Slashdot Mirror


The Mouse Turns 40

Smivs writes with an excerpt from the BBC marking the anniversary of what may be the most famous tech demo outside Trinity site: "The humble computer mouse celebrates its 40th anniversary today. On 9 December 1968 hi-tech visionary Douglas Engelbart first used one to demonstrate novel ways of working with computers. The first mouse that Dr Engelbart used in the demo at the Fall Joint Computer Conference (FJCC) was made of wood and had one button. Much of the technology shown off in the demo inspired the creation of the hardware and software now widely used. ... The mouse, which was built by Bill English, helped Dr Engelbart demonstrate how text files could be clipped, copied and pasted as well as showing ways of using computer networks to collaborate on projects or co-edit documents." According to the article, "A day of celebration is planned in California to mark the 40th anniversary; with many of the researchers behind the original demo reunited to mark the event."

169 comments

  1. Celebration? by clam666 · · Score: 4, Funny

    We're rejoicing over an input device?

    No keyboard monument? Or was it overshadowed by the typewriter?

    --
    I'm a satanic clam.
    1. Re:Celebration? by FredFredrickson · · Score: 1

      This is a dupe. We had a story about this a year ago!

      Come to think about it..

      --
      Belief? Hope? Preference?The Existential Vortex
    2. Re:Celebration? by mewshi_nya · · Score: 1

      We're rejoicing that it's obviously going to die soon. Unless they've been touched by John Coffey, if a mouse lives till 40, they're gonna die. Soon. Like, now.

    3. Re:Celebration? by Mr+Z · · Score: 1

      Wow! The 40th anniversary was a year ago? Holy time travel, Batman! When'd I get in 2009?

    4. Re:Celebration? by TheThiefMaster · · Score: 1

      In three weeks!

      Travelling back in time is bad enough when it's only jet-lag, imagine being days out: "Sorry I'm late boss, my body still thinks it's Christmas"

    5. Re:Celebration? by jhol13 · · Score: 1

      I am disappointed - no one mentioned Krazy Kat!

  2. In other news by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 5, Funny

    The mouse was seen at the local Maserati dealership evaluating cars with his 20-something year old girlfriend.

    1. Re:In other news by Shivetya · · Score: 1

      She would be the two button mouse, after all god gave the other button to her.

      --
      * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
    2. Re:In other news by philspear · · Score: 3, Funny

      Wait, USB has been around 20 years? I didn't know they were even an item, I just thought they were fooling around.

    3. Re:In other news by eln · · Score: 4, Funny

      If I were that mouse, I would steer clear of USB...I hear she'll let just about anyone in to her "ports".

    4. Re:In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahh the 20 something girlfriend for the old guy. I get a kick out of the guys that do that. Yes I was there (between the last wife and the current one) I was 35 dating a 23 year old. It was fun, all they really are good for is lots and lots of shagging. When they are that young they are crazy. Wanting to go bar hopping wednesday night, all night. Let her go with her friends then screw her drunken brains out when she get's home. you'll get tired of it in 3 months.

      Yes, you CAN find a meaningful relationship with that big of an age difference, but mostly it's all about screwing the ever living daylights out of yourself and her and possibly her friend. Bonus points if you can pull off that one.

      Remember, the 40 something guy in the new convertible Porsche is simply something for the rest of us who can get laid easily without the car to laugh at. Those girls you attract are nothing more than expensive hookers.

      Old guy in a new sporty car = sad joke.

    5. Re:In other news by darthnoodles · · Score: 1

      20 year-old...I hear they are 'plug-n-play'.

    6. Re:In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      for the rest of us who can get laid easily without the car to laugh at.

      You sound like one of the ones that use chloroform to get laid

    7. Re:In other news by Ihmhi · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and her younger sister is, well... fast. You know what I'm sayin'?

  3. Sarcastic killjoy by NervousWreck · · Score: 0

    So? 40 means that it's old and obsolete. That ties in perfectly with the fact that I switched my main computer to a laptop with a trackpad.

    --
    I do not have a sig. You are hallucinating.
  4. Re:Priorities, people, priorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Who gives a shit about petty US politics?

  5. Re:Priorities, people, priorities by eln · · Score: 5, Funny

    Oh come on, we already have a special event for when an Illinois politician gets busted for corruption...we call it "Tuesday".

  6. Obligatory review comment by Mononoke · · Score: 5, Funny

    One button. You have to take your hand off the keyboard. Lame.

    --
    NetInfo connection failed for server 127.0.0.1/local
    1. Re:Obligatory review comment by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 1

      No context. 75% of Slashbots don't get it. Lame.

    2. Re:Obligatory review comment by idontgno · · Score: 1
      Ah, but the Slashdotters who really matter do get it. And we embrace CowboyNeal's reality-altering vision and fall worshipping at his feet.

      Excellent, this analogy to Apple products and culture extends consistently and accurately.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    3. Re:Obligatory review comment by theaveng · · Score: 1

      I don't get it. I've used one-button with the Macintosh for years and never needed to remove my hand from the keyboard.

      --
      FOX NEWS.com should be BANNED from television and internet. Have the Congress take it over and give us Truespeak.
    4. Re:Obligatory review comment by theaveng · · Score: 3, Informative

      P.S. I remember when I first used a PC, I kept wondering why I needed a second button. Back then (Win 3.1) the right mouse button was rarely used. The left button would be well-worn while the right button still looked new. It took a couple years for Microsoft to invent the idea of right-button context menus. (Or maybe that should be stole? The Commodore Amiga had been using right button menus since 1986.)

      --
      FOX NEWS.com should be BANNED from television and internet. Have the Congress take it over and give us Truespeak.
    5. Re:Obligatory review comment by strength_of_10_men · · Score: 1

      jesus christ. it's been 40 years and the mouse still ONLY has 2 buttons? wtf?

    6. Re:Obligatory review comment by TypoNAM · · Score: 1

      Mine has five. A Microsoft's IntelliMouse brand and it has the standard left and right buttons with a center/middle button built into the scroll wheel, and the (really useless) forward and backward buttons on the sides of which annoy me whenever I'm browsing and I hit one of them (backward button) accidentally during cases like posting on forums and haven't hit submit yet (lost EVERYTHING).

      --
      This space is not for rent.
    7. Re:Obligatory review comment by srussia · · Score: 4, Funny

      jesus christ. it's been 40 years and the mouse still ONLY has 2 buttons? wtf?

      It's been 7000 years and the WHEEL still comes in just ONE SHAPE? WTF?

      --
      Set your phasers on "funky"!
    8. Re:Obligatory review comment by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      And X has been using 3 buttons since 1984.

    9. Re:Obligatory review comment by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      Actually, your has 7. Even a standard wheel mouse has 5.

      1: Left button
      2: Middle button (click the wheel)
      3: Right button
      4: Scroll wheel up (this actually is just a button)
      5: Scroll wheel down (this is also just a button)

      and your intellimouse adds:
      6: Forward button
      7: Back button

      Try 'xev' on *nix system sometime. ;)

    10. Re:Obligatory review comment by Golias · · Score: 1

      Mine has about a hundred. It's called a keyboard with a trackpad.

      Why would I want to drag a bunch of buttons all over the table when all I need for my well-designed GUI (OS X) is some kind of simple pointer device to interact with my keyboard?

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    11. Re:Obligatory review comment by itsdapead · · Score: 1

      jesus christ. it's been 40 years and the mouse still ONLY has 2 buttons? wtf?

      What are you talking about? Even Apple mice now have the equivalent of 4 buttons and a trackball (and the optical sensor means that they even work on those icy surfaces in hell or on the bristly back of an airborne hog).

      --
      In a survey of 100 programmers, 111111 thought that duck-typing was a good idea.
    12. Re:Obligatory review comment by Gerald · · Score: 1

      It's been 7000 years and the WHEEL still comes in just ONE SHAPE? WTF?

      Two.

    13. Re:Obligatory review comment by lysergic.acid · · Score: 1

      my logitech mouse is pretty much the same setup. except mine comes with software letting you configure the various function keys on the keyboard and mouse.

      and even though occasionally i'll hit the back button on accident (either on the mouse, or hitting backspace when the textbox is out of focus), it never causes any problems even with extremely long posts--because Firefox remembers form states and all i need to do is hit the forward button on the mouse and everything goes back to the way i left it.

    14. Re:Obligatory review comment by TypoNAM · · Score: 1

      Technically to call scroll wheel actions 'buttons' is like saying moving the mouse left, right, up, and down are buttons too. Now operating systems currently firing events to applications do map the mouse wheel actions as buttons (Microsoft Windows does, not sure how UNIX OSs 'label' them) since when the API was originally designed I assume the developers figured only thing that could possibly be added later on to the mouse was more buttons.

      --
      This space is not for rent.
    15. Re:Obligatory review comment by lysergic.acid · · Score: 1

      are your arms that weak that moving a 4~5 ounce mouse poses physical strain on you? i mean, why would i use a clumsy 2-inch trackpad when i have plenty of free desk space for movement?

      just because you prefer a certain setup doesn't mean it's suitable for everyone else. there's a reason why the mouse is so much more popular than trackpads and trackballs. mice are generally more accurate and have superior ergonomic design than trackpads--which are mainly used to conserve space. it's just more comfortable/natural to use a mouse than a trackpad in applications that rely heavily on movement-based inputs, such as 2D and 3D gaming, image editing, or even CAD programs.

      this is how i'd rank various input devices in terms of accuracy/intuitiveness in motion-translation:

      1. tablet/screen hybrids (such as the Wacom Cintiq or tablet PCs) / touchscreens - there's really minimal "translation" to be done here as you're just using your hand/arm as the input device. even though a digitizing tablet requires you to hold a stylus pen, your hand movements are still translated directly into pointer movement.
      2. conventional digitizing tablets (such as Wacom Graphire, Intuos, etc.) - a handheld stylus is still pretty intuitive and natural, but there's a greater gap between the user's physical motions and the motion of the virtual pointer.
      3. a conventional mouse - a mouse provides decent motion-translation for most applications, but it's too clunky for graphic design or other tasks which require accuracy and fine motor skills. also, software functions like motion thresholds and dynamic pointer acceleration (a.k.a. ballistics) can throw off the user's natural motor reflexes (compare drawing a circle with your eyes closed on paper and with a mouse), making the input device less intuitive.
      4. trackball - i'm not particularly fond of trackballs. to be honest, they feel a little awkward to me. however, i know a lot of people swear by them. they're not quite as clumsy as a trackpad, but they still don't provide the same ease of movement as the mouse, and as a result trackballs also rely on more pronounced use of thresholds/ballistics.
      5. trackpad - trackpads inherit all of the drawbacks of the trackball and then compounds them with a tiny input area. certainly the limited range of physical movement afforded by trackpads are largely compensated for in software, but this just leads to even more pronounced use of motion thresholds and ballistics. in fact, it's almost impossible to get a linear response in X + Y acceleration using a touchpad.
      6. pointer stick/nubs - the mouse nipple is about the only thing worse than a trackpad.
    16. Re:Obligatory review comment by Garganus · · Score: 2, Informative

      however many you want.
      curve of constant width Known of since the 1800s at the latest. Oo, found it; this video is more fun and has been around for almost 50 yrs.

    17. Re:Obligatory review comment by Kazoo+the+Clown · · Score: 1

      Hell, I don't even like Emacs-- you have to take your fingers of the home position to hit the function keys. Lame.

    18. Re:Obligatory review comment by IL-CSIXTY4 · · Score: 1

      Actually, Engelbart designed the mouse as a counterpart to the five-key chorded keyboard he worked with his left hand. His plan was for the alphanumeric keyboard to only be used for entering text, and the chorded keyboard for all the other commands. So, you wouldn't have to take your hand off the keyboard.

    19. Re:Obligatory review comment by InfiniteLoopCounter · · Score: 1

      The way your post is written I thought at first you were suggesting that your mouse was your keyboard, and that you had added a tracking ball or something underneath!

    20. Re:Obligatory review comment by theaveng · · Score: 1

      No a modern mouse doesn't use left/right/up/down buttons. It uses an analog potentiometer (or something similar) like those old Atari Paddle controllers, so it can sense small or large movements. Not buttons.

      I've used a Commodore mouse that operated like a digital joystick (with internal buttons). Yuck. No matter how fast you move your mouse, the arrow moves at the same glacial pace. There's no speed control; no fine movements. I upgraded to a true analog mouse rather quickly.

      --
      FOX NEWS.com should be BANNED from television and internet. Have the Congress take it over and give us Truespeak.
    21. Re:Obligatory review comment by TypoNAM · · Score: 1

      I know that because that is what I meant when I was replying to the grand parent about the scroll wheel which works exactly the same way as the mouse move actions (ball mice for example), but the operating system event identifiers are labeling scroll wheel actions as button events. That's what I was talking about.

      --
      This space is not for rent.
  7. Not just mouse: the mother of all demos by Sockatume · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What was amazing wasn't just that he unveiled the mouse, but pretty much launched the concept of personal computing as we know it today, including many of the metaphors we take for granted in the modern graphical OS, as well as video communications, email, hypertext... amazing scenes.

    --
    No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    1. Re:Not just mouse: the mother of all demos by PabloD · · Score: 1

      If you want to hear more about Doug Englerbart, I recommend reading
      What the dormouse said by John Markoff.
      It discusses in detail not only the technical achievements of the main players in the personal
      computing but also provides a deep look at their individual philosophies.

    2. Re:Not just mouse: the mother of all demos by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      Though one big thing that stood out to me based upon brief segments of the video I've seen in the past is that the mouse was originally used to augment the keyboard... not a "mouse or keyboard" paradigm that people seem to use today.

    3. Re:Not just mouse: the mother of all demos by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Though one big thing that stood out to me based upon brief segments of the video I've seen in the past is that the mouse was originally used to augment the keyboard... not a "mouse or keyboard" paradigm that people seem to use today.

      I always wondered why we even need mouse buttons when there are 100+ keys on the keyboard. I don't know very many softwares that use this approach. It would especially be useful for graphic apps. (Doesn't PhotoShop use it?)

      I once built my own hobby music sequencer out of FoxPro that used this approach. Mousing to a "note" and then pressing 1 through 9 would set the intensity (aka "velocity") of that note without touching the mouse buttons. It seemed the natural way to do it. Right-clicking would take too long for lots of notes.

      I suppose one approach would be to use right-click and dragging to set intensity, but to make it interactive would be too much programming for a hobby toy.

      My kids since got into my music equipment and [bleeped] it up.

             

  8. Next big thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So what will be the next big input device? Or are we stuck with mouse and keyboard?

    1. Re:Next big thing by cromar · · Score: 1

      We're already seeing the touchscreen come into its own with the iPod Touch and other similar devices. I would imagine we are probably moving towards simplified interfaces, such as touch or voice command. Soon, I think, computers with keyboards will become somewhat rare outside of the workforce. Keyboard and mouse is just not that efficient for what most people do with computers.

  9. Congrats by truthsearch · · Score: 5, Funny

    Aw, and it doesn't look a day over 30.

    Except it lost its ball. Pretty sad to lose a ball while you're in your prime.

    1. Re:Congrats by Justin+Hopewell · · Score: 4, Funny

      The child in me finds this funny. The adult in me finds it hilarious.

    2. Re:Congrats by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 4, Funny

      Except it lost its ball. Pretty sad to lose a ball while you're in your prime.

      It may have lost its ball, but look at what it gained...a frickin LASER!

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    3. Re:Congrats by eln · · Score: 4, Funny

      Except it lost its ball. Pretty sad to lose a ball while you're in your prime.

      Oh, I don't know...I hear losing a ball makes it easier to win the Tour de France, so it might not be all bad.

    4. Re:Congrats by Conditioner · · Score: 3, Funny

      Mouse Balls Available as FRU (Field Replacement Unit) http://www.neystadt.org/john/humor/IBM-Mouse-Balls.htm

    5. Re:Congrats by dedazo · · Score: 1

      The last time I cleaned out the 'ole crap closet I was about to throw out about 20 mice I had lying around, but I decided to keep the balls.

      Let me say that again so I can preempt the jokes: I chucked the rodents and I kept the balls.

      Now that we're over that, does anyone have any ideas as to what can be done with them? There's nothing better than a heavy large ball bearing covered in rubberized plastic, but I can't figure out what to do with them and I can't bring myself to throw them out.

      --
      Web2.0: I love when people Flickr my cuil and digg my boingboing until my google is reddit and I start to yahoo
    6. Re:Congrats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, I don't know...I hear losing a ball makes it easier to win the Tour de France, so it might not be all bad.

      Ecch, if you really think Lance Armstrong's battle with cancer made anything "easier" for him, you're woefully mistaken.

    7. Re:Congrats by camperdave · · Score: 1

      Now that we're over that, does anyone have any ideas as to what can be done with them?

      Civil war era steam powered machine gun ammo.
      Counterweight and/or ammo for desktop trebuchet.
      Include in presents to throw off the weight for those that shake gifts.
      Giant marble machine.
      Slingshot ammo.
      Miniature bowling balls.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    8. Re:Congrats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Oh, I don't know...I hear losing a ball makes it easier to win the Tour de France, so it might not be all bad.

      Ecch, if you really think Lance Armstrong's battle with cancer made anything "easier" for him, you're woefully mistaken.

      Dude, it's been over ten years. We can officially make jokes about it and you are allowed to laugh about it. Especially because he himself has done so (see Dodgeball: A True Underdog Story).

    9. Re:Congrats by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      Considering that they alls tarted life with no more than ONE ball, losing that one was always a threat, and of course having only one to start with...

      No wonder they got jumpy...

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    10. Re:Congrats by phreakincool · · Score: 1

      Color and number them. Then make a miniature pool table.

    11. Re:Congrats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I still kept my ball. Trackman saves fertility.

    12. Re:Congrats by jafac · · Score: 1

      Yay! Missing ball = Free Testosterone treatments!

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    13. Re:Congrats by Haoie · · Score: 1

      Those old mouse balls are great fun to play with.

      You can even make a collection out of them. In fact I'm sure someone, somewhere, has.

      --
      If each mistake being made is a new one, then progress is being made.
    14. Re:Congrats by dedazo · · Score: 1

      I like where your head's at.

      --
      Web2.0: I love when people Flickr my cuil and digg my boingboing until my google is reddit and I start to yahoo
    15. Re:Congrats by BoothbyTCD · · Score: 1

      Didn't slow Lance Armstrong down much... It helps that the remaining ball is streamlined and aerodynamic.

      --
      snig
  10. Mouse??? WTF by omuls+are+tasty · · Score: 2, Funny

    Dude, this is Slashdot. We don't use freakin mice around here. Keyboards are always faster

    <CTRL+L>javascript:document.getElementById('Submit').click()

    1. Re:Mouse??? WTF by Onaga · · Score: 1

      Using KLM-GOMS analysis, you are incorrect. Applications with really good shortcuts would be faster with a keyboard. Try browsing CNN keyboard only vs. a mouse and let me know how you do.

      And your post may have been tongue-in-cheek, but it wouldn't be slashdot if I didn't reply.

    2. Re:Mouse??? WTF by themusicgod1 · · Score: 1

      "Try browsing CNN"

      Go no further, I think we may have spotted the flaw in your argument.

      --
      GENERATION 26: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation.
    3. Re:Mouse??? WTF by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      % lynx
      gcnn.com
      15

      works fine for me.. (ok, actually I don't apparently have lynx nor links compiled at the moment.. but that's how I seem to remember it works.)

  11. Re:Priorities, people, priorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's Slashdot. It doesn't typically cover current events. While Blagojevich's corruption is rather astounding, there's no interesting angle of hypocrisy or Schadenfreude. And Slashdot isn't the type of place I'd expect to see an informed discussion of what effect this might have on filling the empty IL-Sen seat (I still say Emil Jones as a placeholder, and elect someone new in 2010).

    Other than "holy crap, what a greedy idiot" and the usual "lulz see Democrats, all politicians are eeeeevil", there's not a lot to say.

  12. Mouses by IainMH · · Score: 4, Funny

    And lets be clear. The plural of computer mouse is most definitely not 'computer mouses'.

    1. Re:Mouses by Timberwolf0122 · · Score: 5, Funny

      It is Meases and I hate them to pieces!

      --
      In the not too distant future, next Sunday A.D.
    2. Re:Mouses by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 1

      And lets be clear. The plural of computer mouse is most definitely not 'computer mouses'.

      Computer meices?

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    3. Re:Mouses by IainMH · · Score: 1

      Ha!

      That's preferable.

    4. Re:Mouses by ZERO1ZERO · · Score: 5, Interesting

      We'll begin with box, and the plural is boxes.
      But the plural of ox should be oxen, not oxes.
      Then one fowl is goose, but two are called geese.
      Yet the plural of moose should never be meese.

      You may find a lone mouse or a whole lot of mice,
      But the plural of house is houses, not hice.
      If the plural of man is always called men,
      When couldn't the plural of pan be called pen?

      The cow in the plural may be cows or kine,
      But the plural of vow is vows, not vine.
      And I speak of a foot, and you show me your feet,
      But I give a boot - would a pair be called beet?

      If one is a tooth and a whole set are teeth,
      Why shouldn't the plural of booth be called beeth?
      If the singular is this and plural is these,
      Why shouldn't the plural of kiss be nicknamed kese?

      Then one may be that, and three may be those,
      Yet the plural of hat would never be hose.
      We speak of a brother, and also of brethren,
      But though we say mother, we never say methren.

      The masculine pronouns are he, his and him,
      But imagine the feminine she, shis, and shim!
      So our English, I think you will all agree,
      Is the trickiest language you ever did see. I take it you already know
      Of tough and bough and cough and dough?
      Others may stumble, but not you
      On hiccough, thorough, slough, and through?

      Well done! And now you wish, perhaps,
      To learn of less familiar traps?
      Beware of heard, a dreadful word
      That looks like beard and sounds like bird.

      And dead; it's said like bed, not bead;
      For goodness sake, don't call it deed!
      Watch out for meat and great and threat,
      (they rhyme with suite and straight and debt).

      A moth is not a moth in mother.
      Nor both in bother, broth in brother.
      And here is not a match for there.
      And dear and fear for bear and pear.

      And then there's dose and rose and lose --
      Just look them up -- and goose and choose.
      And cork and work and card and ward,
      And font and front and word and sword.

      And do and go, then thwart and cart.
      Come, come, I've hardly made a start.
      A dreadful language? Why, man alive,
      I'd learned to talk it when I was five.

      And yet to write it, the more I tried,
      I hadn't learned it at fifty-five!

      Original Source Unknown..

    5. Re:Mouses by theaveng · · Score: 2, Informative

      The English language made a lot of sense when it was still Germanic. It had a logical flow.

      Then the damn French took-over the island and English became a multilingual language with contradictory grammar rules. Around the year 1500, the damn pronunciation change. For example: "knicht" was originally pronounced the way it was spelt, and therefore easy to read, but suddenly it became pronounced as "nite". Why? Who the hell knows??? And finally, as if the language wasn't already fraked up, the linguists decided "knight" was the proper spelling because they thought the word came from Greece... even though our Anglo-Saxon ancestors came from Asia, not Greece.

      And thus we have a language that is part French, part Greek, part German, follows contradictory rules, and spells words based upon verbal pronunciations ("k-night") that nobody has used for over five centuries.

      Yeah.

      You'd think someone would come along and say, "Enough is enough" and start spelling English the way it sounds: "Enuf is Enuf".

      --
      FOX NEWS.com should be BANNED from television and internet. Have the Congress take it over and give us Truespeak.
    6. Re:Mouses by ZERO1ZERO · · Score: 1

      You may like this if you haven't seen it before :

      English in the European Community:

      The European Commission has just announced an agreement whereby English will be the official language of the European Union rather than German, which was the other possibility.

      As part of the negotiations, the British Government conceded that English spelling had some room for improvement and has accepted a 5- year phase-in plan that would become known as "Euro-English".

      In the first year, "s" will replace the soft "c". Sertainly, this will make the sivil servants jump with joy. The hard "c" will be dropped in favour of "k". This should klear up konfusion, and keyboards kan have one less letter.

      There will be growing publik enthusiasm in the sekond year when the troublesome "ph" will be replaced with "f". This will make words like fotograf 20% shorter.

      In the 3rd year, publik akseptanse of the new spelling kan be expekted to reach the stage where more komplikated changes are possible. Governments will enkourage the removal of double letters which have always ben a deterent to akurate speling. Also, al wil agre that the horibl mes of the silent "e" in the languag is disgrasful and it should go away.

      By the 4th yer people wil be reseptiv to steps such as replasing "th" with "z" and "w" with "v". During ze fifz yer, ze unesesary "o" kan be dropd from vords kontaining "ou" and after ziz fifz yer, ve vil hav a reil sensibl riten styl. Zer vil be no mor trubl or difikultis and evrivun vil find it ezi tu understand ech oza. Ze drem of a united urop vil finali kum tru.

      Und efter ze fifz yer, ve vil al be speking German like zey vunted in ze forst plas. If zis mad you smil, pleas pas on to oza pepl. !

    7. Re:Mouses by value_added · · Score: 1

      And finally, as if the language wasn't already fraked up ...

      I have no words.

    8. Re:Mouses by D-Cypell · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "You'd think someone would come along and say, "Enough is enough" and start spelling English the way it sounds: "Enuf is Enuf"."

      Already happening! The generation of SMS messengers and facebook status updaters are already setting off down this path.

    9. Re:Mouses by JasterBobaMereel · · Score: 1

      The problem is, the way it sound to who .... ...You say tomato I say Tomaytoh....

      SMS messaging is simply extending early talker systems and IM system short forms ....and they copies many of those from More Code operators ....

      --
      Puteulanus fenestra mortis
    10. Re:Mouses by OglinTatas · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The poem (and one line in particular) reminds me of a book of essays by Theodor Geisel (Dr. Seuss) called "The Tough Coughs as He Ploughs the Dough."
      It's been a long time since I read the book, but the style of your poem could easily pass for a Seuss work (though there are uncharacteristic awkward parts in the above example, for example the kiss line).

      I'm not saying it is from that book, nor that Geisel wrote it. I believe the book contained his work from his twenties and early thirties. But it might be fun to read that book if you haven't done so.

    11. Re:Mouses by OakDragon · · Score: 1

      For example: "knicht" was originally pronounced the way it was spelt, and therefore easy to read, but suddenly it became pronounced as "nite".

      Hmmm... "We are the knichts who say 'nik'!" ... not quite the same.

    12. Re:Mouses by blindd0t · · Score: 1

      Already happening! The generation of SMS messengers and facebook status updaters are already setting off down this path.

      orly? i dunno wai u think that! imho, its definately ok

      Seriously, I think it is far worse than going down that path... Switching to acronyms for words and phrases which hardly spell anything that could be reasonably sounded out would be even more tricky to someone who doesn't already speak the language. That's not to mention all the asinine typos and misspellings which spell out something that would never sound like the word one intended to actually spell.

    13. Re:Mouses by Naznarreb · · Score: 1

      English spelling and pronunciation are as strange as they seem because of the printing press. William Caxton brought the first printing press to England in the mid to late 1400s. One effect of introducing printing to a language is that it tends to fossilize spelling in a manner particular to the time and the place where the printing is done. Since Caxton was in London in the late 15th century, spelling began to be standardized (generally) in the way that 15th century Londoners spoke. The problem, however, is that while spelling was fossilized, speech was not; it continued to evolve and change in the way that language does, so we have +/- 600 of language change that's trying to be mapped onto spelling conventions that haven't moved nearly as fast (spelling conventions have evolved, just not at the same pace as spoken conventions). People have, throughout the history of English, and most of them have not been particularly successful.

    14. Re:Mouses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.neatorama.com/2007/12/17/the-simpul-spelling-moovment/

      They did, it... didn't go over well.

    15. Re:Mouses by theaveng · · Score: 1

      The first time I saw that was about 20 years ago on a local BBS, using a 1 kbit/s modem. It's very very old. (Ist sehr sehr alt.)

      --
      FOX NEWS.com should be BANNED from television and internet. Have the Congress take it over and give us Truespeak.
    16. Re:Mouses by theaveng · · Score: 1

      I'm not allowed to say "fucked up". The UK Internet Watch Foundation might block this p

      &%&a^!2^@$ ...

      CARRIER LOST

      --
      FOX NEWS.com should be BANNED from television and internet. Have the Congress take it over and give us Truespeak.
    17. Re:Mouses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But the plural of house is houses, not hice.

      Except in West London where the singular of house is hice!

    18. Re:Mouses by digitac · · Score: 1

      Wow, that looks like a great test for any text-to-speech program.

    19. Re:Mouses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then the damn French took-over the island

      Afraid not, that would be the Normans.
      See here for French Military Victories

    20. Re:Mouses by ZERO1ZERO · · Score: 1

      It Scots, there are still plenty of people who pronounce 'night' as 'nicht' - that's 'ni' as in 'Nick', 'ch' as in, well the Scottish 'ch' (greek X as in LateX), and a hard 't' as in 'Tango'.

    21. Re:Mouses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      omg totally dude our spelling is lyk totally logicul i could of got an a in english if english was like this

    22. Re:Mouses by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      Most Americans spell words the way they think they should be spelled if they were pronounced the way they think they should be pronounced.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    23. Re:Mouses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Enuf is Enuf".

      go 'ghoti'

    24. Re:Mouses by Emperor+Zombie · · Score: 1

      O-U-G-H
      Charles Battell Loomis

      I'm taught p-l-o-u-g-h
      S'all be pronounce "plow."
      "Zat's easy w'en you know," I say,
      "Mon Anglais, I'll get through!"

      My teacher say zat in zat case,
      O-u-g-h is "oo."
      And zen I laugh and say to him,
      "Zees Anglais make me cough."

      He say "Not 'coo,' but in zat word,
      O-u-g-h is 'off,'"
      Oh, Sacre bleu! such varied sounds
      Of words makes me hiccough!

      He say, "Again mon frien' ees wrong;
      O-u-g-h is 'up'
      In hiccough." Zen I cry, "No more,
      You make my t'roat feel rough."

      "Non, non!" he cry, "you are not right;
      O-u-g-h is 'uff.'"
      I say, "I try to spik your words,
      I cannot spik zem though!"

      "In time you'll learn, but now you're wrong!
      O-u-g-h is 'owe.'"
      "I'll try no more, I s'all go mad,
      I'll drown me in ze lough!"

      "But ere you drown yourself," said he,
      "O-u-g-h is 'ock.'"
      He taught no more, I held him fast,
      And killed him wiz a rough.

      --
      I'm so excited I just made water in my pantaloons!
    25. Re:Mouses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funnily enough, I believe America's great champion of spelling reform, Noah Webster, actually wanted to spell it Enuf. Andrew Carnegie was a proponent of enuf, too.

      Thank goodness that didn't work.

      Firstly, there's the problem of whose dialect you're going to standardize the spelling to. Do you use radio received? Well, all those non-rhotic accents in New England are going to be confused at the extra R's. Do you standardize to a dialect that pronounces Mary, merry, and marry differently, or similarly? If the latter, have you really helped anything by eliminating the ability to distinguish in text?

      And hey, what about existing literature? Do you plan to translate over the entire corpus of modern English? Or do you plan to leave everything yet written as specialist knowledge?

      I suspect the former would be nearly impossible, and much would lose a great deal of meaning in the process. Probably, you'd only have 'great' works shipped over; just look at late middle or early modern English works. If it isn't Chaucer or Shakespeare, good luck finding a modernized edition---and except for vocabulary and style, even Chaucer is far closer to present English than present English to what you suggest.

      If spelling were actually reformed, only specialists would bother learning to read the old stuff. If you think bough, dough, tough, rough and company are tough now, try learning them in college instead of kindergarten.

      No, I'd far, far, far rather keep our kludgy bastard of a language intact than open the massive and unpleasant can of worms involved in trying to reform it. I don't think rendering our civilization illiterate for the sake of literacy is a wise endeavor.

      If you won't take my word for it, perhaps you'd consider Mark Twain's?

      http://www.plainlanguage.gov/examples/humor/marktwain.cfm

      (Attribution has been disputed, but it's almost always ascribed to Twain.)

    26. Re:Mouses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Island and scissors are two words that made the English language through spelling mistakes.
      The bumblebee was originally the humblebee.

  13. Copycats by Fri13 · · Score: 2, Funny

    What? They have copied the "one button mouse" idea from Apple!! Damn Copycats!! Thats why Apple needed to invent the Mighty Mouse so there would not be so many copies!

    1. Re:Copycats by truthsearch · · Score: 1

      No, they invented the Mighty Mouse so we'd have another nipple to play with all day long.

    2. Re:Copycats by irondonkey · · Score: 1

      No, they invented the Mighty Mouse so we'd have a nipple to play with all day long.

      There, fixed that for you.

    3. Re:Copycats by jandrese · · Score: 3, Funny

      As as Slashdotter, I resent the implication that I am not, in fact, a mammal.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
  14. Off Topic by fermion · · Score: 1
    December 9 is a big day. The computer mouse. John Milton. Redd Foxx.

    As a tool, computers with the mouse, particularly the WIMP interface, really revolutionized the game. For some things, like repetitive data entry into vertical business apps, I believe the mouse has not contributed to simplicity. It has allowed a user to perform more tasks in such apps, but that complications has been a mixed blessing. And the over complicated mouse, with 20 buttons, and 3D motions, make me craze the old days of the command line, particalarly an intelligent command line like DEC had.

    --
    "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
  15. 40 Years and Still... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    40 years old and Apple STILL can't make a decent mouse.
    Remember the hockey puck one? What a god awful piece of crap that was.

    Jobs'd

  16. obviously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    This was invented by Shampoo.

    1. Re:obviously by JCSoRocks · · Score: 1

      sonofa... where are mod points when you need them?

      --
      You are using English. Please learn the difference between loose and lose; they're, there, and their; your and you're.
    2. Re:obviously by Pope · · Score: 1

      I don't get it.

      Reference?

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    3. Re:obviously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  17. Re:Priorities, people, priorities by philspear · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Answer: People who live in the US. Which happens to be quite a few around this neck of the interwoods. You might be looking for euroslashdot, which is that way -->

  18. I can't do with these new fangled inventions by Chrisq · · Score: 5, Funny
    I can't do with these new fangled inventions. They don't help. They just slow you down. In my day with a few "vi" keystrokes I could out edit any wysywyg app.

    :wq

    :wq!

    (what's happening. How do I get out of this)

    1. Re:I can't do with these new fangled inventions by theaveng · · Score: 1

      Personally I'm happy the mouse was invented. I remember my first word processor was RUNscript on a C=64, and although it worked just fine, it was a royal pain in the butt to constantly look-up commands. "How do I make bold? Ahhh, .bb - okay now how do I end bold? Hmmm." (pulls down the manual again).

      Having the commands immediately available electronically is far superior to having to constantly look things up in a book.

      --
      FOX NEWS.com should be BANNED from television and internet. Have the Congress take it over and give us Truespeak.
    2. Re:I can't do with these new fangled inventions by ciderVisor · · Score: 5, Funny

      vi - The WYSIWTF editor.

      --
      Squirrel!
    3. Re:I can't do with these new fangled inventions by houghi · · Score: 1
      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    4. Re:I can't do with these new fangled inventions by Fri13 · · Score: 1

      I am not so happy... because it is possible that without mouse, we could have developed faster a working speech controlling, a multitouch controlling and of course, a mind controlling devices. Now we are "stuck" to mouse and the UI what is harder to use.

      We have 12 Function keys... what we dont use so much anymore than the command line time on office application, what menus were controlled via those buttons and what they did in different situations.

      Many office applications can be used very well with function keys and other key combinations. Especially if you need to type information to database only, where you jump from other box to another (of course such UI's should be design so that you can jump to different parts easily, without need to press TAB 10-20 times until you come to end, in this case the mouse can be better).

    5. Re:I can't do with these new fangled inventions by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      How is the mouse necessary for any of that?

      Even if it's not necessarily WYSIWYG (e.g. on a 'hardware' text screen rather than a bitmap display), you could just have menus, or even something similar to command mode in vi. (That is, it doesn't necessarily have to be a text-based version of a menubar with menus, like links does.)

      I think there are definitely examples of text-based programs that are just as easy to use as GUI-based programs. My biggest example is the email program I use -- alpine (essentially pine 5.0 -- and now it supports Unicode). I personally would be frustrated if I couldn't *turn off* a lot of the "new user niceties", but just because it's text-based doesn't mean it's not as easy to use as many GUI programs. (Actually setting up the first email account is ironically one of the difficult parts, even though the GUI-ish facilities like radio buttons & checkboxes already exist.) But other than that, there is plenty of well-written online help, nice menus, etc.

    6. Re:I can't do with these new fangled inventions by theaveng · · Score: 1

      A speech interface works poorly in an office setting. Imagine 500 people all talking at once in the same giant room.

      Mind control is something that was promised in 1980, but still hasn't happened. Like flying cars.

      Function keys go back to what I said previously. You have to keep looking in the manual to discover what "F7" does, or else tape a piece of paper underneath the key (common on old MS-DOS machines). And of course F7 has a different function in every damn program! IMHO the better solution was to use virtual keys & pulldown menus in conjunction with the mouse, so there's no need to consult a manual. It speeds things up.

      --
      FOX NEWS.com should be BANNED from television and internet. Have the Congress take it over and give us Truespeak.
    7. Re:I can't do with these new fangled inventions by theaveng · · Score: 1

      That's okay to have keyboard-based dropdown menus (like MS-DOS often used), but without a mouse you don't have the ease of "grabbing" a paragraph, dragging it, and dropping it in a new spot. The procedure only takes 1 second; the same task could not be accomplished with just a keyboard.

      --
      FOX NEWS.com should be BANNED from television and internet. Have the Congress take it over and give us Truespeak.
    8. Re:I can't do with these new fangled inventions by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      vi - The WYSIWTF editor.

      No, that's Word. Vi is WYTIWTF (T for "type").

  19. Re:Priorities, people, priorities by revlayle · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Correction... some people in the US. Even then, not all of them give a shit, esp. on a TECH WEBSITE.

  20. Re:Priorities, people, priorities by mewshi_nya · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Oh, we care. We're nerds, we pay attention to lots of things. Saying that we don't care because this is a "tech" site is ignorant.

    I got an e-mail alert from the wall street journal about this, and it's VERY interesting stuff...

  21. Guess what else is 40 years old? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    This story: How to clean your mouse This memo is from an unnamed computer company. It went to all field engineers about a computer peripheral problem. The author of this memo was quite serious. The engineers rolled on the floor. "Mouse balls are now available as FRU (Field Replacement Unit). Therefore, if a mouse fails to operate or should it perform erratically, it may need a ball replacement. Because of the delicate nature of this procedure, properly trained personnel should only attempt replacement of mouse balls. Before proceeding, determine the type of mouse balls by examining the underside of the mouse. Domestic balls will be larger and harder than foreign balls. Ball removal procedures differ depending upon the manufacturer of the mouse. Foreign balls can be replaced using the pop-off method. Domestic balls are replaced by using the twist-off method. Mouse balls are not usually static sensitive. However, excessive handling can result in sudden discharge. Upon completion of ball replacement, the mouse may be used immediately. It is recommended that each replacer have a pair of spare balls for maintaining optimum customer satisfaction. Any customer missing his balls should suspect local personnel of removing these necessary items."

    1. Re:Guess what else is 40 years old? by redscare2k4 · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up!!

      Any customer missing his balls should suspect local personnel of removing these necessary items."

      That's the best part :D

    2. Re:Guess what else is 40 years old? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> The author of this memo was quite serious.

      No.

    3. Re:Guess what else is 40 years old? by hurfy · · Score: 1

      my balls are old and dried out after only 40 years i should look into this....

    4. Re:Guess what else is 40 years old? by theaveng · · Score: 1

      >>>The author of this memo was quite serious.

      No he wasn't. That's an old joke that dates back to the 1980s. It was written for the purpose of making BBC and Usenet readers smile.

      --
      FOX NEWS.com should be BANNED from television and internet. Have the Congress take it over and give us Truespeak.
  22. Re:Priorities, people, priorities by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The Governor of Illinois has been arrested on charges of selling a senatorship to the highest bidder and we're celebrating the birthday of a fucking mouse?

    1.) Not everybody is reading this story from Illinois.
    2.) The mouse has already survived longer than this scandal has any hopes of being remembered.
    3.) What are we supposed to do, collectively worry about what this guy has already done?

    We're not Borg and you're not superior for having a spaz attack over it.

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  23. M-I-C-K-E-Y M-O-U-S-E! by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 1

    But how old is Donald Duck and Goofy? ;)

    --
    Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
  24. Re: The Mouse Turns 40 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... cleaning mouse balls jokes turn 39.

  25. Fun with captions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I had a good laugh at the photo caption: "The basic workings of a mouse have changed little in 40 years".

    The way I remember it, the mouse progressed from two perpendicular wheels on the bottom, to a ball that drove two internal wheels with an optical encoder. to optical mice using a reflective pad. to optical mice using surface image capture. And that's not to mention the mouse-like devices in between (trackpoint, touch pads, trackballs...) and permutations of mouse features (wireless, multiple buttons, scroll wheels). Saying that the mouse has changed little is like saying that TVs have changed little in 40 years.

    1. Re:Fun with captions by Thaelon · · Score: 1

      From a user's standpoint they haven't.

      Speaking strictly about a mouse - not a touchpad or a trackball (the headline does say "mouse") - it hasn't changed much to from a user's standpoint.

      It's still a thing with buttons where your fingers go that you move around with your hand to control a pointing device on a computer.

      This isn't terribly shocking considering interface it's designed to work with (a human) has changed even less in 40 years.

      --

      Question everything

  26. Re:Priorities, people, priorities by mea37 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Yeah, but you know what nobody cares abuot?

    This stupid debate over whether anyone cares!

  27. Re:Priorities, people, priorities by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

    Also, I never implied that everyone doesn't care nor did I imply that everyone does care.

    So you are saying that percentage that do care is not 0 or 100 but rather somewhere in between. That's a bold statement, but one I think I agree with.

    --
    echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
  28. Re:Priorities, people, priorities by IceCreamGuy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Holy shit. This guy is right! How naive we've been! We've been reading news about technology on a technology focused website while this whole time our technology news site should have been posting items that have nothing to do with technology! What kind of crazy mixed up world is this!?!

  29. Re:Priorities, people, priorities by revlayle · · Score: 1

    I knew I'd get it right eventually!!!!

  30. used oscilloscopes years before memory chip by peter303 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Computer screens as we know them, did not start becoming generally available until the mid 1970s. The breakthrough was an inexpensive memory chip large enough to hold 5 by 7 patterns of ascii characters 5 x 7 x 40 (1400 bits) and 80 x 48 screenfull of characters (19K at 6 bits per character). A bit of memory cost about $1 until Intel introduced the first kilobyte chips in 1970 (two years after Englebert's demo) dropping the bit price to pennies in mid 1970s. Then it became practical to sell character computer terminals. Before then computer users used punchcards, punchtapes, teletypes, and line printers.

    These were character screens however. Graphics screens took another 10-15 to become personal. The first generation were programmable oscilloscopes, i.e. vector drawing machines. They had their special graphics languages, e.g. GKS, that emulated pen plotters. Limited bit map grapics came in the meantime. Steve Wozniak is famous for one baroque scheme of graphics in the Apple II. It wasnt pure bitmap as we know today. Xerox PARC sold the first B&W bitmaps at $30K a pop ($120K in 2008$). Then about 1980s the first general purpose color raster screen computers came out. At $30K a terminal these were shared in a lab. That was because a megabyte still cost $10K. Finally as memory prices dropped "workstation"-class computers came out around 1985 giving each scientist their personal graphics screen. This was SUN Microsystems original product.

    In 2008 I bought a $7 cellphone with 64K pixel color graphics screen.

    1. Re:used oscilloscopes years before memory chip by hurfy · · Score: 1

      lol, our oldest terminal was several years old at the time in early 80's. It had 2 8x10" boards and more inside to display simple monochrome text. It didn't even do bold, underline, or squares!

    2. Re:used oscilloscopes years before memory chip by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Computer screens as we know them, did not start becoming generally available until the mid 1970s. The breakthrough was an inexpensive memory chip large enough to hold 5 by 7 patterns of ascii characters 5 x 7 x 40 (1400 bits)...

      I once saw an interesting technology for pre-RAM monitors. It was kind of an electronic Etch-A-Sketch in concept: an electron beam, roughly the same kind used in TV's, would somehow "etch" the image into the screen by displacing particles. Primitive scrolling was done by erasing the screen by some kind of global charge that put particles back on the panel (analogous to shaking the Etch-A-Sketch).

      Thus, when you got to the bottom, you pressed a key that cleared the screen and continued on writing at the top. When full again, a symbol at the bottom indicated that it was ready to "scroll", awaiting your "continue" key. (Sort of a ctrl-S and ctrl-Q like behavior in DOS.)

      But, it was primarily used for CAD graphics and engineering via minicomputers, not text-intensive work (probably because teletype terminals were still cheaper at the time for text work.) It didn't need digital RAM because the image was "stored" on the screen itself via displaced particles.

      It's amazing the analog "work-arounds" they had before cheap chips. If they only found a way to put particles back on in specific spots, not just the entire screen, it could have been even more interactive.
           

  31. Star Trek by Yo-Yo-boy-wonder · · Score: 1

    "Computer, Computer?" "Hello Computer" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=19BWJQ8kjrw

  32. Not just mouse: the mother of all demise by mcrbids · · Score: 1

    The original presentation was called "A research center for augmenting human intellect" but the end result of his research is myspace.com.

    It appears that he is still alive today - perhaps somebody should ask him what he feels about causing this much pain, suffering, and scourge to be released on mankind?

    --
    I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    1. Re:Not just mouse: the mother of all demise by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      "Pain, suffering, and scourge"

      You mean miserable old slashdotters like you? :p

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    2. Re:Not just mouse: the mother of all demise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I saw Doug Engelbart, Alan Kay and Bill English yesterday at the http://programforthefuture.org/ conference. Actually spoke with Bill English and made a short video of Doug's and Bill's latest take on an input device in action.

  33. I don't know why I call him Gerald by ciderVisor · · Score: 1

    He's getting rather old but he's a good mouse.

    --
    Squirrel!
    1. Re:I don't know why I call him Gerald by Mr.+Roadkill · · Score: 1

      Buy him a house, you cheap bastard. You've left him homeless long enough.

  34. Side buttons.. by bigattichouse · · Score: 1

    Does anyone else dislike when the pressure spots on the side of the mouse are buttons? Maybe I'm just old, but thats how I move the mouse around (pinch between thumb and ring finger - use index and middle for left and right) ... and I always end up getting extraneous clicks when the sides are buttons. I'd turn this off on my own PC, but its when I use a customer's PC on site. erg.

    --
    meh
    1. Re:Side buttons.. by ZERO1ZERO · · Score: 1

      Yeah. That's pretty annoying. Plus, if you use them when you move to another computer without them you have to double think to perform certian actions. The new(ish) Dell mice have a back and forward right where a right hand thumb sits. I actually physically removed them from my mouse as they were a right PITA.

  35. Ratpoison by blackyottabyte · · Score: 1

    .... seriously why use the mouse? Ratpoison offers the user a GUI without being slowed down by reaching for the mouse.

    1. Re:Ratpoison by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      .... seriously why use the mouse? Ratpoison offers the user a GUI without being slowed down by reaching for the mouse.

      Because we're 1337 enough to not have to prove how 1337 we are?

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  36. big demo video by themusicgod1 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Does anyone know where a free (let's make clear: not realmedia 2 or whatever) online copy of the Big Demo may be found?

    --
    GENERATION 26: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation.
    1. Re:big demo video by Jecel+Assumpcao+Jr · · Score: 1

      I don't know if these are free enough for you, but there is a 192MB AVI file you can download and a Google video with the usual advantages and limitations.

  37. No evidence that people want to use these things. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Macintosh uses an experimental pointing device called a mouse. There is no evidence that people want to use these things. - John C. Dvorak

  38. Re:Priorities, people, priorities by philspear · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    correction... some people in the US...

    That's why I said "quite a few," and did NOT say "People who live in the US, which is everyone on /." Not everyone does, but slashdot is pretty american-centric by visitors and stories.

    I also didn't say "everyone who lives in the US cares about this." I wasn't making absolute statements, I don't know why you read them as such. Maybe to make yourself look smarter when you objected?

  39. Re:Priorities, people, priorities by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Oh come on, we already have a special event for when an Illinois politician gets busted for corruption...we call it "Tuesday".

    I thought it used to be called "Daley?"

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  40. 2 L8 4 d@ by Phrogman · · Score: 1

    SMS is hardly encouraging spelling the way things are said, its encouraging a shorthand form of speech with its own conventions and fashions that will differ from area to area, if not person to person. Its encouraging people to create their own spellings in a sea of pure anarchy.

    English spelling may be completely inconsistent, and I am sure its really a bitch to learn English as a second language in the written form (although I bet spoken English isn't as bad overall as some languages with much more rigid rules on declensions etc), but the SMS users who are creating their own spellings are more properly playing with spellings. Its really more akin to the spelling of English prior to the first dictionaries when a writer might spell the same word several different ways inside of the same document and there were *no* official correct spellings.

    The problem with non-standardized spellings based on an individual's pronunciation of an English word is the wide variety of English dialects spoken all over the world, and for that matter the large number of speakers who have it as a second language, and whose pronunciation is of course coloured by their native language and subsequent accent when speaking English. What you decide to use as an SMS abbreviation of a word when you come from Manchester England for instance, might make zero sense to me when I am from Western Canada, or to a third person living in Mumbai.

    Now, the current standardized spellings for English (which can be divided into 1)the US spelling, and 2) the rest of the world's spelling), are really horrid and I am sure they are a major barrier to learning English for million of people in the rest of the world, but at least they are more or less conventions which are consistent. Any spelling reform almost has to come as an initiative based on the universal adoption of a particular dialect of English.

    Although I live in Canada, speak and write the Queen's English (and thus spell the US word "color" as "colour" etc), my candidate for the eventually dominant form of English is the English language as defined by the speakers of Seattle - why? Because Microsoft Word's spell checker is using US English and I expect that to dominate eventually (yes, you can switch to other versions of English which presumably switches the spell checker as well, but the default is US English). Plus of course, US Culture is currently bombarding the rest of the world like it or not.

    If the US decided to radically reform the official spelling of English and taught the new spelling in schools, its possible the rest of the world would eventually adopt it. The problem is course that all old documents would then be rendered unreadable by the next generation. I doubt that is likely to happen, so I think we are stuck with the current horrid orthography for the foreseeable future :P

    --
    "The first time I got drunk, I got married. The second time I bought a chimpanzee, after that I stayed sober" Arian Seid
    1. Re:2 L8 4 d@ by DirePickle · · Score: 1

      I don't know why everyone thinks that the language ought to be altered just because it's difficult. English is beautiful with all of its nuances and stupidity. It would be a travesty to try to remove them!

    2. Re:2 L8 4 d@ by theaveng · · Score: 1

      It's not the language we want to change. Just the spelling.

      It's not the langwich we want to change. Just the speling. Make it rashonal. For example why add a "u" in the word color? The u is silent and not needed.

      --
      FOX NEWS.com should be BANNED from television and internet. Have the Congress take it over and give us Truespeak.
    3. Re:2 L8 4 d@ by DirePickle · · Score: 1

      To me, changing the spelling in such a fundamental way would, in fact, be necessarily and fundamentally altering the language. The spellings carry with them etymologies (historical or invented) and nuances in connotation that would be lost by standardizing them.

      Plus, then all homophones would become homographs as well, which would be obnoxious. There, their, and they're, all spelled the same! Here and hear, heir and air, hire and higher, metal/meddle/mettle/medal!

  41. Cheese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope they serve cheese at the celebration....

  42. Re: The Mouse Turns 40 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WOW, you mean that despite all their claims neither Microsoft nor Apple invented the mouse?

  43. DUPE by polar+red · · Score: 1
    --
    Yes, I'm left. You have a problem with that?
  44. Wrong Year by TheReverandND · · Score: 1

    The mouse was invented in 1964, NOT 1968 http://www.time.com/time/covers/1101041011/nextessay.html

  45. Re: The Mouse Turns 40 by Aqua_boy17 · · Score: 1

    Of course not. It was Al Gore.

    --
    What if the Hokey Pokey really is what it's all about?
  46. Re:Priorities, people, priorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can't seriously be surprised by this. I have absolutely no doubt that this happens on a regular basis. I wouldn't even bat an eye to learn that every appointed senatorship went to the highest bidder. Maybe it's just the cynic in me, but I assume this is standard operating procedure in the government. The surprising thing isn't that it happened, but that he got caught.

  47. It turns 80 actually by AmigaMMC · · Score: 1

    On a side note: THE Mouse turns 80 (Mickey Mouse, that is). The title of the article doesn't specify which mouse... :-p

  48. Re:Priorities, people, priorities by spankyofoz · · Score: 1

    In summary: We hate F#$@ing Illinois Nazis

    --

    - There is no point, it's like a sphere -
  49. Right button was used at PARC by lpress · · Score: 1

    The Commodore Amiga had been using right button menus since 1986.

    The right mouse button brought up menus on the Alto at Xerox PARC.

  50. "was made of wood and had one button" by Wilk4 · · Score: 1

    "... was made of wood and had one button..."

    isn't that what apple's still use? ;-)

    Or have they finally decided to move to the 'new' bronze-age mice ... made of bronze?

    Heaven forbid they admit anything-PC is right and move to a plastic mouse, or more buttons, wheels, etc...

    ok, apple fan-boys, whack away now. I'll be here busily ignoring you...

    1. Re:"was made of wood and had one button" by Wilk4 · · Score: 1

      yeah, sorry, maybe it's a troll, but the quote and obvious response was just too hard to ignore ;-)