Slashdot Mirror


New Linux Distribution — Exherbo, Announced

An anonymous reader writes "Former Gentoo developer Bryan Østergaard recently announced a new linux distribution aptly named Exherbo. The distribution, which has been underway for a couple of months and is based on ideas and experiences from his long work with Gentoo, features a new packaging format and several subprojects, such as a redesigned init system. Currently no installation medium is available but their package tree is public for the daring ones who want to play with the upcoming distribution. The developers strongly discourage any serious use though, as it's still highly experimental."

322 comments

  1. oblig FP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    But does it run Linux?

    1. Re:oblig FP by sm62704 · · Score: 5, Funny

      But does it run Linux?

      From TFA:

      absolutely nothing works

      So, no. It doesn't run Linux.

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    2. Re:oblig FP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Actually ciaranm is running it on his laptop:

      I've been running Gentoo on my desktop and Exherbo on my laptop (the first Exherbo install on real hardware) for a while now, and I don't see that changing for a good while. So at least one person is running it. :-)
  2. Aptly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Aptly? I don't think that word means what you think it means

    1. Re:Aptly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because it has many things in common with exherbos found in the wild.

  3. So basically... by genesus · · Score: 1

    So basically, it is supposed to be easier to use, but is incompatible with gentoo? Sounds useful...

    1. Re:So basically... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats what they say,

      truth of the matter is paludis is a PITA to work with, and this group of ... "developers" are even worse to work with if you are having problems with paludis

    2. Re:So basically... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      truth of the matter is paludis is a PITA to work with, and this group of ... "developers" are even worse to work with if you are having problems with paludis You are a filthy liar.
  4. Cool.... by LWATCDR · · Score: 4, Insightful

    A new package format. Just what we need.
    Man I have to admit that after reading the site I really want noting to do with this distro. Why is it even on Slashdot? ... Oh well must be a slow day.

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    1. Re:Cool.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      > Man I have to admit that after reading the site I really want noting to do with this distro.

      That's good, because this distro wants nothing to do with you.

    2. Re:Cool.... by LWATCDR · · Score: 5, Funny

      Or anybody else for that matter.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    3. Re:Cool.... by eln · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It doesn't even sound like a distro yet. It sounds like someone got their ego dented and posted a list of things they would want to change about Gentoo, but hasn't gotten much beyond the "writing a list" stage.

      I predict this distro will quietly die as the developers get sick of reinventing the wheel. At best, it will be a very small niche distro.

    4. Re:Cool.... by CrazedWalrus · · Score: 4, Informative
      I wonder why the hell this was even "announced" anyway. From the web site, it's incredibly obvious that this is a pet project by a few developers who just want to try some stuff out. Why is this on Slashdot? They don't want or need any outside involvement.

      From the site:

      OK, I Want to Try Exherbo

      No you don't.

      Yes I Do

      OK, maybe you do, but we don't particularly want you to try it because we don't want to deal with you whining when you find that absolutely nothing works. Exherbo isn't in a fit state for users. We might get there one day, but it's not a priority. Right now, all we care about is getting it into a fit state for a small number of developers.

      [ more snarky stuff amounting to "buzz off" ]

      Really, all we provide is a few things that the few people working on all this find useful for themselves. When we have something for anyone else, we'll let you know.


      Soooooo.... What was the point again?
    5. Re:Cool.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So far as I can see, the package format is just a massively improved version of ebuilds. It's not like it's a completely new format, just the next logical leap forward from ebuilds.

    6. Re:Cool.... by typhoonius · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Don't forget "redesigned init system," for those times when you want an init replacement besides launchd, eINIT, initng, upstart, and Sun's SMF.

    7. Re:Cool.... by kshade · · Score: 1

      Soooooo.... What was the point again?
      Attracting developers maybe?
    8. Re:Cool.... by X0563511 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You know, RPM, deb, tgz, init, etc all had to start somewhere... if people didn't take working systems and replace/enhance them we would still be working off mainframes or worse.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    9. Re:Cool.... by new.chaos · · Score: 1

      I really don't understand why people go out of their way to take a public piss on someone's idea or project. This doesn't look like self-promotion to me, in fact the opposite.

      Truth is there is a lot of improvement that can be made to OS packaging and the QA workflow. Especially from a dev's perspective who does all the work (for $0) and takes all the complaints from people who pay $0.

      Don't get all emo, move to the next headline. Especially if you have no context of what really goes on at that level, and therefore have no idea what you're talking about.

    10. Re:Cool.... by rah1420 · · Score: 1

      we would still be working off mainframes or worse

      Them's fightin' words. :) Either that or this hook is uncomfortable in me mouth.

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens.
    11. Re:Cool.... by Uncle+Focker · · Score: 1

      Oh well must be a slow day. I think that was made plainly obvious when this story made it to the front page: http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/05/19/1229211
    12. Re:Cool.... by AmonEzhno · · Score: 1

      Well it seems like the motivation for it is way off and they are being kind of slippery and cocky about it. But really, what harm can there be? There is obviously the risk of fragmentation, but can you think of a time where fragmentation was at least a little bit useful for the community? It may be a headache for sysadmins but usually it all comes together in the end

      But this thing is obviously not meant for day to day use and is non-functional for the vast majority of people; so why not just let it live and grow and see if something useful comes out of it. It may seem pointless now, but at least they are doing something that MAY be productive.

    13. Re:Cool.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A new package format. Just what we need.
      Man I have to admit that after reading the site I really want noting to do with this distro. Why is it even on Slashdot? ... Oh well must be a slow day. Slashdot is considering running it on all their production servers.
    14. Re:Cool.... by gnupun · · Score: 0

      Soooooo.... What was the point again?
      Profit?
    15. Re:Cool.... by MrHanky · · Score: 1

      It could be viral marketing. Just wait a few weeks, and the meme on the Ubuntu (or Gentoo or whatever) messageboards will be: "Well, if you think Ubuntu is too easy, then why don't you just fuck off to Exherbo instead???!!" And all the wannabe 1337ists will use Exerbo, which will be ad-supported, used to finance SCO, and crap.

      Or perhaps not.

    16. Re:Cool.... by Wiseman1024 · · Score: 5, Funny

      This indeed seems to be a new distro, but it's aimed at Gentoo ricers. CFLAGS JUST KICKED IN, YO!

      VROOM VROOOM!

      --
      I was about to say 13256278887989457651018865901401704640, but it appears this number is private property.
    17. Re:Cool.... by cheater512 · · Score: 1

      You forgot OpenRC which is what Gentoo unstable now uses.
      Its fantastic. :)

    18. Re:Cool.... by CrazedWalrus · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Maybe, but I didn't read it that way. I got more of a "This is our project, leave us alone. It doesn't interest you." That doesn't sound like much of a pitch to developers. The only allusion they made to allowing any outside influence was when they said they probably don't want what you have to offer.

      And no, we don't want to use Exherbo to implement your pet project. Especially not if it's a stupid pet project. Go and inflict it upon Gentoo, they think that porting ebuilds to run on SunOS 2 ksh under Cygwin is a great idea.

      The above paragraph does not apply if your pet project is something we find interesting.


      That last bit was the only "inviting" thing on the whole site, and it doesn't amount to much more than a "Try your luck, see if we think you're 1337 enough." Then again, the whole point was obviously to discourage most people. I guess it worked on me. Maybe some people are attracted by that attitude, but they're probably not the type of people you'd want to work with.
    19. Re:Cool.... by CrazedWalrus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't see any harm. I was just wondering why they bothered announcing it on /. when it seems like they don't really want anyone to be interested in it. *shrug*

      In fact, I can readily see the utility of forking an existing distribution for use as a custom dev platform -- especially if they want to try something crazy and disruptive. Go for it, have fun, learn something, hopefully contribute what you learned back to mainstream distros. Maybe more people should do it.

    20. Re:Cool.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't see any harm. I was just wondering why they bothered announcing it on /. when it seems like they don't really want anyone to be interested in it. *shrug* The developers announced it in a few blog posts and IRC channels. No-one knows who submitted it to Slashdot (although I have a suspicion....)
    21. Re:Cool.... by exley · · Score: 1

      CFLAGS JUST KICKED IN, YO! Man I wish I had some mod points. That is awesome, and I even like Gentoo.

      From the arrogance displayed on the front page of this new non-distro distro, it actually looks like Exherbo is by and for people who are too 1337 for regular Gentoo.

      If you have Gentoo users calling you a bunch of assholes, you should probably check yourself.

    22. Re:Cool.... by CrazedWalrus · · Score: 5, Funny

      Interesting.

      So maybe the story is that they pissed someone off by their exclusionary attitude or by dissing Gentoo/someone's mom/etc, so they put it on Slashdot just to generate interest where it wasn't welcome.

      Sounds like the makings of a geek soap opera.

      Join us next on "As The Nerd Turns" when 1337h4x0r's ambitions to work on a private Linux distro are thwarted by the nefarious Anonymous Reader! Will the site be slashdotted? Will countless newbs flock to this entertainingly hostile distro? Stay tuned for the exciting conclusion!

      Someone call NBC.

    23. Re:Cool.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So maybe the story is that they pissed someone off by their exclusionary attitude or by dissing Gentoo/someone's mom/etc, so they put it on Slashdot just to generate interest where it wasn't welcome. Heh, I didn't mean it that way, just that there's someone who took an interest shortly after it was announced, and maybe got a bit too enthusiastic.
    24. Re:Cool.... by CrazedWalrus · · Score: 1

      It's okay. I was entertained by the idea. :-)

    25. Re:Cool.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This sounds a lot like that silly goneme project from a few years ago. I'm sure it will last just as long too.

    26. Re:Cool.... by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 2, Informative

      ...hasn't gotten much beyond the "writing a list" stage

      1. Get mad
      2. Make a list
      3. Get article on or post to /.
      4. ???
      5. Profit!

      Sounds like half way there to me.

    27. Re:Cool.... by __aabvlw4075 · · Score: 1

      It's not like it's Yet Another Binary Package Format -- it's a source-based format that seeks to improve upon Gentoo's ebuild format in ways that are unlikely to ever happen in Gentoo.

      Personally, I find this to be the most interesting and newsworthy item I've seen on Slashdot for some time -- but I'm a long-time Gentoo user with an interest in these sorts of things.

    28. Re:Cool.... by unforkable · · Score: 1

      OK, I Want to Try Exherbo No you don't. Yes I Do Ok , so buy yourself a leather suit first! Seriously , why a new packaging format! (unless if it introduces real features that couldn't be implemented with the others (deb, rpm..))

    29. Re:Cool.... by Sancho · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It sounds like they're just trying to be cool. If they really didn't want to attract people, they shouldn't have gone to the trouble of putting up that webpage.

    30. Re:Cool.... by drinkypoo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I wonder why the hell this was even "announced" anyway. From the web site, it's incredibly obvious that this is a pet project by a few developers who just want to try some stuff out. Why is this on Slashdot? They don't want or need any outside involvement.

      So is this place news for nerds, or just for whiners?

      This is precisely the kind of news that belongs on Slashdot. Not a crosspost from the beeb or sci-am promoted to the front page solely to produce ad impressions for OSTG. Sorry if it's not cute and fluffy enough for you.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    31. Re:Cool.... by grm_wnr · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yes. Yes, it belongs on Slashdot. So we can make fun of it. Or not. Complaining about complainers is as bad as complaining in the first place.

    32. Re:Cool.... by 0xABADC0DA · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Personally, I find this to be the most interesting and newsworthy item I've seen on Slashdot for some time -- but I'm a long-time Gentoo user with an interest in these sorts of things. I'm in the same boat, but really the only things as a gentoo user that I find to be problems are:

      1) Portage/ takes up 500mb and uses 125k files. That's a giant 'FU' to any filesystem.
      2) Updating the portage tree takes forever.
      3) Emerge takes forever to figure out what to do.

      The first two can be solved easily by using a .zip file to store the portage files, and python has built in support for zip. An uncompressed zip file can work better with xdelta/rsync than a bunch of tiny files, depending on how it is created/updated. Even a compressed one can work great with xdelta with a just little bit of ZIP magic when creating a new archive. This solves #1 and #2. FYI, tar.gz and most other modern archives cannot be used because they don't have an index and are not random access.

      #3 can mostly be achieved with some kind of database that stores the results from last time, instead of 'rescanning' the world every time emerge runs. Even if portage is too hairy to actually improve this, just having files come from a zip instead of being scattered all over will improve the performance a lot. Probably enough to make it 'ok' again.

      So as a user I don't think a new distro is actually needed, and gentoo could be 'fixed' with just a few changes.
    33. Re:Cool.... by CrazedWalrus · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Please. It's a minor test distro that's for private use and is apparently not intended to go anywhere. The developers don't want attention, and actively discourage it on their site. If three friends and I decided to start a pet distro for our own purposes and that we never intended to make public, would you like to hear about it?

      Anyway, I wasn't "whining", as you assert. I was simply observing that there is an apparent disconnect between the contents of the site ("leave us alone") and a front page /. announcement. It has nothing to do with "cute and fluffy".

      I also find a certain degree of irony in the fact that you're trolling, yet advising others in your sig to ignore the trolls. Funny too, because I usually enjoy your posts. You're usually not the trolling type.

    34. Re:Cool.... by NemoinSpace · · Score: 1
      From TFA

      we're not afraid of huge changes to the package format. GOOD! call it whatever you want - just make sure you copy and paste the code fom rpm or apt. I'll take a look at their ideas just out of curiosity, but I sure as hell am not going to wade through the idiosnycracies of another package manager. Seriously, I couldn't find out what advantages this distro plan on bringing to the table in this respect or do they just like the idea of owning *ALL* the sand? Anyway, good luck. -posted on the door to the programmers lunchroom: "No Forks allowed"
    35. Re:Cool.... by cp.tar · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      From what I see, their page is user-hostile because at this pre-alpha point, the distro is user-hostile as well. I certainly didn't read all that in their rather simple announcement: they're working on it, and no, they don't have anything to show for it yet.

      I like Gentoo as it used to be, and I like the community, which is both technically versed and eager to help. I don't like what it's turning into, and I might consider trying Exherbo once it's production-ready.

      Really, the attitude they display may be a bit harsh, but it's a no-nonsense attitude which promises... well, exactly what they put on their page, with no frills and embellishments.

      --
      Ignore this signature. By order.
    36. Re:Cool.... by sexconker · · Score: 1

      A new distro, just what Linux needs.

    37. Re:Cool.... by jonfr · · Score: 1

      The Gentoo Linux community has been turning bad for five years now I think. At least that is what people like you like to claim all the time.

      The community isn't getting bad or the distro, it's your point of view that is getting bad.

    38. Re:Cool.... by aurispector · · Score: 1

      Meh. This is not news. Call when the distro is demonstrably better than most of the others. What exactly is broken that they are trying to fix?

      --
      I have mod points. The reign of terror begins now.
    39. Re:Cool.... by smittyoneeach · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      >by and for people who are too 1337 for regular Gentoo.
      The greatness of Gentoo has been its flexibility. The downfall has been the focus on 'fun' at the expense of good engineering.
      The bigger headz are rebelling and pursuing something better engineered.

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    40. Re:Cool.... by phreakincool · · Score: 2, Funny

      [grabs a bag of popcorn...]

      I'm riveted to my seat! I can't wait to see what happens next!

    41. Re:Cool.... by jthill · · Score: 1
      From planet.exherbo.org:

      First of all, Exherbo was announced because some elements of it will be discussed at an upcoming conference. [...] it seemed wise to at least let people know what was going on [...] Unfortunately Slashdot picked up the announcement because some tard decided it would be a great idea to submit it to them. We did not do that ourselves
      --
      As always, all IMO. Insert "I think" everywhere grammatically possible.
    42. Re:Cool.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it's a pet project between three friends there is no need for a damn public website. They're just want to insult the people they forked from and post it to slashdot. What a bunch of losers.

    43. Re:Cool.... by mollymoo · · Score: 1

      So far as I can see, the package format is just a massively improved version of ebuilds.

      Yep, you can now wait two days between updates without having to spend five hours manually fixing a hideous mangle of mutually blocking packages.

      --
      Chernobyl 'not a wildlife haven' - BBC News
    44. Re:Cool.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK, maybe you do, but we don't particularly want you to try it because we don't want to deal with you whining when you find that absolutely nothing works. Exherbo isn't in a fit state for users. We might get there one day, but it's not a priority. Right now, all we care about is getting it into a fit state for a small number of developers.



      Ah, at last, the return of the proper Linux distro. With all this talk of 'ready for the desktop', 'user-friendly', 'read the documentation', and 'it just works' in the newer distros I thought everyone had forgotten what Linux was really about.

    45. Re:Cool.... by BlackCreek · · Score: 1

      I don't get why they aren't comfortable with Gentoo's Portage or Arch's Pacman, though, it wasn't stated anywhere into detail enough... Because it is easier to write code than to read?

      Ok, ok. To be fair they made some claims on their site. I would prefer if they understood that whenever you claim to have improved something, providing a simple concrete example goes a long way towards convincing your audience that there are good reasons to fork.

    46. Re:Cool.... by neomunk · · Score: 1

      Ooo!
      *grabs popcorn and the remote*
      I'mma gonna wanna save this one...
      *presses the 'record' button on the remote*
      *frowns and hits record again*
      *smashes the remote against his forehead to teach it who's boss, and hits record again*

      Aw FFS, it's NBC! NOOOOOO!!! :-/

    47. Re:Cool.... by neomunk · · Score: 1

      Wow, these guys are dicks. I think I have a motto for them. "Exherbo, for when you're too 1334 to have things actually WORK."

    48. Re:Cool.... by scipiodog · · Score: 1

      I got more of a "This is our project, leave us alone. It doesn't interest you."

      "This is not the distro you're looking for..."

      "You can move about your business..."
      --
      http://clightnirish.wordpress.com/
    49. Re:Cool.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, and I think this shows the linux bias on this site. A distro that doesn't want attention gets put up while discussion of BSD projects is ignored.

      I've been working on a BSD project for two years with not one single article on slashdot. Granted, my little project might not be worthy, but either is this project. Then you have other BSD projects like DragonFly or MirBSD which rarely get attention, yet have been around for years.

      For the uninformed, there are 6 BSD projects and several (for lack of a better term) distros.

      NetBSD -> OpenBSD -> MirBSD
      FreeBSD -> DragonFly
      -> MidnightBSD

      DesktopBSD and PC-BSD are desktops shipping with FreeBSD.

    50. Re:Cool.... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      You missed RCng, which is used on NetBSD and FreeBSD (OpenBSD still uses BSD init). Mind you, I think the set of people who want an init replacement is the same as the set of people who have used SysV init and aren't completely braindead.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    51. Re:Cool.... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      So, basically, you want Gentoo portage to be more like FreeBSD ports (which it copied originally). Updating ports is fast with portsnap, and portupgrade doesn't take very long to work out what to do because the pkgdb is a db. The tree itself is big, but not a problem on any modern filesystem.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    52. Re:Cool.... by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      I meant worse as on "old" - if we didn't take chances and rework/invent stuff we would be very very far behind where we are now.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    53. Re:Cool.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For the uninformed, there are 6 BSD projects and several (for lack of a better term) distros. I don't see what's wrong with using that word in a BSD context. Remind me, what does the D stand for, again?
    54. Re:Cool.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heavens no, FreeBSD ports is even worse -- far worse -- than the current portage. I want something better than both of them.

      And no, the big tree of portage and ports is not "no problem" on any modern filesystem. It sounds like you've bought into the myth that unix filesystems don't get fragmented or have files spread out every which way. They do.

    55. Re:Cool.... by syousef · · Score: 1

      In other news, last week I played with a new version of Eclipse and added a few new plugins. I also got the CDT working again. Quick let's post it to slashdot as a major story. Or perhaps on my few crappy pieces of freeware that I wrote about 10 years ago.

      It's a question of relevance. You might argue that if it's publicly available it may be relevant to someone, but even slashdot users aren't likely to try out a fringe distro like this one. It's certainly not something that is of such great appeal to nerds that broadcasting it like this is a good idea.

      Also last time I checked Slashdot was news for nerds, not just news for Linux IT nerds, so stories on sci-am may well be relevant and of general interest.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
  5. Missing some subtle pun? by naich · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "aptly named Exherbo" I've read both FAs and I can't see why. Am I missing something obvious?

    1. Re:Missing some subtle pun? by Daimanta · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well, exherbo is latin for obvious so you are indeed missing the obvious :)

      --
      Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power lost.
    2. Re:Missing some subtle pun? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After some googling, this guy claims to have asked and found out it means "uproot". Who knows if it's true... Explanation

    3. Re:Missing some subtle pun? by Thornburg · · Score: 5, Informative

      I guess that was supposed to be funny, but "exherbo" apparently means to weed (as in to remove the weeds from a garden). At least, that was the only definition I could come up with using a short google search, and it certainly makes sense.

    4. Re:Missing some subtle pun? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's latin, it means "to weed."

    5. Re:Missing some subtle pun? by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 1

      "aptly named Exherbo"

      I was hoping the pun would be that the gentoo fork was using apt ;-)

      Oh well.

      I've read both FAs and I can't see why. Am I missing something obvious?

      Interestingly, a search for Exherbo on google only yields 116 results as I write this; the lowest I've ever seen for something I've searched for from a slashdot headline. I wonder how many search results google will be returning by morning?

      (funnily enough, a yahoo search for the same item returns fewer, but more relevant results - another first for me).

      --
      There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    6. Re:Missing some subtle pun? by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 4, Funny

      I guess that was supposed to be funny, but "exherbo" apparently means to weed...
      Yes, Østergaard must have been on weed when he decided that the world needs another distro with an all new package format... Yes indeed.
      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    7. Re:Missing some subtle pun? by gentooligan · · Score: 0
      Exherbo means to weed. Which tells you what they've been smoking ;p

      Looks kinda interesting though. There's some pretty smart ideas in there to get past some of the limitations and warts of ebuilds. Good luck to Bryan and friends.

    8. Re:Missing some subtle pun? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Up to 132 in just a few minutes.

    9. Re:Missing some subtle pun? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's an ancient African word meaning "go and use Gentoo or Ubuntu please."

    10. Re:Missing some subtle pun? by bsDaemon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No, Exherbare means "to weed" - Exherbo means I weed or I am weeding -- apparently also "I'm so high right now, i have no idea what making I apparently think that "Distribution" means "hoarding it all to myself, but gloating about it trying to make people jealous, but failing miserably.""

    11. Re:Missing some subtle pun? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Perhaps "aptly named Exherbo" because most people won't know what to make of it.

      Even on Slashdot. The thread's barely started and is already tagged "zzzz" and has people whining about Slow News Day, Yet Another Distro, and Yet Another Package Format. What is this, a /marketing/ bitch session? Slashdot is News for Nerds. The news is we've got a new distro, by Bryan Østergaard no less, and he's trying something new with it. What's more, it's in the very earliest stages so it's a great time to start watching how the project moves forward. And join in.

      If you don't think that's newsworthy then you're in the wrong place, and you want some commercial lifestyle promotion pap like Wired. Get thee hence.

    12. Re:Missing some subtle pun? by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      256 now. Nice round number.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    13. Re:Missing some subtle pun? by The+Outlander · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Thats funny

    14. Re:Missing some subtle pun? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exherbo literally means "I remove the herbs/weeds." The kind of weed you're talking about does, of course, have a Latin name: cannabis (related to *canna*, "hemp").

    15. Re:Missing some subtle pun? by slcdb · · Score: 1

      Am I missing something obvious?
      Yes. The obvious reaction to the name "Exherbo" is "WTF?!?!". And the obvious reaction after reading about Exherbo in TFA is "WTF?!?!". Apt.
      --
      Despite what EULAs say, most software is sold, not licensed.
    16. Re:Missing some subtle pun? by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 2, Funny

      Østergaard must have been on weed...

      Maybe that's why he misspelled the name.
      It should have been ExherbØ (code name: Biting Moose)

    17. Re:Missing some subtle pun? by the+brown+guy · · Score: 1

      hasn't gotten much beyond the "writing a list" stage. Yeah, he's definitely on weed. I can see the list now:
      1. Blaze up some killer hindu kush to stimulate creativity.
      2. Come up with witty name for pointless new distro.
      3. Find and eat cheetos.
      4. Chill
      5. ???
      6. Smoke a celebratory joint for awesome idea/list
      7. Profit! (Or in this case....support the community and enjoy the fame/vag that comes with developing a new distro)
      --
      Orbis terrarum est non altus satis
    18. Re:Missing some subtle pun? by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Is there really something that great about any of the existing package formats? rpm has the stupid header and uses cpio which is even more stupid, I have nothing against .deb but apt I guess... Another distribution is always a good thing though; someone learns something, some new keen tools might be developed. It's not going to hurt anyone.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    19. Re:Missing some subtle pun? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      its not about burdening ye with new formats etc, its an experimental system and if it turns out to have merit it'll be worthwhile learning about it, open source is all about this sort of development, trying shit out and seeing what works and to hell with the popularity vote.

    20. Re:Missing some subtle pun? by LingNoi · · Score: 1

      It hurt me in that this got posted on Slashdot instead of something more interesting.

    21. Re:Missing some subtle pun? by LingNoi · · Score: 1

      It's not news worthy because he's acting like a dick on the main page of his new "distro" and has nothing to show for it. He spends time setting up a public page just to tell people to "go away".

      When he gets past insulting Ubuntu and Gentoo users and actually has something worth reading about then yes, it will be news worthy, until then this is nothing interesting at all.

    22. Re:Missing some subtle pun? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "cleaned".

    23. Re:Missing some subtle pun? by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      Personalized Results 1 - 20 of about 2,520 for Exherbo. (0.17 seconds)
      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    24. Re:Missing some subtle pun? by Ant+P. · · Score: 1

      I've actually bothered to read their package format specification, and from what I understand it's just Gentoo's ebuild format (i.e. a bash script with some variables and some functions) with the worst parts fixed. Certainly seems a lot more sane to me, you can just give it a file containing the url to a source tarball and its default action is to do the configure/make/install that 99% of gentoo ebuilds have to explicitly state. If you don't like it, just write ebuilds instead - their package manager handles them transparently.

      If this ever goes anywhere I'll almost certainly be dumping gentoo. It's become a joke in the last 2 years or so and is becoming increasingly broken.
      You can't blame it on being a bleeding-edge source distro, because they're lagging months behind other distros in a lot of places. It's just plain stupidity and laziness. Most of the developers are too busy pretending to be politicians to do the right thing (hint: fuck off), which is making the ones who actually do anything useful leave instead.

    25. Re:Missing some subtle pun? by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 1

      And now it's over 100k.

      116 to 121,000 in 5 days flat. Nice.

      That's some googceleration (coined a new term).

      --
      There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
  6. Wow, just what we need by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    I'll probably get modded down by the groupthink mods around here (hint: metamods: moderate any downmods as unfair)...

    but really, is this what the Linux user community needs? Yet another Linux distro. Wow. And maybe we can add a new window manager and another variant of Firefox/IceWeasel/Netscape/etc.

    It's really a shame for F/OSS that, time and time again, there is such a huge duplication of effort and half-assed half-finished projects lying around in the junkyard of the Open Source cemetery.

    1. Re:Wow, just what we need by domatic · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's really a shame for F/OSS that, time and time again, there is such a huge duplication of effort and half-assed half-finished projects lying around in the junkyard of the Open Source cemetery.



      And once again someone falls prey to a common misconception: F/OSS is not a monolith. If these guys didn't have the option of having their own sandbox to play in then what makes you think they'd be compelled to play in someone else's? The way this will more than likely shakeout is that fifty or so people will use this for awhile. Maybe it'll be a bit more popular if the primary devs have more stature than I'm giving them credit for.

      These guys will get to have their fun and most everybody else will use an established distro. And that isn't to say good won't come of it. If they have good ideas, the bigger distros might adopt them. If they have REALLY good ideas they may supplant Gentoo among that crowd of people. Bugfixes may also go to upstream projects.

      I know this is weird idea to someone accustomed to being served what they think they want from proprietary software houses but this is nothing but an exercise of freedom. Others are free to use what they make or not. What would you propose? Some sort of law saying that henceforth no one may attempt to start a BSD or Linux distribution?

      The F/OSS world operates on a form of street-cred. These guys will either get it or not. It won't cause any sort of actual problem either way.
    2. Re:Wow, just what we need by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'll probably get modded down by the groupthink mods around here (hint: metamods: moderate any downmods as unfair).

      No. You're getting modded up due to the "there are too many Linux distros" groupthink (that you're completely participating in).

      --
      -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
    3. Re:Wow, just what we need by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's really a great thing for F/OSS that, time and time again, there is such a huge distribution of effort and quickly failed projects lying around in the lesson book of Open Source history.

      Without many failed attempts, no great successes would be had.

    4. Re:Wow, just what we need by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      F/OSS is not a monolith. If these guys didn't have the option of having their own sandbox to play in then what makes you think they'd be compelled to play in someone else's? That's what I dislike about the FOSS attitude. If we had one hundred developers working on one project rather than one hundred projects by one developer each, then we'd see much better quality software.

      I'm not against the idea at all, it's just that I wouldn't recommend it. But hey, choice is a good thing. A lot of the FOSS stuff is top-notch. I'm looking at you, OpenOffice.
    5. Re:Wow, just what we need by sm62704 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'll probably get modded down by the groupthink mods around here (hint: metamods: moderate any downmods as unfair)

      You're given certain comments to metamoderate, but in the event I metamod whatever mod you get (so far they haven't modded it) will determine how I metamoderate. You simply asked a question so I can't see why anyone would downmod. It is an honest question afaict.

      is this what the Linux user community needs?

      No, but it may be what the Linux developer community needs. There could be some really cool code coming out of this that may benefit the user community in the future, but right now it's for developers only. If your hobby is hacking new code, this might be for you.

      It's really a shame for F/OSS that, time and time again, there is such a huge duplication of effort and half-assed half-finished projects lying around in the junkyard of the Open Source cemetery.

      Um, ok maybe I can see why you might get downmodded. I see no "junkyard" nor "cemetary", what Linux projects have died recently? A halfassed half-finished project deserves to die, but that's part of the open source process. And there's a "huge duplication of effort" having Windows, Apple, Solaris, etc, compete; or Ford, Chevy, Toyota, K.I.A. etc. as well. The difference is that if Ford invents something, Chevy's not going to have it in their cars unless they can come up with the same functionality without infringing Ford's patent. If some cool new thing comes of this, you may well see it un Red Hat or Mandriva shortly. That's one of open source's strengths.

      I don't see "duplication of effort" as a weakness in either open source or closed.

      As to junkyards, you might want to read a couple of articles I wrote a few years ago when I was at K5, Useful Dead Technologies and the sequel Good Riddance to Bad Tech.

      Necessiy isn't the mother of invention, it's the father. Hard work is the mother. Do people need more than one mother?

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    6. Re:Wow, just what we need by Cillian · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The whole point in GPL style freedom is that people are free to write another linux distro, if they feel that way inclined, and free to duplicate effort. It is duplication of effort that produces multiple projects which do the same thing, which gives choice, which I believe to be a good thing. If it wasn't for duplication of effort, we wouldn't have GNOME, and KDE, and XFCE, and enlightenment. If you happened to not like the one window manager we did have, tough luck. We're not all part of some big company, so you can't just tell us to all follow what guidelines you want to. This distro really isn't designed to be the next big thing, or to help out the community. You talk about half assed half finished projects as though they are a bad thing. I find, what many people often consider to be an unfinished hack of a tool will do a particular job perfectly. Take this in contrast to something like openoffice, or firefox, which are often considered to be "finished", production, mature products, but are actually completely bloated and not that great at doing what they're supposed to. Really, it is this sort of niche itch scratching that has made linux and everything to do with it what it is. If you happen to want to devote yourself to helping other people, and the "community", then feel free to, but don't start trying to stop other people from coding something for themselves, or a small user group. Another hint: don't try to tell the mods how to think - if they mod down your post, don't whine about it, you deserved it.

      --
      -- All your booze are belong to us.
    7. Re:Wow, just what we need by CrazedWalrus · · Score: 3, Informative

      From the looks of this it's just a sandbox for a few guys to try out some ideas. It'll probably never amount to anything other than hopefully some cool new ideas. Those ideas will probably then be reincorporated into Gentoo or some other projects.

      The major problem seems to have been that they couldn't try out their ideas in Gentoo mostly due to political problems, so they made another Gentoo-esque platform they could directly control.

    8. Re:Wow, just what we need by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "That's what I dislike about the FOSS attitude. If we had one hundred developers working on one project rather than one hundred projects by one developer each, then we'd see much better quality software."

      Uhh no, we'd see one project doing one thing well, and 99 unresolved problems.
      Or maybe we'd see a hundred people yelling at each other (multiply by 2.5 and you have gentoo)

    9. Re:Wow, just what we need by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'll probably get modded down by the groupthink mods around here (hint: metamods: moderate any downmods as unfair)...
      1. Make stupid comment completely influenced by groupthinking and redundant
      2. Add fake warning at the beginning of comment to stop people from modding you down, making then afraid of meta-mod, in fact people will mod you up just for this warning without reading the whole comment
      3. ???
      4. PROFIT!
    10. Re:Wow, just what we need by mckorr · · Score: 5, Insightful
      By that reasoning all new ideas and development should stop immediately till we come up with one perfect distro. Why don't we just dump everything but Debian/Fedora/FreeBSD/whatever, for the good of the community of course! One distro to rule them all, etc. etc.

      The guy wants to experiment with a new init system and a new packaging system. He's put this out as a "distro" so that anyone else who wants to can help out, make suggestions, whatever.

      His work might end up "half-assed half-finished", or it might get incorporated into something larger which changes the way all the current big name distros work. If we are truly championing OSS, we should rather wish this guy well. He's doing exactly what everyone is always talking about, changing the source to suit himself and trying to learn how it is all put together.

    11. Re:Wow, just what we need by rubycodez · · Score: 4, Insightful

      oh, and do you have trouble with hobbyists making steam engines or kites or ships in a bottle? who the fuck are you to tell people how or with who they spend their spare time coding? anyone can fork their own distro or open source project, if you don't like it fuck off.

    12. Re:Wow, just what we need by Steve+Max · · Score: 1

      However, almost all of those developers are just doing it in their spare time. They don't get paid for it. They have no agendas, they only write the code for what they think would be fun/good/important/educative/etc. They don't have to work for something they don't like, don't feel comfortable, or where their ideas aren't welcome. See this case for example: they were trying to work within Gentoo, but it wasn't going anywhere - so they forked away. Who is to tell them that they should just suck it up and stay there? Or even go work with, say, Ubuntu (which has a totally different philosophy)? You can't say that, unless you pay them and they take the offer. Until then, they are free to work with whatever they want. They are happy, so they are more likely to work properly. Some users will like what they write, some will never know about it. That is the beauty of FLOSS.

    13. Re:Wow, just what we need by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      Well, if it becomes the Next Big Thing, it will continue the perception to many that you shouldn't switch to Linux, because eventually another new distro flavor of the month will come along and what you have now work work quite right.

    14. Re:Wow, just what we need by DarkOx · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You might have get a few more polished products that way but you would get anything other then unimaginative copies of other software and obvious evolutionary improvements on it. FOSS already has this problem in spades. Why? because most people are volunteers to be happy they need to feel like they have some sort of input. The result is everything is design by committee and therefore "safe" choices are the only ones that ever get made. This is not a bad thing for a mature project but its not good for young ones working in spaces that offer real chance for innovation.

      The "managed" pure source based distribution is not a solved problem yet. Projects like this are good not because many people will use it, but because they won't. These guys get to go off and do there own thing which will be more likely to make them happy and productive then anything else. They won't really piss off any of the other people working on the Gentoo project because they are not directly working with them any more, and end users won't be subject to their untested whims. Mean while people will be watching. If, and it is a big if I admit, they put something things together that really work then the parent project will be free the cherry pick their good ideas and roll them back in. If they decide to use enough of them these guys may volunteer to rejoin the project as maintainers of their contributions.

      This fork and merge pattern is really the place where FOSS does produce innovative new ideas. Its the people who think like you that case all the YetAnotherXXXXX FOSS projects.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    15. Re:Wow, just what we need by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Soviet Russia the project picks you!

    16. Re:Wow, just what we need by msuarezalvarez · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      So the prospect that there will be something better in the future is bad now?

      I do not know what MS is doing to the masses, but surely the training works!

    17. Re:Wow, just what we need by Yfrwlf · · Score: 1

      Yet another Slashdot argument in which both sides are right on certain points, but continue to pretend they are directly opposed. Working on one thing will get it done faster, that is a good thing, but if you can't have that then at least you can hopefully use the ideas or even better, the actual software that is developed after the fork/splitoff/new project, in other projects which are more mainstream. Yes, competition is good, but so is working together when possible and beneficial. There, settled.

      As a side note, separate projects are much more beneficial to one another when the system they are working on is modular and standardized enough to allow for easy adoption of code between the projects. A new package format, for example, would be just fine if there was a way to easily adopt existing package managers to understand the new package format. APIs/standards please, Linux community. Together, when possible, we are strong.

      --
      Promote true freedom - support standards and interoperability.
    18. Re:Wow, just what we need by pintpusher · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If we had one hundred developers working on one project rather than one hundred projects by one developer each, then we'd see much better quality software. I disagree. What you get with 100 developers working on 100 projects is 100 developers working on projects that they are passionate about, really care about and are committed to. That yields much better code than 100 people working on a project that 1 developer cares about.

      --
      man, I feel like mold.
    19. Re:Wow, just what we need by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's really a shame for F/OSS that, time and time again, there is such a huge duplication of effort

      It's really a shame for F/OSS (market economies) that, time and time again, there is such a huge duplication of effort (competition) lying around in the junkyard of the (market) Open Source cemetary.

      Sure, the Eastern Bloc was a mess...but, but, it's so much more EFFICIENT!

    20. Re:Wow, just what we need by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Without many failed attempts, no great successes would be had.

      That's like saying that you always find what you're looking for in the last place you look.

      Sometimes I get things right the first time. I like that way a lot better.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    21. Re:Wow, just what we need by Sancho · · Score: 1

      It depends upon your end goal.

      If you think that Linux should dominate the desktop, then forking projects is bad. The masses think that Ubuntu /is/ Linux. If all of the Ubuntu developers switch over to Exherbo in three years, the masses will think that Ubuntu stagnated. They'll be more likely to go back to Windows, where at least you have support (even if you have to buy a new copy every 5 years--hell, people do that anyway when their old computer "stops working" due to viruses.)

    22. Re:Wow, just what we need by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "but really, is this what the Linux user community needs?"

      Those who don't need it can ignore it. It will thrive or die depending on who it pleases.
      Not every egg hatches. So what? The strong survive, the rest die off, and it doesn't cost
      anyone anything who does not choose to invest.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    23. Re:Wow, just what we need by Knara · · Score: 1

      So what you're saying is, "If you're an FOSS zealot bent on making everyone use FOSS as their primary desktop OS in the next 10 years, it's bad."

      I think FOSS dominating the desktop would probably be about as bad as MS doing it in the end, because corporations/companies love standardization, and someone will always find a way to make money off a standard.

      Or, to put it another way, I don't think that Ubuntu/Redhat/whatever having 85% of the desktop market would be any less evil than Microsoft having it.

    24. Re:Wow, just what we need by Sancho · · Score: 1

      So what you're saying is, "If you're an FOSS zealot bent on making everyone use FOSS as their primary desktop OS in the next 10 years, it's bad." That's kinda what I was saying, yeah. There are a lot of people with this mindset. Hell, even I have it, to a degree (I think that Linux should be as usable as possible to new users, and as configurable as possible for experts, but I don't think that new distributions are necessarily bad for FOSS.)

      I think FOSS dominating the desktop would probably be about as bad as MS doing it in the end, because corporations/companies love standardization, and someone will always find a way to make money off a standard. What's wrong with people making money?

      Or, to put it another way, I don't think that Ubuntu/Redhat/whatever having 85% of the desktop market would be any less evil than Microsoft having it. Why?

      Microsoft got and maintained their monopoly by using dirty tricks. If Ubuntu got 85% of the desktop market, and kept itself open source (most portions of Ubuntu are covered by the GPL, so this is something they'd have to do), then any evil would instantly be mitigated by someone forking a non-evil alternative. That's why the GPL can be a good thing--try to close people off, and people can tell you to fuck yourself.
    25. Re:Wow, just what we need by trawg · · Score: 1

      It's really a shame for F/OSS that, time and time again, there is such a huge duplication of effort and half-assed half-finished projects lying around in the junkyard of the Open Source cemetery. Also, I think I read that same comment when Ubuntu was announced
    26. Re:Wow, just what we need by jacksonj04 · · Score: 1

      Or, to put it another way, I don't think that Ubuntu/Redhat/whatever having 85% of the desktop market would be any less evil than Microsoft having it. I think it would due to the open nature of the source - if they start being assholes with regards to the users it's fairly trivial to fork the code, market it as something new, and say "100% compatible with your old [distro] applications and files".

      As for standards, nothing stops different distros implementing the same standard. The trouble is that almost everybody in the FOSS world is convinced that their standard is better than the next one, so there is often a total lack of harmonisation. It's getting better as the space matures, but still isn't perfect.
      --
      How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
    27. Re:Wow, just what we need by sexconker · · Score: 1

      I think you're missing the point.

      The last thing Linux needs is a new distro.

      If the people behind this can code, then they should code on one of the countless projects already out there. They would be more helpful to that FOSS "community" I keep hearing so much about, and they'd be more likely to get attention, recognition, and maybe even some money in the future.

      The cornerstone of open source stuff is building off of the work of others. Sometimes it's blatant stealing/copying (be it design or chunks of code), sometimes it's not. But it's always done with the intention of improving something that already exists in some form. Very rarely does the "community" create something new and original concept-wise.

      This is fine, even if it's a little opportunistic/parasitic. Look at what's out there (often for $$$), and duplicate their design and implementation and wrap it up in a free package. You even get the opportunity to add/improve/fix things, and you aren't burdened with compatibility or support concerns.

      A major benefit of open source projects is that of hindsight - they can see what worked and what didn't work in that corporate product, and leverage that without the need for the initial years of design/revision and $$$. The "community", however, if a bunch of cocky nerds who fear the fork and will abandon a project if they smell the touch of corporate. (Much like birds abandoning their chicks if they smell humans. They don't actually do this, but it's a good analogy.)

      Seriously - a project forks, and two different groups get to do the proper thing and build off of once code base instead of one group having to go back to the drawing board. Then people bitch.
      Ubuntu is bundled with Dell machines, the NUMBER 1 OEM in the world. Ubuntu gets exposure and corporate support. It's shit, lost it's way, and it's name is no longer true to it's meaning. What?

      Whenever I see a new project start up, be it another IM client, browser, e-mail client, media player, window manager, etc I laugh. There seem to be a lot of intrepid go-it-alone programmers (and small groups) who fail to utilize either the hindsight advantage or the existing code base advantage. It's a serious waste of time to reinvent the wheel. Linux needs more distros like I need more nipples. Sure, they're fun to play with and all, but I think I've already got more than enough to get any nipple-related jobs done.

      Open source projects on any scale will never be able to compete in terms of design (process + time), research, or $$$ with their corporate counterparts. Open source projects of any significant scale MUST make effective use of the available resources - programming skill and time from contributors, free design and market research from similar corporate products, and the testing and continued project support the community provides.

      Open source is agile, but it cannot afford to spread itself thinly. Another Linux distro is just a bad idea.

    28. Re:Wow, just what we need by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Totally agree with you, mackorr.
      But, the thing is: If he doesn't want people to know about his project, then why the hell has he created a nasty site for it? I really don't see the point...
      And if you get to analyze it through OSS philosophy he's for sure forgetting the community factor of it. This won't help him at all in the near future.

    29. Re:Wow, just what we need by turbidostato · · Score: 1

      "That's what I dislike about the FOSS attitude."

      There's a kind of people that are always upset because the world in not the way they'd like instead of trying to understand it. Just a fact of life.

      "If we had one hundred developers working on one project rather than one hundred projects by one developer each, then we'd see much better quality software."

      The point is not that if we had one hundred developers... The point is that *You* Don't Have One Hundred Developers. If you want to have one hundred developers, you'd better pay them, and then they'll move at your command.

      Meanwhile, the expectable output of one hundred people (not "developers" but just plain people of any kind) moving by they own interests (not yours) is that they'll wander wherever they like to, probably one hundred different paths.

    30. Re:Wow, just what we need by xenocide2 · · Score: 1

      No, the whole point is to create a copyright license that allows collaboration between developers, without being able to pull an evil trick and renege on your half of the agreement. The difference between a fork and a branch is easy to spot: hostilities directly before the fork. I think their website is quite clear on where they stand.

      --
      I Browse at +4 Flamebait

      Open Source Sysadmin

    31. Re:Wow, just what we need by msuarezalvarez · · Score: 1

      I do not think that Linux should dominate the desktop. In fact, I think that's a rather absurd idea. What I think is that choice should be possible. I know what my choice is, too.

      Also, I do not think that the masses identify Ubuntu with Linux. It really depends on what part of the `masses' you are in contact with.

      And on top of that, I think you are underestimating the masses: if developers switch to $NEW_DISTRO, then the masses will follow. They are not idiots. For example, the `masses' that were using Linux before Ubuntu came to be were using something which was clearly not Ubuntu, and they were unidiotic enough to switch.

      The fact that the possibility of better things exists is what keeps OSS going, despite what the moderators that saw my previous post as flamebait seem to think! I really cannot believe you can be at the same time an OSS suporter and think that attempts at building better things is bad.

    32. Re:Wow, just what we need by styrotech · · Score: 2

      I think you're missing the point.

      The last thing Linux needs is a new distro.

      If the people behind this can code, then they should code on one of the countless projects already out there. They would be more helpful to that FOSS "community" I keep hearing so much about, and they'd be more likely to get attention, recognition, and maybe even some money in the future.


      Yeah, FOSS developers should all be slaves to a "movement" rather than geeks that like to scratch their own itches. They should all be forced to code what the community needs rather than what they want to work on. That will do wonders for incentivizing people to code on FOSS software.

      The whole point of FOSS in the first place is to give people the freedom to do EXACTLY what these guys are doing. Pissing on that is pissing on the philosophical basis of and reason for sharing code.

      These guys are experimenting with ideas that are too disruptive for existing distributions to experiment on themselves, and they wouldn't be able to get anywhere with due to the inertia involved in a larger project. The lead has already said he's made more progress on his ideas in months than he was able to in years as part of Gentoo. If the ideas end up being valuable, then other distributions can run with proven solutions. If they don't end up working out, then what's the big deal? - the community now knows that the idea wasn't that good, and some coders learnt a huge amount playing around with their fun new ideas.
    33. Re:Wow, just what we need by digsbo · · Score: 1

      It's really a shame for F/OSS that, time and time again, there is such a huge duplication of effort and half-assed half-finished projects lying around in the junkyard of the Open Source cemetery. Have you ever worked on any proprietary systems? There is far more redundant, half-assed, half-finished crap in the commercial/internal development area compared to FOSS. Mainly because company A doesn't have any way to research or re-use company B's timesheet/project tracking/workflow/AR/CRM software...
    34. Re:Wow, just what we need by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      No, it's not that something better may come along. The problem would be that it is just different enough to break everything. Redhat puts it's files in one location; Ubuntu another. Slack another. Each one of these differences need to be accounted for by developers. That means things are more likely to break when trying to use software built on redhat on slack. You can't even take the installer packages from RH to Ubuntu.. so now i have to go and find the same program again, just in a different package format. If there is even one of the system you're running at the time.

      At least with Windows the number of locations to put things is smaller; system wide installs go to Program files. Configuration files get written to the user's profile. You can ask the OS what those locations are.

    35. Re:Wow, just what we need by msuarezalvarez · · Score: 1

      If anything, this variety that annoys you forces people to build things on such a way that such reorganizations are possible. Automake, for example, is one outcome of that, and it achieves the amazing feat of allowing 97% of developers to simply not care about the issue of where things are to go in the final install. RPM and its build structure is similar, for different set of issues.

      At least with Windows the number of locations to put things is smaller; system wide installs go to Program files. Configuration files get written to the user's profile. You can ask the OS what those locations are.

      This is exactly the same for Linux, in any normal distro, for 95% of the software out there. The locations for `usual' stuff are completely normalized. If you have a non-system package that puts its stuff in odd places, then that is a bug in that software package, much as it is a bug in 50% of all windows apps not to look for "My Programs" using the OS-way, resulting in very sad messes because of localization and what not---not to speak of the debacle of UAC and the I-want-my-app-to-run-as-root-simply-because-I-do phenomenon.

      Yes: you need to sometimes use a different packaging utility. For the standard user, that is irrelevant, as she will in most cases double click on the package and have the system do whatever is correct---this is just a matter of having the mime type associated with the proper app and, again, if your distro does not do this, it is a bug in your distro---and there is even PackageKit to abstract the innards and present a common interface to most common tasks.

      In the end, people will do whatever they want, without absolutely any regard to `The Year of the Linux Desktop' strategists, who tend not to be the ones writing the code... And it is good that they do: doing exactly that it is how we got what we've got now, so I can but have very big hopes for what's to come.

    36. Re:Wow, just what we need by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      In the Free Software world, competition and collaboration are often the same thing. With compatible licenses then two 'competing' projects can easily use each others' code when it makes sense to do so.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    37. Re:Wow, just what we need by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      If anything, this variety that annoys you forces people to build things on such a way that such reorganizations are possible. Automake, for example, is one outcome of that, and it achieves the amazing feat of allowing 97% of developers to simply not care about the issue of where things are to go in the final install. RPM and its build structure is similar, for different set of issues.

      The thing is, automake shouldn't be seen by an end user. When I installed on Linux, automake only appeared if I was compling from a tarball. Otherwise, RPM did whatever to install... but that forces distro makers to manage installation instead of the developer following a set of guidelines. Also, automake can fail. Then what good is it? I've had it fail on more than one occasion.

      This is exactly the same for Linux, in any normal distro, for 95% of the software out there. The locations for `usual' stuff are completely normalized. If you have a non-system package that puts its stuff in odd places, then that is a bug in that software package, much as it is a bug in 50% of all windows apps not to look for "My Programs" using the OS-way, resulting in very sad messes because of localization and what not---not to speak of the debacle of UAC and the I-want-my-app-to-run-as-root-simply-because-I-do phenomenon.

      Yes: you need to sometimes use a different packaging utility. For the standard user, that is irrelevant, as she will in most cases double click on the package and have the system do whatever is correct---this is just a matter of having the mime type associated with the proper app and, again, if your distro does not do this, it is a bug in your distro---and there is even PackageKit to abstract the innards and present a common interface to most common tasks.


      So what does Linux offer a developer to ask to OS where things should go? In .Net, there's the Environment.GetSpecialFolder, for example. But that's a Win32 API so it's not limited to .Net usage. Is there a similar API in Linux? Or do you just have to "know" where things should go, or rely on automake?

    38. Re:Wow, just what we need by sexconker · · Score: 1

      "The philosophical basis and reason for sharing code" ?

      The philosophy that information wants to be free, money is the devil, Ballmer shouldn't throw chairs, etc. is bullshit. Sorry.

      The practical reasons people share code are to save time and reduce the introduction of errors.

      Sure - it's hard to get good results by asking developers to work on shit they don't want to work on, especially if you don't pay them. But letting them run off and do whatever they want is a detriment to the "community", just as "Do What You Feel Day" was a detriment to Springfield.

      Open source zealots will die waiting for the year of the Linux desktop, copyright/patent reform, etc. because they can not get organized and work together for more than 5 minutes.

    39. Re:Wow, just what we need by Yfrwlf · · Score: 1

      They can be to a degree yes, but I'm not sure that's as true as you think it is though, as different programs may be so different that a lot of the code isn't very compatible. Rip out Kopete's webcam interface and put it into Gaim? The developers laughed at me for even suggesting that one. If you make things more modular, though, and have some standardized points of communication, then switching out programs, using different programs, sharing code, etc, is easier. If an entire Linux distro, from the kernel to the desktop, was a big wad of code with no standards, you couldn't easily do things like program a new desktop environment, or a new window manager, because switching to those would be very difficult. If you have standards though and can all be on the same page about interprogram communication, this becomes a million times easier. Thanks to freedesktop.org it's much simpler to make different window managers for example to allow users to easily run and switch between them. So, where and when this can be done in a great way, kudos go to those programmers, for giving everyone else in the world more freedom by being more easily able to add on, change, remove, and use a program. The easier it is to make choices/changes and to adopt and use different programs, the more freedom you and everyone else has.

      If Gaim and Kopete had both used a standardized plugin system, porting a webcam or other plugins between the programs would be cake.

      --
      Promote true freedom - support standards and interoperability.
    40. Re:Wow, just what we need by styrotech · · Score: 1

      The philosophy that information wants to be free, money is the devil, Ballmer shouldn't throw chairs, etc. is bullshit. Sorry


      Huh? That wasn't even close to my point and ignores the rest of the comment altogether. I notice you snipped off the previous sentence to remove its context.

      The freedom to implement your own ideas and take existing code in a new direction is a very important concept for open source developers.

      The attitudes you mention are far more likely to come from the "movement" type zealots (usually bitter Windows refugees) that are usually not open source developers themselves. It's these types that loudly make proclamations about what the "community" should and shouldn't do all while not contributing much (eg code, support, docs etc) themselves - although they probably mistakenly think shrill advocacy is a useful contribution.

      The best thing for any FOSS community is having enough passionate motivated developers. Lose that and you will soon find the community stagnates. Telling someone to stop doing what they want to do and to do what you want them to instead is counter productive.
    41. Re:Wow, just what we need by msuarezalvarez · · Score: 1

      The thing is, automake shouldn't be seen by an end user.

      Of course! But automake makes it trivial for the developers/distributors to adapt to local conventions. It is developers who have to package things for users. A package that requires the user to even know of automake to install is broken.

      When I installed on Linux, automake only appeared if I was compling from a tarball. Otherwise, RPM did whatever to install... but that forces distro makers to manage installation instead of the developer following a set of guidelines.

      What issue are you talking about, specifically? I never have this problem you speak of, and I have not only lots and lots of free software installed, from my distro, from other distros and compiled by hand, but also proprietary software, and I have not seen this problem.

      Also, automake can fail. Then what good is it? I've had it fail on more than one occasion.

      Everything can fail. What's new?

      In any case, a developer that considers automake as an user-level installation thingie is beyond help...

      So what does Linux offer a developer to ask to OS where things should go? In .Net, there's the Environment.GetSpecialFolder, for example. But that's a Win32 API so it's not limited to .Net usage. Is there a similar API in Linux? Or do you just have to "know" where things should go, or rely on automake?

      As I said, only a idiotic developer sees automake as an user level installation tool.

      There are standard locations for essentially everything 95% of the software out there needs to install, and essentially everything 95% of the software out there needs to function is placed in standard locations. Developers need to be aware of the standard conventions (the LSB, for example), and that is not in any way different to needing to know the relevant .Net API.

    42. Re:Wow, just what we need by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      Of course! But automake makes it trivial for the developers/distributors to adapt to local conventions. It is developers who have to package things for users. A package that requires the user to even know of automake to install is broken.

      Yet for many OSS projects, this is the only want to install.

      What issue are you talking about, specifically? I never have this problem you speak of, and I have not only lots and lots of free software installed, from my distro, from other distros and compiled by hand, but also proprietary software, and I have not seen this problem.

      Well the fact that there are at least two completely different ways to install software on Linux doesn't help. The fact that each distro seems to create their very own package management amplifies the problem.

      Everything can fail. What's new?

      Automake or even RPM installations have failed for me many more times than installtion of programs on Windows. Windows has an entire API available to developers to consistently install programs. Why isn't there such a thing in Linux?

      There are standard locations for essentially everything 95% of the software out there needs to install, and essentially everything 95% of the software out there needs to function is placed in standard locations. Developers need to be aware of the standard conventions (the LSB, for example), and that is not in any way different to needing to know the relevant .Net API.

      I don't see it much different. The API exists to help developers adhere to the guidelines. In the Linux world, it seems to be individual distrubutions to provide ways to install programs. As I said, the problem is that Redhat puts some files in different locations than a Deb based distro. Does the LSB even address that? Why doesn't the LSB include some kind of installer API?

    43. Re:Wow, just what we need by msuarezalvarez · · Score: 1

      Of course! But automake makes it trivial for the developers/distributors to adapt to local conventions. It is developers who have to package things for users. A package that requires the user to even know of automake to install is broken. Yet for many OSS projects, this is the only want to install.

      Then complain to the developers of those OSS projects. You do understand that no one is in a position to tell every OSS developer (whatever that may mean!) to stop being a fool and provide a sensible way for their app to be installed.

      What issue are you talking about, specifically? I never have this problem you speak of, and I have not only lots and lots of free software installed, from my distro, from other distros and compiled by hand, but also proprietary software, and I have not seen this problem. Well the fact that there are at least two completely different ways to install software on Linux doesn't help. The fact that each distro seems to create their very own package management amplifies the problem.

      What are those two completely different ways you have inmind? You can't possibly mean `from sources' and `using package management'... The only reason you do not have this problematic alternative with non-OSS software is because you do not have the source!

      It does not matter what package management a distro picks: if it is a user-oriented distro, and it is good at that, then the user will have absolutely no interaction with the package tools apart from pointing, clicking, and so on. I know absolutely computer-illiterate people who from time to time install apps on Ubuntu and Fedora, and who do not know that the underlying packaging systems are different.

      What you are complaining is about half-finished attempts at interfaces to packaging systems. But the variety of packaging systems is irrelevant to your problem: your problem lies entirely with the `half-finished' part. Again: what's new?

      Everything can fail. What's new? Automake or even RPM installations have failed for me many more times than installtion of programs on Windows. Windows has an entire API available to developers to consistently install programs. Why isn't there such a thing in Linux?

      Well, from the developer's point of view, RPM is an API. So is the debian packaging format.

      You have had failures installing, I haven't in ages (at least, since I left Slackware, which characteristically has a utmostly primitive pacaging system) What problems have you had? With what packages? How can you possibly tell it is not the developer's fault instead of the package format's, and that they would not have screwed up using any other API?

      There are standard locations for essentially everything 95% of the software out there needs to install, and essentially everything 95% of the software out there needs to function is placed in standard locations. Developers need to be aware of the standard conventions (the LSB, for example), and that is not in any way different to needing to know the relevant .Net API. I don't see it much different. The API exists to help developers adhere to the guidelines. In the Linux world, it seems to be individual distrubutions to provide ways to install programs. As I said, the problem is that Redhat puts some files in different locations than a Deb based distro. Does the LSB even address that? Why doesn't the LSB include some kind of installer API?

      What files? Why are apps dependent on where those files are?

      Do you know that an RPM file does not have hard-coded the locations where its files will be put, but instead at rpm-installation time the rpm program reads a configuration file which tells it where the different pieces should go? And that it is trivial to install a rpm in a debian box configured to have it follow the debian standards? I am quite sure dpkg allows fore exactly the same.

    44. Re:Wow, just what we need by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      Then complain to the developers of those OSS projects. You do understand that no one is in a position to tell every OSS developer (whatever that may mean!) to stop being a fool and provide a sensible way for their app to be installed.

      Well, complaining usually gets you "this is free, take it or leave it." Also, why bother, when with Windows any software you buy will have an installer.

      What are those two completely different ways you have inmind? You can't possibly mean `from sources' and `using package management'... The only reason you do not have this problematic alternative with non-OSS software is because you do not have the source!

      So you concede that exposing Automake to users is bad, and when I say that there's a lot of OSS software "installed" that way, and the other half is installed via a package management system, you quipe it's not a problem in Windows because I don't have the source? As a user, I don't care about the source. I just want the software that works. I don't care how a cow is milked, I just want to be able to drink the milk.

      It does not matter what package management a distro picks: if it is a user-oriented distro, and it is good at that, then the user will have absolutely no interaction with the package tools apart from pointing, clicking, and so on. I know absolutely computer-illiterate people who from time to time install apps on Ubuntu and Fedora, and who do not know that the underlying packaging systems are different.

      Right, because they are only given the option of installing software that's been packaged. Have any of your users found software that WASN'T packaged for their system, and wanted it installed? Have you had a user that found a package, but couldn't install it on Fedora because it was a deb package? As a developer, I've come across such things, and I'm not talking about development software either. IM clients, torrent cilents, etc.

      What you are complaining is about half-finished attempts at interfaces to packaging systems. But the variety of packaging systems is irrelevant to your problem: your problem lies entirely with the `half-finished' part. Again: what's new?

      It becomes relevent when I put on my developer hat and need to figure out how to package my software. Do I choose RPM, DEP, this new package format? I need to create a package for all three? At this point I WOULD consider releasing just an Automake "installation," just so I don't have to package my software a hundred different ways. This is the point I'm trying to make and that is why I think developers release tarballs with an automake install.

      Well, from the developer's point of view, RPM is an API. So is the debian packaging format.

      Really? I can write a code module and plug it in? Maybe just be inheriting a class? In .Net that's how I can plug custom code into an installer. It's actually part of my assembly. In Linux, deployment seems totally seperated from development. I wouldn't say RPM is an API so much as it is a container format which is created by running a command line program.

      You have had failures installing, I haven't in ages (at least, since I left Slackware, which characteristically has a utmostly primitive pacaging system) What problems have you had? With what packages? How can you possibly tell it is not the developer's fault instead of the package format's, and that they would not have screwed up using any other API?

      You totally missed my point. Ya, it's partially the developers fault, because they didn't create their installer properly. It's also the platforms fault, because package management is not part of every single Linux setup. There's no standard way for your package to see if another one is installed; there's no standard way for a developer to upgrade an existing package. So that when I simply tried to upgrade the Kopete package, for example, it just said "no." I had to dig out the relevent upgrades. Which weren't packaged by Redhat y

    45. Re:Wow, just what we need by msuarezalvarez · · Score: 1

      Well, complaining usually gets you "this is free, take it or leave it." Also, why bother, when with Windows any software you buy will have an installer.

      If they tell you that, then do not use their software. Consider it the analogue of a non-free-as-in-beer software developer charging you a billion dollars for their app: would you buy it at that price?

      What are those two completely different ways you have inmind? You can't possibly mean `from sources' and `using package management'... The only reason you do not have this problematic alternative with non-OSS software is because you do not have the source! So you concede that exposing Automake to users is bad, and when I say that there's a lot of OSS software "installed" that way, and the other half is installed via a package management system, you quipe it's not a problem in Windows because I don't have the source? As a user, I don't care about the source. I just want the software that works. I don't care how a cow is milked, I just want to be able to drink the milk.

      No. I was just trying toguess what are these `two completely different ways of installing apps' you referred to but did not mention.

      Right, because they are only given the option of installing software that's been packaged. Have any of your users found software that WASN'T packaged for their system, and wanted it installed? Have you had a user that found a package, but couldn't install it on Fedora because it was a deb package? As a developer, I've come across such things, and I'm not talking about development software either. IM clients, torrent cilents, etc.

      You seem to believe that someone releasing the source of some app should magically make it installable for anyone. That does not apply in the Linux world, because most people will have no idea of how to proceed, and it does not apply in the Window world, because of the same reason, and I'd say it does not apply in any world.

      I consider `releasing an application' for users to mean `releasing it in user usable form'. That someone wrote an IM client and put the source somewhere in the internet is not releasing it in a user usable form. If the IM client developers simply puts the source out there, then he is not making it available for users. `User usable form' means packaged in a way users can use it. The developer may not care about doing it, but that is his prerrogative.

      You should note that there is quite a lot of people who've somehow managed to get past this insurmountable amount of problems you keep talking about, commercial and non-commercial, open-source and non-open source. It surely could be easier (but I would not want to use an internet-facing IM client written by a developer who cannot grok the rpm .spec format...), but as usual, every could be easier.

    46. Re:Wow, just what we need by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Those movement zealots are the ones the open source developers have to pander to.

      Sure - anyone can go ahead and do what they want.
      Go for it, just don't expect praise from the community. But a new distro does nothing for open source in general, nor does it do anything for the users, specifically.

      I have the cure for cancer, I just need to finish the last few tests and write it down.
      I'm tired of working with those asshats that share my lab. I would rather spend my days making porn. I'm sure they'll get it eventually anyway, they have my notes.

      More power to me, right?

      There is a very small number of people who are able and willing to program for free. When these people abandon projects, projects often die. When these people start new projects, they dilute and confuse they market.

      "The best thing for any FOSS community is having enough passionate motivated developers. Lose that and you will soon find the community stagnates. Telling someone to stop doing what they want to do and to do what you want them to instead is counter productive."

      You're right, except for the fact that there are NOT enough passionate, motivated developers to go around. Losing even one programmer can kill a project instantly. The current system is dangerous - at any given time development could simply stop for a project you like/depend on.

      I would love to see a larger open source development body that assigns people to projects under their umbrella. Maybe even pays some of them. Let them pick and choose projects, but also maintain the power to assign them to a project if needed.

      Oh wait - that sounds familiar...

    47. Re:Wow, just what we need by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      If they tell you that, then do not use their software. Consider it the analogue of a non-free-as-in-beer software developer charging you a billion dollars for their app: would you buy it at that price?

      Let's put the upper level more realistic for an end user; $400. Yeah, I'd pay that. If it was an application that targeted commerical tasks, say Photoshop, yes I'd pay more. At the end of the day, I need software I can use, so software that is difficult to install isn't useful.

      No. I was just trying toguess what are these `two completely different ways of installing apps' you referred to but did not mention.

      Sorry, I should have been more clear.

      You seem to believe that someone releasing the source of some app should magically make it installable for anyone. That does not apply in the Linux world, because most people will have no idea of how to proceed, and it does not apply in the Window world, because of the same reason, and I'd say it does not apply in any world.

      I didn't mention releasing of source at all. Having the source or not is irrelevent to this topic, in my mind. Now releasing software, yes, it should be installable by someone on the target system. Which is the problem with the number of Linux distros; typically the target system is tied to a particular package manager. Hopefully things have changed an RPMs can be used on debs and debs on RPM systems without change or knowledge of the format by the user; ideally the LSB would standardize on the best one. On Windows, you have the Windows Installer API, and that's it. Easy for developers and end users.

      I consider `releasing an application' for users to mean `releasing it in user usable form'. That someone wrote an IM client and put the source somewhere in the internet is not releasing it in a user usable form. If the IM client developers simply puts the source out there, then he is not making it available for users. `User usable form' means packaged in a way users can use it. The developer may not care about doing it, but that is his prerrogative.

      The IM client was packaged as an RPM though.. which didn't help, because of the problems I mentioned.

      You should note that there is quite a lot of people who've somehow managed to get past this insurmountable amount of problems you keep talking about, commercial and non-commercial, open-source and non-open source. It surely could be easier (but I would not want to use an internet-facing IM client written by a developer who cannot grok the rpm .spec format...), but as usual, every could be easier.

      I never said it was insurmountable, I said it throws up challanges needlessly. As a developer, I don't want to package my application 18 different ways. As a user, I want a single consistent way to install and manage my applications. It's an obsticle, and given that I had problems with it, I couldn't imagine say my sister not having problems. If you only get your software from your distribution supplier, I guess you'd be ok. The problem is that developers whose software DOESN'T get included have a problem of getting installed.

      The IM client I was talking about was Kopete. And it wasn't that there was something wrong with the package, it was that the newest version would ONLY work with the newest libraries for KDE, which broke other applications on my system (once I satisfied the 30 or so dependencies I needed to update). It also broke some applications installed via automake.

      Maybe things have improved, like I said. But that was my experience with Mandriva in 2006. After Linux on the desktop for five years, I finally threw up my hands in disgust with all the nonsense I had to go through whenever I tired to update my system or install new software, and it drove me to not only go back to Windows on the desktop, but to replace my long running Linux server.

      Anyway, I'm not trying to bash Linux, but unless there have been signficiant updates, Linux has a long way to go in t

    48. Re:Wow, just what we need by msuarezalvarez · · Score: 1

      I didn't mention releasing of source at all. Having the source or not is irrelevent to this topic, in my mind. Now releasing software, yes, it should be installable by someone on the target system.

      It is relevant in so far you seem to consider that if someone releases the software in source form, it should be installable by end users. I, on the other hand, only consider software to be released to users when it is released in a way they can be expected to handle.

      99% of Windows users will not be able to install software which is not packaged, and you clearly do not consider that as a fault in that platform. Why do you think that regular users not being to install software which was not packaged for them is a problem in the Linux platform (whatever that meay mean)?

      I never said it was insurmountable, I said it throws up challanges needlessly. As a developer, I don't want to package my application 18 different ways. As a user, I want a single consistent way to install and manage my applications. It's an obsticle, and given that I had problems with it, I couldn't imagine say my sister not having problems. If you only get your software from your distribution supplier, I guess you'd be ok. The problem is that developers whose software DOESN'T get included have a problem of getting installed.

      Your sister would never have that problem, because she is probably not even aware that there is another way to install software apart from nicely packaged packages trimed for their platform, whether that platform be Linux in some variant or Windows.

      The IM client I was talking about was Kopete. And it wasn't that there was something wrong with the package, it was that the newest version would ONLY work with the newest libraries for KDE, which broke other applications on my system (once I satisfied the 30 or so dependencies I needed to update). It also broke some applications installed via automake.

      But then you were trying to do something that even the Kopete developers did not intend users to do (I trust them enough to not take them for idiots). Clearly, they based their latest release on versions of libraries which are not yet common. They evidently did a release intended for integrators. Integrators should not have any problem setting up things and, in turn, packaging the package for end users.

      If installing the newest KDE libs broke existing apps, then the new libs were not compatible with the old ones and therefore either they were intended to break compatibility (if that is the case, I am sure the KDE people have set things up so as to have parallel installability) or there is a major bug. In the second case, well, shit happens; in the first, then you must have done something wrong. You will say that is should be easier to do this correctly, but you should take into account that what you tired to do is change a basic library on which the whole desktop depends (if you are using KDE,at least), so that is a seriously major change to your system, which should be considered only when doing system-wide updates. And users simply do not do that.

      Maybe things have improved, like I said. But that was my experience with Mandriva in 2006. After Linux on the desktop for five years, I finally threw up my hands in disgust with all the nonsense I had to go through whenever I tired to update my system or install new software, and it drove me to not only go back to Windows on the desktop, but to replace my long running Linux server.

      Clearly, an example of YMMV.

      Anyway, I'm not trying to bash Linux, but unless there have been signficiant updates, Linux has a long way to go in this area, and my claim that having too many distros / package managers is part of the reason. Take all the good ideas from each one, and make ONE that works really well, and make it part of the LSB. There is such a thing as "too much of a good thi

    49. Re:Wow, just what we need by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      It is relevant in so far you seem to consider that if someone releases the software in source form, it should be installable by end users. I, on the other hand, only consider software to be released to users when it is released in a way they can be expected to handle.

      If the developers have said "this is the only format we're releasing our software in" then yes, I consider it released. Plenty of projects refuse to make distro specific packages. So they are using automake as their "installation API." So you would consider such projects "never released." Which to me shows an attitude problem in the community.

      99% of Windows users will not be able to install software which is not packaged, and you clearly do not consider that as a fault in that platform. Why do you think that regular users not being to install software which was not packaged for them is a problem in the Linux platform (whatever that meay mean)?

      99% of Windows software is packaged and not claimed to be released without some kind of installation package. My whole point is that maybe if linux finally settled on ONE way to manage application installations, more developers would ensure to package their software. As it is, there are a huge number of applications which don't have any kind of packaging beyond automake, and it doesn't seem to be getting better. Developers targeting Windows though wouldn't even dream of NOT making an MSI package. So yes, it's a platform problem.

      Your sister would never have that problem, because she is probably not even aware that there is another way to install software apart from nicely packaged packages trimed for their platform, whether that platform be Linux in some variant or Windows.

      That's just silly. It's not possible for her to find software she would like to install, and be confronted with the choice between tgz (whatever that is, she'll think) or RPM (which notes that it's for Redhat, which she's not running). I know I was hit with that; went looking for some software to fill a need, found it, and because I know what a tgz was able to go that route, although with the problems I mentioned. To say it won't happen is denying reality.

      But then you were trying to do something that even the Kopete developers did not intend users to do (I trust them enough to not take them for idiots). Clearly, they based their latest release on versions of libraries which are not yet common. They evidently did a release intended for integrators. Integrators should not have any problem setting up things and, in turn, packaging the package for end users.

      Except that they also said the only fix to the problems Kopete was having was to upgrade. Not trivial problems, problems of not being able to connect at all to MSN or Yahoo, when they were changnig the protocol almost daily. So they WERE telling people to upgrade. So what is a normal user (or me) supposed to do? Wait a few months until Mandriva releases a new version, and just not have IM?

      That instance shows that package management is broken (because I had to do all the work of finding the OTHER updates) and that Linux isn't immune to DLL hell either.

      If installing the newest KDE libs broke existing apps, then the new libs were not compatible with the old ones and therefore either they were intended to break compatibility (if that is the case, I am sure the KDE people have set things up so as to have parallel installability) or there is a major bug. In the second case, well, shit happens; in the first, then you must have done something wrong. You will say that is should be easier to do this correctly, but you should take into account that what you tired to do is change a basic library on which the whole desktop depends (if you are using KDE,at least), so that is a seriously major change to your system, which should be considered only when doing system-wide updates. And users simply do not do that.

      I can't tell you why it broke. It should not have happened either way. I install

    50. Re:Wow, just what we need by msuarezalvarez · · Score: 1

      If the developers have said "this is the only format we're releasing our software in" then yes, I consider it released. Plenty of projects refuse to make distro specific packages. So they are using automake as their "installation API." So you would consider such projects "never released." Which to me shows an attitude problem in the community.

      At the very most, it shows an attitude problem in me. I in no way represent any community whatsoever!

    51. Re:Wow, just what we need by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      Well I meant the attitude that they consider it "released" when they throw up a tarball with automake. Anyway, I hope you don't think I'm bashing Linux for the sake of bashing. I think this (and other things) are ligitment problems holding it back from wider adoption. Unfortunatly many times the community just flat out refuses to acknowledge the problem, even though their users are insisting it is a problem.

      I find that attitute more than anything to keep me from wanting to try Linux again; when my users say something doesn't work for them, it just doesn't work for them, and I need to find out a way that will.

    52. Re:Wow, just what we need by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Recycling is the name of the game. Code recycling, that is. So many code lines, so many man-hours wasted to the /dev/null bin without recycling.

  7. Awesome. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was just thinking the other day Linux users need more options to choose from.

  8. Notability??!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful


    There are tons of linux distributions that are "new" and more ambitious than this one. In fact, reading the project aims on the website gave me the impression that this is a highly specialized project by somebody who has an axe to grind with the gentoo community. With so many existing gentoo variants out there with larger scope and communities, I am having problems appreciating the notability of this article and why it's even on Slashdot. I normally expect tighter coverage of Linux topics than this.

  9. Most Dangerous Badass Linux Distribution EVER! by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Funny

    The developers strongly discourage any serious use though as it's still highly experimental. It's so dangerous that a single developer can only work on a few lines of code at one time. I heard that one developer accidentally saw a whole module at once ... he's in the hospital now and his condition is stable, I think he's going to be ok.

    Seriously, they treat this thing like they're trying to hype it. "It's not ready for users, not even developers!" The only thing it's ready for is Guatemalan Insane Asylum Inmates! Avert your eyes!

    It is funny that they claim more progress working on this for six months than working on Gentoo for four years. Because of bickering and criticism. I can totally believe that. I wish them tons of success!
    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Most Dangerous Badass Linux Distribution EVER! by cblack · · Score: 4, Funny

      "they claim more progress working on this for six months than working on Gentoo for four years"

      Well, given Gentoo is usable and this is not, I disagree with their assessment.

    2. Re:Most Dangerous Badass Linux Distribution EVER! by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      It is funny that they claim more progress working on this for six months than working on Gentoo for four years. Because of bickering and criticism. I can totally believe that.
      It is funny that they claim more progress working on this for six months than working on Gentoo for four years. Because of the lack of users. I can totally believe that.

      There, I fixed it for you.
      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    3. Re:Most Dangerous Badass Linux Distribution EVER! by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well, given Gentoo is usable and this is not, I disagree with their assessment.
      Are you certain about that statement? Have you even looked at the Portage code? Have you ever tried it?

      Sorry, but in my mind, Gentoo died about the time Daniel Robbins gave up on the thing. And I can't say I blame him, either. Gentoo has to be one of the most spectacular failures in Linus Distro history. Constant bickering so nothing ever gets done. Flames that make even ESR's diatribe about Fedora look tame.

      Gentoo was a good idea. Unfortunately, the man with the vision couldn't seem to keep it going in one direction.

    4. Re:Most Dangerous Badass Linux Distribution EVER! by NMerriam · · Score: 1

      It is funny that they claim more progress working on this for six months than working on Gentoo for four years.


      Nothing surprising about that. The first 95% of any project is the easy part that can be done by anyone over a weekend. It's the last 5% that requires hard work and expertise, and will break your soul if you care about making it as good as it was in your imagination when you began.
      --
      Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.
    5. Re:Most Dangerous Badass Linux Distribution EVER! by avenj · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And who do you think is responsible for most of the flames and poisoned dev environment over the past 4-5 years? Shockingly most of the same folks who are driving this new project...

      Personally, I think it's great. Hopefully it'll draw Ciaran's buds away from Gentoo and maybe eventually Gentoo will be fun again.

      But yes, losing Daniel was a tremendous loss.

    6. Re:Most Dangerous Badass Linux Distribution EVER! by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      Or to over-use the old quote:

      The first 90% of the code takes 90% of the time. The last 10% of the code takes 90% of the time.

    7. Re:Most Dangerous Badass Linux Distribution EVER! by jsled · · Score: 1

      Funny, it continues to work really well for me every week as I get incremental ugprades that keep my system functional, secure and quite current. I'm more regularly up to date than my big-bang-distro friends, certainly with respect to security issues. I don't have to devote weekends to "upgrading the server", crossing my fingers to make sure it works. And I have multiple options with respect to handling libraries and development packages, and a clear path to mixing stable and unstable packages, and tweaking them as need be. Oh, if I want to add (or remove) support for a feature (e.g., bluetooth), I can easily rebuild every package that provides support for that feature ... without getting the cruft of it when I don't need it.

      Quite a "failure", indeed.

      (To be clear: Gentoo does have social and architectural problems. But it does have some very compelling points, and the distro as a whole does keep moving on, quite usefully.)

    8. Re:Most Dangerous Badass Linux Distribution EVER! by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      Gentoo carrys on, but it doesn't grow. It was supposed to be the meta-distribution that can run on any Unix-like OS, but the technology that would allow this (Prefixed Portage) still doesn't happen because very few of the maintainers care to write compatible ebuilds. Code-wise it has been there for years, but as someone who uses Portage on OS X I know how many holes there are in the prefixed tree.

      It's sad to see Gentoo move on so slowly.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    9. Re:Most Dangerous Badass Linux Distribution EVER! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am a loooong time Gentoo user. I think its the greatest. Definatly the easiest to manage, between Vector, slackware, Fedora, and Coyote, I have used a few diffrent distros, and came to like Gentoo the best. It has an INCREADIBLE package system, so if some one wants to out do it, bring it on. ( I cant see how it can be outdone, but bring it on anyway!)

      I would love to see someone acomplish more than Gentoo in the last four years. Its going to take more than a bit of brilliance, and a hell of a lot of hard work.

      "you have nothing to offer us." Great. Get this slow news day crap off the front page, and bury it deep. When These idiots come up for air, Id like to see it. Till then... sionara!

  10. Another new init system? by cblack · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sheesh, don't we have enough non-BSD non-SYSV unix init systems yet? Solaris has their own, Mac OS X has a different one, and I think I recall hearing some other distro changed theirs as well. This fragmentation is irritating for sysadmins and gains little. Have these people looked at the other systems out there (Sun's, Apple's, etc) and seen what needs of theirs are not met? Perhaps extending one of these would be worth considering...
    Altho honestly, I find SysV style init to work just fine.

    1. Re:Another new init system? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, they have.

    2. Re:Another new init system? by hemna · · Score: 1, Insightful

      yah I'm glad I'm not the only one that saw this part of the 'distro' and went...huh? Do we really need a new init system? Maybe if they described why they needed a new init system instead of just whining about Gentoo.

    3. Re:Another new init system? by SlashdotOgre · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'm actually very impressed by Gentoo's new init system (baselayout-2) which was released to ~x86 not too long ago. It's so fast I'm actually considering just disabling the splash image, and it's very simple to configure (and even works with the init replacement projects like init-ng & einit). At work I'm mostly stuck with Sun's SMF (Service Management Facility) and find it too complex and inflexible. I haven't tried Apple's one, but I'm all for diversity. At the very least both Gentoo and Sun (and I'd presume Apple) can work with the legacy scripts, so if you don't like the fancy new methods feel free to stick with the old.

      --
      Sadly, PS/2 was yet another victim of USB, which doesn't care what you plug into it, the electrical slut.
    4. Re:Another new init system? by MrMr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Most replacements for SysV init are based on lack of knowledge of SysV init combined with an attitude problem (that writing code is much easier than understanding code). I gues you're taliking about Upstart (which is now used by Fedora 9 and Ubuntu). Upstart is different, because it is based on a thourough lack of knowledge of SysV init, crond, atd, udev, acpid and apmd all conveniently bundled into one single product.

    5. Re:Another new init system? by MBGMorden · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I have to agree with you. Way back in the day I LOVED Slackware because I understood it's init system (it was just scripts. Worked great, and I constantly was praising it compared to the more traditional SysV systems.

      THEN, in college I took at Unix admin class. Having used Linux for many years, I knew a lot of what they went over already, but one thing they hit on there was the SysV init system. Once I had a human teacher actually explain the system to me and how it worked, I actually switched preferences. SysV is very quick and simple to manipulate once you get the hang of it.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    6. Re:Another new init system? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't believe you don't like Sun's SMF. It is not inflexible or complex when you actually read the documentation! In fact, it's quite the opposite of inflexible!

  11. Aptly named? by jesdynf · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yeah. That's right. Aptly named. Because boy, when I heard it described, "exherbo" just jumped out at me.

    --
    Yahoo! Pipes are awesome. How awesome? http://pipes.yahoo.com/jesdynf/slashdot
    1. Re:Aptly named? by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      Did you try "aptitude search exherbo"? There might have been a usable apt description there.

    2. Re:Aptly named? by pizzach · · Score: 1

      Yeah. That's right. Aptly named. Because boy, when I heard it described, "exherbo" just jumped out at me. The same...it sounds broken. I think I'm going to submit it to their bugzilla.
      --
      Once you start despising the jerks, you become one.
    3. Re:Aptly named? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Yeah. That's right. Aptly named.

      Good point. They should've used apt-get or synaptic to get the name.

    4. Re:Aptly named? by ais523 · · Score: 1

      If it's apt-ly named, then why does it have a new package format?

      --
      (1)DOCOMEFROM!2~.2'~#1WHILE:1<-"'?.1$.2'~'"':1/.1$.2'~#0"$#65535'"$"'"'&.1$.2'~'#0$#65535'"$#0'~#32767$#1"
  12. The year of the linux desktop,,, by DanWS6 · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... is not going to come from this.

    1. Re:The year of the linux desktop,,, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You heard it wrong, it's the year of the Linx Desktops. We're going to overwhelm the disbelievers by force of numbers.

      It's all about digital divergence.

  13. Rationale for new packaging system? by Dwedit · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'd like to see the rationale for creating yet another new packaging system. What's wrong with the current ways, and what will the new way fix?

    1. Re:Rationale for new packaging system? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Exherbo is a source-based distribution like Gentoo. Gentoo uses ebuilds for managing packages. But Gentoo is too tied to their stale package manager (Portage) which means the ebuild format hasn't been updated for a long time. As a result of that, many features aren't implemented and probably never will be. This is what calls for another way of handling source-based installs. The list of involved people contains several current and former gentoo devs, that have fought for changes in gentoo and now, it seems, finally given up on ever seeing those changes implemented in gentoo.

    2. Re:Rationale for new packaging system? by bill_kress · · Score: 1

      I don't know about the packaging system--I mean sure stuff could be improved but overall it'd be tough to beat Debian.

      On the other hand, Init needs to be dragged behind the shed and shot--oh and while you are at it, get the entire X config system to come along to watch, then while it's back is turned quickly put it out of my misery as well.

    3. Re:Rationale for new packaging system? by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1, Troll

      And what's wrong with RPM or DEB packages for handling source-based installs? Both handle the building and installation of source-based packages just fine.

    4. Re:Rationale for new packaging system? by Patatoffel · · Score: 1

      Where can I find these proposed improvements? I have found Portage very powerful until now (perhaps slow bacuase of Python and Bash), and I'd like to see what kind of features are missing (ebuilds are bash scripts, so I wonder why are they obsolete)

    5. Re:Rationale for new packaging system? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      USE flags, CFLAGS, SLOTs...

    6. Re:Rationale for new packaging system? by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 1

      Why do people climb mountains? Because they are there.

      --
      "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
    7. Re:Rationale for new packaging system? by SimonInOz · · Score: 1

      begin sarcasm

      Yeah, Ug, what's with inventing a new wheel thing, those old rollers work just fine. And everybody uses them.

      Stupid idiot. Wasting time on thought and inventing when he could be pushing rocks about like everyone else.

      end sarcasm

      --
      "Cats like plain crisps"
    8. Re:Rationale for new packaging system? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Two words: use deps

    9. Re:Rationale for new packaging system? by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      I can't tell an RPM that I want to build Gnucash with HBCI support. Or that I want ImageMagick without support for JBIG images.

      Like the sibling says - USE flags, SLOTs etc. offr a great degree of configurability if you care to use them properly. (I won't touch CFLAGs as those are mostly performance-related.) The advantage of Gentoo is that you can decide which parts of which programs you want to use on a very fine level. Depending on what you enable/disable that can mean you don't have to install large packages you dn't really need

      For example, several package contain optional X11 interfaces. I don't know if Debian etc. put that into a separate foo-x11 package, but if they don't you automatically have to install X11 just to install foo because you could at some point need X11 to use all of foo's capabilities. On a headless machine that'd mean you lug around X11 without a good reason, especially if the program's configure allows you to disable the X11 component altogether. Gentoo caters to that - there's an X11 USE flag; if it's off no X11-dependent parts will be built.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    10. Re:Rationale for new packaging system? by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      I can't tell an RPM that I want to build Gnucash with HBCI support. Or that I want ImageMagick without support for JBIG images.


      Yes, you can. If you think that you can't, you don't know enough about RPM. Go back and read the docs. Seriously.

      Now, granted, you're going to have to build your source RPMs in a way to make that work (you're not going to do that with unmodified source RPMs from Fedora or OpenSUSE, for instance), but it is possible. Furthermore, DEB packages support something very similar to SLOTs. Again, try reading the docs.

      For example, several package contain optional X11 interfaces. I don't know if Debian etc. put that into a separate foo-x11 package, but if they don't you automatically have to install X11 just to install foo because you could at some point need X11 to use all of foo's capabilities.
      There is usually a 'nox' binary package. For example, emacs22-nox, vim-nox, etc. But I'm not talking about binary packages, I'm talking about source packages. The emacs and emacs-nox packages are built from the same source package. Again, most Gentoo users' lack of knowledge about RPM and DEB is astonishing.

      What I'm saying is that RPM and DEB can be used to make a source-based distro. There really is no need for a new package system, especially when two very good ones already exist.

    11. Re:Rationale for new packaging system? by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      Okay, you could write a program that dynamically generates SRPMs to user specifications, but then again, why not change the package manager to directly support sub-package level configurability?

      "Hand-write this config file" might be okay for xorg.conf fine-tuning, but it's not okay as a step towards building a package. It's even less okay when I can't specify that the package manager shall apply these changes to all SRPMs I will build in the future.

      When I want to make sure that all packages that can support KDE4 do so, Portage just requires me to add "kde4" to the USE variable /etc/make.conf and rebuild all affected packages (ie. emerge -DN world). All future packages will have KDE4 support enabled unless I make a per-package exception. Can SRPMs/rpm/yum do that?

      Portage decouples the actual packages from the options. A package manager that doesn't do that is not very good in my opinion - the end user shouldn't have to touch the package tree (much less add to it) in order to change a build option.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
  14. Design Goals by Mysteray · · Score: 4, Funny
    "Phrase all design goals in such a way that it is hard to use them as slogans to justify stupid changes."

    It might be worth checking out just for that!

  15. From TFA by sm62704 · · Score: 5, Funny

    OK, I Want to Try Exherbo
    No you don't.

    Yes I Do
    OK, maybe you do, but we don't particularly want you to try it because we don't want to deal with you whining when you find that absolutely nothing works. Exherbo isn't in a fit state for users. We might get there one day, but it's not a priority. Right now, all we care about is getting it into a fit state for a small number of developers.

    We don't provide packages for lots of things you consider critical.

    A lot of the packages we do provide don't work.

    A lot of the packages that worked five minutes ago all just broke because we just decided to redesign several large features.

    We don't provide support.

    We don't provide install media.

    We don't provide a usable init system.

    Really, all we provide is a few things that the few people working on all this find useful for themselves. When we have something for anyone else, we'll let you know.


    OK, I don't need to try it. However, I'm curious about one thing:

    Former Gentoo developer Bryan Østergaard recently announced a new linux distribution aptly named Exherbo
    OK, wikipedia has no clue what an "Exherbo" is. What is an "Exherbo" and why is it such an apt name? I don't speak Klingon, are there any Klingons here that can explain this to me?

    From TFA I would guess that "Exherbo" means "fuck you" in Swahili?
    --
    mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    1. Re:From TFA by at_slashdot · · Score: 1

      Exherbo is Latin for weeding jackasses out. It's good that these people left Gentoo...

      --
      "It is our choices, Harry, that show what we truly are, far more than our abilities." -- Prof. Dumbledore
    2. Re:From TFA by mdmkolbe · · Score: 1
    3. Re:From TFA by Compuser · · Score: 1

      Somebody above posted that exherbo means to weed in latin. I can believe that, seeing as "ex-" is a prefix with one typical meaning being to remove and "-herbo" shares a root with the English word herb. Still not sure what is so apt about this name, other than it reveals a liking for cryptic crap and a "if you can't figure it out you are dumb so go away" attitude. So in that sense, it is an apt name I guess. In summary, I would hate to see their variable naming conventions.

    4. Re:From TFA by syousef · · Score: 1

      From TFA I would guess that "Exherbo" means "fuck you" in Swahili?

      It's more like "fuck you, we're gonna weed you out" in Latin.

      People are saying weed. I'd say what these twisted little nerds are thinking is "De-root" or "Un-root" as in remove the fuckups.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
  16. NETCRAFT CONFIRMS IT!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Exherbo is dead..

  17. Well, hasn't the world been screaming ... by wsanders · · Score: 2, Funny

    .. for a new Linux packaging format?

    Well?

    [....]

    --
    Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
    1. Re:Well, hasn't the world been screaming ... by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      With due respect to Cracker, What the world needs now is another Linux Distro, like I need a hole in my head.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    2. Re:Well, hasn't the world been screaming ... by Super+Jamie · · Score: 1

      I agree. The absolute LAST thing that major Linux distros need is a new packaging format.

      Standardize people, don't separate!

    3. Re:Well, hasn't the world been screaming ... by WK2 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I was thinking that too. I was just saying, "We don't have enough packaging formats." There's a lot of room for improvement, and adding features.

      --
      Write your own Choose Your Own Adventure. http://www.freegameengines.org/gamebook-engine/
    4. Re:Well, hasn't the world been screaming ... by zomgfast · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I concur.

    5. Re:Well, hasn't the world been screaming ... by packeteer · · Score: 1

      How is a new distro news? This is basically just an announcement by someone who wants attention to another project that will split the work of developers. Why again do we need another distro and packaging system?

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
    6. Re:Well, hasn't the world been screaming ... by hostyle · · Score: 1

      Seeing as twitter doesnt seem to be around, let me have a go ...

      M$ are clearly behind this distro in a futile attempt to take down all of us amazing linux folk by dilution of the beer^Wpool.

      --
      Caesar si viveret, ad remum dareris.
    7. Re:Well, hasn't the world been screaming ... by m0n5t3r · · Score: 2, Informative

      .. for a new Linux packaging format? why yes, of course it does... it seems that this is part (or a consequence) of an entertaining soap opera involving Ciaran McCreesh and Daniel Robbins, among others (this sounds a lot like TFA, for instance)
  18. Re:Another Linux Distro? by DanWS6 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Nope. All the other 500 previous distros weren't build properly, but this one will be. Mark their words.

  19. My God- Do we really need another?!?! by neowolf · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Aren't there enough already? I know we don't want Linux to get stagnant (if that's even possible) but there are already hundreds of distributions, with a handful (or two) of "major" ones.

    If he wants to make Linux easier to use- why not team up with {insert your favorite desktop distribution here}?

    And really- "Exherbo"? What is that supposed to mean? It was hard enough to get my head around "Ubuntu".

    1. Re:My God- Do we really need another?!?! by domatic · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Most of the minor distros are specialty items like Knoppix or toolkits like Trinity Rescue CD. Having more of such isn't going to hurt anything. Besides, projects like this are a good way of trying out radical ideas without breaking anything. And I suspect the answer to "not teaming up" is that it seems that many developers would rather be Chiefs than common braves.

    2. Re:My God- Do we really need another?!?! by grm_wnr · · Score: 1

      Oh, so this is a source-based live CD? That's certainly a niche waiting to be filled; I always was pissed off that live CDs didn't compile a custom kernel before booting.

      I fully expect someone to point me to a Gentoo live CD that does exactly that already, wouldn't put it past them.

  20. Why is this a Slashdot story? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful
    They state clearly on their page that

    In Conclusion
    It's not that we hate you (unless we do). It's just that we have nothing to offer you, and you have nothing to offer us. They don't have a finished product. They don't even have a product yet. There is nothing to see, and they say it as well. Post this on slashdot when there is something to see. Then they will be happy about the traffic and the press, but now it's just a link to a page that says that maybe, one day, there will be yet another linux distro that wants to make everything better and nicer than the current Big Players(tm).
    1. Re:Why is this a Slashdot story? by jesdynf · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It's worse than that. This isn't a distro, it's just a slap in the face to Gentoo -- and without any justification in the form of running code. They, in fact, are canvassing for your help to help cash the check their mouth wrote.

      Now, I can't tell you whether or not Gentoo merits a slap in the face, but whether or not they're right doesn't have anything to do with that they've done.

      --
      Yahoo! Pipes are awesome. How awesome? http://pipes.yahoo.com/jesdynf/slashdot
    2. Re:Why is this a Slashdot story? by Symbolis · · Score: 1

      Except for the fact that they quite clearly state that they don't want your help. Or anyone's help.

    3. Re:Why is this a Slashdot story? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      There is quite a lot of code in git, including a substantial base system tree and an xorg-x11 tree. And at least one person claims to be running it on a live system.

    4. Re:Why is this a Slashdot story? by jesdynf · · Score: 1

      I can claim I don't want a million dollars, it doesn't make it true.

      Generally, if you buy a domain, get mail and web services running on it, and write a bunch of content for your front page, you've got something to say that you want people to read. If you've got a public-facing bug tracker and publicly-accessible mailing lists, it can be assumed you're inviting the general public to exert their time and effort on your behalf.

      "2 leet 4 u lol" is just posturing.

      --
      Yahoo! Pipes are awesome. How awesome? http://pipes.yahoo.com/jesdynf/slashdot
    5. Re:Why is this a Slashdot story? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nothing to offer us? We have nothing to offer them? What's the fucking point of F/OSS again?

      I can see why this guy is a -former- member of the Gentoo team. I think "Ego" has a better ring than "Exherbo."

    6. Re:Why is this a Slashdot story? by __aabvlw4075 · · Score: 1
      Well, in the dialogue following his announcement, Bryan clarified with this:

      One of our biggest advantages (seen from the developers point of view) is that we have no users and I'd rather keep it that way for a while longer. I do however think the work we're doing is sufficiently mature and interesting for other developers to peek at - not install Exherbo but merely looking at our ideas and concepts and see if they want to grab some of them.
    7. Re:Why is this a Slashdot story? by LingNoi · · Score: 1

      Maybe if he posted some of those ideas on the main page instead of a big "fuck you" to everyone this whole thing would be interesting.

    8. Re:Why is this a Slashdot story? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nothing to offer us? We have nothing to offer them? What's the fucking point of F/OSS again? Freedom - including the freedom to provide something that isn't useful to you, and your freedom not to use it.
  21. New build system? by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 1

    Can we get a new build system as well? None of other ones are up to the task: Ubuntu/Debian's / Red Hat's / Gentoo's (oobvioously) / OpenEmbedded.

    --
    Don't piss off The Angry Economist
  22. How is this news? by pbaer · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    New linux distros are being made all the time, why does this distro deserve attention over any of those other new distros?

    --
    There are 11 types of people, those who know unary and those who don't.
    1. Re:How is this news? by LingNoi · · Score: 1

      Good question, too bad you were retardedly modded flamebait.

  23. So the 90's called... by JSklar · · Score: 2, Funny

    And they want their headline back.

  24. What does Exherbo mean? by Robotech_Master · · Score: 1, Funny

    Um...how about...

    "Jose Exherbo, you are a friend of mine..."

    Well, okay, maybe not.

    --
    Editor Emeritus and Senior Writer, TeleRead.org
    1. Re:What does Exherbo mean? by hemna · · Score: 0

      It means yet another linux distro because some user got pissed for no reason.....oh yah and a new init system. yah we really needed a new one.

  25. So... many... emotions by hansraj · · Score: 0, Troll

    Exherbo is not, at the moment, a user-targeted distribution. It supports packages that the people involved find interesting or useful; it probably does not support your favourite desktop environment or applications. That kind of thing will come later -- there are plenty of other options for users who want a distribution that does everything badly rather than a few things well. I think they already achieved that milestone. Why not call it Release 1.0 already? Or maybe Release Candidate 1.0 in keeping up with the fashion these days?

    Now really, why do they need to fork (yeah, yeah! They say it's not a fork) Gentoo? I think I just figured it out. It's so obvious:

    Newer and faster processors are catching up with the Gentoo way of doing things. I can't describe what is the Gentoo way of doing things but I can somewhat describe what is not. A package completing its install, before a new release, is not the Gentoo way. So we clearly need a new distribution to show those new processors who is the boss and to keep the level of pain^W Gentoo Experience (TM) that we masochists^W Gentoo users enjoy.

    Since I have already spent so much of my precious time enlightening the Slashdot population about this new distribution, I think I will go ahead and summarize parts of the announcement too. In particular the "Why the Need?" section.

    It's not that we think that Gentoo is bad. ... yada yada

    Aspects we find particularly problematic include:
    * Gentoo (packaging) sucks
    * Gentoo (management) sucks
    * Gentoo (developers) suck
    * Gentoo (users) suck
    * Gentoo (developers) suck
    * Why Am I Here? What's the purpose? TFA is a comedy gold!

    PS: All the best to the developers. Can't wait to try it out!
    PPS: The PS was made in all sincerity and its spirit should not be confused with that of the rest of the post ;-)
  26. Exherbo by hpa · · Score: 4, Informative

    Exherbo apparently means "to weed" in Latin...

    1. Re:Exherbo by neowolf · · Score: 3, Funny

      Hmm... Didn't scroll down enough. All I found were references to this project, which seems to be a weed.

    2. Re:Exherbo by mdmkolbe · · Score: 1

      According to the #exherbo IRC channel, it means "uproot". See http://daniel-lange.com/archives/30-kloeri-announces-Exherbo,-another-source-based-Linux-distribution.html. (Of course it probably means both "weed" and "uproot" but it sounds like the project intends the latter meaning.)

    3. Re:Exherbo by quag7 · · Score: 1

      Since you're living in 2002, please do what you can to stop the war!

      Thanks!

    4. Re:Exherbo by indy_Muad'Dib · · Score: 1

      ill tell you what, how about i start buying lotto tickets instead?

      ill give you 10%

  27. Re:Full of fail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everything in the parent post is a lie.

  28. What are the goals? What are the differences? by MMC+Monster · · Score: 0, Redundant

    In this age, anyone can wrap up packages together and come up with a distribution.

    The big question is, What are the goals of the distribution, and What sets it apart from the thousands of other distros out there? Also, can the work in this distro be easily ported to other distros (If so, why not work on an already established distribution)?

    --
    Help! I'm a slashdot refugee.
  29. Truth in advertising by overshoot · · Score: 2, Funny

    Well, that's refreshing. Maybe the gang got some hints on PR from Stone Brewing Company.

    --
    Lacking <sarcasm> tags, /. substitutes moderation as "Troll."
  30. What I want in a packaging system: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Binary packages that Just Work(tm)

    Application packages that can be built from source and Just Work with the libraries that are installed (i.e. automatically "USE" what I have installed) instead of requiring me to install various databases and other random libraries for features I won't ever use.

    Debian and many others get the first part right. Gentoo could have gotten the second part right without too much pain, but then they went and created an arcane variable to make things hard.

    Bonus points if "exherbo-get upgrade" detects which source packages I've custom-built, and upgrades them with new custom-built source packages (optionally built in the background?), instead of ignoring updates (pinned in Debian), or overwriting them with whatever binary package (not pinned in Debian).

    1. Re:What I want in a packaging system: by Dan+Ost · · Score: 1

      Not going to happen unless you're willing to live with huge statically linked binaries.

      Not worth it except for simple utilities that live on a USB fob.

      --

      *sigh* back to work...
  31. Boo Hoo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Judging by the posts here so far, if anything, you are in sync with the groupthink.

  32. Because what Linux needs... by eh · · Score: 1

    ... is another distribution.

  33. Poorly designed with elitism in mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Usability? Is that some kind of stone-age buzzword?

  34. uh, what? by pak9rabid · · Score: 1

    So it's not going to use one of the big two package management systems (deb, rpm)? That's idiotic. So they've pretty much screwed themselves on it ever being adopted in most business applications. C'mon guys. Just use whatever is already out there and has withstood the test of time before reinventing the wheel. And yea..don't even get me started on a NEW init system...

    1. Re:uh, what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So it's not going to use one of the big two package management systems (deb, rpm)? That's idiotic.

      Actually, you're the one being idiotic here. We wouldn't have .deb or .rpm if Debian and Red Hat had just 'used whatever was already out there', i.e. Slackware's .tgz format.

      So they've pretty much screwed themselves on it ever being adopted in most business applications.

      Why does that need to be their short-term goal? Linux (the kernel) was pretty much screwed from the get-go for ever being adopted in most business applications. By your logic, why ever do anything new?

      C'mon guys. Just use whatever is already out there and has withstood the test of time before reinventing the wheel. And yea..don't even get me started on a NEW init system...

      The current sysvinit system really really sucks. Somebody will eventually come up with something better to replace it. Apparently you're against that.

    2. Re:uh, what? by Ant+P. · · Score: 1

      So they've pretty much screwed themselves on it ever being adopted in most business applications. Maybe, just maybe... they don't give a fuck about your business? More power to them for not pandering to idiots with their head up their arse.
  35. Do we really need.... by mofag · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...another post asking do we really need another Linux distro?

  36. Translation from Star Developer Speech to English by martinw89 · · Score: 5, Funny

    >>> Exherbo is a distribution designed for people who know what they're doing with Linux.

    Are you so badass that gentoo is like ripping candy out of newb babie hands? Exherbo!

    >>> Although it shares some code with Gentoo, and although many concepts are similar, and although many of the people involved were or are Gentoo developers, most Exherbo code is rewritten from scratch.

    We know way more than those Gentoo tards will ever know.

    >>> Exherbo is not, at the moment, a user-targeted distribution.

    Come on... you want it, don't you? You want to be so badass to use my awesome distro, to be the most leetest person ever.

    >>> It's not that we think that Gentoo is bad.

    Gentoo is wretched for our godly needs.

    >>> OK, I Want to Try Exherbo

    I am high as a kite.

    >>> Right now, all we care about is getting it into a fit state for a small number of developers.

    We're announcing this publicly because we have no idea what product we're presenting, but we'll make it sound fucking awesome compared to everything else, plus way wore leetsauce, so we can get some actual developers to contribute something useful to make our project objectively good.

    >>> The above paragraph does not apply if your pet project is something we find interesting.

    Again, if you have anything that will make this distro more than a publicity stunt, for the love of god, please let us know.

    >>> It's not that we hate you (unless we do).

    Forgot how much better we are then you? You did? OK, in conclusion, fuck you.



    Credit where credit's due: John Gruber and Mark Pilgrim
  37. It's Worth Reconsidering... by mpapet · · Score: 1

    your opinion for many reasons.

    1. If he and many others didn't try then I have a feeling Linux would be perceptually relegated to Hurd status or lower still.

    2. Yeah, I'd like another window manager. I'd like four entirely new and different WM's.

    3. I'd like iceweasel to run in console, so sure another version of iceweasel would be fabulous.

    The more important question is what exactly is bad about so many choices? Do you understand the danger just a couple of operating system choices creates?

    --
    http://www.maxineudall.com/2010/02/should-economists-be-sued-for-malpractice.html
  38. I'm inspired! by ISurfTooMuch · · Score: 1

    Because of this project, I'm developing a new Linux distro. It's based on Slackware, so I've decided to name it Slackerware. I've assembled a development team of folks I've talked to down at a few local college bars, and, as soon as everyone sobers up, we'll start working on it. However, be warned that this will likely take quite a while. We're thinking something may be ready by...well, we don't have a firm date yet because we haven't met to discuss it. Well, actually, we did meet, but we ended up playing NTN trivia instead. But as soon as we get off our lazy asses and do something, I promise you that Slackerware will be the coolest distro ever.

    BTW, $3 pitchers at The Legacy tonight! Who's in?

  39. Hexquan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From the website: "It's not that we hate you (unless we do). It's just that we have nothing to offer you, and you have nothing to offer us."

    Ahh, that says it all. But than again, why even bother telling us about your secret elite project? Such a waste of time and energy, when you could easily change your gentoo-like build system (which is totally uncompatibile with gentoo for obvious reasons) several times.

    M-x: sarcasm-mode-off

  40. Nice attitude, guys! by Lisandro · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Do we need more of this elitistic bullshit?

    Exherbo is not, at the moment, a user-targeted distribution. It supports packages that the people involved find interesting or useful; it probably does not support your favourite desktop environment or applications. That kind of thing will come later there are plenty of other options for users who want a distribution that does everything badly rather than a few things well. ...

    It's not that we think that Gentoo is bad. It's just that we think we can do something that suits our needs better. We've tried, without success, to do this using Gentoo. Unfortunately, Gentoo has serious shortcomings in several areas that stopped this from being a viable long-term approach (...) Portage. (...) Gentoo management. (...) QA. (...) The users. (...) Lack of overall design and direction.

    Thank God there's much more to that distro you don't think is bad at all. ...

    - OK, I Want to Try Exherbo.
    - No you don't.
    - Yes I Do
    - OK, maybe you do, but we don't particularly want you to try it because we don't want to deal with you whining when you find that absolutely nothing works. (...) We don't provide packages for lots of things you consider critical. A lot of the packages we do provide don't work. A lot of the packages that worked five minutes ago all just broke because we just decided to redesign several large features. We don't provide support. We don't provide install media. We don't provide a usable init system.
    - But I'm a Developer, and I Want to Try Exherbo
    - Well, you know who to talk to if you need to be told where to find the shiny things. And no, we don't want to use Exherbo to implement your pet project. Especially not if it's a stupid pet project. Go and inflict it upon Gentoo, they think that porting ebuilds to run on SunOS 2 ksh under Cygwin is a great idea.
    ...

    Wow! It sounds great! Do i need a secret decoder ring to read the sourcecode?

    Seriously. I'm a Gentoo user and this sounded like a great thing to peek into - Gentoo is not without its share of things to fix/improve. But come on. What exactly are they announcing here? A distro tailored for a handful of users (which is nice) that we can't download, try or even ask about.

    In Conclusion: It's not that we hate you (unless we do). It's just that we have nothing to offer you, and you have nothing to offer us.

    Sounds like it's coming along great, eh? Do us a favor and make your work public when, you know, it is useable by the public. Or even watchable.

    1. Re:Nice attitude, guys! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The source code isn't difficult to find... Ohloh has a list of repositories you can play with. I imagine it's just another way of ensuring they don't get too many users.

    2. Re:Nice attitude, guys! by AnyoneEB · · Score: 1

      From the summary it sounds like the parts they are working on are the lower levels, which usually are only indirectly visible to users. (Note that I have not looked at the project, so the following may not represent its goals specifically.) For instance, their work init might eventually result in a faster booting system, or a better package system might mean the people putting together the packages can do so faster, but as a work in progress these are uninteresting to most users.

      --
      Centralization breaks the internet.
    3. Re:Nice attitude, guys! by Lisandro · · Score: 1

      For instance, their work init might eventually result in aFor instance, their work init might eventually result in a faster booting system, or a better package system might mean the people putting together the packages can do so faster, but as a work in progress these are uninteresting to most users. faster booting system, or a better package system might mean the people putting together the packages can do so faster, but as a work in progress these are uninteresting to most users.

      The point is, there is no such thing as an absolute better in the world of Linux distros - what's best for you or me might not fit the particular needs of a third party. If you're working on a new init or package system, why not tell us a bit about how it works and what it plans to achieve instead of publishing it as an improvement on something that exists (and works)... without any further proof?

    4. Re:Nice attitude, guys! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't even understand why they made a public Web site based on what they wrote. Why not just a private intranet site?

    5. Re:Nice attitude, guys! by Vexorian · · Score: 1

      If you are not laughing at the reverse psychology already, you fail.

      --

      Copyright infringement is "piracy" in the same way DRM is "consumer rape"
  41. I've heard this before... by meadowsoft · · Score: 1

    "The developers strongly discourage any serious use though as it's still highly experimental"

    They said the same thing about democracy...

  42. Nonsense! by Hankapobe · · Score: 4, Funny
    It sounds like someone got their ego dented...

    An IT & FOSS guy got his ego dented?!? Say it isn't so! That never happens!

    FOSS people are the most altruistic and saintly people EVAAR! Why, they give their software away! They give their source away! They work for free much of the time! How dare you criticize these saints! They give us an option against Microsoft the EVIL that will run on Intell/PC products! They give us a way to save old and outdated computers that will go into a landfill!

    How dare you insult those people!!

    1. Re:Nonsense! by Watson+Ladd · · Score: 1

      He's a Theo de Raadt sock puppet.

      --
      Inventions have long since reached their limit, and I see no hope for further development.-- Frontinus, 1st cent. AD
  43. How to get your "distro" to be "big news" on /. by seandiggity · · Score: 1

    Just post some long message about what you don't like in current distros and how you can do better. Then give it a stupid name, tell people they shouldn't look at it, and tinker with the code for a few months.

    Note: Whether it ever runs is an afterthought. Building a community is not even an afterthought.

    --
    Geeks like to think that they can ignore politics, you can leave politics alone, but politics won't leave you alone.-rms
  44. Exherbo by indy_Muad'Dib · · Score: 1

    Exherbo, for people who thought Gentoo wasn't rice enough.

    every install disk comes with a free R-Type sticker* for the side of your case.

    *notice: free R-Type sticker requires a stage 0 build, reguired packages include:
    Pens
    Paper
    Markers
    tape or similar adhesive

  45. but he didn't say what's wrong with Gentoo by pseudorand · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'll start by saying that I'm an unashamed Gentoo fanboy, so mod as appropriate, but Mr. Østergaard seems to have forgotten to mention what he dislikes about Gentoo in either his blog entry or on exherbo.org. He says that Gentoo developers, users, Fanboys, and community are bad, but the most specific technical comment he made was a criticism that someone undertook "porting ebuilds to run on SunOS 2 ksh under Cygwin", which is apparently bad. He simply says of portage that it's "broken and unmaintainable", but he doesn't say why. He says Exherbo option handeling is "much improved" compared to Gentoo's USE flags, but again doesn't say what's wrong with USE flags. (I get around unintended consequences simply by enabling/disabling things on a package-by package basis, so if he's talking about that...).

    I've been using gentoo quite happily for almost 3 years now on various servers as well as desktops for multiple users (no, I don't `emerge world` nightly), so I'm quite interested in what's wrong with portage (It's a godsend from my perspective) and the rest of gentoo. Seriously, I'd really like to know what's going to bite me in the arse here. But alas, Mr. Østergaard criticisms of Gentoo were far to vague and his design goals for Exherbo were equally vague and silly. Maybe he, or someone other than than the Trolls, other distro fanboys, and non-techy former Gentoo users who got burnt and should never have used it in the first place can please point me in the direction of some unbias and fair evaluations of Gentoo's strengths and weaknesses.

    1. Re:but he didn't say what's wrong with Gentoo by Nosklo · · Score: 1

      I guess you can get at least some of the information you're searching here: Description of exheres packager

      --
      find -name "*base*" -exec chown us {} \; ; ln -s /dev/zero /dev/chance ; make time
    2. Re:but he didn't say what's wrong with Gentoo by jim.hansson · · Score: 1

      this is my view of things:
      gentoo was the cool new thing, the hacker's playroom, then people actually started using it as a normal distro, the playroom got smaller. I have used it as base for doing testshots at specialized distros for embedded systems catalyst was/is one of the tools i really liked, so using gentoo to do specialized distro is one of its greatest strength. Biggest weakness, well if you try to use it as a normal distro then you will get constant breakage, update world usually for me meant fixing one or two things by hand, at some times it was fun and I did learn a lot, at some times you just want it to work.
      Gentoo was fun while I was unemployed, now I work and when I get home the last thing I want to do is fix some freaking linkage problem

      --
      preview button, my computer does't have any preview button
    3. Re:but he didn't say what's wrong with Gentoo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Ok, I've been wanting to say this for a while, so I'll go ahead and be an AC... :)

      Gentoo has struggled quite a bit with eliteist devs over the years. There have been major problems with users being skewered for filing bugs that were "stupid" in the eyes of some dev. People have complained, and a lot of current users are upset over these sorts of things.

      Over the last year, though, I've seen definite moves among the more seasoned devs to purge their ranks of the troublemakers. Some devs who were fairly strong contributors but also known for flame wars and eliteist attitudes towards users have been getting the boot. Most users don't notice, since they don't get involved at this level. These ex-devs of course tend to get upset, and other devs get upset over the disagreement of the prioritization of teamwork over technical contribution.

      On the other hand, those flame-wars also had a tendency to block technical progress due to over-polarization. When some guy who acts like a real jerk proposes a great idea, everybody boos it because it is coming from a jerk. Ironically, the booting of some of these devs has actually has enabled some of them to contribute more successfully via side-projects like paludis (the package manager in this new distro). I think this is because when you boot the most outrageous people on both sides of a flame war the more reasonable people in the middle can actually stop and listen to what both sides were saying more constructively.

      Gentoo still has lots of issues, but the recognition of the importance of actually being nice to everybody bodes well for some improvement.

  46. Suspiciously familiar by jrothwell97 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    While some points made are valid (eg portage, along with most other package managers sucks, and Gentoo's management is inefficient) it seems like the distro is completely misguided.

    If anything, we need to be focusing on user-friendly *nixes, not developer torture - less still something more hellish than Gentoo. If someone desperately wants a system like this, they can read LFS. Or strip down a Gentoo install. That way, they're also more likely to get something that's more suited to their needs. And isn't written by someone who looks like they'd happily eat n00b stew for lunch.

    --
    Those using pirated Tinysoft signatures(TM) are a real threat to society and should all be thrown in jail.
    1. Re:Suspiciously familiar by jim.hansson · · Score: 1

      having installed LFS twice I must say that was not so hard, the guide is pretty well written.
      Installing gentoo was not so hard either, the install guide for gentoo was also very good, but trying to manage a gentoo install and keep it usable was at some times pretty hard challenge.

      that evening when I was supposed to format one partition but I missed the number-key and hit enter, and all my LFS partitions got destroyed. I cried my self to sleep (maybe 200 h of work down the drain)

      --
      preview button, my computer does't have any preview button
    2. Re:Suspiciously familiar by Knara · · Score: 1

      The beauty of FOSS is that people can work on anything they damn well please.

    3. Re:Suspiciously familiar by pandrijeczko · · Score: 2, Insightful
      eg portage, along with most other package managers sucks, and Gentoo's management is inefficient

      Can you please explain the above statement because I fail to see what point you are making?

      If you go with a fixed Linux distribution like Ubuntu or Fedora, then what you are getting is a whole heap of source code that has been compiled in a particular way by whomever releases the distro - in some ways you can compare it to the way Microsoft does it with their OSes in that you install the OS as binaries and just download binary updates as you need them. However, when a new version of the OS comes out, whilst you can do some degree of migration from old to new, you're still forced with basically wiping your machine to install the new version.

      The other way of looking at keeping a system updated is to just use "rolling" updates - in other words, rather than the distro creator doing all the source code compilation for you, you decide to pretty much do it yourself. So if you have the confidence to do that compilation against countless libraries yourself, then you go for something like Linux From Scratch - otherwise, if you want some "help" with that, then use Portage within Gentoo to give you that assistance.

      The point I'm trying to make is that the decision is yours to make, not the distro provider. If you can't handle Portage then don't use Gentoo, use a pre-compiled distro and get on with enjoying Linux that way - but don't make it a fault of the package manager just because you don't understand it.

      No software is perfect and, yes, as a long-standing Gentoo user, I sometimes find some of the bugs infuriating - just as I used to find the odd dependency issue in Red Hat or occasional system lock-ups in Windows infurtiating.

      But the fact of the matter is that I don't think I've ever come across a major problem in Gentoo that I've not been able to either resolve myself or get an answer to in the excellent Gentoo Forums & Wiki pages. And, yes, using the Gentoo "~x86" branch, I spend a lot of time having my machines compiling updates but I still use the machines while they're doing it, I enjoy running the "bleeding edge" software and for me it's a learning curve sorting out the occasional problem with it.

      You need to weigh the "pluses and minuses" and work out a balance before deciding on what distro to use. And if someone comes up with a new distro then, so what? Maybe you have no need for it but someone somewhere believes there is a need for it so let them get on with it.

      I personally don't like Ubuntu because I don't like installing binaries and have a real problem with using "sudo" for everything. But I accept it's a fine distro for lots of people, installs in half an hour as opposed to a day with Gentoo and has bought a lot of new people into using Linux so it's a great thing.

      --
      Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
    4. Re:Suspiciously familiar by shiftless · · Score: 1

      However, when a new version of the OS comes out, whilst you can do some degree of migration from old to new, you're still forced with basically wiping your machine to install the new version.

      Uh, what? I just installed Ubuntu 7.04 on my laptop, and as we speak the automated upgrader is putting the finishing touches on upgrading to 7.10. Soon as that finishes I'll let it upgrade me to 8.04. There is no "wiping my machine" going on here at all.

      I ... have a real problem with using "sudo" for everything.

      So do I. That's why the first thing I did on the terminal was type "sudo passwd root", set a password, then proceeded to 'su' to root as usual.

    5. Re:Suspiciously familiar by pbaer · · Score: 1

      I personally don't like Ubuntu because I don't like installing binaries and have a real problem with using "sudo" for everything.

      You do know you can "sudo -i" and it's just like "su"?

      --
      There are 11 types of people, those who know unary and those who don't.
    6. Re:Suspiciously familiar by pandrijeczko · · Score: 1
      You do know you can "sudo -i" and it's just like "su"?

      No, I did not - but then I've not used Ubuntu that much.

      Please don't misunderstand me - Ubuntu is an excellent distro for people who want easy installation and familiarity, it's done a fantastic job getting people into Linux and long may it continue to do so. And the way it does things with protecting root-level privileges from people who could unknowingly do some damage to their systems due to lack of experience is well thought out.

      But me, I just prefer going into a root shell when I need to and I'd rather suffer the occasional pain of compiling everything properly from source rather than using binaries.

      It's just preference, neither way is right or wrong.

      --
      Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
  47. Re:inspired in many places by Gentoo by Nosklo · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Quote found in distro's bugzilla:

    < arkanoid> sometimes I wish I'd wake up and find all the stupid gentoo devs shouting 'april's fool! we're not really morons after all' They have 12 bugs now. At least their package format is cooler than gentoo's.
    --
    find -name "*base*" -exec chown us {} \; ; ln -s /dev/zero /dev/chance ; make time
  48. stop being geeks by remusrm · · Score: 1

    another distro out of 1000s? come on guys... you can do better and pick 3-7 major ones and improve on those, not bs all over... i know the free mentality is ok, but common sense should be used first. and you guys wonder why linux does not do well on the desktop overall...

  49. useless distro #1038912893123 by v3xt0r · · Score: 1

    Congrats. You've just re-invented the wheel, with shiny hub caps.

    It's pretty obvious...

    * these developers are jaded 17yo ex-gentoo users, or equivalent.
    * they really are more control freaks, than skilled linux engineers.
    * this distro probably won't see the light of day, much less the darkness of a cvs repository.
    * it just might be the geek-cred these guys have been looking for, but still have yet to deserve.

    So anyways, back to reality. =)

    --
    the only permanence in existence, is the impermanence of existence.
  50. Package format by Abattoir · · Score: 1

    "features a new packaging format" How many more package formats do we need? What does this one offer that the existing formats don't? Does it work better? Is it capable of handling existing formats? I could RTFA, but hey this is slashdot. We don't do that here.

  51. Re:Translation from Star Developer Speech to Engli by Cillian · · Score: 1

    It's quite simple, they are trying to discourage people who are not prepared for the instability of the project from coming anywhere near it, as they do not wish to support those sorts of people - and who can blame them. Sure, many people might interpret this as being a "badass" rebellious distro, but I don't believe that's how it's intended to be presented.

    --
    -- All your booze are belong to us.
  52. Re:What are the goals? What are the differences? by new.chaos · · Score: 1

    Can you read the damn project website? FFS! You can apparently scan comments on Slashdot, but can't be arsed to read the source.

  53. Fragmentation by LKM · · Score: 1

    I realize that forking and fragmentation have advantages (more competition and all that), but man... sometimes I wonder just how far ahead of everything else Linux would be if everyone worked towards the same goals on the same projects.

  54. Irony by jalefkowit · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one struck by the irony of talking about how "apt" the name is of a new distribution featuring Yet Another Packaging System?

  55. Website modified? by hansraj · · Score: 1
    I now see the following on the Exherbo website:

    Hi slashdot people. Yes, there's code. You not being able to find it is a basic entry test. Earlier they sounded like elitist goofballs, now they sound like elitist assholes!
    1. Re:Website modified? by DF5JT · · Score: 1

      If you are indeed unable to find the code then it's you who is the goofball.

  56. So this is basically a repackaged... by rickb928 · · Score: 1

    ..."if you have to ask how, you probably shouldn't be using this. Or a computer. Go back to your Xbox" distribution.

    What's new about this? I already got a couple of those. And I've got them running, Thank you very much^h^h^h^hlittle.

    feh. Wake me up when you got something that runs on my Mitac 6120N, ACPI bug and all.

    --
    deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  57. Nice name for distro by Fizzl · · Score: 1

    The name sounds like some horrible cardio vascular disease.
    Damn these guys need some latte-sipping, hemp-wearing, mac-using marketing guys.

  58. Announcing YALD, a new linux distro! by chocolatetrumpet · · Score: 1

    YALD (Yet Another Linux Distribution) features:

    1. YAPM package management
    2. YAD desktop environment
    3. YATK toolkit

    Bonuses include Still No Drivers For Your Wireless Hardware & Good Luck With That Built In Sound Card.

    YALD - just what you didn't know you didn't need!

    --
    Spoon not. Fork, or fork not. There is no spoon.
  59. broken? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if former Gentoo developers are leaving Gentoo because Portage. The code is too broken and unmaintainable this does not sound as good publicity for Gentoo.

  60. New Distribution Announcement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would also like to announce a new Linux distribution, Knoppimandradorabuntu. It's completely original as the name would imply. Unfortunately it's so project-specific that only I can work on it. It's completely open source but I'm not sharing it with any of you. It's so cool and secret that I can't even post under my real name.

  61. DEC Alpha Support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Brian was at one time on the Alpha devteam with Gentoo... I wonder if Alpha lovers everywhere will have a new distro to turn to.

  62. THIS is what is wrong with Linux! by rAiNsT0rm · · Score: 0

    And this is exactly what the hell is wrong with Linux. I've seen this so many times I lost count since 1995 when I started into Linux.

    "Sure, there are a hundred wheels, but they are all wrong and I will create a better one from scratch!" - Which in actuality just creates a 101st wheel which is equally screwed up and half-finished.

    "It doesn't work right, but we're 1337 so tough" - Very helpful for a fledgling project, I mean who wouldn't want to work on that?

    "blah blah blah" - This project will in no way actually better anything but instead fragment and shift resources and people and time away from making what we do have the best it can be.

    It is all a joke anymore. All of the delusions and self-propagation of hot air and unattainable idealism has done nothing. Linux was a stable OS that ran Apache damn good 13 years ago, and it still is but unfortunately little else meaningful has happened.

    Sure, we have pretty baubles like the other guys except ours are harder to get working, use, and sometimes broken! Yay!

    We can write with fire on our desktop and then drag wobbly windows around! Wow!

    We have 4,000 apps installed by default and most of them are duplicates or unnecessary for 99% of users! How kewl!

    Simple tasks are overly complex! But we are 1337 so that is kewl too!

    Jesus Christ! Wake up people! Let's get a unified vision, build a stable and streamlined foundation of a set UI, default apps, and packaging system THEN let's work on taking over the world.

    Apple has managed to do this in great speed with limited resources and time because they had a stationary target and hit it often, we have a moving target and we just make new targets rather than bother to knock a few down. FFS.

    --
    http://teasphere.wordpress.com - A little spot of tea
    1. Re:THIS is what is wrong with Linux! by Knara · · Score: 1

      I just don't get what the problem is with people doing what they like. It's the whole POINT of FOSS for chrissake. Stop treating it like it should be some sort of religious movement and anyone who isn't actively contributing towards the defeat of evil commercial software is committing high treason.

    2. Re:THIS is what is wrong with Linux! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a) No one is reinventing anything. Repackaging, yes. You don't have to program Linux from nothing when you create a new distro.
      2) Distros are able to learn, adapt, borrow, and/or use from others. If there is something one distro does well, they all benefit thanks to GPL.
      III) I never see people complain that there are hundreds of different car/truck models to choose from, or that they make new ones all the time and update existing ones every year. Why whine about new Linux distros and updates, especially when they're free?
      four) Anyone that doesn't understand the Linux way of doing things, like the parent and everyone else complaining on this thread, needs to get out of their Windows mindset. Or they're a troll that is somehow connected to Microsoft, period.

    3. Re:THIS is what is wrong with Linux! by pumpkinpuss · · Score: 1

      Let's get a unified vision, build a stable and streamlined foundation of a set UI, default apps, and packaging system. If this happened, Linux might actually be as useable and as easy to use as a commercial OS. Playing around and making your own distro should still be done and encouraged, but I can't see much progress without at least one solid default base from which others could spring off of, add ideas to, play around, and experiment with.
    4. Re:THIS is what is wrong with Linux! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who the fuck said the goal of FOSS was to be popular?!

  63. Happy happy. by cakeypower · · Score: 1

    Just what we need. Another distro. Yay.

  64. They sound irritatingly arrogant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well by the looks of the website, At least we can expect a nice obnoxiously ugly green theme. (never let a programmer design a color scheme).

  65. SWEET! by ROMRIX · · Score: 1

    I think there should be hundreds of distros! That way everyone could just pick one they like and be as different from everyone else as they like! And then they could make them all use different means by which to update and install different stuff and make it where some stuff works only on some distros and not on others and some distros make you have to, I don't know, sort of "compile" the programs together by hand just to work! Ya! And then if some JERK OFF wanted to learn how YOU made it work you could just say RTFM Windows Fanboy! YA! And then, oh, wait...

    1. Re:SWEET! by pxc · · Score: 1

      RTFM is a legitimate request, as long as the information is actually in the manual.

    2. Re:SWEET! by ROMRIX · · Score: 1

      Damn, Making jokes about Linux in here is like farting in church, sure it's kinda funny but nobody laughs and everyone is afraid to mod you up. Just like in church.

  66. Whatever happened to the Popular Front, Reg? by The+Second+Horseman · · Score: 1

    He's over there.
    SPLITTER!

  67. Re:What are the goals? What are the differences? by Knara · · Score: 1

    Welcome to slashdot, where reading the article you comment on has been sadly optional since 1997.

  68. This is great by sentientbrendan · · Score: 1

    "our current package format is somewhat similar in idea to Gentoos ebuilds but is completely incompatible due to the many technical differences."

    I'm so exited that someone has finally stepped up and created one more custom Linux distribution. I think we were all feeling disempowered by the lack of choice afforded by the only 300 or so Linux distributions out there. Now that there are 301 mutually incompatible Linux distributions with their own directory layout, package management system, and configuration system, I finally feel like I have enough choices.

    I'm glad that the authors didn't spend their time doing something worthless like writing new software that we don't already have, or improving an existing distribution. Instead, they did the smart thing and spent months making a Linux distribution, of which they can say (from the article) "Just don't expect anything to work (seriously!)."

    Yay for new, incompatible, and broken Linux distributions written to satisfy some random guys questionable engineering sense!

    Hip Hip Horay!

  69. European Linux Review by pugugly · · Score: 1

    [EricIdleMode=1]
    "Another of the fine European Linux distributions, Exherbo Linux speaks to the casual user and developer alike and what it say is "Get Out", rather like a compiled version of the Amityville Horror. With packages that work as advertised primarily because they are advertised as not working, no install media, no support, and a declared lack of interest in supporting such features as "Usability", Exherbo takes truth in advertising to previously unseen, and indeed unsought for levels.

    If you have found Slackware Linux to be far too overrun with friendly advice for the new user, and Linux in general to be degraded by a desire for it to do useful work for people, then Exherbo Linux is almost certainly the distribution for you."
    [EricIdleMode=0]

    Pug

    --
    An Invisible Entity of Vast Power whose existence must be taken on faith alone: Liberal Media
  70. *yawn* by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    oh boy, YALD.... Just what the world needs.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  71. Exherbo: Distro from outer space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're barking out real loud for a newbie in their site. Let's hear them silently howling tail between legs after they see how real life is.

  72. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  73. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  74. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  75. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  76. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  77. Of course. by Max+Littlemore · · Score: 1

    It isn't a distro yet, although it isn't that anyone got their ego dented, remember it's for Gentoo users and their egos are unassailable. Now that word has got out that someone actually got a fully functioning installation of Gentoo and kept it working for six months, these guys had to create a distro which doesn't work at all and announce it with a site that tells everyone to go away.

    They aren't setting out to reinvent the wheel as such, just taking strategic measures to maintain their 1337ness.

    --
    I don't therefore I'm not.
  78. Finally... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't wait to play Duke Nukem Forever, on a HURD kernel, on Exherbo

  79. WTF by ardin,mcallister · · Score: 1

    Why the hell is this news? a new distro comes out every few seconds.

    SLOW FUCKING NEWS DAY

    --
    "Some men just want to watch the world burn..."
  80. the IRC channel was just as unfriendly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought the project looked interesting and spent a few mins in the irc chan. It was just as unfriendly as the web page.

    1. Re:the IRC channel was just as unfriendly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is typical from this group
      social retards at best

      Expect this kind of attitude /if/ this "distro" ever becomes anything

  81. User-land packaging system by StripedCow · · Score: 1

    Ok, so this is yet another gentoo-inspired distro. What would be really nice, is, if a packaging system came out that would allow non-root users to build stuff in the gentoo style. I mean, with dependency checking/automatic downloading, etc. Just give it a value for the prefix variable, and let it configure and build everything you wish. Ok, I know that gentoo has tools for doing such things, but they are not so user-friendly, nor do I think that they really fully support this mode of operation.

    --
    If Pandora's box is destined to be opened, *I* want to be the one to open it.
  82. exciting by Fergal · · Score: 1

    I'm pretty excited about this. I've used Gentoo for nearly 5 years now. It's served my purposes well, but 5 years is a long time, and if these guys are not dealing with legacy stuff, then I hope they can improve. Great luck to them!

    --
    "cease to exist, giving my goodbye, drive my car into the ocean, you think I'm dead, but i sail away, on a wave of mu
  83. -or Poisonous ex-Gentoo devs do their own thing by iwbcman · · Score: 1


    Haleluja, praise be, be Healed! The second Exodus is here. Exherbo will lead themselves to the promised land.



    And we Gentoo-ers can finally breathe a breath of fresh air. Finally the ex-Gentoo developers Poisonous People Clan have decided to do their own damned thing and leave Gentoo, leave Gentoo alone.




    I wish Exherbo the best of luck. Good fucking riddance.

  84. Re:Full of fail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everything in the parent post is a lie. ORLY

    1) Ciaran did get kicked as a Gentoo-dev *TWICE*
    first time around he was let back in after alot of whining and some technicalities. But he didn't learn how to play with others and was kicked a 2nd time (later on his ability to not play with others got him banned from forums.gentoo.org)

    2) Paludis when build:
    USE="-portage" emerge paludis
    AND then used against the kde4 live Overlay (which for some stupid reason relies on "paludis only feature" - de-paludisification of said ebuilds have shown that it wasn't actually needed to be done like this)
    IF the user then goes and uses portage and emerge, emerge will go and install part of KDE it thinks is missing simply because paludis in USE="-portage" mangle the world file so portage doesn't know what is install

    Result? KDE FUBAR'ed pain to recover which many have just gone Fsck it, re-install
    plus a few other cases

    3) others that are part of "Paludis" and "Exherbo"
    spb, rbrown, Philantrop..
    Oh look those 3 just got kicked from being gentoo dev's because of their inability to work with others as well as irc-M.A.D. incedence.

    So while the OP might of been stretching tnings a bit, all that was actually stated was fact. 100% more fact then your
    "Everything in the parent post is a lie."
    which is 100% wrong
  85. I'm a linux fanboi and all, but... by thegnu · · Score: 1

    It is pretty funny how you take a new Linux "distro" that doesn't work, has no way to install it, and posts its announcements on LIVEJOURNAL, and somehow that's front page-worthy.

    Curious. My friend Jon made the same comment when /. reported on Songbird 0.1. And yeah, a year (or two) later, still no stable Songbird.

    --
    Please stop stalking me, bro.
  86. Too much "Slashdot soup" from one "oyster" by donak · · Score: 1

    From the "Planet" page http://planet.exherbo.org/ on the website:

    First of all, Exherbo was announced because some elements of it will be discussed at an upcoming conference. Rather than having a blank page and let people start various rumors it seemed wise to at least let people know what was going on.
    -and-
    Unfortunately Slashdot picked up the announcement because some tard decided it would be a great idea to submit it to them. We did not do that ourselves because, as we state on the website, we have no need for users at the moment and exherbo won't fulfill users demands for the foreseeable future.

    So, you've all had lots of fun, criticising people who were quietly going about having their fun. And your point was ... ?

    --
    Don't blame me, it's usually 2 in the morning when I post ...
    1. Re:Too much "Slashdot soup" from one "oyster" by quag7 · · Score: 1

      You fool no one. I have it on good authority that Exherbo will be the official distribution of...

      DEF LEPPARD.

      That's right, DEF *fucking* LEPPARD.

      Why pour on hatorade when you can pour some sugar on?

  87. Re:Full of fail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go drown in your own shit, Naib, you worthless, lying, ignorant worm. You are wrong in every conceivable way.

  88. Def Leppard? meh ... by donak · · Score: 1

    More likely the official distro of "Troll Suckers Unlimited".
    Even normally sensible people don't seem to have read beyond the article and home page of the website.
    But I can't help wondering if this isn't a viral marketing campaign ... or maybe Micro$oft trying to break
    into the Linux market with it's very own "FOSS Vaporware".
    One way or another, it got the attention of /. !

    --
    Don't blame me, it's usually 2 in the morning when I post ...
    1. Re:Def Leppard? meh ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even normally sensible people On Slashdot? Surely you jest.
  89. Hope it's nothing like... by jseale · · Score: 1

    Sabayon. That's gotta' be one of the worst mashups of a Gentoo-based Linux distro I've ever seen. I know Sabayon was supposed to be a gaming-oriented distro, but did they have to uglify it and bloat it the way they did?