Slashdot Mirror


New Food-Growth Product a Bit Hairy

MeatBag PussRocket writes "An article from Marketplace.org reports, 'A Florida company has developed an all-natural product that it says could revolutionize how food is grown in the US. It's called Smart Grow, but it might be a tough sell. It's inexpensive. It eliminates the need for pesticides, so it's environmentally friendly, but it's human hair. Plant pathologists at the University of Florida have found the mats eliminate weeds better than leading herbicides and can also make plants grow up to 30 percent larger.'"

243 comments

  1. So let me get this straight... by KingSkippus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Of dangerous chemicals, animal manure, or human hair, people are squeamish about the human hair?

    1. Re:So let me get this straight... by Morphine007 · · Score: 5, Funny

      1 word: cooties

    2. Re:So let me get this straight... by Smidge207 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Agreed and THIS: more people than that die every hour from:

      Pencil sharpener mishaps
      Loose shoelaces
      Ennui
      Swine flu (aka Captain Tripps)
      Paper cuts
      Choking on midgets
      Fox News
      Staring too long at Rob Malda
      Nail biting
      Ugliness
      Smoking cigarettes
      Bad haircuts
      Forgetting to breathe
      Segway vs. Prius collisions
      Snorting bleach
      Coding in CSS
      Auto-erotic asphyxiation
      Cricket attacks
      Playing cricket while intoxicated
      E.coli
      E.fail
      Fork/toaster/musical chairs
      Chair falls
      Chainsaw juggling
      Country music
      Posting about POSIX compliance on Slashdot
      Chewing tinfoil

      =Smidge=

      --
      Is it just my observation, or is eldavojohn an idiot?
    3. Re:So let me get this straight... by Ralph+Spoilsport · · Score: 3, Funny
      I agree. Funny, innit?

      "Oh, that pesticide is NASTY! It's like Zyklon-B or nerve gas! And manure is...is... POOP! It's full of GERMS! But: HUMAN HAIR? EeeEEEeeeewww! Gross! Gag me with a spoon! Give me the nerve gas or the cowshit! Now!"

      RS

      --
      Shoes for Industry. Shoes for the Dead.
    4. Re:So let me get this straight... by gnick · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The weird thing is that if it was something like wool, there would probably be no objection.

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    5. Re:So let me get this straight... by TornCityVenz · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You should see the list of chemicals or "product" some people put in their hair.

      --
      I Need someone to rebuild a Digitech Digital Delay pedal for me....for me...for me...for me.
    6. Re:So let me get this straight... by amorsen · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Go see Auschwitz, then tell me you aren't the least bit squeamish about products made from human hair.

      I'm not saying that I wouldn't buy this, but I can understand the worry.

      --
      Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
    7. Re:So let me get this straight... by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      Of dangerous chemicals, animal manure, or human hair, people are squeamish about the human hair?

      One word: nits. :-D

    8. Re:So let me get this straight... by Gat0r30y · · Score: 4, Funny
      and from the article -

      In China, hair is a commodity, used in wigs and even as an additive in food.

      OK as an additive in food? That is gross. Wait, hair pie? Nevermind.

      --
      Prediction: The real iPhone killer is going to be sex robots from Japan. Think about it.
    9. Re:So let me get this straight... by bondjamesbond · · Score: 0

      Absolutely right. Hair veggies are a disgusting thought. I'm out.

    10. Re:So let me get this straight... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      30% larger? cool. and as we know the smaller fruits from plants compared to larger ones tend to have more flavor. size != quality sometimes. i'm skeptical. then again, i'm open to something that eliminates the use of pesticides in conventional growing.

    11. Re:So let me get this straight... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      "You should see the list of extremely toxic chemicals or "product" MOST people put in their hair."

      Fixed that for you.

      And for those who are in denial, look up the ingredients in your favorite personal care products, then look for the MSDS, and then stfu!

    12. Re:So let me get this straight... by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 1

      Yknow who else used plastic, don't you?

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    13. Re:So let me get this straight... by Amouth · · Score: 2, Insightful

      sadly the people of the new Generation will have zero idea what you are referring too when you talk about Auschwitz - it's very sad but other than in a history book, the common person doesn't pay attention anymore.

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    14. Re:So let me get this straight... by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I don't get it either, I rather take human hair than animal hair too =P

      Just mark the peas "soylent greens" and it's all go.

    15. Re:So let me get this straight... by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Nothing wrong with germs though, without them I doubt it would work very good, but I'm not sure, cubensis grow well in sterile soil.

    16. Re:So let me get this straight... by aliquis · · Score: 1

      I doubt we'll start farm and kill humans to get their hair ..

      Shaving natural dead people don't seem very likely either.

    17. Re:So let me get this straight... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Auswits, isn't that the country just south of Albania?

    18. Re:So let me get this straight... by aliquis · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      sadly the people of the new Generation will have zero idea what you are referring too when you talk about Auschwitz - it's very sad but other than in a history book, the common person doesn't pay attention anymore.

      I guess you're not european then? I'd rather say we are feed ww2 information & holocaust awareness much more than we need / want.

      There are holocaust tv programs every now and then and if you have something like discovery channel you'll get lots of ww2 programs all the time.

    19. Re:So let me get this straight... by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Cysteine is supposed to often be made from hair (according to wikipedia at least.)

      I asked Scivation how it was with the N-acetyl-Cysteine in their VasoCharge product and they said it was not from hair but who knows ..

      Also sheeps wool aren't supposed to grow without cysteine or something such so I guess that's why it's a good source ..

    20. Re:So let me get this straight... by aliquis · · Score: 1

      But they want more sales, not more taste.

      I live in Sweden and here most things don't taste much at all anyway since most of it is shipped unripe anyway.

      One can get things like tomatoes in cans though and then you probably get ripe plum tomatoes instead of green house grown shipped unripe ones.

    21. Re:So let me get this straight... by SEWilco · · Score: 1
      Naked sheep might object to using wool. And does sheep feed grow better with wool mats, so the technology can be used to raise a larger number of sheep so more wool mats can be made?

      Don't forget to order pesticides for the new crop of clothes moths, carpet beetles, cockroaches, and biting lice which eat hair or wool. And field crickets like damp places to hide, but they'll eat the plants instead of eating the mat.

    22. Re:So let me get this straight... by Thelasko · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Of dangerous chemicals, animal manure, or human hair, people are squeamish about the human hair?

      I once heard an old gardener say that the best way to plant a rose bush is on top of a wad of human hair. Apparently this has been done for centuries.

      --
      One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
    23. Re:So let me get this straight... by EvilBudMan · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      2 words

      crystal meth

    24. Re:So let me get this straight... by yoma666 · · Score: 1

      Honestly you don't want to know what's in my hair, i bet it's more dangerous then most chemicals.

    25. Re:So let me get this straight... by bigpaperbag · · Score: 1

      I'll love you forever for calling swine flu captain tripps.

    26. Re:So let me get this straight... by Amouth · · Score: 1

      you are correct i'm from the US - and here sadly the new generation is only taught bad things happened IF there is time in class to do it.

      While we do have the programs your talking about on TV on the discovery and History channel's other than a very select few of the people i know no one i know really watchs them.

      we are doomed to repeat history - i just hope it is never in my families time.

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    27. Re:So let me get this straight... by conspirator57 · · Score: 1

      or lice, communicable diseases, etc.

      might be promising though if given some proactive research (looking for the problems before they bite us in the rear after deployment.)

      would make wigs more expensive though...

      what about hair from other species? like poodles.

      --
      "If still these truths be held to be
      Self evident."
      -Edna St. Vincent Millay
    28. Re:So let me get this straight... by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Well, I don't know, while there will most likely be big wars (omg, all muslims suck, omg, nuke and make a parking lot of the middle east, so on so on ..) I doubt there will be any "omg we need to kill off all the people of worse quality so we can breed on the best übermench only.."

      I mean, on my dads toilet there used to be a frame with an image of a monkey (?) eating a banana and sitting on the toilet, and all these old advertisements with black people seen with red lips and sticks and things like that, like if it was ok to mock them or assume they was inferior and such. Not that much now .. So, I can't really see how anyone would actually get serious about "omg this breed/race of people is much better than this one" and get it off in anytime soon.

      So personally I assume lots of people will die in wars, but I doubt anyone will be stupid enough to try to kill of a race because they would be inferior. Heck, globalization and breeding between us all will make that even less likely to.

      Poorly written I know but anyway.

      Rather off-topic from growing on hair though :D, but I get the first persons post, I've seen the pictures and well, it's easy to associate the two things.

    29. Re:So let me get this straight... by pwfffff · · Score: 5, Funny

      Another exercise: look up the ingredients in SALT and then look up what happens when you mix Na with H2O. Can't believe people eat that stuff, ugh.

    30. Re:So let me get this straight... by amorsen · · Score: 1

      I certainly agree, and maybe with time noone will think about it.

      Wigs are already made from human hairs, and few make a fuss about that (with the exception of hair extensions, which some people do make a fuss about).

      --
      Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
    31. Re:So let me get this straight... by GarryFre · · Score: 2, Funny

      One weed sadly said to the other.... Hair today gone tomorrow!

      --
      www.Migrainesoft.com - Computer giving you a headache? We can fix that!
    32. Re:So let me get this straight... by BunnyClaws · · Score: 1

      This seems to be the case. I can remember my mom using hair clippings for gardening back in the mid 80's.

      --
      "Anything tastes good if you deep fry it."
    33. Re:So let me get this straight... by vlm · · Score: 1

      While we do have the programs your talking about on TV on the discovery and History channel's other than a very select few of the people i know no one i know really watchs them.

      Also from the peoples republic of the united states of america here. The problem is those shows are really boring. 30 minutes of commercials for "greatest generation" era viewers, 25 minutes of intros, credits, fade in and out from commercials, and 1984 style "two minutes hate", and maybe 5 minutes of actual real information.

      But its not for lack of coverage. You do realize that 1/4 of history channel is like, hitlers hairpiece, hitler A-Z, secret story of hitlers abomb, hitlers last stand, hitlers jet aircraft, the hitler conspiracy, city of the underground hitler edition, etc. That guy gets more media attention in 2009 than he got in the 40s, because there is much more media in total now.

      In comparison, the hitler programs make the other 3/4 of the history channel, which is mostly blue collar documentaries (ax men, ice road truckers, tougher in alaska, that train show, etc) and fantasy reality TV (UFO hunters, monsterquest, etc), appear almost exciting.

      Once in a rare while, something like a historical documentary sneaks through onto the H channel, but that is at least as rare as seeing science fiction on the scifi channel.

      I would like a science fiction channel, and I would like a history channel, but they are not available. Oh well, maybe on youtube.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    34. Re:So let me get this straight... by Viper+Daimao · · Score: 1

      30% larger is still 30% more calories and nutrition. Some parts of the world would put more value on that than on the taste aspect.

      --
      "In the game of life, someone always has to lose. To me, if life were fair, that someone would always be Oklahoma." -DKR
    35. Re:So let me get this straight... by emag · · Score: 1

      So, um, do I auto-Godwin by saying that for years we've referred to the History Channel alternately as "the Hitler Channel" or "the Nazi Channel", since every time we turned it on, that was the subject of the current show?

      --
      "The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule." --H.L. Mencken
    36. Re:So let me get this straight... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you kidding? It seems like just about every movie about the WW2 era has to work in the Jewish Holocaust into it whether it fits into the plot or not. If someone in the US doesn't know about the Holocost, they've been high and/or living under a rock for most of their life.

    37. Re:So let me get this straight... by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      The point here is the dosage. Which both you and GP conveniently ignored.

      And from what I know, the "bad" stuff in most hair products is not only in a dosage that makes it not healthy, but also completely unneeded.
      Same as most hygienic products.

      Toothpaste is the best example. Everything in there, except for some tiny amount of fluoride (which are preventive) and some abrasive particles, is completely useless. These are foaming and wetting agents, flavoring, preservatives, coloring and other additives. You would go just as well, using some marble powder with a drop of fluoride solution and a drop of mint oil.
      But in fact, you don't even need that. It's just so you don't have to brush your teeth right after eating. Because then, a normal toothbrush and water would suffice totally.

      It's not much different with pretty much every hygienic product. If you are a chemist, you are much better off, just mixing the stuff yourself, in the most basic way. :)

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    38. Re:So let me get this straight... by ksheff · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sounds like a way for barbers and hair salons to make a little extra money on something that they would otherwise throw away. Start a company advertising that you're going to pay $X per pound of hair. People interested would send away for a box/envelope to put the hair in and send it off to receive their money. Prisons, military boot camps, etc would also be good sources. No one is going to be rounding up hippies and force shaving them even if it would be good for the environment.

      IIRC, human hair is also a good way to kill slugs. The hair gets wrapped around them and strangles the pests.

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    39. Re:So let me get this straight... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Arrrggh!! Oh dear God it's all over me!

    40. Re:So let me get this straight... by ZosX · · Score: 1

      Let me guess. You must be one of those people who nitpick every good idea to death with a million reasons as to why something is a bad idea. Yeah. Hey Mr. "It will never work" how is using less herbicide as well as somewhat fertilizing the ground a possibly bad idea? Because of bugs?? Have you ever been in a garden? Its usually crawling with them. For the record, body lice feed off of your blood when they bite you, they do not eat hair. Clothes moths are certainly something else though, but why would some extra moths in the garden be a bad thing? Same thing with some more beetles. Also field crickets seem to have no problems burrowing under the soil and there is usually enough plant cover for them to hide regardless, adding a bunch of hair is not likely to suddenly make them appear or increase in numbers. Since cockroaches exist naturally in the soil, I doubt that adding some hair will do much to attract them when there is plenty of better things for them to eat outside. I'm only responding that since you felt a need to be such a damned naysayer that most of your points are pretty damned moot on the whole discussion. The GP was making an observation about the acceptance of different materials, not making a direct suggestion to use sheep's wool as ground cover. For home gardening, human hair is actually not a bad idea, though I think that mulching the ground with a good layer of treated (or even untreated, but they don't last as long) wood chips would probably be a lot more effective to be honest.

      Just saying.....

    41. Re:So let me get this straight... by Gilmoure · · Score: 2, Insightful

      We've used dog hair around the house (outside), to drive off mice, moles, gophers, etc. Just stuff a big hunk down any hole we find in the spring and it's usually good for a year. Guess rodents don't like the smell of wet dog either.

      Would be interesting to see how it does with bugs.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    42. Re:So let me get this straight... by keeblebrox · · Score: 1

      I once heard an old gardener say that the best way to plant a rose bush is on top of a wad of human hair. Apparently this has been done for centuries.

      That's a very old gardener.

    43. Re:So let me get this straight... by pieisgood · · Score: 2, Funny

      and my screen name holds true

      --
      Eat sleep die
    44. Re:So let me get this straight... by jae471 · · Score: 1

      Guess rodents don't like the smell of wet dog either.

      I don't think its the "wet" part that keeps the rodents away.

      I might try this. I've got plenty of husky crosses and a squirrel problem.

    45. Re:So let me get this straight... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aaargh, OMG it's all over me!

    46. Re:So let me get this straight... by The+Archon+V2.0 · · Score: 1

      Once in a rare while, something like a historical documentary sneaks through onto the H channel, but that is at least as rare as seeing science fiction on the scifi channel.

      Ah, I remember the old days, when the likes of Sci-Fi Buzz was on. When a reference to meeting Poul Anderson and Frederik Pohl ended in an incredibly bad pun about being "po(u|h)larized" and they could expect most of the audience to get it. Where you could make a weekly "editorial" segment simply by sticking a camera in front of Harlan Ellison and letting him be himself for five minutes. Where the least science-fictiony thing was coverage of a (Western) animation convention which still had the sheer awesomeness of seeing the likes of Don Messick and June Foray being interviewed and voicing their more memorable characters. (Seriously. Papa Smurf meets Rocky the Flying Squirrel. Most memorable 10 seconds of TV ever.)

      I would like a science fiction channel, and I would like a history channel, but they are not available.

      Nope, welcome to Bizarro world, where TLC is not The Learning Channel, where A&E isn't Arts & Entertainment, where AMC isn't American Movie Classics, where TNN wasn't The Nashville Network, and where Sci-Fi is SyFy. I suppose the HyStry Channel is next....

    47. Re:So let me get this straight... by Bigjeff5 · · Score: 1

      The point about the salt was not a dosage issue. NA is incredibly dangerous even in at small levels (consuming a few salt grain sized bits of NA would do serious damage to your mouth and throat), and Cl is deadly at very low levels, it was used as a WMD for a little while. NaCl doesn't become harmfull until you consume very high levels relative to its constituent parts, and you can swim in it if you want. As long as you don't choke, and try not to swallow too much (you've got tons of leeway), you'll be unharmed.

      The point was, just because something is toxic, doesn't mean it can't be used in beneficial ways when paired with the right ingredients at the right levels. The hair product example isn't exactly the same as salt, as salt is molecule and the hair product is a mixture of molecules, but the concept is similar. Same idea as alloys, really. Though I personally recomend not eating them.

      --
      Security is mostly a superstition... Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. - Helen Keller
    48. Re:So let me get this straight... by filthpickle · · Score: 1

      I don't think this is necessarily true...so I googled it.

      http://www.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1880145,00.html

      from that article:

      2. On the So-Called "Dilution Effect": Today's vegetables might be larger, but if you think that means they contain more nutrients, you'd be wrong. Davis writes that jumbo-sized produce contains more "dry matter" than anything else, which dilutes mineral concentrations. In other words, when it comes to growing food, less is more. Scientific papers have cited one of the first reports of this effect, a 1981 study by W.M. Jarrell and R.B. Beverly in Advances in Agronomy, more than 180 times since its publication, "suggesting that the effect is widely regarded as common knowledge."

    49. Re:So let me get this straight... by Viper+Daimao · · Score: 1

      very interesting. thanks for looking that up.

      --
      "In the game of life, someone always has to lose. To me, if life were fair, that someone would always be Oklahoma." -DKR
    50. Re:So let me get this straight... by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > Another exercise: look up the ingredients in SALT and then
      > look up what happens when you mix Na with H2O.

      Of the two major elements in table salt, the sodium is quite frankly not the one I'd be the more squeamish about. But in either case neither component element retains its enthusiastic reactivity in the salt, because it's already reacted with something from the opposite side of the periodic table. There are not very many things sodium would rather be with than the chlorine. Fluorine is one, but if you've got elemental fluorine wafting around at the dinner table, the last thing you're going to be worried about is that it might react with the table salt.

      > Can't believe people eat that stuff, ugh.

      Soy sauce tastes so much better ;-)

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    51. Re:So let me get this straight... by FutureDomain · · Score: 1

      I am from the new Generation and I know what Auschwitz is, you insensitive clod!

      --
      Hydraulic pizza oven!! Guided missile! Herring sandwich! Styrofoam! Jayne Mansfield! Aluminum siding! Borax!
    52. Re:So let me get this straight... by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1

      no no! keep going! i think if you keep it up he may burst into flames! just disprove a few more of his points! any moment now! LOOK! i think he's starting to smoke!

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
    53. Re:So let me get this straight... by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1

      you know, Dihydrogen monoxide is lethal in large quantities.

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
    54. Re:So let me get this straight... by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1

      soy sauce has a lot of salt in it. i'm raining on everyone's parade today, don't feel bad.

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
    55. Re:So let me get this straight... by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Manure isn't a pesticide. And you don't slather it all over the plants anyway*

      *Mushrooms, excluded. Technically you don't slather them with manure, but think about it: if the whole mushroom is feeding on the manure, then it must be sucking up some by capillary action to the upper parts. It doesn't matter how much you rinse the outside.

      And it's not really poop anyway. At least, not the way we understand it. It's herbivore elimination, so it's mostly just partially digested grasses. If they were efficient about extracting nutrients (or, like us, had chosen a higher energy food source), they wouldn't need to be so big.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    56. Re:So let me get this straight... by SEWilco · · Score: 1

      I'm quite familiar with gardening, and do use the proper bugs for them. I'm just following the law of unintended consequences. I said biting lice (which eat feathers and hair), while you're describing sucking lice; biting lice usually need hosts and I'd rather not find out if they can survive in warm mats. And do you really treat your gardening wood chips with pesticides and fungicides to make them last longer?

    57. Re:So let me get this straight... by MeatBag+PussRocket · · Score: 1

      mod me pedantic but mushrooms arent plants, they're fungi... and before the ob. fun guy joke comes along, lets squash it, because like zucchini, thats a plant.

      --
      i wage a holy war against the apostrophe.
    58. Re:So let me get this straight... by MeatBag+PussRocket · · Score: 1

      i'll see your "size != quality" argument and raise you a "natrual == healthier" argument

      --
      i wage a holy war against the apostrophe.
    59. Re:So let me get this straight... by MeatBag+PussRocket · · Score: 1

      centuries? how old was this gardener?

      --
      i wage a holy war against the apostrophe.
    60. Re:So let me get this straight... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Check out your next pizza, bagel, or loaf of bread ... l-cysteine or l-cysteine hydrochloride are often used as dough conditioners. The cheapest source of food grade l-cysteine is human hair. Certain meat-like artificial flavorings are also derived from cysteine.

    61. Re:So let me get this straight... by hachi-control · · Score: 1

      New generation kid here - wat. Very painfully aware of what Auschwitz-Birkenau, Dachau, Treblinka, all are. If you were to ask me about battles in the Boer War (do you even know what that is?) I'd be less knowledgeable, however.

    62. Re:So let me get this straight... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are absolutely correct in your beliefs. People don`t eat sodium hydroxide.

    63. Re:So let me get this straight... by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

      That is exactly why there are less weeds, they end up being eaten by the cooties, and then we kill the cooties with some vidal sassun or selsun blue, all ok in the end really!

    64. Re:So let me get this straight... by Amouth · · Score: 2, Informative

      When i say new generation i'm talking about the kids in school right now.

      my wife is a teacher - it is not uncommon for her to overhear racist remarks coming from her kids - remarks which would make my hair currle.. but to them they have zero clue what they are saying.

      and when you try to explain it to them - all you get is blank stares.. it's really creepy how far gone this world is getting.

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    65. Re:So let me get this straight... by smithmc · · Score: 1

      Fluorine is one, but if you've got elemental fluorine wafting around at the dinner table, the last thing you're going to be worried about is that it might react with the table salt.

      Indeed. Instead you'd probably be marveling at your strong, clean teeth.

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
    66. Re:So let me get this straight... by EvilBudMan · · Score: 1

      Yeah that was my point, anything could be in human hair. One person gets modded as funny for being politically correct. I get modded off topic.

      I wonder how much they pay for your hair. Maybe I could get free haircut out of the deal or something. (joke ha ha)

      But at least someone here got it. Thanks for the reply.

    67. Re:So let me get this straight... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup. 2 reasons

      1. Look at the guy next to you at jury duty. What drugs has he taken that could end up in his hair? What diseases has he been exposed to when he visited his friends in some god-forsaken 3rd world country? Sheep don't travel and don't smoke crack.

      2. If a sheep has a disease, it's probably not going to spread to humans.

    68. Re:So let me get this straight... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    69. Re:So let me get this straight... by eugene+ts+wong · · Score: 1

      Well, you need to elaborate sometimes. It never occured to me that you actually had a point, when you said the 2 words. I didn't know that you meant quality control. I'm very uninformed about drugs, so it just went over my head.

      Now that I understand what you were trying to do, I'm greatful for your comment.

    70. Re:So let me get this straight... by Paranatural · · Score: 2, Informative

      Soy Sauce is frequently made from human hair. In fact, you've probably eaten some yourself. When you buy Soy sauce make sure you check the ingredients. And yes, I am being 100% serious.

    71. Re:So let me get this straight... by EvilBudMan · · Score: 1

      I assume that's what the parent was talking about as I am uninformed about exactly what "cooties" are.

      Since that's probably the kind of hair that you are going to get, I just wondered how they planed on taking the chemicals out of it that humans would build up over a lifetime?

      Besides I think there are already better mediums for growing things like rock wool or better yet nothing at all.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydroponics

    72. Re:So let me get this straight... by eugene+ts+wong · · Score: 1

      Hmm. I thought that I knew what cooties are, but it turns out that I was wrong. Cooties are body louses. They are little bugs that literally suck our blood. I assume that the solution to that specific problem is to just let the hair sit for a while, so that the bugs die. Also the hair could be used only outside, so that it's harder for the bugs to find something to suck.

      As for the chemicals, I kind of wonder about that, too. Hopefully, the chemicals aren't absorbed by plants.

  2. Other usages? by Burkin · · Score: 4, Funny

    and can also make plants grow up to 30 percent larger.'"

    Maybe someone needs to use this idea to make a super penis pill!

    1. Re:Other usages? by bentcd · · Score: 5, Informative

      and can also make plants grow up to 30 percent larger.'"

      Maybe someone needs to use this idea to make a super penis pill!

      Evolution is way ahead of you: the human penis is already grown in a bed of human hair.

      --
      sigs are hazardous to your health
    2. Re:Other usages? by SupremoMan · · Score: 5, Funny

      And trimming the hair makes your penis appear 30% larger.

    3. Re:Other usages? by Don853 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Too bad you can't selectively meta-moderate. I'd like to congratulate the person who modded this "informative".

    4. Re:Other usages? by Trikki+Nikki! · · Score: 1

      Maybe someone needs to use this idea to make a super penis pill!

      I get enough spam in my inbox as it is, please for the love of all that is good and holy do not give the spammers any more ideas!

      --
      i r in ur /.s girling up ur storiez
    5. Re:Other usages? by boneglorious · · Score: 1

      My God, no! LARGE penises, fine...but large HAIRY ones?!

      --
      Can I mod something +1 Scary if it's true but I wish it weren't?
    6. Re:Other usages? by Volante3192 · · Score: 1

      Gives new definition to the phrase French tickler...

    7. Re:Other usages? by Morphine007 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Cue Banner

    8. Re:Other usages? by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Evolution is way ahead of you: the human penis is already grown in a bed of human hair.

      Fuck, I knew the body grooming was a bad idea ..

    9. Re:Other usages? by Slacksoft · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately when human hair is combined with the penis the effect is a 30% reduction in visible growth.

    10. Re:Other usages? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe someone needs to use this idea to make a super penis pill!

      i don't know about you.. but mine grows on hair..

    11. Re:Other usages? by drizek · · Score: 1

      "What a lovely rose!"
      "Thanks, I grew it myself..."
      "How wonderful!"
      "... in my pubes."

    12. Re:Other usages? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For you it might...

  3. Does it work only with human hair? by Lonewolf666 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What about wool from sheep or other animals? That might be cheaper...

    --
    C - the footgun of programming languages
  4. Beowulf clusters of hair donors? by qwertphobia · · Score: 1

    I sense a few more bald heads running around if this product starts to take off!

    --
    Never ask for directions from a two-headed tourist! -Big Bird
    1. Re:Beowulf clusters of hair donors? by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 3, Funny

      I will then have to put up with people asking if I'm ok, have I lost my job, why am I selling my hair for fertilizer?

      Nature can be so cruel.

  5. A new use for dead people by InsaneProcessor · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Another donor item.

    --

    Athiesm is a religion like not collecting stamps is a hobby.
    1. Re:A new use for dead people by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Just cover them with soil and plant the tomatoes, no need to make felts of the hair.

  6. You've gotta tell them! by characterZer0 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Smart Grow is people!

    --
    Go green: turn off your refrigerator.
    1. Re:You've gotta tell them! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does First Lady Michelle Obama know about this?

      Maybe she'll get some of these hair mats for use in the White House vegetable garden. And they come from China, too. There's a political joke in there somewhere, but I don't want to find it ... ;P

    2. Re:You've gotta tell them! by defireman · · Score: 1

      Next thing they'd do is grow hair like cattle!

  7. Re:Does it work only with human hair? by esten · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I would expect that any hair works since Hair being made of protein is rich in nitrogen.

  8. Next up ... by foobsr · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Soylent_Green

    Somehow one has to engineer thresholds.

    CC.

    --
    TaijiQuan (Huang, 5 loosenings)
    1. Re:Next up ... by confused+one · · Score: 1

      Don't mod him redundant! This is how it begins...

  9. Bring the 80's rockers back! by mc1138 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now they really can do something about world hunger!

    1. Re:Bring the 80's rockers back! by Java+Pimp · · Score: 1

      They did raise quite a bit of money with the aptly named Hear 'n Aid project.

      --
      Ascalante: Your bride is over 3,000 years old.
      Kull: She told me she was 19!
    2. Re:Bring the 80's rockers back! by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Now they really can do something about world hunger!

      In the 80s people keept their hair ...

    3. Re:Bring the 80's rockers back! by daem0n1x · · Score: 1

      No, they've all gone bald by now.

  10. Re:Does it work only with human hair? by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

    I would suspect that human hair would be cheaper as there isn't any other use for it.

    --
    Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
  11. Not so bad... by Anenome · · Score: 5, Interesting

    That's not so bad. My HS science teacher told me about an experiment where people off the street were given free chicken and asked how it tastes, etc. Later they were told that the chickens were fed plants grown exclusively from human waste. They didn't eat any more of the chicken after being told this.

    But, there's absolutely nothing wrong with eating an animal which has been fed plants grown on manure, human or otherwise :P

    --
    "I Don't Have Enough Faith to be an Atheist"
    1. Re:Not so bad... by icebrain · · Score: 3, Interesting

      On a field trip to MSFC in 5th grade, a couple of us were brave enough to try water from the prototype of the recycled-urine machine on the space station. Everyone looked at us funny, but it didn't taste any different.

      --
      The meek may inherit the earth, but the strong shall take the stars.
    2. Re:Not so bad... by publiclurker · · Score: 1

      That's funny considering around here most plants are fed chicken waste.

    3. Re:Not so bad... by afidel · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Yes, there is. The waste gets on the plant, the waste contains waste born illnesses, the chicken eats the waste contaminated plant and becomes a carrier/host for the infectious agent, you eat the animal and YOU become sick. There's a reason we don't feed animals meat anymore, it leads to a circle of infection that is MUCH more likely to end in food-born illness for us.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    4. Re:Not so bad... by Asic+Eng · · Score: 1

      I think once you tell people something like: "we just tricked you into eating something which is related to X" - people are just wary of you. It doesn't really matter what X was, just that apparently you tried to gross them out and messed with their food.

    5. Re:Not so bad... by Prof.Phreak · · Score: 1

      human waste could be -very- dangerous if not properly treated. that's why you don't see anyone fertilizing fields (food stuff) with it.

      --

      "If anything can go wrong, it will." - Murphy

    6. Re:Not so bad... by ksheff · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's because the average person has become so very disconnected with how food is grown and harvested. Using human waste as a source of fertilizer isn't an unusual one. I believe I had read somewhere that one of the obstacles in building London's original sewers was that most people were collecting their fecal matter in the cellars of their houses and selling it to farmers for fertilizer. For some, I guess the profit motive was greater than the fear of getting sick and/or dying because of the fumes.

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    7. Re:Not so bad... by daem0n1x · · Score: 1

      People fertilise crops with cow and pig manure for millennia. How come no one never thought of that?

    8. Re:Not so bad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Different to what? Unrecycled urine?

    9. Re:Not so bad... by afidel · · Score: 1

      People died young of horrible diseases for millennia. The modern germ theory had its first proof in 1875. Even with modern knowledge people routinely do ignorant things like spend large amounts of time with farm animals unnecessarily resulting in things like the current outbreak of swine flu. Hell my aunt who is very intelligent, speaks four languages fluently and has traveled around the world was ignorant enough to want to hand feed a wild raccoon.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    10. Re:Not so bad... by eugene+ts+wong · · Score: 1

      Cross-contamination is such a foreign concept to most people. I don't understand why that is. I think that it has to do with people being able to grasp a few concepts in their areas of expertise; every thing else is foreign to them.

    11. Re:Not so bad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On a field trip to MSFC in 5th grade, a couple of us were brave enough to try water from the prototype of the recycled-urine machine on the space station. Everyone looked at us funny, but it didn't taste any different.

      That should just make you wonder how much urine is in the water you usually drink.

  12. I'm Skeptical by Crazy+Man+on+Fire · · Score: 0

    This makes sense if it is applied as a mulch, allowing the desired plant to grow while preventing weeds and other invasive plants. There's plenty of other similar products on the marked made from a variety of materials from plastic to woven fiber to paper. However, I'm suspicious of the claim that the product works if you place it at the bottom of the pot. How is this going to prevent weeds?

    1. Re:I'm Skeptical by internerdj · · Score: 1

      Human hair is nitrogen-rich. The bottom of the pot application is fertilization only. Top of the pot is fertilization and a weed barrier.

  13. Eliminates weeds better than herbicides? by Red+Flayer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Lots of things eliminate weeds better than herbicides. Any sufficiently impermeable material used as mulch eliminates weeds better than herbicides. Most gardeners are familiar with the concept of a weed barrier.

    I used to use sheep manure over newspaper both as a source of nitrogen (and other minerals) and as a weed barrier. It was nearly 100% effective. Given the labor involved, however, I'm sure herbicide would have been more cost-effective at preventing weed growth.

    The question is whether applying a barrier against weeds is more cost-effective than herbicides, and I don't know the answer to that, especially considering the environmental impact of herbicides. Just looking at effectiveness of the material doesn't tell us much.

    One other note -- sure it's inexpensive now, since there is an incredible amount of wasted human hair. But if this were ever deployed widely, I think we'd see prices of shorn hair go up, and I question whether there'd be enough to meet demand until it cost the same as other methods.

    --
    "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    1. Re:Eliminates weeds better than herbicides? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Just imagine if copper thieves switched over to hair. Ow.

    2. Re:Eliminates weeds better than herbicides? by zalas · · Score: 1

      When I listened to this on NPR, they say that they get their hair from China, because hair is apparently traded there, instead of thrown away in the barber shop. I'm sure we can get a decent amount of hair from barbershops worldwide if it becomes useful.

    3. Re:Eliminates weeds better than herbicides? by garcia · · Score: 1

      I'm sure herbicide would have been more cost-effective at preventing weed growth.

      It is, for a few generations but over the course of time certain weeds have become at least partially immune to such spraying and thus they require more and more spraying in order to remain as effective as they once were. While those that oppose chemical sprays for farming claim it's like a drug addiction, I like to think it was a known side effect that the chemical companies were looking to exploit.

    4. Re:Eliminates weeds better than herbicides? by LexPat · · Score: 1

      I wonder how effectively cow hair works. From the number of cows we slaughter you would think there would be plenty of their hair.

    5. Re:Eliminates weeds better than herbicides? by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1

      Cows don't have very long hair, so it's not economical to shear. You are practically proposing that we use raw leather.

      In fact, most animals with hair long enough to use like this are already shorn for use in textiles. (long-haired dogs & cats being possible exceptions)

    6. Re:Eliminates weeds better than herbicides? by aliquis · · Score: 1

      And this is where (future) Monsantos ownage of all crops in the world, all the production of them and (currently) no responsibility for whatever contamination do comes in handy ... ;)

    7. Re:Eliminates weeds better than herbicides? by vlm · · Score: 1

      Most gardeners are familiar with the concept of a weed barrier.

      Now that we're on the topic of a "weed barrier", how does it work when THC can be detected in human hair for drug testing purposes, then the hair is used to grow "innocent" corn flakes or something?

      I wonder if the THC in the hair breaks down, or, is concentrated in the plant thats grown in it? There could be a market for this. Probably, due to solubilities, in oil bearing seeds? Or is that weed bearing oil bearing seeds?

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    8. Re:Eliminates weeds better than herbicides? by hajus · · Score: 1

      Maybe the price of hair would go up, but then I can also see haircuts becoming free or even money flowing the other way to patrons at hairbanks that hire barbers.

    9. Re:Eliminates weeds better than herbicides? by hurfy · · Score: 1

      Just use the contaminated hair on the appropriate plants and it is not an issue :)

      Later, off to get a haircut and a book on weaving.

    10. Re:Eliminates weeds better than herbicides? by meiao · · Score: 1

      One other note -- sure it's inexpensive now, since there is an incredible amount of wasted human hair. But if this were ever deployed widely, I think we'd see prices of shorn hair go up, and I question whether there'd be enough to meet demand until it cost the same as other methods.

      Well, there are human hair wigs, which are quite expensive.
      True, you only sell your hair for a good price if it is long and shiny (or whatever).

    11. Re:Eliminates weeds better than herbicides? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live and farm/garden in Hawaii. One thing that is a recurring problem for us is chickens and pheasants uprooting sprouting plants to eat the seed. Also, wild pigs and deer can be a problem at all stages. I can see that one of the benefits of a product like this could be simply the human scent detering animals from even approaching the field/garden.

    12. Re:Eliminates weeds better than herbicides? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Human hair is pretty much in fixed supply, so you are almost certainly correct.

      The hair is all collected from China, where there is a booming market for hair clippings. At $10/kg sanitized, it's not worth the effort for American barber shops to collect it. Maybe India and Indonesia will get into the global hair market (straight black hair is the most valuable for industrial uses), but American hair is almost certainly exclusively more valuable for wigs (where non-black hair is more valuable). If the value of human hair skyrockets to $100/kg, it's bad for the wig-buying public, but its not likely to increase output much.

  14. Re:Does it work only with human hair? by PotatoFarmer · · Score: 2, Funny

    Good to know. I could probably solve world hunger with the cat hair under my furniture.

  15. taxes by rev_sanchez · · Score: 5, Funny

    Maybe I'll be able to get my head and crotch zoned as agricultural now. My efforts to get them zoned commercial were deemed illegal outside of Nevada.

    --
    If you didn't come to party don't bother knocking on my door. Prince '1999'
    1. Re:taxes by skudenfaugen · · Score: 4, Funny

      Why stop there? My chest and back are covered. Its like I have a sweater on all the time!

    2. Re:taxes by oldhack · · Score: 1

      Mediterranean special - Whole Body Zoning (WBZ)!

      --
      Fuck systemd. Fuck Redhat. Fuck Soylent, too. Wait, scratch the last one.
    3. Re:taxes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is there a market for lice?

  16. Re:Does it work only with human hair? by Burkin · · Score: 2, Informative

    I would suspect that human hair would be cheaper as there isn't any other use for it.

    It's used a lot in wigs.

  17. Somewhat interesting by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

    But it's just not as craptastic as Milorganite...

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  18. Why it is human hair by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's human hair because, being at the top of the food chain, all those nasty chemicals like herbicides, pesticides and fertilizers collect in our bodies in the highest concentrations. Thus our hair is chock-full-o-chemicals. It's no wonder human hair mats have all these wondrous properties -- they are really just recycling all those chemicals we've been putting into the environment for the last 50 years.

    --
    When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    1. Re:Why it is human hair by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're close. Actually, hair is an excellent fertilizer because it's something like 14% nitrogen. Other wonderful fertilizers include bones and blood. Imagine that, dead animals make good fertilizer! This is what nature has been doing with dead plants and animals for a long, long time.

  19. Re:Does it work only with human hair? by chromas · · Score: 1

    In-home gardening

  20. Re:Does it work only with human hair? by Martin+Blank · · Score: 5, Funny

    Galactic hunger could be solved with Stallman's beard!

    --
    You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
  21. Risks? by gehrehmee · · Score: 1

    Alternatively, what's the risk of the various pests that plague crops adapting to flourish in human hair?

    --
    "You know, Hobbes, some days even my lucky rocketship underpants don't help" -- Calvin
    1. Re:Risks? by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Alternatively, what's the risk of the various pests that plague crops adapting to flourish in human hair?

      Just as long as the slugs don't adopt a habit of feeding on it and start to crawl up on top of people heads ..

  22. Hair... factory? by Anenome · · Score: 4, Funny

    So just where is all this hair coming from, exactly? Are there 3rd world hair factories where children will be surreptitiously filmed hanging from the ceiling with their hair attached to hooks to make it grow faster, videos of natives explaining just how many beads they get paid for a pound of hair which figures out to a monthly income equivalent of 63 cents, and the poor orphans trotting out missing chunks from their ear where the evil corporate barbers sheared just a bit too fast and cut them for squirming? Will we see Sally Struthers begging us for just $1 a day so the poor hairless masses CAN AFFORD WIGS?!?!

    --
    "I Don't Have Enough Faith to be an Atheist"
    1. Re:Hair... factory? by Khashishi · · Score: 1

      China. RTFM.

    2. Re:Hair... factory? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But Sally, I sold my hair to get you this fob chain!

    3. Re:Hair... factory? by bluesatin · · Score: 1

      You must be new here.

    4. Re:Hair... factory? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But, John, I sold my fob to get you this mother-of-pearl comb!

    5. Re:Hair... factory? by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      So just where is all this hair coming from, exactly? Are there 3rd world hair factories where children will be surreptitiously filmed hanging from the ceiling with their hair attached to hooks to make it grow faster

      The peanut butter solution.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    6. Re:Hair... factory? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...Wait, was that a John Romero joke?

    7. Re:Hair... factory? by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      On just $1 a day, she's going to need a really cheap source of hair for all those wigs...

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    8. Re:Hair... factory? by eluusive · · Score: 1

      Have you seen the peanut butter solution? Well, it's actually a documentary...

  23. Hay's cheaper and works well, too by smellsofbikes · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The idea of using mulch to control weeds is at least 4000 years old. Sure, it works really well. Why use hair? Buy bales of hay, and break off 20 cm thick flakes. Put them over the ground end-to-end, leaving spaces for the crop stems.
    And there's the reason people have moved to pesticides: it isn't labor-intensive. You don't win anything by having hand labor to install something that only increases your yield 30% unless you're a backyard gardener. You can spray pesticides over 50 acres in an afternoon.

    I use hay to mulch in my garden. It works amazingly well. At the end of the year it's broken-down enough that the tomato roots have grown up into the lowest layer, right at the ground level, to use the proto-compost. The only drawback is seeds in the hay sprouting when it's rototilled in.

    Likewise, ground cloth with holes cut out for the plants you want, works really well -- better than pesticides -- but then you have to deal with a bunch of somewhat broken-down ground cloth at the end of the year.

    --
    Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    1. Re:Hay's cheaper and works well, too by grassy_knoll · · Score: 1

      The ground cloth idea has me thinking...

      I recall a home recycling project where plastic shopping bags were cut open, trimmed, layered 4 - 6 deep, then ironed on low between wax paper. The resulting material is similar to tyvek.

      A ground cloth made from that would seem to serve as a weed barrier and likely not break down as much as something made from other materials.

    2. Re:Hay's cheaper and works well, too by maxume · · Score: 1

      If you can track down some straw, it won't have as much of a seed problem (but it will also do less fertilizing).

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    3. Re:Hay's cheaper and works well, too by hondo77 · · Score: 2, Informative

      A summer of hot sun beating down on it would surely break it down.*

      * - Writing as someone who thought, "Hey, if using plastic sheeting on the ground for a month to kill weed seeds works, think how well it will work if I leave it on the ground for three months!" Hot sun turns plastic nice and brittle and, ultimately, into little bits of plastic blown all over the place.

      --
      I live ze unknown. I love ze unknown. I am ze unknown.
    4. Re:Hay's cheaper and works well, too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      plastic shopping bags

      The other part of being a weed barrier is not killing the things that aren't weeds. This might work with a drip irrigation system under the plastic, otherwise, all your attempts at watering the garden will just run off.

    5. Re:Hay's cheaper and works well, too by hattig · · Score: 1

      You also want water to get through.

      That's where this hair based sheeting (why not just use the hair from highland cattle?) and other ground cover works - it's permeable.

      Plastic + Wax Paper sounds like a recipe for not letting water get to the ground, and hence the roots. Might be good as a base for your driveway/patio/shed floor.

    6. Re:Hay's cheaper and works well, too by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      The only drawback is seeds in the hay sprouting when it's rototilled in.

      Use straw instead of hay and you won't have that problem. Also, straw is cheaper. Though it is nastier stuff to work with -- it's stiffer than hay, thus much 'pokier'. I've gotten some nasty cuts from straw, and I'll never forget the 1/2" splinter I got under my fingernail when I was 14.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    7. Re:Hay's cheaper and works well, too by daem0n1x · · Score: 1

      Labour-intensive may be a good thing in the future. The future agriculture should be labour-intensive again and the use of chemicals should be abandoned. The environment and many millions of unemployed people would be thankful.

      I saw a documentary about this being done in Vietnam. Every family is given a little land. They grow their own crops without any chemicals. They get enough food for themselves and sell the remaining. The country can then feed millions that would otherwise be unemployed crowding up the cities. But this is the exact opposite of modern agriculture, so until the planet collapses most people will laugh and say "not a chance!".

    8. Re:Hay's cheaper and works well, too by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      A summer of hot sun beating down on it would surely break it down.*

      * - Writing as someone who thought, "Hey, if using plastic sheeting on the ground for a month to kill weed seeds works, think how well it will work if I leave it on the ground for three months!" Hot sun turns plastic nice and brittle and, ultimately, into little bits of plastic blown all over the place.

      Try metalized mylar, sun-resistant via reflecting the sun on the plants. Win-win!

      Disclaimer: Purely hypothetical :)

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    9. Re:Hay's cheaper and works well, too by pi_rules · · Score: 1

      Not good. You want your soil warm when growing plants.

      Disclaimer: Grew up in a family owned greenhouse. :)

    10. Re:Hay's cheaper and works well, too by eluusive · · Score: 1

      Or you could do no-till farming and have mulch already on the ground! Then just use seeding equipment to poke through the mulch to plant your seeds! Problems solved! No pesticides, better yields, and the like. Myself, I'm a plan of Aquaponic Greenhouses though.... Soil farming is obsolete.

    11. Re:Hay's cheaper and works well, too by gobbo · · Score: 1

      Why stop there? I have friends who are worm farmers (yes, really), and after decades of skillful gardening they settled on hay bale gardening: planting right in the top of a bale, with a starter of good soil. They live in dry country and this makes for good water management, and by the end of the season the bale has turned into garden soil. No weeding at all. They grow most of their own food this way.

    12. Re:Hay's cheaper and works well, too by Madax · · Score: 1
      I just bought two rolls of recycled paper mulch at my local home improvement store (Menards). It comes in 3 x 50 foot rolls and you can use it just like landscape fabric. At the end of the year you can just till it in. My mother used to use black plastic mulch and at the end of the year it was a PITA to pull up.

      My plan is to use basic wood mulch on top to weigh it down with a few large rocks here and there.

      I found it on Amazon: http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B001E01E2I

  24. I'm going to be rich! by Trikki+Nikki! · · Score: 3, Funny

    I am soooo cashing in on this! I have hair down to my ass, so lets just say my shower gets clogged frequently. How much do you think they buy it for? I've never died/permed/etc...

    This is just like Christmas, only better :D

    --
    i r in ur /.s girling up ur storiez
    1. Re:I'm going to be rich! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I even make it more nutritious by masturbating in the shower clogging up the hair even more with my protein rich semen...

    2. Re:I'm going to be rich! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's quite obvious you never died. It's also obvious you can't write english very well. I hope it's not your mother tongue.

    3. Re:I'm going to be rich! by The+Gaytriot · · Score: 1

      Now that I think about it, I've never died either. I wonder if I can use that to get a discount on my health insurance.

      --
      Srsly u guys. U guys, srsly.
    4. Re:I'm going to be rich! by Trikki+Nikki! · · Score: 1

      It's quite obvious you never died. It's also obvious you can't write English* very well. I hope it's not your mother tongue.

      *Fixed Oh good call Mr Coward. I learned to speak in English, but I learned to write in French. I'm not that bad at writing in English, I am however terrible at proofing what I write. I also like long walks on the beach, tea parties, reading anonymous troll comments, and sing-alongs around the camp fire. Wanna make out now?

      --
      i r in ur /.s girling up ur storiez
  25. Ewww by SnarfQuest · · Score: 1

    Hay waiter, there's a hair in my beans, and I haven't even picked them yet.

    --
    Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
  26. Plastic weed barriers by flyingfsck · · Score: 2, Informative

    Plastic weed barriers are sold on rolls in your friendly local hardware store. A layer of black plastic plus a layer of bark on top is very effective and used by gardeners everywhere.

    --
    Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
    1. Re:Plastic weed barriers by bluesatin · · Score: 1

      A genuine question, how do you water your garden if it's covered in plastic?

    2. Re:Plastic weed barriers by hechacker1 · · Score: 1

      It's actually porous, like a fine mesh or fine screen door. It works ok, but eventually it wears down from gardening and other maintenance requiring your to cut a hole in it. Some weeds can still get through it (we have tough spiked weeds in the desert). I would now go with a natural alternative considering you end up having to replace it anyways. A thick weed resistant lawn helps more than anything.

    3. Re:Plastic weed barriers by FailedTheTuringTest · · Score: 1

      Some people put a drip-irrigation tube down first, then the plastic on top of that.

    4. Re:Plastic weed barriers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tip: Plastic weed barriers break down in sunlight. If you mulch on top of the weed barrier (I use eucalyptus mulch) the barrier will last longer.

      Other tip: If you have perennials you need to leave them adequate holes to spread into during the next year. I have been considering cutting my barrier into strips to allow for this.

  27. Slashdot to digg Conversion Project - Day 13 by Chad+Birch · · Score: 5, Insightful

    samzenpus's campaign to gradually introduce awful articles that should have been in idle onto the main site continues. The plan seems to be to post one or two of these every day until we no longer think of them as odd. Then they can increase the rate a bit, eventually merge idle entirely into the main site, and voila! Slashdot can be as hip and successful of a site as digg is!

    History up to this point:
    April 28 - Tokyo Scientists Create Mobile Slime
    April 27 - Air Force One Flyby Causes Brief Panic In NYC
    April 27 - How To Have an Online Social Life When You're Dead
    April 23 - Race Car Made With Veggies And Powered By Chocolate
    April 22 - Robotic Penguins
    April 22 - Yamaha Unveils Golf Cart Powered By Cow Dung
    April 21 - Biotech Company to Patent Pigs
    April 21 - The Taste of Space
    April 17 - Philosophies and Programming Languages

    Do we really want the guy behind the worst articles I've ever seen on slashdot shaping the direction of this site?

    --
    Sturgeon was an optimist.
    1. Re:Slashdot to digg Conversion Project - Day 13 by bigtangringo · · Score: 1

      It's a protein based (high nitrogen) mulch. Of course plants grow better.

      --
      Yes, I am a smart ass; it's better than the alternative.
    2. Re:Slashdot to digg Conversion Project - Day 13 by bigtangringo · · Score: 1

      Apparently hair takes forever to compost on it's own. If you just wanted to compost hair, and not use it as a mulch, you could probably pre-treat it with a bit of lye. Just don't make your compost pile too alkaline.

      --
      Yes, I am a smart ass; it's better than the alternative.
    3. Re:Slashdot to digg Conversion Project - Day 13 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what

    4. Re:Slashdot to digg Conversion Project - Day 13 by Red+Flayer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Slashdot to digg Conversion Project - Day 13 (Score:5, Insightful) by Chad Birch (1222564)

      Go check the articles posted from 3 years ago. Go back 5 years. Go back 8 years.

      These kind of articles have always been part of slashdot. Users like you have always been complaining about them.

      Get used to it. If you don't like them, don't bother reading them, or the comments to them.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
  28. Reminds me of something from Jack Ass 2... by alexschmidt · · Score: 2, Funny

    Shaving your nether regions and using it as a fake beard....

    1. Re:Reminds me of something from Jack Ass 2... by dov_0 · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of German U-Boat blankets and concentration camps...

      --
      sudo mount --milk --sugar /cup/tea /mouth /etc/init.d/relax start
  29. Ewww by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looks like the tometo.

  30. Re:So let me get this straight... Gives a new MEAN by davidsyes · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    ing to .... Harry Potter...

    Hell, even Clarence Thomas might want to LOUDLY proclaim about his pubic-hair-on-the-Coke-can comment: "See, I'm VINdickATED"...

    Now, things will suck if cashews come with hair... It would also suck if my comments are based on a lame submission summary...

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  31. I, for one... by koro666 · · Score: 1, Redundant

    I, for one, welcome our new hair-eating plant overlords.

  32. Pine Needle Mulch by Dareth · · Score: 1

    I just mulched my flowerbeds with pine needle mulch. Cleared my street front at the same time.
    Good quality mulch, and will renew itself most likely in time for next year.

    --

    I only look human.
    My mother is a halfling and my dad is an ogre, so that makes me an Ogreling
    1. Re:Pine Needle Mulch by slashtivus · · Score: 1

      That would only work well for plants that are acid-tolerant, or in locations that have alkaline soil.
      Good for you if you can use it.

    2. Re:Pine Needle Mulch by Dareth · · Score: 1

      The pine needle mulch is great for my rose bushes. Also not bad for tomato patches.

      --

      I only look human.
      My mother is a halfling and my dad is an ogre, so that makes me an Ogreling
    3. Re:Pine Needle Mulch by smellsofbikes · · Score: 1

      I live in alkaline territory so pine needles are wonderful.

      If you're bored and want to play chemistry, there are some flowers that change color dependent upon soil pH and content, so you can grow a row of flowers and turn them alternately white and blue by judicious dumping of eg coffee grounds or pine needles. I seem to remember Hydrangea work like this, among others.

      In fact, there are a whole class of parasitic flowers that *look* like perfectly normal plants but sneak their roots inside other plants and harvest chemicals from them, and use some of those chemicals to color their flowers.

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
  33. When I was a kid.... by Anachragnome · · Score: 4, Interesting

    When I was in High School, some of the girls there sold their hair once a year to one of the hair product companies, I believe Clairol, but I could be wrong. Pretty sure it was used for testing hair products.

    They actually got quite a bit for it, depending on the length, color and how much they treated it. I remember going to a keg party that was financed by such a girl cashing in on her hair.

    I also remember that one of those same girls always had these crazy long fingernails, as she sold those as well.

    1. Re:When I was a kid.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are lots of things girls can sell.

    2. Re:When I was a kid.... by pablodiazgutierrez · · Score: 1

      Another option is donating your hair to Locks of Love. They make wigs for kids with cancer who are going through chemotherapy. I'm just 3 weeks away from donating mine (bye bye head-banging at rock bars) just before the LA marathon. It's going to be a memorable weekend...

    3. Re:When I was a kid.... by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      My wife's done that two or three times. Very worth charity and pretty easy to do.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
  34. Re:Does it work only with human hair? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only the really nice, large pieces.
    This stuff probably is okay with short little trimmings, all the inches and two inches that most people just leave on the floor of the barbershop.

    I am sad to say I have not contributed to this any in the past three years though.

  35. I've heard weeeeird things .... by freaker_TuC · · Score: 1

    I've heard about people using cumcumbers and other vegetables for sex, but making your plants 30% larger for sex is a bit "over the top" ....

    --
    --- I am known for the ones who want to find me on the net. Is that a privacy risk or a privilege? One might wonder..
  36. Chia-Plant? by spineboy · · Score: 3, Funny

    This is like some bizarro world variation of a Chia-head, but I'm not sure how.

    --
    ..........FULL STOP.
    1. Re:Chia-Plant? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In America, Chia-head hair grow plants for people. In Soviet Russia, people-head hair grow plants for Chia.

  37. Great -instead of head lice... by spineboy · · Score: 2, Funny

    I can see it now - there will be some weed that will adapt to grow on this stuff - something will make the jump. Then we will start to see people who "catch" an infection of dandelions on their head.

    New! - Head & Shoulders with Ortho 5 weed killer!!

    --
    ..........FULL STOP.
    1. Re:Great -instead of head lice... by MartinSchou · · Score: 1

      Hrmm, maybe that explains Harold then ...

    2. Re:Great -instead of head lice... by daem0n1x · · Score: 1

      I see a fashion trend coming up...

  38. You can cover a whole planet with these by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get "The Carpet Makers" (german Original: "Die Haarteppuchknüpfer") bei Andreas Eschbach.

  39. Soylent GREEN for plants! by macraig · · Score: 1

    Who knew the stuff was good for flora, too?

  40. Re:Does it work only with human hair? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thre is no chin behind Stallman's beard; there is only another beard.

  41. I assume this is for soil... by Khyber · · Score: 1

    ...but I wonder how this would work as a hydroponics medium in place of rockwool and hydroton. I'd also wonder about potential hydrogen neutrality of human hair.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  42. Low ambitions by Looke · · Score: 1

    "could revolutionize how food is grown in the US"

    Is US soil very different from what we have elsewhere, or does this company just have low ambitions?

    1. Re:Low ambitions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the rest of the world the just use the bodies from all the genocide.

  43. If hair became valuable... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    would that mean I finally don't have to pay $15 for a haircut?

  44. Not a bad idea... by tjstork · · Score: 1

    Couple this with stem cell harvested human hair, we really could be yelling: "Soylent Green is PEOPLE, MY GOD, ITS PEOPLE"...

    --
    This is my sig.
  45. Ok, I'm sold, but that's just the first year. by wonkavader · · Score: 1

    In the first year, it blocks growth where you don't put it. You punch a big hole, and put in a seed, I suppose, or better, yuo gorw a seedling, then thread the seedling through, crushing the rest.

    But what do you do in the second year? Is it mush by then? Will it affect the growth of that original seedling? Do you till it in before starting? Do you scrape it up and put it on a compost heap? Does it just sit there and work for 2+ years?

    Can you lay down a long a mat of these with big holes, and let that work for years, only placing a fresh small circle over the hole?

    In Korea, I know the usual method is to use garbage bag material for the same function, which seems like an ecodisaster. The hair seems like a much better system, but it might wind up more labor, depending on how long the garbage bag stuff lasts.

    1. Re:Ok, I'm sold, but that's just the first year. by demonlapin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      seems like an ecodisaster

      Why? Something that doesn't degrade... isn't a problem. We make all kinds of things that don't degrade - bricks and concrete, for example - and they're not ecodisasters. They do occupy landfill space, but very few places are really at any risk of running out of landfill space. As long as they don't have toxic leachates - such as older, metallic newspaper inks - there's really very little concerning about plastics per se. (Interesting tip for the young: did you know why Styrofoam first became a bugbear of the environmental movement? Not because it doesn't biodegrade - it's harmless insulation, after all - but because it was blown into foam using CFCs.)

    2. Re:Ok, I'm sold, but that's just the first year. by pi_rules · · Score: 1

      Plastics, at least the kind used in garbage bags and a whole bunch of other consumer goods, are horrible in sun light. You don't notice it in everyday life, but in agriculture that crap gets exposed to sun a whole lot. It's kinda important to the growing process.

      I used to work in a greenhouse and you'd see a PVC pipe shatter into pieces if it'd been installed for, oh, 10 years, and you barely bumped it with something like a broom.

      Hell the clear poly that they drape over a greenhouse is only good for 6 maybe 7 years. It starts to get brittle and weak after that.

    3. Re:Ok, I'm sold, but that's just the first year. by eluusive · · Score: 1

      Styrofoam(Polystyrene) doesn't BIOdegrade, but it does PHOTOdegrade into styrene which is toxic.

    4. Re:Ok, I'm sold, but that's just the first year. by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      Should have thought of that. Thanks.

    5. Re:Ok, I'm sold, but that's just the first year. by True+Grit · · Score: 1

      Why? Something that doesn't degrade... isn't a problem.

      ... unless it ends up in the Pacific Ocean. :)

      We're now beginning to see the long term consequences of plastic in that section of the Pacific north-west of Hawaii, that's now being referred to as the "Great Pacific Garbage Patch". There is tons of small bits, and a lot of larger bits, of plastic still floating around out there, *decades* after it entered the Pacific from various sources.

      Large bits do break down to smaller bits, but if it doesn't biodegrade, then it never really goes away .

      Unfortunately, not all plastic finds its way to an out-of-sight-out-of-mind land-fill, which is the only good place for it, since the damn stuff just won't die. :)

    6. Re:Ok, I'm sold, but that's just the first year. by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I've heard of that before. And you're right, it's a problem. I'm pretty darn conscientious about my trash, so I tend to forget that not everyone else is...

  46. Jeez, man, a list to get therapy! by freaker_TuC · · Score: 1

    Most of those problems can be solved with alcohol or heavy anti-depressants!

    If those don't work one can always smoke and asphyxiate more ...
    Oh, nevermind, this isn't a multiple choice exam...

    Almost died of a heartstroke; a forgotten one in your list!

    --
    --- I am known for the ones who want to find me on the net. Is that a privacy risk or a privilege? One might wonder..
  47. soylent green and vivoleum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    look em up and you see why

  48. Awesome! by ubungy · · Score: 1

    Now I can just run an extension cord out back with me, pack some clippers, and while I'm peeing on all my plants give them some good weed protection too!

  49. Parasites? by catbertscousin · · Score: 1

    But, there's absolutely nothing wrong with eating an animal which has been fed plants grown on manure, human or otherwise :P

    Oh, I don't know, how about Hookworm?

    --
    No good deed goes unpunished. - Avon, Blake's 7
  50. OT: Joke by Kozz · · Score: 1

    Q: Why do Italian men wear heavy gold chains?

    A: So they know where to stop shaving.

    --
    I only post comments when someone on the internet is wrong.
  51. From the picture.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It doesn't look like it comes from your head.

  52. Re:Does it work only with human hair? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thre is no chin behind Stallman's beard; there is only another beard.

    And behind that one? Stallman has a recursive beard!

  53. brunet to go please by sgt+scrub · · Score: 1

    So my "brunet to go" joke finally has meaning?

    --
    Having to work for a living is the root of all evil.
  54. Thriving on sustainability & freeware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And thus, the gnu-neckbeard creates another cottage industry.

  55. Deer resistant, too! by Roadkills-R-Us · · Score: 1

    We've found that anything that smells like humans (hair, pee, etc) keeps the deer away from our plants. Peeing around the flowers is one thing, but we're not so keen on that around the veggies. So this could help there.

    Just so they scrub it for head lice!

    1. Re:Deer resistant, too! by gobbo · · Score: 1

      Just so they scrub it for head lice!

      Human head lice are so specialized that they really can't live off of a nice warm head for very long at all. So, wrong cooties to worry about.

  56. Re:Does it work only with human hair? by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

    It would seem to me that non-human animal hair should work as well, and cheaper. In days past, carpet padding was made from animal-hair felt, which I suspect is not all that different except that it was manufactured to be thicker and more dense than these mats.

    If it works as advertised, I think it's a great idea.

  57. Figures by Cazekiel · · Score: 1

    So I get b!%ched out at a restaurant for doing a quick untangling of my son's hair at the table from a couple mummies sitting next to us (don't you dare give me flak, it was about a second and a half in our own booth, far from theirs), but we're gonna chow down on a salad made from scraps swept up from Cost Cutters?

    I actually think this is a good idea; I just felt like venting.

    --
    You want to know how to help your kids? LEAVE THEM THE F*&K ALONE. --George Carlin
  58. Take that, emancipation.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .. now we finally know how men can be worth more than women. The growth of our hair is at least twice as good as yours, bitches!

  59. Opportunities by ark1 · · Score: 1

    If there is something I've learned from TV/movies is that Kazakhstan is the third largest exporter of Human "Pubiss". Step aside Wall Street, I know where my money will be invested next. Very Nice.

  60. Waiter? There's a hair in my soup! by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

    an experiment where people off the street were given free chicken and asked how it tastes, etc. Later they were told that the chickens were fed plants grown exclusively from human waste. They didn't eat any more of the chicken after being told this.

    People lose their appetite when talked to about poo: Film at 11.

    Next up, talking about maggots and then offering rice to people.

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

    1. Re:Waiter? There's a hair in my soup! by Anenome · · Score: 1

      ROFL, mod the parent up XD
      Ironically, human crap is also the best fertilizer in the world, or so good ol' teach said.

      --
      "I Don't Have Enough Faith to be an Atheist"
  61. a couple thoughts by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    Thought one: Human hair -- why would that be a problem for anyone?

    Thought two: Now, if they could do it with dog hair, they'd really have something!

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  62. Rasta's dream by schizz69 · · Score: 1

    Now they can have another reason to keep their dreads, they can grow their weed in there.

  63. You might be on to something... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm certainly less hungry now after just thinking about it.

  64. Imagine the stink... by svunt · · Score: 1

    ...if this stuff caught fire! Barf.

  65. Cool Whip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "My hair is in the pie, Brian, and now it's inside of you. Part of me is inside of you, Brian. Do you feel me, Brian? Do you feel me inside of you?"

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lich59xsjik&fmt=18

  66. Wool is expensive by stupidflanders · · Score: 1

    Wool and other animal fiber is expensive, and there is a huge market for it. My wife is happy when a skein of wool yarn costs less than $10, and it's not unusual to see her drop $25 just to knit a pair of socks. Oher animal fibers cost even more -- I think the most expensive one I've seen is Musk Ox, which runs about $150/skein (but sooooo soft). There's some markup involved, plus labor for dying etc, but still -- animal fiber is expensive.

    Human hair on the other hand we have no use for -- barbers sweep it into the trash.

  67. Re:Does it work only with human hair? by AP31R0N · · Score: 1

    This is good news for the Scheinhardt Wig Company.

    --
    Utilizing the synergization of benchmark e-solutions to pre-workaround action items!
  68. Soon enough... by lazorz · · Score: 1

    Soylent Green is PEOPLE!!!

  69. Quick! Buy stock in... by Gallomimia · · Score: 1

    Hair Cut Corporations! It will be the new corn farm for ethanol craze! Worlds biggest supplier of food growth fertilizer is DairyLand farms but Chatters salon!

    Whoever sells more haircuts will have more supply to sell to the farmers. This will lead to swift corporate takeovers and mergers. Watch out!

    --
    Sadly, a Libertarian cannot force his views on another, and freedom cannot spread as does the cancer known as religion.