Slashdot Mirror


The Best Gaming Laptop Money Can Buy

Parz writes "Gameplayer has gone live with their winners for the best gaming laptops money can buy as of Q3 2008. The analysis is broken into three sections to cater for three different budget requirements. There is a detailed explanation of why each laptop was selected, going into each hardware component individually. Regular Slashdot users will remember the site's article from a few weeks ago, which analysed the Best Gaming PCs that Money can Buy. Prices may vary depending on where you live."

161 comments

  1. Results will be valid for four days... by Joce640k · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...until the next one comes out.

    --
    No sig today...
    1. Re:Results will be valid for four days... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or melts it's way through the owners laptop

    2. Re:Results will be valid for four days... by jadedoto · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Sad. But true.

    3. Re:Results will be valid for four days... by Endo13 · · Score: 1

      Which is why I went with the best deal I could find for ~$1,000. But if you want to spend more I'd much rather go with something like this: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16834220364

      Just the slightest bit slower than any of the 3 listed in this 'article' and barely half the price of the cheapest of the three.

      --
      There is no -1 Disagree mod. Slashdot.org/faq defines mod options. USE IT.
    4. Re:Results will be valid for four days... by mrmeval · · Score: 1

      I like the review where it says "..one game completely destroyed vista...". ;)

      --
      I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
    5. Re:Results will be valid for four days... by sortius_nod · · Score: 1

      The G series are a nice series from Asus... although you can get the same laptop much cheaper if you don't get a G series. It seems the lights and cover cost an extra $500-$1000 depending on the model you look at.

      Instead of a G1 (which I couldn't afford at the time) I went with an F3JP which is a bit slower but all together a nice gaming laptop. I use it all the time when I go overseas and still am able to play the games I love fine.

      In some ways, having an overspecced laptop really defeats the purpose of having it. Gaming mobility, not premium graphics. I don't want to either have a battery the size of a small car or only be able to log in for 5 minutes when running on battery (yes, I have played online games via 3G and lappy - Eve was a heap of fun :D).

      While it is a massive drool factor, it's quite impractical to have a desktop graphics card in a laptop (which is what seems to be happening more and more). The power consumption of the card alone (heaven forbid it being SLi or Crossfire) chews your battery even in power saving mode.

      I can see what they are doing, but to me, it's just a big "spend more money for better stuff" kind of argument that seems to fall over at the first hurdle.

  2. Never use a laptop for gaming. by telchine · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I always think that using Laptops for gaming is a bit of a silly idea. Every couple of months a new game comes out that requires more powerful graphics, and you can't upgrade the graphics cards in a laptop. So your top of the range laptop bought today will be a pale shadow of its former self when playing the latest game in a year's time. With a desktop PC, you can simply replace the old graphics card with a new one.

    1. Re:Never use a laptop for gaming. by mcsqueak · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You are right. Using a laptop for a primary gaming device, unless you have a lot of money to burn is a rather silly idea since you cannot upgrade it. I found when I was in college and doing a lot of gaming that having a desktop I could upgrade every two years for about $500-800 was the way to go, and it would give me another two years of being able to play the latest titles.

      I recently purchased a fully-loaded Dell XPS 1530 laptop for Photoshop on-the-go functionality, and it has been fun being able to to play some older titles like Half-Life 2 again, but I don't expect it to be able to keep up with what is coming out.

    2. Re:Never use a laptop for gaming. by Windows_NT · · Score: 1

      I dont see how you need a "bleeding edge" computer for the top games. I have a Inspiron 9300 with a Geforce Go 6800 and the only game I cant play on it is Crysis. HL2, Q4, and doom3 all work great on it.
      Going out and paying thousands of dollars on a new PC is like buying the biggest meat grinder you can find because your girlfriend isn't doing it for you anymore.

      --
      Go go Gadget Nailgun!
    3. Re:Never use a laptop for gaming. by Schnoogs · · Score: 0, Informative

      My 1 year old notebook still plays all of the current games.

      You're living in the past my friend.

    4. Re:Never use a laptop for gaming. by Lostlander · · Score: 1

      Personally I find upgrading the graphics card to be the single most effective device to keep your system up to date for gaming. Generally any processor less than 4 years old is enough to run games at very nice frame rates. Having lots of memory never hurts either.

    5. Re:Never use a laptop for gaming. by Hatta · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I just got a laptop for gaming. It's a 1.13 GHZ P3 with 256MB of ram. I spent all weekend playing apple II and TG16 games on it. I had a blast.

      It's not playing games on laptops that's silly. It's the obsession with playing the latest resource hogging games that's silly.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    6. Re:Never use a laptop for gaming. by tepples · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I always think that using Laptops for gaming is a bit of a silly idea.

      And a lot of other people would think using a DS or a PSP for gaming is also a bit of a silly idea, for much the same reasons. If developers choose not to to make games whose graphics scale down to the capabilities of two-year-old laptops, then they choose to let someone else sell products to owners of two-year-old laptops.

    7. Re:Never use a laptop for gaming. by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Until you need one that requires DirectX 10. Then your Go 6800 won't be able to keep up.

    8. Re:Never use a laptop for gaming. by yoshi_mon · · Score: 1

      I just got a laptop for gaming. It's a 1.13 GHZ P3 with 256MB of ram. I spent all weekend playing apple II and TG16 games on it. I had a blast.

      It's not playing games on laptops that's silly. It's the obsession with playing the latest resource hogging games that's silly.

      Yeah...ok. I mean great, I'm glad you enjoy your retro gaming. Heck I even like firing up some of the older stuff now and then. But your kidding right? You think that modern games should be forced into near decades old hardware requirements?

      I'm sure some games do squander resources but what your trying to equate your example too is silly. Could a game like Mass Effect be played on a 2600? Games like WoW could not even exist without todays modern internet infrastructure.

      I guess your point is that it's about game play over graphics kinda and sure great point. But the way you go about making it is kinda /facepalm.

      --

      Really, I know what I'm doing...Ohhhh, look at the shiny buttons!
    9. Re:Never use a laptop for gaming. by dafrazzman · · Score: 1

      There's still an issue in budgeting. I'll pay about twice as much to get myself a gaming PC and a capable laptop (one that can run apps and flash games well). While having the PC is nice for upgrading, having a gaming laptop will work well for about two years (by which time any "budget" laptop will be all but obsolete). Plus, there's the advantage of mobile gaming.

      If you really use your laptop, it's worth it to get a nice one. If you play games only at home, however, there's obviously no sense in forking up for a laptop that will only be used on your desk anyway.

      --
      My preferred name is frazz, but someone keeps taking it. If you see him, tell him I said hi.
    10. Re:Never use a laptop for gaming. by Kingrames · · Score: 1

      If you're buying a laptop for gaming, you can get better than that with only $100. Some of us are willing to pay more than that to get old games like warcraft 2 working smoothly. Besides, who's to say that those resource hogging games won't be fun enough? or that tomorrow's "non-resource-hogging" games won't need hardware this good?

      --
      If you can read this, I forgot to post anonymously.
    11. Re:Never use a laptop for gaming. by kalirion · · Score: 1

      You're right of course. Instead of spending $5k on the newest top of the line laptop, you can spend a mere $1.2k on a pair of the newest top of the line graphics cards.

    12. Re:Never use a laptop for gaming. by 4D6963 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Which is why I for one will be doing my laptopish gaming on a Pandora. Close enough in shape and function to be on topic, after all it's like a DS-sized EEE with good gaming controls and keyboard theoretically usable enough to use the device both as a laptop and a gaming console.

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    13. Re:Never use a laptop for gaming. by MobyDisk · · Score: 2, Informative

      Really, what is silly is that laptops don't have upgradable graphics.

      --

      I agree that it is silly. But for some people it is necessary.

      I am a programmer who does a lot of gaming, and writes games on the side. I got hired to do development at a job that requires me to travel, so I had to get a laptop. Since I use the same tools at work and at home, I either ditch the desktop and use the laptop for everything (including games), or I try to install everything on both computers and keep everything in sync. That's a real big pain. So I opted to get a laptop with a GeForce 8600 GT Mobile, and use my laptop as my gaming PC.

      It is a hassle. But for me, it is better than the alternative.

    14. Re:Never use a laptop for gaming. by Fozzyuw · · Score: 2, Informative

      Some of us are willing to pay more than that to get old games like warcraft 2 working smoothly.

      Hehe. Speaking of which, I played Warcraft II yesterday for a few hours on my Dell Inspiron 8100 that I bought in like 2001... for gaming.

      It's suited my every gaming need since that time and I still play World of Warcraft on it. I couldn't play Doom 3 on it back then, but when I bought a gaming desktop a few years back, I just bought Doom 3 then.

      It's a great machine for running my other older games I never got a chance to play, like Baulders Gate, Fallout 1 & 2, Warcraft 2, and Starcraft. And for playing casual Flash games.

      --
      "The past was erased, the erasure was forgotten, the lie became truth." ~1984 George Orwell
    15. Re:Never use a laptop for gaming. by TheThiefMaster · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Let me know when a DX10-only game comes out...

    16. Re:Never use a laptop for gaming. by Rinisari · · Score: 1

      I had a Sager 5680 (3.2 GHz P4, Radeon 9600, 1 GB RAM, 80 GB 4200 RPM HDD) Sept 2003 to Jan 2006 and it played everything I threw at it at 1600x1200. Granted, I spent $3,150 on it at a time when I could have build the same in a desktop for approx $2,000.

      True gaming laptops are a luxury.

    17. Re:Never use a laptop for gaming. by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      They said the same thing about DirectX 9-only games.

    18. Re:Never use a laptop for gaming. by mistahkurtz · · Score: 1

      Good point. My big issue has always been heat. Laptops aren't made to do serious number crunching, rendering, etc. The hard drives aren't typically meant for constant use. I play wow on occasion, on my HP nc6400, and ventilation can be a serious problem. I've seen CPU temps nearing 80c.

      This is a machine that's about 1.5 years old, has dedicated video card, etc. About the only other thing that I can think of to keep internal temperatures down is to upgrade from 2gb to 4gb of RAM and do away with the swap file.

      I can only imagine a machine from a company like Acer or Dell, with cheaper components and typically shoddier internal layout and design. I'd love a laptop to play games on, but it doesn't seem practical, unless you consider your laptop a throw-away item. I've resolved to not care too much for mine anymore, and will use it till it dies. Which I would expect within the next 6 months or so, if I keep up the gaming.

      --
      not only is time travel possible, it's irrelevant.
    19. Re:Never use a laptop for gaming. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let me know when a DX10-only game comes out...

      Halo 2.

    20. Re:Never use a laptop for gaming. by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      But DX9->DX10 requires an OS "upgrade". DX8->DX9 doesn't, so it's not nearly as big of a deal.

    21. Re:Never use a laptop for gaming. by TheThiefMaster · · Score: 1

      My point is that we're not in the 3rd generation of DX10-supporting cards, by the time DX10-only games come out pre-DX10 PCs will be so far out of date they couldn't play the game even if it was DX9.

      "Windows NT" can already not play games a year old (crysis) on his 5 year old card, by his admission only games that are 3-4 years old work. By the time DX10-only games come out in a few years, only people with (then) 4-year-old PCs won't be able to play them.

    22. Re:Never use a laptop for gaming. by TheThiefMaster · · Score: 1

      *now in the 3rd generation ...

    23. Re:Never use a laptop for gaming. by MyOtherUIDis3digits · · Score: 1

      They said the same thing about DirectX 9-only games.

      True, but DirectX 9 didn't require an OS upgrade (using the word "upgrade" very loosely here).

      --
      Ignore anything I said above, I actually agree with everything you believe - mod accordingly.
    24. Re:Never use a laptop for gaming. by halcyon1234 · · Score: 1

      Let me know when a DX10-only game comes out that doesn't have a hack to make it work with DX9

    25. Re:Never use a laptop for gaming. by CodeMunch · · Score: 1

      Every couple of months a new game comes out that requires more powerful graphics, and you can't upgrade the graphics cards in a laptop

      That is not true. I had an Alienware 7700m. Upgraded the vidcard from a Geforce 6800 GO to a Geforce 7900 GO.

      You don't "require" a new vid card every few months. Game tech(bloat) is fast but not THAT fast.

    26. Re:Never use a laptop for gaming. by Creepy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      well, there isn't too much better than a 8600M GT as of yet, at least performance-wise, but that card is one generation behind. The best nVidia you can get is still a 9800M GTX, and those are just a die-shrink of the 8xxx line (the GTX 200s don't have a mobile platform yet).

      If you always want the latest-and-greatest graphics in a laptop, you should maybe look for something upgradable - nVidia standardized their mobile graphics on the MXM platform and, although ATI has a competing standard (AXIOM), it has so far been losing badly and it is now fairly common to find ATI cards that use MXM.

      The real problem comes with MXM systems that are upgradable - the ASUS C90 is, and I've read MXM Acer laptops are, but after that it's anyone's guess - some MXM computers like the 24" iMac are not. There are also 4 separate sized slots - MXM I, MXM II, MXM III, and MXM HE and larger slots can take the smaller GPUs, but not vice versa (most laptops I've seen that have them are MXM II). Sometimes you also need to buy the notebook manufacturer's branded card, as well. Also note that there is now at least one desktop card that uses MXM - the ASUS Trinity. Basically, it has 3 MXM modules on a regular PCI-E card, and when the graphics card needs updating, you replace the MXM modules, not the card, supposedly saving you some expense.

    27. Re:Never use a laptop for gaming. by RaceCarDriver · · Score: 1

      I always think that using Laptops for gaming is a bit of a silly idea. Every couple of months a new game comes out that requires more powerful graphics, and you can't upgrade the graphics cards in a laptop. So your top of the range laptop bought today will be a pale shadow of its former self when playing the latest game in a year's time. With a desktop PC, you can simply replace the old graphics card with a new one.

      This is untrue. High-end laptops can be upgraded... Such as Alienware...

    28. Re:Never use a laptop for gaming. by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      Anytime you try to combine two devices to get a "best of both worlds" solution, you usually end up getting a "less than mediocre worlds" product. I can't speak for the Pandora personally because I have never used one, but am speaking in generalizations.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    29. Re:Never use a laptop for gaming. by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      There are laptops, where you can upgrade the cpu, the ram and the graphics card. Oh, and exchange various components like a dvd drive and other stuff.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    30. Re:Never use a laptop for gaming. by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      And those formats are standardized too.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    31. Re:Never use a laptop for gaming. by WDot · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you're playing only the latest, most graphics-intensive games, than a laptop isn't the way to go. But if you find yourself spending a lot of time playing older games (not just classics, can include 2004 on if they aren't too power hungry or you can handle lower settings), it's a great idea. Especially if you go to a lot of LANs and the idea of unhooking your PC setup AGAIN starts to get annoying. Plus it's easier on your host's electricity bill. ;)

    32. Re:Never use a laptop for gaming. by Cederic · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I game on a laptop for the simple reason that I have two homes (due to work). So I bought a decent spec laptop and stick it in the car when I switch houses.

      I have a power supply, mouse, headset at each house. I also have a USB powered laptop cooler at each house. Something akin to http://www.misco.co.uk/applications/SearchTools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=280872&sourceid=2459&CAWELAID=84125196

      (I don't have that model. Google for 'laptop cooler' and see what comes up).

      It's a little noisier, but it means I can use a laptop for gaming while lying on a bed (with the laptop on the base on the bed) and the laptop's own fans rarely need to kick in (for WoW - STALKER needed rather more cooling).

      So it will greatly improve the likely lifespan of the laptop.

      If you're using the laptop in 1-2 main locations (so don't have to worry about carrying them) then I'd definitely recommend grabbing a cooler. They're cheap and effective.

    33. Re:Never use a laptop for gaming. by crossmr · · Score: 1

      It all depends on your situation. I moved to Korea for a year about 3 months ago. The size of the place I'm staying just wouldn't allow me to have a desktop so I'm happy to have my m1710 with a Geforce 7900GTX in it. If I can get my hands on an m1730 with 2x8800GTXs in it, I'd happily do so.

    34. Re:Never use a laptop for gaming. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Laptops are awesome for gaming. The portability makes taking it to a friends house so easy. All I have to bring is the laptop, the power cord, and a USB mouse. Nothing can beat that.

      I do all of my gaming on a Compaq Presario with anATI Xpress 200m graphics card. The trick is to have a taste for old games. I think my laptop can probably run Starcraft, Total Annihilation, and Age of Empires II all at the same time without any slowdown. With this laptop I save money on not only on hardware, but on games too!

    35. Re:Never use a laptop for gaming. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1.) I'm a sailor and spend most of my year at sea. Buying a gaming laptop is a great investment. As long as you really load it up, it'll last quite a while. Sure the pricetag may hurt, but assuming you aren't a total graphics fiend you can definitely get a few years worth of performance out of your laptop.

      2.) The Sager 9262 has specs that annhilate all of those laptops on that list, for much cheaper prices AND has user upgradeable graphics. Knew that list was crap when I didn't see the 9262 on the top of the list.

    36. Re:Never use a laptop for gaming. by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Actually having been on the other side, having actually owned a high powered gaming laptop. The worst thing about them is heat and the problems it causes with durability. You don't really have to worry about upgrading a high powered gaming laptop in two years time as it will likely be dead with various failures due to excessive heat load.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    37. Re:Never use a laptop for gaming. by syousef · · Score: 1

      I always think that using Laptops for gaming is a bit of a silly idea

      I'm a new dad, and was a busy person before then. I use the laptop on my hour commute each way. Sometimes I watch DVDs, but often it's flight simulators that I use this time for (MS flight sim and an r/c flight sim). I have a much better desktop but it probably gets about a quarter as much use as my Dell Inspirion 9400 (which incidentally has been a nightmare but I'm still grateful to have a working laptop with an 8800GT in it). Latest and greatest? Phooey! Perhaps if flight sims weren't so unpopular at the moment. Still I'm glad - probably require internet connection to validate or some such rubbish if I was using the latest and greatest. I'm not adding a $30 mobile internet bill to get 10 hours a week of play.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    38. Re:Never use a laptop for gaming. by magus_melchior · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up! Being able to play the latest and greatest shouldn't mean being forced into the upgrade arms race of the gaming industry.

      Now, get off our lawns! We're going to play some retro games. :)

      --
      "We are Microsoft. You shall be assimilated. Competition is futile."
    39. Re:Never use a laptop for gaming. by duanemc · · Score: 1

      Um, the 8800m is available for both 15" & 17" (also in SLI form for the later). Most benchmarks have it as performing at upto 2.5x the 8600.

      I would say that's a significant improvement.

      --
      Contrary to popular oppinion, London is not burning. It is, in fact, quite nippy.
    40. Re:Never use a laptop for gaming. by duanemc · · Score: 1

      While I agree that a Laptop is never as good a gaming platform as a desktop, some people do not have the luxery of staying in one place long enough to be able to have a desktop as their weapon of choice. I myself have been agonizing over the laptop vs. desktop choice since moving to the UK a few months ago. I am here for *upto* three years, but will be traveling back home for a few months next year, and am not 100% sure I will be here for the full 3 years. If I buy a desktop, it is stuck here - when I move, I have to sell it. If I go the laptop, I pay more for a machine that is not as fast, or comfortable, to use. But I can take it home with me... I look forward to reading this article as soon as I can (blocked at work) and hope it helps me with my decission.

      --
      Contrary to popular oppinion, London is not burning. It is, in fact, quite nippy.
    41. Re:Never use a laptop for gaming. by Creepy · · Score: 1

      yes, there is an improvement, but unless you have money to burn, the value of replacing a laptop that is only a year old to get that performance probably isn't worth it - the 8600M GT was in $1800 laptops a year ago, the 8800M GTX is in $1800 laptops today.

      I don't know of any 8800M MXM cards yet, but ACER has 8600M cards on the market to replace older 8400M cards, and ASUS has cards for the C90, so a market is emerging... slowly.

  3. Too much RAM? by Azaril · · Score: 1

    Just browsing through quickly, it seems that at least the extreme models ship with 4gb of RAM + video card memory. Assuming they use 32 bit window - due to the better drivers, from what I've seen it benchmarks better than 64 bit, isn't this completly pointless?

    1. Re:Too much RAM? by Trent+Hawkins · · Score: 5, Funny
      This whole review is bullshit. I mean come on:

      GPU - ATI 4870 X2
      Price: ~$655
      If Golem had a computer, this would be his precious.

      The guy can't even spell "Gollum".
      Geek license revoked!

    2. Re:Too much RAM? by Azaril · · Score: 1

      Sorry as an explanation as to why:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/32_bit

      "The range of integer values that can be stored in 32 bits is 0 through 4,294,967,295 or 2,147,483,648 through 2,147,483,647 using two's complement encoding. Hence, a processor with 32-bit memory addresses can directly access 4 GB of byte-addressable memory."

    3. Re:Too much RAM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Geek license, feh. License to write revoked. I didn't make it past the first paragraph before gross violations of grammar conventions and misuse of English as a whole forced a stop.

    4. Re:Too much RAM? by dr_wheel · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not completely. Sure, they won't see all of the ram with 32-bit windows. But, in my experiences, windows will recognize between 3.25 to 3.5GB in a 4GB system.

      Ideally, 3GB would be the config to use for modern gaming PC's running 32-bit windows (gaming benchmarks seem to indicate that 3GB is better than 2GB for current-gen games). However, if you don't run matched pairs, your ram isn't in dual channel mode.

      So what do you do? Run 4GB across 2 or 4 sticks. It's your best, albeit slightly wasteful, memory config for gaming. And if/when you decide to migrate to 64-bit windows, you're in good shape memory-wise.

    5. Re:Too much RAM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Grammar Nazi much??

      License to revoke licenses revoked.

    6. Re:Too much RAM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a world of difference between "Grammar Nazi" and "refuses to put crap into brain".

    7. Re:Too much RAM? by Minwee · · Score: 2, Informative

      You may want to look that word up some time.

      In addition to the obvious mythological reference, which has nothing to do with Tolkien, the Hebrew word 'Golem' means 'fool', 'stupid' or 'clueless'. So, with that in mind, the review can be read as "If a stupid, clueless fool had a computer, this would be it."

      The only way you could praise it more would be to say that it has "more schmaltz for your schlemiel".

    8. Re:Too much RAM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      two girls, one brain?

    9. Re:Too much RAM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The use of the phrase "his precious" kind of implies that is IS in fact Tolkien's Gollum.

      Fail

    10. Re:Too much RAM? by Minwee · · Score: 1

      And the use of a different name implies that it is not.

      And yes, you have.

    11. Re:Too much RAM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right. Except for the fact that he said "his precious" which is absolutely a reference to the Tolkien character.

    12. Re:Too much RAM? by PitaBred · · Score: 2, Informative

      Considering the author had blatantly incorrect things like:

      LCD: 15.4" is the sweet sport for mobility vs screen real estate.

      I would bet you all the money I have right now that he didn't know the Hebrew meaning for golem, and was in fact trying and failing to reference the Lord of the Rings character. It's very nice that you give him the benefit of the doubt, but the writer gives way too many places to doubt to make that even slightly noble.

    13. Re:Too much RAM? by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      Just browsing through quickly, it seems that at least the extreme models ship with 4gb of RAM + video card memory. Assuming they use 32 bit window - due to the better drivers, from what I've seen it benchmarks better than 64 bit, isn't this completly pointless?
      under an OS that only supports 4GB of address space 4GB of ram tends to give you a little extra usable memory over 3GB (how much depends on the other hardware in the box). Also with some chipsets using a matched pair gives better performance than an unmatched pair.

      It's probablly a marginal benefit but given the extremely low cost of ram now some may consider it worth having.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    14. Re:Too much RAM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      10/10, I raged a little.

    15. Re:Too much RAM? by Azaril · · Score: 1

      Thanks for that, it makes sense with the dual channel RAM. I'll think about it before I post next time :P

  4. From the article... by Lumpy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Your hardware wonâ(TM)t function without an OS, so what better choice than Microsoftâ(TM)s latest offering. Despite the constant criticism, Vista is a very stable, secure and enjoyable platform to work with. In collaboration with the latest gear, games will play at high speed and detail to whet your gaming appetite!"

    Nice to see they are still paid by Microsoft marketing arm. That entire statement goes against everything every reputable gaming site and expert says..

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:From the article... by thewaker · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And note that the constant criticism isn't going away. The MS Marketing machine can't hide the negative opinions.

    2. Re:From the article... by Windows_NT · · Score: 1

      Despite the constant criticism, Vista is a very stable, secure and enjoyable platform to work with

      Geez, Your funny

      --
      Go go Gadget Nailgun!
    3. Re:From the article... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try again.

      If you look up articles since SP1 was released it seems to paint a completely different picture.

    4. Re:From the article... by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      I am normally the first person to put down these conspiracy theories. But being that all laptops that are good enough for gaming come with Vista as the default OS, and the increasing difficultly of getting a legit copy of XP. It seems like a pointless sentence, unless you will get $500 for it. As well it seems way to familiar to Microsoft current advertising of saying "NO WE DON'T SUCK THAT MUCH!".

      Having used Vista on a fully capable system, it is not as bad as Slashdot says it it. But it is still not that great, and not worth getting of XP for, and still there are many little annoying problems you find when you start using normally.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    5. Re:From the article... by oldspewey · · Score: 4, Funny

      Churro?

      --
      If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
    6. Re:From the article... by coryking · · Score: 1

      Good thing the Linux marketing arm showed up and posted a correction, eh?

    7. Re:From the article... by sponga · · Score: 0, Troll

      Does it not basically come down to FPS and compatibility?

      If the game runs smooth and gets good FPS than nothing else matters

      I have Vista and it runs fine but not at the release, but I choose to run XP to get that extra 10-15 fps even though it barely feels different. I am a PC gamer and was there for the fiasco that Vista was, with punkbuster never working right, bad drivers, slow fps and overall incompatibility with certain hardware. I can tell you as a real gamer and not the Tux Racing gamers around here that vast majority of the problems have been solved. It is very simple, hardware gets cheaper and over time the specs will catch up to Vista; I loathe the expensive Vista laptops my buddies have because it runs great but I am not gonna spend that kind of money until it gets cheaper like anything.

      Go to Fatwallet.com/Slickdeals.net to look for a good gaming rig and get an honest opinion on what you get for your money, these guys are the experts at bang per buck. Your best bet for a good gaming rig that is cheap is to wait for a deal to popup checking everyday, sometimes it is a price mistake you might get a $400 laptop or other price matches.

      Go visit any gaming forum and you would have seen the massive problems with Vista and games in the beginning, over time these complaints have dissipated and things are running normally again. The hardware makers and gaming companies took notice to the complaints over Vista and stepped it up with more support.

      The article is kind of crap as it describes to use 64bit Vista but any gamer knows that is a stupid move right now for majority of games, also the gaming site is from .AU and no offense to the Australians but they have the most draconian prices for hardware, software, ISP and everything around there goes against Silicon Valley(whatever that means); not very credible.

    8. Re:From the article... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Nice to see they are still paid by Microsoft marketing arm. That entire statement goes against everything every reputable gaming site and expert says..

      Nice to see random claims from fan boys who post bologna with nothing at all to back up the claim.

      I use Vista Ultimate and can say without a doubt it sucks at a lot of things. Gaming is not one of them ... not even close

    9. Re:From the article... by Real1tyCzech · · Score: 1

      ExtremeTech's recent post Sp1 reviews seem to paint the opposite picture you are trying to imply here.

      Vista gaming is now on par with XP.

      When devs begin getting more comfortable with DX10, it will improve even more. You can already see a difference between the first DX10 titles (no more than DX9 badly ported to DX10) to what has been recently released.

      I know you're just trolling, but someone might actually be dumb enough to have read and believed your BS.

    10. Re:From the article... by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      I am normally the first person to put down these conspiracy theories. But being that all laptops that are good enough for gaming come with Vista as the default OS, and the increasing difficultly of getting a legit copy of XP.

      Sez you. The best place I know of to get a decent gaming rig, Vigor Computing, is still very willing to ship with XP. I just ordered a gaming laptop from them with XP; I'll be getting it in a few days.

    11. Re:From the article... by ivan256 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Vista gaming is now on par with XP.

      Good. Still no need to "upgrade" then...

    12. Re:From the article... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DRM does not affect the game, stop spewing BS.

      Stop repeating what the other clones are saying around here, go to any reputable gaming site and no one is complaining about DRM.

      You DRM fear mongers have gone too far with your BS, Windows users are not affected by DRM.

      Oh yah way to use DRM as a blanket excuse for poor performance on Vista, obviously everyone always screams DRM did this but have no logs or evidence of it affecting the performance.
      I don't get it, for a tech site that is filled with programmers you think they would understand PC gaming a lot more.

    13. Re:From the article... by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Hence why I said with "increasing difficulty". I didn't say it was impossible just more difficult then it was before. I have never heard of Vigor Computing before, as I am sure many people haven't either. But compared to 3 years ago. Getting XP was available for most brands sold.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    14. Re:From the article... by duanemc · · Score: 1

      Because Linux & OSX run so many games, amirite? *NEW* machines, from manufacturers such as Dell, do actually run Vista fine without the problems reported when it originally launched, believe it or not...

      --
      Contrary to popular oppinion, London is not burning. It is, in fact, quite nippy.
  5. How about... by Rie+Beam · · Score: 3, Funny

    A Beowulf cluster of Eee PCs glued to a go-cart. ...what? Can't a man dream?

    1. Re:How about... by Lord+Aurora · · Score: 3, Funny

      Only if Natalie Portman is driving.

      --
      The heavens do not fall for such a trifle.
    2. Re:How about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But "in a cart" implies a grocery store. Don't pay attention to the NECROTIC DOG PENIS.

  6. zzzz by apodyopsis · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    but does it ru....

    oh whats the point?

    seriously, if it browses the net, reads email, and allows me to use office 'ware I'm happy. games are what I have a PS3 for.

  7. Why bother with a notebook? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I question the sanity of sticking SLI/RAID0 configurations with enormous screens in a notebook formfactor. You're essentially giving up on the idea of portability, particularly given that the battery in one of those things can't even keep the machine running for an hour.

    Based on a couple experiences with Falcon Northwest and Alienware laptops, apparently the idiots who buy these things are willing to tolerate battery lifespans in the range of 20 minutes on a full charge.

    At that point, why not just buy a fucking shoebox machine?

    1. Re:Why bother with a notebook? by Sancho · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I question the sanity of sticking SLI/RAID0 configurations with enormous screens in a notebook formfactor. You're essentially giving up on the idea of portability, particularly given that the battery in one of those things can't even keep the machine running for an hour.

      You still get portability. You just don't get to be unplugged. A notebook like this means that you can sit on your couch and play games, or move into your bedroom, or take your computer with you on vacation and play some, etc. Lugging around your desktop is probably not an option in many cases.

    2. Re:Why bother with a notebook? by timeOday · · Score: 1

      It would be interesting to know what percent of the time existing laptops are used plugged in. My guess is 95%. I use my laptop plugged in all day, then go on a 3 hour flight a couple of times per month. Flying is almost the only time you need batteries. I had a laptop that was power hungry for a while, and the heat and noise actually bothered me more than the short battery life.

    3. Re:Why bother with a notebook? by Sancho · · Score: 1

      I've used laptops as my primary machine for at least 7 years, and I'm the same way. It's plugged in most of the time, and I primarily like it for its portability (I'm not tied to a desk--just to any given outlet.)

  8. "The Best Gaming Laptop Money Can Buy" by Rie+Beam · · Score: 4, Funny

    I have no money, is there a list of laptops for people with large piles of string?

    1. Re:"The Best Gaming Laptop Money Can Buy" by Lostlander · · Score: 1

      Ah it seems you have mostly red string we only accept blue string. Remember Counterfeiting string (aka dying the string) is against the law.

    2. Re:"The Best Gaming Laptop Money Can Buy" by Eg0Death · · Score: 1

      Is it one long continuous piece of string or is it cut into short bits?

      --
      Why is this thus? What is the reason for this thusness?
  9. Slashvertisement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Worthless Slashvertisement. The article talks about a Dell XPS, an Alienware and some off brand. Doesn't even mention Falcon NW of Voodoo PC.

  10. Does the original Gameboy Count? by neonprimetime · · Score: 2, Funny

    You can get one on eBay for like $6.50, with Tetris. What else do you need?

    1. Re:Does the original Gameboy Count? by Fujisawa+Sensei · · Score: 0, Troll

      You can get one on eBay for like $6.50, with Tetris. What else do you need?

      How about something that will run games I actually want to play?

      --
      If someone is passing you on the right, you are an asshole for driving in the wrong lane.
    2. Re:Does the original Gameboy Count? by neonprimetime · · Score: 2

      Probably not many people on /. share my opinion ... but I'd much rather spend hours in front of Tetris, Super Mario 3, Dig Dug, Frogger, Sonic, the original WarCraft, Sim City 2000, or some other classic ... than waste my time and money on the latest and greatest resource hog.

    3. Re:Does the original Gameboy Count? by Fujisawa+Sensei · · Score: 1

      Whats your point?

      I don't think that your $6.50 Gameboyrun WarCraft or StarCraft either; it won't even run Star Control.

      --
      If someone is passing you on the right, you are an asshole for driving in the wrong lane.
  11. Should have done best servers for the money by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

    Then perhaps the page would have withstood being slashdotted. Instead their poor server is a smoldering pile of nothingness - but hey their gaming laptops are 5up3r 1337 ! woot!

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    1. Re:Should have done best servers for the money by fxer · · Score: 1

      anybody get a cache of the site before the server melted?

    2. Re:Should have done best servers for the money by morcego · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Don't waste your time.
      There are no tests performed, no benchmarks, no comparisons.

      The guy only went to 3 websites (Dell, Alienware and some other), read the specs, and said what he though of it.

      Completely useless. Glad I use AdBlock. That site doesn't deserve a cent of advertisement money.

      --
      morcego
  12. You don't need money ... by neonprimetime · · Score: 1

    you can try to barter with somebody.

  13. Just to play devils advocate by JeanBaptiste · · Score: 1

    It's more like a shoebox computer with a built in UPS, if the line hiccups or you accidentally disconnect, you don't reboot. Not that it's the correct way to do things, but thats how I basically use my laptop anyways.

  14. Reviews on spec by liquiddark · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's obvious from the article that the reviewer didn't actually use the machines in question, and some of the choices are really questionable - he recommends a machine with Vista 64bit. Given the continued instability of a lot of 64 bit graphics drivers even on desktops, buying a laptop - where custom drivers tend to rule (and ruin) the day - with the OS seems like a massive waste of cash. I think this is a case of Reader Beware.

    1. Re:Reviews on spec by (H)elix1 · · Score: 1

      While I cannot say I spent any quality time with Vista, Window XP-64 is a rock solid gaming OS. With 8G of physical RAM, I've found I can alt-tab in and out of a game with my resource intensive apps running. Using 3.2G of RAM on the 32-bit version of XP, I had to be more cautious.

      Granted, 4G RAM chips (since most laptops only have room for two) is a bit outside most (sane) folk's budget. While my laptop has 4G and a 64-bit OS, the video and CPU are not quite there for gaming.

       

    2. Re:Reviews on spec by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a gamer which has been using Vista 64bit for the last 6months or so, I can't see any reason why people are so afraid of either Vista or 64bit. I've had no problems with either & I know when I stuff more RAM into my box, i won't have any problems.

      Note - I use a desktop for gaming. "Gamer" laptops are way too big/bulky to be considered laptops IMHO.

    3. Re:Reviews on spec by __aardcx5948 · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I don't know about that - I've got a Dell Inspiron 1520 with a NVIDIA 8600M GT, running Vista 64-bit. In the 6 months I've had the laptop, I've had one BSOD, IIRC it wasn't gfx related. Even getting tv-out to work is non-trivial with the NVIDIA drivers. I'm even using the latest beta drivers targeted for desktop PCs, just with a modded .inf file. One good thing about 64-bit Vista is that the drivers has to be signed by MS, otherwise you can't install them. Should (in theory) result in a more stable OS due to less buggy (more tested?) drivers...

    4. Re:Reviews on spec by liquiddark · · Score: 1

      BSOD isn't the problem; driver crashes are. Even on Vista 32 bit on the desktop I have relatively frequent driver crashes with an Nvidia 8600 GTS card. I'm sure it's gotten better since, but I bought a Dell Inspiron laptop years ago and discovered that I couldn't update my driver at all. That line was their main source of laptop income at the time. It's good to know that they have a machine that works, but yours, in my personal experience, is an exceptional case.

    5. Re:Reviews on spec by fostware · · Score: 1

      Actually, I use Vista Ultimate 64-bit on my XPS 1730 now...

      With the forums and community of laptopvideo2go.com, buggy driver versions are few and far between on my laptop.

      --
      "We know what happens to people who stay in the middle of the road. They get run over." - Aneurin Bevan
  15. Except it's not PC games by Moraelin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I can see your point, but the question and the context was about laptops that run PC games.

    Portables like the original gameboy or the newer DS, are a bit of a fixed target: a game either runs on that one configuration, or it doesn't. There are no games written for a DS with an upgraded graphics card, or with more RAM.

    PC gaming doesn't really have such fixed targets. All games try to surpass last year's in terms of graphics, if nothing else because screenshots sell, and the hardware requirements are occasionally outright silly. I can think of some games (e.g., EQ2) which were launched to match hardware specs that didn't even yet exist. E.g., seriously, to run EQ2 with full graphics details you needed a 512 MB graphics card, and that just didn't exist yet. (Well, ok, maybe except as a high-end, professional OpenGL card for CAD.)

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    1. Re:Except it's not PC games by billcopc · · Score: 1

      to run EQ2 with full graphics details you needed a 512 MB graphics card, and that just didn't exist yet.

      That's a good thing! It means the game will not look too outdated in a year, when that impossibly powerful hardware hits the mainstream.

      People bitch and moan about Crysis, but that's a game that will continue to impress even a year or two from now, as GPU power increases as well as monitor resolution.

      Conversely, just because you can't run a game at max settings on your current rig, doesn't mean the game sucks.

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    2. Re:Except it's not PC games by drei0003019 · · Score: 1

      "Unlike Quake 1, there is simply no way of fitting Quake II into the memory configuration of a stock DS. To play the game you must have a supported slot-2 flash card that contains a minimum of 16 megabytes of RAM."
      Quake2DS

      I guess homebrew doesn't count here, just wanted to add that various consoles had hardware upgrades in the past as well as today.

    3. Re:Except it's not PC games by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Meanwhile WoW looked better from a non-technical POV and worked fine on lower end machines even when it was released. MMOs cannot afford to go top tier with their graphics as there will simply be crowds that are too large for the hardware to handle.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    4. Re:Except it's not PC games by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      I guess it depends on what you consider a hardware upgrade. Huge numbers of games for older consoles had banking hardware and saveram (some of which may be used for things other than saves) in the cart and occasionally there was other stuff in there too.

      DS carts on the other hand have an interface that is disk like rather than rom like so if you want extra ram you need to put it on the GBA slot. That means an extra cart for the user to lose. So far the only commercial DS product i'm aware of that does so is the web browser.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  16. Biggest Mistake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...I ever made was purchasing a laptop as a gaming machine. Cooling issues, lack of upgradability, and with latest drivers and tweaked settings it performs worse then a 4 year older dell desktop with half the ram on mobo and on the graphics card. 9800M GTX with 512 ram, and more then 10 minutes of the new penny arcade game and it overheats enough to auto shut down. other games like bioshock it runs poorly with graphics turned all the way down and in low resolution (800x600, going to a non native resolution increased FPS considerably).

  17. Again? by YourExperiment · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Regular slashdot users will remember the site's article from a few weeks ago, which analysed the Best Gaming PCs that Money can Buy.

    Whereas regular Slashdot editors might remember how the last article was panned by readers, and might have ceased spamming us with articles from this site.

    They might also remember to capitalise the name of their own site, but I guess all this is too much to hope for.

    1. Re:Again? by predakanga · · Score: 1

      Actually, quite a number of those "[pannings]" were for issues unrelated to the content, like the paging, or the website not working under Opera. They've come a long way in a short amount of time on things like that (particularly the web browser support - we now test under more than triple the amount of browsers we used to). The Slashdot onslaught, in part, prompted that, so I say, if further articles mean that the site improves further to become a better source of news for sites like Slashdot, all the better.

  18. I reject these totally by cephyn · · Score: 4, Informative

    A gaming laptop review without reviewing one from Sager?

    Ridiculous. I love my Sager, and the company is great.

    http://www.sagernotebook.com/

    --
    Moo.
    1. Re:I reject these totally by der.gruene.v0gel · · Score: 1

      How can Sager not be on here, or even, at the very least, in the Budget section?

      I've had the NP2030-C (14.1") for two years, and it has been absolutely wonderful using it as both a gaming laptop (in WinXP) and to triple-boot XP, Debian, and FreeBSD.

      Haven't had any trouble running games on Medium to Medium-High settings and getting 30+ fps. Also, all of the hardware works under Debian with free drivers (took about a year or so before the webcam driver was developed enough to work).

      I ordered mine through a company called PowerNotebooks.com, mostly for the option of "no OS preinstalled." The price was about half that of an Alienware of comparable specs at the time.

      Also, Sager's and PowerNotebooks.com's support are probably the best I've ever experienced as far as technology goes.

      --
      Unfortunately, I never sleep.
    2. Re:I reject these totally by Danza · · Score: 1

      Sager doesn't make laptops, they buy barebones from Clevo fill em up and resell them. None of these laptops actually come close to competing with Clevos top offering. (although the metabox is a rebranded clevo) spec out the Clevo D901C on RJtech.com and you get a 3Ghz Quad, dual 9800M GTX 1GB DDR3 (each, for a total of 2GB graphics ram). and you can add 3 128 SSD's in raid 0 and 8GB of RAM from newegg for a total of 5899$. thats lightyears ahead of even the best Alienware and 1000's cheaper

    3. Re:I reject these totally by magarity · · Score: 1

      All three of the 'extreme' laptops, and if they had included the equivalent Sager, were the exact same laptop: the Clevo 901. Just with 3 different brand names attached and the alienware has a custom screen cover. The inability of the 'hardware guru' to detect this, and even that he didn't already know it, says a lot about game hardware fanboys.

    4. Re:I reject these totally by magus_melchior · · Score: 1

      Perhaps they don't/can't ship to Australia? I do see an .au domain in TFA.

      But thanks for the link. Been looking for a gaming lappy since the MBP's video chip is likely doomed to fry (GF 8600M), and I didn't want to build yet another badass tower (the one I have is for retro games).

      (and... 4 minutes since posting? I know spam's a problem, but seriously, isn't that discriminating against those who write like Hemingway?)

      --
      "We are Microsoft. You shall be assimilated. Competition is futile."
  19. why? by JustNiz · · Score: 1

    Its dissapointing that even though laptops have largely taken over from desktops for general personal computing use, still no laptop even comes close to the price/performance and especially upgradability of an atx case system.

    If your primary motivation is high-GPU games like crysis, you're still way better served by a conventional PC box rather than a laptop.

    1. Re:why? by genericpoweruser · · Score: 1
      I've always wished there would be such a thing as mobile-ATX. I would LOVE to be able to replace the PSU (even if the power cord was still proprietary), put in a better screen, better speakers, a better case, or mix two crappy/broken laptops to make one decent one.

      It burns me up there's virtually nothing of the sort available.

      --
      A fool and his lamb are worth two in the bush.
  20. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  21. Reputable FUD spewer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Nice to see they are still paid by Microsoft marketing arm. That entire statement goes against everything every reputable gaming site and expert says..

    If a gaming site rails against Vista... they aren't reputable.

    Brainlessly spewing Slashdot's MS-hating FUD doesn't make one reputable. Adhering to the truth makes one reputable... and every REAL reputable gaming site acknowledges Vista is the best platform for gaming.

    Oh... but perhaps you would prefer to get in on the Windows Mojave beta test? Let me know, I can hook you up for really cheap.

    1. Re:Reputable FUD spewer? by UncleTogie · · Score: 1

      Adhering to the truth makes one reputable... and every REAL reputable gaming site acknowledges Vista is the best platform for gaming.

      Links/citations, please?

      --
      Don't tell me to get a life. I'm a gamer; I have LOTS of lives!
  22. Whats the best bicycle for crossing the atlantic? by anomaly256 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Well, it's just as valid a question...

  23. Yeah, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, but is the laptop moist and chewy?

  24. Laptops for games? by nmg196 · · Score: 0, Troll

    Laptops are a STUPID idea for games.

    If you want to play a game on a laptop, that instantly means you need a very high end machine. High end laptops are a total rip-off. They're approximately three times the price of their desktop equivalent. They're also sealed devices which are not upgradable (VERY BAD if you're a gamer, because that means your incredibly expensive machine will now only be useful for about a year). You can't upgrade the CPU or even upgrade the graphics card. Even the a very high end gaming laptop is well off the performance of even a fairly average gaming desktop at less than half the price.

    I presume the only reason the poster requested a laptop is for portability. I would suggest that even a compact portable desktop machine is a much better buy. Yes, it's not going to be battery powered, but it will be FAR cheaper, quicker and more upgradable than any laptop.

  25. the best one money can buy by nimbius · · Score: 4, Interesting

    will heat up like the center of the sun, whir like a 747, weigh a metric ton and never be moved from the desk upon which it will sit, consume as much power as a low end desktop, and work for about 6 months to 1 year until thermal stress takes hold and it becomes worthless for any use. much like jumbo shrimp, conservative republican, and tactical nuclear weapon, this "gaming laptop" capable of running crysis for all of 20 minutes before thermaling out, is an oxymoron.

    the gaming laptop was contrived as a marketing competition tool to push the limits of the laptop form-factor with complete disregard for longevity and end user functionality.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
    1. Re:the best one money can buy by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      I was expecting something about it leaving a scorch mark as its lasting legacy, but yeah, spot on.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    2. Re:the best one money can buy by CodeMunch · · Score: 1

      will heat up like the center of the sun, whir like a 747, weigh a metric ton and never be moved from the desk upon which it will sit, consume as much power as a low end desktop, and work for about 6 months to 1 year until thermal stress takes hold and it becomes worthless for any use. much like jumbo shrimp, conservative republican, and tactical nuclear weapon, this "gaming laptop" capable of running crysis for all of 20 minutes before thermaling out, is an oxymoron.

      You have perfectly described the Alienware 7700m I was given. 12.5lbs of HOT underperforming frustration.

      I did take it with me though, it didn't sit on the desk 24/7. I liked sneaking a round of UT99 or BF1942/DC at lunch. It was much more convenient for lan parties, too.

  26. two words that don't go well together.. by Danzigism · · Score: 0

    Gaming and Laptop.

    --
    *plays the Apogee theme song music*
  27. This list is a joke. I don't get it... by mdm-adph · · Score: 1

    Even the "budget" laptops on their list aren't as powerful as the Gateway P-7811FX, which leaves those laptops in the dust for a couple of hundred dollars less...

    Seriously -- the Gateway has 9800M GTS graphics (compared to the puny 8400M models they listed in the "budget" section), comes with 4GB of RAM -- AND it costs a couple of hundred dollars less.

    --
    It is by my will alone my thoughts acquire motion; it is by the juice of the coffee bean that the thoughts acquire speed
  28. Those Budget Laptops SUCK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Try a HP Pavilion dv7-1020us.

    It retails for 1500, which is cheaper than all 3 "budget" laptops. It's on newegg for 1220.

    It has a Blu-ray Drive, bigger hard drive, more ram, better video card...

    Seriously? Who is this hardware guru? Give me your job.

  29. try by rmst2000 · · Score: 1

    first time, just try to do something, sorry

  30. Re:I reject these totally - Sager by nevermore94 · · Score: 1

    I second this comment. I love my Sager NP2090 and even though it is almost a year old it would kick all of the budget laptops and keep up with most of the performance ones in this review.

    I just finished my first play through of Supreme Commander at 1680x1050 and it never had a hiccup whereas it was sputtering all over the place on my fiance's new Dell Studio 15 at 1440x900.

    --
    Nevermore.
  31. Gun Analogy by Dareth · · Score: 1

    Sure you can buy the most powerful handgun, .50 Auto Express. But don't expect it to be more powerful than even a moderate caliber rifle.

    --

    I only look human.
    My mother is a halfling and my dad is an ogre, so that makes me an Ogreling
  32. Why is it silly? by Khyber · · Score: 1

    I have my laptop for less intensive games, like Open Arena, or Wolfenstein: Enemy Territory, plus the thousands of ROMs and the emulators that play them. It also serves as my portable HD video player and music player when I'm on the road or elsewhere that I cannot lug my desktop and 32" LCD.

    Just because it doesn't do BRAND-NEW gaming doesn't mean it's useless for gaming. People flip out all the time at the astounding MUGEN character list I've created (over 10K characters, only 300 actually in the game and working properly) and that so far has managed to impress far more of my gaming friends than any stupid new bleeding-edge game.

    Gaming != new and shiny games. Gaming is about enjoying what you're playing - it doesn't need the newest graphics. I still see more active Unreal Tournament servers than UT3 servers, and there's far more WolfET servers than Quake Wars.

    "With a desktop PC, you can simply replace the old graphics card with a new one."

    Hey! Guess what? Laptops have MXM slots FOR THE EXACT SAME PURPOSE. You may have to dig a little deeper to get the card in, but the effect is the same - upgraded system.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  33. They've missed the Best Choice by bumptehjambox · · Score: 1
    The Sager NP8660 http://www.notebookreview.com/default.asp?newsID=4590 can be configured with a 9800M GT and T9600 for far less than the FLAMING GAY ORANGE Asus G50V. Plus, it is 15.4" (The fastest 15.4" laptop ever made) The Asus G50V is 15.4, sports the far weaker 9700M, and since it has two hard drive bays it's nearly as large as a 17" and did I mention it only comes in FLAMING GAY ORANGE? You can get a 1920x1200 MATTE screen for the Sager, instead of those glossy screens that morons love so much that hardly any other laptop manufacturer still uses them. I had a G1S, it was nice but I think it's the last decent Asus product that will ever be made. Their giant Republic of Gamers emblem, and blue blinken light bonanza plastered over a giant candy tangerine shell, it's just too tacky. Asus is so dead to me.

    And if you have been given a liquidity injection recently, you can even get the x9100 and have all the fun that the Alienware kids are having. If not, as your attorney, I advise you to just buy it anyway and file for bankruptcy when the time comes.

  34. MOD DOWN by Khyber · · Score: 1

    LAPTOPS HAVE UPGRADABLE GRAPHICS - SEE THE MXM SLOT. Dell had a laptop YEARS AGO with a full-sized AGP slot in it for THIS VERY PURPOSE (Inspiron 9800 IIRC)

    For crying out loud, drop this false and nonsensical notion that YOU CANNOT UPGRADE LAPTOP GRAPHICS. It's been false for YEARS.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    1. Re:MOD DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its certainly not commonplace to be able to do so. In fact none of these have user-upgradeable graphics... go mod yourself down.

    2. Re:MOD DOWN by Khyber · · Score: 0

      Apparently you failed to read the post of MobyDisk to understand why I said what I said - here let me quote for your ignorant cowardly self:

      "Really, what is silly is that laptops don't have upgradable graphics"

      He is 100% wrong about that. And he doesn't say "*THESE* laptops don't have upgradable graphics" he says "ALL LAPTOPS don't have upgradable graphics."

      Now STFU and get off my lawn.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  35. Get real by Khyber · · Score: 1

    Windows is *NOT* a platform. A platform is the hardware architecture, OS, programming languages, runtime libraries, and on occasion a graphical user interface. Windows is only a PART of the platform.

    Who's the one brainlessly spouting stuff, again?

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  36. The author did not look at most laptops. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The author didn't bother to mention an asus laptop thats sub 1k and preforms better than the asus he posts in the budget area. the F8S is much better than the one listed, but I suppose he did this because he apparently does not list ANY ATI laptops I could see. I guess playing crysis on all high at native resolution isn't good enough for a laptop...

  37. Re:This list is a joke. I don't get it... by nesdude · · Score: 1

    A word of caution of people looking at this laptop. While I absolutely love mine, and it runs anything and everything I've tried to throw at it (seriously, even the bloated port of Guitar Hero 3 runs at 1900x1200 at full settings 60fps!), the power adapter died on me *12* days after getting the laptop.

    I'm chalking it up to being extremely unlucky, but Gateway is now dragging their feet sending me a new one. I sent in a request Friday, they told me 3-5 business days and I'd get a confirmation email. No email came, so I emailed again Saturday. Same thing: 3-5 days. Today? Still no email, and now I'm getting angry. I'm hoping for a quick fix, but it's looking bleaker and bleaker.

    But don't let me sway you. The laptop, when it works, is amazing. It doesn't run hot, I get 2 hours of WoW full settings on a full battery (brightness on low), 3 and a half at desktop. It's a REALLY nice machine, I'm just bummed that I had a bum power adapter.

  38. klawiatura.wordpress.com I ned it ;) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When the laptops have been this keyboards? http://klawiatura.wordpress.com/

    1. Re:klawiatura.wordpress.com I ned it ;) by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      When the laptops have been this keyboards? http://klawiatura.wordpress.com/

      I prefer "Polish programmers" keyboard layout when it comes to Polish language.

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
    2. Re:klawiatura.wordpress.com I ned it ;) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Polish keyboards ;)))
      Polish signs in keys & don't You see what writing

  39. No Driver updates by mrsaggy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The biggest problem I have with laptops it the lack of driver updates.
    My laptop has a nVidia graphics card, but is unsupported by nVidia.
    The drivers need to be updated by the manufacturer and I cannot use the universal
    driver. My old laptop with Geforce 2, hasnt had a driver update since 2002.

    S

    1. Re:No Driver updates by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      The biggest problem I have with laptops it the lack of driver updates.
      My laptop has a nVidia graphics card, but is unsupported by nVidia.
      The drivers need to be updated by the manufacturer and I cannot use the universal
      driver. My old laptop with Geforce 2, hasnt had a driver update since 2002.

      Omega drivers work for me if I use Windows. But usually I use a variation of Linux that has the latest drivers in the recent six months the distro was released.

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
  40. Games for a DS with more RAM by tepples · · Score: 1

    There are no games written for a DS with an upgraded graphics card, or with more RAM.

    Nintendo 64 had a 4 MiB RAM expansion (from 4 MiB to 8 MiB), used by at least Perfect Dark, Majora's Mask, Donkey Kong 64, Quake II, and one of the Turok games. Nintendo DS also had an 8 MiB RAM expansion (from 4 MiB to 12 MiB), used by Nintendo DS Browser. (Granted, it's not technically a game, but it's in the same vein as N64 games.) And plenty of homebrew software for Nintendo DS can take advantage of third-party 16 MiB and 32 MiB expansion cards.

    PC gaming doesn't really have such fixed targets.

    Since early 2007, there is one fixed target for games for Windows: whatever Microsoft thinks is the minimum to run Windows Vista's Aero interface. If developers can get minimum settings working smoothly on the cheapest hardware that can run Aero, their products will run on just about any PC from the Vista era.

  41. I'm ridin' spinners, they don't stop. by tepples · · Score: 1

    but I'd much rather spend hours in front of Tetris

    In fact, you can spend hours in front of newer Tetris games without placing one piece. Just spin the piece forever. In fact, The Tetris Company requires this "feature". It's a good thing that fan games let you turn this off.

  42. You don't need DX10 to play a music CD by tepples · · Score: 1

    Halo 2.

    I've played Halo 2 on my PlayStation 1 and Halo 5 on my Dreamcast. If I wanted, I could play Halo 2 on an old Mac from 1995.

  43. 2600 can't do action RPGs, but NES can by tepples · · Score: 1

    Could a game like Mass Effect be played on a 2600?

    The Atari 2600 doesn't have the resources to render an action RPG. But the NES does: witness The Legend of Zelda, Zelda II: The Adventure of Link, and me-too clones such as Spiritual Warfare. Take a step up to the Super NES and you get the Mana series.

  44. Holy Crap by Caboosian · · Score: 1

    They support XP! Forget Acer, hello Sager!

  45. Could you provide a link to such a laptop, please? by ShadowSystems · · Score: 1

    I went to the Dell site, searched for "MXM slot", and the only place Dell mentioned it was in their Forums from 2004.
    If that is a currently available option on a laptop, I'd be interested in browsing the available models for something to purchase.
    Thank you!

  46. Re:Could you provide a link to such a laptop, plea by Khyber · · Score: 1

    Business-class HP Laptops use an MXM slot for graphics. I think the NX9420 or newer model might be up your alley, although if you don't need the uber-shiny shit, you can do an NC6400 or some such with an earlier-gen MXM Type I slot.

    As it is, most companies don't advertise that their laptops can be upgraded GPU-wise, because in order to do so you have to disassemble the laptop. Until they redesign it to where the common user can just pop the back open, remove the GPU heatpipe, switch cards, apply thermal paste in proper amounts, and properly re-mount the heatpipe, it's just not an advertising point.

    That being said, Dell only did (upon research) an AGP-slot laptop. I had to call my friend to bring it over, and it was a custom job done for FullSail video school, a modified Inspiron 9800 with a full-sized 6800 AGP card inside, with VGA and DVI ports.

    Looks like HP is the only laptop maker offering MXM slots, although Toshiba has something about upgradable graphics but it looks like mostly nonsense.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  47. (Sigh) Oh well... Thanks anyway! =) by ShadowSystems · · Score: 1

    The model from Dell you mention is a Discontinued Product that sold 2+ years ago.
    HP can't find any reference to MXM in their inventory & insist I meant MMX...
    Alienware (now Dell) has one, but it's $2,300 for an "Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 2.0GHz 4MB Cache".
    That's the same speed as my current notebook, & I was looking for an upgrade.
    (Shrugs, smiles)
    Oh well, it was a nice thought.
    Thanks for pointing me in the right direction.
    (Gives Kudo's and a cookie.)

    1. Re:(Sigh) Oh well... Thanks anyway! =) by Khyber · · Score: 1

      HP won't reference it because it's not even in the technical manuals - when I ran across the MXM card for the first time it was in an NX9420/9440 and I was working as an HP laptop repair tech. I had just been moved over to the commercial line of laptops because I was too good to be used on a consumer end (I worked too fast.) After looking the card up in the parts database and realizing it was a swappable GPU I started looking up everything that I could - nobody actually advertises it, and you won't know if the laptop has an MXM slot unless you actually disassemble it or find someone that repairs laptops for a company, and ask them yourself.

      As it is, any high-end commercial-line HP will come with an MXM slot - they're using Type III MXM slots now for the new 9800 mobile chipsets.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    2. Re:(Sigh) Oh well... Thanks anyway! =) by Khyber · · Score: 1

      http://www.mxm-sig.org/

      Companies that have adopted MXM are:
      Dell
      Acer
      MSI
      HP

      And many more - just because MXM isn't stated doesn't mean it's not in use. I'll be willing to bet the high-end laptops all have MXM type-III slots

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.