Slashdot Mirror


Dropped Shuttle Toolbag Filmed From Earth

cathector writes "An article at spaceweather.com reports that the toolbag dropped during Heidemarie Stefanyshyn-Piper's spacewalk has been recorded on film from earth: 'When Endeavour astronaut Heidemarie Stefanyshyn-Piper dropped her toolbag during a spacewalk on Nov. 18th and it floated away, mission controllers probably figured they'd seen the last of it. Think again. Last night, Nov. 22nd, veteran satellite observer Kevin Fetter video-recorded the backpack-sized bag gliding over his backyard observatory in Brockville, Ontario. "It was easily 8th magnitude or brighter as it passed by the 4th magnitude star eta Pisces," he says. Spaceweather's satellite tracker is monitoring the toolbag.'" The actual loss of the bag was filmed, too; reader Kagura links in a comment on the original story to this YouTube clip of the bag's escape.

92 of 389 comments (clear)

  1. That's no moon! by Huntr · · Score: 5, Funny

    That's a tool bag!

    1. Re:That's no moon! by windsurfer619 · · Score: 4, Funny

      No, it's a tarp!

    2. Re:That's no moon! by Macthorpe · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well, a woman dropped an expensive toolbag. An organisation comprised predominantly of men oversaw the disintegration of the Space Shuttle Columbia...

      If you're keeping score, I think women might be in the lead for some time yet ;)

      --
      "It does not do to leave a live dragon out of your calculations, if you live near him." - Tolkien
    3. Re:That's no moon! by slater86 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I bet the guys wish they dropped it.Thats some serious bragging rights

      "I told ya you need a telescope to see my tool."

      --
      When people ask if I'm an optimist, I say "I hope so". --Bill Bailey
    4. Re:That's no moon! by nmb3000 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      That's a tool bag!

      Sigh...

      There go another set of $10,000 government hammers -- not to mention the $24,000 socket set :(

      (Ha. As an aside, I wonder how much that tool bag really cost when you factor in its mass during launch.)

      --
      "What do you despise? By this are you truly known." --Princess Irulan, Manual of Muad'Dib
      /)
    5. Re:That's no moon! by LingNoi · · Score: 5, Funny

      oh great, the idiot masses of digg and youtube have found slashdot..

    6. Re:That's no moon! by Ironsides · · Score: 5, Funny

      I bet the guys wish they dropped it.Thats some serious bragging rights "I told ya you need a telescope to see my tool."

      I don't think that implies what you think it implies.

      --
      Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
    7. Re:That's no moon! by djupedal · · Score: 4, Informative
    8. Re:That's no moon! by roguetrick · · Score: 4, Funny

      Trolling is a slashdot tradition.

      You must be new here.

      --
      -The world would be a better place if everyone had a hoverboard
    9. Re:That's no moon! by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ironically, if the grease gun had been manufactured to a higher standard, we probably wouldn't be talking about this now.

    10. Re:That's no moon! by PachmanP · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah I think a better brag would be "I told you that it was visible 350km away!"

      --
      You're thinking small. Why miniaturize the laser, when we could instead enlarge the sharks? -John Searle
    11. Re:That's no moon! by Dan541 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Is that due to their mass during launch, or because NASA think their too good to shop at Walmart?

      --
      An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
    12. Re:That's no moon! by Macthorpe · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Chill, friend - just a joke, aiming to highlight that it's silly to raise the fact that a woman did it, because men aren't exactly robots :)

      Disclaimer: I am a guy and therefore also not a robot.

      --
      "It does not do to leave a live dragon out of your calculations, if you live near him." - Tolkien
    13. Re:That's no moon! by fuego451 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Ah, okay. Must have been a Snap-on starter kit.

    14. Re:That's no moon! by compro01 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You try exposing your socket set to -269C and see how well it works. The steel will become brittle and shatter.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    15. Re:That's no moon! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      100k USD? No biggie, that's like 2000 Euros now.

    16. Re:That's no moon! by LoRdTAW · · Score: 4, Interesting

      LOL Oh if I only had mod points.

      A Snap-on 22 piece ratchet kit is over 500 bucks. Hell a tool box from them is over $300!

    17. Re:That's no moon! by Ihmhi · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I wonder, will she catch any flak for this? Does she get docked salary for letting it slip?

      More importantly, why wasn't this extremely expensive bag tethered to something? If it can't be tethered to her for safety reasons, how about a magnetically secured line attached to the work surface?

    18. Re:That's no moon! by parasonic · · Score: 4, Informative

      how about a magnetically secured line attached to the work surface?

      You are assuming that there exists a ferromagnetic surface which would attract a magnet. Remember what the ISS is mostly made of.

    19. Re:That's no moon! by jollyreaper · · Score: 4, Funny

      NASA guessed the bag/tools as being worth USD$100,000.00 [tbo.com]...

      Still cheaper than Louis Vutton.

      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    20. Re:That's no moon! by X0563511 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Because things we send up there really get that cold. They have to radiate the heat from the pre-launch to get that cold, and they won't - the ISS catches too much heat from the sun.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    21. Re:That's no moon! by FauxPasIII · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Don't forget, this is how it works.

      http://www.xkcd.com/385/

      --
      25% Funny, 25% Insightful, 25% Informative, 25% Troll
    22. Re:That's no moon! by tsa · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Compared to the cost of the whole mission the toolbag costs next to nothing. And people make mistakes and errors. This is a small but slightly annoying one. I think she's punished enough by having her mistake crawling all over the web.

      --

      -- Cheers!

    23. Re:That's no moon! by Failed+Physicist · · Score: 5, Informative

      Mostly, they do.

      From http://www.space.gc.ca/asc/pdf/educator-ecosystem_edu.pdf

      In orbit portions of the ISS will be exposed to direct sunlight 16 times per Earth day.
      Temperatures on these occasions can climb to over 120 degrees Celsius. The ISS will
      also be exposed to complete darkness or lack of radiant energy. Temperatures can
      plummet to -100 degrees Celsius. Thus, the internal environment of both spacecraft
      and space suit, developed for extravehicular activity, must have an active temperature
      regulation system that maintains a narrow range of thermal comfort.

    24. Re:That's no moon! by zonker · · Score: 5, Funny

      Remember what the ISS is mostly made of.

      Love?

    25. Re:That's no moon! by jo_ham · · Score: 4, Funny

      Considering the cost of the ISS and the delays in building it, I'm assuming it's made entirely of unicorn bones.

      Thus, not magnetic.

    26. Re:That's no moon! by HTRednek · · Score: 5, Funny

      And when Deanna drove the Enterprise, she smacked a PLANET!

    27. Re:That's no moon! by Keeper+Of+Keys · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And those bags don't even come with a full set of Allen Keys.

    28. Re:That's no moon! by AlecC · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The tool that finally got the jammed Skylab solar "wings" to unfold was a $10 crowbar from the local hardware store in Florida.

      --
      Consciousness is an illusion caused by an excess of self consciousness.
    29. Re:That's no moon! by nog_lorp · · Score: 4, Funny

      Unicorn bones contain small amounts of neodymium, making them magnetic.

    30. Re:That's no moon! by danieltdp · · Score: 2, Informative

      I always amaze me the fact that there is one xkcd strip for every topic that comes about in slashdot.

      --
      -- dnl
    31. Re:That's no moon! by vlm · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A Snap-on 22 piece ratchet kit is over 500 bucks. Hell a tool box from them is over $300!

      I didn't believe you so I checked.

      http://buy1.snapon.com/catalog/tools.asp?tool=all&Group_ID=103&store=snapon-store

      Direct from manufacturer you're looking at $348.65 for the 20 piece and $610.80 for the 34 piece. I now believe there could be a 22 piece set that I couldn't find thats around $500 with shipping, as you claimed.

      I knew they were outrageously expensive but I didn't expect $20 per socket level of expense. They better be made of solid silver for that price. For that kind of money I don't just expect a socket set, I expect the Chinese guy whom made it to fly out here and pull the wrench for me.

      My first metal lathe was about $500. Somehow I think I get "more" out of that than I would out of a 34 piece socket set.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    32. Re:That's no moon! by isaac338 · · Score: 3, Informative

      There's your problem - no Chinese guys are touching your Snap-On tools unless they're working in an American factory. Snap-On's one of the few companies who still make their tools in US and A.

      Also, what kind of snap on boxes are you guys buying for $300 and where can I get one? Their cheapest roll cabs are in the region of $2-3k...

    33. Re:That's no moon! by Chapter80 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I read that the tool bag was in a larger bag and the larger bag was secure. The tool bag was not secure within the larger bag (once it was opened).

    34. Re:That's no moon! by vlm · · Score: 2, Informative

      There's your problem - no Chinese guys are touching your Snap-On tools unless they're working in an American factory. Snap-On's one of the few companies who still make their tools in US and A.

      Not true any more... just another company selling Chinese junk at American prices.

      http://www.snapon.com.cn/snapon/en/index.htm

      Seems to be down at this moment, but from the google cache of that page:

      With an 86-year experience, Snap-on now focus on China. We set up a factory with well-trained engineers and workers in Kunshan, China. The world-class products produced are not only for China market, but for all the Asia Pacific Area. We also established a trading company, Snap-on Trading ( Shanghai) Co., Ltd. Our professional team can serve the customers throughout the country through a distribution network consisted of 6 Branch Offices and over 120 resellers.

      Here's the factory address should you care to visit

      SNAP-ON ASIA MANUFACTURING (KUNSHAN) CO., LTD
      ADD: 500 Tong Feng East Road, Kunshan, Jiangsu 215300, PRC
      TEL: 86-512-57708282
      FAX: 86-512-57708383

      Or how about this press release linked from the snap-on website?

      http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=90531&p=irol-newsArticle&ID=1133066&highlight=china

      Snap-on Announces First Quarter 2008 Results
      Reports EPS from continuing operations of $0.97 compared to $0.64 last year; Completes acquisition of 60% interest in Chinese hand tool manufacturer

      "We are also very pleased to announce that Snap-on recently completed the acquisition of a 60% interest in Zhejiang Wanda Tools Co., Ltd., a hot-forged hand tool manufacturer in China," said Pinchuk. "This strategic joint venture builds on Snap-on's current presence in the region and complements the company's existing production capabilities in Kunshan, China. Our majority ownership of Wanda Tools, our first hand tool manufacturing facility in China, is expected to be a key contributor to our future state and is another important step in extending Snap-on's manufacturing capability and market coverage in emerging markets around the world."

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    35. Re:That's no moon! by isaac338 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yeah, I know all that. They make Blu-Point tools in China. Snap-On branded hand tools are still all USA made.

    36. Re:That's no moon! by Intron · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's a tool bag!

      Sigh...

      There go another set of $10,000 government hammers -- not to mention the $24,000 socket set :(

      (Ha. As an aside, I wonder how much that tool bag really cost when you factor in its mass during launch.)

      Not the worst accident that's happened due to a dropped tool.

      --
      Intron: the portion of DNA which expresses nothing useful.
  2. Beam me up Scotty by bobbonomo · · Score: 5, Funny

    Scotty will use it in the future to fix the Enterprise. Good stuff.

    1. Re:Beam me up Scotty by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, in the future it'll come back as an alien intelligence named T'lbg.

      --
      You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
  3. Filmed all the way from Earth? by TheLazySci-FiAuthor · · Score: 4, Funny

    And I can't even find a single Phillips screwdriver in my own closet!

    1. Re:Filmed all the way from Earth? by peragrin · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's only a couple hundred miles away. two maybe three hours in the car.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
  4. Great! by Exp315 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Exactly what I said as I dropped a bolt today and it rolled away under the car. :-) I suppose something of this incident will go down in history and become the origin of some common expression like Murphy's Law in the distant future. Maybe feature in a future episode of Star Trek?

    1. Re:Great! by MichaelSmith · · Score: 5, Funny

      I suppose something of this incident will go down in history and become the origin of some common expression like Murphy's Law in the distant future.

      They hubbled it up!

    2. Re:Great! by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2, Funny

      People surnamed "Stefanyshyn-Piper" don't get laws named after them. "Piper", sure. "Stefanyshyn", if the law happens to be mathematical; but that's about it.

  5. Re:Check out the sexism on the youtube video by RiotingPacifist · · Score: 2, Insightful

    cue stream of XKCD links in 3....2....

    --
    IranAir Flight 655 never forget!
  6. Re:brighter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Timestamp 1: Witnesses as far as 720 kilometers apart reported seeing what looked like a bright meteor falling somewhere on the Saskatchewan-Alberta boundary around 5:30 pm MT Thursday, according to the CBC.

    Timestamp 2: Last night, Nov. 22nd, veteran satellite observer Kevin Fetter video-recorded the backpack-sized bag gliding over his backyard observatory in Brockville, Ontario.

    So, no.

  7. Re:Check out the sexism on the youtube video by MichaelSmith · · Score: 4, Informative

    Supposedly secure equipment has been lost during EVA since the Gemini program. Mike Collins lost a camera which jiggled out of a mount on his pressure suit. Its very hard to avoid this kind of problem.

  8. video mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
  9. Re:A "FETCH" unit by Perspiring+Blood · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It probably would be cheaper just to have the astronauts make sure the bag is continually tethered to something.

  10. Re:A "FETCH" unit by Aniyn · · Score: 2, Funny

    It would actually be cheaper to train astronauts not to throw $100,000 worth of tools away. Well, with the way nasa does things, maybe not....

  11. Floating corpses by hansamurai · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So does that mean if an astronaut got disconnected and floated off, we'd be able to see them orbiting or flying off too? Kind of morbid.

    1. Re:Floating corpses by Gordonjcp · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yes, and yes.

    2. Re:Floating corpses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      The tether line is your friend

    3. Re:Floating corpses by Dan541 · · Score: 4, Funny

      However that asshole with the scissors is not.

      --
      An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
  12. Re:Check out the sexism on the youtube video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Hillary was/is smart, Palin was/is/always will be a dumb fuck. Its not sexism to dislike the idea of a more powerful Palin, its self-preservation.

  13. NASA Bloopers Tape by syousef · · Score: 5, Insightful

    NASA funniest home videos?

    Seriously though, I feel sorry for this woman. One minor slip up and because the media latched onto it this is all she'll ever be remembered for. NASA astronauts risk life and limb and while the humour's good we shouldn't forget the effort and sacrifice they make should not be dismissed lightly.

    --
    These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    1. Re:NASA Bloopers Tape by Krishnoid · · Score: 4, Funny

      One minor slip up and because the media latched onto it this is all she'll ever be remembered for.

      "I dropped a toolbag on a spacewalk. But I learned my lesson. And that's why I'll use nothing but Husky brand tethered toolbags, now with lined pockets for those messy grease gun spills."

      The possibilities are endless.

  14. A reason for exploring underground by gmuslera · · Score: 3, Insightful

    at least there when you screw something down there you dont have the whole world watching you

  15. Re:How? by TuaAmin13 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Because of GMm/R^2

  16. Re:Filmed? Those look more like video to me. by gblackwo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Have no fear, language has this wonderful ability to evolve giving words new meaning. Definitions of words are not set in stone.

  17. Dark Star by owlnation · · Score: 4, Interesting

    On top of the toolbag as it glides, sits Doolittle the Spider.

  18. Re:brighter? by overcaffein8d · · Score: 5, Funny

    timestamp 3: ???
    timestamp 4: profit!

    --
    Those of us who think they know everything annoy those of us who do.
  19. Send the shuttle to retrieve it by Dr_Banzai · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Simple: when the shuttle's done at the station, detach and intercept the bag in orbit. Voila, $100k saved. They could think of it as a drill for retrieving an astronaut who floats away during a spacewalk.

    1. Re:Send the shuttle to retrieve it by the_other_chewey · · Score: 4, Informative

      Simple: when the shuttle's done at the station, detach and intercept the bag in orbit. Voila, $100k saved.

      Not a chance. That bag doesn't just float somewhere around the station, it is on an orbital trajectory of its own -
      by now probably quite far from the ISS in fact. And unless Heidemarie aimed very carefully, it isn't even in the same
      orbital plane. The shuttle doesn't carry enough fuel to do plane transfer maneuvers (that's the main reason why timing is important when launching), and even if it did, it would take a hell of a lot of maneuvering to do a full orbital
      realignment - which would probably cost more in fuel alone than those $100k.

    2. Re:Send the shuttle to retrieve it by OriginalArlen · · Score: 2, Interesting
      1. there is no way the shuttle could retrieve an astronaut who "floated away". Hence, no drill.
      2. For the same reasons that they can't intercept you putative astronaut marshmallow, they also can't intercept the toolbag.

      The nature of those reasons are left as an exercise for Dr _Banzai. (Hints: delta-v, ranging.)

      --

      Everything I needed to know about life, I learnt from Blake's Seven
    3. Re:Send the shuttle to retrieve it by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, actually, Shane was going to bring along his fishing pole (you know, just in case), but then Heide was like "That's ridiculous, Scott! There aren't going to be any fish up there, for god's sake. There's no room for all your useless toys. I need room for the sandwiches and extra socks. If your socks get wet what good is your stupid fishing pole?"

      And so the fishing pole stayed home, and you should have seen the look Steve got as they watched the bag drift away and he suddenly turned to Shane and said "Hey - where is your fishing pole?"

      --
      "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
      --- Jerry Garcia
    4. Re:Send the shuttle to retrieve it by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The shuttle doesn't carry enough fuel to do plane transfer maneuvers (that's the main reason why timing is important when launching), and even if it did, it would take a hell of a lot of maneuvering to do a full orbital realignment - which would probably cost more in fuel alone than those $100k.

      This is only partly true. The impetus she could have given the toolbag, even deliberately, is no more than whatever her arm can generate. A Major League Pitcher can manage maybe 100 mph (45 m/s) with a baseball, much less with a backpack sized toolbox.

      I doubt this woman could have come close to that by accident. Which means maybe a few meters per second velocity differential at the beginning. Which the Shuttle could quite easily have matched.

      Letting it go for a while gives it time to move around its new orbit enough that the Shuttle would require multiple burns to match orbits (not because the initial impetus was high, but because you need to change to an orbit that reaches the toolbag's new orbital position and velocity when the toolbag gets to there). Which makes it prohibitive.

      This, of course, ignoring the fact that it's mostly silly to try to recover a toolbag in a situation like that, unless it's clearly going to smack into the ISS or Shuttle in an orbit or three....

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    5. Re:Send the shuttle to retrieve it by the_other_chewey · · Score: 5, Informative

      I think you are wrong.

      I know I'm not. I've calculated stuff like this before.

      The velocity relative to the ISS is a few metres per second at the most.

      You'd be surprised how difficult it is to catch up even in those orders of magnitude.
      Orbital maneuvering is hard, and very unintutive. NASA had to learn this the hard way:
      The early rendez-vous missions assumed it would be possible to fly manual visual approaches once the
      target is in sight. Didn't work. Maneuvering out-of-plane is also energetically very expensive.

      Because it got a single impulse it will keep coming back once an orbit.

      True, the orbits intersect in space. But not in time, due to different excentricity.
      The shuttle/ISS will not be at the section point the next time the bag comes along.

      I don't think catching it with the shuttle on this mission is impossible.

      If the orbital periods have a common integer multiple (unlikely), they could wait and try a very risky
      catch-the-bag EVA (exactly one chance) - but they will probably run out of time, air and other
      supplies before this would be possible even then.

      Just accept it: It's impossible.

    6. Re:Send the shuttle to retrieve it by Dr_Banzai · · Score: 2, Funny

      Nothing's impossible - haven't you seen Apollo 13?

  20. Re:brighter? by Opyros · · Score: 3, Informative

    Bad Astronomy posted an entry devoted to refuting this idea! As Phil Plait says, the very fact that the toolkit has just been sighted shows that it's still up there, and could not have been the fireball.

  21. Neat! by killermookie · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Let's put aside any blame, mistakes, whether the media is being unfair...for just a moment.

    Seeing that bag just drift off, only a few feet away from the station and then a few days later we see it pass by in orbit from Earth is just amazing. I'm always impressed with whatever we do in space.

    Was it my tax dollars that paid for that lost bag? Still worth the money.

  22. The Tool Tray NASA clip... by pentalive · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I was watching some sort of NASA clip that showed a tool tray for on-orbit work. It locked the tools down until you plugged the lanyard from your suit into the tool, then the only way to get the lanyard off the tool was to lock it back into the tray..

    Guess that wasn't in use this time.

  23. Mirrored WMV by antdude · · Score: 3, Funny
    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  24. She fumbled, but it's not her fault. by Qbertino · · Score: 4, Insightful

    She fumbled, in a high-stress enviroment under high-stress circumstances, but it's not her fault. I actually instantly saw the flaw with something/somebody else when I read this the first time.

    what in heavens name is up with a space grease gun leaking grease were it's not supposed to? Were does Nasa get these? At the local hardware store for 10 Dollars a piece or what? This stunt actually went quite well. Imagine her not being able to do her job (or get back to the airlock) because a grease gun explodes all over her helmet visor or something simular.

    Say what you want, but somewhere some Nasa engineering team has to get back to the drawing table ASAP and design a greasegun that actually works relyably - Nasa style wise. Or something simular with no moving parts at all. Maybe get a vaseline can and a spatula tied to a string or something - that's probably how the russians do it.
    I'd actually be super-pissed at gear that goes haywire on me 7 hours into a stressy EVA. I do climbing - imagine your backback shedding mission-critical gear at 300 meters in the vertical or something simular. Multipling that by a thousand hints the scale of issues we're talking about.

    Way more people than just the astronaut are responsible here.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
    1. Re:She fumbled, but it's not her fault. by sqrt(2) · · Score: 3, Informative
      --
      If you build it, nerds will come. Soylentnews.org
  25. The Astronaut's Prayer by Animats · · Score: 4, Funny

    One of the Apollo astronauts once remarked that what they really think about is "Please let me not fuck up.".

  26. Re:How? by MrNaz · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Incorrect. Had she not imparted momentum to it by shoving it aside, it would have stayed right there and not moved, at least in any time frame likely to be relevant to the ISS personnel.

    --
    I hate printers.
  27. Re:Check out the sexism on the youtube video by Manchot · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Your first mistake was reading the comments on a Youtube video.

  28. SAFER by mortonda · · Score: 3, Informative

    It's not that morbid, though it probably would give a spacewalker a bit of a scare. But in the event that they lose both tethers and float off, they also have the SAFER packs to get them back.

  29. Re:brighter? by sleeponthemic · · Score: 2, Informative
    --
    I record my sleeptalking
  30. Far older than Apollo.... by Ellis+D.+Tripp · · Score: 5, Informative

    The statement "Lord, please don't let me fuck this up" was originally referred to as "The Shepard's Prayer", after the first US astronaut, Alan Shepard. He reportedly "recited" it while on the pad awaiting his Mercury flight, not knowing that his mike was hot, and everyone in launch control was listening in.

    Shepard also ended up having to pee in his spacesuit on the pad, because the engineers hadn't considered the effects of having a man lying on his back with his legs elevated for several hours before launch.

    The glory days of manned spaceflight...:)

    --
    Remember "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters"? Help make it a reality again! http://soylentnews.org
  31. Re:A "FETCH" unit by PPH · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yeah, that's the problem at our house. Our FETCH unit digs up the garden, craps on the neighbor's lawn, pisses off their cat, chases squirrels, knocks up the poodle down the street.

    The shuttle crew will need to deploy the rolled up newspaper from time to time.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  32. Re:Filmed? Those look more like video to me. by greenguy · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yeah, but it weirds language.

    --
    What if I do the same thing, and I do get different results?
  33. Re:Check out the sexism on the youtube video by Plaid+Phantom · · Score: 3, Funny

    Dangit fine. I tried to resist, but there wasn't enough time left on the countdown.

    --
    All comments are properties and trademarks of the voices in my head. Not like I'm gonna claim them.
  34. Re:Check out the sexism on the youtube video by tsm_sf · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Look, we've been separating the intelligence and wisdom stats since the late 70's at least.

    --
    Literalism isn't a form of humor, it's you being irritating.
  35. Re:brighter? by scdeimos · · Score: 3, Informative

    Actually, the brightest star in the sky (aside from sol/the sun) is Sirius, which has a negative magnitude at -1.42.

  36. Re:When will the toolbag enter the atmosphere? by X0563511 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Yes. The ISS is in a decaying orbit (a non-decaying orbit would be way-the-fuck-up-there and at blistering velocity), which means the toolbag is too. The difference? The toolbag won't be getting an orbit boost from a spacecraft later.

    --
    For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  37. Re:brighter? by overcaffein8d · · Score: 3, Funny

    i'd say you must be new here, but you probably wouldn't get that either

    --
    Those of us who think they know everything annoy those of us who do.
  38. Re:brighter? by floydman · · Score: 2, Funny

    wasnt that captured by the pirates?

    --
    The lunatic is in my head
  39. Re:When will the toolbag enter the atmosphere? by the_other_chewey · · Score: 2, Informative

    The ISS' orbit decreases by about 4km per month. If we consider reentry at ~75km (completely arbitrary,
    and probably quite a bit off), the ISS itself would come down in about five to six years, give or take. The toolbag
    has a higher density than the ISS, so the deceleration by atmospheric drag should be a bit lower. That puts the time to reentry
    in the order of magnitude of very roughly ten years.

  40. Serious question... by MoeDrippins · · Score: 2, Interesting

    How do we know the thing in the wmv was, in fact, the tool bag? I assume it's tracked or something (based on known orbit/velocity/somethingelseaboutwhichIknownothing)? I.e. we know it should have been there, then? And lo, something was there, then, so that was it?

    --
    Before you design for reuse, make sure to design it for use.
  41. Re:When will the toolbag enter the atmosphere? by StickyWidget · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm sorry, did you really mean to say "density"? Atmospheric drag affects surface area of an object, not the number of atoms per unit of volume.

    ~Sticky
    //I do not think that word means what you think it means...