Slashdot Mirror


LHC Flips On Tomorrow

BTJunkie writes "The Large Hadron Collider, the worlds most expensive science experiment, is set to be turned on tomorrow. We've discussed this multiple times already. A small group of people believe our world will be sucked into extinction (some have even sent death threats). The majority of us, however, won't be losing any sleep tonight." Reader WillRobinson notes that CERN researchers declared the final synchronization test a success and says, "The first attempt to circulate a beam in the LHC will be made this Wednesday, Sept. 10 at the injection energy of 450 GeV (0.45 TeV). The start up time will be between (9:00 to 18:00 Zurich Time) (2:00 to 10:00 CDT) with live webcasts provided at webcast.cern.ch."

526 comments

  1. Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by Drakin020 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I thought tomorrow was when they turned it on. I thought the end of the world was to happen when the first collision is made right?

    --
    The greatest revenge in life is massive success.
    1. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by AKAImBatman · · Score: 5, Funny

      Correct. No boom today. Boom tomorrow. Always boom tomorrow.

    2. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by Akaihiryuu · · Score: 4, Informative

      I don't understand the whole "miniature black hole" thing. I think the naysayers have just been reading too much sci-fi. Microscopic black holes would evaporate in a very small amount of time due to Hawking radiation...they would leave a detectable energy signature so that we could tell they were there, but that's about it. The LHC won't be doing anything that isn't already happening in the upper atmosphere due to cosmic rays anyway.

    3. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One 'expert' put the delay between the test and when the world goes bye bye to be ~ 4 years. So sometime in 2012 would be the end for us.

    4. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *applauds*

    5. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by Paul+Pierce · · Score: 3, Funny

      The LHC won't be doing anything that isn't already happening in the upper atmosphere due to cosmic rays anyway.

      This is true, but what if watching what is going on - changes what happens? Isn't this one of the mysteries of quantum physics?

    6. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by g0bshiTe · · Score: 2, Funny

      Clearly this should be a larger event than the Blackhole of Goatse

      --
      I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
    7. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by chissg · · Score: 5, Informative

      No boom tomorrow either:

      "First beam circulated" != "First collisions"

      Also, beam will be circulated at injection energy (450GeV) and not accelerated to the design collision energy. Even if they did circulate beam in both directions *and collide them* (a separate activity) the total energy of collision would still be less that half of what the tevatron at Fermilab, USA, has been doing for many years. If *that* were a problem we'd already be

    8. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      ...but what if watching what is going on - changes what happens?

      Only if the LHC is propelling cats.

    9. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by nawcom · · Score: 1, Funny

      Microscopic black holes would evaporate in a very small amount of time due to Hawking radiation...they would leave a detectable energy signature so that we could tell they were there, but that's about it.

      I'm sorry, I can't stop laughing when someone references Hawking radiation; I immediately think of Stephen ripping a cute sounding fart and everyone running out of the room due to the overwhelming odor - and then speaking in his computer synthesized voice, "Pardon me. I never can control those unexpected SbDs."

    10. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      You won't get your crazy-ass ideas in the science "journalism" (and I use the word "journalism" very liberally here) sections of news sites and papers if you say "Well, you know, there are various phenomena in the observable universe that can already collide subatomic particles at the insane energy levels we're going to be using."

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    11. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by dominux · · Score: 0

      the ones which may be occurring in the upper atmosphere are moving quite fast. Quite fast enough to escape the Earth, even if that means flying right through it (they probably won't hit anything on the way through, they are that small.) The LHC ones would be at rest, relative to the Earth, they would not escape, They would fall down to the centre of the Earth and oscillate about inside, perhaps eating the occasional atom that they score a direct hit on, or merging with other small black holes. Of course if the theory is right they would last a fraction of a nanosecond before evaporating. If they theory is wrong and a sustainable small black hole is generated that can eat atoms faster than it can evaporate then we could be in a spot of bother. A very very small spot of bother. All of us.

    12. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by CorSci81 · · Score: 5, Funny

      The Large Hairball Collider?

    13. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by omnivagus · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It's an odd coincidence that Dan Simmons, in his Hyperion Cantos series of books, talks about an event called the "Big Mistake of '08" where humanity creates a tiny black hole during a scientific experiment, eventually leading to the destruction of Earth... Of course he doesn't say which century this was in ;-)

    14. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by Directrix1 · · Score: 4, Funny

      With any luck these tests will finally let Schrodinger's cat rest in peace. Never again having to exist in the zombirific dead and alive state.

      --
      Occam's razor is the blind faith in the natural selection of least resistance and in universal oversimplification. -- EF
    15. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by timholman · · Score: 5, Informative

      I don't understand the whole "miniature black hole" thing. I think the naysayers have just been reading too much sci-fi. Microscopic black holes would evaporate in a very small amount of time due to Hawking radiation...they would leave a detectable energy signature so that we could tell they were there, but that's about it. The LHC won't be doing anything that isn't already happening in the upper atmosphere due to cosmic rays anyway.

      One of the main fearmongers concerning the LHC is Otto Rossler. He's a 68-year-old biochemist whose initial career was respected and conventional, but in recent years has veered into promoting his own "Theory of Everything" that contradicts the Theory of Relativity. According to Rossler, (a) Hawking radiation doesn't exist, and (b) microscopic black holes created by cosmic rays are moving so fast that they pass right through the earth, whereas LHC black holes will be trapped by earth's gravity and destroy the planet.

      What's really happening is that Rossler and others like him are using the LHC as a soapbox to promote their particular brands of pseudoscience. From what I've read, any debate with Rossler quickly leads to him promoting his own pet theories, rather than any rational examination of the risks.

    16. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      ...I immediately think of Stephen ripping a cute sounding fart...

      ...

      ...Wow, I think this is the first time I've genuinely been weirded out by someone on Slashdot... Um, congrats?

    17. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by chihowa · · Score: 5, Funny

      If *that* were a problem we'd already be

      Oh crap, it was a problem!

      --
      If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
    18. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by philspear · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Microscopic black holes would evaporate in a very small amount of time due to Hawking radiation..

      Are you willing to gamble the existence of the universe on that untested hypothesis? Yes?

      By the way, every biology article gets tagged "whatcouldpossiblygowrong?" An article showing that artificial DNA self-associates was tagged that. No chance of killer viruses from that, yet it got the tag. Here we have a scientific study with some people actually claiming it will end the earth. They may be idiots, but people who worry about DNA strands creating vampires like in I am legend are just as idiotic. What gives?

      I personally say it's only because no movies have yet taken the idea of LHC and mangled it into nonsense to use as a plot device the way they've used killer artificial viruses. And that's probably only because "complete oblitheration of the world" is a pretty boring plot.

    19. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by fermion · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The naysayers retort is that no one ever has seen Hawking radiation. My retort is that we are afraid that a black hole, which is only a theoretical construct that requires that certain constructs go to infinity, is not being evaporated by Hawking radiation, which coincidentally is another theoretical construct which requires theoretical virtual particles to theoretically become real. If one fanciful theoretical object cannot be eliminated by another fanciful theoretical object, then all my education through bad science fiction is for naught. In the end, right before we are destroyed, we can take solace in knowing two things. First, that black holes are real. Second, that Hawking radiation is not. Sometimes scientific proof comes at a great price.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    20. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by TheDauthi · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The fear is that the LHC is doing one thing differently - any black holes created in the upper atmosphere would have a velocity approaching that of light, and pass harmlessly through the earth, grabbing a proton or two on the way. At the LHC, it's possible that some of the holes created would have a much lower velocity - less than escape velocity. Those holes wouldn't just leave earth, they'd stick around.

      First, we actually have to be in the right range to create the black holes. This is very, very unlikely - it requires large extra dimensions, something allowed for but not expected in theory.

      Then there's Hawking radiation. While there's no reason to believe it doesn't exist (and several to believe it does), it hasn't been experimentally verified. If it doesn't exist, or if a black hole radiates much slower than expected, any created holes could survive long enough to actually absorb more matter.

      This PDF has the interesting math behind all of this.

      Note: No, I'm not even saying they're right. I'm simply stating what their argument is for it. There's a lot of problems with those arguments, and I'm on the "destroy the world? Yeah, right?" side. I'm actually having an LHC get-together tomorrow night, and plan to have an Mad Scientist "End of the World" party on October 21, when they're having the first high-energy collisions.

    21. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by dknj · · Score: 1

      looks like they started the test a little bit early. i didn't expect the black hole to reach here for at least another hour

    22. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by sexconker · · Score: 2, Funny

      No - the scientists would poke at it and huddle around it and such like idiots.

      Let's poke it with tiny probes and see what happens.

      It grows.

      Let's spray some water at it and watch the mist get sucked in.

      It grows.

      Let's put our faces near it and watch it stretch our lips and ears out.

      It swallows a scientist, and grows.

    23. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by flosofl · · Score: 4, Funny

      With any luck these tests will finally let Schrodinger's cat rest in peace. Never again having to exist in the zombirific dead and alive state.

      With the speeds involved I think it's safe to say it will exist as a thin film of... cat. 27km long.

      --
      "This calls for a very special blend of psychology and extreme violence" - Vyvyan "The Young Ones"
    24. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by vertinox · · Score: 1

      I thought tomorrow was when they turned it on. I thought the end of the world was to happen when the first collision is made right?

      According to wiki it says the first collisions are supposed to happen on October 21st, but it references a russian website so I don't know how accurate that is.

      Anyone got any sources on this?

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    25. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by GayBliss · · Score: 1

      Hawking radiation and microscopic black holes are theories that are based mostly on conjecture and calculations that fit a given model. Although I agree with you that the mini black hole thing is probably nothing to worry about, I think the chances of something more interesting happening are just a bit greater than what you imply. But I still won't be losing any sleep over it.

    26. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by jgarra23 · · Score: 1

      Does anyone know how quickly the end of the world is supposed to happen assuming these people are right? Will I have time for one last doobie?

    27. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by kylemonger · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't understand the whole "miniature black hole" thing. I think the naysayers have just been reading too much sci-fi. Microscopic black holes would evaporate in a very small amount of time due to Hawking radiation.

      Yes, if Hawking is right about the radiation. But suppose he's wrong? Or worse, suppose in our attempt to recreate conditions similar to those around the time of the Big Bang, we actually recreate the Big Bang? That's one answer to the Fermi Paradox.

    28. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by atlastiamborn · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well, it's true what they say: "longcat is long".

      --
      I never apologize. I'm sorry, but that's just the way I am.
    29. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no. it will probably be 27mm. see this

    30. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by asCii88 · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's exactly what I was going to say. And I will also add:

      "Collisions" != "Boom"

      But I think I'll still be flagged as Redundant

    31. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by 7+digits · · Score: 5, Funny

      The guy in http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lt1Yo610lG0 explains it all.

      Yes, it is a STARGATE TO HELL ! Doom fans, rejoice ! Happy ! Happy !

    32. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Even if they don't evaporate, black holes don't produce a stronger gravitational field than other objects of the same mass. As long as the law of conservation of matter holds (or even if the amount of matter in the LHC triples) we should be fine.

    33. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Physics is always more fun when cats are involved. /me readies his catapult

      FOR SCIENCE!!!

    34. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by natebarney · · Score: 1

      Well, 709 did say that Earth is a Type 13 planet.

    35. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by TheDauthi · · Score: 1

      The first high energy collisions are on October 21st. They're just running the first full tests, the first circulation of a beam tomorrow.

    36. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've never before seen Stephen Hawking fanfiction. I think I could have happily gone my entire life without thinking those three words together.

    37. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Also, 450GeV is 7E-8 joules, or just enough to power a 60W bulb for 1 billionth of a second. Still scared?

    38. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by vena · · Score: 4, Informative

      wikipedia is wrong or was edited for hilarity. in the books, it's actually "big mistake of '38"

    39. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is very improbable that a miniature black hole created in these collisions is static, meaning it would escape the orbit in the same way black holes of cosmic rays might do.

      Wonder what is a way to even detect them in case of no Hawking radiation...

    40. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by omnivagus · · Score: 3, Informative

      wikipedia is wrong or was edited for hilarity. in the books, it's actually "big mistake of '38"

      Actually, I performed that edit, but it's the '38 that's wrong. I was just reading The Rise of Endymion last night, and it clearly says "Big Mistake of '08", page 92, near the bottom. And that's coming from the AI on the Consul's ship, so it ought to be reliable ;-)

    41. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by repvik · · Score: 1

      The last history entry:
      (cur) (last) 22:27, 9 September 2008 129.2.164.149 (Talk) (33,014 bytes) (Changed "Big Mistake of '38" to "Big Mistake of '08" which actually appears in the novels.) (undo)

      Who am I to trust? ;)

    42. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by budgenator · · Score: 1

      Some how I can't imagine anything with 1TeV of Kinetic energy being thought of at rest in any frame of reference; black hole or otherwise.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    43. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by budgenator · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Does he explain how a proton is going to acquire enough mass into a small enough radius to turn into a blackhole without using lorenz transformations, E=mC^2 and relativistic weirdness?

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    44. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by Kozar_The_Malignant · · Score: 2, Funny

      From what I've read, any debate with Rossler quickly leads to him promoting his own pet theories, rather than any rational examination of the risks.

      No, no, you don't understand. Nutcases like this know that a thorough understanding of their enlightened pseudoscience is fundamental to any rational examination of the risks. They're trying to help you. Really.

      --
      Some mornings it's hardly worth chewing through the restraints to get out of bed.
    45. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by Linker3000 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Big ba-da-boom

      --
      AT&ROFLMAO
    46. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by JebusIsLord · · Score: 1

      Packed into a single proton?? Yep, a little scared.

      --
      Jeremy
    47. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...but what if watching what is going on - changes what happens?

      Only if the LHC is propelling cats.

      Yes, the heisenberg uncertainty landon hadron collider.
      I call it the HULHC (hulk) HAHA

    48. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by Sj0 · · Score: 0

      The event horizon of a black hole is proportional to the mass of the black hole. A black hole with the mass of mount everest would have an event horizon of less than a nanometer. A black hole with the mass of a single particle, which is what we'd be creating, would have an event horizon approaching no size at all.

      And scientists wouldn't be able to do anything with a black hole even if one were to be created by the lhc. Besides the infintesimal size, How would you hold it? A black hole has no charge, no magnetic field, only a gravity and a rotation. It's a singularity, which means all the forces which normally keep matter from imploding onto itself have been overcome.

      --
      It's been a long time.
    49. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by RDW · · Score: 4, Funny

      I like Terry Pratchett's take on this sort of 'low risk' experiment (from 'The Science of Discworld'):

      "Well ... in the unlikely event of it going seriously wrong, it ... wouldn't just blow up the university, sir."

      "What would it blow up, pray?"

      "Er ... everything, sir."

      "Everything there is, you mean?"

      "Within a radius of about fifty thousand miles out into space, sir, yes. According to Hex it'd happen instantaneously. We wouldn't even know about it."

      "And the odds of this are...?"

      "About fifty to one, sir."

      The wizards relaxed.

      "That's pretty safe. I wouldn't bet on a horse at those odds," said the Senior Wrangler.

    50. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by Sj0 · · Score: 1

      The effective volume of a miniature black hole, the event horizon, would be like an atom compared to mount everest. Even if we were to create such a thing, what are the odds that it would actually be capable of grabbing enough matter to be a problem within the lifetime of the solar system?

      --
      It's been a long time.
    51. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by mrslacker · · Score: 1

      Worked for Douglas Adams :p

    52. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by budgenator · · Score: 1

      Dude the difference in classical velocity between a comic ray particle and a LHC proton is negligible, in fact one might expect that half of the cosmic ray are approaching the Earth as it recedes from the rays direction of travel and therefore would be going slower, than rays approaching the other side. A bad analogy would be considering the difference in damage caused by getting shot in the head by a rifle bullet while your running away from it as opposed to running towards it, which would be the cosmic rays vs. shooting yourself in the head with a rifle your carrying while running, which would be a LHC proton/mini-blackhole.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    53. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by Sj0 · · Score: 1

      Rather, it's volume compared to an atom would be like an atom compared to mount everest.

      I'm sort of wondering what the effects of subatomic scale gravitational forces would be. Maybe we'd see an atom torn apart if such a black hole ever managed to graze one?

      --
      It's been a long time.
    54. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Whoosh.

      Also - it's not a singularity.

    55. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by TheNarrator · · Score: 4, Funny

      I kind of like this LHC doom.

      It's not the kind of doom where people tell you the best thing you can do about it is to buy MREs, take a gun out into the mountains, bug out and prepare to defend your MREs from hungry zombies for the next six months.

      Personally, I think the best response is probably PANIC SEX!!!

    56. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by Sj0 · · Score: 1

      "general relativity describes a black hole as a region of empty space with a pointlike singularity at the center and an event horizon at the outer edge".

      And if Hawking radiation doesn't exist, then that's the only description we've got.

      --
      It's been a long time.
    57. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      its the big mistake of '38, actually

    58. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by maxume · · Score: 1

      Do you mean starting from when you posted your comment or starting from when you find out that the world ain't gonna be here no more?

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    59. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by syousef · · Score: 1

      Moderation sucks. This should be moderated.

      Moderate: +5: Quoted Susan Ivanova. or +5: Babylon 5 reference.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    60. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by vrjim · · Score: 1

      It will actually take a few years for it to reach full potential.

    61. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Will I have time for one last doobie?

      The safest thing to do is *always* skin up whenever that question arises; that way there's a good chance you'll be smoking when whatever it is that we were discussing happens, if it happens...

    62. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by Metasquares · · Score: 4, Funny

      No, that one was using 32 bit variables for Unix timestamps.

    63. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by Caraig · · Score: 1

      I personally say it's only because no movies have yet taken the idea of LHC and mangled it into nonsense to use as a plot device the way they've used killer artificial viruses. And that's probably only because "complete oblitheration of the world" is a pretty boring plot.

      You might be surprised....

      --
      "I am an Adept of Tantric VAX."
    64. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by Caraig · · Score: 1

      It's interesting to point out that there are some physicists who believe that a very tiny black hole is, in fact, in the center of Earth. Very tiny.

      I'm not sure how that works out with the 'crush all matter beyond recognizability inside it's event horizon' thing, but, well, there you go.

      --
      "I am an Adept of Tantric VAX."
    65. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by Tmack · · Score: 4, Interesting

      No boom tomorrow either:

      "First beam circulated" != "First collisions"

      I duno, when the beam needs a Dump Block consisting of an 8M long, 10ton graphite rod encased in 1000 tons of concrete, and even then has to be directed around in a pattern to keep from burning through it because it is "capable of melting a 500-kilogram block of copper," Id say boom possible, but not likely. I just wouldnt want to be in the tunnels with something like that racing around held in place by magnets, if one nearby turns off, BOOM you either turn into the incredible hulk, get zapped off to another world or simply vaporized like that 500kg block of copper.

      tm

      --
      Support TBI Research: http://www.raisinhope.org
    66. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by Caraig · · Score: 1

      KLAATU, BARADA! NIK-*cough*cough*cough*

      *shlurrrrp....*

      --
      "I am an Adept of Tantric VAX."
    67. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by k_187 · · Score: 1

      Or there are multiple Big Mistakes

      --
      11 was a racehorse
      12 was 12
      1111 Race
      12112
    68. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by Caraig · · Score: 1

      So you mean tomorrow isn't Resonance Cascade Day?

      Aw, man. I'd gotten lambda-shaped doughnuts for nothing, then; they're not gonna keep till 21 October....

      --
      "I am an Adept of Tantric VAX."
    69. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by TheDauthi · · Score: 1

      A single proton in the LHC, yes. The LHC will be colliding two protons with approximately the same momentum. It's an inelastic collision. The... coefficient of restitution, I think it's called, varies depending on several factors, but there can be rare cases where the resultant particles are low-velocity.

    70. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by TheDauthi · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It would take an absurdly long time for it to get to a macroscopic scale. Just because it's a black hole doesn't mean it's going to just suck everything up. In fact, if it were a charged, stable, non-massive black hole, it can go for quite some time without absorbing matter, simply because of how weak gravity is compared to the other forces. The gravity of a single proton is still going very weak compared to that of its charge.

    71. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by geniusj · · Score: 1

      Indubitably.

    72. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by omnivagus · · Score: 1

      Yeah, at least it's good to know that the Big Mistakes of '00 and '04 didn't cause enough lasting damage to make it into the long-term record books. Guess that means things are going to get better!

    73. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by TheDauthi · · Score: 1

      Actually, it would have a charge, and probably a magnetic field.

    74. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      The guy in http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lt1Yo610lG0 [youtube.com] explains it all.

      That ... that was incredible. I can't figure out whether his performance was a parody, or if he is truly the most messed-up conspiracy theorist of all time ...

    75. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by TheDauthi · · Score: 1

      Probably very little, for a very long time. Gravity is overwhelmed by the other forces at that level, and atoms are mostly empty space. It would spend a very long time going from "smaller than the constituent quarks of a proton" to "The size of a nucleus of an atom".

    76. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      loser

    77. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by c6gunner · · Score: 2, Funny

      Moderation sucks. This should be moderated.

      Moderate: +5: Quoted Susan Ivanova. or +5: Babylon 5 reference.

      The avalanche has already started. It is too late for the pebbles to vote.

    78. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by Spazntwich · · Score: 0, Troll

      Question to mods: Why is someone explaining a joke modded to +5 funny?

      He explicitly stated what the parent post already obviously implied. No joke extension. Where is the humor?

    79. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by bugeaterr · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Mod the above as +10 Informative since most news outlets completely missed this point in their coverage.

      The *actual* doomsday will occur when the first collisions occur in one to two months.

      Much cooler than a black hole would be Death By Strangelet

    80. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by USN1985 · · Score: 1

      So tomorrow is or isn't doomsday if it fails to go as planned?

    81. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by fishbowl · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I always ask for the CV of whoever calls Sen. Obama "inexperienced."
      They always make excuses, rather than disclose their own position from which they criticize.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    82. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by budgenator · · Score: 1

      Ahh good point, I guess we would have to shoot yourselves with two guns and have the bullets collide inside our brain to make a proper bad analogy out of it.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    83. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by c6gunner · · Score: 0, Troll

      Uhm, in case you haven't noticed, I'm not running for president.

      Your argument is just silly. According to that line of logic, I couldn't question some homeless guy's qualifications to be the head of CERN, since I'm not a scientist. It's a logical fallacy of the highest order.

    84. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by Sj0 · · Score: 1

      Care to elaborate with something other than "it would, and probably"?

      If no electromagnetic effects such as light could escape a black hole, how could it have an effective charge?

      --
      It's been a long time.
    85. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by DamienNightbane · · Score: 1

      This must be Tuesday, I never could get the hang of Tuesdays.

    86. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 0

      Only if the LHC is propelling cats.

      Ha ha, funnee. U not even no how many times kitteh heerz dat one.

      U be caful tho, maybe i haz last laf!

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    87. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by Panaflex · · Score: 1

      No... think of two cars going near the speed of light... :-P

      --
      I said no... but I missed and it came out yes.
    88. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      "'Scuse me Egon? You said crossing the streams was bad!"

    89. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by hardburn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Don't say that. Just keep quiet and when we're all still alive on Thursday, the naysayers will just go away.

      --
      Not a typewriter
    90. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by writermike · · Score: 1

      Microscopic black holes would evaporate in a very small amount of time due to Hawking radiation...

      The router I just purchased can kill black holes?!

      DAAAYMN! Dat shit is craazee. Eat it Linksys.

      --
      If Nalgene water bottles are outlawed, only outlaws will have Nalgene water bottles.
    91. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by Detritus · · Score: 1

      I didn't know that one person could have so many crackpot ideas.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    92. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by zerocool^ · · Score: 1

      Video of the Large Hairball Collider in beta testing available here:
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lHnuo17dsBQ

      --
      sig?
    93. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by TheDauthi · · Score: 1

      Electromagnetic -effects- can't. Virtual particles can. Or, if you prefer, the electromagnetic field itself extends throughout spacetime, but the excitation of that field is limited by the speed of light. The field can propogate (but not carry information according to relativity). Vaguely similar to the explanation of why inflation theory doesn't violate relativity. The maybe is because science isn't sure, actually.

    94. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by reverseengineer · · Score: 4, Informative

      A counter to the argument that any subatomic black holes the LHC produces would behave differently than those produced in cosmic ray collisions in the upper atmosphere is the existence of neutron stars. Cosmic rays are constantly colliding with these objects as well.

      Neutron stars present a gravity well surpassed only by that of black holes, so even subatomic black holes moving at relativistic velocities are likely to be pulled in. The densities of neutron stars are such that if it is indeed possible for a subatomic black hole to grow to macroscale by encountering nearby matter, there would be no place likelier. After billions of years of cosmic ray bombardment, one should expect at the very least to find lots of black holes with masses between the Chandrasehkar and Tolman-Oppenheimer-Volkoff limits (roughly, between 1.4 and 3.0 solar masses), implying that these events are the ultimate fate of neutron stars.

      That is not what is observed however; there are in fact no known black holes with masses in that regime, while there are a lot of neutron stars. And it would take much longer than the current lifetime of the universe for a 2 solar mass black hole to evaporate by Hawking radiation, so if they were ever made, they should still be around.

      So either subatomic black holes are not produced in energetic collisions of cosmic rays, which is good news because those energies are far greater than what the LHC will produce, or subatomic black holes very, very rarely or never survive to consume massive objects, which is also good news.

      --
      "FDA staff reviewers expressed concern about the number of patients who were left out of the study because they died."
    95. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by The+Master+Control+P · · Score: 1

      Actually they can have a charge. As charge must be conserved and (to our knowledge) black holes don't get an exception, any net charge that falls into a black hole must manifest as the hole having a charge.

      There are 4 'classes' of black hole, rotating or non-rotating and charged or non-charged.

    96. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its because the expireiment is designed to figure out why the anit-matter decomposes so quickly, or what anti matter is. They expect that the energy created will be sufficiant enough to expose tiny particles never studied before. Its got to do with the laws of physics- every reaction has an oposite reaction stuff... In some advanced reactions there is a lack of opposite, and this expirement is trying to find out why. Saying this, the risks are that these particles have may have a way of nuetrilizing matter, and making it disapear, not so much a black hole, rather then a explosion, or beam of matter-depleated energy or particles if you will. Black holes are still unkown and seem to eject radiation which means they may be turning pure matter into high or low energy.... These will most liekly not be made from the LHC

    97. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your description is literally ripped from a SciAm article that was explaining how the LHC works and had addressed this concern.

    98. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by Knara · · Score: 1

      Good Babylon 5 reference there.

      That series was really quotable. Dunno why I don't see more of it.

    99. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by extrasolar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Are you willing to gamble the existence of the universe on that untested hypothesis? Yes?

      Sure, you could reply to this post thinking that nothing will go wrong; but are you really willing to gamble the existence of the universe on this untested hypothesis?

      See, that's the problem with this whole line of reasoning: the idea that as the conception of danger increases, the less risk we are allowed to afford. And since everything has some risk, there is, afterall, all kinds of things we don't know anything about; and for all you know responding to this very post may bring about the end of the universe.

      But the problem is that any actual risk doesn't need to be demonstrated, and apologists are left with the burden of proving a negative: that running the LHC won't bring about the end of the universe. That's why this is a fallacy, but it works in the same way all scare campaigns work: it affects the primitive part of the brain.

    100. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Friggin hilarious, there are too few jokes made about quantum physics

    101. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by martinw89 · · Score: 1

      And this is why Youtube is an attack on my faith in humanity :(

    102. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by Setherghd · · Score: 1

      I recognize it from The Fifth Element.

    103. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by Frangible · · Score: 1
      Lost used the idea of magnetic monopoles as a science experiment gone wrong leading to an "incident" after which you have to push a button every 108 minutes or there is a "SYSTEM FAILURE" and the world ends.

      Fear not, Luddites, David Desmond Hume shall save the world for you.

    104. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What type of cats??!!

    105. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spoilers... it wasn't a mistake!

    106. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Answer from Just-Used-up-Modpoints:

      It's explained and funny to the morons that don't get the original reference. It's kinda our way of spreading our humor out to the masses.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    107. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, if would be so small it could not interact with matter before being hurled out of Earths orbit.

    108. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by master5o1 · · Score: 1

      the day the LHC comes on is the day that candlejack meme comes tr

      --
      signature is pants
    109. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by Khyber · · Score: 2, Funny

      Even I have had some crackpot ideas, some probably more fu*ked than this video. Like how we can explain past lives by analyzing the energy memory.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    110. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by tambo · · Score: 4, Funny
      Packed into a single proton?? Yep, a little scared.

      No, no, it's perfectly safe. They're just going to have Gordon move the sample into the test chamber...

      - David Stein

      --
      Computer over. Virus = very yes.
    111. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by tambo · · Score: 2, Funny
      I didn't know that one person could have so many crackpot ideas.

      Presumably you've never visited Time Cube before... it's a whole 'nother level of crazy. Just one visit will permanently destroy your ability to be surprised by anyone's level of insanity.

      - David Stein

      --
      Computer over. Virus = very yes.
    112. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by darkmeridian · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This is really the big problem here: we like to imagine black holes as object that suck everything in, but that's only true of black holes that have star-level masses. A black hole sounds impressive until you realize it could weigh as much as a proton. At that scale, it's gravitational pull isn't really going to be big enough to be a big deal on the femtoscale. And at that collapsed size, there is no reason that it will go and contact anything it can suck in.

      --
      A NYC lawyer blogs. http://www.chuangblog.com/
    113. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The world of CERN ended when Slashdot posted this topic!!

    114. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by isomeme · · Score: 1

      It's an odd coincidence that Dan Simmons, in his Hyperion Cantos series of books, talks about an event called the "Big Mistake of '08" where humanity creates a tiny black hole during a scientific experiment, eventually leading to the destruction of Earth... Of course he doesn't say which century this was in ;-)

      Yes, but it clearly wasn't 2008, as when the Big Mistake occurred, there were already thriving human colonies in several nearby star systems. (And powerful, evil AIs, but maybe we already have those...sneaky bastards, they are.)

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a skull.
    115. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Sure, you could reply to this post thinking that nothing will go wrong; but are you really willing to gamble the existence of the universe on this untested hypothesis?

      Of course. My only two options are:

      1. Look prescient
      2. Nobody will be around to point out I was wrong

      .

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    116. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by m0ve · · Score: 1

      THE END IS NEAR !

    117. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by dominux · · Score: 1

      would the black holes have all that Kinetic energy though? I thought they were to be formed by collision of two identical masses travelling at identical speeds in opposite directions. Sounds at rest to me.

    118. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by RuBLed · · Score: 1

      Because you see, the original poster lived at Geneva, the one who explained it lives at australia. I am between the two so I guess when it comes here I would

    119. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by Inzite · · Score: 1

      There was a funny Russian parody on the LHC that was published a few weeks back. It plays on the fact that the words hadron and android are very similar in Russian.

      You can find the original article at: http://vladimir.vladimirovich.ru/2008-7-9/#an2719

      Translated roughly, it reads as:

      One day Vladimir Vladimirovichâ Putin walked into the office of Vladislav Yurevich Surkov, the First Deputy Head of the Presidential Administration.
      Seated, Vladislav Yurevich moved some levers in front of a huge television . The screen showed a colossal pipe, in which stood back to back an android of Boris Gryzlov, the Speaker of the Russian Duma, and an android of Sergey Mikhailovich Mironov, the Speaker of the Federation Council.
      "Listen bro," softly asked Vladimir Vladimirovichâ, "what is that?"
      "The latest development in science," replied Vladislav Yurevich. "The Large Android Collider."
      "I myself see that it's large," stated Vladimir Vladimirovich as he curiously eyed the device. "But what's it for?"
      "To collide androids," explained Vladislav Yurevich. "I just press this red button, and they'll start to move in a circle towards each other. And then they'll collide with great energy."
      "What for?!" inquired a surprised Vladimir Vladimirovichâ.
      "Well, I was thinking...maybe we could finally produce real politics?" pensively commented Vladislav Yurevich. "Of course, there's a chance of side effects..."
      "What side effects?" worriedly asked Vladimir Vladimirovichâ.
      "I don't know," replied Vladislav Yurevich honestly. "For example, the androids could begin to replicate uncontrolledly. There would be a chain reaction. Or, for example, so-called 'strange androids' could be produced. God forbid, of course."
      "Maybe it'd be better not to use it, eh?" asked Vladimir Vladimirovichâ. "Maybe it'd be better not to collide them. You know, just to go on as things are, without politics, like we're used to..."
      "That's not interesting," inhaled Vladislav Yurevich as he reached for the big red button.
      Vladimir Vladimirovichâ closed his eyes in fear.

    120. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by wotcha · · Score: 1

      the date IS the problem 10- 09- 08.... blastoff. someone must have said this... but where... and ...wt

    121. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by jovius · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure if it's on or off. The webcast is all black.

    122. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Boom, sooner or later. BOOM! And then it'll be too late for the particles to vote.

    123. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by Ceriel+Nosforit · · Score: 2, Informative

      Nobody is in the tunnel while the beam is on, except cockroaches. Since the particles are moving in a circle they are as if accelerating constantly and consequently they as charged particles constantly give off radiation, in the gamma range somewhere. The whole tunnel is constantly bathed in lethal levels of radiation.

      --
      All rites reversed 2010
    124. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by srussia · · Score: 1

      I thought tomorrow was when they turned it on. I thought the end of the world was to happen when the first collision is made right?

      Countdown starts Wednesday (10/09/08...)

      --
      Set your phasers on "funky"!
    125. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by Sobrique · · Score: 1

      Stephen Hawking, Rule 34: Go go go.

    126. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, the first beam has circulated now, and I'm still here.

      Though I notice I can't access the video on the site -- perhaps due to heavy load; perhaps because the server has been sucked through a black hole into another plane of existence.

    127. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by Aaron+B+Lingwood · · Score: 1

      This site says it all.

      --
      [Rent This Space]
    128. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (This is not directed at you tambo, but thanks for posting this)

      I feel a bit guilty for laughing since the TimeCube guy is probably suffering from schizophrenia, but I could not help but think of some recent /. posts:

      1 side brain can't reason without the opposite side. Americans are so dumb, educated stupid and evil, they have snot for brain. Believers have snot brain. Educated have snot brain. God worship only needs a snot brain, but it takes Opposite Brain Analysis to know Harmonic Life.

      Substitute Opposite Brain Analysis with <YOUR-OPINION /> and hopefully you will get my point.

      Have a look at the other guys point of view. Perhaps he is a nutjob, but at least hear him out. You don't have to listen for a long time, but at least once a day, imagine that even though you know the earth is flat, you can choose to listen to some of the round-earth-nutters. Most of the time they will go on about Time Cubes and snot, but every now and then they will actually have something interesting to say.

    129. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by sqldr · · Score: 1

      I was wondering why a swiss person just flew past my window at light speed.

      and a cow.

      --
      I wrote my first program at the age of six, and I still can't work out how this website works.
    130. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by kylegordon · · Score: 1

      Unlikely that you'll feel much. You'll most likely be frozen instantly by the dumped coolants when a magnet quenches.

    131. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      we like to imagine black holes as object that suck everything in, but that's only true of black holes that have star-level masses

      Not really; the issue is that black holes have been depicted in popular culture as these massive engines of destruction, relentlessly sucking in anything that comes too close.

      Which is true. However, what's often neglected is that "too close" varies according to the mass of the hole. If the Earth were to suddenly collapse into a black hole, then our satellites would not instantly be sucked to their doom (neglecting any effects due to the sudden contraction of the Earth itself, of course). They'd sit there happily experiencing exactly the same gravitational force as they always have. The acceleration due to gravity at 6400km from the centre of the hole would still be 9.8ms^-2.

      Black holes have exactly the same gravitational field as a "normal" body with that much matter; the difference is that as they are super dense they are super small, and so the r^2 term in the gravitational equation can become very much smaller. Halve the distance, quadruple the force. The acceleration due to gravity at the Earth's surface is 9.8ms^-2; that's 6400km from the centre. If the Earth became a black hole and you were 800km away from the centre, the acceleration would be 7840ms^-2.

      So the issue isn't so much that a tiny black hole has a weak gravitational field; near the event horizon it's just as strong as the field for a supermassive hole. The difference is that the event horizon is very, very much smaller.

    132. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by BlogTheHaggis · · Score: 1

      Correct. No boom today. Boom tomorrow. Always boom tomorrow.

      Haha this sounds like something from Alice in Wonderland:

      "Boom tomorrow, boom yesterday, but never, never boom today..."

    133. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by chenjeru · · Score: 1

      I just wouldnt want to be in the tunnels with something like that racing around held in place by magnets,

      My understanding is that the tunnel area will become radioactive once the beams are active. Getting near the beams or magnets would be highly dangerous whether the beam stayed contained or not.

      --
      Even if you're on the right track, you'll get run over if you just sit there. - Will Rogers
    134. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by JosKarith · · Score: 2, Funny

      Right. So, cockroaches plus immense levels of gamma radiation is no cause for alarm..? Man I'm sure glad Stan never hired you.

      --
      'Don't worry' said the trees when they saw the axe coming, 'The handle is one of us.'
    135. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by F�an�ro · · Score: 1

      The fear is that the LHC is doing one thing differently - any black holes created in the upper atmosphere would have a velocity approaching that of light, and pass harmlessly through the earth, grabbing a proton or two on the way. At the LHC, it's possible that some of the holes created would have a much lower velocity - less than escape velocity. Those holes wouldn't just leave earth, they'd stick around.

      Here is my take on that. Those microscopic black holes due to background radiation would not be generated only on earth. they would be regularly generated on jupiter, the sun, any star, any neutron star. While most would obviously pass trough their host body unhindered, at least some should be captured. Specifically neutron stars, I do not see how a black hole could just pass trough that.

      The spectacular im-/explosion resulting from the collapse should be hard to miss, on the scale of a supernova.
      We never have observed a neutron star collapsing, and we have seen novas only at specific states of a stars developement. No other explosions in our vicinity that could be attributed to large planets either.

    136. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by ZarathustraDK · · Score: 1

      I duno, when the beam needs a Dump Block [ieee.org] consisting of an 8M long, 10ton graphite rod

      I am sorry, my penis is busy that day supporting the tower of Pisa.

      --
      If you quote this signature there'll be 72 copies of Windows ME waiting for you in Heaven.
    137. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by Sj0 · · Score: 1

      If those same virtual particles exist, wouldn't hawking radiation exist, making this entire discussion sort of moot?

      --
      It's been a long time.
    138. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doom fans, rejoice !

      You bring the gun, I'll bring the flashlight and duct tape :)

    139. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by Ceriel+Nosforit · · Score: 1

      Bah. That's what interns are for.

      --
      All rites reversed 2010
    140. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by Rysc · · Score: 1

      I'm sure you mean 790, not 709.

      But thanks for the Lexx reference. When this LHC business started getting press this may I was at a loss to explain to my friends why I was laughing.

      I'm keeping an eye out for those carrots...

      --
      I want my Cowboyneal
    141. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by zygotic+mitosis · · Score: 1

      I came for the longcat reference; I walk away content.

    142. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by curmudgeous · · Score: 1

      Actually, I'm kind of hoping for a resonant cascade event ....

      (Half-Life reference for the gaming challenged)

    143. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by VolciMaster · · Score: 1

      The world *DID* end today. It's just that because it created a black hole, time has been frozen, so you didn't realize it was over.

    144. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by Rysc · · Score: 1

      Unless it's moderated +5 Quoting 5th Element

      --
      I want my Cowboyneal
    145. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by winnabago · · Score: 2, Informative
      Found at your Wikipedia link:

      A detailed analysis [18] concluded that the RHIC collisions were comparable to ones which naturally occur as cosmic rays traverse the solar system, so we would already have seen such a disaster if it were possible. RHIC has been operating since 2000 without incident.

      Phew! I was worried that I overslept and missed the Strangelet singularity! Talk about stating the obvious.

      Wikipedia: -1 Redundant

      --
      Dammit Otto, you have lupus.
    146. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't understand the whole "miniature black hole" thing. I think the naysayers have just been reading too much sci-fi. Microscopic black holes would evaporate in a very small amount of time due to Hawking radiation...they would leave a detectable energy signature so that we could tell they were there, but that's about it. The LHC won't be doing anything that isn't already happening in the upper atmosphere due to cosmic rays anyway.

      Hawkings theory has never even been observed, or tested, SOOOO in fact, there still is a chance that this dude can be wrong, and we are all going to die.

    147. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      Which line are you referring to? I don't remember the line in 5th Element, nor can I find it in a google search. The line is always attributed to Bab5. (Which is where I pulled it from.)

    148. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by jasmak · · Score: 1

      Hey, it could happen. Even to physicists... http://xkcd.com/474/

      --
      It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.
    149. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by Lobster+Quadrille · · Score: 1

      I see no logical fallacy there. Please explain.

      --
      "The cup is in turn designed for holding hot or cold liquids, and has an open rim and closed base." --US Patent #5425497
    150. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by Knara · · Score: 1

      Sinclair, Ivanova, and Garibaldi are back in C&C, discussing the Babylon Curse, when Thomas' ship leaves the station. It enters the jumpgate. "No boom?" asks Sinclair. "No boom," answers Garibaldi.

      "No boom today," Ivanova corrects them. "Boom tomorrow. There's always a boom tomorrow." Sinclair and Garibaldi shake their heads and leave.

      "What?" Ivanova asks. "Look, someone's got to keep some damned perspective around here. One of these days... boom!"

    151. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by post.scriptum · · Score: 1

      Writing in the most annoying and biggest font over the internet, then going to the end of the page and noticing that there is a "Next page" link... is awesome.

    152. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      Try "Special Pleading":

      * assertion that the opponent lacks the qualifications necessary to comprehend a point of view

              Example: I know you think that I should be giving my money to the poor, but you've never been rich before. There are things about wealth that you don't understand.

      His argument is, basically, that anyone who doesn't posses a great deal of political experience can not possibly be an effective judge of Obama's qualification to run the country. That is, in a word, absurd. It essentially dismisses the entire concept of democracy. If you can't see the fallacy in his logic, I suggest you take a course on critical thinking, or at least get yourself a subscription to Skeptic magazine.

    153. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whist I do not believe a black hole is likely to be formed - I disagree with the way CERN as been trying to dispel public fears with statements such as the above or "nature has already conducted the equivalent of about 100 000 LHC experimental programmes on Earth - and the planet still exists."

      The LHC is operating at much higher intensities than we would find on earth - proof we are alive. Invite the people making statements like the above to step into the path of the LHC beam and see how many of them will.

    154. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by Lobster+Quadrille · · Score: 1

      From the wikipedia article you just linked:

      In the classic distinction among material, psychological, and logical fallacies,[1] special pleading most likely falls within the category of psychological fallacy

      Again, no logical fallacy here.

      Regardless, there may indeed be things that may make one candidate better than another, which somebody not familiar with the intricacies would not understand.

      I often run into people who hired contractors without knowledge of the field, and it indeed came back to bite them. If you don't know jack shit about cars, all you have to evaluate a mechanic by is the tidiness of his shop. This is essentially the problem with democracy, and why politicians are more style than substance.

      The difference between philosophy (to which the Special Pleading fallacy applies) and practical use is pretty extreme.

      --
      "The cup is in turn designed for holding hot or cold liquids, and has an open rim and closed base." --US Patent #5425497
    155. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by philspear · · Score: 1

      In my defense, I did mean for that line to be a joke, I was going to write "Yes? Well good..." but couldn't think of anything else before I went off on a tangent. Then I was going to go back and fix it, but then I got high. Oooh oooh.

      In my defense, people use that reasoning all the time with anything biology related.

    156. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone hasn't watched their B5 lately... -50 Geek Points!!!

    157. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      RE:sig -- everything. BTW, roflolyomank

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
    158. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      lol

      You're SO close! If you had just clicked the link to Psychological fallacy you would have found that:

      The Historical fallacy, also called the psychological fallacy, is a logical fallacy originally described by philosopher John Dewey.

      Psychological fallacies are simply a subset of logical fallacies.

      Moving on:

      Regardless, there may indeed be things that may make one candidate better than another, which somebody not familiar with the intricacies would not understand.

      Nobody's arguing otherwise, so congratulations, you just provided a good example of a straw-man fallacy. It's also an "irrelevant conclusion" fallacy, since, while in itself being a perfectly logical argument, it does nothing to address the original question - namely, the idea that the average person is not qualified to judge the amount of relevant experience which a politician has had.

      There are certainly nuances which will not be understood by everyone, but that in itself does not mean that most people are unqualified to pass judgment on the situation. Suggesting otherwise is a logical fallacy in itself - it's essentially an argument from ignorance. It's like saying "well, you don't understand ALL of the science behind the theory of Evolution, therefore you are not qualified to judge it's merits". Better yet - it's like the people who argue that atheists cannot possibly discuss the concept of a "god" since they've never read the bible.

      Lastly, while you can certainly make the argument (as you seem to be doing) that the average voter has no business deciding who's going to run the country, you're going to need to offer a better alternative if you expect anyone to pay attention to you.

    159. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      Qualifications for President of the United States, all other considerations being matters of opinion:

      No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty-five years, and been fourteen years a resident within the United States.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    160. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      Oh, well if that's all it takes, then great! Just don't let me hear you complain about GW again, since he's fully qualified!

      Apparently you put no thought into your comments, whatsoever. Thank you for making it so readily apparent, I'll keep that in mind in the future.

    161. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by Derek+Pomery · · Score: 1

      You sound like a good person to ask.
      Ok. The whole evaporating thing. Quite plausible, I'm instantly willing to believe it. Fact that cosmic rays have as much energy.
      I'm with you.

      But, just wondering. If a miniature black hole is spawned in a beam that's whipping past, dumping its energy into those nifty graphite blocks such that they glow.
      Not the howling emptiness of normal matter but a tightly packed bunch of particles.
      Could enough of 'em get crammed into it to it to stabilise it to a size where it can start gobbling molecules?
      Or would the mini black hole be so tiny it couldn't even chomp on a proton?

      And, is this situation strictly comparable to normal cosmic rays, or are there any variations?

      --
      -- perl -e'print pack"H*","6e656d6f406d38792e6f7267"' /. ate my old sig. Bastards.
    162. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      >Just don't let me hear you complain about GW again, since he's fully qualified!

      I never said he wasn't.

      How dare you claim that I ever did, liar?

      >Apparently you put no thought into your comments, whatsoever.

      Dude, this is slashdot. I've been here so long I stopped giving a fuck, like 12 years ago.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    163. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought tomorrow was when they turned it on. I thought the end of the world was to happen when the first collision is made right?

      stop talkin bout the end of the world that wont happen jeez, u people listen to every fool say out there and the people who really know bout this (scientists) u dont listen to wot they have to say... for christ sake btw if u see in the newspaper 'we gonna die'... theyr just trying to sell just trying to make people buy it, OK???? and then if u keep reading the article they will say that everything is a lie it isnt dangerous ok i hope ive changed ur mind dont be fool a plz!

    164. Re:Not supposed to be dooms day yet. by mila.ex.machina · · Score: 1
  2. The interior view of the LHC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Reminds me of GOATSE.

    1. Re:The interior view of the LHC by Yarhajile · · Score: 1

      That's HOT

  3. Cool...

    1. Re:Cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know, cool!

    2. Re:Cool by duckInferno · · Score: 1

      <aol>LOL I NO SICK LOL!!11</aol>

      Fixed that for you.

      --
      Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, watch it -- I'm huge!
  4. Woohoo... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Glad to see that we'll still be here tomo...

    [Signal lost due to user being sucked into a black hole. Have a nice day. :-)]

    1. Re:Woohoo... by moro_666 · · Score: 1

      why are you hiding behind the AC title if there's none around tomorrow to bitch on your real name anyway ? :p

      we're all gonna die ... quickly, compile that kernel before the world ends, otherwise we'll evaporate with a buggy one (and that would be a shame).

      10th september 2008 - a bad day to quit smoking, drinking, careless sex, drugs, perl coding.

      --

      I'd tell you the chances of this story being a dupe, but you wouldn't like it.
    2. Re:Woohoo... by nospam007 · · Score: 1

      >why are you hiding behind the AC title if there's none around tomorrow to bitch on your real name anyway ? :p

      He's the AntiChrist, tomorrow is his day.

  5. Will Have Sweet Sweet Doomsday Sex ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... with any hawt end-of-the-world fundies out there!

    1. Re:Will Have Sweet Sweet Doomsday Sex ... by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 1

      Sure, if you want to meet 'em in hell .

    2. Re:Will Have Sweet Sweet Doomsday Sex ... by Whiteox · · Score: 1

      Before we follow Alsace-Lorraine into the Black Hole, I should comment that:
      [Exodus] Sex before marriage: That just depends on what the Bride price is, doesn't it?
      Exodus speaks of law relating to the Israelites, those who wanted to keep their tribe homogeneous.
      -----------
      A lot of the old testament was common sense advice. Virginity was prized as it was a clear indication of purity and health. Even in the Islamic traditions, a clean body before prayer is necessary.
      Many of your sources talk about adultery and not pre-marital sex (except for Timothy - who was referring to esoteric purity).
      Historically however, your point is taken. But to assume that it refers to pre-marital sex is mistaken somewhat. Don't confuse church dogma with the Bible. The Old Testament is that of historical principles. You can't take those and combine them with New Testament philosophies for validation. The validation we seek is that of our ethics and morals and our level of Being.
      Jesus however died for all of us and our sins, not just the Israelites. If you are going to preach, then preach the truth. Christianity is a path, and you should follow Christ's precepts to be a Christian. That may mean reading and understanding gnostic and Apostolic Christianity and not for relying solely on a 'made for consumer' Bible.

      --
      Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
  6. Let down... by ZipprHead · · Score: 1

    Hope you are ready for a let down, it is likely to be months before they discover anything of significance.

    That is... even if everything works. With all the code running this thing, there has got to be a few bugs.

    1. Re:Let down... by Tetsujin · · Score: 0

      Hope you are ready for a let down, it is likely to be months before they discover anything of significance.

      That is... even if everything works. With all the code running this thing, there has got to be a few bugs.

      "I've got a bad feeling about this..."

      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
  7. Uh oh by FauxPasIII · · Score: 4, Funny

    Everyone out of the universe... QUICK!

    --
    25% Funny, 25% Insightful, 25% Informative, 25% Troll
    1. Re:Uh oh by somersault · · Score: 4, Funny

      Reader WillRobinson notes.. 450 GeV (0.45 TeV) .. Zurich .. live webcasts ..

      Someone should inform him of the DANGER!

      --
      which is totally what she said
    2. Re:Uh oh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aw, isn't he cute.

    3. Re:Uh oh by jonesdog · · Score: 1

      LOL...

    4. Re:Uh oh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am posting this from The restaurant at the end of Universe and there are quite a few people here talking about what happened in 2008.

  8. Death threats by Hatta · · Score: 5, Funny

    Why would you send death threats to someone you think is going to destroy the world? If he was afraid of dying, he wouldn't be destroying the world, right?

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    1. Re:Death threats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because they're dumb.

    2. Re:Death threats by xstonedogx · · Score: 5, Funny

      No kidding. We should be saving our death threats for where they matter: idle.slashdot.org.

    3. Re:Death threats by Prien715 · · Score: 1

      The person blowing up the world doesn't believe that they are in fact doing so. For them, it would be death or performing a science experiment -- the classic "cake or death" moment. But I doubt these threats are credible.

      --
      RE: Your sig

      Patriotism(n) -- The conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it. ~ George Bernard Shaw

      --
      -- Political fascism requires a Fuhrer.
    4. Re:Death threats by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      Why would you send death threats to someone you think is going to destroy the world? If he was afraid of dying, he wouldn't be destroying the world, right?

      Well the scientist obviously doesn't think they're going to destroy the world and themselves in the process.

      I'm just wondering how exactly this threat was phrased. "If you destroy the world, then so help me I'm going to kill you dead!"

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    5. Re:Death threats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I for one have been hoping that this IS the end of the world. I'm getting quite fed up with having to wake up every morning, and this seems like a decent way to go. At least being sucked into a black hole will cover up anything I ever did.

    6. Re:Death threats by sexconker · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Insightful?

      Logical fallacy is fallacious.

      A threatens B because A believes B's experiments will destroy the world. B believes this is not the case.

      There is no indication that B does not fear death.
      B most likely falls in line with the general stance on death - B probably doesn't want to die.

    7. Re:Death threats by fabs64 · · Score: 1

      Not to mention, how the hell are you going to follow through if they don't listen to you? And why when if you can follow through that mere fact proves you wrong.

      My head hurts at the general logic failures people can manage to come up with :-)

    8. Re:Death threats by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      I disagree.

      As much as the scientists at the LHC think it is hilarious that these idiots think they are going to destroy the world, they know there's a real chance that they just might (no good scientist can rule it out), and that chance is about as likely as someone actually carrying out one of these ridiculous death threats.

      So it's just rational to ignore both, assuming you've taken at least some precautions.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    9. Re:Death threats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      firstly, theres like a 1 in 6 billion chance of actually creating a black hole, and even if it were created, it would be microscopic and probably disappear almost instantly, also people were all claiming doomsday theories on the entrance to the 2nd millennium right?

    10. Re:Death threats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      B is not your personal army.

    11. Re:Death threats by mburg23 · · Score: 1

      havnt you noticed all of these scientists are age 60 and older they dont care if they destroy the iniverse there gunna die soon anyway.

    12. Re:Death threats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right, but the first statement was funny regardless of whether the logic is correct or not. Nice reply Mr. Spock.

  9. End Of The World Party by realisticradical · · Score: 4, Funny

    You're all invited to my end of the world party tonight. LSD and hookers will be served.

    1. Re:End Of The World Party by moderatorrater · · Score: 5, Funny

      So, since I am neither a hooker nor LSD, I'll have to get my own drinks?

    2. Re:End Of The World Party by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

      So, since I am neither a hooker nor LSD, I'll have to get my own drinks?

      No, but on the other hand you won't be hearing from the lawyers, either...

      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
    3. Re:End Of The World Party by jackchance · · Score: 1

      and since it is the end of the world we don't have to worry about STDs or unwanted pregnancy!!!!

      --
      1 1 2 3 5 8 13 21 34 55 89 144 233 377 610 987 1597 2584 4181 6765
    4. Re:End Of The World Party by THESuperShawn · · Score: 1

      Dude, this is Slashdot. If you want anyone here to attend, you better change that.... "You're all invited to my end of the world LANparty tonight. Mt Dew and pr0n will be served."

      --
      Repant. Thy end is sheer.
    5. Re:End Of The World Party by budgenator · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'll chip in towards that, here's a check.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    6. Re:End Of The World Party by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What if I'm LDS?

  10. Only in a single direction by rminsk · · Score: 5, Informative

    They will be only sending a beam around the LHC in a single direction at about 7% power. It will be about a month before they send a beam in the other direction and have a collision. I think it is about a year before they will be up to full power.

    1. Re:Only in a single direction by element-o.p. · · Score: 1

      Wonder if troubleshooting, legal challenges, budget cutbacks, etc. will cause them to wait until 2012?

      (Just in case it's not completely obvious, yes, I amj/k!)

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
    2. Re:Only in a single direction by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      I think it is about a year before they will be up to full power.

      Oh, hell, then I'm going to bed. Damn MSM.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  11. It's going to be OK they said by atari2600 · · Score: 5, Funny

    No possibility of a resonance cascade they said. Put the crystal thing into the spectrometer they said. The whole thing blew up my place of employment and I started Unforeseen Consequences with nothing but a crowbar for a while.

    Moral: Keep your crowbars close and your guns closer and don't trust the scientists.

    1. Re:It's going to be OK they said by EvanED · · Score: 5, Funny

      You say that as a joke, but it may be more likely than you think.

    2. Re:It's going to be OK they said by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      And hey it's not a crowbar but that ratchet looks like it might serve pretty well as a headcrab basher!

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    3. Re:It's going to be OK they said by Bryansix · · Score: 1

      Is that from Halflife?

    4. Re:It's going to be OK they said by Anachragnome · · Score: 3, Funny

      I like how the guy seems to be regarding the "instructions" taped to the LHC with some amusement.

      You know, the ones that were taped over some OTHER scientists note(and with seemingly opposite instructions, note the opposing arrows), and with "danger" tape to make it more "official".

    5. Re:It's going to be OK they said by skuzzlebutt · · Score: 1
      --
      My debut novel AMITY now available: http://jeremydbrooks.c
    6. Re:It's going to be OK they said by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      No, he's a scientist, he gets the crowbar. The ratchet is Marine issue.

    7. Re:It's going to be OK they said by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that from Halflife?

      Yup.

    8. Re:It's going to be OK they said by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fucking Valve - it's ALWAYS VALVE! Hurry up and buy their crap - it might sway them to stop the destruction!

    9. Re:It's going to be OK they said by budgenator · · Score: 1

      it's a torque wrench, but that tie he's wear is real scary.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    10. Re:It's going to be OK they said by CorporateSuit · · Score: 1

      Is that from Halflife?

      It's from the Tick

      --
      I am the richest astronaut ever to win the superbowl.
    11. Re:It's going to be OK they said by corerunner · · Score: 1

      I wish I had mod points today. It's funny because you know it might be true...

      --
      "Don't hate the media, become the media." -Jello Biafra
    12. Re:It's going to be OK they said by martinw89 · · Score: 1

      That was a pretty good series, thanks for the link. I ended up watching all of them

    13. Re:It's going to be OK they said by Javarrito · · Score: 1

      Say, I think you might be onto something.

      All I can say is, attendre-vous imprevus circonstances!

      (And, my apologies to any French speakers)

    14. Re:It's going to be OK they said by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're my hero.

    15. Re:It's going to be OK they said by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And to think I almost skipped clicking on the link. Nice.

    16. Re:It's going to be OK they said by kramulous · · Score: 2, Funny

      But you know these crazy scientists ... they're all having a snigger because they swapped the instructions when he wasn't looking.

      --
      .
    17. Re:It's going to be OK they said by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Woah!

    18. Re:It's going to be OK they said by bar-agent · · Score: 1

      I ended up watching all of them

      Yeah, episode 5 was the shiznit. :)

      --
      i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
  12. It was nice knowing you all... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That strangelet chain reaction is really going to suck... or blow. Maybe both.

  13. In your local time zone by EjectButton · · Score: 1
  14. warping reality already by Onymous+Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    The weirdness has already begun if 9:00 to 18:00 Zurich Time is 2:00 to 10:00 CDT.

    1. Re:warping reality already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, those aren't the same lengths of time (9-18 is 9, 2-10 is 8). Zurich picks up an extra hour because of the crazy experiments.

    2. Re:warping reality already by nospam007 · · Score: 1

      >The weirdness has already begun if 9:00 to 18:00 Zurich Time is 2:00 to 10:00 CDT.

      It's less than 8 hours from now, so you still can party as if there was no tomorrow.

    3. Re:warping reality already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Congratulations....you got the joke. Have a cookie.

    4. Re:warping reality already by catmistake · · Score: 1

      I noticed that too. Apparently, once they turn it on, Zurich Time will speed up quite a bit. Also, usually when translating time zones, its traditional to use Eastern or Pacific time... because there's only a few hundred people living in Central or Mountain time zones... they just don't matter enough to be bothered with.

    5. Re:warping reality already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. 02:00 is 2 am Central time. And today is still the 9th last time I checked.

      So at 1:30 am, grab your favorite slippers and some rocky road. And read the articles on this website http://public.web.cern.ch/public/en/LHC/Safety-en.html thoroughly. They made me feel a little bit better about things. Comparing this collider to the last "doomsday" collider which is still in operation and hasn't killed us all, discussing the cosmic rays already being created naturally in more depth, and about what is expected to happen in many of the cases.

      Also, it looks like there was a miscalculation in the original relativity equations used when the risk of a black hole was brought up! Look at the files linked to at the bottom!!

    6. Re:warping reality already by Thong · · Score: 1

      I wish people would just use UTC for this sort of thing. Now I have to go and work out what Zurich time is and what CDT is. I'm assuming its something to do with the USA.

  15. Am I the only one hoping for... by Paul+Pierce · · Score: 2, Funny

    A superhero or two coming out of this. I just hope it isn't someone from that LHC Rap.

    1. Re:Am I the only one hoping for... by Abreu · · Score: 1

      I actually hope we don't get any superheroes...

      Dr. Manhattan was able to keep Richard Nixon as president until the mid-eighties! I shudder to think of Dubya being president of the US. for three more more terms!

      I'd rather have armaggeddon

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    2. Re:Am I the only one hoping for... by UncleTogie · · Score: 1

      I just hope it isn't someone from that LHC Rap.

      C'mon...you KNOW you want to see alpinekat {aka Katherine McAlpine} in a Wonder Woman outfit...

      --
      Don't tell me to get a life. I'm a gamer; I have LOTS of lives!
  16. Groundhog's day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    I know this is off topic, but...

    Jeez, you know I'm tired of seeing the same set of stories over and over again.

    It's as if some catastrophic event happened that causes the same day to repeat over and over-- does anybody have any idea what could have caused this?

    1. Re:Groundhog's day by Whiteox · · Score: 1

      I think you've got to look at the moral of the movie if you want an answer to that.

      --
      Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
    2. Re:Groundhog's day by Yarhajile · · Score: 1

      Welcome to /.

  17. IMPENDING DOOM!! by 4D6963 · · Score: 5, Funny

    We're doomed!! Oh God, I can't die a virgin! Virgins may all go to heaven, but only to get screwed by Muslim terrorists!

    --
    You just got troll'd!
    1. Re:IMPENDING DOOM!! by BlackSnake112 · · Score: 4, Funny

      I just got a picture of a terrorist entering heaven and 100 male geeks are there waiting for the terrorist.

      Terrorist: "These are not the virgins I was thinking of"

    2. Re:IMPENDING DOOM!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Robot Chicken did this joke.

    3. Re:IMPENDING DOOM!! by Atriqus · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but they never got a +5 funny on /. so it was still open game.

      --
      Hey, look! It's Bono's brother.
    4. Re:IMPENDING DOOM!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As did Family Guy.

    5. Re:IMPENDING DOOM!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Something I don't get about the virgin thing, don't
      they get used up? I mean 50-100 virgins would last
      a year or two-- then no more virgins.

    6. Re:IMPENDING DOOM!! by oldhack · · Score: 1

      Hehehe, those terrorists had it coming. Good one, Allah!

      --
      Fuck systemd. Fuck Redhat. Fuck Soylent, too. Wait, scratch the last one.
    7. Re:IMPENDING DOOM!! by drseuk · · Score: 1

      Sod what happens to your virginity or the universe. Look on the bright side. Verily thoust will be considered a martyr for the end of Microsoft as we know it for the rest of time.

    8. Re:IMPENDING DOOM!! by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      It doesn't count if it happens in heaven, so they stay virgins anyway. What happens in heaven stays in heaven.

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    9. Re:IMPENDING DOOM!! by dodobh · · Score: 1

      The terrorist will watch in shocked silence as all the geeks say, "These are not the virgins you are looking for".

      --
      I can throw myself at the ground, and miss.
    10. Re:IMPENDING DOOM!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was real lame bitch.

  18. "They're waiting for, Gordon, in the test chamber. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Intercom 1: (feedback)"Testing, testing. (coughs) Everything seems to
    be in order."
    Intercom 2: "All right, Gordon. your suit should keep you comfortable
    through all this. The specimen will be delivered to you in a few
    moments. If you would be so good as to climb up and start the rotors,
    we can bring the anti-mass spectrometer to 80 percent and hold it there
    until the carrier arrives.
    Intercom 2: "Gordon, are you not hearing me? Climb up and start the
    rotors, please.
    Intercom 2: "Very good. We'll take it from here."
    Intercom 1: "Power to stage 1 emitters in 3,2,1. I'm seeing predictable
    phase arrays."
    Intercom 1: "Stage 2 emitters activating...now."
    Intercom 2: "Gordon, we cannot predict how long the system can operate
    at this level, nor how long the readings will take. Please, work as
    quickly as you can."
    Intercom 1: "Overhead capacitors to one oh five percent. Uh, it's
    probably not a problem, probably, but I'm showing a small discrepancy
    in... well, no, it's well within acceptable bounds again. Sustaining
    sequence."
    Intercom 2: "I've just been informed that the sample is ready, Gordon.
    It should be coming up to you any moment now. Look to the delivery
    system for your specimen."

  19. Time to get to work... by Pedrito · · Score: 4, Funny

    I need to hurry up and finish work on my black-hole shelter...

    1. Re:Time to get to work... by skuzzlebutt · · Score: 1

      "Remember, kids, if the Black Hole siren sounds: DUCK AND COVER!"

      "...and hope your schooldesk is a f**king TARDIS."

      --
      My debut novel AMITY now available: http://jeremydbrooks.c
    2. Re:Time to get to work... by prmths · · Score: 1

      Duck... and cover!

    3. Re:Time to get to work... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hahah this whole thing sounds mad fun when your not sober. they better have that special plant in that black hole, if me and pedrito room together, i call top bunk!!!!

      SKOAL FOR LIFE BOYS, SEE YA ALL SOON

    4. Re:Time to get to work... by laejoh · · Score: 0

      I've tried calling Milliways but it seems they don't do reservations anymore, the place is full!

  20. the world is not going to end by JeanBaptiste · · Score: 5, Funny

    I owe far too much money for that to ever happen.

  21. Wasn't this already covered by Ghostbusters? by repapetilto · · Score: 2, Informative

    Dr. Egon Spengler: There's something very important I forgot to tell you. Dr. Peter Venkman: What? Dr. Egon Spengler: Don't cross the streams. Dr. Peter Venkman: Why? Dr. Egon Spengler: It would be bad. Dr. Peter Venkman: I'm fuzzy on the whole good/bad thing. What do you mean, "bad"? Dr. Egon Spengler: Try to imagine all life as you know it stopping instantaneously and every molecule in your body exploding at the speed of light. Dr Ray Stantz: Total protonic reversal. Dr. Peter Venkman: Right. That's bad. Okay. All right. Important safety tip. Thanks, Egon.

    1. Re:Wasn't this already covered by Ghostbusters? by repapetilto · · Score: 5, Informative

      Dr. Egon Spengler: There's something very important I forgot to tell you.
      Dr. Peter Venkman: What?
      Dr. Egon Spengler: Don't cross the streams.
      Dr. Peter Venkman: Why?
      Dr. Egon Spengler: It would be bad.
      Dr. Peter Venkman: I'm fuzzy on the whole good/bad thing. What do you mean, "bad"?
      Dr. Egon Spengler: Try to imagine all life as you know it stopping instantaneously and every molecule in your body exploding at the speed of light.
      Dr Ray Stantz: Total protonic reversal.
      Dr. Peter Venkman: Right. That's bad. Okay. All right. Important safety tip. Thanks, Egon.

    2. Re:Wasn't this already covered by Ghostbusters? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dr. Egon Spengler: There's something very important I forgot to tell you.
      Dr. Peter Venkman: What?
      Dr. Egon Spengler: Don't cross the streams.
      Dr. Peter Venkman: Why?
      Dr. Egon Spengler: It would be bad.
      Dr. Peter Venkman: I'm fuzzy on the whole good/bad thing. What do you mean, "bad"?
      Dr. Egon Spengler: Try to imagine all life as you know it stopping instantaneously and every molecule in your body exploding at the speed of light.
      Dr Ray Stantz: Total protonic reversal.
      Dr. Peter Venkman: Right. That's bad. Okay. All right. Important safety tip. Thanks, Egon.

      Umm, this is a game, right?

    3. Re:Wasn't this already covered by Ghostbusters? by FornaxChemica · · Score: 1

      Deja vu. This news story inspires the same jokes. See also this Slashdot article from 1999 about a certain Heavy Ion Collider. Dan Simmons and Valve are making the usual guest appearance.

    4. Re:Wasn't this already covered by Ghostbusters? by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      Philistian.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    5. Re:Wasn't this already covered by Ghostbusters? by repapetilto · · Score: 1

      Ha sorry I just realized it... Its not my fault I got modded +5 informative, I'm not even sure how that makes sense. I thought it was funny.

    6. Re:Wasn't this already covered by Ghostbusters? by Yarhajile · · Score: 1

      Winston: when someone asks you if you're a god, you say "YES"!

  22. 0.45 TeV by swillden · · Score: 4, Funny

    Shouldn't that be 0.439 TeV? (450 GeV / 1024)

    --
    Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    1. Re:0.45 TeV by lordholm · · Score: 1

      When I take over the world, I will instate the capital punishment for the misuse of units.

      Usage of non SI or IEEE units will be punishable with either:
      1) Prison, 10 years for every magnitude of error made in minor offences (i.e. use of m instead of M or vice versa, or mb instead of MiB), followed by death.
      2) Quick Death on the spot for other offences (use of arcane units, this especially include the bar as it is very easy to know what it is in kPa).

      --
      "Civis Europaeus sum!"
    2. Re:0.45 TeV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shouldn't that be 0.439 TeV? (450 GeV / 1024)

      No. That only has to do with bytes, because there are 8 bits to a byte, not ten. Even then, it is a common misconception, because bytes are still measure by 10, aka a Tb is 1,000 Gb, but in order to get 1000 GB you go over by 24. Simple, really.

    3. Re:0.45 TeV by blair1q · · Score: 1

      That would be .409 TieV (450 GeV = 419 GieV, 419/1024 = .409).

      450 GeV, on the other hand, is still .45 TeV, and because of the introduction of the Gi/Ti/etc. prefixes this is no longer ambiguous nor nearly as funny as it once was....

    4. Re:0.45 TeV by swillden · · Score: 1

      because of the introduction of the Gi/Ti/etc. prefixes this is no longer ambiguous nor nearly as funny as it once was....

      On the contrary, the existence of those prefixes (which I use) is what MAKES it funny. To me, anyway.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    5. Re:0.45 TeV by swillden · · Score: 1

      Your post was funnier than mine. I came within a whisker of posting a correction to your "correction".

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    6. Re:0.45 TeV by swillden · · Score: 1

      2) Quick Death on the spot for other offences (use of arcane units, this especially include the bar as it is very easy to know what it is in kPa).

      You're going to wipe out most of the world's SCUBA divers there. American divers will survive, because we use PSI, but the rest of the world expresses cylinder pressures in bar.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    7. Re:0.45 TeV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Giga being 1024 only applies to computing bytes, surely, because it's a factor of two, but not to electron volts.

      In other cases, giga = 1000000000 and terra = 1000000000000.

    8. Re:0.45 TeV by Ihlosi · · Score: 1

      In other cases, giga = 1000000000 and terra = 1000000000000.

      No no no. Terra is what you stand on. It's also what's going to be destroyed if the LHC creates a planet-eating micro black hole or negative strangelet.

    9. Re:0.45 TeV by dcollins117 · · Score: 1

      That would be .409 TieV (450 GeV = 419 GieV, 419/1024 = .409).

      More commonly known as "Formula .409".

    10. Re:0.45 TeV by swillden · · Score: 1

      Giga being 1024 only applies to computing bytes, surely, because it's a factor of two, but not to electron volts.

      It doesn't always apply to computing bytes, either. For example, disk drive capacities and network bandwidths are measured in power-of-10 bytes or bits. Early on in computing even RAM sizes were measured with "proper" SI units, not power-of-two approximations.

      This is why the new binary prefixes (Mi, Gi, Ti) were invented, to disambiguate exactly when we mean 10^12 and when we mean 2^40. Many slashdotters insist that the binary prefixes are stupid and annoying when, in fact, they're necessary to avoid ambiguity. I disagree, which is why I found misapplying the power-of-two definitions (doubly misapplying them, actually) to be funny and why I posted what I did.

      It ruins a joke to explain it, but I'm sure there are some here who could use the explanation.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  23. Explains the silence, they all did it before... by 4D6963 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Coming to think of it, maybe that's why it's so hard to detect alien civilisations similar to us in the universe. We only have the tiny window of time between when they discover radio transmission and until they make their LHC and wipe themselves out.

    --
    You just got troll'd!
    1. Re:Explains the silence, they all did it before... by Tsar · · Score: 1

      That's the punchline of economist Robin Hanson's concept of a "Great Filter," discussed here back in April.

    2. Re:Explains the silence, they all did it before... by verbamour · · Score: 1

      Are you kidding? It's easy to detect alien civilizations similar to our own.

      That's what The Swift Gamma-Ray Burst Mission does, right?

    3. Re:Explains the silence, they all did it before... by smchris · · Score: 1

      At least Szostak's protocells will be sucked into the black hole saving the rest of the universe. Busy week!

    4. Re:Explains the silence, they all did it before... by blair1q · · Score: 1

      (updates Drake's equation for possibility of races too smart for their own good)

    5. Re:Explains the silence, they all did it before... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Parent is not funny. He should have been modded insightful.

      I am a scientist. Granted I am not a physicist. If the probability of a stable black hole forming is greater than anything like 10^-30, it is not worth it. People throw the progress argument often. Mankind playing with LHC is not the same as stone age man playing with fire. Here is why. Back then the risk was limited to one man's life or may be that of a group. Of course, if that one life was that of the original mother (Eve), our story would have been different. My point is, LHC would be worth only when man kind is spread across several solar systems across the galaxy.

    6. Re:Explains the silence, they all did it before... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, if that one life was that of the original mother (Eve)

      let me guess... you are a creationologist or something, right? scientist. right. sure thing. we'll call you...

    7. Re:Explains the silence, they all did it before... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Coming to think of it, maybe that's why it's so hard to detect alien civilisations similar to us in the universe. We only have the tiny window of time between when they discover radio transmission and until they make their LHC and wipe themselves out.

      this is an intelligent way of looking at it

  24. Flipping the switch commentary... by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

    "Hold onto your butts"
    - Samuel L. Jackson (Ray Arnold), Jurassic Park

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  25. I Have by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    my trusty crowbar ready

  26. Remember what we were taught? by No2Gates · · Score: 5, Funny

    Back in the old days of the cold war, in the schools,for preparation of a nuclear bomb falling, we would get under our desks because they are obviously made of some kind of material that can withstand radiation and a giant percussion wave. I'll bet those desks can withstand the LHC black hole too. Only school children and teachers will be left.

    --
    Every time you call tech support, a little kitten dies.
    1. Re:Remember what we were taught? by OneMadMuppet · · Score: 1

      No, they're made of a material that can stop flying glass and shrapnel. The aim was to minimise secondary casualties, not remove primary ones.

    2. Re:Remember what we were taught? by Vectronic · · Score: 1

      It could also be argued that the aim was to get everyone used to living in constant fear/panic...

    3. Re:Remember what we were taught? by c6gunner · · Score: 4, Funny

      It could also be argued that the aim was to get everyone used to living in constant fear/panic...

      Yes, it could. It could also be argued that the aim was to prepare future interns for service under the desk of Bill Clinton.

      Just because an argument COULD be made, doesn't mean it should. If you truly think that your suggestion is a rational one, I'm willing to bet you'd feel right at home with those weirdos from ANSWER.

    4. Re:Remember what we were taught? by Michael+Spencer+Jr. · · Score: 4, Informative

      I didn't miss the joke -- I LOL'ed, I promise -- but speaking as a CERT instructor: you were told to get under your desks not to protect against a blast near enough to cause vaporization, but to protect against a possible collapse of a building damaged by an otherwise-non-lethal pressure wave. Yes of course if the bomb detonates right above you, you're toast, and if the bomb detonates far enough away that the pressure wave can't cause building damage then you're cowering under your desk for nothing. For the huge chunk of distance-from-ground-zero in between those two extremes, though, your chance of surviving a building collapse is much greater if you have a personal void to hide inside -- like the area under a desk. That's why your 'nuclear bomb drill' and your 'tornado drill' are so similar: you are increasing your odds of survival, being successfully located and extracted by search and rescue teams, in the event that part of your building collapses.

    5. Re:Remember what we were taught? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Morloks = teachers

      Eloi = kids

    6. Re:Remember what we were taught? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The chances of getting laid by that hot teacher got a lot better!

    7. Re:Remember what we were taught? by mrcaseyj · · Score: 1

      The idea of hiding under a desk to prevent building collapse never seemed quite right to me. It seemed to make more sense to get beside a desk or preferably some other more crush resistant object. Most school desks don't look to me like they'd be able to stop a falling roof by themselves. And even if they could themselves or collectively, it seems like being beside them would be almost as good as being under. On the other hand if you're under the desk and its legs give out, then the roof is going to press down on your desk and the desk in turn will squish you. Better to be beside the desk because the roof won't be able to crush the desk totally flat, thus there will be a small space next to the desk where the ceiling wont reach all the way to the floor.

      I think the school desk manufacturers are starting to advertise their school desks as more resistant to the crushing forces of black holes in addition to nuclear blasts. School district procurement officers have called for a budget increase to pay for the stronger desks, because if it saves just one child's life... However, most engineers are skeptical of these marketing claims.

    8. Re:Remember what we were taught? by TorKlingberg · · Score: 1

      It won't help if the whole building is collapsing, but if smaller things are falling down everywhere.

    9. Re:Remember what we were taught? by Kirth+Gersen · · Score: 2, Informative

      Parent is correct: I have often considered making the same points whenever the whole "duck and cover" thing is discussed.

      However, he leaves out the issues of flash and broken glass, which are even more likely to create a survivability opportunity over a wide radius than building collapse. Being under a desk is a simple rule of thumb for minimizing those injury modes.

    10. Re:Remember what we were taught? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, they'll hide above their desks this time?

  27. Come on scientists, seriously... by Tetsujin · · Score: 4, Funny

    You guys can't blow up the Earth! It's where I keep all my stuff!

    --
    Bow-ties are cool.
    1. Re:Come on scientists, seriously... by syncmaster955 · · Score: 1

      Better make sure you have off-Earth backup

    2. Re:Come on scientists, seriously... by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 2, Funny

      There's no point in acting all surprised about it. All the planning charts and demolition orders have been on display in your local planning department in Alpha Centauri for fifty of your Earth years, so you've had plenty of time to lodge any formal complains and it's far too late to start making a fuss about it now.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    3. Re:Come on scientists, seriously... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I own that T-shirt too.

  28. Let's make another bang by GreggBz · · Score: 4, Funny

    Quick, who wants to get laid? My standards have dropped considerably, given the circumstances.

    1. Re:Let's make another bang by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Sure, you bring the shovels, I'll pick you up in my car, say, midnight?

    2. Re:Let's make another bang by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Being a Slashdot poster, you probably have to worry if everyone else's standards have dropped, not your own standards.

    3. Re:Let's make another bang by fireforadrymouth · · Score: 3, Funny

      Now you just have to wait for a substantial drop in their standards (and hope they aren't already too busy getting it on).

      The best laid plans...

    4. Re:Let's make another bang by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      unless, if he's straight, but is now willing to try homo sex, and if there is a gay guy who'd throw it in him (or vice versa).

    5. Re:Let's make another bang by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      given the circumstances.

      You're on slashdot?

    6. Re:Let's make another bang by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To (probably mis)quote Torchwood.
      "And I though the end of the world couldn't get worse."

    7. Re:Let's make another bang by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. You would first need standards to drop them.
      2. You sure you want /.'s to fulfill this request...

    8. Re:Let's make another bang by bythescruff · · Score: 1

      It's not *your* standards that are the problem, mate.

      --
      Chuck Norris: Socialism == a thousand years of darkness.
    9. Re:Let's make another bang by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lucky me, I don't have to pay anymore for Visa Card and to witness all this jerks,,, from this planet which no one could respect it. When people start playing with Mother Nature it is the end âoeof nothingâ because life on earth it is only an illusion. We all die one day, no matter poor, rich, smart, stupid etc,,, So we all be the same. ïS Sucks anyways.

  29. Sleeping in tomorrow. by slashflood · · Score: 1

    That means that I don't have to set my alarm clock this evening?

  30. In the precious words of C for Dummies by nategoose · · Score: 2, Funny

    Goodbye cruel world!

  31. live by this rule... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Live every day as if there was no tomorrow. Wait, no, don't take it as an excuse to rack up tons of debt, have unprotected sex and burn your bridges!

  32. Survival by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least the post apocalyptic t-shirts are ready:

    http://fiendfolio.blogspot.com/2008/09/are-you-ready-for-impending-apocalypse.html
       

  33. Half Life.... by Schnoogs · · Score: 0

    ...becomes a reality tomorrow. Get your crowbars and EVA suits ready. Watch out for head crabs and zombies. If you happen to see a guy in a dark suit who likes to hang out behind windows and doors that for some reason you can never get into do not hesitate to shoot his ass.

    1. Re:Half Life.... by rk · · Score: 1

      If you happen to see a guy in a dark suit who likes to hang out behind windows and doors that for some reason you can never get into do not hesitate to shoot his ass.

      I tried but whenever I point my gun at him, I inexplicably point it down.

  34. Paging Dr. Freeman by netruner · · Score: 1

    That dude better be on time tomorrow. If he's not down in the hole with his suit charged up, I'm not going to be happy.

    ...Stupid sonic dogs.

    --



    DISCLAIMER: This post was not checked for speling and grammar- if you complain- you're a whiner
    1. Re:Paging Dr. Freeman by Molochi · · Score: 1

      Eh, their bark was worse than their bite.

      --
      "The Adobe Updater must update itself before it can check for updates. Would you like to update the Adobe Updater now?"
  35. Ob Rap by fermion · · Score: 1

    The LHC Rap. Entertaining and Educational. Edutaining.

    --
    "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
  36. Death by Quantos · · Score: 1

    Death is the ultimate statistic - one out of every one dies. What's the big deal?

    --
    Some people are only alive because it's against the law for me to hunt them down and kill them.
    1. Re:Death by Bryansix · · Score: 1

      I think it is the untimely death and the inability for the human race to go on that has everyone worried.

    2. Re:Death by blair1q · · Score: 1

      Your statistic is not statistically accurate.

      More than half of all people ever born are alive.

  37. All I know is... by glwtta · · Score: 1

    The guy who flips the switch better bring along a crowbar.

    --
    sic transit gloria mundi
  38. Film to watch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Quiet Earth.

    Some day we're going to screw up, but not tomorrow.

  39. Dear /. reader by Arthur+B. · · Score: 1, Redundant

    This is your one shot at getting laid, use it tonight, or lose it.

    --
    \u262D = \u5350
    1. Re:Dear /. reader by nsayer · · Score: 1

      That's probably true whether the universe ends or not.

  40. So what kind of test animals are they using? by Anachragnome · · Score: 0

    I hope they are not using humans, without proper FDA approval.

  41. I did this when I was a kid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If France gets enveloped in a warp field bubble, have them give me a call, I have some experience in this area.
     
    -- wesley crusher

  42. Apocalypse Now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least the post apocalyptic t-shirts are ready:

    http://fiendfolio.blogspot.com/2008/09/are-you-ready-for-impending-apocalypse.html
       

  43. More likely it will punch a hole in the by BitterOldGUy · · Score: 4, Funny
    Universe and we'll be in an alternate reality.

    You'll know it too. You'll wake up one day with a Black President or with an old geezer and a MILF for a VP.

    Then, and only then, will I worry!

    1. Re:More likely it will punch a hole in the by RubberChainsaw · · Score: 2, Funny

      At least I'll get to have a cool goatee.

      --
      I welcome our new 99% overlords.
    2. Re:More likely it will punch a hole in the by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

      Or, God forbid, a tentacle-monster that claims it loves everyone.

    3. Re:More likely it will punch a hole in the by Redneck+Flyboy · · Score: 1

      Get with the times the term is VPILF. ;-)

      --
      "Maintain thy airspeed, lest the ground rise up and smite thee." - Unknown
    4. Re:More likely it will punch a hole in the by maz2331 · · Score: 1

      No the black hole will give you Goatse.

    5. Re:More likely it will punch a hole in the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you mean gilf

    6. Re:More likely it will punch a hole in the by laejoh · · Score: 0

      and there was much rejoicing!

  44. The world can't end with out the CUBS WINNING THE by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    The world can't end with out the CUBS WINNING THE world series

  45. For Sydney Slashdotters by femto · · Score: 4, Informative

    Doctors Karl Kruszelnicki and Kevin Varvell are giving an LHC lecture at the University of Sydney tonight. 7pm at the Footbridge Theatre. Varvell is a contributor to the ATLAS detector. Kruszelnicki is always fun. It includes a live cross to CERN. The lecture was to be in the school of Physics but has had to be transferred to a larger venue due to popular demand.

    1. Re:For Sydney Slashdotters by Whiteox · · Score: 1

      For those who don't know Kruszelnicki: He was the one who worked out why men only get lint in their belly buttons.

      --
      Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
    2. Re:For Sydney Slashdotters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've just had word from Sydney Uni that they are going to try to record the lecture and release it as a podcast. All going well it will be on the Physics Faculty website by Friday.

  46. Radio 4 coverage in the UK by mustafap · · Score: 4, Informative

    For some reason, the BBC are making a big thing of this, and providing a lot of coverage and related programmes on the Radio 4 station.

    The BBC provide a listen again service for those of you who are distant but interested. Check out the programmes here:

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/bigbang/

    Assuming that the world isn't swallowed up by a black hole from the experiment, that is:

    http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/15/science/15risk.html

    --
    Open Source Drum Kit, LPLC deve board - mjhdesigns.com
    1. Re:Radio 4 coverage in the UK by Martin+Spamer · · Score: 1

      Assuming that the world isn't swallowed up by a black hole from the experiment

      I can confidently assert that the world will not be swallowed up by a big black hole.
      When I'm right shown to be right my genius will be affirmed.
      Should I be proven wrong, nobody will be around to gloat.

    2. Re:Radio 4 coverage in the UK by sznupi · · Score: 1

      I seem to notice some interesting differences between UK & US media regarding LHC coverage... ;)

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
  47. Most expensive science experiment ever? by thermopile · · Score: 3, Informative
    Look, I think the LHC is really cool -- and I'm looking forward to the results it produces -- but I'm afraid it's not the most expensive science project.

    The International Space Station gets that (dis)honor, with an estimated cost of $25.6B (US) from 1994 to 2005, not including shuttle costs - and that's just NASA's budget.

    So, from that perspective, the LHC is a bargain. And it's probably still cheap compared to what the Superconducting SuperCollider would have ended up costing.

    --

    "Diplomacy is something you do until you find a rock." --Richard Pound

    1. Re:Most expensive science experiment ever? by mollymoo · · Score: 1

      It's the most expensive science experiment, not project. The ISS isn't a single experimental apparatus like the LHC, it's a platform for multiple experiments. OK, it's really a political pawn, but it's a science platform too.

      --
      Chernobyl 'not a wildlife haven' - BBC News
    2. Re:Most expensive science experiment ever? by ChrisA90278 · · Score: 0, Troll

      No, the ISS can't be the most expensive science project because it has little to do with science. ISS is a project alright but not a science project. Kind of an anti-science project realy as it's main purpose seems to be to suck up money from science related stuff.

    3. Re:Most expensive science experiment ever? by verbamour · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm just mad that the Europeans are going to beat us to destroying the Earth.

      What every happened to America #1?

      It would server them damn Europeans right if the LHC _didn't_ destroy the Earth and we managed to do it with Global Warming (sorry, Global Climate Change) instead. Ah, they'd probably just hide out in their circular tunnel, tweaking their precious proton stream until they got it right... ...stupid geniuses...

    4. Re:Most expensive science experiment ever? by sidyan · · Score: 2, Informative

      For its first 12 years, The ISS has been/will be an engineering project first, a science facility second (with the unending stream of budget cuts and cost overruns invariably being held against the science part). Only when the crew size is increased to 6, after the delivery and outfitting of Node Three, will sufficient crew time be available for science to take the forefront of ISS operations.

      Even disregarding the ISS, ITER could give the LHC a good run for its money in the cost department, though it's not expected to begin operations for another 10 years.

    5. Re:Most expensive science experiment ever? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it goes without saying around here that if there's (space) science to be done there's absolutely no compelling reason for it to be done by the people who are still alive (as opposed to robotic probes/rovers/overlords).

      In that light ISS isn't a science project so much as a PR stunt, and I have a hard time believing that $25billion is the most expensive PR stunt ever. (see: the pyramids, the US presidential electoral system, and Christianity (ok, not technically PR so much as LGAR (Lord God Almighty Relations), but my point stainds))

    6. Re:Most expensive science experiment ever? by Jorophose · · Score: 1

      Because broadband appeared magically...

    7. Re:Most expensive science experiment ever? by Spacezilla · · Score: 1

      So many funny replies to this article, but yours is by far the best. Hilarious, simply hilarious. :)

  48. We're so screwed. by tjstork · · Score: 1

    You know, if I had a nickel for every new technology that we monkeyed with that we thought we could just push to unlimited bounds without somehow screwing ourselves, I'd be pretty rich.

    I mean, if scientists are so certain that something bad won't happen when they set about "recreating the initial conditions of the universe", then, why do they have to do any experiments at all. But they don't genuinely know what is going to happen... do they?

    It may not happen now, but eventually, there will be an experiment that someone will do that will cause significant loss of life.

    --
    This is my sig.
    1. Re:We're so screwed. by gaderael · · Score: 1

      You mean like the nuclear bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki? The scientists then never really knew just how much damage they were going to do, especially with the survivors who developed cancer as a result of the radiation.

      --
      Anyone got a light for my sig?
    2. Re:We're so screwed. by jackchance · · Score: 1
      But you have to weigh that against the lives saved by science.

      antibiotics, vaccines, surgical techniques, etc.

      but wouldn't you say the atom bomb was an experiment that caused significant loss of life?

      --
      1 1 2 3 5 8 13 21 34 55 89 144 233 377 610 987 1597 2584 4181 6765
    3. Re:We're so screwed. by tjstork · · Score: 1

      But you have to weigh that against the lives saved by science. antibiotics, vaccines, surgical techniques, etc.

      Oh yeah, but, with the earth 4 hours away from cracking in half, antibiotics aren't looking so good... :-)

      --
      This is my sig.
    4. Re:We're so screwed. by jackchance · · Score: 1
      good point.

      but, you said "significant loss of life", not "destruction of earth"

      --
      1 1 2 3 5 8 13 21 34 55 89 144 233 377 610 987 1597 2584 4181 6765
    5. Re:We're so screwed. by tjstork · · Score: 1

      good point.

      but, you said "significant loss of life", not "destruction of earth"

      True, but the guys at Nagasaki and Hiroshima were enemies of the USA at the time the bomb was tested, so, it wasn't like it was a loss of -any- life.

      --
      This is my sig.
    6. Re:We're so screwed. by jackchance · · Score: 1

      True, but the guys at Nagasaki and Hiroshima were enemies of the USA at the time the bomb was tested, so, it wasn't like it was a loss of -any- life.

      i'm not sure the point you are trying to make here. Are you saying that it is a bad example, because the deaths due to the atom bomb were not accidents? That makes it even more fucked up. Scientists have been fucking people up since the dawn of time.
      But if you are looking for an accident , I'll have to go with Chernobyl.

      --
      1 1 2 3 5 8 13 21 34 55 89 144 233 377 610 987 1597 2584 4181 6765
  49. I read the title too quickly... by HiVizDiver · · Score: 1

    ... and misread it as "LHC Flips Out Tomorrow". Let's hope it isn't true. ;-)

  50. Regular status updates can be found here: by garethw · · Score: 5, Funny
    --
    garethw
    1. Re:Regular status updates can be found here: by skuzzlebutt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Thankfully, there is an RSS feed so you know in real-time if the Earth has been destroyed:

      http://www.hasthelhcdestroyedtheearth.com/rss.xml

      But, what if the end of the world affects my DSL? Is there an option for SMS?

      --
      My debut novel AMITY now available: http://jeremydbrooks.c
    2. Re:Regular status updates can be found here: by felipekk · · Score: 1

      What's up with the message in the source code?

    3. Re:Regular status updates can be found here: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      http://www.hasthelhcdestroyedtheearth.com/

      Don't forget the RSS feed:
      http://www.hasthelhcdestroyedtheearth.com/rss.xml

    4. Re:Regular status updates can be found here: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The site should give a "as of and " prior to the response.

      Then, of course, an elapsed timer post-turn/pre-apocolypse once this sucker is turned on.

    5. Re:Regular status updates can be found here: by ypctx · · Score: 1
      Is there a RSS feed?
      Do I win a black hole?

      the first person to ask for an RSS feed gets a free black hole in their junk

    6. Re:Regular status updates can be found here: by catmistake · · Score: 1

      Thanks but I already set up a cron to do periodic checks, and in the event of an apocolypse, it'll fire off an email notification.

    7. Re:Regular status updates can be found here: by svank · · Score: 1

      That website seems to be out of date. The International Earth-Destruction Advisory Board reports that the Earth has indeed been destroyed by the LHC in preliminary experiments to determine if the Collider would destroy the earth.

    8. Re:Regular status updates can be found here: by poached · · Score: 1

      should I check back often?

    9. Re:Regular status updates can be found here: by martinw89 · · Score: 2, Funny

      The source for that page is hilarious:

      <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
      <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
      <head>
        <title>Has the Large Hadron Collider destroyed the earth yet?</title>
        <!-- the first person to ask for an RSS feed gets a free black hole in their junk

      ok FINE here
      -->

      <link rel="alternate" title="Has the Large Hadron Collider destroyed the earth yet?" href="http://www.hasthelhcdestroyedtheearth.com/rss.xml" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
      </head>

      <body style="text-align: center; padding-top: 200px;">

        <span style="font-weight: bold; font-size: 120pt; font-family: Arial, sans-serif; text-decoration: none; color: black;"  >NO</span>

      <!-- oh shit bears -->

      <!--
      [ddrucker@scatter ~]$ host -t txt freon.3e.org
      freon.3e.org descriptive text "Anesthetized monkeys exposed to 25,000
      ppm or 50,000 ppm [of freon] for 5 minutes had [cardiac] [arrhythmia]s
      including [tachycardia] and decreased contractility (U.S. EPA 1983)"

      -->

      <script type="text/javascript">
      var gaJsHost = (("https:" == document.location.protocol) ? "https://ssl." : "http://www.");
      document.write(unescape("%3Cscript src='" + gaJsHost + "google-analytics.com/ga.js' type='text/javascript'%3E%3C/script%3E"));
      </script>
      <script type="text/javascript">
      var pageTracker = _gat._getTracker("UA-143825-2");
      pageTracker._trackPageview();
      </script>
      </body>
      </html>

    10. Re:Regular status updates can be found here: by meta-monkey · · Score: 1

      You know, I checked the source for that page, and it's static. It just says "NO." Shouldn't it be doing some kind of poling or something? To check and see if the earth has, in fact, been destroyed by the LHC?

      Shoddy coding, imo.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    11. Re:Regular status updates can be found here: by Surt · · Score: 2, Funny

      You missed the comment
      <!-- oh shit bears -->
      Go look up how that is to be rendered in the html4 spec in the event of the earth's destruction.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    12. Re:Regular status updates can be found here: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Beautiful.

    13. Re:Regular status updates can be found here: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder if they would publish an RSS feed...

    14. Re:Regular status updates can be found here: by kramulous · · Score: 1

      dunno, I hit refresh a couple of times. Maybe this time ...

      --
      .
    15. Re:Regular status updates can be found here: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try a view->source on this. Good stuff.

  51. finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    so finally were approaching the end of our existence... ever wondered why there are no aliens flying around? they all tried the same experiment and flush away their civilization in one day.

  52. Sing it with me! by Spacepup · · Score: 1

    It's the end of the world as we know it...
    It's the end of the world as we know it...
    It's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine.

  53. Tell you what. by blair1q · · Score: 1

    I tell you what. If you think the world will end tomorrow, you give me all your possessions today, and I'll give you the satisfaction of knowing you were right when it happens. That will be the only thing worth having at that point, and I will have a lot of stuff that won't be worth a thing, and no integrity whatsoever as we slip into hell.

    Sound like a deal?

    Because if you don't want to do it, then you're the one lacking in integrity.

  54. Why, just why? by Ironchew · · Score: 1

    Why would CERN be sending out death threats? Confident this will be the big one, maybe.

  55. Cyclical by caluml · · Score: 3, Funny

    Perhaps this is the end of the cycle. Perhaps, this is how our universe was created. And so, every X billion years, we get smart enough, disintegrate the universe, and have to start all over again, evolving from slime.
    Perhaps real intelligence will know *not* to switch it on in a few more cycles of this.

    Well, it's been nice knowing you all. I'm just off to steal some Porsches (no Ferarri garages nearby), and loot, and plunder booty.

    1. Re:Cyclical by Pastis · · Score: 0, Redundant

      And so, every X billion years, we get smart enough, disintegrate the universe, and have to start all over again,

      That doesn't sound smart enough to me !

    2. Re:Cyclical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The man in black pushed the button, and Hell followed with him.

    3. Re:Cyclical by Spatial · · Score: 1

      Nah, the reset looks more like a big button, rather than a ring.

    4. Re:Cyclical by budgenator · · Score: 1

      that's what the big-bang was you know, two half universe sized blackhole crashing into each other!

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
  56. I think we should ask reader WillRobinson by spun · · Score: 4, Funny

    Can you tell us if there is any DANGER! DANGER WILLROBINSON!

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    1. Re:I think we should ask reader WillRobinson by WillRobinson · · Score: 4, Funny

      Did you see my robot flailing its arms around? Was it screaming danger! danger!?

      No not yet as noted above on the amount of energy used. Ill be sure to let ya know when its necessary.

      As reported by CERN announced the success of the second and final test of the Large Hadron Collider's beam synchronization systems which will allow the LHC operations team to inject the first beam into the LHC.

      Some very cool pictures there too. Now what they mean, is a bit beyond my skills.

      Now if I could just get that LHC song out of my head ...

    2. Re:I think we should ask reader WillRobinson by Plutonite · · Score: 2, Funny

      Check out the youtube comments on the video you linked to. Much more entertaining than the video.

      chrisROFL65 (2 minutes ago)

      We are fucked. Fuck you scientist and youtube.

  57. Re:The world can't end with out the CUBS WINNING T by blair1q · · Score: 1

    You are incorrect.

    The world will end before the Cubs win the World Series.

    The LHC may take a few weeks to create its first non-evaporating black hole.

  58. honestly, by toby · · Score: 1

    Don't you think hookers of the world are entitled to just one night off before the world ends?

    Besides, plenty of wives and girlfriends would like one good bonk before then as well...

    --
    you had me at #!
    1. Re:honestly, by moderatorrater · · Score: 2, Funny

      plenty of wives and girlfriends would like one good bonk before then as well

      They'll probably want to take care of their headache and get a good night of sleep more if their past reactions are any indication.

    2. Re:honestly, by lordofwhee · · Score: 1

      That settles it, party at this guy's wife/girlfriend!

    3. Re:honestly, by Phurge · · Score: 1

      Besides, plenty of wives and girlfriends would like one good bonk before then as well...

      You must be new here. Possibly after the universe begins again the slashdot populace will have wives and girfriends to bonk.

      --
      I'll see your hokum and raise you a boondoggle.
  59. Have the nuts not noticed? by damburger · · Score: 2

    Aside from the idiocy of the conspiracy theorists in general, they seemed to have missed the point that if the beam is at 450GeV, then the collision will be 900GeV and that doesn't exceed the energy of the most powerful currently active accelerator (the Tevatron). Even if the 14TeV collisions ultimately envisioned were going to create a micro black hole and end the Earth, it wouldn't happen tomorrow anyway.

    --
    If we can put a man on the moon, why can't we shoot people for Apollo-related non-sequiturs?
    1. Re:Have the nuts not noticed? by Spatial · · Score: 1

      The doomsayers don't notice anything that might interfere with their precious doom and gloom. That's probably why they have such a great track record...

    2. Re:Have the nuts not noticed? by USN1985 · · Score: 1

      Ok fellas, first off, I'm no genius. Far from it. Which is why I come to people who seem to have a semi firm grasp on the idea of the situation. Now I'm pretty sure I'm super paranoid and I might even suffer from a weak version of OCD, of course I'm not going to seek professional help, but to make a long story short, I suffer from anxiety. In the mid-90's as a kid I actually couldn't sleep sometimes because I was certain Hussein had chemical weapons that could reach America. But that's another story. This story is the LHC. Do any of you think that it is eventually going to destroy the world? And what is the gain from it? Is it going to be worth the possible chance of the Earth's demise? I'm just looking for answers here. I'd like to say I don't fear death, as a Christian I shouldn't, but I think it's my anxiety more than anything. Anyone know of any over the counter anti-anxiety medication? Please respond ASAP. It's 9:00 and I'd really like some sleep tonight.

    3. Re:Have the nuts not noticed? by jtankers · · Score: 1

      Tomorrow is a party and a media event, not a technical milestone. The Associated Press quotes CERN's chief spokesman James Gillies as saying "Full power is probably a year away." http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5g5nGPtmoUVIJDgehVJ_snD6vDA6gD933D3J00

    4. Re:Have the nuts not noticed? by JTsyo · · Score: 1

      Well as long as it's not today. We're having Sloppy Joes for dinner and I wouldn't want to miss out on that.

  60. engage! by partowel · · Score: 0

    Warp LHC!

    Lets demonstrate FTL power once and for all.

    In other unrelated news :

    Black hole power systems for sale!

    Infinite power! No maintenance required!

  61. The LHC, a wormhole, and hell. by suck_burners_rice · · Score: 1

    Mark my word. The minute they turn that thing on, all hell is gonna break loose. For one thing, the LHC will produce something very similar to a microscopic black hole, except that it will actually be a wormhole. A wormhole... to hell! And then this wormhole will gradually grow. Given that it's a tear in the fabric of space/time, it will be impossible to do anything about it. How the hell do you sew space/time back together?! Within weeks, it will be large enough that demons and monsters of all shapes and sizes are gonna start spewing out, and everyone they bite will turn into a similar demon/monster. Within six months, the world will be like in I Am Legend, with one dude in New York being the only person left alive. The wormhole will slowly continue to grow, and within several years, even that dude will be killed as the entire planet is sucked in and finds itself directly within the blazes of hell and damnation itself. That is what the LHC will cause. Not some pipsqueak black hole that will probably evaporate within a few milliseconds.

    --
    McCain/Palin '08. Now THAT's hope and change!
    1. Re:The LHC, a wormhole, and hell. by nsayer · · Score: 1

      A wormhole... to hell!

      To hell or to Mars?

    2. Re:The LHC, a wormhole, and hell. by John+Sokol · · Score: 1

      If the LHC doesn't end the world McCain/Palin surly could.

      --
      I am always doing that which I can not do, in order that I may learn how to do it. - Pablo Picasso
    3. Re:The LHC, a wormhole, and hell. by Maestro485 · · Score: 1

      UAC???

      I knew Microsoft was behind all of this!!!

    4. Re:The LHC, a wormhole, and hell. by suck_burners_rice · · Score: 1

      I doubt Palin will end the world. She'll probably improve things a great deal. Especially when she puts Air Force One on eBay.

      --
      McCain/Palin '08. Now THAT's hope and change!
    5. Re:The LHC, a wormhole, and hell. by Whiteox · · Score: 1

      Already been done. The Black Hole explains it all.
      The bad guys go to hell and the good guys survive.
      http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0078869/plotsummary

      --
      Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
    6. Re:The LHC, a wormhole, and hell. by Caraig · · Score: 1

      Given that it's a tear in the fabric of space/time, it will be impossible to do anything about it. How the hell do you sew space/time back together?!

      Not to mention when space/time has been folded, trimmed, and hemmed.

      --
      "I am an Adept of Tantric VAX."
    7. Re:The LHC, a wormhole, and hell. by John+Sokol · · Score: 1

      Does Air Force One on eBay come with McCain too?

      Dude, she scares me. I mean she could make GWB look like a saint in the end.

      I look at McCain/Palin and they just seem like and even bigger bunch of screw up's then Bush/Cheney. Incompetence is one of the best way to disguise a con.

      Plus there are more big oil company ties with her as if Bush/Cheney and the Halliburton Connection wasn't obvious enough. How did a company that maintains oil wells take over ALL our defense contracts anyhow? Don't think there may have been any impropriety there?

      We might as well let the Oil and Gas companies just take over direct control, these guys are hell bent on total full bore global warming as a good thing. People in Canada and Alaska see this as making there land lush and green, while the rest of the human race further south get wiped out. But their republicans and it's clear they don't care because they think that somehow they will be above it all. But when the waves are crashing at there door steps and there no food to eat, they will starve just like the rest of the poor bastards they didn't care about.

      Well I am way off topic now, please forgive me who ever is going to mod this.

      But to get this back on topic I think McCain/Palin driving us in to WW III and/or doing nothing but getting us burning more gas and welcoming the rapture is far more real a danger then the LHC's micro black holes.

      --
      I am always doing that which I can not do, in order that I may learn how to do it. - Pablo Picasso
    8. Re:The LHC, a wormhole, and hell. by Amiralul · · Score: 1

      LHC is a Phantom Zone projector!!

    9. Re:The LHC, a wormhole, and hell. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Improve things for white male business interests, yes. If you make less than five million dollars a year, tough shit.

  62. Fermi Paradox? by gumpish · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Is this the answer to the Fermi paradox?

    If, given the expected number of star systems with planets capable of supporting life (which although may be a low percentage of stars still isn't nil), and given that evolution eventually results in intelligence (or at least there's a decent probability it does), then there should be plenty of other intelligent civilizations (certainly including post-Singularity civilizations). But there (apparently) aren't.

    So either we're first, out of all those star systems...

    Or just perhaps intelligent civilizations all eventually delve into the field of particle physics and build colliders... then wink out of existence in spontaneous black holes.

  63. the end is nigh! by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

    I guess Duke Nukem Forever really *won't* ever come out. *sigh*

    It's been nice typing at you guys. It's been an honor and a privilege. Godspeed.

    1. Re:the end is nigh! by old+and+new+again · · Score: 1

      or we survive and they feel forced to get it out for real (and maybe have it happen in a parallel/post singularity universe (easy programming, just white space)

  64. TechnoCore by ccozan · · Score: 1

    If we read carefully, it was that the TechnoCore actually orchestrated the "Mistake", which after http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technocore explanation is actually sometime in 22nd-23rd century. And of course, we also find out that the AI behind it evolved from "20th century search engines" ;). Interesting read, takes a while to understand the mastery in writing of Dan Simmons.

    1. Re:TechnoCore by omnivagus · · Score: 1

      So what you're saying is that Google's going to use the LHC to pretend to destroy the earth tomorrow? ;-)

  65. I could see the lights dim. by Neanderthal+Ninny · · Score: 1

    I would like see the movie or photo from the International Space Station at night when the lights dim when they turn this this on;)
    Really, this will be exciting what they will find.

  66. Just in case by coren2000 · · Score: 2, Funny

    In case of doomsday tomorrow... I hereby leave all my worldly possessions to the blackhole that will claim everything and kill us all.

  67. The Next Big Bang by Rick+Richardson · · Score: 1

    The Next Big Bang

    054 HISTORY [Closed Captioned]
    Tue, Sep 9, 7:00p - 8:00p CDT

    After $10 billion and 40 years of planning and construction of the Large Hadron Collider, the biggest science experiment in history may yield answers about the universe.

  68. End of the world? Where you going, Shaft? by SirBitBucket · · Score: 1

    I'm goin' to get laid. Where the hell are you going?

  69. Stanislaw Lem covered this idea in Fiasco. by toby · · Score: 1

    He coined a name for the hypothesis, but since I gave my copy away I can't look it up. This page calls it a "developmental window". Fiasco is intensely enjoyable, thought-provoking, and arguably deeply condemnatory of human nature.

    --
    you had me at #!
    1. Re:Stanislaw Lem covered this idea in Fiasco. by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      can you explain me the end of the book? i read it years ago, as i did with all stories about pirx, but i never understood this one book correctly, i think.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
  70. Something to do by HisOmniscience · · Score: 1

    I now have something to do during CS class tomorrow!

  71. what you say makes sense by toby · · Score: 1

    After all, it's a big day tomorrow! (World ending, and all.)

    --
    you had me at #!
  72. Proof! by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    It's happening already! Our print jobs are slowing down. Must be a mini-blackhole. (At least that's what I'm putting in the log.)

  73. mod parent UP - Quiet Earth is an incredible movie by toby · · Score: 1

    and true classic. I miss Bruno Lawrence.

    --
    you had me at #!
  74. dr who by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    tomorrow may end up like an episode of dr who

    1. Re:dr who by MRe_nl · · Score: 1

      Wot? The LHC running around in circles shouting "EXTERMINATE""EXTERMINATE"?
      http://downloads.bbc.co.uk/doctorwho/s4/s4_13/audio/s4_13_aud_04.mp3

      --
      "Kill 'em all and let Root sort 'em out"
  75. Party! by Rick+Genter · · Score: 1

    Anyone else having an end-of-the-world party tonight?

    Just in case ;-).

    --
    Don't underestimate the power of The Source
  76. Mad scientists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How do you make a scientist mad?

    Take away his Large Hadron Collider.

    Yeah, that's bad. Mod me down.

  77. I seriously hope... by sgage · · Score: 1

    ... that the world is consumed by a black hole tomorrow. I just don't see how I can pay my bills this month, and the End Of The World would be quite welcome.

    Oh, sorry to all the rest of you. :-)

    1. Re:I seriously hope... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just don't see how I can pay my bills this month, and the End Of The World would be quite welcome.

      Lucky escape for Arsenal if the world did end.

  78. yes, we will all die by Dreen · · Score: 1
  79. The anthropic princiiple strikes again by jake-in-a-box · · Score: 3, Funny

    At least in this instantiation of the multiverse, nothing universe-destroying will happen. There will undoubtedly be many - perhaps an infinite number - that will be destroyed. But since I will be telling you I told you so, ipso facto it didn't happen here.

    Else we'll never know - nor care.

    --
    To hear the gods laugh tell them your plans.
  80. Re:I honestly believe that... by budgenator · · Score: 1

    so if a mini-blackhole shoots out of the LHC and eats Mars instead of the Earth, do you think Marvin will be very very angry?

    --
    Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
  81. Re:I honestly believe that... by Spatial · · Score: 1

    The probability of the entire Universe spontaneously being destroyed five seconds after you read this due to your anal venting of unpleasant gasses is also "greater than zero." Somehow, I doubt you'll get into a panic over it, all the same.

  82. So who's going to miss me now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All my creditors will be dead too :(

  83. The world has ended - the Internet says so! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I followed the posted link (http://webcast.cern.ch/), but the screen is blank, so I'm assuming the world has ended - or at least the other side of it - as a result of a man-made black hole :-) I'm hoping the black hole has finished it's vengeance against mankind in the northern hemisphere and doesn't decide to go south for the winter (or is that summer?).

  84. I think its cool by implodeme · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    ...but will it run Crysis?

  85. The worlds gonna end? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But Death Magnetic isn't out yet!

  86. Re:I honestly believe that... by Caraig · · Score: 1

    Angry enough to send a payload of Explodium-294 to us to make an Earth-shattering kaboom. Oh, my, yes.

    --
    "I am an Adept of Tantric VAX."
  87. That's just great. by DreadfulGrape · · Score: 1, Informative

    Reality gets sucked into the void on my fuckin' birthday. ...

    Oh well, it's been a nice 48 years. So long, & thanks for all the fish.

    --
    sig has been sent away for a few small repairs...
    1. Re:That's just great. by Spacezilla · · Score: 3, Informative

      Informative? Well, I suppose his did tell us his birthday. My birthday is February 24th, 1980. Now mod me up!

    2. Re:That's just great. by Selanit · · Score: 1

      Quick! Before it hits -- how did you manage to type that message with flippers? O_O

  88. Destroy the Earth and I will KILL you by mkcmkc · · Score: 1

    I'm just wondering how exactly this threat was phrased. "If you destroy the world, then so help me I'm going to kill you dead!"

    No kidding. No one serious is making any threats--they're out buying Uzis and plane tickets. And last year--not this week.

    --
    "Not an actor, but he plays one on TV."
  89. Dr. Strangelet or How I Learned to Stop Worrying a by zentronium · · Score: 1

    Dr. Strangelet or How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Collider

    I'll be hearing this nice tune while the black hole engulfs all of the planet and watch the ensuing chaos.

    http://musiclub.web.cern.ch/MusiClub/bands/cernettes/songs/collider.html

  90. Bwahahahaha! by zazenation · · Score: 1

    Why build a Large Hadron Collider --- The ultimate doomsday device?

    Isn't that a rather overly elaborate way to possibly eliminate all life on earth when a huge tank full of sharks with frickin laser beams would have been so much simpler?

  91. I for one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    can't wait for Large amounts of Herbal Cannabis to be produced from this experiment. Isn't that what LHC means?

  92. So is it or is it not going ruin my Wednesday? by USN1985 · · Score: 1

    Ok guys, I'm pretty sure I suffer from anxiety because I'm freakin out here. I'm a Christian and I've placed my faith in God (I know many of you may not agree with me here), but I'd rather not die in my sleep. And I'd really like to get some sleep. But the idea of the world being destroyed is wayyy too much for me to close my eyes. So in your opinions, is it or is it not going to honestly destroy the world?

    1. Re:So is it or is it not going ruin my Wednesday? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you've placed your faith in god, what difference does science make to your epistemological hand-wringing? The bible doesn't mention the large hadron collider. That should be enough for any good christian.

    2. Re:So is it or is it not going ruin my Wednesday? by USN1985 · · Score: 1

      Wait, you mean they didn't mention the LHC in Revelation? Just kidding, but thanks for the reassurance.

    3. Re:So is it or is it not going ruin my Wednesday? by Yarhajile · · Score: 1

      Saying your prayers surely wont hurt!

  93. Hmm by Jorophose · · Score: 1

    I wonder if this is the secret ending in Spore?

    Or the reason we never hear from Earth in Alpha Centauri?

  94. Don't worry... by Panaflex · · Score: 4, Funny

    LHC has all the latest safety systems... in the event of an actual black hole or strangelet event...

    they simply full the lever and hit the button!!

    It says.. "Black Hole/Stranglet CRASH button - In case of imminent world destruction, break glass and press CMS ABORT button"
    (Yes, that's really in the LHC control room LOL)

    --
    I said no... but I missed and it came out yes.
    1. Re:Don't worry... by kramulous · · Score: 1

      Yeah, real funny. Except that those crazy scientists thought it'd be hilarious to wire it up to a speaker that makes wet fart noises.

      --
      .
    2. Re:Don't worry... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i hope so.
      i really really really don't want to die. :'(

  95. Oh my... by marco.antonio.costa · · Score: 1

    We're doomed. :)

    --
    Send your spendthrift head of state this
  96. And why do YOU care if it creates a black hole? by axlr8or · · Score: 0

    Awww, I can understand you'd be scared if you're living the dream off of this whip cream topped turd of a world we live in. Truth is ALWAYS worth life. Flip the sucker on. If something bad happens you can all come on down. We'll pop some popcorn and sing campfire songs.

  97. Thus speaks the ISO by Torodung · · Score: 1

    I had no idea the ISO posted to Slashdot.

    I guess your standards really have gone to pot! ;^)

    --
    Toro

  98. EOTW Rescheduled, now Nov. 10 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have to wait for them to get the beams up to 5 TeV, still 6 to 8 weeks away assuming all goes well.

  99. Time loop by Samah · · Score: 2, Funny

    Damn it you insensitive clods, we're stuck in a time loop!
    Somehow I was immune to its effects and have been reliving this day over and over and over, at least 100 times now!
    I've been watching Groundhog Day and 12:01 to try to work out what's happening and how I can stop it but... oh crap here it goes ag~~~

    --
    Homonyms are fun!
    You're driving your car, but they're riding their bikes there.
  100. interesting nostradamus post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I saw this on the discovery channel

    Migres, migres de Geneue trestous,
    Saturne d'or en fer se chargera,
    Le contre Raypoz exteriminera tous,
    Auvant l'aruent le ciel signes fera.

    translation:
    get out of Geneva
    a "saturn" metal construction will charge.
    The opposition of positive rays will exterminate all
    Before the happening, the sky will make signs

    quiet impressive terminology for someone who lived in the XVI century

    (http://bigsciencenews.blogspot.com/2008/05/nostradamus-and-lhc.html)

    1. Re:interesting nostradamus post by MightyDrunken · · Score: 1
      Hmm, not much should be read into Nostradamus because the Quatrains are meant to be obscure to begin with. Here are two other interpretations.

      Flee, flee, people of Geneva, your times of plenty will become times of need. Those against Iran will be exterminated. Before this event, there will be signs in the sky.
      Here the literal gold into lead has been obviously interpreted to mean hard times. RAYPOZ is a anagram of Zopyra which this person thinks refers to Persia.

      OR

      [a failed prophecy of an attack by the Emperor Charles V on the Protestant enclave at Geneva]
      Flee, flee Geneva, each and every one! Saturn shall change himself from gold to iron - the opposite! Zopira [Charles V] shall exterminate you all. Before he arrives the sky shall show signs [of it].

      The

      quiet impressive terminology for someone who lived in the XVI century

      is purely of your own making. Amusingly the guy at the blog (http://bigsciencenews.blogspot.com/2008/05/nostradamus-and-lhc.html) thinks that Saturn was only discovered after Gaileo invented the telescope.

  101. Only On Slashdot... by tzjanii · · Score: 0

    Only on Slashdot would this be considered "informative"...

    --
    Slashdot is a pretty cool guy eh posts dupes and doesn't afraid of anything.
  102. Informative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The LHC will NOT create a Black hole, there isn't enough energy to do so.

  103. Obligatory Car Analogy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Imagine a road that goes in a circle.

    Now, tomorrow, they're going to put ONE CAR on the road
    and drive it moderately fast to make sure the road is intact.

    Then they will proceed, in future tests, to drive that ONE CAR
    faster and faster around the circular road to make sure the road holds up.

    On "collision day", the add a SECOND CAR driving in the
    OPPOSITE DIRECTION on that circular road.

    Then they drive those two cars REALLY REALLY FAST and crash them head-on
    into each other.

    The point is to try to understand the cars and how they are put together
    by analyzing the parts that go flying off in the collision, and the speed
    and direction that those parts went flying.

    1. Re:Obligatory Car Analogy by Ceriel+Nosforit · · Score: 1

      Parent is actually BadAnalogyGuy, posting anon since his car analogy is actually good.

      --
      All rites reversed 2010
    2. Re:Obligatory Car Analogy by Permutation+Citizen · · Score: 2, Informative

      The point is to try to understand the cars and how they are put together
      by analyzing the parts that go flying off in the collision, and the speed
      and direction that those parts went flying.

      Actually, they expect to obtain from the collision.
        - Three bicycles
        - one motor bike
        - An amazing big truck nobody has seen yet !

      The truck will move about 10 meters then explode in several vehicules that will be analysed.

    3. Re:Obligatory Car Analogy by zygotic+mitosis · · Score: 1

      It's like Smash Lab, only actually cool and good

    4. Re:Obligatory Car Analogy by sznupi · · Score: 1

      Possibly the best car analogy I've seen here yet...

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
  104. FINALLY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We are going to be killed dead!

  105. Is it to late to by greymond · · Score: 1

    Start selling black hole insurance?

  106. Please let the LHC destroy the world by SlappyBastard · · Score: 1

    I would gladly destroy the world if it meant no one having to hear any more political coverage.

    --
    I scream. You scream. I assume that means we're both acquainted with the problem. We proceed.
  107. what if by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they are doing all this on an assumption, his theory could be wrong and they dont dissapear. why isnt the usa armed forces down there shutting it down? they like to go save the planet for everything else.

  108. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Say your prayers. The white man is trying to play GOD again...

  109. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 0, Troll

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  110. UTC Please by dokebi · · Score: 1

    For international, nay, global event like this, could you please post the time in UTC? At least that way I don't have to convert the time TWICE.

    --
    In Soviet Russia, articles before post read *you*!
  111. A webcast? Why? by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

    The subject line says it all. Watching a bunch of engineers watch computer screens is about as interesting as watching paint dry.

  112. For Melbourne Slashdotters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For Melbournians: Melbourne Uni is hosting a live satellite link at the Melbourne Museum.

  113. Re:I honestly believe that... by DeathElk · · Score: 1
    In all defense of ol' AC, I'm certain that the probability of

    the entire Universe spontaneously being destroyed five seconds after you read this due to your anal venting of unpleasant gasses

    is definitely zero. Hey! Unless you know something I don't... <chinrub/>

  114. Subscribe to the RSS feed by douglips · · Score: 1

    You can keep track of the LHC status by subscribing to the feed here:
    http://www.hasthelhcdestroyedtheearth.com/

  115. Why there are no aliens by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    I am nowhere near smart enough to discuss the experiment itself, but lets try this theorie for some Sci-Fi fun.

    As most slashdotters know, there are theories that suggest that in an infinite universe such as ours, you must get more then one intelligent form of life, simply by the law of averages. With so many stars and so many planets it is unlikely that just one has spawned life. Where you get life, you would eventually get intelligent life, even if a lot of it goes in other directions, perhaps life like whales, huge brains but no means/desire to affect their enviroment, you would inevitably get life-forms similar to our own with a desire to go out and explore.

    So where are they? Because our species is also very young, where are the older space faring species?

    One explenation why we haven't been contacted is that it is impossible. Interstellar travel can never go faster then light and this makes any contact missions impossible.

    But what about this, say that doomsayers are true, it would neatly explain why there are no galactic civilisations, what is this experiment is pandora's box? Any species with the intelligence/curiousity to attempt to go for space comes across this experiment and pushed the big red button and destroys itself.

    If they don't, they are not curious enough and don't want to leave their planet, if they are curious enough, they are doomed.

    Star Trek has long had a similar theory, every species has to survive its nuclear phase, you need the tech to advance but must survive it without killing yourself in a nuclear holocaust.

    As to the actual experiment soon to take place, we got two sides, both basically saying "we are about to do something we don't understand, based on theories nobody has proven but is safe/going to kill us all because we think part Y is true and part X isn't."

    Hawking radiation is going to destroy the blackhole, despite the fact that nobody has ever proven it exists beyond intellectual excersises. It doesn't help the doom-sayers that some of them seem to have clear agenda's, but they got a point. We are about to create a black-hole and then hope that it will be destroyed by something we haven't observed yet.

    This is like starting a fire in your house hoping that there is a bucket of water you just haven't seen yet.

    Personally I think there is a real risk, the scientist are guessing so it is 50/50 they are right or wrong. Considering how much theory has been over-turned by the scientist involved, I wonder if in 50 years (if we are still around) we won't consider their science like we do Einstein's today, brilliant for the time but outdated.

    Oh well, at least this is more fun then discussing the destruction of earth with global warming.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:Why there are no aliens by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      In Joe Haldeman's Forever Peace, one of the plotlines involves an accelerator/collider built around Jupiter. The idea is to get closer and closer to replicating the conditions of the big bang.

      In the story, a theory is developed that any given race survives long enough to develop a similar experiment, which works too well, and recreates the big bang, and creates a new universe. Eventually, life is formed, evolves, and winds up doing the experiment themselves...

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  116. Obligatory reference... Keep your crowbars handy by DimGeo · · Score: 1

    The right man in the wrong place can make all the difference:
    http://www.popgive.com/2008/09/gordon-freeman-spotted-at-cern.html.

  117. Some greaqt quotes on the LHC! by Fuzzypig · · Score: 1

    Letter to the UK paper Metro this morning, "Lots of people have been threatening to kill and beat up the LHC scientists if they destroy the earth. If that does happen, where are these people going to come from exactly?" Then there was a quote from Brian Cox working on the LHC project, "Anyone who thinks the LHC will destroy the world is a t**t!".

    --
    Windows guys please stop pissing on everyone and the Linux guys stop pissing in the wind, hoping to hit Windows guys!
  118. so if we destory the earth, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it means we managed to create something that destroys worlds?
    quick, someone should patent the deathstar.

  119. Video's Down Already - Black Hole Successful by billstewart · · Score: 2, Funny

    Either that, or they're just slashdotted...

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  120. Who invented the word "hadron" anyway? by David+Gerard · · Score: 1

    It's really just a bit typo-prone.

    (I am so very, very sorry.)

    --
    http://rocknerd.co.uk
  121. Anybody still out there? by Evets · · Score: 1

    Is anybody still out there? Or is it just me now?

  122. Financial Impact by gal1264 · · Score: 1

    I read this is going to be a HUGE user of bandwidth once they start sending the data around the world to be analyzed. Is it a good time to invest in network providers? I think there will be good plays along with all the cool scientific stuff we'll get out of it. I know the economy is looking poor, but I don't see internet usage shrinking any time soon.

    I'll be sleeping soundly tonite.

  123. what annoys me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What annoys me is not that the science is being done, nor that people panic about the risks, but that those who panic are labelled ignorant idiots.

    From a psychological point of view, the best way to persuade someone with an irrational fear - especially with elements of paranoia - that they're correct is to tell them that they're an idiot, a fool, that they don't understand. It's either a trigger to go on the defensive, or heard pretty much as "shhh, you're right but we'll have to shut you up".

    From a scientific point of view, you tackle ignorance with explanation. You explain how the risk assessment process works, what previous scientific theory and practice suggests that the danger is limited, etc. I.e. you do what you'd have to do with other scientists, but brought to a language that suits the layman.

    And note "language", not "level". Don't assume that someone with a fear is stupid. A professional should never leave the layman thinking "I'm a professional and I know better than you, case closed" - instead it is the professional's job to help the layman investigate for himself if he chooses. The same applies to doctors, tech support, etc.

    Finally, science is rarely about deductive certainty; there's a whole deal of induction. The layman's worry might be that the status of some exploration is binary - something is either a confident truth or it is a minefield of the unknown. But this isn't how life works - we make assumptions based on our current ability to observe, and we generalise, and sometimes we fuck up; but, considering the amount of dangeorus science we do, it seems we have made a good balance. Perhaps the layman also needs a bit of philosophy, then.

    If people are worried, they are taking notice; and if they're taking notice it means they're not ignoring. How many other science projects get such feedback? Use it to your benefit and theirs.

  124. I can't understand... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    how we can afford to spend that much money on big atom experiments, but can't spend anything on the Shuttle?

    Plus, why is this sited somewhere foreign? I thought it was going to be in Texas? Is it too dangerous to have on US soil?

  125. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So does anyone know what the expected PRACTICAL outcomes we are hoping to see? Interdimensional travel (a-la 'beast of thousand backs'), anti-grav phazotrons anything other than few geeks getting hard-ons?

  126. Particles of far higher energies occur naturally by richard.cs · · Score: 4, Informative

    Has anyone here read about the "Oh-My-God particle"? A proton detected in 1991 with an energy of 3.2±0.9×10^20 eV - that's 51 Joules, an energy you'd expect for a macroscopic object and 10 million times more than the maximum the LHC can produce (7 Tev).

    The linked page has some of the relativistic properties calculated for that proton including that "After traveling one light year, the particle would be only 0.15 femtoseconds -- 46 nanometres -- behind a photon that left at the same time."

  127. And always hitting head on? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You play pool? When you hit two balls NEARLY straight on, no spin or anything, does the one you hit stop and give the energy to the other one? No.

    Therefore if a small fraction of the energy (a billionth, say) were to be left available to the black hole as kinetic energy, that black hole would be going of the order of 1000 times the escape velocity of the earth.

    1. Re:And always hitting head on? by dominux · · Score: 1

      no, they bounce apart. The point of the black hole is that the two pool balls get stuck together when they collide. The KE goes into squishing them past all the repulsive forces until they are so squished that they are dense enough (same mass, smaller volume) that the gravitational force overpowers the repulsive forces and the escape velocity of the squished pair exceeds c.

  128. On the other hand.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if something does go wrong then the black holes will consume France first.

  129. Re: A small group of people... by Msdose · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The physicists are basing their experiments on concepts such as supersymmetry, phase change, gauge theory etc. These are not things that are well understood and defined enough to be called laws of nature. The experiments based on them are very speculative. Other better understood laws of nature such as evolution, genetics, and anthropology are not given any weight when considering the consequences of the experiments. Evolution would suggest that the universe exists now as the current iteration of a long series of universes, each recycled from the last in some process perhaps similar to the LHC experiments. The history of the world is ten thousand religions leading their people to extinction in religious wars. Their policies of eugenics breed zombies who want to die and take the whole world with them. Pack a lunch!

  130. The boom will be... by Inovaovao · · Score: 1

    ... when Chuck Norris will say "Boom!".

  131. As you include more stars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you're including a longer delay before we hear of them. At some point, the difference will be longer than the time they spend being able to be detected at this distance and so you'll have to wait thousands of years before you can notice their first steps.

    And why can we NOT be first?

    PS most of the stars are in the galactic core where there are too many stars for safe environments for carbon-based lifeforms we could recognise to exist.

    "It's been 56 minutes since you last successfully posted a comment"

  132. Re: A small group of people... by David+Gerard · · Score: 1

    Also, time is actually cubical in nature.

    --
    http://rocknerd.co.uk
  133. CERN and legal considerations by golodh · · Score: 1
    Nevermind that whatever collisions CERN has planned are nothing but a wan reflection of the violence of cosmic rays that have been sleeting through the earth every second since it was formed. Unfortunately no-one who has sold all his stock in because he believes in the end of the world believes is going to be swayed by such wishy-washy considerations, right?

    What they might be swayed by however are Legal considerations.

    Now I have been told that CERN's legal department has been asked for an assessment of CERN's potential liability in case the world ended because of their experiments.

    I have furthermore heard that the legal department reasoned thusly. In case the CERN machinery does not cause the end of the world, there will be no damage and therefore CERN will not be liable. In case however that it *does* destroy the world all in one day or less, it is very likely that both the the mail service and any courier service needed to deliver a subpoena will be out of action. Obviously CERN won't be able to be sued for liability if the subpoena can't be delivered, right? In case the destruction of the world takes longer, the legal department is confident that the current court backlog will be sufficient to prevent the case being heard before the end of the world.

    The upshot is that people won't be able to make a quick fortune by suing CERN for e.g. property damage. So from a legal point of view they saw no reason to raise objections and CERN is in the clear.

    I haven't verified this story but it strikes me as solid thinking, and it ought to satisfy doom-sayers. Right?

  134. For those who haven't seen it already: by Kiuas · · Score: 1

    This is a video worth watching if you have no idea what the LHC does.

    --
    "It is the business of the future to be dangerous" -Alfred North Whitehead
  135. Re:"Would", "should", 'ought' ... and Science ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Basically, no one ever created a "smalish black hole" yet ..

    So, with luck, everything will go on as usual, but if, as it is common for about fifty centuries, some of the theories they base this experiment on will be disproved, one has to hope if it will not be the "disappering" property of smalish black holes ...

    However, this may be good new for the USA : no need to pay for the massive debt they owe the rest of the world ... and no need to stage another massive election fraud ...

  136. Can't believe it hasn't been said yet... by Capt+James+McCarthy · · Score: 1

    I, for one, would like to welcome our miniature black hole overlords.

    --
    There are no loopholes. It's either legal or it's not.
    1. Re:Can't believe it hasn't been said yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I AM a miniature black-hole overlord, you insensitive clod....!

  137. Unfortunately ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Black holes are NOT theoretical ...

    Look at the center of that milky way you reside, and you'll feel one (sorry, no can see, as they eat light at a rate pretty much like the USA's pathological need for chinese money)...

    Hopefully, the hungry bastards wont stop at McDonald's :)

    1. Re:Unfortunately ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Black holes are the current fashionable explanation of why certain galaxies behave the way in which they do, and therefore black holes are expected to found at the core of most active galaxies. In particular, the milky way is expected to have black hole the size of a few million suns, with a radius of perhaps 1 AU. If such an object exists, given it's density, the object would be a candidate black hole.

      Within that context, there are two things to remember. First is that even though a black hole is an explanation for the certain behaviors of certain galaxies, it does not mean that the black hole is the best or most reasonable explanation. For instance, aether seemed to be necessary for the transmission of light, but it was proved not to exist. Second, even if something is found that broadly resembles a black hole is found, that does not mean that every prediction made will be verified.

      So, black holes are the current artifacts of observations that cosmology researchers have made. It will be interesting to see if we actually ever move the theory into practical research or how we might deal with the issues of their existence. Honestly black holes are like god, the universe seems overly complicated when their existance is stipulated.

  138. the truth is in the details... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    read again: LHC is the most expensive *experiment*.
    ISS is a project hosting *many* (cheaper) experiments.

    OK, there will be more than exactly one experiment at LHC, but the entire goal of LHC project is Higgs Boson hypothesis.
    ISS does not have a single one hypothesis, unless you really go philosophical.

  139. Status update page by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Updates on status of tests available here

  140. I'm ready by No2Gates · · Score: 1

    I went out and bought a school desk last night and Morlock spray. Nothing can touch me now... I'm INVINCIBLE!!!

    --
    Every time you call tech support, a little kitten dies.
  141. I'd need to read it again to try to explain it :) by toby · · Score: 1

    I'll try and buy another copy and get back to you.

    Here's another review which mentions the "window of contact".

    --
    you had me at #!
  142. Re:Particles of far higher energies occur naturall by Kent+Kelley · · Score: 1

    I was 67 years old when I did some reading in 1991. Here's a visible inorganic fact physicists haven't resolved as of August 10, 2008 over here in Ukraine Richard. Maybe you or another informed reader might propose a physics response: One has said that "Physics is about things that move!" The Queen Nefertiti Rock (See Google verbatim.)was moved and sits upon its pedestal in Utah, USA. It will move again. CERN physicists et al are challenged to explain who moved "Nefertiti - The God Particle"© to its temporary residence. [The expression: "Nefertiti-The God Particle" is the intellectual property of Kent E. Kelley USCGR 641-072 1942] August 10, 2008

  143. Re:Particles of far higher energies occur naturall by Kent+Kelley · · Score: 1

    ERRATUM September 10, 2008 replaces August 10, 2008.

  144. LHC disaster. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Man's technology has exceeded his grasp. - 'The World is not Enough'
    Zealous Nobel Prize hungry Physicists are racing each other and stopping at nothing to try to find the supposed 'Higgs Boson'(aka God) Particle, among others, and are risking nothing less than the annihilation of the Earth and all Life in endless experiments hoping to prove a theory when urgent tangible problems face the planet. The European Organization for Nuclear Research(CERN) new Large Hadron Collider(LHC) is the world's most powerful atom smasher that will soon be firing subatomic particles at each other at nearly the speed of light to create Miniature Big Bangs producing Micro Black Holes, Strangelets and other potentially cataclysmic phenomena.
    Particle physicists have run out of ideas and are at a dead end forcing them to take reckless chances with more and more powerful and costly machines to create new and never-seen-before, unstable and unknown matter while Astrophysicists, on the other hand, are advancing science and knowledge on a daily basis making new discoveries in these same areas by observing the universe, not experimenting with it and with your life.
    The LHC is a dangerous gamble as CERN physicist Alvaro De RÃjula in the BBC LHC documentary, 'The Six Billion Dollar Experiment', incredibly admits quote, "Will we find the Higgs particle at the LHC? That, of course, is the question. And the answer is, science is what we do when we don't know what we're doing." And CERN spokesmodel Brian Cox follows with this stunning quote, "the LHC is certainly, by far, the biggest jump into the unknown."
    The CERN-LHC website Mainpage itself states: "There are many theories as to what will result from these collisions,..." Again, this is because they truly don't know what's going to happen. They are experimenting with forces they don't understand to obtain results they can't comprehend. If you think like most people do that 'They must know what they're doing' you could not be more wrong. Some people think similarly about medical Dr.s but consider this by way of comparison and example from JAMA: "A recent Institute of Medicine report quoted rates estimating that medical errors kill between 44,000 and 98,000 people a year in US hospitals." The second part of the CERN quote reads "...but what's for sure is that a brave new world of physics will emerge from the new accelerator,..." A molecularly changed or Black Hole consumed Lifeless World? The end of the quote reads "...as knowledge in particle physics goes on to describe the workings of the Universe." These experiments to date have so far produced infinitely more questions than answers but there isn't a particle physicist alive who wouldn't gladly trade his life to glimpse the "God particle", and sacrifice the rest of us with him. Reason and common sense will tell you that the risks far outweigh any potential(as CERN physicists themselves say) benefits.
    This quote from National Geographic exactly sums this "science" up: "That's the essence of experimental particle physics: You smash stuff together and see what other stuff comes out."
    Find out more about that "stuff" below;
    http://www.SaneScience.org/
    http://www.LHCFacts.org
    http://www.risk-evaluation-forum.org/anon1.htm
    http://www.lhcdefense.org/
    http://www.lhcconcerns.com
    Popular Mechanics - "World's Biggest Science Project Aims to Unlock 'God Particle'" - http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/extreme_machines/4216588.html"

     

  145. advance in science by john_uy · · Score: 1

    i am very happy that this endeavo(u)r is being done. i am very excited in seeing the results (too bad it's one year till showdown and probably a couple of months for supercomputers to analyze all the data.)

    kudos to the scientific community. scientists from different nations as well as countries have collaborated in this event. i hope this is the start of more advances in science (and hopefully i would live through seeing the fruits of their labo(u)r.) :)

    --
    Live your life each day as if it was your last.
  146. Killzah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looks like we made it so far... I'm getting an I surcived the LHC experiment t-shirt from http://www.madscistuff.com

    Yippie :)

  147. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    facts:
    (1) the universe is a violent place
    (2) Earth, as compared to the universe, is a "protected" and safe place.
    (3) LHC is trying to understand the universe better. In the process, man kind has to experience the vulgarities of the universe on Earth itself.

    LHC is likely to bring some of the violent nature of the universe to Earth in one way or another.