Slashdot Mirror


Firefox Add-On To Track Your Location Via Wi-Fi

Barence writes "Mozilla Labs has unveiled a new Add-on that allows Firefox to pinpoint your location based on Wi-Fi signals. The feature, called Geode, is a prototype for the location-tracking technology that will be built into the forthcoming Firefox 3.1. Geode is designed to work with websites that rely on knowing your location, such as mapping and geotagging services. The prospect of Firefox having the ability to track your location raises obvious privacy fears. Mozilla insists users will remain in complete control. 'With Geode, when a website requests your location a notification bar will ask how much information you want to give that site: your exact location, your neighbourhood, your city, or nothing at all,' the Mozilla Labs blog claims."

181 comments

  1. Big Brother is like a fox on fire by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 5, Funny

    And twice as annoying.

    Excuse me while I install this on my son's laptop ... without him knowing.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    1. Re:Big Brother is like a fox on fire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Excuse me while I install this on my son's laptop ... without him knowing.

      And don't forget the keylogger!

    2. Re:Big Brother is like a fox on fire by kamikazearun · · Score: 1

      And twice as annoying.

      Excuse me while I install this on my son's laptop ... without him knowing.

      Yeah. That's going to work.

    3. Re:Big Brother is like a fox on fire by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      nah, i just look for the encrypted image files - easy to find the pr0n, cause the files are big.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    4. Re:Big Brother is like a fox on fire by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 0

      he forgets i know the root password and thinks i just have a user account ...

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    5. Re:Big Brother is like a fox on fire by fprintf · · Score: 0

      Besides, you are the Dad and can presumably order him to give up the root password anytime you like. I know my son and daughter will give up their passwords at a moments notice - knowing that failure to do so means a) no internet b) no TV c) no food, in that order based on the resistance I get.

      Being a parent and willing to use the authority granted to me as such has its benefits along with the headaches.

      --
      This post brought to you by your friendly neighborhood MBA.
    6. Re:Big Brother is like a fox on fire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Dad, stop messing with my laptop.

    7. Re:Big Brother is like a fox on fire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plus, after years of watching scrambled porn on cable, I have a fetish for things like those high-contrast outlines.

  2. They'll never track me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm wearing my tinfoil underwear.

    Oh crap, this means I need to wear underwear at the computer.

    1. Re:They'll never track me by nahdude812 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Let's see, based on nearby access points, I'd say you're on Linksys Avenue, Linksysburgh, Linksys County, LI.

  3. Skyhook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  4. Why Not... by jpatters · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why not let it give the user the option of telling the web site some arbitrary location?

    --
    "Remember, there never were pineapple-almond cookies here."
    1. Re:Why Not... by einer · · Score: 1

      You can get the source and make it do just that. My personal hope is that the default this to off and make you activate it manually. Also, what are the chances that this gets abused by law enforcement?

    2. Re:Why Not... by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

      exactly. The introductory use case of being in a strange environment and looking for food isn't very compelling. Why not just tell it where you are, ala google maps? What if you want to plan ahead for a future trip? If you can't specify where you are, you cant really do that.

      --
      Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    3. Re:Why Not... by JeanBaptiste · · Score: 1

      uhm, as it's open source, anyone that is a programmer has that option. i'm going to have some fun with this i think.

      posting from the white house, cuba, yemen, etc.

    4. Re:Why Not... by cripkd · · Score: 1

      Dude, its add-on! What do you mean default to off???
      Don;t install it, or if you install it why make it set default locations?
      Other than to seem you're traveling at the speed of light...

      --
      Curiously yours, crip.
    5. Re:Why Not... by Wellington+Grey · · Score: 1

      Why not let it give the user the option of telling the web site some arbitrary location?

      No kidding. I'd love to be able to do this just to get around those damn you're-not-from-America-so-can't-watch-this-video-clip messages. I particularly hate it when (Adobe Flash Player, I'm looking at you) they let me install the program, WATCH THE AD, then give me the message.

      Grey

    6. Re:Why Not... by einer · · Score: 4, Informative

      If you'd bother reading to the second sentence: " The feature, called Geode, is a prototype for the location-tracking technology that will be built into the forthcoming Firefox 3.1."

      You can't not install it, it's already installed.

      Other than that, you seem to be traveling.... you get the point

    7. Re:Why Not... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      You can. TFA mentions that you will be able to manually enter your location, and there's no requirement that you tell the truth.

    8. Re:Why Not... by justdaven · · Score: 1

      I would guess it is for those who can't type, or don't know where they are... Business travelers who are in a new place would be my favorite use for it. My sprint AirCard already has GPS anyway...

    9. Re:Why Not... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have not read the article yet but I am instead replying to your assertion. Does that mean the add-on will be installed by default or that it is built into the binary itself? It it is the latter, I think it's time to embrase Iceweasel and other alternative firefox builds. I find forced unnecessary marketing tools unacceptable and I won't be using this. There are already tons of marketing tools to help advertisers without having to coerce users into using it. Many may say "don't use 3.1 then" but what happens when Firefox pulls a nagging upgrade screen and when a security flaw in 3.0x requires an upgrade.

    10. Re:Why Not... by Fumus · · Score: 1

      Exactly. There was a warning popping up when I enabled javascript copy to clipboard saying that this site wanted blahblah. What's the effort in letting me control which site I want to give my location and which never need it.

    11. Re:Why Not... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not based on something your browser sends, that's based on the IP address the remote server sees traffic from. Without a proxy there really isn't much you can do about it.

    12. Re:Why Not... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have not read the article yet but I am instead replying to your assertion.

      Ok, but you sound totally stupid if you don't even read the second sentence of the summary!

    13. Re:Why Not... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you'd bother RTFyouknowwhat...

      Geode is an extension, and it will not be in Firefox unless you add it to Firefox. Firefox 3.1 will not have any "location-tracking technology", it will just expose the W3C geolocation API so extensions such as Geode can answer to document.geolocation calls from a script. A naked Firefox doesn't know zilch about its location.

      The article is misworded but understandable with a little good will.

    14. Re:Why Not... by hairyfeet · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well if you are on Windows you might want to try Kmeleon which is just Firefox without any bloat. Very fast and now that they have easy to install versions of flashblock and noscript I've been using it more and more and it is quite nice and a lot faster than FF3 on Windows.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    15. Re:Why Not... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for the advice. I guess if Mozilla goes ahead and builds this into Firefox 3.1, that will indeed be the day I switch to K-Meleon -- if not earlier.

    16. Re:Why Not... by ronocdh · · Score: 1

      You can't not install it, it's already installed.

      I don't think you quite understand what this "open source" thing is.

    17. Re:Why Not... by bwd234 · · Score: 1

      "You can. TFA mentions that you will be able to manually enter your location, and there's no requirement that you tell the truth."

      Until the Department of Fatherland Security makes it a crime to give false location information on the internet.

      Afterall, it is for your own protection and if you disagree then you are helping the terrorists to win!

  5. Going back to hard-wired connection by TheNecromancer · · Score: 5, Funny

    I sure hope Best Buy still sells that 2-mile long ethernet cable...

    --
    Attention all planets of the Solar Federation! We have assumed control! - Neil Peart
    1. Re:Going back to hard-wired connection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'd tap that! Wait...

    2. Re:Going back to hard-wired connection by antdude · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      You buy ethernet cables from Best Buy? :P They're so expensive!

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    3. Re:Going back to hard-wired connection by justdaven · · Score: 2, Informative

      100 meter cat 5 limit :)

    4. Re:Going back to hard-wired connection by madnis · · Score: 1

      oh, so 100m doesn't mean 100 miles? crap!

    5. Re:Going back to hard-wired connection by cjb658 · · Score: 1

      Just use a repeater. Or Chrome, Safari, Konqueror, or Internet Exp- well, maybe not that last one.

  6. Ad's by twotailakitsune · · Score: 0

    So, Nebuad is no longer have to be the MITM to steal my privacy?

    1. Re:Ad's by cjb658 · · Score: 1

      Thanks to wireless hotspots, you don't even need that anyway. 99% of hotspots send your personal data in the clear.

  7. ... It's an addon, not a cookie. by plasmacutter · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The addon has to be manually installed.

    It's not a piece of malware, it's not surreptitiously installed by remote servers. It's strictly voluntary.

    The only privacy concerns which arise from this are if people are not careful enough with the addon to disable it.

    --
    VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
    1. Re:... It's an addon, not a cookie. by truthsearch · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Except the summary states "the location-tracking technology... will be built into the forthcoming Firefox 3.1."

      I'd much rather this remain a separately downloadable add-on.

    2. Re:... It's an addon, not a cookie. by plasmacutter · · Score: 1

      Except the summary states "the location-tracking technology... will be built into the forthcoming Firefox 3.1."

      I'd much rather this remain a separately downloadable add-on.

      and it also says you can make sure sites get "nothing at all"

      Additionally, being open source, you can grab the SRC and make builds of it minus that code.

      --
      VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
    3. Re:... It's an addon, not a cookie. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe the add-on is to allow non-mobile computers send location. Install the add-on and tell it manually where you are.

      I don't know if the add-on will allow mobile users to spoof their location.

    4. Re:... It's an addon, not a cookie. by buchner.johannes · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'd much rather this remain a separately downloadable add-on.

      It is designed so that every application has to get the agreement from the user first. He/She may choose to permit access to the accurate or approximate coordinates (or to deny access).

      Source: heise.de (german)

      --
      NB: The message above might reflect my opinion right now, but not necessarily tomorrow or next year.
    5. Re:... It's an addon, not a cookie. by truthsearch · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Just being included would make it open to security problems. Someday a vulnerability might let a sight activate it using JavaScript, for example.

      I'm a minimalist. If I'm not going to ever use it, I'd rather it not be on the computer at all, especially if it's a potential privacy issue.

      And we all know that your average Firefox user will always be going to mozilla for their builds. I doubt a fork that removes this component would gain much traction.

    6. Re:... It's an addon, not a cookie. by plasmacutter · · Score: 1

      It wouldn't need much traction though.

      If the only difference between the fork and the original is a few comment indicators, one person could easily do it and post major builds.

      --
      VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
    7. Re:... It's an addon, not a cookie. by barzok · · Score: 1

      Websites already have some idea where I'm coming from, regardless of my browser and JavaScript settings. All keyed off the known locations of IPs.

    8. Re:... It's an addon, not a cookie. by zen_la · · Score: 1

      We've found a volunteer!

    9. Re:... It's an addon, not a cookie. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the average firefox user would either a) want the features allowed by this addition or b) be fine with the privacy controls, and not have a clue about possible security problems.

    10. Re:... It's an addon, not a cookie. by Spy+Hunter · · Score: 1

      Javascript already has the ability to read any file on your computer and send it to the server via the input type=file element. If you're OK with that, then this is no different. And it could be quite useful when paired with a GPS; imagine turn-by-turn directions with voice prompts in Google Maps, for instance.

      --
      main(c,r){for(r=32;r;) printf(++c>31?c=!r--,"\n":c<r?" ":~c&r?" `":" #");}
    11. Re:... It's an addon, not a cookie. by syousef · · Score: 1

      The only privacy concerns which arise from this are if people are not careful enough with the addon to disable it.

      When there are negative consequences to forgetting to disable a piece of software, it's malware in my book. I don't trust Mozilla any more. The final straw was awfulbar. I do not wish to broadcast unvisited bookmarks to anyone looking over my shoulder no matter how innocuous they are!

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    12. Re:... It's an addon, not a cookie. by kesuki · · Score: 1

      this feature is a deal breaker for me. i'm switching back to firefox 2.

      chrome doesn't have noscript, Ie is not an option. hopefully chrome will get popular enough to get noscript by the time firefox 2 gets too obsolete.

    13. Re:... It's an addon, not a cookie. by cjb658 · · Score: 1

      This has already been done

      Unfortunately, it just tells you where you are. I'd like to see it give turn-by-turn directions.

    14. Re:... It's an addon, not a cookie. by BZ · · Score: 1

      Javascript can't set the value of the file element. So it can only send files that you explicitly pick with the filepicker back to the server.

    15. Re:... It's an addon, not a cookie. by Spy+Hunter · · Score: 1

      Right. And similarly, Javascript can't read data directly from your GPS or WiFi card. It can only get the position data that you explicitly pick to send to the site. It's completely analagous.

      --
      main(c,r){for(r=32;r;) printf(++c>31?c=!r--,"\n":c<r?" ":~c&r?" `":" #");}
    16. Re:... It's an addon, not a cookie. by BZ · · Score: 1

      Yep, exactly.

    17. Re:... It's an addon, not a cookie. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah that's what they want you to think

  8. bad name by larry+bagina · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    "Geode" will easily be confused with Choad, particularly by those with an accent.

    --
    Do you even lift?

    These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

  9. Find some friends by RemoWilliams84 · · Score: 0

    Great, now adult friend finder can locate sexy singles in my apartment building. Why not just let the websites ask the user the information instead of more of those annoying toolbar pop ups. I think Mozilla is turning into Microsoft more and more with each release.

    --
    "I don't have to think. I only have to do it. The results are always perfect, but that's old news." - Meat Puppets
  10. Gee by camperdave · · Score: 1

    Gee! It says I'm at work. Like I'd be anywhere else at this time of the day.

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  11. Solution to a non-problem? by ghoti · · Score: 1, Insightful

    They can already pinpoint your location pretty well using your IP address (and without your permission). So what's the point of this?

    --
    EagerEyes.org: Visualization and Visual Communication
    1. Re:Solution to a non-problem? by athakur999 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      IP geolocation usually only gets you down to the city level usually and even then the city you get isn't always accurate. Using wifi signals (I assume they keep a keep a database of SSIDs and AP MAC addresses to compare against) should be able to get your location down to at least the city block level which is much more useful.

      --
      "People that quote themselves in their signatures bother me" - athakur999
    2. Re:Solution to a non-problem? by Kelson · · Score: 1

      Think mobile computing.

      Consider a search for the nearest coffee shop, video store, etc. within walking distance. You can look for a street address on the nearby buildings (good luck with that in some areas) and type it in, or you can allow you mapping app of choice to figure out where you are and look it up automatically.

    3. Re:Solution to a non-problem? by emj · · Score: 1

      Because you get lousy resolution with Geo-pos-IP, and even the bad services available today are pretty expensive.

    4. Re:Solution to a non-problem? by Techguy666 · · Score: 1

      Like on a 3G iPhone? Their pseudo-GPS using wireless access points gets pretty darn close. It usually pinpoints me within a building or two.

      I think it would be useful to at least have this option on my UMPC, even through Firefox. Business trips can often take me to places I have no interest in going; once there, at least I wouldn't be totally lost.

    5. Re:Solution to a non-problem? by ubercam · · Score: 1

      Microsoft Streets & Trips comes with, or at least came with (not sure) this type of locating feature. I always uninstalled it though. It's been done before at any rate...

      I agree with everyone else in that it should be an optional addon, period.

    6. Re:Solution to a non-problem? by Takumi2501 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      My GPS does a perfectly good job of this.

      Thanks anyway.

      --
      Sent from my computer.
      Now GET OFF MY LAWN!
    7. Re:Solution to a non-problem? by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

      Because you get lousy resolution with Geo-pos-IP, and even the bad services available today are pretty expensive.

      An none work with IPv6.

      --
      Jumpstart the tartan drive.
    8. Re:Solution to a non-problem? by Spy+Hunter · · Score: 1

      The wifi thing is a red herring. The real use of this is when it is paired with a GPS unit for real-time updates. Imagine turn-by-turn directions with voice prompts in Google Maps. Or a web app that can run on your GPS-equipped phone and track your workout runs. Or a location-aware social network that automatically knows which friends are near you right now, without requiring a client app installation. It's just breaking down more barriers between native apps and web apps.

      --
      main(c,r){for(r=32;r;) printf(++c>31?c=!r--,"\n":c<r?" ":~c&r?" `":" #");}
    9. Re:Solution to a non-problem? by emlyncorrin · · Score: 1

      Like on a 3G iPhone? Their pseudo-GPS using wireless access points gets pretty darn close. It usually pinpoints me within a building or two.

      I thought the 3G iPhone had real GPS?

    10. Re:Solution to a non-problem? by TheBig1 · · Score: 1

      No, it triangulates based on cell towers.

    11. Re:Solution to a non-problem? by Zarel · · Score: 1

      No, it has GPS.

      The iPod touch and the old iPhone triangulate WiFi hotspots and cell tower, though.

      --
      Want a high quality FOSS RTS game? Try Warzone 2100!
    12. Re:Solution to a non-problem? by pslam · · Score: 1

      Does your laptop have GPS?

    13. Re:Solution to a non-problem? by IL-CSIXTY4 · · Score: 1

      We just tried out IP geolocation where I work, and the results were depressing. From what my boss found out, we could only get results for ~65% of IP addresses. The ones we could get were close, but not usably close -- our office was listed as being in a town 1/2 hour away in good traffic.

      "Location-based" services need good data on where someone is. If I'm trying to find coffee shops nearby, for example, it doesn't help if the only ones I can find are several towns over.

  12. Stupid by BCW2 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The default damn well better be "nothing at all" or the lawsuits will be spectacular.

    --
    Professional Politicians are not the solution, they ARE the problem.
    1. Re:Stupid by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 1

      Or Opera use will go way up.

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
    2. Re:Stupid by BZ · · Score: 1

      Lawsuits? The loss of goodwill would be a lot more important. Even more important would be the fact that a default of anything other than "nothing at all" is fundamentally the wrong thing to do.

      I don't think you need to worry much on this score. The people working on this are neither stupid nor malicious.

  13. Just one implementation of W3C Geolocation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
  14. Forgot a function by CaptainPatent · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Geode is designed to work with websites that rely on knowing your location, such as mapping, geotagging services, and location-based advertising.

    Hey, they've got to be making money off of it somehow.

    --
    Well, back to rejecting software patent applications.
    1. Re:Forgot a function by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Geode is designed to work with websites that rely on knowing your location, such as mapping, geotagging services, and location-based advertising.

      Hey, they've got to be making money off of it somehow.

      Pfft. Don't most of us have AdBlock Plus installed?

    2. Re:Forgot a function by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure but that's a benefit for them, not for us. Why do we have to see ads for it when they get location data as compensation? It should be at least a mutual benefit and we should see no ads at all.

    3. Re:Forgot a function by jassa · · Score: 1

      No no, this is being made by Mozilla, not Google.

  15. Control is not enough by Improv · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Just like providing DRM systems, there is the danger, when providing this capacity, for websites to begin to demand it, something they can't easily do now because there's no infrastructure to demand it.

    Of course, this is a constant danger/possibility - some days I regret that Javascript was invented because a number of sites don't work at all unless I tell NoScript to allow JS on them. Cost of progress, I guess...

    --
    For every problem, there is at least one solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.
    1. Re:Control is not enough by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      there is the danger, when providing this capacity, for websites to begin to demand it

      There is also the source code, freely available and modifiable, which means you could easily tell such websites that your current location is Fuckoff, in the fine state of NoneOfYourDamnedBusiness.

      a number of sites don't work at all unless I tell NoScript to allow JS on them.

      Hey, it could always be worse. You could always stumble on a site that doesn't work unless you allow Flash on it.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    2. Re:Control is not enough by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

      It would be the height of stupidity for a website to require this since it would require all their users to not only be using wifi, but be using wifi on a registered WAN. I imagine this would take a huge chunk out of their potential user base.

      Then again, for DRM stupidity was no obstacle. So, who knows.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    3. Re:Control is not enough by jonnyt886 · · Score: 1

      Absolutely. However, Mozilla has shown that it is aware of the concerns users will have over privacy - they've assured us that Firefox will make it very easy for users to decline sending this information. As long as most browsers adopt this approach, website designers won't feel (one would hope) that they can force users to allow browsers to send the information in order to use their site. This is in contrast to JavaScript - when it came out, in 1995, it was around the time of the browser wars, it was implemented amongst the key players (Netscape and IE particularly) pretty quickly - enabled by default. That is to say, it was intended for many sites to adopt its use. And until more recently the web has come to expect that JS has been enabled in all the leading browsers that are able to deal with content-rich sites. The landscape is somewhat different now, with browser vendors giving more attention to privacy and security, so hopefully this feature will not suffer that which JS did. :)

    4. Re:Control is not enough by ubercam · · Score: 1

      CNN.com doesn't work for me unless I tell NoScript to NOT allow JS on it. If I enable JS on their site, it doesn't show any text or pictures or anything, just the header. It has been like this for a couple versions of Firefox now.

    5. Re:Control is not enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorta like the early days of cookies, the early browsers used to ask, it was optional at most sites, but if you dont allow cookies now, most sites wont work, bet it gets to be the same for this.

      Another attempt for DHS stuff I bet

  16. Questions by speroni · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Is this IP address driven? Is this mostly for public hotspots? Will one be able to register their home Wifi signal?

    Will one be able to register their neighbors unsecured wifi signal?

    Will there be reverse look uo p for public hotspots? How about "Public" hotspots?

    --
    Eschew Obfuscation
  17. Wow.. good for once it doesn't run on linux! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    just tried to install it to see what it's like, but won't install on i386/Ubuntu

  18. Add-on's are apparently not optional. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey people, it's an add-on...

    If you want the ultimate option try..... not downloading it?

  19. How does wifi "pinpoint your location"? by FourthAge · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Does this require each hotspot owner to register the location of his/her hotspot, so that a database can be queried to find the location?

    e.g. "I can see access points with MAC addresses 00:60:08:57:3C:D2 and 00:E0:18:77:D6:40 so I know I'm at 37 23.516 -122 02.625.."

    How many hotspot owners can be bothered to register their correct location? And re-register it if their IP address changes? How many even change their password?

    --
    The tao of democracy: the government you can vote for is not the real government.
    1. Re:How does wifi "pinpoint your location"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      They sent vehicles out with Wi-fi scanners to catalog broadcast MAC addresses and then map those wireless devices via their GPS location. All that data is then funneled into a database so the position of the Wireless device can be easily "looked up." The downside is that wireless devices are not static and can be easily moved or turned off. So the database must be constantly updated.

    2. Re:How does wifi "pinpoint your location"? by Idiomatick · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It could be updated by the users of firefox, assuming the world didnt move to the west 20meters you should be able to figure out a few routers moving at a time. Sounds like a really fun/interesting code challenge.

    3. Re:How does wifi "pinpoint your location"? by dafpoo · · Score: 1

      It uses skyhook so I think they take care of the location changing and whatnot

    4. Re:How does wifi "pinpoint your location"? by alerante · · Score: 2, Informative

      Wi-Fi location works kind of like Google Street View — someone drives around and collects information on the wireless devices in the area. All of this data is subsequently collected into a database, which is then used to look up locations based on the names and strengths of nearby networks.

    5. Re:How does wifi "pinpoint your location"? by Thelasko · · Score: 1

      e.g. "I can see access points with MAC addresses 00:60:08:57:3C:D2 and 00:E0:18:77:D6:40 so I know I'm at 37 23.516 -122 02.625.."

      Is a web browser even allowed to have access to information like MAC addresses? I figure it ping's a few known servers and calculates its location from the time. In which case, it could easily be fooled by a VPN or Tor.

      --
      One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
    6. Re:How does wifi "pinpoint your location"? by Holistic+Missile · · Score: 1

      I figure it ping's a few known servers and calculates its location from the time. In which case, it could easily be fooled by a VPN or Tor.

      Or Comcast. ;-)

      --
      When you're dead, you don't know you're dead. It only affects the people around you. Same thing when you're stupid.
    7. Re:How does wifi "pinpoint your location"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is a web browser even allowed to have access to information like MAC addresses?

      Unless it's running in a sandbox, sure. "cat /proc/net/arp" on linux.

      I figure it ping's a few known servers and calculates its location from the time.

      I hope that was a joke. Should be clear to anyone that it couldn't work like that

  20. Re:Why Not...because... by denis-The-menace · · Score: 1

    Because the Dept of Homeland Spying would get misleading info on your whereabouts.

    --
    Obama's legacy: (N)othing (S)ecure (A)nywhere and (T)error (S)imulation (A)dministration
  21. Privacy depends on the nature of services by HAL9000_mirror · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If a service can offer a better experience if it knows my location without having to login and identify myself, it is useful in many scenarios. For example, advertising a deal or a offering a coupon for an item in a nearby store. But like any technology, it can definitely be abused.

    There are a few problems with WiFi based location estimation. For example, the SSID may change or vanish. Secondly, it can easily be abused by reporting false location. On the contrary, it can work indoors unlike most commercial GPS'es.

    This technology gained attention with the Place Lab (http://www.placelab.org/) initiative.

  22. Alternative that is available for moible now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Check out Xtify. It does the same thing but for works for mobile, doesn't have a browser dependency and allows you to track the user all the time... And its free. Also, location providers are not limited to WiFi, it includes GPS and cell tower support.

    There is a sample implmentation at SeeMyWhere.

    1. Re:Alternative that is available for moible now... by SleptThroughClass · · Score: 1

      Yeah, Xtify doesn't have a browser dependency. It has a Blackberry dependency. And only three other phone types are in the release schedule.

    2. Re:Alternative that is available for moible now... by jelevy01 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, Xtify doesn't have a browser dependency. It has a Blackberry dependency. And only three other phone types are in the release schedule.

      Actually, Xtify's supported platforms: Blackberry, Windows Mobile, Symbian, iPhone make up only 90.3% of the smartphone market.

    3. Re:Alternative that is available for moible now... by argiedot · · Score: 1

      To be fair, none but the Blackberry seems to be out so far.

  23. Alright! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now I know exactly where Kareem Abdul-Jabbar is!

  24. It doesn't work on Linux! by bigjarom · · Score: 1

    This plug-in is simply not appropriate for slashdot. /off to try it under WINE

    1. Re:It doesn't work on Linux! by bigjarom · · Score: 1

      Firefox/Wine: "Error getting your position. Mea Culpa!" I give up. Have fun using this with windows.

  25. Tracking an IP by fireheadca · · Score: 4, Funny

    Then I'll create a GUI interface in Visual Basic and see if I can track an IP address

    1. Re:Tracking an IP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ROFLMAO !!!!!!111

      That was SO omgwtf

  26. Mozilla "claims"??? by Perp+Atuitie · · Score: 1

    Like they're saying you'll be able to control the feature but there's a good chance they're lying? What's with the casting of doubt on their "real" intentions? Slash. could at least try to keep the tinfoil hats out of product announcements -- save it for the politicians.

    1. Re:Mozilla "claims"??? by Al+Dimond · · Score: 0, Troll

      Ever hear of the "data" project? Mozilla is funded by the ad giants of the web and its grass-roots support comes mostly from webmasters that want browser technology to improve so they can take more and more control over how your computer displays their pages through scripting and Flash.

      Mozilla isn't your friend just because it gives you free stuff. That's the bait. Web tracking-point-oh is the hook.

    2. Re:Mozilla "claims"??? by Al+Dimond · · Score: 1

      Dear Fine Moderator (and m2 folk that might read this): Disagree does not equal Troll. If you think I'm wrong, that Mozilla's word should never be doubted, respond and tell me *why*.

  27. Compatible with what iPhone websites use? by Yvan256 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Is there even such a thing anyway?

    I hope the Firefox team, Apple, Opera and Google will soon sit down and establish a standard for such things (new metas, new javascript, whatever). Tell Microsoft about it, but don't wait for them.

    Also, won't AMD sue for using the Geode name?

    1. Re:Compatible with what iPhone websites use? by Zironic · · Score: 1

      Trademarks are product type specific, that is aslong as there is no risk of someone mixing up geode the processor with geode the program then the trademark does not apply.

    2. Re:Compatible with what iPhone websites use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://dev.w3.org/geo/api/spec-source.html The geolocation api is developed by the w3c.

  28. Undefined license for proprietary component! by hackel · · Score: 5, Interesting

    From the included LICENSE.TXT:

    "The XPCom component contained within the contents of this extension is licensed by
    Skyhook Wireless, Inc. ("Skyhook") and are subject to the Skyhook license and
    terms of use (the "Skyhook License"); you may not use this component except
    in compliance with the Skyhook License.

    You may obtain a copy of the Skyhook License at [need URL]"

    I didn't look long, but I could not find any "Skyhook License" on Skyhook's website (which is I guess why they chose not to fill in the URL!). I certainly would not use a product for which the license was in question like this, especially considering the proprietary, binary-only DLLs they provide. Not that I would be able to try it out, since it only includes 32-bit Windows and Mac libraries, no Linux at all.

    Buyer beware, as they say...

    1. Re:Undefined license for proprietary component! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Skyhook is not the only game in town. Fitting this on top of geoclue on linux would be a lot cooler, me thinks (not to mention all free software).

  29. How close can you get with just your IP? by argent · · Score: 1

    If they have this kind of geolocation information about where Wifi access points are, they probably have the ability to track you down to at least a neighborhood just knowing your IP address for an awful lot of WAPs in their database.

    So even without this plugin, if you use public Wifi you're giving a fair amount of information about your location to the sites you visit.

    What, am I worried about this? No. Should I be?

    1. Re:How close can you get with just your IP? by FrankSchwab · · Score: 1

      I think you're spot-on. As MySpace/Facebook have proven, not using the service doesn't mean that a whole lot of personal information about you can't be revealed by your "friends" who are members.

      Imagine that Google (or some other nefarious agency) starts infecting, err, "adding logging" to WiFi access points. I'm sure it'll be innocuous - protects the children, necessity for the war on terror, etc. But, just like your device can collect all the WiFi access point info and report it, getting back a location; all the WiFi access points can collect the MAC addresses of everyone within range and report them.

      No confidential information is being reported; much like the argument about public cameras ("You're on a public street, you have no right to privacy"), the fact that your device is transmitting it's MAC address eliminates your ability to whine about people collecting that information and using it, even if "using it" means tracking your every move every second of the day.

      This isn't a new threat; every cell phone provider in the country probably does it for every cell phone within range (not just their subscribers). /frank

      --
      And the worms ate into his brain.
    2. Re:How close can you get with just your IP? by argent · · Score: 1

      Imagine that Google (or some other nefarious agency)

      Would that be the Department of Google? Or the Federal Google Administration?

    3. Re:How close can you get with just your IP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The National Google Agency have a secret time capsule that can send someone exactly 7 days into the past.

      For some reason, the time machine can only be operated by one guy, and its one hell of a ride every time! He also has an average-looking Russian colleague that he thinks is hot.

      The capsule is only used to undo bad business decisions made by Google.

  30. Other location services by vrmlguy · · Score: 2, Informative

    There are other ways to approximate your location when you aren't using wi-fi. As an example, http://www.geobytes.com/ipLocator.htm will give you a location derived from your ISP's. Also, a way to set a location in your Firefox profile would be useful for desktop PCs that rarely move. And I should note that Ubiquity is currently using the MaxMind geo-api (http://www.maxmind.com/app/api) for very similar purposes.

    --
    Nothing for 6-digit uids?
    1. Re:Other location services by tubegeek · · Score: 1

      I just tried the link, it had me in Poughkeepsie, NY when I'm, well, let's just say, further south. So I guess it doesn't work too well.

  31. How about... by Twyst3d · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Every day at midnight, the geode add on wakes your laptop and sends a very quick communication to a database online. The database is simple. Geode identifier and a y/n column for has your computer been stolen? If a user has reported his laptop stolen the connection stays on and local authorities are notified.

    --
    And this has been another installament of Captain Obvious! /whoosh
  32. Firefox 3.1? by B5_geek · · Score: 3, Interesting

    And thus marks the end my my upgrade path with Firefox. It's been nice, so long and thanks for all the fish!

    --
    "The price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men." ~Plato (427-347 BC)
    1. Re:Firefox 3.1? by owlnation · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Mozilla has lost its way.

      Enough with the built in "features". The awesome bar was bad enough, this is a step too far. By all means offer it as an add-on. Surely the whole point of add-ons is that people can start with a basic browser and choose which features are useful to them?

      It's time for a fork.

    2. Re:Firefox 3.1? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's time for a fork.

      Except the codebase is such a mess that you'd only work on it if you were paid to. It's actually time for Mozilla to simply die. We need a clean, simple, portable rewrite using WebKit.

    3. Re:Firefox 3.1? by cabjf · · Score: 2, Informative
    4. Re:Firefox 3.1? by Banach · · Score: 1

      +1. The fish were nice. See you later firefox.

    5. Re:Firefox 3.1? by Taibhsear · · Score: 1

      Indeed. I will NOT be installing 3.1 if this tracker is installed with it. If anyone from mozilla reads slashdot pay attention. Do NOT include this software in the core browser or you will lose not only my support but the support of everyone I know. (And I happen to be the tech guy for all of my friends and family, and there are LOTS of them) I will actively make sure they do not upgrade to 3.1. Either make it an add-on or scrap it entirely. If you pride your browser on its security features this is a spit in the face to everything you've worked for.

    6. Re:Firefox 3.1? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can't you all read? It's an add-on. You have to install it by hand. It doesn't come with Firefox. Firefox 3.1 just allows extensions to support the W3C Geolocation API. It doesn't do any geolocation by itself, it just allows extensions to do geolocation. You don't install an extension--no geolocation.

    7. Re:Firefox 3.1? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a good alternative maybe k-meleon [ http://kmeleon.sourceforge.net/ ]

      As for other browers:
      1. Konqueror is being ported with KDE4 for win [ http://windows.kde.org/ ] project, but is not stable yet
      2. KDE for cygwin [ http://kde-cygwin.sourceforge.net/ ] has stopped development.
      3. opera is closed source and 9.6 version adds a facility called Opera link which brings privacy worries

    8. Re:Firefox 3.1? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I totally agree. I want my browser to become LESS intrusive, not more so. How about automatically TOR-ifying it, instead of selling out users of the browser to fricking advertisers.

      I have come to realize that the Darwinian aspect of free software is what is best about it. When a free software project screws up, it is really, really easy to leave it in the dust and evolve onto something better. Ubuntu is what I use today and might be the top distro, but screw it up and I'm gone off of it, instantly. Same for Firefox.

      Mozilla, stop crap like the EULAs. Stop crap like the "awesome" bar. Stop crap like forcing users to download the developer's bar just to be able to easily tweak the cruft out of the stupid default settings. And stop crap like this geo-locating worsening of the browser.

      Geez. People used to criticize Red Hat as the "Microsoft" of open source. I think the way Mozilla seems to have lost its way the past year or so, it is now starting to wear that crown.

    9. Re:Firefox 3.1? by BZ · · Score: 1

      I'm curious: what is the exact problem you have with the geolocation stuff? No data is given to the server unless you explicitly allow it for that particular site. If you _do_ allow it, it enables a class of very interesting web applications, especially on mobile devices.

      Could you explain what your objections are, past an instinctive reaction to the word "track"?

    10. Re:Firefox 3.1? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Geolocation.

      If you like it, groovy, go get it.

      Just don't infect a popular browser with it for people who don't want it.

    11. Re:Firefox 3.1? by ISurfTooMuch · · Score: 1

      I can't speak for the parent, but my problem with it is the possibility of abuse. You're installing an app that can pinpoint the location of your computer, at least to some degree. If someone wants to exploit this "feature", you've already done most of the work for them. All they have to do is find a way to tap into the data that app gathers.

      But regardless of that, my other objection is having such an app included in the browser. If it's an extension, I can choose whether or not I want to install it, but if it's in there, I have no way to remove it. And why should it be in there by default? What's wrong with it being left as an extension? I honestly can't think of a good reason.

      I think the folks at Mozilla had better take a giant step back and do some serious soul searching. If they think the dust-up over the click-through EULA was ugly, they ain't seen nothing yet. Believe me, guys, you _don't_ want to go down this road.

    12. Re:Firefox 3.1? by Oblong_Cheese · · Score: 1

      Looks like the popularity of custom-built branches is going to increase.

    13. Re:Firefox 3.1? by owlnation · · Score: 1

      The specifics of this "feature" are irrelevant. Whether its good or bad for individuals should be a choice. This is the point. If this is built-in there's no choice.

      Some people like the awesome bar for example, some don't mind it, some -- perhaps many -- dislike it intensely. There is absolutely no need for that, or this tracker, to be built into the browser by default. The add-on functionality is perfect and very useful. Let people choose what they need in a browser and keep the basic browser fast and clean. As it is Firefox 3.0 cannot be used on some older systems. This is wholly unnecessary.

      It seems like Mozilla is now intent on adding features rather than having a great stable product.

    14. Re:Firefox 3.1? by BZ · · Score: 1

      > And why should it be in there by default?

      That's a really good question. For now, the W3C is publishing a spec that will require it, but there've been rumblings to the effect that not all W3C specs are worth implementing...

      Realistically, this feature is no more dangerous than many other things (like file inputs, etc) if properly secured. You're right that it increases attack area, but so does SVG. See, for example, http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2008Sep/0112.html

      So the only real question is whether the benefits outweigh the risks. On the desktop, I'm not sure. On mobile devices, almost certainly (especially since those often have an existing way to pinpoint their location anyway).

    15. Re:Firefox 3.1? by BZ · · Score: 1

      > It seems like Mozilla is now intent on adding features rather than having a great stable
      > product.

      That's a false dichotomy, really.

      But there's one more issue here. All the browsers are in a position where they'll become totally irrelevant in a few years if they don't have feature parity with Flash and Silverlight... so they're working on said feature parity (except maybe IE, which doesn't mind being irrelevant if Silverlight wins).

    16. Re:Firefox 3.1? by ISurfTooMuch · · Score: 1

      I completely agree with you.

      I'm just quite puzzled that Mozilla sees the need to build this into the browser. Even if this means nothing here in North America and Europe, can you imagine what this will do to Firefox adoption in a place like China? Would you want to be a dissident with something like this installed on your laptop? I wouldn't. I'd be nervous enough as it is, so I sure as hell wouldn't want this "feature" potentially telling the Chinese government where I was while I was blogging about human rights. As for how they could implement this, all they'd need to do is require users to click through a page that collects this info before they're allowed on the Internet. It'd be just like logging into a commercial hotspot here, except that the Chinese version would reappear every now and then to refresh its data.

      If a tool can be abused, it will be abused.

    17. Re:Firefox 3.1? by BZ · · Score: 1

      > I'm just quite puzzled that Mozilla sees the need to build this into the browser.

      I though you just agreed that this was important on mobile devices...

      > If a tool can be abused, it will be abused.

      That's an argument for having no tools at all, which isn't a good idea. The goal should be to strike a balance.

    18. Re:Firefox 3.1? by ISurfTooMuch · · Score: 1

      I think it can be useful on mobile devices, but that doesn't mean it has to be built into the browser. An extension will do just fine. If you want to meet half-way, then have the extension preinstalled on the upcoming Firefox for mobile platforms, but, since it would still be an extension, users could remove it if they want to do so.

    19. Re:Firefox 3.1? by kc_cyrus · · Score: 1

      And where is the add-ons folder? And there lies your problem

  33. Wardriving, idiot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They drive a car around with a GPS and a wifi antenna recording SSIDs and MACs.

    There exist several companies selling access to enormous databases.

    Moreover as you polll you'll update their database for them: You tell them you see macs A, B, C, D, E and F. They knew that A, B, and C are located near X,Y, so they can tell you your location and now they know that D, E, and F are probably also located near there too.

  34. implementation? by British · · Score: 1

    I know somewhere on the web there's a nationwide wi-fi map, with every point listing their name. I checked my house, and there was my AP. So yeah, pretty slick making software from that data.

    Double edged sword here: yes, privacy concerns, but if your laptop gets stolen & the thief is at a documented area, go in for the retrieval!

  35. Wow! guys @ RIAA HQ are really into child porn!!! by bazorg · · Score: 1

    muahaha

  36. If it's using Skyhook isn't it just Loki? by GrahamIX · · Score: 1

    I've been using the Loki plugin for Firefox on Mac for some time. It uses the Skyhook wifi triangulation system (as seen in iPhone 1.0 geolocation) - isn't this just the same thing?

    http://www.loki.com

  37. How about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a website just asks me nicely and provides a form to type in my location, while telling me exactly how the information will be used, then stores it in a cookie?
    It doesn't make a difference anyway if they pull the info from Firefox, the location will be "fuck off" in my case.

  38. Accuracy by moniker127 · · Score: 1

    I doubt they will be able to get an accurate estimation of your location. It would be cool, but I doubt it. I guess i'll give it a try later today.

  39. Wrong fears ? by nsebban · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "The prospect of Firefox having the ability to track your location raises obvious privacy fears."

    What I fear more is Firefox becoming everything but what people need it to be. You know, a web browser.
    Please wake me up when someone decides to fork FF and remove all the useless crap that's being added lately. We're far from what made many of us tech-savvy people switch to what used to be a lightweight, efficient and secure web browser.

    --
    ____
    nico
    Nico-Live
    1. Re:Wrong fears ? by BZ · · Score: 1

      So what, exactly, is a web browser? Heck, what's "web"? The problem is that the definition keeps changing. Used to be, no image support was fine in a web browser. And no script support. And no CSS support. And no DOM support.

      Note that the W3C is standardizing a geolocation API; this is just an implementation of that W3C spec.

      I should also point out that Firefox 3 is faster and more memory-efficient than Firefox 2 or Firefox 1.5 or Firefox 1.0 (though when comparing to 1.0 you probably need to make sure to be comparing on a computer with a reasonably modern graphics card). It's certainly more secure than the older versions: a number of bugs have been fixed since the Firefox 1.0 days.

      So what's with the "used to be" meme?

  40. Because this is just what my web browser should do by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1

    Seriously, I think it's great. My web browser should not only track my location, but I'd also like to see the ability to compile C++ code, format my hard drive, and make coffee.

    Oh, wait. Somebody already wrote vim! In that case, I"m baffled - why are we finding ways to add more bloat to a browser that used to advertise how lightweight it was?

  41. What features like this need... by bgspence · · Score: 1

    'With Geode, when a website requests your location a notification bar will ask how much information you want to give that site: your exact location, your neighbourhood, your city, or nothing at all,' the Mozilla Labs blog claims."

    I would like to later ask Geode for the lists of web sites I've set to my exact location, neighbourhood, city, or nothing at all.

    I create these settings and forget them. The cloud should not only remember what I set for the Web sites, but for me whenever I want to check,

    1. Re:What features like this need... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean like how you can see a list of sites you have passwords saved for, or sites you allow popups on, or any other number of things you allow on a per site basis in firefox that you are already able to see a list of?

    2. Re:What features like this need... by dossen · · Score: 1

      And it just so happens that the list you are asking for is shown in the options dialog of the extension. Not the most prominent place, but it's there alright.

  42. Firefox Light, anybody? by WK2 · · Score: 1

    It would be great if Mozilla, or somebody else, would make a light version of Firefox, which only had web browsing. It could be extendable, so that user's could have just what they want, and not a lot of feature creep. Perhaps they could call it Phoenix, or Firebird.

    --
    Write your own Choose Your Own Adventure. http://www.freegameengines.org/gamebook-engine/
    1. Re:Firefox Light, anybody? by cjb658 · · Score: 1

      It would be great if Mozilla, or somebody else, would make a light version of Firefox, which only had web browsing. It could be extendable, so that user's could have just what they want, and not a lot of feature creep. Perhaps they could call it Phoenix, or Firebird.

      Wasn't that the whole idea behind having extensions in the first place?

    2. Re:Firefox Light, anybody? by WK2 · · Score: 1

      Yep. That's what I was pointing out, that Firefox has lost it's way. It is no longer a small, lightweight browser.

      Phoenix was the original name for Firefox. Then Firebird. It's purpose was to be small and light-weight, without all of the extra features of the Mozilla web browser (now Seamonkey). So Mozilla stripped out the extra features, and now they are adding them again. I am suggesting that they strip them out again. Everything old is new again.

      --
      Write your own Choose Your Own Adventure. http://www.freegameengines.org/gamebook-engine/
  43. I hope opt out works better than this.... by russler · · Score: 1
  44. Why? by insllvn · · Score: 1

    With Geode, when a website requests your location a notification bar will ask how much information you want to give that site: your exact location, your neighbourhood, your city, or nothing at all

    So, what is the point? What is the point in having it determine where you are by WiFi signal? Why not enter it manually? In fact, if it is at the websites discretion, why even have this at all? It seems like there is not just the potential for abuse, that is the only rational reason to include I can think of; that it is designed for abuse. Am I missing something?

    Further, I don't understand what is going through the heads of the coders over at Mozilla. It is a customizable browser. It can be added on to. That is the only reason to even continue using gecko for christ's sake. Wasn't the original point of Firefox, or Netscape before it, to be a lightweight, standards compliant browser? I have an idea that could realize that goal: STOP BUILDING MORE STUPID SHIT IN.

    Time to switch to Iceweasel.

    1. Re:Why? by BZ · · Score: 1

      > Why not enter it manually?

      More effort on the user's part.

      > In fact, if it is at the websites discretion, why even have this at all?

      The website can ask for the information. Whether the browser tells it is at the user's discretion.

      > that is the only rational reason to include I can think of; ...
      > Further, I don't understand what is going through the heads

      See http://www.w3.org/2008/geolocation/ and especially http://www.w3.org/2008/geolocation/charter/

      That second link gives some examples of the use cases geolocation can address that are not addressed by existing technology.

      I agree that on the desktop there's not as much use for this, but on mobile devices (think smartphones), it's a heck of a lot more useful.

      If you feel strongly about how this should work and the current spec draft at http://dev.w3.org/geo/api/spec-source.html doesn't match that, you may want to send e-mail to public-geolocation@w3.org with your comments.

    2. Re:Why? by pizzach · · Score: 1

      In fact, if it is at the websites discretion, why even have this at all? It seems like there is not just the potential for abuse, that is the only rational reason to include I can think of; that it is designed for abuse

      That was my thought exactly. Even if this feature was designed so that websites are forced to ask for my permission, what are the chances that advertisements start asking every time they load? Any advertisement that I have seen that attempts to post my location in the text to get my attention is usually sleazy enough to make me uncomfortable willfully giving them the information in the first place.

      --
      Once you start despising the jerks, you become one.
    3. Re:Why? by caluml · · Score: 1

      The website can ask for the information. Whether the browser tells it is at the user's discretion.

      Would you be happy with a plugin that stored, and filled in your bank account login details when your bank's site asked for them? Sure, it wouldn't be used as often as this plugin - but the principle remains.
      I sure as hell wouldn't. There is too long a history of browser functionality being subverted, despite the best intentions of the initial programmers. It wouldn't be more than a few days until there was an exploit that could access that information without asking you. And a plugin that can query your WLAN card, or GPS device? That's waaaay too much access for an interface to a hostile environment.
      I even run Firefox as a separate user on my home system - so any malware can't hose data - but unless I start with GRSec or SELinux, and restrict what that user can see/do, it's still too much access.

    4. Re:Why? by BZ · · Score: 1

      > Would you be happy with a plugin that stored, and filled in your bank account login
      > details when your bank's site asked for them?

      If it had the option to never fill them in, and otherwise asked me every time? I might not mind, though I'd prefer those not be stored on my hard drive because my computer might be stolen. That part of the analogy doesn't apply here, since no additional data is being stored on your computer, though.

      > It wouldn't be more than a few days until there was an exploit that could access that
      > information without asking you.

      If your opinion of browser security is that low, you should have much bigger worries than this API. You should be arguing for the removal of file inputs, for example. And of XMLHttpRequest. If those are subverted you lose a lot more than just your location.

      > I even run Firefox as a separate user on my home system

      OK, that does mitigate potential file input issues a good bit.... ;)

  45. I'm also a dad and I found out I was getting deuce by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My two daughters, 15 and 16 years old, were clearing their .bash_history file and .mplayer/ sessions from my finding. I even found some hidden home directories, for which they would secureshell into the computer locally just to hide the access, and then ssh to a terminal in Czechos-Slavakia to store their Paris Hilton music videos laced with Lesbian Strapon domination. I never suspected they were even making their own videos of eachother. I found this out through a modified DRIFTNET program. Who ever knew daddies little girls would grow-up so quick.

  46. iphone 3g ish.. by phaetonic · · Score: 1

    im guessing google maps would use this like it currently uses the GPS feature in an iPhone 3G

  47. Two things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Two things:

    1. Domain name whitelisting (as opposed to blacklisting) should be supported. Remember NoScript.
    2. A priori, the user should manage his own geolocation data, which he can choose to disclose. Firefox must not attempt to automatically figure out a userâ(TM)s geolocation data by asking a remote service provider. This is similar to the default blacklisting of dangerous web sites by comparing their URLs to a local, infrequently updated database instead of communicating with Google in every single instance.

    The browser must be given priority over the web server.

  48. Breaking news, being on reality TV by unassimilatible · · Score: 1

    raises privacy concerns. C'mon people, this privacy at all costs meme is getting a little extreme. This add-on is for people who want to be tracked! Most people who DL Firefox are smart enough not to enable this add-on. For those that aren't should a cool feature not be added to protect people from themselves? Then let's ban guns too (no, let's not).

    --
    Slashdot "libertarians": Small government for me, big government for those I disagree with. -1, I disagree with you
  49. Microsoft even abandoned this... by TheNetAvenger · · Score: 1

    Microsoft had a WiFi geo locator utility and web application several years ago, and abandoned it because people that cared where they were would just use the GPS in their phones, as it was consumer utility to find local information.

    I don't think a utility that reports back where you are will be any more successful, and a bit scary.

  50. If this comes default with firefox... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I will switch browsers. No questions asked. I love firefox more than any other browser, but I will not stand for this. Stop making firefox bloated with stupid shit like this, especially with third-party items we have no real control over.

  51. You have very compliant children. by FatSean · · Score: 1

    You gotta sleep sometime you know. You are lucky.

    --
    Blar.
  52. Microsoft Live Maps has it already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft already have this working on their Live Maps locate me function a while back. It might have been removed now but it was definitely there a while back when it was called "Virtual Earth". Think it was called something like "Locate me"

  53. All of you going BUT ITS OPEN SOURCE... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not all of us are coding Wizzzards like you, so we have to WAIT while someone fixes it..

  54. Simple, uninstall firefox and use ol'zilla or IE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm gonna make this real simple! I'm takin firefox off of my pooter real permanent like!, cuz theres enough code in that monster, three times as much as in the original win95 operatin environment at over a hunnert megabites, to hide a whole tribe o' hogzillas. And sartainly enuf to hide spyware and autoupdatewhetheryalikesitornot ware. I's gonna use IE or an old mozilla program that came complete with the ability to turn off ALL so called spygrades. Remember folks, ALL 'updates' are malware and DRMware and spyware. ALL the good software has already been invented. The only change is that the good stuff is gradually disappearin due to monopolization. Ever see WordPerfect any more....or DBase4 or SyBase. How about commercial BASIC compilers and C compilers..
    O..you gotta go to Linux to get them now as ole gatesy has run 'em all out of the DOS/winders world.

  55. Very cool but should not be installed by default. by WiiVault · · Score: 1

    I really like the ability to use location detection either through Wifi or cell triangulation like many phones. But I worry that this being a default install in Firefox will lead to hackers targetting this feature, which IMHO is quite a scary prospect. Leave it as an add-on and I will surely install it, otherwise I might wait to see how this whole thing pans out security-wise before I upgrade.

  56. Next, Ubuntu makes Firefox compulsory... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is what happens when you let a large corporation fund an open source project. Commercial interests increasingly take precedence.

    I knew it was too good to last. Goodbye Firefox. I suspect Ubuntu will be following you in the not too distant future.

    Do no evil, my a#se.

  57. Now you know why iceweasel exists! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You might not like Richard Stallman's over zealous manner, but time and time again, he proves himself to be right. He split the Firefox code to create Iceweasel and now you can see why that was a good idea.

    Mark Shuttleworth has already refused to include Iceweasel in the Ubuntu repositories and now we see why. Firefox, with its extra functionality, is essential to the business plans of Google and Canonical.

    You won't see Iceweasel in Ubuntu any time soon, no matter how much pressure there is to include it in the repositories.

  58. dumbassery by vajorie · · Score: 1

    for the location-tracking technology that will be built into the forthcoming Firefox 3.1

    wut

  59. Does this imply easy location "spoofing"? by aeschenkarnos · · Score: 1

    Does this imply a fix to the "We're sorry, but the TV show episode you wish to view is not available from your location." annoyance?

  60. Stupid by Corwn+of+Amber · · Score: 1

    Yeah, it will be so easy to track 192.168.1.xxx, right. Use a server to geolocate it like all those annyoing sigs in PHPBB "your ip is blah and you're using firefox on a hackintosh so I know where you live!!!11"

    What's new?

    --
    Making laws based on opinions that stem up from false informations leads to witch hunts.