Slashdot Mirror


Hacking Esquire's E-ink Cover

ptorrone writes "I picked up the Esquire E-inked cover today and took a bunch of high res photos, for the makers out there. It has a programming header, 5-pin ISP, a Microchip PIC 12f629 which is flash programmable, 8 pin, 6 lithium coin cell CR2016s, 3 volts each. Two E-ink screens with flex connections — looks like it was made to be reprogrammed and different screens. The top screen has 11 segments, the bottom has 3. It was designed 2008-06-04. The PCB was made by Forewin, half thickness, 2 layer board (FR4). I think someone out there will likely reflash the PIC and make the segments go on / off at different times and perhaps put other displays on it, there's a little bit of hacking to be had but not that much really."

205 comments

  1. Boring, boring, boring by DogDude · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    So, they go through all of this work and expense and come up a cover that is LAME? Wow. Somebody needs to get fired over that cover. Boring.

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
    1. Re:Boring, boring, boring by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 1

      They did it on purpose. They'd have put the usual hot chick on the cover if they wanted to encourage nerds to do their usual jerk off all over the raster.

      p.s. Esquire mag FTW. Dubious Achievement awards FTW. Maxim and Stuff-reading douchebags -- FAIL.

    2. Re:Boring, boring, boring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those of you who think there is a difference between Maxim, Stuff, and Esquire: Priceless.

    3. Re:Boring, boring, boring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      1995 called - they want their tag back.

    4. Re:Boring, boring, boring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those of you who can't tell the difference between Maxim, Stuff, and Esquire: Retarded.

      (Hint: Two of the three are identical and aimed at fratboy douchebags. One is aimed at men with jobs. You figure it out.)

    5. Re:Boring, boring, boring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Men whose job is being a fratboy douchebag?

    6. Re:Boring, boring, boring by tsjaikdus · · Score: 2, Funny

      "They'd have put the usual hot chick on the cover if they wanted to encourage nerds to do their usual jerk off all over the raster."

      That would result in a short circuit, electrocuting the nerd. Esquire will be held responsible and go bankrupt.

    7. Re:Boring, boring, boring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Digg called - they want their joke back.

    8. Re:Boring, boring, boring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Test blink

  2. What, did you... by PJCRP · · Score: 1

    Really expect to get your cake and hack it into something awesome too?

    --
    Knows everything about nothing and nothing about everything.
  3. What would happen by andreyvul · · Score: 0

    if someone went and re-flashed all the controllers in the Esquire mags to display porn (first thing that comes to mind is Goatse) instead of the original content?

    --
    proud caffeine whore
    1. Re:What would happen by CaptainPatent · · Score: 5, Funny

      if someone went and re-flashed all the controllers in the Esquire mags to display porn (first thing that comes to mind is Goatse) instead of the original content?

      Um, then it would display goatse.

      --
      Well, back to rejecting software patent applications.
    2. Re:What would happen by MattGWU · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't get it. What do YOU think will happen?

      All I can see is a company gets a black eye, blames the whole thing on 'those evil hackers', and sends a potentially cool technology away forever.

      And if the first thing you think of when you think of porn is 'Goatse', man, I'm sorry.

      --
      "These people look deep within my soul and assign me a number based on the order in which I joined" --Homer re:
    3. Re:What would happen by jeepee · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Is goatse porn? man it never occured to me...

      you just ruined my day

    4. Re:What would happen by andreyvul · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I meant *beyond* the obvious.
      And I said Goatse because few people are desensitized to it.
      s/Goatse/Shock image/g
      Also, I was being rhetorical. THERE'S NOT SUPPOSED TO BE A F**KING ANSWER.

      --
      proud caffeine whore
    5. Re:What would happen by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      As awful as goatse is, lemonparty would have people vomiting in the streets and Rustina would have a very small subset of geek in tears laughing.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    6. Re:What would happen by MBCook · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's impossible. These E-ink displays aren't pixel displays (which could show any image), they are segment based (like a cheap calculator, watch, or old LCD game). They can only display what they have been designed to show. Your only choices are for each segment to be dark or light.

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    7. Re:What would happen by MattGWU · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yikes. You need to relax. Go kick back with some Goatse and a beer and mellow out!

      --
      "These people look deep within my soul and assign me a number based on the order in which I joined" --Homer re:
    8. Re:What would happen by snowraver1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I could be wrong, but from looking at the video, it appears that the image is static, but the background changes colour. So there is basically 10 or so "pixels" that flash in the background. Changing the image would be impossible, but you could make it flash faster.

      --
      Copyright 2010. All rights reserved. This comment may not be copied in any way including, but not limited to caching.
    9. Re:What would happen by TheUser0x58 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Not possible. While e-ink is sometimes used for general purpose displays (Amazon Kindle), for specialized applications its much cheaper if the e-ink can only represent compositions of static images in fixed positions, toggled on or off. Kind of like the difference between a modern LCD monitor and the LCD on a Nintendo Game & Watch-type game.

      --
      -- listen to interesting music, support independent radio... WPRB
    10. Re:What would happen by blair1q · · Score: 1

      The next cover would have some sort of program encryption.

    11. Re:What would happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some people become sexually excited when they somebody else's anus. If you think goatse is bad I got 1 word for you: scheisse. Some people think porn is(among other interspecies fantasies) a graphic depiction of a dick-tentacled monster raping a schoolgirl. Some people want to fuck their mom. Hell, many men have since the beginning of time have wanted to fuck their mothers. Some guy named Freud once said the the only abnormal sexual condition is assexuality.

    12. Re:What would happen by dr_dank · · Score: 4, Funny

      Then a bunch of artsy fashionistas would parade around saying that gaping anus is the new black.

      --
      Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
    13. Re:What would happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that was fucking interesting

    14. Re:What would happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      All I can see is a company gets a black eye,

      That's not an eye...

    15. Re:What would happen by pigphish · · Score: 4, Informative

      I think you are misunderstanding the technology. Review: http://www.eink.com/technology/howitworks.html They are very much pixels, dots, or "e-ink microcapsules" which means you should be able to draw any image you want. In the howitworks they seem to have 3 shades: white, black, and grey. When you say you can only show what it was designed to that sounds like if it has an "1" you only get 2 bars like on a calculator. That is really misunderstanding what is actually going on here.

    16. Re:What would happen by Miseph · · Score: 1

      I choked a little reading that. That's too fucking funny.

      --
      Try not to take me more seriously than I take myself.
    17. Re:What would happen by davolfman · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Doesn't mean this one has the contacts laid out for addressable pixels.

    18. Re:What would happen by cgenman · · Score: 4, Interesting

      A pixel is just a very small, very square segment. I believe what the grandparent poster is trying to say is that this particular e-ink display is heavily segment based, and proposition supported by how it is being used in the cover and how cheap it is to make.

      The cheap calculator displays are mostly LCD, which power both high end pixel-driven displays and the videogames that come free with your Happy Meal. This particular implementation of the technology appears to fall to the latter.

      Hence, it would be nearly impossible to display anything other than what is currently on the cover without rebuilding the e-ink sheet. In this particular case, we're all winners.

    19. Re:What would happen by pigphish · · Score: 1

      Very true but the following suggests it just might:
      1. Esquire is inviting people to play with it infers it might be. It may not be the cheapest of the cheap and in fact they offset the cost with the other e-ink screen (the ford advertisement for the flex).
      2. As the article states they opted for better "flex connections (these are pricey connections). It looks like it was made to be reprogrammed and different screens."
      It's all very possible. I'm hopefull.

    20. Re:What would happen by NiteShaed · · Score: 1

      The same thing that would happen if someone went through and pasted nudie pix onto the covers of plain paper copies of Esquire. Eventually someone working at the store would notice, and they'd have the option to either pay for the vandalized copies or talk to the friendly local police officer.
      It's not like these things are on a wireless network, it'd still require someone setting up shop to change the covers, which may or may not be obvious at first, eventually somebody would probably notice as they went from copy to copy hooking it up to a laptop or cutting the covers open to make changes....

      --
      Some bring out the best in others, some the worst. Some bring out far more.
    21. Re:What would happen by pigphish · · Score: 1

      I understand what you're saying. I don't think it's analogous to LCD. Just the way I am reading it perhaps. My understanding is the screen doesn't need to be fundamentally changed to produced an active matrix display at the level of a pixel.

      http://blogs.pcworld.com/staffblog/archives/007371.html

      link above is reading the esquire article the same as me. Could take the display and turn it into something else like "a dirt cheap e-book reader."

    22. Re:What would happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      and vice versa!

    23. Re:What would happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      > In the howitworks they seem to have 3 shades: white, black, and grey.

      Unlike e-books, which apparently also have 3 shades: light grey, dark grey, and grey.

    24. Re:What would happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So basically the whole "E-ink", "revolutionary" you "you can hack it" hype, was just crap that esquire was spewing to sell a few more copies to soon to be disappointed geeks?

      Fun fun, game and watch technology isn't exactly new, also, wasn't one of the big feats that it isn't rigid and is more like a thick paper? That looks like a solid chunk of board and screen.

      Its all nothing more than an expensive wasteful disposable blink tag. I don't see how it can accomplish anything else.

    25. Re:What would happen by nizo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If the internet has done one thing for me, it has killed whatever curiosity I had to go look at new shock images.

    26. Re:What would happen by erayd · · Score: 2, Informative

      ...Could take the display and turn it into something else like "a dirt cheap e-book reader."

      Not possible without dismantling the panel. What you need to remember about this screen is that it doesn't have the control matrix laid out in a grid (with each line 1px wide) like an ebook reader does. Instead, the matrix is composed of discrete sections. These sections cannot be changed without physically dismantling the screen and replacing the active layer, which can't easily be done without destroying the screen.

      --
      Forget world peace, bring on -1 pointless
    27. Re:What would happen by cgenman · · Score: 3, Informative

      Essentially, the paper itself could display individual pixels, in almost exactly the same way that sections of electroluminescent tape could individually light up, but they would need to be wired for it. The difference between running one magnetic inducing plane to the back of a specially-cut region of the paper and running hundreds of wires all crisscrossing them is significnat. And that, of course, is what separates 2 dollar a foot electroluminescent tape from hundred dollar per 3-inch electroluminescent displays. At the point where you've fabricated electromagnetic matrices to interact with the e-paper, you're far into the cost of a real ebook reader.

      The writer there isn't thinking about the tools at hand in any realistic fashion. Realistic tech writers aren't interesting, hence only the fantastic (and ignorant) survive.

    28. Re:What would happen by LilBlackDemon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is probably a little cynical, but they probably got the reprogrammable covers so they could re-use them when they don't sell. Newsstand owners send back the front covers of unsold magazines, newspapers, and other items, and just recycle the rest of the item. Here, the newsstand owners send back a programmable cover, and Esquire's publisher can re-use the cover for a later stunt.

    29. Re:What would happen by ultranova · · Score: 1

      Then a bunch of artsy fashionistas would parade around saying that gaping anus is the new black.

      Back is black.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    30. Re:What would happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      clarification
      sheisse = 2 girls 1 cup

    31. Re:What would happen by Locutus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      from what I saw, they were mentioning "hacking" powering the device when the batteries go dead. And with such large segments, there's just so much you can do with it. Can't even do a power bar unless 1/3, 2/3, 3/3 is of interest.

      What would be interesting is if you could put a homemade backing on it to energize the e-ink and draw custom things inside those segment areas.

      LoB

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
    32. Re:What would happen by Basehart · · Score: 3, Funny

      I think a can of beer would just about fit...

    33. Re:What would happen by Hal_Porter · · Score: 3, Informative

      You can't display Goatse on these things. Each letter is one segment, even from the summary that's clear "The top screen has 11 segments, the bottom has 3".

      I.e. it's not a matrix display.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    34. Re:What would happen by Furan · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Most likely what would usually be a matrix able to address individual capsules is setup to turn on several of them at once in the wiring. This is the only explanation I can find for the low number of pins in what is normally a matrix display with many driver ICs attached directly before going to a controlling device such as the PIC here.

      Instead what we have here is a very low pin count going directly to a shift register controlled by the pic.

      So it's unfortunately obvious from the pictures that no more can be done with the display here. I am, however, interested in reusing the boards for things like fun little robots.

    35. Re:What would happen by spathi-wa · · Score: 1

      ...sideways?

    36. Re:What would happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No - it would display goatse in a blink tag!

      *shivers*

    37. Re:What would happen by LordSnooty · · Score: 1

      They'd die of old age?

    38. Re:What would happen by somersault · · Score: 3, Funny

      Trust me to get the abnormal girlfriend..

      --
      which is totally what she said
    39. Re:What would happen by OolimPhon · · Score: 1

      Do not look at goatse with remaining eye...

    40. Re:What would happen by The+End+Of+Days · · Score: 1

      What's cynical about that? Is there some expectation that a company would throw money away for fun that's being violated here? Such a mindset would be overly idealistic.

    41. Re:What would happen by jebrew · · Score: 1

      It's also not black...

    42. Re:What would happen by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      there are multiple e-ink microcapsules in a pixel. because in a matrix display each pixel is a segment. but these aren't matrix displays.

      the technology to drive eink is nearly identical to lcd. there is a backplane that is attached to the display material that allows you to drive an area of the display with an electrical charge. you can make that area any shape you want really. (just like an LCD)

      you usually can't replace the backplane without destroying the display (usually bonded together). if you can take it of then you could then use your own thin film transistor manufacturing prowess and apply it to the eink material and now you've hacked the display into something useful. Enjoy making those TFTs at home.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    43. Re:What would happen by Philip+Shaw · · Score: 1

      I suspect that would be a lemma of Rule 34:
      any image depicting any part of a (not necessarily human) body is arousing for somebody.

      --
      "A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject."- Winston Churchill
    44. Re:What would happen by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      Tell me AC, where do you live? *lock-n'-load*

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
    45. Re:What would happen by dave420 · · Score: 1

      It isn't??? I've made a huge mistake.

  4. Great for the environment by rminsk · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Most of these magazines are going to end up in landfills with all the toxic materials that are in the display, batteries, chips, and PCBs. Thank you Esquire.

    1. Re:Great for the environment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aw, let the dying medium have its last gasp.

    2. Re:Great for the environment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Esquire made it so it is completely recyclable. so.. Thank you Esquire

    3. Re:Great for the environment by WillRobinson · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Read this:
      http://www.esquire.com/features/recycle-e-ink-cover You will see instructions on proper disposal.

    4. Re:Great for the environment by dbIII · · Score: 4, Insightful

      We need a new mod catagory for posts like the above: "blatantly obvious that they did not read the finagaling article".

    5. Re:Great for the environment by Toonol · · Score: 1

      http://www.esquire.com/features/recycle-e-ink-cover You will see instructions on proper disposal.

      Ok, but I would be surprised if over 5% of the covers disposed of 'properly'.

    6. Re:Great for the environment by narcberry · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Most of these magazines are going to end up in landfills with all the toxic materials that are in the display, batteries, chips, and PCBs. Thank you Esquire.

      OMG blah blah blah...

      Toxic today, useful compound tomorrow. Now I'm not suggesting the world go overboard, but life evolves around the materials on earth.

      I know it seems that wearing dirty underwear and eating out of communal dishes will save the earth, but that's just the hippie in you being a short sighted idiot.

      --
      Modding me -1 troll doesn't make me wrong.
    7. Re:Great for the environment by Koiu+Lpoi · · Score: 3, Funny

      Oh! Oh! I know this one! "+5 Insightful because the mods didn't read it either"!

    8. Re:Great for the environment by Jason1729 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Wow. And here I was hoping I'd still be able to pick up a couple at the newstand tomorrow before they sell out and I have to pay $20+ each on eBay.

      Someone would have to be an idiot to throw these out when they can sell them for well over cover price. There's a large group of people who have been drooling over these for 2 months.

    9. Re:Great for the environment by rminsk · · Score: 1

      It does not matter that there are instructions for recycling the cover. I bet more than 90% will not be disposed of properly and end up in landfills.

    10. Re:Great for the environment by Kamokazi · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think -1 RTFA would suffice.

      --
      As our way of thanking you for your positive contributions to Slashdot, you are eligible to disable Slashdot 2.0.
    11. Re:Great for the environment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Another "wow that's great for the environment" note from Esquire:

      "The ink draws more power at higher temperatures, so we needed to control the temperature the units were going to see from China to the newsstand." Which meant we needed refrigerated trucks.

      So not only are they shipped all the way from China to the newsstand, but they're refrigerated along the way. I think that's a great way to burn as much fuel as possible.

    12. Re:Great for the environment by maxume · · Score: 1

      The problem is that in the interim, Bill, who runs the landfill, took Hal, who was supposed to inspect the landfill, to Tig ol' Bitties and Hal signed off on the liner, and now, all that shit has a chance to leach into someone's drinking water.

      (Don't worry, I don't let the yellow mellow or any crazy nonsense like that, but there is a difference between beneficial consumption and silly, wanton consumption)

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    13. Re:Great for the environment by Kamokazi · · Score: 4, Insightful

      For fuck's sake. Why not worry about all those greeting cards with sound chips in them, or all the alkaline batteries, or printer ink cartridges thrown away? Esquire doing a one-time limited run of these is nothing compared to all of the other sources of toxic landfill materials. Quit being a pessimistic asshole and pissing on the downsides of the current popular topic and worry about some real problems.

      --
      As our way of thanking you for your positive contributions to Slashdot, you are eligible to disable Slashdot 2.0.
    14. Re:Great for the environment by donstenk · · Score: 1

      Doesn't everything, eventually?

      --
      Dennis Onstenk
    15. Re:Great for the environment by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      While I agree that most of these are probably going to end up getting tossed, why do we reserve our flack for this one application? Every last electronic device is in the same position. Do you mention this about every electronic device?

    16. Re:Great for the environment by dbIII · · Score: 4, Insightful
      It really does not merit the toxic OMFG think of the F'ing children knee jerk response. If you want to scare people you should at least have read the thing first to get something resembling a clue.

      Which component in paticular do you think is toxic?

    17. Re:Great for the environment by dbIII · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I apologise for the tone of the earlier post. Some days I am up to my neck in luddites terrified that CRT screens will prevent them from having healthy babies. Unfortunately they use the work "toxic" a lot so I grouped the earlier poster with them.

      Electronic waste is a real problem but it is addressed in the article.

    18. Re:Great for the environment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As long as you can find aluminum cans in the garbage can located right next to the recycle bin, recycling will be an issue...

      As cool as it is, this is a totally irresponsible move on the part of Esquire. For every person that recycles, there is at least another that doesn't.

      I've had 12 y/o children tell me they don't care about the environment. Others point to the ill conceived notion that recycling doesn't pay to warrant their non-recycling habits...

      Give me a break. It may give Esquire a warm fuzzy to claim that they are recyclable. But the fact of the matter is, MOST will likely not be.

    19. Re:Great for the environment by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      The problem is that in the interim, Bill, who runs the landfill, took Hal, who was supposed to inspect the landfill, to Tig ol' Bitties and Hal signed off on the liner, and now, all that shit has a chance to leach into someone's drinking water.

      That's true but a bit of lithium in the drinking water looks like it wouldn't go amiss for some of the posters here.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    20. Re:Great for the environment by Man+On+Pink+Corner · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I wonder if it occurred to the bright bulb who designed this that the magazine will spend most of its time in total darkness on someone's shelf? A cheap photosensor would have saved at least a few of those 6(!) coin cells, I'd bet.

      That would also have solved the shipping problem, since presumably it's dark as all hell inside a Chinese cargo container.

    21. Re:Great for the environment by Vegeta99 · · Score: 1

      Please, go bitch at your neighbor who dumps his lawnmower's oil in the corner by his garage before you waste your time bitching about an esquire cover.

    22. Re:Great for the environment by Linker3000 · · Score: 1

      Are you sure that's 'drool'?

      --
      AT&ROFLMAO
    23. Re:Great for the environment by Sj0 · · Score: 1

      Go bitch about his Ford truck that spits a few liters of oil on the ground without fail every month first.

      --
      It's been a long time.
    24. Re:Great for the environment by Sj0 · · Score: 1

      I hate to say it, but who cares?

      100,000 of these will fit into a small box. Of all the things on the planet to be upset about, these are somewhere around the fact that hot dogs don't properly biodegrade.

      --
      It's been a long time.
    25. Re:Great for the environment by ncc74656 · · Score: 1

      We need a new mod catagory for posts like the above: "blatantly obvious that they did not read the finagaling article".

      You must be new here.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    26. Re:Great for the environment by Toonol · · Score: 1

      Who was bitching? If I bought a copy of this magazine, I'm 95% certain I'd just toss it in the trash as well. Along with my light bulbs (regardless of style), batteries, and obsolete computer equipment. I'm just saying that providing a 'proper recycling path' rarely actually fixes anything, it only provides plausible deniability for the manufacturer.

    27. Re:Great for the environment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah because it is the fault of the manufacturer if the consumer does not recycle? Should we start protesting the Battery companies because idiots still throw them away instead of recycling? Just forget that Esquire tells its readers not to toss the magazine.

      Grow a brain.

    28. Re:Great for the environment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agree completely, Getting tired of green knee jerk crowd. There are many existing environmental issues that warrant more attention.

      The e-ink worked. I had to go out and purchase a copy of Esquire.

  5. hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wonder just how much you can make it do...

    1. Re:hmmm.... by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      >wonder just how much you can make it do...

      With so many posts saying "it's impossible to make it do anything interesting", I'm just waiting...

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  6. The internet is getting to me by Aussenseiter · · Score: 5, Funny

    I really need to stop mentally pronouncing it "E-squire".

  7. More images? by commlinx · · Score: 1

    looks like it was made to be reprogrammed and different screens

    I just tried to upload my pr0n but unfortunately it wouldn't fit in the 1K x 14 of FLASH.

  8. Oh wow, a magazine with a digital cover by CitznFish · · Score: 5, Funny

    who cares! until the magazine can read to me while I'm on the toilet, and answer my questions, or rebuttal my comments, I don't care how much technology goes into the cover.

    Then again if Playboy gets a digital cover that talks dirty to me then I have the option of recanting my previous statement.

    --
    'mmmmmmmmm.... forbidden donut'
    1. Re:Oh wow, a magazine with a digital cover by MartinSchou · · Score: 1

      Uhm ... wouldn't reading Playboy while on the toilet result in a bit of a mess on the floor? Now, reading it while in the bathroom is something entirely different

    2. Re:Oh wow, a magazine with a digital cover by YourExperiment · · Score: 1

      until the magazine can read to me while I'm on the toilet, and answer my questions, or rebuttal my comments

      I'm looking forward to the day when it can befixal your grammar.

  9. Recycling instructions by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 5, Informative
    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
    1. Re:Recycling instructions by Ctrl-Z · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Fascinating.

      All of it can be recycled through your local municipal waste program in the same manner as you dispose of household batteries.

      Last time I checked, household batteries go to the landfill. At least that's what happens where I live. GP has it right.

      --
      www.timcoleman.com is a total waste of your time. Never go there.
    2. Re:Recycling instructions by socsoc · · Score: 4, Informative

      Maybe Canada allows it, but California has had compulsory battery recycling laws since 2006.

    3. Re:Recycling instructions by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "Maybe Canada allows it, but California has had compulsory battery recycling laws since 2006."

      Interesting...what do they do, dig through your trash before they throw it on the truck??

      I don't know of any laws here on what you cannot throw in the trash...I throw everything in there. I've never actually recycled...I have no idea where to take the stuff, and I only have a small 2 seater car, and I'm not gonna be running around town with bags of garbage to drop off somewhere, when I can just toss it all in the can, and the men on the big green trucks comes and takes it all away.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    4. Re:Recycling instructions by maxume · · Score: 1

      It's a bit of a trick to enforce. I just checked, and it looks like the rules in Michigan (my state) are only for lead acid batteries (with restrictions on selling batteries containing mercury).

      My brother can recycle batteries at work so I just stack them up and give them to him once in a while, but I think for most people, the trash is an awfully convenient way to get rid of them.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    5. Re:Recycling instructions by socsoc · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No they don't have enforcement crews digging through your trash, but many business have drop boxes for their employees/customers, especially places like Best Buy. Retailers that sell rechargeable batteries are required to accept them for recycling. It's so easy to recycle them, and there are free programs, so why not?

      A fear of getting caught isn't the reason people comply, it's to keep hazardous material out of the landfill. The same reason we recycle our electronics through free programs instead of burying them in the backyard (well technically the fee is paid at point-of-sale).

    6. Re:Recycling instructions by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 4, Informative
      Radio Shacks will take used batteries for free and send them to be recycled for you. Some other places too (Office Depot maybe?)

      Somewhere there's a website with a list of companies that participate in the program.

      --
      This space available.
    7. Re:Recycling instructions by Jorophose · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It would be nice if the post office or local libraries did this. I don't want to go to best buy or radio shack to drop off batteries but I will walk to the library/post office to do so.

    8. Re:Recycling instructions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      The USPS does.

      http://www.usps.com/communications/newsroom/2008/pr08_028.htm

      And so does one city library system near where I live - Burbank, CA.

    9. Re:Recycling instructions by srw · · Score: 5, Informative

      Sure. I used to work at Radio Shack and we had a battery recycling bin by the till. Every couple of weeks our manager would dump the contents into the trash. I protested, but he said that as long as people thought they were recycling, they felt good and they would come in and buy stuff.

      Oh how I hated that job.

    10. Re:Recycling instructions by gunne · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      And every time I see something like this I think "Oh how I hate those stupid americans"!

      Seriously, stop destroying our world.

    11. Re:Recycling instructions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ikea takes batteries, as well

    12. Re:Recycling instructions by srw · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sorry, but you're wrong. It was all Canadians at that store! (And, to be fair, it was only the manager that approved.)

    13. Re:Recycling instructions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where I live, I place old batteries in a bag, put the bag in the recycling box provided by my local council (where I can also put other stuff to be collected, including hazardous chemicals, used motor oil, newspapers, tin cans etc.), and leave it at the curbside to be collected.

    14. Re:Recycling instructions by somersault · · Score: 1

      I thought Canadians were technically American too? ;)

      --
      which is totally what she said
    15. Re:Recycling instructions by FireFury03 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      http://www.esquire.com/features/recycle-e-ink-cover

      "Simply tear off the cover and dispose of the display unit in your recycling."

      Colour me very surprised if the council don't just landfill the thing because it is too much effort for them to split it up into it's component parts...

    16. Re:Recycling instructions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Literally? No. Dropping something wherever you happen to be standing is literally the least you can do. Recycling takes effort.

    17. Re:Recycling instructions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where I work, there was an effort at one point for 'battery recycling'. They put buckets in the hallways to collect all these old batteries to be recycled. It was a great idea. The buckets filled up in about a day or two. Then they took the buckets away and never brought them back. I bet they found out that nobody would actually take the batteries and they'd just go to the landfill anyway.

    18. Re:Recycling instructions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We won't be once my evil plan to physically separate Canada from continental North America and make a new continent from it is completed. That'll teach ... um ... wait, then we'd all need to take a boat across the border to get cheaper gas... CURSES! FOILED AGAIN!

    19. Re:Recycling instructions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, and for every battery you bring in to Radio Shack for recycling, they give you the name and address of a previous customer who bought a battery.

      Finally, we know why Radio Shack makes you give your name when you buy 'em.

    20. Re:Recycling instructions by wsanders · · Score: 1

      >> what do they do, dig through your trash before they throw it on the truck??

      San Francisco has new law implementing this, and a $1000 fine for putting the wrong stuff in the wrong bin. Like most stupid laws of this type, it is impossible to enforce uniformly and useful only annoy neighbors and punish political enemies.

      --
      Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
    21. Re:Recycling instructions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pretty typical for a Radio Shack operation. Although there were some store that actually complied with the recycling program. The stores I was in did return the boxes. The only times we did not return all the batteries was when we would take the "D" cells out and throw then at the back room exterior door. That kept us from throwing them at customers and district directors.

    22. Re:Recycling instructions by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      1. That is one person.
      2. They where Canadians which are technically Americans but not in the way you describe it.
      3. The EU drove cars that used leaded fuel and didn't come close to meeting US pollution control standards for decades.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  10. what a waste by TheSHAD0W · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why are e-ink based e-books so expensive, while Esquire can afford to use it as a cover for their magazine? Something's missing here.

    1. Re:what a waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      My guess would be that this "screen" is not able to display arbitrary images, rather it can only display those images pre-burned onto the "e-ink". The PIC controller merely flips switches on and off at set time intervals or by button presses. Although interesting and indeed hackable, the hardware necessary to do this stuff is already quite cheap (something like $25 for a USB pickit 1 from Microchip.com).

    2. Re:what a waste by MBCook · · Score: 5, Informative

      Right. The display is just like old Game & Watch games (or any other cheap LCD display). They have a bunch of segments (in this case mostly blocks of words) that can be turned on or off. I'd expect that just like LCDs the more segments you have the more expensive it is to manufacture the thing (not including the cost of controller).

      If you watch the little video that the Make blog post links to, you can see how limited it is.

      That said, it seems to refresh quite fast, which the e-books have problems with. I don't know if this is a consequence of the controller (I doubt it, Amazon/Sony would do better), the size of the pixels (smaller pixels switch slower for some reason, perhaps the small traces prevent higher current that can switch things faster), manufacturing (faster switching is too expensive to make an 800x600 screen), or just perception (since the elements are so large it's not noticeable like when you change small blocks of text).

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    3. Re:what a waste by blair1q · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Because you are an idiot and will pay $400 for a Kindle when it costs about $10 to build.

    4. Re:what a waste by maxume · · Score: 1

      A snide remark about a dozen or so words not making for much of a reading experience would also have been appropriate.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    5. Re:what a waste by neonsignal · · Score: 2, Informative

      The problem with refreshing a pixel based e-ink display is that it has to be erased first (otherwise you get ghost images of the previous page). The erase setting has to be held long enough to achieve a stable and consistent state across the pixels. Some display modes of the ebook readers (eg, the mp3 player updating the play timer on the screen) don't do an erase first, and the update is quite fast (but you do get ghosting).

      For a simple segment display, it doesn't matter if there is ghosting, especially if you are just blinking the display.

    6. Re:what a waste by TheSHAD0W · · Score: 1

      Actually, I looked at the price of the Kindle, winced, and bought an Eee PC instead. It may be a little harder to read than the Kindle, but it's a hell of a lot more capable, and I've gotten pretty fond of it. ;-)

    7. Re:what a waste by dontmakemethink · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's called loss-leading promotions. Bars will sometimes book big touring bands hoping to only break even, mostly for the bragging rights of saying that band played their room.

      --

      War as we knew it was obsolete
      Nothing could beat complete denial
      - Emily Haines
    8. Re:what a waste by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      Well, then, there must be some open source versions that you can DIY. I have a 5-year-old PocketPC that I use. Sure, it's not e-Ink, but it works for me.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    9. Re:what a waste by Eccohawk · · Score: 1

      Esquire can only afford to use it as their cover because:
      a) Ford Motor Corp. has paid a lot of money to 'sponsor' the cover (thus the Ford Flex ad on the inside flap)
      b) they only ran 100,000 copies, versus the normal run somewhere around 500k to 1 million.
      c) they used simpler mechanics to turn on and off 'sections' of the paper versus each individual pixel, which requires much more expensive tech.

  11. But... by christurkel · · Score: 2, Funny

    Does it run...? Imagine...oh never mind.

    --

    CDE open sourced! https://sourceforge.net/projects/cdesktopenv/
    1. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does it run...? Imagine...oh never mind.

      It runs Vista. Hopefully you'll be able to read the cover when they release Service Pack 2.

  12. Ink ink ink by ilovesymbian · · Score: 1

    Again, why does e-ink work that way? As it is, I can't afford regular ink, its so expensive.

    Can't e-ink at least be affordable?

    It reminds me of the e-books (spdf files) from Harvard Business school. So expensive, and dies after 6 months.

    1. Re:Ink ink ink by blair1q · · Score: 1

      e-Ink will be much cheaper than regular ink, especially after you've erased and rewritten "I will not make a fool of myself on the Internet" 5e9 times on your e-ink tablet.

    2. Re:Ink ink ink by i.r.id10t · · Score: 4, Funny

      Until they are programmable enough.

      When I was in middle school, our typing teacher gave repetitive exercises like that, to do at home or in lab. I happened to have a daisy wheel printer at home for my TRS-80 (m4, 32k and 2 drives!), which was basically a - you guessed it! - typewriter.

      A for-next loop and homework was done... even trimmed the edges so the perforation marks wouldn't be there to tip her off....

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
  13. Where can I get one? by Wescotte · · Score: 1

    I was very excited when I first heard about it but after doing some research it appeared to be a very limited run. I haven't seen any locally.. Anyone know where I could order one online?

    1. Re:Where can I get one? by bearl · · Score: 1

      As (almost) always, you can get one right here...

      eBay!

      I am not an employee of... and am not selling... etc.

    2. Re:Where can I get one? by Bobartig · · Score: 1

      What's local for you? I'm in SF, and the nearest Barnes and Nobles to my office seemed to have plenty.

      --
      This is where I get my recommended daily allowance of "Foot in Mouth."
  14. How to watch video? by pipatron · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    So how do I watch this video in Linux? After enabling all 186 layers of javascript hell I only get a gray box with the text "Choose from the players listed below.", and nothing listed below.

    --
    c++; /* this makes c bigger but returns the old value */
  15. Esquire welcomes hacking by Bananatree3 · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Esquire welcomes hackers

    Greetings hackers: Esquire's special E-Ink cover includes two flexible displays that should last for a few months. But the flashing could last longer if you want to try to replace the embedded batteries or find other sources of power. If you come up with inventive ways to extend the power or to hack the circuit board, displays, or the E Ink technology itself, let us know by sending an email to editor@esquire.com and we'll post your results here on Esquire.com. We should tell you, it's not easy and requires some expertise... but you're pretty clever, right? Show us something we don't know.

    1. Re:Esquire welcomes hacking by yuna49 · · Score: 1

      Just don't try carrying it down a street in Boston.

  16. <blink>? by Hurricane78 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Great. The <blink> tag made it to real life!

    Why?? Whyyyyyyyy........??? ;)

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  17. simple segments vs. dot matrix by SuperBanana · · Score: 4, Informative

    Why are e-ink based e-books so expensive, while Esquire can afford to use it as a cover for their magazine? Something's missing here.

    11 very large segments versus 480,000 very small segments. PIC programed to go "turn on segment 1, then 2, then 3. Pause. Switch all them off. Repeat"...versus "fully fledged operating system and electronic document presentation system."

    Oh yes, and Equire printed roughly 233,300 of them (one in three of their circulation of 700,000) in one go. That's roughly equal to the 240,000 Kindle units Amazon has supposedly sold in about 10 months.

    Still, the biggie is the simplicity...

    1. Re:simple segments vs. dot matrix by martin-boundary · · Score: 1

      The hardware specs make a big difference, but the "fully fledged operating system and document presentation system" can be had for essentially nothing, if they pick open source solutions and tweak them a bit if necessary. That's what the Chinese are doing, for example.

    2. Re:simple segments vs. dot matrix by erayd · · Score: 1

      That's exactly what sony did - their reader runs Linux, and is very easily hackable. Don't know what the kindle uses though - my guess is also Linux, but a lot more locked-down.

      --
      Forget world peace, bring on -1 pointless
  18. Re:? by Overzeetop · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Same reason the original blink made it to HTML - because the can. Reminds you a lot of the Jurassic Park line..."they> were so preoccupied with whether or not they could, they didn't stop to think if they should."

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  19. Peter Griffin - Family Guy ? by up2ng · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Putting this cover together really started seven years ago, when deputy editor Peter Griffin..."

    "Hey Lois, Look I'm flashing an Esquire, he he he hehe"
    Stewie: "Oh, good going fat man way to show it to the 21st century"

    --
    Success is not the result of spontaneous combustion, you must set yourself on fire.
  20. Why did Slashdot even run this? by Goaway · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Is this entire thing about how there really isn't any point at all in hacking this thing?

    Gee, thanks for telling us!

    Even the summary has lost interest by the time it reaches the last sentence.

    1. Re:Why did Slashdot even run this? by Darkness404 · · Score: 1

      Well, saying that it is hard to hack is a good article nonetheless as most of us if we saw an e-ink display would buy it to try to hack it, if it wasn't able to be hacked most of us would have wasted the price of the magazine.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
  21. wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To learn more about the E-Ink cover, as well as how to recycle and potentially even hack the issue, we invite you to visit the links below. -FTFA well i'll be damned. corporate media uses the term hack in the correct manner. And its esquire...

    1. Re:wow by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 1

      well i'll be damned. corporate media uses the term hack in the correct manner

      Next on: Four horsemen of the apocalypse spotted above New York.

  22. lame by Briden · · Score: 0

    ugh, lame. and as if you needed anymore reason not to support this: how it was made

  23. E-reader. by Ostracus · · Score: 2, Informative

    *sigh*

    All these comments and you all missed this beauty from the last story.

    --
    Shai Schticks:"You don't make peace with friends, you make peace with enemies"
    1. Re:E-reader. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The NYT registration screen? Yup, looks nice.

    2. Re:E-reader. by Ostracus · · Score: 1

      The New York Times
      Printer Friendly Format Sponsored By

      September 8, 2008
      New E-Newspaper Reader Echoes Look of the Paper
      By ERIC A. TAUB

      CAMBRIDGE, Mass. â" The electronic newspaper, a large portable screen that is constantly updated with the latest news, has been a prop in science fiction for ages. It also figures in the dreams of newspaper publishers struggling with rising production and delivery costs, lower circulation and decreased ad revenue from their paper product.

      While the dream device remains on the drawing board, Plastic Logic will introduce publicly on Monday its version of an electronic newspaper reader: a lightweight plastic screen that mimics the look â" but not the feel â" of a printed newspaper.

      The device, which is unnamed, uses the same technology as the Sony eReader and Amazon.comâ(TM)s Kindle, a highly legible black-and-white display developed by the E Ink Corporation. While both of those devices are intended primarily as book readers, Plastic Logicâ(TM)s device, which will be shown at an emerging technology trade show in San Diego, has a screen more than twice as large. The size of a piece of copier paper, it can be continually updated via a wireless link, and can store and display hundreds of pages of newspapers, books and documents.

      Richard Archuleta, the chief executive of Plastic Logic, said the display was big enough to provide a newspaperlike layout. âoeEven though we have positioned this for business documents, newspapers is what everyone asks for,â Mr. Archuleta said.

      The reader will go on sale in the first half of next year. Plastic Logic will not announce which news organization will display its articles on it until the International Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas in January, when it will also reveal the price.

      Kenneth A. Bronfin, president of Hearst Interactive Media, said, âoeWe are hopeful that we will be able to distribute our newspaper content on a new generation of larger devices sometime next year.â While he would not say what device the companyâ(TM)s papers would use, he said, âoewe have a very strong interest in e-newspapers. Weâ(TM)re very anxious to get involved.â

      The Hearst Corporation, the parent of Hearst Interactive Media, owns 16 daily newspapers, including The Houston Chronicle, The San Antonio Express and The San Francisco Chronicle, and was an early investor in E Ink. The company already distributes electronic versions of some papers on the Amazon Kindle.

      Newspaper companies have watched the technology closely for years. The ideal format, a flexible display that could be rolled or folded like a newspaper, is still years off, says E Ink. But it foresees color displays with moving images and interactive clickable advertising coming in only a few more years, according to Sriram K. Peruvemba, vice president for marketing for E Ink.

      E Ink expects that within the next few years it will be able to create technology that allows users to write on the screen and view videos. At a recent demonstration at E Inkâ(TM)s headquarters here, the company showed prototypes of flexible displays that can create rudimentary colors and animated images. âoeBy 2010, we will have a production version of a display that offers newspaperlike color,â Mr. Peruvemba said.

      If e-newspapers take off, the savings could be hefty. At the The San Francisco Chronicle, for example, print and delivery amount to 65 percent of the paperâ(TM)s fixed expenses, Mr. Bronfin said.

      With electronic readers, publishers would also learn more about its readers. With paper copy subscriptions, newspapers know what address has received a copy and not much else. About those customers picking up a copy on the newsstand, they know nothing.

      As an electronic device, newspapers can determine who is reading their paper, and even which articles are being read. Advertisers would be able to understand their audience and direct advertising to its likeliest

      --
      Shai Schticks:"You don't make peace with friends, you make peace with enemies"
  24. Just got one by dmitrygr · · Score: 3, Informative

    Just bought one. There is a PIC - 12F629 for logic, and 2 8-bit shift registers. There are 6 3-V batteries, whose combined voltage of 18V is used to change eInk state. The e-ink displays show greyscale quite well, if you do not take the full specced time to get them to change state.

    --
    -------
    1. Enjoy your job
    2. Make lots of money
    3. Work within the law

    Choose any two.
    1. Re:Just got one by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

      Wow. I think I would've looked into using a DC-DC converter to generate the 18V instead of 6 batteries - I hope they at least considered it. The e-Ink can't take that much current. The PIC is spec'ed to run from 2.0V to 5.5V, so it can run off 1 battery.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    2. Re:Just got one by morcheeba · · Score: 1

      It's pretty well designed. The number and size of batteries happened to fit their desired life expectancy (90 days, including printing time), so they got lucky. In this case, using a DC-DC boost converter would have resulted in one big honkin' battery that would either be a cylinder (not fitting in the cover well) or exceptionally wide (not a standard size = $$$).

      What's interesting is that the processor has its own battery (B6), and the eink runs off the rest of the batteries (actually only 15 volts). That means one will run out before the other ... if the time difference is large, then that's an inefficiency.

    3. Re:Just got one by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

      I can't imagine that a charge pump would be larger and more expensive than all those additional batteries. I googled around and couldn't find any current draw specs for segmented e-ink displays, but I gotta believe that a single 3V battery or at worst a pair of 3V batteries in parallel could drive the CPU (especially in 32 kHz mode) and the display for a very long time. Since the display changes so infrequently, the CPU and charge pump can both be put to sleep between updates. I'd love to see the actual performance figures for the e-ink display. Epson and Dialog both make controllers for e-ink displays, but their websites lack useful details.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    4. Re:Just got one by morcheeba · · Score: 1

      My point is that you don't get free energy... you could eliminate those extra batteries, but to get the same life, you'd need to replace them with a single larger battery. That single larger battery probably wouldn't fit in the cover as well as the lots of little ones.

      An example: The CR2016 batteries used are 90mAH, 1.6 mm thick, and 20 mm diameter. Replacing this with a DC/DC converter (at a very generous 80% efficiency - at currents this low, the power taken by the generator is significant - the real efficiency would probably be in the 40-50% range) would be a single 675 mAH battery. That's a CR2450 battery -- 5 mm thick (3x thicker) and 24mm in diameter.

      Pricewise, CR2016's are $0.18 each, qty 5000 (Esquire ordered 1.4 million batteries). I didn't find bulk 2450's, so I compared the same manufacturer from the same vendor - the price was 2.66x the cost of the 2016 -- so, I'd guess $0.48. The savings is 6*0.18 - 0.48 = $0.60. At 40% efficiency (two 2450's), the savings is $0.12 -- minus, of course, the cost of the converter, which is non-trivial. You need the driver chip (usually not cheap) and a pair of capacitors (high quality, or else you'll get EMI).

    5. Re:Just got one by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

      Your analysis is quite thorough, but I don't know if it's correct. Without e-ink current figures, we're both stabbing in the dark. You appear to assume that a single replacement e-ink battery would need to have the same ampacity * voltage (wattacity?) as the string of 2016's. I imagine that the relatively high voltage needed is required to generate an electric field across the ink blob, but that it doesn't require a large amount of current (think of driving a MOSFET gate - much higher voltage than bipolar, but at almost negligible current at low frequencies). My guess, and it is only a guess, is that the 5 e-ink batteries will last longer than the CPU battery, and that they chose 5 batteries in series to get 15V. If there were a 15V, 18 mAh battery around, I bet it would've served the purpose.

      I don't know if you're old enough to remember 'A' and 'B' batteries from the tube radio days. The 'A' battery supplied around 1.5 volts and gobs of current for heating the filaments, and the 'B' battery provided 90V or so at fairly low current for the plate. This setup was also used in Geiger counters, where the GM tube needs a very high voltage field to count radiation events. There's a guy on the net that goes by 'allnilo' that makes little DC-DC converters to replace Geiger counter batteries.

      Thanks for the replies, I enjoy debating design choices!

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
  25. OMG HYDROGEN FREE ENERGY!!ONE! by jeffb+(2.718) · · Score: 1

    Don't forget to tear the coin cells open with pliers and drop the foil into water to make hydrogen bubbles. Or pass them along to your friendly neighborhood meth cook.

  26. Adn so it begins... by jmorris42 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Yes this first feeble attempt is fairly lame, a few segments that will burn out in a couple of months and took a fair investment in hardware to pull off. But it won't end here.

    Soon they will put solar collectors on the things to keep it going indefinately, add more segments, etc. Hell, it won't be a generation before they are printing complex enough circuits on the damned things that they will be doing full motion video. On cereal boxes. Or having generic advertising, think shopping carts, seatbacks, etc updating their ad copy over slow radio links. And they already know how to make flat paper speakers so they damned things will be talking whenever somebody is in range.

    --
    Democrat delenda est
    1. Re:Adn so it begins... by Hal_Porter · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And they already know how to make flat paper speakers so they damned things will be talking whenever somebody is in range.

      If they had video cameras, they'd be vandal resistant too.

      "Watch Big Brother! Tonight of ABC! Watch Big Brother Tonight on ABC! Mr Morris, please do not touch this advert, it is the property of Orwell Advertising Inc. Mr Morris, video of the incident has been sent to law enforcement"

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    2. Re:Adn so it begins... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I've seen the next gen of these things. They don't use solar power. They use Bussard collectors. Yes, I was shocked too. You just wave the magazine around in the air for about six hours and they collect sufficient hydrogen atoms to be powered for thirty whole seconds. Amazing. The bonus is that if you get tired of the ridiculous articles in Esquire, and fling it across the room, it will fly at approximately warp 1.1. It actually arrives before you fling it, although they're a little hazy on the actual physics.

    3. Re:Adn so it begins... by bluefloyd8 · · Score: 2, Informative

      The E-ink material keeps its state (dark/light) when power is removed. So it wont burn out, but rather just stop flashing and be stuck on whatever it was displaying when the batteries dies.

  27. Not so impressive by Lord+Byron+II · · Score: 3, Informative

    When I read this, I immediately ran down to Borders to take a look, since the video link on Esquire's site seemed to be broken. It is not very impressive at all. It's very small, maybe 2" by 4" at the most, and it just flashes. It's kind of a neon light sign effect - you can still read the text even when the segment isn't on.

    1. Re:Not so impressive by mgabrys_sf · · Score: 1

      Yes, I'm surprised at the batteries required. I tested some e-ink at a focus group at Monsanto in 1994, and it could be activated by the power in your own fingertips. Why the hell they were "racing the clock" and mucking about with lithium I have no idea.

    2. Re:Not so impressive by Lost+Engineer · · Score: 1

      Video worked for me but I had to temporarily enable Javascript and Flash for esquire.com and hearstmedia.com.

      It could have been slashdotted when you tried, though.

    3. Re:Not so impressive by Darkness404 · · Score: 1

      Because you expected them to pack it with an Intel Atom CPU, a 1 GB SSD, 128 MB of RAM and a nice color LCD? Seriously, what did you expect? Its hard enough to get E-ink as it is, yet alone without substantially increasing the price.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
  28. you can't "just" recycle them by SuperBanana · · Score: 2, Informative

    All of it can be recycled through your local municipal waste program in the same manner as you dispose of household batteries.

    I don't know about anyone else, but my town had an entire shed at the local transfer station for putting batteries.

    Ie, you can't "just" throw them out, even into the recycle bin at the end of your driveway...at least, not in most municpalities. You're not supposed to dispose of batteries as part of regular trash, regardless of whether they're lead-acid car batteries, lithium, alkaline, etc.

    I don't doubt them on the display, though. It really is just polarized particles that are white on one pole and black on the other, in a suspension, with electrodes...

    1. Re:you can't "just" recycle them by Chris+Pimlott · · Score: 1

      Ie, you can't "just" throw them out, even into the recycle bin at the end of your driveway...at least, not in most municpalities. You're not supposed to dispose of batteries as part of regular trash, regardless of whether they're lead-acid car batteries, lithium, alkaline, etc.

      You can in Cleveland, at least for regular alkalines.

  29. Isn't "21st Century" kinda 20th century lingo? by SlappyBastard · · Score: 1

    To paraphrase Vince Lombardi: next time you make it to the future, act like you've been there before.

    Wouldn't it have been cooler had they done something badass? Or even interesting? Christ, I want to find a quick way to hack these and run around fucking them up on news racks!

    It's sooooo frickin juvenile to have an obnoxious blinking thing saying "Welcome to the 21st Century".

    Really?

    I'm sorry you missed out on the last eight years. You're gonna be absolutely fucking horrified to see what has happened since.

    --
    I scream. You scream. I assume that means we're both acquainted with the problem. We proceed.
  30. Any still left in stores? by heroine · · Score: 1

    Assuming you can still find a bookstore, who on earth would still have this one in stock?

  31. about time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Print materials have always had too much substance and not enough flash...it's about time they stepped into the 21st century.

  32. Why e-ink? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    An LCD clock costing a few $ can run for over a year on one or two watch batteries, so how is using e-ink better if it can only last a few months with 6?

    Does the larger area use that much more power? Is it cheaper than LCD? Safer? More durable? Or just more buzzwordy?

    BTW, is this magazine a cheap way to get 6 2016 batteries?

    1. Re:Why e-ink? by Bobartig · · Score: 1

      It's $6. How much does a 2016 go for?

      --
      This is where I get my recommended daily allowance of "Foot in Mouth."
    2. Re:Why e-ink? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      50-80 cents US, but that doesn't include shipping.

  33. Congratulations! by Bananatree3 · · Score: 1

    You just summerized "high-tech" advertising for the next 50 years! May I ask, where did you get your crystal ball?

  34. a business idea by n3r0.m4dski11z · · Score: 0

    write a comic where a guy reads slashdot and then the next panel slashdot comment is acted out. for instance

    "The same reason we recycle our electronics through free programs instead of burying them in the backyard (well technically the fee is paid at point-of-sale)."

    theres a panel with that comment on the screen and then the next panel has a guy burying pcs in the yard and he says, hey lou! your doing it wrong!

    --
    -
  35. Re:? by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 2, Funny

    Well, for centuries brave men and women were trained in the arcane arts. Each spend decades learning how to fight the evils that lay beneat. But then there was a budget cut...

  36. They're happy to have you hack it by billstewart · · Score: 4, Informative

    Their website says they'd be interested to see what people do hacking it, and if you do something cool, please let them know. They say that it wasn't particularly designed to be easy to hack, and they don't know how, so you'll have to figure it out for yourself, but have fun.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:They're happy to have you hack it by bluefloyd8 · · Score: 1

      It isnt hard to hack. But like someone said above, there is nothing you can do with it except change the speed that the segments change. Weeee!

  37. Agreed. by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1

    I was able to get the video working.

    This looks about as cool finding one of those floppy records designed for a needle turntable inside a computer magazine. No. Wait. I actually remember being pretty darn jazzed about that, since that was a period when you had to key programs in by hand and the magazines published miles of BASIC code. It was novel AND useful.

    Sorry, big, slick magazine publisher. Nice try, but perhaps you should have waited until your 80th anniversary.

    -FL

  38. More details by tehaynes · · Score: 5, Informative

    When I first read the Engadget post about the magazine being available I knew I would be driving around all day to find a copy that I could hack. I finally got a few copies and ripped one to shreds as soon as I got home.

    Firstly, they did not use the active matrix version of the E-Ink display. It is a segmented version. This means that you can not make it do kindle like things. You must use the existing segments. The magazine contains two of these 2x5" displays. The cover display has 11 segments while the inside display has 3. They are both black and 'white' (aka grey) displays although several shades seem possible by varying the switch voltage timing. The color areas are created with a transparent overlay that, of course, is always present.

    (Note: These probably do not match the CN1 and CN2 pin outs)
    COVER DISPLAY SEGMENTS
    1. "THE 21ST CENTURY"
    2. "BEGINS"
    3. 1st box after "BEGINS"
    4. 2nd box after "BEGINS"
    5. 3rd box after "BEGINS"
    6. Both boxes (left and right) of "NOW"
    7. "NOW"
    8. The circle arrow
    9. Bottom box 1
    10. Bottom box 2
    12. Bottom box 3

    INNER DISPLAY SEGMENTS
    1. Left side + 2 of 6 'wheel' segments on both 'wheels'
    2. Middle + 2 of 6 'wheel' segments on both 'wheels'
    3. Right side + 2 of 6 'wheel' segments on both 'wheels'

    The cover display uses a 12 line ribbon connector while the inner display uses a 6 line ribbon with only 4 lines that are completed. One line on each display is a common connection while the others are simple on/off lines.

    THE ELECTRONICS
    The circuit board is very simple with only a few components. There are six CR2016 3V batteries, 2 connectors, 2 HEF4094BT 8 stage shift-and-store bus register chips, 1 12F629 Flash based 8bit CMOS microcontroller, 26 resistors, 2 capacitors and 3 transistors. The 12F629 controls 3 transistors that drive the STROBE, DATA and CLOCK pins, at 15v, of the HEF4094BTs. The HEF4094BTs are connected in a cascade fashion to provide 16 latching registers that directly drive the EInk displays.

    WHAT DOES IT ALL DO?
    The Batteries:
    5 of the 6 batteries (B1-B5) are connected in series to provide the 15v driver voltage that is used to change the segments from black to white and back. The other battery (B6) supplies the 3 volts needed to run the microcontroller. The B1-B5 series and B6 both share a common ground.

    The PIC
    U1 is the Microcontroller. This device controls the sequence of the changes.
    Pin 1 is Vdd (+3vdc).
    C1 is used as a noise filter for the power.
    Pin 2 is not used.
    Pin 3 is not used.
    Pin 4 is used for initial programming only.
    Pin 5 drives Q3 through R5.
    This drives the U3 and U3 STROBE (STR) lines causing the shift register data to be stored in the storage register.
    Pin 6 drives Q2 through R3.
    This drives the U2 and U3 CLOCK (CP) lines which allows serial programming of each register bit prior to storage.
    Pin 7 drives Q1 through R1.
    This drives the U2 DATA (S) line. U3 Data is connected to the O's (PIN 10) of U2 which is a serial output.
    pin 8 is Vss(GND).

    The Transistors
    Q1 drives the DATA (D) line of U2 and is driven by U1 Pin 7.
    Q2 drives the CLOCK (CP) lines of U2 and U3 and is driven by U1 Pin 6.
    Q3 drives the STROBE (STR) lines of U2 and U3 and is driven by U1 pin 5.
    Q1-Q3 base pins are connected to common ground.
    R1,3,5 are used for current limiting to protect U1 outputs.
    R2,4,6 are pull-up resistors for Q1-3 causing
    the output to be 15V when off and ground when on. C3 is a noise filter for the pull-up power rail.

    The Shift Registers
    U1 and U2 drive the displays. They are programmed by U1 via a serial bus. The parallel outputs we'll look at from the perspective of the CN1 and CN2 connectors. These work as a marching train of bits. When the clock goes HI all bits are shifted right and the first one is set the whatever DA

    1. Re:More details by Sj0 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      +1, (Only relevant information in entire thread)

      --
      It's been a long time.
    2. Re:More details by slapout · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "six CR2016"

      How much did the magazine cost? It may have been worth the price just to get those batteries.

      http://www.radioshack.com/product/index.jsp?productId=2062103&cp=&kw=CR2016&parentPage=search

      --
      Coder's Stone: The programming language quick ref for iPad
    3. Re:More details by tehaynes · · Score: 1

      $6. The regular Esquire price is $4 for this 200 page book of ads. They marked it up $2 for the special edition.

    4. Re:More details by mako1138 · · Score: 1

      Nice work. I've wanted to get my hands on an e-ink display for some time, even if it's just a segment display, so I guess I'll check this out.

    5. Re:More details by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not entirely worth it. A quick eBay search suggests you can get about a dozen CR2016 cells on the dollar, if not cheaper.

    6. Re:More details by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can get grey by not driving it to full black. There's a V*t response as you move from white to black (it's non-linear) so by setting a segment to 15V for less than full time you get an intermediate value. If you look carefully at what the display is doing it's got four levels: white, black and two intermediate grey levels.

    7. Re:More details by Eccohawk · · Score: 1

      $5.99

  39. Obligatory "you must be new here"... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Read"? "Article"? This is Slashdot! Blasphemy!

  40. Make your own driver circuit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Two questions:
    1) Is the magazine available in Australia yet?
    2) Is the e-ink film separable from the segmented driver circuitry, presumably printed on a flexible PCB? If it is then you could slap the film on your own PCB with your own circuit and have seven segment, bar graphs...basically make your own e-ink equivalent of an LCD display like the ones used in home weather stations and the like.

  41. In Soviet Russia... by todrules · · Score: 1

    In Soviet Russia, magazines take YOU apart!

    1. Re:In Soviet Russia... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FFS, if you are going to do an unfunny ISR joke, can you at least the proper form?

  42. Recycling sucks! by Simonetta · · Score: 1, Informative

    I live near two little restaurants in Portland Oregon USA (the recycling capital of the USA). Every morning there are SIX loud 'big green trucks' that pull up next to my apartment between 5 and 7AM every single day to pick up the recycling. Three trucks for each restaurant: one for glass, one for paper, one for compost. Each loud truck with huge diesels shake the buildings of the entire apartment complex. We complain, but as typical of white-working-class people, the garbage drivers and managers just don't care. Pure redneck 'get 'er done, get 'er done...loud and proud' mentality is a true pain for really-productive people.

        Recycling sucks. It is a sop to the upper-middle-class. The energy expended by driving all the extra 'big green trucks' around to pick up this stuff exceeds the energy saved by having the garbage go to different sections of the landfill. Recycling was a bold idea in the 1970s, it's obsolete now.

        Recycling will only start to make sense in the era of $4.50/gallon diesel when people start bringing empty containers to the food store and refilling them with food. Things like thick, double-ply sugar bags and soy-sauce containers could be reused ten times

    1. Re:Recycling sucks! by roaddemon · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you're going to make a controversial statement like the energy cost of recycling is higher than disposing, please back it up with references.

      Here's something I found about the energy benefits of recycling. From http://ohioline.osu.edu/cd-fact/0108.html.

      "Energy

      Recycling aluminum requires 95 percent less energy than producing aluminum from bauxite ore. Making paper from recycled stock requires 64 percent less energy than using wood pulp. Containers made from recycled plastic save up to 60 percent of the energy required to make the same product from virgin material. Recycled ferrous scrap consumes 75 percent less energy than new ore. Virtually every material recycled uses less energy than using virgin materials. How much energy is this? Using and discarding just two aluminum cans in one day uses more energy than is used daily by each of a billion people in less developed countries. The average saving, however, does not include added energy costs of collection and transportation. "

    2. Re:Recycling sucks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Have you tried reading your own references?

      "The average saving, however, does not include added energy costs of collection and transportation."

    3. Re:Recycling sucks! by tholomyes · · Score: 1

      Classist much?

      Anyhow, I found it interesting that as of March 2007, the city of Portland requires "all residential garbage and recycling haulers in Portland to use B20 (20 percent biodiesel blend fuel)," which is the blend that the city has been using in all of its own diesel vehicles since 2004.

      I don't know if this applies to the commercial garbage haulers as well, though.

      --
      When did the future switch from being a promise to a threat? -C. Palahniuk
  43. If they wanted to sell more magazines to geeks.... by pandrijeczko · · Score: 1

    ...then how about just putting "T'Pol & 7 of 9 in naked shaving foam waterbed romp inside" in black ink on the cover.

    --
    Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
  44. Obligatory by NotPeteMcCabe · · Score: 1

    No wi-fi. Less space than a Nomad. Lame.

  45. Microchip beauty.. ahh...... by axlr8or · · Score: 0

    the 12f629 has a bigger brother. 12f675. For 8 pins these things are awesome little computers, and can do quite a bit. It's funny how much you can get out of one when even Microchip's website says you should 'go bigger'. I love Microchip products, although I want to try some other vendors. The thing is, Microchip products are so well documented, I actually taught myself to program microcontrollers just reading their documentation. Ah, I could go on and on. I have about 30 of em sitting up stairs for my next engine computer... Ah..

  46. Re:? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't wait till encyclopedias implement this! The article on Schroedinger's cat could use a "is <blink>not</blink> dead".

    (heh, captcha for this post was 'spooky')