Slashdot Mirror


New Cellphone Sized "Computer" Takes Aim at Sub-Notebooks

IMOVIO has launched a new cellphone-sized computer that is aimed at something similar to the subnotebook market. While it doesn't have 3G of its own, it does have a QWERTY keyboard, Wi-Fi, and a $175 price point. "It can connect to the Internet using a standard Wi-Fi connection, or it can use your cell phone's mobile broadband connection via Bluetooth. The company is currently pitching it to mobile network operators and retail stores. It's being compared to the ill-fated Palm Foleo. But the comparison doesn't work because the Foleo was Palm-phone only, didn't fit in a pocket and cost well over three times the price of the iKIT.

256 comments

  1. infuriating by mcgrew · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's infuriating. I already have a computer the size of a cell phone. It's called a "cell phone". Damn it, why can't I plug it into a TV or monitor, and plug a mouse and keyboard into it and use the damned thing like a computer?

    1. Re:infuriating by corsec67 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Cell phone companies would come out with that kind of stuff, if people quit buying cell phones from the service providers, and instead bought them from the cell phone manufacturers.

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, don't search me
    2. Re:infuriating by Jabbrwokk · · Score: 3, Funny

      That would be great, if their service providers would let them.

      And IMOVIO sounds like something one would take to relieve constipation.

    3. Re:infuriating by Thelasko · · Score: 1
      --
      One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
    4. Re:infuriating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cell phone companies would come out with that kind of stuff, if people quit buying cell phones from the service providers, and instead bought them from the cell phone manufacturers.

      That'll happen when phones are NOT tied to service providers - AHEM! Apple and Blackberry! I don't have either because I refuse to do business with the carriers that have exclusive contracts with them.

    5. Re:infuriating by east+coast · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Let me ask: Why should it matter where we buy it from? If anything you would think the manufacturers would find accessories of this nature to have high profit margins compared to their phones. I know I'd buy into it.

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    6. Re:infuriating by paul.tap · · Score: 2, Informative

      I have to admit I never tried it, but my Nokia N95 has TV out and support keyboards via bluetooth, so there you are. Personally I prefer my Nokia N810 for mobile computing, connecting to the internet via WLAN running Joikuspot on my N95 with a unlimited data subscription with t-Mobile in the Netherlands (HSDPA)

    7. Re:infuriating by Stewie241 · · Score: 1

      huh? Who does blackberry have an exclusive contract with?

    8. Re:infuriating by mc900ftjesus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Carriers want you using the easiest phone to support and the phones that use the least data. Highly capable phones are a nightmare, especially when you add in that the average American is as smart as a radish.

      They don't really want you to use data, they just want the money for having it available, just like your ISP. So they'll sell you a branded phone, that's locked to hell so you can't do much besides buy ringtones.

      Easy solution to locked phones: don't buy them (yes, I just heard thousands of Apple fanboys gasp at the though of not having Steve's latest piece of crap). Go get an unlocked phone and use a GSM carrier, that wasn't so hard was it?

    9. Re:infuriating by mcgrew · · Score: 1
      Close, but no cigar.

      The Sharp Zaurus is the name of a series of Personal Digital Assistant (PDA) made by Sharp Corporation. The Zaurus was the most popular PDA during the 1990s in Japan and was based on a proprietary operating system. The first Sharp PDA to use the Linux operating system was the SL-5000D, running the Qtopia-based Embedix Plus. The name derives from the common suffix applied to the names of dinosaurs, and was chosen to convey the idea of strength

      I'm talking about a Razr or a Nokia with ports to plug it into your TV/monitor and keyboard/mouse. You're pointing to an old PDA.

    10. Re:infuriating by pilgrim23 · · Score: 1

      I would buy this because: I am one of those people who wants to be connected to my data but hate people, so...I do not CARRY or even own a cell phone. iPod Touch yes, cell phone no. I would be interested int his if the specs were good. what ARE they by the way? CPU? Speed? memory? drive/SD Size? Screen size, dimensions. that article provides a nice pic and NO information

      --
      - Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum.
    11. Re:infuriating by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      Certain models are on exclusive contract with the carriers.

    12. Re:infuriating by Ascoo · · Score: 1

      My year old+ Nokia N95 does that (assuming you use the TV out cable that came with it and any ordinary bluetooth keyboard). Never tried a bluetooth mouse though...

    13. Re:infuriating by Stewie241 · · Score: 1

      Oh... I did not know that. Which ones?

    14. Re:infuriating by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 2, Insightful

      When you're not plugged into the keyboard/mouse and tv/monitor, you're carrying around a bunch of hardware that will blow through your small cellphone battery in minutes. And if it disables a bunch of stuff and underclocks... You're now carrying around hardware you're not using. For what purpose?

      Why not just come up with an easier way to sync/combine your phone and your computer.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    15. Re:infuriating by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 2, Informative

      In particular, the touchscreen model, the Thunder, is sold exclusively through Verizon in the U.S.

    16. Re:infuriating by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      Cell phone companies would come out with that kind of stuff, if people quit buying cell phones from the service providers, and instead bought them from the cell phone manufacturers.

      In Finland it's always been the norm to buy your own phone, and get the service separately. It's only recently that you can get a phone (3G only) as a part of the service. Even then, the phones are rarely sim-locked, and you have the option of buying the phone and service separately for the same total price.

      Nevertheless, there's limited market for something as geeky as the grandparent idea. Most people seem to want a cell phone, not a cell computer.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    17. Re:infuriating by Thelasko · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'll admit it, I was just stealing your high mod points and page location to point out that the Sharp Zaurus had pretty much the same specs as the device mentioned in TFA. There is a reason the Zaurus is no longer made, as you said, the cell phone has replaced it.

      --
      One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
    18. Re:infuriating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you really want haul around a keyboard and mouse for something this small? That would defeat much of the purpose. You might as well get an ultralight PC. Or something just a bit smaller than a note book. I would call it a "sub-notebook." Brilliant! I'm off to make your dreams come true, unless someone's already beat me to it.

    19. Re:infuriating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      especially when you add in that the average American is as smart as a radish.

      I'm a radish you insensitive clod!

    20. Re:infuriating by interstellar_donkey · · Score: 1

      It's all about convergence. It's not unthinkable to believe that in 10-15 years your cellphone WILL be your computer, your media server, your video game console system etc. It'll just depend on what you plug it into.

      And your cell provider will become your ISP. And all will be right with the world.

      --
      The Internet is generally stupid
    21. Re:infuriating by vhogemann · · Score: 1

      Hummm,

      Tecnically it's already doable... My N95 comes with TV-Out, and I know Nokia sells a bluetooth keyboard.

      --
      ---- You know how some doctors have the Messiah complex - they need to save the world? You've got the "Rubik's" complex
    22. Re:infuriating by Toll_Free · · Score: 1

      Ya can always find a reason to boycott.

      Get a windows mobile device then.

      --Toll_Free

    23. Re:infuriating by japhering · · Score: 1

      If only the cell phone manufacturers would make something the public liked at a reasonable price. What is out there lacks features, and functionality, while being way over priced..why pay exorbitant prices

    24. Re:infuriating by xonicx · · Score: 1

      >>why can't I plug it into a TV or monitor, and plug a mouse and keyboard into it and use the damned thing like a computer?

      Should be available soon

      http://www.nvidia.com/page/handheld.html

      you can connect your TV through HDMI,monitor through DVI, keyboard and mouse through USB or bluetooth. 

    25. Re:infuriating by maztuhblastah · · Score: 1

      Easy solution to locked phones: don't buy them (yes, I just heard thousands of Apple fanboys gasp at the though of not having Steve's latest piece of crap). Go get an unlocked phone and use a GSM carrier, that wasn't so hard was it?

      You just couldn't help but stick an anti-Apple jab in there, could you... :D

      Realistically, you don't have to buy only factory-unlocked phones -- a lot of phones are trivial to unlock. I used to always buy Nokias for that reason (DCT-3/4 have been busted for ages). Recently I picked up a second-hand iPhone because I knew that it could reliably be unlocked. It's happily working outside the OS, tethered to my laptop. Kinda makes me the carrier's worst case user...

      But I digress. Just because a phone is locked down by a carrier doesn't mean that its hard to remove the restrictions -- it's usually as simple as a bit of Googling and following a step-by-step guide. Given that it's almost always a one time thing and that phones purchased from your carrier tend to be subsidized, it's not a bad idea to do a bit of research first.

    26. Re:infuriating by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1

      Sharp already tried this a few years back.

      Not in the U.S. - the clamshell-style Zs were only sold in Japan. (The clamshell form factor is very common for electronic dictionaries in Japan.) A few companies imported the later Zaurus models, and did an English conversion.

      I have a SL-C3000, which is simply fantastic. I do a lot of writing on it; it's pocket-sized and has a long battery life.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    27. Re:infuriating by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      No, the keyboard etc could stay home; if everyone had them nobody would have to lug them around. You could keep a set in your car's trunk (boot if you're British) for the few times you needed one and didn't have one.

    28. Re:infuriating by maztuhblastah · · Score: 1

      Uh.... outside the US. Last I checked, the OS is still functional.

    29. Re:infuriating by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 2, Funny

      Get a windows mobile device then.

      No thanks.

    30. Re:infuriating by donstenk · · Score: 1

      I think the latest upmarket Nokia's do just that: bluetooth keyboard, TV output, YouTube (the irony!) etc. It also makes calls. Nokia N95 I think it is.

      --
      Dennis Onstenk
    31. Re:infuriating by hitmark · · Score: 1

      thats how i have always been doing it.

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    32. Re:infuriating by Nethemas+the+Great · · Score: 1

      It's infuriating. I already have a computer the size of a cell phone. It's called a "cell phone". Damn it, why can't I plug it into a TV or monitor, and plug a mouse and keyboard into it and use the damned thing like a computer?

      With a $25/month subscription to our "MyComputer Integration" service you can. Please be advised that if you wish to connect the peripherals you stated the following services are required: "MyKeyboard" for $10/month, "MyMouse" for $5/month, and "MyMonitor" for $15/month. Would you care to also connect an external hard drive for only $30/month using our "MyStorage" service?

      --
      Two of my imaginary friends reproduced once ... with negative results.
    33. Re:infuriating by hitmark · · Score: 1
      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    34. Re:infuriating by mollymoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You can buy a phone in the USA for $9.99 delivered, which includes $10 worth of free airtime and doesn't tie you to a contract (Virgin). If you want a camera you have to pay a massive $50 for your phone. That's not expensive for what you get and it's not expensive in absolute terms either. For what you get, mobile phones are absurdly cheap.

      --
      Chernobyl 'not a wildlife haven' - BBC News
    35. Re:infuriating by rugatero · · Score: 1

      And your cell provider will become your ISP. And all will be right with the world.

      In the UK at least, that already happens.

      --
      This comment is for entertainment purposes only. Any similarity to real insight or information is purely coincidental.
    36. Re:infuriating by Fred_A · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Maybe you ought to move to a country with a live market instead staying in one with a five year plan...

      Just sayin.

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    37. Re:infuriating by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      s/American/person

      It's just that we Americans have the money to spend on things they can't understand ;)

    38. Re:infuriating by ciaohound · · Score: 1

      Regarding constipation, everyone's asking the same question: when will there be a subnotebook in suppository form?

      --
      Oh, yeah, it's not easy to pad these out to 120 characters.
    39. Re:infuriating by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

      This would be a disaster. Just look at what happened when AT&T allowed people to buy phones from someone other than Western Digital. Almost immediately the phone network completely collapsed and the planet imploded in a giant ball of rape, nuclear war, murder, and Pokemon. Do you want to repeat this again? This is why you must NOT buy a phone from anyone but your service provider.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    40. Re:infuriating by couchslug · · Score: 4, Funny

      "especially when you add in that the average American is as smart as a radish."

      I'm a radish, and find the comparison insulting.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    41. Re:infuriating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually, n95 plugs in to a TV and hooks to bluetooth keyboard.

      Only wishing for more than 640x480 resolution on TV though. Next gen may have mouse support.

    42. Re:infuriating by dreamchaser · · Score: 1

      The point you missed is that people shouldn't HAVE to google for methods to unlock their phones, but as long as people keep buying locked phones (like the iPhone and others) there is no pressure to stop the telcos from such practices.

    43. Re:infuriating by smithmc · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's infuriating. I already have a computer the size of a cell phone. It's called a "cell phone". Damn it, why can't I plug it into a TV or monitor, and plug a mouse and keyboard into it and use the damned thing like a computer?

      I am so waiting for something like that to happen. I think of it more as a pocket-size computer "core" (not sure exactly what it contains - CPU, RAM, SSD, what else? NIC? Video?) that you carry around and can plug into various "carriers" that embody the I/O, display, etc. You might have a small, smartphone-sized carrier for true mobility, a larger one that would be basically a notebook PC minus its motherboard, maybe even a set-top box for when you want to browse in front of your big-screen TV, etc. I think that would be way cool.

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
    44. Re:infuriating by recharged95 · · Score: 1
      Wow, it's a Freerunner with a physical keyboard and 3G.

      Now if I can get my freerunner to register my AT&T laptopconnect USB 3G properly then I can one up this--with a crappy touchscreen!

    45. Re:infuriating by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

      Western ELECTRIC, not Western Digital. Oops.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    46. Re:infuriating by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      And this coming from a guy who lives in France. Sheesh.

    47. Re:infuriating by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      If I had a good messaging platform I would totally throw out my cellphone. What I want is something like this, but can standby for hours in an 802.11 roaming mode and wake up when gtalk/yahoo/aim/msn/etc messages come in.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    48. Re:infuriating by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 1

      Carriers want you using the easiest phone to support and the phones that use the least data. Highly capable phones are a nightmare, especially when you add in that the average American is as smart as a radish.

      Bullocks. Carriers want to inventory the smallest number of phones that would attract the largest number of potential customers into signing a 2 year contract.

      Look at T-Mobile, in their bid to come up with a competitor to the iPhone, and Verizon's many offerings didn't see any problems with releasing the G1. The G1 does not look like it will be the easiest phone to support. Especially when the phone and the network don't appear ready for consumption yet.

      I've yet to see my carrier answer the simplest question about my handset. So I know support can't be an issue with them...

      --
      These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
    49. Re:infuriating by Oscaro · · Score: 1

      But I digress. Just because a phone is locked down by a carrier doesn't mean that its hard to remove the restrictions -- it's usually as simple as a bit of Googling and following a step-by-step guide. Given that it's almost always a one time thing and that phones purchased from your carrier tend to be subsidized, it's not a bad idea to do a bit of research first.

      Keep doing that, and you'll get more locks on the next device.

      Stop buying locked device, and maybe something will change.

    50. Re:infuriating by J05H · · Score: 1

      It's called DLNA interface. It exists, the samsung i8510 has it - it can transmit video onto any compatible display device. Or if your phone has video-out like the N95 or i8510 you could plug into something like the MyVu headmounted display. It's already here.

      --
      gigantino.tv - Heavy but weighs nothing.
    51. Re:infuriating by DrgnDancer · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that GGP's argument is wrong even without unlocking. iPhone users have proven to be extremely willing and able to use their data plans. Much more so than users of earlier smart phones. Probably has to do with the web browser not being a useless piece of trash. Android's browser is meant to be fairly nice as well, so I suspect that as better mobile Internet experiences start to appear, people will make greater use of their data plans. Not to mention that both the iPhone and Android have versions of an application store available that make use of the network. Ironically, I pay $20 a month for my iPhone data plan and $40 a month for my wife's Treo data plan. Guess which one sees more data? I'd as soon never use the web again as use Blazer to surf.

      (Of course most of these pretty new phones with decent web browsers also have wifi chipsets. That helps the carriers out somewhat since people will use hotspots when available... I still use actual cell phone data easily two or three times as much on my iPhone as I did on my Treo, and probably four or five times as much as my wife uses her Treo's data plan.)

      --
      I don't need a million points of light, just two points of multi-mode fiber and a 10 Gig-E router.
    52. Re:infuriating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think your poor attempt to troll about the iPhone is irrelevant. If you can't jailbreak it you don't deserve to use it.

      Even without jailbreaking there are loads of apps for it and you can make your own.

      I personally listen to web radios on my iPhone for an approximate 200 Mb per listening day...

      In a week I use between 700Mb to 1Gb of bandwidth...

      This phone is the first one to provide such a variety of applications and web apps. It's the phone which will push mobile operators to deploy a real mobile web access.

    53. Re:infuriating by tolan-b · · Score: 1

      They're still subsidising it.

    54. Re:infuriating by Jabbrwokk · · Score: 1

      I don't want to know how text messaging works with that.

    55. Re:infuriating by DrgnDancer · · Score: 1

      That's where I think a lot of people are missing the boat on how to do this. You can already control and display iPods and iPhones through bases, so clearly the circuitry is already there. Similarly with a lot of other smartphones, their sync ports allow quite a bit of control. Build a base with a USB controller and {whateverthefuckvideosystemtheiPoduses} to VGA or DVI adapter and when you dock your phone it's displayed/controlled by your monitor and USB KB/mouse. You might have to add a very small amount of hardware and software to the phone, but most of it is already there. How much more hardware could you possibly need to take KB and Mouse signals through the sync port in addition to "Play/Pause/stop/fwd/etc".

      --
      I don't need a million points of light, just two points of multi-mode fiber and a 10 Gig-E router.
    56. Re:infuriating by shrikel · · Score: 1

      the average American is as smart as a radish

      You know how dumb the average person is, right?

      Well, by definition, half of them are even dumber than that.

      --
      Any sufficiently simple magic can be passed off as mere advanced technology.
    57. Re:infuriating by kaizokuace · · Score: 1

      Hey I already have one of these! Nintendo beat them to it with the gameboy advance SP.

      --
      Balderdash!
    58. Re:infuriating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The N95 can already plug into a TV and use a bluetooth keyboard.

    59. Re:infuriating by lysergic.acid · · Score: 1

      that won't change a thing really.

      right now all cellular networks are closed/proprietary. so if you're a handset maker and you want to add a new feature, say video conferencing, to your phone, you would need the carrier to approve it and change their network protocol--which they won't do. it's not like a TCP/IP where anyone can develop an application for it without permission from anyone.

      that's why i think it would be better to do away with cellular networks all together. convert current cellular towers for public wireless internet access. TCP/IP is an open and well-established standard designed for general data communication. you can send voice/audio, video, text, and any other kind of information over the network. it's easy for anyone to extend the TCP/IP protocol at the application layer for developing new and innovative technologies. just look at how much the web/internet has progressed in the past decade compared to cellular networks.

      so people would have smart wireless devices that they can use to access the web/internet whenever they want, and when they need to make/receive a call they simply use one of the VoIP services available. but there'd be no more ridiculous data plans, $.15 text messages, and $2 cellphone ringtones. the current cellular carriers' business models are an anachronism.

    60. Re:infuriating by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      It's more infuriating.... I had one EXACTLY like that 4 years ago.

      It was called the Sharp Zaurus and it rocked. It had a clamshell design like that and looked the same except for being silver. SL-C1000 it had a 416mhz processor and did things that made most IT guys drool hard.

      Nice to see all that is old is new again.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    61. Re:infuriating by greyhueofdoubt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Move to another country to get a better cell phone plan? +4 Insightful?

      Must be the post-weekend rush of soon-to-expire mod points.

      That, or I had no idea how much people cared about cell phone plans.

      -b

      --
      No offense, but I've stopped responding to AC's.
    62. Re:infuriating by quenda · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Nokia N810 connecting to the internet via WLAN running Joikuspot on my N95

      Thats a little Rube Goldberg. Can I ask why you don't just use bluetooth as God and Nokia intended? You'll get better battery life on the phone, for one thing.

    63. Re:infuriating by shmlco · · Score: 1

      "...but as long as people keep buying locked phones..."

      'Course, this also means that you're going to have to shell out $400, $500, or more up front for a smartphone, as the primary reason phones are locked is that they're subsidized under the carrier's 2-year contract. Which in turn argues that as long as the average consumer prefers "free" or highly subsidized phones the teclos will continue doing just what they're doing.

      TANSTAAFL.

      --
      Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
    64. Re:infuriating by captjc · · Score: 1

      Praise "Bob"!

      --
      Slow Down Cowboy! It's been 1 hour, 47 minutes since you last successfully posted a comment
    65. Re:infuriating by CodeBuster · · Score: 1

      highly capable phones are a nightmare, especially when you add in that the average American is as smart as a radish.

      Truth be told, the American cell phone carriers would probably prefer that customers accept something like this while paying out the wazoo for service and not complaining. If they thought that they could get away with it then they would do it.

    66. Re:infuriating by sarathmenon · · Score: 1

      If people were intelligent enough, they would realize that the carriers make up for the subsidies in hidden fees over the years. Mobile phones in India come with financing options if people are broke, in the end the fees come out more or less the same (Pay a small amount upfront, and the rest over a year). The model works quite well, and except for the dirt cheap no name chinese phones, the wireless operators do not stock any phones with them. I think the concept that unlocked phones won't work in the US is wrong. Its just that people are used to one system, and it'll take a while ( if ever ) for an alternate method to catch on.

      --
      Microsoft: "You've got questions. We've got dancing paperclips."
    67. Re:infuriating by 6th+time+lucky · · Score: 1

      I don't want to know how text messaging works with that.

      Yes, but just wait till you see what message *receiving* is like

    68. Re:infuriating by 6th+time+lucky · · Score: 1

      Ok I've just got to reply to myself... in the 10 seconds since I posted that I've had go through my head:
      1) Custom (vibrating or air powered) ringtones
      2) Morse (vibrating or air powered) output
      3) Clenching input. I judge air powered input to be too difficult for the average person, but it should be an option. "Excuse me, I just have to send this message..."
      4) Thermal paper, on a roll of course, output...
      5) ???
      6) profit

    69. Re:infuriating by Hucko · · Score: 1

      Heh, in Australia, the cost of a mobile over a contract can be around 1/3 more than to buy it out right. I've always bought my phones out right and got it cheaper. But then, I always make sure I'm working with a surplus.

      --
      Semi-automatic amateur armchair Australian philosopher; conjecture ready at any moment...
    70. Re:infuriating by TheRealDamion · · Score: 1

      It's infuriating. I already have a computer the size of a cell phone. It's called a "cell phone". Damn it, why can't I plug it into a TV or monitor, and plug a mouse and keyboard into it and use the damned thing like a computer?

      The n95 lets you use a bluetooth keyboard and has video out.

    71. Re:infuriating by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      If people were intelligent enough, they would realize that the carriers make up for the subsidies in hidden fees over the years.
      But you are paying the same subscription whether you take the subsidised phone or not. So not taking the subsidised phone and buying a phone elsewhere essentially means you are paying twice.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    72. Re:infuriating by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      But you are paying the same subscription whether you take the subsidised phone or not

      Really? In the UK, you can get SIM-only deals from all of the major providers that are cheaper.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    73. Re:infuriating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's just one of those 'If Obama or McCain doesn't nullify cellphone contracts by executive order, I'm moving to Canada' people. :)

    74. Re:infuriating by WuphonsReach · · Score: 1

      you carry around and can plug into various "carriers" that embody the I/O, display, etc.

      And you pray that nobody has hooked up a tap to the input on that item to record your keystrokes...

      Or at least, you'd only be able to plug into docking points that you trust. Or end up carrying some sort of fold-up keyboard (like has been available for small PDAs for a while).

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
    75. Re:infuriating by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      And what is this going to do? Just the stuff you can already do with an iPhone? Oh, wow, so I can browse the internet and do email. What about, you know, office suites?

      I don't know about you, but my computer is a quad core with 4 gigs of ram and over 2TB of hard drive space. While the average Joe The Plumber may not need that, they need more than what can fit in their pocket and run off of a tiny battery.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    76. Re:infuriating by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

      You can generally do this in the U.S. as well (at least at T-Mobile stores, not sure about the others, they're all too evil for me to give my money to in good conscience). You can buy the phone outright and then get it unlocked. They should unlock it for you, right there in the store, but sometimes the employees are morons and you need to call up Customer Service to get the code.

      But at any rate, it's possible, and it lets you use the phone on whatever plan you'd like, with whatever GSM carrier you'd like. Of course, if you want an unlocked phone there are better places to go than a T-Mobile store, but I just thought I'd point it out -- subsidized phones aren't the only way to buy them, even through the carriers.

      It's just that most Americans have the same reaction to the word "free" that a group of 13-year-old boys do to naked breasts; it doesn't matter what it's attached to, they want some. Combine that with an inability to do basic mathematics and I don't see "free" phones going anywhere, any time soon.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    77. Re:infuriating by smithmc · · Score: 1

      you carry around and can plug into various "carriers" that embody the I/O, display, etc.

      And you pray that nobody has hooked up a tap to the input on that item to record your keystrokes...

      Well, couldn't you say the same thing about any computers you already own?

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
    78. Re:infuriating by DrgnDancer · · Score: 1

      No reason you couldn't run an office suite on a phone. We'd need a bit more memory on the phone, probably, but that'll come. I'm thinking of it longer term. I don't particularly want to be able to use my iPhone this way, but if the next gen iPhone came out with the equivalent of a Pentium class CPU and 64-128MB of RAM, it could run a decent array of software. Give it the software and some multitasking in the OS, maybe develop an industry standard cradle.

      Then instead of public Internet terminals in Airports, and cafes you jut have a place to plug in your phone. Slap it in the cradle at the airport and even on the plane, work on your presentation. Slap it into the cradle in the client's office to give your presentation. Slap it in the cradle at the hotel, check your e-mail, video phone your family, and maybe sync your presentation back to your 'real' computer back home. For that matter, log into the real computer if you need to do work on it that requires significant resources. I'm not saying that something like this would replace workstation computers, but it could marry the best of what laptops do with the portability of a phone. Some people might prefer to carry something more powerful (like a 'real' laptop), but this could seriously reduce the amount you have to use such a beast.

      In the short term, this would be a novelty.. Maybe a few place have cradles here and there for the people who pay the top dollar for such powerful "phones". Smart phones in general were a novelty for years, so were laptops for that matter. If it catches on it could be a paradigm shift.

      --
      I don't need a million points of light, just two points of multi-mode fiber and a 10 Gig-E router.
  2. 3G Tether by thedak · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Because I hear tethered data connections are cheap. I could see wifi, but I don't see it going very well as a tethered device. That said, at that price point I could see alot of geeks, at least the /. crowd picking them up for novelty value -- so it should well well either way.

    1. Re:3G Tether by spectre_240sx · · Score: 1

      It depends on your plan. I can tether without any extra charges, but I've already got a full unlimited BlackBerry plan.

    2. Re:3G Tether by thedak · · Score: 2

      Nice. In Canada we get no such thing -- Telus even recently dropped their unlimited data plan for $100. So one must pay for their standard plan (voice plan + 15 for unlimited BIS when I got mine) + the standard data to be able to use tether, $100 for 1GB a month. Unless there is an overhaul of data plans in Canada it would never fly here, it would just be too prohibitively expensive.

    3. Re:3G Tether by Stewie241 · · Score: 1

      Rogers a while back had a $30/month 6gig plan that I got signed up for on my Blackberry. Not unlimited, but a good amount, especially for a blackberry.

      Ian

    4. Re:3G Tether by Capt.DrumkenBum · · Score: 1

      But you are forgetting that Telus is crap. I had a little celebration when I was finally able to cut them out of my life. Then 2 months later they called me to ask what they could do to get me to come back. I told the CSR on the phone that if they would send a tall beautiful blond to pleasure me once a week, I would consider cuming back to Telus.


      The blond hasn't showed up yet.


      Oh yeah, Telus == Evil

      --
      If I were God, wouldn't I protect my churches from acts of me?
    5. Re:3G Tether by greyhueofdoubt · · Score: 1

      I used Verizon's little usb dongle thing for a few months. It worked fine- almost fast enough to play online games, streaming video would pause every now and then. And then sometimes I would inexplicably get 600kb/s downloads.

      If you visit the states (or wherever verizon sells stuff) for less than a month, you can return the device for a refund and pay only for that month's service. That's what I did.

      -b

      --
      No offense, but I've stopped responding to AC's.
  3. No built in 3G... by ThisIsAnonymous · · Score: 1

    Add built in 3G and then we can talk...Otherwise, you have to connect your cell phone to this beast.

    I'd rather hook a 32X up to a Genesis than carry this thing around with my cell phone dangling...

    1. Re:No built in 3G... by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1

      It has bluetooth for a reason.

    2. Re:No built in 3G... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      I feel the exact opposite. My phone already provides a 3G connection via bluetooth, and eventually I'll replace it with one that does HSPDA.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    3. Re:No built in 3G... by mollymoo · · Score: 1

      Absolutely. I've never quite understood the desire to carry around two 3G radio sets and have two phone contacts. I just Bluetooth to my HSDPA phone - no extra devices, dongles, cables or contracts required. You only get 2.1Mbps through Bluetooth 2.0 EDR, which is theoretically a bottleneck when using an HSDPA network, but in practice it's rare you actually hit those speeds. Perhaps when 7.2Mbps and higher HSDPA speeds arrive it will become more of a bottleneck in real life, but it's not like 2.1Mbps is slow anyway. You can still use the phone for voice and text while it's doing the data thing.

      Bluetoothing to a phone has proved invaluable at times when reception has been poor, I just move the phone to get good reception without having to put my laptop somewhere awkward.

      --
      Chernobyl 'not a wildlife haven' - BBC News
  4. Screen pixels? by David+Gerard · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What's the screen pixels? An Eee 700 is usable at 800x480; this can't go much below that and be usable on the modern Web. Even if the resulting text is Flyspeck 3, at least it'll be detailed Flyspeck 3 rather than pixelated.

    --
    http://rocknerd.co.uk
    1. Re:Screen pixels? by BUL2294 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Someone posted on the original article's forum that it's 320x240. Unfortunately, in this day and age, that resolution borders on useless. Sure, for 80x25 text or for an old VGA 320x200 DOS game it would be cool. But to do anything of recent vintage, you'll end up having to pan-and-scan in zoom mode to see a webpage. Hell, I don't like browsing on my Toshiba Libretto 110CT--and that's 800x480... (And my complaints are with the screen resolution, not speed--Firefox 3 runs acceptably on it).

      --
      Windows 3.1x calc: 3.11 - 3.10 = 0.00
    2. Re:Screen pixels? by Phisbut · · Score: 1

      What's the screen pixels? An Eee 700 is usable at 800x480; this can't go much below that and be usable on the modern Web. Even if the resulting text is Flyspeck 3, at least it'll be detailed Flyspeck 3 rather than pixelated.

      Looking at the specs, it has a 2.8 inch QVGA display, meaning 320x240 resolution.

      --
      After 3 days without programming, life becomes meaningless
      - The Tao of Programming
    3. Re:Screen pixels? by The+Gaytriot · · Score: 1

      The resolution was one of the deciding factors when I was shopping for a netbook, I ended up getting the Acer Aspire One. The original EEEpc's sucked to view web pages with, the newer ones have a resolution of 1024x600, so it's wide enough to view pages without any side scrolling (most of the time).

      --
      Srsly u guys. U guys, srsly.
    4. Re:Screen pixels? by Ragzouken · · Score: 1

      Great for DOS games :P

    5. Re:Screen pixels? by bigjarom · · Score: 1

      My PHONE has 320x320 resolution, so uh, I think that settles it.
      This is laughable.

    6. Re:Screen pixels? by 6Yankee · · Score: 1

      My O2 XDA Stellar (which, I think, is an HTC Kaiser in disguise) is 320x240, and it's surprisingly usable. Sure, you might have to scroll right to get past the page menu, but for the most part the content is usable - certainly enough for most things I want to read on the move. (Two notable exceptions are anything PHPBB-based and Slashdot.) Being able to use it in landscape mode definitely helps. Really, though, in terms of limitations, IE Mobile's lack of meaningful Javascript support (just enough to ignore the NOSCRIPT content and sit there with its thumb up its arse, usually) is a much bigger issue than the small screen.

      (BTW, if anyone knows how I can banish Windows Mobile from this thing and still have it sync with Outlook, I'm all ears.)

      I've got Bluetooth, 3G, and a full QWERTY keyboard. I've had this phone for six months, and had the T-Mobile MDA Vario II (same thing minus the GPS) for 18 months prior to that. So I'm wondering what's so amazing about this gadget that it's made the front page of Slashdot. Meh.

    7. Re:Screen pixels? by Takumi2501 · · Score: 1

      The newer EEEpcs or the newer Aspire Ones?

      I have an Aspire One, and it runs at 1024x800. I still find it kind of cramped, though.

      --
      Sent from my computer.
      Now GET OFF MY LAWN!
    8. Re:Screen pixels? by supernova_hq · · Score: 1

      Have you seen the specs on the higher end nokia N-Series PDA's? They have everything mentioned in the summary plus most of them run linux out of the box!

    9. Re:Screen pixels? by Nethead · · Score: 1

      At 320x240 you can only get a decent 40 column screen. Think C64 type rez but better choice of colors.

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    10. Re:Screen pixels? by Kadagan+AU · · Score: 1

      It doesn't specify the resolution, but I found complete specs here

      For the screen it says:

      Display
      - 2.8 inch QVGA, TFT, 260,000 colors, landscape

      A quick scan of Wikipedia tells me that QVGA is indeed 320x240.

      --
      This space for rent, inquire within.
    11. Re:Screen pixels? by BUL2294 · · Score: 1

      You're right... I forgot that even CGA's 80x25 text was actually 640x200. So, DOS 40x25 text. This thing really is useless!

      --
      Windows 3.1x calc: 3.11 - 3.10 = 0.00
    12. Re:Screen pixels? by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Hell, at 320x240, you'd have to pan and scan for half a minute just to see all of the icons on your MS Office toolbar/rip-off menus.

      At that resolution, an article's name would wordwrap in an RSS feed, and you might get 10 (short) words across the screen at a time.

      By the way: that resolution is just -maybe- usable for an 80x25 character terminal. That puts each of your characters at 4 pixels wide, and ~9.6 pixels high.

      PASS. This device is something designed by people who are trying to cut costs at every corner without any regard for the finished product. What? No connectivity? They can use their phone! Oh, we can make the screen smaller, they'll still buy it! Et cetera.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    13. Re:Screen pixels? by The+Gaytriot · · Score: 1

      I'll have to check to make sure, but all of the Aspire One's I've found online are spec'd at 1024x600, it seems to be standard for the 8.9" screens (and a lot of the 10" ones, too). On Newegg I found one (an HP) that displays 1024x800.

      I agree it's pretty cramped, though as long as I run programs in full screen and keep firefox stripped down to the bone I can get by.

      --
      Srsly u guys. U guys, srsly.
  5. Star Trek by Malluck · · Score: 3, Informative

    So at what point can we start calling these things tricorders and be done with the whole sub-sub-mini-micro-net-note-laptops?

    1. Re:Star Trek by IceCreamGuy · · Score: 4, Funny

      Once they get banned from holodecks.

    2. Re:Star Trek by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

      When they get built in mass spectrometer... Xray diffraction... Infra Red spectrometer.

       

      --
      Deleted
    3. Re:Star Trek by Seth+Kriticos · · Score: 1

      Fun part is, I have a Nokia N800 (about the same size) and there is a full fleged Star Trek (LCARS - Linux can also run starships) theme on it (including icon animation and sound). I'm not a trekie, but this is fun. That thing is actually 2 years old, about same size and can do more (even runs Linux out of the box). And the successor also has a keborad. So where is this exactly news? That there is a new device with lower spec for less money?

    4. Re:Star Trek by hack++slash · · Score: 1

      Only when they can do a bit more than be basic web/email interfaces.

      I dunno about anyone else but I have something that looks like a tricorder and serves a real, useful function; a Metrix MTX-3282 multimeter. And just like the looks, the prices are astronomical...

      --
      To do something right, you often have to roll up your sleeves and get busy.
    5. Re:Star Trek by gsgriffin · · Score: 1

      When they can do at least three things really well. We have only monocorders and bicorders today.

      --
      jsut athnoer menagiensls ltitle psrhae for you to dcoede. Why do we wtsae our tmie dnoig tihs?
  6. No touch typing? by schnikies79 · · Score: 4, Informative

    No thanks. I already have a cellphone with a thumb keyboard.

    --
    Gone!
  7. Not unprecedented by JustinOpinion · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Computers of this size and form-factor are not totally unprecedented. Things like the Nokia N810 internet tablet are similar. (QWERTY keyboard, fits in your pocket, WiFi or bluetooth connectivity...). Also, many smartphones have all the features and functionality of this device (including having a physical keyboard, etc.) with the advantage of direct connectivity through the cell network.

    The only thing this new device can offer is a somewhat lower price ($175 instead of >$400 for the N810). But I think this device will only appeal to a very small market (most people would prefer to spend a bit more for a more capable device, or get something with a bigger screen/keyboard).

    1. Re:Not unprecedented by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

      Well, the thing that keeps me from getting a smart phone is that I don't want to pay for the data plan, but want a way of connecting to wifi ( most places I go are wifi'd or close to wifi'd places). Many otherwise capable phones ( see iphone) requires a data plan. However, I also don't want to carry another device around with me. Any recommendations for a wifi capable smart phone that doesn't require a data plan and is around $200? And while, I'm at it, I'd also like a competent government of the people for the people and by the people and a large fry.

      --
      Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    2. Re:Not unprecedented by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      .. N810 runs linux which is very nice, tried one and liked it much (hey, you can install openvpn on it!) but still actually decided to buy a Nokia E90 communicator as my previous phone broke down. So no linux pda for me but Nokia just released IPSEC-capable VPN for S60e3 phones so I barely use my laptop anymore.

    3. Re:Not unprecedented by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      The only thing this new device can offer is a somewhat lower price ($175 instead of >$400 for the N810). But I think this device will only appeal to a very small market (most people would prefer to spend a bit more for a more capable device, or get something with a bigger screen/keyboard).

      Yeah, first size, then usability, then cost. If this thing had more than QVGA I might trade in my n810 for it, but I traded in my Treo for more screen real estate. Like others have said, though, decent DNS server.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    4. Re:Not unprecedented by b0bby · · Score: 1

      If you can double your budget, you can get an Openmoko ($399).

    5. Re:Not unprecedented by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

      Yeah. Its pretty close to perfect, its developed significantly since I last looked at it. Very tempting. If it were $200, there would be no doubt.

      --
      Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    6. Re:Not unprecedented by CodeBuster · · Score: 1

      I have always been of the opinion that a clamshell notebook cannot really be much smaller than the width of the average pair of human hands plus about one inch or so. If you go smaller than that then you are competing with the large array of thumb typing mobile devices from Nokia, RIM, and others. There is a reason why the sub-notebook category doesn't go much smaller than about 6x9x1 or so and it has to do with the size of human hands and useful screen resolution more than anything else. There are and have been some tablets that are in between, but tablets that small seem to be mostly targeted at niche or specialized markets (i.e. ruggedized tablets for warehousing, inventory, or remote control) and I haven't seen many people using them in my travels in preference to a blackberry or a full fledged sub-notebook.

  8. Hasn't this been done before? by Darundal · · Score: 2, Interesting

    How is this not a PDA minus the PIM apps?

    1. Re:Hasn't this been done before? by komby · · Score: 1

      Seems pretty similar to my ipod touch. Minus the keyboard. Though I have found that the missing 3G connection for the touch makes it very annoying to travel with. I don't see how there will be a large market for these devices without ubiquitous internet.

  9. But does it run Linux by davidwr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    2.6?

    Let's hope 2.4 stays supported for some time to come.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  10. Nokia by rlp · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Nokia has a line of small devices that do the same thing. The 770 (which I use) and 800 have on-screen keyboards, the 810 has a slide-down keyboard. The access the internet via WiFi or a bluetooth connection on a phone.

    --
    [Insert pithy quote here]
    1. Re:Nokia by Dtyst · · Score: 1

      Nokias internet tablets are ok but I like more their Commnicator phones. Nokia has had this mini-"laptop" since 1996 (and it is also a phone). Check their communicator series, the latest being Nokia E90. Unfortunately it's quite expensive.

  11. Small? Go for,high-fidelity tube technology ... by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 4, Funny

    After shrinking down audio technology with integrated circuits, true audiophiles decided that big, 'ol honkers with tubes are better. I predict that the same will happen with PCs. What? A PC in your pocket, how mundane. I have a tube powered ENIAC in my basement. In fact, it IS my basement.

    I can really tell the difference, because every month when the power bill comes, I know it must be good, because it is using butt-loads of electricity.

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  12. Dongle by Skorpfox · · Score: 1

    If they added a USB port, it would be an interesting addition to on site troubleshooting of network gear if all you need is a terminal window. Just add USB serial dongle or something to that effect. Other than that my cell phone does everything it does.

    1. Re:Dongle by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1

      If they added a USB port, it would be an interesting addition to on site troubleshooting of network gear if all you need is a terminal window.

      It has a mini-USB port, but I guess it'd need USB OTG to be useful as you're contemplating.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
  13. The only reason we are calling this a "Computer" by gblackwo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Is because unlike our cellphones/pdas which have the same functionality, this is a clamshell design that looks like a shrunken laptop.

  14. The line between a computer and a pda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ..goes between whether I can type with it using more than two fingers or not. Fail. Next.

    1. Re:The line between a computer and a pda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I saw it, It reminded me of the KByte Zipit, Google Images, a kids toy. $30 on ebay... Runs linux...

  15. Video glasses by spribyl · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Add some video glasses/goggles and I might be interested. The existing screen in to small for real work.

  16. Wanna copy Craig and do exactly like he did? by tepples · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The only thing this new device can offer is a somewhat lower price ($175 instead of >$400 for the N810).

    That and it's cheaper than the Pandora too.

    1. Re:Wanna copy Craig and do exactly like he did? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Cheaper, yes. But the CPU is less than half the speed, it has half as much RAM, a lower-resolution screen, half the battery life, a much older kernel, no X11, no GPU or DSP. Less than half the functionality for half the cost.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    2. Re:Wanna copy Craig and do exactly like he did? by Ihmhi · · Score: 1

      I'd rather have the Pandora. Fingers crossed, I hope to be able to spare the money for the next batch that will ship around January 2009.

      The computer functionality is *really* nice, but the fact that I can load up my movies, anime, .isos of my old Playstation games, music, etc. makes it worth it.

      So basically... the extra $155 is for gaming, movie, music, better processor, hackable OS, etc. Absolutely worth it.

    3. Re:Wanna copy Craig and do exactly like he did? by Sparr0 · · Score: 1

      +1 Agree

    4. Re:Wanna copy Craig and do exactly like he did? by Samizdata · · Score: 1
      N'thed.

      If I had the money...

      --
      It's not the years, honey, it's the mileage. - Colonel Henry Walton Jones, Jr., Ph.D.
    5. Re:Wanna copy Craig and do exactly like he did? by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      Anybody noticed that the Pandro is kinda like an Amiga, only laptop formfactor. Heck, throw in a decent PPC core (like the upcoming titan), or a SPARC one (think sirroco 1) and T(CP)O(ffloading)E(ngine), throw in Opentosh and Apple is in trouble. Blade server manufacturers as well, when I think abotu it. /crackpipe

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
  17. Compare to a DS with DSOrganize by tepples · · Score: 1

    For the same reason a Nintendo DS is not a PDA minus the PIM apps. At least a modded DS can run a primitive PIM app called DSOrganize; I imagine Linux has better PIM apps.

  18. PDA Specs by SlashdotOgre · · Score: 4, Informative

    The specs seem much closer to a PDA than a netbook. Also the choice of using a 2.4 based Linux is interesting. I admit I haven't been following Linux on Xscale, so perhaps that explains the choice. Personally I expect more general purpose use out of a "computer" and these specs seem like it's more geared for PDA use.

    - Processor: Marvell PXA270 312MHz
    - ROM: 128 MB, RAM: 64 MB SDRAM
    - User data: 12MB, User media files: 23MB

    - Operating System: Linux 2.4.19
    - User Interface GUI: Proprietary plus Trolltech QT/E 2.3.8
    - Bluetooth® 2.0 with EDR, supports wireless stereo headset
    - (A2DP) & DUN profile
    - WIFI® IEEE 802.11 b/g
    - Optional USB connection configured for HSDPA dongle
    - QWERTY/AZERTY + numeric keys, other languages optional
    - Micro SD (up to 8GB)
    - 2.8 inch QVGA, TFT, 260,000 colors, landscape

    http://www.webitpr.com/release_detail.asp?ReleaseID=10258

    --
    Sadly, PS/2 was yet another victim of USB, which doesn't care what you plug into it, the electrical slut.
    1. Re:PDA Specs by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Lots of small form-factor devices that use Linux use a 2.4 kernel. This is a shame - 2.6 doesn't seem to support small devices well, and 2.4 lacks a number of features that you'd expect from a semi-modern *NIX. I do wonder why they don't use a BSD variant for these devices, and get something with modern features and a small footprint.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    2. Re:PDA Specs by hattig · · Score: 1

      While I agree that the specs are underwhelming, that is how it is reaching its £99 price point - last generation display, last generation chipset, last generation memory capacity, etc.

      This device's usefulness comes down to its keyboard and the applications installed.

      I think it would be nice if they could have used a higher DPI screen to get 480x320, and in addition used a more up to date ARM SoC, the PXA270 is years old.

    3. Re:PDA Specs by mollymoo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Those specs are very similar to the Gumstix Verdex, which runs 2.6 just fine.

      --
      Chernobyl 'not a wildlife haven' - BBC News
  19. For more info by Seakip18 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    here's the actually spec and release data.

    It looks neat and I'm sure it works well...but smartphones have GPS and 3G/data plans built in. Most have some developer support good to go and better cameras. Ultra-portables have a better keyboard/mouse, more ports to connect crap and full web browsers. Hell, some allow you to just stick in SIM card, rolling all 3 into 1.

    The battery life is ok but not great, seeing how long it takes to charge. It honestly fills no niche or even covers everything. Solid Meh.

    --
    import system.cool.Sig;
  20. Blackberry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can do all of this on a Blackberry (AFAIK), so I don't see why this is news or how it will succeed.

  21. Who needs the Internet? by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

    I have an N800, and have a one-hour train ride to work every day. With two 8 GB SDHC chips in it, I'm set for a month of video viewing.

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  22. We already have cell-phone sized computers by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 5, Funny

    Pretty soon, your iPod/iPhone is going to be your computer. You'll be able to have your iPhone in your pocket, walk in to any building, sit at a thin client (monitor & keyboard) and connect to your iPhone using a physical cable and possibly even BlueTooth or Wi-Fi. Soon your iPhone/iPod will be a wearable computer, with sunglasses for the display and a bluetooth headset. Commands will be spoken into the handset instead of typing. You'll meet somebody and be able to look at their MySpace/Facebook while you're talking to them face to face.

    Do you think I have a decent chance on the speaking circuit as a futurist? :-)

    --
    Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    1. Re:We already have cell-phone sized computers by Wiseazz · · Score: 2, Funny

      You forgot the dire predictions about losing our humanity and ability to socially interact without our technology crutches.

      Oh, and robots. You didn't talk about robots.

      --
      My sig sucks.
    2. Re:We already have cell-phone sized computers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you greatly over estimate the amount of photo albums we'll need to make in the future.

    3. Re:We already have cell-phone sized computers by cranky_slacker · · Score: 1

      You've been reading Cory Doctrow (http://craphound.com/down/) again, haven't you?

    4. Re:We already have cell-phone sized computers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fine GOD!

      Old Lady #1: When my ex-husband passed away, the insurance company said his
      policy didn't cover him.

      Old Lady #2: They didn't have enough money for the funeral.

      Old Lady #3: It's so hard nowadays, with all the gangs and rap music..

      Old Lady #1: What about the robots?

      Old Lady #4: Oh, they're everywhere!

      Old Lady #1: I don't even know why the scientists make them.

      Old Lady #2: Darren and I have a policy with Old Glory Insurance, in case
      we're attacked by robots.

      Old Lady #1: An insurance policy with a robot plan? Certainly, I'm too old.

      Old Lady #2: Old Glory covers anyone over the age of 50 against robot
      attack, regardless of current health.

      Old Glory Robot Insurance.... For when the Metal Ones come for YOU!

    5. Re:We already have cell-phone sized computers by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      Actually I think you're not that far off (even though you got the quite appropriate "funny" mod, I think "insightful" may have been OK as well), as a lot of the connectivity you mention exists already, including the display glasses. Albeit in the lab, and some standardisation is required of course.

      Now all we need is a speed upgrade for Bluetooth (or a new short-distance wireless standard) to transmit the display info and we're technically there.

    6. Re:We already have cell-phone sized computers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure -- Just ignore the part where carriers will want us to pay through the wazoo for this sort of stuff. If text messages cost a dime apiece to send, just imagine how much actual internet access will cost...

  23. iPhone? by lymond01 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So, my iPhone can:

    Access Google Apps for document processing.
    Access the internet in a normal fashion (non-WAP)
    Check email
    Calendaring
    PDFs
    Hook up to data projectors using the component cable adapter
    Play music on my home stereo/computer/car
    And honestly, looking at that keyboard on this sub-sub-notebook, the iPhone's input is likely better (I'm one of the lucky people who LOVES the iPhone keyboard)
    SSH using a new app I bought (sorry...I did buy it)
    RDP using a free app (not as good as the SSH app, but it does let me control my office webcam)
    Play games
    Make lightsaber sounds

    Seriously...this sub-sub-notebook doesn't offer anything I don't have and that the iPhone (and likely other phones) don't already do better.

    1. Re:iPhone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It just does it all for a fraction of the price.

    2. Re:iPhone? by benjin · · Score: 1

      I came here to post the same kind of thing. At this moment my Jail Broken iPhone has a Windows Manager (Finder), MPLayer, a video broadcaster, video recorder, Nintendo, eBook reader and is up on my computer screen using a VNC server on the phone. I just hook it into my dock and type away any text and email on it with my keyboard and when a call comes in I use a headset and just answer it on my screen from halfway across the table in a good reception spot. I don't know what this little linux guy could do that a decently tricked out iPhone can't.
      I love this phone and haven't thought about it as a cell phone since I cracked it a month after I got it last year. It's a mini computer in all the right ways. The thing is the equivalent of my computer I bought in 2001 and it's 1/200th the size yet ironically gets the same battery life. I suppose the same thing could be said for the N95 or some of the other guys out there. I just think this is the closest yet to a functional user interface for a finger. Oh, and plastic screens suck. You have to mash down way too hard for it to respond in a reliable manner.
      Gizmodo has the same discussion going on right now about not calling them smart phones anymore because the phone is such a small part of the total functionality now. Important part to be sure but shrinking all the time with twitter and texting and email making random conversations much less invasive but still available where ever you go. Hell even because of where you go.

    3. Re:iPhone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Seriously...this sub-sub-notebook doesn't offer anything I don't have and that the iPhone [doesn't] already do better.

      How about copy & paste?

    4. Re:iPhone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      USB. It has a USB port, which I can connect a serial dongle to. Yes, I am one of those people who still needs a serial port, and it aggravates me to no end that nothing short of a desktop replacement has one anymore.

  24. Full VGA by Juan+Rey · · Score: 0

    HTC Qtek 9000, aka Grundig 9800, already featured 3G, Wifi, Bluetooth, full keyboard plus 640x480 VGA mode.

    1. Re:Full VGA by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      Yes, but not for $175. I think the price point is the breakthrough. I've got a TyTn, and certainly wouldn't trade it for this. Actually, I'm not sure what I'd do with this. It's too small for surfing, to big to carry in addition to my phone (even a small, non-pda phone), and the resolution isn't really any good for surfing. It might work as a media player or text-mode remote (telnet), but an iSomehting would probably do better at both those tasks for little extra money, and far less than a 9000 or TyTn (or touch Pro).

      There may be a niche market out there somewhere, but at $175 it may be too much for the average geek trinket.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  25. Dvorak by swaq · · Score: 1

    I use Dvorak, you insensitive clods! Seriously though, I'm always annoyed by the mini devices that have Qwerty keyboards, because they are too small to touch type on anyway. An alphabetical keyboard would make more sense (to me, at least).

    1. Re:Dvorak by gblackwo · · Score: 1

      I hate typing on my TI-83.

    2. Re:Dvorak by egomaniac · · Score: 1

      I don't get it. Because QWERTY is unfamiliar to Dvorak users (0.01% of the population) they should switch to a layout which is unfamiliar to 100% of the population?

      --
      ZFS: because love is never having to say fsck
    3. Re:Dvorak by swaq · · Score: 1

      I didn't suggest using Dvorak, I suggested an alphabetical order. Having it in Qwerty doesn't seem useful if you can't touch type on it anyway.

  26. Re:Small? Go for,high-fidelity tube technology ... by kftrendy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Bah. A TRUE computophile won't settle for less than a full-fledged Analytical Engine. Gears are the true analog circuits! I can really tell the difference, because every month when the coal bill comes, I know it must be good, because it is using butt-loads of coal.

  27. Futurism by FourthAge · · Score: 1

    I think you're right, but it will be an x86-compatible PC, because the ability to run legacy x86/Windows apps is a major selling point. (This is, unfortunately, why other CPU architectures are doomed in consumer space.)

    Also, the images won't just be drawn flat on the inside of the glasses. They will be drawn as if you were looking at them on a physical surface in front of you. In reality, there is only a mouse and keyboard on your desk, but you can also see two 25" monitors there.

    --
    The tao of democracy: the government you can vote for is not the real government.
  28. nokia n800 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I own a nokia n800, it runs on maemo, which is an open-source debian derivative with a 2.6 kernel. It links up to apt repositories and has hundreds of packages available It's great for pen testing, I can run ettercap on it with no problem. It also has wifi and bluetooth and can do all the things this thing can. It runs skype, pidgin and can read PDFs. I can use it to SSH or VNC into my home computer. It's got a gorgeous 640x480 screen, runs firefox with adblock plus and fits in my jacket pocket. It can handle 5 hours of constant use without a recharge.

    In summary the n800 is just as good as if not better than this thing and has an established community of people porting packages and developing for it

    1. Re:nokia n800 by khanyisa · · Score: 1

      Absolutely agreed...

  29. Move along nothing to see here ( Zaurus) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have one already, its called a Zaurus.
    why bother?

    1. Re:Move along nothing to see here ( Zaurus) by Xamindar · · Score: 1, Redundant

      Yep, I got one already, a Zaurus C3100. 8gig hard drive, 640x480 resolution, looks to be the same exact size as this one. I can even tether bluetooth with my phone, connect to wifi access points, stream music, watch videos....... move along, this has been done before, and better from the looks of it.

    2. Re:Move along nothing to see here ( Zaurus) by bmsleight · · Score: 1

      But for £99 ?

  30. Tandy PC-5 by bigattichouse · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I still have my old tandy with whopping 4k of ram somewhere: http://www.trs-80.com/images/computer-pc5x300.gif Boy I miss that thing. I remember writing little programs for my physics class. It was also handy to write out equations "long hand" to make sure I entered them properly. If I buy a cell-palm-top, am I just trying to relive junior high? Maybe I won't get beat up so much this time.

    --
    meh
  31. Specs not so good by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

    PXA270 is a pretty old core design, and 312MHz is very slow. 2.4 series kernel lacks a number of features that you'd expect from a *NIX, and it seems not to be running X11, which makes porting apps that don't use Qt quite difficult. Only 64MB of RAM is a bit tight too. Power up time of 3 hours is just lame - my 770 gets 3 hours of browsing time, and the OpenPandora units get around 10 hours.

    Honestly, it sounds like someone was aiming for the £99 price point and ended up crippling the device to get it under the magic three digit mark. Maybe it's going to sell well to the teen market, but it fails as a device for geeks.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  32. Re:The only reason we are calling this a "Computer by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1

    There aren't many PDAs with a clamshell design, and there aren't many cellphones lacking a cell antenna.

  33. It's like they jumped into a time machine... by sootman · · Score: 2, Interesting
    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    1. Re:It's like they jumped into a time machine... by bigjarom · · Score: 1

      That's not fair. The UX50 had double the pixels & it could also be used in 'tablet' mode.
      On the other hand, it did not have the benefit of looking like an ugly black brick.

    2. Re:It's like they jumped into a time machine... by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Sadly, if they would have gone back FURTHER, to 1997, they'd have come up with something far superior... Something with a 3/4ths size keyboard you (most people) could actually full-speed touch-type on. Something that ran for a month on 2AA batteries. Something that could play MP3s. etc.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  34. Price point by mod+40z4gc9s · · Score: 1

    I'll bet it really solutions its vertical market integration with synergistic functionality on a going-forward basis. Price points are so awesome!

  35. Sounds like a Zaurus by morgauo · · Score: 1

    OK, not the SL-5000 that people in the US remember but the more recent SL-C... series which had microdrives, better screen resolution, etc...

    It sounds like a great little device but why would someone want to carry that plus their cellphone. It will fail for that reason. I can't wait for an actual open cellphone, no kill switches, not locked into some company's app store, etc... That means you iPhone. It would be great if it ran Linux and GPE (basically X & gdk scaled down for mobile use). Then existing apps would port easily rather than trying to develop a whole new software base for mobile use, not like Android.

  36. Pandora? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pandora handheld (2009)? Mini-Linux computer for those non-retro-gamers.

  37. Sounds like an iPhone by ChrisA90278 · · Score: 1

    Computer the size of a cell phone?? Sounds like an iPhone. Or an iPod Touch.

    I remeber hearing Steve Job introduce the iPhone. He said to think of this not as a phone but as a computer that runs a phone application.

  38. 64MB by davidwr · · Score: 1

    RAM: 64 MB SDRAM

    That leaves plenty of room for upgrades. Nobody will ever need more than 640MB of RAM.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  39. Nice stuff, but... by Andtalath · · Score: 1

    I prefer a Pandora, which runs linux, has full gaming options and can be used kinda decently as a desktop if necessary.

  40. Close, but not yet a good micro-server by BenEnglishAtHome · · Score: 1

    Remove the keyboard, screen, and wireless stuff. Add one or two ethernet ports and one to three USB ports. Cut the price to $100, max. Then you'd have a perfectly useful micro-server, good for all those tasks that don't take much processor oomph. I could use one or two of what I've described. But this thing? It's neither fish nor fowl and I don't see the use of it.

    1. Re:Close, but not yet a good micro-server by Electrawn · · Score: 1

      See if you can find a Linksys NSLU2 somewhere for your needs.

    2. Re:Close, but not yet a good micro-server by Ant+P. · · Score: 1

      Sounds like you might want one of the boards made by PC Engines. They're almost exactly what you just described, and the kernel supports everything on them as of 2.6.27. (the most important feature works anyway: turning the status LEDs on and off from userspace)

    3. Re:Close, but not yet a good micro-server by BenEnglishAtHome · · Score: 1

      Thank you. That's a good tip.

  41. No mobile 'phone functionality? by Happosai · · Score: 1

    I'll stick with my Nokia E90, thanks...whilst Symbian based rather than Linux, it is also a fully functional mobile telephone.

    [Happosai]

  42. Input methods by LunarEffect · · Score: 1

    I think todays Netbooks are the smallest you should go if you are wanting to put the device on a table and type on it (as compared to holding it in both your hands, typing with your thumbs). I have an Aspire One by Acer and it always takes me a few moments to get accustomed to the smaller keyboard when I fire it up. I really cannot see how I'd work productively on a journey with the iKit. It would be interesting to see development in alternative input methods =)

  43. Other cheaper devices. by Zerth · · Score: 1

    The Zipit2 has a 300 mhz system with 32 megs ram, 8 megs flash, miniSD card slot, has b/g wireless(does WPA), and can run OpenEmbeded Linux. It also has JTAG and serial pads inside, and I think someone is working on getting USB out of the weird connector on the back. The keyboard is chiclet, but it looks about the same as this thing. Honestly, the whole thing looks almost the same, except "business"ified.

    The big plus? You can get it on amazon for $50 bucks. It was $150, but they separated out their IM/SMS service for kids into a separate subscription thing.

    You can just go to the sourceforge project and put the OE boot image on an SD card, or the company set up a wiki with all the GPL bits, but the wireless chip doesn't have a GPL driver. Still, probably more support than the mfg of the device in the story will provide.

    No bluetooth, though.

    1. Re:Other cheaper devices. by Zerth · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, I just read the spec sheet somebody posted. It is a beefed up version of the Zipit. Exact same processor, same screen but it has the USB port brought out, microSD instead of miniSD, but with a bit more ram and bluetooth.

      More ram+bluetooth isn't really worth another 100 bucks though.

      I wonder if this is the same company, or if it is like the Wind/EEE/etc where it a bunch of different companies working off the same reference model.

    2. Re:Other cheaper devices. by jmorris42 · · Score: 1

      > It is a beefed up version of the Zipit.

      Good, glad to see I'm not the only one who remembered the Zipit. That's this thing except with a color display, more ram/flash and this thing appears to run multiple apps unstead of just booting straight into an IM client.

      But I don't want to just slag em, I think they might be close to opening a new form factor up, but this unit just isn't going to do the job. Give it a little more, say one more rev of the hardware cycle, and it will be there. It needs at least a 640x480 screen, enough oomph to run a web browser able to view a wide range of content, including flash video/youtube and run X to open up the app availibility a bit. More ram/flash will come automatically with time thanks to falling prices. And the MSRP needs to get down to where the Zipit was several years ago at $99 no contracts, no bs.

      --
      Democrat delenda est
    3. Re:Other cheaper devices. by Zerth · · Score: 1

      Actually, the latest rev of the zipit does have a color screen. Like I said above, the only difference with this is more memory, bluetooth, a usb port, and $100 bucks. Actually, I think the zipit z2 runs 2.6 instead of 2.4

      Anyway, if somebody thinks this device looks neat, doesn't need bluetooth or a usb port(without soldering, anyway), and can get by with only 32 megs of ram, buy the zipit z2 for $40-50.

      It makes a decent wireless tty, you can use ssh in both directions, and it can be a webserver that you could lose down a heating vent.

      On the other hand, if you think an EEE is too small and underpowered, neither of these are your thing. Honestly, 640x480 doesn't seem much better to me than 320x240. Heck, my EEE by itself at 800x480 is really to small to do anything other than quick fix code, look up bits of info, read ebooks, and be an oversized navsystem.

      But I can plug a monitor into my EEE and have a usable desktop. That won't happen with either of these devices right now. Add a vga/dvi port and make it 256 megs of ram, then you've got a desktop that fits in your pocket good enough for office work.

      Hell, I wish there was a computer video standard that supplied power(there may be already) so they'd stop having to include a particular size of monitor, you could just plug in the LCD/whatever of your choice.

    4. Re:Other cheaper devices. by jmorris42 · · Score: 1

      > Actually, the latest rev of the zipit does have a color screen.

      I looked that up after posting.... But the version 2 is risky. They don't sell the $149 version anymore, now it is $49 + contract and none of the websites on running generic linux on em say of this new version is locked. And it is still a wee bit underpowered. 32M of RAM is a really tight fit for a modern flash enabled browser even if the screen were big enough. But if the $49 version sold over the counter can be repurposed without a service contract I'd just about have to grab one just for playing with. Yet if more than a few of us hacker types do that they will lock it down hard to pretect their tracfone style business model.

      The one in this /. post is overall a better deal since it has more flash, ram, bluetooth and a more normal keyboard layout. And if were actually offered here in the US I suspect the price would be close to $149 instead of the $175 somebody came up with by doing a straight currency conversion.

      --
      Democrat delenda est
    5. Re:Other cheaper devices. by Zerth · · Score: 1

      I own version 2, just got it a week ago off amazon. Semi-glad I did, otherwise I'd be getting this one, as getting a USB port out of Z2 is probably beyond me:)

      The company themselves already set up a wiki, which doesn't seem to get much activity, and somebody else set up a sourceforge page for OpenEmbeded for it, which has some.

    6. Re:Other cheaper devices. by jmorris42 · · Score: 1

      > I own version 2, just got it a week ago off amazon.

      Well I only see a Z2A now but the price of $37.99 is totally tempting. If they haven't Tivo'ed it yet. That A scares me. Please emme know if you can still get a shell prompt using zipit's instructions.

      > Semi-glad I did, otherwise I'd be getting this one, as getting a USB port out of Z2 is probably beyond me:)

      I'd bet good money it is somewhere on that unexplained expansion port along with a ttl level serial port. Might even have a spare SPI and/or i2c back there along with some GPIO pins. As a tinkerer those possibilities call out to me.

      --
      Democrat delenda est
    7. Re:Other cheaper devices. by Zerth · · Score: 1

      According to the serial on the bottom of mine, it is a Z2a.

      I haven't let it boot the original firmware, but I didn't have to flash it, either. I just downloaded the premade shell and put it on a 2gig microSD card I had and used a miniSD adapter. I haven't had time to set up the OpenEmbeded environment on my laptop to compile anything for it yet, so I've just used ssh on the wireless network at my job to start up some machinery without having to trudge all the way back to the office.

    8. Re:Other cheaper devices. by Zerth · · Score: 1

      PS, you may want to comment out the WPA supplicant section of the z2script.sh on the first boot using the premade shell. It seemed to hang if it couldn't connect to a network. Plus, I prefer to tell it which network to connect to.

  44. Incidentally... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

    The Zipit Wireless Z2 has somewhat similar specs(no bluetooth, and only miniSD support) for only 49.99 new, a bit less if you hunt around. The default firmware is absolutely worthless(IM only, and demands that you pay a monthly fee after a couple of weeks of use); but the device runs linux, and there is an openembedded port http://linux.zipitwireless.com/ and http://openzipit.org/

    Not quite as good, and not an out of the box ready to go kind of thing; but pretty cheap for a PXA270 platform that plays reasonably well with hobbyist linux. The product in TFA looks like a fun toy; but the zipit has the advantage of being almost as good, 1/3 the price, and available now.

  45. Dell Axim X51V had all this a couple years ago by Toll_Free · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My Dell Axim X51V has the same thing. It can do VGA, with the proper cable, has Bluetooth, WiFi and most everything else this thing has.

    http://www.mobiletechreview.com/Dell-Axim-X51v.htm

    It has a 16 meg RAM video system in it (not bad for a PDA, and it does VGA on screen as well as using the external VGA to monitor cable), although it costs 50 or so dollars (USD) more to get the VGA output on your monitor, it's still relatively cheap. (http://www.amazon.com/Dell-Axim-X51v-Presentation-Cable/dp/B000FFYALU)

    Add a bluetooth keyboard, and you have pretty much anything and everything you need, unless you HAVE to run linux to be cool (or insert reasoning here, I don't bash OS's, they ALL have their place.)

    At least, it does everything I need... Found an upgrade to 6.1 windows, and it works great for me.

    Of course, YMMV, someone else will say it's crap, etc., etc., etc.... But the bottom line is, it works, and has been out for YEARS. Not to mention, it runs at > 500 megahertz.

    Why does it seem any palm sized device that runs linux is behind the times... Either an old kernel, or a newer kernel, but they are playing ketchup (pun intended) with what's already out there? I mean, seriously now.... Can someone answer that question?
    --Toll_Free

  46. ZAURUS ANYONE!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I already have one of these, but mine is called a Zaurus. It runs Linux, has WiFi, USB, a QWERTY keyboard.....

  47. Re:The only reason we are calling this a "Computer by Echnin · · Score: 1

    Well, I like the form factor actually. It reminds me of my Casio dictionary. I also have a Windows Mobile phone with a flip-out QWERTY keyboard, and I use it for a Chinese dictionary (Pleco), but being able to perch it at an angle like a computer would be much better. I guess something like a HTC Athena is what I want, but that's too expensive for me. If you could get Wenlin running on this, it would be great for Chinese students... The keys look like a cheap Besta though.

    --
    Lalala
  48. Re:Small? Go for,high-fidelity tube technology ... by CorporateSuit · · Score: 5, Funny

    Burning all that coal is going to black out our atmosphere and leave the world in shambles for our children and animals. When you decide to finally join the 21st century, you'll learn that CLEAN computphiles use hydraulic analytical engines powered by slaves on rowers! I can really tell the difference, because every month when the mortality report comes, I know it must be good, because I'm going through butt-loads of slaves.

    --
    I am the richest astronaut ever to win the superbowl.
  49. What I would like to see is.... by Orig_Club_Soda · · Score: 0

    ...The iPhone with a 8 inch by 6 size (or so). Kinda like an ebook reader + full computer.

  50. "QVGA" by Joce640k · · Score: 1

    It's "quarter VGA", ie. 320x200. It's pretty useless, no wonder they had to use acronym to disguise it.

    RAM? Even worse - 64Mb.

    It's nothing more than a geek toy - looks good, but it functionally useless. I'm not even sure it would make an interesting MP3 player.

    The Eee PC 701 is being marked down in price now the 901 is out and it's a zillion times better.

    --
    No sig today...
    1. Re:"QVGA" by David+Gerard · · Score: 1

      That answers my questions. I had a Tungsten C that did better than this.

      --
      http://rocknerd.co.uk
    2. Re:"QVGA" by Zerth · · Score: 1

      No, it makes a crap mp3 player. I've got a device with the same processor(see other post), it can just barely decode and let you keep using your shell. But it makes an awesome wireless TTY that fits in a shirt pocket. The place I work at uses a AIX box for the manufacturing/ordering system and I love being able to check it from anywhere in the plant. I rather prefer my EEE, but it just barely fits in a cargo pocket.

  51. Owning an EEE PC... by gillbates · · Score: 1

    I was at first thinking, "Man, I just paid too much for that thing..."

    I really do want a pocket linux box. Here's the problem: the keyboard on my EEE PC is just usable. Make it smaller, and you can't really type on it.

    And then I learned that it's QVGA. And that it doesn't even have a GB of storage. I think it's a cool gadget, but it's more like a linux PDA than a pc.

    I'm feeling better about my EEE PC now.

    --
    The society for a thought-free internet welcomes you.
    1. Re:Owning an EEE PC... by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      you must not have looked very hard. go buy a sharp zaurus. they've been around for nearly a decade and ran linux for most of that.

      www.ebay.com for your pocket linux box. I had fun running all kinds of apps on mine before it was stolen by the TSA.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    2. Re:Owning an EEE PC... by gillbates · · Score: 1

      I looked at the Zaurus, but it was just too expensive at the time. Maybe they've come down since, but I couldn't see spending $600 for it.

      --
      The society for a thought-free internet welcomes you.
  52. Re:The only reason we are calling this a "Computer by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

    htc universal is the device you want. you can buy it used for about 150 euros already.

    --
    "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
  53. Don't waste your money on this.. by johnkzin · · Score: 1

    Way underpowered.

    Pay $100-$200 more and get an N810 or a Pandora.

    But even at $180, this one is over priced.

  54. Re:Small? Go for,high-fidelity tube technology ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Piss off. Gears? That's like putting a CRT on your ENIAC.

    Everyone knows you're supposed to use the best of the old and the new. REAL geeks and hot rodders are buff men and women and else who use pistons running of a sterling engine coupled to a home made fusion reactor. Steam and coal, if need be for lack of deuterium or tritium, is acceptable, and certaining for the metalwork is okay.

    And no sissy "I bought it on ebay" crap either--you drink Mountain Dew or Jolt or whatever of your choosing and recycle the aluminum cans and cast the pistons m over asphalt wearing asbestos pants. And then cut them to size on your own homemade lathe.

    Gears? The only gears needed are on the lathe--anything for readout is just LAME. REAL geeks check the pistons by sight, running along the corridor if needed.

    Shame on you. As a /.er, you should know better. The only thing worse than you are the ricers of our breed, who insiste on using water valves for their computing needs. Off municipal water hookups no less.

  55. Re:Small? Go for,high-fidelity tube technology ... by Linker3000 · · Score: 1

    Meh - have you not seen the Stone Henge in my back garden.

    --
    AT&ROFLMAO
  56. Guess what? Smaller does not always equal better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I have a keyboard, I want one I can type on - not twiddle thumbs on.

  57. OpenMoko by Hobart · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's infuriating. I already have a computer the size of a cell phone. It's called a "cell phone". Damn it, why can't I plug it into a TV or monitor, and plug a mouse and keyboard into it and use the damned thing like a computer?

    You can.

    http://www.openmoko.com/

    While I believe you'd have to use a USB VGA adapter to get a TV-out, you can certainly use it with a mouse and keyboard. (Tragically, it seems most developers do, as the device's built-in UI is still lacking. The OLPC is (about a year after I got it) just approaching tolerable, I suppose it'll take the Freerunner just as long.

    --
    o/~ Join us now and share the software ...
  58. Phones require phone service by tepples · · Score: 1

    Seriously...this sub-sub-notebook doesn't offer anything I don't have and that the iPhone (and likely other phones) don't already do better.

    A phone needs a 2-year commitment voice/data plan and a legal residence in a covered area. The basic iPhone plan is $70 per month and unavailable, for example, to Vermont residents. You can get an iPhone without a phone (iPod Touch, $229), but that's still more expensive than the device of the article ($175).

    1. Re:Phones require phone service by Jesus_666 · · Score: 2, Informative

      The iPod Touch, however, is twice as fast, has twice the RAM, has a multitouch touchscreen, has twice the screen size (480x320 vs. 320x240), comes with more built-in storage (the smallest version comes with as much as the iKIT can possibly hold; without an additional card (= additional cost) the iKIT has a whopping 25 megs of storage), has access to the Apple App Store with lots of third-party apps, does OpenGL and can play MP3s without performance issues (which the iKIT's CPU apparently can't do when used in cheap MP3 players).

      Compared to the iPod Touch the iKIT is ridiculously expensive.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
  59. From the missing the point department by Vexorian · · Score: 1

    I mean, this is a great competitor for palms and noce PDA stuff, I mean yet another small thing with tiny screen This one got a keyboard?! Well, so could a Palm... but hey, this computer's keys are so tiny that are a little infuriating, you should see that even the much bigger keyboard used by the eee is already pretty hard to use unless your fingers are thin, I think this computer's keyboard is more or less just decorative so it looks like a computer (so people that still don't get it that cell phones and palms are also computers would buy it)

    --

    Copyright infringement is "piracy" in the same way DRM is "consumer rape"
  60. One, it's butt ugly. by zullnero · · Score: 1

    I'm not one for making a big deal about form over function of a computer, but Sony made something a lot like this a few years back called the UX-50. Ran Palm OS, etc. Probably could have run linux quite well if someone wanted to do a little hacking. It looked 10 times better than that shrunken 1989 looking laptop.

    This IMOVIO device looks really cheaply made, and that's just not acceptable in any small form-factor mobile device. Those things take 5 times the beating a normal-use laptop takes. It also offers new in the way of usability, and that's another really, really big thing with small form factor devices. This IMOVIO thing looks poorly made and it looks like it could create a whole new kind of carpal tunnel syndrome. At least with the UX-50, you had a touchscreen.

    I also have a really hard time imagining it being compared it to the Palm Foleo, which had an entirely different purpose. It was a device meant mainly for hardcore business-oriented Palm users, not really targeted as a subnotebook. The idea was to create a small laptop that could be used as a base station for the handheld (that was smaller and more oriented to support seamless syncing, wifi shared networking, and the like).

  61. Re:Small? Go for,high-fidelity tube technology ... by Hercynium · · Score: 3, Funny

    It was hard to see, since it was in danger of being crushed by a dwarf...

    --
    I'm done with sigs. Sigs are lame.
  62. Too Little, Too Late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The iPod touch already owns this space and has a large collection of apps and third party accessories available. The 8GB model is about the same price, has a better screen, multi-touch, and Wifi. It lacks the bluetooth and camera, however

    There are other products, most notably Nokia, that do the same thing and have a keyboard.

    Not sure where they expect to carve out a market

    1. Re:Too Little, Too Late by argent · · Score: 1

      The 8GB model is about the same price, [...]

      For values of "about the same price" that only make sense inside the Reality Distortion Field.

  63. Re:Small? Go for,high-fidelity tube technology ... by A440Hz · · Score: 2, Funny

    I find that the tube-based computers produce executables with more "air" and "top end" that are missing from the transistor product. I also find that using gold-plated USB cables pass data with 1s and 0s that are much more pure.

  64. exactly by zogger · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I want one that snaps into a netbook sized device (giving you a bigger battery, a bigger screen and keyboard and perhaps some more flash memory), or a laptop (ability to access optical drives, longer battery life, etc), or expand that laptop like it is a dock to make it a desktop with full sized monitor and keyboard and good mouse. The same basic unit, but highly modular. A very portable computer that functions as a cellphone, or "other" depending on what is is snapped into to and what accessories are then present. *That* would be a slick little gadget, and once it was attached to another thing, you'd have two or even three screens!

  65. Naw, EEE PCs are the coolest thing ever... by Joce640k · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I tried one the other day, it even ran my 3D editor perfectly at speeds which would put one of those old SGI boxes to shame. It has VGA output for big-screen presentations and would have saved me a lot of shoulder ache from lugging a laptop around last month. I'm getting one as soon as I've got a few hundred bucks to spare.

    The ONLY thing I can see that this thing has got going for it is the WIFI. With some custom applets it could do all sorts of cool things wirelessly.

    Then again, so could an Eee PC...

    --
    No sig today...
  66. Re:Small? Go for,high-fidelity tube technology ... by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

    But do you have one of the new 66-megalith models?!

    (apologies to Terry Pratchett)

    --
    You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
  67. OGO is better by AmigaHeretic · · Score: 1

    You can already get a much better version of this all over Europe for sometime. Just can't seem to get it in the US.

    http://www.ogo.com/en/

    Check out the OGO clips, those are cool.

    1. Re:OGO is better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a website with three-eyed things making silly noises and chasing the mouse pointer.

      That's it.

      Nothing else. If there's a "skip intro" thing, I can't see it.

    2. Re:OGO is better by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      Last I checked, OGO was 8x the price of this iKit thing.

      I think it's much more reasonable to compare the iKit to the Nokia tablets than a ultra mobile PC.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    3. Re:OGO is better by AmigaHeretic · · Score: 1

      >>Last I checked, OGO was 8x the price of this iKit thing.

      ??? The OGO is priced around $99-$129 in most countries. You can buy them without contract a lot of places as well.

    4. Re:OGO is better by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      My mistake, I was thinking of the OQO. Which is a handheld PC for $1300-$2900.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  68. Palm Centro by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    You can buy the unlocked version on Palm's site. But it only comes in white for the unlocked version.

    My problem with smartphones is that they tend to be good at their secondary function (pda, music player, etc). But only mediocre at the phone function. iPhone and Treos are a good example. Treos are terrible phones, and iPhones are arguably only mediocre. It seems like I get a lot better phone-only functionality out of a cheap little Nokia or Samsung.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    1. Re:Palm Centro by Hucko · · Score: 1

      Can you elaborate? How can dialling and receiving a call/txt msg be mediocre? I've got an apple bug biting me but I'm wary that it may be all about the glitz.

      --
      Semi-automatic amateur armchair Australian philosopher; conjecture ready at any moment...
    2. Re:Palm Centro by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      The iPhone has a fair amount of feed back where you can hear yourself talking. (side tone I have heard it called?).
      The call quality on the Treo ranges from terrible to mediocre, depending on the model. Generally you sound a little bit "under water" to the other party.
      iPhone's display is a little difficult to dial one handed with your thumb. or to dial without looking reliably. At least compared to a basic phone with real buttons. Also you can't really dial an iPhone if you have long fingernails. It's just the nature of the touch display they use. (capacity instead of resistive)

      Nothing wrong with getting one, but it is all about the glitz. I have yet to see the iPhone, Treo or Blackberry improve someone's productivity. Answering every email instantly with generally uninsightful comments doesn't seem to be valuable to coworkers.

      I think value features to a cellphone would be:
      built-in flashlight, so you always have it with you.
      GPS with useful maps. google maps style with directions is a bonus here.
      voicemail that is managable (iphone has a great voicemail system)
      the ability to send faxes using your camera (doesn't exist anywhere yet)
      the ability to receive faxes (this isn't done either)
      the ability to send pictures to any phone (iphone can get them in a around about way, but can't easily send them to ANY phone)
      can transfer and backup contact lists and share them with others (treos do this well, man basic phones don't really do it at all) ...and #1, can easily pick up calls when they come in and sound like you're on a real phone to the other party instead of a mediocre cell phone.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    3. Re:Palm Centro by Hucko · · Score: 1

      Thanks... :)

      --
      Semi-automatic amateur armchair Australian philosopher; conjecture ready at any moment...
  69. qwerty? by skylinkdave · · Score: 1

    Why a "qwerty" layout? Who the hell can touch-type on that thing?

    1. Re:qwerty? by Dan541 · · Score: 1

      ive never been a fan of touch type.

      You need tactile feedback to get any real work done.

      --
      An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
  70. Zaurus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I have had a few Sharp Zauruses in the C-3XXX series that did just that a few years ago.

    Surprisingly usable, they were...

    So, how is this new? This sounds like news from the past coming through a rip in the time-space continuum...

  71. Pager? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looks like a fancy two-way pager.

  72. Re:Small? Go for,high-fidelity tube technology ... by syzler · · Score: 3, Funny

    How appropriate that a user named CorporateSuit refers to his IT team as "slaves on rowers."

  73. Awes0me!! by weasel5i2 · · Score: 1

    Wowie! I want one!
    Oh, wait a second. My HTC 8925/Tilt/TyTN-II IS such a computer!

    "It can connect to the Internet using a standard Wi-Fi connection, or it can use your cell phone's mobile broadband connection via Bluetooth.."

    Yep. This here 8925 does all that, QWERTY keyboard, et c, PLUS has its own internal mobile carrier access, independent of Bluetooth (which it also has!) That seems to be at least one notch better than TFA's "mobile computer" if you ask me.

    HTC 8925 = Windows Mobile = Pocket PC = Pocket Personal Computer. (computer being the operative word here)

    As the legendary Blackbeard once said, "This arrrrren't news...!" ^_^

    -W5i2

    --
    [BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY]: X5O!P%@AP[4\PZX54(P^)7CC)7}$EICAR-STANDARD-ANTIVIR US-TEST-FILE!$H+H*
  74. Attaching keyboard/mouse/etc to mobile by weasel5i2 · · Score: 1

    Oh yeah, I forgot to mention..

    There's a thing called the RedFly which lets you basically add a subnotebook-sized console to your mobile phone via bluetooth or USB.. It has no CPU or storage, per se, but appears to work kinda like a thin client: it adds a 7" screen, QWERTY, touchpad, and some host USB ports. I dunno how well or fast it works, but it's definitely out there. http://www.celiocorp.com/ about $300 IIRC..

    -W5i2

    --
    [BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY]: X5O!P%@AP[4\PZX54(P^)7CC)7}$EICAR-STANDARD-ANTIVIR US-TEST-FILE!$H+H*
  75. Re:The only reason we are calling this a "Computer by RobertinXinyang · · Score: 1

    At about 1,000RMB it would not even get a glance from a Chinese student unless it had a GREAT dictionary. That is what they look at those small devices as and they are judged by the quality of the dictionary.

    Wi-Fi is a next to useless feature in China and Wi-Fi is not popular outside of the Hostels that cater to westerners. Even if a student put a wi-fi router in their dorm room it would not be useful as most colleges only allow Windows computers to connect to the network and the internet.

  76. almost completely useless! by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

    This is nuts: why can't portable products which are usable on their own be available?

    As someone else said, this thing basically differs very little from a cell phone - except for its software and lack of connectivity. It's essentially useless on its own.

    Personally, I want to see those yet-undelivered "$100 laptops" we've seen promised several times (and made available through bulk buy or self-import) which appear to be based on the Skytone Alpha 400/Hivision Mininote (the variant with built-in wireless) (seen here: link).

    Yes, I want one; I want one very badly. They're basically 8-year-old technology, but with some newer additions such as wifi. You can run a fair amount of "modern" software on those old HPC computers, and the best of them only have 64Mb RAM. I'm currently running ion 3 as a window manager (matchbox-wm was an option, but it wasn't as intuitive) with dillo2, wordgrinder, irssi/bitlbee, and half a dozen xterms on a Mobilepro 780 without the need for swap. This is on NetBDS. Not "full featured" but well worth $100 - if I could get another one with twice the RAM. $200, well, that'd be cutting it a bit close to what an Eee costs given the feature set.

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  77. Treo 650 specs! Solution looking 4 problem? by Eganicus · · Score: 1

    It's a Treo 650, from 2005? Same specs! OK screen is .6" larger WOW!!!

  78. Insert my foleo comments here... by Eganicus · · Score: 1

    What else is there to say? Wait, my cat likes it. He feels the thumb keyboard limits him, and discriminates against paws. He hired EFF to make full size keyboards standard so cats aren't victims of discrimination.... ( My pocket will be so stuffed with the KB mouse ( down kitty!) and monitor cables )

  79. Does it have a full sized keyboard? by the_raptor · · Score: 1

    Does it have an 80% of full sized keyboard or bigger, and at least 800x600 resolution? If not it isn't competing with sub-notebooks. The sub-notebook form factor is about input and output devices [b]not[/b] computational power. It is about getting the smallest notebook you can with a usable keyboard and monitor. Unless you can sit there for four plus hours typing text on this thing, it isn't competitive. It is the reason I didn't buy an early EEEpc, and waited for the competitors with bigger keyboards to come out.

    --

    ========
    CINC, 4th Penguin Legion
  80. stolen by the TSA? by westyvw · · Score: 1

    As in taken from you, or taken from your luggage? And by the way, my SL5600 for some reason was really easy to type (figuratively) on, I got pretty fast at it.

  81. resentment by Zoxed · · Score: 1

    > when you add in that the average American is as smart as a radish.

    Hey: I am a radish, and I resent that remark.

  82. Re:Small? Go for,high-fidelity tube technology ... by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

    Gears are the true analog circuits! I can really tell the difference, because every month when the coal bill comes, I know it must be good, because it is using butt-loads of coal.

    Also, the analog gears mean that the computed numbers are crisper with rich undertones and better definition.

    --
    SJW n. One who posts facts.
  83. Reminiscent by blackjackshellac · · Score: 1

    This is reminiscent of Timex Sinclair from the late 70s for some reason, much more powerful no doubt, but it's interesting how the compact size is new again. And this seems about as interesting as the Sinclair did at the time. Fail.

    --
    Salut,

    Jacques

  84. Time to pimp the N95 again it seems... by Fluffy+Bunnies · · Score: 1

    I find it odd that whenever there's an article about cell phones, somebody always complains about how they can't do x with their cell phone, forcing me to reply that I can easily do x with my Nokia N95, which was released a year and a half ago. (Several other Nokia models should also work, and I'm fairly sure some Samsung models at least have TV-out ports.)

    1. Re:Time to pimp the N95 again it seems... by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      What carriers use that phone? I want one!

    2. Re:Time to pimp the N95 again it seems... by Fluffy+Bunnies · · Score: 1

      Assuming you're american, none AFAIK. But you can buy it and use it with any carrier that doesn't force you to use their branded phones. It's probably not even that expensive any more now that it's been superseded by newer models.

  85. Done before a million times by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And this is different from a Nokia N810 how...?

  86. Re:The only reason we are calling this a "Computer by Echnin · · Score: 1
    I should have been clearer; I was talking about students of the Chinese language.

    AFAIK all hardware electronic dictionaries on the market are intended for Chinese who are studying English. With a device like this you could possibly run Wenlin (PC/Mac/Wine software). With a PDA you can run Pleco (WM/Palm software).

    As for Wi-Fi in China, I don't know where you live (oh, Henan, right), but when I lived in Beijing last year I found Wi-Fi everywhere. All Starbucks stores have it, most smaller coffee shops have it, Subway has it... Wi-Fi was plenty available in my own personal experience. Much better than Korea, Hong Kong, Taiwan or Japan, where though it may be available for the most part you apparently have to pay or at least register. YMMV of course.

    --
    Lalala
  87. Re:The only reason we are calling this a "Computer by Echnin · · Score: 1

    Interesting. Yeah, that would indeed have been an excellent choice. I don't think I ever saw that at the used phone market - if I did it must have cost way more than 150 eur, because 150 eur (approx 1400 rmb) barely got you a Blue Angel when I was looking. I'm not that unhappy with what I've ended up with though, which is a Toshiba G900, which I got used for 2700 RMB (at the time about 260 eur). Dictionary software itself cost 120 USD anyway.

    --
    Lalala
  88. Pretty cool by acitodg · · Score: 1

    This is a pretty cool computer. I have a blackberry already, so I don't think I would buy one. I think their is a sweet spot for the size of a laptop.