Slashdot Mirror


Alarm Raised On Teenage Hackers

Arno Igne writes to tell us that the number of underage participants in "high-tech" crimes has risen steeply in recent history. Reporting children as young as 11 swapping credit card details and asking for hacks, many are largely unskilled and thus more likely to get caught and arrested. "Communities and forums spring up where people start to swap malicious programs, knowledge and sometimes stolen data. Some also look for exploits and virus code that can be run against the social networking sites popular with many young people. Some then try to peddle or use the details or accounts they net in this way. Mr Boyd said he spent a lot of time tracking down the creators of many of the nuisance programs written to exploit users of social networking sites and the culprit was often a teenager."

213 comments

  1. Gosh, underage hackers with no skill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I wish we had a term to describe that... something that notes the fact they are younger, and simple in their skills... Maybe "script kiddies?"

    1. Re:Gosh, underage hackers with no skill? by moderatorrater · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah, but in this case they're doing it for lolz. I suggest lolkiddiez.

    2. Re:Gosh, underage hackers with no skill? by kdemetter · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yeah , this is really worth a 'nothing to see here , move along'.

      I mean , this is nothing new . It's been that way for over a century.

      I don't like that they track down the 'creator's of those nuisance programs ' , though . Programming these things is a fun way of learning how it works.

      They should be going after the people who USE it for malicious purpose instead.

      I mean , maybe we should just lock up the creators of the Windows API , because you can really do some damage with that.

    3. Re:Gosh, underage hackers with no skill? by bloodninja · · Score: 1

      I wish we had a term to describe that... something that notes the fact they are younger, and simple in their skills... Maybe "script kiddies?"

      That doesn't make headlines like YAMISH does.

      --
      Lock the wife and the dog in the boot of the car.
      Return one hour later.
      Who's happy to see you?
    4. Re:Gosh, underage hackers with no skill? by shawb · · Score: 1

      Uh oh... I've figured it out. lolkiddiez sounds an awful lot like lolkittyz. Which of course means they are just trying to cutesy up what they really are.

      i can has cheezburger haxs?

      --
      I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
    5. Re:Gosh, underage hackers with no skill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      we have another term for them Crackers.

      Hackers are something else completely and they are /not/ criminals.

    6. Re:Gosh, underage hackers with no skill? by Bishop+Rook · · Score: 1

      Or, possibly, hackers on steroids. It depends how much you want people to be frightened.

    7. Re:Gosh, underage hackers with no skill? by steelfood · · Score: 1

      I think teenagers finding a login/password for a pay porn site on a BBS would count as "hacking" to these people.

      Anyway, I remember one of the oldest tricks in the book from when I was a teenager that actually involved money. Somebody would get a list of credit card numbers, and that person would order some thing here and there online with one of those numbers. They'd get it shipped to an accomplice friend's house. Since there's some law that anything that gets delivered to a person belongs to that person regardless of whether that person ordered it or not, the accomplice then would own the items in the shipment. And then the accomplice would give the person who placed the order his stuff.

      I never partook in such things, but I knew plenty of people who did, and was intimately familiar with it. I was asked on several occasions to be the collector, but I never gave a serious reply. I couldn't think of a good enough reason why I would give the address of my residence to someone who scammed others.

      Anyway, I fail to see how this is news to anyone not living under a rock for the past 20 years.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    8. Re:Gosh, underage hackers with no skill? by phulegart · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      {sarcasm}

      Riiiight...
      and there's no reason to remind people of what's currently going on in the world... because everyone regularly proves that they will remember it all, guaranteed.

      Oh... and no reason to go after the person who creates the virus. Only the person who uses it against others.

      No reason to go after the guy who makes pipe bombs either. Just the guy who uses them.

      No reason to go after the guy who makes the full-auto conversion kits. Just the guy who applies them to the off-the-shelf weapon.

      No reason to go after the guy who makes the fake passports. Just the guy who uses one.

      Oh, and why stop at the creator of the windows API? Why not go after the inventor of the computer? {/sarcasm}

      --
      "I love deadlines. I love the whooshing sound they make as they fly by." -D. Adams
    9. Re:Gosh, underage hackers with no skill? by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 2, Informative

      There was a term for them long before "the internets" were flooded with them.

      In the olden days of BBSs, we used to call them "ruggies" which was short for "rug rats". But "script kiddies" is even more accurate of a description, seeing they are basically just following along a "recipe" for cracking something.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    10. Re:Gosh, underage hackers with no skill? by giorgiofr · · Score: 1

      Whuh? The goods are *stolen* but they cannot be confiscated by the gov't? Unbelievable. Must be a really weird quirk in the law system.

      --
      Global warming is a cube.
    11. Re:Gosh, underage hackers with no skill? by theaveng · · Score: 1

      Hey now. I have my current job thanks to hacking Atari 2600 consoles, Commodore 64s, and Amiga 500s. I also did a little bit of "phreaking" until one of our local BBS Sysops got caught by the FBI, so I decided to back-off the illegal stuff. I learned more skills in my bedroom as a "script kiddie" than I ever learned in the gov't-monopoly school system. (I'm happy to say the privatized college education was much more useful. It helped provide focus.)

      --
      FOX NEWS.com should be BANNED from television and internet. Have the Congress take it over and give us Truespeak.
    12. Re:Gosh, underage hackers with no skill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just this morning I found out that my credit card had gotten pawned. Second time it's happened to me in the last 2 years. Luckily this time the credit card company disabled my card before someone had a chance to charge $3,600 to it like last time. It really angers me and makes me wonder where they got my info. Maybe NewEgg, thinkgeek, gas station terminal, restaurant.. who knows...

    13. Re:Gosh, underage hackers with no skill? by Dr+Tall · · Score: 1

      It relies on being unable to prove that the collector is in on the deal with the fraudster. Because a legitimate postal service delivers the package to a party not involved in crime, it cannot be recovered.

    14. Re:Gosh, underage hackers with no skill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh... and no reason to go after the person who creates the virus. Only the person who uses it against others.

      According to you, law enforcement should be prosecuted. Creating viruses is an important step in learning about them. Know thy enemy.

      No reason to go after the guy who makes pipe bombs either. Just the guy who uses them.

      They have legitimate uses. If it were not for "pipe bombs" and other explosives, much of our farm land would not be available today.Even worse, people learning rocketry are now thrown into the "pipe bomb" club.

      No reason to go after the guy who makes the full-auto conversion kits. Just the guy who applies them to the off-the-shelf weapon.

      People are legally allowed to convert/purchase/own fully automatic weapons.

      No reason to go after the guy who makes the fake passports. Just the guy who uses one.

      This fraud on the front end. This item does not belong with the others in your list.

    15. Re:Gosh, underage hackers with no skill? by djdavetrouble · · Score: 1

      It relies on being unable to prove that the collector is in on the deal with the fraudster. Because a legitimate postal service delivers the package to a party not involved in crime, it cannot be recovered.

      What about if they detect the fraud before delivery, then the police are the ones delivering the package, and when you sign for it, you are receiving stolen goods and they arrest you.

      Isn't that how it works with drugs? They deliver it or wait for you to pick it up, then arrest you?

      --
      music lover since 1969
    16. Re:Gosh, underage hackers with no skill? by Rasperin · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No reason to go after the guy who makes rifles, hand guns, etc. Go after the guy who used it to murder people.
      No reason to go after the guy who makes vehicles. Go after the guy who used it to run someone off the road.
      No reason to go after the guy who makes whiskey. Go after the guy who used it to beat someone with.
      Your argument goes both ways sir.

      --
      WTF Slashdot, why do I have to login 50 times to post?
    17. Re:Gosh, underage hackers with no skill? by Ortega-Starfire · · Score: 1

      >People are legally allowed to convert/purchase/own fully automatic weapons.

      Depends on the state.

      http://www.mp5.net/info/sbsconr.htm

      --
      ---- Liquid was a patriot ----
    18. Re:Gosh, underage hackers with no skill? by initdeep · · Score: 1

      Oh, and why stop at the creator of the windows API? Why not go after the inventor of the computer?

      im willing to bet we can get linus much easier and for more.... /sarcasm

    19. Re:Gosh, underage hackers with no skill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Dream on, you hoopy frood. In a better universe perhaps.

    20. Re:Gosh, underage hackers with no skill? by g0dsp33d · · Score: 1

      Analogy fail. There are laws against possessing explosives and faking passports.

      --
      lol: You see no door there!
    21. Re:Gosh, underage hackers with no skill? by roguetrick · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, I had a friend get caught for credit card fraud in middle school. The days of AOL were full of script kiddies. This stuff is old news.

      --
      -The world would be a better place if everyone had a hoverboard
    22. Re:Gosh, underage hackers with no skill? by The+Gaytriot · · Score: 3, Funny

      No reason to go after the guy who makes whiskey. Go after the guy who used it to beat someone with.

      What? Beat him with the whiskey?

      I just accidentally my friend with the whiskey.

      --
      Srsly u guys. U guys, srsly.
    23. Re:Gosh, underage hackers with no skill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends on the state.

      I said, "people are", not, "all people are." ;)

    24. Re:Gosh, underage hackers with no skill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I mean , maybe we should just lock up the creators of the Windows API , because you can really do some damage with that.

      Maybe we should.

    25. Re:Gosh, underage hackers with no skill? by dexomn · · Score: 1

      In the spirit of stupid internet memes I suggest "LoLnOoBz".

      yES, pHEAR tEH lOL nOOBZ aND tEH bROWN tROUTZ tHEY pUT oN tHE iNTERNETZ.

    26. Re:Gosh, underage hackers with no skill? by Grimbleton · · Score: 1

      "People are legally allowed to convert ... fully automatic weapons."

      They sure as fuck aren't in the US. Go read the NFA.

    27. Re:Gosh, underage hackers with no skill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I mean , this is nothing new . It's been that way for over a century."

      I remember those damn abacus tamperers. Always removing a bead or two when I wasn't looking..

    28. Re:Gosh, underage hackers with no skill? by Mister_Stoopid · · Score: 1

      Ummmm, I believe you are incorrect, sir. They do it for the "LULZ". I can haz +5 infourmativ??

    29. Re:Gosh, underage hackers with no skill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't lolies be better?

      Oh wait, I didn't mean it like that...

    30. Re:Gosh, underage hackers with no skill? by Jabbrwokk · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think you'll agree that hacking and phreaking is different than some n00b using scripts to commit electronic crimes. Hacking something just for the sake of doing it, to learn how it works and to poke around in forbidden space, is different than stealing credit card numbers so you can buy the latest ecksbawks game.

      Hacking is still illegal, but but it's not necessarily malicious, like stealing and using someone's credit card number.

    31. Re:Gosh, underage hackers with no skill? by jlarocco · · Score: 3, Informative

      Oh... and no reason to go after the person who creates the virus. Only the person who uses it against others.
      No reason to go after the guy who makes pipe bombs either. Just the guy who uses them.
      No reason to go after the guy who makes the full-auto conversion kits. Just the guy who applies them to the off-the-shelf weapon.
      No reason to go after the guy who makes the fake passports. Just the guy who uses one.

      Makes sense to me. Most things are legal until you use them to do something stupid.

    32. Re:Gosh, underage hackers with no skill? by Ortega-Starfire · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Move to one of the states in the link I provided and you can.

      Step 1. Fill out ATF form 4 (which includes fingerprint card and $200 tax.)
      Step 2. Wait 1 week to 6 months for approval and buy NFA item when the ATF grudgingly accepts that you aren't a felon, insane, or for some other reason not allowed to own Title 2 hardware.
      Step 3. Don't profit (Full auto: nothing makes a paycheck disappear faster.)

      --
      ---- Liquid was a patriot ----
    33. Re:Gosh, underage hackers with no skill? by MartinSchou · · Score: 1

      How can "ruggies" be short for "rug rats"? Both are 7 charaters (not counting whitespaces). That's like saying "The WhiteHouse" is short for "The White House" because you've saved 1 single character.

    34. Re:Gosh, underage hackers with no skill? by Golddess · · Score: 1

      Oh... and no reason to go after the person who creates the virus. Only the person who uses it against others.

      No reason to go after the guy who makes pipe bombs either. Just the guy who uses them.

      No reason to go after the guy who makes the full-auto conversion kits. Just the guy who applies them to the off-the-shelf weapon.

      No reason to go after the guy who makes the fake passports. Just the guy who uses one.

      I know you're being sarcastic, but.. I agree.

      Go after the people who are using and distributing those viruses, not the person who wrote the thing (they can, of course, be the same person/people, but go after them for the act, not the potential to commit the act). Unless it was their intent to release it upon the world and wreck havoc.

      Same goes for pipe bombs, full-auto conversion kits, and fake passports. Unless they are providing such services with intent to cause malice, I say, let them.

      Now it could probably be argued that such services could never be provided without such intent, but that's not what I'm here to discuss. At any rate, the information to do such things shouldn't be fought, it's a losing battle. It's not like cracking someone's password, where outside of brute strength (lets presume perfect encryption for the sake of argument) there's no possible method of obtaining that password. These are things based upon the specific way that our world is wired, and if one person was able to determine how to do it, others can too.

      Fight the cause of the disease, not the symptoms they produce.

      --
      "I'm not sure I like the fugnutish tone you used in your post!" -RogL (608926)-
    35. Re:Gosh, underage hackers with no skill? by dreddnott · · Score: 1

      >I just accidentally my friend with the whiskey.

      Accidentally what?

      --
      I may make you feel, but I can't make you think.
    36. Re:Gosh, underage hackers with no skill? by fatalGlory · · Score: 1

      I have no problem at all with people creating pipe bombs, full-auto conversion kits, fake passports or even viruses.

      It's just one of those issues of great power = great responsibility.

      To that end, if the person has previously shown themselves not to be responsible, I am in favour of discriminating against them personally and preventing them from these activities. If its to learn and test your own ingenuity go for it. Just be wise as to who's hands your powerful creation might fall into and whether or not this risk is too great.

      --
      Censorship is the opposite of education. If neo-darwinism were defensible, people would not need to try and censor ID.
    37. Re:Gosh, underage hackers with no skill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I'm pretty sure he accidentally his friend with the whiskey.

      Reading comprehension sure is going downhill these days...

    38. Re:Gosh, underage hackers with no skill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > "Most things are legal until you use them to do something stupid."

      Humans have an uncanny sense for this.

    39. Re:Gosh, underage hackers with no skill? by Grimbleton · · Score: 1

      Read what I said.

      Read what you said.

      It hasn't been legal to convert to full-auto since 1986.

    40. Re:Gosh, underage hackers with no skill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do realize that while in apparent sarcasm, you spill your argument by changing your side on the last line? looser.

    41. Re:Gosh, underage hackers with no skill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's easier to pronounce innit.

    42. Re:Gosh, underage hackers with no skill? by michaelhood · · Score: 1

      What? Beat him with the whiskey?

      I just accidentally my friend with the whiskey.

      The whole whiskey?

    43. Re:Gosh, underage hackers with no skill? by andy19 · · Score: 1

      That's what you get when you have the packaged delivered to your house.
      Problem with most kids is, they are stupid.

    44. Re:Gosh, underage hackers with no skill? by Ortega-Starfire · · Score: 1

      Sorry, there was a 9th circuit ruling that I thought was still in effect.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Stewart_(2003)

      It has been illegal since 2006 at this point now. But if you do it the right way now with DC vs heller under your belt AND the legality of building your own firearms so long as you promise to never transfer them, you might be able to get away with it, and I might just get my lawyers ready to try.

      --
      ---- Liquid was a patriot ----
    45. Re:Gosh, underage hackers with no skill? by jonnyt886 · · Score: 1

      Er, hacking is not illegal. The summary is confusing 'hacking' with 'cracking'.

      http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_the_difference_between_hacking_and_cracking

    46. Re:Gosh, underage hackers with no skill? by Dr+Tall · · Score: 1

      I guess by "legitimate postal service" I also meant "not the police on a sting operation". I think the cops do whatever they want :) You're right that they'll definitely arrest you!

    47. Re:Gosh, underage hackers with no skill? by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      I shortened the exact title "ruggies" was short for. The technical term it is a shortened form of is "stupid little shit annoying rug rats ruining things for the rest of us in their parent's basement" - if you are not into the brevity thing.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    48. Re:Gosh, underage hackers with no skill? by roguetrick · · Score: 1

      Nah, the package was delivered to another middle schooler's house. The other middle schooler however didn't have the balls to face the feds and cracked.

      --
      -The world would be a better place if everyone had a hoverboard
    49. Re:Gosh, underage hackers with no skill? by Grimbleton · · Score: 1

      Let me know when you do, I'll keep an eye out for your BATFE raid.

  2. "Underage"? by Sockatume · · Score: 5, Interesting

    At what age does high-tech crime become legal then?

    --
    No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    1. Re:"Underage"? by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      That depends on who you're working for. ;)

    2. Re:"Underage"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      No, no. That's just to make it clear that they're all too young to have sex with, so no point getting your hopes up for pulling one of these nubile hacker princesses. I can only assume this is why the Sexy Teen Hackers 2008 calendar never got shot, right? Right?!

    3. Re:"Underage"? by OrangeTide · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Ha! good point.

      I guess once you are 18 you are no longer too young to go to a federal prison.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    4. Re:"Underage"? by rev_g33k_101 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Ha! good point.

      I guess once you are 18 you are no longer too young to go to a federal prison.

      Do you mean a federal pound me in the ass prison?

      --
      "The problem with defending the purity of the English language is that English is about as pure as a cribhouse whore."
    5. Re:"Underage"? by RulerOf · · Score: 1

      If you're under 18, you go to State "Kick Me in the Ass" prison.

      If you're over 18, you go to Federal "Pound Me in the Ass" prison.

      --
      Boot Windows, Linux, and ESX over the network for free.
    6. Re:"Underage"? by Tuoqui · · Score: 1

      Well considering in Canada we have this stupid thing called the YOUNG OFFENDERS ACT that makes the maximum for any crime a child commits (including MURDER) be 2 years. I'd say that the real criminals are being rather smart about this. They're utilizing the youngest and most vulnerable in their criminal networks to do things for them like card validation and use. Which are ironically the most high-risk portions of their operation.

      --
      09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0
      +2 Troll is Slashdot's way of saying groupthink is confused
  3. This is new? by MindlessAutomata · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Script kiddies have been around since the AOL days. Hell, I myself got a juvenile laugh out of punters (remember those? God, the AIM clients were so terrible back then) and other "progs".

    Mostly I imagine the vast majority of this stuff nowadays is myspace-related. Probably kids trying to break into someone else's myspace page because they're little drama whores like that.

    1. Re:This is new? by BigJClark · · Score: 1


      Script kiddies have been around since DOS days ;)

      --

      Hi, I Boris. Hear fix bear, yes?
    2. Re:This is new? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I survived the eighties one time already. The early days of the Ma Bell breakup coincided with dialup BBSs. Now, there were any number of long-distance companies (MCI, Sprint, whatever) that had dialup portals (since they could be hard-switched for some reason), and they gave their clients six-digit identifier pins. So basically any kid with a modem and half a brain (yes, half a brain, since a full one would realize the trouble) could commit wire fraud, and some of us did. Once you got on those BBSs, what would you talk about?

      Then there were the glories of carbon-transfer paper and the mall dumpsters (away from the food court ones). Dumb kids + tech = felonies ahoy! It's been like that for decades.

    3. Re:This is new? by oatesy · · Score: 4, Funny

      I agree...in fact I'm almost ashamed (no I am) to say that my first major experience with "hacking" was on my friends myspace pages. But it doesn't help that great movies like Hackers make young kids think that they can get with Angelina Jolie if they are just good at hacking. I blame society and the movie industry.

    4. Re:This is new? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know what you could script kiddie in DOS that could affect anyone but yourself prior to 1985...

    5. Re:This is new? by lysergic.acid · · Score: 2, Insightful

      yea, what bunch of sensationalized garbage. i'd expect this from FOX news, but not from the BBC.

      teenagers have always been mischievous, and all hackers start as teenagers. most hackers grow out of malicious/immature behavior by adulthood, so naturally most phishers/crackers/virus writers/script kiddies/etc. are going to be teenagers.

      heck, it's our teenage rebelliousness that motivates us to try new things. even though teenagers can be mischievous, it's usually pretty harmless stuff. when i was a in elementary school and junior high i used to write trojans, progs/punters/scrollers, mail bombers, etc. that's what motivated me to learn how to program. and i'm sure there are many others out there who were the same way.

      it's the script kiddies that grow up to become spammers that we need to worry about. they cause the most damage and are a much bigger nuisance and societal problem than mischievous teenage hacker-wannabes. greed-driven malice is much more dangerous than curiosity-driven mischief.

    6. Re:This is new? by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 2, Funny

      But it doesn't help that great movies like Hackers make young kids think that they can get with Angelina Jolie if they are just good at hacking.

      Oh? You didn't get your turn with Angelina Jolie? I'll e-mail Bob and tell him to put you at the front of line.

    7. Re:This is new? by skeeto · · Score: 2, Informative

      Oh, man. Mentioning AIM punters brings back the old memories of being a script kiddie myself. I had a nice collection of those things as a kid.

      I remember finding out about an exploit where IMing someone a certain 5 digits followed by a semicolon instantly crashed their client. I would go into one of the chat rooms, make grandiose false claims (such claiming to be a "super genius"), and then use it on anyone who disagreed with me. A moment or so after I would do it, everyone would see my target silently wink out of the chat room. The client locked up and froze before even showing the IM window I had sent, so the victim had no idea what was going on.

      Letting an idiot 12-year old wield that power was like throwing gasoline on a fire.

    8. Re:This is new? by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      As someone that has had much to personal experience with this, I can decisively say that it is much larger than myspace.

      -Using skype to make anonymous phone calls. I was home alone and had two pizza delivery men show up. One had $50 worth. I don't eat pizza if I can get out of it.

      -Using skype to make anonymous phone calls. I had the police show up, one with pistol drawn and the other with a rifle at the ready. And I mean READY. The phone call had detailed how a car robbery at my house had devolved into a gunfight. My hands were buried in a sand-blasting cabinet. The police had made a dangerous, high-speed run to my house.

      -United States Postal Service boxes delivered to my house. 600 of them. Ordered online. Anonimously.

      -Multiple bomb threats at my son's middle school.

      -Anonymous skype calls to a neighbor, informing them that their daughter was pregnant and other such nonsense. (the 13yr old girl was not).

      Anonimous services on the internet have their place, but they can be abused by the stupid and idle.

      The perpetrator in this case was one of my son's classmates. The last I heard, the investigation was ongoing. The detective did not feel the testimony of my son and my neighbors daughter was enough to get a search warrant for the kids computer, and skype was uncooperative.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    9. Re:This is new? by phulegart · · Score: 1

      wow.

      Isn't that typical. Find anyone or anything else to blame, aside from the actual culprit. I mean, these kids see movies like Hackers, they learn that it is indeed a crime, then they disregard THAT lesson, and only take away from it the fact that if they protect the world from disaster by only doing good with their hacking, they can get the Pretty Girl at the end?

      I don't buy it. Nope. Because Hackers is full, from beginning to end, that Hacking is Bad/Illegal/Criminal. So the only thing that movies are guilty of, is not doing a good enough job of teaching kids that criminal activities lead to jail.

      People are responsible for their own actions.

      --
      "I love deadlines. I love the whooshing sound they make as they fly by." -D. Adams
    10. Re:This is new? by MindlessAutomata · · Score: 1

      That's not what a "script kiddie" is. Sociopathic asshole, yes; script kiddie, no.

    11. Re:This is new? by MindlessAutomata · · Score: 1

      I didn't mean to imply (though I did, sorry!) that it began then, mostly it became more commonplace. The AOL days was when the internet was becoming more solidified in our culture and people were starting to get home PCs and internet connections.

    12. Re:This is new? by oatesy · · Score: 0

      actually i was just kidding... I really do agree that the stupid kids are to blame. But I also do understand why they do it. I almost view the internet as something of a joke most of the time. ANYTHING you have online can potentially be stolen. so with this insecurity it seems like almost like those agreements we never read but always have to accept don't matter either so its okay to just hack into peoples accounts and steal from people because its okay to steal their information they volunteer online, why not the info they don't volunteer?
      only after getting caught do they realize that what they were messing with was real peoples money/info as apposed to being fake online. there's just wasn't much of a distinction between them when i was younger. even i did some very illegal things online but i never made the connection that it was wronging real people until MUCH later.

    13. Re:This is new? by idontgno · · Score: 1

      I'm curious. Do you mind explaining your basis of distinction between those two terms, because they're not necessarily mutually exclusive.

      IMHO, "Sociopathic asshole" goes to motive, while "script kiddie" goes to means.

      But again, I'd be curious to hear your point of view.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    14. Re:This is new? by MindlessAutomata · · Score: 1

      Someone who places anonymous Skype calls to harass people is not a script kiddie anymore than someone who places harassing phone calls from a pay phone at a gas station is.

      What is the point of your post? Karma whoring? It's obvious what I meant; I never said or even implied a sociopath can't be a script kiddie or vice versa.

      A script kiddie just describes a certain type of "hacker", using the term loosely. Usually, by trying to overcome security measures or exploit computer flaws by using someone elses' scripting or programming knowledge, all while having little-to-no knowledge of how the program actually works or what it is doing.

    15. Re:This is new? by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      Got busy (I'm at work), and couldn't finish the list that puts the sociopath in the script kiddie realm.

      -There was the defacing of various myspace pages (of people he didn't even know).

      -Cracking the school computers to modify my son's high school schedule.

      -Various and sundry other activities that all revolve around wasting time in front of a computer while attempting to make other people's lives miserable.

      The point of my post is that:
      a) it isn't harmless activity. The police showing up with loaded weapons was downright dangerous.
      b) the ability to hide behind anonimizing tools amplifies the activities and makes it impossible for law enforcement to protect the innocent.

      It's all fun and games, until someone gets shot or has their credit/social status ruined.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    16. Re:This is new? by MindlessAutomata · · Score: 1

      How do you know the individual in question is even the culprit?

      I'm surprised that the school hasn't yet done anything about having their computers broken into. How exactly was all this done?

    17. Re:This is new? by Creepy · · Score: 1

      I'm with you on the 1980s, but the Bell breakup didn't happen until 1984 and BBSes first became popular in the late 1970s-early 1980s. The switch to not use tones for identification happened in 1983 (and before that Joybubbles, Captain Crunch and the colorful boxes - aka Phone Phreaking). Hackers were War Dialing before the term existed (1983, WarGames, though you could say 1982 because the movie was shot in 1982) and before the IBM PC existed (Apple CAT II scripting was very popular with my group from the early-to-mid 1980s).

      Ah yes, and I remember people stealing CCs for the sole purpose of making long distance calls, but since you first refer to to post 1984 toll fraud era, where you'd have to call a long distance carrier on a local number, enter an access key and then the number you wanted to call, there wasn't a CC involved that I remember - I believe it went straight to billing by the key. I was straying from hacking/piracy around this time (by 1985 girls and music were much more interesting).

    18. Re:This is new? by towelie-ban · · Score: 1

      Script kiddies have been around since the AOL days. Hell, I myself got a juvenile laugh out of punters (remember those? God, the AIM clients were so terrible back then) and other "progs".

      Pardon me, sir. I believe you're referring to progz. They were quite 31337.

    19. Re:This is new? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But it doesn't help that great movies like Hackers make young kids think that they can get with Angelina Jolie if they are just good at hacking.

      I prefer Abby from NCIS. And the movie Hackers was such a joke as to be a bad movie, but an adequate way to spend part of a cold winter day.

    20. Re:This is new? by dintech · · Score: 1

      I think I have a skript for that.

    21. Re:This is new? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes (the parent of your post talking), you're right. That's why I said "coincided with Dialup BBSs" and not not "Coincided with the beginning of...." And yes, on the long-distance wire fraud scam, CC numbers were not involved, but many of the cool BBSs that you might call across the country to log into might have lists of Credit Cards that someone would post. Of course, you'd be stupid to use those instead of rolling your own. Still, I remember some people being just that stupid.

    22. Re:This is new? by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      He has admitted to some of it. Circumstantial evidence tying him to others. He may not be responsible for all of it, granted, but there is a pattern and it ALL stopped when the heat started getting close to him.

      We reported my son's classes being changed. The principal in charge, who is good friends with the boy's grandfather, blew it off. It wasn't until the school resource officer got wind of it that something started there. I don't know if they found anything, or if the principal we've come to know and love as "the bitch" got it buried again. I have no idea how the cracking was accomplished. I've no access to the computers or the investigation. My son is done with that school, and I really can't do anything about what was done there....sooooo...moving on.

      Most of the calls can be traced back to anonymous skype accounts.

      The myspace defacing was done scipt-kiddie style mixed with some password guessing.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
  4. Asking for hacks by Willis13 · · Score: 1

    "c'mon man, just one hack, I know you can spare it! I NEED it!!"

    1. Re:Asking for hacks by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      I already told you. The first one's free, after that if you want to play, you got to pay!

    2. Re:Asking for hacks by Dan541 · · Score: 1

      Like the kids who ask, "How can I hack hotmail?"

      --
      An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
  5. Using kids by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 5, Interesting

    There are cases of Immigrant smuggling where the drivers were juveniles because juveniles are much more difficult to prosecute.

    That's how I'd operate if I were a fraudster - have the kids to the dirty work and give them a cut. There are hordes of bored shithead suburban kids who would love to be "elite haxxors" and they would most likely avoid prosecution the first time.

    1. Re:Using kids by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yep. This is how a lot of the G's do drug smuggling and some other 'dirty' work of running a gang -- get the underage kids to do it. They get busted, they won't do time, and therefore it's a lot harder to get them to squeal. Ya gotta keep 'em separated!

      Of course these aren't your average run-of-the-mill parent-fearing suburban kids either. They're usually the problem-case kids.

    2. Re:Using kids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's how I'd operate if I were a fraudster - have the kids to the dirty work and give them a cut. There are hordes of bored shithead suburban kids who would love to be "elite haxxors" and they would most likely avoid prosecution the first time.

      I work retail and I see people having their kids shoplift for them. Same kinda idea, employees dont suspect some 8 year old kid is stealing something. Not only is this the scummiest thing I can think of, but it can land you in TONS of trouble if you're the adult. Getting kids to commit crimes for you is just wrong, and gets you in more trouble than if you just committed the crime yourself (given they can prove you were involved). Maybe the kids would avoid prosecution, but you sure as hell better hope they don't rat you out.

    3. Re:Using kids by bigpaperbag · · Score: 1

      Fear the return of the Kidsman and his band of child thieves.

    4. Re:Using kids by kefkahax · · Score: 1

      There are cases of Immigrant smuggling where the drivers were juveniles because juveniles are much more difficult to prosecute. That's how I'd operate if I were a fraudster - have the kids to the dirty work and give them a cut. There are hordes of bored shithead suburban kids who would love to be "elite haxxors" and they would most likely avoid prosecution the first time.

      Especially if they rat you out.

    5. Re:Using kids by MindlessAutomata · · Score: 1

      Usually they'd be pissing-their-pants scared to rat them out because they know it'd be highly likely that they'd get a hit put on their head.

    6. Re:Using kids by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Drug laws are worse. A teenager can buy any drug he wants, because the people selling them don't give tow shits about the law or the morality of feeding drugs to juviniles (who studies, observation, and common sense show will grow up to be hopeless addicts if they start smoking pot or drinking at a young age) but know for a certainty that a twelve year old isn't a narcotics officer. Try buying dope at MY age.

      You can buy pot in any high school in America, but you can't buy beer in a single one. If you want to keep drugs out of as many kids' hands as possible, legalize drugs for adults.

    7. Re:Using kids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course there are hordes of bored kids around, it's illegal for them to work. What would you expect them to do? They have to do something which isn't regulated like this, join a gang or just vegetate...

      Or go to one of the many prisons/schools around....

    8. Re:Using kids by Dencrypt · · Score: 1

      This is actually exactly the way real drug dealers (read: wholesale) operate on large scales, containing an area with their products. Largely on poor areas where the recruits can be harvested young and early.The young usually can't be prosecuted. At worst the social workers get notified and the child, youth, whatever gets moved. But then there are always others.
      There are no shortage on children in the world ;)

      (especially today, those with a computer to tie up the subject)

    9. Re:Using kids by repapetilto · · Score: 1

      I'm 5 years out of high school, looking back, I'd say alcohol was slightly more available. You either had to know someone to be able to get it (for pot the guy who knows a guy etc down the line and for alcohol someones brother) or in the special cases of alcohol know the place that will sell to you if you're clever and act straight enough (think send your biggest friend in wearing a suit and carrying a briefcase or going to your nearest "ghetto"). So I'm not sure theres that much weight to that argument. That said I don't think people becoming scumbags or just unable to hold a job has much to do with the legality of their vice of choice, and the whole war on drugs should just be stopped cold tomorrow if possible. I mean really between media glamorization, most people not feeling any real responsibility until they're 20 something, and making it so it takes some street smarts (ie thinking outside of the box your parents/schooling has provided for you) to be selling/buying the illegal stuff adding excitement to the whole thing the current situation is what I would post hoc expect to happen. Also someone ending up undereducated and not realizing the maximum extent of their potential (whatever that means) due to getting high or drunk instead of doing their homework for four years has only themselves and their parents to blame, plenty of people do both.

    10. Re:Using kids by corerunner · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ...and, suddenly, that Offspring track makes complete sense. I must have been too young at the time.

      --
      "Don't hate the media, become the media." -Jello Biafra
    11. Re:Using kids by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      most people not feeling any real responsibility until they're 20 something

      It was 19 for me, that's when I joined the Air Force. But before that, why would I need (let alone want) responsibility? Responsibility is for adults. Teenagers are immortal and never wrong.

      But as with alcohol prohibition in my grandparents' time (Grandma told me Grandpa had a beermaking kit in his barn), the laws against victimless illegal activities always cause the very problems they are supposed to solve.

      Take prostitution - people talk about STDs and streetwalers. Legalize it, zone for it, regulate it so the girls are tested, and there won't be streetwakers or rampant disease.

      Al Capone might never have become powerful if alcohol were legal and regulated. You don't see gangs fighting over alcohol today; today it's the other illegal drugs that cause gang violence.

    12. Re:Using kids by rabatitat · · Score: 1

      Yeah... Which also makes them (skiddies) a good avenue for a real attack... I mean these people are mostly willing to turn their AVs and other security measures off so they could run SOMEONE ELSE's scripts/progs to do the "hacking" since these tend to be red flagged... A serious Trojan anyone???

  6. I forget the term... by MyLongNickName · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I forget the term, but there are laws on the books that state that if you are a landlord, and you continually have tenants who engage in criminal activity that the authorities can confiscate the house. It is a slow process, but the point is that if you own the property that you have some responsibility in insuring that it isn't being used for purposes that are harmful to society.

    Apply that to social networking sites and...

    --
    See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    1. Re:I forget the term... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apply that to operating systems and...

    2. Re:I forget the term... by cdrguru · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Apply to ISPs also. Problem is today that most ISPs actively shield users on their system which engage in malicious activity.

      The answer is always they will not cooperate without a court order. Of course, if the police ask nicely they cooperate without a court order. But after a system is broken into unless there is at least $25,000 in provable damages you aren't going to get anyone in law enforcement interested. And that is just the beginning.

      So if someone is downloading child porn, the police are right there on that. If they break into your system and cause hours of downtime nothing happens. This can be considered to be tacit encouragement. Helping the folks learn about computers. Roughly the same way that gangbangers learn about automatic weapons.

    3. Re:I forget the term... by internerdj · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Apply that to the internet and... We get exactly what we need right? You may not enjoy social networking sites but what if someone used slashdot in a crime? Or wikileaks? Seriously is that the presendent you want set?

    4. Re:I forget the term... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If that was the case then most of the public housing projects in Boston should've been confiscated years ago.

    5. Re:I forget the term... by Alarindris · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I highly doubt that. I used to be a landlord in a rough area of town. We'd see cops there at least once a day. There's no way in hell they can expect a landlord to police. A landlord collects money (only sometimes) and maintains the ground and is in charge of repairs, not law enforcement.

    6. Re:I forget the term... by conteXXt · · Score: 2, Informative

      Think "Grow Houses" Up here in Canada. If a landlord knowing keeps renting to a grower the house can and will be forcibly cleaned up at considerable expense to the owner and the owner may also be held criminally responsible. Different laws/country though.

      --
      The truth about Led Zep should never be told on /. (Karma suicide ensues)
    7. Re:I forget the term... by MozeeToby · · Score: 1

      I would think that they would have to take the size of your building into account. If you house 100 people and 1 or two get arrested each year, that very well could be normal for your neighborhood and have nothing to do with the owner of the building.

      Now consider that a place like myspace or facebook has hundreds of thousands of users, the vaste majority of which are 100% legitimate. In my opinion, it would be unnacceptable to pull the plug on those sites because of what a few idiotic kids did in their free time.

    8. Re:I forget the term... by bloodninja · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Apply to ISPs also. Problem is today that most ISPs actively shield users on their system which engage in malicious activity.

      This is the real answer. Nobody is going to go for MS Windows being too easy to compromise, and nobody is going to go for Myspace (websites generally are not held to real-company laws). However, ISPs that host computers doing phishing, spaming, DDoSing, botnet herding, or other malicious activity should be shut down. I don't care if the computer doing the malicious activity is a compromised Windows machine or not, if the owner is aware or not, or if the owner approved of the ativity or not. Hit the ISPs, let them hit the users, and only then will the users demand a secure OS and secure applications.

      --
      Lock the wife and the dog in the boot of the car.
      Return one hour later.
      Who's happy to see you?
    9. Re:I forget the term... by characterZer0 · · Score: 1

      Do you care if the ISP/host computer is outside of the jurisdiction of your government?

      --
      Go green: turn off your refrigerator.
    10. Re:I forget the term... by bloodninja · · Score: 1

      Do you care if the ISP/host computer is outside of the jurisdiction of your government?

      That is obviously outside the scope of any particular government's ability to intervine. Are you implying that since any single government cannot prevent crime worldwide, that no government should try to prevent crime at all?

      --
      Lock the wife and the dog in the boot of the car.
      Return one hour later.
      Who's happy to see you?
    11. Re:I forget the term... by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      please tell me how to evict or inspect property where they have guns.

      Also if you call the cops on your tenants, it's counted against you.

      So how do you fix that law?

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    12. Re:I forget the term... by MyLongNickName · · Score: 1

      Kinda funny how this thing has bounced up and down in the modding category. I never once said I supported the idea of property confiscation, or applying it to internet activities... just a pause for reflection.

      Continue the mod tug-of-war, gentleman.

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    13. Re:I forget the term... by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      Up here in Canada it only applies to drugs though, afaik. If you're aware that a renter is operating a grow-house, you're bound to report them to the police. That's all.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    14. Re:I forget the term... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they do here in madison, wi

      http://www.madison.com/wsj/home/local/310082

    15. Re:I forget the term... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're responsible for calling the police, but if you let them go unchecked, then you're at fault.

    16. Re:I forget the term... by wikinerd · · Score: 1

      I agree 100%, it is not the landlord's job to police, and landlords are not capable to do that anyway. It's the police's job to do that. After all, how could the landlord police the tenant? they have privacy rights by law after all, so it would be impossible to know what they are doing.

  7. Ummm... by Corpuscavernosa · · Score: 5, Insightful

    many are largely unskilled and thus more likely to get caught and arrested.

    Problem solved?

    --
    We figured out a long time ago that it's easier to elect seven judges than to elect 132 legislators.
    1. Re:Ummm... by Abstrackt · · Score: 1

      That was my first thought, but arrest doesn't always lead to prosecution.

      --
      They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
    2. Re:Ummm... by moderatorrater · · Score: 1

      No, you're supposed to feel back for these kids. Can't you see that they're really the victims? Not the victims in the sense that it's their identity that gets stolen, or in the sense that they're the ones who get hacked, but in the sense that they shouldn't have been able to do this in the first place. Just because they're using stolen credit cards and causing mischief in a public place doesn't mean they should be punished. Shit, what do you think this is, a concentration camp? [/sarcasm]

    3. Re:Ummm... by KDEWolf · · Score: 1

      Profit!

    4. Re:Ummm... by dontmakemethink · · Score: 2, Insightful

      many are largely unskilled and thus more likely to get caught and arrested.

      Problem solved?

      More like problem created. When 16-year-old criminals discover exactly how much less severe the punishment is for them than 18-year-olds, they all have the same thought: "Crap! I've got less than 2 years to get good at this!"

      --

      War as we knew it was obsolete
      Nothing could beat complete denial
      - Emily Haines
    5. Re:Ummm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      many are largely unskilled and thus more likely to get caught and arrested.

      Problem solved?

      Posting as AC for obvious reasons...

      Problem is not solved. I work for one of the largest global internet services and we have a really hard time with these script kiddies. They don't seem to have any really bad intentions, but create extremly dangerous situations that could even end up putting the company out of business. I just wish some of them would actually notify us of problems they find, we'd be happy to even hire talented people who know how to do half of the hacks we see.

      I can tell you it's extremly tedious to start a case against a kid in some far away country. Different countries have different laws, and just getting a case running might take months. Compare this with the fact that we can usually identify who the guys in question really are (down to their home addresses, phone numbers and pictures) within the first day of an incident (we don't gather personaly identifiable data). So yes they don't seem to bother hiding their tracks, but getting anything done about it is next to impossible.

      And I really feel bad for a lot the guys who end up in shit "just for the lulz". Some of them are really talented, and do dumb shit just cause they are bored. Of course most of them will never end up in trouble for what they have done.

  8. Jobs for Kids by colganc · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I wonder if kids had some kind of job if they would be less likely to steal or break the law.

    1. Re:Jobs for Kids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Are there no prisons? Are there no workhouses?

    2. Re:Jobs for Kids by Legion_SB · · Score: 5, Funny

      I wonder if kids had some kind of job if they would be less likely to steal or break the law.

      I totally agree, but prostitution is illegal!

      --
      'a';DROP TABLE users; SELECT * FROM DATA WHERE name LIKE '%'... if you're reading this, it didn't work.
    3. Re:Jobs for Kids by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1, Informative

      Not in Nevada,

    4. Re:Jobs for Kids by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      It doesn't seem to deter adults - the director of the Abraham Lincoln Museum here in Springfield, who earns $150,000 per year, was arrested last week for shoplifting.

    5. Re:Jobs for Kids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In some countries . . .

  9. Oh no, 11 years old trying to hack social sites! by Viol8 · · Score: 5, Funny

    The whole of western civilisation is DOOMED!!

    Or at least until the kid stumbles across some p0rn links or pictures of drunk 18 year old girls and quickly forgets all about his l337 hacking attempts.

  10. Was AOL invented in the 1960s? by davidwr · · Score: 2, Funny

    Script kiddies have been around since the AOL days.

    I didn't know AOL predated the moon landing.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    1. Re:Was AOL invented in the 1960s? by MindlessAutomata · · Score: 1

      Heh, some say the moon landing never happened. I say it did. I'm sure that common ground can be found, though, in wishing that AOL never happened.

  11. 25 by PlusFiveTroll · · Score: 4, Funny

    Never trust anybody over 25!

    1. Re:25 by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Very True, Little Brother! Also, never trust anyone under 26.

  12. Re:One more reason... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    ...to say fuck YES, no to abstinence only education.

  13. The school of hard examples. by Ostracus · · Score: 1

    "Arno Igne writes to tell us that the number of underage participants in "high-tech" crimes has risen steeply in recent history. Reporting children as young as 11 swapping credit card details and asking for hacks, many are largely unskilled and thus more likely to get caught and arrested."

    Well gosh darn it. We need to send them to some kind of school so they will not get caught.

    --
    Shai Schticks:"You don't make peace with friends, you make peace with enemies"
    1. Re:The school of hard examples. by pseudorand · · Score: 1

      I think being in school really is an advantage. Every time I consider how I might go about "hacking" something (hypothetically, of course), I always feel like the first thing I'd need would be admin access to some system with Internet access that can't be traced to me. Home is obviously out, as is work. I could bring my laptop to some free wifi network, but then I risk someone looking over my shoulder or catching me on video surveillance. The free terminals at the library or Starbucks are possibilities, but if they were easily exploitable from the Internet, I'm sure someone would have beat me to it, so I'd have to physically go there to exploit them and that brings me to the same problem as the open wifi.

      But kids have access to computers at school. There's probably no surveillance, and no one would ask many questions about a student sitting in front of a computer for a long while in the library or classroom, and he's probably not the only one to do so either. Even if the sysadmin bothers recording DHCP records, MAC addresses are easily faked. This potential for anonymity really does give students an advantage in hacking.

  14. if you can't or won't by circletimessquare · · Score: 5, Insightful

    find a flaw in the system, the flaw will be found by someone else

    the nice thing about kids being the perps is that there is no more nefarious purpose than "i did for the lulz". do you really think if these teenagers weren't loudly and clumsily exploiting security holes that someone else with much more nefarious purposes is not expoliting the same security holes quietly and discreetly?

    consider kids hacking websites to be that website's security research division. the flaws are found, the flaws are fixed, everyone makes out better. thank god for loud dumb scrit kiddies

    seriously, script kiddies are a blessing. they provide incentive to harden your website, incentive that some websites don't have and apparently need

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:if you can't or won't by Sockatume · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A good analogy might be immunisation. The script kiddies present the network with a weakened form of potentially dangerous attacks, so that it can learn to defend itself. I'm not sure where Jenny McCarthy comes in, but I'm sure I'll figure out a way to make that happen.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    2. Re:if you can't or won't by moderatorrater · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes, trading stolen credit card information is "doing it for the lulz" and has no nefarious purpose.

    3. Re:if you can't or won't by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      It doesn't when you aren't raised to be cognizant of the repercussions of your actions.

      It never ceases to amaze me how entitled and amoral many kids are, being so protected from any kind of failure or problems by their parents, being told constantly that they're perfect, they can do no wrong, and nothing is ever their fault.

      </rant>

    4. Re:if you can't or won't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, nowadays it is. Think about it. If your credit card is stolen, and you report it, YOU GET THE USED CREDIT PUT BACK ON YOUR ACCOUNT. The only one who truly gets royally screwed in this situation is the CC company, as /somebody/ has to eat the costs, especially when they can't track down who was buying all that pr0n.

    5. Re:if you can't or won't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, stealing credit cards and IRL harassment is NOT doing for the lulz. Sometime hacking (usually nothing more than DDoS) can be done for that reason, like anontalk killing the *chans, that was done for the lulz. To compound it, when the *channers tryed to do recon, they were meet with an AIDS infested site so bad the not even firefox could keep the fail out. That was for the lulz.

    6. Re:if you can't or won't by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      I thought it was usually the merchant who got screwed............

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    7. Re:if you can't or won't by rabatitat · · Score: 1

      Another side of the coin, an 0day scenario: Hacker finds an exploit on the popular *cough* OS that runs your server. Makes you the target, HAS specific goals in mind and KNOWS what he/she is doing. Goes to work, cleans up his/her tracks, and releases the exploit and possibly a script so he can take cover in the skiddie chaos that ensues while also making sure that no one else will ever use that exploit since it will be patched... BTW, Mabuhay ang Noypi!!!

  15. been around for a long time by systematical · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I got my first computer when I was 10 around 95-96, within a year I discovered that I could pretend to be someone else by setting up a somewhat legitimate email account and sounding official. My friend and I would email tripod users, geocities users etc... posing as someone who offered free web services. Eventually we would get passwords to their accounts, change the password, and vandalize the web page (eventually we got tired of doing of this, i think we discovered girls around age 12). I didn't learn that this was called phishing until I was in high school. On the plus side it forced me to learn HTML (I wanted my vandalizing to look good), which eventually lead to a career in web development. Hopefully these delinquents can be saved too.

    1. Re:been around for a long time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      you son of a bitch! i have been looking for you for a long time!

    2. Re:been around for a long time by systematical · · Score: 2, Funny

      you must have operated a hanson site back then, that was the primary target.

    3. Re:been around for a long time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i think we discovered girls around age 12

      This and "career in web development" just don't seem to go together, or are we talking "girl" in the Slashdot sense and you where just hacking to get CC numbers for the porn sites?

    4. Re:been around for a long time by systematical · · Score: 1

      Lets just say I was far more efficient in "phishing" for passwords, than girl fishing.

    5. Re:been around for a long time by V!NCENT · · Score: 1

      Girl fishing is easy: take care of your looks, be friendly but act as if you're not interested in love and sex, be funny (make jokes) and even when a girl likes you then pay no interest (have her girlfriend try, then let her girlfriend try, etc, etc). After a while you have a shitload of girls who like you. Now pick one. It's that fscking easy... Yet no one figured it out...

      --
      Here be signatures
    6. Re:been around for a long time by Dan541 · · Score: 1

      Society forgives you.

      --
      An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
    7. Re:been around for a long time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Alternately give up using electronic forms of payment and only use cash.

      This means your wallet is always full of cash, the hotgirl next to you at the bar will have a renewed interest in you if she catches sight of a bulging wallet.

    8. Re:been around for a long time by V!NCENT · · Score: 1

      Yes, she'll be interested in your wallet, and not you !

      --
      Here be signatures
  16. Fraud was common when I was a kid by TheMiddleRoad · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I grew up in Socal. Many people I knew would beige box 900 numbers to get time on a local BBS. Several got all sorts of gear, mostly paintball crap, through credit card numbers gained through dumpster diving. These were mostly 16-17 year olds doing the deed, with some doing it younger, but it's harder when you can't drive.

    The temptation was huge but I managed to not give in. Heck, the temptation still is huge. Why work hard when you can make a few thousand in a few minutes? Oh yeah, because it's wrong. Sigh.

    1. Re:Fraud was common when I was a kid by systematical · · Score: 1

      Its wrong, and dangerous. I prefer free lance work for compensating for my low salary.

    2. Re:Fraud was common when I was a kid by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      I prefer free lance work for compensating for my low salary.

      Really? I've got a job for you, then. I'm, uh, not with the FBI or anything. What we...uhh...I need you to do involves breaking several federal laws. No, no, that's not a badge! I told you, I'm not with the Feds! No, I'm not wearing a wire!

    3. Re:Fraud was common when I was a kid by King_TJ · · Score: 1

      I was going to say pretty much the same thing. Back in the mid to late 1980's, I remember quite a few BBS's run by pre-teens and teens, primarily operating for the purpose of defrauding telcos, hacking systems, swapping credit card info, and generally causing trouble.

      Honestly, I'd say maybe only 1 in 3 actually DID anything with the information, but just having access to it was a thrill, in and of itself, for the other 2 in 3.

      I heard lots of stories of people who supposedly "carded" themselves all sorts of computer upgrades and the like. But the people I knew personally who attempted it were never successful getting anything. (One guy told me a story about having some item shipped to an abandoned house a few houses down from him. But he said right before the UPS guy dropped it off at the door, a suspicious looking vehicle pulled up and parked by the house, sitting there for hours. He figured it was a set-up to catch whoever ordered it, so he never did try to get his package.)

      I guess the point is, this stuff is nothing new. It simply moved from the "BBS underground" to the Internet, where it's probably more difficult to keep it really "underground" for long, with so many more potential site visitors.

    4. Re:Fraud was common when I was a kid by TheMiddleRoad · · Score: 1

      With the increase in fraud, it's actually easier to get away with things now. Police and FBI only bother going after the big defrauders. Small timers get ignored because there aren't enough resources to pursue them. Order a $1000 computer to an abandoned house and there's basically no chance of the FBI or police bothering. The credit card owner, however, might do it. Even then, the odds of prosecution are low, plea bargains are common, and short or no sentences are the norm.

      Fucked up world we live in right now. Perhaps it's time to buy a gun?

    5. Re:Fraud was common when I was a kid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Owning guns might be illegal soon too, the way things are going. Better order it under someone else's name and have it shipped to an abandoned house...

    6. Re:Fraud was common when I was a kid by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      Credit card holders don't go after people, they call it in to their CC company and get it removed as online fraud for free.

      If your CC doesn't have fraud protection, it sucks.

      More importantly, if you were going to steal something with someone else's CC, you'd be less likely to get caught if you used a fraud-protected CC.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    7. Re:Fraud was common when I was a kid by GooberToo · · Score: 1

      Unless you are using some private label card, which is not regulated by the banking industry, all credit cards have fraud protection. This is not always true with debit cards.

      You are at much higher risk of feeling the pains of fraud when using your debit card so if you have a choice, never use your debit card unless it is an emergency.

    8. Re:Fraud was common when I was a kid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Beige boxing 900 numbers eh? So you found a way to exploit 900 numbers using what amounts to a simple linemans headset?

      I think blue box was the term you were looking for. Spend a lot of time reading old BBS text files from the 80's eh?

    9. Re:Fraud was common when I was a kid by rabatitat · · Score: 1

      Taking advantage of the ignorance of people can be done both ways... You could phish/hack your way to get that fat lewt you always wanted or you could offer your services for more productive endeavors... At least you're not worried that the cops won't come knocking at your door. But why black hat for credit cards? Run for Congress and hack the voting machines to insure victory... That's where the real money is... You might even get blown by a hot lobbyist and get paid after...

    10. Re:Fraud was common when I was a kid by TheMiddleRoad · · Score: 1

      Running for political positions is a lot tougher than carding would be.

    11. Re:Fraud was common when I was a kid by rabatitat · · Score: 1

      Soccer mom...

    12. Re:Fraud was common when I was a kid by TheMiddleRoad · · Score: 1

      Soccer moms are easy? Ever ran for political office?

    13. Re:Fraud was common when I was a kid by rabatitat · · Score: 1

      Obviously can't take TWO jokes and didn't quite get the soccer mom reference... But to answer you question, no I have not run for public office nor would I ever want to. Have you? It's no picnic even on a local (city or state) level, since I've done and am doing volunteer work on campaigns as an organizer.

    14. Re:Fraud was common when I was a kid by TheMiddleRoad · · Score: 1

      Too bad you're a prick and anonymous. Yes, beige boxing. Go to someones house, plug wires into their phone lines from the wire or box, then dial the 900 number. Is that complicated?

  17. I have written an article about this.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Click [link removed by administration for phishing scam} to find out more!

  18. Script Kiddies have been around longer than that by yttrstein · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I used to be one, way back in about 1986 or so on my trusty little Commodore 128. Back in those days there were a few pretty incredible bulletin boards that had vast (dozens!) libraries of little tools and wrappers mostly written in bourne...(I think, this was 22 years and 7,000 joints ago, so pardon the fuzziness with some details)

    I didn't really know a damn thing about shell scripts or programming (remember when they were different things?) in those days, but I knew how to change permissions on a file and execute it. And I had some vague knowledge of the basics of how computers talked to each other. And I got into all *kinds* of trouble. It was truly bitchin', and I don't regret a thing.

  19. Heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Script Kiddies :) I guess I was one, kinda.

    I just got annoyed at people nuking other people, and one quick fix was to hack into their windows machine and change one line in system.ini

    explorer=progman.exe

    and then reboot the PC.

    this was back in year 2k'ish

  20. Re:Oh no, 11 years old trying to hack social sites by kdemetter · · Score: 1

    Well , you did say social sites

  21. Re:Oh no, 11 years old trying to hack social sites by rrohbeck · · Score: 1

    pictures of drunk 18 year old girls

    You think they'd be interested in older women?
    Thank God for 4chan & co.

  22. Put them to work... by elloGov · · Score: 0

    Start a QA department where you pay these little guys money to hack your systems. They obviously have interests which aren't being nurtured.

  23. Parents? by rrohbeck · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This probably boils down to parents that are clueless. "But he was only playing on his computer!"
    So parents need to be educated that there's more you can do with a PC and an Internet connection than browse and play WoW.

  24. Re:Oh no, 11 years old trying to hack social sites by Rorschach1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Back when I was a kid, it was those skills that we had to develop to GET the pr0n! When the biggest source was a local BBS with a reasonably vigilant sysop, we had to get creative. It taught me a little about social engineering... like if you registered with a totally unpronounceable foreign name, the sysop would just validate you without a phone call because he didn't want to mispronounce it.

  25. Computer Education in K-12 would help.... by Eganicus · · Score: 1

    Let's teach them how to avoid getting caught in their K-12 Advanced computer classes. Isn't that a basic skill set these days? How to report news when a totalitarian government has blocked web access. ??? Then again, 4chan is cracking me up lately!

  26. Sniffing out Parents? by Ostracus · · Score: 1

    This probably boils down to parents that are clueless. "But he was only playing on his computer!"
    So parents need to be educated that there's more you can do with a PC and an Internet connection than browse and play WoW.

    Welcome to the new "But I'm being a parent!". Be careful what you wish for.

    --
    Shai Schticks:"You don't make peace with friends, you make peace with enemies"
    1. Re:Sniffing out Parents? by rrohbeck · · Score: 1

      Parents need to make it clear to their kids what is acceptable behavior and what isn't. 11 year olds probably don't quite see the impact and consequences of what they're doing or they think that they're anonymous behind a wire and the Net is a free-for-all.

  27. Wargames anybody? by Todd+Knarr · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Seriously, this has been how it is since the early 80s. 25 years ago it was the teenagers who were war-dialing and breaking into time-sharing systems. They're the ones who've got free time for it. As you get older you get into college or into a job and you've got a lot less free time for messing around like that. It only makes sense, then, that school kids would be one of the two major groups doing this (the other being those adults for whom this kind of crime is their job).

    1. Re:Wargames anybody? by east+coast · · Score: 1

      It's a different landscape now a days too. Back in my day we were phreaking to run warez to and from BBSs. Today we have P2P, e-mail and IM.

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
  28. This is actually by nodesyn · · Score: 1

    considered "news" I'm know this has been going on since BEFORE the internet was even available to the public. You know back when you had to dial into a BBS to communicate with other people... and swap files over a 1337 9600 bps modem

    1. Re:This is actually by east+coast · · Score: 0

      and swap files over a 1337 9600 bps modem

      9600? Pfft. N00b.

      300 bps VicModem FTW

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
  29. Not just cyber crime by billcopc · · Score: 1

    Teenagers are doing more of everything these days, not just lame DDoS. If I had to pull an explanation out of my ass, I'd blame it on the increasingly pussy parents failing to keep their kids in line, and the historic legal loophole where minors can get away with anything, with just a slap on the wrist and/or a brief stint in juvey.

    The attitude is that if you're going to do stupid shit, do it before you're eligible for PMITA federal prison.

    --
    -Billco, Fnarg.com
    1. Re:Not just cyber crime by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 1

      Teenagers are not doing "more of everything" these days. The media is just reporting more, because people are more likely to watch news that scares them, and everyone is scared about the impending downfall of our civilization because of out of control youth. Why do you think so many talk shows during the 90s were on the topic of teenagers running around having sex, smoking pot, and joining gangs? It was not because the phenomenon was new, it was because people are more likely to watch that than shows that do not scare them.

      Talented teenagers with computer access have been around for a while, and have been hacking for a while. I did a bit of hacking myself when I was a teenager, nothing major just toying with some systems at my high school. Sometimes, teenagers neglect to think things through, and start using their skills stupidly (stealing credit card numbers, for example), but again, that is not something new.

      --
      Palm trees and 8
  30. Or... by ShieldVV0lf · · Score: 1

    How about Spy Kidz?

    IT JUST WON'T WORK WITH0UT THE Z AT THE END!!!

  31. Kids swapping KNOWLEDGE! by droopycom · · Score: 5, Funny

    Wow!! This is indeed dangerous:

    "people start to swap malicious programs, knowledge and sometimes stolen data."

    Where did they find the KNOWLEDGE in the first place ?

    We need to fight at the source, find the KNOWLEDGE dealers and arrest them!

    We need to make the fight against KNOWLEDGE a national priority, nominate a KNOWLEDGE tsar or something!

    Will somebody think of the children!!

    1. Re:Kids swapping KNOWLEDGE! by thepotoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The education system is waaaaay ahead of you, buddy.

      --
      Obligatory Soundbite Catchphrase
    2. Re:Kids swapping KNOWLEDGE! by Hillgiant · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you don't talk to your children about KNOWLEDGE, who will?

      --
      -
    3. Re:Kids swapping KNOWLEDGE! by rabatitat · · Score: 1

      Some time in 2009: Bill Gates comes out of retirement and becomes... The Secretary of the Internet

  32. Don't pay no mind by Thelasko · · Score: 1

    If you're under eighteen you won't be doing any time.
    Hey Hey hey
    Come out and play!

    --
    One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
  33. Hackles raised over teenaged alarmists by mcgrew · · Score: 4, Funny

    Mr Boyd said he spent a lot of time tracking down the creators of many of the nuisance programs written to exploit users of social networking sites and the culprit was often a teenager."

    Get off my law... HEY GIMME MY PANTS BACK!

    1. Re:Hackles raised over teenaged alarmists by V!NCENT · · Score: 1

      "Lucie! Lucie! Gimme Lucie!"

      --
      Here be signatures
  34. Way overdue for another Operation Sundevil? by Phizzle · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I remember back in late 80s, things were getting out of hand with newbie kiddies just getting into hacking and phreaking and playing with credit card numbers and phone codes. They were creating too much noise that made investigations of bigger fish more difficult. So law enforcement folks got credit companies to bankroll Operation Sundevil, put up a sting BBS (Phoenix Fortress) and captured a tonn of minors, most of who had files with phone codes and credit card numbers because they shotgun downloaded everything that seemed "cool". There are a bunch of honeypot sites and rooms popping up now getting ready to reel in the next crop.

    --
    I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.
  35. Serves them right by jrothwell97 · · Score: 1

    The fact that prepubescent children are people who are most likely to be know-it-alls (not attempting to offend anyone in that age group, but it is the typical attitude) who, say, have defragged their hard drive, once, and think they're therefore computer experts. I once found on the stats panel that someone had reached my blog with the search terms 'HOW DO YOU HACK IN TO A COMPUTER'.

    The fact that they've learned to Google is good, but if they can't turn Caps Lock off or pay a visit to the local library first, they have NO chances of covering their tracks when performing cybercrime.

    IMHO, if they're caught, so be it. Might teach the little buggers to do their research - and that no crime is perfect and that you will get caught.

    --
    Those using pirated Tinysoft signatures(TM) are a real threat to society and should all be thrown in jail.
  36. Targetting them, due to their own idiocy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    It is always funny rewriting a script to target a groups site that was using them.

    In fact, recently, this very same thing happened on 4chan, AGAIN, due to the incredibly high numbers of stupid kids on the /b/ board who actually listen to instructions.
    God, the amount of people who downloaded and ran that script... such a high number of idiots in one place is astounding, and somewhat depressing.

    1. Re:Targetting them, due to their own idiocy. by Mesa+MIke · · Score: 3, Informative

      That's why they're called /b/tards.

    2. Re:Targetting them, due to their own idiocy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      moot went as far as to put up the following sign on the front page

      DEAR RETARDS: STOP SAVING FILES AND RUNNING THEM AS .JS -- ARE YOU REALLY THAT STUPID?

      and the dumb shits still did it.

  37. the difference is by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    in doing it loudily and clumsily, rather than discreetly and quietly

    i didn't ascribe pure motivations to teenaged script kiddies, i ascribed stupidity. of course, some of them are still downright evil in their efforts. but still stupid. better to catch what they are doing now, while they are dumb about it and easier to catch, no?

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  38. Re:Script Kiddies have been around longer than tha by MindlessAutomata · · Score: 1

    You're right. What I did meant to say was, "...even back since...". The AOL era was just when people were starting to get personal home connections and our culture was starting to accommodate the internet more. I didn't mean that script kiddies started arising in that era.

  39. Re:Script Kiddies have been around longer than tha by MindlessAutomata · · Score: 1

    I have to admit, I do look upon some of my script kiddie days with a bit of nostalgia as well :)

  40. I have CCs and 3pl01tz, email me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    wow this SlashingDot site looks kool so many other uber hakkers!

    someboyd email me their exploitz qwik, I have 9, we share long time, you can reach me at douglaslewis (at) comcast (dot) com, that's not my real name, itz my dadz, so you can't find me, oh and I post here anonymousely, so the fedz kant get me nor reed diz sekrit msg

    ok back to myspace, pm you later

  41. BREAKING NEWS by TheRealZero · · Score: 1

    This just in: Kids more likely to be mischievous than adults. More at 11:00.

    1. Re:BREAKING NEWS by s_p_oneil · · Score: 1

      News at 11:00: Kids more likely to disregard laws because they know they won't be tried as adults.

  42. Wonderful! by MrNougat · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This means that law enforcement will spend all their time going after this low-hanging fruit, and the public's fear will be assuaged because of all the "hackers" that are getting put in juvie - while the real troublemakers are left completely alone.

    --
    Web 2.0 == Giant Blogspam Circle Jerk
  43. John Connor? by antdude · · Score: 1

    So like John Connor when he was a teenager?

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  44. Re:Script Kiddies have been around longer than tha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dude, you just admitted to hacking and smoking pot in the same post. Answer the door, it's the FBI trying to distract you while the NSA plants illegal wiretaps on your phone.

  45. Re:Script Kiddies have been around longer than tha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is no need to wiretap a phone when the NSA is the phone company. That's why Bush can comfortably say they don't do any wiretapping.

  46. Re:Script Kiddies have been around longer than tha by YttriumOxide · · Score: 1

    Bah - look at my posting history and you'll get my full name, the company I work for, the fact that I've taken a lot of LSD, admissions of criminal activity relating to computer fraud (for large sums of money) that I was never charged for and a LOT more.
    Thankfully, there's absolutely nothing anyone can realistically do to me with all of this information that would bother me in the slightest.

    Live life without secrets, and there's nothing that can be stolen from you.

    (note: I do not live in, or ever intend on living in, the United States of America)

    --
    My book about LSD and Self-Discovery
    Also on facebook as: DroppingAcidDaleBewan
  47. You punks! by PPH · · Score: 1

    Stay off of my lawn!

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  48. Other studies confirm... by Hordeking · · Score: 0

    That water is wet. For crying out loud...wasn't this fairly obvious? Of course, you have real hackers, who hack things like Xboxen and PS3's to make them run homebrew (and in the process, learning a lot) and you have the ones who see the criminal potential. You know, kind of like the kids who enjoy testing security at the mall versus the ones who like shoplifting.

    This is not a new phenomenon.

    --
    Disclaimer: The opinions and actions of the US Gov't are in no way representative of those held by this author or its ci
  49. learn to shut up and walk away by godfather55v · · Score: 1

    I found my self in the same boat back in college. I had discovered the workstations were caching passwords when i was looking for a way to elevate my local user privileges to use my "new" 64mb pen drive:-) So when i alerted the IT staff of the cached passwords the ax came down on me fast and hard. I must say i was and still am surprised at how bad that pissed them off. However i did escape w/ a slap on the wrist thanks to some great teachers i had as a character reference. But i learned my lesson, if i see something that isn't right security wise i don't say anything and make sure my information isn't comprimized.

  50. Re:One more reason... by F34nor · · Score: 1

    Touche!

  51. Re:Oh no, 11 years old trying to hack social sites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes hiding it as a txt files in the windows directory LOLZ