Slashdot Mirror


Octopuses Have No Personalities and Enjoy HDTV

Whiteox writes about an Australian researcher named Renata Pronk, who has discovered that octopuses prefer HDTV. She recruited 32 gloomy octopuses from the waters of Chowder Bay. Previously, researchers have reported little success when showing video to octopuses. Miss Pronk's insight was that the octopus eye is so refined that it might see standard PAL video, at 25 fps, as a series of stills. She tried HDTV (50 fps) and her subjects reacted to the videos of a crab, another octopus, or a swinging bottle on the end of a string. A further discovery is that octopuses show no trait of individual personalities, even though they exhibit a high level of intelligence. It would certainly be possible to quibble about the definition of "personality" employed, and whether Miss Pronk had successfully measured it.

482 comments

  1. Sounds like... by Loibisch · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...your standard geek.

    What, too close to home? :)

    1. Re:Sounds like... by CaptainPatent · · Score: 5, Funny

      ...your standard geek.

      Hey, I know tons of geeks with tons of personalities... just check their character sheets!

      --
      Well, back to rejecting software patent applications.
    2. Re:Sounds like... by BWJones · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Actually, I'd have to disagree with the assessment of no personality in octopuses. I had a common octopus (octopus vulgaris) as a pet (her name was Cephus, short for cephalopod) for almost two years and she most absolutely displayed a personality completely different from another octopus that I had as a pet for about a year.

      --
      Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    3. Re:Sounds like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I once met a guy who had to role a die to decide whether to laugh or cry.

    4. Re:Sounds like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      See, there's two personalities right there!

    5. Re:Sounds like... by cheebie · · Score: 5, Funny

      Ah, but were you showing them TV a lot? That tends to destroy even invertebrates'
      personalities.

    6. Re:Sounds like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Laughing and crying are actions, not personalities.

    7. Re:Sounds like... by JonTurner · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, she heard that you killed the first one off after less than a year and thought "I'd better perform or he'll do me in, too!"

      Maybe she was just a bad actor?

    8. Re:Sounds like... by Talgrath · · Score: 5, Funny

      It is...*rolls*...a pleasure to meet you!

    9. Re:Sounds like... by MonsterMasher · · Score: 5, Interesting

      - Absolutely!

      My wife keeps salt water tanks and we had an Octopus named Oglebbie. Oglebbie was such a sweetie. (I'm calling her a female, but that is an assumption.)

      We had what can only be called the classic love affair - doomed from the start..

      It started with small touching with fingers/arms. It was routine - every day a few times I would put my octopus-looking hand in and she would embrace. And Pull - she wanted me to stay.

      They have a very sharp beak BTW. Only try this if you are willing to get bit. She never bit me.

      It was definitely love. As soon as I turned on the light she would shoot across the tank to the top door area, and I would open it .. verbally complaining at the time about never get rest.. and Oglebbie would inflate herself with water and climb out to travel across the top of tank to play.

      After a sort time (few minutes) she would go back to the door and if I went over there she would shoot the water at my general direction, then dive in.

      Tragic love.. She would dream of us romping across reefs, and having fun. I would want to go running through fields of flowers with her ...

      One day she lost all her zing. My wife was away and I didn't keep the water level up.. the salt concentration went too high. She didn't die but she lingered, and didn't want to play - which was more torturous for me because she was there.. but not there. And it was my fault.

      Thank you for sharing - I'm still getting over it.. (I really did feel terrible - and the way she seemed to haunt the tank - a fraction of her was left. It's like how your non-nerdy spouse see you when you are coding - but permanent.

    10. Re:Sounds like... by mail2345 · · Score: 1

      Or flip a coin?

    11. Re:Sounds like... by Richard.Tao · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Despite the fact you very well maybe right, a pet owner is more likely to humanize their pet then anyone else. People are notorious for anthropomorphizing things, like cars... so a definitive study on personality would be important. Also, does life span have any effect on personality? Do mice have personalities as much as cats? It seems logical that shorter lived creatures wouldn't have as much time to develop them, having less environmental stimuli, less memories, so they'd need to inherit reasoning skills. But I also have the feeling I may be quite wrong.

    12. Re:Sounds like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sense of humor FAIL.

    13. Re:Sounds like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Sounds like that'd have to be one charming motherfucking squid.

    14. Re:Sounds like... by HexRei · · Score: 2, Interesting

      While we are all entitled to state our opinions, I'd tend to value a scientific study involving 32 subjects over your two-subject anecdotal observation of pets.

      That doesn't mean your wrong, but her evidence seems stronger.

    15. Re:Sounds like... by marxz · · Score: 1

      some of mine even have high charisma!

    16. Re:Sounds like... by trum4n · · Score: 3, Funny

      Quit talking about me! It makes me.... *rolls a 7* ...sad!

    17. Re:Sounds like... by BWJones · · Score: 5, Informative

      ......... Actually octopus have relatively short lifespans. The first one was several months old when I got her from a lab that was doing behavioral research and the fact that he lived almost a year after that was pretty good. The second octopus was a bit of a stowaway when I found her on my SCUBA tank at a gas stop about 100 miles away from the ocean. She was tiny then and lived for almost two years which is pretty long lived for an octopus.

      --
      Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    18. Re:Sounds like... by BWJones · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Would it help to say that IAANS (I am a neuroscientist)?

      --
      Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    19. Re:Sounds like... by BWJones · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'd refer you to the very rich literature on octopus behavior. Octopus have been estimated to be about as smart as dogs with surprisingly adept skills at problems solving and recognition.

      If you'd say that dogs have no personality, I'd say you've never spent *any* time around animals.

      --
      Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    20. Re:Sounds like... by BWJones · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Thanks for the story.

      Cephus died of old age thankfully and I will say that she exhibited many of the same qualities, including a sense of humor or ability to get people to pay attention to her as she would shoot water out of the tank if she wanted attention. She also snuck out of the tank on more than one occasion to steal fish out of the feeder tank across the table from her own aquarium (which necessitated a large, heavy pot to be placed on top of the tank to prevent that sort of behavior.

      --
      Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    21. Re:Sounds like... by lgw · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There seem to be a *large* number of people who have convinced themselves that animals with the intelligecne of dogs or cats are non-sentient, and any personality or self awareness that they seem to exhibit is just the owners self-deception. I've seen smart and dumb cats, and smart and dumb dogs. There are certainly cats and dogs which seem to have no personality or mental model of the world, and act like simple stimulus-response system. There are also cats and dogs with clear personalities that interact with the world in a thoughtful manner.

      I have to agree that those who say that self-awareness (or at least world-awareness, but it's hard to imagine a good mental model of the world that doesn't include oneself) is limited to humans simply haven't spent the time to know better.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    22. Re:Sounds like... by asdfghjklqwertyuiop · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What do you mean she lingered? Just dying slowly? Did the salt concentration cause some physical problem with her or was she "angry" at you?

    23. Re:Sounds like... by daturan · · Score: 1

      thanks for the enjoyable hart warming story, even with bitter sweet ending. It makes me wounder how ("A further discovery is that octopuses show no trait of individual personalities") any one could come to an authoritative like that.

    24. Re:Sounds like... by Richard.Tao · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The argument I was making was intelligence doesn't implies personality.

    25. Re:Sounds like... by dexmachina · · Score: 4, Funny

      I don't know about sad, but rolling a 7 on a single die would certainly leave me impressed.

    26. Re:Sounds like... by absoluteflatness · · Score: 4, Funny

      It was clearly a d10.

      Sheesh.

    27. Re:Sounds like... by BWJones · · Score: 1

      Ah, fair enough. Measures of intelligence and "personality" likely should be separate, even though there are some compelling arguments for correlation at at least "lower" organisms.

      --
      Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    28. Re:Sounds like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Please turn in your geek card and get the fuck out. Thanks.

    29. Re:Sounds like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My god, that was the most touching thing I have ever read on Slashdot.

      Is that really true?

    30. Re:Sounds like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I've had pet rabbits who had very distinct opinions about stuff upon first exposure. One, confronted with the TV, immediately would sit and watch it... as long as it was a science fiction show. Otherwise he'd soon get bored and ignore it. (I never did quite figure out how he differentiated them or what the appeal was to him.) Another couldn't care less and would watch anything on TV, while laying in his little hammock.

      Scifi bunny couldn't care less about music, if I put any on he would look at the speakers for a moment and then go about his business. Couch potato bunny loved classical music but would get very annoyed and stomp around in his cage if I played rock.

    31. Re:Sounds like... by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No, his anecdotal evidence (unless it is just a pack of lies) falsifies the scientist's report that they have no personalities.

      This is not a tale of two conflicting stories, it is a falsifiable claim which has been falsified.

    32. Re:Sounds like... by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      Do mice have personalities as much as cats?

      I don't know about mice, but rats have personalities. I have had a few for pets and I can say that they are as clean as cats and as smart as dogs. They have personalities and make friends, they love to entertain and to be entertained.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    33. Re:Sounds like... by AlXtreme · · Score: 0

      The second octopus was a bit of a stowaway when I found her on my SCUBA tank at a gas stop about 100 miles away from the ocean.

      Sounds like a sucker for air.

      (dodges tomatoes)

      --
      This sig is intentionally left blank
    34. Re:Sounds like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I once met a guy who had to role a die to decide whether to laugh or cry.

      Are you calling the diceman a nerd? :o

    35. Re:Sounds like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Song lyrics?

    36. Re:Sounds like... by kitsunewarlock · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Put the dice away before I take them away.

      --
      Ginga no Rekshiya Mata Each page.
    37. Re:Sounds like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The issue isn't one of sentience, but rather sapience. Most intelligent animals, pets included, could be classified as sentient. They are aware of their surroundings and interact with their keepers and environment. They sense -- thereby fulfilling sentience.

      The question is then one of sapience. As a Psychiatrist, I have to point out that animals (with the possible exception of primates and dolphins) have yet to demonstrate evidence of self-awareness as we know it and decision-making skills. Sapience and sentience are different things.

      Humans are pattern-recognition machines. We seek to find, conscious or not, any pattern in the world in which we live. That extends to our pets or the observed behaviors of animal with which we interact; however, just because we think it so, doesn't make it so.

    38. Re:Sounds like... by loveisoxytocin · · Score: 5, Informative

      There's also a reasonably well developed research literature on personality in octopuses and squid (as well as many other species). All converge to show that they DO have personalities. I'm surprised that the author would claim to have shown they don't have personalities. I can see how you might fail to find evidence that they do have personalities but that is quite different from showing that they don't. A few of the octopus/squid refs are below for those who want to read more on the topic: Sinn, D., Perrin, N., Mather, J. A., & Anderson, R. C. (2001). Early temperamental traits in an octopus (Octopus bimaculoides). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 115, 351-364. Mather, J. A., & Anderson, R. C. (1993). Personalities of Octopuses (Octopus rubescens). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 107, 336-340. Sinn, D. L., Gosling, S. D., & Moltschaniwskyj, N. A. (2008). Development of shy/bold behaviour in squid: Context-specific phenotypes associated with developmental plasticity. Animal Behaviour, 75, 433-442.

    39. Re:Sounds like... by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      even some fishes like gouramis and bettas have pretty distinct personalities (other kinds not very much so).

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    40. Re:Sounds like... by dangitman · · Score: 2, Funny

      It is...*rolls*...a pleasure to meet you!

      No, he means he role-plays a die, not that he rolls one.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    41. Re:Sounds like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      yes, there are a lot of videos/pictures of the octopus and my vietnamese girlfriend, if you search in the right places. they had a *very* special friendship.

    42. Re:Sounds like... by Anivair · · Score: 1

      Ahem ... clearly your findings mean nothing because you had no grant. Once, in the 5th grade, I did an experiment proving that green light made gerbils smarter. Why? Because I was in 5th grade and I didn't know that I was being stupid. Sounds like her experiment is a more advanced version of the same bad science I used.

    43. Re:Sounds like... by sorak · · Score: 1

      It could have been a d20. I'm usually sad when I roll a 7 on one of those.

    44. re:sounds like... by ed.han · · Score: 1

      more likely a d20, if you ask me...esp considering that we're talking about gygax...

      ed

    45. Re:Sounds like... by mopower70 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Interesting? Seriously mods, Interesting? Possibly a page out of The Onion's version of "Dear Penthouse Forums", but... Interesting? Come on.

    46. Re:Sounds like... by DrgnDancer · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Apparently you've never seen my Golden Retriever plan a heist. He's capable of a remarkable level of fore-thought, at least as much as I would give any two or three year old child credit for. He's learned to open "child-proof" trash cans, escape from no-roofed enclosures, and figured out the door knobs we used to have in New Orleans (they were the "handle" variety rather than the "knob" variety so he didn't need hands). He's also self aware and communicative to the point of being able to "talk" to us. If you ask him what he wants he'll show you. Granted 5 times out of 10 he wants food or a treat, but he's developed a vocabulary of wants. He can show you his food bowl, his water being low, his leash, the back door (he can separately tell you the he wants to "go out" to use the bathroom, or "walk" for entertainment), his toys, or even the couch (he sleeps on the couch at night and when my wife and I are in "his bed" to late he gets annoyed). He's also adjusted this vocabulary across three different homes without ever missing a beat. Ironically, we're currently living in an apartment and have to walk them every time they go out (no fenced yard). He still communicates "out" by going to the back door (which leads to a small porch he rarely ever goes out on), and "walk" with his leash. The "walks" are now trips to the park for a longer exercise.

      Now our other dog, while she has a personality, doesn't display anywhere near the retriever's level of self awareness or fore-thought. She'll take advantage of his more successful plots when the opportunity arises, but left to herself would never be able to communicated her desires or plan food grabs. She's capable of basic communications and we usually know what she wants or needs, but she doesn't display anywhere near the retriever's vocabulary or nor his apparent understanding of "conversation".

      --
      I don't need a million points of light, just two points of multi-mode fiber and a 10 Gig-E router.
    47. Re:Sounds like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your nickname makes me curious.
      "I only hit her because I love her!"?

    48. Re:Sounds like... by AmberBlackCat · · Score: 4, Funny

      Guy: You wanna do it?

      [ girl rolls dice ]

      Girl: Nope...

    49. Re:Sounds like... by SmokeyTheBalrog · · Score: 1

      That's only 'cause you don't read your own posts. :)

    50. Re:Sounds like... by kungfugleek · · Score: 1

      You're all amateurs. It was a d7.

    51. Re:Sounds like... by LordEd · · Score: 4, Funny

      What if i put on my robe and wizard hat?

    52. Re:Sounds like... by clone53421 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Once, in the 5th grade, I did an experiment proving that green light made gerbils smarter.

      Well, obviously. They're too dumb to stop when they come to a red light, and those ones get smooshed.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    53. Re:Sounds like... by nschubach · · Score: 1

      I have a question (not saying one if right or wrong) but if you took a human and raised it in a monitored and controlled environment to see if it developed a personality... would it?

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    54. Re:Sounds like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a long time dog owner, I'd agree.

      I've seen our current dog (Shiba-Inu), tell us if she wants to play, or go for a walk, or is hungry. She also tells us if she wants to be pet, or have her tummy rubbed, or if she wants to watch TV (although I think this is in part due to the fact that one of us will be sitting on the couch so she can get scratches at the same time). She tells us when she doesn't want to get out of bed, wants to go to sleep, wants new water, or wants a treat. When no one is home during the day she wanders around and hangs out a bit listlessly (lets hear it for webcams :) ), when we get home she gets excited, and always grabs a treat to meet us by the door with. She obviously displays a personality, and anyone who says otherwise has never owned a pet long enough to discover how to communicate with them.

      I will certainly admit that a part of it might be humans attempting to integrate their pets into their environment, but I think disbelievers discounting the pets actions are too wrapped up in objectively trying to measure the unmeasurable.

      Most dog owners I've talked to seem to place a dog's intelligence at about a toddlers. Perhaps the variation in dogs that we are seeing (besides the obvious variation, the same as in people), is the emergence of a higher level of intelligence in the species as a whole?

    55. Re:Sounds like... by AviLazar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't know about sad, but rolling a 7 on a single die would certainly leave me impressed.

      You're not a real geek. Get out of here you imposter!

      --

      I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
    56. Re:Sounds like... by gurps_npc · · Score: 1

      Do you know that: 1. Animals have a sense of humor? It may only be slapstick, but they will do things like wake you up by farting in your face. Moreover, they do it for no particular reason (i.e. not when they are mad at you). Pet Ducth-ovens are not fun. 2. Many Animals besides primates and dolphins can recognize themselves in a mirror. Crows in particular are known to do this.

      --
      excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    57. Re:Sounds like... by AmberBlackCat · · Score: 2, Funny

      What if i put on my robe and wizard hat?

      [ girl rolls dice ]

      Girl: Nope...

    58. Re:Sounds like... by ventonegro · · Score: 1

      You obviously are an intruder in a site for nerds.

      --
      -- "Usefulness arises from what is not there" - Daoism saying
    59. Re:Sounds like... by nobodylocalhost · · Score: 1

      Just keep asking, eventually she'll roll a "yes", and you'll go "thank you, statistics and probabilities!"

      --
      Where is the "Ignorant" mod tag?
    60. Re:Sounds like... by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      You're assuming there is a possible outcome which is favorable. That may not be the case. The answer space may consist of "no", "hell no", and "get the hell away from me you weirdo".

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    61. Re:Sounds like... by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      thanks for the enjoyable hart warming

      Barbecued male deer? !relevant to occi, methinks...

    62. Re:Sounds like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No offense, but if you're putting up an appeal to authority about anecdotal evidence as a counter to a study with a larger sample group, I'd suggest you're not much of one.

    63. Re:Sounds like... by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      I've seen smart and dumb cats, and smart and dumb dogs.

      I've seen vastly more dumb humans than smart ones.

    64. Re:Sounds like... by Mister_Stoopid · · Score: 1

      (1) there's no +1, heartwarming, so we have to get by with what we have

    65. Re:Sounds like... by zifn4b · · Score: 1

      What if he wielded a magical long sword and had a high level of skill using it?

      --
      We'll make great pets
    66. Re:Sounds like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then I'd guess you've never heard of the scientific principle of proof by counterexample? You can never prove a theory that something doesn't occur. The best you can hope to prove is that it hasn't happened yet. All it takes is one single counterexample to disprove your theory.

    67. Re:Sounds like... by HexRei · · Score: 1

      No it doesn't. His evidence is weak and unscientific, that's why it's called anecdotal.

    68. Re:Sounds like... by HexRei · · Score: 1

      Not really. You weren't conducting a controlled study and you had strong emotional attachment to your relatively tiny (1/16 the size) sample group of a different type of octopus. Like I said, her evidence seems stronger.

    69. Re:Sounds like... by immcintosh · · Score: 1

      There seem to be a *large* number of people who have convinced themselves that animals with the intelligecne of dogs or cats are non-sentient, and any personality or self awareness that they seem to exhibit is just the owners self-deception.

      Thank Descartes for that. He was quite convinced that non-human animals are best compared to clever mechanisms and his philosophy contributed a lot to the Western mindset toward that end.

    70. Re:Sounds like... by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      There seem to be a *large* number of people who have convinced themselves that animals with the intelligecne of dogs or cats are non-sentient, and any personality or self awareness that they seem to exhibit is just the owners self-deception.

      The absence of anything remotely like an objective, testable definition of "personality" and "self-awareness" makes most discussions of the question "does X have personality" battles of poorly examined preconceptions. (And, yes, there are testable operationalizations of the idea of "personality" and "self-awareness" but they tend to be very distant proxies for the ideas people attach to "personality" and "self-awareness" with no real reason to believe that they have any correspondence to the interesting features people have in mind with those words.)

    71. Re:Sounds like... by FleaPlus · · Score: 1

      Octopus have been estimated to be about as smart as dogs with surprisingly adept skills at problems solving and recognition.

      One of the things which has often amazed me about octopuses is that they're so smart despite their lack of myelinated axons. For those unfamiliar with it, myelin is an evolutionary adaptation specific to vertebrates which allows them to transmit neural signals about ~20x faster. I sometimes figure that if octopuses had myelin, the earth would be dominated by a hyper-technological race of chthulhu-like creatures by now. ;)

    72. Re:Sounds like... by cgoodric · · Score: 0

      OK, First off ... How could you NOT NOTICE an octopus, no matter how small, on your SCUBA tank after taking all your gear apart? Second ... What the heck were you doing with your tank at a gas stop?

    73. Re:Sounds like... by lgw · · Score: 1

      My favorite stupid "self-awareness" test is whether an animal can recognize itself in a mirror. Presumable the researchers condsider all blind humans to be non-self-aware.

      IMO, if an animal can solve a problem when the solution requires interaction with objects that it can't percieve at the moment, and there's no operant conditioning at work, it seems very likely indeed that the animal has a mental model of the world (and again it seems very likely that any mental model of the world would include the self as distinct from other objects). Of course, distinguishing conditioning from planning is non-trivial.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    74. Re:Sounds like... by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      Hmm, reminds me of one of my cats. He likes lesbian porn.

    75. Re:Sounds like... by juhaz · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Perhaps the variation in dogs that we are seeing (besides the obvious variation, the same as in people), is the emergence of a higher level of intelligence in the species as a whole?

      I wish you were right, but unfortunately I'd bet it's the other way around - it's not the emergence of intelligence that is causing the variability, but the opposite.

      Wolves are very smart, and dogs of the past had to work for living, with many of their jobs requiring a degree of intelligence, but nowadays they're being bred for variety of reasons, most of which no longer have anything to do with intelligence, but all sort of cute and useless traits people deem as desirable. That means intelligence is no longer being selected for, and on the whole dogs are becoming dumber by the minute - but occasionally you'll get a throwback and much more intelligent dog such as the ones described here.

    76. Re:Sounds like... by sdowney · · Score: 1

      You are easily impressed. A 1 out of 20 chance isn't all that unlikely.

    77. Re:Sounds like... by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 1

      Hand in your geek card. You've never experienced the nirvana that is a d20. /geekpolice

      --
      Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
    78. Re:Sounds like... by hobbit · · Score: 1

      [girl doesn't even bother rolling dice]

      Girl: Nope.

      --
      "Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools, because they have to say something" - Plato
    79. Re:Sounds like... by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      That means intelligence is no longer being selected for, and on the whole dogs are becoming dumber by the minute - but occasionally you'll get a throwback and much more intelligent dog such as the ones described here.

      That may be, among pet dogs. Note that this is not the case for working dogs.

      I raised sheep, and had a sequence of sheepdogs... mostly border collies with some Australian shepherd thrown in. I'll tell you that breeders of border collies respect intelligence, and *will* selectively breed for it... even if that intelligence is manifested as the ability to be easily trained to herd animals.

      Sure, there are a lot of characteristics that border collies are bred for (herding instinct, physical attributes, their 'look', among others) but intelligence is definitely one of them.

      There was an article in National Geographic sometime in the past couple years discussing animal intelligence... border collies were a focal point of part of the article. There's a border collie somwhere (if she's not dead yet) with a comprehension vocabulary of over 700 words.

      At any rate, it's important to note that while *some* breeds are not bred for intelligence, some are. I'm rather surprised that the dog mentioned in the GP's anecdote is a golden retriever, in my experience they are rather dumb. I've found black labs and border collies to be the smartest dogs I've worked with. Just goes to show, there is variability within breeds as well as within the species.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    80. Re:Sounds like... by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 1

      If someone says something is not possible, it takes only one counter example to falsify it. It has nothing to do with the counter example being anecdotal, only on whether it is true.

      Your claim to the contrary only shows what a weak grasp on proof you have. You ought to brush up on the meaning of "scientific", particularly the part about falsifiability.

    81. Re:Sounds like... by dangitman · · Score: 1

      It started with small touching with fingers/arms. It was routine - every day a few times I would put my octopus-looking hand in and she would embrace. And Pull - she wanted me to stay.

      Yeah, it's all romantic and lovely at first... but then comes the tentacle rape.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    82. Re:Sounds like... by Harald+Paulsen · · Score: 1

      For those of you who doesn't get the reference: http://bash.org/?104383

      --
      Harald
    83. Re:Sounds like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      only if you limit yourself to D6s. And depending on the game even that is possible (welcome all you runners out there)

    84. Re:Sounds like... by juhaz · · Score: 1

      Even most of the traditional working breeds are being bred as a pets. Sure, there are still strains or sub-breeds that are bred to work, but I rather doubt they make up even one percent of the total, and we were talking about dogs on the whole. If anything, the existence of such working lines makes the variability so much more pronounced, as they would stand out from the masses - even the masses of "same" breed.

      As for golden retrievers, they just might prove that conjecture - some of them are bred as working dogs too, perhaps your dumb ones were from a pet line, and the smart ones referred here had a significant guide dog heritage.

    85. Re:Sounds like... by gsmraxe · · Score: 1

      Cat's have NO personality...I should know, I live with two of them. Now dogs on the other hand...

    86. Re:Sounds like... by gsmraxe · · Score: 1

      I had a dog that thought it was hilarious to run around and bite my ankles. I would laugh at first, which would encourage her, then I would scream (it hurt) which would really egg her on, until someone would stop her. She also thought it was cute to pinch the back of my hand with her front teeth when I wasn't paying attention. That hurt a little less than the ankle bites. Rottweiler/Labrador mix made for a very smart dog with a lot of energy. I loved her though.

    87. Re:Sounds like... by Reziac · · Score: 1

      [hat type="professional dog trainer" style="field trial retriever"]

      Actually, the Guide Dogs want dogs without too much smarts, because for the blind person, they are really a sort of collision-detection system, NOT a GPS or personal robot. Hence the GDs don't want a dog that thinks too much.

      As to the percentage of a breed still doing the job they were developed for, it varies a lot, from "almost all" to "almost none". For retrievers we have pretty good stats based on fieldtrial placements vs total numbers registered, and put vs hunting licenses, FT dogs are maybe 10% of all working retrievers. Which puts the major breeds' working usage at around 30% for Chesapeakes, 10% for Labs, and 1% for Goldens. (Much lower in metro areas, much higher in rural areas, but the ratios still hold -- tho in the midwest, working Chessies probably approach 100% of the breed, and they are one of the few breeds where nearly all show dogs still work in the field.)

      Intelligence seems not to be a state, but rather a point where brain capacity STOPPED developing. For most working dogs, that's somewhere around the level of a bright 5 or 6 year old human -- they have all the thinking ability of a bright child, and can develop the same vocabulary -- and will do so just from being talked to like you would another person -- even my untrained kennel dogs have a pretty good vocab just from exposure, since I talk to them a lot. You do NOT have to "teach" them individual words per se. And dogs are a LOT more observant than kids of the same mental age, probably because on the whole, dogs have better vision than humans. (YOU try marking a bird that went down 400 yards away, and see if I'm not right about that!)

      For cats and the purely pet breeds that have never had a real job, the point where they stop developing is more like a 2 year old human's level of comprehension and emotional development, and cats often don't make it THAT far. Also, such animals mature mentally much more slowly (if at all).

      I've seen dogs do all sorts of amazing shit, including move furniture so they could climb up on something higher, and herding teeny tiny bugs for entertainment. I have one who can open any door that doesn't lock with a key. Not so amazing, tho, if you consider their mental development to be on a par with a bright 5-6YO human child, and tune your expectations accordingly.

      [/hat]

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    88. Re:Sounds like... by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Not only themselves, but sometimes other individuals seen in a mirror, and will get the direction right as well (look over the correct shoulder toward the new arrival).

      I've had dogs that did what amounts to slapstick. I had one who thought it was great fun to fling mud at people and make them yell! I've also seen some great "actors" -- had one who could peg a sucker the moment they hove in view, and would put on her "pathetic" act the instant they looked her way. Look away and she'd go all calculating instead. I don't think it's coincidence that she was a granddaughter of the mud-flinger :) And her son bangs on the wall when he wants attention!

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    89. Re:Sounds like... by Anenome · · Score: 1

      I think he means that, as a result of the salt concentration going too high, the octopus may have experienced symptoms perhaps similar to a person being similarly deprived of perhaps air, or what happens to people who enter water drinking competitions. It can cause brain damage and death. So I think he's saying that the octopus survived the change in salinity but its personality never recovered. It subsisted in its tank in a diminished capacity, much like an Alzheimers patient. Sounds kinda terrible, considering the 'relationship' they had.

      --
      "I Don't Have Enough Faith to be an Atheist"
  2. Personality by genican1 · · Score: 1

    So all octopi act exactly the same?

    1. Re:Personality by rolfwind · · Score: 5, Informative

      FTFA:
      "The definition of personality," she said, "is having repetition in your responses, for example, being consistently bold, or consistently shy, or consistently aggressive."

      She went on to say that any individual octopus had random, inconsistent, reactions to the same stimuli on any random day.

    2. Re:Personality by codename.matrix · · Score: 5, Funny

      So octopus are like women?

    3. Re:Personality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      The plural is octopodes, not octopi.

    4. Re:Personality by beav007 · · Score: 1, Funny

      I wish I had a mod point for you...

    5. Re:Personality by JackassJedi · · Score: 1

      No, it just means they are all different... wait! Hmmmmm...

      --
      Power corrupts the few, while weakness corrupts the many.
    6. Re:Personality by thewils · · Score: 1

      Not really. These are just the Ozzie octopuses.

      --
      Once I was a four stone apology. Now I am two separate gorillas.
    7. Re:Personality by yali · · Score: 4, Interesting

      But whether you'll observe consistent responses to stimuli will depend on whether you're (a) measuring the right responses and (b) using the right stimuli. In this case, the stimuli were video images. Other researchers have found personality differences when using real stimuli. Maybe there is something about video stimuli that overwhelms individual differences?

    8. Re:Personality by zmollusc · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, octopuses are not inherently evil. You are thinking of krakens.

      --
      They whose government reduces their essential liberties for temporary security, receive neither liberty nor security.
    9. Re:Personality by hobbit · · Score: 1

      That might be her definition of personality. Sounds like my definition of tedium.

      --
      "Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools, because they have to say something" - Plato
    10. Re:Personality by Quasimodem · · Score: 5, Funny

      I still prefer octopi, with a light brown crust.

    11. Re:Personality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Correct! I just found out about this myself from my girlfriend who happens to be a Linguistics major at UCLA. Mod parent up.

    12. Re:Personality by hobbit · · Score: 2, Funny

      To make your intent clearer, you could have posted:

      Correct! I just found out about this myself from a Linguistics major at UCLA who just happens to be my girlfriend. Which is to say: I have a girlfriend. Big me up.

      --
      "Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools, because they have to say something" - Plato
    13. Re:Personality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's spelled "Aussie", you insensitive clod!!!

    14. Re:Personality by ponraul · · Score: 1

      I get the Mexican part. But, can someone explain the octopus part?

    15. Re:Personality by glavenoid · · Score: 1

      yea, they are amused by the quality of the images on the screen. I sense an advertising opportunity for HDTV manufacturers here!

      --
      I, for one, am looking forward to the inevitable /. beta rollout fallout.
    16. Re:Personality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      my girlfriend who happens to be a Linguistics major

      Is she a cunning linguist?

    17. Re:Personality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm, imagine a Mexican with 8 arms.

    18. Re:Personality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      naw he means these are the octopuses where one has seen some success in it's own right and fades away for a few years before getting a reality tv show. it's winy kids and wife capitalize on thisand refuse to FUCK RIGHT OFF coz their too busy bein talentless assholes.

    19. Re:Personality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, we might actually understand octopi someday. We'll NEVER understand women.

    20. Re:Personality by QRDeNameland · · Score: 1

      I prefer Octopus Pie?

      --
      Momentarily, the need for the construction of new light will no longer exist.
    21. Re:Personality by trouser · · Score: 5, Funny

      ...who can only breathe under water and then you put him in a field of broccoli, refusing to return him to the salty depths until he has picked five times his own body weight. There are few things will motivate a Mexican Octo-man to work harder than such an immediate threat to his mortality. During my days in the Raj we were sure to keep a few brine filled baths of Mexican Octo-men handy come the spring. Harvesting time is upon us, fetch the Mexicans, eh what!

      --
      Now wash your hands.
    22. Re:Personality by dpbsmith · · Score: 1

      The American Heritage Dictionary says:

      Octopus, noun: inflected forms: pl. octopuses or octopi.

      I think you are thinking of the plural of "octopod," which refers, not to an individual, but to an octopus species

      Thus: there are twenty octopi in that tank; or, there are twenty octopuses on that tank; but, the octopuses in that tank belong to three different species of octopodes.

    23. Re:Personality by khallow · · Score: 1

      Incorrect. She's not my girlfriend, and octopi or octopuses are the correct plural forms of octopus.

    24. Re:Personality by siride · · Score: 5, Informative

      -1, irrelevant pedantry

      We have borrowed words or phrases into this language that include non-native morphology. With the exception of some Latin and Greek plurals, we generally ignore the non-native morphology and use our own endings. So, for example, not only is it acceptable, but it is required to say "the La Nina" or "those La Ninas" and not "*La Nina" or "*the Nina" or "*those Las Ninas" or "*Estas Ninas". The lexical item is "La Nina", which cannot be decomposed into smaller morphemes like it can in Spanish.

      Another example, also Spanish-related, is the presence of a number of words of Arabic origin in Spanish that begin with "al-", such as "algodon". Originally, this was the definite article in Arabic, but it is now a meaningless part of the word in Spanish and does not prevent the use of the native definite article.

      Or, going back to English, it is generally correct to use a native s-plural for words of Latin origin, except in a small set of common loanwords: "formulas", "nexuses", "moratoriums", etc. Again, this is okay because English isn't Latin and isn't required to use Latin morphology. The fact that it does at all is a more a testament to the high standing Latin had and still has in our culture. Those non-native plurals are actually affectations, rather than the rule. You don't see people generally trying to use non-native plurals with words from other languages (the less important the language, the less likely we are to use anything other than the native s-plural).

      So, my point is, it doesn't really matter what the original morphology was in the language we borrowed from. We borrowed the word as "kraken" and it is not decomposable into any smaller morphemes. The correct *English* plural is "krakens" and not "kraker", "kraks" or "krakulations".

    25. Re:Personality by maiki · · Score: 4, Informative

      For the pedant in all of us, the GP is correct. Etymonline explains how the -pi inflection results from an overgeneralization of the latin -us to -i pluralization (eg. status -> stati, terminus -> termini), but octopus is Greek (oktopous), not Latin, and the plural of pous (foot) is podes.

      Unforutunately (of fortunately, depending on your stance), many of these words are losing their original inflectional category and are being "regularized" to the more Englishy -es (octopuses, statuses, terminuses). Many dictionaries (or the one you provided) don't even list "octopodes" as a plural (and they even list "octopi" since it's taken on a kind of folk-correctness). In order of historical correctness, it would be "octopodes" > "octopuses" > "octopi". In order of usage (and general acceptance by the masses) it would be "octopuses" > "octopi" > "octopodes"

      Now, if we all spoke Chinese or Japanese, there would almost be no such thing as "plural inflection" (imagine all nouns being like mass nouns... "one octopus", "two octopus").

    26. Re:Personality by Tisha_AH · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It is interesting that the octopi have quite a different perception of reality than we are accustomed to. If you imagine the divergent paths that evolution may have taken on different planets throughout the galaxy you can have an introduction to the challenges we face as a species if we ever were to encounter a truly alien life form.

      Our models of intelligence, perception and personality are limited by our very narrow ideas based upon our feeble attempts to understand each other. We define ourselves as the "most intelligent" and "most social" creatures on our own planet. If we were to meet the seven armed trindoc from Beta Centauri (thank you Larry Niven) we may fail to recognize something that is superior to ourselves.

      A Buddhist monk sitting in contemplation of the nature of the universe may appear to be comatose if we were a similarly handicapped species (as ourselves) coming to earth.

      We need to enhance our understanding of every living species (or hive mind colony) on our own planet if we are to be anything more than space traveling, xenophobic rubes when we leave our own planet.

      --
      Tisha Hayes
    27. Re:Personality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Why did this get modded up? How is this funny?

    28. Re:Personality by beav007 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't know. The mods are on crack again. Just go with the flow.

      In fact, parent and I are both losing karma for this. We are getting modded up Funny (+0 Karma), and then getting modded down (-1 Redundant/Flamebait/Troll). So even though the resultant post scores are high, we are actually going backwards.

      Meh, I have karma to burn :P

    29. Re:Personality by HexRei · · Score: 1

      She was using Octopus tetricus. Study involved Octopus rubescens- perhaps this also accounts for the disparity.

    30. Re:Personality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It is a Scandinavian word, so the correct plural form would be kraker.

      "Form is a Latin word, so the correct singular form would be forma, with plural formae."

      That's about how linguistically defensible your complaint was.

    31. Re:Personality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Come to think of it, I think the plural of 'octopus' may be 'sushis'.

    32. Re:Personality by bitrex · · Score: 2, Insightful

      We need to enhance our understanding of every living species (or hive mind colony) on our own planet if we are to be anything more than space traveling, xenophobic rubes when we leave our own planet.

      After observing both human and octopus behavior, I believe there's simple common ground we could find with another long distance space-traveling species.

      We're both going to be really hungry.

    33. Re:Personality by Vastad · · Score: 1

      It is a Scandinavian word, so the correct plural form would be kraker.

      I am so very tempted to twist this into a crack aimed at Caucasians and derogatory euphemisms for them.....but it would be far too easy.

    34. Re:Personality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      -1, irrelevant pedantry

      Merriam-Webster says "kraken" is also an acceptable plural (similar to sheep or deer), so I'm assuming the -1 was about your own post. Misleading or uninformed also apply.

      In English, we routinely hack up imported words either because most people have never been taught what is correct or because they are too lazy to remember. Because Latin and Greek were required in classical education, people were forced to care. If Spanish or Scandinavian were required courses, then we wouldn't hack up those languages either.

      I didn't know the origin of "kraken", and found the parent interesting. It's probably not going to change the way monolingual English-speaking people use "kraken", but it is factual. You should respect that instead of flaming the poster.

    35. Re:Personality by belmolis · · Score: 1

      For some additional info, see Octopussies.

    36. Re:Personality by pcgabe · · Score: 2, Informative

      Octopodes? Are you sure?
      Thus speaketh:

      There are three forms of the plural of octopus; namely, octopuses, octopi, and octopodes. Currently, octopuses is the most common form in the UK as well as the US; octopodes is rare, and octopi is often objectionable.

      The Oxford English Dictionary (2004 update) lists octopuses, octopi and octopodes (in that order); it labels octopodes "rare", and notes that octopi derives from the mistaken assumption that octÅpÅs is a second declension Latin noun, which it is not. Rather, it is (Latinized) Greek, from oktá"pous (á½ÎÏÏZÏÎÏ...Ï), gender masculine, whose plural is oktá"podes (á½ÎÏÏZÏÎÎÎÏ). If the word were native to Latin, it would be octÅpÄ"s ('eight-foot') and the plural octÅpedes, analogous to centipedes and mÄllipedes, as the plural form of pÄ"s ('foot') is pedes. In modern, informal Greek, it is called khtapÃdi (ÏÏαÏÏOEÎÎ), gender neuter, with plural form khtapÃdia (ÏÏαÏÏOEÎÎα).

      Chambers 21st Century Dictionary and the Compact Oxford Dictionary list only octopuses, although the latter notes that octopodes is "still occasionally used"; the British National Corpus has 29 instances of octopuses, 11 of octopi and 4 of octopodes. Merriam-Webster 11th Collegiate Dictionary lists octopuses and octopi, in that order; Webster's New World College Dictionary lists octopuses, octopi and octopodes (in that order).

      Fowler's Modern English Usage states that "the only acceptable plural in English is octopuses," and that octopi is misconceived and octopodes pedantic.

      The term octopod (plural octopods or octopodes) is taken from the taxonomic order Octopoda but has no classical equivalent. The collective form octopus is usually reserved for animals consumed for food.

      End quote.

      So, in summary, the ONLY acceptable plural is actually octopuses . Not to be pedantic or anything. ^_^

      --
      Don't put advice in your sig.
    37. Re:Personality by RancidPeanutOil · · Score: 1

      ...there's another post down (or up, depending) a little further arguing "octopodes" vs. "octopi" - you might want to cut-paste your comment for that one, too, with the further wonderful detail that no native greek speaker coined the term (in the 18th century), and greek has a different word for the creature.

    38. Re:Personality by YttriumOxide · · Score: 2, Informative

      except in a small set of common loanwords: "formulas", "nexuses", "moratoriums", etc

      I agree with your post in general about how to pluralise loanwords using English endings, but did you have to give these examples? Maybe it's a dialect difference between where you are and where I grew up, but we'd lose marks in an English test if we ever wrote "formulas" or "moratoriums" - it'd have to be "formulae" and "moratoria". (I just did a quick check at "Dictionary.com" (hardly authoritative, but I'm in a hurry) and it agrees with me about "moratoria", but offers both plurals for "formula" (-s or -ae)). For me, in spoken speech I'd never consider a "-s" ending for a latin word ending in "ium", always "ia". The "formulas"/"formulae" thing also just sounds weird to me with an "-s", although it doesn't feel "as wrong" to me (I'd still use "formulae" in speech/writing).

      As I said though, these may be dialect differences - English is drifting apart relatively quickly it seems - television may have slowed down the drift somewhat with US shows being viewed worldwide, but it doesn't seem to be sufficient to stop the drift - I can definitely say that the language I grew up speaking is VERY different to the language I tend to use today (I live in a non-English speaking country, so when I use English, I tend to use a simplified subset of "standard English" - all grammatically correct (no "Me go shop now" or whatever), but avoiding some sentence structures or words with a lot of ambiguity. I also do this online, but to a lesser degree (such as in this post) since I'm well aware that the local dialect I spoke growing up (Southern New Zealand by the way, which has a lot of influence from Scottish English, and is very different to Northern New Zealand which is what most people are familiar with) does not lend itself well to the written form if I really want others to understand me)

      (oh, and sorry for the nested parentheses - it's a bad habit I picked up years ago (perhaps related to LISP programming (or perhaps just my own weird thought style)) and I have trouble breaking it)

      --
      My book about LSD and Self-Discovery
      Also on facebook as: DroppingAcidDaleBewan
    39. Re:Personality by YttriumOxide · · Score: 1

      "Octopuses" and "Octopodes" are both generally accepted (personally I prefer "Octopuses" to avoid confusion with my usage (right or wrong) of the word "Octopodes" as a synonym for "Octopoda" (the species order)). "Octopi" is considered almost universally wrong since it has NO linguistic sense behind it (the word isn't Latin in origin (it's Greek), so pluralising the "us" to an "i" is making a mistaken assumption).

      --
      My book about LSD and Self-Discovery
      Also on facebook as: DroppingAcidDaleBewan
    40. Re:Personality by dotancohen · · Score: 4, Informative

      Umm, imagine a Mexican with 8 arms.

      Octopi have only six arms. The other two are legs. (Six appendages for manipulating objects, two for pulling themselves along. And one of them doubles as a sex organ!)

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    41. Re:Personality by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

      And you are thinking of Great Cthulhu.

    42. Re:Personality by pjt33 · · Score: 1

      So, in summary, the ONLY acceptable plural is actually octopuses . Not to be pedantic or anything.

      Clearly. If you were being pedantic you would have gone with the unacceptable octopodes.

      I must say that I find it a bit disappointing that Fowler should call pedantry unacceptable. The message seems to be that majority vote determines truth.

    43. Re:Personality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My piano doubles as a sex organ.

    44. Re:Personality by khallow · · Score: 1

      Octopus is latinized Greek not Greek. Hence, octopi is in play. And glancing around at a few dictionaries, it doesn't appear that octopi is wrong much less "universally" wrong.

    45. Re:Personality by ultranova · · Score: 5, Funny

      Octopi have only six arms. The other two are legs. (Six appendages for manipulating objects, two for pulling themselves along. And one of them doubles as a sex organ!)

      Except in Japan, where all of them do ;).

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    46. Re:Personality by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1


      The difficulty in recognising intelligence might be even greater than you suggest above. I once read a comic book called the Invisibles in which a question was proposed - how would a civilisation far more advanced than our own communicate with us? It was a rhetorical question in the context, the implication being that it would not engage us as individuals, but as a society as a whole - e.g. it could introduce memes, technologies and knowledge to our species. Imagine the difficulty of humanity when the alien creature(s) declined or did not perceive at all our attempts at individual communication, responding only in the form of species-wide communiques. Would be a bit of a humbler for presidents and prime ministers. :)

      We wont know what difficulties we might face in communicating with a different intelligent species, but it could be immensely productive finding out.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    47. Re:Personality by osu-neko · · Score: 1

      I must say that I find it a bit disappointing that Fowler should call pedantry unacceptable. The message seems to be that majority vote determines truth.

      The English language does not have an official standardization body (unlike many other languages), so, yeah, majority vote determines truth. What was once an error can become standard usage, and what was once standard usage can become an error, simply because people start speaking/writing differently. People like Fowler, if they're doing their job correctly, do not define correct usage, they document it, based on observation. If a particular error becomes common enough, it ceases to be an error, the language evolves in the direction that for whatever reason feels right to the majority of people speaking it.

      It annoys pedants like me, who cringe whenever they hear words like "forums" (argh! it's "fora"!), but what can you do. You can try correcting people, and if you're successful, you prevent the language from evolving by preventing the shift from occurring, but some battles are lost causes. The regularization of all plurals in English, regardless of what language the words came from, is pretty much inevitable, like it or not.

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    48. Re:Personality by RedWizzard · · Score: 1

      Octopus is latinized Greek not Greek. Hence, octopi is in play. And glancing around at a few dictionaries, it doesn't appear that octopi is wrong much less "universally" wrong.

      According to the OED (via Wikipedia), octopi would be correct if octopus were a second declension noun, which it isn't. Therefore the correct pural should be octopodes. If it were a native latin noun the plural would be octopedes (cf. centipedes, millipedes). Dictionaries seem to largely agree that octopuses is the most common English plural, octopi next (though misconceived), and octopodes rarely.

    49. Re:Personality by pjt33 · · Score: 1

      I think I may have been too brief in my previous post. My issue here is that Fowler is effectively taking a prescriptivist standpoint: the majority usage is the only correct usage. I'm grudgingly able to accept that incorrect usages can become accepted (while reserving the right to differ on whether they are acceptable), but while a significant minority continue using the previously standard usage lexicographers should call it old-fashioned rather than unacceptable. (Before anyone points it out, yes I am being prescriptive myself, but on a smaller scale).

      Part (most?) of the beauty of the English language comes from its rich variety: like Perl, there's more than one way to say it. Removing words from the dictionary because their popularity drops is understandable, especially when the dictionary has a restricted size, but calling them non-words is another matter entirely.

    50. Re:Personality by YttriumOxide · · Score: 1

      Octopus is latinized Greek not Greek

      I guess you missed the part where I said "in origin", but even taking that it's "latinised Greek" (which I agree it is, despite that being irrelevant), as RedWizzard already said in his reply to you, it'd have to be a second declension noun for "Octopi" to be the plural, and it isn't, so it isn't.

      --
      My book about LSD and Self-Discovery
      Also on facebook as: DroppingAcidDaleBewan
    51. Re:Personality by rich_r · · Score: 1

      Only for an instant. Now he is undone...

    52. Re:Personality by hey! · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, this for once is an occasion for the old saw about "absence of evidence".

      Of course personality is not mere repetition, it is a pattern of characteristic responses to specific kinds of situations. As such an animal doesn't even need self-consciousness to have a personality. Nor need it be very intelligent.

      Self-consciousness and high intelligence add a considerable wrinkle to personality: part of the "situation" an animal responds to is a a complex internal state that the animal is aware of. Which reminds me of a woman I once worked with. Some days she'd be very personable; occasionally she'd even surprise you by baking you cookies. Other days she'd chew you out if you walked too close to her desk. If she was always one way or the other, you could deal with it, but the thing was, you'd never know whether today was a Good Janet day or an Evil Janet day until you'd had your first interaction with her.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    53. Re:Personality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you actually read the text you pasted, you'd see that the only correct plural is octopodes. Octopuses is common enough in English to be acceptable, but ugly and stupid. Octopi is ridiculous, kind of like Fowler's Modern English Usage.

    54. Re:Personality by khallow · · Score: 1

      I guess I see it. Octopus is a standard English noun (whatever that is called properly) not a latin second declension noun. Hence, octopuses not octopi. I don't really understand the insistence on octopodes though (octopod used to be a synonym for octopus?). The order octopoda includes some ancient creatures such as Pohlsepia mazonensis that are called octopods (to indicate membership in the order octopoda) but not octopuses (well, I did find a research paper that called one an "octopus" complete with quotes).

    55. Re:Personality by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      FTFA:
      "The definition of personality," she said, "is having repetition in your responses, for example, being consistently bold, or consistently shy, or consistently aggressive."

      She went on to say that any individual octopus had random, inconsistent, reactions to the same stimuli on any random day.

      Typical scientist: "The definition of personality is robotic, consistent response to stimulus."

    56. Re:Personality by MonsterMasher · · Score: 1

      There is a good body of lit. out there that Octopus have no 'handedness'

      The have 8 'arms'.

      You my friend may be thinking of a squid, or a very good lover!

    57. Re:Personality by MonsterMasher · · Score: 1

      Dam! I want YOU at my next party mixer!
      "You GO guy!!" (or gal)

    58. Re:Personality by j_166 · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure Octopussies is also correct.

    59. Re:Personality by StuffMaster · · Score: 0

      for i in infinity:
            <APPLAUSE>

    60. Re:Personality by infinite9 · · Score: 3, Funny

      not octo-pi

      Yeah, that would be irrational.

      --
      Disconnect your television. Do your own research. Draw your own conclusions. They're probably lying. Don't be a sheep.
    61. Re:Personality by maiki · · Score: 1

      Funny thing is, the plural of many Japanese words is the same as the singular. Eg the plural of "samurai" is "samurai", the plural of "futon" is "futon", and the plural of "sushi" is "sushi". Sometimes people go against this ("ninjas" being a prime example) but this has been the general trend.

    62. Re:Personality by Valdrax · · Score: 1

      If you actually read the text you pasted, you'd see that the only correct plural is octopodes.

      No. Octopus is a loan word. The correct pluralization of loan words is the English pluralization form, not the form from the original language. Nothing in the above text suggests otherwise.

      Insisting on Greek pluralization when we don't even use Greek spelling for the word is madness and only contributes to the ugly and illogical irregular grammar problems of English.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    63. Re:Personality by $0.02 · · Score: 1

      No, no, no. Women are consistent in something. They are consistently inconsistent in everything except in inconsistency.

      --
      If enithin kan gow rong it whil. (Murfey)
    64. Re:Personality by bob.appleyard · · Score: 1

      Note that English keeps the spellings, though.

      With most other languages, when a foreign word gets in, its spelling is mangled to fit the native pronunciation.

      This contributes to English phonemes and lexemes becoming totally out of whack.

      --
      How dare you be so modest!! You conceited bastard!!
    65. Re:Personality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny thing is, the plural of many Japanese words is the same as the singular.

      To clarify: many = almost all. Except for pronouns, Japanese makes no distinction between singular and plural nouns.

      Once Japanese nouns become English loanwords, all bets are off.

    66. Re:Personality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's like a Basil Wolverton comic!

    67. Re:Personality by RedWizzard · · Score: 1

      What I mean is that "octopodes" would be correct if you wanted to borrow (from latin) the plural form as well as the singular form. "Octopi" is what people think the borrowed plural should be but it's incorrect. But yes, "octopuses" is how the plural would be formed in English and that seems to be gaining ground over octopi. According to this page written in 2004 octopi had a slight advantage in terms of number of results returned by Google. It's now very much in favour of octopuses, 490,000 to 344,000.

    68. Re:Personality by maiki · · Score: 1

      Ah, i was unclear. I was talking about Japanese words brought into English. In Japanese itself, of course, there's no pluralization like "ninjas". And you're right, most common nouns are numberless. Although you can add "tachi" or "ra" to common nouns sometimes, to force them into being plural, but that's a little uncommon. Also, sometimes reduplication (like "hito" -> "hitobito" or "sore" -> "sorezore") makes things pluralish, but one could argue that they are actually different words with different semantics.

    69. Re:Personality by corrie · · Score: 1

      It can be both, plus a third choice:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Octopus#Terminology

    70. Re:Personality by pcgabe · · Score: 1

      My issue here is that Fowler is effectively taking a prescriptivist standpoint: the majority usage is the only correct usage. I'm grudgingly able to accept that incorrect usages can become accepted (while reserving the right to differ on whether they are acceptable), but while a significant minority continue using the previously standard usage lexicographers should call it old-fashioned rather than unacceptable./i>

      Hi, I actually agree with you for the most part (well, you did use 'beauty' and 'Perl' in that same sentence...;-). I grudgingly accept that English changes over time (though people that use phrases such as "begs the question" incorrectly do grate on my nerves). The problem I had wasn't that octopuses is more COMMON than octopodes, it was that octopodes is an origin-language pluralization of a (now English) loan-word.

      I wouldn't demand (or allow) someone spell skosh (def: a little bit) as: sukoshi, even though that is the original Japanese "spelling" (of course it's not normally spelled with Latin characters in Japanese). That would be crazy. Nor do I scold people that use the term "double entendre", even now, after the French have moved on to other wording. Why? Because when an English-speaker says "double entendre", they are speaking ENGLISH, not FRENCH. So why demand (or allow) Greek word-forms for an English word?

      THAT is why octopodes is unacceptably pedantic.

      (sorry for returning to a dead-horse topic, but I am a former English teacher; I have Opinions On Things)

      --
      Don't put advice in your sig.
    71. Re:Personality by pjt33 · · Score: 1

      So why demand (or allow) Greek word-forms for an English word?

      There seems to be an implicit claim here that where a noun is loaned by another language only the singular is loaned. I suspect - although, alas, I can't find the resources to confirm or refute - that when octopus entered the English language the only people who used it would also have used octopodes as the plural. If this is the case then it's a strong argument for octopodes as a loan-word with equal standing.

      Of course, English is as inconsistent in its handling of loan words as in everything else. I wouldn't dream of calling a lady's betrothed her fiancée, or of calling her his fiancé: but on the other hand, use of naïf in English is extremely pretentious.

    72. Re:Personality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      -1, irrelevant pedantry

      Given the rest of your comment, I really wish there was a "+/-1, unintentional irony" moderation.

    73. Re:Personality by tkw954 · · Score: 1

      I agree, what are they teaching our childs these days?

    74. Re:Personality by siride · · Score: 1

      Yet another display of ignorance. It doesn't have anything to do with laziness or whatever stupid reason you have come up with for why we don't keep non-native plurals. The reason is, quite simply, that they aren't native plurals! We don't speak Latin, we speak English. We use English grammar, which has plurals in -s, not -a, -er or anything else (aside from some irregulars). The sole reason that we use the Latin plurals for *some* (but by no means all, or even a majority, of loanwords from Latin) is that Latin was held in such esteem during parts of the history of the language, that there was a tendency to force a non-native plural, which is treated as an irregular plural at best, and at worst, a separate word, leading to strange quadruplets like medium/mediums/media/medias. The natural order is not to use the non-native plural (and this is not just an English thing: even Latin itself generally used Latin inflections for Greek and other non-Latin loanwords*). Why is English singled out as being so bad here?

      I am aware that in the Scandinavian languages, "kraken" is a singular with an attached article. And that's fine...in Scandinavian. But in English, that has no bearing because English does not operate that way. And that is the entire point of my post. It is not a flame against Scandinavian linguistics, or the history of the beast, but about the implication that English has somehow screwed it up, and furthermore, that English must respect Scandinavian noun inflections. That is the irrelevant pedantry which I was referring to.

      * For some Greek loanwords, Latin actually employed the Greek declensions, but this was done rather haphazardly and inconsistently. Yes, the Romans even had this problem. My Latin grammar (Gildersleeve) says this about Greek nouns in Latin: "Greek substantives, especially proper names, are commonly Latinised, and declined regularly according to their stem-characteristic. Many substantives, however, either retain their Greek form exclusively, or have the Greek and Latin forms side by side. These variations occur principally in the Singular, in the Plural, the declension is usually regular." (section 65)

    75. Re:Personality by siride · · Score: 1

      I actually chose those examples because they also commonly have non-native plurals, but the point is taken. There are many others where the Latin plural is rare and/or pedantic-sounding ("formulae" is a good example, in fact) and a great deal more where it simply is not used (the plural of "creation" is not "creationes", but the native "creations" without exception). The differences are both dialectical and based on register. Educated or written registers will prefer the Latin plurals, colloquial and other "non-standard" registers and dialects will generally not. The reality is, written standard English really is a different language from the varieties of spoken English and it's rate of change is held in check by generally respected standards, whereas there are no external standards for spoken English (despite the attempts of English teachers and parents of teenagers).

    76. Re:Personality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sheeps. Gooses. Oxes. Mooses. Foots. Mouses. Mans. Womans. When clinging to your original point I recommend that you also use these incorrect plurals, since some of these examples are as native English as one could claim about any English word.

      Seriously though, if you live and work in the scientific, legal, or any other world where non-native English words are commonly used, you present yourself as either ignorant or stupid if you use them improperly. Claiming that those words violate rules of English grammar is not a reasonable defense. My examples above were chosen because they are native English words, violate your rule, and EVERYONE who uses them is viewed as ignorant, stupid, or a poor English-speaker.

      English has rules, but also has exceptions to those rules - just like other languages. If there's enough momentum behind the exception, it will be driven into mainstream use.

      In the recent past, it was professors in classical education (mainly Latin and Greek) who dictated what exceptions were important for English-speaking society to remember. Prior to that, there were centuries of Greek and Latin being used side-by-side (or in competition), which led to the inconsistency you cite. If it was important enough, the original form was kept.

      Today, all it would take is for Hollywood to use a different plural form of "kraken" in a wildly popular movie, and we'd use that exception too.

      My problem with your post(s) is that you take a rule of thumb in English that has MANY well-known exceptions, then make a dangerous sweeping generalization that is provably false. Along the way, you flame the original poster for irrelevant pedantry because his post refers to non-English grammatical rules that you don't care about because "we speak English here" (using much of your own irrelevant pedantry to do it).

      My problem with the moderators is that they gave your post high marks for being "Informative", despite the lack of actual substance and the poor examples you cited. Moratoriums?? Come on...

      My problem with this topic in general is that in this day and age, languages get mixed on a daily basis. If the actual origin is known, then why mutilate the form in an attempt to adhere to some general rule that already has many exceptions? If you run into a native speaker, then you sound like an idiot. There are plenty of native Spanish-speakers in the US that will see your examples mangling "La Nina" as ignorance of the actual root, instead of grammatically correct English.

      Full disclosure: I learned Spanish as a second language, and am learning Japanese as a third. I live in Japan, so I am on the other side of siride's argument regarding grammatical rules. My native - and correct - English is mutilated in order to localize it. This may be good for short-term adoption, but I believe this hinders native Japanese-speakers' ability to learn other languages. The same probably goes for native English-speakers.

      siride's viewpoint may be good for English purists, but not recommended for people who frequently encounter native-speakers of that imported word or phrase. They will think you just don't know the meaning of the words you are using.

    77. Re:Personality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "-1, irrelevant pedantry" was his expected rating. The moderators didn't understand what he posted.

  3. How could they... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Only Australians would be cruel enough to give Vegemite to poor defenseless octopi.

    1. Re:How could they... by Sanat · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I spent three years in Australia back in the 70's and never did learn to enjoy eating Vegemite... it certainly has an acquired taste whether in soup, gravy or on a piece of bread.

      How the kids can devour it is beyond me.

      I do agree that giving Vegemite to an octopus should be against the law.

      --
      And in the end, the love you take is equal to the love you make
    2. Re:How could they... by fireman+sam · · Score: 5, Funny

      There is a long standing law in Australia, if a child doesn't eat vegemite, said child is fed to dingos.

      --
      it is only after a long journey that you know the strength of the horse.
    3. Re:How could they... by BluBrick · · Score: 1, Informative

      There are really only 2 tricks to learning to eat Vegemite - both based around the same fact.

      This stuff ain't peanut butter or jam!

      1. Do NOT expect a sweet taste.
      2. Spread it thin. Real thin. (I'm convinced that Fry's "big heaping bowl of salt" was actually an hallucination brought on by a thickly spread Vegemite sandwich)
      --
      Ahh - My eye!
      The doctor said I'm not supposed to get Slashdot in it!
    4. Re:How could they... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vegemite is vile. Marmite (British marmite) is awesome.

    5. Re:How could they... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget Promite. If you alternate that with Vegemite and Marmite you need to eat nothing else!

    6. Re:How could they... by magarity · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Octopuses," Miss Pronk said, "are very smart. I have seen my octopuses open Vegemite jars by unscrewing the lid.
       
      No, no. If they were very smart, they wouldn't open a jar of Vegemite in the first place.

    7. Re:How could they... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe they are evil geniuses, and they are unscrewing the jar to use the Vegemite as a WMD?

      The best Vegemite sandwiches are those that have had half a day in a school bag in the sun. It goes all nice and melty...

    8. Re:How could they... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, cruel would be forcing Foster's Lager into the octopi.

      My Aussie friends joke that they send the Foster's overseas and keep all the really good stuff at home. Having consumed a few of the brands they keep to themselves as well as Foster's, I'd have to agree.

    9. Re:How could they... by jibjibjib · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I accidentally modded you redundant; I'm posting this to undo the moderation.

    10. Re:How could they... by mabinogi · · Score: 1

      New Zealand Marmite is the One True Marmite - despite coming after the British Marmite.

      --
      Advanced users are users too!
    11. Re:How could they... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if a child doesn't eat vegemite, said child is fed to dingos.

      At least the Dingos get a good meal - That's still less cruel than feeding vegemite to octopuses.

    12. Re:How could they... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it true that a company wanted to make a similar product to Marmite and their marketing department thought of 'Parwill'?

    13. Re:How could they... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The name Vegemite was selected out of a hat by Fred Walker's daughter, Sheilah. Faced with growing competition from New Zealand's Marmite, the product was known from 1928 to 1935 as Parwill, leading to the advertising slogan, "Marmite but Parwill." that is, "Ma [mother] might like the taste but Pa [father] will." This attempt to expand market share was unsuccessful and the name was changed back to Vegemite.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vegemite

    14. Re:How could they... by maxume · · Score: 1

      You have any number of minutes to post an on-topic comment somewhere else in the story, there is no need to reply directly to the comment you moderated with the information that you clicked-too-soon.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    15. Re:How could they... by geminidomino · · Score: 2, Insightful

      New Zealand Marmite is the One True Marmite - despite coming after the British Marmite.

      You mean like how Leto Atreides became the Kwisatz Haderach, despite coming after Paul who couldn't cut it?

      (Just a desperate attempt to get some geekyness back into slashdot...)

    16. Re:How could they... by indigest · · Score: 1

      The researcher probably put fish into the Vegemite jars.

    17. Re:How could they... by ignavus · · Score: 2, Funny

      No. The point is, vegemite jars gradually glue up real tight, and only octopuses can open them. That makes them smarter than us, because we make jars that we cannot open when the product is half used.

      Nothing here says that the octopuses were eating the vegemite. Being smart creatures, they might have been feeding the vegemite to the scientists, or using it to grease their sport cars (vegemite looks surprisingly like automotive lubricant).

      --
      I am anarch of all I survey.
    18. Re:How could they... by gzunk · · Score: 1

      You mean like how Leto Atreides became the Kwisatz Haderach, despite coming after Paul who couldn't cut it?

      (Just a desperate attempt to get some geekyness back into slashdot...)

      Except of course it was Leto Atreides II, not Leto Atreides...

    19. Re:How could they... by jahudabudy · · Score: 1

      So, the trick to eating Vegemite is to eat as little as possible? Sounds like the only winning move is to not play :-)

      --
      ...sometimes, in order to hurt someone very badly, you have to tell that person terrible lies. - PA
    20. Re:How could they... by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      I didn't want to put the suffix in case there was another Leto before Paul's father, and counted on the "coming after Paul" to make it clear that I was talking about Paul's son and not father.

    21. Re:How could they... by jtev · · Score: 1

      Leto III Atredies. Not Leto II Leto II was Paul's first son, and killed by the Sardukur.

      --
      That which is done from love exists beyond good and evil
    22. Re:How could they... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (obligatory Seinfeld reference)

      "maybe the dingo ate 'cho babay"

    23. Re:How could they... by cas2000 · · Score: 1

      yeah, same as when sprinkling salt onto eggs, the idea is to use just a little rather than a lot. a few grains of salt improves the flavour while a teaspoon of salt would make it inedible.

      vegemite on toast tastes pretty good if made to reasonable proportions. toasted bread, hot melted butter, and salty vegemite. carbs & fat & salt. yum.

      it's pretty good on plain bread with loads of butter (not margarine) too.

      some people like sickly sweet things like jam. others like savoury/salty things like vegemite. tastes are different.

      btw, i've known cats (and dogs) who seem more than willing to rip your arm off to get some of your vegemite toast. they like salt.

  4. "Octopuses Have No Personalities and Enjoy HDTV" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    When I read that headline, I thought it applied to many of the people I know as well...

  5. Correlation is not causation by Bromskloss · · Score: 4, Funny

    just remember that.

    --
    Swedish plasma phys. PhD student; MSc EE; knows maths, programming, electronics; finance interest; seeks opportunities
    1. Re:Correlation is not causation by antifoidulus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      People who don't understand statistics and scientific research methods, but like to pretend they are the smartest people on earth, love to say that phrase, just remember that.

    2. Re:Correlation is not causation by Bromskloss · · Score: 5, Funny

      People who don't understand statistics and scientific research methods, but like to pretend they are the smartest people on earth, love to say that phrase, just remember that.

      I'm in good company, then. I'll remember that.

      Btw, I only tried to be funny. Mabye I failed; we'll have to wait for the modding.

      --
      Swedish plasma phys. PhD student; MSc EE; knows maths, programming, electronics; finance interest; seeks opportunities
    3. Re:Correlation is not causation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      People who don't understand statistics and scientific research methods, but like to pretend they are the smartest people on earth, love to say that phrase, just remember that.

      So, there is a correlation, but that doesn't meant there is a...

    4. Re:Correlation is not causation by Shark · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Hehe, tell that to the man-made global warming gang (and watch my karma dive for merely mentioning it).

      Seriously though, scientific measurement of personality in a creature so different from us humans probably would require a bit more than what they did. Can't fault them for trying though... Except perhaps in the 'what use do we have for such knowledge' way.

      --
      Mind the frickin' laser...
    5. Re:Correlation is not causation by hobbit · · Score: 1

      But some people who love to say that understand do statistics and scientific research methods. Which just goes to show.

      --
      "Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools, because they have to say something" - Plato
    6. Re:Correlation is not causation by caitsith01 · · Score: 1

      So if I understand you correctly you're saying that repeating that phrase decreases understanding of of statistics and scientific research methods?

      --
      Read Pynchon.
    7. Re:Correlation is not causation by TheThiefMaster · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      You didn't get funny, but you did manage to get "+1 Troll". :)

    8. Re:Correlation is not causation by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 1

      No, but it's an excellent predictor of ignorance.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    9. Re:Correlation is not causation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Btw, I only tried to be funny. Mabye I failed; we'll have to wait for the modding.

      If you have to explain yourself, then you've failed.

    10. Re:Correlation is not causation by irtza · · Score: 4, Funny

      So if I understand you correctly you're saying that repeating that phrase decreases understanding of of statistics and scientific research methods?

      No, correlation is not causation

      I can do this all day...

      --
      When all else fails, try.
    11. Re:Correlation is not causation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure but you have to remember that correlation is not causation. Their pretending to be the smartest person on earth may not be the cause of their love of that phrase. It might be caused by anthropomorphic global warming, the liberal dominance of the mainstream media, or possibly even a vast right wing conspiracy. We just can't be sure.

    12. Re:Correlation is not causation by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1

      You mean that just because you have no personality and like HDTV, that does not prove that you are related to octopi?

    13. Re:Correlation is not causation by cleatsupkeep · · Score: 1

      You mean it causes ignorance? :-)

    14. Re:Correlation is not causation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And correlation plus a proposed causal mechanism is theory. A lot of people who spout that catch phrase don't seem to realize that.

    15. Re:Correlation is not causation by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 1

      There is a very strong causal relationship. It just goes in the other direction ...

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    16. Re:Correlation is not causation by ignavus · · Score: 1

      There is a strong correlation between (A) the publication of studies that rely on correlation for inferring causation and (B) people saying that correlation is not causation.

      Coincidence?

      --
      I am anarch of all I survey.
  6. I shall name my first child Renata Pronk by EsJay · · Score: 5, Funny

    That is all.

    1. Re:I shall name my first child Renata Pronk by Loibisch · · Score: 4, Funny

      poor boy...

    2. Re:I shall name my first child Renata Pronk by bcrowell · · Score: 4, Interesting

      But seriously, what's up with the "Miss?" Whiteox seems to be parroting it from the Herald article. Last time I checked, we were living in the 21st century. She's presumably a PhD, so either "Dr." or "Ms." would be fine. (In academia there tends to be a kind of reverse snobbery about that. If you look at the listing of faculty at a snobby place like Berkeley, it's all "Mr." and "Ms.," because of course everybody has a PhD. At a community college it's more common to see the "Dr." for people who have PhDs.) I can't remember ever seeing a female academic in the US referred to as "Miss." Not in writing, not in speech. Is this more common in Australia, or is the author of the Herald piece the type of crotchety 95-year-old guy who smokes a pipe, wears suspenders, and uses "Miss" for any female who doesn't remember the Depression?

    3. Re:I shall name my first child Renata Pronk by slushdork · · Score: 4, Informative

      Will she look like this?

    4. Re:I shall name my first child Renata Pronk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I shall name my first child Renata Pronk

      Never have I thought it so fortunate that Slashdotters are as unlikely to breed as they are...

    5. Re:I shall name my first child Renata Pronk by Whiteox · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's up to the individual. My wife prefers Mrs instead of Ms. Perhaps the researcher in question prefers Miss instead of Ms.?
      You could always ask her. (thanks slushdork)
      On your doctoral point, in the above site she states that she is an Honours student. That's post-grad. Next step is Masters or Doctorate.
      As she is not a Phd, Richard Macey (the author of the article ) entitled her as 'Miss'.

      --
      Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
    6. Re:I shall name my first child Renata Pronk by smegmatic · · Score: 1

      Chill out dude, she's probably just a grad student.

    7. Re:I shall name my first child Renata Pronk by rowp · · Score: 1

      Yes I'm sure she will reply to an email from a random person asking a meaningless question.

    8. Re:I shall name my first child Renata Pronk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It appears that she is an Honours student (that is a student in the 4th year of an extended undergraduate degree which will allow her to proceed to studying a PhD immediately, rather than going through a Masters).

      As for why it was "Miss" instead of "Ms." - both are quite common in Australia, and some women prefer to use "Miss" to distance themselves from hardcore feminists like Germaine Greer etc. who are often seen as misandrists.

    9. Re:I shall name my first child Renata Pronk by johanatan · · Score: 1

      Maybe she is unmarried?

    10. Re:I shall name my first child Renata Pronk by BiggerIsBetter · · Score: 3, Funny

      It's her way of telling us she's single.

      --
      Forget thrust, drag, lift and weight. Airplanes fly because of money.
    11. Re:I shall name my first child Renata Pronk by theM_xl · · Score: 1

      Oh come on, the Depression started like half a year ago. Even my grandmother isn't that bad :)

    12. Re:I shall name my first child Renata Pronk by Reservoir+Penguin · · Score: 1

      "Marine Mammat Research" Hehehe. A school that can't even spell.

      --
      US-UK-Israel: The real Axis of Evil
    13. Re:I shall name my first child Renata Pronk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As for why it was "Miss" instead of "Ms." - both are quite common in Australia, and some women prefer to use "Miss" to distance themselves from hardcore feminists like Germaine Greer etc. who are often seen as misandrists.

      "Often seen as" or just "often"?

    14. Re:I shall name my first child Renata Pronk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your wife prefers "Mrs." instead of "Ms." because she's married. "Mrs." is a title designated to married, divorced, or widowed women.

    15. Re:I shall name my first child Renata Pronk by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Mrs. is the correct title of a married woman; Miss refers to an unmarried woman. Ms. is used to generally refer to someone whose marital status is unknown, but some people (such as your wife) prefer to be called by the more specific title when possible.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    16. Re:I shall name my first child Renata Pronk by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Slashvertising? Are her choices really that limited?

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    17. Re:I shall name my first child Renata Pronk by Five+Bucks! · · Score: 1

      I was searching the thread to find a post like this before posting a dupe...

      The use of 'Miss' in the submission is unnecessary and sexist, promoting a masculine domination of society.

      For those who think I'm full of shit (you probably wouldn't be totally wrong) remember there is no distinction between a married man -- Mister -- versus an unmarried woman; Mrs. or Miss.

      While I believe political correctness can go overboard (personhole instead of manhole) things like Police Officer instead of Police Man are certainly reasonable.

      Using 'Miss' as in the the context of the submitted article is demeaning and crude. But then again this is Slashdot...

      --
      52 52'23" W 47 32'07" N
    18. Re:I shall name my first child Renata Pronk by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      For those who think I'm full of shit (you probably wouldn't be totally wrong) remember there is no distinction between a married man -- Mister -- versus an unmarried woman; Mrs. or Miss.

      Actually, that would be "Master", but apparently nobody cared because that usage of the word has become antiquated.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    19. Re:I shall name my first child Renata Pronk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't imagine why you'd not want the title 'Dr Pronk'.

    20. Re:I shall name my first child Renata Pronk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I pronounce 'Ms.' 'Miss' because otherwise I'd be saying something like 'muzz'. Without being too facetious, though, I should point out that this is all academic anyway, no-one actually cares.

      Anecdotally, at my university (ex-polytechnic, if it makes a difference) it took me nearly three years to realise that some of my teachers have doctorates. Because, though some of them are pretentious dickheads, none of them are big enough dickheads nor pretentious enough to think that slapping 'durrr' (That's how I pronounce 'dr.') in front of their names carries any weight with anyone except people who are even bigger dickheads and more pretentious than they are.

    21. Re:I shall name my first child Renata Pronk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought it was supposed to be Ms. if you do not know if the woman is married or not, Mrs. if she is married, and Miss if not. It was my understanding that you are supposed to refer to women you don't know as Ms. since it's none of your business whether they are married or not.

    22. Re:I shall name my first child Renata Pronk by Whiteox · · Score: 1

      it's none of your business whether they are married or not.
      Give this AC a cigar.
      The whole Ms. concept was thrown together in the 70's as part of the woman's liberation movement. Ms.= Miss or Mrs

      --
      Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
  7. This will help HUMANS by [000000] · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    How and why? Whats this project fund for?

    1. Re:This will help HUMANS by Cassius+Corodes · · Score: 2, Funny

      Coz when the octopi rise up and enslave us, we will know how to curry favour with our new masters.

      --
      Control is an illusion, order our comforting lie. From chaos, through chaos, into chaos we fly
    2. Re:This will help HUMANS by digitig · · Score: 5, Funny

      Coz when the octopi rise up and enslave us, we will know how to curry favour with our new masters.

      Mmmm, curried octopus...

      --
      Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
    3. Re:This will help HUMANS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I for one, welcome our new Octopi Overlords.

    4. Re:This will help HUMANS by Gonoff · · Score: 1

      Mmmm, curried octopus...

      rather chewy I'm afraid.

      --
      I'll see your Constitution and raise you a Queen.
    5. Re:This will help HUMANS by dword · · Score: 1

      I, for one, welcome our new... oh, forget it!

    6. Re:This will help HUMANS by Bai+jie · · Score: 1

      Curried FAVOUR, not curried flavor.

  8. intelligence != idiosyncratic preference by critical_point · · Score: 1

    I sometimes wonder why humans evolved to be so irrational, and since societies' proliferation of individual preferences is one example of this I hope that this research continues to be funded.

    1. Re:intelligence != idiosyncratic preference by j-pimp · · Score: 1

      I sometimes wonder why humans evolved to be so irrational, and since societies' proliferation of individual preferences is one example of this I hope that this research continues to be funded.

      I think the dichotomy of individual differences versus tendency to groupthink has served us well for a couple million years. Also, human's are irrational compared to what? We are wired to many cueues that made much more sense even a thousand years ago. Our irrational behavior got us to the point where we could put a few men on the moon. We will retrain our brains to get to the point of putting mankind into space. Eventually, we might evolve to better fit the envirorment we created for ourselves.

      Also, you could argue that there are more important events in human history, or even space flight than landing on the moon. However, my irrational human brain likes the idea of being able to name a specific concrete event, as opposed to something less concrete like, "the proliferation of the internet."

      --
      --- Justin Dearing http://www.justaprogrammer.net/ We're just programmers.
    2. Re:intelligence != idiosyncratic preference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "Also, human's are irrational compared to what? "

      Compared to creatures that know that you don't use a fucking apostrophe to pluralize.

    3. Re:intelligence != idiosyncratic preference by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 1

      I think the dichotomy of individual differences versus tendency to groupthink has served us well for a couple million years.

      And what were the group sizes for most of that time?

      --
      -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
    4. Re:intelligence != idiosyncratic preference by TheKidWho · · Score: 1

      I don't know, do you know for certain??

    5. Re:intelligence != idiosyncratic preference by j-pimp · · Score: 1

      I think the dichotomy of individual differences versus tendency to groupthink has served us well for a couple million years.

      And what were the group sizes for most of that time?

      Are you referring to the fact that our brains can handle a pack size of ~250? If so whats your point? We have always found ways of working around that limitation through hierarchy.

      --
      --- Justin Dearing http://www.justaprogrammer.net/ We're just programmers.
    6. Re:intelligence != idiosyncratic preference by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 1

      Are you referring to the fact that our brains can handle a pack size of ~250? If so whats your point? We have always found ways of working around that limitation through hierarchy.

      Have we? Does it scale? Can the result be "democratic"?

      --
      -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
    7. Re:intelligence != idiosyncratic preference by j-pimp · · Score: 1

      Have we? Does it scale? Can the result be "democratic"?

      Who said anything about democratic? And the number is apparently 150. I got that number from this link. They also use that number in a business book called The Tipping Point. I have not gotten around to reading that book yet.

      Anyway, I'm not saying we are perfect, but we've done pretty well on a macro scale so far. Make an argument towards a superior alternative, that has been achieved.

      Having worked for some "adolescent" companies, I've noticed that certain traits used to achieve initial success have to be unlearned for continued success. Specifically, a young company needs to take advantage of its flexibility and lack of formal process to get new customers. As it matures, a company needs rigid, yet adaptable, internal processes. I think mankind is at that period where the traits that have served them well (pack animal mentality) no longer due. We can and are doing that via learned behavior.

      --
      --- Justin Dearing http://www.justaprogrammer.net/ We're just programmers.
  9. Did anyone read that as HGTV? by jdb2 · · Score: 3, Funny

    HGTV -- Home and Garden Television : The bane of many a married man's existence. Maybe they should design octopus habitats that adhere to the principles of Feng Shui : "Oh my god! That's perfect! It just balances out the energy of the algae encrusted rock in the center!"

    jdb2

    1. Re:Did anyone read that as HGTV? by Warll · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You're kidding right? If anything slashdoters would misread HGTV as HDTV.

    2. Re:Did anyone read that as HGTV? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HGTV?

      Oh, you mean High Graphic Television?
      Yeah, looks good man.

    3. Re:Did anyone read that as HGTV? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "If anything slashdoters would misread HGTV as HDTV."

      I'm disloxic, you insensitive clud.

    4. Re:Did anyone read that as HGTV? by mewshi_nya · · Score: 1

      I actually like watching HGTV... good cuddling coversation with the girlfriend. "Do you like that, honey? Why?"

    5. Re:Did anyone read that as HGTV? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your balls are in a jar in her purse. She spits into the jar every once in awhile, to show her contempt and disgust for the ease with which she was able to get you to willingly surrender them.

      I bet you guys have (bad) sex once a week, for about five minutes each time. Eunuch.

    6. Re:Did anyone read that as HGTV? by Nightspirit · · Score: 1

      Better than Lifetime. I can't stand it when my wife watches that vapid shit.

    7. Re:Did anyone read that as HGTV? by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      So what does it say when you get your GF hooked on Babylon 5 instead?

      Of course, we just finished.. now for farscape...

    8. Re:Did anyone read that as HGTV? by Zordak · · Score: 1

      HGTV is, in fact, proof that Satan is a woman. WHY DO I CARE WHETHER YOU BUY HOUSE 1, HOUSE 2, OR HOUSE 3! And if I hear one more person use the word "eclectic," I swear, an octopus is going to die.

      --

      Today's Sesame Street was brought to you by the number e.
  10. Octopi are Awesome! by hedgemage · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I think that by understanding a creature as alien to us as an octopus, we're learning more about what is 'intelligence'. While they're not going to be developing a civilization any time soon, its cool to have an invertebrate that on many levels is closer to primate intelligence than many mammals.

    1. Re:Octopi are Awesome! by jdb2 · · Score: 5, Informative

      What's hindering them from developing a civilization soon ( In geological time of course ;) is the fact that their lifespans are so short. For example, I believe that the Giant Pacific Octopus only lives for about 4-5 years. It's saddening that such beauty and intelligence only graces this Earth for such a short time. :(

      jdb2

    2. Re:Octopi are Awesome! by h4rm0ny · · Score: 5, Interesting


      We should selectively breed some octopi for greater life span. They are beautiful and fascinating creatures and it would be wonderful if we had some longer lived ones to watch and spend time with.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    3. Re:Octopi are Awesome! by MinutiaeMan · · Score: 1

      Then they become smarter than us and take over? I think I saw that movie.

    4. Re:Octopi are Awesome! by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1


      Hmmm.... Looking at recent human governments I have one thing to say: "I VOTE FOR THE OCTOPUS!"

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    5. Re:Octopi are Awesome! by timeOday · · Score: 1, Funny

      While we're at it let's fix that other great flaw of the octopus: they taste like shoe rubber.

    6. Re:Octopi are Awesome! by Worthless_Comments · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I read Sphere too.

    7. Re:Octopi are Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      "Then they become smarter than us and take over"

      This was discussed by scientists, in the documentary, "The Future Is Wild" as a possible way life on Earth could progress, in millions of years from now. One creature idea put forward as possible, would be in millions of years from now, the idea of squid being able to move onto land. Once they had adapted to land living, then in the even more distant future, they would be truely scary possibilities, like squid/spiders living in trees like monkeys do now. But then escaping onto the land wouldn't be any safer. :)

      i.e...
      "Megasquid, an elephant-sized omnivorous terrestrial squid. Its 8 arms have evolved into walking legs like an elephant's. It uses its two long tentacles for feeding."
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_The_Future_Is_Wild_species#Megasquid

      It had some facinating ideas about the possible directions life could take in the very distant future.

    8. Re:Octopi are Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.princessunicorndoll.com/

    9. Re:Octopi are Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Octopi is most wrong - an incorrect interpretation of the origin of the root word.

      Octopuses is the commonly accepted plural.

      Octopodes is the most correct, but apparently pedantic.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Octopus#Terminology

    10. Re:Octopi are Awesome! by kzieli · · Score: 1

      Ah yes the Octopus. a creature with 3 hearts and green blood. ofcurse it turns out that green blood is not as efficent as red blood (the correct biological names escape me). This is the reason the Octopuses can't survive out of water very long. I recall two things from my last visit to the aquarium: 1: The Octopus was the only animal which had toys in its tank 2: the Cuttle fish and Squid (which are related) where the only animals who seemed to watch you back. (and they had a continous procession of people to watch all day).

      --
      read my mind at http://the-willows.blogspot.com/
    11. Re:Octopi are Awesome! by xx01dk · · Score: 1

      Also, they eat each other. Most of us stopped doing that quite a ways back...

      --
      There is simply too much glass..
    12. Re:Octopi are Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      We should selectively breed some octopi for greater life span. They are beautiful and fascinating creatures and it would be wonderful if we had some longer lived ones to watch and spend time with.

      What could possibly go wrong?

    13. Re:Octopi are Awesome! by Alsee · · Score: 1, Troll

      Or we could just selectively breed humans for a shorter lifespan.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    14. Re:Octopi are Awesome! by firmamentalfalcon · · Score: 1

      Oh really? I thought it was because they do math in octal.

    15. Re:Octopi are Awesome! by Wes+Janson · · Score: 1

      Or we could just selectively breed humans for a shorter lifespan.

      It's called Africa, unfortunately.

    16. Re:Octopi are Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cook them with sake. Something in it does a wonderful job of tenderizing them.

    17. Re:Octopi are Awesome! by Reservoir+Penguin · · Score: 1

      So Mugabe was right after all. The West is using Zimbabwe as a testing rounds for it's abominal eugenics experiments.

      --
      US-UK-Israel: The real Axis of Evil
    18. Re:Octopi are Awesome! by kithrup · · Score: 1

      Hemocyanin -- the copper-based equivalent to hemoglobin.

      I sometimes want a pet cuttlefish.

    19. Re:Octopi are Awesome! by DriedClexler · · Score: 1

      Or we could selectively breed humans for opposition to eugenics.

      --
      Information theory is life. The rest is just the KL divergence.
    20. Re:Octopi are Awesome! by Mozk · · Score: 1
      --
      No existe.
    21. Re:Octopi are Awesome! by bar-agent · · Score: 1

      How does he always draw these things just in time for an appropriate Slashdot story?!?

      --
      i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
    22. Re:Octopi are Awesome! by osu-neko · · Score: 1

      We should selectively breed some octopi for greater life span. They are beautiful and fascinating creatures and it would be wonderful if we had some longer lived ones to watch and spend time with.

      Octopus Howard Families? o.O

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    23. Re:Octopi are Awesome! by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 1

      We just kill each other and let the bodies rot...

    24. Re:Octopi are Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes you do. Note the Cuttlefish did not attack its owner, just thouse whom its owner designated as legitimate targets.

      And with my army of Killer Cuttlefish I will take over the world, well coastal areas at any rate : )

    25. Re:Octopi are Awesome! by Mozk · · Score: 1

      Ha, if you visit the xkcd forums, you'll find that with each comic he draws come quite a few people saying, "Get out of my head!"

      --
      No existe.
    26. Re:Octopi are Awesome! by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      Hell, they've got an intelligence that exceeds that of many people I've met.

    27. Re:Octopi are Awesome! by PitaBred · · Score: 2, Informative

      Green blood is copper based (hemocyanin), red blood is iron based (hemoglobin).

      According to Wikipedia, they're actually MORE efficient in cold water than hemoglobin is, which is why many marine animals (like horseshoe crabs and such) have hemocyanin-based blood.

    28. Re:Octopi are Awesome! by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      Get someone who can cook it right, then. It shouldn't taste like shoe rubber unless it's overcooked.

      But I prefer squid to octopus...

    29. Re:Octopi are Awesome! by genner · · Score: 1

      We just kill each other and let the bodies rot...

      I plan on being cremated :P.

    30. Re:Octopi are Awesome! by rpillala · · Score: 1

      Careful. This road leads to hentai.

      --
      When the axe came to the forest, the trees said, "Look out - the handle was once one of us."
    31. Re:Octopi are Awesome! by Darth_brooks · · Score: 1

      mental note: h4rm0ny - possible octopus sympathizer.

      --
      There are some people that if they don't know, you can't tell 'em.
    32. Re:Octopi are Awesome! by Abreu · · Score: 1

      Everybody knows that the only reason the Mind Flayers, the Drow or the Kuo-Toa have not succesfully invaded the surface world is because they are way too busy fighting each other.

      --
      No sig for the moment.
  11. Cues... by perlhacker14 · · Score: 1

    Cue the nerd insults: 'Yeah, well, you're an octopus!'

  12. Renata looks like a hottie to me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.sims.org.au/research/Pronk-MQ-octopus.cfm
    http://www.smh.com.au/news/national/octopuses-give-eight-thumbs-up-for-highdefinition-tv/2008/12/19/1229189886181.html

    1. Re:Renata looks like a hottie to me... by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1


      So she does. But I suspect she'd just think of me as a creature with no personality and far too many arms. ;)

      (though that is only half-right).

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    2. Re:Renata looks like a hottie to me... by Whiteox · · Score: 1
      --
      Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
    3. Re:Renata looks like a hottie to me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://profile.ak.facebook.com/v228/1406/121/s211600467_1695.jpg

    4. Re:Renata looks like a hottie to me... by Whiteox · · Score: 1

      OMG! I may just change disciplines. I didn't know that Marine Biology attracted women like that.
      Do you think its got something to do with hot Sydney summer beaches, bikinis, suntan oil and surfing??? Looks like she's got a hottie friend too!

      --
      Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
    5. Re:Renata looks like a hottie to me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't know that Marine Biology attracted women like that.

      Are you kidding me??? Marine Biology is the cliche "I am a hot chick and that is what I want to do when I grow up" major.

    6. Re:Renata looks like a hottie to me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very Pronkable...

    7. Re:Renata looks like a hottie to me... by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 1

      Really, you only need ONE arm.

  13. Octopusses announce Reseacher has no Personality by itsybitsy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Oceanianica News (Deep under Chowder Bay): In an important press release today the octopuses involved in the Cowderbay Excursion report on their scientific excursion into the ape territory to assess the intelligence and personality of the horrific to look at four creatures with four limbs that only move on two of them that call themselves humans. The 32 members of the scientific team were specially trained in observational techniques that emphasized uniform behaviors so as to minimize the impact of their presence on the lower life forms being studied.

    A four limbed creature who self identifies as "Miss Pronk" was extensively interviewed and examined. She attempted to use primitive externalized colored skin image projectors to get the 32 excursion members to react. Her primitive attempts at communication failed with what she called "PAL". Then the subject attempted to communicate using something she called "HDTV" by showing images of food. At the sight of a captive octopus the excursion members elected for a quick withdrawal back to the forward base camp in Chowder Bay (human's name for it). The members of the excursion ensured at all times to not reveal any individuality by using the uniform motion training instilled in all octopus from birth.

    An assessment from the team after their safe return to Aquatica City was that the human subject lacked any personality during any of the tests. She failed to move on her two upper limbs and also failed to use her lower limbs except for moving about. In addition she had enclosed herself inside an flexible and rigid outer shell and refused all attempts to leave her shell so that we could examine her personality up close.

    Naturally the humans require additional study. Under no circumstances should attempts be made to communicate with them until the safe return of the captive octopus hostages can be executed.

    In addition it was discovered that while some humans have an additional appendage that is usually kept in the shell the human self identified as Miss Pronk failed to accept any of the advances by the others to have her interact with this appendage. For this reason we conclude that Miss Pronk has no personality.

  14. Re:Tax dollars at work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Almost as wonderful as people who are so fixated and fanatical as to interject inane and unrelated political comment in a science story about octopus.

  15. Never the same color by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they see PAL as a series of stills, do they get visibly angry when forced to watch NTSC?

    1. Re:Never the same color by WD · · Score: 2, Informative

      You do realize that NTSC has a faster frame rate than PAL, right?

    2. Re:Never the same color by thesupraman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And ms.Pronk does not seem to realise that even PAL has a field rate of 50Hz, not 25 (and on many new flatscreens that is horrible redisplayed at 60hz..)

      Field rate is what atters when it comes to seeing refreshed motion, so if they can easily see issues in PAL, they will also see issues in wither 50i or 50p 'HDTV' signals.

      So, its either a resolution issue, or more likely an error in measurement.

      Of course the reason most home 'hunting' animals (dogs, cats) dont react much to tv is that they have excellent depth perception, so the flat screen is obviously false to them.

    3. Re:Never the same color by rowp · · Score: 1

      And you don't seem to realise that ms.Pronk did not write this article. This was posted by a user of 'SD' who stumbled upon an Australian news article. Who then posted a mashed up version of what he found in the news article. News article, not scientific paper. If you didn't know by now, Renata did not write this article herself, unless you have seen her actual published findings i wouldn't be making comments like this.

    4. Re:Never the same color by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously? Most dogs don't react to the TV? Not being sarcastic. It makes sense that they wouldn't, I'm genuinely surprised. My dog gets very excited when he sees other dogs on television. I've even tried it with mute on to make sure it's not just the sound of another dog barking and panting that's exciting him..

      Of course, he IS rather stupid.

    5. Re:Never the same color by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And ms.Pronk does not seem to realise that even PAL has a field rate of 50Hz, not 25 (and on many new flatscreens that is horrible redisplayed at 60hz..)

      That's a wonderful thought until you realize that something may actually see that as 25 independent oddly-striped (interlaced) images per second rather than 50 frames per second.

    6. Re:Never the same color by Nazlfrag · · Score: 1

      It's 50 Hz interlaced, making for 25 full frames per second. If our persistence of vision didn't kick in at 25 fps we would not benefit from interlacing and we would not see smooth motion at all. Interlacing might make the motion smoother, but it doesn't help at low frame rates, it just makes everything look messy. Try watching a 12 fps video interlaced to 24 Hz to see this.

    7. Re:Never the same color by bar-agent · · Score: 1

      Of course, he IS rather stupid.

      Yes; you did say he was a dog.

      --
      i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
    8. Re:Never the same color by Cassander · · Score: 1

      Of course the reason most home 'hunting' animals (dogs, cats) dont react much to tv is that they have excellent depth perception, so the flat screen is obviously false to them.

      I have observed that cats and dogs seem oblivious to the TV, and I have assumed this is the reason, but do you know of any research that backs this up?

      Interestingly, my cat has reacted to the TV exactly once. It was during an episode of Star Trek TNG (I forget which one). Data's cat made a noise and my cat (who was sleeping on the floor in front of the TV) completely freaked out and went into high-alert ready-for-combat mode. After cautiously approaching and sniffing the TV and then leaping away from it, he decided that it wasn't a big deal after all and he could go back to sleep. Weirdest reaction I've ever seen, and when I backed up the episode to replay that moment to see if he would respond again he totally ignored it.

      --
      Knowledge != Intelligence
  16. HDTV inaccuracies in article by WD · · Score: 4, Informative

    Ok, a couple of problems here:
    - Standard video is not 24 frames per second, as the original article states. That's the speed for film, not video.
    - 1080i HDTV is displayed at the same frame rate as standard definition TV. In PAL land, that's 50 fields per second, which makes 25 frames per second.
    - Even at 720p's 50 full frames per second in PAL countries, that does not give the perception of smoother motion. SDTV will give you 50 half-resolution fields per second, and 720P will give you 50 full-resolution frames per second. The motion smoothness will be essentially the same. The real difference is the resolution delivered with each picture.

    1. Re:HDTV inaccuracies in article by DigitAl56K · · Score: 5, Informative

      1080i HDTV is displayed at the same frame rate as standard definition TV. In PAL land, that's 50 fields per second, which makes 25 frames per second.

      Only if it's 1080i25/1080i30 and not 1080i50/1080i60

      Even at 720p's 50 full frames per second in PAL countries, that does not give the perception of smoother motion.

      Yes it does. There are no interlacing artifacts for the horizontal component of the motion.

      The motion smoothness will be essentially the same

      No, because the claim is that the octopus can see the individual pictures (i.e. fields) at 25/30 fps. Where there is significant horizontal motion in an a picture where each field is only updated every 1/25th of a second, the octopus may be able to see each field being updated. At 50 progressive fields per second the entire image is updated at twice the rate. This of course depends on the display type.

      We have to remember that one reason CRT's look "smooth" to us is persistence of vision. We don't notice the light intensity fade over 1/25th of a second as the electron beam scans out the rest of the picture. However, the octopus's persistence of vision may be different. Imagine for a moment that the octopus see's the old "standard definition" display the same was as we see an old CRT when viewed through a camcorder: With big bands running across it due to the scanning done by the electron beam. Maybe with HDTV, where CRT technology is less likely to be used, this is no longer the case and thus the octopus sees the picture as real.

      Anyway, to me this is perfectly plausible. We shouldn't be dismissive so quickly towards a behavior that has actually been observed for several subjects, even if we can't instantly explain it.

    2. Re:HDTV inaccuracies in article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the film speed that matters here though. If standard video is filmed at 24 FPS and HDTV is filmed at 50 FPS, then to something capable of effectively recognizing motion at 50 FPS, the video filmed at 24 FPS will not appear to move about every other visual recognition period.

      It's like if when reading this you saw "TThhiiss iiss aa ssaammppllee sseenntteennccee.." instead of "This is a sample sentence."

    3. Re:HDTV inaccuracies in article by caitsith01 · · Score: 1

      Thank you for saving me some typing. This is half the reason why the average consumer has no idea what they are doing when they buy a TV - the media constantly confusing the terminology in this way.

      --
      Read Pynchon.
    4. Re:HDTV inaccuracies in article by Mana+Mana · · Score: 1

      Whayousay?

      They are trying to reach the octopus' persistence of vision. Rate NOT resolution, IOW.

    5. Re:HDTV inaccuracies in article by Oyvino · · Score: 1

      1080i HDTV is displayed at the same frame rate as standard definition TV. In PAL land, that's 50 fields per second, which makes 25 frames per second.

      Only if it's 1080i25/1080i30 and not 1080i50/1080i60

      There is no such thing as 1080i25 or 1080i30. In HD 1080 you have interlaced 50 or 60 fields per second and progressive 24, 25 and 30 frames per second. In addition you have and option of 50p and 60p in HD 720.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hdtv#Standard_frame_or_field_rates

  17. Octopuses Have No Personalities and Enjoy HDTV by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 5, Funny

    So, in other words, they're just like most slashdotters?

    --
    Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
    1. Re:Octopuses Have No Personalities and Enjoy HDTV by lxs · · Score: 5, Funny

      Actually most of us are Slashdotters. We tolerate you humans on our site, but only barely. Statistically we are four times as likely to get first post than you twoarmers, but breaking in on underseas cables is a pain in the suckers.
      --
      May your tentacles catch many turtles.

    2. Re:Octopuses Have No Personalities and Enjoy HDTV by rubycodez · · Score: 2, Funny

      they like tentacle sex too, so specifically are like hentai anime otako slashdotters.

    3. Re:Octopuses Have No Personalities and Enjoy HDTV by Alsee · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ahh, that explains all the Slashdot Suggestion submissions wanting to replace the -1 Troll moderation option with -1 Squid.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    4. Re:Octopuses Have No Personalities and Enjoy HDTV by jcgf · · Score: 1
      Far out...

      What do you use for input devices?

    5. Re:Octopuses Have No Personalities and Enjoy HDTV by garyebickford · · Score: 1

      So, that must be what happened to the cables off Sicily yesterday - your cable-penetration systems must have failed! The secret is out!

      --
      It's easier to be a result of the past, but more fun to be a cause of the future! http://www.spacefinancegroup.com/
    6. Re:Octopuses Have No Personalities and Enjoy HDTV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, well us human slashdotters don't DIE after we make contact with a girl. So that gives us a good bit of ammo, buddy :D

    7. Re:Octopuses Have No Personalities and Enjoy HDTV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No one has welcomed their eight armed overlords?

      Dale

  18. Test and control by Zebra_X · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "that it might see standard PAL video, at 25 fps, as a series of stills. She tried HDTV (50 fps)"

    So she changed the resolution, and the framerate... and so she now does not know if it is the pixel desity or the framerate that made the difference. In addition, it would be good to note the display type as analog and digital displays work differently...

  19. Error in TFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Her name is actually ANITA. Anita Pronk.

    1. Re:Error in TFA by rowp · · Score: 1

      WHAT? LOL Oh sorry i'll tell her at our family BBQ her name is now Anita, Renata just isn't working

    2. Re:Error in TFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Offtopic? It was informative, you moron.

  20. All this talk of Octupus... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...made me really hungry!

  21. No Personality? by QuantumG · · Score: 5, Funny
    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
    1. Re:No Personality? by hobbit · · Score: 2

      Mod parent up -- nice animation! (And no Rickroll)

      --
      "Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools, because they have to say something" - Plato
    2. Re:No Personality? by antdude · · Score: 1

      Not a liar! True. I checked too. :)

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    3. Re:No Personality? by BotnetZombie · · Score: 1

      Damn you! Is there a sequel?

  22. this is... by acedotcom · · Score: 0

    PRONKING amazing!

    --
    they say it is often more relevant then the comment above, all we know is its called the Sig!
  23. Those wacky austrailian octopi games ... by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 4, Funny

    This almost seems like an Ig Nobel coming in early. But being that this is the holiday season, I'll bite, at the expense of our Australian folks.

    She recruited 32 gloomy octopuses from the waters of Chowder Bay.

    Um, not for me to peck around at Australian dialect, but I think the proper word would be incarcerated.

    Previously, researchers have reported little success when showing video to octopuses.

    WTF?!?! Austrailian scientists: "Hey, what should we do this afternoon?" "Ah, let's show some video to the octopi." Try "Buckaroo Banzai," I think that they will like that one. It's kinda funny, if you understand octopi humor. "Miami Vice" is right out.

    She tried HDTV (50 fps) and her subjects reacted to the videos of a crab, another octopus, or a swinging bottle on the end of a string.

    After this treatment, I'd grab for the bottle in an instant.

    A further discovery is that octopuses show no trait of individual personalities, even though they exhibit a high level of intelligence.

    Just the other day I tossed a chick out of the bed, and said, "You *really* have a great personality, but you are so cold and slimy."

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  24. Re:"Octopuses Have No Personalities and Enjoy HDTV by frieko · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I know a few eight-footed people too..

  25. Re:Septopus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It would be a heptopus anyway.

  26. Not a surprise at all... by NerveGas · · Score: 1

    In fact, you'd wonder why she even needed to bother. Most animals have eyesight that is not as good as humans' in acuity, but much better at picking up motion and flicker.

        In other words, while they couldn't read text at a distance (even if they could read), regular TV looks quite "flickery" to them. That's the reason why most dogs are not interested in watching television.

        Also, the octopus eye is probably much like a dog's eye: In every structure of the canine eyeball, they have sacrificed detailed acuity in favor of light-gathering ability. The sensitivity to motion is what still lets them hunt their prey.

    --
    Oh, you're not stuck, you're just unable to let go of the onion rings.
  27. Me too! by Steve1952 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I also have no personality and prefer HDTV!

    1. Re:Me too! by fm6 · · Score: 1

      So, how many arms do you have?

  28. Pronk! by tzjanii · · Score: 5, Funny

    I want to thank all of the noble Slashdot readers who tagged this story "Pronk," yet again proving their intelligence and foresight in picking a tag which I am sure will occur again and often in the future. Their brave efforts at usefully categorizing articles never ceases to astound.

    --
    Slashdot is a pretty cool guy eh posts dupes and doesn't afraid of anything.
    1. Re:Pronk! by superstick58 · · Score: 1

      There's still hope. Maybe Travis Hafner will develope a technologically superior workout regimen or install some bionic implants to improve his baseball performance. Then, another pronk article will be worthy of the Slashdot front page and the now available tag.

  29. Best Headline Ever by jeffkjo1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Octopuses Have No Personalities and Enjoy HDTV

    This has to be the single greatest slashdot headline I've ever read.... research performed on two seemingly unrelated things combined into one project. Cue bad jokes about what television shows those with 'no personalities' must enjoy.

    1. Re:Best Headline Ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She must have shown them some of those old Hanna-Barbera Squiddly Diddly cartoons.

    2. Re:Best Headline Ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My personal favorite is still the one about "the Japanese agricultural ministry is not in charge of Gundam." Of course, that line was in the summary rather than the title IIRC.

  30. No personality and likes HDTV? by nEoN+nOoDlE · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Sounds like my ex.

    --
    Don't trust a bull's horn, a doberman's tooth, a runaway horse or me.
    1. Re:No personality and likes HDTV? by Spatial · · Score: 2, Funny

      Your ex was an octopus?

      ...how are they in the sack?

    2. Re:No personality and likes HDTV? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try adding "sy" to the end of that, and you got it ;-)

    3. Re:No personality and likes HDTV? by DigitalSorceress · · Score: 1

      Hentai anyone?

      (sorry, could not resist)

      --

      The Digital Sorceress
  31. Hit or...? by Theaetetus · · Score: 1

    Is there really a need to identify whether or not Pronk is married? What bearing does this have on the story? Or is it really just a way to subtly discount her research 'cause it came from, you know, a woman.

    1. Re:Hit or...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good question!

      I wonder why she decided to record her status in the 'not-married' nomenclature of Miss, instead of the 'N/A' nomenclature of Ms. that you feel is necessary for all women to do, no matter if they choose otherwise.

      Maybe you could also explain why you think her being a woman has anything to do with this?

      See, when you point, those 4 other fingers actually ARE pointing back at you...

    2. Re:Hit or...? by rowp · · Score: 1

      omg omg omg omg omg - its a girl quick everyone try to act cool maybe she'll notice us........ lol....

  32. Re:"Octopuses Have No Personalities and Enjoy HDTV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I read that headline, I thought it applied to many of the people I know as well...

    To put it simply Octopuses are natural born couch potatoes. Makes you wonder how they'd react to a beer can?

  33. Kinda like humans... by NoKaOi · · Score: 5, Funny

    "A further discovery is that octopuses show no trait of individual personalities, even though they exhibit a high level of intelligence."

    In other words, they are like 90%+ of the human population. Except for the high level of intelligence part, of course.

  34. Lifespan isn't the most critical. by DrYak · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What's hindering them from developing a civilization soon ( In geological time of course ;) is the fact that their lifespans are so short.

    Humanity has been able to carry on numerous projects on a bigger scale than the average human's lifespan.

    My personal idea about the prerequisite for a civilisation are :
    - A decent way to interact with the environment (at least octopi have plenty of tentacles - dolphins on the other hand, however big their brain is, don't have the physically mean to put their brain at work on much things)
    - A good a quite developed communication system (we humans have speech - octopi seem to have colour-changing communication)
    - A life cycle including nurturing the small. If the parents of a specie have to take care of their kids during their first months/years, that gives also a chance to teach them (thanks to good communication) what they have learned to do with their arms. As opposed to animals whose children are 100% autonomous after birth and can immediately wander on their own.
    That's where this whole business of "programmed death after reproduction" sucks. Not because 4-5 years is short, but because they are genetically programmed to self-destruct (or starve to death if the self-destruction glands are removed) not long after laying eggs (about the time the eggs hatch according to wikipedia).
    There's no nurturing of the kids. Whatever cool and neat trick the parent octopi may have learnt dies with them. They don't get a chance to transmit it to their children.

    Because of this no culture can be carried on, and with this : no civilisation.

    But don't despair there's a kind of mutation called neoteny where some individual are able to reproduce without having acquired all characteristics of adult and still retaining some juvenile trait. Some future octopi may mutate and be able to reproduce, yet not die once the eggs hatches.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
    1. Re:Lifespan isn't the most critical. by supernova_hq · · Score: 4, Funny

      A good a quite developed communication system

      ...and that boys and girls, is the definition of irony.

    2. Re:Lifespan isn't the most critical. by hobbit · · Score: 1

      Humanity has been able to carry on numerous projects on a bigger scale than the average human's lifespan.

      It's a wonder that drosophilae haven't got it together yet.

      --
      "Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools, because they have to say something" - Plato
    3. Re:Lifespan isn't the most critical. by SwabTheDeck · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Communication is critical to developing civilization and lifespan is critical to developing communication. Let's pretend for a moment that octupuses have the same cognitive capacity as human beings and that they have somehow established a form of communication as verbose as our spoken/written language. It takes a human child at least 5 years to gain reasonable command of the language to express his/herself effectively, and many more years after that to communicate complex ideas about society. The brightest of us may be able to grasp these harder concepts by the late teens, while most people probably won't quite get it until at least their mid-20s. If octopuses are only living to the age of 5, they'll never be able to establish a suitably verbose language, nor will their offspring be able to absorb and command this language before their own deaths.

    4. Re:Lifespan isn't the most critical. by feepness · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Dolphins and octopi also have the unfortunate lack of means to readily access fire, a prerequisite of moving beyond the most basic of tool use.

    5. Re:Lifespan isn't the most critical. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it really isn't. Your failure to point out irony, trite as it was, was more apropos.

    6. Re:Lifespan isn't the most critical. by totally+bogus+dude · · Score: 1

      There isn't really any reason to assume that the rate of human learning is applicable to any non-human species. Short-lived species may spend a larger proportion of their time in a higher awareness state than humans. They may also need considerably less sleep. In addition, newborn octopuses may be far more intelligent/capable than a newborn human, further reducing the amount of time spent learning the basics of living before starting to learn "important" stuff. If the parents routinely die before the babies hatch, then the babies must emerge with the ability to feed themselves and probably communicate as well (because nobody's around to teach them) - which would put them far ahead of a human baby.

    7. Re:Lifespan isn't the most critical. by drew · · Score: 1

      Just because they can't learn from their parents doesn't mean that they couldn't learn from other octopi. If every newborn octopus spent the first two years of his life following around a three year old octopus, they could learn quite a bit. What they lack is not the ability to reproduce without dying, but rather the instinct to congregate with other individuals for mutual benefit. This instinct has developed in many unintelligent species, and has failed to develop in some other intelligent species, so I would say things aren't completely hopeless for them, but I would expect that if they don't already have any social tendencies, it would take an awfully long time for them to develop.

      --
      If I don't put anything here, will anyone recognize me anymore?
    8. Re:Lifespan isn't the most critical. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's fairly presumptuous. Fire is useful for many things, but complex tool use isn't one of them.

    9. Re:Lifespan isn't the most critical. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fire permits access to concentrated and quickly released energy, and molecular changes (phase changes, chemical alteration). I guess they could hang out near thermal vents...but yeah, the Discovery Channel's, "The Future is Wild" had the cephelopods moving onto the land......

    10. Re:Lifespan isn't the most critical. by alienw · · Score: 1

      Goddammit, it's not "octopi", it's "octopuses". We speak English, not Latin, and in any case "octopus" comes from Greek.

    11. Re:Lifespan isn't the most critical. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Couldn't the group pass on culture to the children?
      If they live in social groups bigger than a mating pair and their offspring, 'uncles and aunts' could pass the culture on to the children as the parents die.

    12. Re:Lifespan isn't the most critical. by Almahtar · · Score: 1

      That assumes they take the same path we did towards tools and technology. I'd think a successful path towards technology would be very different under water since there are huge differences in so very many environmental conditions. Many of them would make it harder to do things we do on land, but many would make it easier to do things we couldn't on land.

    13. Re:Lifespan isn't the most critical. by osu-neko · · Score: 1

      Humanity has been able to carry on numerous projects on a bigger scale than the average human's lifespan.

      Not recently. That worked back in the day, but modern civilizations are democratic, and democracies can't do anything effectively beyond the length of an election cycle or two. A politician has no reason to pursue any action that won't yield rewards while he or she is still in office. Modern corporations aren't much better...

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    14. Re:Lifespan isn't the most critical. by smoker2 · · Score: 1

      I'm sure I saw a report recently that demonstrated that although octopuses are very quick learners, they have very bad memories, and have to re-learn today, something that they were accomplished at yesterday. That kind of ruins any hope of passing on any knowledge to their young.

    15. Re:Lifespan isn't the most critical. by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      Humanity has been able to carry on numerous projects on a bigger scale than the average human's lifespan.

      Yet in democratic nations, humanity is (mostly) unable to carry on projects which would take longer than an electoral term...

      And television writers unable to create a consistent storyline which lasts longer than 45 minutes.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    16. Re:Lifespan isn't the most critical. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dolphins on the other hand, however big their brain is, don't have the physically mean to put their brain at work on much things

      You mean "didn't", right?

    17. Re:Lifespan isn't the most critical. by E++99 · · Score: 1

      That's where this whole business of "programmed death after reproduction" sucks. Not because 4-5 years is short, but because they are genetically programmed to self-destruct (or starve to death if the self-destruction glands are removed) not long after laying eggs (about the time the eggs hatch according to wikipedia).
      There's no nurturing of the kids. Whatever cool and neat trick the parent octopi may have learnt dies with them. They don't get a chance to transmit it to their children.

      Because of this no culture can be carried on, and with this : no civilisation.

      Culture among species such as chimps and orangutans seems to be perpetuated more between peers than from parents to offspring. Technological culture even more so -- as simian technology pertains to acquiring food, it's not learned until one is old enough to acquire it for himself, and then it is learned from one's food-gathering peers. Even among humans technological culture is passed down mostly by non=parents, but rather upon entering into adulthood by the hunting party/craftsman to whom one is apprenticed/trade school/university/on-the-job training. Moral culture is a different story, but moral culture seems more unique to humans.

    18. Re:Lifespan isn't the most critical. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Their uncle can teach the newborns.
      If they live in community, the problem you describe is easy to solve.

    19. Re:Lifespan isn't the most critical. by feepness · · Score: 1

      I can see hitting the stone age without fire.

      I cannot see getting past any point which requires any sort of metallurgy without it. There is simply no widespread and simple source of concentrated energy.

      Plasma vents? Not nearly widespread enough.

    20. Re:Lifespan isn't the most critical. by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      You are forgetting the ability to accumulate information and pass it on to others. While oral communication and a great memory may accomplish this for small groups of individuals, for organizing larger groups I believe something akin to written communication is necessary.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    21. Re:Lifespan isn't the most critical. by genner · · Score: 1

      And television writers unable to create a consistent storyline which lasts longer than 45 minutes.

      You can pry my mini-series from my cold dead hand.

    22. Re:Lifespan isn't the most critical. by Duodecimal · · Score: 1

      At which point they will eat their children.

    23. Re:Lifespan isn't the most critical. by Cassander · · Score: 1

      A good a quite developed communication system

      ...and that boys and girls, is the definition of irony.

      I'd say that the fact that we can still understand what the parent was trying to say despite their mangling of "proper" english is a testament to how awesome our communication system is, not an example of irony.

      --
      Knowledge != Intelligence
    24. Re:Lifespan isn't the most critical. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's hindering them from developing a civilization soon ( In geological time of course ;) is the fact that their lifespans are so short.

      The issue is not lacking the time to complete projects in their life-times. The issue is that they are of less-than-human intellect and die by the age of five.

      Imagine if humanity was made up entirely of severely retarded 5-year olds. We'd be devoured by neighboring primates before even figuring out to bang the rocks together.

      It would be just like Wisconsin.

    25. Re:Lifespan isn't the most critical. by rpillala · · Score: 1

      To maintain information beyond the lifespan either requires a very comprehensive tradition of memory, or the ability to store information outside one's body. Having that would go a long way for the octopus civilization we're building here on Slashdot.

      Something I got from watching Bill Nye!

      --
      When the axe came to the forest, the trees said, "Look out - the handle was once one of us."
    26. Re:Lifespan isn't the most critical. by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      You can pry my mini-series from my cold dead hand.

      Miniseries... gah...

      Contemporary TV content is just... awful. 'Heroes' comes to mind. What octopus would watch that crap?

      Buying into HDTV is like... buying a high-end gaming PC in order to play World of Warcraft.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    27. Re:Lifespan isn't the most critical. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A good a quite developed communication system

      ...and that boys and girls, is the definition of irony.

      And that, gentlemen, is the definition of wishful thinking.

    28. Re:Lifespan isn't the most critical. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's quite a lot of sunlight. A great dea of that is being concentrated by phytoplankton into energy accessible to the digestive systems of large whales, for example. It stands to reason that if the digestive system can store enough energy to deliver *megawatts* of power (Blue Whale mass ~ 177 Mg can move @ ~14 m/s in bursts), then energy storage and high power production at low temperatures in the ocean is not a physical problem per se.

      We also applied biomechanics to engineer our power and energy problems on land -- how would you have done much better than a horse or elephant only two hundred years ago? -- so a smart in-ocean species would presumably use the resources at hand (or tentacle, or flipper, or fin, or paw) and harness ropes (readily available from kelp, for example) and sieves and the like to a "domesticated" work animal. Just like humans did using plant matter and animals like oxen.

      There is also quite a lot of wave power, and fibrous nets can extract substantial work from differential motion at angles widely separated from the plane of a 2d net. That's just at the surface; there are underwater currents that would be more accessible to species who are comfortable being underwater for extended periods, so more complicated topologies are available. Energy could start being stored mechanically (twisting a fibrous construct like a wind-up spring). Metals are not really necessary for this; humans didn't use them when building early machines or structures -- vegetable matter was sufficient, with the occasional use of stone (the mining of which did not really need metal).

      The development of a permanent record of knowledge is the major obvious problem, in order to make major long-term engineering projects (especially those lasting many years) feasible, however humans figured out greasy pencils on substances to which the grease adheres, specifically for drawing and writing underwater. Humans also figured out making records with knotted bits of rope. A writing/recording analogue is plausible.

      As to how the technology would advance from there, who knows? They could build something along the lines of e.g. Babbage's analytical engine using available resources; metal is not strictly necessary, it just facilitated miniaturization and acceleration.

      One obvious direction of exploration would involve constructing scaffolding for breeding coral colonies onto ("concrete"), taking advantage of the ease of producing cellulosic strands, taking advantage of the layer boundaries that are a little less sharp and inaccessible than for dry land dwellers, and so forth.

      We developed from nomadism via agrarianism; some sort of farming analogue would probably develop once permanent structures were being laid down by an ocean-dwelling intelligence. Indeed, we can see that right now in coral reefs, which as far as we know are not planned or widely managed by the somewhat intelligent species inhabiting them.

      I will end by partially agreeing with you: I don't see how an ocean-dwelling species could develop our technology, however our fire was just a rapid oxidization of recently-alive vegetable matter. They have lots of recently-alive vegetable matter that would require some R&D to figure out how to rapidly convert into heat. "On shore energy facilities"? Who knows. Give it a few hundred thousand years of trial and error, like we had.

      (Perhaps they'd skip fire and go right to hydrolysis and oxyhydrogen combustion, and develop other approaches or simply not be as constrained as humans by lighting (use bioluminescence?), cooking (humans have used salting instead, and we aren't especially good at eliminating salt from ourselves), or farming (slash-and-burn)).

  35. Re:Tax dollars at work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're complaining about gov't funding for octopus research instead of the 18 billion for the auto companies, or the 800 billion bailout for the financial sector?

    That's kind of like being gang raped by every stockbroker on Wall Street and then complaining about the jism in your hair.

  36. It's Chowder... by fireman+sam · · Score: 1

    CHOW-DER!, say it Frenchy!!!

    --
    it is only after a long journey that you know the strength of the horse.
  37. and why would they exhibit personality in a lab by unity100 · · Score: 1

    that they are held captive, in probable danger of life, confined in various containers ?

    do people exhibit their personalities and normal behaviour when thrown to jail temporarily ?

    1. Re:and why would they exhibit personality in a lab by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      Prisoners have individual personalities, your analogy is flawed.

      Dogs and horses have personalities, and they are held in captivity. Even small pet lizards seem to have behaviors that are unique to each individual, and they are most certainly confined in small containers for their entire life.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    2. Re:and why would they exhibit personality in a lab by unity100 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      prisoners have individual personalities indeed, BUT, no prisoner starts to immediately exhibit their personal traits within days, even months of their arrest, and incarceration.

      if, they feel they are in immediate danger of their lives, they even may not exhibit those traits for years to come at all.

      dogs and horses are pets. they are of the breeds that are accustomed to being with man. most of them are already offspring of other pets, and born within the care of humans, or live near them. they do not see them as an immediate threat.

      YET, even any dog, cat that has been born stray, or has been stray for a long time does not immediately start to exhibit his/her personal traits right away, when you take them into your home and even feed them, until they feel they are safe.

    3. Re:and why would they exhibit personality in a lab by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that they are held captive, in probable danger of life, confined in various containers ?

      do people exhibit their personalities and normal behaviour when thrown to jail temporarily ?

      'Probable danger' - this makes me laugh. I think the only probable danger is being injured by them when under study which does not happen very often.

    4. Re:and why would they exhibit personality in a lab by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      Yea. That's not how it works. I don't really care if a person's personality is different under extreme circumstances. And CO will tell you that each new prisoner is different.

      sorry but stray animals have different behaviors too, even if it isn't the personality that would come about in a setting where they are more comfortable.

      (why am I even having this conversation? your assertions are stupid and the topic, so far, seems pointless)

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    5. Re:and why would they exhibit personality in a lab by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      I think the point is that their reactions were random, i.e. they didn't act the same but there was no consistent difference between each other in their reactions. If you take people, no matter the situation, they'll have consistent reactions depending on their personality whether they're John Rambo or your grandmother.

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    6. Re:and why would they exhibit personality in a lab by unity100 · · Score: 1

      you shouldnt have started it in the first place. if you are a person that can actually utter "your assertions are stupid" to someone you are debating with, next time you see a debate, shut the hell up, and dont embarrass yourself or waste others' time.

  38. Re:"Octopuses Have No Personalities and Enjoy HDTV by supernova_hq · · Score: 1

    ...her subjects reacted to the videos of a crab, another octopus, or a swinging bottle on the end of a string

    Can we assume it was a beer bottle?

  39. Re:Tax dollars at work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    That's kind of like being gang raped by every stockbroker on Wall Street and then complaining about the jism in your hair.

    that's still a valid complaint, though.

  40. Plural of octopus != octopi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While -i is the plural for some Latin -us endings (the other option being a stem change followed by -a as in genus/genera), octopus is a Greek word. So the plural is "octopodes".

    (For non-Latin / Greek students: ignore this, saying "octopodes" will give you a reputation as "that weird guy" at best and a "grammer[sic] nazi" at worst.

  41. It seriously took this long for it to be said? by spartin92 · · Score: 1

    I for one, welcome our octopus overlords.

    1. Re:It seriously took this long for it to be said? by Circlotron · · Score: 1

      Beat me to it. Lucky I did a page search first :0)

  42. Grigori by k2enemy · · Score: 1

    I wonder if the Octopus's name is Grigori and has a penchant for attacking women on the beach?

  43. Re:Octopusses announce Reseacher has no Personalit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I really can't stand it when people who can't write try to do funny news articles.

  44. Sense of humor people.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You do realize the whole article is a joke, right?

  45. Would they look stupid picking standard def TV by HangingChad · · Score: 1

    Octopuses give eight thumbs up for high-def TV

    Well, duh. What kind of self-respecting cephalopod would opt for standard definition in this day and age?

    --
    That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
    1. Re:Would they look stupid picking standard def TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thumbs?

  46. Re:Septopus by heptapod · · Score: 1

    Oh, would it now?

  47. Re:Octopusses announce Reseacher has no Personalit by just_a_monkey · · Score: 1

    Oh, shush. Nothing wrong with that one. Not hilarious, but a respectable attempt.

    --
    How inappropriate to call this planet Earth, when clearly it is Ocean.
  48. Re:"Octopuses Have No Personalities and Enjoy HDTV by The+Great+Pretender · · Score: 1

    It was an Australian researcher, so my answer has to be yes.

    --
    A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
  49. Red Mage? by Nimey · · Score: 4, Funny

    Is that you?

    --
    Hail Eris, full of mischief...

    E pluribus sanguinem
    1. Re:Red Mage? by RedWizzard · · Score: 1

      Is that you?

      No.

  50. Maturity? by Stephen+Ma · · Score: 4, Insightful
    The researcher didn't say (or the article didn't report) how mature the octopuses were. Humans tend to have more personality the older they get (until they are elderly); perhaps the same is true for octopuses.

    So I wouldn't pass judgement on octopus personality until somebody compares younger octopuses to older ones.

    1. Re:Maturity? by MonsterMasher · · Score: 1

      Perhaps true.. but could you think of experimental conditions where you 'normalized' for this?

      If you could interact with octopuses (same specie) until there get to know you .. then release them and later re-engage with a method of measuring personality.

      Dam! I should have been a scientist - I was heading that way before I started visiting a web site called slashdo!

  51. Don't be so superficial by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

    With tentacles like this, who needs personality?

    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  52. A Deepness in the Sky by adavies42 · · Score: 1

    Reminds me of A Deepness in the Sky--the aliens there had such good eyesight, they found human video technology hard to work with.

    --
    Media that can be recorded and distributed can be recorded and distributed.
    -kfg
  53. Intentional spelling error? by Firrenzi · · Score: 1

    Call me cynical, but I thought the obvious spelling error may have been placed to simply obtain attention. It seems to have worked considering I am posting.

    --
    The Tao that can be named is not the Tao
  54. The Slashdot Slogan by Laptopdude · · Score: 1

    "Slashdot: News for nerds. Stuff that matters."
    Sure...
    because octopi obviously make up a large part of the prospective HDTV market.

  55. Personality or not by Skratchez · · Score: 0

    opening a jar of vegemite displays dexterity, not intelligence. Only a crazy aussie would think vegemite-seeking behavior was a sign of anything but blind dumb exploration... the results of opening one, presumably underwater, or even in the kitchen are never good.

    1. Re:Personality or not by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      God, must someone really break it down for you? Opening a jar of vegemite displays intelligence because they're smart enough to know they have to unscrew the lid to gain access to the edible contents. Because you have to understand how it works to open it. If you gave a jar of food to a chimp he'd probably try to break it with a stone or even throw it down to break it, and even that would display some intelligence, rather than trying to bite really hard in it.

      --
      You just got troll'd!
  56. Reminds me of an old boyfriend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Sounds a bit like a guy I dated a few years back. He was all over me like an octopus, had no personality and lit up when he saw the latest technology.

    But slashdot readers wouldn't be like that, would they !

  57. Refresh rate by hack++slash · · Score: 2, Funny

    Waitaminute, exactly what type of screens were used in the experiment? CRT? LCD? plasma? DLP? OLED?

    Getting answers to that question would go some way to determining wether it's the differing refresh rate of the image on the screens the octopi are seeing, or the actual framerate of the footage.

    Everyone seems to be hung up with the framerate of the footage but forget that CRT & single chip DLP displays can have a noticable flicker whereas LCD (TFT), plasma (to some extent) & OLED are practically flicker free when a static image is being dispayed.

    --
    To do something right, you often have to roll up your sleeves and get busy.
    1. Re:Refresh rate by nprz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't see why parent was marked funny. I think the answer to that question is important.

      If they are mixing CRT and LCD in their experiment and concluding it has to do with fps (which makes sense for a movie projector... but not a TV), then I think they need to do better research about how they are going to research.

    2. Re:Refresh rate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Salmon sperm enhanced screens, what else?

  58. RON POCTOPUS!!! by corsec67 · · Score: 2, Funny

    RON POCTOPUS!!!

    --
    If I have nothing to hide, don't search me
  59. Re:Octopusses announce Reseacher has no Personalit by rowp · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    wow! From this we can conclude: 1) Your sense of humour is bizarre 2) You are sexually frustrated (we all know why) 3) Due to points 1 and 2 you must therefore be a social retard.

  60. I bet.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Octopuses favorite show is Animal Channel.

  61. Waste of money by RazorSharp · · Score: 1, Funny

    This is what I hate about science. There are so many scientists who seek to know things which are so irrelevant that the only possible good the knowledge could do is satisfy some curiosity. I mean, really, what initiated this study? The article doesn't say.

    The obvious answer to the question, 'why do octopuses react to HD t.v. and not SD' can easily be found through conjecture - 'because octopuses eyes are different than human eyes.' Lo and behold! That's what the study finds. The greater question is, why did anyone give a shit to begin with?

    The personality tidbit is equally useless. First they fail to realize that if you want to pick up on personality traits you need to study a lifeform in its natural habitat. They tried to confuse the octopuses and succeeded. Big whoop.

    Personality in animals - and by personality I don't mean "having repetition in your responses, for example, being consistently bold, or consistently shy, or consistently aggressive." I mean it as an ineffable idea which we, as humans, mutually understand. Predators and omnivores have personalities (people, cats, dogs) while herbavores do not (bunnies, cows). Hence why bunnies make terrible pets.

    --
    "From the depths of my skeptical and rationalist soul, I ask the Lord to protect me from California touchie-feeliedom."
    1. Re:Waste of money by rowp · · Score: 1

      What are 'herbavores'? I love differing opinions but why so angry? Firstly this is not really directly 'Funded'. Renata is a university student and this is simply a study as part of her Honers. Therefore this is not a waste of money. Secondly you claim to know so much about behavior in animals. Can you post some of your scientific evidence. I am not a scientist, nor am i a fool. But i am a nerd because i signed up to slashdot... : )

  62. Obviously survival, not personality by theredshoes · · Score: 2, Funny

    In a second finding, the Macquarie University marine biology researcher resolved a long scientific debate, discovering that octopuses, despite their intelligence, lack individual personalities.

    I am sure an octopus has enough trouble just trying to survive in its habitat and find food to live. I am sure developing a personality is not high on it's priorities, so watching crab on TV would definitely pique it's interest because of the movement and it is a crab, which they must recognize.

    The people on this site love articles about animals and robots for some reason. LOL I have to start reading the Apple section.

  63. Fast nervous system by DrYak · · Score: 1

    There isn't really any reason to assume that the rate of human learning is applicable to any non-human species.

    Specially in the context of the current article, which spawned from the fact that the nervous system of the squid is working so fast that perhaps for them the 25fps of SDTV would not be perceived as motion but as a slideshow.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
    1. Re:Fast nervous system by sunwukong · · Score: 1

      So like Powerpoint -- no wonder they didn't like it!

  64. Re:Octopusses announce Reseacher has no Personalit by Alsee · · Score: 1

    Under no circumstances should attempts be made to communicate with them until the safe return of the captive octopus hostages

    OMG! Bush is an octopus!

    -

    --
    - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  65. Re:"Octopuses Have No Personalities and Enjoy HDTV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I work with many octopi myself.

  66. "otako slashdotters" -- too punny! by zooblethorpe · · Score: 4, Informative

    Oh, that's just too punny -- only I'm not sure if you meant it, or just made a typo.

    For those not familiar with Japanese, otaku is the word for "nerd" -- generally not in any positive sense. The word stems from the roots o-, being a generic honorific prefix to refer to things not your own (simply speaking), and taku or "residence", the underlying implication being someone who never leaves the house.

    Meanwhile, tako is Japanese for "octopus".

    I once heard of an idea for opening a chain of Mexican-themed seafood fast-food restaurants around Japan, called "Tako Taco"...

    Cheers,

    --
    "What in the name of Fats Waller is that?"
    "A four-foot prune."
    1. Re:"otako slashdotters" -- too punny! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't an "anime otaku" just an obsessive fan of japanese animation and hikikomori, or hikki for short, is someone that never leaves the house?
      Although I guess it doesn't matter what exactly otaku means in japan since we are using it as a loanword in English. :)
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Otaku#In_English_and_internationally
      Does actually agree with you, though. So ignore my question. :)

  67. "I have more lives than I do arms!" by superwendel · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    This lady hasn't played FF6. Ultros has more personality than an annoying uncle.

  68. What about the consequences for Tarvuism? by teleny · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Clearly this is in direct contradiction to the Tarvunty, and should be stopped, lest a holy jihad erupt! tarvuism.org

    --
    teleny, friend of cats.
    1. Re:What about the consequences for Tarvuism? by teleny · · Score: 1

      Clearly this is in direct contradiction to the Tarvunty, and should be stopped, lest a holy jihad erupt! tarvuism.org

      eeps! The true link

      --
      teleny, friend of cats.
  69. Cracker + Kraken = Kraker? by sunwolf · · Score: 1

    I think you are thinking of this.

  70. Re:Tax dollars at work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Is increased knowledge of our natural world not a wonderful thing?

  71. I'd like to get my tentacles on her by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And then watch some TV when we're done.

  72. Dr not Dr. by kramulous · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Sorry to go a little grammer nazi on you, but there is no fullstop after Dr. Since the last letter of word to be abbreviated is the last letter of the abbreviation, the fullstop should not be present.

    Doctor - Dr not Dr.
    Mister - Mr not Mr.

    Sorry about that :)

    --
    .
  73. Re:Octopusses announce Reseacher has no Personalit by itsybitsy · · Score: 1

    I know what you mean when your own comments apply to y our own articles.

  74. To Nazi or not to Nazi, that is the question by MarkusQ · · Score: 3, Informative

    Sorry to go a little grammer nazi on you, but there is no fullstop after Dr. Since the last letter of word to be abbreviated is the last letter of the abbreviation, the fullstop should not be present.

    That's been the case in the UK for the last decade or two (longer at Cambridge) but in the U.S. the period is still the norm (as it was pretty much everywhere up until 1950 or so.

    Not to go all history nazi on you or anything...

    --MarkusQ

    P.S. And (switching to spelling Nazi mode) grammar is spelt with an "a."

    1. Re:To Nazi or not to Nazi, that is the question by kramulous · · Score: 1

      P.S. And (switching to spelling Nazi mode) grammar is spelt with an "a."

      Whoops. Thanks for the giggles.

      --
      .
    2. Re:To Nazi or not to Nazi, that is the question by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      If we're being really pedantic, there's a space in "full stop". You also misplaced a "the".

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  75. Ironic... by XDirtypunkX · · Score: 2, Funny

    Because usually it's the ones on TV without a personality!

    I'll be here all week.

  76. Octopi are gamers by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    She tried HDTV (50 fps) and her subjects reacted to the videos of a crab, another octopus, or a swinging bottle on the end of a string

    Obviously Octopi have evolved over millenia to be Nature's perfect PC FPS gamers.

    Not only do they an entire limb to devote to each primary control input (w,a,s,d,q,e plus fire and altfire or jump) but it seems they won't even look at a display unless it starts to approach 60FPS.

    Props to the Oct.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  77. Bah! by CaptSaltyJack · · Score: 1

    This article is pronksurd! You can't go pronking articles about pronks!

  78. With that headline by bahamat · · Score: 1

    I thought the story was going to say they like American Idol.

  79. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Saying that the inconsistent reaction of the octopuses is the only factor proving that they have no personality seems incredibly short sighted to me.

    Have they considered that environmental factors may have a play in the issue? Is it possible that mood could be considered part of having a personality that effects action?

    The inconsistent reaction between octopuses actually proves personality in my mind. If all the octopuses reacted exactly the same, and they are all tested in the same environment, then we we have clear evidence that is an extra factor involved in the process in addition to instinct and environmental reaction.

    I haven't commented on Slashdot in years, but this one really bugged me.

  80. The sad story about Fugly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok, but what about this octopus (about 2/3 down the page)?
    (anecdote is not proof yadda yadda, but still)

  81. Hmmm by JimboFBX · · Score: 1

    If their theory is correct, the fps shouldn't matter, rather it would be - do they react to an LCD tv versus a CRT tv? Not a lot of stuff is recorded at 60 fps so I can't imagine that being the difference. Whether or not the image stays on the screen is much more likely.

  82. 50FPS? - Really? by nmg196 · · Score: 1

    HDTV is NOT 50FPS it's between 24 and 30FPS. At the very best, it's 30FPS displayed at 60Hz but this seems like another example of someone confusing frames per second with refresh rate.

  83. Plural: You're wrong too by DrYak · · Score: 1

    Three things :

    We speak English, not Latin

    1. "octopi" is accepted as a possible plural in english, too. The original poster started the discussion using the analogy-based plural. I kept using it for overall coherency of the thread.

    And like it or not, analogy-based formation of words is actually a quite widespread phenomenon in the evolution of language. There are numerous example of classical greek and latin word - as well as in more modern language - which aren't 100% correct, but look very much like the other words in the category and thus the usage sticks.
    Once usage gets widespread, it begins being accepted as a norm in the language.

    Our spoken language are still evolving, things change, new forms that aren't 100% correct are finally accepted into mainstream. Get over it, and stop bitching on every thread of a forum where there's no guarantee that the other person actually speaks English.

    Or start exclusively using old Sanskrit when communicating on the web, because every modern spoken language (as well as the classical European languages) is an awful corruption of the original Indoeuropean root.

    it's not "octopi", it's "octopuses".

    2. Ok, if you really want to play the anal-retentive grammar nazi type, get your thing straight :
    Feet in Greek is "pous, podes".
    The anal-retentive pedantic plural of "octopus" is "octopodes".

    For the rest of us, whatever the dictionary says, is good enough.
    As I said, octopi (by analogy mechanism) is currently in the dictionary.

    Goddammit

    3. Yes, I'm sure that swearing on an internet thread is the single best method to correct and teach people how to spell unusual words.
    Being polite is completely an option !

    Disclaimer : I did study classical Greek and Latin.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  84. Re:"Octopuses Have No Personalities and Enjoy HDTV by jrothwell97 · · Score: 1

    Yeah, it's a shame octopuses have eight arms not feet.

    --
    Those using pirated Tinysoft signatures(TM) are a real threat to society and should all be thrown in jail.
  85. think it through by Technopaladin · · Score: 1

    If they lived longer that would give them more time to plan our downfall.

  86. Re:Octopusses announce Reseacher has no Personalit by flickwipe · · Score: 1

    8 limbs good
    4 limbs bad

    death to the vertebrates!

  87. Get your arms off my Overthruster by Technopaladin · · Score: 1

    I believe all the octopuses would be named John

  88. Let go! by Analogy+Man · · Score: 1

    Good luck getting the remote back from them!

    --
    When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.
  89. On the personality by omfglearntoplay · · Score: 1

    It's easy to imagine that the reason octopuses respond "randomly" when the screen is employed is due to something unrelated to personality, such as them "testing" this new situation to see what response they should evoke to bring back the crab. If she's not rewarding them with the crab after a specific action, they just keep trying different things randomly hoping it will come back. If that is indeed what they are doing, I'd say they gain another point in the smart score even if it were more instinct that conscious thought that would cause that behavior.

  90. What do they think of us? by MonsterMasher · · Score: 1

    Like the white rats in a funny book most of us have read.. Perhaps they are measuring us ..?

  91. Wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...aren't octopuses closely related to cuttlefish? *gasps*

  92. Cthulhu takes their lifespan! by Dareth · · Score: 1

    Maybe the octopi sacrifice their lifespan to Cthulhu to allow him to live forever!

    --

    I only look human.
    My mother is a halfling and my dad is an ogre, so that makes me an Ogreling
  93. personality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The definition of personality," she said, "is having repetition in your responses, for example, being consistently bold, or consistently shy, or consistently aggressive."

    So they showed a mixture of those? IANAO (oceanographer), but she might be an idiot. That sounds like a pretty complex personality to me if you are bold, shy, and aggressive on different occasions.

  94. [citation needed] by FiloEleven · · Score: 1

    I have never heard of such a distinction in the arms of the octopus. Are you sure you aren't confusing them with squid, which have 8 arms and two longer tentacles that are used for capturing food?

  95. Yum. by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

    She was tiny then and lived for almost two years which is pretty long lived for an octopus.

    Yeah, especially in any near proximity to myself. Octopus is probably my favourite seafood. But the bigger ones are usually much tastier than the babies.

    But these critters are just about the only ones that bring on any pangs of guilt to myself as a (now) recreational diver. They are really quite intelligent and playful, and I find it much more of a wrench to kill them than I do for a fish.

    Incidentally, for those unversed in this culinary delight: Octopus need no bashing or thrashing to tenderise them. A long, slow cooking or a very fast treatment on a hotplate will suffice, and they just melt in the mouth. Anything in between is guaranteed to produce something rubbery and not very nice.

  96. I for one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...welcome our soul-less Octopi overlords.

  97. Pronk'd! by rmpotter · · Score: 1

    I do believe we have all been Pronk'd by this story.

    --
    Is this sig nificant?
  98. Octopi\Octopus is synonymous with Mage\Magi.... by reidiq · · Score: 1

    Is it really that big of a #$#%ing deal? I used to see this on the Mage forums on WOW. Hey fellow Mages! MAGI!!! IT'S MAGES!!! MAGI!!!

    --
    Sig? No thanks. I don't smoke.
  99. Or.... by Degrees · · Score: 1

    People will search the 'dot for Pron and find that Octopuses Have No Personalities and Enjoy HDTV.

    If that doesn't lead to an intellectual wake-up call, I don't know what will.

    --
    "The most sensible request of government we make is not, "Do something!" But "Quit it!"
  100. Women by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have they run out of men to complain about Octopuses Personalities now! I guess disparate women calls for creative solutions ;-)

  101. Real octopuses use by Well-Fed+Troll · · Score: 0
  102. re: by Rankin99 · · Score: 1

    Seriously, how much did they spend researching this? Maybe they should've spent the money elsewhere...

  103. Re:Octopusses announce Reseacher has no Personalit by itsybitsy · · Score: 1

    Actually we vertebrates have four or five limbs... depending on the chromosomes... ;--)

    Some of these guys/gals have way more than eight limbs... yikes what the heck is that... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KT1TSbarW1U.

    Then there is this: http://xkcd.com/520.

  104. Re:"Octopuses Have No Personalities and Enjoy HDTV by Bertie · · Score: 1

    How IS Norfolk this time of year?

  105. Writing suprisingly not necessary by DrYak · · Score: 1

    Humanity has managed to achieve surprisingly lots of stuff without relying on writing.

    History has examples of "Dark Age" during which the ability to write was lost :
    - Homeric Greece - for example - had lost the habit to write in Linear and hadn't re-discovered alphabet from commercial contacts
    - As far as I've read on the web, apparently greate native american nation have had mostly oral tradition with very little physical support
    etc...

    Writing isn't a prerequisite for cultural development. Oral tradition can be sufficient for some forms of civilisation.
    On the other hand, once the need arise, writing systems are quickly (re)discovered by oral societies.
    - either for accounting purpose once trading develops on an important scale
    - or some religious traditions make it necessary (I personally have the impression that the more the religion plays an important part, the more graphic the symbols are like in mayan script or egyptian hieroglyph, and the more the trading plays an important part, the more the symbols get simple and fast to write/carve like cuneiform)

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]