Slashdot Mirror


Russian Town Puts Giant Smiley On Google Maps

Toramir writes "Citizens of the Russian town Chelyabinsk calculated when the satellite, QuickBird, which takes images for Google Earth and Google Maps, would cross above their city and used people to make a giant smiley face. A rock concert on the main square attracted many people and everyone got a yellow cape. It looks like someone at Google was quicker than usual to put up the new data. Maybe Google likes the idea of an entire town working hard to get its 15 minutes of fame. The article has a screenshot of Google Maps and images taken directly at the event."

280 comments

  1. You know what... by incognito84 · · Score: 5, Funny

    In Soviet Russia, satellite smiles at you!

    1. Re:You know what... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read comments below, and tag "hoax" and "fake" on this story. Maybe we'll get the tags to the front page together.

    2. Re:You know what... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      But this IS in russia... it should be:

      In Corporate America, satellite smiles at you!

    3. Re:You know what... by Nabeel_co · · Score: 5, Informative
    4. Re:You know what... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      In Soviet Russia, satellite smiles at you!

      Will Soviet Russia jokes still work when America is Socialist?

    5. Re:You know what... by BountyX · · Score: 4, Interesting

      This has already been done before by the NSA. In an abandoned NSA base, people found US satellites with smiley faces painted on them. The nsa would time it in sync with russian spy satellites. See http://www.xent.com/FoRK-archive/2001.01/0188.html which is actually an exert from the book "Chatter".

      --
      Trying to install linux on my microwave, but keep getting a kernel panic...
    6. Re:You know what... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aha, so this is the place the world's XTC is manufactured.

    7. Re:You know what... by jericho4.0 · · Score: 1

      Very interesting, that.

      --
      "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
    8. Re:You know what... by skarphace · · Score: 1

      You don't even get the same site appearance if you go to the URL in the browser window.

      http://maps.google.de/maps?t=m&hl=de&q=Tscheljabinsk+Russland&output=html

      They don't even have an ajaxy styled maps in Germany. Anyone have any idea why not?

      --
      Bullish Machine Tzar
    9. Re:You know what... by Kagura · · Score: 1

      In an abandoned NSA base, people found US satellites with smiley faces painted on them.

      A tiny correction, it's actually a satellite dish:

      Despite the site's stark appearance, there are some human - and humorous - vestiges. A bright happy face is painted on the smallest of the four satellite dishes on the site, something one former employee said was done so that they could "smile back at the Russians."

      Not all that important of a point, but I thought it significant enough to bring up as it ruined my understanding of the situation.

      That said, I'm halfway through the parent's linked article, and it's a great read about what an NSA facility was like in 2001 when the story was posted. Imagine what they've got in their facilities today, especially if the only things reported on in the article are what the NSA purposefully left behind!

    10. Re:You know what... by defrex · · Score: 1

      Yes they do. If you go to maps.google.de you'll see that it works fine. It's the &output=html that is giving you the flat page.

    11. Re:You know what... by DaVince21 · · Score: 1

      Fake, or already "overwritten" by newer satellite data?

      --
      I am not devoid of humor.
  2. Where exactly? by Mr.+Freeman · · Score: 0

    Anyone know the coordinates for this? The town is pretty big and it's kind of a pain to search the entire town for one smiley face on google maps.

    --
    -1 disagree is not a modifier for a reason. -1 troll, flaimbait, redundant, overrated are NOT acceptable substitutes.
    1. Re:Where exactly? by igny · · Score: 1
      --
      In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is. - Yogi Berra
    2. Re:Where exactly? by evanbd · · Score: 3, Informative

      Here is the spot in the screenshot. No smiley, though.

    3. Re:Where exactly? by robvangelder · · Score: 1

      type Chelyabinsk into google maps. the marker is where they assembled, but I cant see the smiley yet.

    4. Re:Where exactly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's fake.
      http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&hl=en&geocode=&q=tscheljabinsk+russia&ie=UTF8&ll=55.160187,61.402674&spn=0.002758,0.006534&t=h&z=18

    5. Re:Where exactly? by igny · · Score: 1
      --
      In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is. - Yogi Berra
    6. Re:Where exactly? by MarkRose · · Score: 4, Funny

      Way to frown on the happy parade! :(

      --
      Be relentless!
    7. Re:Where exactly? by brian_tanner · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It's worth mentioning that if you zoom in on Google maps and compare the two pictures, it seems that the parked cars and traffic from outside of the immediate smiley area are exactly the same. It appears as if the smiley was photoshopped in or out of one of the pictures.

      Hmmm.

    8. Re:Where exactly? by Hal_Porter · · Score: 5, Funny

      For those who absolutely refused to read the article, here is an artist's impression

      : )

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    9. Re:Where exactly? by Wanado · · Score: 2, Funny

      It appears as if the smiley was photoshopped in or out of one of the pictures.

      Yes, it appears as if the smiley may have been added to the image using Adobe Photoshop software. Adobe Trademark Use

      --
      Somehow along the way I made a bad choice in life and now must live with 0 Karma.
    10. Re:Where exactly? by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      Considering the illogical thing to gang up people on a street with traffic this seems to be a photochop.

      But at least it's a good joke!

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    11. Re:Where exactly? by gmuslera · · Score: 5, Funny

      A new breaktrough in loseless image compression, what really matters of that image in just 2 bytes.

    12. Re:Where exactly? by DamienNightbane · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I wish you could be modded +6 funny for this.

    13. Re:Where exactly? by GFree678 · · Score: 5, Funny

      I disagree. I can provide a better artist's impression: :D

    14. Re:Where exactly? by THESuperShawn · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Christ on a cracker. Every where you go. a tourist. Just head down ulista aTrucka until you come down to old broken down building, make right. Pass statue of great leader Stalin an make left. If you see line for toilet wiper paper, you go to far. Pick up front of Trabaunt and turn around. Look for bear on unicycle but don't stare at the bandages on his feet. Should be right across from old woman who sells the egg people with smaller egg people inside them and yet smaller egg people inside them- I never understood these things. If you still don't see, got to McDonalds where they are giving free tickets and Coke fries to peoples who wear their logo but not steal the salt shakers.

      --
      Repant. Thy end is sheer.
    15. Re:Where exactly? by Paperkirin · · Score: 1

      'â' would be a better impression, if /. worked with Unicode. Oh well.

    16. Re:Where exactly? by c0p0n · · Score: 4, Informative

      Looks fake to me. The screenshots on the article's websites show the cars on the exactly same positions, so it's obviously the same square, photoshopped.

      --

      Your head a splode
    17. Re:Where exactly? by Stooshie · · Score: 2, Funny
      --
      America, Home of the Brave. ... .and the Squaw.
    18. Re:Where exactly? by Inf0phreak · · Score: 4, Funny
      I also heard that a Japanese artist had made an impression:

      ^_^

      --
      ________
      Entranced by anime since late summer 2001 and loving it ^_^
    19. Re:Where exactly? by teh+kurisu · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Off-topic, I know, but I'd never seen this before, and I found it quite funny.

      Trademarks are not verbs.

      CORRECT: The image was enhanced using Adobe® Photoshop® software.
      INCORRECT: The image was photoshopped.

      Trademarks are not verbs, therefore verbs are not trademarks, therefore 'photoshopped' is not a trademark, and can therefore be used freely. Or am I applying logic where none applies? (Yes, I know, trademark law probably covers stuff like this.)

    20. Re:Where exactly? by IanCal · · Score: 1
      Really?

      They seem pretty different to me. The google maps version has a lot of traffic on the road leading off to the right, but the article picture doesn't.

      The parked cars are in the same spot, but the traffic isn't.

    21. Re:Where exactly? by complete+loony · · Score: 2, Informative

      The other pictures from the event clearly show an overcast sky. Even if they did time it properly for the next fly-by, I doubt the google earth image will show anything.

      --
      09F91102 no, 455FE104 nope, F190A1E8 uh-uh, 7A5F8A09 that's not it, C87294CE no. Ah! 452F6E403CDF10714E41DFAA257D313F.
    22. Re:Where exactly? by higuita · · Score: 1

      yep, they cleaned some cars on the right, but on other streets its all the same

      --
      Higuita
    23. Re:Where exactly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can confirm this. Fake fail.

    24. Re:Where exactly? by xonar · · Score: 0

      By your logic, "googling" something is incorrect grammar as well.

      I performed a search using Google search technology and.....

      FAIL

    25. Re:Where exactly? by dollar99 · · Score: 1

      The actual url from the article's screenshot is this: http://maps.google.de/maps?t=m&hl=de&q=Tscheljabinsk+Russland Takes you to the same place with no smiley face. Some cars have been photoshopped out but others are in the exact same positions as the fake photo.

    26. Re:Where exactly? by Simon+Brooke · · Score: 4, Funny

      Off-topic, I know, but I'd never seen this before, and I found it quite funny.

      Trademarks are not verbs.

      CORRECT: The image was enhanced using Adobe® Photoshop® software. INCORRECT: The image was photoshopped.

      Trademarks are not verbs, therefore verbs are not trademarks, therefore 'photoshopped' is not a trademark, and can therefore be used freely. Or am I applying logic where none applies? (Yes, I know, trademark law probably covers stuff like this.)

      I tried to Google for an authoritative answer, but didn't come up with anything.

      --
      I'm old enough to remember when discussions on Slashdot were well informed.
    27. Re:Where exactly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a case of impressionism versus neo-impressionism. There are no winners here.

    28. Re:Where exactly? by 10e6Steve · · Score: 1

      It also looks in the other photographs like a cloudy overcast day when the smiley event actually happened. However in the Google screenshot it looks sunny.

    29. Re:Where exactly? by shadow349 · · Score: 1

      If you take the Google Maps version and the "screenshot" version into Photoshop, layer them, and set the top layer to "Difference", it is obvious it is a photochop.

    30. Re:Where exactly? by dw604 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I don't know... Google it?

    31. Re:Where exactly? by coolsnowmen · · Score: 1

      It is not necessarily wrong; language evolves by its use. It is called a synecdoche: "a term denoting a specific class of thing is used to refer to a larger, more general class.

      If you google the term, you should be able to print out the definition and xerox it for the world to see.

    32. Re:Where exactly? by need4mospd · · Score: 5, Funny

      I Britannica'd the info and found what you're looking for. I'll Xerox the page and UPS it to you.

    33. Re:Where exactly? by camperdave · · Score: 4, Funny

      Looks fake to me. The screenshots on the article's websites show the cars on the exactly same positions, so it's obviously the same square, photoshopped.

      That makes me angry. They go through all the trouble of handing out yellow capes to hundreds of people. They tell them where to stand, and they probably have to wait there for quite a time while the satellite passes over. They have to block traffic, and business, etc. Then some humourless drone down at Google goes and photoshops all that work away. It was probably done by the same sourpuss person who got rid of the "Swim across the Atlantic" instruction you used to get when asking for directions from New York to London, England.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    34. Re:Where exactly? by jsight · · Score: 1

      Looks fake to me. The screenshots on the article's websites show the cars on the exactly same positions, so it's obviously the same square, photoshopped.

      That makes me angry. They go through all the trouble of handing out yellow capes to hundreds of people. They tell them where to stand, and they probably have to wait there for quite a time while the satellite passes over. They have to block traffic, and business, etc. Then some humourless drone down at Google goes and photoshops all that work away. It was probably done by the same sourpuss person who got rid of the "Swim across the Atlantic" instruction you used to get when asking for directions from New York to London, England.

      I think you have missed the point. Google is not the one doing the photoshopping here, the people claming to have done this are.

    35. Re:Where exactly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Whoooooooooosh

    36. Re:Where exactly? by drodal · · Score: 0

      Looks fake to me. The screenshots on the article's websites show the cars on the exactly same positions, so it's obviously the same square, photoshopped.

      That makes me angry. They go through all the trouble of handing out yellow capes to hundreds of people. They tell them where to stand, and they probably have to wait there for quite a time while the satellite passes over. They have to block traffic, and business, etc. Then some humourless drone down at Google goes and photoshops all that work away. It was probably done by the same sourpuss person who got rid of the "Swim across the Atlantic" instruction you used to get when asking for directions from New York to London, England.

      I think you have missed the point. Google is not the one doing the photoshopping here, the people claming to have done this are.

      isn't that the point misser calling the point getter the point misser????? <clue> he was being funny</clue>

    37. Re:Where exactly? by The+Gaytriot · · Score: 3, Funny

      It was definitely 'shopped, but I did manage to find a real instance of this happening. It was in Central Park, NY, weird...
      Here's a screenshot:
      http://05lan.dyndns.org/public/centralpark.JPG

      This one is definitely not photoshopped.

      --
      Srsly u guys. U guys, srsly.
    38. Re:Where exactly? by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      Looks fake to me. The screenshots on the article's websites show the cars on the exactly same positions, so it's obviously the same square, photoshopped.

      Yeah, no one would ever park their car in the exact same parking spot day after day of work, or leave a car parked in a single spot for days at a time.~

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    39. Re:Where exactly? by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 0

      I believe it was an outdoor concert with sections barricaded off to form the eyes and mouth, likely with the required permits applied for and granted. They block off several streets downtown at least once a year for several days for local talent here.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    40. Re:Where exactly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is hilarious. Just spewed on my keyboard.

    41. Re:Where exactly? by omnipresentbob · · Score: 1

      3 byes. There's a space. :P

    42. Re:Where exactly? by leadfoot · · Score: 0

      Are you sure that Google didn't do the photoshopping?

      --
      "We're gonna need a bigger boat"
    43. Re:Where exactly? by The+Gaytriot · · Score: 1

      Woohoo! My server lasted 1 hour and 20 minutes of slashdot.

      PR PR PR!
       

      --
      Srsly u guys. U guys, srsly.
    44. Re:Where exactly? by WoLpH · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's 3 bytes actually, he added a space there ;)

    45. Re:Where exactly? by irenaeous · · Score: 2, Informative

      Look again. Even the moving cars (the ones that have not been photoshopped away) are in exactly the same place.

    46. Re:Where exactly? by dexomn · · Score: 1

      INCOMPLETE SIG!, Plz call Commissar now!

    47. Re:Where exactly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      3

      --
      Filter error: You can type more than that for your comment.

    48. Re:Where exactly? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Only after I use a Kleenix and get some coffee from the Thermos.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    49. Re:Where exactly? by Samah · · Score: 1

      This one is definitely not photoshopped.

      No, but it WAS mspainted.

      --
      Homonyms are fun!
      You're driving your car, but they're riding their bikes there.
    50. Re:Where exactly? by nobodymk2 · · Score: 1

      4. The null character. ": )\0"...not to mention the pointer to said string?

    51. Re:Where exactly? by nobodymk2 · · Score: 1

      I remember in one of my computer science classes the professor showed us the Adobe post on a unofficial Photoshop (et all) discussion board, asking them to stop saying "Photoshop" and use "Adobe Photoshop" and also stop using it as a verb. I believe this is because they would lose the trademark (yet Xerox is still Xerox). Though no word phrase is quite as good as "Photoshopped". Enhanced in photoshop sounds like we adjusted the color and contrast in photoshop, but photoshopped seems like we added extra smoke trails to make the news more dramatic or added a similie face to the google maps screenshot. Then again when we say "15 minutes of fame" it is entirely possible that another satellite image was taken, and no photoshop was involved.

    52. Re:Where exactly? by digitalarena · · Score: 1

      I think they were Gimped in.

  3. Google will have to remove the pic by zappepcs · · Score: 5, Funny

    or the copyright owners of the smiley face will issue a DMCA take down notice.

    Whether that would really happen or not, the news has become so much like the Onion that I kind of expect asshattery like that.

    1. Re:Google will have to remove the pic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      the copyright owners of the smiley face will issue a DMCA take down notice.

      In Soviet Russia, smiley face owns copyright on DMCA!

      In future Soviet USA, they skip take down notice. Instead send you straight to a DMCA Forced Work Camp in Alaska. Where you will transcribe entire works of Disney, by hand.

    2. Re:Google will have to remove the pic by asylumx · · Score: 1

      Forrest Gump doesn't want the russkies to be happy, eh? Shit happens!

    3. Re:Google will have to remove the pic by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      Uh, given that the smiley face is Dryco's logo a DMCA takedown is the last thing I'd worry about. Now a pocket chainsaw...

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    4. Re:Google will have to remove the pic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where you will transcribe entire works of Disney, by hand.

      But... Disney mostly produced motion pictures and animated works, not textual media...?

      Or is that the point? You have to transcribe on a physical medium, the data that would encode the moving pictures' data???

      Crap, guess I'd better hurry up and start working then; One, Zero, Zero, One, One, One, Zero, Q-bit, One, Zero........

    5. Re:Google will have to remove the pic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&hl=en&geocode=&q=russland,+oblast+tscheljabinsk,+tscheljabinsk&ie=UTF8&cd=1&ll=55.159945,61.403843&spn=0.003935,0.01177&t=h&z=17

      No smiley face.... But the DCMA will still come.

      In Soviet Russia, Dot slashes you!

  4. Where is it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just looked at Google maps, but the smiling face is nowhere to be found. Russian cover up?

    1. Re:Where is it? by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1

      Not on maps.google.de (the screenshot is from the German google URL) either.

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    2. Re:Where is it? by TobyRush · · Score: 4, Funny

      No... wait... I see it! You kind of have to focus your eyes on a point behind the picture.

      --
      Sam! If you will let me be,
      I will try them.
      You will see.
    3. Re:Where is it? by darthnoodles · · Score: 1

      Now that would be funny.

      Somebody needs to make a huge magic-eye and let Google take a pic for the satellite. I wonder if it would still work.

    4. Re:Where is it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a schooner!

    5. Re:Where is it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, its a sailboat.

  5. Please stop the images by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They just look ugly. Seriously.

    1. Re:Please stop the images by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      : (

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
  6. In soviet Russia.. by 278MorkandMindy · · Score: 5, Funny

    In soviet Russia, we know when the American satellites are coming!

    1. Re:In soviet Russia.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      You do not know when the toilet paper is coming!

    2. Re:In soviet Russia.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      In soviet Russia, we know when the American satellites are coming!

      Because outer space is not maintained by the U.S.A. Art Buchwald, upon hearing the plans for moving Minuteman missiles in a secret underground tunnel network so that the Russians would not know where the missiles were at any point of time, instead proposed using AmTrak for moving the missiles around.

      And in order to make sure the Russians never knew where the missiles were, to give them the train schedules.

      I think they actually heeded his advice in so far as railroads were indeed used for that purpose. I don't know whether they also followed his suggestion of handing over the train schedules. There are probably treaties against that kind of infamy.

    3. Re:In soviet Russia.. by sharkey · · Score: 1

      Howdy-Ho!

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    4. Re:In soviet Russia.. by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

      You do not know when the toilet paper is coming!

      You do not know when the Johns are coming!

      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
  7. Fake images by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    You can see the search used in the image. Search for for 'Tscheljabinsk, russia' and zoom in. You can see that you end up in the same square, but there is no smiley there!

    Also: cars were removed from the image close to the square, but they're in the same locations further away. Light hits the image from the same angle, which means same time and date difference from equinox).

    1. Re:Fake images by 4D6963 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Furthermore the fake screenshot depicts the very exact same thing as the rooftop picture. What's more pathetic, that they actually did it but not for when Google would actually shoot (is there even any way to actually know that?) or that the Slashdot "editors" didn't even see that coming.

      I guess that's Journalism 2.0, in which it's the user who does the editor's job of spotting the bullshit.

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    2. Re:Fake images by maglor_83 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Never mind the fact that they say they timed when the satellite would come over, but it's an aerial photo.

      Also, they did a similar thing on James May's 20th Century, where he made a giant space invader to be captured on a satellite image.

    3. Re:Fake images by Hal_Porter · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I guess that's Journalism 2.0, in which it's the user who does the editor's job of spotting the bullshit.

      Is this really a bad thing though? I first watched CNN during the first gulf war. They were kind of dumb, but they had people on the ground in Baghdad and those people stuck their cameras out of the window and sounded scared but enthusiastic. Every time there was a crisis they'd fly someone out there and broadcast anything cool they filmed. There wasn't much attempt at analysis, but it was still pretty interesting

      Now when I watch CNN they seemed to have far more stuff back home. Every half our or so they run an advert for CNN "Eco Solutions" which is the opposite of journalism - they know the story before the leave the office and select reports that fit it. There are far more talking heads back in the studio repeating conventional wisdom from the US. Frankly this is boring - I don't care what middle class Americans believe is happening.

      I'd much rather just see a stream of images from what is actually happening and make up my own mind. There less editorial control the better.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    4. Re:Fake images by John+Sokol · · Score: 1

      They could just have photo shopped it in.

      --
      I am always doing that which I can not do, in order that I may learn how to do it. - Pablo Picasso
    5. Re:Fake images by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Open source news. Everyone gets to fix the flaws.

    6. Re:Fake images by easyTree · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'd much rather just see a stream of images from what is actually happening and make up my own mind. There less editorial control the better.

      Perhaps you've forgotten that the purpose of news isn't to inform, it's to coerce opinion.

    7. Re:Fake images by Hal_Porter · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, the purpose of a TV channel is to sell adverts, make the journalists feel important and not tell the viewers anything that might upset their world view. It's actually quite the opposite of trying to coerce opinion, I actually think there's an element of karma whoring going on.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    8. Re:Fake images by easyTree · · Score: 4, Funny

      No, the purpose of a cinema is to sell popcorn. It's actually quite the opposite of karma whoring.

    9. Re:Fake images by Nutria · · Score: 2

      They were kind of dumb

      1GW was when I realized how completely stupid most reporters are, and how in over their heads they were when dealing with military issues, asking questions like, "so which units are going to attack, and where?".

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    10. Re:Fake images by 117 · · Score: 1

      No, the purpose of a cinema is to sell popcorn. It's actually quite the opposite of karma whoring.

      In the UK it isn't

    11. Re:Fake images by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      No, the purpose of a cinema is to sell popcorn.

      Really? That's funny because the last time I went there the only thing I saw people buying were tickets.

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    12. Re:Fake images by catwh0re · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I wouldn't think a satellite would get the required resolution for a crowd of people standing around in yellow capes.

      That sounds more like the google aerial photography. For which Google, as they did in Australia, specifically issues a press release and an online tool to track the location of the plane so the general population could form interesting assemblies to be later viewed on google maps.

    13. Re:Fake images by easyTree · · Score: 1

      One more reason why it's best to watch films at home.

    14. Re:Fake images by dintech · · Score: 1

      Hoaxers are the new trolls and Slashdot just fed them.

    15. Re:Fake images by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      They were kind of dumb

      1GW was when I realized how completely stupid most reporters are, and how in over their heads they were when dealing with military issues, asking questions like, "so which units are going to attack, and where?".

      "Please speak slowly and clearly into my flower."

    16. Re:Fake images by LearnToSpell · · Score: 1

      You have to buy a ticket so you can get in and buy some popcorn!

    17. Re:Fake images by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a great segment on Euronews (on UK Sky TV, dunno if you can get it) called "no comment" that is this taken to the extreme. It's literally half an hour of continuous footage of a fierce running street battle or something with no commentary whatsoever other than text right at the start that says where it is, hence you often have NO IDEA what's going on or why.

    18. Re:Fake images by davinc · · Score: 1

      Judging by the photos from the event and other comments, the photo was likely doctored by Google to remove the smile face.

    19. Re:Fake images by Jorophose · · Score: 1

      I don't think any cinema has made more than pennies on the total amount of tickets sold for a recent movie...

      Concessions are where it's at. Why do you think it's so expensive?

    20. Re:Fake images by davidsyes · · Score: 1

      I thought the purpose of a TV channel was to "PROGRAM", ("We now resume our program...")

      A (TV) drug-infused nation (such as the US) is more likely to be more tame and subdued than one lacking TV's "programming".

      Lesser duties of the TV:

      Inform/Educate (prepare/maintain population subsumation/gullibility)
      Confuse/Disorient/Distract (keep up debates especially during voting cycles)
      Deceive/Manipulate (keep up enough non-congruity to guarantee support for war/invasion/etc)

      Adverts are just a huge, HUGE bonus to those owning the stations, frequencies, and towers/repeaters.

      But, I gave up my two TVs in 2003. They're addictive, and when i visit or stay in places with TVs, i end up hooked on them for 5-10 hours at a time. Fortunately, I have DVDs, CAD apps, and drawing to wean me off of TV. All i really care for are educational (Discovery/PBS/ and similar; BBC-like; Sci-FI and a few others. (If i had a Borg Vinculum and processing data port, I could plug into 22.454 million data outputs...)

      --
      Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  8. URRS by floatingrunner · · Score: 0
    (united republics of the red star)

    what? no red star?

    can't seem to find it either. will check back again

  9. ÐzÑÐнÑOE Ñ...& by gblackwo · · Score: 5, Informative

    ÐÑо? ÐÑ Ð½Ð ÐонÐмÐÐÑÐ Ðо-ÑÑfÑÑÐÐ? ÑмоÑÑÐ Ð google ÐÐÑÐÐоÐ! ÐоРWow, seriously no cyrillic on slashdot? What is this the 90's?

  10. It's a bad photoshop by Rufus211 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Compare these two:
    http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_IeJHb-2CVGM/SNUFiyTlEHI/AAAAAAAAAIQ/shQMNh5h89o/s1600-h/smiley-1000.jpg
    http://maps.google.com/maps?q=tscheljabinsk+russland&ie=UTF8&oe=utf-8&client=iceweasel-a&t=h&ll=55.160037,61.403425&spn=0.004793,0.011179&z=17

    The cars on all the side streets and all the shadows are exactly the same. Someone just photoshoped out the cars on the main street and put in the smily. Nothing to see here.

    1. Re:It's a bad photoshop by alain94040 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      To be fair, since the other pictures look authentic, I'd say the meeting really happened. It's just that Google wasn't fast enough to record it. That shows you a limitation of Google :-) There are still a few things you can do without Google noticing right away.

      Alain - fairsoftware.net

    2. Re:It's a bad photoshop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, the photos of the event clearly show an overcast sky.

      This may have interfered with satellite optical photography.

    3. Re:It's a bad photoshop by tehfly · · Score: 1

      true, it does look like a photoshop. A bit disappointing really, after it's been /.'ed and everything =(

    4. Re:It's a bad photoshop by Ihmhi · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Maybe they're all abandoned cars, the way Russia's economy is...

    5. Re:It's a bad photoshop by darkonc · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Well, if it was overcast when they had the concert, it may be that they timed it right for the satellite overpass, but the clouds made it almost useless for google's purposes. They just didn't realize that they needed to coordinate according to both satellite overpass times and weather forcasts.

      Nice try, though.

      --
      Sometimes boldness is in fashion. Sometimes only the brave will be bold.
    6. Re:It's a bad photoshop by bendodge · · Score: 1

      Also, the shadows in the event photos are nothing like the shadows in the Maps "screenshot".

      --
      The government can't save you.
    7. Re:It's a bad photoshop by darkonc · · Score: 1

      One shadow that isn't the same is the shadow cast by the statue of Lenin(?). It should fall on the people on the bottom of the face, but it got photoshopped out, too.

      --
      Sometimes boldness is in fashion. Sometimes only the brave will be bold.
    8. Re:It's a bad photoshop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nope. they use airplanes for close-ups.

    9. Re:It's a bad photoshop by magarity · · Score: 1

      Well, if it was overcast when they had the concert
       
      Then just look for them on Google Deep IR Earth.

    10. Re:It's a bad photoshop by Minigun_Fiend · · Score: 1

      Actually, if you look at the two images you just posted the cars on the streets are clearly in *different* positions. I'd say perhaps Google reverted the change or something?

    11. Re:It's a bad photoshop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds reasonable. And then they photoshopped the Google Maps image for the press, in the hope that no one would notice. Probably because they had announced the event weeks before and just didn't count on the really miniscule possibility of failure. Or maybe people were trying to cover up how stupid they were when they went on despite the clouds. The scary thing is that the "make it look like it's supposed to" attitude seems to be widespread in the press, not only in Russia. It's not just about images either, but about text as well. And I think it's not necessarily the authors' fault, since we, as a whole society, often can't accept that things aren't the way we want them to be.

    12. Re:It's a bad photoshop by gsslay · · Score: 4, Informative

      Except that the high resolution photographs on google are not taken by satellite. They're aerial photographs.

      So the entire exercise was based on a fiction, and the organisers probably knew this.

    13. Re:It's a bad photoshop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Compare these two:
      http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_IeJHb-2CVGM/SNUFiyTlEHI/AAAAAAAAAIQ/shQMNh5h89o/s1600-h/smiley-1000.jpg
      http://maps.google.com/maps?q=tscheljabinsk+russland&ie=UTF8&oe=utf-8&client=iceweasel-a&t=h&ll=55.160037,61.403425&spn=0.004793,0.011179&z=17

      The cars on all the side streets and all the shadows are exactly the same. Someone just photoshoped out the cars on the main street and put in the smily. Nothing to see here.

      Yes, that comparison is utterly convincing. If you look at the pattern of parked cars away from the main square, the pattern is exactly the same in each image. The images only differ in the paved area around the smiley. Total photoshop job.

    14. Re:It's a bad photoshop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes i noticed this too. Is it April Fools day on slashdot or blogspot or something??

  11. Looks like the satellite image is a fake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Notice that the satellite photo visible on google maps right now ( http://tinyurl.com/4su6t8 ) has a big empty area where the smiley should be, and it's not just a stale cache: the cars driving a block away are in the exact same position as in the smiley shot from the article.

  12. FAKE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's cloudy in the photos!

  13. Mad by xPsi · · Score: 4, Funny

    Very creative. But were they going for the Alfred E. Neuman look? Probably should have put the stage below the chin. Still love it. Perhaps more with the missing tooth.

    --
    i\hbar\dot{\psi}=\hat{H}\psi
    1. Re:Mad by darkonc · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They could have always camoed the stage..... But I kinda like the Alfred E. Neuman look.

      --
      Sometimes boldness is in fashion. Sometimes only the brave will be bold.
  14. Overcast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It looks like it's consistently overcast in the photos from the event itself. I don't know for sure relative heights of clouds and imaging satellites, but my understanding is that satellites still can't see through clouds (in visible ranges).

  15. FAKE FAKE FAKE!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Knowing exactly when the satellite will take the picture of that specific spot... Yeah right.

    Did anybody notice the clouds during the event? satellite images wont go trough those clouds.

  16. Photoshopped? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    City on Google Maps

    Screenshot from summary

    Now, look at the vehicles on the street next to the smiley. On the south-west road, there are two cars next to each, same on both pictures. The cars also look the same on the north road, east of the smiley, and the road leading west. Looks like someone just cleared the street and added the smiley in.

    Just to be sure, here is the link to the German Google Maps, which the screen shot appears to be coming from. I think it's a mock-up for when Google does update their images.

    -rey

  17. Lenina? by at_slashdot · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Do they still celebrate Lenin as a hero after the crap they endured because of him and his acolytes?

    --
    "It is our choices, Harry, that show what we truly are, far more than our abilities." -- Prof. Dumbledore
    1. Re:Lenina? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's called "Earth Day"

    2. Re:Lenina? by discards · · Score: 1

      It's Stalin that messed it up, not Lenin. Get your facts straight.

    3. Re:Lenina? by at_slashdot · · Score: 1

      You are an idiot, how do you know I'm American, and if I am how do you know I like Bush? Oh, wait, I just responded to an Anonymous Coward...

      --
      "It is our choices, Harry, that show what we truly are, far more than our abilities." -- Prof. Dumbledore
    4. Re:Lenina? by at_slashdot · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Right... and Communism is good but it was badly implemented *rolls eyes*

      --
      "It is our choices, Harry, that show what we truly are, far more than our abilities." -- Prof. Dumbledore
    5. Re:Lenina? by nawcom · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Right... and Communism is good but it was badly implemented *rolls eyes*

      Hehe there's the proof that you are American right there.

    6. Re:Lenina? by at_slashdot · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Read about "ad hominem argument" in a dictionary. How is it relevant what I am?

      --
      "It is our choices, Harry, that show what we truly are, far more than our abilities." -- Prof. Dumbledore
    7. Re:Lenina? by guacamole · · Score: 1

      Oh man, check the other street names on that picture. They include

      "Soviet Street", "Kirov Street", and "Revolution Plaza".

    8. Re:Lenina? by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      Palin is a heroine. She once saved me from a moose.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    9. Re:Lenina? by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's what people said about Windows.

      Oh shit, Godwin.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    10. Re:Lenina? by at_slashdot · · Score: 1

      Is there anybody (except Bill Gates and Ballmer) who says that Windows is good in theory?

      --
      "It is our choices, Harry, that show what we truly are, far more than our abilities." -- Prof. Dumbledore
    11. Re:Lenina? by at_slashdot · · Score: 2, Funny

      Palin is a heroine. She once drilled oil with her bare hands.

      --
      "It is our choices, Harry, that show what we truly are, far more than our abilities." -- Prof. Dumbledore
    12. Re:Lenina? by avanderveen · · Score: 1

      Lenin would have brought Russia through a smooth transition into a new population-driven communist state, until he got shot and Stalin forcefully took position as leader. Stalin is the one who brought on "the crap they endured".

    13. Re:Lenina? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Right... and Communism is good but it was badly implemented *rolls eyes*

      Well... Yeah...

      Similarly, one can say democracy is good yet most African nations implement it rather wrongly.

    14. Re:Lenina? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Read about "ad hominem argument" in a dictionary. How is it relevant what I am?

      Because you're stupid.

    15. Re:Lenina? by kauttapiste · · Score: 1

      Do they still celebrate Lenin as a hero after the crap they endured because of him and his acolytes?

      Yes, yes they (or many of them) do. But the sad part is that now they are trying to pass Stalin as not the monster dictator he was but as a strong ruler who did what had to be done. Check out e.g. this editorial from last year on the Herald: New Russian history.

    16. Re:Lenina? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 4, Informative
      Some do.

      Anyway, almost every city in Russia still has Sovetskaya street and the Lenin square (complete with a statue). My own home town, Tambov, also has Karl Marx street, Komsomolskaya street etc. Some streets that were named after the more odious figures were renamed in the 90s (one was named after Antonov-Ovseenko, who was the commissar in charge of suppressing the anti-communist Tambov peasant rebellion in 1920s, and personally signed the order to use poison gas against the rebel), but most of the "generic" names were left untouched.

    17. Re:Lenina? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yeah? Well I once drilled HER oil with my bare hands.

    18. Re:Lenina? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Replying to a personal attack by implying that the attacker doesn't know the Latin word for the action... way to lower yourself to the same level.

    19. Re:Lenina? by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

      One might say the same about capitalism.

      Short selling a legitimate market force? Methinks not.

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
    20. Re:Lenina? by mev · · Score: 1

      Last year I bicycled across Russia.

      My experience is many Russian cities still have a Lenina street. A Lenin statue in the main square is also still common. In Ulan-Ude is the world's largest Lenin head (a google image search shows several examples). When we cycled through Krasnoyarsk, someone had fun and had papered over one of the "Lenina" signs to make it "Putina".

      The year before I bicycled through Ukraine and then via Kursk, Tambov, Penza to Samara. In Western Ukraine there were not (no longer) Lenin statues. However, it was interesting as we got close to Kiev and then beyond suddenly Ukrainian towns had their Lenin statues and Lenin streets.

    21. Re:Lenina? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He was making reference to the fact that Americans have a knee-jerk rejection reaction without really knowing that it's flawed or not, only that COMMUNISM IS WRONG.

    22. Re:Lenina? by Ragzouken · · Score: 1

      Right... and America is free but it's just protecting you against terrorism.

    23. Re:Lenina? by discards · · Score: 1

      Yea, Communism is great but very hard to implement. You know, like Lisp is beautiful but generally useless for your everyday needs, so we go and use crappy Java

    24. Re:Lenina? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Moose bites can be pretty nasty. A moose once bit my sister...

    25. Re:Lenina? by steelfood · · Score: 1

      Sarah Palin is Chuck Norris with boobs.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    26. Re:Lenina? by LanceUppercut · · Score: 1

      Well, you have to adjust for the fact that they are not Americans, so they don't have that American crap injected in their heads at the age of 5, as you do, and they are not required to watch the TV propaganda 12 hours every day, as you do. In other words, to put it in less words, they might have a different view of their history, don't they? After all it is _their_ history, isn't it?

    27. Re:Lenina? by LanceUppercut · · Score: 1

      So what? Significant historical events and figures are never forgotten, regardless of how they are percieved later. In USA, for one example, Vietnam war Veterans drive around with licence plates indentifying them as such. Can you imagine SS Vetrans driving around with swastikas on their cars in Germany?

    28. Re:Lenina? by LanceUppercut · · Score: 1

      Right... And 2+2 equals 4 *rolls eyes*

    29. Re:Lenina? by LanceUppercut · · Score: 1

      It is important simply to emphasize the fact that it doesn't need to be followed by any meaningful discussion. Your reaction is nothing more than an automatic response of an electronic chip sledge-hammered into your head at childhood. You have no control over its functions. Moreover, people here are actually trying to be compassionate to you, considering the brain damage you suffered...

    30. Re:Lenina? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Moose bites can be very nasty.

    31. Re:Lenina? by Agronomist+Cowherd · · Score: 1

      A moose once bit my sister.

      --
      -DwS
  18. In sovied russia, tech.slashdot is the new idle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I had hoped idle would stay confined to idle. This is not technology.

    This ... is ... IDLE!!! </300>

  19. lovely by emart · · Score: 1

    this is really cute! google maps hacks ftw!

    --
    "they didn't know it was impossible, so they did it!" - Mark Twain
  20. Prior Art by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Simi Valley, CA has had a burnt-in smiley face since the 80's.

    Bout the best part of this town, really.

  21. hmm by thatskinnyguy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Obvious Photoshop job. For punishment, I think we can all work together and put him over his bandwidth cap.

    --
    The game.
    1. Re:hmm by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1

      Does Blogspot have a bandwidth cap?

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    2. Re:hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm. The supposed screenshot has him logged in to googlemail. Let's send him a few gigs of 'fan' mail.

  22. Looks like a lineage 2 ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...adena formation pic.

  23. In Soviet Russia... by FlyByPC · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... Google searches for YOU!

    --
    Paleotechnologist and connoisseur of pretty shiny things.
    1. Re:In Soviet Russia... by CrazyJim1 · · Score: 1

      That kinda goes with our poll. If I am searching for myself, I should have a tool that finds me.

  24. Rick Rolled? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    I think we just got Rick Rolled.

  25. Shopped by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the on-site pictures, participants are wearing raincoats, and there is diffuse shadow everywhere. Clearly an overcast day.

  26. Yes, Lenina by tetromino · · Score: 5, Informative

    If a town or a street got renamed during the Soviet period, after 1992 its name was in most cases restored to the pre-revolutionary version. However, if the street was built during the Soviet period, of course it would not get renamed, since it never had a pre-Soviet name in the first place. Renaming a street just because its name is no longer politically fashionable is akin to rewriting history, no better than what the Soviets were doing.

    1. Re:Yes, Lenina by at_slashdot · · Score: 1

      I wonder then if Germans kept the names of the streets build during the Hitler regime. The name of the streets change according to the political situation, in what world do you live?

      --
      "It is our choices, Harry, that show what we truly are, far more than our abilities." -- Prof. Dumbledore
    2. Re:Yes, Lenina by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, they should be more like Americans - rename major public works (say, a $350 million stadium) because some corporation gave them money one or two orders of magnitude less than what it cost.

    3. Re:Yes, Lenina by at_slashdot · · Score: 1

      That's only proof that Americans are smart, they can sell names... if Russians were smart would have sold all Lenina and Revolution Street names to Gazprom. Wouldn't you like to live on Gazprom Street instead of Lenina?

      --
      "It is our choices, Harry, that show what we truly are, far more than our abilities." -- Prof. Dumbledore
    4. Re:Yes, Lenina by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I think he was comparing the desire to forget a nasty period of history, not equating the crimes perpetrated by the respective historical figures.

      Me, I'm wondering how many girls born in 80s Scotland were named Margaret.

    5. Re:Yes, Lenina by syousef · · Score: 1

      Renaming a street just because its name is no longer politically fashionable is akin to rewriting history, no better than what the Soviets were doing.

      BUT Would YOU want to live on Hitler street?

      Don't bother replying. I just Godwined the conversation.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    6. Re:Yes, Lenina by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Do not forget that Russia had an absolutist feudalist government, with peonage, before Lenin's revolution - people were better off during Lenin's time. Even those loathing Stalin often consider Lenin in a similar way as most Americans look at their founding fathers.

      And if you look at recent history: living conditions for most Russians became much worse during Jeltzin's reign of corruption, than they were during the 1970es and 1980es. Most Russians are not convinced that "western style democracy" is a more just, efficient and humane system than "sovjet democracy": in a country as large as Russia, sovjet rule often meant 'rule of the inept', but 'democratic rule' means 'rule of the greedy', of the Mafia and the oligarchs.

    7. Re:Yes, Lenina by Imsdal · · Score: 1

      Me, I'm wondering how many girls born in 80s Scotland were named Margaret.

      Ask and ye shall receive: not many, as can be seen here.

      The same is true for almost all names that were popular when Ms Thatcher was born. Of the ten most popular girls' names in 1900, only Elizabeth and Catherine remained in the top 100 in 2000. Names are extremely fashion driven, and popular or unpopular politicians have very little impact either way. Also, girl names vary more. Nine of the top 10 boys' names in 1900 were top 100 in 2000, and James and Andrew were still in the top 10.

    8. Re:Yes, Lenina by ubercam · · Score: 2, Informative

      Sure they did! All over the place.

      As an example, Platz der deutschen Einheit, Kassel (Square of German Unity) used to be called Adolf-Hitler-Platz. That's what a friend of mine who lives there told me.

      I mean come on, if you lived on Hilterallee, Goebbelsstraße or Mengeleplatz, wouldn't you want it changed too?

      Not only that, the East German city of Chemnitz was renamed to Karl-Marx-Stadt during communism, but reverted to the previous name after the wall fell. Same with Eisenhüttenstadt, which was renamed to Stalinstadt.

      I'm sure there are way more examples, but that's all I could come up with in 2 minutes.

    9. Re:Yes, Lenina by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) That town is an old town, and that square and those streets probably predate the Bolsheviks. Even if not... 2) So you think some town in Alabama renaming Jim Crow Avenue or Jigaboo Lane would be no better than what the Soviets where doing?

      With place names like Lenin Avenue, Revolution Square, and Soviet Street, the good citizens of Chelyabinsk, or the town fathers in any case, certainly give the impression of being unreformed communists.

    10. Re:Yes, Lenina by tftp · · Score: 1

      Do not forget that Russia had an absolutist feudalist government, with peonage, before Lenin's revolution - people were better off during Lenin's time.

      The serfdom in Russia was abolished in 1861 - a good half a century before Lenin walked into history. These years were generally good for development of agrarian capitalism, and a good number of former peasants got wealthy. Those were the guys Lenin (and Stalin) declared enemies, and they were all eliminated by 1930s, mostly by taking their property away and shipping the whole family to Siberia, to die.

      Even those loathing Stalin often consider Lenin in a similar way as most Americans look at their founding fathers.

      This was a popular mind trick in 1970s, when someone had to be made responsible for all the damage. Stalin was a convenient scapegoat since he was dead already, and he was indeed a bad guy in real life. However in 1990s Lenin's traditional friendly face was unmasked by many historians, writers and other to be just as inhumane as Stalin's. For example, a famous Lenin's order "to kill all priests, every single one" - it's pretty barbaric even if you don't subscribe to religion. I do not believe that many people still see Lenin as a founding father.

      Most Russians are not convinced that "western style democracy" is a more just, efficient and humane system than "sovjet democracy"

      This is absolutely correct, considering that "western style democracy" is in fact a staged political show where results of elections do not matter. This is exactly why we see so much backlash against people who promoted this kind of democracy in 1990s - Russians know now what these proposals actually mean, and they don't want any of them any more. Yeltsin did a good thing to Russia by giving it the taste of this "western democracy" - it built an immunity to it.

    11. Re:Yes, Lenina by davidphogan74 · · Score: 1

      Just look what happened to Hitler City North Carolina. If they hadn't changed their name to Charlotte, they'd be sunk.

  27. Overcast and that's not how it works by Chairboy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    There's about 20 "I don't see it in Google Maps" and "It was photoshopped!" posts that don't mention any of the basic reasons why this didn't work.

    1. Google Maps isn't realtime, some areas have photos updated every few years. My house is a picture from over a year ago, for instance. Just because the bird goes overhead doesn't mean the content goes into Google Maps, and even if it did, it would only go in for a few days until the next pass, so... concept fail.

    2. Did anyone actually LOOK at the photos taken on the ground at the event? It was OVERCAST. These are not magical Star Trek satellites with super inverse polaron field vision that sees through clouds.

    Why aren't other folks touching on these VERY BASIC FLAWS with the clever premise?

    1. Re:Overcast and that's not how it works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another obvious give-away that it's photoshopped is the bright red strip of flowers in the lower right corner of the ground photograph. In the sattelite image the same strip of flowers is in a dull green.

    2. Re:Overcast and that's not how it works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These are not magical Star Trek satellites

      correct. they are airplanes.

    3. Re:Overcast and that's not how it works by gsslay · · Score: 1

      You're missing out the fact that the high resolution images on Google are not taken by satellite. They're aerial survey shots; i.e. taken from a plane.

      The satellite images used on Google don't get near resolving the kind of detail you'd need for this kind of stunt. They're used where aerial survey shots aren't available.

    4. Re:Overcast and that's not how it works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "These are not magical Star Trek satellites with super inverse polaron field vision that sees through clouds."

      Google Maps doesn't use satellites at that zoom level, it's all aereal photography.

  28. There ain't one by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 1
    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
  29. Re:In North America... by supernova_hq · · Score: 1

    ... Google searches for YOU!

    There, fixed that for you.

  30. Make it stop... by RSCruiser · · Score: 1

    I vaguely remember blocking idle so I wouldn't see this crap. Did I miss the memo outlining idle getting moved to tech?

  31. Re:It's a GOOD photoshop by Myrcutio · · Score: 2, Insightful

    correction: it's a good photoshop, because it fooled us enough to dig deeper. i think they succeeded in their prank marvelously.

  32. Looks creepy by JumperCable · · Score: 1

    Not the reputation a town wants.

  33. Quick! by Snarkhunter · · Score: 1

    Someone set something like this up with a screenshot of the town on Google Maps instead of a smiley!

    I'm pretty sure that a recursive Google Maps will MORE than make up for a broken LHC.

  34. Fake - photoshop job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The real google map picture is identical apart from the smiley face (same traffic, shadows etc.)

    http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&hl=en&geocode=&q=tscheljabinsk,+russland&ie=UTF8&ll=55.160221,61.402159&spn=0.003181,0.008197&t=h&z=17&iwloc=addr

    The location photos show it was a very cloudy day with a very low cloud ceiling - so no satellite or plane shots either.

    Crap fake.

  35. Re:It's a GOOD photoshop by Rufus211 · · Score: 2, Informative

    correction: it's a good photoshop, because it fooled us enough to dig deeper. i think they succeeded in their prank marvelously.

    Fooling a /. "editor" doesn't make it a good photoshop. It took me about a second to realize it was a hoax, and less than 30 more to look up the above link. I guess that was a bit too much effort for samzenpus.

  36. This was exciting... for about 5 minutes by puzzbot · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I was pretty excited to see this article about my hometown! Until I read the comments. You people sure know how to rain on someone's parade :P

    1. Re:This was exciting... for about 5 minutes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can have the last laugh as they turn to socialism to prop up their capitalism. ;)

  37. Fun idea by prjt · · Score: 1

    Had it been real it would have been a fun idea, if Google posted times when taking photos I guess more people would go outside, they should try that.

  38. That's nothing by commodoresloat · · Score: 5, Funny

    You should see how many things in the U.S. are named after Ronald Reagan!

    1. Re:That's nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should see how many things in the U.S. are named after Ronald Reagan!

      ::Channeling Yakov Smirnoff::
      What a country!

    2. Re:That's nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      But there's only one thing named after George Bush, sadly that thing is still running the country.

    3. Re:That's nothing by T.E.D. · · Score: 1

      My personal favorite is RR Intl. Airport in D.C., which happens to be one of only 2 places in the country that *never* voted him any electors. Congress forced the name change on them, over their strenuous objections. Now there's a slap in the face for you.

    4. Re:That's nothing by walterwalter · · Score: 1

      I agree with you, but DCA is actually located in Arlington, VA.

  39. Here's an example of the real thing by S-100 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Target Stores sometimes paint their logo on the roofs of their locations. I don't know if they do it for the sake of Google Maps, but it's quite visible. Here's one from a store in Chicago:

    http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&hl=en&geocode=&q=target+stores+chicago&ie=UTF8&ll=42.006225,-87.886505&spn=0.012883,0.017509&t=k&z=16

    1. Re:Here's an example of the real thing by Petrushka · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's not for the sake of Google Maps, it's to be visible to passengers in passing planes. Notice the major international airport (O'Hare) about 500 m south-west of that spot ...

      Here's another company logo just to the south of O'Hare. Sometimes you see them further away if the building is in a flight-path. Here and here are a couple several km away from Auckland Airport; notice the different orientation of the logos, depending on the angle the building will be visible from.

    2. Re:Here's an example of the real thing by mgabrys_sf · · Score: 2, Funny

      Shh! You FOOL! Those are Wall Mart's cover story for their impending death-satellite campaign. You're not supposed to mention them until AFTER the attack.

      One more word outa you, and you'll be a door greeter in Topeka for the next 5 years.

      ALL HAIL WALLMART!

    3. Re:Here's an example of the real thing by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      Lots of supermarkets do. In Drumchapel in the north-west of Glasgow there is a large B&Q and a large Sainsbury's, both with their logos on the roof and clearly visible to people in aircraft flying into Glasgow Airport (Google map, when Runway 23 is in use (that's slightly to the west). Down near the Clyde, a little to the east, you can still see the name painted on the roof of the old Yarrow shipyard building. It's pretty faded now, presumably because Yarrow is gone (thank you ultra-right economic policies of the 80s - Americans, Palin will be your Maggie Thatcher).

    4. Re:Here's an example of the real thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Am I the only one thinking that Target is making things just that much easier for setting up a next aerial attack against the US?

    5. Re:Here's an example of the real thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you ever noticed that most of the Target stores that have a target on them are located close to an airport?

      Maybe that is why they have the target?
      http://googlesightseeing.com/2005/08/14/target-stores/

    6. Re:Here's an example of the real thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In case you didn't notice, that target is right in the flight path of O'hare, I have seen it flying in on several occasions.

    7. Re:Here's an example of the real thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So do sports arenas, particularly, American Airlines: AA Arena in Miami and AA Center in Dallas.

    8. Re:Here's an example of the real thing by againjj · · Score: 1

      Nah, they just don't like Chicago, and are inviting someone to take aim.

    9. Re:Here's an example of the real thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They've been doing since before Google maps.

      I'm still waiting for someone to fire a missile into one.

  40. Lenin's name is there forever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Check coordinates 54.468 64.797 on Google Maps.
    What you see was put there for you to see on Google Maps 38 years ago ("Lenin, 100 years")

  41. hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this is soooo old , to late for the swag broham

  42. Re:ÐzÑÐнÑOE Ñ. by metachimp · · Score: 1

    ne gavarite pa-Russki

    --
    The system has failed you, don't fail yourself. --Billy Bragg
  43. Never mind. by John+Vai · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It was just a stupid promo action for the local Internet service provider (is74.ru). They also gathered these people to sign the petition "please introduce a $15 unlimited Internet plan". Although they did not collect enough signatures, they still introduced it.

    Also, they promised to hire a plane to get rid of the clouds (which would not help anyway - google maps will never add just a 500×500 meter shot to their maps if everything else is covered by clouds. They also promised that you'll be able to see the shots on Google Maps the next day - which is also a blatant lie. This ISP already had a terrible reputation for cutting the optical cables of its competitors, and now this.

  44. One consolation... by patio11 · · Score: 1

    ... everybody involved in Idle dies horribly at the end.

    1. Re:One consolation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...all except one, who goes to tell the story to the rest of Slashdot, and make sure that what happened to Idle is NEVER forgotten. Is that what you want? Do you want to make Idle into a martyr?

  45. The most irradiated smiley on Earth by Frantactical+Fruke · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Someone probably felt that Chelyabinsk could use some positive publicity for a change, as they have so far only been known as the "Most Contaminated Spot on the Planet": http://www.logtv.com/films/chelyabinsk/
    ...which is why I'm graciously refraining from posting that link...now why do I suddenly get Boy George singing Karma Chameleon in my poor skull?

  46. Whatever by spud.dups · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Though I doubt no one cares at this point, I took the images in the article, and the current google map images, and overlapped them. If it was a photoshop job they did a really good job with the traffic. If it was real, then the same cars just happen to park in the same places on those days. Or maybe the satellite passed by twice on the same day to take a shot at a different time. The link to my image file is here.

  47. Bad teeth by laddiebuck · · Score: 2, Funny

    I see that according to good old Eastern European custom, the smiley has bad teeth. Probably too much vodka...

    (Disclaimer: I say this as a Hungarian with bad teeth. :)

  48. Highly efficient solutions by FornaxChemica · · Score: 1

    They should have made them wear sombreros or, even better, giant yellow graduation hats. This smiley looks washed-out. As for being captured by the satellite's camera, here's a couple of alternatives to photoshopping:

    1. Tie the people together so they stay where they are no matter how many days it takes (based on the scientific principle that skeletons can wear yellow hats too).
    2. Turn it into a job to boost Russian economy! hire professional pixel-people 24/7.
    3. Force the citizens to wear yellow clothes at all time and move around the city in groups like the Roman testudo formation. Add a distinctive touch to your city!
  49. It was actually explained in one of the links ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Read the discussion in the link after the images taken on the event.

    This was a real attempt, but it was acknowledged (by people who were there) as failed, probably beccause of the overcast.

    It was a ploy event for a local IPS (which according to the commenter happens to have bad reputation anyway).

    Case closed?

  50. Something similar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&hl=en&geocode=&q=tetraeder+oberhausen&ie=UTF8&t=h&ll=51.526837,6.959416&spn=0.000582,0.00132&z=20

    This is in Bottrop, Germany on a hill that was created from a mining dump. Apparently, there's a guy who manually (with just a bag and a bicycle) sorts stones by colors all day.

    If you zoom out, a few meters northeast is a steel construction, the so-called Tetraeder. This is a ~50m high viewing platform.

    If you zoom out further, a bit southeast is a green ? shaped hall. This is an indoor ski slope. :)

    More pictures, the google maps photos are a bit older, when I visited that place a couple of months ago, they had aliens.

    http://www.ruhrgebiet-fuer-lau.de/aliens-am-tetraeder/

  51. meanwhile, in Italy ... by alex4point0 · · Score: 0, Interesting

    I hope you can all stop laughing at the Russians 'shooping a map for a moment to take the time to check out the following:

    go to http://www.flashearth.com/ and select the Microsoft VE (with labels) radio button.

    in the 'search' field type in

    Godi, Italy

    and then gradually scroll out. Look! It's-a da magical NATO run-a-way, and she is a covered in trees so nobody bomb-a her!

    C/- http://cryptome.org/ - there were heaps of them.

    --
    By the time you finish reading this sentence will end.
  52. And maybe it was just because its something nice ? by unity100 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Maybe Google likes the idea of an entire town working hard to get its 15 minutes of fame

    goddamn everything doesnt need to be negative, you know. maybe someone thought it was something fuckin' nice to happen, and people to see ?

    i like our culture, but this 'sarcastic pessimistic know-it-all zit' thing sometimes fails badly. gets tiring.

  53. In soviet Russia.. by phexitol · · Score: 5, Funny

    Toilet paper knows when you are coming! Oh, wait a minute...

  54. umm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not photoshopped - just that one area was updated temporarily by some overzealous gooogle employee.

  55. bleh by joss · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'm more impressed that they made their park a union jack, I guess that was put up a 100+ years ago, so maybe they just have a history of sucking up to the powers that be..

    --
    http://rareformnewmedia.com/
  56. Think outside the box (look outside the window) by MonkeyOnATypewriter · · Score: 1

    That screenshot from "blogger" contains, in the bottom-right corner a small "P", that comes from an online game called "PMOG" ( http://pmog.com/ ).

    I don't know exactly the rules of this game, but I remember that about an year ago I played it.

    To get/steal points in this game, you have to trick users (who are also players of PMOG) to enter on a web-page where you left "mines".

    So my theory is that he got the news, photoshopped the current screenshot (to get e-press* attention) and released it on the internet, and waited to propagate around, so he will get an advantage in the game.

    So the article is half true (the concert and the people), and half false (they don't have the photo this way).

    Epic hoax ! Great played !

    * - update your buzzwords list

  57. It just shows... by jskline · · Score: 1

    It just shows that these people like to have a little fun too once in a while like the rest of us.

    --
    All content in this message is copyright (c) 2008. All rights reserved. RIAA is prohibited here.
  58. Not only that... by carvalhao · · Score: 1

    ... but they even kept most of the cars in the precise same spots as the present image!! What a production!

    1. Re:Not only that... by StalinsNotDead · · Score: 1

      Maybe they can't afford fuel either.

      --
      Thanks to the internet, we can now all die alone together! -SomeWoman
  59. mapsandearth by Mapsandearth · · Score: 1

    i love google earth and i have a blog about it . so nice picture :-)

  60. Finally, a way GIMP is definitely superior! by Mathinker · · Score: 1

    As the name GIMP is not a trademark, it is perfectly allowable to use it as a verb, noun, adjective, and in all the other ways Adobe won't let you use the name Photoshop. Just expect to get a lot of strange looks if you do!

    (Disclaimer: this post does not detract from any or all other ways GIMP might be, objectively or subjectively, superior to Adobe Photoshop. Your mileage may vary. Offer void where prohibited. Posting and reading Slashdot may shorten your real life. This is not legal or medical advice, consult trained professionals if necessary.)

    1. Re:Finally, a way GIMP is definitely superior! by freakmn · · Score: 1

      So, you're saying that we're looking at a Gimped photo?

      --
      warning: This post is likely to contain gobs of dripping sarcasm. Consume at your own risk.
    2. Re:Finally, a way GIMP is definitely superior! by devilspgd · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah... "I gimped Bob into the company photo" will go over real well.

      --
      Give a man a fish, he'll eat for a day, but teach a man to phish...
  61. Must be fake - it's not there if you search now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some joke by somebody.
    You can do the search now, and nothing's there.

  62. Union flag Park by Timberwolf0122 · · Score: 1

    Looks like the UK got there first by designing the park at the bottom of the screen to look lie the Union Flag.

    --
    In the not too distant future, next Sunday A.D.
    1. Re:Union flag Park by LanceUppercut · · Score: 1

      You probably missed the fact that this is in Russia. If anything, it's the Union Jack that was designed after the park, not the other way around

  63. Re:In North America... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    *Whoooosh*

  64. Non-photoshopped Bart Simpson on Terraserver by SlideRuleGuy · · Score: 1

    Non-photoshopped Bart Simpson, mowed into a farmer's field near some property that used to be in the family...

    http://terraserver-usa.com/image.aspx?T=1&S=10&Z=15&X=1711&Y=22050&W=2&qs=%7CSt.+Joseph%7CMO%7C/

  65. a google founder has Russian citizenship by peter303 · · Score: 1

    Hum, I think we have a suspect ...

  66. Done by TClevenger · · Score: 1

    Prologis does this on some of their warehouses. If you have a warehouse or other large flat-roof building in a flight path, you could probably rent the space as a billboard. (GIS for "Prologis" for pics.)

  67. THE... LAST... GUY! by Mara-chan · · Score: 1

    Isn't anyone else reminded of the PS3 game "The Last Guy"? http://ps3.ign.com/dor/objects/14265437/the-last-guy/images/the-last-guy-20080820102941083.html I couldn't find a quick screenshot of it, but on some levels the people you're trying to save spell out "Help me" and such (in the language of the city you're trying to save too... cool).

  68. Eyeballs. by fm6 · · Score: 1

    Actually, the purpose of news (at least TV news) seems to be exactly the opposite of what you claim. Look at Fox News, with their constant assertions that anybody to the left of Genghis Khan is an atheist traitor of dubious intelligence. Does that mean that Rupert Murdoch is out to change America into a right-wing theocracy? Not at all. The dude is actually pretty moderate in his opinions, and is good friends with Hilary Clinton. All he cares about is eyeballs. And the way he attracts eyeballs in the U.S. is by telling right-wing dittoheads what they already know. In the U.K., it's by adding soft core porn to a regular newspaper. On The Simpsons, it's by making fun of the very institutions that made him rich, and even of himself.

    The "eco" stuff on CNN is more of the same for a different audience. Nobody is going to jump on the "save the planet" bandwagon because somebody on TV told them to. What those pieces do is make pro-ecology middle class Americans feel less guilty about their huge carbon footprints.

    1. Re:Eyeballs. by davidphogan74 · · Score: 1

      I remember my first day of a broadcasting class in college with a well-respected teacher who had (over 30 years) taught many powerful people in the mainstream media. He wrote on the board, and waited while we all copied it to our notebooks, "Television is a delivery method for advertising."

      Nothing on TV is on for any reason other than money in the 30000 foot view of it. Just like many corners of the internet. The original intent may not have been money, but eventually you get a few Google ads, maybe a flash one, and you start to profit.

      Television news is catered to what most of the key viewers are willing to watch. Unlike most other programs, news is aimed towards the old, the married, and the educated. The local stations love their local news shows because it gets decent ratings, it's so cheap (relative to other programming) to make, and they usually get to keep 100% of the ad revenue - the networks don't get a cut of local programming.

      Why do you think entertainers always get in the news before a new product launch? Usually the network breaking the story owns the publisher.

      Back on topic, in the long run I bet someone found ways to make money off this. Like, ads for example?

    2. Re:Eyeballs. by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Back on topic, in the long run I bet someone found ways to make money off this. Like, ads for example?

      The whole thing is pretty effective ad for a Russian town none of us ever heard of before. Any bets that the local Chamber of Commerce (or whatever they call it in Russia) was behind this?

      (The rest of your post pretty much explains why a lot of people don't watch TV any more.)

  69. pizdets!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why didn't I think of that?

  70. Re:ÐzÑÐнÑOE Ñ. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, but it is Perl so it might as well be.

  71. I wouldn't have realized it was a hoax... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...hadn't the blogger tagged his own article as "hoax"!

  72. zoom zoom... by uberlinuxguy · · Score: 0

    The interesting point here is if you look at the last picture http://englishrussia.com/?p=2047 with the animated version of what they tried to achieve, it's a zoomed in snap shot of what's on google.

    --
    The Uber
    http://www.tulg.org/
    http://devurandom.livejournal.com/
  73. THANK YOU by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    See also: "Palm Pilot" used to refer to all PDA-like devices, "Jeep" used to refer to any small 4x4.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  74. Re:ÐzÑÐнÑOE Ñ. by kesuki · · Score: 1

    sadly, it's the lameness filter. hop over to slashdot.jp sometime, full utf-8 support. apparently the japanese don't have problems with lameness filters.

  75. This is a Fake by toby360 · · Score: 1

    You can see the goole map image here: http://maps.google.ca/maps?f=q&hl=en&geocode=&q=Russia,+oblast+Tscheljabinsk,+Tscheljabinsk&ie=UTF8&cd=1&ll=55.160251,61.403317&spn=0.003561,0.007381&t=h&z=17&iwloc=addr Notice that its the same picture as there are cars in the same places with a few vehicles removed near the smiley face as well to help wit the blending. Cars parked in rows near the bottom of the screenshot are all identical to the current map image.

  76. Re:ÐzÑÐнÑOE Ñ. by nebulus4 · · Score: 0

    You sound surprised. Slashdot doesn't support UTF-8... yet... and ISO-8859-1 (aka Latin-1) is not the same as ISO-8859-5.

    --
    "It would be wrong to refuse to face the fact that everything is fundamentally sick and sad."
  77. Re:ÐzÑÐнÑOE Ñ. by nebulus4 · · Score: 0

    ne govorite po-russki

    didn't really want to be a grammar nazi...

    --
    "It would be wrong to refuse to face the fact that everything is fundamentally sick and sad."
  78. woa! by skiter666 · · Score: 0

    google photoshoped them out!

  79. Are you serious? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jesus, if you are going to fake a picture like this, don't make it something that can be disproven in 15 seconds. Also, don't set this fake image at the exact location Google zooms to when you search for that city. I didn't even have to search for that exact location! Google pointed right to it!

    BTW, Google Earth/Maps doesn't offer aerial views like that, only Live Maps and Virtual Earth.

  80. Re:ÐzÑÐнÑOE Ñ. by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    Holy MOLEY, Batman! Not enough "caped" crusaders...

    Yeh, and Slash lacks Asian fonts, too, at least last time i tried.

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  81. Re:In soviet Russia.. I think i see and feel a by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    DIGITAL wipeout coming...

    What would be funny is if the next time the Gbird overflies wall street, about 25,000 people form letters:

    "THE NUKES ARE HERE"

    Give Langley and that huge, off-colored hill-top building outside of Baltimore something (else/additional) to do...

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  82. People involved by dashesy · · Score: 1

    You can see actual people gathering here (http://russianfun.net/russian-fun/giant-smiley-face-from-russia/)

  83. It's all about the drugs! by cute-boy · · Score: 1

    From the 'one the ground' photos, it looks like there is a fair chance the google shot was done on a different day, as it's cloudy on the day of the event, which presumably prevents the satelite from taking pictures of the ground beneath the clouds.

    I'd suggest this is a more likely story:

    Dance party promoter makes up story which will attract punters to event, using the story of the smiley, widely associated with the use of the party drug Ecstacy.

    "A smiley big enough to be seen from Space!"

    Punters know it's going to be their sort of event, because they love to take party drugs.

    Profit!

  84. Well there's your problem! by nobodymk2 · · Score: 1

    meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"

    (removed the less/greater-than signs as it wasn't displaying)

  85. Photoshop by Friendly+Pyro · · Score: 1

    anytime something cool like this happens everyone says its photoshop.