Slashdot Mirror


Small Asteroid On Collision Course With Earth

musatov writes "There's talk on The Minor Planet Mailing List about a small asteroid approaching Earth with a 99.8% probability of colliding. The entrance to the Earth's atmosphere will take place October 7 at 0246 UTC (2:35 after this story goes live) over northern Sudan, releasing the energy of about a kiloton of TNT. The asteroid is assumed to be 3-4 meters in size; it is expected to burn up completely in the atmosphere, causing no harm. As a powerful bolide, it may put on quite a show in the sky. For those advanced enough in astronomy to observe, check the MPEC 2008-T50 and MPEC 2008-T64 circulars. NASA's JPL Small Body Database has a 3D orbit view. The story has been already picked up by CNN and NASA."

397 comments

  1. Asteroid? Why not meteor? by Martin+Blank · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I thought bodies this small were usually referred to as meteors. What's the difference?

    --
    You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
  2. Awesome! by log0n · · Score: 1

    (assuming the summary is correct and it will likely burn up)

    1. Re:Awesome! by philspear · · Score: 2, Interesting

      More specifically if it burns away completely BEFORE hitting the earth. If it burns up in the resulting explosion... :-(

      One thing I've wondered, those small asteroids that hit the earth, say that land and are about the size of my fist, did those burn down to that size from a bigger size, or are there trajectories that it could land mostly without burning up. Like if it goes in at a really steep angle, could a rock the size of a basketball before it enters be about the size of a basketball when it lands, or is that pretty much impossible?

      I realize this next question depends on a lot of factors, such as asteroid composition, angle of entry, and the answer to that last question, but if a rock landed in my backyard, again about the size of a basketball, what is the range of sizes before it entered that you would expect? Volkswagon? Semi truck? Seems like something that someone would have calculated.

      Basically, I'm wondering if it's possible that a pea-sized meteorite could go flying through my head like a bullet.

    2. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
    3. Re:Awesome! by kylemonger · · Score: 2, Funny

      Basically, I'm wondering if it's possible that a pea-sized meteorite could go flying through my head like a bullet.

      Only if you try to change the past.

    4. Re:Awesome! by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 4, Informative

      One thing I've wondered, those small asteroids that hit the earth, say that land and are about the size of my fist, did those burn down to that size from a bigger size, or are there trajectories that it could land mostly without burning up. Like if it goes in at a really steep angle, could a rock the size of a basketball before it enters be about the size of a basketball when it lands, or is that pretty much impossible?

      Yes they "burned down". Yes, there are trajectories that let things land without burning up. But they make for lousy shows, since it requires the rock to skim the outer atmosphere just deep enough to slow below escape velocity, and then slowly (over a period of months or years) lose enough more energy that they reenter permanently. If that happens, and if they're metallic, and if they're really extremely spherical (no hot spots other than the obvious one - out front), then maybe they can make it to the ground substantially intact. Odds - well, literally astronomical.

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    5. Re:Awesome! by Charles+Dodgeson · · Score: 1

      Basically, I'm wondering if it's possible that a pea-sized meteorite could go flying through my head like a bullet.

      Once it is small enough so that its surface area to mass ratio is sufficiently large, air resistance will just slow the thing down. There was a case a few years ago where someone was actually hit in the foot by a small meteor. No harm done.

      --
      Prime numbers are exactly what Alan Greenspan says they are -S. Minsky
    6. Re:Awesome! by Agripa · · Score: 1

      Basically, I'm wondering if it's possible that a pea-sized meteorite could go flying through my head like a bullet.

      Only if you try to change the past.

      Luckily for me my gun jammed instead. Twice.

    7. Re:Awesome! by davolfman · · Score: 1

      That said space is big.

    8. Re:Awesome! by isorox · · Score: 1

      Precisely. Earth is small. Just hitting the Earth is like trying to shoot a hoop from the other side of the Atlantic. Hitting it in the gradual way to slow down is like shooting a hoop in NY by bouncing it off the Washington Monument while on a rollercoaster in Karachi.

    9. Re:Awesome! by lamapper · · Score: 1

      . . . There was a case a few years ago where someone was actually hit in the foot by a small meteor. No harm done.

      I so wanted this to be true...lol, can you imagine, the odds, being hit by a meteorite and surviving, yet my guess it would be harder to win the lottery, err, okay harder for me to win the lottery as I can't imagine that happening either. But one can dream... (funding and working on an open source project while being able to pay the rent and put food on the table would be nice!)

      Here is the link that shows not only the object that hit the 14 year old back in 2002; but shows an analysis of the object by someone knowledgeable. They are stating

      ...that this was not a meteorite. I am 100% certain this is a piece of iron smelting slag, which can be found all over the countryside. It is the refuse of former iron smelting activities, some even dating back to medieval times.

      I admit that I was thinking, when I read about the incident, that it was waste from a toilet from an airplane.

      Regardless, if I were her, I would still put it in a scrapbook somewhere.

      --
      Is your Internet Throttled? Install DD-Wrt, OpenWRT or Tomato to learn the truth! Google: 1Gbps/1Gbps: 5 Communities
    10. Re:Awesome! by bytesex · · Score: 1

      There was a story on slashdot, a few years ago, on how tiny space 'masses' with enormous speeds would sometimes fly right through the earth, and they found this out by comparing earthquake measuring equipment from different parts of the globe. So, if there's still any truth to that theory, then, yes.

      --
      Religion is what happens when nature strikes and groupthink goes wrong.
    11. Re:Awesome! by Charles+Dodgeson · · Score: 1

      I so wanted this to be true...

      Oh, well. Thanks (I suppose) for the correction. The world just gone down in coolness a notch.

      --
      Prime numbers are exactly what Alan Greenspan says they are -S. Minsky
  3. Is this really news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Small asteroids that burn up in the upper atmosphere are far from uncommon. Why is this suddenly notable?

    1. Re:Is this really news? by Darkness404 · · Score: 1

      I think this one is actually observable, or at least the summery makes it seem that way.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    2. Re:Is this really news? by QuantumG · · Score: 0, Redundant

      RTFA.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    3. Re:Is this really news? by Peter+Cooper · · Score: 2, Informative

      Supposedly it's the first time that an asteroid / meteor has been accurately (well, we'll see on that front!) predicted to enter the atmosphere at a specific time and location.

    4. Re:Is this really news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      RTFA.

      No!

    5. Re:Is this really news? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      This is the first time ever an object has been identified to be on collision course with the earth and which has gone on to actually hit us.

      Also, given the small size of the objetc I am amazed they pulled it off.

      There was a suggestion made that this might be a booster from a mars probe because its orbit does take it close to mars, Another possibility is that it is a fragment of mars.

    6. Re:Is this really news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      okay AC, I've tolerated your schenanigans long enough! I'll go and stand in the corner immediately!

    7. Re:Is this really news? by Krupuk · · Score: 1

      But only to the sudanese slashdotters, or what?

    8. Re:Is this really news? by rebelcan · · Score: 1

      To reiterate:

      No!

      --
      God is dead -- Nietzsche
      Nietzsche is dead -- God
      Zombie Nietzsche lives! -- Zombie Nietzsche
    9. Re:Is this really news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because this is the first time such an event has been predicted ahead of time.

    10. Re:Is this really news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because this is the first time such an object has been detected in advance of hitting Earth's atmosphere.

      The object itself is unremarkable, it's detection is.

    11. Re:Is this really news? by Iridium_Hack · · Score: 1

      At least this one will get rid of all them thar pirates over there. . . harrrrr!

    12. Re:Is this really news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Although it happens every few months, it RARELY occurs that we have the opportunity to anticipate the event. Kudos to the team on the Left Coast.

  4. Jesus my chest. by Drakin020 · · Score: 0

    I just got this deep sick feeling in my chest when I was readying that headline. It wasn't until " it is expected to burn up completely in the atmosphere, causing no harm." that I took a deep breath.

    Sorry I know that's somewhat off topic, but....

    --
    The greatest revenge in life is massive success.
    1. Re:Jesus my chest. by delysid-x · · Score: 1

      The next big one could come any time and kill us all. If it was really the end of the world would they let us know?

    2. Re:Jesus my chest. by BungaDunga · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Would it matter?

    3. Re:Jesus my chest. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just more media scaremongering to keep you scared.

    4. Re:Jesus my chest. by Carnildo · · Score: 1

      That'a assuming it's a rocky asteroid. If it's nickel-iron, it'll leave a small crater.

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
    5. Re:Jesus my chest. by khendron · · Score: 5, Funny

      The next big one could come any time and kill us all. If it was really the end of the world would they let us know?

      I sure that Slashdot would report it at least twice.

      --
      Life is like a web application. Sometime you need cookies just to get by.
    6. Re:Jesus my chest. by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      The odds of it landing on you even if were tough enough to survive atmospheric entry are pretty remote. You should probably get all worked up over watching the lotto numbers scroll by instead.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    7. Re:Jesus my chest. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would it matter?

      It's the difference between mass hysteria and blissful ignorance with something resembling a dignified end to the race. As far as I'm concerned, bliss be damned: people ought to be given the chance to make peace with god or whoever. Captcha: humility.

    8. Re:Jesus my chest. by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 3, Funny

      The odds of it landing on you even if were tough enough to survive atmospheric entry are pretty remote.

      The odds are astronomical, even! Hell, the odds are on a galactic scale! Why, the odds are so big, they make space look small!

      Thank, you, thank you, I'm here all....Hey! What's with the giant hooooooooook....

    9. Re:Jesus my chest. by sam_v1.35b · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The next big one could come any time and kill us all. If it was really the end of the world would they let us know?

      "They" is a nebulous concept that in this case includes tens or hundreds of thousands of professional and amateur astronomers across the globe. A big asteroid on a collision course with Earth would be noticed by many people as it got close, so I'd expect we'd all know about it.

    10. Re:Jesus my chest. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And "I sure" that grammar would be a afterthink both reportings!

    11. Re:Jesus my chest. by Pichu0102 · · Score: 4, Funny

      And at least the first report would come in only a few days after it happened!

      Oh wait..

    12. Re:Jesus my chest. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would it matter?

      The difference between 99.999999% dying (60 survivors) and 99.9999999 dying (6 survivors) may not matter much to you or the powers that be. It may mean the difference between extinction and survival. Does it matter whether or not humanity goes extinct? If not, what is stuff that matters?

    13. Re:Jesus my chest. by KGIII · · Score: 1

      I hope any god has a clause that says if you come to peace with him just prior to death for the soul purposes of saving your soul then you get a hearty, "Fuck you!"

      Just sayin' as it doesn't seem like any god would think that that was a real belief.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    14. Re:Jesus my chest. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, it couldn't be that the so-called scary stories sell. Like the 90 year old lady who shot herself in the chest twice over a foreclosure last week. People don't want old ladies shooting themselves, but they're happy to read about it. And email the link to friends.

    15. Re:Jesus my chest. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      And some people out there would spend their last moments alive bitching about the dupe.

    16. Re:Jesus my chest. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would any god give a shit if he's believed in? If I was a deity, I'd make it my job to make sure that the human race knows nothing about me.

    17. Re:Jesus my chest. by Merls+the+Sneaky · · Score: 2, Funny

      What difference will it make if you aren't a survivor, you have better odds of being sued by the **AA's than that.

    18. Re:Jesus my chest. by Drakonik · · Score: 1

      There are things I want to do before I day. People I want to talk to, places I want to be, things like that. It's hard for me to force myself because I can tell myself "the world will still be here tomorrow".

    19. Re:Jesus my chest. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only as it gets close, though, by which point it'd be hard to do anything about it. If it's still 20 years away, picking it out of the sky and correctly calculating its orbit might be the kind of thing only a small group of people discover, and maybe the government will step in to cover it up to avoid panic.

    20. Re:Jesus my chest. by Firehed · · Score: 1

      Did you watch Armageddon? Specifically what happens on the ground?

      Yes, it matters.

      Not that hollywood is exactly a bastion of truth, but I'd still rather not spend my last days in a riot. At least not one that I wasn't responsible for starting.

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    21. Re:Jesus my chest. by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      The odds of it landing on you even if were tough enough to survive atmospheric entry are pretty remote.

      The odds are astronomical, even! Hell, the odds are on a galactic scale! Why, the odds are so big, they make space look small!

      You jest. It must be remembered that there is a woman in Alabama (not sure if she's still alive, but it's only been 50-odd years, so quite possibly) who was hit by a meteorite. Well, technically it was still a meteor, since it hadn't hit ground when it hit her, but maybe we can stretch the definition slightly since it hit her house first.

      Plus there was a meteor that wrecked a few houses in India recently. It hurt a few people, as I recall.

      Still worse odds than winning the lottery, of course.

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    22. Re:Jesus my chest. by KGIII · · Score: 3, Funny

      Don't get me started on the "if I was a god" thing... If I was a god you'd best get sacrificing some virgins and stuffs.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    23. Re:Jesus my chest. by supernova_hq · · Score: 1

      I don't like the sound of those odds...

    24. Re:Jesus my chest. by erlenic · · Score: 1

      ... I'd still rather not spend my last days in a riot. At least not one that I wasn't responsible for starting.

      Easy solution: when they announce that the world's gonna end, start the riot yourself.

    25. Re:Jesus my chest. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Make peace with God? Fuck that! And when I say "fuck that" I mean I'm going to fuck the first girl I see on the street! (Hey, I'm a slashdot reader, and this is my fantasy)

    26. Re:Jesus my chest. by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          Blissful ignorance means we'll be writing stupid comments on Slashdot as it happens.

          Informed people will be victims of the mass hysteria. Myself, I'd prefer to at least move away from the point of impact, and continue writing stupid comments on Slashdot. :)

          About the time they say "there's an object the size of the moon coming at the earth", people will be selling anti-apocalypse kits, cans of powdered water, and other imaginary but expensive emergency supplies just in case they survive and money is worth something on post-apocalyptic earth. :)

          I caught the story about 1/2 hour after it was suppose to strike. I'm still wondering if we survived. I guess they didn't feel like running the follow up story. At least a picture would be nice. :)

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    27. Re:Jesus my chest. by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

      At 99.9999999%, if I'm the only male survivor, and the other 5 are hot chicks, I'm going to really dig repopulating the planet. Let the games begin. :)

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    28. Re:Jesus my chest. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that everyone on /. already are "rioting" themself.

    29. Re:Jesus my chest. by rebelcan · · Score: 1

      Well, I know I'm fine.

      I've already come to terms with my noodly deity, which includes the hot redheaded stripper, and plenty of Kilkenny

      --
      God is dead -- Nietzsche
      Nietzsche is dead -- God
      Zombie Nietzsche lives! -- Zombie Nietzsche
    30. Re:Jesus my chest. by rebelcan · · Score: 1

      What if the other five are tubgirl?

      --
      God is dead -- Nietzsche
      Nietzsche is dead -- God
      Zombie Nietzsche lives! -- Zombie Nietzsche
    31. Re:Jesus my chest. by rebelcan · · Score: 1

      I call dibs on the car dealerships!

      --
      God is dead -- Nietzsche
      Nietzsche is dead -- God
      Zombie Nietzsche lives! -- Zombie Nietzsche
    32. Re:Jesus my chest. by rebelcan · · Score: 1

      And then after the ten or so completely botched missions to divert it, they'd still try to cover it up. Mostly so that all the angry end-of-days rioting wouldn't be directed at them, probably.

      --
      God is dead -- Nietzsche
      Nietzsche is dead -- God
      Zombie Nietzsche lives! -- Zombie Nietzsche
    33. Re:Jesus my chest. by isorox · · Score: 1

      At 99.9999999%, if I'm the only male survivor, and the other 5 are hot chicks, I'm going to really dig repopulating the planet. Let the games begin. :)

      Not enough genetic diversity

    34. Re:Jesus my chest. by router · · Score: 1

      You're forgetting the effects of inbreeding. *cackle*

      andy

    35. Re:Jesus my chest. by kettlechips · · Score: 1

      I sure that Slashdot would report it at least twice.

      With the customary 95% chance of the first comment being modded "(Score:5, Funny)".

    36. Re:Jesus my chest. by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          Then suicide is a valid option. There's only so much my good genes can do with a gene pool like that. :)

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    37. Re:Jesus my chest. by tmosley · · Score: 1

      God prefers sluts. That's why He created STDs.

    38. Re:Jesus my chest. by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      If I was a god you'd best get sacrificing some virgins and stuffs.

      I'm in Illinois, where in the hell would I find a virgin?

    39. Re:Jesus my chest. by geekoid · · Score: 1

      the mysterious 'They'...
      Cue spooky music.

      Really, if something large enough to make life really really difficult for humans as visible, and coming are way, every astronomer would know. Astronomers are really bad at keeping secrets these days!

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    40. Re:Jesus my chest. by caluml · · Score: 1

      It must be remembered that there is a woman in Alabama (not sure if she's still alive, but it's only been 50-odd years, so quite possibly) who was hit by a meteorite.

      American, you say? Who did she sue about it?

    41. Re:Jesus my chest. by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      American, you say? Who did she sue about it?

      This was in the early 1950's. Before the lawsuit frenzy that has struck America. If it had happened today, I'd imagine she'd sue the guy who built her house for not making it Meteor-proof.

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
  5. Oh jeez... by Fluffeh · · Score: 1

    Let the jokes about the end of the world begin...

    --
    Moved to http://soylentnews.org/. You are invited to join us too!
    1. Re:Oh jeez... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop bashing President Palin! She's doing her very best, which is an example all Americans should follow!

    2. Re:Oh jeez... by CorporateSuit · · Score: 4, Funny

      No worries,

      2 hours gives CERN plenty of time to aim the LHC at the asteroid and obliterate it with a black hole.

      --
      I am the richest astronaut ever to win the superbowl.
    3. Re:Oh jeez... by zygotic+mitosis · · Score: 1

      Cool; I wrote a song about an asteroid wiping out the earth. Maybe I'm a prophet

    4. Re:Oh jeez... by pembo13 · · Score: 1

      If only they could get the darn thing to work.

      --
      "Thanks for all the money you paid to us. We've used it to buy off ISO among other things" -Microsoft
    5. Re:Oh jeez... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you are just a paranoid git either way you should be celebrated!

    6. Re:Oh jeez... by RazzleDazzle · · Score: 1

      The advanced Psilons surely could use their black hole generator or even the devious Darloks who likely already stole the technology. Maybe next will come a giant space crystal life form. Perhaps with our ion drives (moves 6 parsecs per turn) we can soon escape the solar system and make some serious headway towards becoming the MOO.

      --
      ZERO ZERO ONE ZERO ONE ZERO ONE ONE! Just brushing up for my next big invention: Ethernet over Voice (EoV)
    7. Re:Oh jeez... by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Got a link/recording?

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    8. Re:Oh jeez... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No need to worry. The Cubs didn't make it to the World Series and win, so at least that one sign of the apocalypse has been averted. (For now at least.)

    9. Re:Oh jeez... by supernova_hq · · Score: 1

      Maybe the LHC does work.
      Maybe NASA knew about the asteroid months ago.
      Maybe they took the LHC offline to AIM it at the asteroid.
      Maybe they aimed it the wrong way (downwards).

      Maybe we're screwed either way!

    10. Re:Oh jeez... by flows · · Score: 1

      The advanced Psilons surely could use their black hole generator or even the devious Darloks who likely already stole the technology. Maybe next will come a giant space crystal life form. Perhaps with our ion drives (moves 6 parsecs per turn) we can soon escape the solar system and make some serious headway towards becoming the MOO.

      If we had just saved enough for your planetary reserve, I'm sure our scientists could research a way to destroy the asteroid in one turn.

      There goes my productivity for the day... installing dosbox now...

    11. Re:Oh jeez... by zolaar · · Score: 1

      Eli? Eli! This is Marvin, your cousin!

      Your cousin!! Marvin Vance??!!

      You know the idea for a new gun you're looking for? Well listen to this!!!!

      --
      One man's constant is another man's variable.
    12. Re:Oh jeez... by RazzleDazzle · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah dosbox... been there, done that. It's funny how I still remember the majority of the copy protection ship names even after all these years. Of course every now and then I wont remember even up to the third one, that is when this comes in handy:
      http://www.krytosvirus.com/images/moo1.gif

      --
      ZERO ZERO ONE ZERO ONE ZERO ONE ONE! Just brushing up for my next big invention: Ethernet over Voice (EoV)
  6. Re:Asteroid? Why not meteor? by tekrat · · Score: 5, Informative

    They become meteors *once* they start to interact with the Earth's atmosphere. Until that time, they are classified as space objects, and the names seem to change dependent upon size and approximate mass.

    --
    If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
  7. Re:Asteroid? Why not meteor? by QuantumG · · Score: 3, Informative

    It's an asteroid until it enters the atmosphere.

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
  8. Re:Asteroid? Why not meteor? by Martin+Blank · · Score: 3, Informative

    OK, fair point. I should have referenced meteoroids. But still, aside from a sensational headline, wouldn't this usually be classified as a meteoroid rather than an asteroid?

    --
    You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
  9. So I guess.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I still have to go to work tomorrow? :(

  10. good by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    maybe the superstitious nutjobs in northern sudan take it as a godly sign that they should stop genociding southern sudan

    the acehnese independence drive in indonesia pretty much died off after the 2004 tsumani

    we talk about comets and eclipses having an impact in geopolitics in ancient history

    well, it still goes on today

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:good by Cyberax · · Score: 3, Insightful

      More likely they'll think it's a divine sigh that they're doing everything fine.

    2. Re:good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      where is "+1 sad but true" ?

    3. Re:good by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Remember, divine signs are an excuse to get your society to let you so what you wanted to do in the first place.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  11. it's the end of the world and... by owlnation · · Score: 5, Funny

    Bankers everywhere rejoice!

    1. Re:it's the end of the world and... by No2Gates · · Score: 0

      First it was the LHC, now this? I'm going to call in sick and go on a drinking binge, max out the credit cards, and go to VEGAS!!!

      --
      Every time you call tech support, a little kitten dies.
    2. Re:it's the end of the world and... by Gazzonyx · · Score: 1

      Well, you gotta' give it to 'em. They played the numbers saying, "what's the worst thing that could possibly happen?"

      Luckily we'll all be wiped out before that question is answered.

      --

      If I mod you up, it doesn't necessarily mean I agree with what you've said, sorry.

    3. Re:it's the end of the world and... by britneys+9th+husband · · Score: 1

      If the world were really ending, why would you waste time calling your boss?

      --
      Hear recorded Slashdot headlines on your phone! New service beta testing. Just call (248) 434-5508
    4. Re:it's the end of the world and... by No2Gates · · Score: 0

      Excellent point.

      --
      Every time you call tech support, a little kitten dies.
    5. Re:it's the end of the world and... by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      I feel fine!

  12. Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I take it I won't be able to see anything here in Michigan, USA?

    1. Re:Hmmm by delysid-x · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't it suck if it really were the end of the world and you couldn't even watch it hit?

    2. Re:Hmmm by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Domesticated turkeys will sometimes stand out in the rain and look up at it. When they do so their beak automatically opens and they stare up long enough so that some drown. A buddy of mine owns an organic turkey farm and it is quite common to go pick up the stupid, dead, drowned turkeys after the rains.

      So, while your comment rings true with me, it seems really stupid. Yes, me. Not your comment so much but the me bit. If this were something that I could see then I'd probably be out there looking up with a telescope.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    3. Re:Hmmm by z0idberg · · Score: 1

      snopes says false.

    4. Re:Hmmm by MadnessASAP · · Score: 1

      You wouldn't need a telescope for long.

      --
      I may agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to face the consequences of saying it.
    5. Re:Hmmm by KGIII · · Score: 1

      To you and the person below you - why did we go pick them up? I can easily accept the reasoning given to me was incorrect. But no, there were dead birds.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    6. Re:Hmmm by thatskinnyguy · · Score: 1

      If I remember correctly, if something large were to hit the other side of the world, we would be the unfortunate ones to die slowly of the side-effects. As the Earth is a round object, the fireball from an Armageddon-scale impact would be projected out into space and not envelope the Earth itself.

      --
      The game.
  13. Re:Asteroid? Why not meteor? by Bragador · · Score: 2, Informative

    Meteoroid/meteor: Any of the small solid extraterrestrial bodies that hits the earth's atmosphere

    Meteorite: A solid body that has arrived on the Earth or Moon from outer space. It can range in size from microscopic to many tons. Its composition ranges from that of silicate rocks to metallic iron-nickel.

    Asteroids: Asteroids, also called minor planets or planetoids, are a class of astronomical objects. The term asteroid is generally used to indicate a diverse group of small celestial bodies.

  14. Re:Asteroid? Why not meteor? by Fluffeh · · Score: 1

    It's an asteroid while it's out floating in space. When it comes knocking on our atmosphere then it becomes a meteor. If it doesn't totally burn up on it's way down and hits the earth, it's a meteorite.

    Don't even get me started on Kupier Belt Objects, Meteoroids or Comets!

    --
    Moved to http://soylentnews.org/. You are invited to join us too!
  15. Re:Asteroid? Why not meteor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At the moment, it could be considered (in everyday language) a very small asteroid in orbit around the Sun, although by the formal division that has been proposed (see the "bolide" link in the summary), it would be considered a meteoroid because it is so small (10m diameter). In a short while, it will briefly be a meteor in the Earth's atmosphere, although it will likely be bright enough to be considered a fireball. If we're lucky, there might be some meteorites that result, and which can be picked up on the ground.

    Does that help? If not, refer to the link in the summary.

  16. Don't watch it by duckInferno · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... or you'll go blind and the next thing you know, you'll being devoured by a giant plant.

    Instead, watch it through a pinhole cut into some cardboard.

    --
    Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, watch it -- I'm huge!
    1. Re:Don't watch it by skroz · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sadly, I haven't seen any triffids today.

      --
      -- Minds are like parachutes... they work best when open.
    2. Re:Don't watch it by duckInferno · · Score: 2, Funny

      I told you not to watch it!

      --
      Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, watch it -- I'm huge!
  17. Re:Asteroid? Why not meteor? by sreid · · Score: 5, Informative

    You're right. The Royal Astronomical Society has proposed a new definition where a meteoroid is between 100 Âm and 10 m across.

  18. Who Cares About Sudan? by resistant · · Score: 1, Insightful

    My prediction is that because it's over an impoverished third-world country, no one will care much, aside from astronomers and a small number (relative to world population) of other smarter people who know perfectly well that it could have just as easily been over Los Angeles or New York City. Not that this particular incident is important as anything but yet another warning that space objects of unpredictable size can suddenly strike Earth, as has happened frequently in geological time for billions of years.

    --
    A truly excellent pizza parlor is a delight unto the heavens. Treasure the sauce and the toppings!
    1. Re:Who Cares About Sudan? by Free+the+Cowards · · Score: 1

      Um, so what? Do you think that one kiloton exploding high up in the atmosphere over New York or Los Angeles would do anything other than provide an unusual light show for the inhabitants? Think again.

      --
      If you mod me Overrated, you are admitting that you have no penis.
    2. Re:Who Cares About Sudan? by erlenic · · Score: 1

      Well, I could certainly see it causing some people to freak out and think it's a terrorist attack.

    3. Re:Who Cares About Sudan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you know that asking a question isn't that same as making a statement? Thank again.

    4. Re:Who Cares About Sudan? by Free+the+Cowards · · Score: 1

      Again, so what? Lite Brite toys have caused "some people" to freak out and think it's a terrorist attack.

      --
      If you mod me Overrated, you are admitting that you have no penis.
  19. It's Pluto... by blue+l0g1c · · Score: 5, Funny

    and it wants revenge.

    1. Re:It's Pluto... by mcneely.mike · · Score: 1

      No, it's Uranus and it wants Montezuma's revenge!

      --
      soylentnews.org Go there to enjoy the people!
    2. Re:It's Pluto... by laejoh · · Score: 0

      Great, now evertime I'll hear the Marines anthem I'll think goatse!

      From the halls of Montezuma...

    3. Re:It's Pluto... by TheDarkMaster · · Score: 1

      LOL!!

      --
      Religion: The greatest weapon of mass destruction of all time
  20. Don't be fooled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is obviously the first wave of Xenu's attack on the Thetans.

  21. Re:Asteroid? Why not meteor? by chibiace · · Score: 0

    pluto is a what now?

    --
    he who controls the spice controls the universe
  22. Here's the NASA article by Bragador · · Score: 5, Informative

    Small Asteroid Predicted to Cause Brilliant Fireball over Northern Sudan

    A very small, few-meter sized asteroid, designated 2008 TC3, was found Monday morning by the Catalina Sky Survey from their observatory near Tucson Arizona. Preliminary orbital computations by the Minor Planet Center suggested an atmospheric entry of this object within a day of discovery. JPL confirmed that an atmospheric impact will very likely occur during early morning twilight over northern Sudan, north-eastern Africa, at 2:46 UT Tuesday morning. The fireball, which could be brilliant, will travel west to east (from azimuth = 281 degrees) at a relative atmospheric impact velocity of 12.8 km/s and arrive at a very low angle (19 degrees) to the local horizon. It is very unlikely that any sizable fragments will survive passage through the Earth's atmosphere.

    Objects of this size would be expected to enter the Earth's atmosphere every few months on average but this is the first time such an event has been predicted ahead of time.

    1. Re:Here's the NASA article by fm6 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Objects of this size would be expected to enter the Earth's atmosphere every few months on average but this is the first time such an event has been predicted ahead of time.

      This detail got left out of the story summary, making this sound like a bigger deal than it actually is. This is a routine, mundane event — only the prediction is newsworthy.

    2. Re:Here's the NASA article by dogdick · · Score: 0

      The story has been already picked up by CNN and NASA

      Picked up by NASA huh? Id certainly fucking hope so.

    3. Re:Here's the NASA article by Jonathan+McDowell · · Score: 5, Interesting

      This detail got left out of the story summary, making this sound like a bigger deal than it actually is. This is a routine, mundane event — only the prediction is newsworthy.

      What this really means is that the new surveys are looking at more of the sky more frequently and deeper (seeing fainter objects), so now we are starting to catch things hitting the Earth that would have been missed in the past.

      I wouldn't say this is a mundane event though, this is going to be bigger than the majority of fireballs that get seen. Yes, every few months, but most are over uninhabited areas and don't get seen. And they are not tracked in advance - so we'll get to see how big a fireball you get for a body whose size we have a rough idea of (a few meters across).

      For technical updates, see
      http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/mpec/RecentMPECs.html

    4. Re:Here's the NASA article by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Yes, every few months, but most are over uninhabited areas and don't get seen.

      This one will come down over the Sudan. Not exactly a major metropolitan area.

      My first reaction to the headline ("Asteroid" and "Collision Course" are not exactly innocuous keywords) was that something really serious was up. Even more serious than the argument over a certain politician's lipstick. Now there is news here (it's really cool that they're getting better at predicting this stuff) but it's nowhere as big a deal as the headline, or even the summary, suggest.

  23. Good News Everyone... by gooman · · Score: 4, Funny

    Since it is such a small asteroid we can save some money. We don't need to send an all-star cast to blow it up, we only need to send one celebrity.
    I suggest Bruce Willis, since we can save even more money not having to worry about the return trip.

    --
    "Kittens give Morbo gas!"
    1. Re:Good News Everyone... by amRadioHed · · Score: 5, Funny

      Please can we send Tom Cruise instead??

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    2. Re:Good News Everyone... by Fluffeh · · Score: 1

      Amen to that space travelling alien who drops monsters into volcanoes!

      Oh wait. I mean... Yeah, just drop him in!

      --
      Moved to http://soylentnews.org/. You are invited to join us too!
    3. Re:Good News Everyone... by gooman · · Score: 1

      Well, he wasn't part of the original cast (Armageddon) but sure, why not?
      Plus, sending Tom Cruise will help reduce costs even further, since he's already "out there."

      --
      "Kittens give Morbo gas!"
    4. Re:Good News Everyone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Please can we send Tom Cruise instead??

      No, he won't come out of the closet.

    5. Re:Good News Everyone... by The+Master+Control+P · · Score: 1

      Tom? Tom, it's R Kelly. Listen, you... you gotta come out of the closet, Tom.

    6. Re:Good News Everyone... by Foobar+of+Borg · · Score: 1

      Please can we send Tom Cruise instead??

      He'll probably tell us all that our asteroid problem can be solved by taking more vitamins.

    7. Re:Good News Everyone... by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Please can we send Tom Cruise instead??

      For the love of Xenu no, We need to save Tom for the alien invasion.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    8. Re:Good News Everyone... by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      Please can we send Tom Cruise instead??

      Or how about a Tom Cruise Missile?

      Hang on, there's a Scientology attorney at my door...

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    9. Re:Good News Everyone... by ProzacPatient · · Score: 1

      Pfft! Only Chuck Norris can handle this by roundhouse kicking it, and scoring a home run in the process.

    10. Re:Good News Everyone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about Jerry Bruckheimer, instead?

    11. Re:Good News Everyone... by Erbo · · Score: 1

      Nah. We'll take care of it. Lexx's Hulk will reduce that 'roid to raw ore in no time (Strip Miner IIs will do that), and my fully-rigged Iteron V will get the ore to the nearest station for refining. Meanwhile, Selena can ride shotgun in her Myrmidon, blasters and railguns ready in case the rats show up. Keep an eye out for can-tippers...

      --
      Be who you are...and be it in style!
    12. Re:Good News Everyone... by NoisySplatter · · Score: 1

      It's only a few cubic meters, use a shuttle.

      --
      In Soviet Russia meme tires of you!
    13. Re:Good News Everyone... by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      Don't be glib! You don't know the history of asteroids OR vitamins like I do!

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    14. Re:Good News Everyone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a great idea. His avatar is 7 billion years old, and probably can return to earth safely to search for a new container.

    15. Re:Good News Everyone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty sure Neal Stephenson recommends we send the Pope first.

    16. Re:Good News Everyone... by demigod · · Score: 1

      Please can we send Tom Cruise instead??

      You've got the wrong maverick.

      I suggest Palin, kill 2 birds with one stone

      --
      "The last thing I want to do is deal with a bunch of people who want something."
      Major Major
    17. Re:Good News Everyone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I second that. Tell him Xenu is on it waiting for him.

  24. Re:Asteroid? Why not meteor? by lysergic.acid · · Score: 1

    what's wrong with comets? aren't they just chunks of dirty ice? they aren't classified differently depending on whether they're in space, in the atmosphere, or on the ground. there's nothing confusing about comets, and it's a useful definition IMO.

  25. Scary... by ZipprHead · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This is scary to me, not so much that a small asteroid is going to burn up and make a light show, but news of it comes out 24 hours before hand.

    Would a body 10,20,100 or 1000 times the size be detected 24 hours before hitting us? Hell... 72 Hours?

    1. Re:Scary... by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

      24 hours before hand? Check again, this is came out with maybe 6 hours notice. Your popcorn should be in the microwave right now if you intend to watch.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    2. Re:Scary... by db32 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      More importantly, would they even tell anyone and cause a panic. I suspect if it was a real threat they wouldn't let the news out until it was too late to worry.

      --
      The only change I can believe in is what I find in my couch cushions.
    3. Re:Scary... by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      The short notice is because the object is very small. An object big enough to be a real threat is more likely to be detected a long way out.

    4. Re:Scary... by Vexorian · · Score: 2, Funny

      Would we need to know? ... Ok, I guess some might be looking forward for panic sex.

      --

      Copyright infringement is "piracy" in the same way DRM is "consumer rape"
    5. Re:Scary... by The+Master+Control+P · · Score: 3, Funny

      Your microwave takes 6 hours to make popcorn? Dude, you need a new microwave.

    6. Re:Scary... by Samah · · Score: 1

      It's because (as usual) the Slashdot article title is overhyped. There is no ELE "collision" as such. I'd expect as much alert to this as your regular lunar eclipse announcement.

      --
      Homonyms are fun!
      You're driving your car, but they're riding their bikes there.
    7. Re:Scary... by amRadioHed · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well it was only two hours by the time I posted that, but truth be told I'm out a microwave right now. I make my popcorn by putting the bag on top of my wireless router and firing up a bittorent.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    8. Re:Scary... by phagstrom · · Score: 1

      Pftt, two hours to pop on your router? It must be puny. ;-)

  26. Re:Asteroid bad for economy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Liar. You're intentionally misleading people. Troll is left even if you have tried to offset an off topic with a one sentence comment.

  27. Testing tractor beam theory. by DeadDecoy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Wouldn't this be an ideal opportunity to test out the theory of using a satellite's gravity to tow an asteroid away? Well, it's too late now, but I'm sure the research would be useful if we ever wanted to have a greater chance of avoiding potential disasters.

    1. Re:Testing tractor beam theory. by Fluffeh · · Score: 3, Informative

      Firstly the mass of a satellite would not generate enough of a gravity well to nudge any object off a crash course with the earth. Secondly, as the object in question will be travelling at around 12.8km/s (That's just under 8 miles per second if you are American). The sort of gravity needed to change that trajectory considerably would likely cause much much more problems than this little lump of rock could ever cause.

      --
      Moved to http://soylentnews.org/. You are invited to join us too!
    2. Re:Testing tractor beam theory. by mbone · · Score: 1

      No. The tractor idea (it's not a beam, for pete's sake) would take months to test. We have about... 1 hour.

  28. Re:Asteroid? Why not meteor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    a dog

  29. Wait, I've seen this movie by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    The little one is followed by a great big one. Panic!

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  30. Because the LHC failed... by master5o1 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Because the LHC failed at destroying us all, they sent this asteroid/meteor to finish us off. Seems like this will fail too.

    --
    signature is pants
    1. Re:Because the LHC failed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'll keep trying, I have to get it right eventually.

      - Your Pal the Anti-Christ

  31. Re:Asteroid? Why not meteor? by AJWM · · Score: 3, Informative

    It's an asteroid until it enters the atmosphere.

    No, if it's less than 10 meters diameter it's only a meteoroid.

    --
    -- Alastair
  32. Sigh by areusche · · Score: 1

    I love it when scientists try to correct people with the difference between meteorites and asteroids. Just let the unwashed masses say it wrong :)

    1. Re:Sigh by PRMan · · Score: 1

      And for that matter, it's not a bison nickel...

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
  33. The point of the article is the last line by Gresyth · · Score: 1, Informative

    Objects of this size would be expected to enter the Earth's atmosphere every few months on average but this is the first time such an event has been predicted ahead of time.

    --
    Tech Support: "No, sir...clicking on 'Remember Password' will NOT help you remember your password."
    1. Re:The point of the article is the last line by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      How many have been predicted after the event?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  34. Bomb Sudan!!! by Maestro485 · · Score: 0, Troll

    I'm sure the US has been waiting for a chance to bomb Sudan. Now they don't have to do anything!!!

    Since we're tagging stories with "story" why not tag this post with "post" or this article (which I did not read) with "article" or this opinion with "opinion" or this journal with "journal" or this line of bullshit with "bullshit".

    1. Re:Bomb Sudan!!! by corsec67 · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'm sure the US has been waiting for a chance to bomb Sudan. Now they don't have to do anything!!!

      And in other news, the asteroid was found to have large amounts of Naquadah in it.

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, don't search me
    2. Re:Bomb Sudan!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and 17 independent warheads...

  35. Re:Asteroid? Why not meteor? by fm6 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Without the sensational headline, who would care?

  36. Re:Asteroid? Why not meteor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    they aren't classified differently depending on whether they're in space, in the atmosphere, or on the ground.

    That's cuz comets generally don't reach the ground.

  37. It's not going to collide. by BungeBash · · Score: 0

    It's not going to collide so fix the title. It's going to burn up in our atmosphere becoming a meteor. http://www.cnn.com/2008/TECH/space/10/06/asteroid.fireball/index.html Let's try to publish stuff accurately...

    1. Re:It's not going to collide. by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

      What about Shoemaker-Levy 9? Didn't that count as a meteor collision even though it burned up in Jupiter's atmosphere? I would think the atmosphere counts as part of the Earth as much as the oceans would.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    2. Re:It's not going to collide. by Sechr+Nibw · · Score: 1

      Playing chicken with another automobile is driving on a collision course with them, so why not this? [Usually] in chicken, you don't actually collide with the other object, but it's still a collision course.

    3. Re:It's not going to collide. by mbone · · Score: 1

      It's not going to collide so fix the title. It's going to burn up in our atmosphere becoming a meteor...

      after it collides with the Earth (or at least its atmosphere).

    4. Re:It's not going to collide. by BungeBash · · Score: 0

      In chicken at one point both cars were heading TOWARDS each other. This is like saying a pitch inside during a baseball game was on a collision course just because it was close to the batter.

  38. It is blackhole by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 0, Redundant
    created by the cern collider. It is coming back for a rematch with the collider. But the collider has tunrned tail and run away from the field. This round goes to the blackhole.

    Reports indicate Darth Vader has already moved out of his bunker 1 mile under the Vice Presidential mansion and taken up a position in the orbit, in case it is not an asteroid at all but a squadron of rebel X wings.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  39. We're all going to die! by HangingChad · · Score: 4, Funny

    a small asteroid approaching Earth with a 99.8% probability of colliding

    O-M-G We're all going to die! It's the end of the world! Run! Agh, forget that, you'll just die tired! I'm freaking out! I'm freaking out!

    The asteroid is assumed to be 3-4 meters in size...

    This has been a test of the emergency end of the world system. Has this been the actual end of the world you would have been given explicit instructions to bend over and kiss your ass good bye.

    This concludes this test of the emergency end of the world system.

    --
    That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
    1. Re:We're all going to die! by AstrumPreliator · · Score: 1

      A few weeks ago the university campus police sent everyone an e-mail saying "... a tornado is approaching from the west. Please take cover in a shelter designed to minimize damages." 39 minutes later they send out another e-mail saying "The email message that went out regarding a tornado was a TEST ONLY. ... We apologize for the miscommunication."

      Of course I didn't read my e-mail until much later on that evening, so I had a good laugh at it.

    2. Re:We're all going to die! by schmidt349 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I thought that if the world was going to end we were meant to lie down or put a paper bag over our head or something. That's what they told us in the Army...

    3. Re:We're all going to die! by jagdish · · Score: 2, Funny

      Would a paper bag over my head help?

    4. Re:We're all going to die! by dogganos · · Score: 1

      >O-M-G We're all going to die! It's the end of the >world! Run!

      No worries. Most people are dead, far before they stop breathing...

  40. Re:Asteroid? Why not meteor? by SEWilco · · Score: 5, Funny

    If a comet is on the ground, we call it a glacier.

  41. Re:Asteroid? Why not meteor? by AikonMGB · · Score: 0

    Right, but it's not a meteoroid until it enters the atmosphere . Until then, as the GP stated, it is still an asteroid.

    Aikon-

  42. Not exactly any warning by Haoie · · Score: 1

    You'd think any asteroid heading for our planet would garner at least a passing mention in the media, but no.

    And in the meantime, the LHC gets all the attention. What a world.

    --
    If each mistake being made is a new one, then progress is being made.
  43. Re:Asteroid? Why not meteor? by MyLongNickName · · Score: 3, Funny

    So then, would a big asteroid just be an aster? Or .... never mind.

    --
    See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
  44. Re:Asteroid? Why not meteor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Great, but WTF is Goofy, then?

  45. Re:Asteroid? Why not meteor? by xstonedogx · · Score: 4, Informative

    Wrong, it's a meteoroid in space, a meteor in the atmosphere, and if any of it makes it to the ground, it's a meteorite.

    It's never an asteroid because it's not big enough.

  46. What a gyp. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The asteroid is assumed to be 3-4 meters in size; it is expected to burn up completely in the atmosphere, causing no harm."

    "expected to burn up completely in the atmosphere, causing no harm."

    "causing no harm."

    Aw...

  47. Regime in Sudan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everyone is focusing on the asteroid. I wonder (and wander) on a slightly different tangent. The regime in Sudan has been continuing for a long time their human rights atrocities in Darfur, etc. Perhaps this is God's way of firing a warning shot. ;)

    1. Re:Regime in Sudan? by KGIII · · Score: 1

      This is /. and most of us don't even believe in a god. Oh, and we're trying to emulate 4chan so... Tits or GTFO.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  48. We can spot this tiny rock way off... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...in the cavernous depths of space, yet we can't find Bin Laden on out own small planet?

    1. Re:We can spot this tiny rock way off... by mbone · · Score: 1

      ...in the cavernous depths of space, yet we can't find Bin Laden on out own small planet?

      It's always hard to find things in clutter - I have the same problem with my desk.

      If he was alone in deep space, we could find him too.

  49. Re:Asteroid? Why not meteor? by nomadic · · Score: 3, Funny

    Then once they've fully entered the atmosphere astronomers refer to them as "Cosmic World Destroyers." It's all very scientific.

  50. Quick! by ZarathustraDK · · Score: 1

    Fire something of the same size off earth. All those bits'n'pieces will just make earth heavier and sink into the Sun!

    Or think of it this way americans: Every time a meteor hits earth you become heavier.

    --
    If you quote this signature there'll be 72 copies of Windows ME waiting for you in Heaven.
  51. Re:I hope it hits Barack Obama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Enjoy your visit from the Secret Service. Let us know how it went. :)

  52. yeah, fuck those bastards in Ache by Reality+Master+201 · · Score: 1

    Yeah! fuck them and their selfish drive for independence from a government that's brutally repressed them for years so it can exploit the oil and gas reserves in the province.

    1. Re:yeah, fuck those bastards in Ache by The+Master+Control+P · · Score: 1

      Take a chill pill dude. GP wasn't making any judgement on the validity of the Aceh province independance movement; He was simply observing the neutral fact that it largely abated after the Christmas Day tsunami.

  53. Anubis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    failed the first time so he's trying yet again. Don't worry, SG-1 will save the world[tm] again as they always do.

  54. Re:I hope it hits Barack Obama by tekrat · · Score: 4, Funny

    Well, call me a Washin'ton out-cider, don'cha know, betcha', shucks, all I gotta' do is wink and sure, by golly, that asteroid'll collide with Obama fer sure. 'Cause he's a terrist celebrity, by golly, gosh, so dangerous, and I'd like ta' ignore that question and talk 'bout energy.

    Sincerely;
    Sarah Palin

    --
    If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
  55. How Kind by failedlogic · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    For those advanced enough in astronomy to observe, check the MPEC 2008-T50 and MPEC 2008-T64 circulars.

    Never read a more polite way of phrasing "otherwise, you're an astronomy idiot".

  56. Take that Darfur! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thank god, we're finally going to attack Sudan...oh I mean...a meteor!

  57. Re:Asteroid? Why not meteor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll call it a shooting star thanks

  58. Re:Asteroid? Why not meteor? by AikonMGB · · Score: 3, Funny

    I stand corrected; had my oids, eors, and ites crossed.

  59. Re:Asteroid? Why not meteor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Out floating in space."? Is 40,000-65,000 mph called "out floating" in your book?

  60. Re:Asteroid? Why not meteor? by freeabelian · · Score: 5, Informative

    "A very small, few-meter sized asteroid, designated 2008 TC3..." "It is very unlikely that any sizable fragments will survive passage through the Earth's atmosphere..." Let's pretend that "few-meter-sized" means 3m in diameter, that the space rock is perfectly spherical and will hit the Earth's surface in one piece. Mass of asteroid = density*volume = (3000kg/m^3)*(4*pi*(1.5m)^2/3) = 28274.334 kg (Density data from an eyeball-average of table in http://aa.usno.navy.mil/faq/docs/asteroid_masses) If it hits the surface at 12800m/s, then: Kinetic energy = .5*mv^2 = 2316233431638.683 J ~ 2316 gigajoules 1 ton TNT = 4.184GJ (from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joule), so the meteorite impact is roughly 553.6 tons of TNT. Caveat emptor: many, many approximations.

  61. Happy feast of the pig! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Happy feast of the pig!

  62. 02:46 UT by mbone · · Score: 1

    Is one hour from now.

    Any slashdotters in Sudan ?

    1. Re:02:46 UT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Any slashdotters in Sudan ?

      Haha good one!

  63. Re:Asteroid? Why not meteor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh gawd... chopper sick balls on this guy...

  64. Re:Asteroid? Why not meteor? by CptNerd · · Score: 5, Funny

    A horrible violation of the laws of God and Man...

    --
    By the taping of my glasses, something geeky this way passes
  65. Pool on crater size ? by mbone · · Score: 1

    Since there is great uncertainty in the mass of this object (albedo ? density ? who knows!) is anyone interested in a pool for the crater size ? I say that there will be one and my bet is for 3 meters.

    1. Re:Pool on crater size ? by actionbastard · · Score: 1

      Because one cannot know the true composition of the object in question, hence its mass, until it hits the ground -if it ever does, and the angle of incidence and the object's velocity at time of impact, it is very difficult to predict the size of the crater, if any, should the object strike the ground. However, generally, from past impact events, if the object were of a nickle-iron composition and its angle of incidence was high enough and its relative velocity was slow enough, so it would preserve as much mass as possible during its entry phase, a meteorite of this size, if it were of nickle-iron composition -could possibly- make a crater anywhere from 35 to 50 meters in diameter -given the aforementioned pre-conditions.

      --
      Sig this!
    2. Re:Pool on crater size ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Pool on crater size ?

      I'm going to go for Olympic.

  66. Cost! by Wolfier · · Score: 4, Funny

    Asteroid is free, Meteor is expensive - costs anywhere from 50 to 99 MP to cast, depending on which FF you're playing.

    I'd use an Asteroid over Meteor any day.

    1. Re:Cost! by DavidD_CA · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm playing on the Super Nintendo.

      It's called METEO, you insenstive clod!

      --
      -David
    2. Re:Cost! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm playing on the Super Nintendo.

      It's called METEO, you insenstive clod!

      I believe the proper retort to that is, "YOU SPOONY BARD!"

  67. Re:Asteroid? Why not meteor? by Tehrasha · · Score: 1
    'Not big enough' sounds like another planet/not-a-planet argument with vaugely defined criteria.

    I would assume that it is being called an 'asteroid' because it was discovered, path projected, and designated before entering the atmosphere. Where as a 'meteroid' would be a lump of rock which was discovered only after it impacted the shuttle/hubble/iss/atmosphere/etc.

  68. Re:Asteroid? Why not meteor? by actionbastard · · Score: 3, Informative

    By recent definition this object should not be classified as an asteroid, but a meteoroid. Meteoroid is what the object is when travelling in space. Meteor is the visual phenomenon that you see as the object enters the Earth's upper atmosphere and frictional heating causes the surface of the object to melt and then form a plasma around the object. Meteorite is the remains of a meteoroid that entered the Earth's atmosphere and reached the ground.

    It is entirely possible that this meteoroid -depending on its composition, stony, stony-iron, carbonaceous chondrite, or iron/nickel-iron and its velocity and angle of incidence to the Earth's atmosphere- could reach the ground and form a sizable crater. The accepted figure for crater size is roughly 25 times the diameter of the object at the time of impact with the surface. The Barringer Crater was formed by an object estimated to be approximately 50 meters across at the time of impact. If this object reaches the ground at one-half of its present estimated size, it could form a crater 35 to 50 meters across. It would be quite the show if one were within a mile or two of the impact.

    --
    Sig this!
  69. Re:Asteroid? Why not meteor? by sukotto · · Score: 5, Funny

    So, a Dwarf Asteroid then?

    --
    Come play free flash games on Kongregate!
  70. Re:Asteroid? Why not meteor? by SlashDev · · Score: 1

    Next time a very large asteroid is on collision with earth, I'll be looking for you to debate the naming of the object? :)

    --

    TOP DSLR Cameras Reviews of the top DSLRs
  71. Re:I hope it hits Barack Obama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you fuck, they're both liars. by singling one out you are defending a liar.

    vote for either one and you're voting for a liar and taking on the job of a whore.

  72. This is really a shame.. by The+Breeze · · Score: 1

    Too bad we didn't see this thing coming earlier. With a year's warning, it would be great practice to see if we could get some sort of vehicle close enough to destroy it. If we could find a way to target this thing, we could rest assured that we know how to target a larger object that could actually do damage. It would have been great target practice; big enough to track and try to hit but small enough that it doesn't matter if we miss.

  73. Re:Asteroid? Why not meteor? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 3, Funny

    Then once they've fully entered the atmosphere astronomers refer to them as "Cosmic World Destroyers.".

    But only for a short time.

  74. Re:I hope it hits Barack Obama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was going to give a response, but I've got a campaign event in less than twelve hours.

    Sincerely,
    Joe Biden

  75. Re:Asteroid? Why not meteor? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

    I saw another estimate of about a 1000 which is close enough.

  76. Re:Asteroid? Why not meteor? by onemorechip · · Score: 1

    Meteoroid/meteor: Any of the small solid extraterrestrial bodies that hits the earth's atmosphere

    No, hitting the atmosphere is what distinguishes meteors from meteoroids.

    --
    But, I wanted socialized health insurance!
  77. 1 in 20 chance it'll be bigger than expected by jmichaelg · · Score: 4, Interesting

    5% of the meteors are iron. Iron is both denser and darker than the far more common stony meteor which means if the asteroid is made of iron, it'll be bigger than expected because the size estimates are based on the amount of light the asteroid is reflecting. If it's iron, its higher density, combined with its larger size, will improve the odds that some remnants will make earth fall.

    If it makes earth fall it'll be by far, the most valuable meteorite ever since it's the first asteroid whose arrival was predicted. It'll literally be money from Heaven for whomever finds a piece.

    1. Re:1 in 20 chance it'll be bigger than expected by Phics · · Score: 1

      And in Dongola, the weather will be clear with an expected high of 107 Fahrenheit, and a chance of light meteor showers. Remember to pack those umbrellas!

      --
      There are two types of people in the world; those who believe there are two types of people, and those who don't.
    2. Re:1 in 20 chance it'll be bigger than expected by Bob+The+Cowboy · · Score: 1

      So what you're saying is that if it rolls a 20 it could do double damage? Like, Duh.

    3. Re:1 in 20 chance it'll be bigger than expected by Dr+La · · Score: 1

      Iron is both denser and darker than the far more common stony meteor

      You are wrong there. M-class (iron) and S-class (silicious) objects have similar albedoes: 0.10 - 0.18 resp. 0.10 - 0.22. Carbonaceous objects have significantly lower albedoes (0.03 - 0.09) but are also structurally very weak and highly likely to disintegrate.

      --
      Ceterum censeo Carthaginem delendam esse
    4. Re:1 in 20 chance it'll be bigger than expected by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. Order plane tickets to the Sudan
      2. Look for my baseball mitt
      3. ????
      4. Profit!!!

  78. Spotting round. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not coming from the Geminds' or Leonids' direction, I hope. Is it ?

  79. Your buddy thinks you're an idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  80. Re:Asteroid? Why not meteor? by charlesj68 · · Score: 2, Funny

    'Not big enough' sounds like another planet/not-a-planet argument with vaugely defined criteria.

    There are some emails in my spam box that think they might be able to help it out ...

  81. T-20minutes, by my calculations by robbak · · Score: 1

    Any Slashdotters out there with cameras &c?

    --
    Prediction for end of Universe #42: Fencepost error in Quantum_bogosort.cpp
  82. Re:Asteroid? Why not meteor? by sreid · · Score: 5, Funny

    size challenged asteroid

  83. Pictures of expected impact location by jmichaelg · · Score: 1

    One of the posters on mpml put up these pictures of the expected impact area...
    http://www.southing.com/Templates/diary/diary_entries/sudan/diary_right_10dec.htm

    1. Re:Pictures of expected impact location by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Thanks for not rick rolling..or worse.
      I click on the link and then immediatly realized what a mistake that can be. Fortunately it as what you said.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  84. 3m wide but 2km long ? by MarkTina · · Score: 1

    What happens if this "object" is shaped like a spear ? So it only looks 3m wide from our perspective of looking at it, and really there is another couple of km behind it ?!? Will the Earth be skewered like a cherrie on a tooth pick ? :-)

    1. Re:3m wide but 2km long ? by robbak · · Score: 1

      No, or course.

      Seriously, it would be rotating, like every other astronomical body, and we would detect the wildly changing brightness levels.

      If it was long, thin and end on, the item would rapidly be rotated by aerodynamic forces until it is side on, where it would instantly break up, like, well, Challenger.

      Note that we are looking at the object side-on. It is more like an object that is being gently lobbed into our path. Earth's speed around the sun = 29.7859163 km / sec
      http://www.google.com.au/search?hl=en&client=firefox-a&rls=com.ubuntu%3Aen-US%3Aunofficial&hs=nf2&q=1+AU+*+2*+pi+%2F+1+year+in+km%2Fsec&btnG=Search&meta= (google calculator is amazing!)

      --
      Prediction for end of Universe #42: Fencepost error in Quantum_bogosort.cpp
  85. Life will go on, we will prevail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OK, so here's what we do. We hit the rock with matching force. We launch Verne 'Mini-Me' Troyer on a Scooty-Puff Jr out to blow it up. And instead of Tea Leoni on MSNBC, we go with that 'Leave Britney Alone' character on You Tube.

    I shall call it [using quote fingers] "Deep Impact 2: Meteoric Boogaloo." This time, it's igneous. Or metamorphic. [Shrugs] Whatever. I don't know rock types.

  86. Further Updates from jpl at T-60min by robbak · · Score: 2, Informative

    Update - 6:45 PM PDT (1 hour prior to atmospheric entry)

    Since its discovery barely a day ago, 2008 TC3 has been observed extensively by astronomers around the world, and as a result, our orbit predictions have become very precise. We estimate that this object will enter the Earth's atmosphere at around 2:45:28 UTC and reach maximum deceleration at around 2:45:54 UTC. These times are uncertain by +/- 15 seconds or so. The time at which any fragments might reach the ground depends a great deal on the physical properties of the object, but should be around 2:46:20 UTC +/- 40 seconds.

    T-750 and counting

    --
    Prediction for end of Universe #42: Fencepost error in Quantum_bogosort.cpp
    1. Re:Further Updates from jpl at T-60min by Temtongkek · · Score: 1

      I'm not freaking out until I hear about the T-800's. Fully armored, very tough.

  87. Nice day by gmuslera · · Score: 1

    in a 24 hour period we saw the fall of Wall Street and now the fall of the sky (ok, a very small part of it)... what will be next?

  88. Re:Asteroid? Why not meteor? by Cussin_IT · · Score: 1

    Does it realy matter if it
    A)causes news coverage that interupts your TV watching
    B) lands on your house or
    C) blots out the sun/ distroys all life on earth

    --
    Read my blog you know you want to
  89. Re:Asteroid? Why not meteor? by stonedcat · · Score: 1

    Giant insects will look back on this one day and laugh.

    --
    You can't take the sky from me.
  90. Too close for comfort.... by AntiGenX · · Score: 1

    The only thing that really bothers me about this story is that it was detected so close to the impact time. I hope that's only due to the relative small size of the object.

    1. Re:Too close for comfort.... by Somegeek · · Score: 1

      Really small rocks are hard to see.

      Especially really small dark colored ones.

      It should be taken as a sign of our improving detection ability that we were able to see this one before it hit at all.

      Detecting and mapping the orbits of all of these near earth asteroids is one of the purposes behind the LSST project that we have been hearing so much about lately.

      http://www.lsst.org/lsst_home.shtml

      --
      And as you tread the halls of sanity, You feel so glad to be, Unable to go beyond. I have a message, From another time..
  91. how big? by kylemonger · · Score: 1

    With, lo, 1 minute to impact it occurs to me to wonder how they are so sure of the size of this rock.

    1. Re:how big? by robbak · · Score: 1

      All based on its brightness. I don't think they could have estimated its mass.

      So, if it is a real dull black, it could be bigger. Their error bars were big: Their estimates were between 1 and 3 meters across.

      Anyway, that's impact. I hope there were some pictures!

      --
      Prediction for end of Universe #42: Fencepost error in Quantum_bogosort.cpp
    2. Re:how big? by Dr+La · · Score: 1

      It are estimates from the objects observed brightness. The nominal value (3 meter) is usually based on an assumed albedo of 0.15. Depending on the composition, the true albedo can range between 0.03 (very dark carbonaceous) and 0.22.

      With H=30.4 for 2008 TC3 (MPEC 2008-T74), the estimated size range from these albedoes is from 2 to 8 meter, with best estimate 3 meter.

      --
      Ceterum censeo Carthaginem delendam esse
  92. For those who didn't get the joke... by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1
    1. Re:For those who didn't get the joke... by corsec67 · · Score: 1

      That is one of those jokes where if you have to explain it, it is worthless, but the specific episode I was referring to is Failsafe

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, don't search me
  93. Re:Asteroid? Why not meteor? by emagery · · Score: 3, Funny

    What... the 'roid will dramatically increase the oxygen content of the planet? (insectoid respiratory systems are terribly inefficient, hence drastically limiting their size) ... ok, well that last bit kinda ruined the intended joke... except, I didn't think anyone would get it otherwise... *throws hands up in air in self frustration* ... btw, did it hit yet?

  94. Non-smoking section by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I do hope it respects the no-smoking here signs.

  95. Taco Bell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is Taco Bell going to setup a target so everyone in America gets a free taco if it hits the right spot?

  96. Is it over? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are we still alive?

    1. Re:Is it over? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I'll just check to the computer...............
      Computer says 'NO'

  97. Re:Asteroid? Why not meteor? by emagery · · Score: 1

    "Out floating in space."? Is 40,000-65,000 mph called "out floating" in your book?

    yah... its all relative, mang... whole solar system is moving through the galaxy at sowhere between 220 and 250 kilometers per second... i.e., between 490,000mph and 560,000mph... and, while I don't know about you... but I can't even feel it happening!!

  98. Abandon hope all yee who live! by supernova_hq · · Score: 5, Funny

    Oh crap, the fate of the earth depends on the accuracy of a slashdot summary?!?

    1. Re:Abandon hope all yee who live! by Randwulf · · Score: 1

      You have no chance to survive make your time.

    2. Re:Abandon hope all yee who live! by rebelcan · · Score: 1

      Well, maybe that's why they have dupes. To slowly clarify and re-edit.

      Kinda like going back in time to change the present, except this way we have a record of the changes.

      --
      God is dead -- Nietzsche
      Nietzsche is dead -- God
      Zombie Nietzsche lives! -- Zombie Nietzsche
  99. Happens Every Day by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 2, Funny

    We call them "shooting stars", and wish on them.

    This one is a "collision asteroid" because it's good marketing for Star Wars "missile defense" gussied up for more recent Hollywood treatment like _Deep Impact_.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  100. Thanks so much by Duncan+Blackthorne · · Score: 1

    Am I the only person who just about crapped his pants when he started reading TFA? Likewise, am I the only person who made the general assumption that an 'asteroid' referred to an object significantly larger than what they're talking about here? WTF dude!?

    1. Re:Thanks so much by Somegeek · · Score: 1

      Don't stress so much. You don't have to worry unless you see a phrase like E.L.E. or Planet Killer attached. And probably not even then. Don't you watch any movies at all?

      --
      And as you tread the halls of sanity, You feel so glad to be, Unable to go beyond. I have a message, From another time..
    2. Re:Thanks so much by Duncan+Blackthorne · · Score: 1

      No worries. If I know that there's a 99.9% chance of a "planet killer" sized asteroid colliding with this planet, the only thing I'm going to be worrying about is whether I can get drunk enough fast enough before it happens so I'll be passed out when the end comes. :p

  101. The correct term by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 1

    is Minor Asteroid

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
    1. Re:The correct term by Yewbert · · Score: 1

      Half-asteroid?

    2. Re:The correct term by j00r0m4nc3r · · Score: 1

      Halfteroid

    3. Re:The correct term by B30-7A · · Score: 1

      hemi-roid. Sorry, I couldn't resist.

    4. Re:The correct term by georgewad · · Score: 2, Funny

      hemi-roid?

      --
      Karma: It's not just a good idea. It's the law.
  102. Re:Asteroid? Why not meteor? by fuego451 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Asteroid, meteoroid or hemorrhoid; what does it matter? They're all a pain in the ass.

  103. BRAINNNNNNS by SEWilco · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Now that it hit, zombie party at CERN!

  104. Metrics by kialara · · Score: 0

    I need this in a metric that I can understand.

    How many atomic bombs does a kiloton of TNT equal?

    1. Re:Metrics by robbak · · Score: 1

      Hiroshima was between 12 and 15 kilotons, Nagasaki, 20 to 22.

      --
      Prediction for end of Universe #42: Fencepost error in Quantum_bogosort.cpp
  105. Perhaps you've underestimated, actually by Gazzonyx · · Score: 1

    If it doesn't enter the atmosphere as a single piece (your assumption for simplicities sake), won't you have more surface area thereby increasing the friction and accelerating the energy release (erm, I think impulse is the term I'm looking for... it's been a few years since high school physics and I was never any good at it to begin with)? Or, you'll have the same amount of energy released in a shorter time frame which will be more forceful than the 'shell' burning away in the atmosphere at a more steady rate. Is this correct?

    --

    If I mod you up, it doesn't necessarily mean I agree with what you've said, sorry.

  106. Re:Asteroid? Why not meteor? by ozphx · · Score: 1

    Its called good suspension. You get it on the bigger vehicles.

    --
    3laws: No freebies, no backsies, GTFO.
  107. Re:Asteroid? Why not meteor? by MrNaz · · Score: 1

    +1 Reference to one of my favorite movies of all time!

    --
    I hate printers.
  108. Better yet... have Revolta... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...and Cruise both fly up in Revolta's jet and hit the damn thing head-on. That'll solve three problems at once.

  109. Dwarferoid? by JoeGee · · Score: 1

    Micreor? Asterissimal?

    --

    Get off my virtual lawn, you damned virtual kids!
  110. Re:Asteroid? Why not meteor? by sidb · · Score: 4, Informative

    It doesn't matter whether it hits the ground in one piece, splits into fragments, or burns up entirely before impact. The energy release is the same; only the location and form of the released energy will vary. I was assuming that the OP meant 1 kton of energy dissipated as heat into the atmosphere. It's a weird unit of measure to use for anything that isn't a point explosion, though. Still, I wonder how much it takes to noticeably affect anything beyond a temporary light show—the weather, perhaps. Probably more than this meteor has, even with your higher figure, unless it hits the ground.

  111. meteoroid not asteroid by Iowan41 · · Score: 1

    That is too small to think of as an asteroid. Myself I'd make the switch at maybe 100 meters.

  112. Re:Asteroid? Why not meteor? by apostrophesemicolon · · Score: 1

    oids eors and ites are just rocks. But when Meteora hits, it became quad-platinum! see what I did there?

  113. It's the size of...a car...in Texas, sir by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's what we call a boredom killer.

  114. Re:Asteroid? Why not meteor? by dupper · · Score: 1

    The meteorite is the source of the light
    And the meteor's just what we see
    And the meteoroid is a stone that's devoid of the fire that propelled it to thee

    And the meteorite's just what causes the light
    And the meteor's how it's perceived
    And the meteoroid's a bone thrown from the void that lies quiet in offering to thee

    -- Joanna Newsom, 'Emily'

  115. Re:Asteroid? Why not meteor? by Metasquares · · Score: 1

    If we can only find them 2 hours before they're scheduled to hit, that's about all we can do.

  116. Well? by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 1

    Well? Did we die?

    --
    Don't piss off The Angry Economist
    1. Re:Well? by rrohbeck · · Score: 1

      No we di%^##U(@_
      NO CARRIER

    2. Re:Well? by Askmum · · Score: 1

      Hmm. As it is 7:24 UTC now and seeing no newsreports at all, looks like a dud.

  117. This sort of impact happens once a month. by SETIGuy · · Score: 5, Informative

    A kiloton scale impact is a once a month thing. The only interesting thing about this collision is that we detected the object in advance. All the other ones have hit without warning. A 20 kiloton impact is a once a year event. It's only when you get to 10 megaton events that you have to worry about any effects on the ground, (apart from people looking at the bolide being temporarily or permanently blinded).

  118. Re:Asteroid? Why not meteor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Nah... it's Dad having an orgasm.

  119. that's not how the terminology is usually used by Trepidity · · Score: 1

    A meteoroid is an object in space, not in the atmosphere, that is smaller than about 10m; objects in space larger than that are asteroids.

    When a meteroid enters the atmosphere, it becomes a meteor.

  120. oops, I see you responded elsewhere in the thread by Trepidity · · Score: 1

    Apologies for the redundant correction!

  121. It's an escape pod with C3P0 and R2D2! by itsybitsy · · Score: 1

    Another escape from Darth.

  122. Re:Asteroid? Why not meteor? by greyhueofdoubt · · Score: 1

    So an asteroid that interacts with our atmosphere would be an aster, and if it hit the earth it'd be an asterite? Firefox's spell check disagrees ;)

    -b

    --
    No offense, but I've stopped responding to AC's.
  123. One would think by Voyager529 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That a meter(oid)/asteroid that gets this kind of press coverage would get a name more creative than "2008 TC3". Geez, the Greeks and Romans had that down thousands of years ago. What happened? Joey

    1. Re:One would think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That a meter(oid)/asteroid that gets this kind of press coverage would get a name more creative than "2008 TC3". Geez, the Greeks and Romans had that down thousands of years ago. What happened?

      Joey

      What happened? Some Jews were getting drunk & saw one of those, and decided it meant the Messiah was coming, and now we have Christians naming them.

  124. Re:Asteroid? Why not meteor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    And in the atmosphere it's called hail.

  125. Re:Asteroid? Why not meteor? by Varun+Soundararajan · · Score: 1

    Does it realy matter if it A)causes news coverage that interupts your TV watching B) lands on your house or C) blots out the sun/ distroys all life on earth

    I am not sure about A. If B happens, you wont read this post and if C happens, neither of us will be able to read this post after the impact.

  126. Re:Asteroid? Why not meteor? by jamstar7 · · Score: 1
    Yeah, but the gas mileage sucks.

    Next time, get the 2.0 liter 4 cylinder model with the sports suspension, better response...

    --
    Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
  127. Re:Asteroid? Why not meteor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    you are funny.

  128. It hasn't been said yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obligatory "That's no asteroid!" comment.

  129. Well, to get technical by celtic_hackr · · Score: 1

    It only becomes a meteorite if it doesn't become and ELE. Then it becomes a HYHTTKYAGite.

  130. Re:I hope it hits Barack Obama by wclacy · · Score: 0, Troll

    According to Obama's website it says:

    He is going to spend Billions on Universal Health coverage.

    He is going to spend Billions to provide child care

    He is going to spend Billions on Education.

    He is going to spend Billions Social Security.

    He is going to spend Billions on "Universal Voluntary Public Service"

    He is going to spend Billions on the Defense(92,000 additional soldiers)

    He is going to spend $150 billion more on Energy

    He is going to spend Billions on Homeland Security

    He is going to spend Billions on Welfare

    He is going to spend Billions on Veterans

    He is going to spend Billions on "transportation systems"

    He is going to spend Billions on tax cuts for those who don't pay taxes.(This is called Welfare)

    He is going to doubling federal funding for basic scientific research

    He is going to spend Billions on much more I have not listed.

    He is going to remove the tax burden from Farmers, Seniors, Lower class, Middle Class, Homeowners, Small Businesses, College Parents, Uninsured, etc.(So the only ones really paying taxes are Large corporations and Rich people...both of which are despised by Obama and will likely be driven from this country by high taxes and new Obama mandates! Then who will pay the taxes?)

    So when Obama says he is going to spend spend spend and at the same time lower or remove the tax burden from 95% of Americans, No I do not believe him.

    Obama either doesn't know simple math or he is lying to everyone.

    So rather than have the country run into the ground by Obama I would prefer he is run into the ground by an Asteroid.

  131. Let Space Come to Us by JumperCable · · Score: 1

    Instead of spending the enormous dollars it takes to explore other planets*, wouldn't it be cheaper to:
    1. Send up a unit to slow down some of these meteors,
    2. Pick them up in orbit
    3. Deliver them to the Space Station for scientific research
    4. Maybe even package them for a soft landing for ground based researchers to examine
    5. ????
    6. Profit!!!

    With all the talk about panspermia, what better way to explore this possibility? Otherwise we are left with the burnt out husks of what has hit the earth.

    This very well may be the cheapest easiest way to explore space. From our couch!

    * I still think we should try to explore other planets, but this presents a great value.

    1. Re:Let Space Come to Us by VoidCrow · · Score: 1

      Joke?

    2. Re:Let Space Come to Us by freddy_dreddy · · Score: 1

      Reply?

      --
      "Violence is the last refuge of the competent, and, generally, the first refuge of the incompetent" - Thing_1
  132. This is all nice but.... by Kleen13 · · Score: 1

    Look at how little notice we get. You /. guys gotta get laid, like right now!

    --
    That sinking feeling deep in your gut when you KNOW you screwed up bad summed up with: {head desk} {head desk}
  133. Re:Asteroid? Why not meteor? by woot+account · · Score: 1

    33333 That's what I was thinking about the whole time I was reading through this discussion.

  134. Re:Asteroid? Why not meteor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hail to the queen!

  135. Size doesn't matter by Macka · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... it's what it does on entry that counts!

    1. Re:Size doesn't matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everyone gets excited and it's over in 3 seconds?

  136. We are doomed by sTERNKERN · · Score: 1

    First LHC, then this... hold on to your towels, i think the vogons will be the next.

  137. Re:Asteroid? Why not meteor? by Sique · · Score: 2, Informative

    No. To be an aster it must be able to sustain nuclear fusion. Because "astera" is latin and means "star".

    And yes: Asteroids are literally "star-like thingies".

    --
    .sig: Sique *sigh*
  138. Re:Asteroid? Why not meteor? by rebelcan · · Score: 2, Funny

    At which point, all the dead will wake up, society will crumble, and then we'll have much more important things to worry about than what to call it.

    Just saying, is all.

    --
    God is dead -- Nietzsche
    Nietzsche is dead -- God
    Zombie Nietzsche lives! -- Zombie Nietzsche
  139. Re:Asteroid? Why not meteor? by rebelcan · · Score: 1

    You are not familiar with the /. moderation system.

    --
    God is dead -- Nietzsche
    Nietzsche is dead -- God
    Zombie Nietzsche lives! -- Zombie Nietzsche
  140. Re:Asteroid? Why not meteor? by rebelcan · · Score: 2, Funny

    You forgot:

    D) Wakes up all the dead.

    Which reminds me, I have to update my Zombie Action Plan.

    --
    God is dead -- Nietzsche
    Nietzsche is dead -- God
    Zombie Nietzsche lives! -- Zombie Nietzsche
  141. Re:Asteroid? Why not meteor? by rebelcan · · Score: 1

    And if it's in my drink, then I'm too drunk to care.

    --
    God is dead -- Nietzsche
    Nietzsche is dead -- God
    Zombie Nietzsche lives! -- Zombie Nietzsche
  142. At Least We Still Have Carnival by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, since it's headed for Sudan and not Rio De Janerio, we won't have to go to war.

  143. Re:Asteroid? Why not meteor? by isorox · · Score: 1

    Beware the oids of march

  144. Re:Asteroid? Why not meteor? by PeKbM0 · · Score: 1

    Or a snowball, if it's too small.

  145. Jubei by mutherhacker · · Score: 1

    This is the first time I've seen this kind of news on slashdot. I dont believe my eyes. Has slashdot really SUNK that low? What kind of title is that? A title like that can only scare people. Like the headlines on TV news and newspapers. Anthrax! Terrorism! Spiced up to increase ratings. Scare people for an asteroid that will burn up in the atmosphere? Why? I really thought slashdot was better than this.

    1. Re:Jubei by LingNoi · · Score: 1

      What's to be scared of the news has been reported a day AFTER it actually happened.

    2. Re:Jubei by mutherhacker · · Score: 1

      You are missing the point. The moment I saw the news title I was scared! (before reading the actual details). Why should slashdot give me a fright like that for something so trivial?

  146. Obligatory by ciderVisor · · Score: 1

    There was a suggestion made that this might be a booster from a mars probe because its orbit does take it close to mars, Another possibility is that it is a fragment of mars.

    The chances of anything coming from Mars are a million-to-one.

    --
    Squirrel!
    1. Re:Obligatory by Kagura · · Score: 1

      It was a million-to-one chance, Doc. A million to one. ;)

  147. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just accelerate Earth a little bit. This will do the job.

  148. Slashdot math by omuls+are+tasty · · Score: 1

    4 replies later, and nobody notices that he's using r^2 in a *volume* formula? Yes, yes, in 3 dimensions?

    No, he is new here.

    1. Re:Slashdot math by camperdave · · Score: 1

      We're all a bit busy making sure our parent's basement^h^h^h^h Ultimate Disaster Survival Complex is well stocked with Coke and Cheetos to be looking for typos in the math.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    2. Re:Slashdot math by freeabelian · · Score: 1

      You are right. Arrive at the correct answer by multiplying the wrong value by another 1.5. Comes out to 830.4 tons of TNT. Which coincides with MichaelSmith's comment: "I saw another estimate of about a 1000 which is close enough."

  149. Why don't we try to catch it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's probably too late to get a mission ready for this rock, but according TFA there will probably be another one along in a few months. Catching a rock like this for study would be challenging, useful and interesting.

    How feasible would this be? Obviously it would take a lot of energy to slow this thing down, and doing it so without obliterating it in the process would be tricky, but I'm sure humanity can think up something. If the rock is largely iron, could magnetic fields be used to slow it?

  150. Android? by flappinbooger · · Score: 1

    Too many Google phone articles. At first I thought a small Android phone was on a collision course with Earth...

    What are they DOING?

    --
    Flappinbooger isn't my real name
  151. Re:Asteroid? Why not meteor? by Mikkeles · · Score: 3, Funny

    And an asteroid breaking in two would be two hemorrhoids?

    --
    Great minds think alike; fools seldom differ.
  152. Re:Asteroid? Why not meteor? by DikSeaCup · · Score: 1

    But it's october.

  153. What about the Elves? by camperdave · · Score: 1

    Dwarf stars
    dwarf planets
    now dwarf asteroids

    What about the elves?

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    1. Re:What about the Elves? by Talderas · · Score: 1

      Silly elves and dwarfs. You neglect the goblins and orcs! They're people too.

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    2. Re:What about the Elves? by TheDreadSlashdotterD · · Score: 1

      We'll call them dog food.

      --
      I have nothing to say.
    3. Re:What about the Elves? by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

      "Silly elves and dwarfs. You neglect the goblins and orcs! They're people too."

      Humm, no. They are "o", "@" can e and #o them without any problem.

  154. Re:I hope it hits Barack Obama by jambox · · Score: 1

    Well Bush spent trillions on invading other countries. So if Obama simply avoids that, yes he'll probably have enough money for all that and more.

    --
    You thought you could break the laws of physics without paying the PRICE?
  155. Torino Scale Zero by argent · · Score: 1

    Looks like a Torino Zero event:

    No Hazard (White Zone) - 0 - The likelihood of a collision is zero, or is so low as to be effectively zero. Also applies to small objects such as meteors and bodies that burn up in the atmosphere as well as infrequent meteorite falls that rarely cause damage.

  156. I'm rooting for the rock by gelfling · · Score: 1

    And if we're really lucky it will turn out to be 4 miles across.

    1. Re:I'm rooting for the rock by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Hah! I totally got paper ready.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  157. Re:I hope it hits Barack Obama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hi Sarah.... I totally agree with you. You're HOT !!!!

  158. Don't be silly by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    The fate of the earth does NOT lie with the slashdot editors, it is tied to the accuracy of slashdot moderators.

    I suggest investing in shotgun shells and water filters.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  159. Casa Bonita by ShannaraFan · · Score: 1

    This will all be over after I go to Casa Bonita on Saturday....

  160. i know some acehnese by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    i am sympathetic to their cause. the javanese are not interested in their well-being

    however, the tsuami squashed the rebellion, which is true. that's all i made note of

    you need to work on your communication skills

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:i know some acehnese by Reality+Master+201 · · Score: 1

      you need to work on your communication skills

      Hmm. Interesting point. But on the other hand, eat a dick.

  161. Re:I hope it hits Barack Obama by Stele · · Score: 1

    Oh, and Ronald Reagan.

  162. Re:Asteroid? Why not meteor? by Paranatural · · Score: 1

    A shooting star is not a star
    Is not a star at all
    A shooting star's a meteor
    That's heading for a fall

    A shooting star is not a star
    Why does it shine so bright?
    The friction as it falls through air
    Produces heat and light

    A shooting star or meteor
    Whichever name you like
    The minute it comes down to Earth
    It's called a meteorite

  163. Re:Asteroid? Why not meteor? by ErroneousBee · · Score: 1

    The meteorite is the source of the light
    And the meteor's just what we see
    And the meteoroid is a stone that's devoid of the fire that propelled it to thee

    And the meteorite's just what causes the light
    And the meteor's how it's perceived
    And the meteoroid's a bone thrown from the void that lies quiet in offering to thee

    --
    **TODO** Steal someone elses sig.
  164. Re:Asteroid? Why not meteor? by Theoboley · · Score: 0

    If earth isn't doomed by this meteor, i don't want to hear about it.

    --
    Stupidity only gets you so far, then you've gotta try
  165. it helps not to demonstrate how bad your communication skills are when someone says you have a problem there

    but thanks for playing little kid

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:lol by Reality+Master+201 · · Score: 1

      When you have to go for the "but thanks for playing little kid" move, you've already lost.

  166. Re:Asteroid? Why not meteor? by TheDreadSlashdotterD · · Score: 1

    Then you have a lot of bewaring to do.

    --
    I have nothing to say.
  167. Oh Shit - She's Really Willy Wonka! by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

    It's been bouncing around in my head now for a month, and reading that just made the light turn on. She sounds a lot like Johnny Depp's portrayal of Willy Wonka in the 2005 remake of Charlie and the Chocolate Factory. Scary. Now all we need is the 7up guy (Geoffrey Holder) doing voice over in the political ads.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  168. Re:Asteroid? Why not meteor? by rehtonAesoohC · · Score: 1

    A little people asteroid.

  169. "blah blah blah by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    blah blah blah

    lol lol lol

    zzz zzz zzz"

    are you babbling again cretin? go, play in your corner. and its past your bedtime anyways

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:"blah blah blah by Reality+Master+201 · · Score: 1

      Yes. Absolutely. Past my bedtime.

  170. Re:Asteroid? Why not meteor? by steelfood · · Score: 1

    It's not fat, it's just big boned!

    --
    "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
  171. Re:Asteroid? Why not meteor? by AJWM · · Score: 1

    Well, no, they'd still be meteors and meteorites. But the mark it leaves (crater or geological crater remnants) is called an astrobleme.

    The rock (actually more nickel-iron) that formed the Barringer Crater in Arizona was big enough to be called an asteroid, the crater is also known as Meteor Crater and the remaining fragments of the asteroid are called meteorites (Canyon Diablo meteorites, named as per tradition after the nearest post office). The crater itself is an astrobleme.

    Of course if the surviving fragments were originally from Superman's home planet, they're called kryptonite.

    --
    -- Alastair
  172. touchdown ! by freddy_dreddy · · Score: 2, Informative
    --
    "Violence is the last refuge of the competent, and, generally, the first refuge of the incompetent" - Thing_1
  173. To-may-toe vs To-mah-toe by TravisO · · Score: 1

    Only /. could take a story that could be about their own demise and turn it into an arguement about semantics.

    Who cares if we're dying, you just said to-mah-toe!

    1. Re:To-may-toe vs To-mah-toe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      See, you're a victim of improper semantics. If it had said meteor you might have realized that there is no chance in hell that this is going to kill anyone.

  174. Re:Asteroid? Why not meteor? by RabidMoose · · Score: 1

    Or would it be red-hot twins?

  175. Re:Asteroid? Why not meteor? by mcgrew · · Score: 1

    They say preparation-H will help you with your assteroids. I had surgery on mine.

    Oh asteroid, never mind...

  176. NO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The earth is flat.

    There is no atmosphere.

  177. And how can you tell? by Joe+the+Lesser · · Score: 1

    Cause of the bark!

    --
    "I only speak the truth"
    Karma: null(Mostly affected by an unassigned variable)
  178. Bullshit. by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1

    Uh. . . So it has a .2% chance of missing the Earth, but if it doesn't miss, then it is known for certain exactly when and where it will strike. And that place just happens to be a geo-political hot zone?

    So what is that exactly? Stupid math? Stupid reporting? Or. . ?

    If I wanted to nuke somebody but not get blamed for it. . . Or if I wanted people to think that I'd nuked you and was trying to cover my tracks. Or if I wanted to muddy the waters with incomplete ideas and raise the state of confusion and alarm another notch closer to the breaking point. . .

    Confusion is the method; nobody gets any straight answers, attention is diffused so no positive steps can be taken --but the stress-level is successfully raised and the dark deed accomplished.

    But there is a solution.

    Enough attention and postulation subverts dark plans because a correct postulation gives predictive power and respect to the postulator, and this is a danger. --A couple of correct postulations in a row, and then people have a reason to act pre-emptively. And since it's always the same villain responsible, they can't have that. Conversely, an incorrect postulation means that the speaker loses respect and personal confidence and power. And that's a good thing from the perspective of a control freak.

    But. . . What they don't get is that when the ego is detached from the process, there is no diminishing of confidence or personal power. Logical predictions based on observations of the possible leads to a kind of dis-arming of the event. Stay alert; if you know and see the danger, if you look it in the eyes and experience the result in-vitro as it were, the chances are much reduced of an actual event taking place. That's been my experience in events large and small. Plan for the worst and the worst never happens. Funny, that. Knowledge protects, eh?

    -FL

    1. Re:Bullshit. by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      > Uh. . . So it has a .2% chance of missing the Earth, but if it doesn't miss, then it is
      > known for certain exactly when and where it will strike.

      No. It is known for certain exactly when and where it is most likely to strike. It is very likely to strike very close to the most probable spot. It is much less likely to strike elsewhere, and there is a small possibility that it will miss entirely.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  179. Re:Asteroid? Why not meteor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had asteroids once and boy did they hurt?

  180. Re:Asteroid? Why not meteor? by infinite9 · · Score: 1

    This reminds me of a joke many of you have probably heard.

    Mickey Mouse decides to file for divorce. When they get in front of the judge, he seems skeptical. The judge says to Mickey, "So what you're saying is that your wife, Minnie is a little strange?" Mickey said, "No! What I said was that she was fucking Goofy."

    --
    Disconnect your television. Do your own research. Draw your own conclusions. They're probably lying. Don't be a sheep.
  181. But with the time change by DJRumpy · · Score: 0

    That would make the impact right about no....

  182. Re:Asteroid? Why not meteor? by Starcub · · Score: 1

    Are you sure about that? My understanding was that a stationary rock in space was an asteroid, a space rock in motion was a meteor, a rock in motion within the amoshpere was a meteorite, and a rock inside the Earth's atmosphere that didn't move was called a politician.

  183. Impact of Asteroid 2008 TC3 Confirmed by Guppy · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news160.html

    Confirmation has been received that the asteroid impact fireball occurred at the predicted time and place. The energy recorded was estimated to be 0.9 to 1.0 kT of TNT and the time of detection was 02:45:45 on October 7 (Greenwich Standard Time). More details on this detection will be forthcoming. An additional confirmation was apparently reported by a KLM airliner (see: (http://www.spaceweather.com). As reported by Peter Brown (University of Western Ontario, Canada), a preliminary examination of infrasound stations nearest to the predicted impact point shows that at least one station recorded the event. These measurements are consistent with the predicted time and place of the atmospheric impact and indicate an estimated energy of 1.1 - 2.1 kT of TNT.

    Just in case anyone's still checking all the way down here...

  184. Re:Asteroid? Why not meteor? by jobst · · Score: 1

    size DOES matter, ESPECIALLY in THIS case ... you do not want two quarter-pounders "hanging there" ;-)

    --
    to code or not to code, that is the question.
  185. Re:Asteroid? Why not meteor? by jobst · · Score: 1

    Have you ever heard of the theory of relativity? I feel relatively better having a Hemorrhoid than an Asteroid ... and a Hemorrhoid entering the atmosphere (with owner attached) does not have much of an impact on all of human kind but one ...

    --
    to code or not to code, that is the question.
  186. Atomic Bomb x 25,000 will stop it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I could tell ya how to increase the explosive power of a missile-delivered atomic bomb by 25,000 times but then I'd hafta kill ya.

    1. Re:Atomic Bomb x 25,000 will stop it by ImitationEnergy · · Score: 0

      It goes without saying {main article} but I guess I'll chime into the previous anyway => once one big rock {roid, dwarf, refrigerator} has Earth's name on it it's a great deal more bloody likely more in the group are finding the Earth-Moon combined gravitational attraction very attractive as say like coming home to Mama at the end of a long day's work. Not to mention it either but I will => the Moon swinging around the planet is like a big metal detector and asteroid magnet zipping around 24/7 to start these things coming toward us. In fact, the Moon's wide swath constitutes an extension of Earth's gravitational field, and we can look at the other pock-marked planets in our solar system to know what's coming for us.

      OUR OWN MOON IS WORKING AGAINST US!

      Extra credit reading => http://tinyurl.com/4ntz2p {Spanish blog}.

      --
      Industrial Age 2 + How-to Stop Malignant Cancers.
  187. Re:Asteroid? Why not meteor? by NotBornYesterday · · Score: 1

    If I drink enough, I can usually start to feel how fast everything is moving ... and spinning ...

    --
    I prefer rogues to imbeciles because they sometimes take a rest.
  188. Re:I hope it hits Barack Obama by wclacy · · Score: 1

    The total spend on Iraq to this point 800 Billion. and Obama says he wants to add 92,000 additional soldiers.

    92,000 X $40,000(est. annual cost) = 3,680,000,000

    I don't think Obama will cut spending, he has voted for just about every spending bill he has had the chance to vote for. He has not said specifically what he will cut.

  189. Re:I hope it hits Barack Obama by jambox · · Score: 1

    Simple fact one: The US can't just keep on spending money it hasn't really got. 8 years of it is too much already.

    Simple fact two: Tax will have to be raised and spending cut to avoid total economic meltdown.

    --
    You thought you could break the laws of physics without paying the PRICE?
  190. Re:I hope it hits Barack Obama by wclacy · · Score: 1

    The largest expenditure of the Federal Government is Social Spending. According to Obama's website he is going to increase every form of social spending by Billions of dollars. His Health program alone will be Trillions of dollars. When Health care is a "Right" that means it should be provided for everyone. Who is going to pay for it? Government protects our "rights" and so by Obama's logic Government will protect/manage our Health Care "right". Even if you Trust Obama to run Health Care(which I don't), He will not be the only future President we have. In the future they will be talking about Obama's Health Care the way we talk about Social Security now.

    Taxes will not have to be raised if spending is cut. Raising taxes will hurt an already hurting economy. Obama's plan to tax the top 5% will hurt the economy even more. You cannot tax the economy into growth. Taxes paid to Government = money taken out of the economy run through the bureaucracy and then trickle back into the economy.

    Either way neither candidate has a good plan to fix the economy, but Obama is the one candidate that never says no to anybody when it comes to spending. Just look at his web page, He wants to spend more money on every issue.

  191. Re:Asteroid? Why not meteor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...the asteroid hit at 0243 UTC with an energy between 1.1 and 2.1 kilotons of TNT.
    from http://www.spaceweather.com/

  192. Re:Asteroid? Why not meteor? by caluml · · Score: 1

    Goofy (in the UK at least) tends to mean front teeth that protrude. But, with a little reworking, your joke could be number one over here. :)

  193. Re:Asteroid? Why not meteor? by caluml · · Score: 1

    Arrrgh. Yet something else, heating up our world, causing the ice to melt, and polar bears, poor cute, cuddly polar bears, they'll drown, drown! Leave them alone, you bastards... :(

  194. Re:I hope it hits Barack Obama by jambox · · Score: 1

    As long as he stops deliberately wrecking the budget and avoids another war, Obama will be an improvement upon the incumbent. Looks like we'll find out.

    --
    You thought you could break the laws of physics without paying the PRICE?
  195. Re:I hope it hits Barack Obama by wclacy · · Score: 1

    It does look like we will find out.

    With everyone as upset as they are with the last 8 years of a Republican in the presidency, you would think that Obama would be blowing his Republican challenger out of the water. Especially when die hard Republicans don't even like McCain. I think in a way Obama scares everyone except the extreme left.

  196. Re:Asteroid? Why not meteor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go to digg for the articles, Go to slashdot for the bad jokes.

    Hey, i am not complaining...

  197. Re:Asteroid? Why not meteor? by SlashDev · · Score: 1

    Not really, how about spending some quality time or do something you've always wanted to do, make peace with your enemy, eat a nice steak and fries, scream from the top of your lungs, or even post on Slashdot your last thoughts...

    --

    TOP DSLR Cameras Reviews of the top DSLRs