Slashdot Mirror


Google Turns 10

Ian Lamont writes "It was on September 7, 1998 that Larry Page and Sergey Brin founded Google Inc., aiming to provide a better search engine. You can see what it looked like here. Google had a relatively good search engine technology that succeeded in burying many late 1990s competitors, and it eventually developed a successful advertising model and pledged to operate on a 'don't be evil' philosophy. The company now has nearly 20,000 employees and a $150 billion market value, and has been acquiring or developing a host of groundbreaking technologies. When did you start using its search engine? Is the world a better place because of Google?"

209 comments

  1. pictures by toby · · Score: 5, Informative

    For those curious, like I was, here are the original Google server pictures missing from the Wayback Machine's archive.

    --
    you had me at #!
    1. Re:pictures by Bazman · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Wow, until I looked at those pics I didn't realise 'Google!' was an anagram of 'Go Lego!'

    2. Re:pictures by longacre · · Score: 1

      So that's the secret: Lego cases!

    3. Re:pictures by miller60 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Even better. Here's a pictorial history of Google's servers (be sure to scroll down).

    4. Re:pictures by Tackhead · · Score: 5, Interesting

      For those curious, like I was, here are the original Google server pictures missing from the Wayback Machine's archive.

      And if you're ever in Mountain View, CA, you can see one the first production server racks from 1999, as well as the Lego (actually Duplo) blocks that housed the original 1998 beta server shown in your link.

      The artifacts can be viewed by the public at the Computer History Museum, along with everything from a Difference Engine, an Enigma machine, parts of ENIAC, numerous Crays, a restored and working PDP-1, an Apple I, and pretty much everything else you can imagine.

      No visit to the Bay Area is complete without a trip to the Computer History Museum.

    5. Re:pictures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bazman, I had always saw the anagram. Google and Lego go hand in hand. GoogLeGoogLeGoogLeGo... you get the picture. Google's first server was built from Legos. Also Larry Page built a printer from Lego blocks long ago. It turns out that Lego blocks happen to have a practical use outside of merely being a toy. You can bet many an engineer an architect a designer have started out with Legos in their prepubescent years, but structurally you can build sturdy cases out of them and then some.

    6. Re:pictures by 32771 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Uh that reminds me:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microserfs

      I wonder whether it inspired anyone.

      --
      Je me souviens.
    7. Re:pictures by somersault · · Score: 1

      Well spotted - I saw a news piece on this tonight and they had a brief animation of a 3D google logo made out of lego, I've never made the connection before as I thought it was just a cool word they chose that was a play on 'googol'.

      As for when I first used google, it must be 9 or 10 years ago. I remember my dad telling me about it being the most clever and fast search engine. I was stunned at the ability to search millions of pages and send back results in fractions of a second (possibly it was the first time I'd ever seen "this page was generated in 0.15 seconds" type thing).

      Obviously I didn't expect in the least for google to become a household name, but I started using it instead of altavista (back then vista was a cool word in my dictionary). I thought that it would be 'just another search engine' and stay as a fairly obscure one that only geeks knew about. I was pretty shocked to find out that they were making money from it because I pictured the whole thing as being a type of science/computing curioso than an actual company, as my dad had mentioned that it was a university project.

      Anyway, Happy Birthday Google, congrats2u!

      --
      which is totally what she said
    8. Re:pictures by IorDMUX · · Score: 2

      Unfortunately, it appears that the Computer History Museum hosts its home page on an ENIAC replica, as I believe we just slashdotted this site though the *comment* section.

      I mean, c'mon. Do that many of us really live in Mountain View?

      --
      >> Standing on head makes smile of frown, but rest of face also upside down.
    9. Re:pictures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fffffffffffffffff

      Picture. On the right. Hideous.

    10. Re:pictures by weetabeex · · Score: 1

      I guess you should wonder whom was it inspired by.

      The novel's title is a play on words involving the software company Microsoftâ"most of the major characters in the novel are initially employees of the companyâ"and the term serf (the lowest social class of the feudal society).>/p>

    11. Re:pictures by Toshito · · Score: 1

      I work on a datawarehouse for a big bank that still runs on one of those IBM F50... for 11 years now! Most of the HD are original, running 24/7 since 1997. Apart from a having to replace a couple of fan, and maybe 4 HD, this machine has been very reliable! (right now the database is about 500GB and is still used daily by about 10 users writing queries). We're on Oracle 8i...

      --
      Try it! Library of Babel
    12. Re:pictures by bi$hop · · Score: 1

      It could also be an anagram of 'Log Ego', since they undoubtedly have some of the biggest log files on the planet.

    13. Re:pictures by Bazman · · Score: 2, Funny

      Also, it's an anagram of 'Go Ogle', which, considering what The Internet Is For, is appropriate...

  2. Deja News by Anonymous+Crowhead · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I started using Google when it bought Deja News which was the only good place to find a broad selection of technical information on the web. I guess I just defaulted to Google as a search engine after that.

    1. Re:Deja News by thermopile · · Score: 1

      I made the switch from AltaVista to Google when I discovered Google would consistently return pretty much what I was looking for on the first page. That was early 1999. Then they added USENET? Never looked back since.

      --

      "Diplomacy is something you do until you find a rock." --Richard Pound

    2. Re:Deja News by unlametheweak · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There was no one search engine that I used until somebody at work told me about Google (early 2001). Lycos, Dogpile, AltaVista, Yahoo, etc and so on all come to mind. There was no "loyalty" until Google. Google set the standard. Let's hope it doesn't grow too big for it's breeches.

    3. Re:Deja News by Roadkills-R-Us · · Score: 1

      That's about the time frame I started using it. But I had resisted for a long time because I didn't think their model of "rank by links" was such a good idea. Eventually it got good enough I trusted it reasonably, and by then the others (yahoo, altavista, alltheweb) all seemed to have more problems than google.

      That said, I still sometimes use the others.

    4. Re:Deja News by anss123 · · Score: 1

      I made the switch from AltaVista to Google when I discovered Google would consistently return pretty much what I was looking for on the first page.

      I switched from AltaVista since every time I misspelled it I was redirected to a porn site, which was an embarrassment waiting to happen.

      AltaVista often did a better job then Google when searching for slightly obscure topics, and even today Google can be troublesome with its tendency to favor heavily linked sites - i.e. popular sites.

    5. Re:Deja News by UltraAyla · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Same story for me. I was probably much younger and newer to the Internet at that time than many people here (I think my family got Internet access sometime in '97). I had heard a lot about Yahoo and AltaVista, so I tended to use them but I'd also looked around at MSN, Askjeeves, NothernLight and Lycos and all of those guys when I couldn't find what I was looking for. Then I started seeing Google coming up for things. I still remember thinking their site looked funny, but MAN did it find what I wanted so quickly. Sometime after that it became my home page (probably 2000 or 2001) and I more or less stopped using anything else.

    6. Re:Deja News by repvik · · Score: 1

      One interesting sidenote is that AllTheWeb had hardware search which was ~20x the speed of Google per server. Unfortunately, AllTheWeb had only a couple servers and Google had dozens. That, combined with different algorithms and a verbable name was probably the reason ATW lost for Google ;)

    7. Re:Deja News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I used a meta-crawler (a front end of multiple search engines) and saw that most of my "good" results were from Google. After seeing how fast it loaded on dialup, there was no turning back.

    8. Re:Deja News by jrumney · · Score: 1

      I remember switching first to Excite, then Hotbot, then Altavista as my regular search engine before I started using Google. By the time Google came out, Altavista had deteriorated to the point where I was revisiting hotbot and excite, or using one of the Meta search engines for normal searches. Until Google brought out image search, hotbot still had its place, as it let you restrict searches to particular media types (I mainly used it to search for images, as there just wasn't that much interesting video and audio content around; unless you were searching for porn).

    9. Re:Deja News by craagz · · Score: 1

      I experienced internet first in 1998, that's a big thing for a guy from India and I seriously got invovled with google by 2000. Before that I was too much into yahoo (chat mostly). I am aiming to use all of google's services, already counting 13 from the top of my mind.

    10. Re:Deja News by mcvos · · Score: 1

      I made the switch from AltaVista to Google when I discovered Google would consistently return pretty much what I was looking for on the first page. That was early 1999.

      Same here. There'd been some search engine wars with Lycos and Webcrawler, I believe, and eventually I settled on AltaVista. But the AltaVista pages got way to cluttered, and suddenly Google shows up with a clean design and far better search results, and somehow they managed to stay on top since then.

    11. Re:Deja News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the same ... for some reason, I think I got into the habit of using hotbot.com ... until google.

    12. Re:Deja News by Grizzlysmit · · Score: 1

      There was no one search engine that I used until somebody at work told me about Google (early 2001). Lycos, Dogpile, AltaVista, Yahoo, etc and so on all come to mind. There was no "loyalty" until Google. Google set the standard. Let's hope it doesn't grow too big for it's breeches.

      same here except it was some what earlier for me 1998 or 1999 not sure which

      --
      in my life God comes first.... but Linux is pretty high after that :-D
      Francis Smit
  3. What a historic year 1998 was.... by Izabael_DaJinn · · Score: 5, Funny

    Google AND the Big Lebowski make the scene in that fateful year. Coincidence? Hmm.....

    I don't know about Google, but the world is definitely a better place because of the Dude.

    --
    Careful What You Wish For....
    1. Re:What a historic year 1998 was.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Dude abides.

    2. Re:What a historic year 1998 was.... by LionMage · · Score: 1

      The Goog abides?

    3. Re:What a historic year 1998 was.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google = rug of the search market - really tying everything together nicely.

    4. Re:What a historic year 1998 was.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google AND the Big Lebowski make the scene in that fateful year. Coincidence? Hmm.....

      I don't know about Google, but the world is definitely a better place because of the Dude.

      That's fucking interesting man. That's fucking interesting.

    5. Re:What a historic year 1998 was.... by clem · · Score: 1

      That logo really held the web page together, didn't it?

      --
      Your courageous and selfless spelling corrections have made me a better person.
    6. Re:What a historic year 1998 was.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean this Dude? Yes, 1998 was historic for him.

    7. Re:What a historic year 1998 was.... by conureman · · Score: 1

      The year THAT dude signed the DMCA? Historic isn't the word that comes to mind.

      --
      The cost of that cleanup, of course, will be borne by taxpayers, not industry.
  4. People use Google because... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Of all the search engines, Google was the best name to use as a verb.

    "All this time I thought 'Googling yourself' was the other thing."
    -- Marge Simpson

    1. Re:People use Google because... by atari2600 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Google doesn't want you to say Google.

    2. Re:People use Google because... by Hatta · · Score: 1

      That's not what your link says. They don't want it to be a generic verb, as they could lose their trademark. But really, does anyone use 'google' as a generic verb? When people say "Google it", they mean "search Google(tm) for it".

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    3. Re:People use Google because... by Anpheus · · Score: 1

      That's a trademark issue. If they act like they're totally OK with it, then Microsoft and Yahoo can use google as a verb anywhere they like. Google doesn't want that to happen, so they defend it anyway, despite it being impossible. Putting it in dictionaries, as mentioned above and below I believe, is a new tactic for trademark defense. At least, it is to me. I am not a lawyer. :)

    4. Re:People use Google because... by pushing-robot · · Score: 5, Funny

      Of all the search engines, Google was the best name to use as a verb.

      I disagree. Imagine the conversations if Microsoft's service had caught on:

      "Dude, have you seen Japanese tentacle rape?"
      "Yeah, I Lived it!"

      --
      How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
    5. Re:People use Google because... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Only on Slashdot is tentacle rape insightful.

    6. Re:People use Google because... by DriedClexler · · Score: 1

      No, if you put cameras on the raping tentacles, that would be pretty in-sight-ful.

      --
      Information theory is life. The rest is just the KL divergence.
  5. Back in school.. by OshEcho · · Score: 0

    I remember back in school, when I would go to yahoo, ask jeeves, and other places that I can't remember before I searched on google when researching for reports.
    I don't remember when I started to use just google. But it's been years since I've not been able to find something on google.

    I'm happy with google as long as they continue to "do no evil".

    --
    -Echo
    1. Re:Back in school.. by moderatorrater · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Agreed. Search engines were horrible back then, and google was no exception (for me, anyway). It was about a year and a half after they debuted that I started using them, and I haven't looked back.

      As for the 'do no evil' part, I find it funny that the people who hate google so badly still use it. They're so much better than the competition that the people who hate it come up with convulted methods to try to use it without their information getting tracked.

    2. Re:Back in school.. by Alien+Being · · Score: 5, Funny

      Same here.

      One day, when Yahoo was still king, I was having bad luck finding results. I had tried all the search engines I knew about.. Yahoo, Alta Vista, etc.

      Finally I asked Jeeves for the "best web search" and he recommended Google. Well done, Jeeves!

    3. Re:Back in school.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And when you search now for "best web search" in Google it recommends dogpile.com

  6. When did I start using google? by stevedcc · · Score: 5, Funny

    I don't know, well before 2002. I'm sure they know the exact date!

    --
    todo - The developer's equivalent of confession: "Forgive me Father, for I have sinned..."
    1. Re:When did I start using google? by kd5zex · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I can't remember what I used before Google just like I can't remember what I did before the internet became accessible for common folk.

    2. Re:When did I start using google? by bonch · · Score: 0, Informative

      Parent was a joke about Google's tracking policies, moderators.

  7. The Ville by Clay+Pigeon+-TPF-VS- · · Score: 1

    I started using Google when it gave me www.theville.org as the first result when I typed in the ville as a search string. Altavista doesnt even have www.theville.org on its first page for that same search string.

    --
    Viral software licensing is not freedom, it is in fact GNU/Socialism.
    1. Re:The Ville by danieltdp · · Score: 2, Informative

      I had a similiar experience. I was always struggling to find somthing at altavista when I heard about google and decided to give it a try. Things that came up at page 65 or whatever on altavista just kept popping on google's first results all the time!

      I dropped altavista and never looked back

      --
      -- dnl
    2. Re:The Ville by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Alta la vista, baby!

  8. Late 1999. by bluephone · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In late 1999 I heard buzz from my fellow geeks that Google provided amazing results, so I tried it out. Within a couple days, I completely abandoned Alta Vista for Google, and even scaled back bothering with Yahoo because the results were just crazy accurate. I found myself boosting it to friends both of the geek persuasion and not, and everyone liked it. IMO, it was truly a case of a superior product trouncing the competition, the entire point of capitalism. They built a better mouse trap (pun not entirely intended).

    --
    jX [ Make everything as simple as possible, but no simpler. - Einstein ]
    1. Re:Late 1999. by dedazo · · Score: 0

      Same here. I heard from someone about Google and after the first few searches I dropped AltaVista (which back then was the best search engine) and never looked back.

      The fact that they took over DejaNews also helped.

      --
      Web2.0: I love when people Flickr my cuil and digg my boingboing until my google is reddit and I start to yahoo
    2. Re:Late 1999. by MarcoAtWork · · Score: 1

      pretty much the same, before google I used to use a mix of altavista/hotbot/yahoo but after I tried it a couple of times I was hooked given how incredibly better their search results were. Wish I had thought about applying to work there back then, it must have been quite a lot of fun.

      Only thing I wasn't happy about at all was when they acquired deja, as I thought the original deja interface was better. Nowadays very few folks are on usenet anymore unfortunately, so it is a moot point.

      Hey google, what about creating a new search type along the lines of 'look for this search only on messageboards and forums'? It would make it a lot simpler when you want to know what people think about something, and I bet it would be quite easy to code from the back-end perspective where I bet you have pages tagged as 'this is a forum/message board' already: maybe a filetype:messageboard overload?

      --
      -- the cake is a lie
    3. Re:Late 1999. by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      I was a big fan of OpenText's search engine in the late 1990s. It was far better than any of the others I'd used before. (They still exist but left that market.)

      After being introduced to Google in fall of 1999, I had a string of "I'm feeling lucky" attempts resulting in exactly what I wanted. I was hooked. It's only in the last few years that I've found some specialty search engines give better results, as too many Google results are ad trolls or tangentially-related forum posts or obscure PDFs (and in those cases I still resort to Google if the specialty search engines fail, since those forum posts or PDFs may be all there is).

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    4. Re:Late 1999. by Creepy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'd guess I started somewhere in 1999 as well, but possibly 1998 - a guy I'd worked with in college showed it to me and the fact that it had indexed both my college website and my first html, which had somehow gotten nested into a server and never deleted (and was circa 1992 - that is pre-mosaic - I wrote it I believe for WorldWideWeb (it was on NeXT, so logical) and then wrote a different page for another pre-1993 browser (no idea which, but it was text - I don't know if lynx was around yet or not - all I know is my page was all text), but then decided it had no future and Gopher was the future - man, was I ever wrong.

      Google's future I could immediately see - easy to remember and a very simple page with fast search and a huge index. Also having come from AltaVista and to a lesser extent, Netscape and Yahoo portals, the lack of massive amounts of advertising was refreshing (and the lack of those newfangled popup ads was cool, too).

    5. Re:Late 1999. by goofyspouse · · Score: 1

      I also took this same path. It seems like a lot of former AltaVista users jumped at about the same time.

    6. Re:Late 1999. by $0.02 · · Score: 1

      I started using Google years ago and have been using it ever since. Interesting, I learned about it on Slashdot :-)

      --
      If enithin kan gow rong it whil. (Murfey)
    7. Re:Late 1999. by benxx · · Score: 1

      Me too.. I was the one who first used Google at my college (in 1999). My first search query on Google was "Kate Winslet nude photos". Results were pretty much accurate :) I stopped using Yahoo! and AltaVista since then.

      --
      Love me or leave me. Hey, where's everybody going?
    8. Re:Late 1999. by vakuona · · Score: 1

      Slightly different for me. I was accessing the internet from a decidedly 3rd world country, and I used Yahoo. Yahoo, being a portal and all, took quite a while to load. So I saw the "powered by Gogle" thing and searched for Google. Never ooked back since. Also helped that it was pretty handy at returning resulst, and didn't bother me with the "hand optimised" results Yahoo liked throwing at me.

  9. Firefox by Flyers2391 · · Score: 0

    I always used yahoo search until I started using firefox. After a little while, I had a preference for google

  10. Hell Yes by hoofinasia · · Score: 3, Informative

    Xprize, Summer of code, etc. Google is definitely a great company. Sure Gmail is Creepy and they've taken heat for their TOS, but they are still a stand-up, innovative company in my mind. And god-by-every-name bless those guys for their green mindedness and showing its possible for a billionaire corp to do some good.

    However, that doesn't mean they won't be next generation's Microsoft. Remember, MS had the little guy advantage for a while, and was innovative and even generous with the charities. But plenty hate them now.

    1. Re:Hell Yes by SlashDotDotDot · · Score: 1

      they've taken heat for their TOS

      Some of that TOS stuff apparently turned out to be a mistake:

      Google on Chrome EULA controversy: our bad, we'll change it

      --
      /...
    2. Re:Hell Yes by hoofinasia · · Score: 1

      I think we need a slashdot-specific Godwin's law... Except for Microsoft. And it lowers your Score by 2.

      Godwin's Law
      Godwin's Law Humorously

    3. Re:Hell Yes by Chyeld · · Score: 1

      As someone who lived through the rise of Microsoft, the only people I remember 'loving' them were their stockholders.

      Then again, my first computer was a Timex Sinclair ZX81, my next an Atari 520 ST, and I used Mac's in college because the PC's didn't even have a hard drive.

      The primary difference, and the reason I don't expect Google to become the next Microsoft, is Larry and Sergey have never come off as arseholes IMO. While Bill Gates always acted like one IMO.

      The founders of a company may not control it's every decision, but they do have a huge influence over its actions and the culture that forms around it. Bill G. has always been of the old school robber baron, pull every nasty trick you can to get ahead, philosophy. And that level of dickweedness is exactly why most people who hate Microsoft today, hate it.

      That isn't to say that Google is perfect, or never makes mistakes or decisions that aren't solely for the purpose of its own gain. When you look at the rational complaints people have about Google, it's less "OMG they are teh eViL!" and more "Microsoft has made me paranoid! Google could do something bad with this! Do not want!"

  11. It's easy to forget by SlashDotDotDot · · Score: 5, Interesting

    how bad search really was before Google. For that matter it's easy to forget that it used to take work to find information at all. Our culture has just barely begun to come to terms with how revolutionary this change really is.

    --
    /...
    1. Re:It's easy to forget by Bogtha · · Score: 1

      It really was that bad back then. Pre-Google, it wasn't unusual to go to the second results page even for common queries. These days, I almost never have to go past the first results page. I suspect the effect is magnified due to the growth of the web though. It's easier to find relevant pages when there's so many more of them.

      As for me, I started using Google back when it was google.stanford.edu, so that's 1997 or earlier.

      --
      Bogtha Bogtha Bogtha
    2. Re:It's easy to forget by DrEldarion · · Score: 4, Funny

      Nah, it's easy to remember how bad search was before Google. Someone has set up a very handy page to remind everyone.

    3. Re:It's easy to forget by SlashDotDotDot · · Score: 1

      Nah, it's easy to remember how bad search was before Google. Someone has set up a very handy page to remind everyone.

      I know your comment was tongue in cheek, but really, it was worse than that. Cuil isn't going to take over the world, but the results are OK and the visual layout is kind of nifty.

      --
      /...
    4. Re:It's easy to forget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know, although I knew of Google I didn't start using until it was better then AltaVista (1999 or so I believe). AltaVista wasn't bad at the time.

    5. Re:It's easy to forget by dan+dan+the+dna+man · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Altavista was that bad? I mean I grew up with Veronica and WAIS. I do appreciate that Google came out on top, but Altavista rocked for a while :)

      --
      I don't read your sig, why do you read mine?
    6. Re:It's easy to forget by syousef · · Score: 3, Interesting

      how bad search really was before Google. For that matter it's easy to forget that it used to take work to find information at all. Our culture has just barely begun to come to terms with how revolutionary this change really is.

      I'm TIRED of hearing about Google as some sort of saviour.

      Search engines weren't bad before Google. In fact Altavista was great in its day. It didn't survive competition with Google (and probably wouldn't have scaled well).

      What has Google brought us? Google news? Nope the bought Deja. Gmail? Sure, that was theirs. Google has also produced some brilliant toolkits and their image search is good. However their "do no evil" is a joke? Their terms of service are onerous even when they have bothered to vet them to prevent copy and paste errors. They install crapware on the computer (GoogleUpdate) that's quite hard to get rid of (doesn't uinstall), and are quite liberal about having their apps phone home. Sure they were once (during the boom) a fantastic employer providing all sorts of facilities, free food and sharing the wealth with employees. However they've been in the news lately for clawing back employee benefits.

      So I'm tired of hearing how great the company is. Sure they're historically significant, and influential and newsworthy, but they're not God's gift to computing. The brand loyalty and fanboyism on this board has reached epic proportions. Google, Apple, Linux good (no matter what they do wrong). Ugh. Get some perspective.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    7. Re:It's easy to forget by kestasjk · · Score: 4, Funny

      There's a second page?!

      --
      // MD_Update(&m,buf,j);
    8. Re:It's easy to forget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK, really? I just tried cuil and searched for my complete name, without quotes. Didn't find my pages on the 15 first pages of results. Using Google: the first result is my site, and I have 5 matches on the first page... What I got in cuil was some genealogy of some unknown people whose surnames were not quite exactly unlike mine. The first matches that were in any way related to me were on page 7 and were some comments I had written to the PHP interactive user guide.

    9. Re:It's easy to forget by merreborn · · Score: 1

      It's easy to forget how bad search really was before Google.

      Oh, I don't ever think I'll forget, thanks to a single, defining moment. It was the mid ninties, I was about 13, and I needed a picture of a door for homework. I searched "door picture" on altavista. There were one or two terrible, low res pictures of doors in the results. The rest were porn.

    10. Re:It's easy to forget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Google was attractive at first mostly because the interface was so clean compared to the "web portal" crap that every other search engine suddenly morphed into in the late 90s. Altavista had a reasonable database and a great command interface.

    11. Re:It's easy to forget by houghi · · Score: 1

      And it is easy to forget how good it used to be. I did a search to see on how to watercool (is that even a word?) my videocard. I get some 500.000 hits on buying the card with some links to watercooling that I can also buy or the other way arround.

      After adding a lot of + and - in the search, the nuber went down, but still no result.

      I used to type one or two words and got what I was looking for. Now I need to expand my search result to show at least 50 on the first page to be sure that I can find something that is interesting to me.

      More and more I start using http://clusty.com/ that puts it in nice groups (or clusters) where I can filter out things I do not want much easier.

      A search for "watercooling videocard" gives me 536.000 results on Google and 2.042 on clusty.com and I rather have those 2.000 that are relevant then the shitload that Google gives me and where I must look around and do a search in the result.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    12. Re:It's easy to forget by rk · · Score: 1

      I don't remember Altavista's search ever being that bad, but I switched permanently to Google when Altavista started to remake themselves into a portal. Google's interface was so clean it trumped altavista.

      Now, Google can be a portal, but it's not a bad one, and can all be dismissed and returned to an interface that isn't much more different than the one they had then.

    13. Re:It's easy to forget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahhrg, fixing a mistaken moderation. Should have been funny.

    14. Re:It's easy to forget by bendodge · · Score: 1

      Just a note: as a small-network admin, I like Google Updater (since things like Google Earth and sometimes Picasa are in use). Just one less thing to have to think about. Well, I am annoyed by the auto-start thing (which I always remove). I wish vendors would get a clue about that.

      --
      The government can't save you.
    15. Re:It's easy to forget by iamhigh · · Score: 1

      I hear ya on the fanboy comment, but I think google really was a revolutionary company. Were they saviours? Nah, but they did make the geek's life easier. And, they made the non-geek's life even easier, which in turn made the geek's life easier. I really don't use any of their services (gmail is my junk mail), but they are head and shoulders above the rest as far as searching and for that they deserve much credit. As for treatment of employees, I am pretty sure I would accept a position at google if they offered, wouldn't you?

      --
      No comprende? Let me type that a little slower for you...
    16. Re:It's easy to forget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget about "Google Search" - its a great search engine. Try it out. You may be surprised!

    17. Re:It's easy to forget by dcobbler · · Score: 1

      I was in the "building web libraries" business back then. I can tell you that search wasn't necessarily that bad, you just had to pay for it .

      Though I have to tell ya, when matahari came out, we couldn't believe how good it was compared to altavista and all the rest. And the looks on our client's faces when we said we used an "offline search bot" was priceless. The money that come out of their pockets wasn't too bad either!

      Ciao,
      Dcobbler

    18. Re:It's easy to forget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know. If you type in "Google" as a search term, the resulting page is nice... much better than Google's collection.

      I think I'll bookmark the page for when I'm looking for one of Google's more obscure apps!

    19. Re:It's easy to forget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Didn't make it past the first phone interview either, eh?

    20. Re:It's easy to forget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The biggest change for me from pre-Google to post-Google wasn't the ability to find things but the ability to re-find things. Before Google, I would search on Altavista, Yahoo, Hotbot and few others and eventually find what I wanted. But unless I actually saved the URL somewhere, none of those search engines were reliable enough to be able to re-find the interesting things I had found earlier if I either needed to revisit that information or wanted to share it with friends.

      But once Google showed up, I learned to stop bookmarking all the stuff that I wanted to revisit since I knew that it was easy enough to find again should I need to.

    21. Re:It's easy to forget by geekoid · · Score: 1

      It's good to its people, and produces fantastic products it gives away.
      Where is the evil?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    22. Re:It's easy to forget by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      how bad search really was before Google.

      Speak for yourself! Well, I did mostly search for porn back then...

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    23. Re:It's easy to forget by sledge_hmmer · · Score: 2, Funny

      You are bang on...I started using Google back in 1999 or 2000 mainly to look for porn *no kidding*.

      At the time I lived in a country where the ISPs had firewalls that restricted access to "indecent and inappropriate content". The up side was that most filtering was done off URLs, so as long as I found new/less frequented websites I was ahead of the game.

      I still remember the feeling of having won a treasure hunt every time I found an unrestricted website. Ah! Those were the days....these young whippersnappers have it good these days with p2p and all!

    24. Re:It's easy to forget by extrasolar · · Score: 1

      I remember back when I was 13. It was so much easier to say, "I don't know how this got on the computer Mom! I was searching for math homework" or something :)

    25. Re:It's easy to forget by kipman725 · · Score: 1

      search engines were awful before goggle. This is evidenced by googles HUGE rise and the lack of competition on actual searches.

    26. Re:It's easy to forget by mattack2 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Are you sure? You mean your page wasn't found in the results of:
      http://www.cuil.com/search?q=Anonymous+Coward

    27. Re:It's easy to forget by AbRASiON · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Bullshit, as long as I've been using the web nothing comes close to googles search quality.
      Ok perhaps they aren't our saviour or something like that but no other search engine even came close to such precise and exact results.

      I can type in exactly what I want and I get it 99% of the time (and I mean 99%)
      Try that with Live search even today and it spits back all kind of ridiculous shit, you have to wonder what on earth it's thinking.

    28. Re:It's easy to forget by digitalchinky · · Score: 1

      These days, even in google, I'm often going up to page 47 and beyond. Lets call it an addition to gathering images.

    29. Re:It's easy to forget by vikstar · · Score: 1

      I 'cuiled' you, like you said complete name without quotes, and the first link that came up was an entire wiki page devoted to you: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anonymous_Coward

      --
      The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than the question of whether a submarine can swim.
    30. Re:It's easy to forget by jrumney · · Score: 1

      Altavista rocked when it first started, not because its search results were any better than Lycos, Excite, Hotbot and others of the time, but because it was fast. Google rocked when I first started using it (in 2000 IIRC) for the same reason, and because the front page was free of the ads and portal baggage that had started to invade search engines by then.

    31. Re:It's easy to forget by syousef · · Score: 2, Informative

      Good to it's people? Are you talking about the 75% increase in childcare that they provide (effectively slashing parent's salaries), or the health care benefits that's been in the news because it's worse than that offered by Microsoft, but apparently they decided that the cost of equaling it was too much (then tried to tell employees it's the price of working for such an innovative company)? They're not struggling. They don't need to act that way.

      As for the free products they give away - they're always in beta and buggy, they have terms and conditions that mean Google owns or has unlimited license to your data, they're happy to install spyware and crapware that's difficult to remove (like Google update) and they usually buy out the competition.

      How do you have difficulty seeing the evil?

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    32. Re:It's easy to forget by syousef · · Score: 1

      When I was using Altavista it was good. As for finding everything you want 99% of the time you must be pretty esay to satisify. Half the time I need to go to specialist sites to find things (arxiv.org for astronomy, pubmed for medial for example, price watch sites for price comparison). If I just used Google I'd miss all of that. If you think Google is the end all be all, you're missing out on a lot.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    33. Re:It's easy to forget by tooth · · Score: 1

      I remember when searching for things I'd often ignore the first and sometimes second page of results; with google it's the opposite and I rarely go to the next pages. Most times I'll refine my search if it's not on the first page of results.

    34. Re:It's easy to forget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe that should hint you to the fact that you and your site lack relevance.

    35. Re:It's easy to forget by YttriumOxide · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you should consider how to re-phrase your searches. If I wanted to know how make my own system to water cool my video card, rather than buying a pre-packaged solution I'd use Google and type something like building own water cooling video card. Searching for just watercooling videocard, I would EXPECT to see results for off the shelf solutions.

      I find a lot of people are in the old "one or two words mentality" from the days of text based games that just took <VERB> <OBJECT> commands. Expand to a more natural or semi-natural query, and your results will be MUCH better.

      --
      My book about LSD and Self-Discovery
      Also on facebook as: DroppingAcidDaleBewan
    36. Re:It's easy to forget by Prof.Phreak · · Score: 1

      It's also easy to ignore that google has gotten much worse than it was back in 1999-2002-ish period. Maybe it's the blogs or SEOs or something, but their results are not impressing me as they did in 1999.

      --

      "If anything can go wrong, it will." - Murphy

  12. In related news... by gmuslera · · Score: 4, Funny

    Google Beta Turns 15

    1. Re:In related news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you made my day.

  13. DejaNews predated Google by davidwr · · Score: 1

    DejaNews was around in 1995 or earlier. They were one of Google's early acquisitions.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  14. The Data Center Decade by 1sockchuck · · Score: 3, Funny

    All the really good evil is coded and compiled deep inside the top-secret Google data centers, surrounded by moats filled with sharks with friggin' laser beams on their heads.

    Conspiracy theories aside, the data centers are a major innovation, and an area where Google has set standards for its competitors to chase. Google's massively scalable infrastructure is a big part of what has set it apart.

  15. Gopher! by PuddleBoy · · Score: 2, Funny

    Google? I still visit the Mother Gopher for all my informational needs!

    1. Re:Gopher! by Albert+Sandberg · · Score: 1

      grandpa? is that you? get off my fucking internet you old tard.

  16. I say they're doing a good job. by sco_robinso · · Score: 1

    I still have the best search results, by far, on google. Yahoo would come in 2nd, and MS Live in a very distant 3rd. I know I can find what I need on Google, so whatever magic search mojo algorithims they're using, are working.

    They've also offered a host of relatively good, free, albeit always-in-beta services. They were offering 1GB of storage when almost all the other guys were offeing 2 or 3 MB's.

    I think google should just keep on rockin.

  17. i was using altavista by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    which is still around

    it was 2000, a guy told me about it at work, and i was instantly hooked, simply because the search results were better than anything else i had tried

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:i was using altavista by Creepy+Crawler · · Score: 1

      Altavista's a bunch nicer BTW, as it was a demo to sell Digital computers. Its one of the few binary searchers. Google's a fuzzy search. good in many cases, but not all.

      Well... I was using altavista.digital.com . Now it's some park for HP.

      --
    2. Re:i was using altavista by Lije+Baley · · Score: 2, Informative

      Altavista was excellent when it first came out. It had the clean Google-like interface, great coverage, and was very controllable. Then it went to hell and got "Portalized". I remember switching to Google because I had to, and that my initial impression was that Google was inferior to the original Altavista, but at least better than anything available at the time.

      --
      Strange things are afoot at the Circle-K.
  18. Stanford, the venture capital firm by Animats · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Google started off running on Stanford equipment, and was spun off, as happens frequently at Stanford. Sun and Cisco also started with Stanford people and equipment.

    Stanford has become a real estate company and a venture capital firm that runs a university on the side for the tax break. It's working out very well; they now have $21.6 billion in investment assets, including a big chunk of Google. This started around 1991, when the financial management operation was spun off as a separate company. The financial operation invests in venture pools, which in turn fund venture capitalists, which fund startup companies, some of which become big. They can draw on expertise from the academic side to help evaluate investments. It's working quite well; annualized returns for the past decade were 15.1%. Tax free!

    1. Re:Stanford, the venture capital firm by Timmmm · · Score: 1

      Erm... All universities (well all the good ones) have business incubators for spin-offs with the aim of commercialising research. How is Stanford different (other than being very successful)?

    2. Re:Stanford, the venture capital firm by city · · Score: 1

      I, for one, blame Adam Smith as he's an Invisible Hand wielding overlord.

      --
      I am a v1ral sig. Plse c0py me and h3lp me spread. Thank y0u?
    3. Re:Stanford, the venture capital firm by religious+freak · · Score: 3, Interesting

      BFD, Yale has about the same amount and Harvard has about $35B. The people that attend those colleges are rich, and colleges are ranked by how much money their alumni donate. Every major university has an endowment, though the best obviously stand out, as they do in academics.

      Congress got irked at all the money just "sitting" there tax free and forced the university's hand by offering reduced, or sometimes even free education to certain lower income families. In this case "lower income" could mean $120,000/yr.

      I think the universities could put the money to better use, but singling Stanford out is not telling the whole story. Also, I think VC investing in your students' business ideas is a great use of money and a great way to keep the virtuous cycle going. The key is selling at some point.

      http://www.scrippsnews.com/node/30080

      --
      If you can read this... 01110101 01110010 00100000 01100001 00100000 01100111 01100101 01100101 01101011
  19. Do no evil? by R2.0 · · Score: 1

    I thought it was "Don't be evil". There are some subtle differences.

    --
    "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
  20. Vote For Freedom-Vote Against John McCain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I guess that's why McCain emphasizes his character because he has NO skills, particularly, piloting skills. John McCain spent your hard-earned federal tax dollars and more time crashing planes
    than he spent flying them.

    John McCain: A Zero.

    1. Re:Vote For Freedom-Vote Against John McCain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1

  21. Better? by camperdave · · Score: 2

    I don't know if it's a better world, but I can sure find a lot more stuff a lot easier than ever before.

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    1. Re:Better? by Typoboy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I really have no idea, but lemme check. You expect me to remember things like this?

    2. Re:Better? by WK2 · · Score: 1

      So what are you going to do? Read 7.8 Million pages to make a survey? This is a job for Google Fight!

      "the world is better because of google" - 99.2 Million
      "the world is not better because of google" - 116 Million

      Clearly, Google makes the world suck.

      --
      Write your own Choose Your Own Adventure. http://www.freegameengines.org/gamebook-engine/
  22. Back in my day... by Luyseyal · · Score: 1

    I tried out Google when I first heard about it (naturally here on Slashdot). It wasn't instant love. I still went back and forth between my favorite -- Hotbot -- and Google. But eventually, Google won out.

    I never understood why anyone liked Altavista after I told them about Hotbot. Hotbot was so much more consistent at bringing desired content to the top of the pile.

    And then there was Google.
    -l

    --
    Help cure AIDS, cancer, and more. Donate your unused computer time to worldcommunitygrid.org. Join Team Slashdot!
    1. Re:Back in my day... by vistic · · Score: 1

      Hotbot always had those radioactive colors... and every search just yielded porn.

      I think I was a fan of Webcrawler or Metacrawler... the one with the cute little spider.

  23. As with Chrome by nickswitzer · · Score: 1

    I hope that they keep the same values that made everyone switch to Google as their search engine for Chrome. I believe if they base their formation of Chrome off of the principles and ideals they had when they formed Google, I look forward to it's inception.

  24. Wow... by Quartz25 · · Score: 1

    That's 110 in binary years! In Silicon Valley terms, that's ancient.

    --
    Most people don't get why the integral of "e to the x" is so funny. Most math majors don't have a sense of humor.
    1. Re:Wow... by swordgeek · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Um...no it's not.

      Try 1010.

      I'm sure you know that, but I just had to reply to a post with an Invader Zim quote in it.

      --

      "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
    2. Re:Wow... by Quartz25 · · Score: 1

      You're lying!!!!!

      --
      Most people don't get why the integral of "e to the x" is so funny. Most math majors don't have a sense of humor.
  25. google.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they got Google on computors now ?

  26. MODS ON CRACK by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Come on mods, that's not redundant, it's fucking funny!

    --
    Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
  27. Better? Maybe. Different? Definitely. by atari2600 · · Score: 1

    All I can think of is all those job search results, those infidelity results, all that porn, those movies, lyrics, wallpapers, did i mention porn, fedex-ups-usps-dhl tracking, spell checking, simple calculations, unit conversions, product comparisons, cracks, telling time, tracking flights, spying on your neighbors, caching ability and a lot more stuff has certainly been very convenient for me and a few million other people.

    Your mileage may vary.

  28. indeed by toby · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've been there once. The tour docent was fairly knowledgeable too.

    I just hope they're concentrating on the old stuff more than Web 1.0.

    --
    you had me at #!
  29. Wow, seems like a lifetime ago by swordgeek · · Score: 2, Informative

    November of 1998 I was doing some y2k testing for the phone company, and one of the long-timers ("the guru" of Unix there) told me about a new search engine he had been using for a few weeks, that rocked his world. Over Christmas I started playing with Google(beta), and eventually quit using anything else.

    It's still the best search engine out there, but that's because everyone else has given up. It's nowhere as useful now as it was when it first came out, unfortunately.

    --

    "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
  30. Especially good over dialup by kevintron · · Score: 2, Informative

    Of course this isn't much of a concern for most Slashdot readers these days, but one reason I switched to Google, however many years ago it was, and have kept coming back, has been their consistent consideration for those of us who are occasionally stuck with a slow net connection.

    Using Yahoo over dialup is intolerable. By comparison Google's main search page is still lightning fast over a modem. Sure, they'll let you gum it up with all that "iGoogle" clutter if you insist, but if you avoid the eye candy temptations, you'll just get clean, fast, functional design.

    And Gmail can be adjusted to have dialup-friendly settings much more easily than any other webmail service I've seen.

  31. Is the world a better place because of Google?" by rs232 · · Score: 1

    Not necessarly, but Internet search technology certainly is ..

    Now if only the Slashdot people were also to enthused ..

    --
    davecb5620@gmail.com
  32. how i miss the simple days of yahoo by mrMurray · · Score: 1

    oh remember back before google using those subject listings at yahoo. yep now i don't have to look for relevant lists anymore, now i can type in what i'm searching for and find even longer lists! thanks google.

  33. TFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I put "slashdot" in TFA and pressed "I'm feeling lucky" and the Wayback Machine said it wasn't archived. :(

  34. I'm disappointed by Sarten-X · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My favorite thing about Google is the unique logos marking special occasions. Sadly, they don't seem to consider today special enough.

    --
    You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
  35. Minimal Page Size by jbezorg · · Score: 4, Informative

    I started using Google as my home page because of it's minimal page size. If I opened a browser I was either going to use a bookmark or was going to do a search. Not having to wait for the overhead that the other search engines had was a bonus to search results that were on par with other search engines.

    --
    I've lost all my marbles except one & It's fun to test angular & centripetal acceleration in my skull
  36. Google Movers. by Ostracus · · Score: 1

    "Is the world a better place because of Google?""

    When they get around to moving my house from the other side of the county. Then the world will be a better place.

    --
    Shai Schticks:"You don't make peace with friends, you make peace with enemies"
  37. Holy smokes. I feel like a grandparent! by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I can't believe how you've grown! Why it seems like only yesterday. . .

    Literally. This internet thing is growing up so fast!

    Dang. There are actually net-savvy kids out there now who never lived in a world without Google. Think about that!

    When did years start to fly by like this? I'm amazed.

    -FL

  38. Google doesn't want you to say Google by falconwolf · · Score: 4, Informative

    Actually TFA says Google doesn't want people to use, say "googling" as a term for generic searches. As it says, there are serious, by business standards, concerns with using the term. It dilutes the trademark. Xerox had the same problem when people started using "xerox" to mean copying or duplicating. You only xerox on a Xerox machine. I skate with inline skates, the skates are Roller Blades, so when I use them I say roller blading. If the skate were not Roller Blades I wouldn't use the term "roller blading".

    Falcon

    1. Re:Google doesn't want you to say Google by cbowland · · Score: 1

      I like the phrase "put a google-y on it" as in "if you don't know what a blah, blah, blah is, just put a google-y on it.

      --

      Give a man a fish and he will eat for a day.
      Teach him to eat and he will fish forever.

    2. Re:Google doesn't want you to say Google by spyder913 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Unfortunately for Google (and Adobe, and Xerox) what they want people to do doesn't matter. Fortunately for the Google and Adobe, when people talk about "googling" or "photoshopping" they are still usually using their products. Unlike the large number of people making xeroxes on their Canon copier.

    3. Re:Google doesn't want you to say Google by jgarra23 · · Score: 1

      Leave it to lawyers to turn something innocuous and something people do without thinking in to something completely ridiculous.

      There are only two types of politicians, war heroes and lawyers. The rest got there by accident.

    4. Re:Google doesn't want you to say Google by Awptimus+Prime · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If the skate were not Roller Blades I wouldn't use the term "roller blading".

      Yes, but it's a good way to stick out like a giant wrinkly penis in social settings to not use the common phrases for things. I call gelatin deserts 'jello', inline skates 'roller blades', and using the search bar in a browser 'googling', if for not other reason than to not have to stop and explain things with more words than needed.

      Then again, as a personal entity with no stake in these corporate entities, I could care less about their trademark protections.

      Anyway, just about everyone uses Google nowadays, so it's usually going to be technically correct to say "googling".

    5. Re:Google doesn't want you to say Google by Awptimus+Prime · · Score: 1

      Photoshopping.

      That's one I forgot in my last post. I use Gimp, but in casual conversation, "photoshopping" sounds so much sexier than "gimping".

      It also keeps from having to explain wth Gimp is. Since once they find out it's free, the conversation will turn to "hey, can you help me download that?" and then a hundred emails about how to do this or that. No thanks. :)

    6. Re:Google doesn't want you to say Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google doesn't want people to use, say "googling" as a term for generic searches. As it says, there are serious, by business standards, concerns with using the term. It dilutes the trademark.

      ha ha ha ha ha ... yeaaaa, google this. what's most funny is you admitted you are a fruit booter.

    7. Re:Google doesn't want you to say Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is not the general public's responsibility to alter their speech to protect a company's trademark.

    8. Re:Google doesn't want you to say Google by falconwolf · · Score: 2, Informative

      Unfortunately for Google (and Adobe, and Xerox) what they want people to do doesn't matter.

      While it may not, does not, matter colloquially legally it does. Xerox for instance has gone on at it's own expense to protect it's trademark. Trademark protection is a serious concern in business. Coca-cola's trademark is valued at $72.5 billion dollars.

      Falcon

    9. Re:Google doesn't want you to say Google by jrumney · · Score: 1

      and Adobe

      "Little Johnny Flashed his bits on youtube".

      Or did you have a different Abobe product in mind?

    10. Re:Google doesn't want you to say Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then I won't xerox with my Acme copier. I won't ride my Acme escalator. And you better believe I won't order a coke in Las Vegas!

    11. Re:Google doesn't want you to say Google by zobier · · Score: 1

      Coca-cola's trademark is valued at $72.5 billion dollars.

      But they aren't suing people for accidentally coke bottles.

      --
      Me lost me cookie at the disco.
  39. you convinced me by toby · · Score: 1

    There were one or two terrible, low res pictures of doors in the results. The rest were porn.

    I am *so* going back to AltaVista! Thanks for the tip!

    --
    you had me at #!
  40. "When did you start using google?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm at least slightly amused about how google has apparently reached a point where it can be assumed that every given person uses google.

    1. Re:"When did you start using google?" by YttriumOxide · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Interesting question: Do you know anyone who doesn't? I personally don't (well, possibly I do, but just don't know that they don't, but I haven't personally witnessed anyone using something else for their web search in a LONG time).

      --
      My book about LSD and Self-Discovery
      Also on facebook as: DroppingAcidDaleBewan
  41. No KVM? by istartedi · · Score: 1

    Awesome! Multiple keyboards and monitors. Truly slapped together. I wonder when they got their first KVM.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  42. Do Evil by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1, Informative

    Too bad that Do No Evil has so obviously fallen by the wayside, although the search engine does remain good.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  43. Creepy Gmail by rk · · Score: 3, Funny

    I consider not ever getting email from Daniel Brandt to be one of Gmail's most compelling features.

  44. The Owls Are Coming by darthdavid · · Score: 1

    Next year they'll get their Hogwarts letter...

  45. Very Evil Company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have no idea why Google constantly gets a pass from Slashdot posters. Their privacy record is atrocious. They are one of the worst companies in existence as far as not respecting their users privacy. The Google monopoly and the way they treat users personal information is 100x worst than anything Microsoft has ever done.

  46. do you Yahoo? by opencity · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Remember Yahoo's big ad campaign to become a verb. No one Yahoos, everyone Googles

    --
    Physics is like sex: sure, it may give some practical results, but that's not why we do it.
  47. So google turned 9.995 today? by m3j00 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    From where I'm sitting, today is September 5th.

  48. Metacrawler by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

    I remember when Metacrawler was invented here at UW. For several years it was my search tool of choice. But it eventually went commercial, and soon afterward it went way south. Fortunately I became aware of Google at about that time - and (unlike Metacrawler) when Google went commercial, they managed to remember why people used their tool in the first place.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
  49. message boards by falconwolf · · Score: 2, Informative

    Hey google, what about creating a new search type along the lines of 'look for this search only on messageboards and forums'?

    Google is good for blogs but like you say I don't think it's that good for message boards or forums. Alta Vista gives me better results there. What I find weird is that when I've done some searches on Google the top results were from About.com, specifically searching on topics about photography and archaeology or anthropology. Google for monte verde and Google's first result is Tom Dillehay on the First People in South America.

    Falcon

  50. I first used google... by Puffy+Director+Pants · · Score: 1

    when it was mentioned on the Steve Jackson Games website. Checking there, I see it was September of that year. So that's when.

  51. www.cuil.com by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    Cuil did the same to me as Google has done. Using cuil.com I search for photography and the second result is About.com. Searching for Monte Verde and About.com's Monte Verde section is on the first page, the 10th result.

    Falcon

  52. "don't be evil" by Singularitarian2048 · · Score: 1

    The Google motto is "don't be evil", not "do no evil".

    "do no evil" sounds lame.

    "don't be evil" sounds Googley.

    1. Re:"Don't be evil" by AlexCGilliland · · Score: 1, Informative

      your chronology is incorrect, adSense is from 2004, they bought youtube in 06 and gmail was released later in 04 I don't think adwords is to blame for content less sites, there were plenty before 04 checkout has no startup costs, they cant afford to run checks, I agree this seems risky.

      --
      GENERATION 25: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the purple monkey dishwasher
  53. It wasn't the results by geekoid · · Score: 2, Insightful

    it was the load speed. While every other search engine/crawler took forever to load a boat load of crap, Google was simple.

    Really, does any person outside of Google care if returns .02 seconds faster then a competitor?

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  54. Re:Holy smokes. I feel like a grandparent! by geekoid · · Score: 0, Troll

    You're old, we get it.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  55. Stomping on shins... by Anynomous+Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ... but I'm not too impressed. Google profits from the ease of separating advertisers from their money, not from the relatively meager output of their 20000 employees.

    For each and every thing Google offers, decent alternatives exist. Even if Google search would disappear, the void would be filled quickly. The same second source effect applies a fortiori to their shady advertisement business, Gmail and the hodgepodge of unrelated, discretionary, copycat and so-so bits and pieces.

    So I wouldn't be surprised if Google would become irrelevant in the next decennium.

    --
    I'm not a coward by any name.
  56. bookmarks by nut · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I discovered it 1999, in my first job in IT.

    I remember one of my colleagues was rather dismissive of it, suggesting that a search engine was only as good as the number of pages it had indexed. Google was new, therefore it couldn't have indexed as many as the others. I started using it anyway.

    What I remember is that before google I used to bookmark everything useful I found, so I could be sure of finding it again. After using google for a while I stopped bothering. It was quicker to find a page with google that troll through my huge list of bookmarks.

    --
    Never trust a man in a blue trench coat, Never drive a car when you're dead
  57. What? No posts pointing out the irony... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that Google's first mailing list is hosted on Yahoo?

  58. Re:Holy smokes. I feel like a grandparent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dang. There are actually net-savvy kids out there now who never lived in a world without Google. Think about that!

    I wouldn't put much stock in that if I were you. The majority of these 'net-savvy' kids are the same ones posting to Myspace and fucking Bebo for christs sakes. Sure they think themselves net-savvy but they're all deluded.

  59. When did you STOP using Google? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I, for one, try to use Google as seldom as possible. They know too much (cue Pablo Francisco voiceover... ;) Seriously, the Google corporation is really, really clever in the way they market themselves to the public eye. Don't be evil and all that stuff; to work for them, supposedly, is an incredible experience, cool and whatnot... unlike other companies. Sort of like a Google Distortion Field that surrounds them. Their recent success with the Chrome browser is an excellent example for their successful marketing. But if you really think about all the information the Google corporation is collecting, you should be afraid, you should be VERY afraid!

    To give you an idea check out this video from a presentation at toorcon by Steven Rambaw titled "Privacy is Dead - Get over it", ironically hosted at Google (Youtube has it, too, BTW): http://video.google.com/googleplayer.swf?docId=-383709537384528624 The presentation does NOT specifically deal with Google, but the big G get's its mention, of course. Whatever you might think about Rambam or Google or anything else concerning internet & privacy, for that matter, I really recommend you to sit down and take the time to watch this video. It's about two hours long, but really enlightening, even if you already have a general grip on things concerning privacy in today's highly networked world.

    Returning to tha G, nowadays I try to use alternatives wherever I can (Meta: ixquick.com, clusty.com, Sroogle.org [Yes, despite it's owner], etc). When I still used to use Google regularly I noticed that sometimes I even found results through other search engines, like Yahoo, that Google simply didn't know about, specifically in relation to Japanese websites. They're not that good, after all. (NOTE: Not that Yahoo is any better than Google. They're every bit as hungry for information as everyone else in this business.)

    So, when did YOU stop using Google? ;o)

  60. Exclamation marks suck. by DancesWithBlowTorch · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Oh god, they too used to have an exclamation mark in their brand name!

    It looks weird. It sounds weird in your head. And it totally! messes up the readability of texts. Just imagine you have to write an article about Google! considering Yahoo! might be a good acquisition target!

    So why on earth did everyone do that in the nineties? And why has no one told the marketing departments of this world that the nineties are over?

    1. Re:Exclamation marks suck. by mcvos · · Score: 1

      So why on earth did everyone do that in the nineties? And why has no one told the marketing departments of this world that the nineties are over?

      I think Google dropped its exclamation mark quite some time ago. Perhaps around the time they could afford a marketing department?

      It's just Yahoo! that's the odd one out now, but being the odd one out can also be useful from a marketing point of view.

    2. Re:Exclamation marks suck. by inu_maru · · Score: 1

      The Freakazoid! made it look cool, that's why

      --
      Mu
  61. Binary? by PPH · · Score: 3, Funny

    Is that 10, base 2? Come on, folks. Let your innner geek out. It should read:

    Google Turns 0x0A

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
    1. Re:Binary? by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      Is that 10, base 2?

      With so much data to haul around, I'm sure Google has upgraded to at least 100, base T, by now.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  62. My wife uses the phrase "Google knows all!" by crovira · · Score: 2, Funny

    And I must admit its caught on...

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
    1. Re:My wife uses the phrase "Google knows all!" by craagz · · Score: 1

      When my sub-ordinates ask me something, I ask them "Have you asked Google first?"

  63. Priceless by sagematt · · Score: 1

    There's nothing more delightful to me than seeing a 10-year-old pwn Microsoft.

  64. Puberty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    That means Google will hit puberty soon.
    What will this mean for "Don't be evil"?

  65. Alta Vista wasn't "great". by jafo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I started using google sometime in 1996, quite possibly shortly after they started in January. I heard about this new search engine, possibly even here on slashdot, and gave it a try.

    Before then, I was mostly using Alta Vista. It was ok, but you really had to dig through the results to find what you needed. I remember that time as "all search engines suck, Alta Vista just sucks less".

    Then I tried google.stanford.edu and never went back. Literally. Their index was much smaller than Alta Vista at that time, but their results were so much better. Alta Vista had all sorts of garbage on their front page, but that never really bothered me -- it was all about the search results, the cleaner front page was just a side benefit.

    So, in response to the previous poster, I would argue that Google *WAS* some sort of a savior. Definitely back in 1996 they were.

    Maybe those that came in later like 1998 to 2000 were coming from a much improved Alta Vista than I was, but in 1996 Alta Vista was really quite terrible in comparison with Google.

    Sean

    1. Re:Alta Vista wasn't "great". by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      I suspect the intervening decade has blurred your memory somewhat. I too tried Google very early on, but I abandoned it. Not only was it hideously slow, but the search results quite frankly sucked. (I was searching mainly for obscure non techie stuff - something Google still doesn't always handle too well.) For a good while the first page of results on those topics from Google were usually static pages from Yahoo! or other directory sites. It wasn't until about '98 or '99 that Google finally seemed to get it's act together and to start to pull away from the pack.

    2. Re:Alta Vista wasn't "great". by Walter+Carver · · Score: 1

      Whoa! 1996? My whois sais Slashdot started on 05-Oct-1997. Is this some conspiracy dude? :P

  66. Do no evil. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I dunno, but am I the only one who thinks of that more as an injunction?

    "Do no evil....for all your data are belong to us...and to whomever we feel like sharing them with."

  67. I use Gimp by falconwolf · · Score: 2, Funny

    I want to try Film Gimp aka CinePaint. But I need a book or something to learn it and I haven't found one. That or someone to show me how to use it.

    Falcon

  68. When did the current design go live? by iansocool · · Score: 1

    When did Google change from the look in 1998 to the current white background look? I think I must have been using it since then (maybe 2000?). I've tried some brief stints with other search engines, to give them a shot, but I've always liked using Google best.

  69. trademarks by falconwolf · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Then again, as a personal entity with no stake in these corporate entities, I could care less about their trademark protections.

    I used to write and there's not many things that will get a published writer slapped with a lawsuit faster than to use a trademark as a verb, or in the case of Coca Cola as a pronoun for a generic drink. In my writing classes and in the writing clubs or groups I was a member of this was pretty regularly stressed. A regular person on the streets, or on /. doesn't have to be concerned but someone who writes for a living certainly does.

    Anyway, just about everyone uses Google nowadays, so it's usually going to be technically correct to say "googling".

    According to TFA not quite 2/3 of searches are done with Google. I wouldn't say that that's "just about everyone". I don't use Google for all of my searches either, most but not all. I also use About.com, Alta Vista, Ask.com, and Dmoz (Open Directory Project).

    Falcon

  70. used them since by mistahkurtz · · Score: 1

    the results tally returned as goooooooooooogle

    --
    not only is time travel possible, it's irrelevant.
  71. "Don't be evil" by Animats · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The problem with Google is that their "don't be evil" claim is hard to take seriously any more. Ads at the right of search results weren't too bad, but then it went downhill. They created the "content-related ad" industry, which resulted in a vast number of "made for AdWords" junk sites and blogs, the "domaining" industry, and a vast amount of crap. Even real advertisers don't like it; the smarter ones opt out of the Google Content Network and stick with the search result ads.

    From there it went downhill. Google doesn't do much to qualify their advertisers, and as we point out occasionally, about 35% of them are "bottom feeders", where you can't even identify the real business behind the ad.

    Then there's Google Checkout. They accept very marginal businesses. They ought to be doing the kind of validation a bank does of its clients, but clearly, they don't.

    Google's real problem is that they went public at the top of their game. Google was #1 in search when they went public, so they couldn't grow in their main business area. They had to expand to justify their high P/E ratio, and none of their expansion areas (YouTube, GMail, etc.) made money. So they had to figure out how to get more revenue per search result. At that point they started to turn to the dark side.

  72. Re:Holy smokes. I feel like a grandparent! by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1

    You're old, we get it.

    Hm. Uncalled for snark. Did I fail to recognize somebody's brilliance or was that just general bitterness?

    Ah well. Everybody gets to try again tomorrow.

    Cheers!

    -FL

  73. IN Russia, we had it about 2001. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Russian Google began with non-prestigious 3rd level domain, google.com.ru. I noticed Google was a deface- at those times. I used NN4 browser. This is the shot: http://pyotr.pisem.net/google.gif
    Well, the main stiff tp mention on the shot is the barewords those are tabu directly on the Search button (:

  74. In that time by Le+Fol · · Score: 1

    If you wanted to stay on top, you read Slashdot. I think that's why I started to use Google in September 1998. Before or later, but around that time for sure.

  75. Asta La Vista AltaVista by Lothar · · Score: 2, Informative

    After my geek friend told me of google in autumn of 1998 I quickly abandoned AltaVista for Google. For a few weeks I would do dual searches with both to compare results and to check how Google was stacking up and it quickly became apparent that they were much much better and they had a nicer cleaner search interface. When I did my CS project I remember occasionally using both google and yahoo because they did put different search items near the top 10-20. Occationally Yahoo would throw up something Google hadn't found. But Google always overall had much better hits.

  76. Matt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I like Google but I fear it is getting way too big. While Google shouldn't be punished for being successful, I do fear that it'll be the only major search engine on the Internet in the next few years.

    I'm only one person, but I do sometimes use Yahoo! just to support it (a little).

  77. I remenbered using Yahoo... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    ...and ALtavista..., they were great until they started:

    +Putting annoying ads(with annoying video and sound!!) in the search page.

      +Putting the companies that bought them in the first places of the search results.

      +Being slow as snails.

      +Difficult advanced search(the first ftpsearch was very, very good, they trashed it), for searching multiple terms you needed to use "Advanced search" and put AND and parenthesis!!!

      +Making it a portal instead of searching( TRANSLATION: "We are going to control what you see and do on internet,not you").

    I suppose they started listening the economists people in their companies.

    One day I discovered google from "searchlores.org", never went back. I always felt it was too good to be true, and expected the day google is being controlled by business mindset people that sinks the company in the long term for getting short term profits(and leaving as heroes and millionaires ) to be near, it will take more time that I thought though.

    1. Re:I remenbered using Yahoo... by ezyzeke · · Score: 1

      Same here, I came across Google while listing my website in DMOZ (http://www.dmoz.org/add.html). I continued using Altavista for translation services for quite a while, but the clean interface of Google, without cluttering, quick on 28.8kbps modem users (like me for quite a while), and displaying a couple of lines in clear text of relevant portions of the page was unbeatable. I couldn't understand why anyone would want to continue to use the over-bloated Yahoo and Altavista engines/portals!

  78. Google was created originally in Feb 1997. by googletruth · · Score: 1

    Google was created originally in Feb 1997. It was planned by THREE (Hubert, Larry, and Sergey) people, NOT two. Details see: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d1Yx8eo0fzY

  79. Yahoo!++ by asvravi · · Score: 1

    +this +is +how +my +search +phrase +used +to +look +like +on +Yahoo! +until +I +found +Google +in +1999

  80. search by conureman · · Score: 1

    Google was the only search engine that got the correct results for me. I always marveled at the correct algorithm and was baffled as to how the others managed to attract any users.

    --
    The cost of that cleanup, of course, will be borne by taxpayers, not industry.
  81. October 1998? by gravis777 · · Score: 1

    When did you start using its search engine?

    If I was not too lazy to dig through 10 years of Slashdot archives, I could probably tell you. I just know it was in early beta (possibly alpha) when I started using it, and I was so thrilled by it, I stopped using altavista, the only halfway decent search engine before then (okay, lets start the fight, yahoo, webcrawler, excite). So, yeah, I am sure I have easily been using it for 10 years. The page at archive.org said that they had 25 million webpages being crawled. I am pretty sure it was not quite that big when I started using them - I am thinking they had only indexed 10 million when I started. We were also pretty big Linux freaks, so Google's server farms and clusters really fascinated us. I was a 2nd year CS student at this time, and we ate this up.