Slashdot Mirror


How Do Geeks Exercise?

An anonymous reader writes "I have always been thin but all the sitting in front of the PC is taking its toll now that I'm getting older. I have begun to get a little heavier around the waist. I don't eat a lot but the weight seems to stay on these days. Most of the time I don't have the luxury of just getting out of the house/office. And being an introvert, I'm not enamored of the idea of exercising in full view of *shudder* people. I regularly do press-ups (60 per night) and sit-ups (30 per night) and some fetching and carrying, but that is all and these days it isn't enough. I need a solid and effective routine that will tone all my muscle groups efficiently. Do any Slashdotters have a regular workout routine that can be performed in the privacy of the home to stave off those pounds?"

65 of 1,806 comments (clear)

  1. Bike to work by evw · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Bike to work. (Make living close enough to bike a priority.)

    1. Re:Bike to work by letxa2000 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Agreed. I bike 30 miles every other day and that was enough, along with a sensible diet, to get me from a peak of 180 pounds down to a more healthy 155. Now I'm steady at 155 but can still eat more than I normally could without the exercise. Plus it's good for the heart.

      Maintaining weight is a matter of how many calories you consume and how many your burn. Weight training will build muscle but doesn't burn a lot of calories. Things like running, swimming, and biking are the kinds of things that burn calories.

      I'm sorry you're an introvert. Make time for your health and enjoy the great outdoors. You can always get a stationary bike but, having one of those that I use in the winter, I can assure you that a real bike out in the real world is MUCH more rewarding and it will help you relax mentally as well as keep you in shape physically.

    2. Re:Bike to work by JakeD409 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Bike to work. (Make living close enough to bike a priority.)

      I want to start doing, but I work in an office where they'd care if I came to work sweaty and stinky. What's the solution to this?

    3. Re:Bike to work by NickHydroxide · · Score: 4, Informative

      Weight training will build muscle but doesn't burn a lot of calories. Things like running, swimming, and biking are the kinds of things that burn calories.

      You'd be surprised. Not only does resistance training burn kilojoules at a sufficient rate to lose weight (depending on your eating habits), but also the increase in metabolism (due to increased muscle mass) means that your BMR will be higher than if you only engaged in aerobic training. In other words, you'll burn more kilojoules at rest.

    4. Re:Bike to work by pluther · · Score: 5, Funny

      Just bike home from work, instead?

      --
      If the masses can keep you down, you're not the Ubermensch.
    5. Re:Bike to work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      and makes you better than everyone else.

      I laughed at this, but why do some cyclists have that attitude? I'm talking about the type who scream at motorists to "share the road" because "bikes have the same rights as motor vehicles," and then proceed to run the next four red lights.

      /rant

    6. Re:Bike to work by $random_var · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I bike halfway to work - in California we have these "park and ride" lots, where you can drive to a transportation hub and catch public transit the rest of the way. My long commute and lack of bike trails near home make biking all the way to work impractical, but there's a beautiful bike trail along the 56 freeway that I can take once I get to the park and ride lot.

      Other than that, I stretch, do crunches, and do pushups every morning when I wake up. This is not only stay-in-shape exercise, it's also wake-me-up exercise - double benefits! On the weekents, I ride my bike to In N Out - the benefits may cancel out with the calories, but at least I'm getting exercise. :-)

      To speak to your specific questions, you may want to consider pilates in the home. That gives you a pretty full body workout. You can get private pilates lessons (about $40/hour around here) to help you build a routine, and then go from there exercising at home. I tried that, but frankly I didn't like putting in half an hour to an hour per day.

    7. Re:Bike to work by letxa2000 · · Score: 5, Informative

      A good mix is obviously best. But if he wants to burn calories, I stand by my assertion that traditional exercises such as running, swimming, and cycling are more efficient at burning calories than weight training unless you're doing some ungodly effort on the weight training.

      As an example, this link suggest that at 155 pounds and 60 minutes, I'd burn about 744 calories per hour cycling at 14-15.9mph. Meanwhile, general weightlifting comes in at 223 calories and vigorous weightlifting comes in at 446 calories. And it's a lot more reasonable for most people to do an hour on a bike than a constant productive hour of weight training.

      If he wants to lose weight, he should do these kinds of activities (biking, running, etc.). If he is looking for muscle mass then obviously weight training is an obvious choice. And if he wants both, well, he's going to have to do both.

    8. Re:Bike to work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Tell me about it. 1200-1280 calories a day, for almost 8 years, an hour walk every morning and 2 hours cyclic + circuit work 5 nights a week, and I have all the strength in the world underneath this flab. I also have fat rolls hanging off my arms and thighs, my stomach hangs down so much I haven't seen my own crotch in years unless I'm looking in the mirror, and I have two extra chins. 380lbs is the lowest I've been since the 1990s. Some of us keep up a decent amount of muscle and a hell of a lot of fat on minimal energy intake.

    9. Re:Bike to work by Flapjack · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That's simply not true. Muscle mass burns calories all day long while aerobics only burns while you perform that particular exercise. Metabolic rate is increased around 11hrs post-resistance training & only 1 hr aerobically. You really need to do both to be fit though, as well as the 3rd piece of the puzzle - flexibility.

      --
      More is Better.
    10. Re:Bike to work by u.hertlein · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm sorry you're an introvert.

      Don't be sorry for us (you insensitive clod!)

      It's not like it's a disease, bad in anyway, or meaning that one does not enjoy being outside.
      It's probably different for everyone - for me it means that I don't like being in crowds and
      am more likely to relax being alone or with (a few) close friends.

      But I digress.

      --
      Geek by Nature - Linux by Choice.
    11. Re:Bike to work by thedullroar · · Score: 5, Informative

      Counter citation: "Body size and composition. To function properly, a bigger body mass requires more energy (more calories) than does a smaller body mass. Also, muscle burns more calories than fat does. So the more muscle you have in relation to fat, the higher your basal metabolic rate." From http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/metabolism/WT00006

      --
      Didn't your mother teach you not to do things you would be ashamed to see on the evening news?
    12. Re:Bike to work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Have you considered selling your body to science? I mean by studying the way you can spend 3000 to 4000 calories while eating only 1200 calories could lead to a perpetual machine or something!

    13. Re:Bike to work by GeffDE · · Score: 5, Funny

      Unpossible, AC Troll! Your lies are laid bare.

      The minimum caloric needs of your 380 lb corpulence are ~2700 calories/day. Any less than that and your body starts raiding your fat rolls like your raid bakery rolls.

      You are full of shit; that may explain your obesity.

      --
      It has been a nervous year, with people beginning to feel like Christian Scientists with appendicitis.
    14. Re:Bike to work by Hadlock · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Shower before work and put on clean clothes before you leave. The clothes are (for your purposes anyways) sterile, as is your body. Just like you can't make a green oasis of a field from parched desert from an hour's rain, you can't stink from an hour's exercise right out of the shower. I'd recommend a shower after biking home from work however!

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    15. Re:Bike to work by berboot · · Score: 5, Informative

      If you shower at home before biking, you'll be surprised at how little your sweat smells after a ride into work. Apparently the smell people associate with sweat is mostly bacteria being dispersed by the sweat. Then when you get to work, I change in the restroom into my work clothes, and freshen up any sweaty spots with some scentless moist wipes, apply some deodorant, and I'm good to go for the day. I've been petitioning my employer to install a shower, but so far, no luck.

    16. Re:Bike to work by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 4, Informative

      From a quick search, unverified stats show that bikes make up 2% (just like milk) of vehicle fatalities:

      From:
      http://bicycleuniverse.info/transpo/almanac-safety.html

      How many cyclists die

      Deaths per year. 725, 629, 665, 732, and 693 cyclists died per year in 2004, 2003, 2002, 2001, and 2000 respectively, and were about 89% male. (National Highway Traffic Saftey Administration, and Insurance Institute for Highway Safety)

      An average of 16.5 cyclists per million die every year in the U.S. (For motorists, it's 19.9 motorists per million.) (National Safety Council 1988)

      Cyclists are 2% of road deaths & injuries. The 761 cyclists killed in 1996 accounted for 2% of traffic fatalities, and the 59,000 cyclists injured made up 2% of all traffic injuries. (5)

      They also state later:
      Health benefits of cycling outweigh the risks. "The gain of 'life years' through improved fitness among regular cyclists, and thus their increased longevity exceeds the loss of 'life years' in cycle fatalities (British Medical Association, 1992). An analysis based on the life expectancy of each cyclist killed in road accidents using actuarial data, and the increased longevity of those engaging in exercise regimes several times a week compared with those leading relatively sedentary lives, has shown that, even in the current cycle hostile environment, the benefits in terms of life years gained, outweigh life years lost in cycling fatalities by a factor of around 20 to 1." -- Mayer Hillman, Senior Fellow Emeritus, Policy Studies Institute, and British Medical Association researcher (7, 8)

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    17. Re:Bike to work by Sparky+McGruff · · Score: 5, Funny

      Perhaps he left off a zero... If he spends 3,000 to 4,000 calories a day, while only eating 12,000 calories, it would explain a lot.

    18. Re:Bike to work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This is a myth that's been going around for quite some time...there's absolutely no basis for claiming that a well muscled person burns more calories when sitting on the couch.

      How about the fucking laws of a physics? If that extra muscle isn't decaying, and is being maintained alive, it takes energy to do so.

      The same thing is true for fatter people too. They burn more energy just sitting around. It's one of the reason for the yo-yo dieting. They lower their food intake, lose weight, thus their body requires less energy for maintenance of their thinner body. Now their lower intake of food isn't enough to make them lose weight at the same rate, and eventually they'll stop losing weight altogether. This causes them to becomes disheartened, they quit the diet thinking their new weight is good enough, and start eating at their older levels. Except that their older levels is far more energy than they need and they quickly gain the weight again.

      Advice to everyone who intends to lose weight. This sucks, but until you accept this as the truth, you'll never succeed: you don't go on a diet until you lose the weight and then it's over. You go on a diet, you lose weight. If you stop losing weight, it means you'll have to cut more calories. Eventually you'll reach the weight you want. Then you don't get to eat any more calories. You just found your equilibrium calorie point. That's the maximum you get to eat forever.

      Unless you put on some muscle and do enough cardio to burn more calories. Then you get to eat a bit more.

    19. Re:Bike to work by letxa2000 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Following-up, I found this link which says:

      he estimates that the increased lean body mass associated with exercise can increase total daily energy expenditure by between 8% (143 cals per day) for a moderately active person to 14% (286 cals per day) for a highly active person.

      If this person dos moderate weight training then over time (the increased MBR is not immediate) he might burn an extra 143 calories per day. That pretty much supports my position that if he wants to lose weight, he needs to be on a bike burning 400-740 calories per hour rather than 223 calories per hour of weightlifting. So if he does two hours of weight training to my two hours of biking, he'll burn maybe 223 * 2 + 143 = 589 calories per day in his exercise while I burn close to 1,480 even if I don't get any increased muscle mass from biking (which I do, albeit to a lesser extent than a good weight training program).

      If you want to burn calories: Run or bike, or similar cardio exercises. Of course a balanced workout including weight training is obviously the final goal. But if the immediate goal is weight loss, weight training isn't going to accomplish it nearly as fast as running or biking.

    20. Re:Bike to work by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 4, Funny
      Generally I send my orc hunter out on foot instead of using his epic mount.

      Oh, wait...

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    21. Re:Bike to work by TeacherOfHeroes · · Score: 4, Informative

      This was said in jest, but if your city's busses are good enough to include bike racks, and you are able to find a bus route that will take you close to where you work, you can take the bike with you, and just bike home.

    22. Re:Bike to work by Kell+Bengal · · Score: 5, Interesting
      I have had a similar experience. I do an hour of exercise a night (mostly riding - about 2500 kj) and lived on 4000 kj daily (yes, I worked it out) and my weight never droped below 110 kg.

      I got frustrated and decided to get scientific about it. When I did the maths I was surprised that my daily base intake should be 8000 kj - about twice of what I was getting. I realised that my body was probably in starvation mode and my metabolism was very slow.

      Currently, I'm working on an energy intake of about 6000-8000 kj and letting the exercise I do increase my metabolism and burn it off slowly. Consider upping your intake to 1500 calories a day and see how your metabolism reacts.

      --
      Scientists point out problems, engineers fix them
      altslashdot.org: The future of slashdot.
    23. Re:Bike to work by kesuki · · Score: 4, Interesting

      "The minimum caloric needs of your 380 lb corpulence are ~2700 calories/day. Any less than that and your body starts raiding your fat rolls like your raid bakery rolls."

      perhaps, the fault doesn't lie in the AC, but rather in the information he's using to obtain his calories? I for one have noticed that food packaging, while usually having truthful nutrition facts labels, have downright false of misleading front of package portion numbers, the worst offender was 'great value' brand products, their microwave bacon claims the same number of ounces as their competitor, hormel, yet if you go by the nutrition facts label, and do the math you wind up with double the number of grams of meat as on the front of the package. if you go by calories per gram, and multiply by the front of the package, you'd only come up with 50% of the actual calories.

      now myself, the only diet i use is pretty simple. 1. restrict sugar. sugar is evil, and i avoid sugary foods wherever possible. 2. snack healthy this means, for me, popcorn, pork rinds, whole grain baked snack chips, 1% fat cottage cheese, or small quantities of peanut butter + wheat bread (like a fold over sandwich)

      anything high in protein is a priority over other snacking options carb based snacks are highly limited, once in a while for a treat i'll get a 99 cent sized potato/dorrito chip bag, or a candy bar, mostly the only other treat i allow is stride gum, which uses more carbs in chewing that chewing gum gives calories.

      Since i can't tolerate asperatame (headaches) that means i'm stuck with sucralose or stevia for low carb flavored drinks. luckily a very nice sucralose based powdered drink mix is on the market under 2 brand names propel, and fulfill. for $2.50/10 pack and $2/10 pack respectively. This is my primary daily drink although i'm likely getting over vitaminized by this but they're water soluble vitamins...

      since my food is also on a budget, i've been relying on some fairly cheap, but not as good for me products, and i shop almost exclusively at the local wal-mart. i was having weight gain problems when i was eating breakfast cereal daily, and i have trouble following my diet on vacations, since my relatives have no sane diet restrictions... but since i cut the breakfast cereal, my weight has stabilized. i only eat breakfast (microwave ones, though) on my grocery shopping day, so i'm not shopping on an empty stomach. i allow allow myself about 16 ounces of sugar sweetened soda(actually 1/4 a 2-liter), per day maximum, skipping days whenever possible through will power, etc.

      and i sit all day in front of a computer, and don't exercise.

      it's totally unhealthy, to not exercise, but i always justify my life style with the 'you can't live forever' argument.

    24. Re:Bike to work by flewp · · Score: 5, Funny

      Buy a huge SUV big enough to fit your bike in. Then drive to work with the bike. Then ride your bike home. Then take a cab to pick up your SUV and drive home. Simple!

      --
      WWJD.... for a Klondike bar?
    25. Re:Bike to work by blitziod · · Score: 4, Insightful

      accept you are confusing phsyics with biology. the caloric content of food is based on what the average person should be able to get from it. If the posters body can extract more of the energy from foods( or certain types of foods) than average he will get more energy than the caloric contents on the label. those are not based at 100% conversion to energy.

      --
      The only way to bust a doper--is when you yourself become a smoker!
    26. Re:Bike to work by dubl-u · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The minimum caloric needs of your 380 lb corpulence are ~2700 calories/day.

      I've seen other people make similar reports. You're quoting an average number, but I've never seen good data on the outliers, which this guy could well be.

      Also, data like that you quote is generally taken from people on normal diets. The body has a number of low-calorie adaptations do deal with times of famine.

      Although the AC you reply to is not typical, you won't be able to know that he's actually wrong until you get him in a lab for a week. Which, given that you feel confident enough to be a total dick about it, I'm sure you've already done, right?

    27. Re:Bike to work by smellotron · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Just be careful to ALWAYS alert the bus driver when you're handling your bike, and ALWAYS maintain eye contact while doing so. There was a case in the last year somewhere in Illinois where the bus driver didn't pay attention, and ended up running over and dragging a cyclist who was getting his bike from the rack on the front of the bus.

    28. Re:Bike to work by sir+fer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A lot of good suggestions here, but what you people are also missing (amongst other things) is the number of calories that get used up building extra muscle. It takes something like 24 calories to build a gram of muscle which would only yield 4 calories if eaten (insert cannibal jokes here), so there's a lot more to the weight-training-picture than all of the above posts take into account by focusing on the number of calories that get used in the activity.

      Also, people who only focus on calories are missing 90% of the nutrition picture. If calories were the only thing that mattered when it came to body composition, then we could all drink vegetable oil and eat sugar without any worries. There is a lot more to the nutritional picture than calories, such as vitamins, minerals and the "side effects" and chemical interaction of any food upon the body. For example one can obtain amino-acids from nuts or tobacco leaves but I can guess which one we would all prefer.

      When it comes to diet, just try and eat "clean" i.e. stay away from food you haven't prepared yourself and learn to read food labels. This will generally keep a lot of hidden crap out of ones diet. Learn to like rice, lean meats/fish, raw/lightly cooked veges and fruits. Eating a good deal of fibre and nutrient-rich food will go a long way toward moving ones body composition in a favourable direction, and in my experience will solve 90% of the problem

      --
      Debian FTW ;o)
    29. Re:Bike to work by Simon+Brooke · · Score: 4, Informative

      I really hate the holier than thou attitude as well. I'll gladly share the road with cyclists... when they start going the speed limit instead of doing 20mph in the middle of the road with a posted 30 mph speed limit - thus holding everyone behind them up.

      This is a nonsense argument anyway, because in urban traffic a cyclist is almost always faster than a car. What's slowing you down is not cyclists, it's congestion. A cyclist uses a lot less road space than a car, so if everyone got out of their cars and onto bikes there would be a lot less congestion and everyone would get to their destinations faster (and in better temper).

      But - at least in the UK and most other English-speaking countries - cyclists use the road by right while motorists use it by license. The point about a license is you don't have a right - that it can be taken away from you.

      Motorists are allowed on the road as long as they play nice with the people who have a right to be there - and no longer.

      --
      I'm old enough to remember when discussions on Slashdot were well informed.
    30. Re:Bike to work by c0p0n · · Score: 4, Informative

      The answer to weight lifting vs cardio is to do both. Alternate cardio days with weight lifting days. Your muscles repair and grow both in size and strength when you are resting, so you need some days off. For example, my workout consists on mon/thurs cardio & core, tues/fri weight training. So if you workout your legs, heart & core one day, they will be in repair mode the next while you're exercising a different set of muscles.

      Food is equally important, for it affects directly your performance in everything. You need to eat MASSES of veg and salad and fruits. And by MASSES I mean they have to be the bulk of your diet. Don't consume many carbs the days you're working out, do mostly veg & protein. No fats. Replenish the days you're resting with eating a bit more carbs. Brown rice, wholewheat bread, cereals such as oats, porridge, wheetabix.

      Have breakfast in the form of cereals I said earlier. Eat some protein right after working out. If you feel peckish, nibble on apples. Leave bananas and melon fo "once in a while" as they contain masses of sugar, nevertheless you still need to eat them. Substitute meat by white or blue fish. Eat oily fish twice a week; red meat once, white meat twice.

      Water. At least 2 litres a day, specially when you workout. Reason being, all the fat & energy your body is burning leaves debris, and guess how you expel it... hydration is not also important for that, but also to keep your brain's and body performance; and your skin will be so much better. Water. Not diet coke, yes? And forget by the way about coke & fanta. 125kcal every 1/3 litre (one can). Dude, that is well bad. It takes 12m on a medium sized person running at 9 km/h to burn all that.

      --

      Your head a splode
    31. Re:Bike to work by KGIII · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There are some great ideas here as you say but there are also some dangerous ones from my learning experiences. I will quantify/qualify...

      I went through about 13 years as a NON-PROFESSIONAL body builder. Not a weight lifter. (spacing intentional) At my peak I managed to hit 198 pounds with a 3% body fat. (For those interested in the perspective I'm a hair under 5' 10" tall.) At that time I was spending two to four hours a day in a gym and actually striving to get in a couple hours a day of some other heavy physical activity such as running or playing a sport. It was an obsession, prior to this I had been fat.

      I will NOT say that I know what I'm talking about because at 33 years old I suddenly started getting chubby but, by that time, I was already down to 172 pounds, not muscle, but chub. If I'd chopped the chub off (cardio) I'd have been nothing but 152 pounds.

      There are reasons at both ends of the spectrum for me.

      The first is diet and exercise. I ate well, I ate a lot. I ate healthy. During build cycles I'd consume 10k calories a day and think nothing of it. (I still love me some peanut butter.)

      The second, latter days, is due to lack of diet and lack of exercise.

      Today I've gotten to a healthy weight of 165.5 pounds (went to the doctor's this week) and pretty much sit there. I'd estimate that I engage in some sort of low impact exercise two to three times per week.

      However, I only eat two meals a day and only have two snacks per day. My caloric intake from beer is enough to maintain the weight and my limited activity keeps me from sagging.

      I would say that diet, nothing else, is more important than any other aspect of weight control. For each person it WILL be different. The idea that we, as geeks, can apply metrics is patently absurd because the human body ranges in scope from person to person to such wildly different degrees that we simply can't.

      This being said, I'm not a doctor and a doctor is the best choice to start with. Look to see what you're healthy enough to do and to find the best methods to achieve your weight control goals. To put it into geek terms there is no right choice nor a better choice for an OS/app but the one that works best for you. In my case it has always been diet constraints/allowances as the single most important factor.

      For anyone else it may be different.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    32. Re:Bike to work by xalorous · · Score: 5, Informative

      I think you are trying to say that one should strive for balance between weight/resistance training and aerobic excercise?

      I'm male, approaching 40. At 30 I joined the armed forces and had an ongoing battle with weight and fitness for 4 years until I left. I learned (in no particular order after the first one):
      1. To lose weight requires that you burn more calories than you consume.
      2. After 30, men need to lift weights to maintain muscle mass.
      3. Don't run two days in a row.
      4. Muscle burns more calories than fat.
      5. If you dramatically increase your exercise, your appetite will increase.
      6. Change gradually and consult a physician.
      7. Running shoes are not one size fits all.
      8. "Fat burns in a fire fueled by carbs" (don't go on 0 carb diets, you'll burn muscle mass before you burn fat.)

      Sensible portions at meals, avoid sugary foods and highly processed flour, eat balanced meals, err towards more fruit and green leafy vegetables, exercise for stress relief and burning calories.

      --
      TANSTAAFL GIGO Acronyms to live by!
    33. Re:Bike to work by GeffDE · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually, the caloric content of food is measured by a bomb calorimeter, which simply burns the food until it is completely oxidized. To extract the maximum amount of energy, the body must do the same thing, which is what occurs through the metabolic pathway of glycolysis -> krebs cycle -> electron transport chain for sugars; beta-oxidation -> krebs cycle -> ETC for fats; and protease digestion -> reduction to pyruvate/acetyl CoA -> krebs cycle -> ETC for proteins. These pathways result in the food being broken down into water and carbon dioxide, the same end-products from the bomb calorimeter. In chemistry, the total energy derived from a chemical reaction (or set of chemical reactions) is given by the equation: Delta_Energy = Energy(in bonds of reactants) - Energy(in bonds of products). The body cannot extract more energy than this, and that is exactly what the bomb calorimeter is measuring. The caloric content of foods is based on the total amount of energy that can be derived from a food product.*

      Now, if our AC troll friend can derive more energy from food than the bomb calorimeter can, he is, quite literally, Mr. Fusion.



      * As such, it follows that people do not actually require 2000 kCal (on average) per day; however, that is how much energy needs to be in the food so that the ~35% efficient catabolic pathways can derive enough useful energy from the food to power the body. 35% efficiency is extremely high (the most efficient internal combustion engines get ~25-30%); it is the result of literally billions of years of evolution because deriving energy from a substrate is a requirement of life, so the whole complicated mess has been around from the beginning. Therefore, Nature has optimized the crap out of it. Unless Mr. Fusion up there has different catabolic pathways than the rest of life on earth there is no way that he could be that more efficient than everyone else.

      --
      It has been a nervous year, with people beginning to feel like Christian Scientists with appendicitis.
  2. Leave the car at home by Shados · · Score: 4, Informative

    Pretty much what the title says. Leave the car at home if you can. If you take public transportation, walking to the bus stop (rushing so you don't miss it =P), running down the stairs of the subway station (not using those fancy high tech automated ones! /cough), and so on, the pounds go away quite fast.

    That is if you live somewhere where its possible. I've melted a lot doing that.

  3. Get outside by colourmyeyes · · Score: 4, Funny

    Seriously. It's actually pretty nice out there, or at least it was the few times I've had to go out.

    --
    My grandmother used anecdotal evidence all the time, and she lived to be 120 years old.
  4. Sex by sir_eccles · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's even more fun when you have an exercise partner.

    1. Re:Sex by kwabbles · · Score: 5, Funny

      The question was:

      "Do any Slashdotters have a regular workout routine that can be performed in the privacy of the home to stave off those pounds?"

      --
      Just disrupt the deflector shield with a tachyon burst.
  5. Kayaking by Moray_Reef · · Score: 5, Informative

    You have to get out of the house, but to suit the introvert, you can go where most people can't. You also get to wear PFD as well as and a baggy dry suit to cover up the unsightlyness if you need it in your area.

    --
    If you voted for Nader, THIS IS ALL YOUR FAULT!!
  6. Aerobics Necessary by MarkvW · · Score: 5, Informative

    You very much need aerobic exercise to supplement your muscular-oriented exercise. Aerobic exercise works the heart, lungs, and circulatory system--very critical subsystems.

    I'd recommend a treadmill or a bike with a trainer hooked up to it. Have a TV in front of you. After reading a couple books about it, use a heart rate monitor to keep from pushing too hard or too easy.

    Try to build up to one hour per day. Don't discontinue your calisthenics. Read about exercise.

    1. Re:Aerobics Necessary by Martin+Blank · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'll add my experience into this. I'm currently getting caught up on 24. I missed a few episodes way back in Season 1, and so I stopped watching it. I use it to get roughly the same amount of time in on the treadmill each session (42:30, give or take a minute or so), and since I've just reached 4pm in Season 1, I still have a long way to go, even daily, to finish it out.

      Pick a series that you've missed, one that you can get a little lost in. Press play on the DVD remote and press the start button on the treadmill at the same time. Anything that goes for a total of 30 minutes or more (any hour-timeslot TV show from The Sopranos to The Wire to West Wing works perfectly) will keep you diverted from the effort itself enough that you'll be able to pass the time without much notice.

      I've only been doing this for a couple of months (started 24 a little into it), and I've managed to have to stay off of it due to foot injuries for a week at a time twice (get good new running shoes from a sporting good store!), but I'm averaging about 450 calories burned according to the built-in meter without too much stress, and I've dropped 14 pounds from my peak. I have a goal of dropping another eight pounds by October, which should be easily done well before, and may push on for another five after that, but that puts me at 140, and my family complains when I'm that low.

      If you're a complete geek, graph everything available. I track time, distance, average speed, calories burned, and fat calories burned, as well as pounds burned (based on 3600 calories per pound), average per session, number of sessions, weight each day, and the approximate target date the goal will be reached. All of these are graphed, so I can see my weight dropping and my efforts returning improved numbers.

      Another key point is to watch your calorie intake. I've tried doing the diet tracking and getting proper nutrition or leaving out fats or whatever, and I find that I stop this after a couple of weeks. It's much easier to track calories instead, and you don't stress over what you eat for dinner. I've read that it the average metabolism burn about 12 calories per pound per day, so if you weigh 160 pounds and can keep your intake below 1920 calories per day, you're going to do well. It's not at all difficult to maintain 1600 calories per day without much discipline, and it doesn't send your body into a crash that causes it to horde fat. It also gives you room for the occasional pizza day.

      One of the things that I do to help stave off the occasional hunger is to drink more fluids. I've found that the low-calorie Crystal Light mixes give me a good variety with little hassle and little cost. If it works for you, try Diet Coke Plus. It's not everyone's favorite flavor, but it's different from regular Diet Coke, and I use it to douse my occasional soda cravings.

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
  7. Martial arts by Fry-kun · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They're cool enough to do in front of other people, no matter how bad you are, and you have something to show off to your friends. It's a win-win scenario.

    --
    Did you know that "FTW" ("for the win") is a direct translation of "Sieg Heil"?
    1. Re:Martial arts by Paradigm_Complex · · Score: 5, Funny

      They're cool enough to do in front of other people, no matter how bad you are, and you have something to show off to your friends.

      You've never been beatten up by a twelve year old girl, have you? Say, while testing for my yellow belt. Err, your yellow belt.

      --
      "A witty saying proves nothing." - Voltaire
  8. I am in the same boat, here's what I do: by problah · · Score: 4, Informative

    I went and picked up a cheap yet sturdy bike ($500.00 Specialized Hard Core Comp), and I take the train to work. from train stations in either direction it's about a 10 minute ride (20 total one way), however I can bike down to farther train stations to get a real benefit from it.

    So the next train station from my work is about a 45 minute bike ride away, while the first one is ten.

    The one after that is about an hour and a half away, and so on an so forth.

    You can do this with bus stops too.

    It's uncomfortable at first getting used to the bike, so pick up Mtn Bike shorts (They aren't the spandex ones, they look like regular shorts), and get used to it, then have at it. I love it now, and I royally hate working out in front of people.

    Good luck!

  9. Well not quite, BUT... by Moryath · · Score: 4, Informative

    #1 - Yourself Fitness. PC, PS2, Xbox all options for it (and the ps2 and xbox titles are both compatible with their "upgraded" counterparts).

    #2 - Wii Fit. Surprisingly effective if you discipline yourself to doing it. Downside: not as organized.

    And now we get to some of the better stuff.

    #3 - Find a local swimming pool, strap on a pair of rollerblades, get a bicycle.

    #4 - Join a sports league. Your local parks & recreation department is a good start here and can steer you to local team sports if nothing else. This will also help with your "introverted" problem.

    #5 - Once you take care of the "introverted" problem... get a girlfriend and do a lot of the world's #1 calorie-burning exercise.

    1. Re:Well not quite, BUT... by spir0 · · Score: 5, Funny

      #3 - Find a local swimming pool, strap on a pair of rollerblades, get a bicycle.

      I actually tried this and found I worked up a sweat very quickly. But a word of warning -- when cycling with rollerblades in a swimming pool, stay in the shallow end. The deep can be treacherous and the bike will weigh you down like you wouldn't believe.

      --
      The reason girls and Windows users don't understand UNIX is because all the documentation is in Man files.
    2. Re:Well not quite, BUT... by Bwana+Geek · · Score: 5, Funny

      #5 - Once you take care of the "introverted" problem... get a girlfriend and do a lot of the world's #1 calorie-burning exercise.

      Your girlfriend makes you take her shopping too, eh? I don't care what she says -- the only thing getting thinner is my wallet.

    3. Re:Well not quite, BUT... by Colonel+Korn · · Score: 5, Funny

      If you're in it for the calories, you might as well jog(which burns 286 calories per half hour) as opposed to sex(which burns 173 per half hour).

      That's not very impressive sex.

      --
      "I zero-index my hamsters" - Willtor (147206)
    4. Re:Well not quite, BUT... by kklein · · Score: 5, Funny

      #3 - Find a local swimming pool, strap on a pair of rollerblades, get a bicycle.

      I don't know what sport you're describing there, but it sounds pretty sweet.

  10. Left foot braking by mobby_6kl · · Score: 5, Funny

    This way my left leg/foot gets more exercise when driving an automatic, otherwise a heavy clutch does the trick.

  11. All Muscle Groups by nick_davison · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Unless you've got the luxury of a huge amount of space, the only way you're going to come close to exercising all groups is via free weights.

    Multi exercise machines don't even come close (more on that later). Treadmills/stationary bikes are great for burning calories which'll do most of your weight loss goals but you're asking about all muscle groups. BOSU balls, steps, jump ropes are all more limited in application. The other great full body exercise, swimming, isn't really an option in the privacy of your own home unless you're rich enough to have a good sized pool.

    The problem with free weights, and this comes from being married to a physical therapist who's also an ACE certified personal trainer, is: You're doing it wrong.

    Don't feel bad. Just about everyone does. From the Navy guys I've watched prepping for their PRTs by holding a dumbell in one position and flapping their elbows like chickens to those who swing weights and let the momentum carry them through the weak spots to those who only really focus on a few core groups.

    This is what a good personal trainer will do for you (and, yes, I hate the idea of paying the meathead ones too). A good one will slow you down and perfect your form: meaning you're actually building the weak points not just swinging past them. A good one will start you on machines (really good for isolating the exact form you need but lousy at exercising all of the supporting groups) and then slowly move you over to free weights (really good at exercising a lot of supporting groups, lousy at teaching you good form). A good one will also teach you a whole range of exercises so you're not just bulking your biceps with no work on your triceps, strengthening abs without matching your lats, working on your upper body with no attention to your chicken legs (yes, you, 95% of guys in gyms).

    Look at it this way...

    How good of a coder would you be if you never learned from other people's code and never had anyone review yours? Sure, you might be a prodigy and do some cool trick most people have never thought of. More likely, you'll write messy, inefficient code that seems like it works while leaving memory leaks everywhere.

    In the same way, you might manage to learn everything about lifting from message boards and videos. More likely, you'll get a fair amount right but still be doing a few gastly things that it never occurs to you they're wrong.

    This is why we suck it up, venture in to a gym, find a good trainer (being willing to fire the bad ones until we get that one we vibe with), and learn the technique first... so we can then get it right in our splendid isolation.

  12. Re:Tai Chi by Phrogman · · Score: 5, Informative

    Tai Chi is essentially a form of Kung Fu slowed down to maximize the exercise potential and lessen the strain on your body.

    Once you have learned the essential 108 movements (its all one long cycle that puts you back where you are started, but is learned as 108 or so individual moves), you have a routine that will exercise pretty much every muscle in your body, looks cool, and requires no equipment to perform in, any stretch of ground/grass/parkinglot with a roughly 15x15 ft area free would probably do.

    Its been very popular in China for centuries and obviously works quite well, given the number of old people you see doing it in droves there.

    --
    "The first time I got drunk, I got married. The second time I bought a chimpanzee, after that I stayed sober" Arian Seid
  13. Exercise in front of people anyway by rickward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So you're an introvert. Big deal! Exercise in front of people anyway.

    Look, no one's going to make fun of you for going to the gym; in fact, they are more likely to make fun of someone who needs exercise and doesn't go to the gym.

    The gym isn't Counter-Strike. No one cares if you're an exercise n00b. In fact, in my experience if you screw up at the gym, someone who knows what they're doing will show you the proper way to exercise so you don't injure yourself.

    If you can afford it, and if you really care about your fitness and attractiveness, there is no reason not to go to the gym.

  14. Re:Crossfit by lurker4hire · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Just want to put another nod out there for crossfit, I'm going to a crossfit gym but if you're the introvert type and can handle being extra careful to observe good proper form on your own, doing the WOD (workout of the day - scaled to your fitness level) will give you a good all around workout over time.

    I watched most of the theory vids before deciding to try it out:

    http://www.crossfit.com/cf-info/excercise.html#Clips

    I'd recommend starting with the video "intro to intensity"

    l4h

  15. Hacker Diet? by bdcrazy · · Score: 5, Informative

    How come nobody has mentioned this one yet? I mean, come on! It has fitness tips as well as diet since you really need both to get the pounds off.

    Hacker Diet

    --
    Tonights forecast: Dark. Continued dark throughout most of the evening, with some widely-scattered light towards morning
  16. Thougths from an ex-overweight guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Until the start of 2008 I was about 90 lbs overweight and morbidly obese. Throughout the year I have lost 70 lbs, and I am on my way to having a healthy BMI.

    Here are my thoughts:

    You don't have to go to a gym, but it really helps to have access to nice array of equipment. Get over your fear of going to the gym. No one gives a crap about you --except for when you may be using equipment they want to use. If you want to avoid socializing, wear headphones or go during off hours. If you are afraid of the locker room (that's normal it takes sometime to get used to), then don't use it.

    Now on to to the technical stuff: You need to do a moderate to strenuous aerobic activity at least ~30 minutes a day 3 days a week (5 is better) for the rest of your life. I like to run, row, hike up mountains and occasionally use the elliptical machine. This is necessary for good cardiovascular health, and will help you in your later years. It will also as a side effect help you loose weight.

    You need to do some basic weight training. You seem to favor body weight exercises, keep doing push ups, try increasing the reps, or difficulty by doing them on an incline. Learn to do pullups/dips also. Finally buy a few dumbbells, going up to 35-40 lbs in weight. Learn to do basic curls, and some presses. Later on read some fitness books, or go to a couple of fitness blogs to learn how to do lifts and presses that work your big muscle groups --think squats, and dead lifts. Doing this won't make you a huge muscle guy (believe me the gains are not that great) but you'll be happy with your increased strength. It will also help to keep you from looking flabby.

    One more thing. The key to loosing weight is your diet. Good weight loss is slow, and steady. Cut 500-1000 calories from your diet, and you'll loose 2 lbs a week. However, you need to combine it with exercise or you'll have to keep "dieting" for the rest of your life to maintain your weight. That won't happen, so creating a nice caloric deficit through working out 3-5 times a day will help you maintain a healthy weight once you've reached it.

  17. Battle of the bulge by blueforce · · Score: 4, Informative

    Personally, I go to a gym. But then, I live in a small town so I don't see very many *people*. Incidentally, I've always gone to a gym, even when I lived in a slightly larger town of Philadelphia.

    The key to the middle parts is: it's the last fat to go.

    You don't say how old you are, but the fact is you're getting older and your metabolism continues to slow each year. You can combat that by moving (aka exercise) and eating. Yes, eating. If you don't take in enough calories - the right calories - your body will react by storing what it can, usually in your middle. Unfortunately, your middle is the last place you lose from.

    Muscles burn calories. You can increase your resting metabolic rate by building muscle. Just having more muscle mass == more calories burned sitting on your butt. It's a vicious cycle though, if you don't maintain the muscle (aka exercise) you'll lose it through catabolism (body breaks it down for energy).

    There's a godzillion things you can do at home, but the easiest way to start is with push-ups and sit-ups. Buy an exercise ball, one of those big funny-looking rubber balls. There are dozens of different exercises you can do with those. They're cheap and they're extremely versatile. You don't necessarily need weights if you're a beginner, or even intermediate. You just need to use your body as the weight and do _something_ to trick your body into building some muscle mass. (You won't build a ton just doing pushups, but you'd be suprised how quickly it works) Consistency is key - 3 times per week on the "weights". You need a day in-between to allow your body to recover and actually build the muscle.

    This one goes without saying: Eat healthy!

    If you have the means, i.e. space and money, get a treadmill. Use it 30 minutes a day, 5-6 days a week.

    The bottom line is, you have to burn calories and build some muscle. The only way to do either one is to _move_ a lot.

    --
    If you do what you always did, you get what you always got.
  18. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  19. Let me translate that for us true nerds by infernalC · · Score: 5, Funny

    cosin() is more fun than sin()...

  20. DDR (Dance Dance Revolution) absolutely by vorpal22 · · Score: 4, Informative

    I have a health condition that makes it extremely difficult and stressful for me to leave the house to exercise... I do enjoy a good cardio workout, and was feeling quite unhappy about being unable to engage in a regular routinized exercise session that I enjoyed (because aerobics, yoga, pilates, etc. tapes just aren't that much fun to me), so I decided to see what the hype was about last Christmas and I picked up a DDR game.

    Now I'm an avid DDRer, and I must say that it can be a fantastic workout, especially if you play doubles (i.e. two mats) as you move your centre of gravity much more often, and if you work yourself up to the harder levels, which get you moving faster. I can burn an estimated 1000 calories per session, and those sessions just fly by because I'm really enjoying myself. You don't only see your improvement in the game, but the improvement in your appearance, too. My stomach is trim now, and I have that nice abdominal V that some fit people get.

    If you haven't tried DDR, I highly recommend it. Get a PS2 game, get a couple cheap mats, and give it a go. If DDR isn't your cup of tea, find an exercise routine that you can do at home that you enjoy so that you actually feel inclined to do it more than a few times. You'll never keep up a regime that bores, intimidates, or embarrasses you.

  21. ...and a couple of MAJOR caveats by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 4, Informative

    Those exercises are not for beginners, though. If you aren't already in pretty good shape, two of them are outright dangerous: the bridge will wreck your neck, and squats with the heels coming up will wreck your knees. And even if you're in good shape, I've never met either a qualified doctor, physio or professional sports coach who advocates bridging, because of the risk of neck injury.

    --
    If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
  22. Re:Technical explanation; didn't rtfa. by EvanED · · Score: 4, Funny

    (Disclaimer: I'm no scientist. Well, a computer scientist. But that doesn't apply here.)

    Don't you mean "Damn it, I'm a computer scientist, not a doctor"?

  23. Re:Technical explanation; didn't rtfa. by packeteer · · Score: 4, Informative

    Having greater muscle volume does lead to greater calories burned without doing anything. This however is a pretty small gain. With aerobic exercise you can burn a ton of calories and most importantly you directly burn fat. When you burn the short term energy stores (sugar) of the body it effects you hunger. When you directly burn fat you feel less hungry after working out. This is why aerobic exercise is best for losing weight. Resistance training will work but it takes more will power.

    --
    unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
  24. Zen and the Art of Self-Resistence by nukey56 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Self-resistence isometric and isotonic training. Costs nothing, builds muscle efficiently, surprises your friends and balances your life. Also, you can do it while posting to /. from your basement ;)

  25. Re:Technical explanation; didn't rtfa. by fearofcarpet · · Score: 5, Informative

    To specifically address the question posed (what do we, the Slashdot readers, do to stay in shape):

    I eat vegetarian; low dairy, lots of beans, tempeh, and seasonal fruits/veggies. I bring my lunch to work every day which is cheaper and more nutritious than buying it.

    I lift weights three times a week for an hour emphasizing multi-join and body-weight-resistance exercises like pull-ups, push-ups, dips, incline and hanging crunches, etc.

    I bike to work whenever the weather permits.

    I run 5 km at least once a week (though bad knees sometimes demand that I go for a long walk instead).

    All of this combined yields a weekly time commitment of about 3.5 hours of exercise plus 90 minutes of biking to and from work (2 mi each way). I'm 185 lbs, 6'1", and I fill out my nerdy T-shirts in the shoulders, not the belly. I don't have six-pack, but I certainly don't have a gut. All around I feel very health even though the vast, vast, majority of my time is spent sitting on my ass in front of a computer at work.

    I don't care whose biology teacher told them what about which calories are burned by how many muscles, but my whopping 3.5 hours a week of exercise entitles me to all the beer I can drink and stuffing my face with burritos to my heart's content without gaining a fraction of an inch around my waste line (which hasn't changed in 15 years). And no, I'm not one of those skinny nerds than can eat Taco Bell every day and still look like a bent coat hanger.

    I think that the big trick to staying healthy is sticking with your routine, whatever it is. Don't just go on a diet and start running in response to feeling fat and out of shape. Biking to work is a great way to start and, depending on where you live, has the added benefit of being faster than driving.

    --
    Actually, I wrote my thesis on life experience.