Slashdot Mirror


Circuit Board Design For a Small Startup?

Patrick Bowman writes "I'm with a small (okay, it's just me) startup planning a camera-related USB device for the mass market. It's probably patentable so I can't give details. I can handle the software but have no hardware design or manufacturing experience. Does anyone have any recommendations for a company to handle the PCB design and manufacture? Instead of starting from scratch I've also considered approaching one of the companies (mostly in China) that make similar devices and asking them to modify their hardware for my requirements, and to provide their source for me to modify. Has anyone taken this route before? How did it work for you?"

262 comments

  1. Try Express PCB by pcjunky · · Score: 5, Informative

    Express PCB will do prototype PCBs for as little as $50 for three units. Free software to get started with (no autorouting but hey).

    1. Re:Try Express PCB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes, ExpressPCB or PCB123 is nice. Do not go the China route. You will only wind up banging your head against the wall unless you speak fluent Chinese.

    2. Re:Try Express PCB by odin84gk · · Score: 5, Informative
      He is asking someone to design the board, including the schematic design. ExpressPCB, PCB123, and all other PCB houses fabricate the printed wiring board. They do not design and populate a circuit board for a non-technical person.

      Yes, there are a LOT of companies who do this. I would compare it to asking Slashdot for a recommendation on a website designer. If you want a professional product, expect to spend well over $50,000 for a decent company.

      On a side note, my experience with Chinese contractors is that they focus on making things as cheaply as possible, to a fault. You will hear stories about contract manufacturers in China who will take a design and remove components until it fails functional testing, keeping the savings for themselves. (This is a very, very bad thing since they can remove safety and quality features, such as a snubber circuit).

      I would heavily recommend outsourcing to Mexico before outsourcing to China. Even better, do it in the US.

    3. Re:Try Express PCB by digitalunity · · Score: 2, Interesting

      AC speaks the truth. Do not seek any manufacturing in China unless you're planning on high volume production.

      If you're still in prototyping phase, you have no reason to try. You will just end up frustrated.

      --
      You can't legislate goodness. Let each to his own destiny, by will of his freely made choices.
    4. Re:Try Express PCB by b96miata · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Even better, how about we stop encouraging/helping wild-eyed "entrepreneurs" who have these great ideas that are "probably patentable" but who are wholly incapable of actually inventing said devices.

      Hell, I have an idea for a 400mpg car for the automotive market. It's probably patentable so I can't give details. I can handle the in-car dvd and entertainment system but have no automotive engineering or manufacturing experience. Does anyone have any recommendations for a company to handle the drivetrain design and manufacture? Instead of starting from scratch I've also considered approaching one of the companies (mostly in Michigan) that make similar vehicles and asking them to modify their hardware for my requirements, and to provide their in-car dvd and entertainment system source for me to modify. Has anyone taken this route before? How did it work for you?"

    5. Re:Try Express PCB by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Do not go the China route. You will only wind up banging your head against the wall unless you speak fluent Chinese.

      And if your design is worth anything, you'll start seeing it on eBay, at dollar stores, in mail order catalogs, As Seen On TV... You'll wonder where those orders are, because none will be coming to you... Theft by Chinese blackmarketers.

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    6. Re:Try Express PCB by mcvos · · Score: 2, Funny

      1. Ask Slashdot
      2. ????
      3. Profit!

    7. Re:Try Express PCB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Why?

    8. Re:Try Express PCB by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      When I have a "probably patentable" idea, I say "screw it" because patents cost the thousands of dollars I can't afford to gamble, especially since patent law is on the corporations' side and totally against the little guy.

      Instead I just post the idea to slashdot so the world will have it for free; prior art. If someone has an idea for a camera but doesn't know how to build a camera, or the electronics for one, he doesn't have much of a chance at making a marketable product out of his "probably patentable" and possibly already patented idea.

    9. Re:Try Express PCB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Jerk.

    10. Re:Try Express PCB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
      Yeah, let's stop helping people, that's a good idea.

      Many companies start off without the complete expertise to produce the product they envision. Outsourcing part of the work to another company might be smart and profitable for both parties. As long as I don't have to share the risk I'm perfectly OK with that. What's your problem?

    11. Re:Try Express PCB by rubycodez · · Score: 4, Insightful

      how about we stop encouraging/helping wild-eyed "entrepreneurs"

      bullshit, I've seen inspired people with ideas hook up with the people with know-how and build amazing businesses. teamwork multiplies brain power. and your mocking of the article poster isn't even accurate, embedded software is a core component of his product vision

    12. Re:Try Express PCB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Patrick, just ignore b96miata. Don't put all your financial eggs into this basket, but keep pursuing it. Hopefully you'll be posting in a few years about how fabulously well your camera-related-usb-device company is doing. Anyone who dismisses innovators and inventors as 'wild-eyed entrepreneurs in quotes' should do us a favor and either replace their counter-productive smartass remarks with constructive criticism or save their crabbiness for their kids who won't get off their lawn. Good luck.

    13. Re:Try Express PCB by AutopsyReport · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Even better, how about we stop encouraging/helping wild-eyed "entrepreneurs" who have these great ideas that are "probably patentable" but who are wholly incapable of actually inventing said devices.

      He did invent it, but he doesn't know how to build it. There's absolutely no shame in having the brains to invent a better product but not having the skills to build it.

      So, you can lose the attitude. We do need encouragement for enterpreneurs, whether or not they understand something so inconsequential like how to design hardware. Very, very few of us can.

      --

      For he today that sheds his blood with me shall be my brother.

    14. Re:Try Express PCB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even better, how about we stop encouraging/helping wild-eyed "smartasses" who have these great ideas that are "probably better off in /. responses" but who are wholly incapable of actually giving good advice.

    15. Re:Try Express PCB by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Even better. partner with someone that is competent in electronics.

      Honestly, if the guy thinks he can do it on his own he is completely nuts.

      Either get a few million in operating capitol and hire an EE ($68,000.00 to start) and the associated staff, or find one that will partner with you for 50% of the money to be made.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    16. Re:Try Express PCB by b96miata · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What, exactly, is your definition of "invent"?

      Part of an invention is the process by which it operates and is constructed.

      Patenting an "invention" that you have no ability to actually produce is no different than these companies who patented things like "an internet-connected gaming system with wireless controllers" but never built one, because they didn't know how, yet now feel sony, nintendo, MS et al owe them billions of dollars.

    17. Re:Try Express PCB by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 1

      ...my experience with Chinese contractors is that they focus on making things as cheaply as possible, to a fault. You will hear stories about contract manufacturers in China who will take a design and remove components until it fails functional testing

      Or they'll use counterfeit semiconductors that'll blow under minimum load, resulting in lots of angry customers who have to send their expensive toys in for service...

    18. Re:Try Express PCB by AutopsyReport · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You are a little off-base here, bud. What you are talking about are patent trolls which spec out an idea, typically already in use, patent it but do not intend to produce.

      This guy has spec'd out an idea but doesn't have the expertise to build it. He still intends to build it, but needs to outsource that part. Care to elaborate how he is comparable to a patent troll?

      --

      For he today that sheds his blood with me shall be my brother.

    19. Re:Try Express PCB by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 3, Informative

      Nominally if you are operating a consumer electronics business you empower your hardware engineers to never allow a foreign factory to substitute parts in your product.

      Your design includes the schematics, the gerbers AND the BOM, when you do your product testing you test ALL THREE. You provide your factory with what they need to manufacture (gerbers+parts) and force them to ask you for substitutions or deviations.

      You always do a first article inspection, you always test the output of the factory before you go to market, and you never let them have a choice.

      Unless you're in very high volume production, the amount of management you will need here in the US to maintain this, is insane. If you're doing high end, high margin products, you may as well use a US based manufacturer. They can be evil as well, but at least they speak english and are no more than a few timezones away.

      I advocate keeping the hardware design in-house with your software. You can successfully outsource the mfg, you probably want to contract out the layout (drafting), but you want at least one hardware engineer who understands how to design and test PCBs on staff. A lot of them (me included) also know how to do device drivers, bootloaders, and programmable logic that you may need, and ought to be able to handle the signal processing discussions which will arise (CCDs aren't foolproof).

    20. Re:Try Express PCB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      http://www.ftdichip.com/ They can covert most legacy stuff to USB.

    21. Re:Try Express PCB by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      What, exactly, is your definition of "invent"?

      Part of an invention is the process by which it operates and is constructed.

      So every inventor of a product implemented on a circuit board needs to know the capabilities of modern board fabricators to produce a PCB capable of mass production at a reasonable price?

      That's crazy. He's the inventor - fair enough. All he needs is to hire (or partner with) and engineer capable of implementing his circuit.

      I, for example, could easily design a board to implement his circuit, in any combination of hardware and HDL as necessary, in a way that would yield a finished product capable of low-cost production. That's what I get paid for already.

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    22. Re:Try Express PCB by oliderid · · Score: 1

      Even better, how about we stop encouraging/helping wild-eyed "entrepreneurs" who have these great ideas that are "probably patentable" but who are wholly incapable of actually inventing said devices.

      Steve Jobs shouldn't have "great ideas" about software because he can't program?

    23. Re:Try Express PCB by JWSmythe · · Score: 4, Insightful

          If the numbers are anything like I've seen, for every wild eyed entrepreneur that has a project survive for even a couple years, that same entrepreneur has had dozens fail. For every entrepreneur like this, there are hundreds that throw everything they have into their "I'm going to make it with this!" project, and fail miserably.

          A long time ago, I believed in a vision, and the talk. I was young and stupid. I still have tens of thousands of shares in that company. The company sold it's assets, and closed the doors long ago, but in theory if the company were to ever reorganize, those shares could be worth something.

          I keep them as a reminder, just because someone has a wild idea and hundreds (or even dozens) of people to follow them, it doesn't mean that they will thrive.

          If the original poster has an idea, great. If he can prototype it, even better. If he can arrange for manufacturing, excellent.

          Now, if he can take his killer product, get it to market *AND* the public want to buy it, now you're golden. Otherwise, you're just another guy with a dream of making it huge.

          Lots of people have had killer products, that have gone nowhere. It can be the latest, greatest innovation that's ever existed, but when you can't get it to market, and/or you can't get the public to buy it, then all you have is a story to tell your grandkids (or the other old lonely single guys at the bar where you drown your sorrows every night.)

          Not to shoot down a dream. Go for it. Just stay practical.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    24. Re:Try Express PCB by Hurricane78 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You are confusing inventing with engineering.

      "Leaving research exclusively in the hands of engineers, we would have perfectly functioning oil lamps, but no electricity." -- Albert Einstein

      I feel offended by your comment.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    25. Re:Try Express PCB by nweis · · Score: 1

      Instead I just post the idea to slashdot so the world will have it for free; prior art.

      Shampoo?

    26. Re:Try Express PCB by Rorschach1 · · Score: 3, Informative

      I agree with the $50,000+ price tag if you're looking to have someone else do everything.

      As for building it in the US, have you tried? It *can* be done, but it seems to keep getting more difficult. I do have some PCBs assembled in the US, even though I could have them done in China for less. But for stuff like injection molded cables, I've gotten prices of $8+ each in the US when I can get them for around $1.50 in China. I'm willing to pay 50% to 100% more to keep production in the US, but 500%+ is a little hard to swallow.

      There are also independent QA providers that operate in China who (for a price) will keep a close eye on outsourced manufacturing, and it's their job to know all of the little tricks the factories like to pull.

      Most of the service-related companies I use in the US (printing, PCB assembly, metal fabrication, axial component sequencing) are small, usually family-owned businesses. They're the only ones who have been able to offer the prices and level of service that make it worth paying a premium for. And too many of the big companies, through arrogance or apathy, won't even touch something a little out of the ordinary. They're like the kids working at McDonald's - if it's not on one of the buttons in front of them, they can't do it.

    27. Re:Try Express PCB by b96miata · · Score: 1

      The patent troll example was to illustrate the example between idea, (and in some cases, patent) and actual invention.

      I didn't say our fair poster was a patent troll, merely that he hadn't invented the device in question yet.

      Having an idea for something is not the same as inventing it.

    28. Re:Try Express PCB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, he said it may be 'patentable.' I would assume he means to figure out how to build one then patent it.

    29. Re:Try Express PCB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      US is way too expensive. But there are good board makers that will help you with design and execute your plan strictly to your definitions.
      Basically, China is not an option regarding that, as they fail quality, but you can go to Europe.
      We had a company in Bulgaria making our boards and they came better than we planned for 1/3 of the price we quoted in the US.
      Try Bulgaria, Romania, Ukraine, eastern Europe. Google is your friend...

    30. Re:Try Express PCB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Instead I just post the idea to slashdot so the world will have it for free; prior art.

      Shampoo?

      Deodorant?

    31. Re:Try Express PCB by richardkelleher · · Score: 1

      The thing is, he doesn't have a circuit, he has some idea about how some object might act (let's call it a spec.), but now idea how to make it act that way. He needs someone to design the product for him and he will write the software (or rather, modify software that someone else has written). Until both of those are done, nothing is truly invented.

    32. Re:Try Express PCB by richardkelleher · · Score: 1

      Jobs had Woz, need I say more...

    33. Re:Try Express PCB by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "Instead I just post the idea to slashdot so the world will have it for free; prior art. If someone has an idea for a camera but doesn't know how to build a camera, or the electronics for one, he doesn't have much of a chance at making a marketable product out of his "probably patentable" and possibly already patented idea."

      But, if he just 'gives it away for free', then he won't make any $$ off of the idea, which is the impetus for doing this in the first place, eh? I mean, we ARE all here to make a buck.

      That being said, he could look into getting a provisional patent I think...that is about $3K or so with a lawyer. Do that...you're then protected, and then you can try to sell your idea or partner with a larger company that can afford the real patent...and voila, you make big bucks and go onto the next idea.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    34. Re:Try Express PCB by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Or, as usual, the Chinese will steal your idea, fab up their own version of the product, sell it under another name, and make money off your idea.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    35. Re:Try Express PCB by gwait · · Score: 1

      I would go so far as to say he better spend some time on his own to work out how to actually do the hardware part, at least to the point where he will be able to tell if a contractor or potential hw oriented business partner is bullshitting him.

      It doesn't sound like he's at the point where real money needs to be thrown around, this feels like a garage shop startup concept.
      Silicon is practically free these days.

      Reading between the lines I get the feeling he has almost no clue at all about the hardware side.
      I think that leads to some of the negative comments - if he's really that ignorant of hardware design, perhaps his concept is physically impossible, kind of like all those garage shop mechanics who don't understand basic thermodynamics and try to invent perpetual motion machines.

      If he's passionate about his product idea, he should warm up to it by say grabbing a few issues of "Make" magazine, try his hand at actually building some basic hardware. Many of the embedded micro firms have free reference designs, with schematics.
      There are a ton of hobbyist level free projects all over the web..

      --
      Bavarian Purity Law of Rice Krispie Squares: Rice Krispies, Marshmallows, Butter, Vanilla.
    36. Re:Try Express PCB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lippert Design and Integration Ltd...

      Keith D. Brown P.Eng ...

      Semoia Industries...

      If you talk to the counter staff at your local independent industrial electronics distributor, they probably know several local people who can work on your project.

    37. Re:Try Express PCB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      HAHAHA!!!

      You made a stereotype joke!!!

      Well played, you rock!

      --end sarcasm

    38. Re:Try Express PCB by sabt-pestnu · · Score: 1

      Part of an invention is the process by which it operates and is constructed.

      Having an idea for something is not the same as inventing it.

      I have to take issue with this. You've presumed that the invention contains some principle heretofore unknown. Now that's a quite valid definition of 'invention'. But it does not include everything that is patentable, nor does it include everything that is an innovation.

      Just for one example, you should apply your definition to drugs. The process by which it operates is entirely natural; the invention is the application. Possibly also the construction of the drug, but not necessarily.

      For another example, pick anything repurposed. How about, "attaching a camera to a radar gun with a single trigger, and the radar result displayed in the frame". Two items that already exist. Combining them, though, is an invention. There is no doubt that such a thing can be made, even jury rigged. The operation (of the two items together) qualifies as an invention.

      To insist on a working model in all cases (to PROVE that it would work) is pedantic. Save it for when a design innovation ("this cup really does right itself, no matter how you drop it!") or a principle innovation ("With this combination of electronics, I create a self-levitating body!").

      Of course, there's always the crazies ("With blessed water from artesian wells, and these prayers and incantations, I can summon the Imp of the Perverse!"). Those, sure. Insist on a demonstration. Within a pentagon. ... er, pentacle.

    39. Re:Try Express PCB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      /. in general has a creepy bias against patents. I think the primary problem is that the people that actually have the time to sit here and post all day, are not likely to have the smarts or initiative to start a company. I'm thinking tee shirts, video games, mama's basement. Yeah, we get the profile alright.

    40. Re:Try Express PCB by Spazmania · · Score: 1

      bullshit, I've seen inspired people with ideas hook up with the people with know-how and build amazing businesses.

      As have I. But they weren't wild-eyed quote entrepreneurs endquote. They were smart, creative individuals who shared hundreds of clever ideas before running in to someone who, upon hearing the latest idea, said "That's brilliant. What if we did that here, here and here? We could make a business out of it."

      The guy with the one idea, so brilliant he can't tell you about it lest someone steal it, doesn't have have what it takes.

      --
      Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion.
    41. Re:Try Express PCB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you're an idea-bigot!!! burn him!!!

    42. Re:Try Express PCB by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      No, he should have great ideas about marketing because he can't program. That has always been his strong point. Let the engineers figure out what to actually do with it. The question is how do you sell it, and to whom?

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    43. Re:Try Express PCB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do what you've done- post on /. and ask other interested hobbyists/enthusiasts to join in. The US is sadly a nation of individuals. Good team efforts are a rarity here. I have extensive automotive experience, lots of ideas, electronics and software engineer, and would love to work with a team on better designs. I'm not willing to give up my ideas to Detroit (unless they give 1) lots of $ and 2) royalties) so I'll develop them on my own, slowly due to being alone and $ constraints.

    44. Re:Try Express PCB by home-electro.com · · Score: 1

      I did a circuit design for "probably patentable" device couple of years ago. And customer could not provide any details, too.

      After doing some initial work they asked me to sign NDA (which I did) so that they could provide me some details.

      It turned out they were working on perpetual mobile. Yes, that's right. And I was designing a power supply for it. (Do you get it, a power supply for a power generator!) They were very eager to pay money but just listening to their crazy talk was giving me such a bad headache, I quickly dumped them.

      Oh, f*ck, I think I just violated that NDA...

    45. Re:Try Express PCB by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      You forgot to add that they will also make your product a tasty melamine flavor too!

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    46. Re:Try Express PCB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How can he have 'invented' anything more than a vague description with out the knowledge to actually build it. You need to know how to actually do it to claim an invention (IMHO). Otherwise it's just a vague concept that can be implemented a million different ways (which one(s) of those did he invent?).

    47. Re:Try Express PCB by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      Sounds like he has a napkin's worth of circuit. That's fine. When I finish it for him, I'll be an inventor on the patent, too.

      He doesn't have the patent, yet. He just thinks it's patentable.

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    48. Re:Try Express PCB by SparkleMotion88 · · Score: 1

      Your argument by analogy fails completely. There are tons of people out there who can build a successful prototype using breadboard, wire wrap, etc but have no business designing and manufacturing production-quality PCBs. I recommend building to prototype yourself. If you don't have the skills, you should learn them. Once you have a working prototype, pay good money for a quality shop to design and fab the PCBs. You could even try something like ExpressPCB for a low-quantity run.

    49. Re:Try Express PCB by Gridpoet · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Indeed, there is a story of a toy developer that had a Chinese company design a motorized toy that had some simple microcontroller logic on it. The toy was designed for young children and would basically move around in a preset pattern and respond to some simple stimulus.
      The company chopped apart the design so much they ended up running the motor straight from the stamp with no flyback diode...

      needless to say, when little kiddies on Christmas morning started rolling the toy with a little force, the back emf fried the stamps...

      ouch

      the lesson here is, if you pay to have that work done, at least hire a known contractor to check the circuit for design defects.

      --

      -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
      This is MY galaxy...go find your OWN!

    50. Re:Try Express PCB by TimothyDavis · · Score: 1

      Wrong. Wrong. Wrong.

      Just because I cannot build a device - doesn't mean that I can't come up with an idea that is worth something to the market.

      For instance, a while ago my wife was involved in a fender bender where the other driver make an unprotected left hand turn (we drive on the right here) in front of my wife at the intersection. My wife had a green light, and the other driver claimed she had a green left hand turn arrow.

      This got me thinking - wouldn't it be great to have a dashboard camera that could have recorded the accident? I have searched online, and the items I have found don't meet what I want. The biggest problem is price. So my idea is to have essentially a webcam, with an SD slot, which does a circular write of the recordings (writes the the end, and overwrites the beginning). If you get into an accident, you pull the device and offload the recording.

      What you are saying is that I need to know electrical engineering to build this product, which is just wrong.

    51. Re:Try Express PCB by richardkelleher · · Score: 1

      Good luck to you, I honestly hope you both make millions. A good idea combined with technical expertise can make a great product.

    52. Re:Try Express PCB by FridgeFreezer · · Score: 1

      Or just try any local small business that deals with or consults on electronics & design - they don't have to have anything to do with cameras to know how to nail a PCB together.

      --
      There is no music - home taping killed it.
    53. Re:Try Express PCB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wow what a douche. You must be from the Obama campaign who is basically against free enterprise.... at least it seems like it.

      This country NEEDS people that have fresh idea's and want to actually better themselves...

      Im I just opened up a can a worms.

    54. Re:Try Express PCB by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      But who's the inventor? You can argue he hasn't invented anything because nothing he has actually works, but if he comes up with an idea, develops a spec for a PCB that will implement his code and idea, and commissions someone else to build the PCB he uses in the "invention" who invented it? The guy who turns specs into PCBs? Or the guy that came up with the idea and saw it through to a working product?

    55. Re:Try Express PCB by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I've had great success, and ultra-cheap prices, with pcbcart.com in China for PCB manufacturing.

      I can't testify to their ability in component stuffing, but for making the plain boards, it was a fantastic deal.

      I've used the Bulgarian company (Olimex), and they're a pain. Instead of a modern web interface like pcbcart.com has, they require you to send files by email, and payment authorization by something called "fax". WTF??? Their prices aren't that great anymore either.

      As for US places, they're just plain ridiculous. If you're doing an ultra high-end, complicated design (perhaps for some high-end military hardware), then they might be a good place to go. Otherwise, they're a rip-off. Sending a normal-complexity design to a US PCB house is like asking Rolls-Royce or Ferrari to do some custom automotive work for you and then wondering why the price is so high.

    56. Re:Try Express PCB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's a fresh idea: don't use apostrophes to pluralize!
      Or at least explain to me why "idea's" needs an apostrophe plural but "worms" doesn't?

    57. Re:Try Express PCB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gotta agree with the GP here on the definition of "invent". Without a working prototype you've invented nothing. Sure, parts of the prototype creation may need to be outsourced, but until you've done it there is no invention.

      With your reasoning I could spec out a space elevator, patent it, and just claim that I'm waiting to find someone that knows how to build it.

    58. Re:Try Express PCB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny... when I was swapping a Cummins Diesel into my Ford I saw first hand how much car companies actually makes themselves. In my case:

      Engine -outsourced to Cummins
      Front Axle: outsourced to Dana
      Rear Axle: outsourced to Sterling
      Steering: outsourced to saginaw
      Transmission: outsourced to New Venture
      Transfer case: outsourced to New Process
      The list can go on and on, they don't make brakes, wiper systems, headlights + taillights, tires, wheels, all the Electrical systems and computers are usually Bosch or some other...

      Bottom line, he may or may not end up making the product, but to say since he doesn't have expertise in ALL related fields to bring his product to market that it CAN'T be brought to market is very naive and pessimistic.

    59. Re:Try Express PCB by zuzulo · · Score: 1

      By the way, a friend of mine actually recently wrote an interesting article about how engineers can do their own small scale manufacturing. Its in product design and development magazine, and the article can be found here.

      Basically my quick version:

      1) start a corporation
      2) buy your own CnC/rapid prototyping tech or plan to outsource prototyping efforts
      3) build prototype
      4) use rapid prototyping techniques to refine product
      4) outsource final product manufacturing
      5) sell product online through various channels
      6) profit!

      Actually makes quite a bit of sense these days. I wrote a short article about the current trend toward decentralized manufacturing as well ...

      --
      "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
    60. Re:Try Express PCB by tgrigsby · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Nothing in the world can take the place of persistence. Talent will not; nothing is more common than unsuccessful men with talent. Genius will not; unrewarded genius is almost a proverb. Education will not; the world is full of educated derelicts. Persistence and determination alone are omnipotent."

      This is from an ARGO Computers ad in the July 8th, 1991 edition of Microtimes. The browned page hangs on the wall of my home office. When I think I'm done trying with some project, I look at that page, and then I man up and ask if the project has a realistic chance if I just keep trying.

      There once was a man that tried a dozen different businesses, and every single one failed. At age 40, on his last attempt, something simple that he was good at, he founded a restaurant that enjoyed reasonable success. When he attempted to franchise it, he received 1009 rejections before he finally managed to found his restaurant chain.

      His name was Harland Sanders, his chain was KFC, and before this wild-eyed entrepreneur died he would have told you that 11 herbs and spices weren't the secret of his success. It was determination.

      --
      *** *** You're just jealous 'cause the voices talk to me... ***
    61. Re:Try Express PCB by curunir · · Score: 1

      Yes, but without engineers, there would be cars falling from the skies on a regular basis.

      We call inventors without the knowledge to base their ideas on reality Science Fiction writers.

      The poster of this article does sound like he's grounded in reality since he's professed an ability to produce part of his product, so I'm hesitant to lump him in with the all the people who have an idea but no means or ability to produce it. But I have no shortage of people coming to me with what they believe is an idea for the next big thing. They almost always offer 2% of the company or some piddly dollar amount if the company ever gets funded in exchange for a mere prototype of the product. The mindset is always the same...my idea is worth millions and the execution of the idea is so easy a caveman could do it. And that's dead wrong. There have been many, many companies that have had great ideas and failed to execute. It's not easy.

      Call me when you've had a lawyer draw up an NDA for me to sign, you're willing to tell me your entire idea and you're willing to offer significant equity (read: equal equity with all other founders.) Until then, you're just another helpless nobody with an unrealistic dream. And approaching an engineer with the typical inventor's mindset is just as offensive as the GP's assertion. If I were the article author and I had expertise in part of what was necessary to make the product, I would draw up a basic design document, get it notarized and see a lawyer to draw up an NDA. I would then search for someone with expertise in the areas that I couldn't handle and try to convince them to co-found the company based on the prototype we developed together.

      Minimizing the importance of what you're unable to do is arrogant and far too often people with what they believe to be great ideas fall prey to this.

      --
      "Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos!"
    62. Re:Try Express PCB by DrLang21 · · Score: 1

      Big companies are not going to buy up a provisional patent unless your idea is so obviously certain to pay off big that you would be better off asking for venture capital anyways. Big corporations have two main directives for dealing with patents that could make them money. Either buy up a little guy who has done the leg work to prove that there is market demand, OR wait till the patent runs out cause the little guy can't afford to do anything with it anyways. Remember, a provisional patent lasts a very limited amount of time, and it usually takes longer than that to find a buyer.

      --
      I see the glass as full with a FoS of 2.
    63. Re:Try Express PCB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gotta agree. This is the type of things patents are actually useful for- it gives the idea guys an opportunity to outsource some of the bits they don't know how to do (let's face it, we can't know everything) so that they can get on with what they do best.. having more ideas. What I mean is that, if he filed a provisional patent, he could go have meaningful and productive discussions about what company to hire to design his circuit board, without being afraid of them stealing the idea.

    64. Re:Try Express PCB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or, as usual, the Chinese will steal your idea, fab up their own version of the product, sell it under another name, and make money off your idea.

      Never EVER send functional firmware and programmable logic contents to your contract manufacturer! Create test designs instead, used just to verify manufacturing job was correctly done.

      Of course, design in means of in-circuit programming of micros, PLDs, non-volatile memory chips, etc. and do that as well as final functional testing in-house.

      Oh, and always repeat the test you sent to contract manufacturer when assemblies arrive, before you go on and fill it with final programs.

    65. Re:Try Express PCB by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      When I have a "probably patentable" idea, I say "screw it"

      Maybe you should come up with an invention instead?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    66. Re:Try Express PCB by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      He did invent it, but he doesn't know how to build it.

      In that case, I invented the time machine, the teleporter and the perpetual motion machine.

      Wouldn't-X-be-cool does not justify a patent on X.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    67. Re:Try Express PCB by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Combining them, though, is an invention. There is no doubt that such a thing can be made, even jury rigged. The operation (of the two items together) qualifies as an invention.

      I would say sticking two pre-existing things together does not qualify as a a patentable invention[1]. The specific mechanism for doing so, however, could well do so.

      [1] I'm not referring to ideas which use the magic incantation "via the internet". Those are of course automatically patentable.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    68. Re:Try Express PCB by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Conceptually, it's not far off an aircraft's black box. In some countries, police cars have a similar thing. I believe some taxis in Belgium have them too. Cue off topic debate about how red light cameras are unconstitutional...

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    69. Re:Try Express PCB by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      But then he isn't trying to patent trucks.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    70. Re:Try Express PCB by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Either get a few million in operating capitol

      You mean he should buy the government? Hate to break it to you, but the bankers got there first. Curse them and their inside knowledge! They're all masons, you know.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    71. Re:Try Express PCB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks tgrigsby that was gold.

    72. Re:Try Express PCB by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      Alas, I was speaking hypothetically. I likely couldn't work for him free and clear. Stupid no-compete clause from an over-protective employer.

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    73. Re:Try Express PCB by soundguy4film · · Score: 1

      You sir are a fool! When people cooperate with eachother in different fields you improve products and develop new technologies. Without this kind of building on our forefathers shoulders we would still be grunting around in caves picking berries and hunting mammoths!

      A good idea is nothing without the designer the manufacturer the engineers and the distribution company, but at the same time all of those companies are nothing if they have no basis for a product.

      Often designers dont know the first thing about engineering, they just ahve a good idea that is user friendly, often manufacturers build terrible products because they just build it they do not properly develop the usability and marketability of that device. A great product starts with a design that may just be drawing with a few specific features, without engineers and manufactureres it is nothing, but if the engineers designed the device it might well be altogether practical with no aesthtic or ergonomic attributes just functions that are hard to use.

      Comon our world is based on cell based development look at the movie industry, and the game industry. Doing everything yourself is 1 not feasible, 2 takes too long, 3 lacks review process, 4 misses all the valuable input other members of your team may contribute.

    74. Re:Try Express PCB by Carpathius · · Score: 1

      Knowing that a thing *can* be done is not the same as having the ability to build it.

      In the case of the time machine, the teleporter and the perpetual motion machine, you don't even know if any one of them is possible.

      I don't know much about circuit boards either, but I bet I could, with a tiny bit of research, make a good determination if a thing was possible within the parameters I set.

      Let's see... for example, I know that it would be possible to build an amature radio handheld that would allow you to input your ID and someone else's ID, then your radio would only respond when the other ID was calling you, and your transmissions would be the only ones heard by the other ID (assuming that radio had similar software and hardware). We can go a bit farther and make it a standard, putting a switch on all handhelds that either limits your transmission and reception to certain ID, or opens it wide up so everyone can hear you and you can hear everyone else.

      It's certainly possible. (It's also probably not viable and potentially illegal based upon interference problems.)

      The point isn't that this is an invention, good or bad, the point is, first, that a person can certainly "invent" something without knowing exactly how to build it, and, second, simply because you don't know exactly how to build something doesn't mean you don't know it can be built.

      Sean.

  2. If you're in New England... by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 0, Offtopic
  3. Where are you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Depends on where you are - I recommend working with someone local. This is the kind of project where you would want to work very closely with the manufacturer. If you happen to be in Colorado - I highly recommend Premier Manufacturing (pmscs.com). They're really good at working with specific customers.

    1. Re:Where are you? by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Depends on where you are - I recommend working with someone local. This is the kind of project where you would want to work very closely with the manufacturer.

      I second this sentiment. A 3 hr flight to your supplier just puts a big wall betwen you and them. I don't know the scale of operations you are looking into, but you may want to do a few site visits/surveys to make sure that they are up to snuff.

      Parts control is important. Just because a component comes from the same supplier, doesn't mean that it was manufactured in the same plant. I learned the hard way that some plants produce on the high side of their tolerances, and some plants produce on the low side of their tolerances. And some plants just don't meet their tolerances.

      A refund on a $50 component isn't comforting when all of a sudden your latest units start failing infant mortality tests.

      --
      Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
    2. Re:Where are you? by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 3, Interesting

      And some plants just don't meet their tolerances.

      A refund on a $50 component isn't comforting when all of a sudden your latest units start failing infant mortality tests.

      Actually, now that someone posted a comment about some of the Chinese factories... I think this is exactly what happened with our components.

      These components were manufactured to a tolerance, and sold in lots of 50-100k. I have no doubt that as production continued, the factory stripped out what it could from the components in terms of structural support gradually. They kept removing it while it continued to work, and we kept using the components over the course of 20 years.

      Now, 20 years later, the components that worked for us so long ago, have now been stripped down to eggshell thickness. We began a new production that required some specific qualification tests. Quite literally we ended up with the Rattle in our Shake, Rattle, and Roll tests. The component had snapped off during vibration tests.

      Pulling out the microscopes, we found that the newer components used less glue at their adhesion points than the previous components, or components manufactured in the company's flagship plant. The glue was just enough so that the components would survive safety qualification tests, but when exposed to HALT, they were the first things to go.

      --
      Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
  4. Good luck with IP if working with the Chinese by Bearhouse · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In my direct experience, they are highly-skilled in copying/ripping off and even building on/improving on original ideas. Note: This is for stuff which is often already trademarked, registered and patented.

    So, I'd suggest getting some VC/angel financing and professional help, and patent your idea to hell and back in major markets before doing anything else. OK, they'll take a huge chunk of the eventual gain, but 50% of something is a lot better than 100% of nothing.

    1. Re:Good luck with IP if working with the Chinese by Samschnooks · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So, I'd suggest getting some VC/angel financing and professional help, and patent your idea to hell and back in major markets before doing anything else. OK, they'll take a huge chunk of the eventual gain, but 50% of something is a lot better than 100% of nothing.

      The entrepreneur doesn't start getting anything until the VC have hit their return goals. So it's quite possible that the company is sold, or what have you, for a few million and you still end up with nothing.

      In short, if you're going the VC way, be sure to read and understand the agreement and get legal advice!

    2. Re:Good luck with IP if working with the Chinese by qoncept · · Score: 1

      In my experience the Chinese are a lot better at copying something and making it a whole lot worse. For examples, see cordless drills, end tables, keyboards, silverware, toy cars, hinges, blue jeans and Great Wall trucks.

      --
      Whale
    3. Re:Good luck with IP if working with the Chinese by Ralph+Spoilsport · · Score: 0
      Well, I would skip the VC/Angel angle, and just get a few built using the ideas discussed here and then PATENT THE LIVING FUCK OUT OF IT. USA, Canada, EU, Japan, etc. Then sell it to a company that does "camera related USB" devices for (pinky finger at corner of mouth) MILLIONS OF DOLLARS.

      Then buy a farm near a river in Tennessee and start your own religion. That's where one person can make stupid amounts of money.

      RS

      --
      Shoes for Industry. Shoes for the Dead.
    4. Re:Good luck with IP if working with the Chinese by tiananmen+tank+man · · Score: 0, Troll

      The person that posed this question to slashdot knows this because he said he is looking into patenting his idea. Yet he is wanting to copy/modifiy someone else's design and is hopping the Chinese contact will just give him the source for the design. wow, some kind of hypacrite he is.

    5. Re:Good luck with IP if working with the Chinese by nebby · · Score: 5, Informative

      This generally isn't true. A VC will get preferred stock and as such in a liquidation event they will be able to recover their money before anyone else can. (So if you take on 1M in funding, sell the company for 500K, you're right, you get nothing and they lose 500K). I'm guessing this is what you're thinking of.

      If you sell the company for 2M and they put in 1M, they get their 1M back and the rest of the pie can be sliced up in different ways depending on the term sheet. (Google participating preferred stock cap)

      --
      --
    6. Re:Good luck with IP if working with the Chinese by seanadams.com · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In my direct experience, they are highly-skilled in copying/ripping off and even building on/improving on original ideas. Note: This is for stuff which is often already trademarked, registered and patented.

      OTOH, it sounds like he's not looking for some revolutionary hardware design, indeed he might modify an existing design.

      In my experience manufacturing in China, I have not had any problems with knockoffs (although that has happened in the USA!). However, my products have always had their special sauce in the software/firmware. Software is protected by copyright and even if someone in China clones your product, they will not be able to sell it in the US or Europe.

      It's much easier to defend yourself with copyright law than with patents. On that note, file a provisional patent - just write up how it works in your own words, and get a lawyer to file it for you. Personally I would not go any further than that. This evidences when you had the idea, and even though it's much less than an actual, issued patent, having it on file can go a long way in the future if you need to fend of a patent on validity grounds.

      So, I'd suggest getting some VC/angel financing and professional help, and patent your idea to hell and back in major markets before doing anything else. OK, they'll take a huge chunk of the eventual gain, but 50% of something is a lot better than 100% of nothing.

      Especially in this economy, I would not be out trying to raise money. And in general, you need to be very careful about slicing up your cap chart right off the bat. Get as far as you can on your software work and build a solid proof of concept first. Hopefully you can fund that yourself or moonlight it. By then you'll have a better idea what you'll need to get off the ground.

    7. Re:Good luck with IP if working with the Chinese by Bearhouse · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Some truth in that, but if your market has already been hugely cannibalised, (before you even get to it) then it's small comfort to say, "look, my product is better".

      Also, I was in China recently with the boss of a major multinational which develops and sells complex electromechanical industrial products. He showed me two products; one made in their 'state of the art' factory in Europe, the other a Chinese copy. He asked me to spot the difference. I could not.

      His reply; "It's easy. Hook 'em up and the Chinese one works". Ouch.

    8. Re:Good luck with IP if working with the Chinese by mcgrew · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's much easier to defend yourself with copyright law than with patents.

      Also, patents last only 20 years, while copyright is unconstitutionally (despite what SCOTUS says) forever for all practical purposes. Plus, patents require lawyers and cost thousands of dollars, while registering a copyright is cheap; the ones I registered in the 1980s were only $20 each (they've probably gone up).

      If you have to defend it, you're going to need a lawyer in any case.

    9. Re:Good luck with IP if working with the Chinese by oliderid · · Score: 1

      Yeah and having fund with no functional prototype of any sort is a wet dream in those days.

      I don't know his ideas but I'm quite sure that he would waste his time (and his precious contacts) if he has nothing to show.

      If you have no functional prototype, only vague concept on a paper...99% you will find no investor and for the remaining 1% do not expect to keep 50% of your company. The one who is clearly taking the risk here is the VC not the entrepreneur.

      For a first round, try to get money from friends and relatives to fund an initial prototype. Or more realistically...Paid it from your own pocket. Once it works, (in a way it can impress a non-techical minded person), then you are ready for the second step.

    10. Re:Good luck with IP if working with the Chinese by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      The entrepreneur doesn't start getting anything until the VC have hit their return goals.

      Every VC is going to have a different contract, and you can always negotiate.
      Furthermore, you're going to be able to pay yourself a salary, and probably bonuses too, unless the VC contract expressly forbids it or the VC people control your board of directors.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    11. Re:Good luck with IP if working with the Chinese by Samschnooks · · Score: 1

      f you sell the company for 2M and they put in 1M, they get their 1M back and the rest of the pie can be sliced up in different ways depending on the term sheet. (Google participating preferred stock cap)

      I've seen deals where, in the above situation, the VC demands 40% return, so they sell the company for 2mill, the VC gets their 1 mill plus 400K and THEN everyone else splits the 600k that's left.

      Everyone has their own deal and terms. There's no one way to do a VC deal. That's why I stressed that you get legal advice.

    12. Re:Good luck with IP if working with the Chinese by radish · · Score: 1

      Heh :) I was just thinking of what your take on this would be!

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    13. Re:Good luck with IP if working with the Chinese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are assuming that the liquidation preference is 1x, which isn't always the case.

      Many times it can be 1.5 or 2x which result in what the op said - the entrepreneur not seeing any money until the VC has hit their return goals.

      So if it is a 2x liquidation preference and the VC put in 1 MM and the entity is sold for $2MM the VC takes it all.

    14. Re:Good luck with IP if working with the Chinese by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 2, Funny

      This generally isn't true. A VC will get preferred stock and as such in a liquidation event they will be able to recover their money before anyone else can. (So if you take on 1M in funding, sell the company for 500K, you're right, you get nothing and they lose 500K). I'm guessing this is what you're thinking of.

      I think the idea with VC is to soak up a high salary, buy a Tesla sports car, acquire a blond trophy GF, an live high on the hog with a phenomenal "burn rate", until all the money is gone, then move on to the next VC project.

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    15. Re:Good luck with IP if working with the Chinese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Still wrong.

      If a VC puts 1M into a company they usually own upwards of 90% of the company as preferred stockholders. That means they get 90% of whatever the company sells for. If you sell for 2M then the VC gets 1.8M.

      If all they did was get their money back then they are taking huge risk (giving you 1M that you'll probably lose) for no gain (only getting back their 1M *if* you succeed).

    16. Re:Good luck with IP if working with the Chinese by shaitand · · Score: 1

      'It's much easier to defend yourself with copyright law than with patents. On that note, file a provisional patent - just write up how it works in your own words, and get a lawyer to file it for you.'

      Yeah, minus the lawyer. We are talking $80 vs a few grand here. You can e-file these things nowdays for god sake.

    17. Re:Good luck with IP if working with the Chinese by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      In my direct experience, they are highly-skilled in copying/ripping off and even building on/improving on original ideas. Note: This is for stuff which is often already trademarked, registered and patented.

      This is news?

      Seriously, this is news?

      In 1993 we made a batch of 15 of our particular thing to sell to a Chinese company in our business. We got a good price for them and we had absolutely no doubt that they were going to be stripped down. investigated and copied. That's fine and good. We got what we wanted from the deal ; we sold product into a market that we were never going to penetrate. And most importantly, we've raised the level of competition for our competitors. We still know how to do the job better than the Chinese (having the machine is one thing ; using it is another), and they're undercutting our competitors and driving them out of business. Win-win, for us.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    18. Re:Good luck with IP if working with the Chinese by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Hey 1998, not seen you for some time - must be what, ten years or so. Eleven? You're totally kidding me!

      You look like you lost some weight...

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    19. Re:Good luck with IP if working with the Chinese by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      building on/improving on original ideas.

      I think you're confusing them with the Japanese. I suppose all "slants" look alike to you?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  5. Find some partners by u38cg · · Score: 5, Insightful
    If you're serious about producing something that has the potential to be mass market, I suggest you bring some partners on board. For product development, find an electronic engineer that can cope with the hardware side; and also someone that can speak marketese and has experience in accessing the kind of markets you're talking about.

    It's nice and all to think you can be the next Richard Branson by doing it all yourself, but in reality very few businesses go from zero to IPO with a single guy pulling all the strings.

    --
    [FUCK BETA]
    1. Re:Find some partners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sir,

      I disagree with your post almost in its entirety.

      There are plenty of great electrical engineers who didn't get involved in the profession they became famous for until later in life -- the most blatant example being Grandma Moses, who started making circuit boards after most of her generation was dead...long dead. Some people choose their young adult jobs because they need to make a living, or circumstance forces them, or because they simply never had exposure to something they later discover or it was the wrong type of exposure. There are so many reasons why someone can have a passion for something and not pursue it until later in life.

      Even if I grant you that 10,000 hours is the right number, 10,000 hours is about 5 years of a full-time job. I will say that lines up pretty closely with my personal experience, as I switched to a CS major with two and a half years left (from math, from studio art) and felt extremely solid after my first three years on the job.

      HTH. HAND.

      -jcr

    2. Re:Find some partners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An 'electronic' engineer huh? I better check with the IEEE to see if they have any members like that ;)

    3. Re:Find some partners by u38cg · · Score: 1

      Hi, and welcome to the *World* Wide Web. Here in the UK, electronic and electrical engineering are seperately taught and studied fields. I am aware that this is different to how things are done in some parts of the world; on the other other hand, Sir, may I suggest that you are aware of very little at all.

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
    4. Re:Find some partners by Rorschach1 · · Score: 1

      Depends a lot on the exact value of 'mass market' and the sales potential. Really, a lot of this can be done with contract labor. Once the design is done, there are plenty of places out there (many of them reputable outfits that aren't likely to swipe your IP, even) that can handle component sourcing, injection molding, assembly, and even fulfillment.

      Marketing should absolutely not be neglected. Us nerds tend to underestimate (or simply find distasteful) the amount of marketing and promotion that needs to be done to make a product successful.

      In this case, I think building a working prototype needs to be the first step, and then you've got something more than just big ideas if you do go looking for partners or VC.

      And I have to point out that not everyone WANTS an IPO. The best thing about owning my own company is that I don't have to answer to anyone except my customers. Investors are the last thing I want right now. Yeah, I'll probably never become a billionaire with a privately held company, but I could be happy enough as a millionaire. I have simple tastes; I just want a nice house somewhere, an airstrip, and a T-38 Talon with a Robotech paint job.

    5. Re:Find some partners by KarlH420 · · Score: 1

      This is where your social networking sites come in. Find some reliable people with electronic design experience. I myself do mainly embedded HW and SW. :-)

  6. Try gEDA and do it yourself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why not just download the open-source suite, gEDA http://www.gpleda.org/ and build the board yourself. Then, you can send the gerber files to any manufacturing site you wish.

    1. Re:Try gEDA and do it yourself by mkiwi · · Score: 2, Informative

      He has no hardware design experience, he needs someone else to design and layout the circuit. gEDA will not work for him.

      That said, gEDA is ok for many things, but it lacks in features compared to the free Mentor Graphics PADS version that is probably good enough for his needs. It is also way too hard to create custom schematic symbols in gEDA. FOSS is way behind when it comes to this, unfortunately- I wish it were different.

    2. Re:Try gEDA and do it yourself by Alioth · · Score: 1

      It is? I found it trivially easy to make new symbols, just draw them and convert them to a symbol in gSchem. "Draw/select all/convert" also works for making custom footprints in PCB.

      Now the gSchem -> PCB bit would produce some challenges for people who can only use a GUI (it's not hard, but it doesn't have a push a GUI button to do it method). But symbol creation both for PCB footprints and schematic symbols was something I found extremely easy, just draw it and convert it to a symbol.

    3. Re:Try gEDA and do it yourself by smoker2 · · Score: 1

      The symbol itself is straight forward, the properties are harder to define. It was easier to take an existing symbol and edit the properties.

  7. Going to China saves you the patenting hassle... by dg2fer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Think twice. If you request a vendor modifying his product, and it's easy enough he can do it right away -- how do you think you can ensure he won't run his product line to make more devices than you have requested?

    By contract perhaps? Go and sue a chinese vendor in China, then...

    First, build a prototype yourself so you know it will work. Or find someone at your location with the appropriate knowledge. Short distances speed up development. The one will then very probably be able to design a custom PCB out of the prototype. And the appropriate software (e.g. Eagle) isn't expensive.

    But if you shouldn't know how to build the prototype yourself, I wonder how you know your invention will work at all...

    However, good luck.

    --
    The slighly overweight penguin.
  8. There are many by AgeingProgrrammer · · Score: 2, Informative

    many many sources for this - look in trade journals such as EDN and Electronic Design and Embedded Systems Design.

    To a lesser degree, some wisdom can be gleaned from Circuit Cellar Ink.

    I have some (limited) experience with Asian contract mfrs, and would not recommend this for a startup.

    GOOD LUCK

  9. Keep costs down by AbbeyRoad · · Score: 1

    My advise is to learn to do as much as you can yourself.

    Try not to rely on other companies or people for
    consulting or design (expensive) until you are
    sure you have hard data proving your design will
    make money.

    Most people think a startup is a risky project to
    make lots of money. This is a wrong and dangerous
    point of view.

    A startup should be seen as a project to prove
    the viability of a new business. You can tick
    it as a success when that viability has been
    established definitively as "yes" or "no",
    while at the same time spending as little capital
    a possible in the process.

    Doing as much as possible yourself means less
    chance waisting capital.

    paulsheer@gmail.com

    1. Re:Keep costs down by ZeroExistenZ · · Score: 1
      I wished my capital would waist a bit more ;)

      But you are right, the disadvantage is the time spent to pick up something new. Time is money, you could pay someone who already has invested that time in electronics and use his expertize with your vision; you cannot master everything, or not fast enough to get that idea out. (it's something which frustrates me as well as I like to understand and be able to do anything from the ground up. It's just not economical and isn't efficient.)

      It's fairly easy to use something as PICAXE to quickly prototype something, get an existing design, study some specs and perform your modifications on existing components.

      --
      I think we can keep recursing like this until someone returns 1
    2. Re:Keep costs down by AbbeyRoad · · Score: 1

      Have you actually started a successful startup?
      Or are you just speaking "theoretically" like
      most slashdotters.

      Most startups fail. The bottom line is that you
      don't *know* what the real pitfalls are or whether
      the business is viable. On the bases of the fact
      that most startups fail, you should do everything
      yourself to try minimse expenditure.

      If you think that this (perfectly logical)
      approach does not work for you, then you are
      better off gambling on risky NYSE stocks.
      Such gambling comes down to the same thing
      really and consumes a lot less effort.

    3. Re:Keep costs down by smoker2 · · Score: 1

      The odds are that his vision is highly reliant on invalid assumptions. He needs someone who understands the hardware to go over the idea and see if it's at all possible.

  10. B&B Electronics by joelmax · · Score: 1

    You may want to check out B&B Electronics. A few years ago, they were dealing with custom boards, not sure if they still do now, but you can check em out at http://www.bb-elec.com/

  11. Guru.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can find somebody very capable on Guru.com. Ask for references from previous customers.

  12. As I've often said before... by KlaymenDK · · Score: 5, Informative

    http://www.pad2pad.com/
    A printed circuit board manufacturer providing all your custom printed circuit board

    http://www.olimex.com/
    Electronic design and PCB sub-contract assembly

    http://www.eurocircuits.com/
    PCB manufacturing; verified a la carte on demand specifications ...also...

    http://www.emachineshop.com/
    Machine shop to create custom parts, products and prototypes

    http://www.tapplastics.com/
    TAP Plastics specialize in fiberglass resins and fabrics for fiberglass repair, plastic containers, and custom fabrication

    (non-affiliation yadda yadda goes here)

    1. Re:As I've often said before... by End+Program · · Score: 4, Informative

      Protocase is great if you need a custom chassis or even sheet metal panels.

      http://www.protocase.com/

    2. Re:As I've often said before... by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1

      Thank you and GP for the info. I do EE work for small projects of mine, and these links will be invaluable.

    3. Re:As I've often said before... by drhank1980 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Here is one more, I did several boards with them when I was in college, their customer service was very helpful with my first board.

      http://www.4pcb.com/

  13. Stay Local by timias1 · · Score: 4, Informative

    There is a cottage industry of small engineering firms that could suit your needs in the US (assuming your in the US). Generally they are run by senior engineers who have done many projects of similar size to what you're sort of talking about. Generally the firms in China do not do their own design work, and unless you speak Chinese, the language barriers will be an extra challenge to overcome, not to mention the difference in time zones. Also don't forget you will have to gain certain regulatory approvals depending on the nature of your product, and I doubt anyone in China has much background designing the product around these requirements. Personally I think it is best to stick with a local company, or at least one in the same country as you.

    1. Re:Stay Local by Cornwallis · · Score: 4, Funny

      But think of all the free publicity he'll get when his Chinese-produced product gets condemned for leaking toxic everything into the environment, the workers all turn out to be slaves, etc., etc., etc.

    2. Re:Stay Local by digitalunity · · Score: 1

      As someone who formerly worked in the US consumer product safety testing industry, I can say this is the least of his concerns.

      Starting with hardware that's already been through electromagnetic compatibility testing would be a huge leg up in getting the project done. A USB based camera device wouldn't need any safety certifications to be sold in the US or Canada but FCC compliance testing does need to be done in the US. Sale in the EU may require a declaration of conformity that it complies with the low voltage and EM directives.

      Also, many chinese manufacturers are quite familiar with the product testing and certification process since a lot of them export their products to the US, Canada and Europe where certifications are either de facto required or truly legally mandatory.

      --
      You can't legislate goodness. Let each to his own destiny, by will of his freely made choices.
    3. Re:Stay Local by hedwards · · Score: 1

      I think that depends largely upon how custom the OP's talking. I know that the openpandora.org project got some introductions through TI to find an engineer. With most of the chips and goobins being somewhat standard OMAP3.

      But from what I understand it had a lot to do with somebody at TI wanting it as a bit of a pet project to show off the technology.

  14. Captain Jack Taylor by Captain+Jack+Taylor · · Score: 1

    www.robots-everywhere.com If you need actual DESIGN done, we're pros. Matteo's one of the best CEs in the US right now and Reason...well he's Reason Bradley and needs no introduction. :P Want it done right, price negotiable? Talk to us and we'll help you get what you need. :)

  15. Get the product working First! by odin84gk · · Score: 1
    Mass production is great for getting the cost down, but it is a lot of work and requires a lot of money.

    You should really get it working before you go down that road. If you want some hardware quickly and easily, go to a university and look for someone doing a senior project to design your electronics. This would only cost you $500 for parts. Otherwise, you should go about it in the same way you would look for a website designer.

    If you want to do true mass-production, be prepared to raise well over $500,000 for all of the require overhead (Hard tooling for enclosures, test fixtures for automated testing, printing manuals, not to mention packing materials).

    Don't worry about a patent or having China steal your IP. Everyone thinks their idea is revolutionary, and the China shops won't recognize a revolutionary product until it slaps them in the face. As far as patents go, any company that wants to rip you off can get around your patent very easily. Don't worry about the patent until you have a working product and you have the funding to mass-produce it.

  16. Device qualification by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    The first hurdle is prototyping the device. If push comes to shove find a near-broke college student to do the hardware design for you, a better choice would be an outfit with experience such as Parallax, Systronix, or Digilent. But before you can go 'mass-market', you will need to test your device and not just to make sure it works. Does it meet all government requirements (FCC part 15)? Is it safe (UL certification)? Are there going to be any manufacturability issues (just because you made one does not mean someone can make 100,000 for you reliability and cheaply).

  17. Get An NDA! by CyberLord+Seven · · Score: 4, Informative
    I assume the "patentable" parts of this are in the software since you have no hardware experience. Others are giving good advice on where to go for hardware experience. In particular I like the idea of a partner. If you live in the State of California I suggest you try to snag a copy of "Small Time Operator". It is published by Nolo Press in Berkeley and is full of smart business advice for those new to owning their own business in the State of California. Check out the sections on incorporation and partners carefully.

    Something I don't think you will get from others is the suggestion that before you talk to anyone you get a copy of an excellent non-disclosure agreement (NDA).

    With a good NDA you can talk freely about your project with little risk of the second party being able to talk to a third party without significant financial repercussions. I have worked in procurement* for the last sixteen years and I could talk for hours on the value of a good NDA. Try using Google for an example of a good NDA. They need not be complex, but they do need to spell out the repercussions if the second party talks about your idea with a third party. Get them to sign before you share any critical details.

    *I hate that we stopped being purchasing and became procurement for one simple reason; one of the accepted definitions of someone who procures is pimp! I really don't think that is the impression a Fortune 500 company wants to make, but then they did not ask me. :)

    --
    We have always been at war with Eurasia!
    1. Re:Get An NDA! by b96miata · · Score: 1

      At least they didn't name the department Procurement and Importunation.

    2. Re:Get An NDA! by Sir+Holo · · Score: 1

      Good solo-inventor NDAs are available here and also here.

      Nolo also has lots of other good stuff for solo inventors, like Patent it Yourself.

      Good luck.

  18. Good luck by Rorschach1 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Good luck getting source code from Chinese companies. I've tried a few times, and even with a company that I already buy tens of thousands of dollars of equipment from, the answer has always been an emphatic 'no'.

    In some cases, the problem may be that the source code isn't theirs. Take two way radios, for example. There are many, many different models on the market that all share the same basic firmware. Each of the companies licenses it from one design house, probably along with some of the hardware designs, too.

    It's often hard to tell who's even a manufacturer and who's just a trading company, unless you go and personally tour the factory. Even then they can make it difficult to figure out who's who.

    Where I HAVE had a measure of success is in buying partial products. For example, if you look on SparkFun Electronics' website, you'll see a weather sensor assembly. I bought those from a weather station manufacturer in China, and since their usual wireless interface wasn't FCC approved and wasn't needed for my application anyway, I negotiated a deal to buy the bare sensors at a significantly reduced price that still gives them enough extra profit margin to make it worth the hassle (the unneeded touch screen display is the expensive part), while still being far cheaper than designing and producing my own hardware. The reason they're at SparkFun now is that I'm way behind schedule on designing my own electronics package and I got tired of them taking up warehouse space, and sold part of the lot at wholesale.

    The good news is that lots of Chinese companies are basically family-owned, and you CAN sometimes get through to the people who make the decisions, where with US companies you might not. But again, I've never had any success getting firmware source (even relatively simple stuff that I could recreate myself in a week) from any of them. Cable assemblies, housings, and so forth, sure. But not a single line of code.

    If you're serious about making it happen, consider catching a flight to Hong Kong next month. The Hong Kong Electronics Fair, electronicAsia, and the China Sourcing Fair are all there at the same time around the 12-16th, and the massive Canton Fair (this will be my first year there) is right after that in Guangzhou, but that takes a little more planning.

    Just showing up in person and leaving business cards (bring a few hundred, seriously) will get you much better responses later in email. They know you're serious enough to make the trip, at least. That was a benefit I hadn't foreseen my first trip. Also, allow a couple of days extra after the fairs for meetings with vendors if you do make some good contacts.

    Also, one book I've found particularly useful in understanding the business culture in China is "The Essential Guide for Buying from China's Manufacturers" by James Lord, ISBN 1419628461. Wish I'd read that before my first trip there. (Tip: Beware the phrase "no problem". =])

    If you do make it to Hong Kong, drop me a note and I'll meet you for a beer some time.

    scott@argentdata.com

    1. Re:Good luck by cerberusss · · Score: 4, Funny

      Tip: Beware the phrase "no problem".

      Also beware the phrase: "do you want a girl for tonight?"

      When I did my bachelor's thesis in Shanghai, I once drank a beer with one of the Western people I knew there. He worked in trade. He said that agreeing to said phrase will significantly alter your negotiation position in the morning. On the wrong side. :-)

      --
      8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
  19. Try a design firm to handle the EE. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would recommend a product design firm. like these guys:

    http://www.pdt.com/

    As inspiration, you could look at Cobra as an example (they make GPS Naviagtion systems and radar detectors. The whole company is 2 guys who outsource everything).

  20. shameless plug: www.plexus.com by bdcowell · · Score: 5, Informative

    I work at Plexus, a global Electronic Manufacturing Services company, in the engineering services division. We do hardware, PCB layout, software, mechanical, test, project management, etc. Whatever piece or pieces you are looking for, we can do. If you want to use us for manufacturing eventually, great. You pay for the development, so you own the IP and can take it wherever you want. We work with multi-billion dollar companies but also have worked with 1-man startups before.

    http://www.plexus.com/contactus.php

    1. Re:shameless plug: www.plexus.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well I can help with his shameless plug. Our company uses Plexus for manufacturing and product testing and they are quite professional, timely and flexible.

      I'm a PCB hardware engineer by trade.

    2. Re:shameless plug: www.plexus.com by Pascoea · · Score: 3, Interesting

      (Former) Plexus lab bitch here. Very good company with some extremely talented engineers. They are fairly expensive, but you certainly get what you pay for.

    3. Re:shameless plug: www.plexus.com by Angstroman · · Score: 1

      I don't work for Plexus, but I am familiar with some of their projects. From what I have seen they are a first class outfit.

  21. You might check out open source... by kabocox · · Score: 1

    A while back, I came across some articles on open source hardware and how exciting/fast growing those projects are. The thing isn't that you have a patentable idea. It's can you stay ahead once anyone else sees your idea and makes their slightly different copy of it?

    Apparently, the thing with the OSH is that they released their base design and have basically something like a forum to suggest/give improvements. Of all the various Chinese fabs that they ordered a few thousand from, each of the chinese folks once learning that they could reuse the base hardware ran with it and used it for other stuff as well. The original folks are still abit ahead with better features/support than the rest, but its all the competition and low prices that make it possible.

    Where they've learned how to make money is on the support and custom R&D end. Its amazing some of the things and prices on some of their products. But the profit margins are much, much lower than what you'd want. There was something about a device attached to art work to track it and it being sold for a $150-200 per device to museums. Their open source hardware could do the same thing for like $5-10 for a couple. They had a few other examples that were similar.

    Now obviously you want your business to be long term profitable and not to just hand our your ideas and such. I'd suggest that you do a quick search in the OPH and just double check if anyone else is already doing what you are planning and if so how much it's going to cost them. It's liable to cost you about the same to produce something similar. Plus you might consider how wide spread some of those various projects are. If it looks like your idea can bring in money for the next 5 years, by all means patent it and make as much as you can off it. If it looks like there are a couple of others about ready to do the same thing and are giving away the specs at cost, then you should seriously think about joining up, or using their hardware for portions of your project or releasing your specs. It depends on how great your competitive advantage actually is about what you decide to do though.

    One thing to remember though even if there is a project doing something similar or you just decide to use their hardware in your stuff, it's that you are selling your stuff to your clients. Is this something that you can make a living off of "support" or assisting others in setting it up? If not seriously think about how you tend to bring in money in the future. One day some one will be competing against you. Now a days that could be far sooner than you realize.

  22. Have it done for you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1) Although some people recommend learning it yourself, I would advice from experience to find someone. There are lots of people that offer such a service for a fairly low price, locally and they will help you improve your design with their experience. I haven't tried it myself, but elance.com seems like a good place to find someone like that. Remember, copying a reference design is often not the smartest choice, since quite a few reference designs use uncommon parts with long leadtimes and high prices. Having someone help you, who has the experience can/will save you a lot of time, hassles and money. And get you access to parts (a lot of companies don't sell to individuals).

    2) A second way to find an experienced designer is to just ask a local PCB manufacturer if they know someone who does a lot of this stuff and is working freelance or at a small firm.

    Good luck!

  23. If you're in Belgium.... by Ptur · · Score: 1

    contact Dekimo (www.dekimo.be) - they do design and production on any level you want.
    disclaimer - I work there :)

  24. if you have some time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can use the free tool eagle from cadsoft (free for small designs, and works on linux) to design the pcb

    You probably won't make the best pcb at first, but it would get you going, don't try to make the pcb yourself, if you've never done that it would take you a lot of time, cost a lot for the equipment and you won't get good results without at least a month practise.
    Lot's of small companies can make the pcb for you cheap, find a company close to home, it much more fun than supporting the chinese copy factory

  25. EZpcb by arugulatarsus · · Score: 3, Informative

    I've had nothing but success with EZPCB. They charged around 150$ for 36 boards... They design, routing and assembly services too.
    The way I coordinated with them, because they are in china, is by MSN instant messenger when I was about to go to bed.
    They are courteous, they make a good product, and are inexpensive.
    expect a 2 week delay from order to reception.

    1. Re:EZpcb by arugulatarsus · · Score: 1

      Double post. A selling point of EZpcb is impeccable English.

  26. Lotsa good and horrible advice above by Ancient_Hacker · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Lotsa good and horrible advice above.

    If you're going to make a commercial product, and you want it to be manufacturable and have high yield and work reliably for more than a week, you need a lot of expert help.

    You need an EE to design the circuit.

        Then you need a manufacturing EE to redesign the circuit so it does not use any rare or known unreliable or hard to surface mount or single sourced parts.

      Then you need a quality engineer who will redesign things so the hot voltage regulator is not right next to the electrolytic capacitors, and shuffle the pcb traces so they're less likely to short out from tin whiskers, and rearrange them for better ESD protection, and they will test it in an environmental chamber for performance over a wide temperature range.

      Then you'll need a standards EE who will make sure it meets EU and US standards for safety and toxicity and flammability and electromagnetic emissions.

    Then you need someone on site at the manufacturing facility to do QA and make sure they don't divert your product into the black or grey market.

    Then you need enough extra time and money to do the whole thing over again if the original design still turns out to be unmanufacturable or have poor yield or reliability.

    Don't feel too bad, when Apple set up their own disk drive manufacturing facility, the yield even after extensive tweaking was only about 40%. And that's with huge amounts of money and lots of experienced engineers in the area.

    You need a whole lot more than a PCB house.

    1. Re:Lotsa good and horrible advice above by SparkEE · · Score: 2, Informative

      There's no reason all those EEs you mention can't be the same person, unless you're hiring someone with less than a few years experience, or has worked only in a large company all his career. There are many small (1 or 2 people) design firms that have the expertise to see a design from concept to production.

      Find a local design consultant, someone relatively senior in experience. Let that person worry about finding a PCB house for prototypes and small-scale production. If the product is successfull, and the small-scale run sells, then hire someone on full-time to manage the large-scale production.

    2. Re:Lotsa good and horrible advice above by ajlitt · · Score: 1

      From experience, I can tell you that you won't get anywhere with a hardware startup if you don't start prototyping until you've lined up resources to see your product through production. No investor is going to listen if you're asking for millions up front in material, engineering, and manufacturing costs, especially if you don't have a prototype or mock-up to show for it.

      Bring in an engineer experienced in the technologies and market you're targeting (USB, embedded, PCB design, CE products). Give them a real stake in the company. Fuel out of YOUR pocket a small prototype run. Once you have something in-hand and with enough functionality to demonstrate your idea, seek an investor to fund everything the parent poster mentioned.

      Expect that your first prototype will not be in the final form factor. This has two advantages: Larger components (and I mean TQFP, 603 discretes, etc) can be hand-soldered relatively easily in small quantities. Getting a company to do small batch assembly is expensive, and unless you have more than a few hundred components hand assembly isn't too time consuming. If you must use an IC that's BGA or hard to solder QFN, see if the board house can solder just that part. You can hand solder them if you're daring, but you probably don't want to risk your company on a "reflow skillet". Using a larger board gives room for debug headers and test points, which will give your engineer the ability to fix design bugs with some crafty soldering. Even with an oversized prototype board, budget for at least two respins of the board.

    3. Re:Lotsa good and horrible advice above by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      You need an EE to design the circuit.

              Then you need a manufacturing EE to redesign the circuit so it does not use any rare or known unreliable or hard to surface mount or single sourced parts.

          Then you need a quality engineer who will redesign things so the hot voltage regulator is not right next to the electrolytic capacitors, and shuffle the pcb traces so they're less likely to short out from tin whiskers, and rearrange them for better ESD protection, and they will test it in an environmental chamber for performance over a wide temperature range.

          Then you'll need a standards EE who will make sure it meets EU and US standards for safety and toxicity and flammability and electromagnetic emissions.

      I think you just need a "quality" engineer in general. All of those fall into my unofficial job description and I handle all of those well.

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    4. Re:Lotsa good and horrible advice above by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with the spirit of your post completely, however you don't strictly need a separate engineer for each of those tasks. I know plenty of CE/EE types who could handle all of those tasks (excepting standards). The do it over line is especially important. These things never seem to go fully right the first, or often the second time. Electronic circuit boards are much like the software in the system - they involve often as much care and feeding as the rest.

    5. Re:Lotsa good and horrible advice above by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      If this USB device is powered off the USB port, there's a good chance that most of the concerns above won't be relevant. If you program it yourself after it's manufactured, you have some protection against being ripped off. If it's an all-electronic device, yield should not be a problem. Final QA has to be under your direct control.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    6. Re:Lotsa good and horrible advice above by bughunter · · Score: 1

      1. You need an EE to design the circuit.
      2. Then you need a manufacturing EE to redesign the circuit so it does not use any rare or known unreliable or hard to surface mount or single sourced parts.
      3. Then you need a quality engineer who will redesign things so the hot voltage regulator is not right next to the electrolytic capacitors, and shuffle the pcb traces so they're less likely to short out from tin whiskers, and rearrange them for better ESD protection, and they will test it in an environmental chamber for performance over a wide temperature range.
      4. Then you'll need a standards EE who will make sure it meets EU and US standards for safety and toxicity and flammability and electromagnetic emissions.

      In my 20 years in aerospace, I've encountered quite a few good, experienced designers (usu. not someone who holds an EE degree, or a salaried engineer position) can do the last three items quoted. A *really* good designer or "supertech" can do all four, but I've encountered only four or five of those rare assets, ever.

      The sad part, though, is that nearly everyone you interview will tell you they can do all four. And many cannot live up to even one of the claims.

      --
      I can see the fnords!
    7. Re:Lotsa good and horrible advice above by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Seeing as the poster is a one-engineer outfit right now, a single EE is probably good enough, assuming he or she is experienced.

      You need an EE to design the circuit.

              Then you need a manufacturing EE to redesign the circuit so it does not use any rare or known unreliable or hard to surface mount or single sourced parts.

      Any EE worth your money isn't designing circuits that are infeasible. If you need a second engineer to make sure the design produced by the first actually works, just pay the second more and have him or her do the whole thing.

      Then you need a quality engineer who will redesign things so the hot voltage regulator is not right next to the electrolytic capacitors, and shuffle the pcb traces so they're less likely to short out from tin whiskers, and rearrange them for better ESD protection, and they will test it in an environmental chamber for performance over a wide temperature range.

      This means your engineer should have experience designing products of a similar nature. You hardly need another salaried employee to tell you to keep the regulator heatsink away from heat-sensitive components!

      Then you'll need a standards EE who will make sure it meets EU and US standards for safety and toxicity and flammability and electromagnetic emissions.

      To be honest this isn't very difficult. If the poster is interested in entering a consumer products field (some sort of digital camera peripheral, it was indicated) it is unlikely that he or she will need to delve into standards beyond verifying that all of the off-the-shelf chips and components used are RoHS compliant or whatever standard needs to be met. Also, there are relatively few standards that do need to be met for the indicated field (though it was vague). Again, not worth another salaried employee.

      Then you need someone on site at the manufacturing facility to do QA and make sure they don't divert your product into the black or grey market.

      What sort of one-engineer firm has a dedicated manufacturing facility with staff on-site? He or she is probably going to be ordering batches without further contracts, at least for the near future. This will probably entail doing some research,visiting the manufacturing facility, and cutting checks every x months for a new batch.

      I would imagine that a single EE would suffice for the poster's needs. I do think that hiring a salaried engineer is important though. All-in-one hardware shops provide constant quality work with a contract... but not necessarily good quality work. Hiring an employee means you have constant contact, have flexibility with product changes, and have immediate experience available for reference.

      If the poster needs anyone other than a single EE I would recommend a logistics/inventory/distribution employee - someone who has some experience dealing with distributors, knows how to do responsible ordering and planning with respect to keeping inventory, lead-times, etc, and can deal with distributors one-on-one, optimally with some proficiency with electronics engineering, if not necessarily design experience. Dealing with distributors and ordering supplies and so on is a mix of business skills, social skills, and technical wherewithal - plus it's a relatively inexpensive position to fill.

      But 5 in-house EEs to accompany one software guy on a USB peripheral project? Not necessary.

    8. Re:Lotsa good and horrible advice above by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or he could just get someone with experience doing this stuff for a living rather than 20 people with specialized degrees. Why you need 4 engineers to solve basic layout issues is something I don't get.

    9. Re:Lotsa good and horrible advice above by Ancient_Hacker · · Score: 1

      It's possible to sometimes find a really good engineer that can do several of these areas, but since the OP was so new, it's unlikely he'd be able to recognize the renissance EE.

      Everybody has strong and weak areas. If this product involves a considerable investment, you don't want the whole project depending on one engineer being Mr. Wonderful and Mr. Perfect.

  27. I'd think hard about your plan... by sirwired · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You want to target the mass-market, yet your firm consists of only you? You need to think about how you are going to get mass-market retailers to actually sell the thing, how you are going to get press coverage to publicize it, where you are going to get funding for the production runs, etc.

    There are certainly ways to go about this for software (i.e. a game developer producing a little gem for XBox Live), but because of manufacturing costs, this is harder to do for hardware.

    I think your best hope is to get a crude hardware prototype with your software running on it, and let an actual mass-market company buy it off of you (or hire you.) The alternative would be to somehow get funding, but if you have no experience in the industry, you won't find anybody willing to hand you money.

    SirWired

    1. Re:I'd think hard about your plan... by coarticulation · · Score: 1

      I think your best hope is to get a crude hardware prototype with your software running on it, and let an actual mass-market company buy it off of you (or hire you.)

      I'll second the idea of starting with a prototype. If you don't have hardware experience, there's a good chance you are overlooking something critical. An example from experience: I did some work for a small company that wanted to build a USB remote control for digital cameras. Neat concept, but after some breadboarding we found there were fundamental reasons why it was impossible at a reasonable price and performance point -- like, many digitals don't support a "take-picture" command via USB.

      Depending on what you're trying to do, I would suggest looking at a place like microcontrollershop.com to see if you can get some existing boards that you can wire together to implement your idea with a low up-front investment. If your idea still looks reasonable at that point, you have something workable to demonstrate, you have a starting point for a hardware design, and you have a platform for software development while the real hardware is being developed.

  28. Germans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  29. Make a prototype! by nietsch · · Score: 1

    This sounds like you did not really think it all trough, and overestimate your own potential. It is not hard nowadays to produce a electronic prototype of most thinks you can think of, with the help of MCU's from AVR. The Arduino community does it all the time, so why not you? If you can demonstrate such a prototype, you can convince other people that it might make a profit. If you don't, well maybe sucking (up to) VC's (off) might work.
    By the way, if you are not able to do the hardware side, then I very much doubt that your idea is more then a software solution. If it is not, it is not patentable. Please don't waste societies resources then.

    --
    This space is intentionally staring blankly at you
  30. File a Provisional Patent Application (maybe) by 3D-nut · · Score: 2, Informative

    You can get some short-term IP protection by filing a PPA. Filing fee was $100 last I knew (small entity). Go to nolo.com and buy "Patent It Yourself" for about $30. Read, understand, and follow all safety instructions. Then you can talk to potential partners, investors, vendors, etc. more confidently.

  31. Better go with local companies. by colin1256 · · Score: 1

    If your device contains patentable ideas, I would really encourage you not to have someone in China or elsewhere out of country do it for you, otherwise any IP you may have in it may well be gone right away.

    It is definitely the better idea to look up local electronics design and assembly companies and have them do the work for you. Not only are they going to be in the same timezone as you are and will generally turn out to be much more responsive with regards to modifications and problems than someone abroad.
    Especially if you go with small businesses, your project is going to be much more relevant to them in turns of money in comparison to their total earnings, so you will be much more important to them than you would be to a large design and assembly company.

    Just look up a few in the yellow pages, have a chat with them and go with the one(s) that you feel you are on the same "wavelength" on.

    Also, you can sign Non Disclosure Agreements with them, which are much easier to enforce because only your local laws apply.

  32. Avoid China by Russell2566 · · Score: 1

    I own a small business that was looking to get some manufacturing work done. While the Chinese were dirt cheap, in the end their version of what is ethical business practice and what are's was turned out to be vastly different.

    You also get what you pay for. Look to a company in the US first for starting out. Once you have a proven design and concept, then consider moving elsewhere to build what you have. The extra money up front will give you a better product!

  33. 4PCB - highly recommended! (and American) by skydude_20 · · Score: 1

    http://4pcb.com/ great manufacturer located in Denver. They have great deals, willing to work with you at all levels of production (prototypes vs. actual production releases). If you are new to design they are very helpful and willing to test your designs before printing, to warn of any mistakes you may have.

    --
    Jesus saves souls and redeems them for valuable cash prizes
  34. Partners by morgauxo · · Score: 1

    Someone suggested getting partners, at least an Electrical Engineer and a salesperson. I couldn't agree more. If you have a good idea and can handle the software side then great, thats your contribution to your new company but you need more. I would suggest finding an EE student at a local university with an interest in self-employment. As for sending your idea to China to get prototyped... take a look on Ebay for chinese iPhone clones. Do you really want to send your idea there? I realize that you probably dream of being the one and only #1 of your own company since you aren't already looking for partners but consider this... starting out your resources will be limitted. Cheap help will give you exactly what you pay for.. cheap product. That is, If they don't just run off with your idea. Good help will probably be out of reach for a while. Partners don't get paid in money. They are paid with a share in your company which at this point costs you nothing to give as it is only an idea. Ideas are a dime a dozen. It's the work and dedication of someone truly committed to making the idea real that will make or break you. New business take more commitment than babies to keep them alive it's only a partner who will have that kind of motivation. While you may think you lose out in the end by giving them a part of your company/idea you will also be gaining a part of the ideas, skills and work they put in which means you come out ahead. Your partners will be motivated to see you succede as their own success is tied to yours.

  35. There are open source groups that do this by Theovon · · Score: 1

    Check out the following groups:
    The Open Hardware Foundation (www.openhardwarefoundation.org)
    The Open Graphics Project (www.opengraphics.org, www.traversaltech.com)

    Their OGD1 board is in prototypes. They should be able to help you with design and refer you to board fabrication companies.

    1. Re:There are open source groups that do this by home-electro.com · · Score: 1

      Uhm, let's see...
      www.openhardwarefoundation.org:
      Future home of The Open Hardware Foundation.

      underwhelming...

    2. Re:There are open source groups that do this by Theovon · · Score: 1

      Ugh. The site is just down. They'll fix it shortly.

  36. don't go to china, your IP *will* be stolen by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 2, Interesting

    its sad but true.

    I almost went thru this myself. I'm a software guy but do a decent amount of hw design and building. I once designed a camera RF remote control (it was semi popular on the dpreview website where I posted the design) and I even started talking to a china business guy (I met on ebay as a seller for some of my raw parts) and we started to talk about what it would take to custom make the boards and the plastic boxes for it.

    upfront tooling costs and all that would have been covered by me, not him. I'd have to take essentially all the risk.

    and what would I get for it? my production run would be done but then, once done, they'd run 10x or 100x of their own from MY design! they'd screw me. I got that feeling loud and clear.

    I didn't go any further. sad, isn't it? but I can't 'police' across the ocean and I do NOT want to spend my effort only to be robbed of my design so blatantely. I was told 'this is how it is' either deal with it or don't do it.

    so I didn't do it.

    if you can, do it locally. you have more control over things and the ethics, well, they may match yours a bit better.

    (I also have learned a lot by hanging out on various DIY audio forums; there are a lot of folks who have experience with 'kit building', meaning they make/design their circuit and board (usually using Eagle) and then sell partial or full kits. its a good exercise to go thru and there's lot of info about it for people starting out, just check the web based audio forums or any other 'DIY' style forum).

    Eagle isn't too bad and even a sw guy like me came up to speed on it in less than a week and had a board designed (on paper, at least; then I did the toner transfer method to get my first copper board made).

    anyway, avoid china. unless you KNOW how to manage such a thing, most likely you will be taken to the cleaners ;(

    --

    --
    "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    1. Re:don't go to china, your IP *will* be stolen by home-electro.com · · Score: 1

      It very easy to protect yourself from this if your design has an MCU in it. Your remote control most certainly does.

      I just send them MCUs already programmed. So they can build more circuits if they want to, but without an MCU code it will be dead.

    2. Re:don't go to china, your IP *will* be stolen by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      mine didn't have an mcu, just a code decoder (for RF or IR, same kind of chip). ie, it was 'pure' hardware so there was no key to lock them out of, so to speak.

      you do have a good point. the 'lock' bit on modern controllers should be enough to keep your rights - as long as you USE controllers.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
  37. Do it in your local country, or better yet, area by WindBourne · · Score: 4, Interesting

    back in 1994-95, I had an idea of converting tv signal to a video stream (ala sling media). Contacted a firm in Atlanta, and they were going to charge some 20K (guarenteed 3 boards, etc), but found a firm in HK that would do it for 5K. We opted to go with the 5K. Had issue after issue after issue with them. In the end, after spending 20K and still not having SQUAT from them, I called it quits. That is why Sling has a product and we did not. Otherwise, the unit would be different and it would have come from Colorado.

    Do yourself a favor and do it local. Once you have the product selling, if you still feel like you can increase the margins by getting it done overseas, then and only then do it. Just keep in mind that Asia does not have the same laws and know it. Basically they will nickle and dime you to death. And for the states, I suggest knowing EXACTLY upfront what you need done. Shop around. They all have specialties of items that are one offs. There are a number of chips out there that will allow you to try various ideas.

    One last thing. If you get your company going, if I may suggest, keep your engineers local. If you go over to Asia, any ideas you have will likely end up in some other product before yours is out the door.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  38. Cypress Microsystems may still provide... by polyomninym · · Score: 1

    PSoC Express prototyping/design boards. Google that. Good luck on your quest.

  39. We Did Something Similar by limekiller4 · · Score: 1

    Not too long ago I worked for a company that would take OEM (Gilbarco, Tokheim, etc.) gasoline pump parts (pcbs, panels, buttons, etc.) and send them to Shenzhen, China, to be ripped apart, analyzed and remade. IMO the recreated parts were better than the original.

    So rather than trying to convince OEMs to modify their designs for your purposes, buy one, send it to such a company and pay FAR less while getting exactly what you need with full control over the manufacturing process.

    --
    My .02,
    Limekiller
  40. Check out... by matt_kizerian · · Score: 1

    ...www.zengineersco.com. They do board design and prototyping, and can help you get set up with a manufacturer.

  41. batchPCB by Spiked_Three · · Score: 1

    http://www.batchpcb.com/ you might have to wait a week or 2 but cheap and just what you are looking for.

    --
    slashdot troll = you make a compelling argument I do not like the implications of.
  42. If you are still at the prototype stage by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 4, Informative
    Have you thought of approaching one of your local universities with a view to making a lot of the design a project for a gifted student (Cut him in on any royalties). It's the kind of thing most Uni's are crying out for. If it ends up winning any awards you are happy the Uni's happy and so is the student.

    Just a thought

    --

    Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

    1. Re:If you are still at the prototype stage by speedtux · · Score: 1

      In my experience, "gifted students" have their own new product ideas; they don't need someone else's.

    2. Re:If you are still at the prototype stage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      That's actually a really good idea. There are a lot of electrical engineers graduating each year that need to choose a final project, either sponsored by a professor or by a company. With this year wrapping up, it is a perfect time to get on the list of projects for next year's students.

    3. Re:If you are still at the prototype stage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Be very careful to read any agreements with the university though.

      Uni's are very big on getting IP to license out to help fund the school and tend to have a we have full license to your patent, and can do whatever we want with it (include sell it on the open market).

      You can negotiate this point - but it will cost you. My dealings had something like a 5% fee w/ $50mil cap per year. This was in effect for 5 years, at which point the Uni had the right to sell the patent if they didn't make $25mil total.

      The work I did was a large scale company - that wanted to reach out to a well known school. I would imagine a small company may have different things to worry about.

      But I agree - working with a school can be very good. At a minimum you may get to see some young talent that you may want to recruit when they graduate - and already knows your tech....

    4. Re:If you are still at the prototype stage by n7ytd · · Score: 1

      This may seem to be a good approach to get some free/low-cost development, but keep in mind:

      • A student close to graduation has no experience. If your budget is this tight, you probably don't want to bet all your hopes on the guy who's never done this before. You recognize that you don't have the needed experience, so hiring someone else without the experience is no help. An experienced engineer will know enough to not just layout your PCB, but will be able to foresee problems in your design, or ways to reduce the component count or make the software guy's job easier.
      • The student needs to publish his project and results. Remember he's going to be graded on this, so he at a minimum will be expected to share his data with his professors, and probably will be presenting it to others in his class as part of the curriculum. If he agrees to sign an NDA, he has no idea what he's doing since there is no way he can get credit for a secret project. If you are concerned about the cat getting out of the bag before you've applied for a patent, this may be a big deal.
    5. Re:If you are still at the prototype stage by richard+tarantula+ · · Score: 1

      There's one thing though to keep in mind (as I tested these waters for a software project when I was a student) depending on the university (public/private) and what sorts of bylaws they have regarding creation of intellectual property, you may have to design a specific contract to get around these clauses (if possible) which may state that any participation in such a project WHILE they are student automatically transfers rights to the University. We managed to have a post-grad optical physicist sign an NDA and a contract with us though no work he did was actually ever "transferred" or utilized by us, as the question was still not clear as to whether any work he would undertake would actually belong to him or the university.

      The university I dealt with in particular had a "commercial arm" which dealt with projects created by faculty etc., and sought to commercialize these efforts. You may want to see if something like that exists -- at the very least you could get a fair review on the merits of your project (and yes they did sign an NDA).

      But anyway, what could ensue is a messy legal problem. My advice would be to make sure you carefully read the research rules and provisions and, if you're up for it, have a sit down with the equivalent of the research provost and/or their legal counsel or you may be finding yourself sitting down with them anyway!

    6. Re:If you are still at the prototype stage by blakelarson · · Score: 1

      Whoa! IP alert! Many universities like to take a cut of the IP if one of their students or professors are involved. And if a student is involved (say in a "design projects" class), then so is the professor -- BOOM -- the university owns the IP. Better to ask around and hire a student, do not get involved with the school if you can avoid it. Speaking from experience here...

    7. Re:If you are still at the prototype stage by home-electro.com · · Score: 1

      Correct, any recent graduate won't be able to handle a complex design with a camera.

  43. Parent is Half-Right by mpapet · · Score: 1

    In my direct experience, they are highly-skilled in copying/ripping off and even building on/improving on original ideas.

    I can second this experience having worked for an OEM.

    The comments about financing work for some, but not for most. VC will *at least* want to see some finished product moving. Even then you can easily end up with nothing to show for your efforts partnering with VC.

    Finally, if the device is so special, license it out as soon as possible. Why? Because if you are at all successful your idea will be copied and sold at a steep discount. And no, you won't be able to afford the litigation.

    --
    http://www.maxineudall.com/2010/02/should-economists-be-sued-for-malpractice.html
  44. Technical Mandala by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used:

    http://www.technical-mandala.com/

    for our machine controller board on a time and materials basis. I recommend them highly. They handle relatively small quantity production for us, too.

  45. Wired Article by AutopsyReport · · Score: 1

    There is a Wired article that you might find informative. It chronicles a hardware startup. It won't help you with the specifics, but it will provide a heads-up for what you can expect dealing with a manufacturer from China, selling, etc.

    --

    For he today that sheds his blood with me shall be my brother.

  46. Bull Crap! by gbutler69 · · Score: 1

    An "Great Idea" is not an invention! Anyone who says otherwise is a douche-bag!

    --
    Over-the-top Response Guy! Giving "Over-the-Top Responses" since 1970.
  47. ok look... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am said hardware guy, inventor (14 issued so far) and entrepreneur. My advice is:
    1. You can easily know for sure whether your device is patentable with a reasonably simple keyword search of USPTO databases.
    2. If it is truly NEW, count on $10k to $12k to draft, file, and convince the examiner. With this in mind is it still worth the effort? How about if giant competitor A challenges you in court?
    3. The only way you can know #2 above is through market analysis. DO THIS FIRST!

    If the answer to the market question is not a profound slam dunk yes, I suggest you market it as a hobbyist accessory for low cost to try and recoup your development costs.

    There are literally millions of hardware / PCBoard layout / manufacturing guys out there. A simple google search will show this.

    Save your money by doing your homework and taking a cold hard look at your work through a skeptic's eyes.

    Best of luck. I've had some luck at this, but I still have a day job too.

    -m

  48. File a provisional patent first by Steve1952 · · Score: 1

    It's a good idea to at least file a provisional patent on your concept before you discuss it with vendors. Write up your ideas and sketches as completely as you can, and send it in to the USPTO with a check for $110 using form SB16, available at: http://www.uspto.gov/web/forms/sb0016_fill.pdf

  49. Find an Electronic Contract Manufacturer by realperseus · · Score: 1

    Pat, I'm going to assume that you have all the legal things under control and what you need now is someone to manufacture the device... Google "electronic contract manufacturers" [your city name]. Most of these places will have experience with what you want to accomplish hardware-wise and will sign non-disclosures, etc.. . Good luck!

    --
    "Trusting every aspect of our lives to a giant computer was the smartest thing we ever did.." Homer Simpson
  50. I work in this field. by smellsofbikes · · Score: 1

    Find a local electrical engineer who is willing to do consulting work and get that person to do the schematic and produce a working prototype. Many will also be capable of doing the pcb layout. You might end up buying the software for them. OrCAD is usable if it's a simple design. Altium/Protel is easier to use for larger projects.
    Once you have a functioning layout, you can look at fab companies. At that point, it makes sense to go overseas, not before, because trying to get a decent hardware design done out-of-country is a nightmare. Even cross-country it's really hard: there are lots of tweaks required. Many fab companies can source the parts, do assembly, and test. Expect that to cost 3x as much as the board fabrication itself.
    Then, you have a functional product, and you can start looking into what it's going to take to get it to a point where it can actually be sold: testing, quality, certification. Expect that to take as long and cost as much as the schematic/layout/fabrication/assembly part.
    Marketing/advertising is at least as hard, but that part I don't know. For that matter, the marketing research, in the first place, that determines whether it's even worth doing, costs a bunch and takes a lot of time.

    In conclusion (as they say) the software is about 15% of the project, and getting the other 85% funded and finished is all work that's as hard as the software, and that you're not good at, so you're probably going to have to purchase.

    --
    Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
  51. get a job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    or figure this shit out for yourself

  52. IP in China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My understanding is that China doesn't have any stringent IP laws like the West does. I'd be very careful about taking your "patentable" ideas to such a country, if it really is that valuable to you.

    1. Re:IP in China by holychicken · · Score: 1

      This cannot be stressed enough. Maybe some companies in China are trustworthy, but chances are if you do a "swap" all you would be doing is giving them your idea for them to make cheaply.

  53. Take the Red Wire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.redwirellc.com

    Run by some very smart MIT guys with whom I am friends.

  54. Already been done by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If it's "probably patentable", it's probably already been patented. Companies that take their IP seriously and engage in electronic development are very good at writing broad patents to protect their market from minor advancements. Unless your idea is already in the patent process and you have a competent patent attorney who's already helped you write the application, your idea is unlikely to be patented, and you are very likely to be robbed. Look at the history of the Microsoft Mouse patent lawsuits for examples of big companies ripping off small developers for clever improvement ideas, and _NEVER_ rely on an NDA with a big company to prevent them from rebranding and profiting from work you discussed in a closed meeting with them, looking for investment funds.

    1. Re:Already been done by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      That is false. I have seen LOADS of ideas that later become patents ONLY LATER. Back in 1981, I was actively working on a clothes dryer that used microwaves AND low pressure. I later saw that another company did the microwave idea and sold it to the navy for use on their boats. But they never figured out dropping the pressure. Cheap to run a vac pump esp across multiple dryers. To the best of my knowledge, it is still not patented.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  55. Good idea != invention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Invention means both the good idea and the reduction to practice (which, these days, means being able to write down a proposed physical embodiment that someone could build).

    So, having the idea, but not having the skills, means you're NOT an inventor. You're an idea generator.

  56. Do the design in-house by limaxray · · Score: 1

    If the hardware requirements are simple enough, I would seriously consider doing the design in-house.

    I have my own start-up company and faced the same situation when I first started. I am a computer engineer though, and can do the PCB design myself, but would rather outsource as much as possible. Long story short, after getting a number of quotes, a production ready PCB design (sans software) was around $50k for a fairly straight forward design. I don't know about you, but I didn't have that kind of cash to dump into a single design (I'm working with 4 discrete boards now).

    Anyway, I started with PCB123 as it is free to get started and very easy to use. The downside is it does lock you into their PCB manufacturer (Sunstone Circuits) but it is a good place to start for prototype and initial production runs.

    Furthermore, for prototypes and small scale production board assembly, I recommend hand assembly. Get yourself a pair of tweezers, a tub of solder paste (I prefer Kester Easy Profile 256, but I work in a RoHS exempt industry so this may not work for you), an electric skillet and a SMT rework station. For small batches, this is by far cheaper and faster than machine assembly - It's just not worth the time and cost of having an assembly house setup their equipment to only assemble a handful of boards. When you're ready for a final production run with a few thousand units, you'll obviously need the machine assembly - until then stick with hand assembly. I assure you hand SMT assembly is much easier than it may seem; I actually prefer it to hand through-hole assembly and now avoid through-hole like the plague on any designs I'll need to hand assemble.

    Once you have a working design, you can dump your design files onto a production house and have the thing produced - many places you just need to send them your gerber files and bill of materials and they'll take care of the rest - PCB123 offers such a service via their partners. I would suggest staying local and avoiding China. I've heard many horror stories and what you save in production costs, you'll lose in quality, shipping costs, and turn-around times. When starting off, being able to call someone for support who speaks the same language as you and works the same hours as you is nearly priceless. Perhaps look to China for things like enclosures - I can't really give you advice there as that is not something I've had to deal with.

    If you're capable of writing the embedded software for such a device, I'd be willing to bet you'd be capable of designing and building the device as well. It may take a bit of extra effort and require you to learn some new things, but I really don't think it is as difficult as it may seem. Look for any development kits that can do what you need, and then copy and modify their schematics for your own design - this is why part manufacturers produce these kits. If you don't feel comfortable doing this yourself, reach out to any electrical engineering friends you might have, or hire an EE as a part-time contractor. Your best bet may be to do the bulk of the leg work yourself, and hire an EE to look over your shoulder and give you guidance.

    Just my $0.02

  57. Company Reference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Try D3 Engineering out of Rochester, NY. They have experience designing hardware for "smart" cameras and also DSP software. We are currently subcontracting them to design custom hardware for video acquisition and port our software from a desktop environment onto a DSP.

  58. Several steps needed by Animats · · Score: 1

    You have a lot of work ahead of you.

    First, you need to build a functional prototype. This doesn't have to be manufacturable at low cost; it just has to work. It can be larger than the production version and the parts cost may be higher. Then you'll have something to demo, and can get feedback on whether this is something worth making in quantity. This is something you can get done by one EE who does prototypes.

    Second, you need to decide whether your idea is good enough to patent. If it's a "me-too" idea, or something that could be replaced by a similar device not covered by the patent, don't bother. Read "Patent It Yourself", from Nolo Press, for advice on this. Incidentally, nobody serious files provisional patents; you either file a real patent or don't bother.

    The next step is to get a case designed. You're selling a camera accessory, where form factor and design are important. Right now, things are slow in the design business, and you can probably find someone competent to do your sketches and mockups. Start reading industrial design magazines so you understand how to talk to a designer.

    Now it's business decision time. Is there a viable product in this? Can you afford to make it? Can you get enough money together? You now have something to show; it's not vaporware at this point. So you can get opinions on whether manufacturing it is a good idea.

    Only now are you ready to talk about manufacturing. There are major companies that will do the whole job for you, such as Flextronics, which makes, among many other things, most of Microsoft's hardware products, including the Xboxes. Things are slow in that industry right now (Flextronics just did a major downsizing) so they'll probably talk to you. They don't finance you; that's your problem. They design the electronics, design the case, get the parts cost down, and make the thing to order. If you don't have enough money for them, they might pass you down to a lower-tier contract manufacturer.

  59. Try Stratford Digital by jm2morri · · Score: 1

    This is exactly what my company does -- custom electronic design. We keep very little overhead and are small and flexible. We cover design to managing manufacturing--various parts as per the customer's need.

    www.stratforddigital.ca

    End of shameless plug.

    James.

  60. Re: Circuit Board Design For a Small Startup? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know a company that might be able to help: http://www.asiabizgroup.com/ has a lot of experience helping high tech firms move into China, Taiwan, Japan, and Korea. They know a lot of OEMs, so may have some solid recommendations.

  61. Think about your commercialization strategy first by grumpyman · · Score: 1

    If your idea is truly novel, IP protection is paramount (patent,NDA...etc.). Then next is to produce a proof-of-concept, not so much a prototype that you can replicate for mass production. You need this to engage with customers (or reseller/partner) so that they will give you feedback. It may or may not be 100% what the end-user may want/need, hence the proof-of-concept. Once you delve/invest into a final design/mass production unit, it'll be tough to change if you're in a 'wrong' direction.

  62. Shameless plug, but... by deman1985 · · Score: 1

    I run a contract technology development firm (KappaStone) based in Columbus, Ohio. We work with start-ups and small companies all the time and I'd be happy to sit down and talk about your concept. Although the bulk of our work is done on a cash basis, we are willing to discuss alternative agreements on a case-by-case basis.

    If you have any interest, visit our site at http://www.kappastone.com or give us a call at 800-706-4534.

  63. Try Phoenix International by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I work for a company called Phoenix International, we are fully subsidiary of John Deere. We do build to spec and build to print designs as well as manufacturing. We have facilities in the US as well as Mexico and India.

    Check out our web-site.
    http://www.phoeintl.com/

    I'm a Software Engineer there, but you could contact someone from Marketing to talk about things.

  64. Please clarify the need by guzzirider · · Score: 1

    Being a hardware type .. I found this an interesting post. I am evaluating the basic premise of the question. Dos the poster have the skills do design and or hack some existing device, produce a schematic and a BOM but just lacks the PCB layout experience or was looking for a near turn key solution for hardware from a concept?

    There are threads here about various PCB houses that have limited layout software. This would assume that the poster can produce a schematic/BOM of a working device. And would also assume the ability to produce some kind of prototype (if some existing device could be modified I would guess some kind of hare ware hack). In the old days this would be called "blue wired". For most modern stuff I have found that 30AWG wire wrap wire is way to big. I use 34 - 40 AWG magnet wire. (the stuff that the insulation will cook off with a 'Hot' iron)

    Good PCB layout tools are not cheap. However Eagle is affordable.
    The idea of some kind of a partner has been recommended and is a good idea.

    Good Luck

  65. Consider an FPGA development board by SleezyG · · Score: 1

    Hiring an EE and going straight to PCB design and fab is not a cheap proposition. You instead should focus on the intellectual property and in building a prototype/demo unit. This can be done on any number of FPGA development boards for a relatively low price. Depending on your specific requirements, you would spend anywhere from $200 to $6000 on one of these boards.

    In particular:

    1) Learn about FPGA's. Learn how to program in Verilog or VHDL or find a Computer Engineering grad student to help you with this.
    2) Get an account on opencores.org. Identify the cores you can use so you don't have to reinvent the wheel. The USB core comes to mind.
    3) Find an inexpensive FPGA development board that could host your prototype. Xilinx and Altera (the two leading FPGA manufacturers) sell these and offer a "web kit" version of their software for free. The Xilinx Spartan 3A Video Starter Kit may work for you.

  66. eagle by drolli · · Score: 1

    for small things it is quite ok. The autorouting sucks an needs lots of manual tuning, but thts ok/

  67. $3k? Try $80! by HEbGb · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A provisional patent doesn't need a lawyer, and is all of $80. Go to the uspto.gov website.

  68. Learn Eagle by stevenm86 · · Score: 1

    Get Eagle. It's free and there are a lot of part libraries out there. It's quite backward, but you will soon learn that most electronics CAD tools are. I guess there isn't all THAT much overlap between ECE and HCI people... Have Eagle produce a Gerber file and then send it off to your favorite board house. Happy routing :)

    1. Re:Learn Eagle by burtosis · · Score: 1

      The free ware version of eagle is not for profit. So do this only if you don't mind stuffing the people at eagle out of some cash. Eagle has great layout and schematic features, and has a good user interface. It is also one of the cheapest cad software packages for the feature set if you decide that you want to pony up the cash.

  69. Some perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I find it amusing how Slashdotters are willing to criticise Microsoft for its emphasis on IP, yet they are the first to give advice on how to protect IP when "one of them" asks a question about outsourcing to China or elsewhere.

  70. No. U need to learn board layout by heroine · · Score: 1

    Most people in consumer electronics do their own software & their own hardware. There aren't big companies with dedicated job functions like there were.

  71. Did this myself... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I own a startup as well. I formed an LLC (just myself the LLC is in case I get sued) and I am still working very very hard. Learn from my mistakes, PATENT NOTHING! I mean this, why? Because by the time you have a working product your publish date will probably be years ago and your patent will probably have already gone through at least one or two rejects. According to the IP lawyer I didn't have on the pay roll but was willing to help out, you should expect a few rejects regardless of how NON obvious the design is.

    My products have nothing to do with USB cameras but it seams like we have a similar problem, there was something very close in the market but not exactly what you were looking for. I've had a couple EE courses in college so I started with looking into chip design myself. Cypress has a great PSoC system you can look into. Just about everything you'd need is on that board. Designing it yourself, building it yourself before going to anyone is the best route if you can.

    What I ended up doing though was contacting a local PCB, they directed me to the engineer they had on contract. I had the EE guy sign an NDA and I paid him about a grand. He was a great guy to work with! I went to his home and we laid out the plans on the kitchen table. I learned a few things from the guy but being who I am I just about had the design ready for him by the time he suggested anything. A year passed after this and I had worked on the design a lot. One month before my patent was published Apple came out with a competing product, odd to say the least. Suffice it to say it made me paranoid.

    I went back to the drawing board many many times after seeing that EE guy. I eventually came up with a design that avoids all other patents, it is a ton cheaper for startup as there is no hardware to manufact on the client side...but the down side is I have no IP protection and I probably never will...it will come down to marketing.

    Here is the bottom line, building a startup is hard. If you can do everything you want to do with existing hardware on the market then design software around that...avoid having to sell any hardware yourself. While this is probably not an option for you and you will have to design hardware and sell it...AVOID CHINA! Contract law means something here and that's all an NDA is...good luck enforcing that in China on your startup income.

    You're going down a long long road, I hope you're determined. You will have nay sayers, you will have competing products, you will have every large company in the market steal your idea and while your over a barrel they tell you to sue them. Every card is stacked against you from developing, to coding, to marketing...DO NOT FORGET THIS. Being the little guy means nothing today. It used to be the case that IP rights protected the little guy but that was a long time ago. Today using the patent system means everyone gets to know your product before you have a product in hand. Keep things small with low TCO, keep things close to home to avoid losing trade secrets etc, don't trust the patent system it is broken and they will reject your idea regardless of how great it is and you can expect at least 2-5 years before even having a good idea where your patent will go. The patent system is a lot like congress and bills today...it goes where the money is....and I'm guessing that isn't you.

    It was great to read this! I'm glad I'm not the only one in this boat. I'll try and contact you and see if I can give you any other suggestions. Don't lose hope, and don't expect hope is all you need...after all...hope without action is sloth right :-)

    ~AC

    1. Re:Did this myself... by jonsmirl · · Score: 1

      I laugh all the time when I see small companies and individuals worrying about patents and NDAs. You're just making the lawyers rich. Almost all projects like this fail. Don't spend a bunch of money protecting something that has the odds stacked against it. Instead spend that money on making sure that customers actually want what you are building. A highly protected concept that no one wants is worthless. Even worse is 10,000 boards in a warehouse that no one wants.

      Don't worry about China, it is an unwinable situation. If you go to China and no one copies you, that's bad news - they think you are going to fail. If you get copied that's actually good news. Staying in the US won't help. Once you are a little successful someone will send one of your devices to China and they will still clone it. A top engineer can clone most mass market hardware after looking at it for a couple of hours.

      Marketing, customer service, channel, branding, web presence, retail partnerships, etc - these are things that can't easily be cloned. If a clone form China beats you it is because you failed in these areas.

      There are billions of ideas but it is rare for an individual idea to have true value. The value is in the company that surrounds the idea. You have to build the company to extract the value. Microsoft is where they are today because they control the OEM software market with an iron first, not because they have brilliant software ideas.

      Everyone should do at least one startup in their life. As the saying goes - you can't win the lottery if you don't buy a ticket.

  72. Cole Design and Development, LLC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cole Design and Development, LLC specializes in micro electronic design and embedded software development. Akron, Ohio-based.
    http://www.coledd.com

  73. Cart. Horse. by jtara · · Score: 1

    You need an engineer at this point, not a PCB design.

  74. Give someone in the US a job by sargon666777 · · Score: 1

    Why not hire an engineer to design it? Give someone in the U.S. a job we need them right now.

    --
    Am I lying when I tell you that im telling the truth? Or am I telling the truth when I say that Im lying?
  75. The process: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok in a nutshell this is how a PCB gets designed and made:

    1) You have your PCB designer - This guy reads all the datasheets of every hardware component you need and decides how best to tie them together. He'll need to consider signal integrity, power, environmental conditions and matching voltage standards etc. For a large or complex project, there might be extra consultants on hand to run simulations and design the power sections.

    2) Layout Engineer - This is the guy/gal that takes a schematic drawing and actually convert it to something physical on a board. The PCB Designer will work close with the layout person to make sure the traces are thick enough, the signals are routed properly so there's no interference, etc. The layout person will make sure it meets the design requirements of the fab house so that the board CAN be made using a board material that is sufficient for noise/power/price.

    3) PCB Board Manufacturer: They just make the PCB. You pay for the silkscreen and stuff. Once the silkscreen is made and you made a boo-boo, you have to buy a new one.

    4) Operations or Purchaser: They order the parts and make sure they match what you asked for on time. Might also double check that they meet RoHS or restriction of hazardous materials (Mandatory for consumer electronics). Your PCB Designer should be already be aware of this.

    5) Assembly: This is a plant that will actually solder/bake your parts onto the printed circuit board. They might handle your testing as well.

    6) Board testing: Depending on complexity and quantities, you will need a "chicken-pecker" board checker or a full blow ICT clamshell. You want to be sure the design is pretty final before ordering a ICT test fixture.

    7) Additional QA/Testing: Probably a trained technician that runs test scripts on your product.

    8) UL/Compliance testing: you need someone who's familiar with the rules and requirements of the countries you're exporting to. They'll hire out a UL lab and get your hardware tested. Once it passes you're in luck.

    9) EM interference, same as 8 above. Your product has to be taken to a lab to make sure there's not too much noise generated from it.

    10) Profit, maybe.

  76. Shit I forgot to add by Samschnooks · · Score: 1

    Most deals do NOT go public. Google and all those big deals are the minority of VC deals. Most of the time, the company is sold off to a bigger company for cash and maybe some stock in the purchasing corporation.

  77. Build a working prototype first by fragMasterFlash · · Score: 1

    Building a working prototype of USB peripheral using development kit is not that difficult. Many of the kits available from Cypress Semiconductor include a daughter card specifically for prototyping. Your cost for a development kit should run about $500 and the cost of licensing the full SDK for firmware development should run about $1000 (you *might* be able to get by with the free trial version for your initial prototype build). Depending on the complexity of your design, a consultant could probably get you up and running with 20 - 40 hours of work with an hourly rate of $150 - $200 (consider going the DIY route if this cost is prohibitive). Once you have a working prototype you need to pound the pavement to get the Angel investment to take your product through a full design cycle.

  78. Get over it. by Spazmania · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I can't give details

    Get over it. The whole secretiveness about our product thing is a fast track to failure in a startup company.

    You need customers, first adopters, partners and venture capitalists. Until you're ready to talk freely, they won't even return your phone call. Worry about the patents when you actually have a revenue stream.

    Seriously. How many hardware geeks here on slashdot who might have been interested in your project chose not to contact you because it isn't worth their time to chase a secret of dubious quality?

    --
    Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion.
    1. Re:Get over it. by techhead79 · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry but I'd have to disagree with this. Get over it? If the idea is even half as good as he thinks, the people he has to worry about are not like minded people with little to no cash...it's the large companies that can just sneeze at the problem and have more than enough cash flow and people involved to have a working product in seconds. Let's say one of those people he got over it with decides they don't like him anymore? Guess who they will be picking up the phone to call next stating, and I quote..."I got a great FREE idea for you!". He should not get over it. Have a look at the movie flash of genius - I had to look up how to spell genius so I guess I'm not one!!! Hahaha!

    2. Re:Get over it. by Spazmania · · Score: 1

      large companies [...] working product in seconds.

      You've never worked at a large company. Creativity and initiative are in short supply. When a large company wants your idea, it's vastly cheaper and easier for them to buy it from you. As an entrepreneur, bringing about that purchase is the sensible goal.

      --
      Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion.
    3. Re:Get over it. by techhead79 · · Score: 1

      Actually I have and am currently working at a large company. Who will treat a person with respect if you have no IP rights to a product? Who will treat you with respect when you have an idea that can easily be taken away with no one the wiser? Working in a large company I have met many many people that adopt ideas and even code as their own just so they can reach the next ladder rung in the corporate world. Vastly cheaper and easier than stealing an idea and berrying you under a lifetime worth of legal paperwork?

  79. Freescale ref design by AmericanInKiev · · Score: 1

    freescale has a reference board for a webcam, it may be usb. Reference designs are generally wide-open-source (as opposed to merely open-source).

  80. Find someone to market it first by dbc · · Score: 1

    You say this is a mass market item. You say you are a one man shop. Guess what -- you can't scale yourself up to deliver to a mass market fast enough to be successful. IOW: your business model is utterly broken. Not to worry, I will describe a proven one that works well:

    Step 1: Build a quick prototype using whatever and whoever is convenient. I would suggest hiring someone local to do the PCB design for you, get the source files from them so you can later do it yourself or hire someone else.

    Step 2: Have the PCB's done by APCircuits or PCBExpress or similar. Or a local shop. You might even consider having a assembly house do your prototypes. Get it all working, mostly. The prototype can be ugly. You might find a local shop that can do all this from PCB design to assembly for you -- probably a good way to go if you can.

    Steps 1 and 2 will cost you several (or even many) times what a production version of the unit will cost. So:

    Step 3: Construct a bill-of-materials spreadsheet that is correct plus-or-minus 5 cents based on what it costs to source parts and manufacture in China. 5 cents. I'm not kidding. Real sourced-in-China 100K unit prices. I'm not kidding. Do your homework here.

    Step 4: Market the idea to companies that have the manufacturing expertise and the marketing channel to deliver to the mass market. Sign a development contract where you: a) deliver a production design, b) support their PCB and manufacturing and purchasing people in China to bring up production, c) get progress payments for development engineering work so you can eat during that time, d) get a modest royalty if your product actually eventually ships.

    This works. I know people that are quite successful with this model. They live well. They work their asses off, too, though.

  81. Linux.. kiCAD by mckillnm · · Score: 2, Informative
    My offer is kiCad..

    http://kicad.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/Main_Page

    Great schematic capture, auto-router, parts list, etc.. all open source!

    -Marko

  82. Sytems Engineering: From the Prototype to Market by gte881s · · Score: 1

    There are several steps in getting a product to market, and it sounds as though you are well on your way. First, I want to emphasize that hardware design in inherently more risky than software design, so you should first learn about systems engineering from someone who has put a product such as this together. If you tell yourself that you can do the software, make sure you are equally confident that your team can put the hardware together. It has been my experience that the hardware itself can be one of the most challenging as well as one of the most expensive aspects of the system design process. First, you must think from the system level about the product both in terms of the overall design specifications and the engineering required to meet your specification to meet a particular cost model. You will need someone to handle software (it sounds as though you have that covered), electronic design, mechanical design, PCB layout, sensor and optical system requirements, and how you will put it all together. Since you asked about PCBs, it is absolutely necessary that you find an experienced PCB engineer, either by hiring one (the market is great for this right now, if you have the money to hire) or by finding someone with hardware design experience to work as a consultant and could select the components, layout the board, and then work with a mechanical engineer to package the system for the mass market. There are many companies that are more than happy to contract with you to do this, but beware that they have different focuses in terms of quantity, reliability, and, most importantly, cost. The design process prior to going to a Chinese manufacturer will usually include a working prototype, a couple of design iterations, and a final (usually several copies) of the final test prototype for verification and comparison to the Chinese production model. Simply put, you donâ(TM)t want to order 50000 buggy boards. Express PCB will print the board itself, but you will need another shop to drop the components and solder them to the board. Iâ(TM)ve had luck with a couple of companies that are local to me and you will likely be able to find a shop that can provide you with PCB finishing services. Your PCB engineer will likely help you select components (probably from DigiKey) and whatever sensor you are using (likely directly from Kodak, depending on the sensor, or from a vendor that will give you a complete OEM camera (that is usually a better option if you have no sensor integration experience, but will typically cost more per unit, so if you are going to mass market the camera, youâ(TM)ll want to look into other options). In summary, your team will need to work on the product design from different perspectives, both the systems/business/cost side and the design/fabricate/testing side.

  83. Find and hire an EE. by Mal-2 · · Score: 1

    I know a few electrical engineers that could probably do this in their sleep, and make it fit in an Altoids tin. Find someone like that, hire him under contract so you can enforce an NDA, then run some prototype PCBs locally where the turnaround time is fairly minimal. Once you have a design that works, then you go to various (probably Chinese) companies for bids with full plans and part lists already in hand. Hopefully you will be able to complete the software end yourself, as this is where you will have to continually tweak and upgrade. The hardware shouldn't change unless some of your parts become unavailable or excessively expensive.

    Make sure you know what your primary requirements are -- remember the "good, cheap, fast, choose any two" rule applies here. Know where you want to stand on the balance of the three.

    Mal-2

    --
    How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
  84. my name's mike and I have an idea for... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I want to make a device and sell it to millions of people with shoddy software. Then I'll go out of business and move to the bahamas and leave all the mom and pop computer shops out there to bang their heads on the wall supporting my product.

  85. r2k_in_the_vortex by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i suggest you think this over really carefully before you get started. designing a mass producible electronic device, with no experience or a fat wallet to pay some company to do it for you is near impossible. even for people skilled in this field this is not a task to be started all by yourself and without a pretty hefty budget.
    it would be best to make it work as a prototype on a breadboard or smth to make sure you get your circuitry and software right before you even start thinking about making it mass producible

  86. Check out Bunnnie Huang's blog by frank1998 · · Score: 1

    Bunnie Huang (for Xbox hacking and Chumby fame) has some interesting experiences, mostly positive, doing similar things in China. See his blog.

  87. Hire somebody by mollyhackit · · Score: 1

    Quit fucking around on Slashdot and hire a hardware designer. It doesn't even have to be an EE. Right now hobbyists are going from idea to product without any formal training.

  88. Re:Going to China saves you the patenting hassle.. by smoker2 · · Score: 1

    Eagle is available on linux too.

    I wonder how much of his idea has been tested. I had an idea, and being a stubborn bastard as well as ignorant of electronics, I decided to learn by doing. I quickly found that I was focussed on the end product when I found that I couldn't provide enough power in the space I had decided to work with. It was not an option to make more space available (at least not unless I prototyped using surface mount, which is expensive). But at least I found out by designing a schematic, getting the parts and soldering it up. It was a waste of money, but spare diodes are never wasted and I have a new interest. So my idea which I wanted to get built yesterday is on the back burner until I can find a way around it.
    This is without mentioning that I was probably infringing on someones patent anyway - I never checked. Also, just as I was coming to this final realisation, I came across someone already selling something that was almost exactly what I wanted. I could hack their gear to get my result. Selling it would be harder of course. And it was still too big.

  89. If you have to ask Slashdot to find an answer.... by Goody · · Score: 1

    ...to this question, you're probably not capable of designing and prototyping this product and bringing it to market. Not to be rude and blunt, but it's the truth. Find someone who can or quietly write your idea in a notebook and store it away.

    --
    Tired of being "punished" by the Slashdot $rtbl since 2002. I'm now over at http://soylentnews.org/ .
  90. Try Subsite Electronics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Try Subsite electronics, they are primarily an underground locator electronics manufacturer, but they also outsource their engineers when they are low on projects (at least when I worked there they did). They are very capable of doing your design work, and were pretty friendly last time I talked to them. Their website is subsite.com - make sure you are sent to someone in the subsite building (They are owned by ditchwitch). Good luck.

  91. Try InDesign by cide1 · · Score: 1

    I work for / partially own InDesign, LLC (http://indesign-llc.com) that does exactly this type of contract product design. Located in Indianapolis, we have in house approximately 60 employees. Most are engineers, with many years of electrical, firmware, PCB layout, PCB assembly, test, and mechanical experience. We have done several camera related products, and a large number of our product designs include USB in some capacity. We can do just hardware and mechanical if you have firmware resources available. We can do quick low volume prototypes, or design for and work with an outside third party manufacturer for high volumes. Feel free to respond to my email address above, or contact one of our account managers from the InDesign website to learn more about our capabilities.

    --
    -- the computer doesn't want any beer, no matter how much you think it does. NEVER, EVER feed your computer beer.
  92. Digitec, Inc. by rift_design · · Score: 1

    One of my clients, Digitec, does a great job with PCB design and engineering. They are in the midwest and have over 25 years of experience. Their site is a bit outdated, but you can find out more at http://digitecinc.com.

    --
    always on the edge...rift design studio
  93. Local College by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Go to your local tech college and try to recruit help. Give them stake in the company.

    Stay away from the chinese as they are liable to get the stolen version of your product to market before you do.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  94. wired just did an article about how it could be do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's a story in wired about the dudes who invented to fitbit and their process of getting it to market:
    http://blog.wired.com/gadgets/2009/03/changing-econom.html

  95. The case against Patents (by Don Lancaster) by n4djs · · Score: 2, Interesting

    http://www.tinaja.com/glib/casagpat.pdf is a good read by Don Lancaster (writer of the "TTL Cookbook" - yeah, that Don Lancaster) and why he considers the patent system to be a games that is stacked against the small player.

  96. Wow, what a poor choice for a summary by osgeek · · Score: 1

    Coming to Slashdot, of all places, begging for help while swinging your "not yours, I want to patent it" bat around is just pathetic.

    1. Re:Wow, what a poor choice for a summary by Dogbertius · · Score: 1

      No, he just prefers LGPL over GPL :)

  97. Outsource the idea to a university by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Engineering Students in many universities need some form of a final project, and original ideas are often lacking. Something original and within there abilities is a win-win for you are them.

    PATENT IT FIRST and you can divulge it to anyone. this will help if you do decide to manufacture as you can give the company explicit details so they can give you a more accurate quote.

    BEFORE SPEC'ING OUT MANUFACTURERS YOU MUST HAVE A WORKING PROTOTYPE.
    going directly into manufacturing is extremely risky with absolutely no payoff. Prototypes will tell you what needs to change, what can be omitted etc. giving you a much better device and likely cheaper.

    In my undergraduate career as a senior project we built a fully functioning medical device. It was based on research that only provided an algorithm and we (a team of 10 undergraduate students, 2 computer engineers. 2 electrical engineers. 4 biomedical engineers, and 2 industrial designers) were able to design a prototype using pretty close to what the final manufacturing process would require.
    The project has since been picked up and i currently work as a consultant on its commercial final design awaiting FDA approval.

    one thing to look out for is the universities ownership of the project. There is normally nothing in the universities policies that simply gives them ownership because a student created it, however if said student is using the universities facilities and resources they then can make a pretty strong claim toward ownership. so make sure you check into this first.

  98. Cheap high quality labor then? by Dogbertius · · Score: 1

    So basically, you need an electrical and/or computer engineer at the very minimum so that the device can even be built. I've done this kind of work before, and it never gets old when someone is stunned that the price tag is in the thousands rather than $300 or so. There is a rather misguided notion that PCB design, component selection, PIC programming, failsafe testing, etc, is the same as photoshopping a zit out of a picture at the London Drugs photo booth. To get this kind of work done, you're going to be paying for people who've spent something like a minimum of 5 years in university, 5 years in industry, and something like $150 000 to pay for all the training to boot.

  99. New Product Design by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's assume you have a plan for marketing the product. If your software can run on an existing product, you may be able to strike a deal with that product's maker. Something like he will furnish up assembled and tested hardware at "wholesale" (something less than retail). Don't count on talking anyone into doing a special design just for you, not unless you are a peerless salesman who convinces the maker that you will take hundreds or thousands of units.
      If you have to roll your own hardware (the likely case) then you have one man hardware project. You don't want a company, you want one good hardware designer. This guy will draw the electrical schematics, do the printed circuit board layout (Gerber files) , send the Gerber's to a printed circuit board fab house, assemble, debug and test the prototype unit, program all the programmable logic devices, furnish a written programmer's model of the gadget, and design a factory acceptance test procedure. For extra credit he can find or design casework (molded plastic?). With luck you can find a case that you can buy. Molding your own case requires expensive dies, say $30,000 for soft tooling.
        The hardware guy will need access to test equipment, say a scope, device programmers and a logic analyser. He will also need access to a schematic capture program (Orcad), a PC layout program (PADS), and a programmable logic programming system.
    Figure three months design followed by 6 months debugging of prototype, longer if trouble is encountered.
        You can find guys who will work as contract engineers or guys that will join your startup, in return for a share of the winnings if the project works. You want some experience, the right guy will have designed a USB or camera product.

  100. Da' quote by G4Cube · · Score: 1

    WTF Google that Einstein "quote" and the only place it shows up is this post.

    1. Re:Da' quote by Suicyco · · Score: 1

      Huh... http://www.max-planck-innovation.de/share/newsletter/Newsletter_01_2005_en.pdf

      Anyway, don't know how accurate the quote is, but that is the first link to pop up.

  101. Worry about FCC, CE, UL cost first. by Spaceball_3000 · · Score: 1

    First think about your costs. FCC, CE, UL, etc.. certifications can end up more than the cost to develop a new product (one man operation.) Patentable, forget this, you can't afford to patent it yet, get the product first out, then worry about patenting it.

  102. My thanks to you all by Patrick+Bowman · · Score: 1

    To all of you who replied to my initial post, thank you. I've read all the responses carefully, even the trolls: they too have their story. There's a wealth of excellent advice here and a high signal-to-noise ratio. Thanks in particular to those of you who took the time to provide thoughtful and well-rounded answers. Will this idea fly? Beats me. But I hope to have a lot of fun finding out.

  103. Avoid patents, see Don Lancaster by beachdog · · Score: 1

    Check out the "avoid patents" development strategy and tactics that has been developed and tested by technical writer and engineer Don Lancaster.

    Don wrote "CMOS Cookbook" around 1973 and he is still active selling some specialized products, books, EBay stuff and more.

    His strategy is: avoid patents, build a kit or add on first, stay below the radar of the big players, treat the project as part of a process rather than a one time bonanza.

    www.tinaja.com

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Don_Lancaster

  104. Checkout Prevas by Flu · · Score: 1
    at www.prevas.com.

    Prevas is my employer, a scandinavian-based design house, specialized in developing intelligence in products and industrial systems for the world's leading companies. Over 550 consultants in these fields help make our clients more competitive through innovative, profitable, futureproof solutions.

    Prevas is a publicly traded IT consulting company with rock-solid expertise and 20 years' experience. We are based in the Nordic countries and serve clients in a range of industries around the globe.

    One of Prevas' strongest competitive advantages is our ability to deliver IT solutions at previously agreed upon terms. These terms might be regarding the functional requirements, financial requirements, or both.

    * Prevas deliver 95% of its projects on time, with just 3% of all projects requiring warranty services upon completion.
    * As far as customer satisfaction goes, our customer rate us at 8.6 on a scale of 1 to 10.

    Prevas is a Microsoft Windows Embedded Gold Partner as well as National Instruments Alliance Program Partner, and - of course - have excellent relationship with selected PCB manufacturing plants that are capable of producing anything from prototype to million-unit series. Prevas also have exellent knowledge of the UL, CE, WEE, RoHS and other directives required for producing products for the major world markets.

    Reference customers include both major companies such as Nokia, ABB, Panasonic, Siemens, Stoneridge, Volvo, and minor companies that are still growing, including start-ups.

  105. Sensible Electronics (805)-750-0665 does job. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sensible Electronics. We do schematic capture (analog and digital design, but you already did design, did you?), PCB layout, firmware.
          Call (805)-750-0665 any time (this is my cellular), ask Lev.
            PCB prototype I usually order from "www.pcbfabexpress.com". "Sierra Proto Express" faster but more expensive. China is good for mass production, not for prototype or design.

  106. Good Post by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    For small quantities on a small system (using just a off design), I did not go through all this. BUT, I suspect that if the guy has a hit, and wants to scale up, he will in fact need all that you said.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  107. A recommendation by solid_liq · · Score: 1

    You asked for a recommendation for a company, so I'll give you one. There's a company called Applied Integration. I used to work for them (appropriate disclosure, I think) designing digital video surveillance systems (I worked on the software side). The market dropped out after the dot-com bomb, and the owner went back to doing custom hardware designs. He's very good at what he does, has designed imaging systems for the telescopes of major observatories down to small surveillance systems, and he's nearing retirement. He may be able to do what you need for a reasonable enough price. I also would never expect him to rip off your idea, though I would of course make sure to have an NDA (Non-Disclosure Agreement) and the whole nine (legal-wise) yards in place. The website is http://appliedi.com/

    I hope that helps.

  108. Business and pattern by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey bro!! If you need more details on how to go about it ..... Please think as a business man.... Go and get you Idea to be patent first..... Everyone in this world invent and creating something every day.... Dont let your idea to be taken by someone before you patent. If you need more details on how to go about it feel free to contact me via email. Thank you.

  109. HW manufacturing: It's risky for small outfits. by WOOFYGOOFY · · Score: 1

    I know a physicist in a major US university whose dept. needed a custom board made. They contracted with a Chinese company. Long (expensive) story short: quality control was so bad, they took it in house. Just one data point, but the lesson I took from that was if you're a small company or just a few people, Chinese fab (is there any other?) may be a crap shoot. I would have told you that a the Chinese factory would have been excited by the order and done what it took to make things go right. My advice: have a bushy strategic tree that allows for survival if the hardware doesn't work. If that's not part of your game plan, rewrite your game plan.

  110. STOP - are you a lawyer? (Re:Get An NDA!) by myvirtualid · · Score: 1

    Are you lawyer? If not, stop offering legal advice. I'm not a lawyer either, so I'll just paraphrase what my lawyer told me two weeks ago: "Sure, an NDA is a good step - if it can be enforced." If you are a lawyer, please cite case law, etc., that backs up this "magic NDA" view.

    An NDA is not a magic shield that will protect your ideas. At best, it is one tool among many. At worst, it is fool's security blanket.

    Another tool is the provisional patent.

    And another is meticulous documentation - document every meeting, every email, etc. I make some people sign NDAs - for others, I rely on the fact that I can point to a body of evidence - correspondence, journals, etc. - that show that the ideas were mine. It depends on the person, the situation, the likelihood they will sign - if you ask someone for advice, why would they sign an NDA? What, exactly, do they get out of it?

    --
    I'm here EdgeKeep Inc.