Slashdot Mirror


New Flu Strain Appears In the US and Mexico

Combat Wombat writes with this excerpt from Reuters: "A strain of flu never seen before has killed up to 60 people in Mexico and also appeared in the United States, where eight people were infected but recovered, health officials said on Friday. Mexico's government said at least 20 people have died of the flu and it may also be responsible for 40 other deaths. [The government] shut down schools and canceled major public events in Mexico City to try to prevent more deaths in the sprawling, overcrowded capital. ... Close analysis showed the disease is a mixture of swine, human and avian viruses, according to the CDC. Humans can occasionally catch swine flu from pigs but rarely have they been known to pass it on to other people. Mexico reported 1,004 suspected cases of the new virus, including four possible cases in Mexicali on the border with California.

315 comments

  1. Delayed by chaynlynk · · Score: 5, Funny

    Wow, with news at this pace, we would find out about the end of the world a week after!

    1. Re:Delayed by CarpetShark · · Score: 1

      Well, up until now, it was "only" foreigners dying.

    2. Re:Delayed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      CDC has a twitter feed for latest confirmed info:

      http://twitter.com/CDCemergency

    3. Re:Delayed by Ex-MislTech · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Well as weird as it seems some doctors in Mexico are claiming
      they are under reporting the death toll to prevent panic.

      http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/talking_point/8018428.stm

      They are saying over 200 at this point, and if that is true
      that would put this more on par with the 1918 pandemic.

      Let's hope it is not true...

      --
      google "32 trillion offshore needs IRS attention"
    4. Re:Delayed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      - There is 5 niggers in a Cadilac. They drive off the Grand Cannon. What is sad about this story?
      - A Cadilac seats 6 niggers.

  2. hands... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But will a giant stupid hand appear at the end and totally fuck up what could have been a pretty good disaster/post-apocalypic plague movie despite the involvement of Stephen King, by suddenly and quite unnecessarily dragging in banal mysticism/religion?

    1. Re:hands... by siliconincdotnet · · Score: 1

      The Stand always had the whole mysticism thing going on with Flagg and Mother Abby.

      The only thing that was dragged in was King's typical shitty ending. I'm just hoping he doesn't do the same to the Gunslinger seri... oh wait a minute. He did. =(

      --
      Insert witty .sig here
    2. Re:hands... by phantomfive · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have to disagree there, the Gunslinger ending was right.....what did you expect, Roland to enter the tower and find some mystical Nirvana? I don't see how it could have been much better, if he'd given up finding the tower it would have been worse, if he'd gone in but not shown what happened inside it would have been worse. What exactly could he find inside the tower that would have given him fulfillment? Absolutely nothing. He was chasing a false dream, and he will continue to chase it until he learns to chase something real instead. That's how life works: if you chase illusions, you're never going to catch them.

      --
      Qxe4
    3. Re:hands... by rhyder128k · · Score: 1

      At least the TV adaptation could be split into "good tape"/"crap tape" on VHS.

      --
      Michael Reed, freelance tech writer.
    4. Re:hands... by siliconincdotnet · · Score: 1

      It's not so much the "contents" of the tower I disagreed with, it's the whole Mordred/Flagg/Eddie/Oy/etc etc thing. Of course they were going to die in the end, but I think he could have paid much more attention to such well established characters and sent them to the clearing at the end of their path in a more fitting manner.

      --
      Insert witty .sig here
    5. Re:hands... by phantomfive · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Stephen King has a thing for letting people die in ways he considers natural. He also likes to mess with his reader's emotions, and bother them a bit, like when Eddie died, it went from happy hugging family, to dead man. Total emotion switch there. In the book it even had a picture of them all hugging. And it was something that could in fact have happened, so you can't escape from the uncomfortable nature of it by saying, "oh, that wouldn't happen." It's an uncomfortable reality that you need to deal with. King likes uncomfortable realities.

      On the other hand, I'm kind of interested in your ideas. How would you have ended it differently?

      --
      Qxe4
    6. Re:hands... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nothing more natural than a giant glowy hand detonating a nuclear device!

    7. Re:hands... by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

      I've never read the Tower series though I am familiar with it. I'd planned on holding off until he finished the damn thing and then I heard it was a disappointment. I know King likes to write without an outline and this can be both exhilarating and frustrating. The Stand was an amazing book but the ending was a total deus ex cloaca.

      I've found that pattern in his books over the years, they're fun journeys but disappointing endings.

      The fan reaction to Galactica seems to be very similar to the fan reaction to the Dark Tower -- some people think the ending was perfect but many more are screaming about how it made no sense and didn't hold up. I think this is understandable because King and the BSG writers worked the same way; no outlines, just going where the muse took 'em on a given day. I know there were retcons in both the Tower and BSG that had people wanting to throw things against the wall.

      So, what' your take?

      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    8. Re:hands... by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      I liked it, and enjoyed the ending. When I read, I try to see it from the author's point of view. If you are trying to impose your own view of what should happen onto a story, you will not enjoy it. I suspect people who didn't like the ending either didn't understand it or had a preconceived notion of how a story should end. That is my take.

      --
      Qxe4
    9. Re:hands... by siliconincdotnet · · Score: 1

      How would I have ended it differently... an excellent question, and one I hadn't put too much thought into other than, "Oh god not like this."

      Ok, ask and I'll try to deliver. Well, not really, I just took an Ambien and started on a glass of wine. This may be terrible, but hopefully it won't be any worse than King's ending.

      Roland and company are resting up near the tower, preparing for tomorrow morning: their long final walk into the unknown. Roland awakes before the others, and decides either one of two things: "If they follow me, they will die - so I will go on alone without them." Not a very Roland-like thought, so "They'll be in my way. This is MY quest, and I'll finish it on my own." The party is unaware of Flagg and Mordreds location and status.

      Regardless of reason "why", Roland abandons his party and proceeds on alone. When morning comes, the party discovers he's gone and decides to chase after him. They leave, and soon Mordred and his new pet, a very confused/lobotomized Flagg, catch up.

      Now what to do with our characters... We can play some deus ex machina and have an older Jacky Sawyer (and maybe a few wolves) show up and brutally dispose of Flagg and Mordred, and "save" the others, perhaps scattering them across the territories as sorta "knight errants" (keeping Jake and Oy together of course). Or, we can just kill them. No Jacky Sawyer crossover, but at least they get to die with their boots on. Not a little death either, a big long "this fight gets it's own chapter" type of battle. Alternatively, since our villains and heroes are all still more or less intact, spin off a separate book about just them and whatever their disposition turns out to be. If we let them die, they need to die honorable and valiant deaths.

      Now we have Roland marching on to his tower, minus his horn.He gains entry and slaughters (not erases) the Crimson King in some fashion, with some great Client Eastwood style one-liners. He looks around, and his horn is there on a pedestal. He proceeds to the balcony, blows it, and cries out the names of all of those he left behind. Now, he marches on up to the top. At every room he learns some new truth, and usually a terrible one that he would rather not know. And when he reaches the pinnacle?

      The man in black fled across the desert, and the gunslinger followed.

      --
      Insert witty .sig here
    10. Re:hands... by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      After reading this, I am seeing how it could be a perfectly good ending, and I'm wondering why King didn't make the ending this way. I'm sure he could have if he'd wanted to, so I will assume he chose not to. Why exactly did he make that choice?

      Why did he choose to erase the crimson king instead of a violent exciting battle, which Roland had done at least twice before in other books? Maybe Roland wasn't strong enough to defeat such a powerful character alone? Maybe the fight like that highlighted some aspect of the character of the Crimson King that wouldn't have been shown otherwise. These are my thoughts.

      --
      Qxe4
  3. Obligatory by oskard · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I, for one, welcome our new microbial pigfluenza overlords!

    --
    Sigs are for Terrorists.
    1. Re:Obligatory by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 1

      You forgot the avian element, they would be "flying pigfluenza overlords".

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
    2. Re:Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If only it was a swine-arachnid hybrid. doh!

    3. Re:Obligatory by scotsghost · · Score: 1
    4. Re:Obligatory by unitron · · Score: 2, Funny

      So basically this strain is one that was only expected to emerge "when pigs fly"?

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  4. Flu in Queens by Chink+Admin · · Score: 5, Informative

    The flu has (very likely) already hit Queens, NY. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/25/nyregion/25sick.html?_r=1&hp

  5. For those who want to save time: by gcnaddict · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The reason why this strain is so bad is because it's transmissible from person to person with ease.

    On the plus side, it's not resistant to Tamiflu... yet. Given that strains of Tamiflu-resistant human flu are turning up, I wouldn't be surprised to see this one learn to dodge bullets as well.

    That's why this strain is seen as a potential pandemic.

    --
    Viable Slashdot alternatives: https://pipedot.org/ and http://soylentnews.org/
    1. Re:For those who want to save time: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      learn to dodge bullets as well.

      Zerg.

    2. Re:For those who want to save time: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      [...] I wouldn't be surprised to see this one learn to dodge bullets as well.

      I'm afraid that once it has evolved this far, it won't have to.

    3. Re:For those who want to save time: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The reason why this strain is so bad is because it's transmissible from person to person with ease.

      That's not what the article says. It looks like it might be able to transmit person to person, which is unusual for swine flu, but there's no evidence it's easy.

    4. Re:For those who want to save time: by Requiem18th · · Score: 1

      danmaku da!

      --
      But... the future refused to change.
    5. Re:For those who want to save time: by apostrophesemicolon · · Score: 1

      I'm afraid that once it has evolved this far, it won't have to.

      is it The One, then?

    6. Re:For those who want to save time: by camperslo · · Score: 1

      That's not what the article says. It looks like it might be able to transmit person to person, which is unusual for swine flu, but there's no evidence it's easy.

      The eight new cases in New York were students that had been on a trip to Mexico.
      Odds are good that they were just out and about seeing sights and around people.
      It's not like the case with a family member, partner or care-giver spending considerable time in close proximity to someone that's ill.

      Channel-flipping a bit ago I noticed Telemundo network running a soccer game. Usually the stadiums are packed for these, so it was a bit shocking to a just-for-tv (the seats empty).
      Considering the economic effects of shut-down events and lost tourism, things must have looked very bad for the Mexican government to take the actions we've seen.

  6. This is really big news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Influenza has killed more people than all fatalities combined from every war.

    1. Re:This is really big news... by mbessey · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The Influenza of 1918 Killed two to three times as many people as died in World War I, in just two years. Tens of millions of people died in 2 years.

      http://virus.stanford.edu/uda/

    2. Re:This is really big news... by niktemadur · · Score: 1

      The Influenza of 1918 Killed two to three times as many people as died in World War I, in just two years. Tens of millions of people died in 2 years.

      Yup, the Spanish Influenza is the epic mind-blower that nobody talks about, like it's been wiped from the collective memory bank, somebody should mod up both posts above this one.
      Cue the obligatory geek joke here, a real groaner: Nobody expects the Spanish Influenza!

      --
      Lil' Thindime, lilting a lacrimose lament, krashes the kwaint konfines of Kokonino Kounty
    3. Re:This is really big news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess there is not so much to reminisce about wrt to the Spanish Flu. "Ahhh, it was back in the day, in 1918, any many died. The end."

  7. Brought to you by the good people at Fort Detrick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They want to kill you.

  8. Good luck with quarantines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    This shit had to start in a country where people regard barriers, walls and borers as funny suggestions.

    1. Re:Good luck with quarantines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      You mean the US?

      The first few known cases originated in the US.

    2. Re:Good luck with quarantines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess he meant the US... Mexico may ignore one barrier, but the US ignore them all

    3. Re:Good luck with quarantines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The U.S. and Mexico ARE the same country. At least 10% of the people born in Mexico live in the United States. A sizable portion of Mexico's GDP comes from the States.

      But influenza doesn't kill nearly as many people per year as the news media would have you believe. The CDC lumps flu and pneumonia together in their stats.

    4. Re:Good luck with quarantines by networkzombie · · Score: 1

      Originated in the US? It is well documented that the first few known cases were from Vera Cruz Mexico. http://www.grist.org/article/2009-04-25-swine-flu-smithfield/ http://www.mydd.com/story/ http://www.google.com/search?q=swine+flu+veracruz&afid=5052&s=&search=. Although the pig farm it may have originated on is owned by a U.S. company and is reported to have deplorable conditions.

  9. Cancel Air Flight; Limit Damage to the Americas by wintermute1974 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Before this spreads unnecessarily, this would be an ideal time to limit air flight in and out of the Americas.

    We as a species are putting everyone at risk by allowing unlimited, unrestricted, near-instantaneous travel from point to point on the globe.

    Shipping cargo can continue of course; if the crew get sick en route, they can always be quarantined off the coast of wherever they arrive.

    1. Re:Cancel Air Flight; Limit Damage to the Americas by siliconincdotnet · · Score: 5, Funny

      Goddamnit, Madagascar has already shut it's borders.

      --
      Insert witty .sig here
    2. Re:Cancel Air Flight; Limit Damage to the Americas by MagikSlinger · · Score: 1

      Most flus are carried around the globe by migrating birds, especially in the days before international trade and travel.

      --
      The bitter lessons of a veteran coder: http://bitterprogrammer.blogspot.com
    3. Re:Cancel Air Flight; Limit Damage to the Americas by Kagura · · Score: 1, Informative

      Hah. That made me laugh. ;)

    4. Re:Cancel Air Flight; Limit Damage to the Americas by gringofrijolero · · Score: 2, Interesting

      On the long run it makes us more resistant to disease. That used to be a good thing.

      --
      Todos mis movimientos están friamente calculados
    5. Re:Cancel Air Flight; Limit Damage to the Americas by wintermute1974 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      On [sic] the long run it makes us more resistant to disease.

      Yes, on the species level we will all benefit. Unfortunately for you, depending on your particular genome and how it's currently being expressed, you might be personally in for a little bit of trouble, which is why some people prefer to worry (or panic).

    6. Re:Cancel Air Flight; Limit Damage to the Americas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      if you see any flying pigs then you know we're in trouble.

    7. Re:Cancel Air Flight; Limit Damage to the Americas by Toonol · · Score: 1

      Temporarily putting people at risk; in the long run, it's building a more resistant species.

    8. Re:Cancel Air Flight; Limit Damage to the Americas by pete-classic · · Score: 1

      I find your post quite chilling.

      Before this spreads unnecessarily, this would be an ideal time to limit air flight in and out of the Americas.

      How would you feel about re-phrasing this in the active voice? Who should limit air flight?

      We as a species are putting everyone at risk by allowing unlimited, unrestricted, near-instantaneous travel from point to point on the globe.

      Allowing? I was born a free man. I require, and ask for, no one's sufferance to travel as I please.

      A nation may refuse me admittance, but I need no further permission to go where I'd like. As a citizen of Colorado I have the right to travel freely in all of the United States with no permission, whatever.

      Quite chilling.

      -Peter

    9. Re:Cancel Air Flight; Limit Damage to the Americas by religious+freak · · Score: 1

      goodluckwiththat. No one "allows" me to travel. Countries allow me within their borders, but my right to travel is my own and is not allowed by anybody.

      --
      If you can read this... 01110101 01110010 00100000 01100001 00100000 01100111 01100101 01100101 01101011
    10. Re:Cancel Air Flight; Limit Damage to the Americas by Weedhopper · · Score: 4, Insightful

      /sigh. I was hoping to be able to stick with Mac virus jokes but....

      No.

      At this point in the epidemic cycle, that would be a premature panic reaction. Panic always and inevitably causes more harm than good.

      There's a number of factors that influence decision making to limit the spread of any disease. Variables that need to be filled in before far reaching decisions are made include the transmissability and virulence of this particular strain. In other words, things that not yet been established include the number people exposed, the number of people who were exposed who developed symptoms, the number of people who developed symptons that were severe enough to seek medical attention and the number of those who died.

      Some of those, you can make a guess at but you won't know with any reasonable degree of certainty for a while. Meanwhile, the public health system is keeping an eye out for new cases. Between the two, you continue to develop your model, which helps you determine just what the potential is.

      Now, to grossly oversimplify and at the risk of sounding a little callous here, seriously sick people will show up at the hospital, clinic, etc. There's a number of reasons that they might not, but you can bet that if a young adult gets sick of the flu and dies, someone's going to hear about it. With low awareness, this is the group that you catch, which is not okay because there are transmissive people out there wandering around infecting other people.

      The other side of that spectrum is just as bad and in the professional opinion many, can be worse. The moment that the authoritative reaction is severe, such as shutting down transportation systems, the population panics. Suddenly, you have every person with a cough and a runny nose swamping the public health system. Add to the fact that it's now SPRING and the beginning of allergy season in the southern US, and you've just made the difficult job of outbreak investigation and outbreak control much more difficult by several orders of magnitude.

      The response has to be measured in a way to balance numerous factors so NO. Cancelling ar flights at this juncture would be an example of a supremely BAD idea.

      Now, the moment you KNOW that it's spreading faster than you have the capacity to contain and control, THEN you take the drastic step of public alerts limited quarantine. Before then, it's just irresponsible.

    11. Re:Cancel Air Flight; Limit Damage to the Americas by maxume · · Score: 1

      It's probably already too late for this one. Strong public health measures and research into treatments are a more reasonable approach than any sort of meaningful flight quarantine (can you imagine 2 or 3 days on either side of every flight? Longer would probably be better...).

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    12. Re:Cancel Air Flight; Limit Damage to the Americas by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 5, Funny

      As a citizen of Colorado I have the right to travel freely in all of the United States with no permission, whatever.

      Unless the authorities institute a general quarantine. In which case your libertarian ass will be staying put.

    13. Re:Cancel Air Flight; Limit Damage to the Americas by Majik+Sheff · · Score: 3, Informative

      Beat me to it. This is a reference to the game Pandemic 2 for those who don't get it. I've been so frustrated by Madagascar that I actually name my diseases after it. Madagascan Insanity Pox is one of the few that actually made it.

      http://www.crazymonkeygames.com/fullscreen.php?game=Pandemic-2

      --
      Women are like electronics: you don't know how damaged they are until you try to turn them on.
    14. Re:Cancel Air Flight; Limit Damage to the Americas by Chyeld · · Score: 1
    15. Re:Cancel Air Flight; Limit Damage to the Americas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent "informative".

    16. Re:Cancel Air Flight; Limit Damage to the Americas by Weedhopper · · Score: 1

      This isn't true. It's very hard to predict where you are on the epidemiological curve until you're past the first hump and even then, it's a guessing.

      If we're in the beginning states, control measures can be very effective. Proving that it was the control measures that limited the spread is another matter.

    17. Re:Cancel Air Flight; Limit Damage to the Americas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      What is so informative about knowing something made someone laugh?

      Stupid mods.

    18. Re:Cancel Air Flight; Limit Damage to the Americas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      if you see any flying pigs then you know we're in trouble.

      I think that is less likely to happen as airlines are making obese passengers pay for two seats.

    19. Re:Cancel Air Flight; Limit Damage to the Americas by mysidia · · Score: 1

      Your means of transportation (ability to operate a vehicle, board an airplane, train, highway access, etc), are all government regulated, and they have the full right to deny you any or all those means, for any reason they so choose.

      The government can also shutdown or block access to the means of transportation at will. I.E. Cancel flights, shut down trains. Blockade highways with armed guards. Arrest you if you are caught trespassing (walking through someone's private property, or entering government-owned property without permission) etc.

    20. Re:Cancel Air Flight; Limit Damage to the Americas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent "Interesting"

    21. Re:Cancel Air Flight; Limit Damage to the Americas by a+whoabot · · Score: 1

      Before this spreads unnecessarily, this would be an ideal time to limit air flight in and out of the Americas.

      How would you feel about re-phrasing this in the active voice? Who should limit air flight?"

      I'm no grammarian, but as far as I can tell, all three verbs in that sentence are in the active voice. I think you've just jumbled the terms: You said "active voice" when you meant "personal". Your point is well taken by me, I just thought I'd point that out. I've continued typing because it's a rainy Saturday afternoon.

      spreads = active indicative
      would be = active subjunctive
      to limit = active infinitive

      There is no (widely used at least)* passive form of "to be", but if you wanted to convert the sentence into something with passive voices as much as possible it would be:

      "Before this be spread** unnecessarily, this would be an ideal time for air flight in and out of the Americas to be limited."

      Note that what makes it passive is the fact that the verb represents an action of which the grammatical subject is the logical object -- the action is done to the grammatical subject or similar. In the active voice the grammatical subject is the logical subject -- the action is done by the grammatical subject or similar.

      * Maybe it occurs in philosophy or theology when contingent versus necessary existence is discussed.

      ** One may also say "Before this is spread..." depending on dialect. By the way, I don't like the "this" is the main clause, I would go for "that" or even just have nothing it its place. To be really rhetorically effective I would use "that" and then include another sentence after: "And that time is now." Or actually I would turn it into a general statement and let the reader draw the conclusion to the particular: "Not after, but before an epidemic spreads unnecessarily, that would be an ideal time for air flight to be limited." You would probably particularly hate that one!

    22. Re:Cancel Air Flight; Limit Damage to the Americas by pete-classic · · Score: 1

      At times like these I wish I'd gone to a Catholic high school.

      I hope the OP ignores the "passive voice" bit and answers the question that follows.

      -Peter

    23. Re:Cancel Air Flight; Limit Damage to the Americas by RightSaidFred99 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Retarded point. In the long run it makes us more resistant to _this_ disease. So say 3 million people die from it, then never die from it again. Whoohoo! What a net win for the species! Oh, wait, until the next one that's slightly different.

    24. Re:Cancel Air Flight; Limit Damage to the Americas by budgenator · · Score: 1

      Allowing? I was born a free man. I require, and ask for, no one's sufferance to travel as I please.

      A nation may refuse me admittance, but I need no further permission to go where I'd like. As a citizen of Colorado I have the right to travel freely in all of the United States with no permission, whatever.

      Both sides of the isle seem to be working on correcting that situation.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    25. Re:Cancel Air Flight; Limit Damage to the Americas by Moridin42 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Why stop there? Not that it would stop there. Maybe the politicians and airlines are better elsewhere in the world. (Actually.. Japan was quite nice all around. Little miffed to have my fingerprints taken on entry, but that was about my only complaint) But the US ones suck. They'll put on security theatre and overstep all bounds of reason and logic to put on the show. After all, any sick person is a potential threat to the rest of humanity. Let us all pass laws forcing airlines to perform in-depth health checks at the airport. Part of the security process, you know? Think of the children. Fear the germs. And all that.

      --
      I don't expect morality, equality, consistency, or justice from the law. I expect only legality.
    26. Re:Cancel Air Flight; Limit Damage to the Americas by mikael · · Score: 1
      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    27. Re:Cancel Air Flight; Limit Damage to the Americas by ultranova · · Score: 1

      No one "allows" me to travel. Countries allow me within their borders, but my right to travel is my own and is not allowed by anybody.

      If no country besides your own allows you within their borders, you aren't travelling anywhere from your country. Keep your diseased libertarian ass on your side of the border, OK?

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    28. Re:Cancel Air Flight; Limit Damage to the Americas by gringofrijolero · · Score: 1

      So say 3 million people die from it...

      Yeah, think of the money saved on blood pressure medicine...

      --
      Todos mis movimientos están friamente calculados
    29. Re:Cancel Air Flight; Limit Damage to the Americas by Collinp6 · · Score: 1

      Lets hope the other countries dont follow :).

    30. Re:Cancel Air Flight; Limit Damage to the Americas by karnal · · Score: 1

      So say 3 million people die from it, then never die from it again.

      Of course they'll never die from it again; they're already DEAD!

      --
      Karnal
    31. Re:Cancel Air Flight; Limit Damage to the Americas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent "Insightful"

    32. Re:Cancel Air Flight; Limit Damage to the Americas by DamienNightbane · · Score: 1

      Mod parent "Redundant"

    33. Re:Cancel Air Flight; Limit Damage to the Americas by pescina · · Score: 1, Funny

      if you see any flying pigs then you know we're in trouble.

      Either that or there's a new Pink Floyd tour.

    34. Re:Cancel Air Flight; Limit Damage to the Americas by TheLink · · Score: 1

      > Temporarily putting people at risk; in the long run, it's building a more resistant species.

      The thing is, it might be a nonhuman species.

      Some people might be a bit dismayed with that.

      I think even the crocodiles might shed a tear or two (BTW they have better immune systems in many ways).

      --
    35. Re:Cancel Air Flight; Limit Damage to the Americas by camperslo · · Score: 1

      Who should limit air flight?

      Should? It started some time ago. Government teams have previously established that of the bird-pig co-conspirators, suicide-attack birds have worked in teams to clog aircraft engines. Pig involvement is still under investigation.
      There are some rumors that pigs in Colorado may have been behind the creation of "Lite" beer.

    36. Re:Cancel Air Flight; Limit Damage to the Americas by rs79 · · Score: 1

      What if only the "double muscle" gene proved effective against the virus. Overnight the planet would become a race of mutant superman freaks.

      --
      Need Mercedes parts ?
  10. Made from Birds and Pigs in Mexico? by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 0, Troll

    Chorizoflu?

    --
    If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
    1. Re:Made from Birds and Pigs in Mexico? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hahahahaha... no, it seems it entered the country from Asian people arriving to California...it started in the US and for some reason spreaded more quickly here in Mexico

  11. No need to beware Man-bear-big by sause_coder · · Score: 1, Funny

    We should have been worried about Man-bird-pig! Curse you Al Gore.

    1. Re:No need to beware Man-bear-big by MikePikeFL · · Score: 1

      I'm super cereal you guys!

      --
      "Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon full of tapes hurtling down the highway" -Andrew Tanenbaum
  12. finally! by ZosX · · Score: 2, Funny

    news that will make people crap their pants!

    1. Re:finally! by arndawg · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I jizzed

  13. Artificially Created Strain of H1N1? by wintermute1974 · · Score: 5, Informative

    New Scientist Magazine also has a good introductory article about it:
    http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn17025-deadly-new-flu-virus-in-us-and-mexico-may-go-pandemic.html

    From the article:
    Flu viruses are named after the two main proteins on their surfaces, abbreviated H and N. They are also differentiated by what animal they usually infect. The H in the new virus comes from pigs, but some of its other genes come from bird and human flu viruses, a mixture that the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention calls "very unusual".
    ====

    When people start making comments like this, I can't help wondering if this was someone's science project that got out into the open instead of a strain that occurred naturally.

    1. Re:Artificially Created Strain of H1N1? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      from the CDC link:

      "So we have some gene segments that are North American swine influenza viruses. Some gene segments North American avian influenza viruses. One gene segment from a human influenza virus and two gene segments that are normally found from swine influenza viruses in Asia and in Europe."

      Got me alarmed as well.

    2. Re:Artificially Created Strain of H1N1? by pmarini · · Score: 2, Funny

      When people start making comments like this, I can't help wondering if this was someone's science project that got out into the open instead of a strain that occurred naturally.

      like in Twelve Monkeys? can we reverse the disaster à la I am a legend finale?

      --
      Can I put a spell on those who can't spell?
      Your wheels are loose and they're losing their grip, good you're there.
    3. Re:Artificially Created Strain of H1N1? by khallow · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The problem is that in the absence of more information it could go either way. Mexico City is a great place to infect, if one wants a disease to end up in the US. OTOH, this sort of mixing to my understanding occurs frequently in natural influenza. All it takes is one cell infected simultaneously by two variants of the flu. That in turn just requires one farm simultaneously infected by those two viruses. It sounds like they caught the virus early enough (and it is sufficiently non-lethal) so that they can trace where the disease originated.

    4. Re:Artificially Created Strain of H1N1? by Eudial · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, I was curious about that, too. I don't think it's intentional though. What speaks for a random event or a lab accident as opposed to some intentional act of bio-terrorism is the fact that it's survivable, and not resistant to drugs.

      --
      GAAH! MY PRINTER IS ON FIRE!!! PUT IT OUT! PUT IT OUT!
    5. Re:Artificially Created Strain of H1N1? by bhima · · Score: 4, Informative

      If it really is a weaponized strain, it's an extraordinarily poor one. I've just finished listening to "The Great Influenza: The Epic Story of the Deadliest Plague In History" by John M. Barry.

      The 1918 Influenza A strain was a subtype of avian strain H1N1, which spread & killed much faster.

      One would expect by now even the most incompetent biotechnologist with an eye towards weaponizing could at least match the 1918 strain.

      --
      Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
    6. Re:Artificially Created Strain of H1N1? by religious+freak · · Score: 1

      Could still very easily been a biohack gone wrong. However, I agree with you that this is unlikely.

      --
      If you can read this... 01110101 01110010 00100000 01100001 00100000 01100111 01100101 01100101 01101011
    7. Re:Artificially Created Strain of H1N1? by Hogwash+McFly · · Score: 2, Interesting

      When people start making comments like this, I can't help wondering if this was someone's science project that got out into the open instead of a strain that occurred naturally.

      Yeah, that or an effort from Gilead Sciences to increase sales of Tamiflu.

      --
      Mother, do you think they'll like this sig?
    8. Re:Artificially Created Strain of H1N1? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Paranoia alert! Did china develop and cause the release of this flu? Is this a terroristic attack upon the USA? Where, oh where is GWB when we need him?
      ====

      anonymous does not forget nor forgive
      ====

      give us your lolis and no one will be hurt
      ====

      zerg rush
      ====

      pool's closed

    9. Re:Artificially Created Strain of H1N1? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Didn't Tom Clancy write a whole book about the scenerio?

    10. Re:Artificially Created Strain of H1N1? by jerAzevedo · · Score: 1

      When people start making comments like this, I can't help wondering if this was someone's science project that got out into the open instead of a strain that occurred naturally.

      Not sure if this is just conspiracy theory stuff but,

      This strain of swine influenza that?s been cultured in a laboratory is something that?s not been seen anywhere actually in the United States and the world, so this is actually a new strain of influenza that?s been identified,? said Dr. John Carlo, Dallas Co. Medical Director (video clip here).

      Was this a slip-up or an admission that this new super-strain of swine influenza was deliberately cultured in a laboratory and released?

      http://www.prisonplanet.com/medical-director-swine-flu-was-cultured-in-a-laboratory.html

      Could be referring to scientists creating viruses like this in the past to test medication. Also if it was produced in a lab I doubt it would have been "intentionally" released.

    11. Re:Artificially Created Strain of H1N1? by Latinhypercube · · Score: 0

      I would guess a pig with swine flu contracted avian flu.

    12. Re:Artificially Created Strain of H1N1? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The H in the new virus comes from pigs, but some of its other genes come from bird and human flu viruses

      Impossible!

      Genesis 1:24 - And God said, "Let the land produce living creatures according to their kinds: livestock, creatures that move along the ground, and wild animals, each according to its kind." And it was so.

      So either God is simply a figment of our imagination, or this virus is....

    13. Re:Artificially Created Strain of H1N1? by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Mexico City has direct flight lines to just about every major hub point in the world. It's already by and far too late to even worry about it, one of the immunologists here in Ontario has stated it's better to prepare believing it's already wild in the population.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    14. Re:Artificially Created Strain of H1N1? by Weedhopper · · Score: 1

      You're inferring too much from what this immunologist said. It is wise to prepare, but that doesn't mean control mechanisms at the source will not be effective in limiting both the pace and geographical spread of the disease.

      If the immunologist said it was by and far too late to worry about it, he should be quiet and leave outbreak control to people who know what they're talking about.

    15. Re:Artificially Created Strain of H1N1? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, I guess I'm just wondering, would a "weaponized strain" need to be something other than an "extraordinary poor one"? Cause it seems like "box cutters" are also extraordinarily poor weapons, but still effective depending on your intent.

    16. Re:Artificially Created Strain of H1N1? by adamchou · · Score: 1

      Unless the country weaponizing is wrapped in a giant bubble, i really doubt that anyone would ever want to weaponize any highly contagious and highly deadly bioweapon. I'm no military expert but i'm pretty certain highly deadly is the key characteristic of a desired bioweapon, not highly contagious.

    17. Re:Artificially Created Strain of H1N1? by Tuidjy · · Score: 1

      Am I missing something, or did someone rewrite "I am a legend"?
      At the end of the story _I_ remember, the main character understand
      that he, the last human, has become a murdering monster to the
      race that has inherited our world. How exactly would that be
      "reversing the disaster"?

      --
      No good deed goes unpunished...
    18. Re:Artificially Created Strain of H1N1? by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      Well, let it save your "race"... There problem solved.

      Oh boy, I really hope nobody really does this...

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    19. Re:Artificially Created Strain of H1N1? by jmulvey · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I think the chances of this being bio-terrorism just clicked up a notch: According to this article:
      The first case was seen in Mexico on April 13. The outbreak coincided with the President Barack Obama's trip to Mexico City on April 16. Obama was received at Mexico's anthropology museum in Mexico City by Felipe Solis, a distinguished archeologist who died the following day from symptoms similar to flu, Reforma newspaper reported. The newspaper didn't confirm if Solis had swine flu or not.

    20. Re:Artificially Created Strain of H1N1? by budgenator · · Score: 1

      It's not the normal military you have to worry about, it's the ones that are convinced that they are fighting one God's side in the battle of Armageddon and even if both sides are wiped out, they will live forever in the Promised land.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    21. Re:Artificially Created Strain of H1N1? by ultranova · · Score: 1

      One would expect by now even the most incompetent biotechnologist with an eye towards weaponizing could at least match the 1918 strain.

      However, why would they? Flu is impossible to contain, it will spread to your own population, including the very scientists who made it. Using it as a weapon would be insane, even stupider than nuclear weapons (where you have a theoretical chance that the other side won't launch theirs). The only imaginable scenario would be where you use a non-deadly flu to temporarily disrupt the other nations production, with the price being that you'll suffer the same disruption a bit later.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    22. Re:Artificially Created Strain of H1N1? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One would expect by now even the most incompetent biotechnologist with an eye towards weaponizing could at least match the 1918 strain.

      yes and no... bioengineering isn't an exact science we don't know all the steps from a to z so you have to guess. moreover, to weaponise a disease is easy in theory and next to impossible to be selective enough to 'them' and not 'us'. if it was so easy, people would be doing it with the bugs that are living in your toilet, in there backyards with equipment purchased on ebay.

      problem with H1N1 it effected everyone, problem was it was out of control...weapons are a little more controllable

      source: PhD in molecular biochemistry.

    23. Re:Artificially Created Strain of H1N1? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know about you, but when I read that, I can't help but think about the avian flu vaccine shipped to CZ by a US company which was, in fact, a very strong strain of avian-human flu. Or the claims by top Chinese military officials that they would wipe millions of the populations of the Americas off the map with a super-virus. Kinda scary.

      Kinda interesting that they were doing "pandemic emergency drill preparedness" down in Texas a couple weeks ago (14th?). I wonder if that's related.

    24. Re:Artificially Created Strain of H1N1? by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      With a weaponized biological agent, or really any virus or anything which kills its host and infects through proximity, there are several things to consider with regard to its effectiveness:

      * Its ability to spread quickly is reversely proportional to how severe the initial onset is. If a carrier can be an infected host, passing it on to others, before exhibiting symptoms, it spreads faster and wider.
      * It's ability to not kill its hosts too quickly. if they die too quickly, the host can't pass it on.
      * Its ability to keep the host infective long enough throughout its infestation to keep people getting infected. See the first point, as its related.

      The thing about the 1918 flu is that it was able to spread quickly enough, without the initial symptoms being bad enough, to spread quickly. It also had a fairly long period where the hosts remained infective, IIRC.

      As far as it being a weaponized strain... it's a virus. Would you, as a country, want to have a virus on the loose which is highly infective, spreads quickly, and has a high mortality rate? I don't think so: vaccines would be very, very expensive, and being the only country to possess them would be a big "we did it" sign to everyone else. This is, IMO, even more likely to be the case when the 'attacking' country is populous and concentrated (such as China and/or Russia, the most likely culprits, IMO, if it were such the case).

      Which brings up a third possibility... it's an incompetently weaponized virus strain, done by a terrorist organization. Not a theory I'll hold to, but it's a possibility. It could also be something put forward by a government or two to try and evoke the whole "fear, uncertainty, and doubt" thing in the populace, which they could then leverage to the desired result. The coming weeks and months will tell whether any of these are true, or if it's just like SARS.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    25. Re:Artificially Created Strain of H1N1? by ed__ · · Score: 1

      No, by cultured he means that it's been isolated in the lab and identified. That is to say, they took a sample from a sick person and then grew it in the lab (ie cultivated) and then sequenced it or whatever and figure out exactly what it was.

    26. Re:Artificially Created Strain of H1N1? by V.11.1997 · · Score: 1

      The outbreak coincided with the President Barack Obama's trip to Mexico City on April 16.

      Not really. The trend was noticed on March 18 according to The Globe and Mail and El Universal (in Spanish). "Mid-March" according to the BBC

    27. Re:Artificially Created Strain of H1N1? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He died of a heart attack

    28. Re:Artificially Created Strain of H1N1? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, not to be a conspiracy theorist or anything, but this surfaced on youtube just a few weeks ago:
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_qJQCJp4ehc
      Funny coincidence right?

    29. Re:Artificially Created Strain of H1N1? by witherstaff · · Score: 1

      Wasn't that a plot of Millenium - vaccinate your small group, kill off the rest? I don't remember much of that show, other than it was no Xfiles.

    30. Re:Artificially Created Strain of H1N1? by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1


      The GP is referring to the film version of "I Am Legend" starring Will Smith. SPOILERS FOLLOW:

      At the end of the Will Smith version, he derives a cure for the disease. A cure that actually entirely reverses the effects of the disease on people. He himself is killed by the infected, but passes on a sample of the cure to a fellow survivor and her son who flee to a colony of immune people somewhere in the North. Wil Smith's character rediscovers his faith in God for inexplicable reasons (and I don't use the word 'inexplicable' to mean poorly justified, either) and the colony waves some nice Stars and Stripes banners. I understand that this is different to the book.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    31. Re:Artificially Created Strain of H1N1? by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1

      It's not the normal military you have to worry about, it's the ones that are convinced that they are fighting one God's side in the battle of Armageddon and even if both sides are wiped out, they will live forever in the Promised land.

      It certainly is. But in case anyone reading interprets your post to be talking about Islamic fundamentalists in the Middle East, it's worth highlighting the influential people in the USA who believe that a large war involving Israel is one of the key steps toward Armageddon and thus their ascension to heaven in "The Rapture", and who are actively working toward this end.

      Example: Resolutions passed in Texas (see PDF in link) concerning support for Israel occupying Palestine. Why are states in Texas concerning themselves with this? Because it has a large number of Christian Zionists - estimated 8% of US population belongs to Churches that teach war in Middle East with Israel is one of the steps toward Armageddon. Some of these people are very influential, such as Tom DeLay.

      Now I'm not actually unconvinced that US support for Israel's actions wont be the start of Armageddon... I just don't see it as leading to many of us being taken up to Heaven (and if I did - I still wouldn't want it to happen for the sake of all those who weren't going to heaven). So yes - we do have to worry about those who want war because they think it will lead to Heaven for them. But to be clear - there are plenty of those in the US and they have influence on policy to help bring that about.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    32. Re:Artificially Created Strain of H1N1? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1
      SPOILER WARNING:

      There have been three different film adaptations of the book, all with different endings. The first had a similar ending to the book, but with the realisation coming to the audience not to the protagonist (he dies declaring that they are all freaks, when we see them acting more human than him). The second, he found a cure derived from his blood (he had injected himself with an experimental vaccine near the end of the pandemic, which was the reason for his immunity) and is then killed by a spear throw. The film ends with his cure-carrying blood leaking out into the fountain. The final film has the worst ending of the three, where he finds the cure, gives it to someone else who then takes it to a colony of survivors and everyone lives happily ever after.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    33. Re:Artificially Created Strain of H1N1? by permaculture · · Score: 1

      Ever seen 'Survivors' (1975) ?

      Here's the opening sequence, depicting the accident with the bottle, and the subsequent rapid spread of the disease.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mNjjnwCJqCY

      --
      Environmentalism is the new Victorianism. Everyone ties on a green corset and pretends we're virtuous.
    34. Re:Artificially Created Strain of H1N1? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Unless you have a vaccine, in which case you can immunise your own population first, then release it, and pray it doesn't mutate too much. Bioweapons aren't impossible to use effectively, they're just so much harder to use effectively than any other kind of weapon (with the possible exception of nuclear) that they're not worth bothering with in a conventional war scenario. If someone like Saddam Hussain had had access to something like this flu strain, however, do you think he'd have hesitated to infect himself just before he was captured and spread it to the soldiers who captured him and all of the people at his trial?

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    35. Re:Artificially Created Strain of H1N1? by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 1

      If someone like Saddam Hussain had had access to something like this flu strain, however, do you think he'd have hesitated to infect himself just before he was captured and spread it to the soldiers who captured him and all of the people at his trial?

      Considering that Hussein had the chance to go out in a blaze of glory and chose instead to surrender, I think it's a good bet that the answer is "no."

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    36. Re:Artificially Created Strain of H1N1? by bhima · · Score: 1

      I think that presupposes a certain set of strategies which probably aren't exactly so.

      --
      Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
    37. Re:Artificially Created Strain of H1N1? by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      One would expect by now even the most incompetent biotechnologist with an eye towards weaponizing could at least match the 1918 strain.

      However, why would they? Flu is impossible to contain, it will spread to your own population, including the very scientists who made it. Using it as a weapon would be insane, even stupider than nuclear weapons (where you have a theoretical chance that the other side won't launch theirs).

      "Mr. President, I would not rule out the chance to preserve a nucleus of human specimens. It would be quite easy atthe bottom of some of our deeper mineshafts. The radioactivity would never penetrate a mine some thousands of feet deep. And in a matter of weeks, sufficient improvements in dwelling space could easily be provided."
      [ ... ]
      "It would not be difficult mein Fuhrer! Nuclear reactors could, heh... I'm sorry. Mr. President. Nuclear reactors could provide power almost indefinitely !"

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    38. Re:Artificially Created Strain of H1N1? by ErkDemon · · Score: 1

      One would expect by now even the most incompetent biotechnologist with an eye towards weaponizing could at least match the 1918 strain.

      ... unless our hypothetical bioweapon designer was trying to do something a bit more sophisticated, like, say, targeting a particular ethnic group.

      But I guess the people in the field will have already thought of that, and tried cross-referencing deathrate against tissue type. If people with particular ethnic backgrounds or blood groups were getting hit particularly hard by this thing, we should probably already know about it by now.

  14. Captain Tripps! by Daswolfen · · Score: 1

    I'm not worried though.. I have been dreaming of an old black woman so I should be ok...

    --
    Don't rush me, Sonny. You rush a miracle man, you get rotten miracles.
    1. Re:Captain Tripps! by zmollusc · · Score: 1

      That Tripps is bad news, dude. Even if you pull through, the part of your brain that lets you understand machinery is affected and you walk or cycle everywhere ignoring the millions of cars.

      --
      They whose government reduces their essential liberties for temporary security, receive neither liberty nor security.
    2. Re:Captain Tripps! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless you're in an area where the roads aren't bogged down by cars? There's a ton of times where they drive...

  15. Shut down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    EVERYTHING!

  16. Some company found out a year before already... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...as this article learns us.
    Makes you indeed wonder !
     
    Mental note: beware of Replikins bringing medicine to lethal flu.

  17. So did the virus evolve? by Epeeist · · Score: 1

    And will people in Texas (*cough* Don McLeroy *cough*) believe it, or will they just come up with the usual "well its still a virus" meme.

    1. Re:So did the virus evolve? by PatrickThomson · · Score: 2, Funny

      He's coughing! It's already too late!

      --
      I am one of many. My idea is not unique, nor do I expect my voice alone to sway you. I speak in a chorus of opinion.
    2. Re:So did the virus evolve? by UncleTogie · · Score: 5, Informative

      Believe it? I caught it.

      San Antonio area was one of the first hit, and for all the cases diagnosed, I guarantee ya there are dozens more that couldn't afford to see a doctor.

      Didn't feel TOO much worse than the normal version of flu. Little less achy, but a LOT more power-hurling.

      --
      Don't tell me to get a life. I'm a gamer; I have LOTS of lives!
    3. Re:So did the virus evolve? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously the creator put it there to punish gays. Or illegal immigrants or something. Yeah, that's the ticket.

    4. Re:So did the virus evolve? by stoicio · · Score: 0, Troll

      They won't get the virus in Texas. They plan to secede instead.

    5. Re:So did the virus evolve? by Drakin020 · · Score: 1

      So wait are you saying you caught this virus they are talking about? I live in the Waco area so I'm trying to stay informed.

      CDC reported 2 cases in America from their last update.

      --
      The greatest revenge in life is massive success.
    6. Re:So did the virus evolve? by supahdren · · Score: 1

      If you were vomiting, it probably was NOT the flu. See: http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20030114/flu_not030114/Health?s_name=&no_ads= Flu symptoms: coughing, sneezing, runny nose, achy muscles, fatigue, lethargy, fever Things not on the list: vomiting, diarrhea Nausea and vomiting from the flu can occur, especially in children, but they are not the hallmark of the disease. If you were "power hurling," you almost certainly did not have the flu.

    7. Re:So did the virus evolve? by justinlee37 · · Score: 1

      But if the virus is evolved, couldn't it cause new symptoms?

      Here is some good lunchtime material from wikipedia about the Spanish Flu: "Symptoms included a blue tint to the face and coughing up blood caused by severe obstruction of the lungs. In some cases, the virus caused an uncontrollable hemorrhaging that filled the lungs, and patients drowned in their body fluids (pneumonia). In others, the flu caused frequent loss of bowel control and the victim would die from losing critical intestinal lining and blood loss."

      In any case we have no idea if the OP really had swine flu or not. I wonder if he went to the doctor to receive a medical opinion, or if he is just assuming?

    8. Re:So did the virus evolve? by budgenator · · Score: 1

      People with the flu or even an aggressive cold often have nausea and loose stools due to swallowing excess mucus. Throwing up a little phlegm and a episode of diarrhea or two doesn't rule out influenza.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    9. Re:So did the virus evolve? by unitron · · Score: 1

      The vomiting could have been the result of medication. I had something that sure felt like the flu back in the mid '80s and my brother the doctor gave me two different things out of his sample collection, one of which introduced me to a level of stomach spasm I had no idea was humanly possible.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    10. Re:So did the virus evolve? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Influenza != stomach flu.

    11. Re:So did the virus evolve? by UncleTogie · · Score: 1

      If you were vomiting, it probably was NOT the flu.

      According to the CDC, nausea is not unheard of in swine flu.

      --
      Don't tell me to get a life. I'm a gamer; I have LOTS of lives!
    12. Re:So did the virus evolve? by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      Flu symptoms: coughing, sneezing, runny nose, achy muscles, fatigue, lethargy, fever

      I have had a influenza with those symptoms for the last few days, I don't like it. feels like a fizzy drink is being held under my nose *all the time*, I'm in Australia though - lots of people have it, surely it's not the same one here already.

      If it is I can tell you it sucks, major headache, hard to sleep :-(

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    13. Re:So did the virus evolve? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You caught A flu, do you have any reason to believe you caught This flu? Or just karma whoring?

    14. Re:So did the virus evolve? by Reziac · · Score: 1

      If power-hurling is a notable symptom, then we already had it here in the Los Angeles area, early last fall. Otherwise, probably not as severe as the average flu.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    15. Re:So did the virus evolve? by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Back in the 1960s, flu almost always meant "stomach flu". The major symptoms were 2 to 3 days of violent vomiting and diarrhea. It was extremely contagious, with about a 3 day incubation period.

      After 1970 or so the "stomach flu" abruptly became rare, and "flu" started to mean the fever and lung involvement we're familiar with today.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    16. Re:So did the virus evolve? by Erikderzweite · · Score: 1

      What are you doing here on /.? Do you want to infect us all?! You do know how fast can a virus spread through the intertubes? If not for Linux, I'll be writing my testament now.

    17. Re:So did the virus evolve? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, if you think you had it, you'd better get blood drawn so they can test you for the antibodies and know what exactly you had. That'd help them determine exactly how far it's spread.

    18. Re:So did the virus evolve? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hurling? Sounds to me like you had food poisoning, not flu at all.

  18. May I be the first to say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Uh oh, spaghetti O's

  19. I have a Mac by Weedhopper · · Score: 4, Funny

    I have a Macbook Pro. That means I'm immune, right?

    1. Re:I have a Mac by Brett+Buck · · Score: 4, Funny

      As long as you never leave your mom's basement, yes.

              Brett

    2. Re:I have a Mac by melted+keyboard · · Score: 1

      But, but, but... then that means I can't visit cafes or delicatessens, while pointing out the flaws of others for using inferior hardware, OSes, and gadgets? *ducks*

    3. Re:I have a Mac by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      Yup, as long as you keep it on your lap while you type, the heat will sterilize the virus.

      /typing on a Macbook Pro.

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    4. Re:I have a Mac by Daimanta · · Score: 1

      I've heard that smug kills the flu so yes, you're probably immune.

      --
      Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power lost.
    5. Re:I have a Mac by LeonN · · Score: 1

      yeeees :) that means everyone in here is immune. ./ people will be the last ones on earth! All hail the big taco

      --
      http://freelinuxguides.wikidot.com
    6. Re:I have a Mac by francium+de+neobie · · Score: 1

      But if you're driving a Prius while typing on a MacBook Pro, the smug will kill you too.

  20. Re:Cancel Air Flight by zmollusc · · Score: 2, Funny

    WTF 'near-instantaneous'? You must have never flown on anything but private learjets.

    --
    They whose government reduces their essential liberties for temporary security, receive neither liberty nor security.
  21. Re:Cancel Air Flight by Schemat1c · · Score: 1

    WTF 'near-instantaneous'? You must have never flown on anything but private learjets.

    Horses,ships = months. Cars = days. Planes = hours.

    Get it now?

    --

    "Nobody knows the age of the human race, but everybody agrees that it is old enough to know better." - Unknown
  22. Interesting Coindicence by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 1

    Interesting that this pops up shortly after the release of this book.

  23. Re:Cancel Air Flight by Kagura · · Score: 1

    WTF 'near-instantaneous'? You must have never flown on anything but private learjets.

    You must have never taken a boat anywhere.

  24. This Article Has Everything To Do With /. by wintermute1974 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What? This article isn't about a .1 release of your favorite open source software package?

    Despite that fact, it really is Slashdot's purview. Biology, migration, politics, computer models, projections, population studies ...

  25. Roche stock ... by foobsr · · Score: 3, Informative

    ... on a low. Perhaps a good buy, as Tamiflu is said to help.

    Or should I say clever timing?

    CC.

    --
    TaijiQuan (Huang, 5 loosenings)
    1. Re:Roche stock ... by jonnat · · Score: 1

      Perhaps a good buy, as Tamiflu is said to help.

      The Bird Flu scare did not seem to help. I don't see why this would.

  26. Nothing to worry about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No excuse me while I lie down, I'm feeling a bit warm. OINK!

  27. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's true, we can't get sick if we never leave the basement.

  28. Mmmmm... by hackus · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The chances of these proteins from bird, avian flu combining with a swine retro virus that is easily transmittable is astronomical.

    Unless of course, it really isn't about chance, and it was engineered that way. Taking the best from Avian flu, and Swine Flu and combining them into a easily transmittable vector for human consumption.

    I would bet for example it already has spread world wide.

    The higher its kill rate the more skeptical I will believe this is a natural borne virus which came about through natural events.

    We will have to wait for the death toll statistics for the outbreak. But if it is over 30% death it has to be human engineered. Even the Black Death required highly specific environmental factors to come about. Since humans control our environment by a factor of a 1000 more than the dark ages, any virus would have to be thousands of times more virulent.

    On top of that it is spread through casual contact?

    Sure, its TOTALLY natural.

    -Hack

    --
    Got Geometrodynamics? Awe, too hard to figure out? Too bad.
    1. Re:Mmmmm... by John+Hasler · · Score: 4, Informative

      > The chances of these proteins from bird, avian flu combining with a swine retro virus
      > that is easily transmittable is astronomical.

      Yes, it is fairly likely. Influenza viruses do this sort of thing all the time.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    2. Re:Mmmmm... by Weedhopper · · Score: 1

      I was gonna respond to this but then I realized it was so wrong, that it has to be a clever troll.

    3. Re:Mmmmm... by Omestes · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The chances of these proteins from bird, avian flu combining with a swine retro virus that is easily transmittable is astronomical.

      How many generations does a typical virus go through in a very short period of time? You forget that "evolutionary" time is vastly sped up for our bacterial and viral friends. In the amount of time it took me to type this paragraph these bugger probably went through a couple hundred generations, and spawned untold mutations. Thats why viruses are so hard to fight. This is especially true with influenza, which is why we don't have a "cure" for it yet.

      Sometimes viruses win the genetic lottery too, especially when they get to go through billions of iterations each year. The odds of HIV/AIDs jumping from primates to a human form was also astronomical, as was the original swine flu, but I doubt that anyone would posit those as cases of biological weapons gone wrong.

       

      --
      A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
    4. Re:Mmmmm... by HiThere · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They're fast, but they aren't THAT fast. I think that 20 minutes is a fair guess at a generation time without any additional information. And they don't change environments with each generation. You'll bet multiple generations within a single cell.

      That said, you've got tremendous numbers of virus particles reproducing simultaneously in an extremely large number of places. So unlikely events ARE to be expected. Still, this seems a bit of an extreme example. As described it requires at least 5 cross-over mutations between 5 different strains with different geographical locations of high frequency. Probably more than that, as the information was a bit sketchy. So it's extremely unlikely. But unlikely isn't impossible...and it isn't impossible without directed assistance. This could be quite normal. It could also be artificial. And sloppy practice in a lab dealing with dangerous biochemicals isn't at all unheard of. And, of course, it could also be intentional. I can't guess which way to bet. My personal guess would be natural evolution, but in an environment that caused this multiple exposure some how.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    5. Re:Mmmmm... by unitron · · Score: 1

      You misunderestimate the power of idiocy.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    6. Re:Mmmmm... by Reziac · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No need for conspiracy theories. All you need is a culture where pigs and birds (notably ducks) are kept in close proximity. Pig coronavirus, when passed through a bird, often alters into a human-infective "flu" virus. Since there are hundreds of coronaviruses, and plenty of poor rural areas where pigs and fowl are kept together (notably China) the fact that we regularly get new flu variants is just mother nature being her bitchy self.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    7. Re:Mmmmm... by helicase · · Score: 1

      The crazy thing about the influenza virus is that it's genome is fragmented into 8 pieces. Now, imagine a single cell is infected with 2 strains of a virus... Say the aforementioned H5N1 virus and and this H1N1 virus have both infected one host. Now there is a very real possibility of rearrangement between the 8 viral RNAs of those two strains. BAM! You now have a very scary virus, and very quickly. Another thing that has been neglected in this conversation is that viral mutation rates (in viruses with RNA genomes anyhow) are MUCH higher than what we normally consider, as RNA-dependent RNA polymerases have zip for proofreading activity. Yep, I'm going to wash my hands 42 times now.

  29. Yes by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    Please go visit Mexico City.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  30. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Jesus, you haven't been here that long, have you?

    This site isn't a technology site.

  31. Close the ports! by mazarin5 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I think it's time for that trip to Madagascar...

    --
    Fnord.
    1. Re:Close the ports! by stoicio · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, go to Madagascar and get hemorrhagic fever instead...

  32. Engineered by anarking · · Score: 0, Troll

    Swine, Humand and Avian??? Engineered by the U.S. Government, just like the traceable spread of Anthrax.

  33. Protective Measures: Goggles and Face Masks by wintermute1974 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    From a cursory look around the Internet today, there is a lot of advice on what kind of face mask to wear to help cut down on transmission. Apparently even simple surgical masks are good enough for the flu virus (although better version are also available).

    This post is more about eye protection: Next to the nose and mouth, your eyes are the next best method for transmission. Are thick, wrap-around glasses or goggles a good idea? I know that people in Japan with allergies have such equipment. Can anyone provide links to them or their medical efficacy?

  34. transplant organs from pork to human... by kandresen · · Score: 2, Interesting

    For a few year ago it was a huge ethical question about growing human organs in pig for transplantation in case of accidents.
    The proponents focused upon the saving of lives in the moment
    The opposition focused upon the threats this could cause for the entire human race as viruses suddenly could pass the gap and flood us with waves of new diseases we have never known before.

    Not that I know if this is due to growing human organs inside porks, but expect many new deadly deceases such as this as animal grown parts turn up inside humans.

    1. Re:transplant organs from pork to human... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      If its about growing human organs inside of pigs, the immune system of said pig has likely been replaced with a human immune system. Otherwise, your organ factory has just become and organ grinder.

    2. Re:transplant organs from pork to human... by gyrogeerloose · · Score: 2, Funny

      growing human organs in pig for transplantation

      That's it--no more liverwurst for me...

      --
      This ain't rocket surgery.
    3. Re:transplant organs from pork to human... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I guess they stuffed some chicken in there as well, because it has avian parts as well.

    4. Re:transplant organs from pork to human... by passim · · Score: 1

      Well, I've got some pig and cow parts in me and I have not developed any 'many new deadly diseases such as this'. If you were in my shoes and alive because of this great technology, you'd probably have a different outlook on the ethical questions. Viruses 'pass the gap' from bird to pig to man (and back, too) all the time and apparently have since animals were domesticated. You are certainly entitled to have uninformed opinions and make doomsday predictions but you'd better hope you never need any extra parts - the human ones are hard to come by.

    5. Re:transplant organs from pork to human... by TheLink · · Score: 1

      You're probably doing it wrong. Just add fava beans and a nice chianti.

      --
    6. Re:transplant organs from pork to human... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      There is a good evolutionary reason why Muslims and Jews don't eat pig. Pigs are biologically very similar to humans, and the species jump from pig to human is one of the easiest that any disease can make. By avoiding eating pigs, members of these two faiths isolated themselves from an easy route for infection and so were able to spread more than other religions. The most extreme counterexample can be found in tribes which encouraged eating their defeated opponents, meaning that a single infected and defeated warrior from another tribe could kill off all of the warriors in the tribe that killed him by passing.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  35. Spreading? by joeszilagyi · · Score: 1

    The news stories are saying there are suspected cases in California, Texas, New York City, Long Island, and Westchester County now.

    --
    Dude, where's my packet?
    1. Re:Spreading? by Weedhopper · · Score: 1

      There's been a lot more news on this since I started posting on this thread and if those cases in Kansas and New York are in fact the same strain as the one in Mexico, this one definitely has pandemic potential.

      The coming few days will tell. If a few confirmed cases were to be reported on another continent in the next 24 to 48 hours, it additional control and containment procedures might be in order.

  36. Re:Protective Measures: Goggles and Face Masks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can anyone provide links to their medical efficacy?

    Sure! What the goggles do

    ...

    Oh, come on! You were asking for it!

  37. And some are sent by companies by TheLink · · Score: 1

    Nowadays some are spread by companies that make vaccines.

    http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=aTo3LbhcA75I

    Rather strange that the avian flu could end up in a vaccine that's supposed to contain a very different sort of flu.

    If they are that careless and sloppy maybe they should be shutdown for safety reasons. How about National Security reasons?

    The level of incompetence required is hard to distinguish from evil.

    This is not stuff like "Conficker".

    What next? Whoops we accidentally sent you a weaponized flu we were working on for the Military. Sorry, we'll give you a discount on your next order OK?

    --
    1. Re:And some are sent by companies by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1, Interesting

      What next? Whoops we accidentally sent you a weaponized flu we were working on for the Military. Sorry, we'll give you a discount on your next order OK?

      My neighbours already got one in mail...

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    2. Re:And some are sent by companies by TheLink · · Score: 1

      The bloomberg article I linked to was talking about Baxter and avian flu.

      Weaponized flu is a bit different.

      If that avian flu Baxter sent was really a weaponized flu that's even bigger news.

      --
  38. related to the Baxter accident ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=aTo3LbhcA75I

  39. uhh.. by binaryseraph · · Score: 1

    _old_news_

    1. Re:uhh.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Slashdot depends on users for their news. Saying things like "_old_news_" is entirely useless. Stop complaining and start submitting.

  40. Re:whelp, you know what we gotta do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    as we all know, 1 US citizen =60 mexicans. So the obvious solution, before the US citizen dies, is to kill all mexicans. The easy way to do this is stop giving them money, or leaving loose change around so that they starve to death.

    change your dope dude. try something asian.

  41. Re:Cancel Air Flight by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

    You know, it was calculated that the Black Death was able to spread throughout Europe with the speed of up to 10 km/day (about 700 furlongs per fortnight, in imperial units). This is pretty fast when you consider that it is still believed that Black Death was carried by mice and fleas. Now imagine a disease carrier boarding a Jumbo in Tokyo heading for New York...

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
  42. WHO chief says swine flu has pandemic potential by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.reuters.com/article/marketsNews/idUSLP31018720090425

  43. Actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The experts are saying that this is highly unusual and they have never seen anything like it. Yes, flu mutates, but it usually doesn't mutate simultaneously with so many differing vectors.

      That's the odd and suspicious part that people are noting. I just listened to the WHO Q and A press conference and they are taking this pretty seriously, as in emergency mode, a step below full panic mode. You just might want to not be so instantly dismissive and blase about it. If you haven't noticed, the Mexican authorities have canceled all large public events, which they never do. Flu happens all the time, it is seasonal, they don't cancel big events over it, until now. They are on the scene and seem to be a little more alarmed over it than your dismissive "oh bother, happens all the time, p'shaw, plain old flu" internet armchair medical opinion. This is not a usual form of normal mutated flu.

  44. Young Adults by copponex · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I thought the reason it was so bad is because many of the dead are young adults. That's one of the milestones of a really dangerous pandemic, right?

    1. Re:Young Adults by MoonBuggy · · Score: 1

      So how does it compare to Avian Flu, or SARS, or whatever the health scare before that was?

      I'm sure it's a good thing for them to be cautious, but honestly I have to admit to seeing the whole thing as a bit of a 'boy who cried wolf' scenario. I certainly don't know how I'd tell if this were something that really caused any more threat than the non-events that have preceded it.

    2. Re:Young Adults by Latinhypercube · · Score: 0

      It turns your immune system on itself. That is why the young and middle aged die, whilst old and very young survive.

    3. Re:Young Adults by pete-wilko · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Unfortunately the difference this time is human to human transmission, which was very limited with the previous examples. The larger question is how much of a mutation has occurred and therefore how potentially dangerous it is.

      Also need to determine how far it has actually spread to get an indication of actually how dangerous it may or may not be - i.e. there's around 8 deaths out of 1004 cases, but if it turns out there's another 1000 unreported cases with no fatalities then it may not be that bad.

    4. Re:Young Adults by voidphoenix · · Score: 1

      ~60 deaths. ~20 have been verified to be of the H5N1 strain. It's batting 6% mortality so far.

    5. Re:Young Adults by Weedhopper · · Score: 1

      And just where are getting these numbers?

    6. Re:Young Adults by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Some people actually have other sources of information other than Slashdot, unbelievable as you may find that.

      There are these things called newspapers. Some of them are even online, updated in real time throughout the day and night.

      Try it out, you may like it.

    7. Re:Young Adults by adamchou · · Score: 1

      That's one of the milestones of a really dangerous pandemic

      I'm no infectious disease specialist but after reading the article on the Spanish Flu, I don't believe that death of young people is a milestone for a pandemic. Its more a milestone for an extremely deadly virus because thats a sign that its able to subvert or reverse a strong immune system. A pandemic, by definition, is just an infection disease that has a widespread number of cases. It doesn't require the disease to be deadly.

    8. Re:Young Adults by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      I thought the reason it was so bad is because many of the dead are coming back to life. That's one of the milestones of a really dangerous pandemic, right?

      Fixed that for you.

    9. Re:Young Adults by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think this actually means you are killed by the your immune response to the virus.
      Young healthy immune system over reacting == dead
      old played out or immature immune system = a few days of discomfort. ... it would be ironic if something like aids ended up saving the species

    10. Re:Young Adults by ColdWetDog · · Score: 4, Informative

      No, it's not H5N1, it's an H1N1 strain.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    11. Re:Young Adults by Repossessed · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not always, but in flu the deadly strains (at least, Spanish flu and the strain everyone was afraid would shift to humans) cause an overreaction by the immune system. Young adults, whose immune systems are in top shape, get screwed up bad.

      --
      Liberte, Egalite, Fraternite (TM)
    12. Re:Young Adults by erc · · Score: 1

      Not H5N1, but H1N1. Similar to the 1918 flu.

      --
      -- Ed Carp, N7EKG erc@pobox.com PGP KeyID: 0x0BD32C9B What I'm up to: http://intuitives.mine.nu
    13. Re:Young Adults by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

      All we wanna do is eat your brains! We're not unreasonable, no-one's gonna eat your eyes.

    14. Re:Young Adults by Mex · · Score: 1

      81 deaths official as of Saturday night, and unofficial 200 deaths.

    15. Re:Young Adults by u38cg · · Score: 1

      Strictly speaking, it's not an over-reaction per se - it's just that when the immune system does adapt to the virus, it kills the entire viral load very quickly, leading to blood poisoning.

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
    16. Re:Young Adults by Repossessed · · Score: 1

      I thought the problem was fluid in the lungs? Or is that because of the BP?

      --
      Liberte, Egalite, Fraternite (TM)
    17. Re:Young Adults by u38cg · · Score: 1

      IANADNDIPOOTV, but my limited understanding going on what I've read is that no, fluid on the lungs is not usually severe enough in this particular form to cause death. But who knows. What we do know from history is that ill advised speculation and comment during the early stages of a potential crisis are usually dead wrong (just check out /.'s stories from 9/11 for superb examples).

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
    18. Re:Young Adults by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      So, can't you treat that in people with strong immune systems with mild doses of immunosuppressants? I.e. damage their immune system intentionally (in a short-term and reversible way) so that it's in a similar state to that of someone with a weaker immune system who would be ill for longer but survive?

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    19. Re:Young Adults by RDW · · Score: 1

      Some very interesting experiments using hybrid viruses created by inserting genes from the 1918 pandemic strain into current less virulent strains have shown that multiple mechanisms act to make the 'Spanish flu' so deadly. It turns out that the 1918 variant of the viral 'RNA polymerase complex' (a set of genes that the virus uses to copy itself) allows replication to occur directly in the lungs, as well as the upper respiratory tract where most flu viruses grow. The 1918 versions of various other genes modulate the host immune system in particularly nasty ways, simultaneously inhibiting the antiviral response that would normally clear the virus within a few days, and over-stimulating another part of the immune system so that the host's own tissue is damaged. So it's an especially vicious combination of factors, rather than a single mechanism at work. It's too early to say if anything like this is happening with the Mexican strain, but human to human transmission of any influenza virus that causes significant mortality in healthy young adults is a cause for very serious concern.

    20. Re:Young Adults by Toonol · · Score: 1

      I don't understand how those numbers can even begin to be relied on. A mortality rate demands that you know the entire number of people infected, and we don't have a clue. It have passed through thousands of people with no greater effect than a 'run-down' feeling for a few days.

      I think the reported 6% mortality rate is better rephrased as "of the people who became so sick that the medical establishment became aware of their condition, 6% died."

  45. Re:Protective Measures: Goggles and Face Masks by maxume · · Score: 5, Funny

    The only way to be sure you are safe is a total body condom.

    --
    Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  46. So no Mexican pig fucking then? by antifoidulus · · Score: 1

    Damnit, there goes my.... I mean my friends....vacation. Now what are we supposed to do?

  47. Wowwowowow by JDub87 · · Score: 1

    ... Viruses mix with other viruses now? When did that start happening?

    1. Re:Wowwowowow by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Always.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    2. Re:Wowwowowow by budgenator · · Score: 1

      viruses hijack a host cell to make new viruses, if there are two viruses hijack the same cell everything can get mixed up and some new results.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    3. Re:Wowwowowow by passim · · Score: 1

      It's called reassortment. Different viruses in the same host exchange genes and form new viruses. The Great Influenza, by John M. Barry, is a detailed and highly readable nonfiction account of the 1918 flu that explains this and many other complexities of influenza. Read it while you still have time.

  48. Actually, actually by Weedhopper · · Score: 4, Informative

    For any epidemic with a new strain, there's ALWAYS something that's fairly unusual and something you have never seen before.

    In fact, it's unusual NOT to see something unusual. I get suspicious when there's nothing strange with a straight textbook case. Someone's probably not investigating hard enough.

    In case you haven't guessed yet, I am by profession an epidemiologist. There's NOT ENOUGH information available to the public to draw any conclusions. I'm sure the guys on this one are up to their eyeballs with conflicting information and are trying to sort it all out.

    There's a potential, but until we know better, keep your fearmongering to yourself.

    And you're using the word "vector" wrong. Depending on what you believe, your understanding might not even be wrong.

    1. Re:Actually, actually by moortak · · Score: 1

      The AC may have some things wrong, but they are correct that the WHO is pretty worried. They don't seem to be 'holy fuck' worried yet, but it bears watching.

      --
      Xavier Rabourdin for president 2012
    2. Re:Actually, actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In fact, it's unusual NOT to see something unusual. I get suspicious when there's nothing strange with a straight textbook case. Someone's probably not investigating hard enough.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UOArsNMVqGg

  49. Obligatory comment from a native Los Angeleno... by MsGeek · · Score: 1

    It's not pigfluenza, it's La gripe carnitas.

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
  50. Oblig. Pinky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    You know, it was calculated that the Black Death was able to spread throughout Europe with the speed of up to 10 km/day (about 700 furlongs per fortnight, in imperial units). This is pretty fast when you consider that it is still believed that Black Death was carried by mice and fleas. Now imagine a disease carrier boarding a Jumbo in Tokyo heading for New York...

    But, Brain...
    How are we going to come up with the money for a flight from Tokyo to New York? Narf!

  51. _Deus Ex_ was not a documentary by Torodung · · Score: 1

    Deus Ex was not a documentary. NATO forces will arrive soon to control the situation, not UN forces.

    --
    Toro

  52. Don't run -- treat it yourself. (PP & D) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    I would guess that if a serious flu comes through, you will not be able to avoid it.

    However, if I understand correctly, flu typically kills by filling the lungs up with mucus, and preventing breathing -- a fatal pneumonia, if you will. However, such a symptom is entirely (and easily) treatable. The treatment is called PP &D, and it takes about 20 minutes to drain the lungs. In other words, in the time it would take the ambulance to get you and get you to the hospital, you could be in good enough condition to walk out the door.

    I've done this on my kid, and it does greatly improve breathing function.

    Therefore, my advice would be to simply be prepared to do PP & D on others, the price being that they learn to do it, and do PP & D on still others in a 2:1 ratio until the need is gone. That way, if you do get sick, you will have someone to do it on you, and the flu wonâ(TM)t be fatal.

    Here are two good sources on how to to PP&D.
    http://www.phoenixchildrens.com/emily-center/child-health-topics/handouts/CPT-55b.pdf

    http://www.questdiagnostics.com/kbase/as/ug1720/how.htm

  53. any connection to this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Baxter in Austria unintentionally contaminated samples with the bird flu virus that were used in laboratories in three neighboring countries, raising concern about the potential spread of the deadly disease.

    http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=aTo3LbhcA75I

  54. Baxter Int'l anywhere nearby??? by sgt_doom · · Score: 1, Interesting
    Gee, this sounds awfully familiar, kinda like what happened several months ago involving Baxter International, the pharmaceutical corp which manufactures avian flue vaccine but isn't having much luck in marketing it.

    Baxter nearby when this took place, me wonders????

    1. Re:Baxter Int'l anywhere nearby??? by indi0144 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hi Fellow American Concerned Citizen
      What you're talking about sounds too much just like a conspiracy theory and just because of that you know that everyone reading your post will say "OMG it can be truth but talking about it would make other people lose any credibility on me, better hush. Now, curse that damn Mexicans" Is that what you want? Huh? Sounds a little racist for me so stop wasting everyone's time and just gather somewhere with other people, go to a baseball park, or basketball arena, don't forget to breath very deep once you're there and if by any chance you see someone sneezing just go a kiss him/her! Why not? These are great times! Let's all enjoy our achievement bonus che.. eh your bonus points if you go without a jacket or coat.

      Yours

      Pedro Sanchez
      viral marketing
      Baxter International Mexico
      Mexico D.F.

    2. Re:Baxter Int'l anywhere nearby??? by BungaDunga · · Score: 1

      Right, because this is avian flu! Wait, it's a virus NOBODY HAS EVER SEEN BEFORE. Our current vaccines DON'T WORK- this is an H1N1 strain, the avain flu we were worried about is H5N1. We'll need to put together a new vaccine, which could take months. Yes, that might benefit the manufacturers- because this is a capitalistic society.

    3. Re:Baxter Int'l anywhere nearby??? by treeves · · Score: 1

      Funny coincidence: Since I have a bank account at Washington Mutual which is about to no longer exist in name. I got a mass form letter from Chase Bank the other day informing me of this,... and it was signed by ...Pedro Sanchez, West Region Manager.

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
  55. Perhaps they've already weaponized it.... by sgt_doom · · Score: 1

    Citizen bhima, I believe they already may have. So there may actually be "competent" biotechnologists out there.....

  56. In Related News... by tzjanii · · Score: 1

    The Prime Minister of Madacasgar, Monja Roindefo, has ordered the ports of this African island nation closed. Advisors to the Prime Minister informed him of some instances of disease in Mexico. "Someone was coughing," they said. Mr. Roindefo is reported to have responded with an order to "shut down everything."

    --
    Slashdot is a pretty cool guy eh posts dupes and doesn't afraid of anything.
  57. ReGenesis? by janap · · Score: 1

    Sounds like a job for Dr David SandstrÃm of NORBAC.

    1. Re:ReGenesis? by plasmidmap · · Score: 1

      Sandstrom would have solved this already. Then he would have had a flash back to releasing Spanish flu and have to go get drunk in China again.

      (But really, this does read like a ReGenesis plot! Everything I know about influenza I learned from ReGenesis.)

  58. what hubris by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not me mastermind, it is the CDC and WHO that are saying these things. Get it? You need someone to hold your hand and find the links for you? They AREN'T saying this is a normal mutation like they see every season, they are saying it is quite unusual and bears much closer study. They DON'T say that with normal flu, and you know it. Go ahead, admit that. Why don't YOU go read some of what they are saying, and listen to the news conferences before you spout off. You should be ashamed of yourself spouting junk science here just to hear your own gums flap in the cyber breeze. If this was just a normal seasonal variation and mutation they would have said that, and they would have already run the odds, made their best possible guess, and had vaccines developed months ago, like normal, the routine for developing flu vaccines based on traditional transmission patterns, which are roughly Asia to the Americas and Europe. Because this is so new and so unusual in its makeup, they are saying just a little while ago now it might take until October to have vaccines for it. Notice how this case is now different from "normal" flu? Isn't that something you supposedly covered your first year?

        This isn't fear mongering, its just summarizing what the experts who know are saying. These are "emergency meetings", planned schedules radically altered, Mexico canceling now over 500 public events and so on. I fail to see that reporting the facts is fear mongering, it is what it is, and this ISN'T a normal flu mutation. It wouldn't be headlines all over, big heads of departments and so on wouldn't be calling emergency meetings or issuing press releases about it. After that, it is just semantics, go argue with them if they are fear mongering or not.

    But they are, aren't they? I am not fear mongering, but you are trying to minimize like this is somehow normal. No, it isn't a full official pandemic yet, but they are really close to that level and are waiting for a lot more tests to come in, but so far, every day, almost every hour now we are seeing it in more places. They just pulled the first airline passenger, part of the crew, right off a plane when it landed at Heathrow, just a short time ago. It came from Mexico. Are you starting to get it now? This is data, but pretending this data doesn't exist, along with the ramifications, is just foolish. It is easy enough to access.

    Your false arrogance is astounding. I hope you work for a private concern that can go bankrupt and aren't being paid by the tax payer.

    1. Re:what hubris by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone get this man a tinfoil hat, please.

  59. Re:Obligatory comment from a native Los Angeleno.. by gyrogeerloose · · Score: 1

    Good one, but probably over the heads of all those Nortenos out there.

    --
    This ain't rocket surgery.
  60. What's next? by DanJ_UK · · Score: 1

    Bird flu, pig flu, what's next?

    --
    - Dan
    1. Re:What's next? by Pictish+Prince · · Score: 1

      Bird flu, pig flu, what's next?

      BSD (Bird Swine Disease)
      Ok, it's a troll - go ahead & mod me down.

      --
      Only his tendency toward a dazed stupor prevented him from screaming aloud.
  61. Re:Don't run -- treat it yourself. (PP & D) by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

    Sure. I just will continue, to never open the door of the basement, and irradiate all my food while it gets trough the lock.

    I also guess, we on /. wouldn't even notice this, if it weren't for those moles from the outside, bringing in such news as this. ;)

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  62. Limit damage to North America by cenc · · Score: 1

    What do you mean the Americas? Try North America.

    Chile where I live has already implemented screening at the airports for all international flights and anyone with fever or symptoms is being taking to the hospital for evaluation before they allow entry in to the country.

  63. So, what does Google trends say? by cenc · · Score: 1

    Is anyone trying to test this method of tracking flu outbreaks by watching search engine result trends to see if it really works in this case?

    http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v457/n7232/full/nature07634.html

    1. Re:So, what does Google trends say? by cenc · · Score: 3, Interesting
    2. Re:So, what does Google trends say? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That information will be useless in a few days when everyone starts googling for flu.

      Surely?

  64. Immune system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've read that flus like this one kill people at a rate inversely proportionate to the strength of their immune system. Thus, could we limit the impact of the flu by having affected people take drugs that suppress the response of the immune system?

    1. Re:Immune system by cherokee158 · · Score: 1

      The flu virus can be fatal by setting off what is known as a cytokine storm, which is essentially the immune system ramped up to the point where it kills the host as well as the pathogen. There are bodily chemicals that are supposed to limit the release of cytokines so that this does not happen, but sometimes they fail to stem the tide.

      I don't completely understand it, but I suspect that is why healthy adults often succumb to flu pandemics while children and elderly people survive. The healthy adults have more robust immune systems and they respond more strongly to the virus.

      Cytokines produce an inflammatory response (which fights the virus but also produces all the unpleasant symptoms), so I would think that a good anti-inflammatory would help, but I'm not sure. There is a ton of good info on it at wikipedia, though. I suggest everyone read up on it before panicking.

      No one in the U.S. has died yet, and I suspect that this flu outbreak has actually been going on for many months before the papers got wind of it. No one in the U.S. has died yet. I think it's a bit premature to start handing out surgical masks.

  65. Terror. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    http://turnerradionetwork.blogspot.com/2009/04/new-flu-outbreak-traced-to-missing-us.html

    1. Re:Terror. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol Hal Turner

  66. This kind of thing by cjjjer · · Score: 1

    I always wonder how close to the truth Steven King's The Stand would be with regards to this kind of thing happening (minus the supernatural element).

  67. Re:Don't run -- treat it yourself. (PP & D) by moortak · · Score: 2, Informative

    Minor correction P&PD

    --
    Xavier Rabourdin for president 2012
  68. Re:Cancel Air Flight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So your claim is hours is near-instantaneous? I refuse to "get" that.

  69. It's already too widespread to contain by rbarreira · · Score: 2, Informative

    Now, the moment you KNOW that it's spreading faster than you have the capacity to contain and control, THEN you take the drastic step of public alerts limited quarantine. Before then, it's just irresponsible.

    http://www.reuters.com/article/latestCrisis/idUSN25473389

    An unusual new flu virus has spread widely and cannot be contained, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention confirmed on Saturday.

    "It is clear that this is widespread. And that is why we have let you know that we cannot contain the spread of this virus," the CDC's Dr. Anne Schuchat told reporters on a conference call.

    --

    The AACS key is NOT 0xF606EEFD628B1CA427BEA93A9CA9773F
    1. Re:It's already too widespread to contain by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      "It is clear that this is widespread. And that is why we have let you know that we cannot contain the spread of this virus," the CDC's Dr. Anne Schuchat told reporters on a conference call.

      *Waves at the back of the room*
      "Dr Schuchat, are you saying we should nuke it from orbit ?"

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
  70. Re:Don't run -- treat it yourself. (PP & D) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Unfortunately this isnt a typical flue, and if it's the same killing method as with the Asian bird flue (also a mix of human, bird and swine afaik), it causes sepsis.

    The reason people with good immune systems died was because their immune response triggered a massive death of flue virus in the blood, causing blood poisoning. Not a whole lot of good PP&D will do you.

    Added bonus: did someone use any of those antivirals lately to fight the common cold? You're in for a treat: good chance they wont work on you as well as they should when the flue gets here.

  71. Correction: you might have had it by mbessey · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Unless someone at CDC or your state health laboratories have cultured your virus, there's no way to be sure what you had. Actually, I bet they'd like to hear from you...

  72. This isn't swine flu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Swine Flu? Why are they calling it that? This flu has genes in common with human flu, avian flu and swine flu. This flu is transmitted from person to person. This flu originated with people, not with pigs. This isn't swine flu, it is human flu. What political angle do they have behind calling it swine flu? What's the FUD?

  73. Re:flu post! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Dirty Sanchez" is an invention by disgusting whites (makers of the "Dutch Oven," "Hot Lunch," "Stick a Carrot Up Your Passed-Out Buddy's Ass," and many more.)

  74. 1918 epidemic rehash by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

    Swine, avian, and human transgenic flu? Hmm. Kinda like the flu epidemic of 1918 which killed millions, isn't it?

    I wonder if this has anything to do with the same strain of flu which was recently (2003 IIRC) re-engineered, or recovered, by a scientist from a sample (or something like that) of the 1918 pandemic.

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  75. Fluid in the lungs and smoking by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

    Interesting thought - it's quite possible, I suppose. I seem to recall hearing/reading about the impact of the 1918 flu in North Dakota on the family that lived in the house we were staying in (small town, so it was easy to find the records). The mid-20s couple died, but the grandmother and child survived. I seem to recall something about it being respiratory related: the lungs filled up with fluid resulting in the person drowning.

    If that was the primary cause of death in 1918, it seems like it'd be pretty "easy" to deal with the flu symptoms today: just siphon fluid from people's lungs until they defeat the flu. On the other hand, if people live longer with the flu, and the flu runs its course, an additional, more virulent strain might develop.

    Wouldn't it be supremely ironic if this were to become a pandemic, and the only people who survived in the 'healthy adult' age group (say, 16-40 or so), or those with a higher survival rate, were smokers? I wonder if any correlation could be drawn between the 1918 pandemic casualties and smoking - I doubt such information is available due to how drastically that flu impacted societal advancement.

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    1. Re:Fluid in the lungs and smoking by TheLink · · Score: 1

      >it seems like it'd be pretty "easy" to deal with the flu symptoms today: just siphon fluid from people's lungs until they defeat the flu.

      It might be a bit difficult to siphon fluid from other people's lungs while having to siphon fluid from your own lungs.

      Hospitals can deal with a few cases. But when it gets to a pandemic level stuff starts to fall apart.

      There'll also be a few nuts who will break quarantine and infect others. Some even intentionally.

      Oh humans will survive. There'll be a bunch of survivalists and tribes stuck in the jungle. But given how modern society is dependent on so many specialists, it's hard to keep things running smoothly if the "3 people in the organization that know how to do X are dead or incapacitated". Sure given time maybe someone else can figure it out, but is there time? Nowadays a lot of thing is "just in time", no vast amount of stocks in warehouses.

      That's why navy ships are "overcrewed". If 30% of the crew died, there's still a high chance the ship can still fight battles.

      I doubt many companies are "overcrewed" nowadays. Any extra capacity would have been cut or converted to $$$$ and siphoned off.

      --
    2. Re:Fluid in the lungs and smoking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it would not be ironic, it would be incongruous.

      Irony is a secret message for an audience, and would be appropriate if someone or something produced the virus specifically to target non-smokers with the idea that smokers would say: "aha! you got this because you don't damage your lungs with smoke!"

      That one type of damage (from smoke and hot vapour inhalation) might protect one against another type of damage (cytokine cascades and other inflammatory responses that destroy lung tissues in the presence of an active flu infection) would be incongruous because there is no apparent reason why the former would have a protective effect against the latter. There are plausible but also highly unlikely reasons why smokers might have less of an inflammatory response to the flu antigen or the daughter products of infection mostly having to do with an attenuation of inflammation response generally (because the inflammation is chronic in people with e.g. emphysema) or preferential binding by inhaled smoke matter, or metabolits, or physical damage from heat. There are many many more plausible reasons why smokers would suffer more than non-smokers (precisely because of the damage that smoking does to lung tissue and also because viruses that travel by droplet infection may possibly be able to travel more efficently in the exhalations of a smoker). There is a significantly overlapping area between the sets of outcomes as well.

      For irony: should it be that smokers as a population have a better statistical outcome than non-smokers with respect to one particular outbreak, it would be ironic if tobacco companies marketed cigarettes as a prophylactic and this increases the early death rate over the course of a generation or two much more than the non-smoke-"treated" flu would have on its own.

      "See, smoking is protective!" -- message on its face, meaning that it has a plausible or even proven prophylactic effect on one particular flu. "But it will kill you later on in life after you've spent lots of money on our brand of cigarette" -- secret message sent to "clued in" members of the audience.

      That's what irony is.

  76. 18 people died so far? what? more like a 100... by calder0n · · Score: 1

    Their numbers seem too low. A friend that works at a local hospital in Mexico city said that only at her hospital 40 people died already.

  77. Timely bad response is better than late good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now, the moment you KNOW that it's spreading faster than you have the capacity to contain and control, THEN you take the drastic step of public alerts limited quarantine. Before then, it's just irresponsible.

    Ummm, no. As articles in Scientific American regularly state, any timely response to a pandemic is better than any late perfect response. Every simulation that's been done, has shown that what's MOST important is to act quickly, no matter how dumb the response is.
    Thank god(s) it's not like the 1918 pandemic where healthy people were more likely to die due to their good immune system being able to tear up the body like no one's business.

  78. Re:Obligatory comment from a native Los Angeleno.. by niktemadur · · Score: 1

    It's not pigfluenza, it's La gripe carnitas.

    Mmmm... Carnitas.

    For those poor, uninitiated mortals, carnitas is the ultimate bacon porn, a taco in which you pick and choose your favorite pig components fried in a lard-filled vat, such as buche (stomach), cuero (rind), cachete (cheek), tripa (tripe), corazon (heart), costilla (rib), etcetera, the most hardcore item being zurrapa, all the bits and pieces that broke away and sedimented at the bottom. Add grain salt, chopped onion and cilantro, freshly squeezed lemon, salsa, and... well, pork away!

    --
    Lil' Thindime, lilting a lacrimose lament, krashes the kwaint konfines of Kokonino Kounty
  79. Re:Don't run -- treat it yourself. (PP & D) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    PD&P may work for chronic CF. It will fail miserably against the inflammatory storm that these new influenza strains create in the lung. (New as in not evolved to the human host).

    In severe influenza, this inflammatory response destroys lung tissue. It doesn't matter if you clear the mucus, there's no lung surface left to breathe through.

    This strain is susceptible to relenza for now, but will take all of a few weeks to become resistant once relenza is widely used to treat it.

    With confirmed presence in New York and the UK, this virus has probably already arrived in a mall near you.

    ZOMGWAAGTD!!!

  80. What a month! by friendofish · · Score: 1

    I've had a hard time sleeping well as I've been having recurring dreams about some old black lady telling me to come visit her in Hemmingford Home, Nebraska. And now comes news of a new flu. Screw this, I'm gonna go listen to some Larry Underwood and get drunk.

  81. Unconfirmed cases in New Zealand, Govt moribund by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A group of young Kiwis just back from Mexico have come down with an influenza-like illness, striking fears a flu virus that may have killed 80 people has arrived in New Zealand.
    http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/health/2364487/Kiwis-show-flu-like-symptoms

  82. Re:Don't run -- treat it yourself. (PP & D) by electrosoccertux · · Score: 1

    Pft who needs all that. If your lungs are filling with fluid, just get someone to turn you upside down and shake you while you cough.

    Kids these days don't even know gravity when they see it. Get off my lawn!!!

  83. Fort Detrick disease samples missing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fort Detrick disease samples may be missing
    Originally published April 22, 2009
    http://www.fredericknewspost.com/sections/news/display.htm?StoryID=89293
    Army criminal investigators are looking into the possibility that disease samples are missing from biolabs at Fort Detrick.
    As first reported in today's edition of The Frederick News-Post by columnist Katherine Heerbrandt, the investigators are from the U.S. Army Criminal Investigation Division unit at Fort Meade.
    Chad Jones, spokesman for Fort Meade, said CID is investigating the possibility of missing virus samples from the U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases.
    He said the only other detail he could provide is that the investigation is ongoing.
    Fort Detrick does not have its own CID office, Jones said, which is why Fort Meade's CID was brought in.
    Jones said he could not comment on when the investigation started.
    CID is responsible for investigating crimes where the Army is, or may be, a party of interest, according to the U.S. Army Criminal Investigation Command website.
    USAMRIID is the Army's top biodefense lab, where researchers study pathogens including Ebola, anthrax and plague.
    In February, USAMRIID halted all its research into these and other diseases, known as "select agents" following the discovery of virus samples that weren't listed in its inventory.
    The institute's commander, Col. John Skvorak, ordered research halted while workers conducted a complete inventory of the institute's select agents.
    That inventory is nearly completed, though the exact end date isn't known yet, said Caree Vander Linden, USAMRIID spokeswoman.
    Vander Linden said she didn't know about the CID investigation and referred questions to the CID's head public affairs office.
    There is no indication whether the CID investigation is connected to USAMRIID's re-inventorying of its select agent stocks.

  84. Re:As a Democrat I blame George W. Bush by MJMullinII · · Score: 0

    As a Democrat I blame The Jew Puppet George "Chimpy" Bu$Hitler McHaliburtain

    Jews, Jews, Jews,...ALWAYS with the Jews.

    What ever happened to just blaming whitey in general?

    --
    "Don't be a martyr -- BE THE ONE WHO GOT AWAY!"
  85. Re:Don't run -- treat it yourself. (PP & D) by rve · · Score: 1

    Added bonus: did someone use any of those antivirals lately to fight the common cold? You're in for a treat: good chance they wont work on you as well as they should when the flue gets here.

    Antivirals don't work very well in any case. Tamiflu is considered effective because it was shown to reduce the symptoms by about a day. This means that instead of 10 days, you're only sick for 9.

    People who take it for a common cold are seriously not thinking clearly, as it works by inhibiting the synthesis of a protein in the flu virus. This protein isn't present in other viruses, so you're only taking a placebo with real side effects.

  86. Re:Protective Measures: Goggles and Face Masks by u38cg · · Score: 1

    Even more important: wash your goddamned hands. Scrub your hands properly numerous times a day, using a nailbrush, and you will significantly improve your chances of avoiding picking up anything. Don't touch your face if you can avoid it. Yes, this is an airborne strain we're talking about, but even airborne viruses are usually transmitted by touch.

    --
    [FUCK BETA]
  87. Re:Protective Measures: Goggles and Face Masks by ultranova · · Score: 1

    This post is more about eye protection: Next to the nose and mouth, your eyes are the next best method for transmission. Are thick, wrap-around glasses or goggles a good idea?

    No, they aren't. They make you look like an idiot and can't stop you from getting infected. If this turns into a pandemic, the very air will be saturated with viral particles; you cannot avoid breathing some, or eating some with your food or water.

    Your best bet is to ensure that you get enough sleep (to keep your immune system up), aren't overly stressed, eat healthily and are in decent shape. Also wash your hands; it won't stop the flu, but it will lessen the chances of some other nastiness from distracting your immune system at the critical moment.

    Beyond that, you either can resist this thing or you can't. If you can, fine; if you can't, you'll die. It's genetic, and there's nothing you can do about it. You either make your Fortitude save or you won't, so just chill and wait for the dice to fall. Besides, worrying about it will cause stress, which will weaken your immune system and give you a penalty, thus lessening your chances.

    Seriously, people, this breathing mask and goggles nonsense is just the viral equivalent of airport security theatre, and just as effective. If you have to go, go without looking like idiots.

    --

    Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

  88. Why do I think about the name .. Monsanto? by freaker_TuC · · Score: 1

    a mixture of swine, human and avian viruses

    Could be it's paranoia on my side, although mixing genetic engineering with swines and the gap is closer to such kinds of mixtures...

    --
    --- I am known for the ones who want to find me on the net. Is that a privacy risk or a privilege? One might wonder..
  89. I say.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    we take off, and nuke the site from orbit. It's the onyl way to be sure.

  90. Re:Don't run -- treat it yourself. (PP & D) by NotSoHeavyD3 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Oh, that immune system going nuts thing is called a Cytokine Storm.(Although it sounds more like a video game I would have played as a kid.) More on that for anybody who cares http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cytokine_storm

    --
    Did you know 80 to 90% of the moderators on slashdot wouldn't recognize a troll even if one dragged them under a bridge.
  91. Re:Protective Measures: Goggles and Face Masks by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

    Your best bet is to ensure that you get enough sleep (to keep your immune system up)

    Except that this appears to be one of the varieties, like the 1918 pandemic, where the flu is only moderately irritating and the deaths are caused by the immune response, so weakening your immune system slightly (maybe go and catch a bacterial infection too and give it two things to worry about...) will be more likely to increase your chances of survival.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  92. There are worse diseases by JDub87 · · Score: 1

    Alright, I'll admit this is bad. But why the "panic" over something that so far only has the "potential" to do massive harm? What about HIV and other STD's that are roaming free across the land infecting hundreds of thousands of people a year?

    1. Re:There are worse diseases by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Flu's can kill quick, and fast with high vectors of infection. With the ability to overwhelm the entire health infrastructure in the matter of a week or two. Where HIV and STD's are generally controllable, preventable, and treatable when proper measures are used, or are put into practice.

      What makes this particular one worse is that it strikes people in their prime, not the young or old.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
  93. Re:Don't run -- treat it yourself. (PP & D) by Will.Woodhull · · Score: 4, Informative

    Speaking from my nursing background here (20+ years as Registered Nurse in Intensive Care, Emergency Room, and medical wards).

    Postural drainage and percussion (PD&P) are appropriate when the "fluid in the lungs" is in the bronchial tree, as in cystic fibrosis and some kinds of bronchitis. It will do no good in pneumonia and may cause greater harm.

    In pneumonia the dangerous fluid is not within the lumens of the bronchial tree where it could be coughed out; it is the walls of the tree that are swollen with excess interstitial fluid that is the danger. The swelling increases the distance between the air sacs and blood vessels, and as it progresses, it collapses the air sacs. So you don't have gobs of stuff blocking the lungs; you've got less working lung area.

    If you start to come down with the flu a good plan would be to avoid exercise or any activity that would increase your O2 demand and your CO2 production. Spend your awake time mostly sitting, and rest in a semi-recumbent position rather than flat in bed. Do deep breathing exercises every half hour or so to help keep airways open. Go with sedentary activities like reading, watching tv, working on improving your slashdot karma, and so on. And remember that the hardware of your mind is now compromised by the illness, so you are not as sharp as usual, your judgment may be bad, and there are going to be more bugs in your code and logic.

    --
    Will
  94. How protective are face masks? by maillemaker · · Score: 1

    I've always wondered just how effective those paper masks are. They do not seem to seal well against the face. I would think at least 20% of the air you breath in bypasses the filter. Do these things actually do any good?

    --
    A work that expires before its copyright never enters the public domain and thus enjoys eternal copyright protection.
  95. Factory Farming Side Effect by Lord_Pall · · Score: 1

    This isn't genetically engineered, it's a side effect of bad farming practices.

    In the same way we've managed to infect our pigs with MRSA http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/15/opinion/15kristof.html I think we've managed to kick up yet another variant..

    Signs are pointing to a Smithfields Farms hog-farm in Veracruz where the outbreak originated. http://www.grist.org/article/2009-04-25-swine-flu-smithfield/

    I'm not arguing for us to go back to sticks and weeds for our food supply, but if you set up a farming environment where the only way to guarantee survival of your animals is continual, therapeutic antibiotics, you're doing it wrong.

  96. Re:Protective Measures: Goggles and Face Masks by ultranova · · Score: 1

    Except that this appears to be one of the varieties, like the 1918 pandemic, where the flu is only moderately irritating and the deaths are caused by the immune response, so weakening your immune system slightly (maybe go and catch a bacterial infection too and give it two things to worry about...) will be more likely to increase your chances of survival.

    Except that inflammation doesn't weaken your immune system, it causes it to switch to "war mode", which means that any pre-existing infection increases the chances that the total response is out of proportion and will kill you.

    --

    Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

  97. HIV isn't airborne. by yossarianuk · · Score: 1

    Although I get your point the main difference between Aids/HIV is that your can't catch it just by being near one of 'the infected'. Also the speed of transmission will be much faster so will the speed of death. Just heard someone in Scotland is ill after getting back from Mexico - time to rebuild that wall........

  98. Re:Don't run -- treat it yourself. (PP & D) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would guess that if a serious flu comes through, you will not be able to avoid it.

    However, if I understand correctly, flu typically kills by filling the lungs up with mucus, and preventing breathing -- a fatal pneumonia, if you will. However, such a symptom is entirely (and easily) treatable. The treatment is called PP &D, and it takes about 20 minutes to drain the lungs. In other words, in the time it would take the ambulance to get you and get you to the hospital, you could be in good enough condition to walk out the door.

    I've done this on my kid, and it does greatly improve breathing function.

    Therefore, my advice would be to simply be prepared to do PP & D on others, the price being that they learn to do it, and do PP & D on still others in a 2:1 ratio until the need is gone. That way, if you do get sick, you will have someone to do it on you, and the flu wonâ(TM)t be fatal.

    Here are two good sources on how to to PP&D.
    http://www.phoenixchildrens.com/emily-center/child-health-topics/handouts/CPT-55b.pdf

    http://www.questdiagnostics.com/kbase/as/ug1720/how.htm

    ummm - correct me if I am wrong but Flu deaths usually follow from lung infections, pneumonia, blood poisoning, bleeeding in the lungs...
    the body will anyway clear mucus naturally by coughing, this is not the problem.
    If mucus was just the problem I think the world would not be all that worried.

  99. Re:Don't run -- treat it yourself. (PP & D) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a pediatrician, I will vouch for this treatment. It's also called chest percussive therapy (CPT) or "pulmonary toilet."

    Like most other things, it works a lot better if you don't wait for someone to be very sick and on death's door before you start it.

  100. Re:Don't run -- treat it yourself. (PP & D) by StuckInSyrup · · Score: 1

    Reminds me of a joke from a prof. in virology back in the days:
    An untreated flu makes you sick for a week. A treated one for 7 days.

    --
    Ni.
  101. It's obvious. by Xest · · Score: 1

    Fish flu would seem the next logical step.

    Just wait until you catch a fatal flu next time you go swimming in the ocean!

  102. Perhaps we'll have a quick test for this one too.. by RobiOne · · Score: 1

    Since these guys have the best Avian Flu test, they might be able to make a variant for this one too..

    Amazing biotech on this test btw..

    --
    -- Robi
  103. how new strains of fu happen by rs79 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Mans living in close proximity with foul and swine - usually under conditions of extreme poverty and in China, is what cause flues to cross the species barrer and become zoodemic. Airplane travel causes them to go pandemic.

    You don't need labs to create new and deadly flu viruses when the poor have been crowdsourcing this for eons.

    --
    Need Mercedes parts ?
  104. Re:Obligatory comment from a native Los Angeleno.. by garaged · · Score: 1

    I'm norteño you insensitive clod!!

    --
    I'm positive, don't belive me look at my karma
  105. Re:Obligatory comment from a native Los Angeleno.. by gyrogeerloose · · Score: 1

    Yeah, me too. But I live in San Diego so I know what carnitas are.

    --
    This ain't rocket surgery.