Slashdot Mirror


The Guardian Shifts To Twitter After 188 Years of Ink

teflon_king writes with news that renowned British newspaper The Guardian will be abandoning its paper-and-ink distribution scheme and publishing all articles and news as Tweets. Quoting: "A mammoth project is also under way to rewrite the whole of the newspaper's archive, stretching back to 1821, in the form of tweets. Major stories already completed include '1832 Reform Act gives voting rights to one in five adult males yay!!!;' 'OMG Hitler invades Poland, allies declare war see tinyurl.com/b5x6e for more;' and 'JFK assassin8d @ Dallas, def. heard second gunshot from grassy knoll WTF?' Sceptics have expressed concerns that 140 characters may be insufficient to capture the full breadth of meaningful human activity, but social media experts say the spread of Twitter encourages brevity, and that it ought to be possible to convey the gist of any message in a tweet. For example, Martin Luther King's legendary 1963 speech on the steps of the Lincoln memorial appears in the Guardian's Twitterised archive as 'I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the colour of their skin but by,' eliminating the waffle and bluster of the original."

211 comments

  1. Interesting... by LingNoi · · Score: 5, Funny

    I wonder if this will make the guardian more interesting to read..

    1. Re:Interesting... by Kentaree · · Score: 2

      Less reading time to get bored in though ;)

    2. Re:Interesting... by Leafheart · · Score: 1

      Less verbose for sure.

      --
      --- "When you gotta do something wrong. You gotta do it right. (Fighter)"
    3. Re:Interesting... by sp1nl0ck · · Score: 1, Informative

      You realise of course that this is an April Fool. The author of the article, http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2009/apr/01/guardian-twitter-media-technology, is Rio Palof - an anagram of "April Fool"...

      --
      War is God's way of teaching Americans geography
    4. Re:Interesting... by orclevegam · · Score: 4, Funny

      TL;DR

      --
      Curiosity was framed, Ignorance killed the cat.
    5. Re:Interesting... by enrgeeman · · Score: 1

      that's nice, but where's the other L?

      --
      sent from my slashdot browser.
    6. Re:Interesting... by MaxwellEdison · · Score: 2

      Parent is sitting on it, accounting for the overly serious tone decrying this article as an April Fool's Day prank, as if he is protecting the poor innocent idiots who can't realize this immediately.


      ...


      Just going for a flamebait achievement...

      --
      -=Bang Bang=-
    7. Re:Interesting... by chdig · · Score: 1

      5 minutes after the article is posted, you feel the need to jump in and blow the joke?! I was hoping to enjoy the posts by people who didn't get it, but your pride at picking out a supposed anagram spoiled that.

      I could have understood if you'd pointed out that it wasn't a real anagram, and is missing an 'L'.

      Whoever modded you up as "informative" has absolutely no sense of humour. -1 spoiler would have been more sensible.

    8. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rio Palof - an anagram of "April Fool

      Not quite, you need another "l". As it is, it is only an anagram of "April Foo".

    9. Re:Interesting... by Mad-Bassist · · Score: 1

      [You realise of course that this is an April Fool.]

      This year...

      --
      "The only legitimate use of a computer is to play games." - Eugene Jarvis
    10. Re:Interesting... by cube135 · · Score: 4, Funny

      140 characters should be enough for everyone!

    11. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      zomg all of the "aprilsfool" tags have been removed! Now I have to use critical thinking to figure out what's real!

      This is an outrage! If I could twit a faceblog about it, I would!

    12. Re:Interesting... by Dragon+of+the+Pants · · Score: 1

      Nope.

    13. Re:Interesting... by SalaSSin · · Score: 1

      If he didn't realise that, he wouldn't have been posting this, he would be trying to subscribe...

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced incompetence is indistinguishable from malice - Grey's Law
    14. Re:Interesting... by R_Kulio · · Score: 5, Funny

      Rio Palof - an anagram of "April Fool

      Not quite, you need another "l". As it is, it is only an anagram of "April Foo".

      I pity the April Foo

    15. Re:Interesting... by maotx · · Score: 1

      No

      --
      I'm a virgo and on Slashdot. Coincidence? Yes.
    16. Re:Interesting... by stfvon007 · · Score: 1

      This just in: President had heart attack. He went to hospital. He lived. Everybody happy. :) Updates forthcoming.

      --
      All misspellings and grammatical errors in the above post are intentional and part of my artistic expression.
    17. Re:Interesting... by BattleApple · · Score: 2, Funny

      Maybe Mr T is writing for The Guardian these days?

      APRIL FOO, FOO!

    18. Re:Interesting... by jd · · Score: 1

      You DO realize that this is just a cunning ploy to hide their typos, don't you? Nobody will be able to distinguish them from a new form of 'Leetspeek.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    19. Re:Interesting... by Binestar · · Score: 1

      As someone who has been through a *lot* of 4/1's on Slashdot, I have to say that if you really need to be told this is an april fools article, you should probably put down the computer and get back on the short bus.

      --
      Do you Gentoo!?
    20. Re:Interesting... by RiotingPacifist · · Score: 1

      yes, most people did realize but was there any need to be a dick and spoil the fun?

      --
      IranAir Flight 655 never forget!
    21. Re:Interesting... by DrLang21 · · Score: 1

      I genuinely do not like April Fools articles on my news sites. Usually they're easy to spot, but sometimes you get caught by one. And considering that I put trust in my news sources, I don't appreciate them trying to make a fool of me. It makes me think I should just assume all news on April Fools is likely to be fake and not read it.

      --
      I see the glass as full with a FoS of 2.
    22. Re:Interesting... by Patch86 · · Score: 1

      Trust The Guardian to compliment their joke with an anagram. Can the next April Fools be in the form of a cryptic crossword?

    23. Re:Interesting... by chdig · · Score: 1

      Are you implying that the Guardian moving to Twitter isn't easy enough to spot?

      Slashdot has a mod for "Funny" -- humor is a part of this site, and it's not your run-of-the-mill news site. This was a simple inside joke related to technology that all regular readers should have "got" in a split second. If you don't like humor on /., then move along, but please don't spoil it for the rest of us by exposing obvious jokes, or modding such exposure as "informative".

      --
      now that I think of it, though, it is true that Funny receives no karma, while extremely obvious, dull and humorless posts aimed to spoil any fun are for some reason rewarded.

    24. Re:Interesting... by Poltras · · Score: 1

      Slashdot is starting to look like reddit with all those punt threads with no real value added to the discussion :P

    25. Re:Interesting... by DrLang21 · · Score: 1

      It's not just /., this is a common move on many news sites (for example, The Guardian). This one was easy to spot. However, this one was not so obvious. This isn't just a poke at /., this is a poke at news reporting in general.

      --
      I see the glass as full with a FoS of 2.
    26. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DR

    27. Re:Interesting... by Petrushka · · Score: 1

      Not quite, you need another "l". As it is, it is only an anagram of "April Foo".

      I pity the April Foo

      Personally, I pity the April Bar.

      (It's in Amsterdam, off the Vijzelstraat. Feel free to pop in any night and check out the local gals.)

    28. Re:Interesting... by polemistes · · Score: 1

      I'm disappointed, I had really hoped they would go for the second choice. The 10 digit calculator upside-down format. OB'LLBEGOO

    29. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What more do you expect from Teh Gruniard?

    30. Re:Interesting... by rts008 · · Score: 1

      No, that one was also obvious.

      You're just gullible.

      --
      Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
    31. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It worked for thesun.co.uk

  2. They'll still Tweet Less Than by gurutc · · Score: 1

    My favorite Tweeter, Lance Armstrong

    --
    Moderation in All Things... Especially Moderation - gurutc
  3. cmon! enough already! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    tsop ts1

  4. "Waffle & Bluster"?! by eldavojohn · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Martin Luther King's legendary 1963 speech on the steps of the Lincoln memorial appears in the Guardian's Twitterised archive as 'I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the colour of their skin but by,' eliminating the waffle and bluster of the original.

    I couldn't find anything when googling for "waffle and bluster" aside from this story so I looked up each of the words.

    waffle

    Speech or writing that is vague, pretentious or evasive. Example: "This interesting point seems to get lost a little within a lot of self-important waffle."

    bluster

    Pompous, officious talk.

    I guess we think more highly of Doctor Martin Luther King Jr. in the states.

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:"Waffle & Bluster"?! by aristotle-dude · · Score: 4, Insightful

      *Whoosh* He was a great man. He was a preacher and a political activist who played a pivotal role in the history of the US but I think he would be disturbed by this "worship" of him given that he was a humble man of faith. You act like someone was disrespecting a revered prophet or something. It's a joke. You are supposed to laugh. For crying out loud, christians can take light hearted jokes and even tell them to each other but this cult of personality surrounding King Jr seems to have no sense of humour.

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    2. Re:"Waffle & Bluster"?! by Gerafix · · Score: 1

      Hey, they're British, they don't think highly, give 'em a break.

    3. Re:"Waffle & Bluster"?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, in the states you simply don't understand irony.

    4. Re:"Waffle & Bluster"?! by Zontar_Thing_From_Ve · · Score: 1

      *Whoosh* He was a great man. He was a preacher and a political activist who played a pivotal role in the history of the US but I think he would be disturbed by this "worship" of him given that he was a humble man of faith. You act like someone was disrespecting a revered prophet or something. It's a joke. You are supposed to laugh.

      Until I read this post, I didn't get that it was a joke, but now I understand that you're right. Unfortunately British humour (spelling it in the British way for all you Brits out there) doesn't always translate well for Americans. Honestly, I can now understand that it's a joke, but I don't think it's particularly funny.

      Yes, I do like Monty Python and Rowan Atkinson's various projects, but as a general rule I'm not sure I'd say that just being British means you have a leg up in the funny department.

    5. Re:"Waffle & Bluster"?! by benwiggy · · Score: 2, Informative

      I guess we think more highly of Doctor Martin Luther King Jr. in the states.

      In the UK, we think so highly of Dr. King that it is clearly absurd and comic to suggest that his speeches are full of waffle and bluster.

      It's almost as if the writer of the article doesn't expect to be taken seriously.

    6. Re:"Waffle & Bluster"?! by notarockstar1979 · · Score: 1

      The use of words expressing something other than their literal intention....now that IS irony. --Bender

    7. Re:"Waffle & Bluster"?! by Cube+Steak · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Until I read this post, I didn't get that it was a joke,

      So you didn't get that a line in a story that is clearly an April Fools joke is a joke? Were you born with no sense of humor or did you have it removed later in life?

    8. Re:"Waffle & Bluster"?! by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      Hmm... I think you didn't get the memo..

    9. Re:"Waffle & Bluster"?! by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      I think you'd appreciate Benny Hill and The Two Ronnies. Though some of the later contains political parodies that you might be confused or angered by.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    10. Re:"Waffle & Bluster"?! by fastest+fascist · · Score: 1

      Someone needs to take their humour disinhibitor pills.

    11. Re:"Waffle & Bluster"?! by DrgnDancer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You... didn't... realize... Gods I hope you're joking. Please? A 200 year old newspaper announces that it is not only switching to a pure "Twitter" format, but rewriting its entire (200 year old) archive into the same format (On April 1st), and you thought there was the slightest chance it could be serious? I see.

      So I have this bridge in Arizona. It's a really hot buy, but the last customer fell through. Would you be interested? I really need to unload this thing, so I'll be quite generous with the terms.

      --
      I don't need a million points of light, just two points of multi-mode fiber and a 10 Gig-E router.
    12. Re:"Waffle & Bluster"?! by paintswithcolour · · Score: 1

      Of course definitions don't demonstrate tone. Feel free to insert you own [irony] tags there...

    13. Re:"Waffle & Bluster"?! by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      The definition of the joke is "when I laugh".

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    14. Re:"Waffle & Bluster"?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The definition of the joke is "when I laugh".

      I prefer "when someone laughs at you."

    15. Re:"Waffle & Bluster"?! by pablo.cl · · Score: 1

      What they are actually saying is Martin L. King can't be condensed, his speech is good as it is.

    16. Re:"Waffle & Bluster"?! by tnk1 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I don't know about you, but I was completely fooled by the "OMG Hitler invades Poland" headline.

      Must be that dry British humour I keep hearing about.

    17. Re:"Waffle & Bluster"?! by xouumalperxe · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure I'd say that just being British means you have a leg up in the funny department

      I beg to differ!

    18. Re:"Waffle & Bluster"?! by Cube+Steak · · Score: 1

      So I have this bridge in Arizona. It's a really hot buy, but the last customer fell through.

      Sorry, that was my fault. I wired the money to the guy so he could get his gold out of Nigeria to buy your bridge, but the transfer never made it to him.

    19. Re:"Waffle & Bluster"?! by carlzum · · Score: 1

      I guess we think more highly of Doctor Martin Luther King Jr. in the states.

      We would vilify him during his lifetime and gun him down, but we'd certainly never call him pompous. The UK should make this right by reluctantly adopting a holiday in his honor over the next few decades.

    20. Re:"Waffle & Bluster"?! by steelfood · · Score: 1

      Better yet, I have $10 million in an offshore bank account that I'm trying to transfer to the US. But I can't get to it because I currently have no money to pay for the processing fees. If you can advance me $10K so that I can pay those processing fees, I will give you 5% of the money I'm able to bring out.

      P.S. This isn't a scam, or an April Fools joke. I'm serious.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    21. Re:"Waffle & Bluster"?! by Failed+Physicist · · Score: 1

      lol (posting only for april fool's achievement)

    22. Re:"Waffle & Bluster"?! by rts008 · · Score: 1

      Clearly the problem was there was not a 'canned laugh track', or a 'laugh here' tag. That's the way we do it in the USA so we know we are being subjected to comedy.

      Watch any 'sitcom' made in the USA. All have laugh tracks to let you know that was supposed to be funny. ;-)

      --
      Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
  5. Pandora's blog has been opened by ReverendLoki · · Score: 1

    The line of people who want to post in this thread just to get an "achievement" can start here...

    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    1. Re:Pandora's blog has been opened by beardape · · Score: 1

      Give me my archievement

    2. Re:Pandora's blog has been opened by AvitarX · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Achievement Whore, the new Karma Whore.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    3. Re:Pandora's blog has been opened by lordandmaker · · Score: 1

      *achieves*

    4. Re:Pandora's blog has been opened by iainl · · Score: 1

      Start where?

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
    5. Re:Pandora's blog has been opened by ShadowRangerRIT · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Wait, I thought the achievement was for posting in the original Achievement April Fools thread? Not that it matters, /. was useless even before the achievement spamming.

      --
      $_ = "wftedskaebjgdpjgidbsmnjgcdwatb"; tr/a-z/oh, turtleneck Phrase Jar!/; print
    6. Re:Pandora's blog has been opened by bigtomrodney · · Score: 5, Funny

      Screw the achievements, where are all the PONIES?!

      --
      I never get used to these constant resurrections
    7. Re:Pandora's blog has been opened by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does posting anonymously count?

    8. Re:Pandora's blog has been opened by ShadowRangerRIT · · Score: 1

      Dammit. Forgot the qualifier. It was useless *on April Fools*. It's only *mostly* useless on other days.

      --
      $_ = "wftedskaebjgdpjgidbsmnjgcdwatb"; tr/a-z/oh, turtleneck Phrase Jar!/; print
    9. Re:Pandora's blog has been opened by mrdoogee · · Score: 1

      Ha Ha! I achieve!

    10. Re:Pandora's blog has been opened by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      achieve!!!!!

    11. Re:Pandora's blog has been opened by Em+Emalb · · Score: 5, Funny

      Your post advocates a

      (X) moronic ( ) Totalitarian (X) consumer-driven (X) Charles Brosonish ( ) Governmental

      approach to humor. Your "OMGPonies!" will not work. Here is why it won't work. (One or more of the following may apply to your particular post, and it may have other flaws which used to vary from state to state before a bad federal law was passed.)

      (X) Your post was simply unfunny.
      (X) Mailing lists and other legitimate websites would not bother stealing it from you
      (X) Monkeys simply can't aim that well.
      ( ) It is defenseless against brute force attacks
      (X) Slashdot will attempt to use this as an unfunny meme
      (X) Users of email will not put up with it
      (X) Linus Torvalds did not even chuckle
      (X) The police will tour again
      (X) Requires the attention span of a gnat
      (X) Requires immediate total cooperation of God in Heaven
      (X) The meme is tired and worn out and I'm just as likely to get a -1 troll as a +5 funny.

      Specifically, your plan fails to account for

        (X) Asshats
        (X) Asshats
        (X) Asshats
        (X) Asshats
        (X) Asshats
        (X) Technically illiterate politicians
        (X) Extreme stupidity on the part of people in general
        (X) Outlook
        (X) Asshats

      and the following philosophical objections may also apply:

        (X) Ideas similar to yours are easy to come up with, yet none have ever been shown funny
        (X) We should be able to talk about Viagra without being censored
        ( ) Incompatibility with open source or open source licenses
        (X) unfunny jokes do nothing to solve the problem
        (X) Temporary/one-line jokes are cumbersome
        ( ) I don't want the government thinking your lame
        (X) Killing them that way is not slow and painful enough

      Furthermore, this is what I think about you:

        (X) Sorry dude, but that is simply unfunny.
        (X) Once you go OMGPonies! you can never go back.
        (X) This is a stupid idea, and you're a stupid person for suggesting it.
        (X) Nice try, assh0le! I'm going to find out where you live and burn your house down!
        (X) What you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone on this site is now dumber for having read it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.

      --
      Sent from your iPad.
    12. Re:Pandora's blog has been opened by Samschnooks · · Score: 1

      Achievement Whore, the new Karma Whore.

      I've always been doing those things without the achievement points. Does that make me a slut?

    13. Re:Pandora's blog has been opened by sherpajohn · · Score: 1

      I, for one, welcome our new Achievement Whore Overlords!

      --

      Going on means going far
      Going far means returning
    14. Re:Pandora's blog has been opened by SputnikPanic · · Score: 1

      Please, sir, may I have another (achievement)?

    15. Re:Pandora's blog has been opened by OK+PC · · Score: 3, Funny

      I've seen things you people wouldn't believe, and from this side only! The flight of a half-man, half-bird. Dinosaurs nuzzling their young in pastures where strip-malls should be. Cookies on dowels. All those moments lost in time; gone like eggs off a hooker's stomach. Time to die.

      --
      Did you get that thing I sent ya?
    16. Re:Pandora's blog has been opened by Etrias · · Score: 1

      Okay great! I'm here. What did I unlock by the achievement? Do I get a new Submit button that flashes up Hot Grits and Natalie Portman?

    17. Re:Pandora's blog has been opened by Apotekaren · · Score: 1

      Plonk, YAY! I don't play WoW(life has a tendency to take all my time) but I'm slightly excited about this.

      --
      She: Hey, are you a traitor? Me: No, I'm atheist.
    18. Re:Pandora's blog has been opened by eXonyte · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well I'm going to pride myself in being one of those who does NOT have the achievement!

    19. Re:Pandora's blog has been opened by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meet the new whore, same as the old whore.

    20. Re:Pandora's blog has been opened by Shadin · · Score: 1

      So, is it this one, the other, or one not yet posted?

    21. Re:Pandora's blog has been opened by nico60513 · · Score: 2, Funny

      No thanks. Even if I get all of the achievements they'll just add more achievements to get me to buy new slashdot downloadable content.

    22. Re:Pandora's blog has been opened by s!lat · · Score: 1

      *post*.... No really though, someone somewhere will do this. It's just a matter of time

      --
      It's a leather thing
    23. Re:Pandora's blog has been opened by thesp · · Score: 1

      Achievement please :-) Thank you kindly, sir...

    24. Re:Pandora's blog has been opened by vandiemen007 · · Score: 1

      Shhh that's their 2010 April Fools surprise!

    25. Re:Pandora's blog has been opened by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well it seems my friend you have underestimated that comment, overestimated your own and if your signature is anything to go by you've attacked a fellow Irishman. Bravo!

    26. Re:Pandora's blog has been opened by FeepingCreature · · Score: 1

      Screw the achievements, where are all the PONIES?!

      StackOverflow has unicorns.

      Does that count?

    27. Re:Pandora's blog has been opened by kramerd · · Score: 1

      Really? Outlook?

    28. Re:Pandora's blog has been opened by Klatos · · Score: 1

      Finally someone will acknowledge my greatness! *achieves*

    29. Re:Pandora's blog has been opened by Slartibartfass · · Score: 1

      Toasting in this bread.

    30. Re:Pandora's blog has been opened by Lyrael · · Score: 1

      Gief!

    31. Re:Pandora's blog has been opened by Lyrael · · Score: 1

      Gimme gimme gimme.

    32. Re:Pandora's blog has been opened by greyline · · Score: 1

      At least I'll be able to achieve something in my life

    33. Re:Pandora's blog has been opened by tpjunkie · · Score: 1

      How about achievement spaders? There have got to be "secret" or unusual achievements sprinkled around the site. Maybe "Had a missing option comment moderated +5" or "Successfully included a rickrolling in an article summary"?

    34. Re:Pandora's blog has been opened by Em+Emalb · · Score: 1

      Dude, in the end, you can ALWAYS point a finger at Outlook and call it the culprit.

      --
      Sent from your iPad.
    35. Re:Pandora's blog has been opened by deep9x · · Score: 1

      This game was way better before.

    36. Re:Pandora's blog has been opened by DevonBorn · · Score: 1

      It's no good. You're going to have to post in all of them just to make sure :) Just a thought - it's entirely possibly that there isn't an April Fools achievement and the achievement is the /. April Fools.

      --
      Just think: 50% of all people are below average.
    37. Re:Pandora's blog has been opened by furby076 · · Score: 1

      I want a pink one. With a scarf. And candies!

      --

      I do not support "The Man". I also do not support your irrational stupidity
    38. Re:Pandora's blog has been opened by Xeldar · · Score: 1

      Okay, what the hell. Gimme my achievement!

    39. Re:Pandora's blog has been opened by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      But where does it end? :/

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    40. Re:Pandora's blog has been opened by slimjim8094 · · Score: 1

      Bah. Hopefully the devs will write something shutting this down, and force useful comments.

      -1 Fuckwit achievement whore

      --
      I have developed a truly marvelous proof of this comment, which this signature is too narrow to contain.
    41. Re:Pandora's blog has been opened by Nakor+BlueRider · · Score: 1

      Sadly, there's nothing new about it.

    42. Re:Pandora's blog has been opened by Sethus · · Score: 1

      You sir, are a champion and a hero of my whoring habits.

      That aside, this has got to be the most frustrating Slashdot change in a while for me. I quit WoW 6 months ago, and now I'm just going to get addicted to Slashdot achievements!

      --
      Posting with out proof reading since 2001.
    43. Re:Pandora's blog has been opened by seringen · · Score: 1

      might as well post in a really inane discussion then

    44. Re:Pandora's blog has been opened by Xgamer4 · · Score: 1

      Sounds about right.

    45. Re:Pandora's blog has been opened by teknognome · · Score: 1

      Woo, achievement!

    46. Re:Pandora's blog has been opened by PJ1216 · · Score: 1

      wow. just wow.

    47. Re:Pandora's blog has been opened by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Actually, I don't see anyone with the "The Fool" achievement. I'm thinking they might plan on retroactively giving it out when the story is archived...

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    48. Re:Pandora's blog has been opened by Yosho · · Score: 1

      Sure, why not.

      --
      Karma: Terrifying (mostly affected by atrocities you've committed)
    49. Re:Pandora's blog has been opened by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      My achievement whoring didn't get me the achievement :(

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    50. Re:Pandora's blog has been opened by vigour · · Score: 1

      Your post advocates a

      (X) moronic ( ) Totalitarian (X) consumer-driven (X) Charles Brosonish ( ) Governmental

      approach to humor. Your "OMGPonies!" will not work. Here is why it won't work. (One or more of the following may apply to your particular post, and it may have other flaws which used to vary from state to state before a bad federal law was passed.)

      (X) Your post was simply unfunny. (X) Mailing lists and other legitimate websites would not bother stealing it from you (X) Monkeys simply can't aim that well. ( ) It is defenseless against brute force attacks (X) Slashdot will attempt to use this as an unfunny meme (X) Users of email will not put up with it (X) Linus Torvalds did not even chuckle (X) The police will tour again (X) Requires the attention span of a gnat (X) Requires immediate total cooperation of God in Heaven (X) The meme is tired and worn out and I'm just as likely to get a -1 troll as a +5 funny.

      Specifically, your plan fails to account for

      (X) Asshats (X) Asshats (X) Asshats (X) Asshats (X) Asshats (X) Technically illiterate politicians (X) Extreme stupidity on the part of people in general (X) Outlook (X) Asshats

      and the following philosophical objections may also apply:

      (X) Ideas similar to yours are easy to come up with, yet none have ever been shown funny (X) We should be able to talk about Viagra without being censored ( ) Incompatibility with open source or open source licenses (X) unfunny jokes do nothing to solve the problem (X) Temporary/one-line jokes are cumbersome ( ) I don't want the government thinking your lame (X) Killing them that way is not slow and painful enough

      Furthermore, this is what I think about you:

      (X) Sorry dude, but that is simply unfunny. (X) Once you go OMGPonies! you can never go back. (X) This is a stupid idea, and you're a stupid person for suggesting it. (X) Nice try, assh0le! I'm going to find out where you live and burn your house down! (X) What you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone on this site is now dumber for having read it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.

      That's a response worthy of Robert A. Heinlein, as was mentioned here a while ago.

  6. This is how all news should be by notarockstar1979 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There is no good reason for tons and tons of information in news articles. This boils everything down to the essentials and puts it into a format that everyone can understand. Good for you The Guardian! /joke

    1. Re:This is how all news should be by kae77 · · Score: 1

      Doesn't that work for Bill O'Reilly?

    2. Re:This is how all news should be by hansamurai · · Score: 1

      This is almost pretty much true, but basically equates to the summaries at Slashdot. A couple hundred characters, with a link that probably 10% of the commentators actually follow.

  7. Hahaha by Calabacin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This post seems legit ;-)

    --
    How much wood would a woodchopper chop if a woodchopper would chop wood?
    1. Re:Hahaha by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 1

      It's actually pretty plausible. Here in Seattle one of our largest and oldest newspapers, the Seattle Post Intelligencer, just ended its print operation and is scaling back to be an exclusively digital operation.

      But then it got into the twitter bit and I realized it was an april fools joke.

  8. Sweet by Em+Emalb · · Score: 5, Funny

    Since I have the attention span of woah, Britney Spears just ate an entire bowl of rusty nails on live TV.

    What was I saying? Oh, right. As I was saying, if cars continue to run on haha, nice bewbs! then we'll definitely need to see improvement in the White House.

    --
    Sent from your iPad.
  9. ZOMG!!11!11!! by JCSoRocks · · Score: 1

    It's about time these lazy journalists got with the times.

    --
    You are using English. Please learn the difference between loose and lose; they're, there, and their; your and you're.
    1. Re:ZOMG!!11!11!! by Kentaree · · Score: 1

      Of course, moving to a form of media which encourages short posts is a really good way to get rid of lazy journalists...

    2. Re:ZOMG!!11!11!! by itschy · · Score: 1

      It's about time these lazy journalists got with the times.

      So the Times already twitters, do they?

  10. Arrg twitter this twitter that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Twitter: Micro Blogging Service
    Tweet: To send a message on twitter.
    Twat: Any journalist that reports on/about twitter.

    1. Re:Arrg twitter this twitter that. by rokel · · Score: 1

      Seriously if I hear one more reporter on NPR talk about Second Life and Twitter I.... I may be forced to give in and assimilate. :(

    2. Re:Arrg twitter this twitter that. by MightyDrunken · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I thought to twitter was to talk incessantly about inane crap.
      Oh wait!

    3. Re:Arrg twitter this twitter that. by slyn · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The maker of Twitter must be laughing hysterically now as he swims in vast seas of money and shits 17 carat gold logs, thinking back to that fateful day where he first came upon the idea for his website...

      Twitter Guy: EUREKA!1
      Some Guy: What?
      TG: I just got a great idea for a website, users upload what they are doing or thinking at any given moment in time for the whole world to see!
      SG: Isn't that just what a facebook status is?
      TG: Hmmmm, we can limit the number of characters people use to only 140, concise and it will keep the server load down so we always have a good uptime!
      SG: Why 140?
      TG: Because its (12 x 12) - 4
      SG: Oooooookay? How do you plan on making money?
      TG: Its just a great idea so venture capitalists will just throw money at our potential.
      SG: .... you sound like a twit.
      TG: BRILLIANT, WE CAN CALL IT TWITTER!1!11

    4. Re:Arrg twitter this twitter that. by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      Twitter: Micro Blogging Service Tweet: To send a message on twitter. Twat: Any journalist that reports on/about twitter.

      You missed one:
      Twit: Someone who uses Twitter

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    5. Re:Arrg twitter this twitter that. by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 1

      No, that's also a twat.

      --
      "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
  11. R U Sure ? by elcorvax · · Score: 5, Funny

    And are they going to post the news in the Lolcat language ??

    1. Re:R U Sure ? by CaptainBruce · · Score: 2, Funny

      Just the commentary.

    2. Re:R U Sure ? by Em+Emalb · · Score: 1

      Hmmm, I am intrigued by your ideas and would like to expand upon them:

      Obama wins US election: I can has wyte howse?

      US declares war on Afghanistan: I'm in ur base, killin ur dewds.

      Supreme Court rules on Roe vs Wade: I can has aborshun?

      --
      Sent from your iPad.
    3. Re:R U Sure ? by jd · · Score: 1

      There are now English-to-Lolcat automatic translators. I am considering producing a Lolcat 'translation' for Ubuntu, but teh goggie keeps eeting it.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  12. google news by themacks · · Score: 2, Funny

    let's just hope this doesn't mean google will start aggregating tweets

    --
    i read about it in a blog once
  13. It's the right thing to do by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

    and it solves GMG's dispute with Google News

  14. Maybe Now by Chlorine+Trifluoride · · Score: 1

    People will actually pay attention to the news.

  15. tinyurl link works, is serious :( by adavies42 · · Score: 1, Funny

    the good news is tinyurl.com/b5x6e is real. the bad news is it goes to the wikipedia article on WWII--come on guys, how hard would it be to slip a rickroll in there?

    --
    Media that can be recorded and distributed can be recorded and distributed.
    -kfg
  16. muppet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    anyone that thinks this isn't an april foolds day prank

  17. Better idea... by rotide · · Score: 1
    Instead of publishing via "Tweets", publish on Teats!

    I would definitely subscribe. For the articles of course.

    1. Re:Better idea... by Wolvenhaven · · Score: 1

      You might want to specify which species, or we could end up with cat, dog, and cow stories.

      --
      Orwell was an optimist.
    2. Re:Better idea... by Qzukk · · Score: 1

      publish on Teats!

      I think that idea has already been patented by goldenpalace.com

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    3. Re:Better idea... by SpacePirate20X6 · · Score: 1

      publish on Teats!

      I think that idea has already been patented by goldenpalace.com

      Not the braille edition...

  18. Some day.. by Warlord88 · · Score: 1

    If you will it Guardian, it is no dream.

  19. Nice try... by ratinox · · Score: 1

    ...but no cigar. I might have bought it if the story had been about The Sun, or The Dail Wail, though.

    1. Re:Nice try... by milas · · Score: 2, Informative

      I might have bought it if the story had been about The Sun, or The Dail Wail, though.

      Yeah, but those papers aren't actually clever.

    2. Re:Nice try... by ratinox · · Score: 1

      I meant, of course, the Daily Wail. Stupid fingers.

    3. Re:Nice try... by ratinox · · Score: 1

      Indeed, but they are likely to jump on any passing bandwagon. Besides, it would probably improve the quality of their journalism...

    4. Re:Nice try... by reverseengineer · · Score: 1
      That was actually my favorite line of the story:

      Most now offer Twitter feeds of major breaking news headlines, while the Daily Mail recently pioneered an iPhone application providing users with a one-click facility for reporting suspicious behaviour by migrants or gays.

      Utterly believable.

      --
      "FDA staff reviewers expressed concern about the number of patients who were left out of the study because they died."
    5. Re:Nice try... by robthebloke · · Score: 2, Funny

      Can't wait for the page3 tweet.... (.Y.)

  20. Poor April Fools Day by Azaril · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You'd think that after the story yesterday, they would come up with something a little less obvious. The whole premise of the fools joke is to get people to believe it, at least temporarily. How can a paper, who only 24 hours before complained about the lack of funding on the internet, possibly goto an internet only distribution system? I might be getting old, but in my eyes, no april fools joke will ever match up to the seminal BBC prank. Now to stop those damn kids skateboarding on the sidewalk...

    1. Re:Poor April Fools Day by Iyonesco · · Score: 1

      No the whole premise of April Fools' Day is to waste my time. Why the hell am I spending today reading stories that aren't true?! The whole thing is completely moronic and anyone who engages in the practice should be shot. It's the very definition of "not clever and not funny".

    2. Re:Poor April Fools Day by chdig · · Score: 1

      The only time that should have been wasted was reading the title: "The Guardian Shifts To Twitter After 188 Years of Ink".

      That you clicked on the article and read a bunch of posts about a dead-obvious april fools joke was time that you wasted all by yourself. No need to blame anyone else for it.

      --
      And if you didn't get that it was a joke, then maybe you should go shoot yourself.

  21. Sigh ... by krou · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ... whatever happened to believable April Fools stories? It was a lot more fun when you could really get fooled instead of just being able to discount a story within the first line. (Kids, get off my lawn, too!)

    --
    'If Christ had tweeted the sermon on the mount, it might have lasted until nightfall.' - John Perry Barlow
    1. Re:Sigh ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, because it was *soooooo* believable the year that /. went into "OMG Ponies!" mode.

      They don't all have to be believable, as long as they are funny.

    2. Re:Sigh ... by A.+B3ttik · · Score: 1

      There's at least two stories on the FrontPage of Slashdot that I _still_ can't tell if they're real or not.

    3. Re:Sigh ... by antdude · · Score: 1

      /. should post both real and fake stories like that worm story. :)

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    4. Re:Sigh ... by fermion · · Score: 1
      Sometimes a joke is just situation comedy. The fact that the Guardian is an old paper. The fact that it is respected. The fact that it is so unbelievable. That is why it is funny.

      Now, if the paper had been the Sun, it would not have been so funny, for any number of reasons. If it had been the WSJ, it would have so believable that it would spread and caused all sort of chaos like affecting stock prices.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
  22. Not April Fools. The End of the World. by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

    So shall it be at the end of the world: the angels shall come forth, and sever the wicked from among the just, And shall cast them into the furnace of fire: there shall be wailing and gnashing of teeth (Matthew 13:49-50).

    /me Looks at "jokes" posted for April Fools

    I think we're in hell.

    *weeps*

    1. Re:Not April Fools. The End of the World. by robthebloke · · Score: 4, Informative

      In other news, the release date for Duke Nukem Forever has been announced....

    2. Re:Not April Fools. The End of the World. by eln · · Score: 4, Funny

      You know, I remember when April Fools jokes about DNF's release date were fresh and new.

      When even april fools day jokes about your release date become stale, that might be a hint you've waited just a tad too long to release your product.

  23. This has made today's jokes worthwhile by ptbarnett · · Score: 1
    A mammoth project is also under way to rewrite the whole of the newspaper's archive, stretching back to 1821, in the form of tweets. Major stories already completed include "1832 Reform Act gives voting rights to one in five adult males yay!!!"; "OMG Hitler invades Poland, allies declare war see tinyurl.com/b5x6e for more"; and "JFK assassin8d @ Dallas, def. heard second gunshot from grassy knoll WTF?"

    I have to give kudos to the Guardian... it's going to be hard to top this one.

    1. Re:This has made today's jokes worthwhile by squiggly12 · · Score: 0

      I totally agree, that was the only part I really enjoyed. :)

    2. Re:This has made today's jokes worthwhile by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      This April Fool's is nothing compared to the Grauniad's 1977 April fool. In 1977, they published a 7 page supplement (7 full-size pages, not tabloid size) and the island of San Seriffe. It was hilarious and full of jokes, puns, etc. and must have taken significant effort to write and convince the management to publish it.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    3. Re:This has made today's jokes worthwhile by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      "A mammoth project is also under way to rewrite the whole of the newspaper's archive, stretching back to 1821"

      This would go a lot easier with an enhancement to Apache's mod-rewrite. Or maybe Google's new app, 'NewsReWriter'.

      So let's get on that, eh?

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  24. Oblig... by ausekilis · · Score: 0

    new headline:

    OH HAI! I UPGRADED UR GARDIEN KTHXBYE

    (that's right... mod me down... care--)

  25. Twitter is pervasive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  26. Ha......ha, ha.....ha...another lame April Fools by Ynsats · · Score: 0

    Is anyone else tired of these stupid jokes?

    Kia released one yesterday with a half assed photoshop of a new Soul with "wind catchers" for the Soul "Wind powered hybrid".

  27. OMG Tweets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I got the fail whale while trying to RTFA..or should that be RTFT? @the_guardian: This is so OMGWTFBBQPONIES! crap. fail whale again!

  28. dailywtf.com did it better. by jholder · · Score: 1

    But nice try anyway.

    --
    -- John
  29. Should fix the headline to... by Phizzle · · Score: 1

    The Guardian is about to twat!

    --
    I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.
  30. "waffle and bluster" NO by Pope · · Score: 1

    Give me waffles and maple syrup any day of the week (side of bacon, please), bluster just doesn't have that same yummy taste.

    --
    It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
  31. already follow it by dominux · · Score: 1

    The guardian reporters have been out in force today twittering about the G20 riots - they probably outnumbered the protesters. The technology section twitters here: http://www.twitter.com/guardiantech or it does when the fail whale isn't showing.

  32. Twitter is over capacity. by 0x537461746943 · · Score: 1

    Twitter is over capacity. Too many tweets! Please wait a moment and try again.

    Good luck with that.

  33. In the same spirit... by bluenirve · · Score: 1

    1849: "OMG gold @ cali. we're leaving in 10." Oct 8, 1871: "Flamers in chicago http://bit.ly/SaAdB" Dec 7, 1941: "omg.. azn invasion!" Sept 11, 2001: "2planes1catastrophe" March 31, 2009: "any suggestions for hilarious april fools pranks? DM us!"

  34. Looking forward to by drunkenoafoffofb3ta · · Score: 1

    Rants by George Monbiot over Guardian Twitter then! : )

  35. http://aprilfoolsdayontheweb.com/2009.html by Picass0 · · Score: 1

    Instead of posting every single April Fool's prank separately

  36. Re:Ha......ha, ha.....ha...another lame April Fool by wikki · · Score: 1

    It may be a lame april fools joke, but in the long term I wouldn't be surprised if stuff like this starts to happen. There are already a lot of news organizations that put out updates via Twitter. 140 characters a little hard to fit an entire news story in, but people are giving less and less attention to the news these days anyway.

  37. if it wasn't 1st april this would be a shame. by oliverthered · · Score: 1

    It would be quite a big step for a newspaper like the guardian that prides it's self on contect to reduce all it's stories down to something that would be worthy of the sun.

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
  38. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  39. I know it's a joke... by mdm-adph · · Score: 1

    But this made me think back to the Times' "headlines" that Winston had to create in short Newspeak blurbs in 1984.

    --
    It is by my will alone my thoughts acquire motion; it is by the juice of the coffee bean that the thoughts acquire speed
  40. Why this is preposterous!! by MaxwellEdison · · Score: 1

    Now if you'll excuse me...

    OMGPONIES

    --
    -=Bang Bang=-
  41. April Fools? by ericrost · · Score: 1

    Just trying to get the stupid achievement if its real.

    1. Re:April Fools? by Azmiik · · Score: 1

      What is real. The achievement or this post. You must take the Blue pill to find the answers.

    2. Re:April Fools? by Takichi · · Score: 1

      ditto

  42. This isn't what I heard by Hasney · · Score: 1

    I heard the whole company was moving to post only on 4chan and every story would have some releveance to a power rating or other.

  43. And.... by MarkGriz · · Score: 1

    ...nothing of value was lost.

    --
    Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
  44. MountainX.com becomes nation's first twaper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mountain Xpress, an Asheville NC based paper, has also announced a shift to twitter based reporting. Check it out and read their "Twitter manifesto" at www.mountainx.com

  45. Not necessarily a bad idea by orthancstone · · Score: 1

    A teacher of mine once said the substance of a news story should be clear by the end of the first paragraph. The april fools' joke aside, this could be a useful way to get reporters back on track with story reporting.

  46. TweetTorrent distribution by khendron · · Score: 1

    I see a new mode of distribution for newspapers.

    Just break up all the articles in the 140 character tweets. Then all readers with a TweetTorrent client would be able to gather them together (and share them of course) and read the entire newspaper.

    --
    Life is like a web application. Sometime you need cookies just to get by.
  47. Brevity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is double plus good.

    Or rather:

    Brevity: ++ OK.

  48. impossible by speedtux · · Score: 1

    Guardian journalists simply are incapable of condensing their pompous bloviations down to 140 characters.

  49. Mod parent up dammit ! by clang_jangle · · Score: 1

    Really wish I had mod points for you; that was the hardest I've laughed all week. On a day when too many people are trying too hard to be funny, you hit the spot. :)

    --
    Caveat Utilitor
  50. The Island of San Serriffe by Epeeist · · Score: 1

    Nowhere near as good as this one - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/San_Serriffe

    Travel agents were besieged after the article appeared.

  51. STOP IT! JUST STOP IT!! by kaizendojo · · Score: 0, Troll

    Give up on these lame frigging April Fools posts. Not one of them has been funny or even mildly entertaining. If you want humor, post some actual news stories and let the /. denizens have at it.

    The comments are ALWAYS funnier than this crap.

  52. "Playboy" on twitter, as well . . . by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

    It shouldn't make a difference for the most of us anyway, who claim we "only read the articles."

    ASCII art porn, indeed.

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  53. Tags are ruining everything! by Bob+The+Cowboy · · Score: 1

    Tags break April Fools gags :o(

    1. Re:Tags are ruining everything! by Clandestine_Blaze · · Score: 1

      I would also add that the obvious subjects are ruining the April Fools gags, and unfortunately, even if Slashdot were to post a real-looking April Fools gag, nobody would buy it.

      I still enjoy searching around websites to see what April Fools gags are being posted; it used to be like looking for easter eggs.

  54. regarding craigslist use of telepathy by cnewmark · · Score: 1

    no comment

  55. Seemingly obvious, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A guy in my office fell for this this morning.

  56. Fox News by brkello · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think this would be a better format for Fox News. I mean really, 140 characters is more than enough for them. "Liberals!" "Socialism!" "Baby killers!" "Obama's recession!" "Tax and Spend!" "Destruction of marriage!" "Easy on terrorists!"

    Heck, I think that pretty much sums up all of Fox News right now. I guess they can just shut down and open up the air ways for some real journalism. How about a 24/7 Daily Show channel?

    --
    Support a great indie game: http://www.abaddon360.com
  57. Help me by Jamamala · · Score: 1

    I'm trapped in an alternate universe where this is real.



    Oh wait, I picked up The Sun.

    1. Re:Help me by Andr+T. · · Score: 1

      Ask CADIE for help.

      --

      Any life is made up of a single moment, the moment in which a man finds out, once and for all, who he is.

    2. Re:Help me by clintonmonk · · Score: 1

      That could be a dangerous thing to do. She would probably just recommend a place to visit.

  58. Perfect /. policy too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot needs to implement a 140 character limit on comments. It's very annoying to read these comments that drone on after a nice informat

  59. Crap by Lifyre · · Score: 1

    I looked at the headline, thought well that sucks. Then I wondered where the years of dragging it out, crying for help, and withering away in painful destructive lawsuits against the internet, google, and yahoo for undermining their business model went.

    --
    I'll meet you at the intersection of "Should be" and "Reality"
  60. !news by icannotthinkofaname · · Score: 1

    This isn't News. This is Olds. Twitter's popularity is spiking. This was only inevitable.

    (Also, searching for April Fool's story. >_>)

    --
    Let q be a radix > 1. I am in ur base-q, killing 10 d00ds.
  61. 140 Character Limit by JimR · · Score: 1

    140 characters shouldn't be too much of a problem to get the nuances of an important news item across.

    If they need more they can always use tweetdoubler.

    --
    #exclude <ms/windows.h>
  62. MLK quote could have been funnier by Mr_Magick · · Score: 1

    Just transform the quote into 3l33t speak... "Iz pwnzor ppl dat hatez. n00bs a11 same." or something similar. (I'm just found out I'm very bad at haxzor txt)

  63. I find twitter to be too wordy by hedwards · · Score: 1

    We need a site that caters to the ultra short messages of light.

    2009/4/1 12:00 pm: Dude ;-)
    2009/4/1 11:23 am: Dude
    2009/4/1 11:04 am: D-Ude

    See, now isn't that a whole lot of self indulgent crap we don't have to ignore?

  64. TLDR by ritcereal · · Score: 1

    TLDR

  65. Umm... by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

    wouldn't that make us all underachievers?

  66. Positively Uncivilized! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now how am I going to get the butler to press it nicely before I read it?

  67. The twitter fad needs to die by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

    I'm not surprised there is an April Fools topic related to Twitter. I think people like twitter because the small text limit gives you an excuse for writing like a spacker.

  68. Don't Laugh... by CrazyTalk · · Score: 1

    It happened to the Seattle P-I for real this year - over 100 years of ink, forced to stop the presses and go to web only.

  69. It's just competition by Jade+E.+2 · · Score: 1

    They're trying to steal readers by catering to the attention span of The Sun's traditional audience, obviously.