Slashdot Mirror


Storm Causes AT&T Outage Across Midwest

dstates writes "AT&T left users across several Midwestern states without cellular phone service yesterday. The outage apparently resulted from a power failure at a Michigan switching center and spread to affect level3 Internet communications. The powerful windstorm also left 400,000 users without electricity. Interestingly, except for a few reports in Chicago and Indianapolis papers, AT&T has managed to keep this out of the mainstream media. Widespread communication failures also followed Hurricane Ike in Texas earlier this year. With the increasing trend for users to drop landlines and rely only on cell phones, this is becoming an emergency preparedness issue." Yes this included me. Still does. At least my office still has power — maybe we'll just camp here tonight. :)

213 comments

  1. Roaming? by girlintraining · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The problem isn't the cell phone network per-se, but rather the inability of these providers to peer with each other. AT&T may have been down, but what about T-Mobile, the other GSM provider in the United States? When a major failure like this occurs that locks out only some cell phone users in a given area, the problem is not technology but politics.

    Why, given how critical cell phones are during an emergency, this is allowed to continue is beyond me. Congress seems to care more about protecting corporate profits and reputation than providing a robust cellular network for its citizens. Hey, homeland security, are you listening? Fix this.

    --
    #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    1. Re:Roaming? by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      AT&T/Comcast/AT&T burned a LOT of bridges when they became Cingular. I used to be able to roam almost anywhere, and if a roaming tower was the best strength I connected to that. After cingular got involved they pissed off a lot of other carriers. Now my phone refuses to talk to any nearby roaming towers but tries to connect to that single AT&T tower about 12 miles away that gives me barely any signal. I have to hack my phones to disable this configuration to get decent cellphone service out of them.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    2. Re:Roaming? by zappepcs · · Score: 4, Informative

      They are trying to fix it, much the same way that Sarbanes-Oxley fixes accounting problems. Communications providers are required to keep an 8 hour power backup on all sites and 24+ backup on 'important' sites like switching centers or something along those lines. The idea is that storms like those that hit New Orleans would not cause the problems that they did. This storm is exactly the thing this measure by the FCC is supposed to fix... HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

      Legislators (Goodbye FCC) do NOT know how to run businesses. Some perhaps, but on the whole they are terrible business advisers and this legislation only proves it in the aftermath of this storm. I hold a harsh opinion of this situation because AT&T should have had backups in place to handle this situation. All Communications providers deal with such things and AT&T has enough history to know what to do... shame on them.

    3. Re:Roaming? by foniksonik · · Score: 1

      Do landlines work any different?

      If I get landline service from one provider and it's switching center gets knocked out during a disaster, can I then make calls through another provider?

      --
      A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
    4. Re:Roaming? by yelvington · · Score: 3, Informative

      We're staying with relatives on a farm south of Chicago. All the AT&T phones lost their ability to dial out, yet they could receive incoming calls. Our T-Mobile phones were fine.

      You're right, this is a case of corporate power struggles trumping customer service, as any of these phones should automatically fail over to another GSM network. In an emergency, dialing out is essential.

    5. Re:Roaming? by zappepcs · · Score: 5, Insightful

      BTW, besides those rescuers you see on television after a storm, remember that there are ordinary heroes sitting in a truck babysitting a generator, or climbing poles, or renting a snowcat to get to the tower site so that your phone will work when you want it to. They are suffering the elements, usually alone, and bear the responsibilities of ensuring your comfort with little or no thanks. They are up all night watching the weather, planning and preparing to go babysit that tower(s) so your phone or pager will work. They work almost tirelessly for the simple comfort of knowing that when the shit hit the fan, the equipment they are responsible for did not fail. They are little appreciated on a normal day, and unseen during the emergency, but it is their dedication that you count on and not the system or the company.

    6. Re:Roaming? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent up. This is the most insightful thing I've seen on Slashdot in years.

    7. Re:Roaming? by Shakrai · · Score: 5, Informative

      AT&T/Comcast/AT&T burned a LOT of bridges when they became Cingular. I used to be able to roam almost anywhere, and if a roaming tower was the best strength I connected to that. After cingular got involved they pissed off a lot of other carriers. Now my phone refuses to talk to any nearby roaming towers but tries to connect to that single AT&T tower about 12 miles away that gives me barely any signal

      I don't think that really has to do with burning bridges. It has to do with AT&T not wanting to pay money for you to roam. It costs them money every single minute that you are using another carriers network.

      I used to have a T-Mobile phone (had to ditch them for Verizon when I moved in with the GF -- no signal at her house) and they did the same thing. They would disable roaming on AT&T/Cingular in areas where they had coverage. Even if you were in a zone with no T-Mobile service you couldn't hop onto Cingular. To be able to roam on Cingular you had to drive out of the county where T-Mobile had native coverage -- then you'd be able to connect to and use the Cingular network. If you were within the county where they had native service but happened to be in a dead zone you were SOL -- roaming wasn't allowed.

      I have to hack my phones to disable this configuration to get decent cellphone service out of them.

      I'm surprised that worked. With GSM your home network decides whether or not you will be allowed to connect to that roaming partner based on the location area code. If that LAC indicates an area where they have native service they probably won't let you connect to the roaming partner. If it indicates an area where they don't have native service then you stand a better chance of being allowed to use that roaming partner.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    8. Re:Roaming? by Shakrai · · Score: 2, Informative

      You're right, this is a case of corporate power struggles trumping customer service, as any of these phones should automatically fail over to another GSM network. In an emergency, dialing out is essential.

      T-Mobile has been known to enable unrestricted roaming during natural disasters. During non-disasters they limit the areas that you can roam based on where they have native service. If they have native service in your city you will never be allowed to connect to AT&T no matter how crappy the T-Mobile signal is. During some natural disasters they've removed this restriction and you can connect to AT&T (and other GSM providers) at will.

      Comes in handy if the T-Mobile network goes down or is congested. I've never been in that situation but a few friends of mine have and were very thankful that they removed the roaming restrictions.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    9. Re:Roaming? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Congress seems to care more about protecting corporate profits and reputation than providing a robust cellular network for its citizens.

      I would love to see the part of the Constitution that says "Congress shall provide a robust cellular network for its citizens."

      I'm just saying.

    10. Re:Roaming? by Shakrai · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I wish I had mod points for you. I used to work for a WISP and had the "privilege" of climbing towers in god-awful weather after storms to restore service to our customers. It's scary enough to climb the things in normal weather. Doing it Upstate New York in January after a storm has coated the tower with ice is absolutely horrible.

      The worst part was that was my first job and I only got paid $10/hr to scale the friggen things. Looking back on it I wasn't making nearly enough money to be risking my life like that. At least our customers were appreciative though. That helped more than you can imagine.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    11. Re:Roaming? by bogaboga · · Score: 1, Redundant

      Does this kind of situation explain why we in North America are a little bit "behind" Europeans and Asians when it comes to the "cell phone" and exploiting its maximum potential?

      I hear the "cell phone" elsewhere in the world is capable of so much more than simply making calls and texting, which are the bulk of what we use cell phones for over here.

    12. Re:Roaming? by Shakrai · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I would love to see the part of the Constitution that says "Congress shall provide a robust cellular network for its citizens."

      Don't worry -- someone will come along sooner or later and twist the interstate commerce clause until they manage to come up with that interpretation. Remember, all parts of the Constitution should be interpreted as liberally as possible, except the 2nd amendment of course. That clearly provides for a collective right and doesn't apply to the states.....

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    13. Re:Roaming? by smidget2k4 · · Score: 1

      Not this time, it promptly hit 50 degrees F after the wind storm. Michigan weather is a fickle beast...

    14. Re:Roaming? by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Informative

      Nokia phones can get set to have a preferred tower ID. I get into them and set the preferred tower id to a roaming tower that gives full strength at my house. I used to have a blackjack, but got rid of it because it cant do that.

      the preferred tower setting overrides it somehow and it works. I've been doing this for the past 4 years and they still have not canceled my account.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    15. Re:Roaming? by bberens · · Score: 2, Informative

      Land lines were put in place a long time ago, when businesses and government were still foolish enough to consider common citizens in their decision making. Therefore the land lines have MUCH better redundancy systems in place when compared to the wireless systems.

      --
      Check out my lame java blog at www.javachopshop.com
    16. Re:Roaming? by Shakrai · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Does this kind of situation explain why we in North America are a little bit "behind" Europeans and Asians when it comes to the "cell phone" and exploiting its maximum potential?

      No. All this situation relates to is which networks you are allowed to roam on. Europe works much the same way. If you have Deutsch Telekom phone you probably aren't going to be able to connect to and use Vodafone's network in an area where DT has native coverage. Why should they pay Vodafone a per minute rate for you to roam when they have a native network in the area where you happen to be?

      I hear the "cell phone" elsewhere in the world is capable of so much more than simply making calls and texting, which are the bulk of what we use cell phones for over here.

      *shrug*, we have a smartphone market. I haven't been in Europe for a few years but the last time I was over there I was actually disappointed with the state of 3G. It's probably better now but when I was in Europe their 3G offerings weren't any better than ours.

      Japan and South Korea are different animals -- they are a full generation ahead of Europe and the US and people use their phones for all manner of things over there. That's as much cultural as anything -- how many Americans don't even see the point of SMS let alone internet browsing? Most people I know with phones regard them as phones and don't care about the extra features.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    17. Re:Roaming? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Legislators (Goodbye FCC) do NOT know how to run businesses.

      Sounds like businesses don't know how to run businesses either. Let's reward them with golden parachutes.

    18. Re:Roaming? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      This is why GSM providers here are required by law to carry a call to an emergency number, no matter what provider the caller has. They're also required to give an emergency call a line, no matter what and no matter what strain is already put on the network. The only exception to this is that you may refuse emergency calls if your network is already working at maximum load AND only carrying emergency calls (pretty unlikely, but imagine a 9/11 situation).

      This is why you may see the info "emergency call only" on your display when you're outside your provider's network. The phone gets some signal from a competing phone company, which wouldn't carry a normal call of course, but who has to carry an emergency call.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    19. Re:Roaming? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

      how many Americans don't even see the point of SMS

      IDK Y not ask my BFF Jill?

      Answer: "Not enough" since we're getting inane txt-speak commercials about it.

    20. Re:Roaming? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's okay though.

      I mean if president Obama can spend $70 Billion dollars that we don't have to try to assure that everyone can get broadband internet access, why not spend a few billion more to assure that everyone's cellular service is "uninteruptable"

      I suggest at least septuple redundancy.

      And of course that money should just build infrastructure for the big communications companies that they can later charge for access to.

    21. Re:Roaming? by Opportunist · · Score: 2, Informative

      I don't know about landlines in the US, but in Europe most of them are in the ground. A storm doesn't really bother them.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    22. Re:Roaming? by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      Answer: "Not enough" since we're getting inane txt-speak commercials about it.

      What are these commercials you speak of?

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    23. Re:Roaming? by Shakrai · · Score: 2, Informative

      Then your network must allow roaming in that particular area. With GSM the network that you connect to (even if it's the native network) contacts your home location register to find out if your phone is allowed to connect to that particular part of the network and what features are enabled on your account.

      If your provider saw fit they could disable roaming and no amount of hacks to your device would override it.

      I've been doing this for the past 4 years and they still have not canceled my account.

      I doubt they ever would, unless you are predominately using the roaming partner instead of your native network. AT&T and T-Mobile both have policies in place to cancel the accounts of customers that go over a certain threshold of minutes used on roaming partners. For AT&T I think it's 40% of your minute usage. T-Mobile is 50% IIRC.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    24. Re:Roaming? by awyeah · · Score: 4, Informative

      There are two things at play here: The ability to control network selection on the handset, and what the cellular networks allow you to do.

      On GSM devices, there's a flag on the SIM card that tells your phone whether or not to show you the "manual network selection" menu. With AT&T, their SIM cards are configured to disable this menu when you're in the US, but enable it when outside the US.

      However, on many devices, you can force them to ignore the SIM setting and have manual network selection enabled always. With Motorola phones, you can do it via SEEM editing, and there's obviously a way to do it on Symbian as well. This is what Lumpy is doing.

      Shakrai, what you're talking about is the actual roaming agreements between providers. This also affects network selection. Providers can specify which phones are allowed on their network. Legally, all phones must be allowed to associate with all GSM towers to provide 911 capability, but they can be limited to just that. For example, when I only have T-Mobile coverage, my AT&T BlackBerry shows "SOS" where the signal bars usually are.

      AT&T and T-Mobile have been doing this for a while. They had roaming agreements where specific cell sites would allow the other operator's phones in areas where the other operator's coverage was spotty.

      So when Lumpy uses manual network selection on his phone, which he had to enable by modifying something, the rules that the operators set forth on their networks still apply. If he tries to associate with a T-Mobile tower in certain areas, he will most likely get locked out, but in other areas he may not.

      --
      Why, no, I haven't meta-moderated lately. Thanks for asking!
    25. Re:Roaming? by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      Why should they pay Vodafone a per minute rate for you to roam when they have a native network in the area where you happen to be?

      Because the native network is not as strong of a signal, and it would be a better service for the customer? Seriously, if the companies were FORCED to allow this, they'd either 1) continue eating the cost or 2) improve signal in the affected area. If they did 3) raise rates and do nothing else, they'd quickly lose customers to the provider with better coverage.

    26. Re:Roaming? by JWSmythe · · Score: 4, Insightful

          Several years ago, I was driving across the country from Florida to California. I was only a couple days behind a hurricane that had made a mess. No, it was way before Katrina.

          Every hotel along I-10 for hundreds of miles had utility trucks from all over the place. I usually drive at night to avoid traffic, and I know these guys need to at least get a little bit of sleep. I know the utility guys get sent out from all over the place to fix problems induced by bad storms. It never really hit me that it wasn't just a few hundred sent, but an entire army. I would stop at hotels, and they would tell me that they were completely booked up because of the utility guys. Not just their hotel, but every hotel in the city. "Try the next town, 50 miles down the road." It's not like they were hogging the rooms, they were stuffed in. One guy per bed, and a guy or two on the floor. This is our civilian army, that keeps things working after a disaster.

          Unfortunately, all the general public knows is "they don't have my power on yet.", even though it is an army working hard to repair everything. People like instant gratification. They think it should be a light switch fix (hit the switch, it works).

          It's a job I wouldn't want. High voltages, dangerous weather, and long hours.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    27. Re:Roaming? by xda · · Score: 1

      I don't think it is a good idea to have Homeland Security directly involved in the inner workings of a telecom network.

      It sounds to me like one of the backbone links at AT&T went down and for some reason did not converge to another backbone link.

      Let's point our fingers in the right direction, and stop summoning the Government.

    28. Re:Roaming? by c00rdb · · Score: 1

      It's her BFF Rose, not Jill.

    29. Re:Roaming? by Voyager529 · · Score: 1

      Hey, homeland security, are you listening? Fix this.

      Say that on your cell phone along with "bomb white house" or something to that effect. They'll be listening then!

    30. Re:Roaming? by zBoD · · Score: 0

      And they do that for free?!! Wow!

      --
      BoD
    31. Re:Roaming? by Shakrai · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because the native network is not as strong of a signal, and it would be a better service for the customer? Seriously, if the companies were FORCED to allow this, they'd either 1) continue eating the cost or 2) improve signal in the affected area. If they did 3) raise rates and do nothing else, they'd quickly lose customers to the provider with better coverage.

      Raising rates is the likely outcome of a mandate like that. I doubt many people would switch to the provider with "better coverage" because "better coverage" is very subjective. Yeah, AT&T might have better coverage inside Wally World than T-Mobile but if T-Mobile works everywhere else do you really see many customers switching over it?

      I'm not a fan of Governmental mandates but if you want to impose them on the wireless industry I can think of much more important things to fix than mandated roaming.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    32. Re:Roaming? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But if you arent getting service, how can your native tower tell you to not use a roaming tower? This seems like it should be handled at the hardware, software, or firmware levels. If it can be disabled, those are the areas I would look at.

    33. Re:Roaming? by charlesnw · · Score: 1

      Um.... no. My t-mobile phone roams onto AT&T quite frequently. It's a blackberry pearl. This is in an area with t-mobile coverage.

      --
      Charles Wyble System Engineer
    34. Re:Roaming? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the FCC put out a plan to have cell providers provision towers with generator backup in case of power failure for just this reason.... last I knew it was resoundingly shot down by the telcos.

      I have Centennial wireless (non GSM) right now in Michigan and have no problem... bet that will change when the Fat Lady (Ma Bell) sings! (or buys them out)

    35. Re:Roaming? by zemkai · · Score: 1

      Some 85% of what DHS considers "critical infrastructure" in the US is owned by the private sector. Are you suggesting that the government take that over?

    36. Re:Roaming? by LiENUS · · Score: 1
    37. Re:Roaming? by JBHarris · · Score: 1

      Currently, If you dial 911 on any cellular phone in the US it will use any network it can see, regardless of the carrier or owner of the tower. An AT&T phone will use T-Mobile towers for 911 calls without hesitation, etc. Unless the "emergency" calls you spoke of were people calling their girlfriends to make sure they were OK....in which case, yes...your point stands.

    38. Re:Roaming? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Simpler solution: I bought a non-US GSM phone, which seems to roam to the strongest tower regardless of affiliation.

    39. Re:Roaming? by Ironica · · Score: 1

      Of course there are actual people doing the work, and "the work" may be very difficult or dangerous. But my business relationship is with the company, and it's up to that company to hire sufficient people to do that work. If something goes down, then that implies that they did NOT hire enough or the right people... or that $#!% happens, and things went down anyway despite their efforts. If it happens rarely and I get apologies, I assume the latter. If it happens frequently and I get blown off, I assume the former.

      I count on the company to hire skilled, dedicated individuals and to maintain their morale regardless of the working conditions. I *can't* count on the individuals, because I don't have any means of contacting or contracting them.

      That said, I'm glad they do their job, and on the rare occasions I *do* come in contact with them, I'm inclined to say thanks. (I stopped and said "Thank you for the job you're doing" to two people picking up litter at the Zoo the other day... It is the kind of thing I'd do.)

      --
      Don't you wish your girlfriend was a geek like me?
    40. Re:Roaming? by afidel · · Score: 1

      The thing that pissed me off was even though their towers were providing NO service they were still locking my phone into the AT&T network. I tried to refresh my host routing table but it just came back with Cingular towers, it was frustrating that the towers were alive enough to fark up my tables but not enough to complete a call.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    41. Re:Roaming? by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      AT&T didn't "become" Cingular, they bought them out. I'd been happy with Cingular for years; never any dead spots, never any roaming charges, then AT&T bought them and the service became nonexistant while my bills went through the roof. I think they might have bitten off more than they could chew when they bought Cingular.

      As to the actual topic, the statement "With the increasing trend for users to drop landlines and rely only on cell phones, this is becoming an emergency preparedness issue" is ignorant. When the tornados tore my town up in March, 2006 the entire city was without power for the rest of the night, and hard hit places like my neighborhood were without power for a week.

      It only takes one broken pole to disrupt landline communications, if it's between you and a switching station. It was weeks before anyone's landline in my neighborhood was online, and a month before the cable company got my internet access back.

      Meanwhile my cell phone worked perfectly during and after the storm (except there was no long distance; I had my daughter in Chatham, a nearby town that the tornados missed, call her grandparents and sister).

      If the pole outside your house is knocked down, you have no power, cable, or phone. Meanwhile in most places you're going to have to have ALL the cell towers knocked down before you lose service. Cell phones' real enemy is satellites; when they go out, your phone won't work.

    42. Re:Roaming? by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      My t-mobile phone roams onto AT&T quite frequently. It's a blackberry pearl. This is in an area with t-mobile coverage

      Then T-Mobile allows roaming in your area. Typically they don't in areas where they have native coverage. Go to T-Mobile's coverage map and key in zip code 13760. Look at all the dead zones and notice where the roaming coverage is. Then go to AT&T's coverage map and look at their coverage in the same area.

      T-Mobile won't allow you to roam on AT&T around these parts until you get out of the county where they have native coverage -- even if you are in part of the county where no coverage exists. This is SOP for them and be thankful you live in an area where they haven't decided to do this for whatever reason.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    43. Re:Roaming? by kimvette · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, all the general public knows is "they don't have my power on yet.", even though it is an army working hard to repair everything. People like instant gratification. They think it should be a light switch fix (hit the switch, it works).

      The really stupid part of all of this? We're still using 19th-century techniques, stringing utility lines overhead rather than laying them underground where they would be unaffected by most weather.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    44. Re:Roaming? by lysergic.acid · · Score: 2, Interesting

      there are major cultural differences between Japan/South Korea and the U.S. to be sure, but there are also fundamental socioeconomic & technological differences as well. these things are inextricably tied to one another i think, so you really can't discuss one without the other.

      one major point of divergence is Japan's more progressive approach to public infrastructure. whereas the US favors privatization and deregulation, the Japanese government takes a more pro-active approach in promoting technological progress. for example, the government owns a 1/3rd stake in Japan's largest telecom/cellular phone carrier/ISP, NTT (Nippon Telegraph & Telephone). this hybrid private/socialized approach is similar to Japan's health care system, which, while provided by the private sector, is heavily regulated through price controls determined by negotiations between the government and industry leaders ever couple of years.

      the Japanese government also actively funds the sciences and technology. in the mid 90's Japan invested 2.6% of their GDP into R&D, which is about on par with the US, which invested 2.5% at the time. however, whereas US funding is focused primarily on defense, Japan's funding has been focused on non-military R&D, which far exceeds the US. and while government funded (non-defense-related) R&D has been decreasing in the US over the past decade, R&D funding in Japan has roughly doubled--largely due to efforts to intensify international research cooperation (creating world class research facilities within Japan and abroad) and also to strengthen Japan's human and physical infrastructure for basic sciences within universities.

      but Japan's rapid pace of technological progress isn't just due to publicly funded basic research. there have also been reports in the media that Toyota's hybrid gas-electric technology was largely subsidized by the government, which is in line with the Japanese government's history of working closely with domestic industries. and through NTT the Japanese government has also provided its citizens with faster and cheaper broadband. as a result, Japan has the highest FttH penetration in the world.

      so what came first, the Japanese government's interventionist policies or Japan's technophilic culture? it's hard to say, but whichever is the case, this system clearly has its advantages. Sweden is another country with similar public policy, and in both cases it seems to serve the public better than a strictly free market approach. not only do individuals enjoy better/more advanced public infrastructure (and at a far lower cost), but the Japanese economy has proven extremely resilient even during global economic downturns.

    45. Re:Roaming? by SaDan · · Score: 1

      As someone who used to drive around and gas up generators for a privately owned WISP, thank you.

      Some of the tower sites I had to maintain were also next to or on the same tower as cellular providers, and I'd be there the same time their technicians were there during bad weather or extended outages. Even gave a couple gallons of gas from my reserves to one of the cell providers when they ran out one time last summer.

      People who work infrastructure deserve a lot of credit for your daily comforts.

    46. Re:Roaming? by kimvette · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Crap, I just made a similar post above before I saw yours. If I'd seen yours first I'd have modded you up.

      That is exactly the problem; because we built our infrastructure back when everything was bleeding edge first-generation technology, the world has passed us behind. Our internet infrastructure is still based on ARPANET-era lines in spots, our ISPs are still using first-generation broadband and because of municipalities granting monopolies they are raping us on pricing (I paid for unlimited internet that you advertised to me, MAKE IT UNLIMITED for God's sake! Let your yea be yea and your nay be nay, doing otherwise is FRAUD. It doesn't matter that I've never even gone over 20GB, I don't like the fact that I have ANY limit besides bit rates), using infrastructure paid for in full BY US (taxpayers), not them, and of course the electric companies are still riding on the backs of taxpayer-paid lines and they won't make the investments to run new cables underground whenever a road is repaved.

      That should be law; whenever a street is repaved, ALL utilities are moved undground. It's amazing how "clean" streets (mostly in private housing and industrialdevelopments) feel when there isn't a rat's nest of overhead lines and utility poles all over the place, cluttering up the landscape.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    47. Re:Roaming? by afidel · · Score: 1

      This wasn't towers, it was a power failure combined with incompetence running a switching center. Every piece of equipment should have had full redundant power sources with sufficient battery power on each to fix the generator if there was a problem.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    48. Re:Roaming? by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      Look it up - the difference between overhead and buried lines is generally a wash; it depends on geography, but the cost isn't that much different.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    49. Re:Roaming? by Chris+Tucker · · Score: 1

      "I would love to see the part of the Constitution that says "Congress shall provide a robust cellular network for its citizens.""

      Here you go:

      We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare , and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
      (emphasis added)

      You're welcome!

      --
      Guaranteed! This comment 100% Anthrax free!
    50. Re:Roaming? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, homeland security, are you listening?

      Yes, as a matter of fact homeland security is listening...

    51. Re:Roaming? by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      Except this is a larger area than a single store. If i can't get reliable coverage in half my county, people ARE likely to switch. It's actually the reason I'm on Verizon. I hate them, and would rather use pretty much ANY other provider... but none of them have close to the coverage of Verizon. The whole point of a cell phone is to make calls / text.. communicate... if you can't do that, people won't be happy.

      As far as your nonsense on government mandates... fortunately government can do more than one thing at a time, so I don't see your point as relevent. To suggest we shouldn't fix smaller problems because larger problems are still unsolved is rather silly... we'd never get anything done, because larger problems require more time and more complex solutions.

    52. Re:Roaming? by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      Except this is a larger area than a single store. If i can't get reliable coverage in half my county, people ARE likely to switch. It's actually the reason I'm on Verizon. I hate them, and would rather use pretty much ANY other provider... but none of them have close to the coverage of Verizon.

      So your proposal is to mandate that other carriers be forced to let you roam on Verizon's network so you don't have to do business directly with Verizon? Obviously you've decided that the coverage Verizon offers is more important to you than the other reasons you hate them -- otherwise I assume you'd be doing business with someone else. What's the problem here? If you don't like Verizon switch to T-Mobile -- they are the anti-Verizon in terms of pricing plans and customer service -- but you'll "pay" for that cheaper rate plan with less coverage.

      I'll tell you exactly what will happen if you mandate this: The carriers will all go back to charging for roaming (upwards of $0.69/min in the old days) instead of including it for free. Be careful what you wish for -- you might just get it.

      As far as your nonsense on government mandates... fortunately government can do more than one thing at a time, so I don't see your point as relevent.

      First off, it's spelled "relevant". Second off, I never said that Government can't do more than one thing at a time. All I said was that I'm not real comfortable with the idea of Governmental mandates. Every single mandate or regulation that you pass increases the cost of doing business which invariably increases the cost that you or I have to pay when we buy products from that business.

      With some regulation (environmental regulation comes to mind -- nobody thinks Jiffy Lube dumping oil in the river would be good, even if it would make oil changes cheaper) the increased cost is justified as a net benefit to society. You'd have a harder time convincing me of that with a mandate to allow roaming in the wireless industry.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    53. Re:Roaming? by GweeDo · · Score: 1

      "I hear the "cell phone" elsewhere in the world is capable of so much more than simply making calls and texting, which are the bulk of what we use cell phones for over here."

      My cell phone call place calls, text, get emails, browse the web, ssh to a server, stream Sirius from their site, play Minesweeper...

      So how exactly do us North American's have more gimped phones?

      (now our cost of services might suck...I honestly have no idea, but our phones are just as capable as any others)

    54. Re:Roaming? by curveclimber · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that will be a shame, because the corporate governance we have on this and so many other issues is so awesome.

    55. Re:Roaming? by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      how many Americans don't even see the point of SMS

      at $0.25US to send AND receive them, I can see why all americnas other than the kiddies dont see the point. We're being raped over the price of SMS messages.

      We will not adopt SMS like they do elsewhere until our providers stop robbing the customer blind.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    56. Re:Roaming? by shicaca · · Score: 0

      The idiotic part of this mindset is that in hospitals they have to have 24/7 power for things like ventilators, etc. Ditto for 911/emergency services. Why doesn't the government say these 'important' places must employ emergency backups that will last indefinitely while fuel is supplied. There are now backup generators that run on natural gas that will last indefinitely while the natural gas is flowing. If there's an insane amount of energy required for cell towers in large areas, they could restrict its use for 911 calls only. It's scary that after ~24hrs you're hosed. Cost blah blah blah. Bullshit, I say. In an emergency during a poweroutage, this would be greatly appreciated.

    57. Re:Roaming? by Dan541 · · Score: 1

      Dialling 112 on a GSM handset will connect you to the countries emergency services using any available connection.

      --
      An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
    58. Re:Roaming? by Nimey · · Score: 1

      I haven't known anybody to blame the utility crews; most of them are very thankful to have them out there, especially at night in bad weather.

      People do tend to blame the utility /companies/, especially when the companies quit trimming back trees which then fell onto power lines and knocked them down.

      I'm ambivalent about that; it is partly the utility's fault, but part of it is also the damnfool landowners who plant big trees too near power lines, and don't bother to hire someone to trim their trees either. You'd have this problem to an extent with buried lines, since tree roots can grow out unseen and gradually break the line, much as they do with sidewalks.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    59. Re:Roaming? by Nimey · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Interstate Commerce is such a huge loophole. It's used to pretty much neuter the powers of the state governments as Congress sees fit. Pity the Supreme Court didn't nip that in the bud back in the day; nowadays the Supremes would probably be loath to do it because it would cause chaos.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    60. Re:Roaming? by Khyber · · Score: 1

      The problem with putting things in the ground is you'll have to dig them up later if something bad happens, say a water main bursting or gas line exploding.

      Maintanance costs and upgrades to infrastructure become less costly and easier when you don't have to dig so much.

      This is why telephone service poles are still all across the desert in the southwestern USA - can you imagine having to go out into that heat to dig something up to locate a problem or upgrade the infrastructure?

      Money, money, money.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    61. Re:Roaming? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      when I moved in with the GF

      LOL! How is that working out for you? How much of your personality have you been forced to change?

      I bet she is fat :(

    62. Re:Roaming? by budgenator · · Score: 1

      ...then the ice breaks loose jams and dams until it pushes the river above the 100 year flood datum about once a decade

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    63. Re:Roaming? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you. As an AT&T employee, I appreciate you taking a stand for us, even when our network drops out. In our call center today, I handled several customer calls in Tech Support for that area, and had nothing but happy customers that were very understanding of the situation, and appreciative of our efforts to get things back up quickly.

    64. Re:Roaming? by Leebert · · Score: 1

      We're still using 19th-century techniques, stringing utility lines overhead rather than laying them underground where they would be unaffected by most weather.

      My father worked for Baltimore Gas and Electric for 36 years. I asked him about this once. His take was unexpected: He pointed out that troubleshooting for underground utilities is volumes worse than that of overhead utilities. For a power outage, they would have to first isolate the fault to a specific segment (fair enough), then go get a backhoe, jackhammers, etc. and rip up a street. That whole process can increase repair time several times over.

    65. Re:Roaming? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      That's not really the problem. The problem is that nothing was invested to improve those lines and make them redundant. Redundancy costs money, and when the company running the business is private, that money should go to the shareholders or make the product cheaper.

      Our telco was for a long time after WW2 a public company, and governments by definition are more concerned with availability and reliability than profit. It also was a government monopoly, and while I'm not really for monopolies, in some areas they make sense. When you're dealing with critical infrastructure, and here I think of water, power, communications, gas, sewage and even public transport, I do want one. For more than one reason.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    66. Re:Roaming? by MECC · · Score: 1

      Congress seems to care more about protecting corporate profits and reputation than providing a robust cellular network for its citizens.

      Correct.

      --
      "We are all geniuses when we dream"
      - E.M. Cioran
    67. Re:Roaming? by holt · · Score: 1

      ...damnfool landowners who plant big trees too near power lines...

      It's not always the landowners' fault. The city in which my folks live planted trees in their right-of-way a few years ago, directly under the lines that connect to Mom and Dad's house. Dad pointed out that they'd be a problem in a few years but was told that it would be at least ten years before it was an issue and anyway the city would fix it. (This by the landscaper putting in the trees.) Of course, five years later the tree is becoming a problem, and Mom and Dad are expected to take care of it. In this case the landscaper just wanted to sell an extra tree, and there wasn't really anything the landowner could do about it at the time.

    68. Re:Roaming? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

      Sorry, but you're quoting the preamble. That's only laying out the purpose of the document and not granting any Authority whatsoever. It was hoped by the framers that the Constitution itself "promoted the general Welfare' and not that Congress should be able to do anything it wants as long is it's "in the best interest" of the public.

      The General Welfare clause in Article I Section 8 is an introduction to the enumerated powers that follow and not itself a grant of power. So even if this is the quote you meant to give, that doesn't really fly either.

      Unfortunately yours is a common misinterpretation. If we take your point of view then the powers of government are really unlimited.

      It's also fraught with conflicts. For instance, who gets to be the arbiter of what constitutes "general welfare?"

      I believe your premise is flawed from the beginning.

      A brief study of the history surrounding the drafting of the Constitution will show you the intent behind the document.

    69. Re:Roaming? by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > The problem is... the inability of these providers to peer with each other.
      > AT&T may have been down, but what about T-Mobile... When a major failure... locks
      > out only some... users in a given area, the problem is not technology but politics.

      I agree with you this far. However...

      > Why, given how critical cell phones are during an emergency, this is allowed to continue is beyond me.

      Give me a break. Cell phones are a luxury item that just a few years ago almost nobody could afford, and now suddenly they're a critical service that can't be allowed to go down for a day, something homeland security should be concerned with keeping running in a natural-disaster scenario? Why, just because a lot of people have them now?

      Get real. Normal phone lines to my knowledge have never been seen as critical to national security or emergency management, so why would cell phones? If robotic maids become cheap enough and popular enough that everybody and his dog has one, will those also then be critical to national security?

      In the real world, if the power goes out for a few minutes during a storm we shrug, get out the candles, forget about the television and the internet for a couple of hours, and read a book or play a game or talk to one another (you know, face-to-face, verbally). You might want to hang up your cellphone and join us out here some time, just for a change of pace. It may be a bit different from what you're used to, but the video is pretty high-res.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    70. Re:Roaming? by Uzuri · · Score: 1

      Sing it :)

      My dad works telecomm for the local power company, and of course he's out in all weather when the #$%^ hits the fan, because if communication goes down... well, nothing else much is happening, either.

      Most people are real nice to the guys who get out there and do the work, thankfully. I've seen them loudly cheered before.

      --
      I'm a she-slashdotter... but I make up for it by living with my folks.
  2. Tinfoil hat! Go! by cthulu_mt · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Interestingly, except for a few reports in Chicago and Indianapolis papers, AT&T has managed to keep this out of the mainstream media/

    Conspiracy theory much? Maybe the media is more interested in reporting loss of life and emergency services than cell phone outage?

    --
    Virginia is for lovers. EVE is for griefers.
  3. If All You Have Is a Cell Phone... by littlewink · · Score: 4, Insightful

    then you're out of luck. Most landline phones have independent power and will work in an emergency. That's one reason I always have a landline.

    1. Re:If All You Have Is a Cell Phone... by von_rick · · Score: 1

      How about a HAM radio set?

      --

      Face your daemons!

    2. Re:If All You Have Is a Cell Phone... by rrossman2 · · Score: 1

      Even a land line won't work if the wind blows down the tele-co lines and/or causes someone to wreck into a telephone pole and snap a line. Then if you don't have a cell phone you're still SOL

    3. Re:If All You Have Is a Cell Phone... by Ihmhi · · Score: 1

      You could always rent a Sat-phone. They go for something like $50 a week. Expensive to buy (About $2,000), but good for a weekend in the hills where you won't get signal.

    4. Re:If All You Have Is a Cell Phone... by turkeydance · · Score: 1

      yes. ALWAYS have a landline. we've been through two hurricanes and one ice storm that took down all the power and wireless networks. POTS still rules. even dial-up worked good enough for email.

    5. Re:If All You Have Is a Cell Phone... by awyeah · · Score: 1

      I agree. Although cell phones are generally very reliable, land lines rarely go out. I still have a land line (although I have no phone connected to it), I've got the most basic calling plan which is about $15/month. I have a phone nearby that I can connect to it if I need to call 911 and my blackberry is out.

      --
      Why, no, I haven't meta-moderated lately. Thanks for asking!
    6. Re:If All You Have Is a Cell Phone... by Wapiti-eater · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That requires a license - training - practice - effort - learning - preparation - actually doing something rather than just paying some one else take care of your needs (cell co) and then whining when their stuff breaks.

      Least with my HF rigs - only infrastructure I depend on for communications are the laws of physics and the presence of time/space.

      Interesting in this consumer society where paying a bill insinuates the right to whine. Kudos to those that do rather than gripe.

      --
      Senior NCO in the fight against entropy. I've seen things, man. Things no one should have to see.....
    7. Re:If All You Have Is a Cell Phone... by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Funny, everywhere I've ever lived since I got a cell phone, I've lost service on my landline more frequently and for longer periods of time than on m cell.

      I'm in an apartment now, with no landline, but I hear about landline outages all the time. My grandfather is the apartment manager, living on the opposite end of the same building, and my mother lives two stories directly below me; they have outages every couple weeks, at the same time. Wiring from the pole, to the demarc was replaced last year. Wiring from the demarc to each unit was replaced 9 months ago. Wiring in each unit is replaced when the tenant moves out, or upon request; my grandfather's was the first to be replaced and my mother moved in after I did, after they started changing out the wiring. The problems still continue. Last month, AT&T replaced wiring from the nearest pole, all the way to the CO. There have been 3 outages since then.

      I had a 5 hour DATA outage, incoming and outgoing calls worked fine, on my AT&T BlackBerry Curve yesterday. That's one of 3 outages I've experienced that wasn't caused by my own faulty equipment, in seven years with AT&T.

      That's right, I've seen as many landline outages, with no wiring more than a year old, in the last month, than I have experienced cellular outages in the last 7 years... In the last month. Extrapolate that and you get an 84:1 ratio of landline:cell failures in my area.

      One of the other cell outages I've had were when the AT&T/Cingular merger originally happened and I was still on a Cingular rate plan. Switching to an AT&T rate plan fixed it. That did piss me off, since it was the same rate plan, for the same monthly charge, with the same terms, on the same phone, with the same SIM card and same phone number, on the same towers. It's almost like the towers were programmed to fuck up Cingular rate plans; change one bit and it works great.

      The other was after the huge blackout that affected most of the northern US. My phone worked fine (charging off of an inverter) until 2 hours before power was restored. It worked again 5 minutes after the lights came back on.

      I'd say, with the inexcusable exception of their obvious mucking with connections based on the TYPE of rate plan, the reliability of my cell has been amazing.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    8. Re:If All You Have Is a Cell Phone... by awyeah · · Score: 1

      Wow, I guess land line service isn't reliable everywhere. I had always figured it was!

      --
      Why, no, I haven't meta-moderated lately. Thanks for asking!
    9. Re:If All You Have Is a Cell Phone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      then you're out of luck.

      Most landline phones have independent power and will work in an emergency. That's one reason I always have a landline.

      I live in Houston and was out of power during Ike for 2 weeks. Nothing worked those two weeks: power, cell, or land line. We have always kept our land line because when all else failed, the land line always worked and they had enough backup power to run it for days if not weeks.

      Guess what happened when the power went out this time? No land lines either. Turns out that all the backup UPS power has been removed from all the CO interlinks along the way from the main CO to the end user access points. I couldn't get any tech to admit it when I asked, but I have a sneaky suspicion that the phone company eliminated the copper from the main CO and now just hang the POTS interfaces off of the local DSLAM internet links. Only catch is that when the power goes out, so do the POTS lines.

      Would you go to work and leave your wife and kids at home knowing that they couldn't call you and that 911 didn't work on either land lines or cell phones? Scary stuff.

    10. Re:If All You Have Is a Cell Phone... by Dan541 · · Score: 1

      Landlines are vulnerable to lawnmowers. Your blackberry is not.

      --
      An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
    11. Re:If All You Have Is a Cell Phone... by Nethead · · Score: 1

      The bumper-sticker on my truck (next to the ham plates): Ham radio; no infrastructure required.

      73 de w7com

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    12. Re:If All You Have Is a Cell Phone... by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Nope. It's not. It's not in a LOT of places, several cities in Michigan and several in Ohio, at the least. Every city I've lived in, actually.

      I've also found, from my own experience, my experience selling the devices, and through observation of friends, family, and coworkers, that a huge part of the reliability of cell service lies in your device, rather than the network. If all you ever get is the free (or cheaper) phones, all you'll ever be likely to have is crap service.

      A poorly designed antenna or poorly implemented radio can be the difference between full signal and no signal; I've been on both ends of that, standing in the same spot, with different phones; same SIM card, same service. Switched the SIM back and forth a few times to make sure it wasn't just a momentary outage.

      Yes, it makes that much of a difference. One phone (freebie Motorola peanut-looking thing) got no signal. The other (Nokia 6820) got full signal.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    13. Re:If All You Have Is a Cell Phone... by awyeah · · Score: 1

      I agree fully with that. I have friends who complain about reception in various places, and I almost always have reception in places they don't... even though we're on the same provider.

      Another thing to note is that some of those lower-end phones might not support all of the frequencies (for example, some GSM phones in North America only do 1900MHz, but most of the providers use both 850MHz and 1900MHz).

      --
      Why, no, I haven't meta-moderated lately. Thanks for asking!
    14. Re:If All You Have Is a Cell Phone... by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Yes, that makes a difference, as well. the 1900MHz signal can go farther with unobstructed line of sight, but 850MHz signals can penetrate buildings more easily. It's important to have a phone that can handle both in the US. Don't forget 900MHz and 1800MHz, if you're going to be leaving the US for any reason!

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
  4. Not conspiracy, but AT&T has not been forthcom by neapolitan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I would argue that the OP has a point. I am a doctor, was on call (I'm not kidding), and missed several important messages due to my cellphone going out (my blackberry just silently stopped receiving all work mail, all internet functions went dead, full 3G signal but "tunnel failed.") Granted, there is a lot of redundancy in communications, so my pager later started going off with a lot of people saying "where are you???", and I then called them on a landline.

    I thought it was my phone, rebooted 3 times, and only today did I find out that it was a national outage (saw here, confirmed all over the net.) I think AT&T should just have sent a free txt saying "We are having problems" or made an large scale announcement via voicemail, which would have helped me (and others) plan. I was about to get a replacement phone from a friend and plug my SIM into it.

    The point is we start to rely on these devices, and blackberries, for better or worse, are used for very important things in business, health care, and otherwise.

    --
    Slashdotter, ID #101. UIDs are in binary, right?
  5. I was wondering. by das3cr · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I live in Indiana and the ATT&T trucks have been out in force.

    Mostly just sitting in their vans, next to switching stations, drinking coffee and eating doughnuts. Now it makes sense.

    --
    Hurricane Island Outward Bound
    OB
    1. Re:I was wondering. by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      I live in Indiana and the ATT&T trucks have been out in force. Mostly just sitting in their vans, next to switching stations, drinking coffee and eating doughnuts. Now it makes sense.

      That's undercover cops, dude. Hide the hookers, dope, and roulette tables.

  6. This also affected Comcast who hands off to L3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Comcast had impaired connectivity yesterday with traceroutes dieing in the L3 network.

  7. Office camping party! by twilightzero · · Score: 2, Funny

    Camping at the office is a time-honored tradition here in Minnesota, and now that the offices have internet access it's WAY more fun! ;)

    --

    "Christ what a design! I could eat a handful of iron filings and PUKE a better emergency pump than that!"
  8. Will AT&T repay me for the days my service was by freedom_india · · Score: 4, Interesting

    First Question of any contract: Any contract in which any of the party is unable to fulfill the terms of the contract will be is liable to either NOT collect remuneration of the said contract for that quantity, OR reimburse the amount for that period.
    Will AT&T send me a check for the days my service was out?
    Because last i checked, weather is not a cause for NOT fulfilling a contract. For the same reason i cannot claim weather for not paying my mortgage.
    Question is, will AT&T refund the amount for the period of outage.
    If not a class-action suit can be filed in coordination with other users.

    --
    "Doing what i can, with what i have." ~ Burt Gummer
  9. Coming soon... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    If you think today was fun, wait until April 2009 when the unions go on strike against AT&T. The company believes it can weather the strike by training salespeople and programmers to climb poles, but c'mon, we all know how well that will work out.

    1. Re:Coming soon... by ekidder · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I worked during the last strike. I was doing repair line duty. And then we had those massive storms in the midwest and my life was very miserable for four days. It was really really depressing talking to all of those people.

  10. Press coverage by machine321 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I was going to notify the press, but I couldn't get any calls on my cell phone to go through.

  11. Re:Not conspiracy, but AT&T has not been forth by ceejayoz · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If AT&T's service was down, how would they send you a text or voicemail?

  12. Re:Will AT&T repay me for the days my service by cthulu_mt · · Score: 5, Informative

    Most contracts include a "Force Majure" clause that absolves the service provider in the event of a natural disaster.

    --
    Virginia is for lovers. EVE is for griefers.
  13. Re:Will AT&T repay me for the days my service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    i just called them and while they won't say they had an issue, they gave me a $10 credit

  14. Re:Not conspiracy, but AT&T has not been forth by neapolitan · · Score: 1

    I knew somebody would claim this impossible, but both SMS and voicemail were working, at least in my area. Incoming calls seemed to go to VM and then I could retrieve it (I was driving, so might have been simply out of range). Outgoing calls worked for me. All 3G internet / WAP was down.

    This morning service is back to normal, and there was no announcement SMS nor notification of recent downed services from AT&T, therefore, before I knew about all this I was still aiming to replace my phone. Hence my comment.

    --
    Slashdotter, ID #101. UIDs are in binary, right?
  15. Re:Will AT&T repay me for the days my service by Blimey85 · · Score: 1

    Brighthouse had some failure a couple weeks back and cable tv service was out for 8 to 20 hours depending on where you lived. Happened right when two big sports games were on tv so a lot of people were pissed. Brighthouse is doing pro-rated refunds for that time period. They also sent a coupon for a free pay per view movie and a letter of apology. A coupon for a free pay per view event, wrestling, boxing, whatever, would have been much nicer as I've already seen all of the pay per movies that I want to see right now. I thought it was a nice gesture though.

    --
    How is it that one careless match can start a forest fire, but it takes a whole box to start a campfire?
  16. Re:Will AT&T repay me for the days my service by macx666 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The inability for AT&T's datacenter in Michigan to have power backups that can last more than a day should hardly be considered a natural disaster.

    I'd love to see something happen in terms of getting money back, but somehow I doubt most subscribers care enough to push for it.

  17. It is easy to keep that out of the news by erroneus · · Score: 3, Funny

    They are major advertisers and can pretty much control what is reported about them most of the time. All they had to do was make a few calls... oh wait...

    1. Re:It is easy to keep that out of the news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Guess those press release AT&T sent were not enough?

  18. Not a conspiracy by jmkaza · · Score: 5, Informative

    AT&T has managed to keep this out of the mainstream media

    I'm in Arizona, and I saw that AT&T service was down in the midwest from multiple sources, before I finished my first cup of coffee. If there's been any lack of information reported about this, my guess is that's because the press is more concerned about hundreds of thousands who are without power in below freezing conditions, rather than a few people who can't make phone calls.

    1. Re:Not a conspiracy by egburr · · Score: 1

      I'm in North Carolina, where the weather was pretty good (it broke 70 yesterday)with only light rain. I had no trouble with my cell phone, but completely lost useful internet access for hours. I was unable to get anything but local news, which had no mention of the problem. At first, many sites I frequent failed to respond, and soon even DNS was failing to resolve. Traceroutes on IP addresses I knew all stopped at some router *.washington.level3.net (which I figured was Washington DC). About six hours into the outage, everything started working again. I never heard any reports about this problem until now! I certainly would not have associated a storm in Michigan with the cause of that trouble.

      --

      Edward Burr
      Having a smoking section in a restaurant is like having a peeing section in a swimming pool.
    2. Re:Not a conspiracy by egburr · · Score: 1
      I'm in North Carolina and was affected by this. No trouble with my cell phone, but lost internet access for hours. I would never have associated it with a storm in Michigan!

      At first, all but relatively local sites quit responding, them eventually DNS quit resolving altogether. Tracerouts to some IP addresses I knew all stopped at a router *.washington.level3.net (which I figured is Washington DC). About 4-5 hours later, everything started working again.

      I still wouldn't have associated this with the AT&T outage and storm in Michigan if it weren't for that comment about Level 3 being affected and that my traceroutes all stopped at level3.net.

      This story is the first I've heard to explain what happened here yesterday!

      --

      Edward Burr
      Having a smoking section in a restaurant is like having a peeing section in a swimming pool.
  19. What about the recent ice storm in the Northeast? by Dekortage · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Natural disasters seem to be all the rage lately.

    A few weeks ago, the U.S. Northeast was hit by a major ice storm. At the peak, ~1.4 million people were without power across Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Maine, and upstate New York. FEMA declared emergencies in several areas, and each state declared emergencies and disaster areas in additional areas. Like a lot of people, I lost power for several days, which means I also lost heat and water (not on municipal water or on piped gas). This guy had the presence of mind to take a few pictures of the ice layers... it was kind of astonishing, at least to me.

    --
    $nice = $webHosting + $domainNames + $sslCerts
  20. New News and Wireless Service by mpapet · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The summary is full of *very* misplaced expectations regarding wireless service.

    A. There was never an expectation that the service would ever be plain old telephone service (POTS) quality. Thinking otherwise just sets you up for disappointment. Telco's pretty much hate POTS because it was designed and regulated to be extremely reliable. Get a POTS line and move on.

    B. ATT doesn't care if individuals go without service. A few hundred thousand users having downtime for hours is nothing because it can be blamed on an "act of God." They care if they have to go before their regulators because that costs campaign contributions.

    C. I have a bank of dial-up modems as the very last line of defense in our NOC for just this reason. We deal with messages, so it would work in a bad situation. Not ideal, but I'll take it and our customer's PHB's are generally pleased we think that carefully.

    POTS is good. Long live POTS.

    --
    http://www.maxineudall.com/2010/02/should-economists-be-sued-for-malpractice.html
  21. Re:Not conspiracy, but AT&T has not been forth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This was even the case in Pittsburgh. I could not receive/make calls nor obtain any server communications over 3G despite the phone indicating full strength signal. Rebooting did not resolve the issue.

  22. Re:Not conspiracy, but AT&T has not been forth by Ihmhi · · Score: 1

    Via companies whose towers aren't down? Yeah it would cost them money, but it's the responsible thing to do.

  23. AT&T's employees are under strict orders... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...to *NEVER* admit anything is wrong with their equipment. To do so is grounds for immediate termination.

    1. Re:AT&T's employees are under strict orders... by wastedlife · · Score: 1

      BS.
      They had an isolated outage delivering OPT-E-MAN access to one of my clients, and admitted it was a component failure that caused it. They were quick to move my client over to working temporary equipment until the part was replaced. At which time they made the cutover back to permanent equipment at midnight to reduce further downtime.

      If you are talking about the wireless branch specifically, then yes they should have made the downtime more apparent. At least a notice on their website or something. But when my phone lost service yesterday (Only one I know personally that lost service, thought my SIM card was bust), I went down to an AT&T store to get a replacement. I was quickly informed that there is an outage because of network issues. Sounds like admission of a problem to me.

      --
      Said, "It's just like dice but it's got more sides And it tells me who lives and who dies"
  24. WPS & GETS did not work either by jaredmauch · · Score: 1

    WPS and GETS did not work from my cellular phone during this time. This was quite a severe outage, and caused 'No Service' for a very wide area locally as well. I did not determine if it was due to the tower being without power though, most sites have 8-12 hours of standby power at most.

  25. Re:Will AT&T repay me for the days my service by jaredmauch · · Score: 2, Informative

    If the facility had the roof blown off due to the 60mph+ winds we had, and caused a safety hazard due to exposed wiring, etc.. I certainly can see a case, but this is all conjecture. Unless you (and I don't) have facts to support your postulation, we can go on feeding the echo chamber more and more!

  26. Infrastructure! by grolaw · · Score: 1, Insightful

    90 day profit margins have run the USA for the past 8 years - so the Minneapolis I-35 bridge collapses, New Orleans and the Gulf Coast are totaled and now we are looking at primary communications breaking down.

    For more than 50 years telephone carried its own power. If your power line went down odds were that you still could call for an ambulance/fire over your telephone.

    Today - we still have the weasels who claim that they are making the "homeland" safe against terrorists - but not storms!

    We need infrastructure - maintenance and new far, far more now than we ever have in the past. We don't have local radio now - all programming is run by conglomerates. If that rail car in Fargo derails and leaks methylisocyanate - there is no way to warn the locals.....

    Bophal comes to the US. Thanks a lot, BUSHCO!

    1. Re:Infrastructure! by Cornwallis · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Oh please spare us the BUSHCO crap. The I-35 bridge didn't suddenly deteriorate over the past 8 years. Taking the nation's infrastructure for granted has been going on since it was first created. Short-term profits were what drove the 90s. Remember the dot com boom and bust? Grow up. There was a decent Op-Ed piece in the NYT discussing this issue: Reboot America

    2. Re:Infrastructure! by squidguy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wasn't the bridge inspected, and passed, by the State?

    3. Re:Infrastructure! by daniel_newby · · Score: 1

      ... so the Minneapolis I-35 bridge collapses ...

      The I-35 bridge collapsed because of a design flaw. (Mostly. The inspection engineers had a case of tunnel vision.)

      We don't have local radio now - all programming is run by conglomerates. If that rail car in Fargo derails and leaks methylisocyanate - there is no way to warn the locals.....

      You mean besides the Emergency Alert System, which is required by law to be supported by a wide variety of radio transmitters.

    4. Re:Infrastructure! by grolaw · · Score: 1

      I-35 is an INTERSTATE HIGHWAY created by an act of Congress and signed by President Eisenhower. The Feds have the duty to maintain the INTERSTATE HIGHWAY SYSTEM.

    5. Re:Infrastructure! by grolaw · · Score: 1

      The New York Times - my original home-town broadsheet - has changed from the days when it engaged in reportage and today when it kisses the ring of the VP and his minions. They sat on the Wiretapping story through the 2004 election season and they also gave that worthless minx Judith Miller carte blanch to feed disinformation about the Iraq war as proffered by Scooter Libby & Dick Cheney.

      I dropped a 30+ year subscription to the NYT because of such garbage - and I hope that they lose the new building that they have hocked - it is the price one pays for doing the king's dirty work and forgetting what the 5th estate is about.

      As for growing up - well, I'll leave that to you - and your child-like short memory.

    6. Re:Infrastructure! by grolaw · · Score: 1

      You mean the EAS that DOESN'T WORK on massive nets? http://www.slate.com/id/2157395/sidebar/2157437/

    7. Re:Infrastructure! by Cornwallis · · Score: 0

      Please. You're still ignoring the original issue which is the fact there isn't enough money anywhere to keep shoring up the our aging infrastructure. Attempting to blame decay on BUSHCO is silly. All of the DC Scoundrels(TM) are complicit. What makes it worse is OBAMACO is planning more of the same by "investing" in huge public works projects that will simply continue the exacerbate the same problems we have now.

    8. Re:Infrastructure! by grolaw · · Score: 1

      You seem to have no concept of the cost of the Gramm, Leach Bliley Act http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gramm-Leach-Bliley_Act
      Passed in a lame duck session in 1999 the regulations implementing the act were written in 2001 and went into effect Jan 1, 2002. http://www.ftc.gov/privacy/glbact/glbsub1.htm
      The unregulated Credit Derivative market ran up "investments" to the tune of $200 Trillion or about 4x the World's GNP.

      The BUSHIES were entirely behind robbing the US and the rest of the planet blind. They have left a shell of a nation - the USA, deeply in debt to the oil states and China and those notes come due in 20 years.

      If we had (1) Never gone into Iraq - 100% of the US Infrastructure needs could have been met; and, (2) If we hadn't cut taxes during wartime (unprecedented in any nation); and, (3) If we had kept the SEC and other regulatory agencies awake - we wouldn't have these "money" problems.

      Where the US GNP is $13.6 Trillion and Wall Street creates, and trades/sells credit derivatives worth $200 Trillion - money just isn't money any more. My sources are the Financial Times, my education (I'm a lawyer), my investments and a slew of other sources than /.

      New Orleans was a pure example of gross - if not criminal - negligence. Don't tell me about money - tons went in after but there was a 3 day warning as Katrina formed in the Atlantic, crossed over Florida and then hit the Gulf Coast. All at a time when the Bushies had "restructured" government to increase "homeland security" - years after a single terrorist incident the President was telling the head of FEMA (no longer a Cabinet Agency), "Heckofa job Brownie" to Michael DeWayne Brown - a moron of an attorney with no emergency management skills - he did NOTHING to limit the damage BEFORE Katrina hit. Hell, he had to find out about what was going on from CNN while ensconced in Baton Rouge.

      Go ahead and delude yourself - but the US has a $10.5 Trillion Dollar hangover as of TODAY thanks to BUSHCO - and the price will just go up and up and up as the bills come due.

  27. Re:Not conspiracy, but AT&T has not been forth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is currently happening in Columbus, OH. Calls go straight to VM. Voicemail and 3G are fine, working, and outbound calls are OK, but all incoming calls are hitting a "0 seconds" ringtime. They've 'reset' that to 20 seconds or longer, but it doesn't seem to make a difference...everything inbound goes to voicemail.

  28. Interesting by chazzf · · Score: 1

    I experienced this yesterday driving west across the state on I-94--I kept getting "network busy" around Ann Arbor.

    --
    No statement is true, not even this one.
  29. Re:Will AT&T repay me for the days my service by Burrfoot · · Score: 1

    When my AT&T line goes down (which it does far too often given that the lines are underground) I get a credit on my next bill for the time form my trouble call until service is restored. Don't they do the same thing for cell phones? [Asked as a long-time Sprint customer. I don't know Sprint's policy -- on the other hand they've never been down [that I knew of anyway]]

  30. Re:What about the recent ice storm in the Northeas by haruchai · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Welcome to Canada - we see that all the time in Montreal; it's actually quite beautiful, until it gets heavy enough to snap trees, down powerlines, make sidewalks and roads unnavigable.

    --
    Pain is merely failure leaving the body
  31. Re:Will AT&T repay me for the days my service by cthulu_mt · · Score: 1
    Here is the Fore Majure cluase from our companies contract:

    Our obligations to render services hereunder, in whole or in part, shall be suspended during any period where such rendering by us is prevented by in each case, any of the following factors which are beyond our reasonable control: war, riot, invasion, flood, fire, hurricane, tornado, requirement of law, computer virus, Internet infrastructure failure, disruption of services provided by our ISP or other suppliers, earthquake, computer system malfunction caused by factors not subject to our reasonable control, power failure, accident, strike or lockout, governmental interference or regulation, terrorism, infectious disease, or any other condition beyond our reasonable control. An equitable reduction in the fees to be paid to us shall be made in proportion to the value of any services required hereunder which we fail to provide due the existence of any such Force Majeure condition.

    Standard boilerplate stuff. We had to invoke the clause a few years ago when a hurricane shut down our facilities for 2 days.

    --
    Virginia is for lovers. EVE is for griefers.
  32. Thats all a nice homespun story and all but.. by Viol8 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    .. if "the company" didn't pay them, they wouldn't get out of bed. Lets not pretend they're up those poles out of the kindness of their hearts.

    1. Re:Thats all a nice homespun story and all but.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True... but don't ignore the folks that when they are hired to do a job strive to do it well and against what odd may exist. Some of these folks truly believe in getting things back going after a storm like this despite what they get paid. You know folks with a good work ethic.

  33. Economic Disaster Areas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Given that practically the entire state of Michigan is an economic disaster area with critical infrastructures (roads, utilities, state and local govts themselves, etc) crumbing apart for the past decade, and no money being spent to maintain or rebuild them.... then just how wise is it for the telecommunications giants to locate their data centers there?

  34. Excuse me for pointing this out, but as a doctor.. by Viol8 · · Score: 0, Troll

    ..perhaps you should consider getting a friggin landline for when you're on call!

    If you're an emergency doctor and you rely on mobile devices to get emergency calls you're an ass. A pager or mobile is fine in a hospital where theres always a backup PA system to call you , but its NOT fine when you're at home.

  35. Unsung Heros by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Exactly right!

    Most bean counter types don't have a clue why they have all those over priced techies on the payroll, and when cost cutting comes along, they make an easy target.

    I don't have to go around in bad weather fixing crappy equipment, as I'm a Network Analyst, but the details could easily fit my job.

    Most of the time, I'm watching, monitoring, tweaking, updating, and so on. That's my job when the shit isn't hitting the fan. Most of the time I can avert disaster by seeing the shit before it hits the fan.

    BTW, our department is going down to 60% of staffing, and when we were fully staffed we were "understaffed". I'm not sure how much longer I can keep the shit away from the fan.

    --
    Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
  36. Re:What about the recent ice storm in the Northeas by Dekortage · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I can believe this happens elsewhere on a more regular basis. The emergencies were from exactly what you said: snapped trees, downed powerlines, etc. My neighbor had one 40-foot elm split down the middle and land on his roof, and a similarly-sized maple tree uprooted from the weight of the ice -- as it fell, it took out the transformer on a nearby power pole, then landed on his truck. Ouch.

    --
    $nice = $webHosting + $domainNames + $sslCerts
  37. Re:Not conspiracy, but AT&T has not been forth by monomania · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here in Des Moines, I lost EDGE data service all morning but could still call out and receive calls. I tried every customer number for AT&T but got the "all offices are closed, call next business day" and there was no message (automated or otherwise) about outages. I was left to wonder if it was an account problem, etc. (WiFi worked fine). Even after service was restored in the early afternoon (locally) there was no message or information regarding the outage, nor any info to be found on their website. Less than impressive customer care.

  38. still don't grasp the obvious... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    ...that is why in America we'll keep replacing the power lines above ground instead of putting them underground.

    1. Re:still don't grasp the obvious... by computersareevil · · Score: 1

      Ummmm... The huge cost difference?

  39. That's why I still have a landline by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    I rarely use it. Actually, I never do, thinking about it. But one thing is certain: It will work in an emergency situation. It is independent from the local electricity (powered by the telco, don't ask me the details), cables are down in the ground (so even a citywide fire would do little harm to them, provided the switching boxes last, which they should do, being in fireproof environments), whatever insanity happens I will most likely get to hear a dialtone when I pick up.

    Call me paranoid, but considering what I pay for insurance, the landline is pretty cheap.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:That's why I still have a landline by kv9 · · Score: 0, Troll

      whatever insanity happens I will most likely get to hear a dialtone when I pick up.

      if zombie movies have taught me anything it's that the first thing to go is exactly your precious dialtone. then you'll get your ass chewed on by some growling guy. good luck with that.

    2. Re:That's why I still have a landline by MCZapf · · Score: 1

      For what little it's worth, during the 2003 blackout in the northeast US, my landline was dead while my cell phone still worked. I was disappointed, considering the ONLY thing that happened was a power failure - no storm.

    3. Re:That's why I still have a landline by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Oh c'mon, we're having a serious discussion here and you start with some made up crap. Everyone knows that the phone isn't where you're looking for aid in a zombie attack, you have your shotgun ready and a few trusted friends who happen to live (of course) right around the corner or veg' away on your sofa anyway.

      I certainly don't have the landline for zombie attacks. That would be like using garlic to scare off Werewolves, you have to use the right tools for the right occasion.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  40. emergency calls do whatever it takes by dominux · · Score: 5, Informative

    Put the keylock on and dial 112, 911 or 999 on any mobile, watch as it punches straight through the keylock and will dial. It will place the call over any mobile network it can reach, roaming or otherwise. Now try it with no credit on a pay as you go SIM. still works. Now take the SIM out. Still works.

    1. Re:emergency calls do whatever it takes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That annoys the heck out of me. What's the point of locking the keypad if you can still mash 999? Preventing accidental calls is the reason why I lock the keypad in the first place!

    2. Re:emergency calls do whatever it takes by girlintraining · · Score: 1

      Ah, at least on the Motorola RAZR v2, if you remove the SIM card, the phone will not be able to dial or perform any functions. It will simply stall at "Insert SIM card," and not boot.

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    3. Re:emergency calls do whatever it takes by dominux · · Score: 1

      so does my Ericsson. but try pressing 112 when it is in that state (don't press the call button though)

  41. It apparently takes 2 weeks to fix a tower by ruiner13 · · Score: 1

    I have AT&T in Indianapolis. At my house, I normally have at least 4 bars of service. Last month, it went to complete "No Service", because apparently the tower servicing my area was having issues. When I called AT&T, it took going to seven different support representatives before I could actually find someone who could look at their network monitoring data and tell me a tower went down. Knowing that they knew it was a problem, I figured it would be quickly resolved. NO SIR! They said it would be 2 weeks before they could get someone to fix the tower. If a major carrier such as AT&T can't get a single tower fixed in under 2 weeks, I really have zero faith that they'd be able to respond quickly to an emergency situation such as this. I suspect it will take months if not years before service is back to normal, if their service times they told me are accurate.

    --

    today is spelling optional day.

  42. Re:Will AT&T repay me for the days my service by freedom_india · · Score: 1

    Nope. Does not stand in ANY court of law.
    A contract is a contract is a contract between humans.
    Any court will first overrule this piece of crap and rule AT&T is liable to compensate for loss of service contracted for.
    Declaration of War, Dealings with enemy and illegal items for contract are the only ones NOT enforceable by a court.
    All others are strictly enforceable whatever be the cause, including but not limited to storms, rains, snow, hail, sleet, fire or loss of life of employees.
    Not that am heartless, but a Corporation has no soul and no heart. If i was snowed in and could not make my mortgage payment, the bank will foreclose on me, notwithstanding 10-feet of snow in my town.
    Similarly, when dealing with corporations, leave your heart and soul at the door.
    Deal with logically and legally to the letter.
    If they make a single mistake, however small, screw them completely. They would do the same to you.

    --
    "Doing what i can, with what i have." ~ Burt Gummer
  43. Re:Will AT&T repay me for the days my service by squidguy · · Score: 1

    Will AT&T send me a check for the days my service was out?
    They won't send you a check, unless you happen to have a balance in your favor when you terminate your account. Call your carrier and request a credit because of a service outage - if you are polite and a good customer (e.g., pays on time) they will give it to you...even if it was due to weather.

  44. A storm, not Storm... by ckthorp · · Score: 1

    Am I the only person that expected this to be about the Storm network doing a DDoS, or some such, to AT&T's network...

  45. Yeah, I thought Blackberry Storm was w/ Verizon by geoffrobinson · · Score: 1

    Can't keep my phones apart without a scorecard.

    --
    Except for ending slavery, the Nazis, communism, & securing American independence, war has never solved anything.
  46. Making AT&T pay... by freedom_india · · Score: 3, Informative

    A Credit is NOT the same as a check.
    Reimbursement needs to be in the same terms of original contract.
    You don't give them CREDIT for providing you service. They take your money: period.
    Similarly, ask for a check or money order sent to your address. If they refuse, sue them in small claims court for violating a contract.
    Why should you accept CREDIT when they don't accept yours?
    A Credit is just an interest-free loan to these guys.
    Refuse to accept unilateral changes to your contract and demand the repayment from them in check or cash.
    Better yet, do the following:
    1) Send a registered letter to their local office demanding financial compensation for the days not in service and quote the contract. Give them 7 calendar days to pay (not working days).
    2) Wait for 7 days and when they don't respond, file a complaint with small claims court. Ask the clerk to send a notice to their local exchange in telephone directory with another 7 calendar days to respond.
    3) They still wont respond for $5 or $10.
    4) Enter a default judgment. Tell the judge they insulted him/her by deeming this court to be beneath their status (appeals to vanity and not logic). The judge will be furious on their own to consider MAXIMUM enforcement.
    5) Get the judge to declare that AT&T is in default of a debt to you. This is very important. Because this disassociates the original contract from the debt. In other words, in the eyes of law, AT&T is indebted to you for the said amount as if they borrowed money from you (in a way true).
    5) Now the judge will ask what do you want to do: Request that the judge allows you to seize their assets for payment of this debt. Get a bailiff order.
    6) Call your close friends/relatives and state there (from a pay phone or get somebody else to call) to gather at the local AT&T office for a fire sale.
    7) Get the Sheriff and a deputy. Go to the AT&T office and paste the order to their door stating their assets are being seized for discharging a debt. Throw every employee out. Ask any protesters to be considered as disobeying a judge's order.
    8) Ask the sheriff to seize their equipment and conduct an auction at the doors with Sheriff and his officers as guards.
    9) Your friends and relatives should have arrived by now. Make them bid 10 cents or 20 cents for iPhones, telephones, routers, computers, etc., and sell it to them at that price.
    10) Finish the sale within 15 mins enough to collct your debt. The longer you delay, the exponential the probability that some retarded employee will call a AT&T lawyer who gets the judgment suspended.
    11) Now you have a nice collection of worthy items for the $10 you were owed by AT&T. Plus AT&T credit is screwed because you had a lien and auction of their property.

    If you had owed 30 cents on a mortgage that was overdue, ANY bank would do the same to you.

    --
    "Doing what i can, with what i have." ~ Burt Gummer
    1. Re:Making AT&T pay... by devman · · Score: 3, Funny

      Most people just say IANAL (I am not a lawyer). Instead of proving it so dramatically as you just did.

    2. Re:Making AT&T pay... by freedom_india · · Score: 2, Funny

      Most people accept corporate overlordship without questioning. Iam not one of them.

      --
      "Doing what i can, with what i have." ~ Burt Gummer
  47. Re:Will AT&T repay me for the days my service by cthulu_mt · · Score: 1

    Wrog. Force Majure clauses have most certainly been upheld in courts, in the US and India. I'd recommend not waiting until the last minute to remit your mortgage payment.

    --
    Virginia is for lovers. EVE is for griefers.
  48. Re:Excuse me for pointing this out, but as a docto by plague3106 · · Score: 1

    Well apparently he DID have a landline, if you bothered reading the post. Of course and landline doesn't help if he had to do something important for himself or his family; buy gas for a generator, food, whatever. A cell phone makes him reachable no matter where he is, a landline does not.. which is likely why they called his cell first. Of course, nobody seems to know AT&T dropped the ball, and so didn't bother with the landline.. they assumed the cell network was fine.

  49. OMG NO CELL!!!! by GottliebPins · · Score: 1

    OMG I CANT TEXT ANYONE! IM GOING TO DIE! Why so serious? Back when everyone was on land lines if we had an ice storm the lines were down. No phone service. Now that we have cell towers every couple miles you expect them to work 100% of the time? A cell tower has to be connected to a land line somewhere, and it needs power. If the power is out or the land lines are down, so is your cell tower. People couldn't wait to abandon their land lines then they bitch about not being able to get good cell service in every arm pit in the country. And now when I'm up in the mountains staying in a nice secluded cabin in the woods I get to sit on the porch and look up at the cell towers blinking away all night. So much for the view but I get 3 bars. Now people can call and pester me anywhere I go. Thank goodness for progress.

  50. A major reason not to cancel POTS service by TheHawke · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You cell phone users just don't get it, do you?
    One of the major reasons why they want you away from your landline service is that they don't have to comply with the state or fed rules, tariffs, and laws forcing them to maintain POTS service even through the worst of weather.

    Lose a cell tower? Fine, two weeks to get it back up.
    Lose a phone line, depending on your state, from 12 hours to a working week in compliance with PUC regulations (in Texas it's 5 days, then Austin gets froggy).
    Business landline goes down, 3-5 hours, as fast as a tech can get on site after getting pulled from a lower priority job.
    Business cell service breaks, ok, duh, you get the point now?

    What is $15-$25/mo for basic POTS service that is there when you need it in comparison to $60+ cell service that is still not as dependable as we like it to be?
    I'll keep my POTS service and call forward from it to my cell, keeps the telemarketers at bay.

    --
    First rule of holes; When in one, stop digging.
  51. Re:Will AT&T repay me for the days my service by awyeah · · Score: 1

    Yep -

    All service providers have clauses in their contracts that get them out of liability for these situations. From AT&T's wireless service agreement (go to http://www.wireless.att.com/learn/articles-resources/wireless-terms.jsp, then click on "Terms of Service"):

    "WE DO NOT GUARANTEE YOU UNINTERRUPTED SERVICE OR COVERAGE. WE CANNOT ASSURE YOU THAT IF YOU PLACE A 911 CALL YOU WILL BE FOUND."
    [...]

    They then go on to basically say that they are not liable for any interruptions in their service for pretty much any reason.

    They do state, however, that if your service is interrupted for more than 24 hours, you can call them and ask for a refund.

    My experience is that even if you're out for less than 24 hours, they'll sometimes give you a small refund if you just ask nicely.

    Basically, with cell providers (and consumer-grade ISPs, and anyone else that normally provides a continuous service), they obviously want to have as close to 100% uptime as they possibly can, but they don't want to be sued if they don't. These clauses in the contract prevent them from being sued... but they can't prevent them from losing customers. What keeps them as reliable as they (normally) are, is market forces. If you're too unreliable, you'll lose customers.

    My ISP, who will go nameless, is a great example... Now, they've been incredibly reliable for me, but when I signed up and read their terms of service, it basically says that they could provide zero uptime for an entire billing period, and you still have to pay them. Again, I really think that's just so they can't be sued, and I have no doubt that they make every effort to keep their network up and running as well as possible.

    --
    Why, no, I haven't meta-moderated lately. Thanks for asking!
  52. Re:Not conspiracy, but AT&T has not been forth by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 1

    In the aftermath of Ike, the most reliable mode of communication I had (I have no land lines) were text messages. I wasn't surprised. I experienced the same thing during Katrina. And I had seen discussion of this elsewhere - to include Slashdot.

  53. Re:Will AT&T repay me for the days my service by macx666 · · Score: 1

    No, I don't know for fact that they don't have adequate power backup. I do know for fact that they didn't loose their roof. I also know, as I live in the general area, that other than a few trees down here and there, power was the only problem.

    I certainly didn't see anything about trees falling on datacenters in the storm reports I've read through. I have, however, read about many many people being out of power because of the winds.

  54. Re:Will AT&T repay me for the days my service by macx666 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That's fine. If a tornado ripped through their datacenter, I could see that being Force Majeure. Failure to have a backup generator (or other power protection mechanism) is not force majeure and you would be hard pressed to find a judge that would say otherwise. Failure to have power for any reason is considered a predictable event that any datacenter operator should be able to deal with for 24 hours.

  55. Re:Excuse me for pointing this out, but as a docto by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He said he had a pager. That counts as backup.

  56. Wow, what's with the ice storms?!?! by eriks · · Score: 1

    I just survived 11 days without power in central Massachusetts. Though how much of that was really necessary because of devastation due to the ice storm (which really was devastating) and how much was due to penny pinching by the gas & light company, remains to be seen, there is an ongoing investigation.

  57. Re:Not conspiracy, but AT&T has not been forth by dgatwood · · Score: 1

    Outgoing calls work because the tower doesn't have to phone home to make an outgoing call. Incoming calls don't work because the tower near you has to contact the primary tower in the city where your cell phone's phone number is registered to tell it that the phone is currently hanging off a different tower. What is probably happening here is that the inter-tower communication is not working. This is probably because of the same trunk line failure that is causing the data to not work. In other words, chances are, the tower near you is working fine, but your home tower (wherever that is) is dead as a doornail.

    --

    Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  58. Re:What about the recent ice storm in the Northeas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Damn that global warming...er, climate change!!

  59. Emergency professionals on-call by troll8901 · · Score: 1

    perhaps you should consider getting a friggin landline for when you're on call!

    If you're an emergency doctor and you rely on mobile devices to get emergency calls you're an ass.

    Perhaps someone would like to explain:

    • How being "on call" affects a professional?
    • How hospitals operate night-shift?

    It will be an interesting read.

  60. Cell phones with no battery chargers? by HockeyPuck · · Score: 1

    I've always wondered what do people do that have dropped their landline service for cell/VOIP/Cable only service when they have a multi-day power outage? We've seen these outages after Hurricanes in the South/texas areas as well as ice storms in the midwest and northeast. In the recent ice storm (~2weeks ago) in NewEngland, all hardware stores had large signs up out front that said 'No Generators', I even heard of one guy that drove from NH to CT to get a generator.

    1. Re:Cell phones with no battery chargers? by kevin.fowler · · Score: 1

      New England resident here: I've got a Duracell Pocket Power charger, a battery-less solar USB charger, and an old 4-AA battery iPod charger (clunky, but can still give an iPhone a charge). I'm in the city now, but long power outages used to be a problem back in the boonies. It's always good to be prepared.

      It's crazy how many people who live anywhere (city or country) who don't have a maglite/crank radio/space blankets/stash of emergency food.

      --
      Bury me in mashed potatoes.
    2. Re:Cell phones with no battery chargers? by SaDan · · Score: 1

      DC to AC inverter and two cars. I can go days without any power at home, and keep my cell phones charged up, get online, etc.

    3. Re:Cell phones with no battery chargers? by tcgroat · · Score: 1

      A 12V car charger will do nicely. Most phones come with one, and even if yours doesn't they're widely available and don't cost much. The charger is low current, so you don't need to run the engine while charging.

      The bigger concern is the cell company's infrastructure. I can't believe they fought the FCC's run time and maintenance requirements. Because the cell phone system is part of the 9-1-1 communications infrastructure, I'd expect at a minimum NFPA 110 Class 24, level 2 compliance (24 hours run-time before refueling).

    4. Re:Cell phones with no battery chargers? by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      Beyond the car-chargers, a lot of cell phones are USB powered. A laptop battery can charge a cell phone quite a few times as long as there's no actual computing being done.

    5. Re:Cell phones with no battery chargers? by cdrguru · · Score: 1

      (a) There are relatively few CO locations as compared to the number of cell towers.

      (b) Your average 24-hour runtime generator is a little bigger than the average cell tower "house". Therefore, it would be at least double the space to add the generator. And that is for the ground-level towers - what about those on the top of buildings?

    6. Re:Cell phones with no battery chargers? by afidel · · Score: 1

      Car charger, that big 800-1800A 12V battery will power your cellphone almost indefinitely and it comes with it's own generator. Hybrid cars could be even better but we need some intelligence in future plugin models and you will have to get a service disconnect switch if you want to use your inhouse wiring =)

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  61. Ice storms and winter weather are nothing new by rickb928 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    And neither are technology problems.

    In 1998 Maine suffered the worst ice storm in decades. Power, telephone, and cellular service were affected. Yes, cable TV also.

    In Gray, Maine, I was without power for 11 days. My sister in Searsport was without for 17 days, 2 of which were unnecessary - her house was about a quarter-mile in the woods, and the crews missed her line. She had power restored a few hours after calling in and reporting she was still out, and could see lights on at neighbors' houses. Darn.

    Among the events that would inform the Midwest utilities:

    1. Bangor Hydro-Electric, serving North-Central and Downeast Maine reported virtually 100% loss of transmission lines and 100% of customers affected. Central Maine Power reported most customers affected north of Portland, and most transmission lines down. Both utilities reported to major customers that restoration would take weeks, and they pretty much beat thet estimate. Not bad for rebuilding either 70% or 100% of their transmission network. BHE in particular had to replace completely many miles of hi-v transmission line, with poles snapped off. Availability of basic equipment like insulators became the limiting factor. In light of this, customers such as Verizon and cell carriers were told they were genuinely SOL.

    2. The Verizon maintenance supervisor for the state had just relocated from Cape Cod, where he survived a similar event a year earlier. He immediately commandeered all generators, battery packs for SLCs etc, and emergency equipment from Mass, lower NY state, and beyond. Upstate NY was also affected and could spare nothing. His actions permitted his team to keep swapping the batteries out of SLCs, recharging them, and swapping to keep basic phone service running. He also asked for and got fuel from the Maine National Guard to keep the trucks and generators running. Most gas stations were down for lack of power.

    3. As is the nature of winter storms, power lines suffer the most because they are highest on the poles. Telephone is next, and cable TV is usually lowest and suffers the least. Cable companies didn't bother much for restoration, since TV is the luxury you give up when the generator needs more gas than you have. Thankfully, this also meant most telephone service survived, and all they had to do was keep their gensets running. 'That's All'... It was a massive effort.

    4. Cell service then was TDMA and CDMA, and NAMPS. It was good, despite the problems of the carriers having to do their own bucket-brigade battery swapping. They did terrically.

    5. From my observations, quick action by carriers to put plans into action, clever thinking, and looking beyond the usual boundaries of support saved the day.

    6. And one saving grace - the NBC affiliate in Portand broadcasts on Channel 6. Audio was available on most FM radios, way down on the band. When HD kicks in, this will be lost. No replacement I see.

    It appears that AT&T is caught here with a central switch/datacenter that is stranded. We'll dissect their planning, no doubt, but ultimately they needed to plan for a week of power failure. I know that sounds preposterous, but my hospital clients at the time were even parking water trucks in the lot in case power outages resulted in public water supplies failing. Diesel tankers also came in. One hospital had backup privileges with a sister facility in Pennsylvania, and we would have transferred back-office processing there and flown/driven key personnel for a week to keep paychecks, billing, and patient care data current. Fortunately, my old stomping grounds were no longer my business. That hospital was out for 5 days, and ended up with a National Guard generator on site. The Guardsmen went without power for their armory to do that, sleeping in trucks and tents. Fortunately, it was not that cold for January. If it was 10 degrees colder, a lot of people would have died, never ready for that sort of trouble.

    I escaped to friends in New Hampshire. Yes, I'm a wuss.

    AT&T should own up to bad planning, despite the unusual weather. Redundancy is crucial, expensive, and worth it.

    --
    deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    1. Re:Ice storms and winter weather are nothing new by kevin.fowler · · Score: 1

      That recent storm was hard to really get my head around. Places 20 miles outside of BOSTON were without power for a week.

      --
      Bury me in mashed potatoes.
  62. Why so sporadic? by wastedlife · · Score: 1

    My phone was the only one I know personally to have had issues yesterday. My wife, her parents and my parents all had working cell phones through AT&T all day yesterday. From about noon until about 9 PM I could not make or recieve any calls or SMS after several reboots and a swapped SIM card from my local AT&T retailer. WTF? I understand how a data-center failure could cause widespread issues, but how does it only affect some people and not all from the area?

    --
    Said, "It's just like dice but it's got more sides And it tells me who lives and who dies"
  63. People are used to this now. Standards are lower! by ScottFree2600 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Never had a call drop? Never been someplace where there is "no network"? Never had a conversation that you simply couldn't understand because of the "stacked" aggressive compression? C'mon! Thanks to the wireless companies, people have lower standards now, in terms of audio quality, reliability and availability. I used to work for Jabra years ago, before they had any market share and weren't really sure what direction to take. I was brought on to improve audio quality for various products. One was the small "all in ear" headset. It had terrible audio due to the lack of "proximity effect", there was really no way to "fix" this problem. I used to piss everybody off by calling it "an ear mounted speakerphone" in meetings. People would never accept the poor quality on land line phones (the headset market at that time). Poof! Along comes wireless and the lack of quality is expected by the consumer. Result: sell product and then company! People who have only a cell phone are nuts, and deaf!

  64. There's more here... by Oliver+Aaltonen · · Score: 1

    My wife and I lost our AT&T service in Hyannis, MA on Christmas morning, and it's been sporadic ever since. When I called 12/26, the CSR mentioned the entire New England region had known issues with phone service, and they were working on it. This has been going on for 4+ days now with no updates... there are a bunch of threads going on AT&T's customer support forums with reports of others nationwide without coverage.

  65. Re:Not conspiracy, but AT&T has not been forth by KovaaK · · Score: 1

    Is it fixed for you yet? I had no problems with SMS yesterday, and I made one call (turns out the place was closed, so no one answered). AT&T seemed to be working fine for me yesterday, so maybe your phone coincidentally is having issues.

  66. Isn't it wonderful... by GuloGulo · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    "That clearly provides for a collective right and doesn't apply to the states..."

    Seriously though, isn't it wonderful anti-gun nuts can't even make that weak argument anymore.

    --
    "The government grants you rights, not the other way around."-- beav007. Yes, these people really exist...
    1. Re:Isn't it wonderful... by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      Seriously though, isn't it wonderful anti-gun nuts can't even make that weak argument anymore.

      Oh, just wait. At the very least we've probably got another assault weapons ban coming back. You really would have thought that the Democrats would have learned by now.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    2. Re:Isn't it wonderful... by Khyber · · Score: 1

      The Militia Act would get that nonsense stricken down if taken to court. Access to arms currently in use for warfare, and all that stuff.

      And if you think nobody's going to buy a tank, I point you to Master P, who has a fully functional gold and platinum plated tank. Yes, it works and fires and drives. I point you to Arnold, who has a military Humvee (I think he was the first to own one as well.) Several people have bought fighter jets.

      A ban on assault weapons when people can own city-leveling hardware makes no sense according to the Militia Act.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  67. That's some phone by slapout · · Score: 1

    Wow. I knew there was a lot of buzz about the new Blackberry , but I didn't think it'd be enough to move all of AT&T's Midwest customers to Verizon. :-)

    --
    Coder's Stone: The programming language quick ref for iPad
  68. Re:Roaming? (PS) by mcgrew · · Score: 1

    The wikipedia article I linked was not correct in many aspects. For instance, it said "The hardest hit areas were in the commercial area around White Oaks Mall and along Veterans Parkway". Actually the area by what is known to locals as the "Wabash Curve" in a line to south 9th street were the hardest hit, and a stretch of Dirkeon Parkway on the far east side of town. Dirkson was closed for weeks, as it was covered in utility poles.

    A commercial building by the Wabash Curve (which no longer actually exists, it's now the intersection of Stanford, Wabash, and MacAurthur) had steel I-beam girders twisted. A short way up Wabash the Barrellhead lost its roof, and that's about as far west as the damage was.

    Unfortunately we have to go by wikipedia's erroneous tale, as uncyclopedia doesn't have an entry.

    The wikipedia article also neglects to mention the (on topic) infrastructure damage, which was extreme.

    It mentions looting [citation needed], but there was no looting whatever. Wikipedia is the only mention of any looting. The areas that were hit were destroyed; there was nothing to loot.

    Come on, wikiguys, fix the wikipedia.

  69. Pictures of damage from the Dec 11-12 Ice Storm by dtmos · · Score: 1

    In case some are from warmer climes and don't know what the fuss with ice storms is all about, here are a couple of damage scenes for your perusal. Basically, ice builds up on all external surfaces of a structure until either (a) the weight of the ice causes the structure to collapse, or (b) the surface area of the structure is increased to the point that the wind in the storm blows the structure over.

    This is the KC1XX amateur radio contest station in Mason, New Hampshire, after the storm. More than 1.5 inches of radial ice.

    Scroll down to December 12 and 14 in the maintenance and upgrade blog to see pictures of the ice storm damage at the K1TTT station in Peru, Massachusetts. His December 15 entry lists the damage, and subsequent entries begin the long process of rebuilding.

  70. News outlets slow again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dataoutages.com was the first to report this on their bb-outage list and on their blog at http://blog.dataoutages.com/ Up until then, the reps that I spoke with at AT&T didn't even know what was going on until they started checking around and found out about it through the RSS feed and then calling the techs.

  71. Re:Roaming? (PS) by LoadWB · · Score: 1

    Or, as part of the community which builds Wikipedia, YOU could fix it.

  72. Re:Roaming? (PS) by mcgrew · · Score: 1

    Nope. I gave up on editing wikipedia a long time ago, and it just keeps getting worse.

    When I found I had a cataract, of course I hit wikipedia and looked up "cataract surgery". It was helpful, but the device that my doctor was to implant in my eye in place of its occluded lens wasn't listed, even though the FDA had approved its use three years earlier.

    So I edited the entry, and added the acommodating lens, which my surgeon had implanted. Wikipedia mentioned the single focus IOLs that had been used since their invention in the late forties, and it mentioned multifocal IOLs that work somewhet like bifocal (trifocal) eyeglasses, but not the lens that would actually focus.

    A week later my edit was edited out. Someone apparently didn't believe that they had invented a focusing lens implant, or one of Baush & Laum's competetitors didn't want anyone to know they existed.

    I looked it up six months later and someone had re-edited it to add the CrystaLens. A week later and his edit, too, was undone.

    So I'll just use wikipedia for non-critical research and quick lookups, and leave the editing to those who don't mind their efforts being vandalized. But if I'm quoting it here or anywhere else and there's an obvious error (the mall wasn't touched by the tornados and there was no looting) I'm going to call them on it.

    Of course, uncyclopedia is even worse. Their article on crack was absolutely hilarious, but it has had all the humor excised and replaced with inane stupidity. Fortunately their article on kitten huffing is no longer editible. Oddly, my edit to its entry on slashdot (copountry) remains unvandalized and it is still funny. I added the quotes

    "In Soviet Russia, slashdot trolls YUO!." ~ Russian Reversal on Slashdot
    "On the streets these days, a dime bag of kittens costs a pretty penny." ~ Oscar Wilde on Slashdot's "offtopic" moderation

    Speaking of which...

  73. Re:Not conspiracy, but AT&T has not been forth by BronsCon · · Score: 1

    If you listen to the ENTIRE "our offices are closed" message, you are given an 800 number to their after hours call center.

    That's where the message about the outage was.

    Wrong place, if you ask me, but there it was.

    All I lost yesterday was EDGE and GPRS, presumably 3G, as well, but I have no way to know for sure.

    Incoming and outgoing calls both worked fine for me all day. Everything is working now.

    --
    APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
  74. Re:Will AT&T repay me for the days my service by mazarin5 · · Score: 1

    More and more!

    --
    Fnord.
  75. Still on-going by guidojones · · Score: 1

    As of 5pm in the Chicago area, I still don't have full service. I received a call, missed it and it went to voice mail. I tried from my home phone calling my cell to receive it and was surprised to get the message that my number was disconnected or no longer in service .... As of 4:30 when I finally got a hold of AT&T, there was still no ETA for total resolution ....

  76. Re:Will AT&T repay me for the days my service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use to work for a cell phone company and can answer your question. Contact at&t and have them suspend your service for the period the service is out. You will get a prorated credit on your next bill. I remember taking calls from people like you. Almost without exception the person was a complete moron. Dont bother replying, I wont read it.

  77. Re:Not conspiracy, but AT&T has not been forth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Doesn't stop people from emailing me to say they're having trouble with email. Usually turns out the trouble is a typo in the "To:" field which is clearly indicated by the error message that says, "This message could not be delivered because the user [ferd@somecompany.com] does not exist. Please check the address and try again."

    Or they're really having email trouble and they wait a few hours before calling to ask why I haven't responded to their email.

  78. Re:Will AT&T repay me for the days my service by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

    Lawyers basically consider anything unexpected an act of god. For this reason, you always have to be careful in entering into a contract with a broad FM clause.

  79. Re:Not conspiracy, but AT&T has not been forth by kickassweb · · Score: 1

    It might pay to have a spare, a pay-as-you-go phone for just such emergencies. Most of us wouldn't need that type of redundancy, but in your case (and the case of every doctor on call) it should be mandatory.

    --
    I'd love to change the world but I can't find the source code.
  80. Ham Radio rules! by erc · · Score: 1

    I bring up stories like this every time I hear an emergency manager say, "oh, we don't need ham radio anymore, we have cell and sat phones."

    --
    -- Ed Carp, N7EKG erc@pobox.com PGP KeyID: 0x0BD32C9B What I'm up to: http://intuitives.mine.nu
  81. No problem! by Lxy · · Score: 1

    Generator... check
    Icom 746.... check
    folding dipole... check

    I'm sorry, what are these phone things you were talking about?

    --

    There is no reasonable defense against an idiot with an agenda
    :wq
  82. Landlines Quickly Losing Advantage. by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

    During Ike, many land lines also failed.

    1970's: A copper wire ran from the phone company to you. The phone company had their own generators or first dibs on regular power.

    2000's: A plastic/glass fiber-optic wire goes to a local switch box. Local power with battery backup (SAME as cell phones) runs from the copper wire to your house.

    2000's: in some subdivisions... the fiber actually goes down your street and there is no backup for the 60' of copper wire to it.

    During Ike, My AT&T Cell phone randomly worked great while my friend's Verizon completely died. Something about being on the 3G network-- no idea why it worked and theirs failed.

    However- electricity was a problem. From Rita, I had gasoline but Ike kind of stunned us (hit the day we were going to galveston on vacation -- we were sure it was going to be another "miss" 80-120 miles away but it was like a guided missle) and it took a couple days to realize this was serious and to find my inverter going (at least that gave me two lights, a fan, optionally a microwave, laptop, and roomba chargable vacuum cleaner (regular vac wouldn't run).

    I should have a solar set up with battery (Xantex?) by next storm in addition to a generator (8-10 hours, will run a window unit, lights, a TV, and a laptop).

    But --- Landlines are no longer reliable. I was without them for about 3 years entirely but for now have a $16 a month deal (that's after taxes!) from AT&T. 25 outgoing calls (10 cents after that). Mainly use it to find my cell phone when I lose it in the house.

    I STOPPED using landlines tho - because the spam calls got so bad. I would get home to 10-15 messages- all trying to sell me things. I said, "I am not going to PAY AT&T for this kind of abuse any more on my frikkin unlisted number (which i pay them $1 to have)).

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  83. Reminds me of any holiday by caller9 · · Score: 1

    I spent Christmas in a GSM dead zone which is approx 5 miles from a fairly large population and an interstate. At my parents I get 0 bars with the AT&T logo which alternates to 1 bar and no signal depending on atmospheric conditions. A cloud rolled in at about 2AM whereupon I got those "merry christmas" text messages... ah nice to wake up to.

    The threshold with which they paint these signal zones on their coverage map is ridiculous. Naturally it only works outdoors or in a window sill at certain times, only on one side of the house. Some parts of the house will work. Almost anywhere else I get great coverage (aside from lakes close to the afore mentioned area where summer holidays are spent). This is repeated at aunt's and grandma's but not the roads between.

    Pretty much everyone in the town has Alltel and some crappy to passable CDMA tech (just from looking at them).

    On another note:
    The reason Japan and Korea can roll out awesome networks are social but mostly geographic. Look at Japan for instance. Surface area is tiny compared to US. Japan: 145840 square miles. Texas: 268601 square miles. Also Texas doesn't line up neatly on either side of a mountain range. Sure you can argue user density and back-haul capacity but c'mon that's just one state.

  84. Re:Will AT&T repay me for the days my service by freedom_india · · Score: 1

    Act of God is the only clause available.
    Hurricanes are no excuse for NOT making a payment on your mortgage and NOT an excuse for AT&T not providing you a telephone line in lieu of compensation.

    --
    "Doing what i can, with what i have." ~ Burt Gummer
  85. Re:Excuse me for pointing this out, but as a docto by Viol8 · · Score: 1

    Yes he had a landline , but it appears he hadn't bothered to give the number to anyone!

  86. Good ideas, but not needed. by neapolitan · · Score: 1

    Not really -- your argument sounds attractive, but is not always the best. People always have these grand fantasies about reaching doctors on call, but added redundancy does not always help. If something works 99.9% of the time, it is probably "good enough" for the expense, given redundancy already exists.

    If docs were issued a prepaid phone for home call (would have to be an entirely different network e.g. Verizon(CDMA) vs AT&T's GSM), most likely somebody would forget to charge it (rarely used: I would estimate once every couple years) or forget to add minutes (most of them have expiring minutes over time), or the physicians would not want to carry it (another thing to carry / charge / drop / break / lose / clip to the belt with four other things.) The numbers would get mixed up -- would you rather have one number for the busy nurse to call at every nursing station / call operator, or 4 in decreasing order? Everything has to be grounded in practicality. A good paging network as cellphone backup is better.

    A typical physician setup is email/blackberry for nonurgent, long communications (e.g. patients to see tomorrow AM when you get to the hospital.) For urgent communications most docs rely on a cellphone, and also carry a pager for the reliability (far above 99%) and increased range (much better than cellphone.) Landlines, as some of the people insinuated, are of course only practical when sitting at home or in an office.

    Thus, my blackberry went out, cellphone went to VM, and the pager came through for me. An additional cellphone might have helped, but possibly not. If my pager happened to be out also, they would have overhead paged me throughout all hospitals I cover, which I would have heard and called back (this is how they did it in the old days anyway, and I was in a hospital at the time.) If I didn't hear this, they would have called my home, but I wasn't home anyway.

    If all this failed, they would have called a colleague of mine. If he just got in a car crash, they would have called an in-house ICU doctor cover. If the in house intensive care doc just fell down the stairs and was out of commission, they would have called an on-call emergency doctor. If he was just kidnapped by terrorists, you're just being silly.

    Point is, there's a lot of redundancy designed to make things safe already. There is generally decent technological support behind the basics. Electronic health records, that's another matter, and don't get me started... :p

    --
    Slashdotter, ID #101. UIDs are in binary, right?
  87. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  88. Really this is news? by wilec · · Score: 1

    Any random pigeon fart knocks out AT&T in these parts. And Cingular USED to be a great service. The root of todays corporate mergers : #1 Use every legal, barely legal and sometimes maybe legal trick to trash the value of your prey. #2 Once your grubby paws have the prize, employ ruthless slash and burn techniques to staff, equipment and services then sell off everything else possible, preferably at bargain basement prices to an offshore shell company under your discreet control. #3 PROFIT!!! Economies of scale my ass, defined accurately it means not much more than an enhanced ability to run over or strong arm competitors, customers, suppliers and employees, and in some rare cases even the creditors. No wonder the world economy has been trashed, yet again.

    wabi-sabi
    matthew

  89. Re:Roaming? (PS) by Dahan · · Score: 1

    Could you point us to your edits? I glanced through the history of Cataract surgery, and didn't spot any edit where a mention of the CrystaLens was added or removed, although I may have missed it. Someone added a link to the CrystaLens to the Intraocular lens article back in August 2007, and as far as I can tell, it's been in there ever since... it's certainly mentioned right now.

  90. Re:Roaming? (PS) by mcgrew · · Score: 1

    The edit would have been some time in late 2006; I got the implant in June of that year.

    I think I may try to edit the damned thing once more. We'll see if it holds, the device has been in use for five years now.