by westbake · · Score: 1

    I can explain almost everything for you.

    Dilithium crystals are a form of the window out of anti-matter containment chamber. They were first used as an exit window for more primitive vacuum magnetic bottles, where the lattice distance was used to refract anti-protons of the correct inertial energy to the reaction chamber. Eventually, it was realized that a hexagonal close packed arrangement at the correct temperature could not only guide but store anti-protons when subjected to a properly constructed optical pump field. This greatly simplified anti-matter storage and was considerably safer than the massive bottle designs of the late 21st century. The crystals are consumed in both cases because nothing is perfect but a good set of crystals can serve for decades before needing replacement.

    Heisenberg compensators work by quantum entanglements correction. Events that could lead to local instability are intentionally entangled and shifted to random locations in the universe. A more interesting version of this is to capture potential differences across parallel universes and harness it for useful work. This provided a limitless supply of energy in the 23rd century that replaced almost all others and started a process of cooling our current universe, though the overall heat balance between the infinite possible universes has yet to be discovered and there was a furious ethical debate over dumping random energy to other universes before it was realized that others must be doing the same to us and this is why the universe is actually self organizing.

    Transporter malfunctions in the early 23rd century, interestingly, led the way to that energy source by proving the existence of parallel worlds and pointing to the mechanisms of quantum entanglement between them. The people you saw there were not really "split" so much as they were shifted and rotated.

    I made all of that up in the last 5 minutes, but I can't imagine Vista being useful or interesting. What are they going to do, upload their "live" photos to solve crimes between lock ups? Will a BSD infusion bring stability to the madness? Stay tuned ... only the most creative of geniuses will make that pig fly.

    --
    I am a name troll of Westlake. Visit my homepage to learn why.
  84. This is nothing new... by Herger · · Score: 1

    This has been going on for years, from soap operas to your favorite cartoons. If you saw The Biggest Loser with its prominent product placement, you already know NBC is leading the way in advertainment.

  85. program-length commercials by v1 · · Score: 1

    Don't we already have this at 2am on most channels? At least this sounds very similar.

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    1. Re:program-length commercials by cashman73 · · Score: 1

      I stopped watching infomercials when I cancelled my cable tv subscription last year,... I would highly recommend it. Infomercials suck.

  86. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  87. viper? Knight Rider? by iphayd · · Score: 1

    Well, I got halfway down the page of comments, then finally got sick of looking and searched for the word.

    No-one has mentioned that NBC has tried this type of thing before.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viper_(TV_series)

    And I see one hit for the most recent advertainment:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knight_Rider_(2008_film)

  88. Price is Right? by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

    That's the ULTIMATE product placement show... the "game" is guessing the suggested retail price (how cute) of graciously supplied products for constants to win. How long has that been on the air?

  89. Tired: Infomercials by A+New+Normalcy · · Score: 1

    Wired: Commertainment!

    --
    ...Lorenzo / I'm into kinky crustaceans. I just discovered internet praWn.
    1. Re:Tired: Infomercials by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      Wired: Commertainment! Dramercials, sitcommercials, game shows. (It'd be hard to do law and/or police shows around a product line (other than OCP). But a branded medical show could be done if The Colbert Report's "Cheating Death with Dr. Stephen T. Colbert, DFA" segments are anything to judge by.)

      TV series centered around a product line aren't new. They've marketed them to children for years (Transformers, GI Joe, My Little Pony, really anything that had a line of tie-in toys). And what else is The Price is Right than a game show about products? (Wheel of Fortune used to be that way too, where each round was followed by shopping for products, "and the rest on a gift certificate.")
      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  90. On the other hand by Leuf · · Score: 1

    It's not like the networks are doing a very good job of getting much of anything decent on the air as it is. And yet there are no ramifications. They just put out the same crap again, with more layers of ads on top to try to make up for how poorly they did before, which only serves to reduce the audience further. So perhaps a show that is tied to the fate of a company that really will feel it if it is horrible will actually be better. Maybe they will stick it out through initial low ratings to try to build an audience to avoid the embarrassment of canceling their show. Maybe it's just late and I am not thinking straight. Lately it seems like the advertisers are doing a better job promoting new music than the music industry itself, so maybe they'll do better with tv as well.

  91. Ha! Ahaha! AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

    Oh wait, you're serious?

    --
    You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
  92. Great idea, as long as... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...the products on the show are used and function exactly as they do in real life, including inexperienced & incompetent operators and commonly known failure modes, thus exploiting each product's creative potential for comedy and pathos.

    I'd absolutely watch a show that featured an honestly portrayed InFocus or Sony video projector bulb going out right in the middle of the critical presentation, followed with a panic call to the projector vendor and a bleeped/pixelated expletive when the price of the replacement bulb is revealed. Or the honest aftermath of a group lunch at Taco Bell or the Olive Garden.

    More importantly, if Slashdot decides to follow NBC, I urge them to go public and confirm that Cowboy Neal and Jack Handey are the same person.

  93. actually a good thing by cashman73 · · Score: 1

    I really don't mind advertisements built into television shows . . . provided that it doesn't degrade the quality of the entertainment. Overdone, this sort of thing gets really, really cheesy quickly. But done right, it can actually be a positive thing that will both add some sense of reality to the show while at the same time bringing in more dollars. Plus, with built-in advertisements, it goes hand-in-hand with the bittorrent model of distributing television shows -- since most of them are stripped of all advertisements anyway, the product placement ads can't be stripped and they don't lose money, so they can't complain about "piracy".

  94. Old Hat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hasn't this already been done before? I believe these types of shows are called "infomercials".

  95. too many cheifs... by ocularb0b · · Score: 1

    I work on commercials all the time and most of that time is spent watching the client argue with the agency, who argues with director who argues with everyone else, about every ridiculous detail. Either they will fail to ever get a script together or they will make a show that is so incoherent it will look like a clips show with no theme. They will try but i dont think we'll see anything that anyone will want to watch.

    --
    Support bacteria, the only culture most people have.
  96. Obligatory Microsoft Sponsored Show by pandrijeczko · · Score: 1

    "NYPD Blue Screen"

    --
    Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
  97. Too much Apple on TV by dave562 · · Score: 1

    It was only a matter of time. I started noticing a few years ago that in television programs it seems like the "good guys" are always using Apples. The people in positions of power are always using Apples. The "bad guys" and the standard extras are always using PCs. I just figured it is the inherent bias of the movie/creative industry because they have been using Avid and Final Cut for so long that they just tend to feature their own tools in prominent positions. It was only a matter of time before Microsoft went for some real product placement to counter the trend. I wonder how long before they come up with a "reality" program where everyone involved is writing and marketing software and they slant the show to make it seem like developing code for OSX is next to impossible while writing code for Windows is super simple.

  98. OT: Your sig by plover · · Score: 0
    Regarding your .sig:

    ...Lorenzo/When I was a kid, we had electricity, but the wires weren't full then; they didn't sag as they do nowadays. Are you aware that sag actually is the limiting factor to power carrying capacity on high tension lines? The more current they carry, the higher their temperature, the higher temperature expands the metals making the wires get longer, and they hang lower. Maintaining safe clearances between the wires and the ground determines the power capacity. And with today's greater demands on our near-capacity electric distribution infrastructure, the power companies are pushing as much current as they can through every wire available.

    So Lorenzo is absolutely right: the wires are now full, and they sag lower nowadays as a result.

    --
    John
  99. It could work... by TexNex · · Score: 1

    I seem to remember the Folgers comercials with Anthony Head and the entire 30-60sec spot was a drama based around a cup of coffee. Every week or two you would get a new comercial which would diplay flogers but bring new action to the drama. It was well done and I still remember them due to the great setup. If the ad people could do something like that I'd support them.

  100. 80's - 30min toy commercials by servognome · · Score: 1

    Gave us great franchises like G.I. Joe, He-Man & Transformers

    --
    D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
  101. Will the advertisements just be... by schwachs · · Score: 1

    Will the advertisements just be clips from 'real' shows... but only 18 minutes per hour? Sounds like a 'brilliant' way to reverse the model.

  102. The Office - Staples Connection by kjell79 · · Score: 1

    Like this already isn't happening with The Office. It seems as if that show is out to promote Staples, not only as a brand, but to give the image that it's a well run company too.

  103. Day time television by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Next you'll have detergent manufacturers sponsoring drama serials.

  104. Cartoons by SpectreBlofeld · · Score: 1

    My first thought ran to the cartoons I loved as a child, and how disillusioned I was when I realized that Transformers and He-Man were spin-offs of toy lines (and not the other way around).

    I think this is more a sign of the continued infantilization of society than anything.

  105. Look On The Bright Side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can't wait for the Viagra and Cialas Hour to debut.

  106. Nothing's Changed by Honkin'+on+Bobo · · Score: 1

    What's the big deal? It's always been this way in one form or another for television shows. Look at He-Man Masters of the Universe...I for one love the show, along with countless others. (We're also waiting for the 2009 movie, which should kick ass, a la 300...) But if anyone remembers Filmation created that show for Matel as a (basically) 1/2 hour toy commercial to push their merch, and when you saw a new character enter the show, it was a new character in their toy line for sale...Many people love the show regardless of the reasons why it was made at first.

  107. Soap Operas by dereference · · Score: 1

    Even more blatant (and even longer ago) Soap Operas started this trend. They're known as such because the whole point of every episode was to sell cleaning products to the viewers, by a combination of product placement and in-show advertising (typically given by the main actors, in character). This concept started on radio in the 1930s and continued into television over the next two decades.

  108. The big question... by Pherlin · · Score: 1

    Will this Gemini Division tell me all the good things about Lightspeed Briefs?

  109. Wow by robotbebop · · Score: 0

    Life imitates 30 Rock :( Jack Donague would be proud.

  110. Nothing new by waTR · · Score: 0

    This is nothing new, where do you think Soap Opera came from... it was a program made to sell clothes washing soap. Why is this news?

    --
    Huh? [devShell.org]
  111. We Asked for it. by cathector · · Score: 1

    funny, i read yesterday's article about the continuing rise of p2p file sharing and thought "okay, i'm a big media entity. given that i clearly can no longer control the distribution of my product, and furthermore that interspersed commercials are easily skipped or edited out, how am i going to keep making lots of money ?". the most obvious answer is exactly this: integrate the advertisements further into the content itself.

    ie,
    open content distribution results in shittier popular content.

  112. Re:OT: Your sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Regarding power line sag because of carrying a full load, there is a remarkable analog to testicles in this, but the margin of this page is too small to hold my proof.

  113. There's been a few changes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The show is called Knight Ridder and Michael is now a crime-fighting reporter who drive KITT, a car with access to all the latest news and information from across the world with the same quality and excellent you've come to expect from Knight Ridder papers.

  114. GI Joe, Transformers, He-Man by dorath · · Score: 1

    When I first saw the title of the article, I couldn't help but think of the cartoons I watched as a kid. While I greatly enjoyed them, they were basically just advertisements for related merchandise.

    How would this translate to the companies in the summary? The Cisco League of America? The Green Intel Corps 2 Duo? The Microsoft Source Force? Oh, right.

    While it sounds silly enough, it has been done. How it'll go for an audience more advanced in years is beyond me, but I suppose that's why I perfer tech to marketing.

  115. its called cartoons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this has been around for forever. its called CARTOONS. you really think they made GI Joe, He Man, and Thundercats just because it was creative? no, it was a 22 min ad disguised as entertainment. actually it was pretty good entertainment. bring back the thundercats!

  116. Toy companies have done this for years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This isn't new. Cartoons whose sole purpose was to push toy lines were all the rage in the 80s-- Transformers, He-Man, and GI Joe ring any bells?

  117. Ever seen The Hire from BMW? by mdarksbane · · Score: 1

    I have no problem with this if they make it good, and don't interrupt it with other advertising.

    Ever seen the series of short internet films BMW made? It's called The Hire www.thehire.tv.

    They brought in some big name directors and actors, gave them a good budget, premise, and some creative control - and they ended up with some really cool films that also happen to be some of the most effective commercials I've seen.

    The trick is that the BMW car is there... but no one shouts it out at you, it's just the tool that the main character uses to do his job (which largely involves cool car chases). And that they're well done films to begin with.

    Do I expect NBC to do something similarly cool? I doubt it, but I have no problem with the concept :)

  118. This is the long-prophesized end of broadcast TV by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

    And good riddance.

    This will accelerate the move to Internet video produced by independents and broadcast over the Net.

    Let broadcast television continue its race to the bottom with reality shows, sports, and biased news.

    --
    Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  119. Who says you can't write a show about a product? by klimb20 · · Score: 1

    Almost every other normal idea for a show has been done (we already have too many doctor and crime shows). Will having a show centered around products and services of a company seem forced? Maybe, or it can be just as contrived as any other show. If NBC wants to try this they should go ahead, though I'm sure expectations from viewers will be quite low.