Slashdot Mirror


Why Japan Hates the iPhone

Ponca City, We love you writes "With a high level of technical sophistication, critical customers, and high innovation rate, Japan is the toughest cell phone market in the world. So it's not surprising that although Apple is the third-largest mobile supplier in the world, selling 10 million units in 2008, in Japan the iPhone is selling so poorly it's being offered for free. The country is famous for being ahead of its time when it comes to technology, and the iPhone just doesn't cut it. For example, Japanese handset users are into video and photos — and the iPhone has neither a video camera, multimedia text messaging, nor a TV tuner. Pricing plans in Japan are also very competitive, and the iPhone's $60-and-up monthly plan is too high compared to competitors; a survey lat year showed that among Japanese consumers, 91% didn't want to buy an iPhone. The cellular weapon of choice in Japan would be the Panasonic P905i, a fancy cellphone that doubles as a 3-inch TV and features 3-G, GPS, a 5.1-megapixel camera, and motion sensors for Wii-style games. 'When I show this to visitors from the US, they're amazed,' according to journalist Nobi Hayashi, who adds, 'Carrying around an iPhone in Japan would make you look pretty lame.'"

149 of 884 comments (clear)

  1. Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 3, Funny

    In Japan, only old people use iPhones?

    --
    Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    1. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      In Japan, only old people use iPhones?

      No, the fact is that the iphone is a piece of crap that doesn't do anything special. It's a triumph of marketing.

      The only reason the iphone is popular in the US is that other US cell phone options are so crappy, but that's a reflection of what the US carriers are selling.

    2. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by JCSoRocks · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Thank God someone else feels this way. I'm so sick of people getting iPhones and then insisting on whipping them out and showing them off every three seconds. It's not that impressive, every douche already owns one. I've seen it a million times. No, I don't wish I had one. If I wanted one, I'd already have it. I just don't think it's worth the money. The summary alone says it all - no video? no MMS? My friend's free POS phone has that. It's a mediocre phone in a sexy package with a touchscreen. No surprise the Japanese aren't interested.

      PS - can we avoid turning this into a fanboy flamewar - just this once? I called it sexy...

      --
      You are using English. Please learn the difference between loose and lose; they're, there, and their; your and you're.
    3. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by jav1231 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's all relative and relative to the US market the iPhone is not a piece of crap. It's great to talk about the Japanese market, the cool gadgets, and how much better they are. But guess what? If we can't get/use them here it's irrelevant. No one seems the least bit interested in marketing them here. Does it suck? Sure it sucks but it's been this way for the last 10 years.

    4. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by BlackCreek · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I reckon that the iPhone is actually a good phone (if you disregard how expensive it is when considering the contract fees), but IMHO, it is indeed, first and foremost a triumph of marketing over all else.

      There are a bazillion of things that the phone lacks, specially if you consider its price. But then there is this group-think thing where people will convince themselves that they don't actually need whatever is lacking, and that they absolutely need whatever is there.

      People buy this phone for the same reason that other people buy luxury clothes: the promise of higher social status, and self-esteem through brand name identification.

    5. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by cayenne8 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      "You can pay vending machines with your cell phone. "

      I for one, am NOT anxious to have a cell phone that spends my money on vending or anything else.

      I prefer most of my purchases to be with good, old fashioned cash. I can keep up with my spending better that way...it isn't abstracting money from value, say like how casino chips make you forget you're really playing for real money.

      I like to keep any credit as low as possible....once out of CC debt hell, I intend to say out of CC debt hell. I wouldn't want to pay by cell phone, just another possible way to ruin yourself by spending without thinking.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    6. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by jbezorg · · Score: 4, Funny

      Does anybody else but me think that if we bust on the iPhone some more, this guy's head will explode?

      --
      I've lost all my marbles except one & It's fun to test angular & centripetal acceleration in my skull
    7. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by babyrat · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I prefer most of my purchases to be with good, old fashioned cash. I can keep up with my spending better that way...it isn't abstracting money from value, say like how casino chips make you forget you're really playing for real money.

      I feel exactly opposite to this - I use my credit card or debit card for absolutely everything I can (within reason) in order to keep track of my money. At the end of the month I can import my bill electronically into Quicken and see where all my money went. Even without Quicken at least there is a record. Contrast this with - crap, I just took $200 out of the ATM Monday and now I have 12 cents left in my pocket - where did it go?

      I always pay my credit card off at the end of the month so there is no CC debt hell.

      Now to get back on topic, sort of ...

      Paying with my iPhone would likely have similar advantages.

    8. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by molarmass192 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I disagree, the iPhone was the first to offer a touch screen based UI, a solid internet browser, a usable mobile calendar, and a viable iPod replacement. Is it the end all be all of cell phones, no. However, what made the iPhone so good was the software stack more than the hardware stack. The iPhone software stack is still by far the best on the market. The hardware is just slightly above average, but I (personally) think Apple did this to create an upgrade path. For example. want GPS? Upgrade from V1 to V2. Next will be, want video? Upgrade from V2 to V3 ... etc.

      --

      Good people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly, while bad people will find a way around the laws-Plato
    9. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by Gilmoure · · Score: 5, Funny

      ...every douche already owns one.

      I don't.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    10. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by geekoid · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "...every douche already owns one. "
      then "No, I don't wish I had one."

      Clearly every douche doesn't have one~

      It's Japan. I don't care what you offer, it's going to be damn difficult for a 'Western' company to crack that nut.
      Doable, just difficult.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    11. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by dmizer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      How long ago did you live in Japan ... 10 ... 15 years ago?

      The P905i is already outdated. I've had mine for over a year now. Lots of the phones they have now make the P905i look like ancient tech. Motion sensors which rotate the clock display so it stays upright as you turn the phone 10Mpx cameras with touch screens for selecting your photo subject. 4 inch tv screens with multimedia capability that would make your head spin. You can record your favorite TV show while you're at work, bring your phone home, plug it into your TV and watch the show on the big screen. Complete webkit stack (Yes, that means you can become a walking web server).

      Seriously, you're iPhone sucks compared to what's out now.

    12. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by Oktober+Sunset · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yoe're not a douche, you're an asshole.

    13. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by Concerned+Onlooker · · Score: 2, Funny

      "PS - can we avoid turning this into a fanboy flamewar - just this once?"

      No, not when you start out the conversation like this:
      "It's not that impressive, every douche already owns one."

      So, no, apparently we can't. And you started it.

      --
      http://www.rootstrikers.org/
    14. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by dmizer · · Score: 5, Informative

      In Japan, there were already touch screen phones, and phones with full web browsers built in long before the iPhone was even announced. What you have on the iPhone now is about where Japan was around 4 or 5 years ago. The P905i mentioned in TFA was on the market in 2007 when Steve was making his iPhone keynote.

    15. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by interkin3tic · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, the fact is that the iphone is a piece of crap that doesn't do anything special.

      Wrong: there's that one app that displays a zippo lighter, and you can open up the zippo and light it, and then if you tilt the phone the flame ACTUALLY MOVES!

      Yeah. Put THAT in your pipe and then use that app to smoke it.

    16. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by Gilmoure · · Score: 5, Funny

      Ah, that explains the spherical white helmet.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    17. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by immcintosh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I reckon that the iPhone is actually a good phone

      In my experience with mine, "phone" is one of the things it is definitively NOT good at.

    18. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by supersocialist · · Score: 2, Informative

      You need to do more research. I can wirelessly sync music to my current-firmware iphone through Amarok over SSH with keyed authentication, and I'm definitely on the low end of technical knowledge when it comes to linux. There are clear, easy-to-follow wiki how-tos. To trick the iphone into reading unsigned database entries, you only have to edit a single entry in a .plist file on the phone.

    19. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by dgatwood · · Score: 5, Informative

      Could somebody explain what the point of a 10 MP CCD is with a typical cell phone lens being only 1.25 mm in diameter with a 3.5 mm focal length? That's like putting a Ferrari engine in a Pinto, but slightly less useful.

      By my math, the resolving power of the lens provides for a horizontal resolution (at the red end of the spectrum) of just shy of 4,000 pixels in the long direction on a cell-phone-sized CCD, and that's if the lens is ground perfectly and if the alignment between lens and CCD is also perfect. Chances are, at 3600 pixels, a 10 MP photo is probably significantly exceeding the real-world resolving power of any real-world cell camera lens unless the lens costs $10,000 to grind and is glued to the sensor....

      Not to mention that the light gathering capabilities of such a small lens are terrible and that the low light SNR of a CCD is inversely proportional to the number of pixels. Can a 10 MP cell phone camera take pictures of usable quality in anything less than the light of the sun going nova?

      Seriously, I just don't get it. It's like they're adding pixel count because they can without stopping to consider whether they should.... Above about 3 MP, a cell camera makes no sense given the lens size, quality, and mounting tolerances. Maybe 5 MP. Maybe.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    20. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by relguj9 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Eh, for me it was cheaper to get an iPhone, both phone wise and plan wise than a Blackberry or any other 3g capable device.

      I couldn't care less about MMS, I can upload photos to facebook or get stuff off of my e-mail.

      I also have no desire to watch videos, if I'm going to watch TV or a movie, it's going to be off of my DVR or computer on my 52" TV and 7.1 surround system on my comfortable couch with a beer, not on my tiny ass cell phone. Youtube, the internet and the app store provide more than enough instant entertainment if I'm stuck somewhere or bored.

      I have no need for turn by turn directions either, I actually prefer google maps + GPS.

      My biggest complaint about the iPhone is that you have to crack it to do certain things, like copy over ringtones.

      The iPhone doesn't suck, you're just being anti-trendy and generally pissed. I'm not a fan of trendy shit or Apple in general, but the iPhone is a pretty good device.

    21. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by PyroMosh · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Apple has historically been different, one of the few companies welcomed, even enthusiastically embraced by the Japanese.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9TyR3fyLO_I

      They love gadgets over their. The way Apple does things, and the typical build quality is what the Japanese market is all about. Cool technology packaged in an easy-to-use, stylish package. It's not like North America, where it's more or less a race to the bottom to see who can build the cheapest widget with the biggest numbers, to hell with quality. They *care* about (perceived) build quality. That's why the expensive Sony Trinitron that never had significant market share here, dominated over there during the years of tube based Televisions. It wasn't just a "buy domestic" mentality. Because much of Sony's competition was Japanese as well.

      The iPod and the Mac mesh *perfectly* with what the Japanese love about technology. In fact, I'd even go so far to say the iPhone gets it nearly right, but fails with several, easily corrected critical flaws that Apple just seems unwilling to correct. MMS, Video, App Store issues - that's all software, the build quality of the hardware seems perfectly respectable to me. It feels quick and responsive most of the time, and I'd never own one because of lack of openness (my definition of "open" may differ as I'm a Windows Mobile fan) and because of those few fatal flaws mentioned in TFA.

      (This is my second post today defending Sony. I need to go take a shower.)

    22. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by nekura · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's not necessary to crack the iPhone to copy over ringtones, but it's not super simple, either. It's been a while since I've done, but if I remember correctly you just cut out the piece of song you want in your favorite audio editing program, encode that to m4a in iTunes, change the extension to .m4r, then reimport that to the Ringtones section of iTunes.

      --

      "Programming is like sex - one mistake and you'll have to support it for the rest of your life."
    23. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by eap · · Score: 2, Informative

      ...The summary alone says it all - no video?

      I don't care to take up for the iPhone, but they can do video. It requires jailbreaking (not the same as unlocking), which is fairly easy to do.

      The fact that it is hardware capable of video but restricted by Apple will probably not win any fans, but just sayin', if you want to record video on the iPhone you can.

    24. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by badasscat · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It's Japan. I don't care what you offer, it's going to be damn difficult for a 'Western' company to crack that nut.
      Doable, just difficult.

      It's not really all that difficult. In fact, the iPod does just fine there. (The Walkman digital players are neck and neck, but that's to be expected - there is *some* home court advantage, just in the marketing and language if nothing else.)

      In fact, there are not many categories of anything there over which we (meaning western companies) have not had at least some influence, and in many cases are market leaders. It's a total myth that the Japanese only like Japanese products. Well ok, then how do you explain Levi's, Starbucks, McDonald's, Apple (other than the iPhone), Microsoft, Chanel, Coach, hollywood movies, Mariah Carey, etc. etc.?

      The fact is they love our stuff. They just don't love all of it equally, and why should they? We don't love all of our stuff equally either. They just happen to have slightly different priorities in what they're looking for, but they have no bias whatsoever in terms of where the products they use come from.

      The companies that do best there are the ones that tweak their stuff to Japanese tastes and/or expectations. That should be obvious, but apparently it was not obvious to Apple with the iPhone, which is clearly on the low end of phones in Japan on specs... and uglier than most too. So it's no surprise that it would be unpopular.

      But if it had an 8mp camera, a TV tuner, a cheaper rate plan, a higher-res screen, a clamshell design and proper buttons? It wouldn't matter who made it, people there would buy it.

    25. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by yenne · · Score: 2, Funny

      But... 10 is better than five. I just don't see how you don't Get It.

      I've heard that next month they're releasing one that goes to 11.

    26. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by irae · · Score: 2, Funny

      Did it take you like 15 minutes to write it?

    27. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by Garganus · · Score: 2, Funny

      Nop stupif. And nonody likws a smattass.

    28. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by SilentTristero · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What about folded optics? Minolta had a camera like this with a 45 degree mirror behind the lens and the sensor down one side a few years ago. Gives longer focal length in a slim body. Don't know if any of the camphone companies are doing this though, there's probably not enough empty space in the case.

  2. Japan hates the iPhone by Bromskloss · · Score: 4, Funny

    Oh no, it has become self-aware!

    --
    Swedish plasma phys. PhD student; MSc EE; knows maths, programming, electronics; finance interest; seeks opportunities
  3. What's new? by stewbacca · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Japanese products have been so over-the-top and over-engineered for the past 25 years, this hardly comes as any surprise. I mean, just take a look at the current Honda Civic dashboard and compare it to a German car's dashboard. The Honda is all gadget-y and digital-y and the German car is just, well, Teutonic-ly svelte. Maybe the saying "there's no accounting for bad taste" doesn't ring true in Japan.

    1. Re:What's new? by rshol · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Or maybe good taste is relative and not an absolute.

    2. Re:What's new? by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The Japanese seem to have a talent for doing everything to excess. Sometimes that's a good thing, such as when they decide to make something sleek and efficient. Then you get, say, the 1989 Nissan 240SX, with a .26 CD, 30 MPG freeway on 87 octane (the Japanese version probably does better, but on more expensive fuel) and some of the best handling ever seen in a sports car of its class. Other times they decide to gewgaw it up to the max, and you get any Sony Vaio product with buttons that fall off and shit. Er, do I have a bone to pick? Anyway the point is that you can find ample examples of both, but I think you're right about the electronics these days. Not that I can load the page that shows their favorite phone. Personally I just want a fucking eyetap built into some Oakley M-frames with photo-gray tint, and a discreet wearable computer so I don't look like a total tard at all times, and I want it to replace all of my computers or at least their current interfaces. What's better than a monitor with a privacy filter? No monitor, and no keyboard either. Then I can jerk around with my own virtual interfaces all I want.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:What's new? by Moryath · · Score: 3, Funny

      Obligatory:

      What about my electronic lavvy? It comes when you call, takes your trousers down, does everything - it's just so stylish.

      Due to hit the Japanese market in... what, three years?

    4. Re:What's new? by MightyYar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I have a one-word rebuttal:
      iDrive

      To be fair, it's much better now... but WOW, what a price to pay for a spartan dashboard!

      Also, you have to consider that the market for the Honda Civic in no way overlaps with any German car. Even the Volkswagen marketing doesn't really overlap too much. The street racing crowd is not going to be showing off too many Rabbits or Jettas.

      But I agree with you and think the VW Rabbit dash looks better than the Civic dash. Mostly I object to the silvery trim, but most of what I see is that VW cost-cuts by using a symmetric dash where they can just plop the driver's side gear for left or right-hand drive. The Honda is clearly designed for left-hand only. I can certainly see how people who desire a bit more bling would like the Honda.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    5. Re:What's new? by 2short · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Well, the saying didn't come from me, but I do find lots of truth in it."

      But you're misquoting it. It's "there's no accounting for taste"; You stuck the "bad" in there. The more common saying has a lot of truth in it, and expresses exactly what rshol said.

  4. Don't be so surprised. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    For one, the Japanese are well ahead of the West in terms of cellphone technology, as witnessed by the description of the P905i. For the Japanese, the 3G iPhone is old hat.

    In addition, unlike in the U.S., where we love Japanese products, the Japanese hate our products. They're very biased towards home-grown stuff. They typically steer clear of imports. Imports are generally more expensive in Japan due to tariffs and such, too.

    1. Re:Don't be so surprised. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I think it's more than that. In Japan, space is very constrained and most of the phones I saw there were flip phones. This gave the user a modicum of privacy, even on crowded transport. iPhones simply aren't made with that type of concern in mind.

    2. Re:Don't be so surprised. by Moryath · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Indeed.

      The Japanese make a mockery of WTO "free trade" regulations on a daily basis, but they get away with because they're a relatively small market compared to the US. By contrast, when some of us in the US suggest that maybe we should switch to "fair trade" that imposes tariffs on goods imported from places that have zero environmental protection laws and pay out slave-labor wages (to even the playing field), we get shouted at about "protectionism."

      The Japanese also have a major cultural complex about what is "true japanese." If you have one grandparent who wasn't born in Japan (or worse yet, isn't ethnically asian), it doesn't matter that your family may have been there for 75 years, as far as they are concerned you're still a gaijin. If you're there for tourism, grand, but trying to live there and get employment, or even someday fit into Japanese society as a gaijin? Might as well forget it unless you're going to be an Engrish teacher (and even then, the "natives" will get promoted above you every time).

      American and European products? Well, that's gaijin stuff.

    3. Re:Don't be so surprised. by SilverJets · · Score: 4, Interesting

      While your argument does hold some merit to the "discrimination" against foreign products the most likely reason for the iPhone hate is that it does not function the way most Japanese people need it to. When I was in Tokyo last year, for every 10 people I saw using a cell phone 9 of them were texting and most of them had a flip phone. In fact I found the size of the phones to be quite funny because they looked like the early flip phones...very large.

      Having seen and played around with an iPhone I can see why it would not appeal to people who just text with their phone. Especially when riding on a train so that you are holding on to the railing with one hand and texting with the other. Also, the keyboard on the iPhone takes up screen space. Why would you want to lose a lot of the screen to a touch keybpad when you can get a phone that has a separate screen and keypad?

    4. Re:Don't be so surprised. by mdwh2 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Indeed, although also in Europe, whilst perhaps not as advanced as Japan, we've still had things like 3G and Internet access in even non-"smart" phones for years, and we wonder what all the fuss is about.

    5. Re:Don't be so surprised. by Alinabi · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They're very biased towards home-grown stuff.

      ...the iPod sells well in Japan...

      --
      "You can't allow somebody to commit the crime before you detain them." [Condoleezza Rice]
    6. Re:Don't be so surprised. by MightyYar · · Score: 3, Funny

      In addition, unlike in the U.S., where we love Japanese products, the Japanese hate our products.

      Except for our rice. They LOOOOVE California rice. I thought that this was odd until it was explained to me that the Japanese had brought the rice to California, and thus it was actually just Japanese rice grown in a better climate. LOL, how do I roll my eyes on the internet?

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    7. Re:Don't be so surprised. by Ninnle+Labs,+LLC · · Score: 5, Informative

      but they get away with because they're a relatively small market compared to the US.

      What?! They are the second largest economy in the world... That's hardly what I'd call a "small market".

    8. Re:Don't be so surprised. by kno3 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Why would you want to lose a lot of the screen to a touch keybpad when you can get a phone that has a separate screen and keypad?

      Is this not obvious? So that you can fill the surface of the phone with screen, therefore having a bigger screen. You use the keypad when you need it, but then if you wana watch something for example, the keypad goes and you have a nice large screen to watch stuff on.

    9. Re:Don't be so surprised. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Get over yourself. My mother's caucasian American, my Father's Japanese. I don't get treated like a Gaijin even though I definitely don't have the pure-Japanese look. All it takes is a good understanding of the culture (and living it), and speaking Japanese like a native. I've never had anyone promoted over me simply because they were more Japanese than I was, although I have been accused of the opposite, in that my "American" background put me at an advantage. (Partially true, since both Japanese and English are a native language to me, and speaking both is a massive plus in my field, but that has nothing to do with my genetic makeup.) The "he got promoted because he was xxxx" is, 90% of the time, the sound of a loser whining.

      One thing I see with "Engrish Teachers" getting passed up for promotion is that their English is good, but the Teaching part is not. (Which is to be expected... how many gaijin English teachers in Japan do you know that have had adequate training to become a teacher? A number very close to ZERO would be the answer.) That may not be the teacher's fault considering the way these teachers are recruited, but it is certainly a valid reason why the promotions may not be moving in their favor.

      As far as the iPhone is concerned, I have one, and I know what the complaining is all about. I'd say that 50% of the problem is that the iPhone doesn't offer any of the proprietary "keitai" functions that everyone has come to expect from ANY phone these days in Japan. Offer a product that doesn't have the functions you want, and it's no surprise that people don't want it. However, another 50% of the problem is that it's locked into the SoftBank carrier. Piss poor customer service, terrible reception unless you're in the middle of one of the big cities, and bad pricing plans upon launch.

      But when the summary quotes Nobi Hayashi (who the hell is this guy!?) as saying that carrying an iPhone is "lame", well... sounds like he's either sour because he doesn't have one, or else he only hangs around keitai geeks. Having an iPhone is a GREAT conversation starter with girls. Carrying a Panasonic P905i isn't gonna generate the same kind of enthusiasm.

    10. Re:Don't be so surprised. by TheLink · · Score: 4, Interesting

      But the iphone lack of success is little (nothing?) to do with all that.

      Using "protectionism" as an excuse for the iPhone's failure, is like using "protectionism" as an excuse for your car not selling well in Japan, when the real reason is you don't make right hand drive cars.

      The iPhone is an inferior product compared to the competing products in Japan. The iPhone doesn't even have built-in, reliable (non-fiddly) and well-integrated QR code (a type of 2D "barcode") reader app.

      There are QR codes everywhere in Japan - business cards, ads, signs, magazines, etc.

      Example usage: bus stops

      See: http://2d-code.co.uk/bus-stop-qr-code/

      "Each bus has a GPS which continuously updates the bus company server with its position. The QR Code at the bus stop takes you to a mobilised page for that stop which shows a list of approaching buses, their location, whether they are on time or delayed (if delayed by how many minutes), estimated arrival time at the stop and if there are any alternative buses going in the same direction."

      The Japanese do buy foreign stuff, it just has to meet their standards. The Chinese need specially regulated farms for their farm produce to sell in Japan, you can call that protectionism, but I call it a good idea given the dubious stuff the Chinese tend to get up to ;).

      Lastly with regards to forever being a "gaijin" and never being promoted.

      If a real Japanese CEO screws up big time in Japan, they're almost expected to commit suicide (it's one of the traditional and honourable options left for you).

      Whereas a US CEO gets 20 million dollars to "go away and stop hurting the company, please".

      So yah, that's a big cultural divide there. Think you can really be one of them?

      Even many of the Japanese can't be "japanese enough", and those suffer for it, because "a nail that sticks up/out must be hammered down". You think those will get promoted as well? Of course as a gaijin, you will forever stick out. So best you work for the few companies that are fine with that.

      My friends didn't seem to have any complaints about working in Japan.

      --
  5. This is because Japanese people are smart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Have you ever noticed that they speak some strange version of the Mexican language and look unlike us? Also their food is expensive because we eat cows which are large, plentiful and docile animals, while Japanise people only eat fearsome and rare SHARKS to boast of their manliness. In conclusion, Japan is a far away place somewhere in Mexico where smart people do not eat cows. Thank you will you marry me.

  6. of course by Lord+Ender · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The iPhone is inferior in lots of ways. It has NO stereo bluetooth support! It also lacks bluetooth IP networking for tethering to your laptop, and it doesn't use the standard USB mini-B cable.

    The iPhone needs a lot of improvement before I would consider it.

    --
    A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    1. Re:of course by garcia · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It has NO stereo bluetooth support! It also lacks bluetooth IP networking for tethering to your laptop, and it doesn't use the standard USB mini-B cable.

      *shrug*, when I look for a phone none of these things are even a consideration for me. I don't use bluetooth for anything and I really don't care about what USB cable is used as long as I can transfer what I need to the device quickly.

      Personally there are plenty of choices out there in phones because people have different needs and tastes. The iPhone isn't anywhere near the perfect mobile device (actually far from it) but it does what it does very well. I am a mass transit rider and I love the video/music player and the web browser. I used to own a T-mobile Sidekick and I really miss the keyboard on that device as well as the background application running. It's been difficult for me to get used to the fact that I am not available on AIM 24/7 wherever I am.

      You take the good with the bad and you weigh your options before choosing your device. I decided that the media component of the iPhone was far superior to other devices I tried and that was more important to me on my commutes, especially after a 5.5" of snow falls after 12 PM in Minneapolis crushing the roadways during rush hour.

      YMMV.

    2. Re:of course by Flaggday · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The USB mini-B cable may be "standard", but the iPod dock connector is plentiful. Check households, office desks, backpacks, and I bet you'll find it much easier to locate a dock connector than a USB mini-B to anything.

    3. Re:of course by rolfwind · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But it always goes back to the original iPod review on /.
      "No wireless. Less space than a nomad. Lame."

      There is a schism between the features crowd and the functions well crowd. Apple bridges that well enough for the American market to come up with products people really want. But the problem has always been the solely American-centric focus. Japanese and many other markets don't have the same tastes. Perhaps the Japanese are more toward the features side and are techy enough not to worry about seamless integration (I have no idea).

      Let's face it: the killer app on the iPhone are two things: seamless integration among components (hardware/software) and now the App Store - giving you thousands of capabilities that competitors don't have now (but easily can). (Balmer: Developers, developers, developers!!!)

      But you can't go into foreign markets with the exact same thing, prices, etc and expect not to be completely beaten up. Just like most domestic US cars are unsellable almost everywhere else: they are simply too big in both exterior and motor size.

      Apple is a design house. It's problem is that it is so centralized and secretive, it's hard for it to compete in other markets. It needs design houses in other countries to start competing elsewhere. And be willing to individualize their approach to regions/countries.

    4. Re:of course by poetmatt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You can "design" until you are blue in the face but in the end of the day a 2 pound bag of shit with a pink bow tie is still a 2 pound bag of shit.

      People's feelings will not change just because you changed your name from Diebold to Premier Election services or whatever they're called now.

    5. Re:of course by 0xdeadbeef · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Let's face it: the killer app on the iPhone are two things: seamless integration among components (hardware/software) and now the App Store

      No, the killer apps are the tolerable music player that syncs with iTunes and the first decent small-screen web browser.

      (And why do you keep repeating this term "seamless integration"? If it were seamless, you wouldn't have to exit every application to run another, as if it were Palm OS, or DOS. That's a very big seam.)

    6. Re:of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Savvy? You mean obcessed with gimmicks.

    7. Re:of course by nasor · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think the real issue is much simpler; Japanese people text like crazy, and the iPhone is pretty bad for texting. Simple as that.

  7. Proof by whisper_jeff · · Score: 3, Interesting

    While I love the iPhone and think it's damn cool, things like this are (to me) just another piece of proof that the North American (and western society, in general) cell phone markets are set up to discourage innovation and advancement and are, instead, designed to ensure lock-in with particular vendors and suppliers. We _NEED_ regulators to step in and start putting companies in their places. That will open up innovation and encourage manufacturers to make better products to compete for consumer dollars. Also, regulators need to force carriers to provide better plans at reasonable rates. But, since a lot of people are getting rich off of the current stifling system, I won't be holding my breath for that sort of change to happen... We will continue to remain behind the times.

    1. Re:Proof by thedonger · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Maybe we just need stop believing that we all must have a cell phone and stop buying the crap about which you are complaining? Or we all buy stripped down, inexpensive models with basic plans.

      What you may not be factoring in is that the vast majority of the American cell phone-buying public thinks the iPhone is the greatest thing since sliced bread. They don't care about Linux, and they don't know what Japan is doing outside of their anecdotal awareness that the Japanese are very tech-savvy.

      If you want the government to force cell phone companies and carriers to do anything it will cost you tax dollars - probably a greater amount relative to the time you will have to wait for the cell phone companies/carriers to come to your awareness in their own time.

      --
      Help fight poverty: Punch a poor person.
    2. Re:Proof by steelfood · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Cell phones in asia are less tools, and more fashion statements. They're like your designer handbags or fancy shoes, except priced at a point even teenagers would be able to and do afford multiple phones. And because the major networks are GSM, people can easily switch phones to match their current attire with a swap of a SIM card. This means there's insane competition in Japan, and it means there's a huge drive for continuous innovation to stay ahead of the fashion curve (it's fashionable to be tech-competent over there). To even begin to do that here, the government needs to do a few relatively minor, but important things:

      1) Encourage open infrastructure. Basically, undo everything the FCC has been doing for the past 8 years. If a government grant was used to build a network, then the operator should be forced to lease the network to a third party for wholesale prices. Or, put network operators in the same class as gas and electric companies, and heavily regulate them.

      2) Encourage open standards within the government. The government should encourage standardization based on open standards. It should give grants to organizations that work towards such ends, and stipulate that by taking government money, the result is public domain. That eliminates a lot of barriers to entry to a market.

      3) Return the rights to the people. That means outlawing anti-competitive exclusivity clauses and the likes. Forcing phone carriers to make their numbers portable was a great move. That trend of forcing interoperability has to continue. For example, France requires unlocked versions of phones to be sold alongside their locked version.

      4) Remove the teeth of patent trolls. The patent system needs to be significantly overhauled. As the system exists currently, patents stifle innovation, not encourage it.

      Doing this won't change the culture overnight. But I'm certain we'll start to see improvements within 5 years.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    3. Re:Proof by vadim_t · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The question we really should ask us isn't 'why is Japan so far ahead of us technologically', but rather 'why is Japan so far behind us in soft technologies?' You know, things like UI design, quality of life, etc?

      No, the question we should ask us is precisely "why is Japan so far ahead of us technologically". I want to know why they can have all that fancy stuff on their phones, and I can't. The question "why is Japan so far behind us in soft technologies?" is not for us, but for Japan. It's their problem, so it's them who should think about it. Why waste time on thinking why somebody else has a problem you don't?

  8. Re:maybe the reviews just don't translate well. by abigsmurf · · Score: 5, Funny

    *in your best schoolgirl voice*

    Kawaii~~~

    or alternatively
    *breathing heavily and drooling*

    Moe~~~

  9. Well...The iPhone isnt that special... by TyrainDreams · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Everyone still drools over the iPhone as if it has every feature of every phone and more! When it's just an on par smart device. Sure it has a lot of great features and the app store from apple, but there are far better phones in existence and its sure not going to get people who are being described as the peak of technological civilization(true or not).

    I am happy with my HTC Vogue, it plays music...and has internet...I think it even makes calls...oh wait its the sprint network...so no, no calls...

  10. Re:How come it's only in Japan by fictionpuss · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Because we're at the behest of the phone companies, not the other way around. They can comfortably sit on technology, and decide when to release/market it for the most $$$.

    Then not only are you stuck with older technology, you're locked out of exploiting that technology to its fullest extent, by the same companies who have a secondary market peddling crappy closed source software.

    Roll on OpenMoko.

  11. That phone description sounds familiar by GooberToo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    and features 3-G, GPS, a 5.1-megapixel camera, and motion sensors for Wii-style games. 'When I show this to visitors from the US, they're amazed,'

    Android G1 owners wouldn't be "amazed". After all, it they are describing a G1.

    1. Re:That phone description sounds familiar by ribuck · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Take a look at this video of the Panasonic P905i. At first it looks like it has a similar form factor to the Android G1, until they morph it from a slider to a flip-phone and pull out the digital TV aerial. Seriously cool!

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E6J5EtiQ1ps

  12. Re:maybe the reviews just don't translate well. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Depending on whether it's set to vibrate?

  13. Makes you look pretty lame here too... by Assmasher · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...seriously, why don't people just either burn their money or donate it directly to Apple? No flash? No Java? Apple decides whether or not someone can sell/distribute an application? Have to buy a Crapintosh to develop for it?

    Why do people accept this kind of behavior from Apple, but not other companies? Weird...

    --
    Loading...
  14. Pretty lame? by kimvette · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "'Carrying around an iPhone in Japan would make you look pretty lame.'"

    God, how I wish I could get that Japanese cellphone with built-in 3" TV (Panasonic P905i) because I've always chosen cellphones out of regard of what Japanese teenagers might think of me! :-p

    Sorry, I'll just stick with the iPhone, and upgrade to a phone based on Android when it matures. I would have love to have gone with an openmoko phone but that platform was pretty much stillborn. :(

    Japanese cellphones are way way ahead of ours? Next thing you know, you'll be telling us that third-world countries have faster interweb access than we do - without bandwidth caps. This is old news.

    --
    The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    1. Re:Pretty lame? by mdwh2 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Sorry, I'll just stick with the iPhone, and upgrade to a phone based on Android when it matures.

      Similarly, I'm sticking with my Motorola V980 phone, and will upgrade to a new phone when it matures. A necessary condition for "maturity" is having basic functionality that even my years old bog standard phone has, such as copy/paste, and MMS. (Cue the "But I don't need that, so why would anyone else!" posts.)

      Japanese cellphones are way way ahead of ours? Next thing you know, you'll be telling us that third-world countries have faster interweb access than we do

      Indeed. I'm in the UK, which perhaps explains why the supposedly "new" Iphone offerings have been done here in ordinary phones for years. And people have the cheek to claim that other manufacturers are copying the Iphone!

    2. Re:Pretty lame? by Foochee · · Score: 2, Informative

      Here's a video of the P905i in action. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E6J5EtiQ1ps

    3. Re:Pretty lame? by mdwh2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I know everyone says that non-US phones are way ahead of us, but what UK phone had amazing integration with Google maps (or any online map provider) years ago?

      Um, just about all of them except the really cheap ones that don't do Java? As the other commenter pointed out, Google have a Java client. Oh I'm sorry, I forget that the Iphone can't even support Java either, so I mean "really cheap ones, and the expensive Iphone".

      For years I've seen friends with various smartphones that have GPS and mapping software (some of them choose to store the map on the phone, so they don't even need an Internet connection). I'm afraid I don't know the model of phone - you see, unlike Iphone users, when anyone else gets out their phone and uses it, they don't make a big fuss of "Hey, I'm doing this on my IpHoNe [or whatever model it is], isn't this cool!" They just get on and use it.

      Which UK phone had multitouch?

      Multitouch is a recent phone development, and not unique to the Iphone AIUI. I'll admit that multitouch is one neat thing that the Iphone has helped develop - all phone companies have introduced new things when they release new phones, and there's no reason for Apple to be different. I never said that the Iphone had nothing neat or new in it - but that doesn't mean that Apple invented all the things that people falsely claim were new in the Iphone.

      Which UK phone had a great app store?

      App store? If I see an App, I download it, and it just works. Why would I tie myself to one store? The phone providers (Vodafone, etc) provide online stores for people who don't want to go looking for it, it's been this way for years.

      Which UK phone had visual voice mail?

      No idea, what is this?

      Which UK phone had a full blown browser years ago?

      Any phone (except the cheap non-Java ones) can run Opera Mini (most have built in browsers too, albeit often not as good). Smartphones have had full blown browsers for years. Are you seriously suggesting that the Iphone is the first phone with a decent browser? I think that proves my point about just how limited the technology must be in some countries. We've been able to browse the web for years. I remember it being impressive when I saw people doing it about, oh, 2003, but for heaven's sake, it's 2009.

      Which UK phone integrated perfectly with your music collection on your computer?

      I can't think of a phone these days that doesn't play mp3s from your computer, and this has been around for years too.

      Of course, you'll probably claim some magical significance in terms of your use of "amazing", "great", "full blown", "perfectly" - which smells like a No True Scotsman fallacy (oh, it doesn't count that it had a browser, it wasn't "full blown"). You'll have to objectively define what these terms mean, and show why the Iphone's offering was a significant and important change, and explain how it is better than everything else on the market.

      For that matter did any non-US phone have all these features (and more) *years* ago?

      Well, it didn't include all features, because you've listed multitouch which is a recent development in the phone industry. But it's a fallacy to claim that therefore the Iphone is the first to do all of these features! I could just as easily claim that since the Iphone can't do all the features that my years old cheap phone can do (e.g., Java, copy/paste, video recording/phoning, MMS), that therefore my phone is better in other respects too.

      I didn't claim that everything on the Iphone was done years ago - that's a straw man you're attacking. But a large number of things that people do think the Iphone did first (most notably, web browsing) or are cool when the Iphone finally gets it (3G) are ancient history in the rest of the phone industry.

      But honestly, from my point of view the iPhone is really advanced, not just for the US market, but for every market. But I guess it's cool to hate the iPhone on slashdot and ins

  15. Re:How come it's only in Japan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Two things.

    First, they have a completely locked down, proprietary phone network, where it is absolutely impossible to do anything without express permission from the network operator.

    Second, have you tried using a piece of Japanese consumer electronics? They're absolutely terrible. While the Japanese can handle electronics pretty well, they have no clue at all about user interface design, and their culture values having fifty million features crammed onto a device with none of them being slightly useful over having a device that does a few things very well.

  16. A better title would have been by Exitar · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Japan is immune to Reality Distortion Field"

    1. Re:A better title would have been by Rakshasa+Taisab · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Japan has its own Reality Distortion Field.

      One that makes Jobs' RDF look like that worn-out magician at the street corner that never manages to get any of his lame tricks right.

      --
      - These characters were randomly selected.
    2. Re:A better title would have been by Aladrin · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Immune to Apple's, maybe... But I'm sure they've got plenty of their own.

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
  17. Different products for different markets. by Jacques+Chester · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The Japanese are buying a list of features: screen size, TV, radio, motion sensors, pedometer, email, circle of protection etc etc. A lot of tech-heads in the West like that approach and also make their decision based on the number of ticked boxes on the back of the display container.

    The rest of us just want a phone that makes phone calls without having to click through 50 damn menus. And that looks kind of nice. That's the iPhone.

    --

    Classical Liberalism: All your base are belong to you.

    1. Re:Different products for different markets. by Chrono11901 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So they base there decisions on the features and ability's while Americans base theirs on how tard friendly the phone is?

      Considering how many people payed 5$ for the ifart app, you might be on to something.

  18. Text messaging? by Goaway · · Score: 3, Interesting

    multimedia text messaging

    Japan has never even used "text messaging" as in the horribly lame and limited SMS - they use normal email for that. I don't think anybody is missing some kludgy extension to a protocol they never used in the first place, either.

  19. free iphones from softbank by davejenkins · · Score: 2, Informative

    Softbank is now offering the 8GB iPhone for free (with two year data plan). I saw this yesterday, and translated a quick summary on my site for the Japanese language-challenged: http://www.davejenkins.com/

  20. Re:Want to know what Linux can do? by MightyYar · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's totally true... their gadgets are indeed bleeding edge, but American consumers wouldn't put up with the buggy nature of their gadgetry. We eventually get much of the same stuff, after the Japanese public has been kind enough to beta test it for us :)

    By the way, even by slashdot standards... this is REALLY old news. Forbes was claiming the iPhone was doomed in Japan over a year ago. If it succeeded despite all of that, well THAT would be some news.

    --
    W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  21. Japan is unlike any other place in the world.... by blackchiney · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Japan is unique in the fact that it's a sizeable market. Most western companies have attempted to market products there and failed. The only market that does well is American and European fashion.

    I think this has to do with a little bit of NIH (not invented here) and poor understanding of the country. Hell even Microsoft with billions of dollars sunk into the XBox marketing can't make a dent there and there is only 2 competitors. On the other hand Sony did so poorly in the international mobile market they had to team up with Ericcson to bail them out. Product marketing in Japan is like the LOST bubble. We can't seem to get in and they can't seem to get out.

  22. Re:How come it's only in Japan by Rakshasa+Taisab · · Score: 5, Interesting

    We don't get these kinds of telephones in Europe or the US because the... Wait for it... They...

    SUCK!

    No, seriously, they absolutely suck. I've been using the phones here for a few years, and one of the main features they have is that they're an implementation of a checklist of features you'll never use more than one or twice, all crammed into the least user-friendly UI you could imagine.

    They have absolutely no sense of UI design, and being so used to dealing with crappy interfaces they're not even aware of the possibility nor the advantages of a well designed one. Seriously, have you ever looked at one of their webpages?

    Call it taste, or what ever. But the reality is that the iPhone and phones from e.g. Nokia just don't do it well here in Japan, and neither of the two companies should try to change or they'll lose what gives them customers in the west.

    Oh, and BTW... Softbank's (particulary their iPhone's) subscription plan sucks.

    --
    - These characters were randomly selected.
  23. It's the Kanji support stupid by putaro · · Score: 5, Informative

    Kanji input on the iPhone is as good as the other cell phones. Given that text messaging is a major use for cell phones, this is a big problem.

    The UI on the iPhone blows away Japanese cell phones (I live in Japan and I use them all the time). The reason the iPhone isn't taking off as well in Japan is the kanji support and Softbank's piss poor marketing support. They have not done a good job of differentiating the iPhone from the other touch screen phones and, in fact, SoftBank carries several other touch screen phones which is confusing.

    1. Re:It's the Kanji support stupid by Virak · · Score: 2

      The reason the iPhone isn't taking off as well in Japan is the kanji support

      Well that'd make sen-

      Kanji input on the iPhone is as good as the other cell phones.

      Wait, what? Did you mean to say it isn't as good as with other phones? Because that'd make a lot more sense. (And if so, I'm curious as to what exactly is wrong with it; I don't even have an iPhone, let alone input Japanese with one)

  24. Makes me wonder by bogaboga · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Although the Japanese and a number of Asian countries are "ahead of us" (read USA) when it comes to technology, most Americans I know of still regard the USA to be the most technologically advanced country in the world. It baffles me.

    Just last week, I was in Shanghai and I can say that from the Magnetic Levitation train to the technology that runs and manages public transit, those folks are way ahead of us.

    When I rode the subway in New York on return to USA, you could not blame me for thinking I am in a country of the fifties. What's happened to the USA?

    1. Re:Makes me wonder by Totenglocke · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What's happened? Our culture decided sometime in the 50's-60's that doing well in school was for losers. We've also developed a sense of entitlement and think everything should be low cost or free, regardless of how much it costs to manufacture or develop (a co-worker who complained about the "high gas prices" when gas was $1.50 a few weeks back comes to mind.......I think if gas was free she'd complain that we weren't being paid to take the gas!). The main reason behind people thinking we're the most technologically advanced country is the idiotic "God Bless America" / "We're #1" crap that tells people being born in the US somehow makes you special and you don't have to work as hard.

      --
      "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." ~Thomas Jefferson
    2. Re:Makes me wonder by Eil · · Score: 4, Funny

      I have no mod points for this excellent comment so instead I'll pay you in Cheetos.

    3. Re:Makes me wonder by jandrese · · Score: 2, Insightful

      One thing to consider: Is that new technology there for showing off, or is it actually useful? Maglev trains have been tried a few times in the US, but they've always been considered too impractical for mass production. One thing you have to remember is that just because a technology looks cool and futuristic doesn't mean that it's necessarily better.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    4. Re:Makes me wonder by asv108 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      US taxpayers, most of which do not ride trains, do not want to pay for fancy trains they will never ride. Its a lot easier to spend trillions on public works projects in a totalitarian regime like China.

    5. Re:Makes me wonder by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Geography:

      US is huge compared to Japan. So in Japan it's significantly easier to implement a high speed wireless network. This makes Japan the perfect test bed for new wireless technologies. Teenagers (regardless of the country) will buy anything trendy or gives the appearance that they are more advanced than their peers. Japanese teenagers in urban areas appear to have a large disposable income and the willingness to purchase the new "in" thing en masse. If I wanted to thoroughly test something wireless and high-tech I would introduce it in Japan first.

      The US has it's technological hotspots too. But it is only a small percentage of the US continent. So cool devices don't normally find it's way in the US market for mass consumption. However if you know where to look, you will find pretty nifty uses of technology but it's mostly in the business technologies instead of consumer tech.

      Age:

      The New York subway is considerably older than the Shanghai MagLev, and it would be costly and produce too much downtime to replace it with something that only gave a marginal ROI.

      Image:

      Don't forget some countries put a lot of money into "showcase technologies" (eg. very small bullet train lines, world's tallest skyscraper, etc.) to give the appearance that somehow their country is more "advance" than its neighbors. Unfortunately some of the countries that build these "showcases" have very oppressive governments.

      Perspective:

      When you live in the US, you are able to see the "warts". Bad news sells more papers. Teacher unions make it a point to always show need for more money. blah.. blah.. So you compare what you see while vacationing in other countries (which is always just the tip of the iceberg) with what you live in at home.

      Reality:

      We live in a global society. One day soon, political boundaries will become nothing more than regulation zones. I think this happened already, but for political reasons no one wants to admit this. I work and live with friends of different nationalities. I'll travel and work at locations outside the US. I chat and play with people from around the world thanks to the internet.

      --
      These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
    6. Re:Makes me wonder by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But if the old still works sufficiently well, there is little point in tossing it out in the face of trillion dollar deficits.

      We take this too far. This only leads to roads falling apart, major freeways that are potholed, bridges that collapse, viaducts that are cracking, the general rundown of our infrastructure, til we get to the point where there is nothing but to have massive injections of capital in order to make things safe, let alone state of the art.

      Everyone wants everything clean fresh and new. Then they're told they have to sacrifice something. Or that they might (shock) have to pay for it, and the "DONT YOU RAISE MY TAXES!" crowd starts chanting, and proposals get shot down, bridges collapse, people scream for blood, and the cycle repeats.

  25. An indictment of Japan, really by malice · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The Panasonic P905i wouldn't appeal to me at all. I really don't think of a cell phone that doubles as a portable TV is particularly innovative; I think it's rather sad.

    I saw this all over Japan, people watching TV on the subway... and meanwhile the Internet access and web capabilities of this phone, and others in Japan, are quite poor relative to what the iPhone or G1 can do.

    I'm sorry, but being able to watch live TV on a cell phone is not "OMG, it's so advanced, I want it" in my book.

  26. Re:Want to know what Linux can do? by MindlessAutomata · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'll channel the average Apple fanboy and just say that copy-and-paste is an unnecessary feature that only makes things more difficult to use. You should be glad there's no cumbersome copy-and-paste feature! Apple knows best.

  27. I agree by 2names · · Score: 5, Funny

    'Carrying around an iPhone in Japan would make you look pretty lame.'

    It doesn't do much for your reputation in the U.S. either...

    I like to use the old Bluetooth headset analogy.

    Old Techie: "You know how lumberjacks will sometimes put a big red X on trees?"
    Young Techie (who is wearing a bluetooth headset): "Like, yeah."
    O.T.: "That big red X is a sign to other lumberjacks that the tree bearing it needs to be culled from the population."
    Y.T.: "Culled. That's not really a word, is it?"
    O.T.: "The bluetooth headset is the human equivalent."

    /s/bluetooth\ headset/iPhone/g

    --
    "I'm just here to regulate funkiness."
    1. Re:I agree by adolf · · Score: 4, Funny

      Could be.

      Off-topic, young techie story: I was on IRC once, a decade or so ago, and a friend there was opining that it'd be so much more fun to write code if he could just do it on a real VT100, or at least on a monitor that had a VT100 logo on it. A year or so later, I found a DEC VT100 in good condition at the Dayton Hamvention fleemarket for $1.

      He said it worked fine. I said I didn't care if it worked, and that I was only interested in the logo. I offered him $5, if he'd just let me pry off the logo. He refused, and was insistent that I take the entire terminal for $1 or nothing at all. So I gave him a dollar, and took the whole thing.

      But it was heavy, and I wasn't about to carry it around all day. So I walked over to the nearest trash can, pried the logo off with my knife, and announced to the crowd my intention: Take this genuine DEC VT100, for free, or it goes into the trash. People looked. They listened. But here's the thing: Nobody wanted the free gear. I pleaded with folks to PLEASE take this free historic artifact, but they wouldn't do it.

      So, I tossed it into the trash barrel. It landed with a dull thud on top of a mountain of discarded plastic bottles and small electronics. And then, everything changed: In mere seconds, Old Techies swarmed upon it like flies on shit to rescue it from its grave.

      As long as it was merely free, the item had no value. But once it was trash, it was worth having.

      Totally bizarre.

    2. Re:I agree by joNDoty · · Score: 3, Insightful

      As long as it was merely free, the item had no value. But once it was trash, it was worth having.

      I think that's because even if you claim you're offering something for free, there's still a feeling that they owe you. Whereas they owe a trash can nothing.

    3. Re:I agree by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So, I tossed it into the trash barrel. It landed with a dull thud on top of a mountain of discarded plastic bottles and small electronics.

      *shudders* Do you realize how many cute, little, innocent kittens died on that horrible day?

  28. Re:How come it's only in Japan by NinjaCoder · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My Nokia N96 has a tv decoder built-in (for the new DVB-H standard). However, in all the countries I have travelled to in Europe since I got it, only in Finland (in Turku) could I actually get channels.

  29. Japanese "usability" by zerofoo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Japan's culture of usability is "different" from ours to say the least.

    Having worked in the electronics industry, I can tell you that Japanese users place high value on features and technical complexity. Mastering a technically complex device is viewed as an accomplishment.

    Look at some of the electronics designed for the Japanese market - rows and rows of tiny buttons, incomprehensible menus, difficult to read displays; then look at electronics designed for the US market - touch screens, big legible fonts and buttons, simple - easy to navigate menus.

    (Most of) western society places a high value on ease of use over functionality. Apple does very well in those markets. Japanese culture is very detail oriented and places value on technical complexity and function.

    It's a culture thing, and Apple needs to understand that if they want to succeed in the Japanese market.

    -ted

    1. Re:Japanese "usability" by vadim_t · · Score: 2, Funny

      Two words: Japanese toilet

  30. Re:How come it's only in Japan by beelsebob · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Because all these articles are talking rubbish. Japan is not ahead of us here, they just don't want the same thing as us. I explicitly don't want a phone that's a 3" TV, I don't want a phone that's a 5 megapixel camera with a shit lens, I don't want a phone that's a video camera, I don't want a phone that can send MMSes (especially when it can send email).

    I want a phone that's simple to use, beautiful, and gets on with being a phone, which the iPhone is absolutely ideal for.

    p.s. I *definitely* don't want a phone shaped like hello kitty.

  31. Re:The question is... by foniksonik · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Does you phone sync your contacts, calendars and email OTA? Does it let you control your Media Center? Does it play 3D games?

    Can you take a photo of something and load it into an app where you can annotate it and then email it off?

    It's not about old/new technology.. it's about a platform that can be extended with a truly good interface that let's you do things... the iPhone isn't perfect but it is certainly one of the best mobile platforms ever created.

    --
    A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
  32. Re:How come it's only in Japan by mdwh2 · · Score: 2, Informative

    In the UK, ordinary phones have been able to do things like web browsing, 3G, video recording/phoning/downloading, maps, copy and paste for years, and higher end phones have been offering things like wireless and GPS on top of that for ages.

  33. Apple is not third!! by jfanning · · Score: 5, Informative

    Apple is in absolutely no way the "third-largest mobile supplier in the world".

    Not even close.

    The top are: Nokia (40%), Samsung (14%), Motorola (14%), Sony Ericsson (9%) and LG (7%). Apple is well down in the single digits.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mobile_phone

    On the other hand they have captured a surprisingly large share of the revenue, but only because the iPhone is a high margin product and they don't compete in the high volume area.

  34. Re:Want to know what Linux can do? by commodore64_love · · Score: 3, Interesting

    >>>American consumers wouldn't put up with the buggy nature of Japanese gadgetry.

    Or the incessant obsolescence. Buy a MUSE analog HDTV in 1990, and have it obsoleted ten years later (broadcasts discontinued). Buy an Enhanced Definition Betamax around the same timeframe, and watch it go belly-up in 2003. Invest heavily in karaoke laserdiscs, and watch them be discontinued so you can no longer play your huge library.

    There are advantages to waiting - like saving money not investing in doomed products.

    Also I think obsessing about shiny new toys is not healthy - but that's just my own personal opinion. While it's true the Japanese had access to ED Betamax, and American consumers did not, I think we survived just fine. It was no great loss.

    --
    "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
  35. Poor kamikazes by sunking2 · · Score: 4, Funny

    They gave their lives only to become a nation of dudes with man purses. If they only knew before. Or maybe they saw it coming and decided death was better.

  36. Re:Want to know what Linux can do? by Xest · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That would be a good theory were it true, but the fact is the US cell phone market has always been even further behind than just skipping the beta phase. Every time I'd visit and go into a shop selling mobiles I'd have to chuckle to myself at the stuff they were selling which was years behind what we had even in Europe, let alone Japan.

    This is why the original iPhone was a flop everywhere but the US (yes it was even a flop in Europe), people were looking at it and thinking what's the big deal when it's camera, it's memory, it's lack of custom apps, lack of MMS, lack of 3G, lack of GPS and so on made it a laughably poor device, whilst in the US it was pretty state of the art.

    Move forward to the iPhone 3G and Apple have realise their mistakes and have moved forward a bit, but as stated in the summary, the iPhone still lacks features that many in Europe and Japan have come to expect.

    The US is a world leader on most things, but cell phones are one of the few products the US was simply years behind on, often never even getting some of the high end Nokia models we enjoyed in Europe For example, did the US ever even get the Nokia 7650 in the end? a phone that in 2001 had a camera, could play Doom, browse the web, run Java apps- in fact, everything the original iPhone had minus touch screen but plus a whole bunch of other features (MMS, custom apps).

    Apple realised the mobile gap was in the US and took advantage of that, they couldn't compete immediately with the companies like Nokia that had been doing it years and the US gave them a place to get started without ever needing to do so. Once their foot was in the door they could fairly quickly move on with their technology to produce a phone that was a little more attractive in Europe/Japan, if they keep it up and keep going they'll do well.

    At the end of the day though, the summary comes as no suprise as it really is quite similar to the story here in Europe. It's not to slag Apple off, because if the US was as uptodate on mobile technology as Europe it's questionable whether Apple could've got it's foot in the door as easily as it did and more fool Nokia et. al. for not taking the opportunity to exploit the rather backwards US cell phone market themselves. I think this is also why the iPhone has the following it does, not necessarily because it's any better than other phones outside North America- it still lacks a lot of features European and Japanese phones have, but because it's a decent mid-range phone in Europe/Japan and more importantly, because it is light years ahead of much of what the US ever really had before it.

  37. Re:How come it's only in Japan by DeadCatX2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Users and their expectations differ widely, as the article mentions. One set of users want a device to do a few things very well, and another set wants it to do everything even if that makes it more complicated. Being a hardware developer, I am of the latter mindset.

    Management is always on your ass to get the product out the door, generally as soon as it works. User interface considerations add greatly to the product latency, and if you have competitors you might not have the luxury of designing a good interface.

    Not all interfaces can easily be abstracted for human interaction. For instance, we like for one design component to have one purpose, but sometimes this isn't really tractable because we require more buttons than space permits, so we use "soft buttons". That is to say nothing of the desire for knobs, switches, jog wheels, and so on.

    There's also the 80/20 rule. Just because no one uses all of the features on a single phone doesn't mean that the all of the features aren't used regularly across all of the phones.

    --
    :(){ :|:& };:
  38. thats a real concern by circletimessquare · · Score: 4, Insightful

    i have a blackberry with built in gps

    the gps is disabled. why? because verizon wants me to buy their retarded cell phone tower triangulation location service for $10/ month. the gps chip is sitting right on my phone. free. locked. i downloaded the free gmail app (amazing they let me do that, huh?), and all i can do is a get a rough approximation of my location. i've got the hardware, on the phone, to get the free signal. and verizon won't let me

    fucking evil, fucking retarded. it does nothing, dear verizon, except fill me with a burning hatred for you

    now i can understand a cell company competing with the services of another cell company, and blocking this or that signal that is a PAID service

    but when they go out and start squashing well-established FREE signal services, WHEN THE HARDWARE TO GET IT IS ALREADY ON THE FUCKING PHONE, i begin to channel my inner communist. that is the most evil retarded bullshit there is. free market business practices at their most evil

    so i agree with you, i can see them blocking the free hdtv digital signals. 100% possible

    the only redoubt i can consider is that, being a free market, t-mobile, sprint, etc., should unlock free gps and unlock free tv signals, if they aren't already, and make a marketing bonanza on that fact

    you'd see verizon quickly lose customers, and quietly reverse their fucking evil shit sucking behavior

    they already lost me, i totally hate them for that, and have told them in no uncertain terms

    evil motherfuckers. blocking free gps in order to sell me their half assed triangulation service. the hardware is already built into THE DAMN PHONE you fucking asswipes

    die you sleazy shitsucking verizon, die

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:thats a real concern by dargaud · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I suggest you don't purchase an HP digital multimeter/signal analyzer... When you later call them to purchase a 1Gb memory upgrade (for about 1000$) they just give you a code to type in on the device... to activate the extra memory that is already installed inside the device. Now I'm only a lowly engineer with no decision/purchase power, but I told them in no uncertain terms to go fuck themselves, and if I had any power the device would be on its way back in the mail with a money-back request. All this because their marketing practices would make a maggot gag.

      --
      Non-Linux Penguins ?
    2. Re:thats a real concern by Pyroja · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You are a troll. Verizon does a lot of backhanded evil shit, and there are many reasons to hate on them. Don't make shit up. The GPS on all VZW BlackBerries has been unlocked for months. I've got my BlackBerry Storm right here in front of me. Not only did it come with a free mapping app, BB Maps, I also went and installed Google Maps. Funny that, it accesses the GPS just fine. So does Nav4All. And SignalLoc. And Poynt. A year ago you could've slung this claim. Not today. Better luck next time.

      --
      [Trojan.]
  39. No MMS. LOL. by inotocracy · · Score: 3, Informative

    When I found out that the iPhone lacked MMS I couldn't help but laugh. No MMS? Seriously? How can a mobile phone be released and not support that oh so basic functionality. Every single phone released has MMS but not the iPhone. Why exactly?

  40. Re:Want to know what Linux can do? by iocat · · Score: 5, Interesting
    The biggest problem with the iPhone in Japan (or so I was told by everyone I asked in Japan) is that it requires 2 hands to use effectively. Therefore, you can't use it to text one handed on a crowded subway where you need one hand to hold on to the overhead strap.

    ALso, for whatever reason, people seemed less impressed by its fancy pants touch scrolling UI, and more interested in simple lists they could click through, and being able to pull down over the air TV versus d/l videos.

    Personally, I agree with my Japanese friends; I'm not a huge fan (I like a keyboard).

    But, it's interesting to note that almost every expat American I saw on my last trip had an iPhone, though -- so there might be just more appeal, culturally, to Amercians and westerners for some reason. There's certainly no shortage of cult-of-Mac people in Japan, but it didn't seem to translate to the phone.

    --

    Dude, I think I can see my house from here.

  41. Language note for the curious by querist · · Score: 5, Informative

    The Japanese word transliterated "kawaii" is usually translated "cute" in dictionaries, and is composed of two kanji (borrowed Chinese characters), the first meaning "to be able to, to be allowed to" and the second meaning "to love" or "love". The Chinese word written the same way (ke3 ai4) is also translated as "cute" and the implied meaning from the order of the characters/words is "loveable".

    Yes, that would most likely be the word used by Japanese tweenies and teenaged (and even older) ladies. Just remember, this is the nation and culture that brought us "Hello Kitty".

    1. Re:Language note for the curious by JCSoRocks · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I bet the iPhone - Hello Kitty Edition would sell millions... Features pink bezel and adorable hello kitty stylized back plate.

      --
      You are using English. Please learn the difference between loose and lose; they're, there, and their; your and you're.
    2. Re:Language note for the curious by redxxx · · Score: 2, Funny

      Great, now explain Moe without sounding like a pedophile.

    3. Re:Language note for the curious by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2, Funny

      I bet the iPhone - Hello Kitty Edition would sell millions

      Go and wash your head out with Clorox, please. Don't do that again.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  42. Re:How come it's only in Japan by jambox · · Score: 2, Funny

    They can comfortably sit on technology

    Yeah I seen the videos too. Dirty bastards!

    --
    You thought you could break the laws of physics without paying the PRICE?
  43. What Makes a Good UI by Colonel+Korn · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The Japanese cell market sounds a lot like the Korean market, which makes me think that it's not just "features instead of UI" that makes the Japanese dislike the iPhone, but instead the UI itself. In Korea, when someone wants to get a specific feature of his cell phone, which may be through several "ugly" list menus, he flips open the phone, takes about a quarter second to hit the memorized sequence of hotkeys for menu choices on his hardware keypad without looking at the phone, and by the time he gets it out of his pocket and up to his head the feature is waiting for him. An American with an iPhone will take five more seconds to navigate through pretty menus to get to the same thing. The iPhone looks more friendly and advanced, but the guy with the archaic lists navigates his UI 10x faster. Even Americans, at least the more techy ones, can get used to their phones to the extent that the UI which looks clunky to us at first actually _works_ much better for them than an iPhone's can.

    --
    "I zero-index my hamsters" - Willtor (147206)
    1. Re:What Makes a Good UI by quarterbuck · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually Nokia was the original champion for this.
      Each menu on the phone is associated with a number 1= Call 2= Messages etc. and the same applies to the submenus. Most of my friends had these sequences memorized, so they could pick up a phone and type 1-2-1 and get into their received text messages menu etc. without looking at their phone.
      The cool thing was that this sequence of menu's was the same in ALL the Nokia phones, so most of the users stuck with Nokia when they upgraded.
      Later on Nokia changed their menu layout and their phone chargers causing a lot of the users to defect.

      --
      http://slashdot.org/submission/1062723/Cheap-mobile-data-plan?art_pos=2
  44. Re:Want to know what Linux can do? by TubeSteak · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This is why the original iPhone was a flop everywhere but the US (yes it was even a flop in Europe), people were looking at it and thinking what's the big deal when it's camera, it's memory, it's lack of custom apps, lack of MMS, lack of 3G, lack of GPS and so on made it a laughably poor device, whilst in the US it was pretty state of the art.

    I was traveling overseas when the original iPhone came out and people were going crazy for it.
    Not because it had good features, but because it was a status symbol.

    Mobile shops were hawking it for 2x retail and selling out every time they got a new box of iPhones.
    The mobile stores all had waiting lists, even those kiosks in the mall.
    Having one meant either someone hand carried it from America or you paid >$1000 US
    /But that's just my anecdotal experience.

    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
  45. No surprise really.... by BetterSense · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...that a particular American product isn't cutting it in the land of the rising sun. These days, there's only four things America does better than the rest of the world: music, movies, microcode, and high-speed pizza delivery.

  46. Re:Want to know what Linux can do? by lymond01 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Being an original iPhone adopter from the U.S. I'd say it's strength isn't in its features, but in its usability. As stated 1000 times, the iPhone interface, much like the MacOS interface, is beyond any of its competitors, at least in the U.S. Intuitive, smooth, with good feedback (though not tactile -- and I've taken to sighing when I hear the tappity-tap of a blackberry user in a theater or classroom compared to the silent keyboard of the iPhone).

    Dodging the easy car analogy, the iPhone is a partner who knows what you want, instead of someone who can offer anything you want.

  47. Re:Want to know what Linux can do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Apple didn't "invent" copy/paste for god's sake, though they did popularise it. What fanboyism, sheesh, though you were inaccurate even in apple terms - the Lisa (1981) had it before the Mac.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copy_&_paste

    Emacs had kill/save/yank functionality equivalent to or better than most cut/copy/paste until recently (since it kept a history on the "kill ring", though in the modern era such functionality exists as clipboard history daemons on linux/X11 ) basically forever.

    The Amiga had 256 independent clipboards that were also represented in the virtual filesystem layer, which was handy (though there are command line clipboard access tools under linux nowadays which are pretty much equivalently handy).

  48. Re:Want to know what Linux can do? by aclarke · · Score: 5, Interesting

    To each their own, I guess. I just got back from Switzerland, and had one person comment on how fancy my phone was. She had heard of iPhones but I guess had never seen one, or an iPod Touch either. This is from a family with 5 iPods.

    Maybe, as others have stated, Apple designed a product which would sell well in its primary market, the US. There's a "duh" moment for you. Yes, other markets have better mobile phones and coverage, but as a Canadian I don't feel bad for you Americans :-( Things here are even worse.

    I have to say though that given what little I've seen of the Panasonic P905i, I'd take the iPhone any day. A phone with a giant antenna and TV access? No thanks. It goes back to cultural preferences once again.

  49. Mobile Web by vaxt · · Score: 2, Informative

    This is all wrong. In Japan they have two distinct internets, which are not compatible with eachother: the regular internet, which we are used to, and the "keitai" (mobile) web. It's my understanding that the Japanese public mostly cares about the Keitai web, which is packed full of proprietary technologies. The iPhone, following global standards is completely incompatible with the Keitai web, and thus is why people don't want it.

  50. Re:Want to know what Linux can do? by cthellis · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You'd be hard-pressed to find ANY Apple fanboy saying "it's not necessary." Most are still "what the crap?" themselves, and go so far as to say "I guess they're working on a new system that will change expectations as to what 'cutting' and 'pasting' means to mobile devices and to the 'cloud,' and aren't going to bring it out until they're ready.

    Not to mention Apple's been pretty hard-line as to the 'sandbox' concept for apps, and dramatic clipboard alterations would start giving people access to all sorts of potential monkey-business.

    So while they may "understand" on a "logistical for Apple" level, effectively NO ONE says it's unnecessary, or doesn't find themselves missing it.

  51. Re:warning by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 3, Funny

    The user "twitter" is a twitter sockpuppet.

    Isn't that an infinite loop? If he is his own sock puppet, what is inside the sock? I now have this vision of an endless sock puppet with nothing but sock puppets inside, puppet as puppeteer...
    And now my brain hurts...
    Thanks

    --
    You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
  52. only foreigners, perhaps by Trepidity · · Score: 5, Funny

    There are a lot of American things that seem to be chic in Japan, but technology has never really been one of them. It's like trying to impress a German with your precision-engineered American luxury car or something.

    1. Re:only foreigners, perhaps by lordtoran · · Score: 5, Funny

      Or like impressing a Frenchman with your tasty British cuisine.

      --
      Want to hear the voice of GOD? cat /boot/vmlinuz > /dev/dsp
  53. Re:Want to know what Linux can do? by Nick+Ives · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Actually, I'm always quite mystified by comments like that. In what way, other than perhaps a slightly wider form factor, does the iPhone "require" a second hand to use effectively? It's certainly speedier to have two thumbs available for typing, the ability to use multi-finger gestures like pinching... But if you're just quickly using it, in what way is it difficult?

    The ability to touch-text is common here in the UK and I'd expect even more-so in Japan. I'd never buy a phone without a proper input pad for that very reason - touch-texting whilst pissed in a club and having a conversation is essential!

    --
    Nick
  54. Re:Want to know what Linux can do? by SoupGuru · · Score: 4, Funny

    I heard iPhones get angry if you anthropomorphize them.

    --
    What doesn't kill you only delays the inevitable
  55. Maddox Summarized the iPhone the Best by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 2

    From his post (warning: Strong Language):

    "There you have it: the most objective comparison of two cellphones ever made. I think I'll take the rest of the afternoon off and copy and paste text on my cellphone because I can"

    http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=iphone

  56. Re:How come it's only in Japan by noewun · · Score: 5, Insightful

    . . .they just don't want the same thing as us.

    True, and there are things about Japanese culture which make their cel phone market very different from ours. One of the biggest things is the way in which the Japanese commute to and from work: Japan has a much higher use of public transportation than does the U.S., and the Japanese are heavy users of rail travel. This means, according to the last figures I checked, the average Japanese working person has an hour commute to and from work which is, essentially, free time. Contrast this to the U.S., in which the majority of people drive to work.

    To me, this explains a lot of the Japanese demand for the use of video and TV on the cel phones, and from the cel phone networks: they have the time and inclination to use those services. Contrast this to the U.S., in which people have to (supposedly) concentrate on their driving; we have lots of talk radio here, something to listen to during that commute which requires no hands.

    Add to this all of the other commuting the Japanese do via rail and you have a market which just doesn't exist in the U.S. I think this holds true in Europe as well, which also has a higher incidence of public transportation use than the U.S. We drive here, a lot, and that niche just doesn't exist. Most Americans get their online TV and video either at work or at home. Which is to say that population and work patterns influence technology adoption and use as much as, or more than, GUI design and technical achievement.

    At least that's my theory.

    --
    I am a believer of momentum and curves.
  57. as soon as this contract is up, i'm doing the same by circletimessquare · · Score: 2, Funny

    fuck you verizon

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  58. Re:Want to know what Linux can do? by cayenne8 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    "The ability to touch-text is common here in the UK and I'd expect even more-so in Japan. I'd never buy a phone without a proper input pad for that very reason - touch-texting whilst pissed in a club and having a conversation is essential!"

    I think it also may have something to do with txt messaging starting out earlier and still probably more popular in Europe and other far away lands than in the US.

    I think early on, it had to do with how ya'll are billed for voice and txt...it was cheaper over there to txt than to voice. Over here...pretty much the opposite. Heck...still is really...you have to pay extra to txt or get a txt plan for your phone.

    I actually never tried it till just after Katrina, when we found it was about the only way to contact anyone with a 504 area code on their phone. You simply could not call anyone for almost a month or more, but you could txt them.

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  59. A disaster--91% didn't want to buy an iPhone by Zero+return · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Goodness--only 9% of people might want to buy an iPhone when Apple is looking for 1% of the market.

    What a disaster!

  60. Re:Want to know what Linux can do? by commodore64_love · · Score: 2, Funny

    >>>What fanboyism.

    I've never owned an Apple in my entire life. Swing-and-a-miss. Maybe you should just correct people when they make mistakes, with adult-style tact, rather than call them childish names.

    Ass. ;-)

    --
    "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
  61. Re:Want to know what Linux can do? by babyrat · · Score: 2, Informative

    This is from a year ago...but it seems to contradict the 'flop'...

    http://www.pocket-lint.co.uk/news/news.phtml/13104/14128/iphone-o2-sales-figures-success.phtml

    O2 has confirmed that the iPhone is the company's fastest selling device it has ever had in the UK, however stopped short of saying actually how many it sold in the first month and half on sale.

  62. WHAT ARE THE NUMBERS? by homejapan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I can't believe this - yet another "the iPhone failed in Japan" article with NO SALES DATA to support the claim. Maybe it is selling slowly here in Japan. Maybe flopping miserably. But why make that claim with no numbers to back it up? Get the numbers first!

    There are other reasons why Softbank might cut the price. End-of-season (that'd be now) goals. Inventory clearance for a new model. Or the biggest reason of all: a lousy economy. If the iPhone is sluggish in Japan, it's not the only thing; everyone from Toyota on down is bleeding money and laying off workers as sales slump for just about everything.

    Even in a good economy, maybe the iPhone wouldn't succeed here. Maybe it would. Sadly, without any data upon which to base intelligent comments, we're still going to get non-stop uninformed punditry about market potential and breathless unproven claims of "cultural differences".

  63. Re:warning by wick3t · · Score: 2, Funny

    I once wrote an infinite loop in a Comp Science exam paper. 6 years on and I'm still waiting for the results.

  64. Not true at all IMHO by Nicky+G · · Score: 2, Interesting

    When I was in Japan a few months ago, I got a hell of a lot of "iPhone? Sugoi!" (cool!) in response to using my iPhone in public. The Japanese public may reject it for technical reasons (original lack of emoji support, tv, video, etc.) or pricing reasons, but "lack of cool" is not one of them, I don't think.

  65. Lame by kalel666 · · Score: 2, Informative

    It seems Chen used an old article to quote Hayashi thusly, "Hayashi's cellular weapon of choice? A Panasonic P905i, a fancy cellphone that doubles as a 3-inch TV. It also features 3-G, GPS, a 5.1-megapixel camera and motion sensors for Wii-style games."

    The none-too-happy Hayashi reports, "My cellular weapon of choice, of course is an iPhone... I can't agree with what Brian's article had to say and here is how I view the iPhone market in Japan."
    http://blog.nobi.cc/2009/02/my-view-of-how-iphone-is-doing-in-japan-by-nobi-nobuyuki-hayashi.html/

    iPhone Mattters today also has a related report, "The Japanese hate the iPhone so much they start four iPhone magazines."
    http://www.iphonematters.com/article/the_japanese_hate_the_iphone_so_much_they_start_four_iphone_magazines_173/#When:12:42:00Z/

    --
    I HAVE CUBIC WISDOM THAT TRANSCENDS AND CONTRADICTS ONE DAY GODS
  66. Correction by Shin-LaC · · Score: 4, Informative

    That kanji spelling of kawaii is ateji (= employing kanji that sort of match the sound and meaning of a word, but have no grounds in its etymology). The word "kawaii" comes from "kahohayusi", which then evolved into "kahahayusi", "kahayusi", "kawayusi", and finally into "kawaii". "Kahohayusi" is a compound of "kaho" , meaning "face" (kao in modern Japanese), and "hayusi", meaning "bright".

    Much like "mabayusi" (=> modern "mabusii") indicates a brightness so strong that you have to avert your eyes, "kahohayusi" literally describes a sight that you can't face. By metaphor, the original meaning of the word was "pitiable", "a sorry sight". This meaning is retained in the modern word "kawaisou", while the meaning of "kawaii" changed into "lovely, cute".

    As for how that happened, we can conjecture something like this: small, weak things are pitiful, but they can also elicit a feeling of wanting to help them; the reaction changes from "turning your face away" to "extending your hand", so to speak, and thus the feeling becomes one of attraction.

    (if you don't believe me, check the Gogen Yurai Jiten)

    Who knows, maybe someday Japanese buyers will be moved by the pitiful, weak iPhone, and grant it a place inside their hearts. ;)

  67. Re:Want to know what Linux can do? by Knara · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Or, perhaps, maybe you should just know what you're talking about before hitting "submit"?

  68. Hijacking by Lars+T. · · Score: 3, Informative
    http://blog.nobi.cc/2009/02/my-view-of-how-iphone-is-doing-in-japan-by-nobi-nobuyuki-hayashi.html/

    My cellular weapon of choice, of course is an iPhone and my cellular weapon of choice to the foreigners is INFOBAR2 and I don't even dare to charge my P905i these days.

    This from the guy misquoted in both the article and summary. The author actually asked for his opinion, but then took something from an old interview.

    --

    Lars T.

    To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

  69. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  70. So, about the Japanese... by Tokyo_Otaku · · Score: 2, Informative

    Some of the stuff that comes up on this website just kills me some days. Every time a story comes up about Japan, and why something isn't selling there, a bunch of posters go on about what a bunch of xenophobic dicks Japanese are and how no western companies can do well there.

    To those people: You obviously don't live here, and you should consider the merits of spouting off on things with which you have no direct experience.

    I live in Tokyo. I've been here for about 6 years and have worked helping to restructure a well-known Japanese company.

    So, on to some random points:

    1) Do Japanese have a water-tight sense of national identity?

    Yes.

    But they are not the only ones with nationalistic issues. See also "We're #1 motherfuckers" in the US and the vague but pervasive smugness of Europeans.

    2) Are some Japanese people arrogant, screaming racists?

    Yes.

    And like there aren't arrogant and screaming racists in the US or Europe... No siree...

    This is often thought to be more widespread than it is, partly because foreigners are not always welcome in a number of establishments in Japan. In some cases this is indeed because they are racist.

    This is way more often the case because Japanese are not good culturally with dealing with the unfamiliar or strangers, even other Japanese. Letting the foreigner in who doesn't know the right way to behave and will freak out all the patrons is not good business.

    They are not totally unjustified in thinking that foreigners will not behave themselves, given the massive number of westerners who come here and act like total dicks, in the same way people are known to act like total dicks when visiting the Amish. I don't know how many times I have had to cringe when reading the news or standing on the train because of the obnoxious behaviour of other gaijin.

    All that said, I've seen a little old Japanese guy body-check my friend, for no other apparent reason than he was a Gaijin.

    3) Are domestic Japanese businesses insular and hard to do business with?

    Yes.

    Domestic Japanese companies tend to cluster together in groups, solidified with cross shareholdings. It's often times difficult for Japanese companies to work with other Japanese companies, so don't feel so picked on.

    Granted things were waaaaaay worse in the 80's. They used to rebuff ski equipment makes with bullshit excuses like, and I'm not kidding, "Japanese snow is different". It seems that Japan has collectively grown up a little since then.

    4) Japanese hate foreign brands. They only want to buy Japanese things.

    No.

    Here are a list of things that are insanely popular in Japan:

    - Starbucks
    - Louis Vuitton
    - Virtually any European fashion brand
    - Krispy Kreme (2 hours lineups just to get one)
    - iPod
    - McDonalds (there is a word for meeting there)
    - Apple products (amongst designers)
    - Hollywood movies
    - Microsoft software
    - Dell hardware
    - Cisco routers
    - etc etc etc

    Do I really need to say anything more?

    5) The XBox 360 failed in Japan because of X.

    No.

    Unless X happens to be the fact that MS massively screwed up the launch in Japan by not having a single game Japanese people wanted to play in the initial line-up. JRPGs, fighting games and simulators of all kinds. That's what they like.

    In Microsoft's defence, they have done their best to recover like champs. They obviously went right out and commissioned a bunched of JRPGs, which have all hit in the last 6 months, taking XBox 360 to the top of the hardware charts three times, including this week.

    6) Japanese don't buy the iPhone because their phones are super wicked.

    Yes and No.

    Japanese phones have been waaaaaay ahead for a long time. The phones in the US, until the iPhone and Android have been pretty much a total joke.

    That said, the

  71. What did Nobu really say about the iPhone? by Me!+Me!+42 · · Score: 2, Informative

    What did Nobuyuki Hayashi really say before he was so badly misquoted by Brian Chen?
    Read his blog: (hint his real cellphone of choice is . . . an iPhone!?!!):
    http://blog.nobi.cc/2009/02/my-view-of-how-iphone-is-doing-in-japan-by-nobi-nobuyuki-hayashi.html

    --
    -- My apologies if the above facts contain any opinions, or vice versa! --