Slashdot Mirror


Google Map To Real Piracy

An anonymous reader noted that you can now see a Google Map of piracy. Not the pretend kind, the real kind with boats and stuff. Considering how much time we spend talking about the other kind, I think it's worth paying attention to the real problems out there.

63 of 262 comments (clear)

  1. Time for Qs to come back by AKAImBatman · · Score: 5, Interesting

    From what I've been hearing, it sounds like the biggest problem in defending against the Solmalian surge in piracy is that the pirates know where the US ships are and avoid them. They've taken to attacking farther and farther out from the coast, often impacting new shipping lanes when displaced by US warships.

    Maybe I've been reading too much fiction, but am I the only one thinking: Q Ship?

    1. Lure pirate in with tasty looking merchie.

    2. Wait until pirate is within range and intentions are clear.

    3. Throw the covers off the guns and blast them into next year.

    4. ???

    5. Profit!!!

    (Well, the merchies do anyway.)

    1. Re:Time for Qs to come back by mmkkbb · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's not just that. Trying to coordinate the numerous navies involved can't be easy. I have been reading the occasional bit of Informattion Dissemination's coverage of the events out there. It's way too much for me to swallow on a regular basis, but it has commentary from professionals, not just journalists or cheerleaders.

      --
      -mkb
    2. Re:Time for Qs to come back by thrillseeker · · Score: 5, Funny

      The pirates are on the run now - the UN has approved sanctions against them - God help them when they read that.

    3. Re:Time for Qs to come back by Kabuthunk · · Score: 2

      That sounds more prone to problems (and should the pirates actually still capture it, then you're screwed) than my idea. Much like a Q-ship, you have a ship that looks like it's got good stuff on it. However, it's loaded to the hilt with explosives. Have it radio-controlled, so no actual people are on-board. A few lifelike dummies behind the wheel perhaps. Sail it around where things get hijacked, wait for it to have just that done to it, and push the big red button that says "make pirates go away now". Hell, even just full-speed that ship into Eyl pirate bay and pushing the button when it gets to land. That option probably would be avoided though, since likely people might be concerned that some non-criminals are there, and you can't try them in court with this method, etc, etc.

      But a few decoy explody ships here and there to take out the ones actually in the act of pirating the ship, and I'm sure the amount of piracy would decrease significantly.

      --
      Planet Zebeth - Metroid with a twist
    4. Re:Time for Qs to come back by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Informative

      Throw the covers off the guns and blast them into next year.

      Your punishment may be a bit extreme but maybe it's just because I'm the kind of guy that likes fair justice & is concerned that the rest of the world sees my country as one that blindly kills people.

      You are forgetting that these pirates are (aside from being human beings) winning people over by giving them things in a very Robin-Hood-esque type scenario--even if it's only offering the people a paying job as a pirate in an otherwise devastated and unstable economy. You would very quickly fall into disfavor with the locals ... these pirates have even alegedly defended fishing areas for locals. They claim they are more like the coast guard trying to protect the food of hungry people. I think entire cities have bought into their propaganda and are willing to harbor/help them.

      True or not, it's brazen disregard for how other people see things that causes really really bad things for America. Going in there, shooting up criminals & leaving is not going to improve anyone's image. Yes, these people are kidnappers & thieves but I don't think insta-death is a good way to deal with them.

      Not a whole lot in this world is purely black and white.

      --
      My work here is dung.
    5. Re:Time for Qs to come back by nbert · · Score: 5, Interesting

      One thing I'd like to add: There are not enough military ships in the world to really control the affected area. More ships result in higher safety, but as long as cargo and tourist ships pass the area unguarded the pirates still have a chance.

      In my opinion any real solution has to change something within Somali territory. It's not like the pirates can switch to safer jobs on land when the international efforts become unpleasant.

    6. Re:Time for Qs to come back by AKAImBatman · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I seriously doubt that a Q-Ship armed to the hilt and crewed by experienced naval personnel would fall into pirate hands. These guys are attacking with fishing boats for crying out loud! The problem isn't that our ships can't hold their own against the pirates. That much is stupidly simple. It's finding the pirates that's the problem. And these guys are even less sophisticated than other piracy organizations equipped with speedboats and cutters.

      I mean, take a look at these guys. If someone would arm our merchies with a few mortars and sniper rifles, these pirates wouldn't be able to get their assault rifles within weapons range. But for some reason, today's governments think that armed merchies are a bad idea. So... Q-Ships. They'd kick ass. :-)

    7. Re:Time for Qs to come back by AKAImBatman · · Score: 4, Interesting

      "Launch Marine Assault to capture positively identified pirates" works just as well. It merely lacks that nice ring "blast them into next year" has. :-)

      Your point is well taken. However, I still think Q-Ships are an answer. Q-Ships are the kind of bait that would cause pirates to identify themselves so that you can take action. Whether that be a matter of sinking them or capturing them, there's a good chance of it working. As a bonus, you'll start to give the pirates pause as they attempt to ascertain whether the ship they're about to attack is a real merchie or a Q-Ship.

      For bonus points, borrow real merchant ships but crew them with naval officers and marines. That way NATO forces can move from ship to ship, leaving the pirates to further second-guess themselves. Is this merchie a trap? No way to know short of attempting attack.

    8. Re:Time for Qs to come back by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 5, Funny

      ...any real solution has to change something within Somali territory

      Pave the entire country and turn it into permit required parking.
      Then deny parking permits to all of the pirates.

    9. Re:Time for Qs to come back by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Why not just allow ships to arm themselves? Q-ships will just lead to "scout" pirate ships that test the waters to see if the ship is armed then still go after the regular ships.

      If that oil tanker had a few RPGs and people that knew how to use them, there wouldn't be a problem. As other people have said these are fishing boats.

    10. Re:Time for Qs to come back by AKAImBatman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Have the pirates been killing anyone? Not to my knowledge ....

      Sadly, this is incorrect:

      http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,21842522-1702,00.html
      http://article.wn.com/view/2008/10/23/Pirates_to_kill_crew_on_arms_ship_if_NATO_ships_attack/
      http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/1572236/Somali-pirates-threaten-to-kill-tanker-crew.html

      They can and do kill people. And if this is allowed to continue, more and more people are going to die. On both sides.

      I'm merely saddened your plan doesn't involve fixing any of Somalia's real problems. Just killing offenders.

      My plan only addresses the short term issue: The piracy. That has to be dealt with immediately. Unchecked piracy will only result in the loss of more lives and cause economic problems on a world-wide scale.

      Dealing with the political issues in Somalia is a more complex issue that lacks an immediate solution. I wish I could venture a good plan, but I do not understand the dynamics of the situation well enough to produce one. It's not like Somalia hasn't been receiving foreign aid:

      By some
      reckonings, no other country save Israel has
      received such high levels of military and
      economic aid per capita; certainly no country
      has less to show for it. Even before its collapse
      into protracted civil war and anarchy in 1990,
      Somalia had earned a reputation as a graveyard
      of foreign aid, a land where aid projects were
      notoriously unsuccessful, and where high levels
      of foreign assistance helped to create an
      entirely unsustainable, corrupt and repressive
      state.

      What do they do with our foreign aid workers? Why, they kidnap and kill them:

      http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/06/world/africa/06briefs-6FOREIGNAIDW_BRF.html
      http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20081105/wl_afp/somaliaunrestreliefkidnap_081105183945
      http://www.patronusanalytical.com/files/Somali%20Aid%20Worker%20Murdered.php
      http://www.pr-inside.com/somali-aid-worker-killed-witnesses-say-r904499.htm

      What would you have us do? I'm all for finding a peaceful solution if one can be arrived at. But as of this moment, there is an immediate problem people are dying or being threatened with death.

      Food for thought: Isn't it interesting how the pirates can't afford food, but can always afford assault rifles? Perhaps there is more to their Robin Hood image than meets the eye.

    11. Re:Time for Qs to come back by denis-The-menace · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The irony is that things only get moving when oil is involved.

      Now that they have a tanker full of it, the US will be called to "liberate" it.

      Once that ship is gone, we'll go back to Status Quo.

      --
      Obama's legacy: (N)othing (S)ecure (A)nywhere and (T)error (S)imulation (A)dministration
    12. Re:Time for Qs to come back by MacColossus · · Score: 4, Funny

      That's a great idea. Just sneak up on them and push the "F" key on your keyboard.

    13. Re:Time for Qs to come back by IronChef · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I can't find the reference right now, but when I was reading about piracy last week arming the merchant ships was said to be difficult politically.

      I think it was something like this: the merchant ships have to pass through many nations' waters, and in some of those nations the arms needed to fight off pirates are illegal. So... if you have private armed guards on board, you're breaking the law at some of your ports. Therefore, being a well behaved company, you don't have guards at all.

      This is lame, even as it makes sense. How would a US port feel about a foreign ship pulling in when a dozen civilians with grenade launchers are strolling around on deck? The Coast Guard would go ape.

      Anyway, I would like to find a proper explanation for the current state of affairs.

    14. Re:Time for Qs to come back by Duradin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So you want the US, fresh on its "success" in Iraq and Afghanistan to "liberate" yet another country we don't really understand (and one that we've previously failed in)?

      We go in, "liberate" a country and get called the great satan and western pig-dog imperialists.

      We don't go in and everyone whines that we're not doing anything.

      Somali isn't even a cause of regime change. There is no effective regime. Somali would be like Afghanistan on hell difficulty in hardcore mode. Humanitarian aid doesn't work because you basically need to launch an invasion to get it to where and who it needs to go to. Then you have to make sure it stays where it should be. You've got warlords and factions to deal with, not a government. Each one will try to play you against the others.

      Letting the pirates rake in millions of dollars in ransoms isn't helping anyone. They aren't going out in their little boats throwing sunshine and rainbows at their target.

      In the long run probably the best thing that could happen would be that they end up sinking a ship. Then the fun and games would be over and the kid gloves would come off.

    15. Re:Time for Qs to come back by canUbeleiveIT · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm merely saddened your plan doesn't involve fixing any of Somalia's real problems. Just killing offenders.

      It's funny, the shit has been hitting the fan for innocent civilians in Somalia but it only gets real attention (and demand for NATO intervention) when it starts to affect our trade ships ... heaven forbid our trade be interrupted!

      In principle I agree with what your sentiments, but it isn't as if helping Somalia hasn't been tried. Unfortunately, the experience has been that going to Somalia and trying to help has often meant that one will be killed. Merely sending food, technology or money results in one or more of the ruling juntas stealing it.

      It's a extremely unfortunate situation in which many innocents suffer and die, and many people and governments would happily give of their time and money to help the situation. But, sadly, it's kind of like giving money to your drug-addicted brother-in-law--helping him doesn't help him.

    16. Re:Time for Qs to come back by Snocone · · Score: 4, Interesting

      If that oil tanker had a few RPGs and people that knew how to use them, there wouldn't be a problem.

      No, RPGs aren't an appropriate defense weapon. 500m is the propulsion limit and the limit of hand held accuracy is more like 50m.

      All you need is a handful of hunting rifles of polar bear hunting capability, I suggest my preferred caliber the .300 Win Mag aka 7.62 × 67 mm. Half a dozen of those on deck and you are effectively safe from anything short of an actual warship.
       

    17. Re:Time for Qs to come back by Snocone · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's funny, the shit has been hitting the fan for innocent civilians in Somalia but it only gets real attention (and demand for NATO intervention) when it starts to affect our trade ships

      Uh, dude...

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Hawk_Down_(book)

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Hawk_Down_(film)

      For crying out loud, there's VIDEO GAMES about it.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delta_Force:_Black_Hawk_Down

      Just exactly what does it take to meet your threshold for "real attention", since apparently a multiple Academy Award winning Ridley Scott motion picture doesn't do it?

    18. Re:Time for Qs to come back by jmorris42 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      > How would a US port feel about a foreign ship pulling in when a dozen civilians
      > with grenade launchers are strolling around on deck? The Coast Guard would go ape.

      As an NRA member I'm not afraid of arms or people wielding them, so long as they are the right people bearing them for the right reasons and shooting them at the right (or would that be wrong?) people. So no, I would have no problem with a $150M tanker laden with $100M in crude being armed. Seems rather sane to me. If we are trusting the crew not to use the far more dangerous tanker itself as a weapon I see no reason to begrudge them a couple of rocket launchers to defend themselves from pirates. No, they can't carry them off the ship and they should be expected to have the decency to stow them away once they are safely in US waters. If I can't have a rocket launcher why should they get to have all the fun. :)

      This story just goes to show ya what pansies we have allowed ourselves to become. Can you imagine pirate infested waters under Ronald Reagan's six hundred ship navy? People might accuse America of trying to police the world, but dang it back when we really did it the world was a safer place... as it was when the British Navy ruled the seas. Pirates had short life expectancies.

      --
      Democrat delenda est
    19. Re:Time for Qs to come back by winkydink · · Score: 3, Informative
      --

      "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    20. Re:Time for Qs to come back by el+americano · · Score: 4, Funny

      A strongly worded letter can't be far behind.

      --
      Those are my principles. If you don't like them I have others. -Groucho Marx
    21. Re:Time for Qs to come back by toriver · · Score: 4, Funny

      You can go further back also, to Lyndon B. Johnson's War on Poverty which eradicated poverty in the U.S.

    22. Re:Time for Qs to come back by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 4, Informative

      Theres been a war on piracy since 1801. And a war on slavery off the coast of Africa that the US was involved in. Theres a power vacuum now with the fall of the Soviet Union and the shrinking of navies and naval basing.

      Back before, the Soviets had naval basing in the region, out of Somalia and at times, Yemen. That dried up, Somalia got disastrous and the UN pulled out. the boil festered and now we are seeing some fallout for giving up on Somalia in the mid 90s.

    23. Re:Time for Qs to come back by RogerWilco · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The problem is, that if the ships start shooting at the pirates, the pirates start shooting at the merchant ships.

      Given that those ships might carry a cargo worth hundreds of millions, are very slow, almost impossible to miss, and can be sunk with a well placed RPG, it's not a risk most of the merchant companies want to take.

      That is the essence of the issue why these ships are not protecting themselves. The pirates would blow them up.

      --
      RogerWilco the Adventurous Janitor
    24. Re:Time for Qs to come back by DerekLyons · · Score: 2, Informative

      One thing I'd like to add: There are not enough military ships in the world to really control the affected area.

      Huh? The US alone could do it if really wanted to. Probably the UK or France could too, though they might need a bit of aid from the other.

    25. Re:Time for Qs to come back by IronChef · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oh, I agree. I wasn't trying to say that fear was the RIGHT reaction. If foreign merchant ships want to have mercenaries on board I think we should find a way to make that work--and their home ports should extend us the same courtesy.

      Pirates... Sheesh. History, like Hollywood, has run out of ideas and is relaunching old ideas.

    26. Re:Time for Qs to come back by jmorris42 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > As in, full of Middle-Easterners. Do you really want those people armed?

      Ok, you are trying to make a funny and all that but I'm gonna play along. Dude, they are already armed with a fully loaded oil tanker. Just how much more damage are they going to do with a couple of AKs and perhaps a rocket launcher or three? A hundred million dollars worth of crude oil is enough to do a heck of a lot of damage to a port. Plus they could opt to just sink the damned thing in an inconvienient spot.

      So unless we are going to forbid ships with 'ragheads' in the crew we just have to hope that the people who own that quarter billion worth of tanker and cargo have enough on the line to avoid hiring a crew of terrorists. The worry would be a gang of these pirates being terrorists and instead of holding a tanker hostage quietly throwing the origional crew overboard and then continuing it's voyage and blowing it up/sinking it at an oil terminal here or in the middle east.

      --
      Democrat delenda est
    27. Re:Time for Qs to come back by DerekLyons · · Score: 3, Informative

      Huh? The USN (and other nation's navies) have been working on anti-piracy measures in that area for years. Just because you've never heard of it doesn't mean it isn't happening.

    28. Re:Time for Qs to come back by Bonobo_Unknown · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I would have modded you up just for the neat phrase you invented: got disastrous ;)

      --
      We don't believe in radical loony monotheistic religions from the middle east -- we're Christians.
    29. Re:Time for Qs to come back by Fnord666 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Food for thought: Isn't it interesting how the pirates can't afford food, but can always afford assault rifles?

      That's because assault rifles are a lot more plentiful than food in Somalia.

      --
      'The tyrant will always find pretext for his tyranny.' - Aesop's Fables
    30. Re:Time for Qs to come back by srussia · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I would have modded you up just for the neat phrase you invented: got disastrous ;)

      That would be a euphemism for "was destabilized by a US-backed coup"--in this case in 2006.

      --
      Set your phasers on "funky"!
    31. Re:Time for Qs to come back by CmdrGravy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Why should NATO act ? How many of those hijacked vessels are registered in NATO countries ? I'm betting it's not many so why would we care if they're hijacked or not.

      It's down to countries like Saudia Arabia who are making vast sums of money transporting oil through that area to spend some of that money on their own protection, if they want to protect their ships. At the moment it looks like they prefer to pay out ransoms ( which seems to me to be a highly stupid strategy and is simply providing the pirates with better weapons to capture bigger ships ) but if that's what they want to do it's up to them.

      If our own ships are affected we should take a leaf out the Frenchies book and send in aquatic special forces to eliminate the pirates but whilst it's not our ships we don't have to do anything.

  2. Not Pirates by youngerpants · · Score: 5, Funny

    I wish people would stop using the word Pirate; they're merely redistributing content.

    1. Re:Not Pirates by Mantrid · · Score: 3, Funny

      We should really be going after the shipyards...without them, we wouldn't have this problem!!

    2. Re:Not Pirates by megamerican · · Score: 2, Informative

      Historically, there were very few real pirates.

      Most were privateers, meaning they were sponsored by a nation. It wouldn't surprise me if this is the case here as well. These so-called pirates don't have a lot to gain in the long term. It'll be interesting to see what the response will be by governments in order to "fix" this problem and who really benefits.

      These stories about pirates have been very frequent in the past few weeks, magically when oil and gas are well below what most could have ever predicted.

      --
      If you have something that you dont want anyone to know, maybe you shouldnt be doing it in the first place -Eric Schmidt
    3. Re:Not Pirates by MozeeToby · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Have you heard anything about Somolia in the past, oh I don't know 20 years? There is no government in control of the people, not in the sense you seem to imply. There's also no organized economy or workers rights. Most likely, these pirates are average people with starving family back home, doing anything they can to put food on the table.

      Like a lot of problems around the world, the only way you are going to 'fix' the problem is to raise the standard of living so that the risks of brazenly illegal behavior outweigh the benifits. Sending aid is, of course, a very tricky situation. For many people, it feels like rewarding people who have broken the law. Not to mention there will always be the select few who have become attached to the power they have gained.

    4. Re:Not Pirates by PPalmgren · · Score: 2, Informative

      I work for a large shipping company. Piracy has been in the news lately because they are going after larger and larger ships in deeper waters. The most recent headliner was a supertanker carrying $100 million in crude oil getting hijacked, the largest vessel in history to ever be hijacked. One of our company's vessels fended off an attempted hijacking a few weeks ago as well. Regardless of cargo, vessels of this size often cost nearly 6 figures a day just to own, let alone operating costs. The costs of these hijackings are astronomical, that is why they are in the news. It is not OPEC propaganda.

  3. Woah if you zoom in, you can see the ships! by FredFredrickson · · Score: 3, Funny

    Google identified the pirate locations based on the ships themselves! If you zoom in on one, such as Attack ID: 2008/187 You can actually see the pirate ship, and somebody walking the plank! (Just above puerto la cruz)

    --
    Belief? Hope? Preference?The Existential Vortex
  4. Shippers urge copyright blockade of Somali coast by mcgrew · · Score: 5, Funny

    By EILEEN NG - 42 minutes ago
    KUALA LUMPUR, Malaysia (AP) -- Shipping officials from around the world called Monday for a military blockade along Somalia's coast to intercept copyright infringer vessels heading out to sea. Yemen's government said Somali copyright infringers have seized another ship.

    Peter Swift, managing director of the International Association of Independent Tanker Owners, said stronger naval action -- including aerial and aviation support -- is necessary to battle rampant piracy in the Gulf of Aden near Somalia.

    But NATO, which has four warships off the coast of Somalia, rejected a blockade.

    Some 20 tankers sail through the sea lane daily. But many tanker owners are considering a massive detour around southern Africa to avoid copyright infringers, which will delay delivery and push costs up by 30 percent, Swift said.
    The association, whose members own 2,900 tankers or 75 percent of the world's fleet, opposes attempts to arm merchant ships because it could escalate the violence and put crew members at even greater risk, he said.
    "The other option is perhaps putting a blockade around Somalia and introducing the idea of intercepting vessels leaving Somalia rather than to try to protect the whole of the Gulf of Aden," Swift said.

    Somali copyright infringers have become increasingly brazen, seizing eight vessels in the past two weeks, including a huge Saudi supertanker loaded with $100 million worth of crude oil.

    On Monday, Yemen's Interior Ministry says Somali copyright infringers have hijacked a Yemeni cargo ship in the Arabian Sea. It said communication with the vessel was lost last Tuesday after it had been out to sea for a week.

    The ship is called Adina and it was not immediately clear what cargo it was carrying. The U.S. 5th Fleet based in Bahrain could not confirm the hijacking.
    The Arabian Sea is part of the Indian Ocean and stretches between Yemen and Somalia. The Gulf of Aden links it with the Red Sea.

    A blockade along Somalia's 2,400 mile coastline would not be easy.
    "But some intervention there may be effective," Swift told reporters on the sidelines of a shipping conference in Malaysia.

    U.S. Gen. John Craddock, NATO's supreme allied commander, said Monday the alliance's mandate is solely to escort World Food Program ships to Somalia and to conduct anti-piracy patrols.

    Asked what he thought of a Russian proposal to jointly attack the copyright infringer strongholds, Craddock answered: "That's far beyond what I've been tasked to do."

    According to Lt. Nathan Christensen, 5th Fleet spokesman, more than 14 warships from Denmark, France, India, Malaysia, Pakistan, Russia, the U.S. and NATO are currently patrolling a vast international maritime corridor. They escort some merchant ships and respond to distress calls in the area.
    Christensen declined to comment on the idea of a blockade.
    But the navies say it is virtually impossible to patrol the vast sea around the gulf.
    NATO has ruled out a blockade.

    "Blocking ports is not contemplated by NATO," said NATO Secretary General Jaap de Hoop Scheffer in Brussels. U.N. Security Council resolutions "do not include these kind of actions and as far as NATO is concerned, this is at the moment not on the cards," he said.

    Secretary-General of the Arab League Amr Moussa said Monday Arabs should deploy their own naval forces to fight piracy in the Horn of Africa and also cooperate with foreign fleets in the area.

    Diplomats of the Arab countries on the Red Sea met in Cairo last week to coordinate efforts to combat piracy, but some of these nations have been reluctant to get involved.

    Somalia, an impoverished nation caught up in an Islamic insurgency, has had no functioning government since 1991. Before the Yemeni report of another hijacked ship, there had been 95 copyright infringer attacks so far this year in Somali waters, with 39 ships hijacked.

    There were 15 ships with nearly 300 crew still in the hands of Somali copyright infringers, who dock the

  5. They've kidnapped the maps! by davidwr · · Score: 5, Funny

    NEWS FLASH

    This just in...

    Somali pirates have seized control of Slashdot and are using it as their new gunship to take down web sites such as http://www.icc-ccs.org/ .

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  6. Re:Where's Wall Street? by Cyberax · · Score: 2

    Don't worry. Crimson Permanent Assurance Co. will get them.

  7. Site slashdotted, mirror here: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Site is slashdotted, here's a mirror of the current pirate activity:

    Pirate Hotbed

  8. Convoys by zentinal · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Does anyone know why, given the huge area and the number of ships to protect, merchant ships in the area aren't being organized into convoys with military escort through those waters?

    Wouldn't that strategy work at least as well as it did in WWII?

    I don't think the pirates have submarines or aircraft... yet.

    1. Re:Convoys by kwiqsilver · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Because that would be expensive. There are too many ships going through the Red Sea or other hot spots to organize small enough convoys that don't end up leaving ships waiting for days for an escort. And imagine the traffic jams you'd see at the Suez and Panama Canals when that convoy showed up.

      If you want a military solution, a better option would be to park a carrier or two in each hot spot, and give each merchant ship contact information for the carrier(s) in an area, so they can call in a strafing run on any small, well armed boats that get too close (like pirate 911).

      A better solution still would be to remove the international legal restrictions against carrying small arms (e.g. battle rifles) and fixed armaments (e.g. fixed machine guns and light artillery) on a merchant ship. A few years ago, a Cruise Ship used a sonic weapon to fend off a pirate attack off Somalia. Imagine if instead of a non-lethal sonic cannon, they had unleashed a few rounds from a 30mm Cannon modified to fire at sea-based attackers. It would have stopped that attack and prevented those pirates (and that boat) from mounting any future attacks.

    2. Re:Convoys by Pheersome · · Score: 2, Informative

      The EU navies have begun convoy operations in the Gulf of Aden:

      http://www.lloydslist.com/ll/news/eu-launches-naval-escorts-in-gulf-of-aden/20017577798.htm

      --
      Better to light a candle than to curse the darkness.
    3. Re:Convoys by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 3, Informative

      give each merchant ship contact information for the carrier(s) in an area, so they can call in a strafing run on any small, well armed boats that get too close (like pirate 911).

      By the time the 'small, well armed boat' is identifiably too close...it is too close for an aircraft to get there in time. Plus which, the military pilot can't just take the word of some random guy about whether to shoot some other random boat in the water.

  9. speaking of piracy by jollyreaper · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It looks like the jacked up idle template pirated my user page. What do we have to do to get rid of it?

    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    1. Re:speaking of piracy by argent · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes, I was wondering about that. I go to my user page now and I've got a bunch of spam about features of slashdot I don't care a damn about instead of the list of my recent comments I was looking for.

  10. The solution is simple by xs650 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Send the RIAA and their lawyers after the pirates. It won't stop the piracy, but it will get rid of the RIAA and a bunch of lawyers.

  11. Piet Hein by tsa · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Here in NL we have a song about Piet Hein. He brought us the Spanish silver fleet when Holland ruled the waves and was at war with the Spaniards in the 17th century. He was a national hero back then, but in fact he was just a pirate. He stole all the silver the Spaniards had stolen from the natives in South America.

    --

    -- Cheers!

  12. No, they might laugh themselves to death . . . by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 4, Funny

    . . . which can only be the real intention of the announcement of sanctions against the pirates.

    This is actually a big deal for the UN, because they banned Joke Warfare (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joke_warfare) years ago.

    Maybe someone should threaten the pirates with "going to bed without any supper?"

    OK, no Nintendo for a week?

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  13. Proof for Pastafarienism by Nick+Ives · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The Great Flying Spaghetti Monster has revealed to us that there is a link between pirates and global warming, as piracy goes down, global warming increases. Surely this is evidence (not that any is needed) for this basic truth? As pirates steal oil tankers the price of oil will increase thereby limiting its consumption and decreasing the amount of global warming.

    It's plain simple logic, just like the plain, simple, wholesome taste of pasta with a tomato sauce.

    --
    Nick
  14. Take off the tinfoil hat by spun · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No, most pirates were not privateers. But most privateers were also pirates. The reason being, privateers could only get Letters of Marque and Reprisal when their country was at war, and the letters only covered attacking enemy shipping. What did privateers do during the times their country was not at war? They turned to outright piracy.

    The idea of modern countries handing out letters of Marque is ridiculous. Implying the pirates are after oil is just dumb. Saying the pirates don't have a lot to gain in the long run is also stupid, and shows how uneducated you are on the matter. Just look at the ransoms they receive. You only have to do it once. This is not some kind of Pirates of the Caribbean secret order of pirates. This is groups of starving desperate men trying for the Big Score. They take what they can get, and hope the shipping company will pay a ransom rather than see their ship sunk. They aren't selling oil and goods on the black market.

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
  15. Re:Where's Wall Street? by spun · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Technically, Wall Street is the Capo di tutti Capi directing their Uomini D'onore, Congress, on who to shake down. Leave it to a troll who's name is deliberately reminiscent of 'hairy vagina' to defend Wall Street.

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
  16. Historical Precident by sp3d2orbit · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm normally pro-US hegemony and quick to defend our actions. But, I'm about to give a silver bullet to my opposition.

    I can't help but notice the parallels between America's situation and Rome during its final centuries. Rome eventually degraded as barbaric pressures from the outside world overwhelmed their ability to control them.

    Modern America seems to be collapsing under a similar weight. Terrorism and piracy are equivalent modern forms of barbarism. The fact that the US cannot control it anymore validates the position that the US military is way overstretched and that our empire is on the decline.

    Ug.

    1. Re:Historical Precident by Panseh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How many of these ships taken hostage have been American owned? None that I know of. Even if they were all American ships, the pirates only received an estimated $30 million in ransoms this year. Not exactly a huge chunk of US GDP. Consider focusing your concerns on issues within the country, rather than get distracted by FUD like terrorism and piracy.

    2. Re:Historical Precident by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm not going to dismiss the notion of any parallels between America's present situation and that of the fall of Rome. But I'm not sure that the ones you've stated stand up to scrutiny.

      If there's one thing we should take from the last 8 years, is that international terrorism is not a problem to be solved through military means.

      As for these pirates. Purely because the US hasn't sent its military to deal with them, doesn't mean that it couldn't. The US Navy is quite capable of indiscriminately denying Somalian ships passage to the sea. Not to mention sending in the marines, or airstrikes. Now this would be like swatting some flies with the 5th fleet. And undoubtebly the wrong move, given the situation. But its a mistake to confuse not having the capability, and not choosing you use that capability.

  17. So... by yyr · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...when will there be a Google map showing the locations of ninjas?

  18. Citizen of the Galaxy as applied to this problem: by Ortega-Starfire · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Robert Heinlein wrote a book where merchant ships scooting through space were armed with nuclear rockets to blow the pirates straight to hell because the government cruisers, while effective, were few and far between.

    Obviously, we don't need to go nuclear on the pirates, but some small arms would go a long way to curbing the problem. Bigger ships can get bigger guns.

    Arm each ship with some guns and grenade launchers. Scale up as appropriate for larger ships. Problem solved.

    --
    ---- Liquid was a patriot ----
  19. Re:massive weaponry has been suggested by Ortega-Starfire · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hire adventurers? Put an exclamation point in front of the hiring place and gun toting wow players will naturally gravitate towards the quest giver. Set up cameras and sell footage to TV shows. Adventurers get salvage rights on the pirates taken out, everyone wins.

    Call it the Naval Interdiction Nullification Joint Assault program. Or for short, the NINJA program.

    --
    ---- Liquid was a patriot ----
  20. A little background by kaynaan · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This Issue is not black and white as most people think. This piracy has been going on for more than a 15 years off the coast of Somalia. In the past the targets were usually Japanese boats illegally tuna fishing a few miles off the north-eastern coast. back home these men are not looked upon as pirates they were a de facto navy for so long. believe it or not they have certain code they follow which is largely based on our nomadic culture .. they have not hurt a single hostage nor are they interested in doing so ... their hostages are treated with respect and food and water are shared equally among capture and captured... they are not locked up or anything like that. I admit the last few months what they are doing is beyond the pale .. but I cannot help admiring the the courage to take on a vessels of that size with dingy motor boats. contrary to what many articles report they are nowhere near as organized as they would have you believe .. the whole hi-tech thieves things is BS ... granted the last 'pirate' boat i've seen was about 13 years ago .. but the only thing these guys have got going for them is the 2 steel spheres in their shorts

  21. Reasons Piracy Continues by linuxbert · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Piracy exists in Somalia because the government lacks sufficient ability and influence to stop it.
    It continues largely because the international community that has the ability to stop it, doesnt have the reason to. Modern warships can sink targets they cant visually see. The Gulf of Aden is large, but its not that large.

    Most ships, even if owned by a western company, are flagged in a Convenient state - Panama, Liberia etc. these countries love the revenue form being a flag state but have no means of protecting their flagged ships. Most ships are crewed by non western crews.. many from the Philippines, Bangladesh, etc. again countries with limited abilities to protect their nationals internationally.

    The west has many ships in the area, however they are reluctant to act for political reasons, if no nationals are involved, or its not a home flagged ship, its really not the concern of the country. The pirates get their million dollar ransom, which to a pirate is a wind fall, but to a shipping company, used to paying $60000/day fuel bills, really isnt that big a deal. Furthermore the risks to the pirates are relatively small - the French raided a la Poinete, a yacht that was taken by pirates and was crewed by french nationals, and the Indians sunk a Pirate mother ship last week. So for the pirates 2 out of over 100 incidents ended badly. To stop the pirates, the western world needs to actively seek them out, hunt them down and stop them from taking ships, as well as recapturing ships by force. When pirates begin to face the consequences - to this point there have been almost none, then they will cease their actions, because taking a ship no longer results in a quick profit for the prirates, and the risk of death goes up significantly for the actual takers of the ship.

    Incidentally, the IMO is now recommending ships hire private security to protect them in troubled waters. Blackwater international has also purchased ships. The 18th century tales of piracy make a difference between a Privateer and a pirate a privateer was a mercenary ship working for a nation, to harass enemy shipping - they could take prizes, but paid a percentage to the crown, and wouldn't attack friendly shipping. a pirate had no Letter of Marque, paid no commissions, and attacked who he wanted when he wanted...

    everything old is new again.

    One final aside, those whom complain about copyright infringement by referring to it as piracy do a great disservice to the victims of piracy, imagine having your office attacked by men armed with machine guns and RPG's and your only defense is to run, and spray the attackers with a fire hose. from the floor above..

  22. What a bunch of crap by Vinegar+Joe · · Score: 2, Informative

    According to some of the hostages just released:

    Five Indian sailors who were among the crew of a Japanese-owned cargo ship hijacked by pirates and held for two months before a ransom was paid said Monday their captivity was "total desperation."

    The sailors were generally in good health when they were released, but according to the five who spoke publicly Monday conditions aboard the Stolt Valor were severe and they lived for two months in continual fear of being killed by the pirates.

    "We were always ... all 24 hours we were on gunpoint," said Fernandes. "We were all staying on the bridge (in the) navigation area. All 22 crew members were sleeping there, eating there. Only for shower and all, only two people were allowed -- two people will go, then they come up, two (more) people will go."

      Another crew member, Naved Burandkar, said the hijacking occurred when pirates came behind the Stolt Valor on a boat and fired rocket-propelled grenades.

    "They were continuously firing (at) our ship," he said. "They boarded our ship. They were firing ... nobody was going to understand what's happening so you can imagine what the situation was there."

    http://edition.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/asiapcf/11/24/india.pirates/index.html

    --
    "The average reporter we talk to is 27 years old......They literally know nothing." - Ben Rhodes