Slashdot Mirror


Google Has All My Data – How Do I Back It Up?

shadeshope writes "Slowly but surely Google has taken over my computing life. How can I back it up? Bit by bit with their mantra, hip image and brilliant services, Google has gained my trust and all my data. I am doing almost all of my computing in the cloud. Google Reader, Calender, Email, Docs and Notes have become my tools of choice; even to the point where my day book, research notes, etc., are all on Google's servers. It was just so easy, enabling me to effortlessly work from multiple computers, operating systems and locations. I know, I know, this is foolish — all my eggs are firmly in one basket. It has crept up on me. As a long-time computer user and committed pessimist, I have used many schemes over the years to ensure my data is safe. Now I have ceded all control to Google. How can I regain some control and back this all up? Is there a one-touch solution that will take all my data from the various online apps and archive it on my home server?"

215 comments

  1. Kill Somebody by LearnToSpell · · Score: 5, Funny

    Then the gov't will back it all up for you! Easy.

  2. Easy! by Yvan256 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Once you get all your data back, buy a Mac, subscribe to MobileMe and be safe, knowing that all your data is in the safe hands of a single compa...

    Oh wait.

    1. Re:Easy! by Divebus · · Score: 5, Funny

      Idunno, Sergey. Ask Larry what he does.

      --

      Most of the stuff on /. won't survive first contact with facts.
    2. Re:Easy! by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Once you get all your data back, buy a Mac, subscribe to MobileMe and be safe, knowing that all your data is in the safe hands of a single compa...

      You chose a poor example. Pretty much all the Mobile Me services store the data both on Apple's servers and on the local machine, by default.

      I know you meant this as a joke, but your suggestion actually would allow a user to regain control of their data, albeit probably not in the most flexible way.

    3. Re:Easy! by me+at+werk · · Score: 4, Informative

      There's also notMac, which replaces .Mac.

      --
      For context, click Parent.
    4. Re:Easy! by mpe · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I know you meant this as a joke, but your suggestion actually would allow a user to regain control of their data, albeit probably not in the most flexible way.

      It might enable them to regain control of their future data. But they have almost certainly lost control of their current data.
      About the only way of retaining control over your data whilst having a third party store it would be if you encrypt in such a way that that party will never have access to anything other than the cyphertext. Which has the side effect that you can't process that data with web based apps.

    5. Re:Easy! by Kreisler · · Score: 1

      This is exactly why I went with MobileMe, and since I also use Apple's Backup software, I have my data in three places - the MobileMe server, my Mac, and my personal backup. The biggest problem I see is with large amounts of data. Some of the work I do is audio, and MobileMe isn't a great solution for lots of Logic files - that just stays on my external, but for the average user's personal and light work stuff, MobileMe seems fine. (Until Google adds backup to Google Desktop, which I wouldn't be surprised to see at some point.)

    6. Re:Easy! by Redfeather · · Score: 1

      What are we talking about here, true control (ie limiting third-party access) or backup for archive and easier editing? If we're talking about no-outside-control then options are, unfortunately limited. I don't think the question of who owns data on colo servers has been answered yet, but the possibility that encryting your data without google having some kind of backup against failure is pretty slim at this point.

      If we're talking backup for propensity's sake, there have to be a whole whack of options - straight down to word-for-word copy-and-paste, depending on your determination and the tools at hand. Local and remote backups are never a bad idea, even if it's only control theatre.

      --
      Those things you're doing with that stuff you just bought? That's not what it's for! -
    7. Re:Easy! by fermion · · Score: 1
      .mac, does serve one important function of a data retention plan. It provides multiple multiple and offsite backups of data. I can say it works pretty well. I have not lost much data since using it. I have data stored on my computer, on my phone, and on Apple servers. I am not sure what changes with Mobileme, though my suspicion is that data might become more susceptible to loss. This is because Apple does not provide a system to insure data integrity. I have lost individual files and bits of data over the years. Apple will warn you if whole swaths of data is to be deleted, but that does not prevent the occasional missing bit. If you catch it, or have local backup, the data can be maintained. But noticing a obscure bit of data is gone is a challenge.

      Which means that a paranoid keeps really critical stuff backed up another way. I have chosen to move to text based solutions, and then keep a off site SVN repository. This maintain a somewhat audit-able trail for data integrity. Since I assume that Google is backing data, and it that part of it probably more secure than the single local copy most people maintain, the issue would be data integrity. I wonder if there is something in the API that might allow an version control type solution so that changes made would be stored to another site. Of course, such a solution might costs money, and the beauty of google is that it allows users to trade privacy and control for free-to-them services, so such a solution may be out of the domain.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    8. Re:Easy! by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      Actually I have a free MobileMe trial, just really didn't have the time to really try it out yet. My backups are done via Time Machine, on a Time Capsule, with monthly backups to CD-Rs (my code isn't big enough for DVD-Rs, yet).

    9. Re:Easy! by Yvan256 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah I mean that as a joke (since a lot of people here think Apple is as evil as Google).

      Any sane person using Leopard will also have Time Machine enabled, on an external hard drive, meaning a local and external backup for most people, and three backups for those also using MobileMe.

      You're right, using a Mac as an example was the worst possible choice.

    10. Re:Easy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Once you get all your data back, buy a Mac, subscribe to MobileMe and be safe, knowing that all your data is in the safe hands of a single compa...

      Oh wait.

      No he meant something that would work. Come on Apple get it together, if I wanted products that didn't work as advertised I'd go M$. ;)

    11. Re:Easy! by shicaca · · Score: 0

      Cept Apple just recently ceded to accidentally deleting a whole bunch of people's e-mail addresses accidentally. I've used the imap/smtp for gmail, but it takes forever b/c there's a hard limit to the amount you can dl at once. It takes all night for me to do, and then you have to find a GOOD way to back that up on your local machine. I also use Google Calendar Sync. Currently I have it sync from my computer to google and not vice versa just because their GCal service kind of blows at times w/ regards to functionality so I use my smart phone/palm/computer to back that up effectively :) (gcal sync) --> http://www.google.com/support/calendar/bin/answer.py?answer=89955 As far as the others, though, good luck. I think there's the gmail drive if the notes and what-not are stored in the same place as mail, but I don't think it is... Integrated all into one? Not yet from what I've seen so far.

    12. Re:Easy! by localoptimum · · Score: 1
      :D

      Nice comment!

      Incidentally, I tried MobileMe. It's a heap of garbage, it should be up there with all other good ideas that are atrociously implemented with zero useful help.

      --
      This message was scanned by European governments and contains no terrorism.
    13. Re:Easy! by jo42 · · Score: 1

      "A Fool and his Data are soon parted."

    14. Re:Easy! by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      Are you talking about Captain Picard?

    15. Re:Easy! by project-nova · · Score: 1

      404 - notFound :-)

    16. Re:Easy! by againjj · · Score: 1

      Google cache
      Though, it looks like not much is done with it -- 15 days of development in October last year.

  3. backup by mudgie · · Score: 1

    I guess you could rely on third-party apps that sync it locally...

    1. Re:backup by Grimmey · · Score: 1

      Which one works best for you to backup gmail?

    2. Re:backup by interventka · · Score: 1

      (works well in Linux or Linux-like systems, anyway) Use a good email client that has the option to download your mailboxes locally, then use rsync or rdiff to make the backup wherever you like. The IMAP interface to Gmail works well enough that the only thing you'd lose is filters and such made in Gmail.

    3. Re:backup by david@ecsd.com · · Score: 2, Informative

      POP3

  4. Uh, Google? by clang_jangle · · Score: 4, Informative

    Gbackup, of course! Well OK, not yer, but apparently coming soon. If you need it now, um, Google is your friend. And there's more, if you check Google.
    And BTW, web apps != "the cloud".

    --
    Caveat Utilitor
    1. Re:Uh, Google? by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And BTW, web apps != "the cloud".

      Huh? Google web apps, at the very least, can be considered "the cloud", unless you are arguing that the term "cloud computing" has no meaning.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    2. Re:Uh, Google? by pitchpipe · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Slowly but surely [Meth] has taken over my [...] life. How can I [get it back]? Bit by bit with [its seductiveness], hip image and brilliant [highs]. [Meth] has gained my trust and all my [money]. I am doing almost all of my [living] in the cloud. [Meth Labs and narco-traffickers] have become my tools of choice. Even to the point where my [home, business] etc are all [Meth labs].It was just so easy, enabling me to effortlessly work from multiple computers, operating systems and locations. I know, I know, this is foolish -- all my eggs are firmly in one [drug]. It has crept up on me. As a long-time [cocaine] user, and committed pessimist, I have used many [drugs] over the years to ensure my [highs] are safe. Now I have ceded all control to [Meth]. How can I regain some control and back this all up? Is there a one-touch solution that will take [] my [life] from the various [drugs] and [recover] it[]?"

      --
      Look where all this talking got us, baby.
    3. Re:Uh, Google? by clang_jangle · · Score: 4, Insightful

      unless you are arguing that the term "cloud computing" has no meaning.

      Correct, it's an unnecessary buzzword (is that an oxymoron?) to cover something that's existed since the days of mainframes and dumb terminals. You know, that limiting, ancient paradigm that led to the microcomputer revolution because it sucked so bad? :)

      --
      Caveat Utilitor
    4. Re:Uh, Google? by chunk08 · · Score: 5, Informative

      (is that an oxymoron?)

      No, it's needlessly redundant.
      Necessarily redundant is an oxymoron.

      (And so are many people when burnt.)/jokealert

      --
      Do away with our corrupt tax code. Support the Fair Tax
    5. Re:Uh, Google? by SoVeryTired · · Score: 2, Informative

      You're confusing an oxymoron with a tautology.

      --
      Slashdot: news for Apple. Stuff that Apple.
    6. Re:Uh, Google? by Bob+The+Magic+Camel · · Score: 2, Informative

      is that an oxymoron?

      No, it's rhetorical tautology.

      --
      This signature is esoteric
    7. Re:Uh, Google? by x_MeRLiN_x · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Please share the joke we (me and chunk08) both missed.

    8. Re:Uh, Google? by clang_jangle · · Score: 0, Troll

      Duh, it is an oxymoron -- unless you know of a good paying job in IT one can get and keep without having to learn any buzzwords?

      --
      Caveat Utilitor
    9. Re:Uh, Google? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not going to explore your tasteless joke, but redundancy is often necessary. Think of a brake or a nuclear power plant.

    10. Re:Uh, Google? by couchslug · · Score: 5, Funny

      "How can I regain some control and back this all up?"

      I suggest searching [Meth] for answers!

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    11. Re:Uh, Google? by blahplusplus · · Score: 1

      Actually you bring up a very good point in your humor, with the advent of the internet and google people are becoming increasingly addicted to data. Now, considering opportunity vs time cost which is ever present in our short lives so we end up giving up more and more of our data to the websites/cloud. Privacy in the coming age will be either a product for big companies, etc, or increasingly irrelevant as the web has shown (myspace/facebook generation). It seems in order to do anything and gain peoples trust to some extent, some amount of disclosure is necessary. There are many people with websites, blogs, etc with their real names on it. The web is becoming more and more integral into how we do business and how we interact across large distances (telepresence, etc).

    12. Re:Uh, Google? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      unless you are arguing that the term "cloud computing" has no meaning.

      Correct, it's an unnecessary buzzword (is that an oxymoron?) to cover something that's existed since the days of mainframes and dumb terminals. You know, that limiting, ancient paradigm that led to the microcomputer revolution because it sucked so bad? :)

      It would be nice if you could elaborate on this point some more.

      Services like Google AppEngine and Amazon S3 seem very different from a traditional corporate mainframe with time-limited access closed off behind a firewall or not even connected to a larger network.

      Cloud computing might be a natural evolution from the mainframe/terminal approach, but it is certainly not the same thing and not just a new term.

    13. Re:Uh, Google? by BattleApple · · Score: 1

      Thank god for microcomputers.. how else would I run my dumb terminal emulator??

    14. Re:Uh, Google? by Nutria · · Score: 1

      You know, that limiting, ancient paradigm that led to the microcomputer revolution because it sucked so bad?

      You mean the paradigm where data and apps are stored centrally, and some intelligence (like simple data verification) is passed out to the edge?

      Seriously, Dozens-of-web-servers-in-a-DC+AJAX+browser is the pendulum swinging back to the mainframe-in-a-DC+COBOL+CICS+3270 paradigm that we-who-are-old-enough derided as horribly ancient and dinosaurish.

      The reason that this paradigm survived and is returning is because it it extremely resource-efficient, with a mainframe being able to support a huge multiple more users than a similarly-powered minicomputer.

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    15. Re:Uh, Google? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought an oxymoron was an apparent, incidental contradiction, like "jumbo shrimp" or "new and improved."

      I'm not sure what necessarily redundant things are called.

    16. Re:Uh, Google? by maestroX · · Score: 1

      Correct, it's an unnecessary buzzword (is that an oxymoron?) to cover something that's existed since the days of mainframes and dumb terminals

      Correct, it's a necessary buzzword to sell something like next-gen virtual data centers and underpowered subnotebooks.

      Such a devious plot can only be concocted by the RIAA to hide the merits of grid-computing: torrents.

      No, the term Cloud is brilliant.

      :-)

    17. Re:Uh, Google? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An oxymoron is a concept made up of contradictory elements. Its exactly the opposite of redundancy, needless or not.

    18. Re:Uh, Google? by gnuman99 · · Score: 1

      In today's world of cloud computing synergies of Web 2.0, who needs backup? Information is there to be free!

      Is that enough buzzwords for today?

    19. Re:Uh, Google? by plopez · · Score: 1

      And BTW, web apps != "the cloud".

      Please enlighten me. What is the definition of "the cloud".

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    20. Re:Uh, Google? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Buzzword prediction: Cloudlets

      Now you can have the cloud in your home !!!

      what goeth, shall surely cometh.

    21. Re:Uh, Google? by monk · · Score: 1

      Necessarily redundant is an oxymoron.

      Unless you need failover.

      --
      [-- Trust the Monkey --]
    22. Re:Uh, Google? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Being that this has existed for so long, are there any existing words that describe "Outsourcing programs and data to the internet in general as opposed to a specific internet entity" as concisely as the term "cloud computing"?

      Because if not, then I think cloud computing fills a useful gap in the language.

    23. Re:Uh, Google? by chunk08 · · Score: 1

      LOL ok, got me there. I was talking about in language. Of course, the English language could use failover many times...

      --
      Do away with our corrupt tax code. Support the Fair Tax
  5. Um.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nope!

  6. P.T. Barnum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    >>Bit by bit with their mantra, hip image and brilliant services.

    There's a sucker born every minute.

  7. why bother? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    google's redundancy is legendary. why bother?

    i can see if they maybe canceled a service or somesuch, but that's highly unlikely, especially for their more popular stuff. (spreadsheets, email, pictures)

    i can understand the urge to keep it all local, but with their diversity, it's much more safe in their "cloud" than it would be at my house...

    1. Re:why bother? by corsec67 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That would work, unless Google itself deletes your account or all of your email.

      Backups are meant to cover more than just hard drive failures, otherwise RAID 1/5 would be sufficient.

      Also, if you can't backup your data from Google, you can't switch from Google to anyone else, so you are locked in.

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, don't search me
    2. Re:why bother? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      both of those cases are over 2 years ago, when gmail was "truly" in beta.

      and every single app i've seen from google allows for personal backup of one type or another.

      there is no single solution, but every individual file is accessible and usually in useful non-locked formats that are easily manipulated.

      i agree this feature would be nice to have, but it's not really good business sense to do that... your not making it easy for your customer to leave you? (duh)

      but with google it's at least possible.

    3. Re:why bother? by hedwards · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Right, and not to mention that time that they had an error and a lot of people really did lose messages.

      Personally, I don't keep anything vital on google services except email. The email gets backed up via imap periodically.

      This works fine for me because I don't usually have items that I'd be upset about losing, most of the things I do have are not sent over email or are easily backed up individually.

    4. Re:why bother? by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Maybe a better argument is for company-level control of user information rather than just user-level backups. If an employee deletes all of their e-mail, the company can't comply with document retention requirements. Likewise, deleting a user eliminates all of their data with no backup recourse.

      For e-mail, I imagine what you have to do is migrate service from gmail to positini (google subsidiary) to get the added functionality.

    5. Re:why bother? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Also, if you can't backup your data from Google, you can't switch from Google to anyone else, so you are locked in.

      Switch!? What is this crazy talk!

    6. Re:why bother? by WK2 · · Score: 1

      i agree this feature would be nice to have, but it's not really good business sense to do that... your not making it easy for your customer to leave you? (duh)

      If it is easier to leave, people will be more likely to trust you in the first place. Have you ever had an obsessive ex? And you see her some time after everything settles down, and she wants to sleep with you "just one last time?" If you've ever been through that, you would know that it is a bad idea to join someone that is difficult to leave.

      Personally, the whole "put personal information on somebody else's computer" fad seems weird to me.

      --
      Write your own Choose Your Own Adventure. http://www.freegameengines.org/gamebook-engine/
    7. Re:why bother? by STrinity · · Score: 1

      What if they slowly transform their services into kludgy messes, as has already happen to their Usenet archive? Relying on a single company because you believe they'll never screw up is a recipe for disaster.

      --
      Les Miserables Volume 1 now up with my reading of
    8. Re:why bother? by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      Google's Usenet archive used to be DejaNews, it was easily searchable and it was independent.

      It's a shame that Google got ahold of that.

    9. Re:why bother? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, if you can't backup your data from Google, you can't switch from Google to anyone else, so you are locked in.

      Yes, you've pointed out the main problem with completely relying on a single and partly closed platform: Lock-in. I, personally, trust that Google does a good job with backing up all the data. But the problem is not with data loss, but with access (i. e., lack thereof). Your data is worthless (for you, at least, I think Google values it pretty much) if you are not free to do with it whatever you want.

  8. * shrugs shoulders * by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I don't know ... Google it

  9. Not sure about one-touch... by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 4, Informative

    But Google solutions tend to at least support established open standards.

    That is: You can archive your Gmail account via IMAP. You can probably download your Google Calendar appointments as an iCal file. While I'm not sure of the best way to automate it, all of your documents in Google Docs are available in OpenDocument.

    Still, these are all "some assembly required".

    --
    Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    1. Re:Not sure about one-touch... by TubeSteak · · Score: 4, Informative

      But Google solutions tend to at least support established open standards.

      That is: You can archive your Gmail account via IMAP.

      You might have to rejigger some of your tags to end up with a folder structure in your IMAP archive
      Otherwise it'll just be all your mail in one folder.

      http://googlesystem.blogspot.com/2007/10/nested-folders-in-gmail.html
       
      /Unless Gmail has changed something since that was written.
      //Personally, I don't consider tags a replacement for folders

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    2. Re:Not sure about one-touch... by dan+dan+the+dna+man · · Score: 1, Interesting

      "But Google solutions tend to at least support established open standards."

      Oh really?. You must have a new definition of 'standards'.

      --
      I don't read your sig, why do you read mine?
    3. Re:Not sure about one-touch... by illumin8 · · Score: 1

      That is: You can archive your Gmail account via IMAP.

      You can use fetchmail, a UNIX/Linux command line tool to grab all of your email from your IMAP enabled Gmail account and archive it somewhere else. It can even keep headers intact so it doesn't look like you forwarded all of your email. I would suggest getting another IMAP enabled email server somewhere, whether on a webhost or elsewhere, and have fetchmail run in a daily or hourly cron job, grabbing all new email messages and forwarding them to your backup mail server.

      As far as Google docs goes, you'll have to manually save each document to a file, as I don't know how to automate this. You should be able to do a calendar export from Google calendar into a file that can be imported by other calendar software.

      Good luck! I still think Google is about 10 times less likely to lose my data than some cheap web hosting company, but they have been known to lose Gmail accounts before.

      --
      "When the president does it, that means it's not illegal." - Richard M. Nixon
    4. Re:Not sure about one-touch... by Daengbo · · Score: 4, Informative
      For Google Docs:
      1. Get the Google Docs:Download Greasemonkey script.
      2. Get DownThemAll! 1.0.3
      3. Profit!

      For Google Calendar:

      1. Find your private iCal link in the settings
      2. Create a cron script to use wget and a timedate stamp.

      or

      1. Install Conduit
      2. Set up a sync

      For GMail:

      1. Use POP or IMAP

      For Picassa:

      1. Install Picassa

      or

      1. Install Conduit
      2. Set up a sync

      For YouTube

      1. Install Conduit
      2. Set up a sync
    5. Re:Not sure about one-touch... by ezratrumpet · · Score: 1

      I back up my gmail and gcalendar in exactly that manner. I only use GDocs for simple publishing/sharing for just that reason - it could all go away, poof! and with no recourse or backup available.

      Of course, an electromagnetic pulse could achieve the same result on my home computer, I suppose. Life would probably go on, albeit with challenges.

    6. Re:Not sure about one-touch... by voxelz · · Score: 1

      Google Docs now has an offline mode, that will synchronize your documents with your computer every time you log on. This is done with Google Gears and it stores everything in a folder that you can backup.

    7. Re:Not sure about one-touch... by RudeIota · · Score: 1
      No.

      Actually, each 'label' you have in Gmail is represented by a 'folder' in IMAP. You end up with one master directory that has all of your emails and each sub folder (each label) contains the appropriate emails within it.

      I've been using IMAP since it was introduced in gmail and it has worked exactly that way since the first day. It works that way on my phone and in Thunderbird.

      --
      Fact: Everything I say is fiction.
    8. Re:Not sure about one-touch... by jarfil · · Score: 1

      Gmail, when accessed through IMAP, shows each of your tags as separate IMAP folders.
      So you may end up downloading some mail twice, but your overall structure will be preserved for backup purposes.

    9. Re:Not sure about one-touch... by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

      //Personally, I don't consider tags a replacement for folders

      I consider them to be a superset, though I do wish they were hierarchical. Writing an open-source Gmail replacement is at #3 or #4 on my list of weekend projects. Unfortunately, the first one is taking more weekends than I anticipated...

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    10. Re:Not sure about one-touch... by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You appear to have linked to yet another Google technology which is used internally, which they've open sourced because they've found it useful.

      It's no more relevant to this discussion than what filesystem they're using. (And, for the record, they rolled their own FS anyway.)

      Remember: I said "support open standards". I didn't say "exclusively uses open standards for everything, including stuff the public was never meant to see."

      Are you running on OpenFirmware? Have you flashed your BIOS with Coreboot?

      No? Then how is Google any worse? I'd call this better -- at least they've given us some source to play with. I still wish Apple would give me the firmware to my fucking keyboard.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    11. Re:Not sure about one-touch... by Daengbo · · Score: 1

      The method I mentioned has the advantage of getting the documents in a form usable to you immediately. Offline is cool, though. I use IMAP with offline for my e-mail.

    12. Re:Not sure about one-touch... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course not. Tags aren't a replacement for folders. Search is.

  10. Not one solution by vrmlguy · · Score: 5, Informative

    Thunderbird can back up gmail, and the Zindus extension will back up you address book. Lifehacker had a story in the past month about using wget to backup your del.icio.us bookmarks; I presume it can be adapted to Googlepages and your blog. Finally, if you install Google Gears, a lot of content will be cached on your laptop. I don't know how you'd retrieve it, but at least you'd know where it was.

    --
    Nothing for 6-digit uids?
  11. You are so.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..fucked. Seriously. You have been indexed, Sir.

  12. So... by Warll · · Score: 1
    You're asking if there is yet another Google service to do this for you? Or are you planing on trusting a third party with your "sensitive"[1] data?

    [1] Just confese to your wife, I'm sure whe'll understand. Worst case she makes you see a shrink.

  13. Spelling, please. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's Calendar, not Calender.

  14. It's simple! by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 4, Funny

    File -> "Save As..."

    --
    Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
  15. why back up by Edmund+Blackadder · · Score: 1, Troll

    Google has their own backups I am sure. So the only way your data would be lost is if the entire Google company goes under. And would you really want to live in a world without Google?

    1. Re:why back up by jsebrech · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Google does NOT have your backups. They have redundancy in their data storage, but when their servers get the command to delete something, it gets deleted everywhere, permanently!

      See their own faq: http://mail.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=50208

    2. Re:why back up by Yaa+101 · · Score: 1

      Yes please... Besides I did before too. :-)

    3. Re:why back up by John+Hasler · · Score: 3, Interesting

      > Google has their own backups I am sure.

      What makes you think that they back up the users' data? (Note: users, not customers.)

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    4. Re:why back up by Anpheus · · Score: 1, Informative

      That's not true and you know it. It'd be a waste to do that on their end. I highly doubt it gets securely wiped, and I'm guessing it's only a few references that get set to NULL or somesuch and the data still exists. And if they have tape backups, well, obviously they're not going to pull those out and wipe those every time you delete an old email.

      So completely gone? No, getting rid of something permanently on the internet (not just on Google) is hard, close to impossible. What Google is basically saying is that when you delete something, don't cry to them to get it back, it's as much an effort to truly delete all traces of something as it is to actually restore it. If they aren't going to pull out tapes to delete your emails, they won't do it to recover them. If they aren't going to waste CPU/IO on deleting every single disparate copy of your email, they aren't going to waste CPU/IO trying to recover it.

    5. Re:why back up by ckthorp · · Score: 1

      Except I wish deleting things from Google was that easy. Google has a nasty habit of archiving anything that has ever touched their servers for an indefinite period of time.

    6. Re:why back up by mpe · · Score: 1

      What makes you think that they back up the users' data? (Note: users, not customers.)

      Not being able to restore a "user's" data, for the benefit of that user dosn't mean that they don't back it up for the benefit of someone else...

    7. Re:why back up by jopsen · · Score: 1

      Google doesn't delete it... They move it to a new datacenter where the european privacy advocates can't reach your data... And then they mine it for decades to come... :)
      - Or not, how would I know...

    8. Re:why back up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...

      I cant believe this got marked +3 Insightful.

    9. Re:why back up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      So... what you're saying is that it's permanently deleted then. Or, does "can't get it back no matter how much I beg" mean something else where you're from?

    10. Re:why back up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GFS.

    11. Re:why back up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They use the same infrastructure as their other services. This means your data triple-JBOD stored by default.

      If they had no backups we'd hear about gmail users unable to access their emails fairly often, but in reality we pretty much never hear about gmail data loss like that.

    12. Re:why back up by Anpheus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm saying that if that if the Sheriff, well, to be honest, the FBI rolls in, and says, we're taking these backup tapes, then they'll have it. Not deleted.

      But if you roll in and say, hey, I want my old emails, they'll say, sorry, no, we have no way of giving you just your old emails back in a timely manner.

      That said, Google has resisted what it correctly considered to be unlawful demands for information.

  16. Back away, slowly... by mnslinky · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Use the Google services only where necessary. We've been doing this for a company I've started, but we only put documents and information on Google's services while we need it there. Not only is all our data on our backup server, but we only put data on their servers while it's needed. Visiting customer sites, etc.

    In addition, isn't this the kind of thing that makes laptops so great? Bring it with you! There are tons of sharing apps about for various uses. Use a VPN and sshfs for remote file access. Use iCal/whatever to sync with your google calendar. That sort of thing.

    In short, slowly migrate to a safer solution you're in more control of. You may lose a bit of your convenience, but safe data is worth it, in my opinion.

    1. Re:Back away, slowly... by silanea · · Score: 2

      [...] we only put data on their servers while it's needed. Visiting customer sites, etc. [...]

      I do hope you don't put any sensitive data there, like any kind of customer data? At least at my current employer we'd grill you for good if we found out about something like this. We already have quite a hard time keeping our employees from storing company data anywhere outside approved locations. Contractors are required to sign an agreement that forbids them from doing such a thing under penalty (along with requiring them to encrypt all data they receive from us).

      --
      Rudolf Hess edited Mein Kampf. He was the very first grammar nazi.
    2. Re:Back away, slowly... by mnslinky · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Do you think u'm a fucking retard? Of course I don't put private data on a system like that. I never implied I did, either. In addition, it's MY fucking company. I'll do as I please. People pay me because I make solid, security cautious decisions.

    3. Re:Back away, slowly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're much too diplomatic. As soon as I saw "Google has gained my trust and all my data. I am doing almost all of my computing in the cloud." I thought "The submitter is a complete idiot."

      Don't compute in the cloud. Don't store data in the cloud. If it's not happening in the processor that's in the computer on your desktop, and it's not stored on the hard drive on your desktop, then you can pick one or more of the following inevitable outcomes: You will [ ] lose it, [ ] have it stolen, [ ] have it sold, [ ] have it harvested, [ ] have it posted in public view.

    4. Re:Back away, slowly... by silanea · · Score: 1

      No offence. I've seen it happen far too often, so I'm a bit sensitive when it comes to protecting data from leaking.

      On your other point, though: Sure, it's your company. But your customers' data is not yours. If you're one of the few people who make sensible decisions, fine. But again: I've witnessed too many fuckups to trust anyone to make the right choice. I usually check and double-check on contractors.

      --
      Rudolf Hess edited Mein Kampf. He was the very first grammar nazi.
    5. Re:Back away, slowly... by maestroX · · Score: 2, Funny

      You don't appear to be the cautious type, Mr. Fucking Security man.

    6. Re:Back away, slowly... by mnslinky · · Score: 1

      What I supposed I didn't mention is that I'm in the security industry, so if my customers didn't trust me, I wouldn't be there in the first place.

  17. PEBKAC by pembo13 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    First step would be to not give Google all your data. I have no problem with the company (as yet), but I understand that all they are is a for-profit company. If Google has all your data to the point you need to make this post, I think you may have other more pressing things to worry about... like the fact that it may no longer really be your data any more.

    --
    "Thanks for all the money you paid to us. We've used it to buy off ISO among other things" -Microsoft
    1. Re:PEBKAC by mpe · · Score: 1

      First step would be to not give Google all your data. I have no problem with the company (as yet), but I understand that all they are is a for-profit company.

      As well as being a company in a part of the world with very few data protection laws. Whilst not perfect such laws do restrict your risk of access to governments and criminals :)

      If Google has all your data to the point you need to make this post, I think you may have other more pressing things to worry about... like the fact that it may no longer really be your data any more.

      It technically still belongs to them. In the same way that the MPAA/RIAA's "content" still belongs to them...

  18. Re:stupid question by mnslinky · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What part of Sarbanes-Oxley requires they backup data that has nothing to do with their finances? I think you don't know what you're talking about. SOx is very much misinterpreted, and you're only continuing the trend.

  19. Cloud Addiction by daveime · · Score: 5, Interesting

    As a long-time computer user, and committed pessimist, I'd have hoped you'd think about backups long before you placed all your trust in the cloud.

    This is exactly the model that all clouds will eventually mutate into ... once enough people become dependent on the cloud, they will announce it will become a paid service the following week.

    Your eggs, Google's basket.

    Cat got your tongue? (something important seems to be missing from your comment ... like the body or the subject!) Erm, you mean you can't detect which it is ???

    1. Re:Cloud Addiction by texascycle · · Score: 1

      Does Google have a PayPal account yet?

  20. Ask Slashdot Troll ? by vic-traill · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Does This 'Ask Slashdot' have the air of a troll to anyone else? It's like the questioner is serving it up so that every Google-hating/privacy-loving/I-told-you-so'er can go *apeshit* on it.

    --
    [17] Leary, T., White, C., Wood, P. R., Bhabha, W. D., and Wirth, N. Lambda calculus considered harmful. In Proceedings
    1. Re:Ask Slashdot Troll ? by Nymz · · Score: 3, Interesting

      While /. management might encourage /. editors to troll in order to drive page views and profits, I imagine there are a number of people out there, that one day woke up and realized 'the Google has you Neo'. Not that Google is the only bad guy, or that they must be demonized. But each person or company needs at some point to take some responsibility for themselves. Asking /. readers for a little advice seems reasonable.

    2. Re:Ask Slashdot Troll ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree, and I am firmly in that group. However, I don't fault Google for this at all; this guy has nobody but himself to blame. If you want to keep control over your data, KEEP CONTROL OVER YOUR DATA. It's that fucking simple.

    3. Re:Ask Slashdot Troll ? by Aladrin · · Score: 1

      It does, except that I want to know this. I have only put a few docs on Google Docs, but I'd like an easy way to back that stuff up so I never lose it. I can manually save each one, but I'd rather push a button and go eat lunch, instead.

      Someone above suggested writing a script that automates it, but let's be honest... I'm lazy. If someone else writes it, that means I don't have to. If Google writes it, I'll feel pretty confident about it working and being there when I want it.

      I'm not so crazy yet as to store critical data on there, but I'd still feel the loss if it went *poof*.

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    4. Re:Ask Slashdot Troll ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I beg to differ, but it is in fact a legitimate question. With so many of us relying on Google services on a daily basis it's at the very least food for thought.

  21. Re:stupid question by John+Hasler · · Score: 4, Informative

    The only data S-O requires Google to back up is their own financial data. They have no legal obligation whatsoever to the users of their free services. They could delete all of the OP's data right now for any reason or none and he would have no recourse.

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  22. The solution is irrelevant by Duncan+Blackthorne · · Score: 0

    The real problem is that you allowed this to happen in the first place. Get your data back, and don't let anyone have it again. It's bad enough that more or less any government agency likely has access to ALL your data right now, that any talented hacker likely can GET access to it, and that Google could be SELLING your very personal data to the highest bidder. Put in on a secure USB flash drive or something.

    1. Re:The solution is irrelevant by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      It's bad enough that more or less any government agency likely has access to ALL your data right now

      Google has already refused a Justice Department order for data and I feel pretty confident they will refuse another order.

      any talented hacker likely can GET access to it

      You mean cracker, hacker is the wrong word.

      Google could be SELLING your very personal data to the highest bidder

      The best thing that Google has going for it is their reputation. If they start selling users' data that rep will go down the toilet.

      Put in on a secure USB flash drive or something.

      I use external drives as well as flash drives. I have, and lost, too much data to store it all on flash drives though. I have a Linux PC with 2 HDDs, the one it came with had Linux installed and I installed the second one for user files. That one is 750GB and 500GB is used now. However it was lost when the drive was reformatted, when I specifically told the tech who repaired it not to reformat or erase the data, I wish I had had an external drive to backup the data then.

      Oh, and the only thing I use Google for is searching, I don't even use gmail.

      Falcon

  23. And thus we discover the wonder of the web... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, cloud computing. Web apps. Kids are such a trusting lot, but that'll change soon.

    Really, you can believe me, can't you? :)

  24. Ahem by archont · · Score: 1

    When google's servers go down, in first order, you'll be looking for an atomic shelter. Data backup - somewhere down the road.

  25. Backing up email by betelgeuse68 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Use Outlook and connect to GMAIL through IMAP, then save off your email to a .PST file via the Import/Export tool.

    -M

    1. Re:Backing up email by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ewww... Outlook? PST file?! I think you're on the wrong site.

    2. Re:Backing up email by Albert+Sandberg · · Score: 1

      And you want to suggest linux users to do what exactly?

      I'm a pro-linux myself but he actually gave some good advice.

    3. Re:Backing up email by Ox0065 · · Score: 1

      save off your email to a .PST file

      Now all your e-mails are on your computer. Unfortunately they are 'backed up' in a proprietary format supported by only one company, but that's OK because 'they are not (*cough*)' Oh!

      Why not use a standard, well understood format with multiple implementations? mbox, maildir, etc?

      --
      thx e
    4. Re:Backing up email by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, Linux/Windows/Mac users can use Thunderbird (which event Microsoft developers recognize as a significantly better IMAP client), and store in a non-proprietary mailbox format.

    5. Re:Backing up email by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The approach is good, but does it really need to be Outlook/PST? I hate farting around with PST files...I'd recommend using a different email client that lets you export the emails to some other non-proprietary database.

    6. Re:Backing up email by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then export your PST file so that you can import it into Thunderbird. Then the messages can be exported in a format that is usable by other applications.

    7. Re:Backing up email by Haeleth · · Score: 1

      Um, just because someone doesn't use or like Outlook doesn't mean they're a Linux user.

      Outlook is a complicated and expensive business-oriented tool, used primarily by people who need to connect to Exchange servers. Most Windows users, if they use a desktop mail client at all, use either Outlook Express (which has nothing to do with Outlook whatsoever), its successor Windows Live Mail, or a third-party client such as Eudora or Thunderbird.

    8. Re:Backing up email by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And then keep your data in a MS proprietary format?

    9. Re:Backing up email by fraudrogic · · Score: 1

      Use Outlook and connect to GMAIL through IMAP, then save off your email to a .PST file via the Import/Export tool.

      -M

      I use Outlook to retrieve my gmail via IMAP. It appears that only the headers and subject line are downloaded all at once. Only until you open an individual email will it actually download the rest (including attachments).

      --
      I only mod up parents of "mod parent up" posts...
  26. No problem by djupedal · · Score: 1

    Use Acrobat to crawl your Google content. If you need to extract from that, there are several options. But hey - part of buying into the Google cloud is letting them worry about backups. I'm fairly sure they are much more concerned and adept than you will ever be :)

  27. Customer Service? by Vyx · · Score: 1

    Has anyone ever tried calling them? I've never dealt with Google's customer service, but they may be helpful. If nothing else, you'll get a good idea about their policies reguarding customer data and what they allow said customers to do with it.

    --
    Zerg = 1a2a3a4a5sh6sh7sh8sh9sh0sf
    1. Re:Customer Service? by brian_tanner · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My friend tried to get special permission to publish a figure that had a Google Map screenshot in his Ph.D thesis. If you read the T&C on maps you're not technically allowed to publish such things.

      Anyways, the result that he found was that Google doesn't *have* a phone number. Their buildings and offices do, their sales people do, but I can almost guarantee that there is no "getting to a person" for any query you might have from a technical or legal standpoint.

      I guess.. on that note, have you tried posting in the relevant Google groups?

    2. Re:Customer Service? by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      > Has anyone ever tried calling them? I've never dealt with Google's customer service,
      > but they may be helpful.

      I'm sure they are, for customers. This guy, however, is not a customer. He is a user of a free service.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    3. Re:Customer Service? by Haeleth · · Score: 1

      This guy, however, is not a customer. He is a user of a free service.

      When he uses the service, he looks at ads. When he looks at ads, Google makes money. Therefore, when he uses the service, Google makes money.

      Hint: someone who provides you with revenue in exchange for a service is generally called a "customer".

    4. Re:Customer Service? by jj421 · · Score: 1

      Ads? What ads?

  28. Mod parent up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are wise, grasshopper. Wise and perceptive.

  29. What the heck happened? by tsa · · Score: 1

    I remember not so many years ago people would say here that they would never ever trust their data with an online storage company. Far too dangerous: they can read your data, what if they go bankrupt or something goes wrong and you loose your subscription, etc etc. Now suddenly people don't make local backups anymore. I wonder whose RDF is larger: Google's or Steve's?

    --

    -- Cheers!

  30. Conduit by thesaurus · · Score: 1

    Conduit (http://www.conduit-project.org/) is aiming to be what you what. Currently it supports some two-way syncing between Google contacts and GCal. It only has one-way to GDocs so far. Lifehacker reviews it here: http://lifehacker.com/398775/sync-and-back-up-your-data-with-conduit-for-linux

  31. backup in case google is gone tomorrow? by thc4k · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Seriously, what should happen to google? If you think google will lose your data soon, bet on that on your local stock market. You'll be so rich when that happens that you wouldnt care anymore.

  32. one-touch solution? by Noke · · Score: 3, Informative

    Is there a one-touch solution that will take all my data from the various online apps and archive it on my home server?"

    no.

  33. Easy scripted Backup for Gmail at least by carpediem55 · · Score: 3, Informative

    I use http://www.gmail-backup.com/ to backup my gmail accounts. It works with regular gmail and google apps gmail. It has a click and backup view, but I use the cmd line interface to automate a daily backup of all my mail and labels to a folder as .eml files. It also lets you restore to gmail if needed. It has a few quirks, but over all is very useful.

    --
    Sig!
  34. POP3 by Lord+Lode · · Score: 1

    One thing you can at least back up for sure is all your emails from gmail, since you can download it all through POP3. I don't know about the other services.

  35. Store it on the network by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It worked for the Bastard...
    If your employer has a bunch of gigabit ethernet lying around, use that. Just get the files stored on the network so they're shooting around the lines, then pull them off as needed. It's gotta work.
    -Hammer

  36. Has anyone asked Google for a restore? by Bazman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If I delete something at work, and then six months later think 'whatever happened to that file?', there's a chance it'll be on our backup archive and I can get it back. Or I can roll back to any of the last week's daily backups. Can Google do that? Has anyone tried? Does it keep versions?

    They seem to encourage you to not delete anything, but that doesn't help with undoing several revisions of a document, does it?

    I'm not a big google docs user, so I might have missed this somewhere.

    1. Re:Has anyone asked Google for a restore? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      google docs and spreadsheets does have a restore and revision system.

      gmail... use archive instead of delete.

      unless your transferring large attachments constantly, i doubt you'll need more space than what you've got.

    2. Re:Has anyone asked Google for a restore? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know about deleted files, but in the file menu of a document they keep all(or at least large number of most recent) of the revisions you have made to a document which you can review and compare with another revision of the same document.

    3. Re:Has anyone asked Google for a restore? by maglor_83 · · Score: 1

      They have a revisions tab with this for spreadsheets at least. I've never used their other stuff, but I assume it would be the same.

    4. Re:Has anyone asked Google for a restore? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a revisions tab that has every change ever made from what I can tell. I don't have any docs older than a year, but it seems to go back all the way to the document's creation.

  37. are you serious?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This reads like some pathetic love novel reduced to "I hate you google, why are you so great, you know I can never say no to you". If you do not care about your information (work or private) and never plan to work on anything of consequence then sure go ahead, share your info with some company (with potential future use by other companies or governments). And if this is simply some google marketing stunt to fill the web with "I hate google because they are so awesome" then go away, this does not belong on /. Please, stop with all the free google advertising, give me something of substance or novel to waste my time on.

    1. Re:are you serious?! by idiocracy · · Score: 1

      agreed. This sounds like some Jobs/Apple RDF nonsense where the user has drank the kool-aid. 1) I hope the /. community has not lost ALL perspective on the use of keeping their vast sums of information private. 2) currently, google services are not as good as the software I am already using (and when my web connection goes down I do not care)

  38. Just a few thoughts... by CaptainTux · · Score: 5, Insightful

    First, Google did not 'take over' your life or your data. You willingly gave it to them and, now that you find yourself a bit worried about the implications of one company having all of your data, you are trying to paint them as some sort of evil entity that cajoled and nearly forced you to turn over your data to them.

    They didn't.

    Take responsibility for your decision to hand over your data. Just because a service or company is cool and sexy doesn't give them any special powers to make you do anything. Google included.

    Now, as to backing up your data, I'm not sure what the problem is. Google isn't holding your data hostage at all. With the exception of maybe Notes, you can get your data from Google to your local machine pretty easy:

    Email: setup a POP3 client and download all your mail to your machine from GMail.

    Documents: Go to FILE->DOWNLOAD AS and export each document to a file on your hard disk.

    Reader: Spend some time looking at each feeds URL and bring them into a desktop feed reader.

    Calendar: Find a tool (and there are some, I just can't think of the name now) that will allow you to bring Google Calendar data off of the server and into a local app.

    The truth is you are not a slave to Google. You can leave anytime you want. That doesn't mean it's not going to take a little work on your end to do so but, then, why shouldn't it? YOU chose to go 100% with Google (as many of us have including me) and it isn't Googles responsibility to make it super simple for you to up and leave.

    --
    Anthony Papillion
    Advanced Data Concepts, Inc.
    "Quality Custom Software and IT Services"
    1. Re:Just a few thoughts... by mbaciarello · · Score: 1

      Calendar: Find a tool (and there are some, I just can't think of the name now) that will allow you to bring Google Calendar data off of the server and into a local app.

      For Calendars and Mail, here's what I do (Mac OS X 10.5):

      • Spanning Sync for 2-way syncing of contacts and calendar to Address Book and iCal, respectively
      • Mail.app for IMAP sync of email
      • A (rather convoluted, I must say) series of backup jobs using JungleDisk, which mirrors to Amazon S3 using encryption; I guess Mozy or Carbonite (if they ever manage to come up with a Mac client) would be the same.
      • Time Machine to keep hourly incrementals over WiFi both at home and at the office
      • SuperDuper for disk mirroring to an external drive at home and, when I actually get past my laziness, to another one in the office

      Time Machine backups are frequent and automatic, but you can't boot off of them if you don't have a Leopard disc at hand. When used in conjunction with location-aware "script runners" such as the free MarcoPolo, no action is required except the initial backup run. The system mounts the relevant network drive in each context, and TM does the rest.

      SuperDuper backups are there to give me something to boot off of in case of catastrophe. They don't need to be up-to-the-minute: that's what the TM/online ones are for.

    2. Re:Just a few thoughts... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great information. A little testy, though.

    3. Re:Just a few thoughts... by natoochtoniket · · Score: 1

      There's a business opportunity there.

      1. Bundle up all of those into a single easy-to-use application suite.
      2. Perhaps also include a feature to upload any documents that exist on your local machine that are not yet duplicated in google.
      3. Give it a name. Maybe something like "gsync".
      4. Distribute it open-source.
      5. Sell it with documentation and optional CD to those who are too lazy to make the open source version.
      6. Profit!

    4. Re:Just a few thoughts... by si618 · · Score: 1

      Well said Anthony!

      > Reader: Spend some time looking at each feeds URL and bring them into a desktop feed reader.

      It's easier than that:
      Settings -> Import/Export -> Export

      > Calendar: Find a tool (and there are some, I just can't think of the name now) that will allow you to bring Google Calendar data off of the server and into a local app.

      I use this and it works great with Outlook:
      http://www.google.com/support/calendar/bin/answer.py?hl=en-nz&answer=89955

      --
      Sometimes I doubt your commitment to Sparkle Motion
  39. Hacker Backup Services . . . by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

    Sounds like a sound business opportunity to me. You have your data hosted, but kinda sorta don't really trust the host service. Hire a hacker service that hacks your host service, and backs up your data, without the host service knowing. That way, if you and your host service get in a huff, you still have your data from your hacker service.

    But IBM has probably patented this already.

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  40. Re:stupid answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Except maybe people with stock options from the google company?

  41. What does Google owe you? by beaststwo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I wonder precisely what promises Google has made and what responsibilities have they disclaimed themselves of? As any business school graduate knows, one of the keys to keeping customers is to make it easy to start with them but tough to leave.

    Does Google owe any level of data integrity and privacy? Do they owe return of user data without claiming rights to use it otherwise? Do they make any promise of data protection and disaster recovery? What due diligence does the use owe in the process?

    As we move to an environment where more and more people simply 'trust" corporations to hold and protect their (potentially personal) data, I fear that we're way ahead of the law in defining the rights and responsibilities of both users and providers. In the absence of law, providers, such as Google, will write naturally terms of use that mostly benefit themselves. Users will simply lose.

    1. Re:What does Google owe you? by John+Hasler · · Score: 4, Insightful

      > In the absence of law, providers, such as Google, will write naturally terms of use that
      > mostly benefit themselves.

      Real providers with whom you have a contract are obligated by law to do whatever the contract says they have to do (assuming that you hold up your end by paying the bill). Advertising agencies such as Google that provide free services for promotional purposes have no legal obligations to their "users" whatever. Nor should they.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    2. Re:What does Google owe you? by Durindana · · Score: 1

      Erm if Google is providing a service, it's a "real provider" of that service, whether Google chooses to charge for it or not... are you suggesting there is no contractual relationship between users of Google services and Google?

      I haven't read any Google ToS/EULAs (I don't use gmail et al), so I don't know their terms, but... those assuredly are contracts, and I would be pretty damn surprised if they didn't disclaim Google's liability for all sorts of things. If that were not the case, it seems like it would be fairly trivial to bend Google over if something went wrong... simply because you're not "paying a bill" does not mean there's no consideration for the contract.

      IANYL (I Am Not Your Lawyer) and this post is not legal advice.

    3. Re:What does Google owe you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're not a lawyer, you don't use Google and you can't be bothered to read their TOS...why -are- you posting, anyway?

  42. Conduit or other synchronization software by MrvFD · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm personally excepting to Conduit to fulfill my needs in backing up from different sites. Of course synchronizing is different from backing up, but when I have all the data on my local machine I can backup those easily.

    I'm not very keen in using Google or any other services for my calendar, contacts, photos etc. data. If I'll think I'll need on-the-fly syncing, I'll rather just setup a sync server on my home server.

  43. Gah! by strawberryutopia · · Score: 1

    This sounds worryingly like me!

    But anyway, as far as I'm aware, many if not all of Google's services let you export all the data. For example, Reader lets you export the list of feeds you're subscribed to. Notebook lets you export each notebook.

    It's all a bit tedious though, but it wouldn't be too hard to code something to do it all for you. I don't think anyone's done one yet, but if you have a look round sourceforge you might find something interesting.

    --
    I'm a leaf on the wind, watch how I soar...
    -Lucy-
    1. Re:Gah! by baydat · · Score: 1

      WOW I'm a bit shocked too...i can congatulate you on keeping your hard drive clean but now that google and the govt have all your data...most if not all of their apps allow you to extract into some other flavor of app $MS, Mozilla , or something better... don't trust others with your data, they could pull the plug at any time whether their own choice or someone elses.

  44. Re:stupid question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So which section in the Sarbanes-Oxley Act explicitly requires data backups?

  45. simple... by Johnny+Chinpo · · Score: 1

    Don't trust anybody with your data. ImO you were stupid to do so in the first place.

  46. movemydata.org by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...is an ongoing project to provide exactly this sort of functionality; no deliverables yet though

  47. re hip image by cinnamon+colbert · · Score: 0, Troll

    soon, google will finally be recognized as the evil empire it is
    When will goo$le bashing overtake M$ bashing ?
    my bet, August 12, 2010
    anybody else wanna get in on the betting pool ?

  48. Re:frothy piss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not right now you don't!

  49. backdown.com by istartedi · · Score: 1

    OK, don't go there. It's just some lousy advertising site. It's just that if it weren't taken, I might have used this domain to run the hypothetical service I've been talking about for months now: backdown, as opposed to backup. It would be just what you're talking about--something that takes all this web app crap and pulls it back down to your local box. Ideally, you should be able to change services. I began to think of this when I realized I was accumulating a lot of metadata for my photos in Flickr. I began to think, it would be nice if I could preserve all of that locally, or even store it in a service-independant format so that I could change services. Imagine, you have a standard XML format for photo metadata, and you can translate your Flickr metadata into that, and then upload it into whatever service or application comes along later.

    Technicly, we know it can be done. The real problem seems to be some of the legal crap that could happen to you as a result of agreeing to the TOS. I'm not sure about Flickr, but the LinkedIn TOS is evil in this regard. They specificly say you can't have a LinkedIn account if you are competing with LinkedIn, and the development of such a service could easily be placed in that category.

    So. I haven't put any effort into it. It's just another idea for the halfbakery.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  50. hit print by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    google can even do it for you:
    http://mail.google.com/mail/help/paper/more.html

  51. whatelse? by jsim · · Score: 2, Informative
    Mail - Download use POP3 or IMAP

    Documents - Use "offline access for Google Docs"

    Contacts - export to CSV or vCard

    calendar - export it as a private address in ical format (also XML, html)

    blogs - HTTracker

    photos - try picasa

    what else?

  52. important meme forgotten? by irtza · · Score: 1

    already to 111 posts and non one has says:

    all your data are belong to google /. I am disappointed.

    --
    When all else fails, try.
  53. Have you checked out Google Gears? by MichaelPenne · · Score: 4, Informative

    Google Docs Offline If the 'cloud' explodes, I guess you can open your Docs offline folder with a web browser, and save the documents as OO, HTML, etc. Other folks have posted about using IMAP to get your email, etc.

  54. Re:You, sir, are an idiot !! Google is NOT to trus by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

    Who's the idiot.

    --
    You just got troll'd!
  55. Do you really have to ask? by Kral_Blbec · · Score: 0

    Gmail supports IMAP, syncronize it with thunderbird and you are set.

    Calander can be synronized with GCaldaemon to sunbird and saved there.

    Gdocs can export everything as pdf or doc. Yay.

    Picasa albumns, well you uploaded it in the first place I hope you still have your own copy.

    Reader, just get another RSS program and copy the links. You dont need to back anything up (i hope) and how many feeds do you really follow?

    Its not that hard...

  56. Cloud... by MichaelPenne · · Score: 1

    The big difference between a cloud and a mainframe is that the cloud itself runs on 'micro-computers' - so the old problem of the micro-computers obeying Moore's law and out-running the mainframe is obsolete. Anyway, cloud computing is the latest greatest thing, and you can expect many forwards of 'the website is down' until you agree:-).

  57. Tried that. by Fencepost · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now how do I get the prosecutor to return those backups to me?

    --
    fencepost
    just a little off
  58. Oooh, I know! by Ignacio · · Score: 1

    On GMailFS!

  59. Only wimps need backup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think it was Linus who once said to the effect, "only wimps backup. Others post everything on the web and let it be mirrored by every other site." Oh, you mean personal data...

  60. Google Backup! by multi+io · · Score: 1

    I'm sure Google provides an online backup service of some sort. Use that and you'll be fine.

  61. You get what you pay for... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You get what you pay for... suckas!

  62. Re:stupid question by weg · · Score: 1

    I thought that, all Sarbanes-Oxley states is, that Apple has to charge their customers for their updates for selected products. I believe it must mention Apple explicitely, since other companies don't charge for their updates.

    --
    Georg
  63. several solutions by speedtux · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Mail and Calendar, you can simply back up by subscribing to them using IMAP/POP and iCal.

    Google Sites, you can kind of backup with wget; just make a copy of the site from a cron job.

    For Google Docs, you can use Gears; it won't be a full backup, but it will have local copies of the most important documents, and you can cut-and-paste out of that in a pinch.

    In the long term, something like Gnome Conduit will probably solve this problem once and for all; until then, one just has to muddle through.

  64. Can't add to the topic here except 'same here!' by AbRASiON · · Score: 1

    What do we do?

    Googles applications and services (thus far) are still completely within my 'non evil' threshold, they are useful, convienient, fast, cross platform etc etc.
    Google docs has an incredibly important spreadsheet in there, which I can manually backup but interestingly I would also like to add a password to it (beyond the pass required for my google account) I wish they'd add that feature too, because if anyone ever reads that spreadsheet with malicious intent, I'm @$%#ed!

    Anyone got any ideas on how to back this stuff up?

    1. Re:Can't add to the topic here except 'same here!' by Sadsfae · · Score: 1

      I would also like to add a password to it (beyond the pass required for my google account) I wish they'd add that feature too, because if anyone ever reads that spreadsheet with malicious intent, I'm @$%#ed!

      Is it the release schedule for Duke Nukem Forever? What else could be that important?

      --
      Have a squat over at the hobo house.
    2. Re:Can't add to the topic here except 'same here!' by AbRASiON · · Score: 1

      To be honest, I know it's stupid but it's a spreadsheet containing my usernames and passwords to most forums (slashdot for example)
      It's unlikely my password will ever be compromised but it is a concern.

      Again: yes, I know it's not clever but damn it's handy, anyone who has been using the net for a while (most slashdotters) would realise after 10 years you can really chock up a huge amount of accounts on the internet (I'd estimate I have over 250 passwords, seriously)

  65. All your data are belong to us by largesnike · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Putting stuff in the cloud sorta worries me as well, which is why I've kept out of it.

    I find that things like Picassa are OK because these are only copies of your digital stuff at home. But even then, your comments, captions and arrangements would, it seems belong to them.

    --
    "Laugh while you can a-monkey boy!" - Dr Emilio Lizardo
  66. How to back it up? Any way you can. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If google has all your data, (a) you're an idiot for not keeping it backed up already and (b) start copying it locally, any way you can.

    If you don't have a local copy of your data, you're just asking for trouble. Either that, or it's not important enough to bother with if it goes away.

  67. Re:frothy piss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    retarded cunt

  68. screen scraping by Mike610544 · · Score: 1

    If it's on the web you can archive it.

    It's not the easiest way to do it, but with the increased difficulty rating even if your execution is less than perfect you could get a good score

    --
    ... also, I can kill you with my brain.
  69. Here's one thing you can do, at least for email. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Set up another email account strictly for archiving (your home server, a different gmail account, or another offering like yahoo).

    Have google foward a copy of all this mail to your backup account.

    Really, though, I doubt you have much to worry about. Why would google up and delete your account? Typical operations would just disable the account, and leave it lying around for a while just in case.

    If you delete mail on google, it doesn't even really get deleted. It gets stored in your trash folder. From there you'd have to delete it a second time to really tell them to forget it.

    Chances are google has much more reliability and availability than your home server could ever provide. So just make a "memory" account like I did, and forward at least the important stuff their.

  70. Where is my facebook archive? by Carpal+Tunnel · · Score: 1

    I have the same issue with facebook. Despite my discouragement, my friends insist on sending me messages on facebook. I'd rather not cancel my account, but at the same time, i'm getting increasingly nervous about all that data out of my reach. I wrote a crawler a few years ago, but facebook has started kicking people off for that behavior. I just recently wrote them a note asking for help backing up my data. We shall see what they say. I consider the ability to locally mirror all my cloud data to be requirement.

  71. I wouldn't worry about it by Sadsfae · · Score: 1

    Though they might now be the same, the internet can go down before google does.

    --
    Have a squat over at the hobo house.
  72. asper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Conversely, I use Google docs to backup all my papers I leave on my usb thumb drive.

  73. Back up... don't back it up by webagogue · · Score: 1

    Back up, sonny. Undo what you've done. Keeping all the data that's important to you with one provider, while probably convenient now, will probably cause you problems later on. Microformats are an answer.

    --

    Knowledge is valuable. Ignorance is dangerous. Censorship is unacceptable. http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=10
    1. Re:Back up... don't back it up by grikdog · · Score: 1

      I stupid. What is zis "microformat" ting?

      --
      ``Tension, apprehension & dissension have begun!'' - Duffy Wyg&, in Alfred Bester's _The Demolished Man_
  74. from the graviator by graviator · · Score: 1

    As long as you give in and allow yourself to give other people your stuff you are in trouble. So you must start to slowly put all future data on your own hard disks and disk's.and each day slowly pull the data out and change it if, and when you can!if you don't there was no reason to have brought this subject up...

  75. How much are you willing to spend... by gabba_gabba_hey · · Score: 1

    How much are you willing to spend on a "one touch" solution? Maybe we can work something out.

  76. DIY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I suggest you buy your self a old PC then hope over to The How To Forge and follow the install 'The Perfect Setup' (Ubuntu server with PHP, MySQL, Web Mail (Round Cube is nice!) and then set up a web site and install 'Feed on Feeds', 'Online Bookmarks', plus any other server side app's that you can find/want and use SSL. Use FTP to upload any documents made locally, thus making them accessable where ever you go. Then back server as you like. Now where's my foil hat?..

  77. Why backup... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if you can't find it on google, it can't be important. Just lay back and let google decide what's important and what's not.

  78. Mount Gmail Filesystem Locally by johndmartiniii · · Score: 1

    There is 'gmailfs' which allows you to mount your Gmail share as a local directory. It is apparently not fully secure as it stores your password as text on your system, but well...

    I know that it is available for Linux systems, though I have never been able to fully get it to work.

    Here is theLinux link.

    Here is a link to a Windows Port.

    It's not a "one-touch" solution, but what is? I has the potential to be a great deal more than just your average backup.

    --
    If you don't know what you're doing, you can't make mistakes.
  79. Looks dead by yabos · · Score: 1

    It seems that that project is pretty dead and it doesn't even work with Leopard.

    1. Re:Looks dead by me+at+werk · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the forums recommend dotmac now.

      --
      For context, click Parent.
  80. goosync, mail forwards by rwa2 · · Score: 1

    I don't actually use the google stuff all that much... but I set up gmail to forward all mail to my home account.

    Also I have goosync publish all my calendar and contact data from my palm onto the site. I guess I could use it to go the other way as well.

    Don't know what to do about google docs, other than to export everything to local files. I really haven't used it, though the collaboration features seem interesting.

  81. Some helpful links by MattCutts · · Score: 1

    Google has a specific policy of not trapping users' data, so you can back up almost any data you have at Google. Here are some helpful links:

    How to back up almost any Google service:
    http://googlesystem.blogspot.com/2007/12/creating-backup-for-your-google-account.html
    http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/not-trapping-users-data-good/

    Backup a Blogger blog:
    http://googlesystem.blogspot.com/2007/02/how-to-backup-blogger-blog.html

    Backup Google bookmarks:
    http://googlesystem.blogspot.com/2007/06/export-your-google-bookmarks.html

    Backup your Gmail with getmail:
    http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/backup-gmail-in-linux-with-getmail/

  82. Some excerpts from the google license agreement by plopez · · Score: 1

    http://www.google.com/a/help/intl/en/users/terms.html

    You agree to comply with your company's data usage and privacy policies.

    So in other words, don't put important company information on their servers without permission. In other words, that end run you are doing around your companies security policies is a violation.

    You agree that Google has no responsibility or liability for the deletion or failure to store any Content and other communications maintained or transmitted by Google services.

    No backups, no liability for lack of backups.

    Upon the termination of your use of Google services, including upon receipt of a certificate or other legal document confirming your death, Google will close your account and you will no longer be able to retrieve content contained in that account.

    Better get your stuff off of their servers if you decide to quit the service.

    You agree that Google may at any time and for any reason, including a period of account inactivity, terminate your access to Google services, terminate the Terms, or suspend or terminate your account. In the event of termination, your account will be disabled and you may not be granted access to Google services, your account or any files or other content contained in your account.

    If google terminates your account, you may not be able to retrieve your data.

    Then there are the clauses re: we are not liable for anything.

    This just reinforces my uneasiness with using these services. You can lose control of very important information with no recourse or ability to retrieve those data. I have raised these objections only to be told "dude, you don't get the cloud, its 733t!"

    Just stop and think before you send out information into a "cloud" or even to remotely hosted servers. Think about the worst case secenarios and what their impact would be.

    --
    putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
  83. CalGoo can sync your desktop and Google Calendar. by MPvDdB · · Score: 1

    You could use CALGOO (Java so can be made to work on a lot of different platforms) to synchronize your calendar data between Google's Calendar and the dekstop version of CALGOO on your (main) desk- and/or laptops. Giving you access to your calendar if you are on the road and have no internet access available as an added benefit. http://www.calgoo.com/ regards from Leeuwarden Peter van Dobben de Bruijn

  84. privacy by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    Privacy in the coming age will be either a product for big companies, etc, or increasingly irrelevant as the web has shown (myspace/facebook generation).

    Unfortunately too many people give up their privacy with facebook/myspace, gmail, and online data storage. They use these so they'll expect others to use them too. I haven't signed up with any of them though I may join Photo.net when I start a photo business. Otherwise I want to keep my data local, I use an external drive for backup. And I want to run my apps locally as well, and be able to take it with me so I got a laptop. the closest I may come to storing data online is if I use my Linux PC as a server and setup a VPN. Well, I also keep my email on my ISP's server.

    Falcon

  85. Buy Google Premier Account by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and get your data backed up by Google. So easy.

  86. Gmail by colinRTM · · Score: 1

    I only use Google for my email, nevertheless I still run nightly backups of everything in my Gmail account, to my server.

    I use "Offlineimap". You might wish to look into it; I highly recommend it.

  87. Liar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You, sir, author of TFA, are NOT a committed pessimist. If you were, you would not have adopted any of these Google gimmicks (which are, of course, all a foot in the door of privacy violation). Us genuine pessimists still haven't ever used a Google site except maps and search.