Slashdot Mirror


A Quasi-Quasicrystal

An anonymous reader sends along a link to a mindbending article in Science News on quasicrystals — odd materials with a structure partway between order and disorder. Now researchers have found something even odder: a material that's partway between a quasicrystal and a regular crystal. The order in the new structure is provided by the Fibonacci sequence. It was constructed with plastic beads and laser beams, so no new materials science inventions are on the horizon. "'We are absolutely sure that this structure should have properties that are not usual,' Mikhael says, because materials with odd structures almost always do. Now they just have to figure out what those properties are."

121 comments

  1. Anyone else find that quote hilarious? by haltenfrauden27 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "'We are absolutely sure that this structure should have properties that are not usual,' Mikhael says, because materials with odd structures almost always do."

    Sounds like something out of a Monty Python sketch.

    Seriously, though, I'd rather hear about what interesting/new discoveries come out of this strange material than just hear about the possibility of its existence.

    1. Re:Anyone else find that quote hilarious? by Paradigm_Complex · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Seriously, though, I'd rather hear about what interesting/new discoveries come out of this strange material than just hear about the possibility of its existence.

      When that's announced people will complain that the information is pretty useless and would rather hear about practical applications found for it.
      When that's announced people will complain about why they haven't heard about this before. Others will complain about how it was on digg years ago and how slashdot is slow.

      So shut up and discuss the interesting stuff we have know now :D
      Or get high and stare at the trippy pictures :D
      Or make an off topic meme-based joke :(

      --
      "A witty saying proves nothing." - Voltaire
    2. Re:Anyone else find that quote hilarious? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

      Seriously, though, I'd rather hear about what interesting/new discoveries come out of this strange material than just hear about the possibility of its existence.

      ... Then you should try a news site that deals with less than the latest science news.

    3. Re:Anyone else find that quote hilarious? by MrEricSir · · Score: 1

      "Nobody expects the unusual properties!"

      --
      There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
    4. Re:Anyone else find that quote hilarious? by dontmakemethink · · Score: 3, Informative

      "'We are absolutely sure that this structure should have properties that are not usual,' Mikhael says, because materials with odd structures almost always do."

      Sounds like George Dubya Bush paraphrasing Yoda.

      --

      War as we knew it was obsolete
      Nothing could beat complete denial
      - Emily Haines
    5. Re:Anyone else find that quote hilarious? by hyades1 · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Or make an off topic meme-based joke"

      You mean, like teaching sharks with lasers on their heads to swim in formation so they could generate quasi-crystals as they went about their nefarious business? I am above such childish antics!

      --
      I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
    6. Re:Anyone else find that quote hilarious? by syousef · · Score: 3, Funny

      So shut up and discuss the interesting stuff we have know now :D

      Is that what they call quasi quasi moderation?

      That's cwazsy.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    7. Re:Anyone else find that quote hilarious? by dwater · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "We are absolutely sure that this structure should have properties that are not usual,' Mikhael says, because materials with odd structures almost always do."

      Right. What kind of logic does this guy use?

      "We are absolutely sure it should have 'something'... because ... others almost always do..."

      "We're...100%....80%....60%..." Add a few more even 'less certain' words, like "surely", "perhaps", "maybe" and the confidence in his assertion would have dropped from 100% certainty all the way to 0% certainty in a single sentence.

      I mean, hedging your bets or what? This guy should be a politician.

      --
      Max.
    8. Re:Anyone else find that quote hilarious? by tobiasly · · Score: 1

      Meanwhile, a lone humanoid soldier from the year 2215 is being sent back through time to the day before yesterday, in a desperate attempt to kill the inventor of these quasi-quasicrystals, destroy all his work, and utterly wipe all knowledge of their existence from human memory (including this Slashdot article). But it may already be too late. "Goddamn quasi-quasicrystals and their unusual properties... If only we knew", he thinks as he enters the chronopod. "If only we knew!!"

    9. Re:Anyone else find that quote hilarious? by IceCreamGuy · · Score: 1

      Yes, well, you see, they inductively deduced this concusion...

    10. Re:Anyone else find that quote hilarious? by Blitz22 · · Score: 1

      60% of the time, it works every time....

      --
      If I went around claiming I was an emperor...they'd put me away!
    11. Re:Anyone else find that quote hilarious? by Artuir · · Score: 5, Funny

      I for one welcome our shark-toting Fibonacci based Hitler laser fiends, you insensitive clod!

    12. Re:Anyone else find that quote hilarious? by tsa · · Score: 1

      What's the problem? The answer to the question wether these structures have remarkable properties is definitely 'Maybe'.

      --

      -- Cheers!

    13. Re:Anyone else find that quote hilarious? by omnichad · · Score: 3, Funny

      And it would have worked too, if it weren't for the dupes (on Slashdot).

    14. Re:Anyone else find that quote hilarious? by dwater · · Score: 1

      Are you sure?

      --
      Max.
    15. Re:Anyone else find that quote hilarious? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I liked the quote, but had to read it twice. The logic is perfect. Given that "others almost always do" it follows that this one "should" too, and being "sure" adds nothing to the statement. It is like being sure that the ball doesn't usually land on black in roulette. The word "absolutely" is redundant when used before the word sure, but it somehow makes the odd sentence more interesting. If a sentence is going to be an odd one, I suppose it should at least be interesting.

    16. Re:Anyone else find that quote hilarious? by Firehed · · Score: 4, Funny

      In Soviet Russia, insensitive sharks tote Fibonacci, you Hitler-based laser crystal!

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    17. Re:Anyone else find that quote hilarious? by Bob-taro · · Score: 1

      "We're...100%....80%....60%..." Add a few more even 'less certain' words, like "surely", "perhaps", "maybe" and the confidence in his assertion would have dropped from 100% certainty all the way to 0% certainty in a single sentence.

      I think what they're trying to say is that 60% of the time, it works every time.

      --
      Prov 9:8 Do not rebuke mockers or they will hate you; rebuke the wise and they will love you.
    18. Re:Anyone else find that quote hilarious? by dwater · · Score: 1

      > I think what they're trying to say is that 60% of the time, it works every time. ...and they're certain of that because in the past it has worked most of the time.

      --
      Max.
    19. Re:Anyone else find that quote hilarious? by bytesex · · Score: 1

      In Korea, only old people will complain about these things.

      --
      Religion is what happens when nature strikes and groupthink goes wrong.
    20. Re:Anyone else find that quote hilarious? by Artuir · · Score: 1

      If it would ever be possible to kill people over the internet, this thread would do it. :D

    21. Re:Anyone else find that quote hilarious? by crovira · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No.

      But the Fibonacci sequence is fascinating.

      This material is definitely odd. (Lets hope it can be related down atomic scale.)

      The reason it makes a good insulator is the Fibonacci gaps. They make for discrete jumps like quantum jumps because there is no smooth path for electron 'energy bands' to follow.

      --
      MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
    22. Re:Anyone else find that quote hilarious? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, I would like to discuss with Slashdot about this ground-breaking idea I just had about creating a new nanomaterial based on the number 42.

    23. Re:Anyone else find that quote hilarious? by tsa · · Score: 1

      Yes. Very sure.

      --

      -- Cheers!

    24. Re:Anyone else find that quote hilarious? by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      So shut up and discuss the interesting stuff we have know now :D
      Or get high and stare at the trippy pictures :D

      Can't I do both?

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    25. Re:Anyone else find that quote hilarious? by Redfeather · · Score: 1

      If my toes were made of broccoli, I would rule the world.

      --
      Those things you're doing with that stuff you just bought? That's not what it's for! -
    26. Re:Anyone else find that quote hilarious? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PROFIT?

    27. Re:Anyone else find that quote hilarious? by shaitand · · Score: 1

      you made a comparison to hitler or nazi's, apparently the discussion is over.

  2. A truckload of beads for your stock options! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Hey, it has worked before...

  3. Quasy-quasycrossbreeds by Lord+Lode · · Score: 1

    Remember the comic from XKCD about the spork cross breeds? This could apply to Quasy-Quasycrystals too. They could breed hybrids in proportions corresponding to every binary fraction in the whole spectrum between Crystal and Quasy-Crystal. Fear the powerful forces!

    1. Re:Quasy-quasycrossbreeds by SilentBob0727 · · Score: 2, Funny

      That was the first thing I thought of too.

      quasiquasicrystals, then quasiquasicrystalcrystals, then quasicrystalcrystalquasicrystalquasis...

      You're dealing with forces beyond your understanding....

      --
      Life would be easier if I had the source code.
    2. Re:Quasy-quasycrossbreeds by silentcoder · · Score: 2, Funny

      Apparently... that would be ALL forces then ? :p

      --
      Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
    3. Re:Quasy-quasycrossbreeds by ratbag · · Score: 1

      Any reason for the perverse spelling of quasi?

    4. Re:Quasy-quasycrossbreeds by Lord+Lode · · Score: 2, Funny

      Uh, mi fyngers hyt the wrong kei whyle tipyng!

    5. Re:Quasy-quasycrossbreeds by BlackCobra43 · · Score: 1

      You're clever young man, very clever, but it's quasy all the way down.

      --
      I never spellcheck and I freely admit it. Save your karma for more worthwhile "lol erorrs" replies
    6. Re:Quasy-quasycrossbreeds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You seem to have your own unique way with English. Here's the comic.

    7. Re:Quasy-quasycrossbreeds by Sciryl+Llort · · Score: 1

      # from the ice age to the dole age,
        there is but one concern -
        I have just discovered:
        Some crystals are more crystalline than others,
        Some crystals are more crystalline than others
        Other crystals are intermediate in crystallinity between the first... /#

  4. In the old days... by Moryath · · Score: 3, Funny

    we used to just split hairs.

    Now we split crystals. And get quasicrystals. Which were supposed to be unusual.

    And now we have quasi-quasicrystals. And then they're "not usual."

    And next we can get something somewhere between a quasicrystal and a quasiquasicrystal.

    I'd rather hear about what interesting/new discoveries come out of this strange material than just hear about the possibility of its existence.

    In 10 years' time you'll be hearing about the quasiquasiquasiquasiquasiquasiquasiquasiquasicrystal, but we still won't know what the heck to do with them.

    "We are absolutely sure that this structure should have properties that are not usual," Mikhael says, because materials with odd structures almost always do. Now they just have to figure out what those properties are.

    Property #1: the ability to endow a grad student with his PhD and a sizable chunk of grant money.

    1. Re:In the old days... by tubapro12 · · Score: 1

      The trend seems to be leading to us getting quasi-quasi-quasicrystals, which will be not unusual.

    2. Re:In the old days... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      For an example of a practical use, Teflon is a quasicrystal. I read somewhere that they tend to be slippery.

    3. Re:In the old days... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      And next we can get something somewhere between a quasicrystal and a quasiquasicrystal.

      So if I'm building a database about materials, I ought to make the crystallynessosity field a float, instead of a boolean?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    4. Re:In the old days... by flyingsquid · · Score: 1

      I've already got a quasiquasicrystal, partway between crystal and not-crystal, in my garage. See, I accidentally mixed a bunch of salt into this big tub of vaseline...

    5. Re:In the old days... by Lars+T. · · Score: 2, Funny

      For an example of a practical use, Teflon is a quasicrystal. I read somewhere that they tend to be slippery.

      So these Quasi-Quasi-Crystals (TM) will send us down a slippery slope?

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    6. Re:In the old days... by Kingrames · · Score: 1

      Let's not jump to conclusions here.

      --
      If you can read this, I forgot to post anonymously.
    7. Re:In the old days... by kootsoop · · Score: 1

      Let's not jump to conclusions here.

      You're new here, aren't you?

      --
      "Engineering is the art of making what you want from things you can get" - Jerry Avins
    8. Re:In the old days... by Blublu · · Score: 1

      What were you doing with a tub full of vaseline? Actually, nevermind. I don't want to know.

      --
      meh
    9. Re:In the old days... by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 1

      Property #1: the ability to endow a grad student with his PhD and the university with a sizable chunk of grant money.

      There. Fixed that for you...

      --
      That is all.
    10. Re:In the old days... by Kingrames · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm stapled to my desk chair, you insensitive clod!

      --
      If you can read this, I forgot to post anonymously.
    11. Re:In the old days... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, they will BE the slippery slope.

  5. Possibilities by moteyalpha · · Score: 3, Funny

    I could be a random resistance element that could be used as a random number seed. Or it could be the mythical room temperature non-conductor.

    1. Re:Possibilities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It most probably tastes purple as all strange substances do.

    2. Re:Possibilities by Quantus347 · · Score: 1

      The secret to the Flux Capacitor perhaps?

      --
      Common Sense isn't as Common as people think...
    3. Re:Possibilities by steelfood · · Score: 1

      I could be a random resistance element that could be used as a random number seed.

      The fact that you're on /. alone disqualifies you from being used as a seed for anything.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
  6. First one is easy! by yellowstone · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now they just have to figure out what those properties are.

    1) Does it taste like chicken?

    --
    150 Opening BINARY mode data connection for slashdot.sig (129323052 bytes).
    1. Re:First one is easy! by gmby · · Score: 1

      "Or make an off topic meme-based joke"

      "1) Does it taste like chicken?"

      2) Does it run linux?

      3) Does it have a girl friend?

      4) Does it live in it's Mothers Basement?

      5) Does it Profit?

      6) Profit!

      Ops.. I think we missed a step!

      --
      I don't want a pickle; I just want a Motor-Cycle! A four foot cop arrived with a five foot gun!
    2. Re:First one is easy! by GroeFaZ · · Score: 1

      Everything more or less tastes like chicken.

      --
      The grass is always greener on the other side of the light cone.
    3. Re:First one is easy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everything more or less tastes like chicken.

      except chicken

    4. Re:First one is easy! by daveime · · Score: 1

      And I don't think they could work out what chicken tastes like, which is why chicken tastes like everything else.

      Shut up Mouse !

    5. Re:First one is easy! by Redfeather · · Score: 1

      Does it END?

      1) Yes.

      2) No.

      3) Do you feel ENJOY !!! Sorry for Disturb

      --
      Those things you're doing with that stuff you just bought? That's not what it's for! -
  7. "found" or "constructed" by ulash · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Which one is it? The summary needs to make up its mind. Either it is something that occurs naturally (and TFA seems to suggest otherwise) in which case it would be "found" or it is something cooked up in a lab which would make it "constructed".

    1. Re:"found" or "constructed" by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 1

      Indeed. If it is naturally occurring, it should be called a quasi-quasicrystal, but if it is manmade, it should be called a pseudo-quasicrystal :D

      --
      No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    2. Re:"found" or "constructed" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't say something like that around pseudopods or you might find a non-man-made foot in your ass. Thankfully, it'll be really small (but don't let it get all the way up into your digestive tract.)

    3. Re:"found" or "constructed" by renoX · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Both!

      Maybe you should read TFA: it was both found and constructed, found because they didn't expect it, constructed because it's not something which occurs naturally.

    4. Re:"found" or "constructed" by Lars+T. · · Score: 2, Funny

      Both!

      Maybe you should read TFA: it was both found and constructed, found because they didn't expect it, constructed because it's not something which occurs naturally.

      Isn't the word for that "dumbfound"?

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

  8. I have by Konster · · Score: 2, Funny

    I have isolated a compound in my lab. I call it the Politiquasicrystal. I have determined that it can bend the truth with no expenditure of energy.

    1. Re:I have by Exitar · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's nothing compared to my iQuasicrystal and its Reality Distortion Field.

    2. Re:I have by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, Apple has 100,000 on order

    3. Re:I have by Bastard+of+Subhumani · · Score: 1

      I have isolated a compound in my lab.

      So have I, but unfortunately the margin is too small to write its chemical formula in.

      --
      Only three things are certain; death, taxes, and apocryphal quotations - Ben Franklin.
  9. Penrose tiling? by srussia · · Score: 1

    Why is there no mention of Penrose tiling in TFA?

    --
    Set your phasers on "funky"!
    1. Re:Penrose tiling? by whyloginwhysubscribe · · Score: 5, Funny

      They don't exist anymore - they got bought out by Hawking's Bathrooms in 2004.

    2. Re:Penrose tiling? by AlienIntelligence · · Score: 1

      I was wondering that myself... first
      thing I thought when I saw the graphics
      was, 'hey... wasn't that my old AfterDark95
      screensaver?'
      [ http://afterdarksaver.blogspot.com/2007/11/penrose.html ]

      That and good ole satori...
      [ http://telcontar.net/DesktopPics/satori.php ]

      -AI

      --
      For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion
    3. Re:Penrose tiling? by feranick · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Because it's one of the several possible tiling, and it's not exclusive. In other words, there are other tilings that fit specific type of quasicrystals. There is no reason to pick Penrose's one. What has been found in TFA, is more general. In fact the tiling in this system is very different from any other, since it is somewhat an hybrid between a conventional quasicrystal and a crystal. Why are you all so obsessed with Penrose's tiling?

    4. Re:Penrose tiling? by ozbird · · Score: 1
      Why are you all so obsessed with Penrose's tiling?

      To quote Wikipedia:

      A Penrose tiling has many remarkable properties, most notably:

      • It is nonperiodic which means that it lacks any translational symmetry. More informally, a shifted copy will never match the original exactly.
      • Any finite region in a tiling appears infinitely many times in that tiling and, in fact, in any other tiling. This property would be trivially true of a tiling with translational symmetry but is non-trivial when applied to the non-periodic Penrose tilings.
      • It is a quasicrystal: implemented as a physical structure a Penrose tiling will produce Bragg diffraction; the diffractogram reveals both the underlying fivefold symmetry and the long range order. This order reflects the fact that the tilings are organized, not through translational symmetry, but rather through a process sometimes called "deflation" or "inflation." (My emphasis)

      But mostly because they're cool.

    5. Re:Penrose tiling? by albyrne5 · · Score: 1

      Don't know, but I got my bathroom done in Penrose tiling and it looks pretty cool. (Quite expensive though).

    6. Re:Penrose tiling? by Siquo · · Score: 0

      My first association with those pictures was with the 500 years older Girih tiling...

    7. Re:Penrose tiling? by feranick · · Score: 1

      I like Penrose tilings as the next guy (actually even more, since I wrote my PhD dissertation about it). However it's besides the point of TFA. The fact it isn't mentioned it's simply because it's irrelevant. Science isn't about fanboysm.

  10. definitely "found" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Much like LSD, it was found while trying to cook up something else in a lab. Who knows, someday we might identify naturally-occuring examples of this quasi-quasi crystalline structure... for now it's just a lab phenomenon.

  11. mindbending crystals? by DohnJoe · · Score: 1

    Zlorfik!

  12. New meme by Misanthrope · · Score: 3, Funny

    Almost but not entirely unlike crystal?

    1. Re:New meme by Paradigm_Complex · · Score: 1

      Psh, that meme is almost but not entirely unlike crystal.

      Hmmm... Psh, that meme is almost but not entirely unlike crystal.

      There we go. If you follow the line above the one you were referring to in my previous post first, it works a lot better.

      --
      "A witty saying proves nothing." - Voltaire
    2. Re:New meme by nospam007 · · Score: 4, Funny

      It can be used to build a machine making something almost, but not quite, entirely unlike tea.

  13. Plastic beads, like you make a necklace out of? by AlienIntelligence · · Score: 2, Informative

    Well, for those that didn't RTFA, I did for
    you... and no... they didn't go to a piece
    goods shop and buy a sack of necklace beads.

    FTA:
    To simplify matters, the team set out to create a quasicrystal from micron-sized plastic beads called colloidal particles.

    For those unfamiliar with colloidals, it is
    from the Greek work kolla, meaning glue as the
    first colloids were just that. Particulate size
    is such that surface area is greater than volume
    thus the particulates tend not to settle from
    gravity.

    They're pretty useful in everyday life. Some
    common items would be some aerosol sprays,
    shotcrete for your pool out back and the yummy
    emulsion, mayonnaise!

    These in TFA however are just micron sized beads
    of plastic.

    -AI

    --
    For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion
    1. Re:Plastic beads, like you make a necklace out of? by XSpud · · Score: 1

      For those unfamiliar with colloidals, it is from the Greek work kolla, meaning glue as the first colloids were just that. Particulate size is such that surface area is greater than volume thus the particulates tend not to settle from gravity.

      And for those unfamiliar with mathematics, the bit relating surface area to volume does not make any sense.

    2. Re:Plastic beads, like you make a necklace out of? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess maybe this would be a realm for
      chemists and physicists and not the realm
      of a mathematician.

      Since it seems to be a concept that a
      mathematician might not be able to grasp.

      I believe the concept is better stated as
      a large surface area per unit volume.

    3. Re:Plastic beads, like you make a necklace out of? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could we please
      not press enter after
      every three or
      maybe four words?

    4. Re:Plastic beads, like you make a necklace out of? by Emperor+Zombie · · Score: 1

      -Burma Shave

      --
      I'm so excited I just made water in my pantaloons!
    5. Re:Plastic beads, like you make a necklace out of? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since it seems to be a concept that a
      mathematician might not be able to grasp.

      Really now. Perhaps it was just
      misstated. Yes, that was it exactly.

      3-volume and 2-volume (area) are not comparable as units.

      In any case, any mathematician worth his salt realizes that your notion of a colloidal suspension is utterly backwards. The suspended particles have MINIMAL surface area for their volume. This means that they have the lowest possible potential energy, with respect to surface tension, for that volume. Indeed, it costs more energy for the suspension medium to deform them (so that it can reach its minimal energy state) than to live with it.

      A simple analog is the arcs of an arch, supporting each other in virtue of the fact that they both want to fall.

    6. Re:Plastic beads, like you make a necklace out of? by poopdeville · · Score: 1

      Mayonnaise is a decent example. Mayo is essentially bubble-fied oil suspended in a viscous protein "gel" (the egg). The bubbles of oil get in the way of the protein collapsing, and vice-versa. But if you heat mayonnaise, the suspension breaks as the protein gains enough energy to deform the bubbles.

      --
      After all, I am strangely colored.
  14. Paraphrasing TFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    We'd like to study these crystals, but we require more vespene gas!

  15. Name? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Quasiquasicrystal doesn't roll of the tongue...

    Quasi is roughly the same as almost, right?

    What is the latin equivalent of "Barely"?

    1. Re:Name? by Arimus · · Score: 1

      Quasi is 'as-if' or 'sort-of'

      Fere is 'almost' - which rolls of the tongue slightly easier...

      So think these new crystals could be called Fere quassi crystallinus (almost sort-of crystals) instead ;)

      --
      --- Users are like bacteria -> Each one causing a thousand tiny crises until the host finally gives up and dies.
    2. Re:Name? by srussia · · Score: 1

      How about "irregularly ordered aperiodic crystals"?

      --
      Set your phasers on "funky"!
  16. Impossible! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Diamonds are the hardest material known the man!

    1. Re:Impossible! by dmbasso · · Score: 1, Funny

      The women that know me think otherwise... they ever say the hardest material known to them is my... head! :\

      --
      `echo $[0x853204FA81]|tr 0-9 ionbsdeaml`@gmail.com
  17. quasi-quasicrystal beads?? by davidsyes · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    What the hell? What's next, psychedelic furs? Why not resurrect Marley, Hendrix, and Morrison and some Woodstockes and give them algea and foil and an audience in Stonehenge? Wait Wait, Don't tell me. the whirled will come stoned and UNhinged and unable to compute the motions to drink an conjugate swerves...

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  18. Not new, really. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    In the 90s, I was a PhD student in theorethical physics. One of the paper I read showed a crystal with a structure based on the fibonacci sequence. Such structures were also realised in superlattices at LinkÃping University, Sweden, in a cooperation between the theoretical physics group and the thin film group. You could contact Dr. Rolf Riklund for the details, his PhD student did the study.
     

  19. Meh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They had this ages ago, Kryptonite.

  20. ANKOS? by oodaloop · · Score: 1

    I realize someone is going to mod me flamebait or troll, but I just wanted to say the images remind me of the cellular automata simulations from Wolfram's "A New Kind of Science" in that they are semi-ordered but non-predictable. Neat stuff regardless.

    --
    Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    1. Re:ANKOS? by albyrne5 · · Score: 1

      Why would you expect to be modded flamebait or troll for such a comment? I don't understand?

    2. Re:ANKOS? by oodaloop · · Score: 2, Informative

      Every other reference to Wolfram on /. seems to be rather derogatory. He's seen as stealing others' ideas and shamelessly self-promoting. His "A New Kind of Science", at 1200 pages, was self-published and unedited. For these reasons and others, he doesn't seem to have the highest reputation, though despite it all I found ANKOS pretty amazing.

      --
      Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    3. Re:ANKOS? by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1

      Precisely which page of the 1200 pages has something that justifies the existence of the other 1199 pages?

      --
      Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
    4. Re:ANKOS? by oodaloop · · Score: 1

      Precisely which page in any book justifies the existence of the others? If you just want to be a dick, go bother someone else.

      --
      Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    5. Re:ANKOS? by albyrne5 · · Score: 1

      I didn't read ANKOS, but I did read "The lifebox, the seashell and the soul" and I really dig the ideas and I have put ANKOS on my to-read list for sure.

    6. Re:ANKOS? by oodaloop · · Score: 1

      I hadn't heard of that book, though I did like Rucker's Software/Realware/etc series and other books like Saucer Wisdom. I'll try to pick it up sometime. Thanks for the heads up.

      As a non-scientist, I found ANKOS mind-blowing. It was a world-changing book for me, at least the parts I could understand. It challenged everything I thought I knew about predictability, order, chaos, randomness, the search of extra-terrestrial life, and how stuff works in general. I remember having the craziest dreams for the 2 months it took me to read it. Highly recommend.

      --
      Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
  21. It's the Omega molecule! by Crock23A · · Score: 1

    Perfection is always just out of reach.

  22. Re:Slashdot.. by urcreepyneighbor · · Score: 1

    Stuff that matters, to people who don't think.

    PhysOrg and Science Daily will fill your need for hard news. :)

    --
    "The fight for freedom has only just begun." - Geert Wilders
  23. Re:Slashdot.. by intothemiddle · · Score: 1

    Hard news? As opposed to this soft news? Or as we call it in the trade B--lsh-t.

    So I should just come to slashdot for rumours and gossip? What is this, a knitting circle of nerds?

  24. Bill and Ted-ism's by Reecie · · Score: 2, Funny

    "That was non- non-non non-heinous!"

  25. Fractal Quasiness? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shouldn't this be from the fractal-quasiness dept instead of fractional-quasiness? :-)

  26. cheap shot by arkarumba · · Score: 2, Funny

    Thats almost but not entirely unlike a meme.

  27. Re:Slashdot.. by rugatero · · Score: 1

    What is this, a knitting circle of nerds?

    No, that's what you end up with when someone confuses Perl and purl.

    --
    This comment is for entertainment purposes only. Any similarity to real insight or information is purely coincidental.
  28. A quasi-quasicrystal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A quasi-quasicrystal, also known as "crystal"...

  29. you're only quasi-evil. by einsteingroovin · · Score: 1

    now is this an evil... quasi-quasi crystal?

  30. "You're toying with powerful forces here." by cyclobotomy · · Score: 1
  31. Next they'l lfind that... by Hasmanean · · Score: 1

    Quasiness is quantized, and two quasicrystals must differ in some parameter by n times a constant.

    Quasi-mechanics.

    --
    Hasan
  32. Fix or Fail? by BluBrick · · Score: 1

    The researchers specifically said that they were expecting properties that were not usual.

    --
    Ahh - My eye!
    The doctor said I'm not supposed to get Slashdot in it!
  33. Quasicrystalline approximants; a rather old idea by one-eye-johnson · · Score: 1

    As mentioned in the article, a quasicrystalline arrangement basically contains symmetry elements which cannot fill space ('non-crystallographic'). In fact the only rotational symmetries that can fill space are 2-, 3-, 4- and 6-fold rotations. Again, to use the article's example, you can't tile a wall with pentagons-- the simplest shape with fivefold rotational symmetry.

    The idea of a "quasi-quasi-crystal" which approximates the forbidden symmetries of a quasicrystal quite well (e.g. almost-perfect-but-not-actual fivefold rotational symmetry) while filling space has been around for a while in the solid state chem/physics fields, and have been mathematically described since at least the 1950s (prolly earlier?). In fact there are intermetallic phases that form both quasicrystalline approximants and actual quasicrystals. So far the only quasicrystalline phase to be solved has icosahedral symmetry. It is beyond the scope of this post to discuss this further, but a google scholar (or scifinder, for thos that have it!) should turn up a lot of information.

    Interestingly enough, forbidden symmetries in 2 or 3 dimensions can actually be crystallographic in some higher dimensional geometry; quasicrystals and their approximants can be described as projections from some space (usually 6- or 8-D real number space) to 3 dimensions.

    To extend the article's tiling example, you can in fact tile a 2d surface with pentagons-- provided that the surface is wrapped around a 3d sphere! This is the dodecahedron, a platonic solid. The same concept applies to more dimensions; for example, you can fill space with 3d tetrahedra in 4 dimensions-- this is termed the 600-cell, a 4d platonic solid.
    Without going into too much detail, a common projection involves the golden ratio "tau" (or "phi", depending on whether you're a crystallographer or a mathematician), while approximants involve numbers in the Fibonnacci sequence. The limit of the quotient of successive Fibonacci numbers is in fact the golden ratio tau=(1+sqrt(5))/2=1.618... Using tau as a parameter in the projection gives the quasicrystal, while using ratios of higher pairs of consecutive Fibonacci numbers gives larger/more complex approximants. (pithy search term: "cut-and-project quasicrystal")

    Just for fun, you can make a 2d quasicrystal that looks pretty similar to the article's pictures by taking the dot product of all 5-dimensional vectors with integral components (e.g. (1 0 -2 0 7) etc.) with the vector containing the fifth roots of unity (0, exp((2*pi*i*1)/5), ...,exp((2*pi*i*4)/5)).

    IMHO the experiment to 'figure out the properties of quasicrystals' seems kinda BS because those properties arise from quantum/electronic interactions between atoms, not from interactions between particles and some completely external system. But this is pure speculation on my part. And the results are pretty fucking sweet. Especially considered that that they are actual images, not some mathematical construction.

    In conclusion, this post could have been a book. GS, scifinder, wikipedia, your local math library have a wealth of info about this topic.

  34. what do quasicrystals have to do with rabbits? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am quite disappointed here, that nobody seems to know about the connection between "Quasicrystals", Chemistry and Mathematics. The posted article though is one of the worse I ever read about the topic. Most of the research was done in the 90s and they always tried to sell this mostly very theoretical research as "developing new materials with new properties", hence the "teflon-like behavior" mentioned in the article, but AFAIK nothing really "cool" for the everyday user was developed so far. But none the less a still very interesting field of research all hold together by the Fibonacci sequence resp. the Golden Ratio.
    There used to be some nice introductions into quasicrystals in the net ... but looks like those pages never changed since 1995.

    http://www.lassp.cornell.edu/lifshitz/quasicrystals.html

    PS: the growths rate of rabbids follows the fibonacci sequence

    1 1 2 3 5 8 13 21