Slashdot Mirror


Slashdot's Disagree Mail

Since we covered people who wanted out of Slashdot last week, I thought we'd look at some people who wanted back in. These users found that living without Slashdot was a lot harder than they thought. Maybe you've just been married and are finding out your wife is less interesting than Slashdot or maybe you were bad and want to make amends. These people found out it's hard to make it without your favorite website. Keep reading to find out what they'll do to get back.

I realize that sometimes it's hard to figure out when you've crossed the line. It just seemed so obvious in this case that I wasn't sure what to write back. The other thing to remember here is that this guys name was a synonym for excrement, joined with a sex act.

On Sun, 26 Jun 2005 ******* wrote:
"People have the right to say what they want. If you are going to run a website thats free you have to let me talk about fucking animals if I want. I don't really fuck them but if I did it's none of your business if I want to talk about it. I know I will be marked as a troll I don't care about that. I care about not being able to post more. I don't care if I've been modded down or that my karma is low. I have inner karma not some stupid number you made up. If my inner karma is ok with talking about something bad that I don't do you should be to. Let me post more."

Don't get me wrong I like Slashdot but if you are a newlywed and you want to spend more time here than with your new wife, you married poorly. Maybe if you did some more "working" on your wife, you'd find something much better to do in the dark than read Slashdot.

On Wed, 2 July 2008 ********* wrote:
"I know you're busy but was wondering if you can help me out. I really like reading Slashdot but my new wife hates how much I check it during the day. She says that I should check on her as much but we both know that she doesn't update as much :-). LOL but really she doesn't. I thought I could teach her how cool gadgets and geeks are but she doesn't believe me and won't even try. I'm sitting in the dark down here right now so she won't see me. I've rambled enough what I want to ask of you is that maybe you could post more girl kinda stories. She likes horses and has had them since she was a little girl maybe something about horses. If you can't I understand but would really reallly appreciate it. If you can even mail me some stories you find that she might like just mail me the URL and maybe together we can convert her. I really want to read more and talk to her less. If you could work on her for me I'll be the most loyal reader ever."

This is one of my favorite mails of all time. Getting propositioned to bend the rules at work is the type of thing that is usually reserved for politicians or people working concert security. This lady proved that Valentine's Day can be lonely and there is nothing someone would not do to post to Slashdot.

On Fri, 14 Feb 2003 ****** wrote:
"I've been banned because you say I've been bad. How bad would you like me? I have some pictures on ******* my username is ****** If you like what you see let me know maybe we can work something out. I've always had a thing for the smart guys. Just thinking about what we could do is making my face flush and my nipples get hard. I'm going to need to change my panties I think. Maybe I'll let you change them for me. I live in Boston but travel a lot. All I need is a little slashdot love but I'm sure you can give me a lot. I'd like to straddle you and let my motuh wander over your ears, licking them while you tell me how I shouldn't have done what I did. You grab my hair and..."

It goes on for a couple of paragraphs, I'll spare you the details except to mention that the word "enter" was tattooed in a few places that you can probably imagine. To be honest at this point I was hoping I would find an Esc tattoo somewhere. She ends with:

"... I couldn't be more serious. I have a feeling that we can work something out that we both would enjoy."

188 comments

  1. Protesting too much? by Naughty+Bob · · Score: 4, Funny

    ....I thought we'd look at some people who wanted back in....

    So actually, it was 1 person who wanted back in, some guy claiming a /. story about horses will save his marriage, and... ah. Perhaps the real reason for this lamest of front page stories?-

    An opportunity for a little light boasting. I bet chicks would dig me if I too edited Slashdot....

    --
    "Be light, stinging, insolent and melancholy"
    1. Re:Protesting too much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ....I thought we'd look at some people who wanted back in....

      That's what she said!

    2. Re:Protesting too much? by Joe+Snipe · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Just stop. If you don't like it don't read it, that simple. And don't keep saying "it shouldn't be front page", honestly do you know of any other parts of slashdot that are not on the front page by default?

      --
      Sometimes, life itself is sarcasm...
    3. Re:Protesting too much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      honestly do you know of any other parts of slashdot that are not on the front page by default?

      How about Backslash?

    4. Re:Protesting too much? by blair1q · · Score: 1

      Is it really that easy to become the subject of a Disagree Mail story? Write a Penthouse Forum submission and change the pool boy to the /. letter opener?

      I bet there wasn't a chick within two mothers' basements of the person who wrote that email.

    5. Re:Protesting too much? by madprof · · Score: 1

      These are still funny.

    6. Re:Protesting too much? by g0dsp33d · · Score: 1

      It may be a clever way to clean out their bin spam by subtly letting users know that what they say might make to the front pages.

      What am I thinking? They're probably getting double now from AC's waiting their fame.

      --
      lol: You see no door there!
    7. Re:Protesting too much? by Joe+Snipe · · Score: 1

      The only reason backslash isn't on the front page is that it hasn't had a new entry in 2 years. It was front page while it lasted. And I liked backslash alot. But I like idle too, and i am tired of wading through posts of people whining about the content to read the relevant posts.

      --
      Sometimes, life itself is sarcasm...
  2. OMG Ponies by immcintosh · · Score: 5, Funny

    She likes horses and has had them since she was a little girl maybe something about horses. If you can't I understand but would really reallly appreciate it.

    It's decided. We need more OMG PONIES.

    1. Re:OMG Ponies by gardyloo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Can't be worse than the colorscheme on SlashMail, right?

    2. Re:OMG Ponies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      There was a pretty in depth comment on horses just the other day... http://ask.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=961481&cid=24971623

    3. Re:OMG Ponies by AgentPaper · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's decided. We need more OMG PWNIES.

      Fixed that for you.

      --
      First rule of trauma: Bleeding always stops.
    4. Re:OMG Ponies by Columcille · · Score: 1

      Where is the -1 painful mod?

      --
      I love my sig.
    5. Re:OMG Ponies by psychodelicacy · · Score: 4, Funny

      Clearly, the guy who wrote post No.1 needs to be introduced to the wife of the guy who wrote post No.2. He clearly has lots of lovely stories about nice animals to tell her...

      --
      A closed mouth gathers no foot.
    6. Re:OMG Ponies by nbauman · · Score: 1

      I agree. Let's have more stories about horses. Maybe we'll get more chicks on Slashdot.

      Which gives me an idea for a good pickup line: "You look like you like horses." I'll have to try that out.

      It would probably work more often than "What's your distro?"

      The other thing he could try is this http://hardware.slashdot.org/hardware/07/08/08/0029252.shtml

    7. Re:OMG Ponies by kandela · · Score: 1

      I think these are the type of ponies that we're most likely to see on /. http://borgpony.deviantart.com/ I wonder if it's what his wife would like to see though.

      --
      Conservation of angular momentum makes the world go round.
    8. Re:OMG Ponies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clearly, the guy who wrote post No.1 needs to be introduced to the wife of the guy who wrote post No.2. He clearly has lots of lovely stories about nice animals to tell her...

      This made me laugh so hard I think I peed myself a little...

    9. Re:OMG Ponies by magarity · · Score: 1

      It's decided. We need more OMG PONIES
       
      Thanks to the firefox plugin of the same name, that's all I ever get here.

    10. Re:OMG Ponies by nategoose · · Score: 1

      Just combine the first two letters and start posting more stories about donkey shows --- OMG Donkies!

    11. Re:OMG Ponies by psychodelicacy · · Score: 1

      Then my work here is done.

      --
      A closed mouth gathers no foot.
  3. Cmon! by CaptainPatent · · Score: 5, Funny

    I have some pictures on ******* my username is ****** If you like what you see let me know

    No really, what was her user name... you know, just out of curiosity...

    --
    Well, back to rejecting software patent applications.
    1. Re:Cmon! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I definitely second this motion. Anonymously of course, but ... yeah.

    2. Re:Cmon! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Her? you're obviously new here...

    3. Re:Cmon! by MyLongNickName · · Score: 1

      CmdrTaco. Biggest cup size I'd ever seen.

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    4. Re:Cmon! by qoncept · · Score: 1

      Sorry, dude. She said she likes smart guys. Not guys that take lame joke bait.

      Seriously, if you're going to post that, you should, at the very least, and not that it would excuse you, include a disclaimer. A simple "I'll bite, ..." or the ol' subject "Because somebody had to say it."

      --
      Whale
    5. Re:Cmon! by KGIII · · Score: 3, Funny

      And a link to the pictures... Hell, I won't even bother posting AC.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    6. Re:Cmon! by Bryansix · · Score: 1

      It's probably a guy who wrote that email. Trust me, you don't want to go down that path.

    7. Re:Cmon! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No... That was funny and made me laugh! Thx

    8. Re:Cmon! by somersault · · Score: 1

      Someone has a bad story to tell :s

      --
      which is totally what she said
    9. Re:Cmon! by Bryansix · · Score: 2, Funny

      No actually. I know about this trick because a roommate of my brother in college has this as a hobby. He would email people back and forth acting like he was a woman interested in the other party. Then he would send penis pics.

    10. Re:Cmon! by somersault · · Score: 1

      Some people are scarily gullible.. :s

      --
      which is totally what she said
    11. Re:Cmon! by abirdman · · Score: 1

      I have some pictures on ******* my username is ******

      It looks like they posted her password too! Jeeeze...

      --
      Everything I've ever learned the hard way was based on a statistically invalid sample.
    12. Re:Cmon! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have some pictures on ******* my username is ****** If you like what you see let me know

      No really, what was her user name... you know, just out of curiosity...

      Looks like "hunter2" to me ...

    13. Re:Cmon! by Dan541 · · Score: 1

      How do you send email to /.?

      I have never once seen an email address apart from user comments, and I doubt these people are looking at the whois.

      --
      An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
    14. Re:Cmon! by MollyB · · Score: 1

      The easiest way to get a message to "slashdot" is to read CmdrTaco's Journal:
      https://slashdot.org/~CmdrTaco/journal/

      He allows comments to his journal entries, and you can find out lots of interesting stuff about what is going on by reading the other comments.

  4. Please... by bman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Make it stop.

    Think of the children.

    1. Re:Please... by fbjon · · Score: 3, Funny

      Use the prefs, Luke.

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    2. Re:Please... by shrikel · · Score: 1

      Why don't I have mod points right now? That was funny.

      --
      Any sufficiently simple magic can be passed off as mere advanced technology.
  5. Reading is fundemental by bonkeydcow · · Score: 5, Funny

    "I really want to read more and talk to her less."
    In the words of Larry the cable guy. That's funny right there, I don't care who you are.

    1. Re:Reading is fundemental by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When you are married for about 7 months, then you will understand. He has a shorter attention span than most, but eventually any husband gets tired of her voice.

  6. Great post by eebra82 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "People have the right to say what they want. If you are going to run a website thats free you have to let me talk about fucking animals if I want. I don't really fuck them but if I did it's none of your business if I want to talk about it. I know I will be marked as a troll I don't care about that. I care about not being able to post more. I don't care if I've been modded down or that my karma is low. I have inner karma not some stupid number you made up. If my inner karma is ok with talking about something bad that I don't do you should be to. Let me post more."

    What does Slashdot being free have to do with moderation? Same thing goes for free forums; if the topic is set on hardware, you discuss hardware and not sodomized goats. You're free to express whatever view you have, but since certain rules apply to the commentary system, you must also respect it. Furthermore, they don't forbid you to post unrelated comments. But they do have authority to delete it if you're not playing by the rules.

    1. Re:Great post by TheSpoom · · Score: 3, Insightful

      A lot of people seem to think that free speech extends to non-public places. A public forum like Slashdot is still owned by someone (in this case, OSTG) and that someone has the right to refuse entry.

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    2. Re:Great post by AccUser · · Score: 4, Funny

      and that someone has the right to refuse entry.

      If only the same could be said for that poor goat. :-(

      --

      Any fool can talk, but it takes a wise man to listen.

    3. Re:Great post by operagost · · Score: 1

      A lot of people seem to think that free speech extends to non-public places. A public forum like Slashdot is still owned by someone (in this case, OSTG) and that someone has the right to refuse entry.

      Except for reasons of race, religion, sex, politics, sexual orientation, dress, etc... gee, I guess using the word "right' here is ironic.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    4. Re:Great post by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

      Those exceptions are unchangeable personal characteristics (or inherently personal beliefs) that may or may not affect how a person actually behaves on a site, so I think it's fair that someone can't say "no niggers" and get away with it.

      With the exception of dress, of course, but I'm pretty sure we still see signs that say "No Shirt, No Shoes, No Service", n'est-ce pas?

      You could, though, ban someone for insulting another person for being straight, or calling a fellow black man a nigger where such language isn't usually accepted on the site.

      Basically, what I'm saying is that it's fair that you should only be able to ban based on past history or current behaviour, because that's all that will ultimately affect your site.

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    5. Re:Great post by antifoidulus · · Score: 1

      But surely there has to be some overlap, what about automatic goat sodomizers?

    6. Re:Great post by Hotawa+Hawk-eye · · Score: 1

      Or, to put it shortly: free speech is a right, an audience is not.

    7. Re:Great post by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 1

      >> if the topic is set on hardware, you discuss hardware and not sodomized goats

      Sodomized Goat is Intel's code name for the "tock" side of their 16nm process microarchitecture.

    8. Re:Great post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and that someone has the right to refuse entry.

      Someone who has "enter" tattooed around her bodily orifices is also technically a public forum.

    9. Re:Great post by Skrapion · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure we still see signs that say "No Shirt, No Shoes, No Service", n'est-ce pas?

      You misunderstand. Those signs are just listing the three things they don't provide.

      --
      The details are trivial and useless; The reasons, as always, purely human ones.
    10. Re:Great post by Gandalf_Greyhame · · Score: 1

      Or

      Guys:
      No shirt, no service

      Girls:
      No shirt, no charge

      --
      I am not stubborn. I am right!
  7. I confess by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 4, Funny

    I personally wrote *all* those mails myself.

    --
    Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
  8. talk to her less by SoupGuru · · Score: 3, Funny

    Wow, way to disprove the slashdot stereotype.

    --
    What doesn't kill you only delays the inevitable
  9. Wow, to the newlywed guy! by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you spend more time on Slashdot than with your newlywed wife, I'd say you probably need some serious counseling. Like, right now.

    Oh, and in case you missed it, Slashdot did, at one time have a story about ponies. ;) OMG PONIES!!!!

    1. Re:Wow, to the newlywed guy! by PawNtheSandman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But they were not Apocalypse Ponies.

      I demand more Apocalypse Pony stories!

    2. Re:Wow, to the newlywed guy! by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      Uh, try the Book of Revelations. Also, I hear some cat named Nostradamus wrote stuff in the 12th century or something like that.

    3. Re:Wow, to the newlywed guy! by hesiod · · Score: 5, Funny

      My cat's name is Nostradamus, but he doesn't write shit, that lazy bastard.

    4. Re:Wow, to the newlywed guy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Wooooooosssshhhhhh!!!

    5. Re:Wow, to the newlywed guy! by operagost · · Score: 1

      It's spelled Revelation. And Nostradamus didn't write about the horses; that imagery belongs solely to the Bible.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    6. Re:Wow, to the newlywed guy! by Gandalf_Greyhame · · Score: 1

      cats write in scent. haven't you ever read a cat book? (Red Dwarf TV Series for anyone not up to speed, season 1 "Waiting for God")

      yes, I know this is redundant... and so is this

      --
      I am not stubborn. I am right!
  10. OMG Panties by bit+trollent · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I think we can all agree that what we need more OMG Panties.

    1. Re:OMG Panties by beav007 · · Score: 1

      Or less. I can't decide...

  11. Why by camperdave · · Score: 3, Funny

    Why

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    1. Re:Why by pushing-robot · · Score: 1

      Are

      --
      How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
    2. Re:Why by pushing-robot · · Score: 1

      You

      --
      How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
    3. Re:Why by pushing-robot · · Score: 1

      Using

      --
      How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
    4. Re:Why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My

    5. Re:Why by pushing-robot · · Score: 1

      Dasher

      --
      How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
    6. Re:Why by pushing-robot · · Score: 1

      To

      --
      How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
    7. Re:Why by pushing-robot · · Score: 1

      Write

      --
      How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
    8. Re:Why by pushing-robot · · Score: 1

      Your

      --
      How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
    9. Re:Why by pushing-robot · · Score: 1

      Post?

      --
      How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
    10. Re:Why by sameerds · · Score: 1

      Why not!

  12. yo samzenpus by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

    that was a dude. You were trolled. Don't feel bad, you weren't trolled as bad as fyodor. That was funny.

    --
    Do you even lift?

    These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    1. Re:yo samzenpus by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 3, Insightful

      you weren't trolled as bad as fyodor

      I'm not sure anyone has been trolled as bad fyodor.

    2. Re:yo samzenpus by tlacuache · · Score: 1

      I must have missed that one, can someone fill me in?

    3. Re:yo samzenpus by pionzypher · · Score: 3, Informative

      Found via google:

      In 2002, Fyodor was the victim of an impersonation attack by a Slashdot user who was posing as a woman. Fyodor sent an email to the fake "woman" in an attempt to solicit further conversation and a possible meeting. When the hoax was revealed, the hoaxer insulted fyodor (I believe the word was "wanker").

      Fyodor responded by using information disclosure vulnerabilities in yahoo email to find the originating IP address of the Slashdot prankster (SumDeusExMachine) who was at the time a college student based on the Pacific coast. SDEM was using an open X server for windows, MI/X, with no security enabled. Fyodor quickly scanned SDEM's box, found the open X server, and attached to it, monitoring SDEM's life for nine hours. He took many screen shots of SDEM's machine and posted them to his web site, insecure.org.

      A lot of personal information was revealed in these screenshots, including the existence and ip address of a "secret troll irc server", which was running an irc bot capable of tracking and posting new stories. Jamie McCarthy used the information disclosed by Fyodor's attack to log onto this server, discover the new-story-bot, and modify Slashdot to break the troll's new-story-robot.


      Direct copy/paste from: http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=189213&cid=15582790

      So he got burned decently, but he gave some back. ;)

      --
      I'll believe in corporations having personhood when Texas executes one... - advocate_one
    4. Re:yo samzenpus by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      I can't open the wayback machine link from a child of that posting in Firefox 3.0:

      Content Encoding Error

      The page you are trying to view cannot be shown because it uses an invalid or unsupported form of compression.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  13. Is by camperdave · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Is

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  14. Shark jumping anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you have to put this on the front page, minimize it like the other limited-interest stuff.

    I'm here to read the articles, not you. Message, not messenger.

    Or is this Slashdot's way of making all readers register so they can filter out Idle?

    1. Re:Shark jumping anyone? by deft · · Score: 1

      Its clearly a way to keep you posting.

      People hate howards stern too.... every day they listen to him.

      --

      There's nothing Intelligent about Intelligent Design.
    2. Re:Shark jumping anyone? by twistedsymphony · · Score: 1

      I suspect that they want more people to check out the idle section by putting some of it on the main page and figure the disagree mails are the most appropriate vehicle.

      I enjoy them, it's about the only part of the idle section I do like.

  15. Enough Already ! by CmdrGravy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Seriously, if we really must be subjected to this crap surely to goodness there have at some point been some real genuinely amusing e-mails rather than this rather obvious trollish piss taking we're currently being shown. Honestly, anything rather than this, amusing anecdotes of the editors journey into work, his relationship with his stepmother or the black family who have moved in down the street anything would be better.

    Please, please, please make this stop !

    1. Re:Enough Already ! by evilklown · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You know, you don't have to read every story that gets posted.

    2. Re:Enough Already ! by pdboddy · · Score: 4, Informative

      You can make it so that Idle doesn't show on the main page. Checked your user preferences lately?

      --
      Julie Moult is an idiot.
    3. Re:Enough Already ! by citylivin · · Score: 1

      Why should I change my preferences, slashdots the one who sucks!

      --
      As a potential lottery winner, I totally support tax cuts for the wealthy
    4. Re:Enough Already ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, as an AC, I can't change my user preferences. Well, I can, but next time I visit the site they will be gone. Why????? Because I don't let any website keep cookies on my machine from boot up to boot up and I prefer to "surf" anonymously. So I respectfully disagree with you that you can easily just turn this "feature" off. So I suppose Slashdot is now like "no child left behind" and we are all forced to the lowest common denominator. Way to go Slashdot eds.!!!!

    5. Re:Enough Already ! by Koiu+Lpoi · · Score: 1

      Can it change the RSS feed I use to read it?

    6. Re:Enough Already ! by fuocoZERO · · Score: 1

      Changing prefs is easy! Just post your username and password on this thread and one of the nice people here will change 'em for you!

    7. Re:Enough Already ! by ZzzzSleep · · Score: 1

      It seems I repeat this info in every idle story that hits the front page, but here it is again. You can use something like yahoo pipes to filter out all the idle stories from the feed. Or if you can't be bothered doing that, then simply subscribe to the following feed. http://m1.pipes.vip.sp1.yahoo.com/pipes/pipe.info?_id=527129296c75002203989957b76e87d9

    8. Re:Enough Already ! by pdboddy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Heh, they should automate it so that the first post of every IDLE thread is that link or info on how to change your preferences. :P

      --
      Julie Moult is an idiot.
    9. Re:Enough Already ! by pdboddy · · Score: 1

      Heh, so you don't want to change your preferences... and you keep clicking the Idle link... I think you don't quite know what "sucks" means. :P

      --
      Julie Moult is an idiot.
  16. The by camperdave · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  17. Ick by Itninja · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Just thinking about what we could do is making my face flush and my nipples get hard. I'm going to need to change my panties

    Fifty bucks says this was written by a dude.

    --
    I judt got a nre Kinesis keybiartf so please excusr ant egregiou typos.
    1. Re:Ick by jason.sweet · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Fifty bucks says this was written by a dude."

      100 bucks says samzenpus found that out in person.

    2. Re:Ick by LighterShadeOfBlack · · Score: 1

      The way that was worded made me think of incontinence rather than moist lady parts. Whoever wrote it, I think they need to work on their dirty talk.

      --
      Spelling mistakes, grammatical errors, and stupid comments are intentional.
    3. Re:Ick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Holy Crap! a Talking Fifty!

    4. Re:Ick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That doesn't mean he was lying :)

  18. People is stupid by 192939495969798999 · · Score: 3, Funny

    I am just shocked at how stupid some of these people is.

    --
    stuff |
    1. Re:People is stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      LOL - you said "is" - you should of said "am"!

    2. Re:People is stupid by BitterOldGUy · · Score: 1

      Cmdr Taco et al. Laughing all the way to the bank. People R stewpid.

    3. Re:People is stupid by EvilGoodGuy · · Score: 1

      Indeed there is many stupid people.

    4. Re:People is stupid by rarity · · Score: 1

      I am just shocked at how stupid some of these people is.

      I are just shocked at how stupid some of these people am.

      There, fixed that for you.

    5. Re:People is stupid by Merlin843 · · Score: 1

      I am just shocked at how stupid some of these people is. LOL - you said "is" - you should of said "am"! Person is singular to people. is and am are singular. so the correct syntax of this sentence is: "I am just shocked at how stupid some people are."

  19. Comment by camperdave · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Comment

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    1. Re:Comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      C-C-C-COMBO BREAKER

    2. Re:Comment by Pulse_Instance · · Score: 2, Funny

      EPIC FAIL

  20. Spare us the details? by supernova_hq · · Score: 1

    You are going to spare us the details?!?!?

    1. Re:Spare us the details? by ZERO1ZERO · · Score: 1

      Exactly - what is the freaking point of posting this pish in the first place.

    2. Re:Spare us the details? by supernova_hq · · Score: 1

      Whoosh! (I was references the remaining part of the last email)

  21. Box by camperdave · · Score: 1

    Box

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  22. So by camperdave · · Score: 1

    So

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    1. Re:So by DwarfGoanna · · Score: 1

      C-C-C-C-C-COMBO BREAKER!!

      (sorry, but what else are you going to do in an idle thread?)

      --

      "You know why you do not see me styling wit my homies? Because I have no homies!!" -Mojo Jojo

  23. Small? by camperdave · · Score: 1

    Small?

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    1. Re:Small? by Cobralisk · · Score: 1

      It's to encourage readers to switch to Chrome, which lets you resize boxes as large as you like. :)

      --
      Waiting for ad.doubleclick.net...
    2. Re:Small? by mustafap · · Score: 4, Funny

      >Chrome, which lets you resize boxes as large as you like

      ah, so *thats* where all the extra ram went.

      --
      Open Source Drum Kit, LPLC deve board - mjhdesigns.com
    3. Re:Small? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because you touch yourself at night.

    4. Re:Small? by pdboddy · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, the extra "ram" went to the animal fucker in the first email.

      --
      Julie Moult is an idiot.
    5. Re:Small? by Spacezilla · · Score: 1

      Haha, good one. :)

    6. Re:Small? by mustafap · · Score: 1

      lol. Took me a second read to get that one.

      Can I share your mod points for setting that one up for you ;o)

      --
      Open Source Drum Kit, LPLC deve board - mjhdesigns.com
    7. Re:Small? by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      Because the style rule that says textarea { width 99%; } is missing in the idle stylesheet, so it's only sizing according to the cols="50" attribute, and that's rather narrow for a non-monospace font.

      I'm still working on a client-side rule to fix it. form[action=//idle.slashdot.org/comments.pl] #postercomment { width: 99% ! important } used to work but doesn't anymore.

      Another thing to fix is the lack of double-spacing between paragraphs in Preview. They come out fine once Submitted, but cause frustration when they don't come out in Preview.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  24. wtf? by l0cust · · Score: 1

    It goes on for a couple of paragraphs, I'll spare you the details

    Ok I don't like you anymore.

    --
    Politicians and Pedophiles: Two groups of exploitive bastards who are most dangerous when they're thinking of children.
  25. Ok, so logically... by serviscope_minor · · Score: 5, Funny

    One guy wants to talk about screwing animals. Another guy wants more stories about horses. The third person is obsessed with sex...

    The simple application of logic suggests that one story could make all three people happy. Is this going to be new slashdot section? Award goes to the slashdotter who comes up with the new section icon.

    --
    SJW n. One who posts facts.
    1. Re:Ok, so logically... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A hand jerking a pencil eraser-sized dick would be ideal for a section icon.

    2. Re:Ok, so logically... by lazyforker · · Score: 1

      Goatse.cx of course.

    3. Re:Ok, so logically... by operagost · · Score: 1

      Horsese.cx. You fail at the internet.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    4. Re:Ok, so logically... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Award goes to the slashdotter who comes up with the new section icon.

      I can think of one. How about goatse.cx?

      Kinda ironic how the captcha for this is "uncouth".

    5. Re:Ok, so logically... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The icon is the number 3 rotated clockwise 90 degrees which forms a large nutsack. It should suffice for ponies (they have horse sized nuts), sex crazed geeks (have blue nuts), and screwing animals (see horse sized nuts comment). It can also be used as a pair of jugs.

    6. Re:Ok, so logically... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's already been tried - unfortunately, the man posing to have his picture taken for the icon wasn't able to get it just right.

    7. Re:Ok, so logically... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is an establishment just outside of Fairbanks Alaska bt the Name of
      Skinny Dick's Halfway Inn.

      This establishment has a sign of two bears uhm going after it.

      I think that would the new sections icon really work

      http://www.skinnydicksak.com/Gift_Shop/items/T-Shirts_Underwear.html

      note the banner at the top of the page

  26. The last letter by g0bshiTe · · Score: 1

    /me changes his name to CowboyN3al

    You think she'll fall for it?

    --
    I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
  27. So much wasted space to the right! by sveard · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Perhaps soon we will see "no more idle" mails in Slashdot's Disagree Mail? I mean, those mails must be piling up, right? :)

    Or has this already been done?

  28. Re:Seriously? by serviscope_minor · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Please make it stop. I can't decide if it's because it's (a) short, (b) unfunny, or (c) just lame, but make the disagree mail go away. Soon.

    Seriously? You don't like these stories, yet when you see them on the front page, you put your dislike aside, click on the link and take the time to post a comment. So, despite your claim, here you are, getting entertainment from the thread. Seems to me that these stories are doing their job...

    --
    SJW n. One who posts facts.
  29. I said this by dbc23 · · Score: 1

    In the last disagree mail but... When did slashdot become somethingawful?

  30. Re:Seriously? by VeNoM0619 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Please make it stop. I can't decide if it's because it's (a) short, (b) unfunny, or (c) just lame, but stop making comments. Soon.

    If it says Idle... don't read it? Why do people complain? Even the FRONT PAGE of slashdot says "Idle is a complete waste of your time, don't go there". This goes to show how many idiots will still post how much they hate something they are reading, even knowing they don't like it BEFORE reading it. What's next, going to a Microsoft forum and saying how much you hate Microsoft?

    --
    Disclaimer: I am not god.
    We may not be created equal
    But we can be treated equal.
  31. Poor newlywed fellow... by eagee · · Score: 2, Insightful

    He hasn't figured out how to translate girl-language ... seriously kid - if you want someone with your interests you're pretty much going to have to marry a guy. What you need, is a girl language to guy language translation toolkit! Unfortunately, no one has made one yet. However... Translations exist! ... When a girl says, "You always read /. instead of paying attention to me!" what she's really saying is, "I feel like we haven't spent a lot of time together lately, and I miss you." Close the laptop then and there, and make some time for your girl (if you want to keep her). Marriage is all about compromise. You don't have to have the same interests, but you do have to live together - which means sucking it up and talking about horses sometimes. Furthermore, stop sneaking around in your own home! That's just retarded.

    1. Re:Poor newlywed fellow... by snowraver1 · · Score: 1

      You missed the (very valid) point that /. updates more often that a Wife/GF. Sometimes the web just puts out better then the real thing...

      --
      Copyright 2010. All rights reserved. This comment may not be copied in any way including, but not limited to caching.
    2. Re:Poor newlywed fellow... by Anonymous+Psychopath · · Score: 4, Funny

      The longer I'm married, the more sneaking around my own house I do. Especially damning is when boxes from Newegg show up at the door. I gotta get those suckers off the porch and into my office quickly before they are spotted.

      --

      Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.

    3. Re:Poor newlywed fellow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The longer I'm married, the more sneaking around my own house I do. Especially damning is when boxes from Newegg show up at the door. I gotta get those suckers off the porch and into my office quickly before they are spotted.

      Lol You just described my life :P

  32. Free Speech by Experiment+626 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That first guy exemplifies a very common misconception about free speech, that because you have the right to say what you want (true), you have the right to force other people to provide you a forum for that speech, publish that speech, etc. (false). The principle of free speech says you should have as much right as CmdrTaco to create a Web site to talk about whatever it is you want to talk about, not that you should be able to hijack someone else's.

    If McCain had showed up at the DNC and told them they had to give him the floor for an hour to tell everyone why Obama is a lousy candidate, the convention organizers would rightfully tell him, "Your convention is next week, talk about whatever you want there but at this one we have a liberal, pro-Obama message". It's also why spam blocking is not a free speech issue like the spammers try to paint it as. You have the right to say whatever you want about your product, but not the right to force me to receive or read your messages.

    It's really just a case of your right to swing your fist ending where the other guy's face begins.

    1. Re:Free Speech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "That first guy exemplifies a very common misconception about free speech, that because you have the right to say what you want (true), you have the right to force other people to provide you a forum for that speech, publish that speech, etc. (false). The principle of free speech says you should have as much right as CmdrTaco to create a Web site to talk about whatever it is you want to talk about, not that you should be able to hijack someone else's."

      But the truth is website comments are a kind of public forum, i.e. if you don't want people talking about things in the open then the site should have private comments and not allow anonymous comments.

      IMHO the whole concept of free speech vs restricted speech is kind of based on flawed understanding of reality anyway, can anyone truly stop speech? When a jet flies nearby and you can hear it from miles away, is that infringing on your rights?

      The way nature works is at odds with a lot of our notions and laws.

    2. Re:Free Speech by OneMadMuppet · · Score: 1

      > You have the right to say whatever you want about your product So long as it doesn't break any FDA or FTC rules. YMMV.

    3. Re:Free Speech by gujo-odori · · Score: 1

      Bzzzzt!

      No matter how much of a public forum a website may or may not be, the fact of the matter is that neither you nor I have any legal right to freedom of speech on /. or any other site.

      What the Constitution has to say about freedom of speech is that the government cannot restrict free speech. Private entities, whether it be you or I on our private websites, or online communities such as /., are free to restrict speech on their property in any way they like.

      It boils down to "Their website, their rules." You want to say whatever you want on the Internet? Cool. Set up your own server, buy our own bandwidth, and go for it.

      What everybody - particularly those least worth listening to - seem to misconstrue about freedom of speech is that anyone owes you a forum. They don't. Nor, especially, does anyone owe anyone an audience. You can talk all you want, but no one has to listen.

    4. Re:Free Speech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not a common misconception about free speech, it's a common trolling tactic.But thank god it is, easy +5 insightfuls all around!

  33. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And yet you continue to read it.
    Repeating the same action and expecting a different result?

  34. I be bad karma by arizwebfoot · · Score: 1, Interesting

    So . . .now that I have bad karma, how much longer before I get booted too?

    --
    Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy.
  35. Missing pieces by scipiodog · · Score: 5, Funny

    "I'd like to straddle you and let my motuh wander over your ears, licking them while you tell me how I shouldn't have done what I did. You grab my hair and..."

    I think I can guess what came next:

    "I put on my wizard hat...."

    --
    http://clightnirish.wordpress.com/
    1. Re:Missing pieces by ack154 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Nice...

      I can't believe it took that long for a BloodNinja joke. The setup was right there...

  36. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    since when were you forced to read every story on slashdot?

    just skip it alread!

  37. Re:Seriously? by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

    but make the disagree mail go away. Soon.

    Sure. Click here, find section "Customize Stories on the Homepage", click the left most button in the line starting with "Idle", click "Save".

    --

    Lars T.

    To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

  38. It's probably been posted already but by Ynsats · · Score: 1

    I gotta ask.

    What the hell is a "motuh" and why would anyone want it licking their ears?

    1. Re:It's probably been posted already but by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 1

      I read it as 'motd' which is certainly slashdotty but doesn't answer your question at all...

  39. Horsies and Princesses by fourbeer · · Score: 1

    Slashdot definitely needs more articles about Horsies and Princess.

    1. Re:Horsies and Princesses by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 1

      Did someone say Princess?

      --
      Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
  40. Re:Seriously? by pdwalker · · Score: 1

    Please make it stop. I can't decide if it's because it's (a) short, (b) unfunny, or (c) just lame, but make the disagree mail go away. Soon.

    Are you kidding? I normally mod the "funny" posts down by 5 so I don't have to see them.

    These, however, are fantastic!

    Honestly, you cannot make this stuff any funnier.

  41. Best Slashdot sig ever! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    "I personally wrote *all* those mails myself."

    Coming from the guy (girl?!) whose .sig used to be "If God didn't want us fucking livestock, why did he make them so sexy?", I can believe that! Especially the one about horses ;)

    1. Re:Best Slashdot sig ever! by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

      Wow, I'm famous a little bit. I had no idea that anybody was paying attention to what I do, except for the woman on skype who calls me to see me ejaculate on my webcam.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    2. Re:Best Slashdot sig ever! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Wow, I'm famous a little bit. I had no idea that anybody was paying attention to what I do"

      Nah, I don't any more, not since you got that boring new sig ;-)

      "except for the woman on skype who calls me to see me ejaculate on my webcam."

      Doesn't that clog up the lens? Still, I guess the important part's over by then anyway

    3. Re:Best Slashdot sig ever! by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

      I did actually get some on the lens once. I like to put the cam right up to my dick so they can see what's happening. It's hard to judge the right distance when there's so much else going on. Focus, lighting, angle, aim, stroke, timing, pinching, spurting, distance. You can see how easy it is to get the cam a little too close.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
  42. Anonymous Coward wants out of /. too! :( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am Anonymous Coward,

    seriously... what does /. have to do with anything today? I can't even remember what I liked about Slashdot before I stopped reading it daily in late 2001.

    I feel sorry for the quality of Slashdot today. It's like having to read(!) FOX News and CNN whinge about retarded, non-geeky bullshit.

    Good bye. You're too shabby for my precious troll art.

  43. Damnit... by Kintar1900 · · Score: 1

    Still waiting for the ability to keep this tripe out of my customized /. page.

  44. Reminds me of this Onion story by unassimilatible · · Score: 1

    Mr. Hide-in-the-dark-and-read-Slashdot reminds me of this story: Red-Lace Nightie Portends Another Excruciating Night For Closeted

    --
    Slashdot "libertarians": Small government for me, big government for those I disagree with. -1, I disagree with you
    1. Re:Reminds me of this Onion story by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Holy linkfail, batman!

      Here's the fixed link: http://www.theonion.com/content/node/39073

  45. That's where you're wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I still have nightmares about OMG Ponies...

  46. I think... by zentigger · · Score: 1

    you need to forward the email from the naughty girl to the nerd

    --

    the above is my personal opinion and does not necessarily reflect that of the little voices in my head

  47. Ha ha ha you think dems are "liberal"? C'mon. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm always highly amused by people characterizing the Democratic party as "liberal".

     

    To be "Liberal" is "to be willing to consider new things" which sure don't describe any mainstream political parties in this nation. The Democrats are trying to shop Bill Clinton in a darker skin tone (having failed to re-sell him in a different gender). Even the Republicans are just shopping tired old Reaganism with a glossy wrapper pasted over it.

     

    To be "Conservative" is to be "unwilling to change old things that still work" which also does not describe either party these days, though it arguably can still be applied to many individuals within the US power structure (like Ron Paul, Russ Feingold, or Robert Byrd).

     

    Calling the Dems liberal involves two layers of koolaid-guzzling self-deception - first, you have to believe liberalism is somehow either inherently good or inherently bad, and give up any consideration of nuances related to specific issues, and then in some way convince yourself that this overly simplistic view is somehow being represented by entrenched power brokers who haven't changed their basic stance on anything in decades.

     

    It's like believing the Republicans are the party of fiscal responsibility. Pure Orwellian doublethink.

  48. Re:Seriously? by nonewmsgs · · Score: 1

    exactly my point. where are all the other microsoft haters at all the vista is the greatest OS eva forums?? micro means small and soft means soft

  49. These actually made me laugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey! I actually liked these e-mails. This idle thing is getting better every week!

  50. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please, for the love of god, stop replying to people who post about how much they hate disagree mail! No one wants to listen to stupid people telling stupid people how stupid they are for saying stupid things about how stupid the stupid disagree mail is! I'm sick and tired of reading all of this useless drivel in this most holy of slashdot sections. There are much more important things to be discussed in the idle section.

    Sincerely,

    Heda Pizonaz

  51. There are ways not to hijack... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know what I hate.. I hate when I buy a mother board and the bios supposedly is supported by the vendor but it turns out that it really doesn't. When that happens it makes me want to find a Brazilian Malamute (which is just like a regular Malamute but has had it's butt waxed) and just have my way with that beast.

  52. Yes I do! by catbertscousin · · Score: 2, Funny

    If I don't, I'll get dragged out of the basement by trolls. The ponies told me so.

    --
    No good deed goes unpunished. - Avon, Blake's 7
  53. "a synonym for excrement, joined with a sex act" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Santorum?

  54. Re:Seriously? by owlnation · · Score: 2

    "If it says Idle... don't read it? Why do people complain?

    Because not EVERYONE can see it IS idle. If you use the /. RSS feed you do NOT know if something is "idle" or not.

    If /. must persist with this digg-based, lowbrow "idle" crap -- despite a large number of users complaining -- then they should at least remove the titles from the main RSS feed or put "IDLE:" at the beginning of every article title.

    Then, those of us who do not wish to read this shit can avoid it. That seems fair, does it not?

  55. If we don't comment... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...how will anyone in authority know we hate the Disagree Mail? Perhaps telepathy?

    ***OOO EEEE OOO I'M GOING TO HATE DISAGREE MAIL TO DEATH OOO EEE OOO***

    Every time someone says "If you hate it don't read it", I wonder if that person has any idea how communication actually works...

    1. Re:If we don't comment... by Skrapion · · Score: 1

      If only there was some way we could send mail to Slahsdot when we disagree on how the site is being run...

      --
      The details are trivial and useless; The reasons, as always, purely human ones.
  56. Great position. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "What does Slashdot being free have to do with moderation? Same thing goes for free forums; if the topic is set on hardware, you discuss hardware and not sodomized goats"

    What about sodomizing hardware?  :)

  57. The Guy with wife problem by Provocateur · · Score: 1

    Can't emphasize this enough: Don't ever, ever tell her that after slashdot, you also browse freshmeat. Ever.

    It will *end* your problem, but not in a manner that I would describe as "pleasant".

    --
    WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
    1. Re:The Guy with wife problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ending his problem can be done by saying he browses screenshots of Suse as well.

  58. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's funny. I actually debated not clicking on the link. For about a full minute, which when you have add like me is saying something. I thought, maybe if I don't click it, that will tell the admins something and maybe this shit will stop making it to the main page so I don't have to see this shit when I'm not logged in (yes, I realize I can change my user preferences - the opposite could be said for everyone who likes these insipid stories... you can opt in).

    Then the add kicked in and *wham* before I know it I'm posting in this thread.
    Fuck you, slashdot. Fuck you.

  59. Re:Seriously? by ZzzzSleep · · Score: 1

    *Repeat mode on* Use yahoo pipes. It can filter the slashdot rss feed for you and remove all the idle stories, so you don't have to come here and complain then. http://m1.pipes.vip.sp1.yahoo.com/pipes/pipe.info?_id=527129296c75002203989957b76e87d9

  60. google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is evil

  61. This is Slashdot, all right! by Rsriram · · Score: 1

    A horny lady wants to "enter" and editor wants to "escape".

    --
    O this learning! What a thing it is - William Shakespeare
  62. I LOVE this section SO MUCH.... by danger_nakamura · · Score: 1

    ... that I wrote a jingle...

    I'm so very happy
    The day is Disagree Mail
    Big fat mailman dance
    With my Disagree Mail
    All ugly no brain fool
    Hate my Disagree Mail
    I feed them to the cat
    To get my Disagree Mail
    Feed me - feed me more
    I need Disagree Mail
    Hovering in darkness
    With my Disagree Mail
    You Disagree - I kill you
    For my Disagree Mail
    Stupid no-sex nerds
    Hate my Disagree Mail
    So for true all love I have
    Stay with Disagree Mail
    Wait I do another week
    For more Disagree Mail
    Wait alone I will I will
    For lovely Disagree Mail

  63. AND? AND? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "You grab my hair and..."

    And? And? Keep going damn it, I'm almost there...!

  64. User Secrets by MadMan2 · · Score: 1

    Hmmm... I must confess I did laugh a lot with these "letters".
    Maybe, it might be a fun idea to open an anonymous slashsex.org section with an anonymous Users Secrets section?

    That way we can all wonder how bizarre and freaky/strange/weird/pathetic/wonderful/sad./kinky/distasteful/unusual/funny/exotic(remove adjectives to your own liking) or the sex life of geeks is? We can truly be amazed by the variety, and maybe Kinsey can write a new report?
    Maybe, just maybe...

    --

    Peace & Long Life,
    MadMan-2