Slashdot Mirror


Liquid Metal CPU Heatsink Beats Water Cooling

unassimilatible writes "Bios Magazine is reporting that the world's first commercially available liquid-metal based CPU cooler is about to ship. Danamics, a Danish company, claims that its LM-10 outperforms standard air-cooled heatsinks and most watercooled systems with a mere 1W power draw. 'The liquid metal is a key component in Danamics cooling systems. Liquid metal has two major advantages when cooling high power density heat sources: Firstly it has superior thermo physical properties that decrease temperature — and temperature non-uniformity — on die and across chips. Secondly, the electrical properties of the liquid metal enables efficient, reliable and ultra compact electromagnetic pumping without the use of moving parts, shafts, seals, etc.' Awesome technology, if it actually works and is affordable. The submitter requests that the moderators terminate all T-1000 jokes."

218 comments

  1. Toxicity? by i_ate_god · · Score: 5, Interesting

    And just how good for the environment is this liquid metal? Or for your health?

    --
    I'm god, but it's a bit of a drag really...
    1. Re:Toxicity? by strelitsa · · Score: 5, Informative

      There was a nice discussion about this in Firehose before this made it to the Big Page. A couple of the candidates for the liquid metal that might be used in this thing are environmentally neutral (bismuth, tin, etc.).

      --
      No mod points, no meta-moderating/Firehose/all the other free work Slashdot wants me to do.
    2. Re:Toxicity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      this "liquid metal" wouldn't be Mercury or something like it, would it? Minute parts of mercury can contaminate large water bodies by being ingested into the food chain...

    3. Re:Toxicity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Yeah, does it say anywhere what metal they are using? Mercury would be too large of a hazard I would think, although there are a few metals that are liquid just above room temperature.

    4. Re:Toxicity? by Sangui5 · · Score: 5, Informative

      From my Firehose post:

      It's mostly likely using Field's metal (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Field%27s_metal), Rose's metal (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rose_metal), Galinstan (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galinstan), or one of the other low-melting point low toxicity alloys, NOT mercury.

    5. Re:Toxicity? by strelitsa · · Score: 1

      That's the one. It set me to Googling for almost an hour. Thanks for posting.

      --
      No mod points, no meta-moderating/Firehose/all the other free work Slashdot wants me to do.
    6. Re:Toxicity? by FlyingBishop · · Score: 1

      It remains a pretty useless article for not specifying. I understand if it's a proprietary alloy or something, but how hard is it to say "it's a proprietary alloy"? It's hard to really say anything without something more specific than "liquid metal." Aside from the obvious T-1000 jokes.

    7. Re:Toxicity? by Amiga+Lover · · Score: 4, Informative

      I expect it's a metal related to these, http://www.indium.com/TIM/solutions/liquidmetal.php which are used as thermal interface materials in machines like Apple's 8 core Mac Pros. The heatsinks on those are wetted with a little of the liquid metal in place of stuff like arctic silver. While working on Mac Pros I found it's like mercury, but sticks to the processor heatspreader and heatsink base. It's liquid even in a cold room. There's toxicity info on that site somewhere, but I'm in a rush at the moment. No doubt someone else will find it and post.

    8. Re:Toxicity? by MdotCpDeltaT · · Score: 5, Funny

      I think the liquid metal is their server.

    9. Re:Toxicity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      You know, this is the internet. And you can use Slashdot's URL 'tag' to autolinkify the URLs you enter. For those without the Firefox extension that autolinkifies plain text URLs, I give you: Field's metal, Rose metal and Galinstan

    10. Re:Toxicity? by actionbastard · · Score: 1

      The metal alloys you cite have melting points too high to be of any practical use for semiconductor cooling. They have to be a liquid throughout the entire system to provide fluid flow to allow the liquid to be circulated within the system.

      --
      Sig this!
    11. Re:Toxicity? by jlarocco · · Score: 5, Informative
    12. Re:Toxicity? by Sangui5 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Galistan is liquid to -19 degrees C....

    13. Re:Toxicity? by Klaus_1250 · · Score: 1

      Galistan (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galinstan) seems the only one usable, the others have a melting point of around 70 degrees Celcius. Which won't work if they cool better than air or water (which usually keeps the temps below 50 degrees celcius).

      --
      It only takes one man to change the Wisdom of the Crowd to Tyranny of the Masses.
    14. Re:Toxicity? by Sangui5 · · Score: 1

      Oh, why does everyone insist on making things easy for the lazy? Especially since I was too lazy to linkify them earlier....

    15. Re:Toxicity? by dhovis · · Score: 4, Informative

      I doubt they're using any of those. Rose's metal uses lead, and the other two contain large percentages of indium and gallium, both of which are getting pretty expensive. Much of the world's gallium goes into GaAs and GaN, whereas the indium goes into indium tin oxide (or ITO), which is a transparent conductor that goes into all LCD screens.

      --

      --
      The internet is the greatest source of biased information in the history of mankind.

    16. Re:Toxicity? by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      Needing to be 62 C just to stay liquid, Field's metal probably wouldn't work. Maybe Galinstan would work, but the article doesn't discuss cost, maybe it's not so bad.

    17. Re:Toxicity? by nimbius · · Score: 0

      Perfectly safe....provided your name isnt John Connor. sorry, couldnt resist.

      --
      Good people go to bed earlier.
    18. Re:Toxicity? by mrmeval · · Score: 5, Interesting

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liquid_metal_embrittlement

      Hope they figured this out or mitigate it somehow.

      --
      I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
    19. Re:Toxicity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. No. No.

      The metal isn't liquid. The name refers to its glassy properties. See this:

      http://www.liquidmetal.com/

    20. Re:Toxicity? by maglor_83 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Yeah, does it say anywhere what metal they are using? Mercury would be too large of a hazard I would think, although there are a few metals that are liquid just above room temperature.

      Well... its not a liquid metal, but chocolate is meant to be liquid at room temperature, and not only can you take relatively large quantities without overly harmful effects, but it tastes great too!

    21. Re:Toxicity? by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 4, Interesting

      NaK melts at -13 C. It could be that in principle. It would burn if released, but in the intended use it should be safe enough.

      --

      -WolfWithoutAClause

      "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
    22. Re:Toxicity? by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1, Troll

      Fields metal is good stuff - it's used as a mimetic polyalloy in several weapons related programs. Fields also won a medal for it.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    23. Re:Toxicity? by Kazymyr · · Score: 4, Informative

      Mod parent up - I was about to post on the same lines. Looks like all the likely candidates contain gallium, and gallium is not known to play nice to other metals - corrodes them etc.

      --
      I hadn't known there were so many idiots in the world until I started using the Internet -Stanislaw Lem
    24. Re:Toxicity? by Hal_Porter · · Score: 0

      Sucks to be you, human. Luckily I'm made out of a mimetic polyalloy not water. Enjoy your large water body!

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    25. Re:Toxicity? by dermoth666 · · Score: 1

      Field's metal and Rose metal boiling points are too high.

      Galinstan is probably very expensive... There are some more here:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fusible_alloy

    26. Re:Toxicity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Galinstan. One of the lesser known elements of the 'Axis of Evil'!! (Metallic Substances Edition)

      Fire ze missiles!

    27. Re:Toxicity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Think of the health consequences? I see liquid metal cooled CPU and think, finally a use for Natalie Portman after she is petrified.

    28. Re:Toxicity? by Duncan+Blackthorne · · Score: 1

      Of the three you listed, Galinstan is the only one that's liquid at room temperature, so I'd bet on it being that.

    29. Re:Toxicity? by TigerBull · · Score: 1

      'Liquid metal' doesn't necessarily mean at room temperature (unless you've been very naughty). The sodium filled exhaust valves in my old 914 only have liquid centers at operating temperatures.

    30. Re:Toxicity? by rachit · · Score: 2, Informative

      ... Looks like all the likely candidates contain gallium, and gallium is not known to play nice to other metals - corrodes them etc.

      I was actually wondering as well, so I actually read the linked wiki article on Liquid metal embrittlement: From the article:

      Exceptions to this rule have been observed, as in the case of aluminium in the presence of liquid gallium.[1]

    31. Re:Toxicity? by paulgrant · · Score: 3, Funny

      how about a link to the firefox extension that autolinkifies plain text urls?
      sheesh!
      and thanks :)

    32. Re:Toxicity? by Hittite+Creosote · · Score: 1

      Do you know of any other suitable liquid metal they could be using, then, as I don't - mercury is just too toxic (compared to Galinstan, anyway) and NaK is a fire and explosion hazard, so even if gallium alloys are getting more expensive, they're still the less toxic, cheapest option.

    33. Re:Toxicity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is Fields metal good at maths?

    34. Re:Toxicity? by Xtifr · · Score: 4, Interesting

      If it's being used to cool CPUs, I don't think it needs to be liquid at room temperature, since the area near most modern CPUs is considerably hotter than that! If your CPU is running at room temperature, you probably don't need much cooling (and if you do, you're going to need a much more elaborate system than merely one based on a liquid metal, since a passive heat-sink isn't going to take you anywhere below room temperature).

      If the liquid metal you're using for cooling tends to freeze at room temperature, that's going to present a few engineering challenges, but I don't think they're insurmountable, and, given the relative rarity of metals that are liquid at room temperature (and the unpleasant nature of some of them, e.g. mercury) it may well be worth it.

      Pure gallium melts at body temperature and is generally considered non-toxic. If it weren't for the expense, it might be a decent option itself. That said, Galinstan does sound like a promising option, though one of its ingredients (indium) is even more expensive than gallium, which could be a problem. Tin's still relatively cheap, though. :)

    35. Re:Toxicity? by 4D6963 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      For the lazy:

      Field's metal Rose metal Galinstan

      Oh I am lazy too but I didn't have to bother, I just double clicked the links and it opened in new tabs, that's to this Firefox extension (https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/1939)

      Yeah, I said I was lazy, that means I'm too lazy to type <a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/1939">this</a>. Oh wait.. crap.

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    36. Re:Toxicity? by hatchet · · Score: 1

      They probably use NaK which is also used as coolant in some nuclear reactors and has melting point of -12.6ÂC

    37. Re:Toxicity? by KGIII · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Bugger Moore's law, how about Murphy's? You can get non-conductive liquids which help to remove some of the risks associated with liquid cooling but does this galinstan (or any other liquid metal) also conduct electricity well? My searching hasn't given me much information though I did find one page warning that a spill could conduct electricity but it didn't say how well nor did it really go into details as to the actual resistance or the likes.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    38. Re:Toxicity? by Kijori · · Score: 0

      I don't know whether it's true or not, but the Wikipedia article suggests that aluminium is an exception.

    39. Re:Toxicity? by marco.antonio.costa · · Score: 1

      You know, eating glass is bad for you also. So the dilemma is, tell people not to eat it, or ban the production of bottles. It's tough, I know...

      I for one welcome our magnetically-pumped liquid-metal thermal-conductive overlords.

      --
      Send your spendthrift head of state this
    40. Re:Toxicity? by somersault · · Score: 2, Informative

      You know, this isn't just the internet, this is slashdot, where a lot of people can code or at least know some HTML - you could just use the anchor tag. I haven't used any autolinkify gubbimatrons, but I expect they'd take longer to click than it takes to type <a href=paste_url_here>link name here</a> anyway..

      --
      which is totally what she said
    41. Re:Toxicity? by MrMacman2u · · Score: 1

      They probably use NaK which is also used as coolant in some nuclear reactors and has melting point of -12.6ÂC

      Only for the Pentium 4 Extreme.

      --
      This signature is lame.
    42. Re:Toxicity? by AndersOSU · · Score: 1

      I would think even mercury would be safer.

    43. Re:Toxicity? by raynet · · Score: 1

      The wiki article you linked to indicates that using gallium with aluminum is an exception to this metal embrittlement thingy.

      --
      - Raynet --> .
    44. Re:Toxicity? by viscus · · Score: 1

      Your case would go out in a blaze of glory if the cooler sprang a leak for any reason.

    45. Re:Toxicity? by Svartalf · · Score: 4, Informative

      Use a sealed system.

      Galinstan can be pumped via magneto-hydrodynamic action throughout the sealed system- no moving parts and intrinsically nothing to wear out. Oh, and you very definitely do not want to use Aluminum in the system. It alloys away aluminum like Mercury does- disintegrates it FAST.

      I don't think you'd want to use flex hoses, but a pre-built, rigid cooling system, using glass or certain copper alloys known to not be directly attacked by Galinstan like aluminum is and purge the air out and charge what few air gaps you have with argon, you SHOULD have a gem of a system. While it's thermal capacity is lower than water or mineral oil (Yes, I've done my own tinkering- including toying with an idea or two with Galinstan; unfortunately the stuff's just insanely expensive to have the volume of metal I'd have needed to do the idea- something on the order of about $1500 or so in the stuff...) it's thermal conductivity is right on up there with Copper and it effectively yanks the heat right on out if you've got enough heat exchange surface to dump the heat to. If you've got extremely high density heat dissipation, this might actually be an answer.

      --
      I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
    46. Re:Toxicity? by love-blood-rhetoric · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I work with gallium-indium-tin eutectic metals routinely. They definitely do not play well with some metals, specifically those commonly used in heat sinks. It will readily react with both aluminum and copper resulting in a nasty grayish black compound...not so good for moving heat. However, I do use it against nickel plated copper surfaces with no problems provided that the nickel strike is well done; i.e. it's not porous. The metals it does play well with are typically stainless steel, but stainless is a very bad conductor of heat relative to copper and aluminum.

    47. Re:Toxicity? by wattrlz · · Score: 1

      Lead and Cadmium aren't particularly environmentally friendly either. Pure indium's OK, but when it corrodes it's not entirely safe either. Then again, most existing computer components aren't exactly innocuous anyway.

    48. Re:Toxicity? by MJMullinII · · Score: 1

      Yeah, well...

      If one of MY limbs freeze, I'm just in extreme agony.

      If one of YOUR limbs freeze, IT SHATTERS ON IMPACT!

      So who's the sucker now!

      --
      "Don't be a martyr -- BE THE ONE WHO GOT AWAY!"
    49. Re:Toxicity? by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      The nation's personal injury lawyers heartily support your idea.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    50. Re:Toxicity? by bersl2 · · Score: 1

      There's also the custom <URL:http://slashdot.org/> trick.

    51. Re:Toxicity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can almost guarantee that it is galinstan, as it has been in heatpipe related heatsinke devices for a long time. It is also not very expensive, and non toxic (or so we think). The only problem with it is that it doesn't really perform any better than regular solid heatpipes.

    52. Re:Toxicity? by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      While mercury is toxic, it has a pretty low vapor pressure and is fairly easy to contain. The danger from occasional mercury leaks has, I suspect, been slightly overblown.

      But yeah, you wouldn't want to work in the factory where they make the things without some strict containment protocols. A "little bit" for "a long time" is still "a lot."

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    53. Re:Toxicity? by Spatial · · Score: 1

      Why on Earth was this modded troll?

    54. Re:Toxicity? by Alastor187 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If it's being used to cool CPUs, I don't think it needs to be liquid at room temperature, since the area near most modern CPUs is considerably hotter than that! If your CPU is running at room temperature, you probably don't need much cooling (and if you do, you're going to need a much more elaborate system than merely one based on a liquid metal, since a passive heat-sink isn't going to take you anywhere below room temperature).

      This may be true when the machine is running, but what about when it is initially started? As the processor begins to warm up the cooling medium will still be solid. Since solids are hard to pump the heat generated by the processor must be transported by conduction only. If the designer goes through the trouble of using a liquid cooler, it is probably safe to say that conduction only heat removal is not sufficient. So this presents some serious transient start-up issues.

    55. Re:Toxicity? by default+luser · · Score: 1

      Does it really matter when the existing solution (water with ions) also conducts electricity quite well?

      The fact is, MOST of the best conductors of heat also conduct electricity well.

      Pure water is actually a poor electrical and heat conductor; what makes it popular for cooling is that it is liquid at room temperature, cheap and easy to acquire, and is only marginally corrosive (compared to other liquid coolants).

      Liquid is the key: even though water is a poor thermal conductor, if you keep it constantly moving through a system, it will move more heat than just passive conduction using a solid metal. This has to do with increased rate of heat transfer when you have a larget temperature delta.

      --

      Man is the animal that laughs.
      And occasionally whores for Karma.

    56. Re:Toxicity? by jlarocco · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Wow! You're so right. That one add-on feature totally makes up for all the other reasons I don't use Firefox. Oh wait, except my browser already has that feature by default. I didn't even have to waste time digging through hundreds of crap extensions to find the handful that are actually useful.

      At this point everybody on /. who wants to use Firefox already uses Firefox. Go be a fanboi somewhere else, you're just wasting everybody's time here.

    57. Re:Toxicity? by adisakp · · Score: 1

      Here's a really good link on cooling with Liquid Metal NaK. It even describes how the magnetic pump technology works.

    58. Re:Toxicity? by adisakp · · Score: 1

      Galinstan's been done before. There was already a liquid metal cooler using Galinstan for a Sapphire Radeon back in 2005.

    59. Re:Toxicity? by Xtifr · · Score: 1

      If the designer goes through the trouble of using a liquid cooler, it is probably safe to say that conduction only heat removal is not sufficient.

      Not by the time it's at full operating temperature, but it presumably takes a non-finite amount of time to warm up, during which time, the metal in the sink will be melting. Furthermore, the metal will be carrying heat away even before it melts, so it's not like there won't be any cooling until all the metal is liquid. As the temperature of the CPU rises, so will the cooling ability of the heat sink. As I said previously, it's an engineering challenge, but I doubt it's a serious obstacle--even if it's not the route they're taking.

      I'm actually more worried about the magnetic pump. I'm not sure what the effect of having a small-but-powerful electromagnet right next to your CPU would be, but I can't imagine that it's a good thing, and that's going to be an issue no matter what the melting temperature of the metal coolant.

    60. Re:Toxicity? by mrmeval · · Score: 1

      I missed that, good catch. If they're using that then it should do well.

      Do not get it wet. ;)

      For the tinfoil hat folks this is most excellent. Dump water into the cooling system and set off a spark.

      I couldn't find the /. story
      http://pontotriplo.org/quickpicks/2007/05/generating_hydrogen_with_a_liquid_aluminum-gallium_alloy.html

      --
      I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
  2. Poor T-1000 by NoobixCube · · Score: 1, Funny

    He got like 3 lines in that whole movie, and now he's left out of the fun of being ribbed on Slashdot. Probably has something to do with having no ribs... Sorry, had to :P

    --
    Admit it. You post strawman arguments as AC so you get modded Insightful for refuting them, rather than Troll
  3. Reads like an ad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Reads like an ad...

    1. Re:Reads like an ad... by DanWS6 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's a true slashdot story then.

  4. No T-1000 jokes, huh, submitter? by realmolo · · Score: 4, Funny

    Slashdot: Remember, Subby, when I promised to kill you last? Subby: That's right, Slashdot. You did. Slashdot: I lied.

    1. Re:No T-1000 jokes, huh, submitter? by Todd+Fisher · · Score: 0

      Firstly it has superior thermo physical properties that decrease temperature - and it's not a tooomor!

      --


      --I'm not talking about dance lessons. I'm talking about putting a brick through the other guy's windshield.-
    2. Re:No T-1000 jokes, huh, submitter? by Zencyde · · Score: 2, Informative

      For the love of God, Slashdot has a markup system!

      Please use <br> to create breaks.

      --
      What day is it? Could you please tell me?
    3. Re:No T-1000 jokes, huh, submitter? by realmolo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yeah, I know. I forgot to put in the breaks. I do that a lot. I'm used to EVERY OTHER FORUM SOFTWARE IN THE WORLD, where the breaks are inserted for you.

    4. Re:No T-1000 jokes, huh, submitter? by Shados · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, infoq.com does it this way too. Drives me wacko (fortunately, if you select plain old text as the option before posting in slashdot, it behaves normally. I just wish I didnt have to select it every fucking time)

    5. Re:No T-1000 jokes, huh, submitter? by maglor_83 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Put your posts in 'Plain old text' mode, and they're done for you.
      Like this!
      And you can still use html tags
      like that br

    6. Re:No T-1000 jokes, huh, submitter? by n+dot+l · · Score: 1

      I just wish I didnt have to select it every fucking time)

      You don't. There's a setting for that.

    7. Re:No T-1000 jokes, huh, submitter? by TubeSteak · · Score: 4, Informative

      http://slashdot.org/my/comments
      (skip down most of the way towards the bottom)

      Comment Post Mode
      Select: Plain Old Text

      I really don't understand why it isn't the /. default

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    8. Re:No T-1000 jokes, huh, submitter? by beav007 · · Score: 1

      *cough* preview *cough*

    9. Re:No T-1000 jokes, huh, submitter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's too bad that Slashdot doesn't offer the option to view your post in some way pre-posting. Curses!

    10. Re:No T-1000 jokes, huh, submitter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I know. I forgot to put in the breaks. I do that a lot. I'm used to EVERY OTHER FORUM SOFTWARE IN THE WORLD, where the breaks are inserted for you.

      And, as the evidence suggests, you are too smart to need the preview button. That thing is for children and bagpipers.

    11. Re:No T-1000 jokes, huh, submitter? by Shados · · Score: 1

      Wohoo, now that I can be even more efficient at being inefficient! Thanks!

    12. Re:No T-1000 jokes, huh, submitter? by catmistake · · Score: 1

      you can set this behavior once in your slashdot user preferences

    13. Re:No T-1000 jokes, huh, submitter? by Zencyde · · Score: 1

      Slashdot has one of those as well. Just middle click "reply", or open it in a new window. Underneath the entry field it says "HTML Formatted". Change it it "Extrans (html tags to text)". There, tags are inserted for you. :P

      --
      What day is it? Could you please tell me?
    14. Re:No T-1000 jokes, huh, submitter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That actually sounds like a line from the film Commando with Arnold.

  5. Depends... by ArchieBunker · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Too much of anything can kill you. Water, salt, mercury, oxygen etc etc. They probably use some alloy with an extremely low melting temperature. The article is a bit short on the specifics.

    --
    Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    1. Re:Depends... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Yes indeed. Anything can kill you. Just consider how much much mercury it would take to accomplish that feat when compared to the amount (and the effort involved in the act) of water it would take.

      Either way, it would be nice to know what they're slipping into those things (especially since they operate on a single watt).

      On another note, wouldn't it be interesting if your computer literally "froze" because temperatures dropped and the alloy solidified?

    2. Re:Depends... by Sj0 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If your computer was that cold, wouldn't the purpose of the heat sink be pretty much negated until it thawed?

      --
      It's been a long time.
    3. Re:Depends... by tftp · · Score: 1

      One glass of water can kill you, if inhaled... and one ton of mercury will not kill you, if it's sealed in containers.

    4. Re:Depends... by xalorous · · Score: 2, Informative

      Heat sinks are solid chunks of metal with fins.

      If the melting point of a liquid is 62 C, then it is solid anywhere below 62 C. Which could be called 'frozen'. And 50 C is hardly 'cold' by any stretch of the imagination. Unless you're from the planet Mercury.

      --
      TANSTAAFL GIGO Acronyms to live by!
    5. Re:Depends... by 4D6963 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Too much of anything can kill you.

      Semi-obligatory :

      -Yes but too much [tobacco] is bad for you.
      -Well of course too much is bad for you, that's what "too much" means you blithering twat. If you had too much water it would be bad for you, wouldn't it? "Too much" precisely means that quantity which is excessive, that's what it means. Could you ever say "too much water is good for you"? I mean if it's too much it's too much. Too much of anything is too much. Obviously. Jesus.

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    6. Re:Depends... by Sj0 · · Score: 1

      Yep, you've definitely stated what a heatsink is and two irrationally high possible melting points.

      Honestly though, I don't want my CPU at 50C if I can help it, especially if this 1W solution is supposed to be better than water cooling.

      --
      It's been a long time.
    7. Re:Depends... by xalorous · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The melting point came from the wiki on liquid metals.

      Having recently looked into heatsinks/cooling fans/water cooling systems at Tom's Hardware, I'd go so far as to say if you can run your computer full blast and peak temperature settles at anything less than 70C, you've got a good system. The best heatsink/fan combos were at about 72C, IIRC. The water cooling systems were obviously cooler but I don't think they got down to 50.

      As a less pricey possibility, has anyone looked into brine cooling systems (using a water-based solution instead of plain water for better thermal transfer)? And do water cooling systems use pure water or tapwater?

      --
      TANSTAAFL GIGO Acronyms to live by!
    8. Re:Depends... by AndersOSU · · Score: 1

      Most of them use DI water or some other (relatively) non-conductive liquid. Makes it much safer for your computer in case of a leak. I wouldn't be surprised if someone out there built a rig with a chiller and a brine bath that cools below 0C, but it's probably not something commercially available.

    9. Re:Depends... by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 1

      Most water based solutions don't use water at all, but instead a variety of types of non-conducting lubricating anti-freeze.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    10. Re:Depends... by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Informative

      There is little to no point to using DI water because it will react with itself and the system and will not be DI for any useful period of time. Instead most cooling systems use additives. You can use good old rubbing alcohol which is pretty effective (if slightly dangerous in excessive quantity) or simply use one of the jillions of automotive products designed for this purpose, like red line water wetter.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    11. Re:Depends... by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Having recently looked into heatsinks/cooling fans/water cooling systems at Tom's Hardware, I'd go so far as to say if you can run your computer full blast and peak temperature settles at anything less than 70C, you've got a good system. The best heatsink/fan combos were at about 72C, IIRC. The water cooling systems were obviously cooler but I don't think they got down to 50.

      Is that the state of cooling nowadays? I have an old Sempron based system along with a pretty standard fan cooler that you would expect from a few years ago. It idles at around 50C and running full out it's only 56C or so. It's not very quiet, but it works fine. Supposedly the CPU draws about 62W, which isn't all that different from today's mainstream budget CPUs.

      Most everyone I know who does the water cooling thing uses standard automotive coolant in their systems. The big problem with plain water is that things will start to grow in it and it will become nasty, and depending on what's in it in terms of minerals, the water can be corrosive to certain metal parts it comes into contact with. Naturally, these problems have already been addressed when it comes to automotive applications, so why not use coolant?

    12. Re:Depends... by robaal · · Score: 1

      The best heatsink/fan combos were at about 72C, IIRC.

      Is that the state of cooling nowadays? I have an old Sempron based system along with a pretty standard fan cooler that you would expect from a few years ago. It idles at around 50C and running full out it's only 56C or so.

      Intel's 65nm quadcores are just a bit hot. OTOH they idle much cooler than their stress-test temp (more than 30ÂC lower in the THG test).

      AFAIK the latest - 45nm - quads run significantly cooler.

  6. Banned in California? by kaos07 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can see the Governator imposing a ban on the import of this product...

    1. Re:Banned in California? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I can see the Governator imposing a ban on the import of this product...

      Warning:
      This product contains chemicals known by the State of California to cause cancer and/or the rise of cyborg assassins bent on enslaving mankind.

  7. The obvious choice... by Monkey_Genius · · Score: 0, Troll

    for the coolant metal is Mercury -a very dangerous material- because Bromine would be a far worse choice. So what does a company that produces a product that uses a highly toxic material do to limit its liability when some dumbass decides to 'mod' the LMC?

    --
    I've got your sig, right here.
    1. Re:The obvious choice... by Deadstick · · Score: 4, Insightful
      some dumbass

      As opposed to a person who (a) thinks mercury and bromine are the only two liquid metals and (b) thinks bromine is a metal at all?

      rj

    2. Re:The obvious choice... by Whiteox · · Score: 4, Funny

      lol Every stick Bromine+Al?
      Your typical Aluminium (Aluminum) heatsink will burn ferociously, spitting white hot molten Al during assembly! hahahahahaha!

      --
      Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
    3. Re:The obvious choice... by Artuir · · Score: 3, Funny

      Isn't bromine a type of soup?

    4. Re:The obvious choice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      all metals are liquids and solids and gases. as are various other compounds.

  8. Schmoo Schmoo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Too much of anything can kill you. Water, salt, mercury, oxygen etc etc. They probably use some alloy with an extremely low melting temperature. The article is a bit short on the specifics.

    Lets test your theory. I demand you pay several women to sleep with me until I die. We'll see who laughs last!

    1. Re:Schmoo Schmoo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Snuu Snuu, actually.

    2. Re:Schmoo Schmoo by maglor_83 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah alright how about her?
      Interestingly wikipedia claims she was born aged 55, which explains a lot.

    3. Re:Schmoo Schmoo by Whiteox · · Score: 2, Funny

      How many do you consider to be "several"?
      I remember some kind of Sci-Fi movie? show/book? where a group of men were used by the female inhabitants of a planet for sex and pro-creation.
      The men aged prematurely, were a husk of their former selves and begged to be released from their ordeal.
      Is that what you want?

      --
      Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
    4. Re:Schmoo Schmoo by omnipresentbob · · Score: 1

      They told me I could keep my cash =\

    5. Re:Schmoo Schmoo by BlackSnake112 · · Score: 1

      This a trick question?

    6. Re:Schmoo Schmoo by pxc · · Score: 1
  9. No T-1000 jokes? by actionbastard · · Score: 4, Funny

    Chill out. Dickwad.

    --
    Sig this!
    1. Re:No T-1000 jokes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can place all your T-1000 jokes here.

    2. Re:No T-1000 jokes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please, there may be minors reading...

      "Chill out, DIPstick."

      (Worst. Foley. Ever.)

  10. Liquid metal by gmuslera · · Score: 1

    is what ends being your CPU if your cooler fails.

    Assuming that we are speaking here of room temperature liquid metal, which one? Some are rare, other are not liquid at normal room temperature, but could be when the cpu starts to get hot, or could be an alloy, but aren't so much choices afaik (or they don't specify as any will work).

    1. Re:Liquid metal by cheater512 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Sillicon isnt a metal. :)

    2. Re:Liquid metal by quanticle · · Score: 1

      As others have pointed out, there are a variety of fusible alloys that are no more toxic than the other components in the computer.

      --
      We all know what to do, but we don't know how to get re-elected once we have done it
    3. Re:Liquid metal by raynet · · Score: 1

      Yup, it is metalloid.

      --
      - Raynet --> .
    4. Re:Liquid metal by Locklin · · Score: 1

      Interesting, pick the right metal and you have a standard (solid) heatsink at cool temperatures, which becomes liquid cooled just as your CPU cranks up.

      --
      "Knowledge is the only instrument of production that is not subject to diminishing returns" -Journal of Political Econom
    5. Re:Liquid metal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metalloid
      But in the way that it looks atomically and the way that it interacts with other chemicals the most similar element to it is carbon(not identical).
      Note:
      Not suggesting it's a metal.
      Metalloids are not to be considered metals.

  11. The real obvious choice by Sangui5 · · Score: 2, Informative

    is a fusible alloy of some sort. The one's without cadmium or potassium are relatively safe, and galistan doesn't even have any lead in it.

  12. What metal? by dpbsmith · · Score: 3, Interesting

    How odd that the article doesn't even hint at what the metal is. I wonder why not?

    1. Re:What metal? by dermoth666 · · Score: 1

      Possibly because adding that much mercury (assuming they use that) to every computer on earth is the worse thing you could ever do against the environment. Even China refusing to lower their greenhouse gas emissions is nothing compared to it!

    2. Re:What metal? by Detritus · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Has mercury replaced plutonium as the most feared element by the "Let's all run around in circles, and scream and shout" wing of the environmental movement?

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    3. Re:What metal? by frostband · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'm not sure what the metal is either. At first I though they were talking about Liquidmetal(TM)

      But they don't mention that it is those trademarked alloys. I still suspect it's another amorphous alloy (bulk metallic glass) even though that's not mentioned in the article and I haven't seen any other posts that mention that might be what it is. In any case, the Zirconium based Liquidmetal(TM) uses Zr, Be, Ti, Cu, and Ni. Here's the wikipedia article on Liquidmetal

      I've done a bit of research on AA/BMG's but nothing with the thermal properties though

    4. Re:What metal? by rubycodez · · Score: 2, Interesting

      a mimetic poly-alloy

    5. Re:What metal? by RightSaidFred99 · · Score: 1
      I firmly agree. I think you should do some sort of demonstration to mock the environmentalists and go buy about a dozen CFLs. Lock yourself in a small room and break them all on the floor. Then hang out for a few minutes and breathe real deeply. Then laugh (maniacally, probably for the rest of your newly shortened and crazy life) at the environmentalists when you walk out.

      Actually, I pseudo-agree with you. The danger from CFLs is a bit overblown if they're disposed of properly. In fact, they have less of a "mercury footprint" than incandescent bulbs over their lifetime.

      But putting it in a computer, which will probably be dumped in a trash can in 5-7 years without a second thought, is just stupid as the grandparent mentions.

    6. Re:What metal? by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      a mimetic poly-alloy

      You slipped that one under the radar.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    7. Re:What metal? by jd · · Score: 1

      There are generally two possible reasons - either the patent for something hasn't gone through and they're wanting to avoid too much of the wrong attention whilst still stirring up the interest of customers, OR there is a major flaw in the technology and they hope to fix it before anyone notices by hiding the details.

      I have seen the latter, on two different startups I've had entanglements with. Wretched NDAs and the Old Boys Network mean you're not getting either story from me, but the fact is that dodgy use of trade secrets to hide flawed products is not unusual.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    8. Re:What metal? by The+Warlock · · Score: 1

      This is competing with water cooling; we're hardly talking about "every computer on earth". We're talking about a handful of high-performance neckbeard gaming/overclocking rigs. And maybe some supercomputers, but they've been using similar setups for quite some time now already.

      --
      I've upped my standards, so up yours.
    9. Re:What metal? by BlackSnake112 · · Score: 1

      I remember reading somewhere that people were taking the old motherboards (and add in cards) melting them down for the gold in them. I have no idea that gold was used in those old computers. But people threw away gold without a second thought.

    10. Re:What metal? by Abreu · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure what the metal is either. At first I though they were talking about Liquidmetal(TM)

      Is that like Liquid Paper(TM)?

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    11. Re:What metal? by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      ah well, it's been 17 years since it was released

  13. Sodium cooling by bmo · · Score: 5, Informative

    " Awesome technology, if it actually works and is affordable."

    It works. It's worked for decades under the sea cooling nuclear reactors and in piston aircraft engines.

    http://www.enginehistory.org/air-cooled_cylinders_3.htm

    " During his early years at McCook Field the ever-ingenious Sam Heron had observed the characteristics of various sodium compounds which are normally used in heat-treating operations. These materials are solid at room temperature and become liquid at engine operating temperatures. He observed that since these compounds wet the surface of steel alloys readily and transfer heat very well, their use should be effective in extending the life of exhaust valves. The ancestor of our present-day sodium-cooled valves had arrived, thanks to Mr. Heron, and almost ninety years later we are still enjoying the benefits of his ingenuity though even today such valves are not completely fault free."

    Also, it's not terribly expensive. Just don't go hacking into the reservoir or any of the tubes with a saw, mmmkay?

    --
    BMO

    1. Re:Sodium cooling by Cal+Paterson · · Score: 3, Informative

      Some supercomputers already use liquid metal to supercool them (and, AFAIK, have done for a while). I believe it's normally some kind of gallium alloy, but I'm not chemist enough to say more than that.

    2. Re:Sodium cooling by icegreentea · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sodium only works because nuclear reactors put out a lot of heat. You won't be able to sodium cool your computers. That's where the uncertainty comes in. What metal/metal-alloy is liquid below 100C, is relatively cheap, and safe. Mercury (the obvious answer for one and two) is almost certainly a nono for number three.

    3. Re:Sodium cooling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Was he a hardy guy ?

    4. Re:Sodium cooling by Chryana · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I can't speak for the piston aircraft engine cooling part, but the advantages of sodium weren't sufficient to keep using it in submarines. Basically, if the reactor had to be shut down, it was impossible to restart, since the coolant would have by that time frozen solid. Not so desirable in the middle of the Pacific Ocean. So, as far as I know, cooling with liquid sodium is not used in any currently running nuclear submarine. Anyways, I am quite skeptical of the bold claims made in this press release. We see the usual patent pending technology, which has broken some unknown thus far barrier to the widespread use of this technology in the PC cooling area, putting the company ahead of the competition. I'll believe it when I see it. Until then, it looks like a potentially very effective venture capital sink for clueless investors with money to burn.

    5. Re:Sodium cooling by smellsofbikes · · Score: 2, Informative

      FWIW my dad's 1964 Ford had sodium-filled exhaust valves, and I'm told many higher-end Mercedes these days have the same.

      The problem comes when you're using the engine for drag-racing, and a connecting rod fails, slamming the piston into the red-hot exhaust valves. Things get very exciting.

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    6. Re:Sodium cooling by joib · · Score: 1

      Which supercomputers might that be? This is the first time I've heard of it.

      (Cray uses Flourinert for some machines, which is not a liquid metal).

    7. Re:Sodium cooling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just don't go hacking into the reservoir or any of the tubes with a saw, mmmkay?

      That's OK - just don't piss on the sodium, mmkay?

    8. Re:Sodium cooling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm, the last engine in a car that used sodium filled exhaust valves,that I am aware of, was a 1966 Ford 352.

      I may be wrong, but maybe there is a reason they don't use sodium. Maybe because they can get acceptable (read cheaper) solutions by a combination of freeing exhaust restrictions at the head, forcing the flame front to 'float' in the air swirl creating by the properly designed combustion chamber preventing hot spots, maybe by having better lubricants that can absorb more heat, and making the lubricants run closer to the surface of better alloyed engine assemblies.

      Oh yeah, forgot dry sump heat exchangers. They began using those in WWII. The P-51 and many others had those..

      Sodium burns hot at a low temp.

      Ever see a magnesium block in a early 70's Volkswagen Bug go up? Pretty flamage.. Pretty hot - melts reinforced concrete, the car, asphalt, etc..

      Is sodium one of those elements that will catch fire pretty easily in our breathing space? Wonder if it's smoke is toxic..

  14. What is liquid metal? by dacut · · Score: 4, Informative

    Google is being of limited help here. The main link I'm finding is to Liquidmetal Technologies, which is producing Liquidmetal and Vitreloy -- zirconium-based alloys which are amorphous in structure (hence the "liquid" in the name) but are otherwise solid in appearance and use (and much stronger than stainless steel or titanium). This is not something one would be pumping through heat tubes to cool a CPU.

    Obviously, mercury is out due to its toxicity. My initial thought was they're using metal bits in a suspension, but I have doubts as to whether this would actually do anything useful. Deeper searching yields this page, which describes a gallium/indium/tin alloy which is liquid at room temperature. Wikipedia'a entry for gallium concurs, saying, "It has been suggested that a liquid gallium-tin alloy could be used to cool computer chips in place of water."

    Any materials experts out there care to comment?

    1. Re:What is liquid metal? by ^_^x · · Score: 1

      Others have suggested sodium alloys too.

      Then, I still don't see it. Mercury and alkali metals are too dangerous. Then again, I can see it done with mercury if they can convince regulators it's sealed well enough. It would also explain why they don't dare get more specific than "metal." Otherwise they could patent it, or failing a patent, it should be pretty easy to cut open and analyze if you're a competitor.

      I'll throw my guess in with your suggestion of Ga-In-Sn, or just Ga.

  15. No liquid metal jokes? by martin-boundary · · Score: 4, Funny
    Fair enough. How about mimetic poly alloy jokes?

    "That's not liquid metal, that's a mimetic poly alloy!"

    "It's as if millions of nano cpus suddenly cried out in terror and were silenced"

    "Mime or mime not. There is no try."

    "T-1000, I am your mould."

    1. Re:No liquid metal jokes? by |/|/||| · · Score: 1

      "Mimed and failed?"
      "Mimed and died."

      --
      [javac] 100 errors
    2. Re:No liquid metal jokes? by oodaloop · · Score: 1

      What about, "I'll put you in the cooler!"

      Here we have an article about liquid metal as a means of cooling and no Mr. Freeze jokes!

      --
      Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
  16. Magnetic pump? by lawpoop · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The article mentions that this device uses an electromagnetic pump to move the heat around. In my naivete, I suggested a similar thing, without a pump. I imagined a sort of metal lava-lamp, where at the base, next to the CPU, blobs of molten metal would rise up towards the top of the heat sink. As they rose, they would cool off ( with the help of the fan) , and then sink again to collect more heat. So, the outside of the heat sink would be copper or aluminum or something, and the inside would be some low-temperature metal like tin. Traditional fin architecture would assist in dispersing the heat.

    --
    Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
    -- Pablo Picasso
    1. Re:Magnetic pump? by maglor_83 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Isn't that exactly what a heat pipe does?

    2. Re:Magnetic pump? by Max+Littlemore · · Score: 1

      So, the outside of the heat sink would be copper or aluminum or something, and the inside would be some low-temperature metal like tin.

      From what I can figure out of low temperature liquid metals, inside would probably be some gallium-tin alloy if it was to be non toxic. If so, the heat sink would need to be copper. Gallium eats through aluminium.

      --
      I don't therefore I'm not.
    3. Re:Magnetic pump? by Blackhalo · · Score: 1

      "the inside would be some low-temperature metal like tin."

      For what a Pentium 4?

      "The melting point of Tin is 231.9681 C."

      I was thinking mercury but that seems awful toxic. The gallium alloy think is interesting though.

      --
      "There is nothing to do it. But to do it." -Floyd Pepper
  17. cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and i can cure cancer by mixing saliva and boiling urine... IF IT WORKS AND IS AFFORDABLE.

  18. We, Denmark by ZarathustraDK · · Score: 5, Funny

    We give you funny cartoons and heatsinks.

    You give us Bush, Microsoft and Michael Jackson.

    Bad deal, Denmark thinks.

    --
    If you quote this signature there'll be 72 copies of Windows ME waiting for you in Heaven.
  19. Been there, done that by TheModelEskimo · · Score: 4, Funny

    Actually, back in my sophomore year in college, my roommates and I built a liquid-metal-cooled 6-node cluster into the back seat of an old Fiero.

    The cool thing was, power was so cheap (via government subsidies called "grants") that we eventually upgraded the cluster to run a realtime terrain modeling system that was supposed to identify a path through a network of roads that allowed for the highest average speed, given speed limits and road lengths. The terrain modeling part would determine a way to maximize the time spent going downhill.

    DARPA initially supported us, and were going to upgrade our status, give us clearances, etc. but they eventually killed our funding after Ford found out we were using a Fiero and complained about our physical safety while operating the system. But man, DARPA know of some *way* cool ghost towns and low-traffic road networks.



    The preceding is a work of fiction written by an easily-distracted procrastinator in a severe time crunch

    1. Re:Been there, done that by transporter_ii · · Score: 1

      Back in the day, I would have been happy with a 2-node cluster in the backseat of my Fiero.

      Jokes aside, I did have a Fiero and it was a two-seater like a 'vette. There was no backseat.

      --
      Doctors destroy health, lawyers destroy justice, universities destroy knowledge, religion destroys spirituality
    2. Re:Been there, done that by TheModelEskimo · · Score: 1

      Did I say seat? I meant "shelf." ;-)

    3. Re:Been there, done that by thatskinnyguy · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, the Fiero was put out by Pontiac (GM) and not Ford.

      --
      The game.
    4. Re:Been there, done that by TheModelEskimo · · Score: 1

      Right, and it's just like Ford to complain about GM getting special treatment...anyway, nevermind, not a big deal :D

    5. Re:Been there, done that by seeker_1us · · Score: 4, Informative

      The Fiero had no back seat.

    6. Re:Been there, done that by TheModelEskimo · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sweet, modded to 5, Interesting for a work of fiction involving a mythical Fiero with a back seat. Hey, if you guys want, I got more where this stuff came from. There was one time, back in the first Desert Storm, when my Republican Guard buddies and I...well, another day maybe.

  20. Why not just use freons. by Lewrker · · Score: 0

    They work. I need a nice suntan.

  21. Just add som potassium by viking80 · · Score: 3, Informative

    An alloy of sodium (Na) and potassium (K) is liquid from 12.6 to 785 C

    it is cheap and wets most metals (good heat transfer)

    it is a little reactive, so recycling would need some special handling.

    --
    don't cut it off www.mgmbill.org
    1. Re:Just add som potassium by Ellis+D.+Tripp · · Score: 3, Informative

      it is a little reactive, so recycling would need some special handling.

      A little reactive? It would burn pretty violently if simply exposed to air, and EXPLODE if it came in contact with water. And either event would produce highly corrosive byproducts.

      --
      Remember "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters"? Help make it a reality again! http://soylentnews.org
    2. Re:Just add som potassium by maglor_83 · · Score: 2, Funny

      A little reactive? It would burn pretty violently if simply exposed to air, and EXPLODE if it came in contact with water. And either event would produce highly corrosive byproducts.

      Where do I sign up?!

    3. Re:Just add som potassium by bmo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "A little reactive? It would burn pretty violently if simply exposed to air"

      You're exaggerating. You're thinking of cesium.

      It all depends on how far down the periodic table you go and how much.

      This is sodium and potassium

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l9z5-mJ8NZk&feature=related

      "EXPLODE"

      Yeah, but you're exaggerating more. If anything, there would be a gram or two of metal in the coolant tube to cool a CPU. Not a whole heck of a lot. We're not talking about throwing 20 pounds of the stuff off the bridge near MIT. And besides, if water is in contact with your motherboard, you've got other problems.

      Here's a video of cutting slices off a brick of sodium. As you can see, it doesn't ignite on contact with air. All the fun happens when you put it in water.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JD85OUkEKKw

      "remember the time you stole some sulfuric acid from school?" Ahahaha

      BTW, a video of cesium:

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sNdijknRxfU "ooooohhh"

      --
      BMO

    4. Re:Just add som potassium by delt0r · · Score: 1

      Lithium ion batteries anyone....

      --
      If information wants to be free, why does my internet connection cost so much?
    5. Re:Just add som potassium by wattrlz · · Score: 1

      it is a little reactive, so recycling would need some special handling.

      A little reactive? It would burn pretty violently if simply exposed to air, and EXPLODE if it came in contact with water. And either event would produce highly corrosive byproducts.

      That's why it's been mostly replaced with Galinstan.

    6. Re:Just add som potassium by utnapistim · · Score: 2, Funny

      it is a little reactive, so recycling would need some special handling.

      A little reactive? It would burn pretty violently if simply exposed to air, and EXPLODE if it came in contact with water. And either event would produce highly corrosive byproducts.

      What he meant was ...
      Do not touch the operational end of The Device.
      Do not look directly at the operational end of The Device.
      Do not submerge The Device in liquid, even partially.
      Most importantly, under no circumstances should you-HHhhhHH!

      Doing so, will result in an 'unsatisfactory' mark on your official testing record followed by death.

      --
      Tie two birds together: although they have four wings, they cannot fly. (The blind man)
    7. Re:Just add som potassium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or mercury Hg? this can be toxic

  22. Obligatory Terminator 2 quotage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "So this other guy, he's a Terminator like you, right?"

    "Not like me. A T-1000, advanced prototype."

    "More advanced than you are?"

    "Yes. A mimetic poly-alloy."

    "What the hell does that mean?"

    "Liquid metal."

  23. Re: A little reactive? by Ken_g6 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Could be worse. Could be cesium.

    --
    (T>t && O(n)--) == sqrt(666)
  24. T-1000 isn't made out of metal by bigplrbear · · Score: 2, Funny

    He's made out of a "mimetic poly-alloy" you insensitive clod! Evil governator killing robots have feelings too ya know!

  25. Let me say that I for one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    will be the first to welcome our new liquid metal overlords. Hey, that would be just like that Terminator guy!!!!

  26. coolless cpu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What if a CPU were made this way...

    take a flourescent lightbulb tube, and two radio transmitters... transmit a signal into the lightbulb to make a lightshow and find the lightshow to play to how the signals are sent.

    so figure out what signal to send for how the lightshow goes, then figure out how to send a signal with a math function where the lightshow is the answer.

  27. Pricing? by X · · Score: 1

    Supposedly it is reasonably priced, but I couldn't find any information on price anywhere.

    --
    sigs are a waste of space
  28. Im just asking by meeya · · Score: 2, Interesting

    cant it be sodium? or something of the class?

    1. Re:Im just asking by MrNaz · · Score: 1

      Yep. Fun and games when your sodium conduit breaks at the same time as the conduit on your water cooling system.

      --
      I hate printers.
    2. Re:Im just asking by icegreentea · · Score: 1

      It can't be pure sodium. Pure sodium becomes liquid at like 95 degrees or so. Getting your CPU to run that fast to begin with would be quite a feat. I also imagine if you get a hole in the piping, then your screwed. Sodium reacts violently with water (including water vapour in the air). It cannot end well.

  29. "Moderators terminate all T-1000 jokes" by Nova+Express · · Score: 2, Funny

    Don't worry. They'll be back.

    --
    Lawrence Person (lawrencepersonh@gmailh.com (remove all "h"s to mail)

    http://www.lawrenceperson.com/

  30. Re: A little reactive? by Firehed · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yes indeed. That website triggered positively explosive reactions in my retinas. :(

    I'll be sending you a bill.

    --
    How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
  31. Not a joke. by MrNaz · · Score: 4, Funny

    "The submitter requests that the moderators terminate all T-1000 jokes."

    The only way to do that would be to wait until the thread becomes stale, assess people who made the jokes, and then send back a cybernetic soldier to kill their mothers.

    --
    I hate printers.
    1. Re:Not a joke. by paimin · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up! Good one.

      --
      Facebook is the new AOL
    2. Re:Not a joke. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...thereby preventing them from posting the jokes, resulting in, nobody going back in time to kill their mothers, meaning that they are alive to post the jokes, meaning that a cybernetic assassin will go back in time and kill their mothers, thus preventing them from being born, and so they wouldn't have posted the joke, which means that nobody would go back in time to kill their mothers...

    3. Re:Not a joke. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But if they did this wouldn't all the jokes be gone already? Or are we in the 1985 of an alternate timeline? Great scotts!

  32. T-1000 by wozzinator · · Score: 0

    It cant form complex machines, guns and explosives have chemicals, moving parts, it doesn't work that way, but it can form solid metal shapes.

    --
    BSD is for people who love Unix, Linux is for people who hate Microsoft.
  33. 'Article' is ripped from the product website: by Jaqenn · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Go To the Danamics website: http://www.danamics.com/technology/background.aspx

    Click on Technology. Then click background:

    Cooling of semiconductor hot-spots has developed into a demanding task. In recent years the high power density of microchips has increased rapidly, thereby increasing temperature and temperature non -uniformity on die and across chips. The drive for extremely low thermal resistance if further accelerated by the trend towards smaller system enclosures which has made the cooling task even more difficult. This gives the cooling companies a new challenge. To create cooling devices that is reliable, efficient and compact. Danamics does all of those.

    Then click Pump:

    Electromagnetic pumps have been used for decades and have been seen in a variety of applications. From space crafts and satellites, on nuclear-driven surface warships and submarines and also in land based nuclear reactors and industrial applications. In space, at sea, at land and now also as a key element for hot spot cooling. An electromagnetic pump has several advantages over typical mechanical pump designs. It contains no moving parts, shafts, seals, etc., emits no noise or vibration, has unlimited MTBF and suffers no performance degrading over time. Typically electromagnetic pumps have had the drawback of a high current requirement. The Danamics patent pending multi-string electromagnetic pump eliminates this limitation and delivers a high flow with minimal current input. Due to the small size and power requirements, the multi-string pump makes a liquid metal cooler suitable for use in smaller applications such as home computers, workstations and even laptops.

    Then click Liquid Metal:

    The liquid metal is a key component in Danamics cooling systems. Liquid metal has two major advantages when cooling high power density heat sources: Firstly it has superior thermo physical properties that decrease temperature - and temperature nonâ"uniformity - on die and across chips. Secondly the electrical properties of the liquid metal enables efficient, reliable and ultra compact electromagnetic pumping without the use of moving parts, shafts, seals, etc.

    Then click Benefits:

    Liquid Metal has numerous key advantages compared to competing technologies, such as water-cooling or traditional air cooling. The most important ones are: Ultimate performance Danamics LM10 is the worldâ(TM)s best performing air-cooler. By utilizing the unique properties of liquid metal, the cooler has the lowest thermal resistance of any air-cooler in the market. The cooling capabilities exceeds most watercoolers in a single device. Easy mounting Compared to competing solutions, the Danamics LM10 is a true all-in-one product. There are no external housings, large reservoirs or bulky radiators. With liquid metal cooling you have true performance in a compact, self-contained unit. This makes mounting a breeze and the Danamics LM10 cooler can be mounted in minutes. No moving parts The superior liquid metal brings another advantage besides its efficiency. The properties of liquid metal make the use of an electromagnetic pump possible. Danamicsâ(TM) patent pending multi-string pump delivers high flow combined with a very low power-draw of less than 1W. No noise and no vibration Compared to watercooling pumps, the electromagnetic pump used in Danamics LM10 cooler has numerous benefits. It is hermetically sealed and has no moving parts, which means that no noise or vibration is added to the system from the electromagnetic pump. Also the pump is orientation independent, which ensures maximum flexibility for users and system integrators. Innovative technology Danamics LM10 is built from the ground up using innovative technology. The combination of liquid metal and an electromagnetic pump is all new in commercial cooling devices, bringing

    --
    You are awash in a sea of fiercely stated opinions. Obvious exits are: 'File->Quit', 'Reply', and 'Page Down'.
    1. Re:'Article' is ripped from the product website: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It contains no moving parts, shafts, seals, etc., emits no noise or vibration, has unlimited MTBF and suffers no performance degrading over time.

      Now that *is* impressive!

  34. Re: A little reactive? by HuguesT · · Score: 1

    Even worse : Francium

  35. Re: A little reactive? by HuguesT · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Even worse, Francium.

  36. Re: A little reactive? by Ken_g6 · · Score: 1

    Sheesh. Some people have no appreciation for rustic wood-panel decor on a web site.

    --
    (T>t && O(n)--) == sqrt(666)
  37. You know you're in trouble ... by Random+BedHead+Ed · · Score: 1

    ... when you open the case to add a stick of RAM and the heat sink asks you if you've "seen this boy."

  38. Nice try by AuMatar · · Score: 1, Redundant

    You can terminate all the T-1000 jokes you want, but they'll be back.

    --
    I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
  39. How it's made by heroine · · Score: 1

    Obviously no information about how the liquid metal is made since this is an advertisement, but it's probably a repackaging of ferrofluid in a standard Chinese water cooler.

  40. Waitasecondthere! by n1hilist · · Score: 1

    I just saw the teaser for the new Terminator movie and you want me to put liquid metal in my puter??!

  41. Re:coc!k by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Umm... What?

  42. Improving air-cooling instead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    What about replacing the normal metal heat-sink with Reticulated-Vitreous-Carbon foam... it has a high heat conductivity, and a huge surface area. Its also very light having only 3% relative density. This would seem to me to be the cheapest way of improving CPU cooling.

  43. Better than Watercooling? by Loibisch · · Score: 1

    Technically I understand how liquid metal CAN be more efficient than water. But then again the flow of water is aided by pumps which force a lot of water per second through the cooler, not to mention that a proper radiator is about twice the size of that thing.

    Looks to me like Biosmagazine just copied that part from Danamics' press release. Without any comparative benchmarks (hell, we don't even have a comparison to a standard cooler) I'll remain unconvinced.

  44. Slashdotted by mdm42 · · Score: 1

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sNdijknRxfU "ooooohhh"

    "We're sorry. This video is no longer available."

    YouTube vulnerable to the /. effect? :-O

    --
    New mod option wanted: -1 DrunkenRambling
  45. I think that was the point by Xtifr · · Score: 1

    I think that was the point. Why would Ford complain if they were using a Ford?

  46. The Water CPU cooler says... by fredrik70 · · Score: 1

    ... I'll be back...

    --
    if (!signature) { throw std::runtime_error("No sig!"); }
  47. Autolinkifying URLs (was Re:Toxicity?) by Tsar · · Score: 3, Informative

    how about a link to the firefox extension that autolinkifies plain text urls?

    That would be Linkification, now at version 1.3.5 and Firefox 3.0.x compatible.

    1. Re:Autolinkifying URLs (was Re:Toxicity?) by OutOfMyTree · · Score: 2, Informative

      You find the overhead of Linkification is small enough to make its one trick worthwhile? I have used the DragAndGo family of extensions for years. Just highlight a text URL, drag, and go straight there. But drag plenty of other things and get instant sensible actions. I nearly went insane until they updated for FF3.

      From the QuickDrag website:

      If you are satisfied with the basic feature set and want something with the smallest possible footprint, then QuickDrag is for you.

      If you want lots of features, such as directional dragging options [Ed: ie more choices], QuickDrag is not for you. You should try Drag de Go, Easy DragToGo (which appears to based off of Drag de Go), or other similar extensions.

                     

  48. Methinks... by Compuser · · Score: 1

    A typical electromagnetic pump (IIRC) does have moving parts so the "no moving parts" business suggests it is something to do with E&M and pumping but a bit more exotic. My guess is that the "liquid metal" is a ferrofluid and the cooling mechanism is thermomagnetic convection.

  49. NaK alloy is NOT the same as elemental Na or K.... by Ellis+D.+Tripp · · Score: 2, Informative

    , but just as its physical properties change through alloying (allowing it to become a liquid at STP), so do its CHEMICAL properties. The alloy is a good bit more chemically reactive than the constituent elements are separately.

    Then you need to consider the possibiility of the material being exposed to air or water at ELEVATED TEMPERATURES, if for example the circulating pump stops working, and the coolant tubes rupture...

    --
    Remember "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters"? Help make it a reality again! http://soylentnews.org
  50. What about diamond? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Diamond, and many forms of graphite, have much higher thermal conductivities than any metal. In addition, diamond is an electrical insulator. In the situation of this liquid metal, the most significant mechanism is forced convection, not conduction. However, it is already at a significant disadvantage with respect to solid diamond, what kind of flow rate do they need to attain to equal the heat transfer ability of diamond?

  51. Heat-pipe have phase change by DrYak · · Score: 1

    Lava lamp (and the cooler suggested by Lawpoop), only use the difference of density of a *liquid* at different temperature to create convection flow.

    In heat-pipe, you also get a flow, but that flow uses 2 phases : boiled to *gaz* (at very low internal pressure) by the CPU and condensed back to *liquid* at the heatsink side.

    The difference between a lava lamp and and heatpipe, is exactly the same you find between a water cooling kit and a vapo-chill kit (or a fridge).

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  52. why make fun of hifi by cinnamon+colbert · · Score: 1

    previously on /., alot of fun has been made of stereo equipment, like 600 dollar wooden knobs or 20,000 dollar cables (yes, that is not a type - 20K for wires). I take silly things like liquid cooling as a sign that the pc industry is mature and now a consumer industyr, and most of the engineering is focused on either (a) silly things that give marginal improvement in specs that don't matter (cooling) or cost cutting like the auto industry

  53. Terminator by Theoboley · · Score: 0

    The T1000 takes many forms. Knives, Stabbing weapons. and now... HEATSINK!!

    --
    Stupidity only gets you so far, then you've gotta try
  54. LOL! What a bass ackwards headline... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is something that you might perhaps to expect to see on digg or fark or what ever uncivilized place. It's like announcing that metals are more dense than water is... shouldn't exactly surprise most /. readers. We're not all paid Micro$oft moles here, so don't throw too much gunk at us.

    Please, use your brains when submitting and wording stories.

  55. Eh? by arodland · · Score: 1

    I don't think my Toshiba T1000 really generates enough heat to need a liquid-metal heatsink.

  56. A whole new meaning for mathematicians... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Should they get the Field's Metal poured over them from a 5 gallon jug just like the coach of a winning sports team?

  57. Been done before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nanocoolers tries this a few years ago and nobody wanted anything to do with the liquid metal. It is not alll that much better than water in application, in theory yes, but not in application.

  58. which metal? titanium? tungsten? by swschrad · · Score: 1

    I think they'd not come into effect until too late.

    liquid bismuth would be useful at 180 degrees F for that which can handle it. except there is an end-of-bismuth date around 2020 beginning to be mentioned.

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
  59. Because it is a troll by mbessey · · Score: 1

    1. "Mimetic Polyalloy" is techno-gibberish from the Terminator movies.
    2. "The "Fields Medal" and "Fields Metal" have nothing to do with each other.

    1. Re:Because it is a troll by duckInferno · · Score: 1

      Way to ruin the joke.

      --
      Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, watch it -- I'm huge!
  60. Unlimited MTBF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What does "unlimited mean time between failures" even mean? There's no limit on how often it can fail? It never fails? If the latter, how would you test that?

  61. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Talk about been there, done that, this is nanocoolers all over again. Whatever liquid metal they use it is either;
    a: toxic
    b; to expensive

    That's exactly the trap Nanocoolers fell into, no one would buy this, no one is going to buy it, another flame out. It should work but think of a gaming rig, the picture is nothing more than a heat pipe assembly, how is this different than what is being done now?