Slashdot Mirror


WHO Raises Swine Flu Threat Level

Solarch writes "Late in the afternoon on Wednesday, the WHO raised the pandemic threat level for H1N1 "swine flu" to 5. Global media outlets(such as CNN, Fox News, and the BBC) preempted normal broadcast coverage and immediately published stories on their websites. To clarify, the WHO's elevation is mainly a sign to governments that the virus is spreading quickly and that steps should be taken on a governmental level to stage supplies and medicines to combat a possible pandemic. Unfortunately, broadcast coverage focused on phrases like 'pandemic imminent' (CNN marquee). In other news, patient zero, the medical term for the initial human vector of a disease, has been tentatively identified in Mexico."

117 of 557 comments (clear)

  1. I dunno? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Who does raise the swine flu threat level?

    1. Re:I dunno? by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 4, Funny

      WHO's on first.

      --
      "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
    2. Re:I dunno? by nxtr · · Score: 5, Funny

      It is not the pronoun, but rather a global public health agency with the unlikely name of WHO that raised the pandemic threat level.

      Clearly, you are one confused man.

    3. Re:I dunno? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      WHOosh.

    4. Re:I dunno? by Bertie · · Score: 5, Funny

      Thanks for that. We Won't Get Fooled Again.

    5. Re:I dunno? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      What's on first?

    6. Re:I dunno? by againjj · · Score: 5, Funny

      Who's on first. What's on second.

    7. Re:I dunno? by PayPaI · · Score: 5, Funny
    8. Re:I dunno? by OakDragon · · Score: 4, Funny

      Chalmers: "Well, Seymour, it seems we've put together a baseball team, and I was wondering, who's on first, eh?"
      Skinner: "Yes. Not the pronoun, but rather a player with the unlikely name of 'Who' is on first."
      Chalmers: "Well that's just great, Seymour! We've been out here six seconds and you've already managed to blow the routine!"

    9. Re:I dunno? by sootman · · Score: 5, Funny

      Costello: Well then who sets the swine flu threat level?
      Abbott: Yes.
      Costello: I mean the group's name.
      Abbott: Who.
      Costello: The group that sets the level.
      Abbott: Who.
      Costello: The group that...
      Abbott: Who!
      Costello: I'm asking YOU who sets the level!
      Abbott: That's the group's name.
      Costello: That's who's name?
      Abbott: Yes.
      Costello: Well go ahead and tell me.
      Abbott: That's it.
      Costello: That's who?
      Abbott: Yes.
      Costello: Look, you got a group that sets the level?
      Abbott: Certainly.
      Costello: Who?
      Abbott: That's right.
      Costello: All I'm trying to find out is what's the group's name that sets the swine flu level.
      Abbott: No. WHAT is the Web Hypertext Application Technology Working Group.
      Costello: I'm not asking you who's the Web Hypertext Application Technology Working Group.
      Abbott: Who sets the level!
      Costello: I don't know.
      Abbott & Costello Together: Third base!

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    10. Re:I dunno? by mabhatter654 · · Score: 2, Funny

      We all know it's the VIRAL GPL (Genes of Pig Linux)

    11. Re:I dunno? by johannesg · · Score: 5, Funny

      You are all making jokes but you are missing the big picture. The WHO is an agency of the United Nations, and they *want* you to panic so they can take over your government! Haven't you people learned nothing from Deus Ex!?

    12. Re:I dunno? by ayjay29 · · Score: 2, Funny

      WHO let the pigs out? (Oink, Oink, Oink, Oink)
      WHO let the pigs out? (Oink, Oink, Oink, Oink)

      --
      Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated up.
    13. Re:I dunno? by ZeroExistenZ · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's not time to panic yet.

      Absolutely not. But that's what the parent is indicating: it's overhyped and there's a spread of "fear" and needless "danger" associated with it in the media.

      In recent events, the stockmarket has crashed, economies are trying to recover, alot of people in unemployment and instead of taking action, they're manipulated into panic and fear about some insignificant virus and envisioning a swine-apocalypse. To me it seems a bit as populuscontrol or some weak sensationalism.

      Do you remember SARS?

      --
      I think we can keep recursing like this until someone returns 1
  2. Please let it be!! by happy_place · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I get the feeling that Media outlets are DESPERATELY Hoping that this will be a Pandemic... as if they're bored or really really really like human suffering... oh wait, what's that saying about if it bleeds it's frontpage news? Sigh. --Ray PS> Would hate to die of Swine Flu, just because of what it's called... and all that it would imply if I caught it...

    --
    http://www.beanleafpress.com
    1. Re:Please let it be!! by John+Hasler · · Score: 5, Funny

      > Would hate to die of Swine Flu, just because of what it's called... and all that it
      > would imply if I caught it...

      Then call it Mexican flu.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    2. Re:Please let it be!! by rasper99 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The saying is "If it bleeds, it leads" as in leading story.

    3. Re:Please let it be!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Would hate to die of Swine Flu, just because of what it's called... and all that it would imply if I caught it...

      You're thinking of Swine Syphillis.

    4. Re:Please let it be!! by V50 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Yeah, there's certainly a section of the media that wants terrible news to happen. I don't think they consciously or overtly want stuff to happen, but deep inside, I do think that part of them does.

      I think it's partially human nature though. I've found myself sort of bugged at times by part of me that wants a war to break out, or a pandemic to happen, or the stock market to tank, etc. I think it comes from oftentimes looking at news as fiction that happens far away. And for the most part it's true. If a war breaks out in Africa, for instance, for the majority of North Americans or whatnot, it may as well be fiction for how little it actually affects them.

      tldr; When it doesn't directly harm them, IMO, people often look at news as fiction, and want a more exciting outcome.

    5. Re:Please let it be!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Now that's just insulting.

    6. Re:Please let it be!! by ring-eldest · · Score: 5, Funny

      Would hate to die of Swine Flu, just because of what it's called... and all that it would imply if I caught it...

      Don't kid yourself, slashdot-netizen, chances are you don't get enough human interaction or even sunlight to risk infection. You're as good as immune.

    7. Re:Please let it be!! by treeves · · Score: 4, Funny

      That's actually what Israel is calling it. I guess "swine flu" isn't kosher.

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    8. Re:Please let it be!! by smaddox · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Back when there was this method called "investigative reporting", there would be crazy things going on all the time, and yet exposing them actually brought improvements.

      Today, "investigative reporting" means blowing trivial and menial things completely out of proportion, asking non-experts their oppinions, and twisting experts words into doom and gloom. It's pathetic how hard these people work to do nothing.

    9. Re:Please let it be!! by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 4, Informative

      I think it's partially human nature though.

      They call it Schadenfreude http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schadenfreude and there is a lot more of it in the world than one would like to believe.

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
    10. Re:Please let it be!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      How is it insulting?

      The 1918 flu pandemic was known as the Spanish Flu because it was first widely reported in Spain. Other countries with earlier infections had been at war and were censoring news stories but Spain was not (In Spain it was known as the French Flu).

      This outbreak was first recorded in Mexico so it makes sense to call it the Mexico Flu.

    11. Re:Please let it be!! by V50 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I agree with you to a degree, there certainly is a human element that enjoys other people's suffering. Not too complex though, it makes us feel better in comparison. :)

      What I meant though, to use an example, is having part of you wish a destructive news event to occur, more for entertainment purposes.

      To use an example, back in 2003, (when I was 15) I was a strong supporter of the Iraq war. I made all sorts of justifications based on human rights, WMDs (laugh all you want), Saddam being a dick, etc. The real reason I supported the Iraq invasion in '03 is because I wanted to see a war take place, I wanted exciting footage of missiles hitting Baghdad, I wanted propaganda from both sides, I wanted maps on Wikipedia with how much each side held. Part of me was even disappointed when Baghdad fell quickly. I wanted to see a nasty battle.

      Criticise me as a deranged sociopath all you want, but treating the news as entertainment is far from limited to me. Most people dress it up with other reasons though, like I did. The difference is that because I was 15 at the time, I didn't really hide my true motives for supporting the Iraq invasion very far, knowing the whole time I really just wanted a big expensive exciting war drama to be broadcast over CNN.

      And for all it affected me at the time, (15, Canadian, knew no Americans, let alone military personnel.), it may as well have been a war movie. Being older, (hopefully) more mature, and knowing several people who have served in Iraq and/or Afghanistan, perhaps my opinion would be a bit different, but at the time, Iraq may have been a war movie to me, and good entertainment.

    12. Re:Please let it be!! by timeOday · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No, I think it's mainly just wanting some stimulation or excitement, or to be part of something historic, and not particularly happiness at others' misfortune. There is something very rousing about feeling you are part of history, or in an epic battle.

    13. Re:Please let it be!! by pohl · · Score: 2, Insightful

      LOL... Right, it's because they discovered it wasn't a video game - not that it became evident that the justification was mere pretense.

      --

      The "cue the foo posts in 3, 2, 1..." posts will commence with no subsequent foo posts in 3, 2, 1...

    14. Re:Please let it be!! by treeves · · Score: 4, Informative
      I thought so too, but I just found this:

      Swine flu name wont be changed in Israel
      By Marc Brodsky April 29, 2009
      NEW YORK (JTA) -- The swine flu will not take any new names in Israel despite the unease of a health official from a fervently religious party.
      Deputy health minister Yakov Litzman, a member of United Torah Judaism, said earlier this week that the name "swine flu" should not be used as it contains the name of the unkosher animal. Litzman suggested that authorities call the virus sweeping the globe "Mexican flu."
      But Mexico's ambassador to Israel, Frederico Salas, and the Jewish state's envoy to Mexico, Yosef Livne, both lodged official complaints Tuesday to the Israeli Foreign Ministry protesting the term.
      A Foreign Ministry official told the French news agency AFP that Salas "was offended" by the term "Mexican flu."
      "Israel has no intention of giving the flu any new names," the official said. "It was nothing more than a slip of the tongue."
      Two Israelis who recently returned from Mexico have contracted swine flu in the first such cases in the Middle East. Several other cases are suspected, including the 5-year-old niece of one of the confirmed cases.

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    15. Re:Please let it be!! by jesser · · Score: 5, Funny

      Just make sure you don't get caught downloading the iraq war. With all the money they put into it, I don't think they'd be happy to find it being torrented.

      --
      The shareholder is always right.
    16. Re:Please let it be!! by Bitmap0023 · · Score: 5, Informative

      whats strange is the original outbreak of the 1918 spanish flu started at a Kansas army base. As the WW1 soldiers were deployed to Europe the virus went with them.

    17. Re:Please let it be!! by nbauman · · Score: 2, Funny

      Deputy health minister Yakov Litzman, a member of United Torah Judaism, said earlier this week that the name "swine flu" should not be used as it contains the name of the unkosher animal. Litzman suggested that authorities call the virus sweeping the globe "Mexican flu."

      You mean herpes is kosher, so they don't have to change its name?

      You really have to be Jewish to realize what an idiot this guy is. But if you're not, you can sort of get the idea.

    18. Re:Please let it be!! by martin-boundary · · Score: 2, Funny

      But Mexico's ambassador to Israel, Frederico Salas, and the Jewish state's envoy to Mexico, Yosef Livne, both lodged official complaints Tuesday to the Israeli Foreign Ministry protesting the term.

      Sounds like a Mexican standoff with the religious party!

    19. Re:Please let it be!! by wumingzi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I wonder if by chance this will finally be the thing that will make them close our border down south?

      You mean stop letting my coworkers and neighbors go down to Cancun so they can come back here and infect me and my children with swine flu? Excellent idea!

      Oh. You were talking about the guys in front of the labor pickup area. Seen 'em. Don't talk to 'em. Don't drink with 'em. They're not a big health concern to me.

    20. Re:Please let it be!! by Znork · · Score: 4, Informative

      It wasn't a natural disaster, wasn't an accident, wasn't even a war. It was a big...

      The term you're looking for is blowback.

    21. Re:Please let it be!! by Knutsi · · Score: 3, Interesting

      A Norwegian health authority official stated "our worst case scenario is that 1,4 million gets sick, 13.000 dies" then went on to underline this was the WORST case scenario, and it might even end up being nothing. What does the headlines say in the media? "13.000 might die!", and "1,4 million fall ill!". Why? To scare me? What kind of people are these editors and journalists?

  3. Semi-Pandemic by Plekto · · Score: 2, Informative

    The sad thing is that it will affect the poor and the Third World most of all. Only the extremely ill, old, young, and those with compromised immune systems will have a problem in more developed countries where antiviral medicine is available.

    $50 for some medicine is pretty much nothing in the U.S., for instance. If you're in India or China, well... life's going to get rough for a lot of people there.

    1. Re:Semi-Pandemic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually, the virus strikes people with healthy immune systems, and the causes of death are an immune system overreaction. Translated: People with excellent immune systems are more likely to die than those with weaker ones.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cytokine_storm

    2. Re:Semi-Pandemic by Vellmont · · Score: 2, Insightful


      Only the extremely ill, old, young, and those with compromised immune systems will have a problem in more developed countries where antiviral medicine is available.

      Wow. You have just far too much faith in the governments of the world, and medicine. First of all there's not enough antiviral flu medication for everyone if the virus spreads to a large percentage of the population (not to mention infra-structure to distribute all of it, care for everyone, etc). Secondly, the flu mutates like crazy. The virus can easily evolve into a strain that's resistant to the 4 drugs used against influenza. At that point being rich isn't going to save you.

      --
      AccountKiller
    3. Re:Semi-Pandemic by Vellmont · · Score: 4, Informative


      It it is most dangerous to those with strong immune systems because of the potential for cytokine storms

      Which is pure speculation at this point. The truth is nobody knows why it's mostly killed young people so far. Pointing to a cytokine storm as the cause is possible, but very misleading.

      --
      AccountKiller
    4. Re:Semi-Pandemic by Brett+Buck · · Score: 3, Informative

      The sad thing is that it will affect the poor and the Third World most of all. Only the extremely ill, old, young, and those with compromised immune systems will have a problem in more developed countries where antiviral medicine is available.

      Not necessarily. The reason the 1918 version of H1N1 was so bad was that those with healthy immune systems were more likely to die because the immune system overreacted. You have a point about the antiviral medicine, but the other factors *favor* those in third-world countries.

      Brett

    5. Re:Semi-Pandemic by Plekto · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Wow. You have just far too much faith in the governments of the world, and medicine
      ****
      We've had one death so far in the U.S., and it was a baby. Two of the drugs that we do have available are effective, and I heard that there are roughly enough of those two to treat 30-50 million people in the U.S.

      My comment wasn't about the people in the richer nations being so much better off so much as it being a commentary on the sad state of affairs where the poor get hit the hardest, like they do pretty much any time a disaster happens.

      I don't have much faith in governments, but those populations without ANY modern medicine at all are going to suffer a large number of deaths. Be it from overactive immune systems or compromised ones - both extremes seem to be a problem in these sorts of situations.

      In India, you have millions of people who are so poor that they burn garbage to keep warm. When droves of them start dying, secondary diseases and epidemics become a real worry as well. No, not everyone in India is like that, obviously, but with nearly a billion people all living in a pretty close proximity to each other, it's not likely that things will be good, either.

    6. Re:Semi-Pandemic by MartinSchou · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Very true.

      At this point we're just using hypotheses and another one that I just dreamed up is that ths strain needs a certain industrial polutants to be between certain points (sweet spot) for it to be lethal.

      Since more people have caught it, and more people have died from it in Mexico, this is also plausible, since the polution levels are easily higher there than in the US and Europe.

      I say plausible, but very unlikely, as I just came up with this halfassed idea. But if it ends up being true, I want credit!

    7. Re:Semi-Pandemic by theNAM666 · · Score: 3, Informative

      The sad thing is that it will affect the poor and the Third World most of all. Only the extremely ill, old, young, and those with compromised immune systems will have a problem in more developed countries where antiviral medicine is available.

      This is likely somewhat inaccurate. The efficacy of SARS and the previous avian flus-- and of pandemic flus in general-- is that they cause the strongest human immune systems (18-30 yrs) to overreact and fill the lungs with fluid, slowly drowning the victims. (Antivirals are also not all that effective, versus respirators and manual techniques to clear the lungs).

      We also don't quite know what we're up against, get.

      That said, if the developing world looses its young and strong, that is in some ways worse. But don't think the developed world is out of the way: avian flu killed one in three victims in Hong Kong, right?

    8. Re:Semi-Pandemic by againjj · · Score: 4, Funny

      That page is riddled with [citation needed]. It doesn't exactly inspire confidence.

    9. Re:Semi-Pandemic by an+unsound+mind · · Score: 3, Informative

      Aaand clarifying before justified downmods:

      It kills healthy people, more of them thus far than ill people. And it's rather obvious why it hasn't killed much people in the last 30 years - if you don't get that, get the hell outta my Slashdot and your ass into Biology 101.

      It's not yet confirmed it's cytokine storm precisely - but it's certainly a possibility on the table.

    10. Re:Semi-Pandemic by hurfy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      And this is the ONLY real story here.

      If this is an average flu season at least a couple dozen kids in the US have died already from the standard A/B/whatever strains vs 1 for the swine flu.

      I'll leave you to figure out i gave an very conservative guess according to the CDC. Mexico i have no clue.

      It is still much more dangerous to cross the street for lunch, how about a banner to Stop for Pedestrians :(

    11. Re:Semi-Pandemic by Khyber · · Score: 3, Interesting

      God I love my immune system and genetic oddities. I'm one of the few people that has the natural genetic resistance to HIV (descendant of Black Plague survivors) and my immune system is so strong I haven't touched a flu shot in over a decade and rarely get sick to begin with.

      I won't need to be rich to survive! I just keep up my filthy habits that reinforce my immune system and laugh at the rich that need medication. As George Carlin said quite accurately: "Tempered in raw shit."

      Yes, I used to play in sewers, quite often. Blowing shit up and hearing the reverberations go for minutes was a fave pasttime.

      Evolution in action, folks. Watch closely!

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    12. Re:Semi-Pandemic by dgatwood · · Score: 3, Interesting

      IMHO, it is several months too early to definitively conclude that this attacks healthy people harder, whether by cytokine storm or otherwise. Right now, all the people getting hit are young people because this is the very first wave of the illness. People who are most mobile and most social are most likely to be exposed first, so that's who we're seeing getting sick right now.

      Almost all the people in the U.S. who have gotten sick are schoolchildren, but that's because they are the most mobile, once again. If you look at that in isolation, you might erroneously conclude that school-aged people in the U.S. are more vulnerable, when in reality, they were merely the first to be exposed.

      Only when you look at the data over a long period of time in aggregate can you say for certain that it hits younger people harder. In a few months, if the pattern holds, then we know this resembles bird flu in its behavior. Initially, though, it could just as easily be blamed on mobility, greater probability of living alone (and not seeking health care early enough), or any number of other causes that have nothing (directly) to do with age.

      The more interesting question, IMHO, is why there have been no U.S. deaths yet except for a small Mexican infant visiting this country. There are several possibilities:

      • selection bias---often during the early stages of an outbreak, only the most serious cases get noticed because people ignore a mild case of flu. If only a few percent of all the swine flu cases in Mexico were actually reported, the numbers make a lot more sense.
      • better medical care---Mexico did have shortages of flu medications initially, and this may have cost lives.
      • better sanitation---Mexico has many areas with poor sanitation. People in those areas could easily experience much greater bacterial exposure there than they might experience in other places. Since deaths among young people from flu are generally caused by secondary bacterial infections, this could increase the risk significantly.
      • better nutrition---Mexico has a much larger percentage of population living below the poverty line. Poor nutrition can contribute significantly to viral susceptibility.
      • surprise---Initially, people didn't expect this sort of outbreak and this were less likely to treat this as a serious disease. Delayed treatment can sometimes make the difference between life and death.
      • genetic immunity---Although most people these days are mutts genetically, Hispanic people do tend to have significantly greater genes from Spanish and Aboriginal American peoples than, for example, your average Caucasian does. Much as some descendants of plague survivors show immunity to HIV, it may be that some virus(es) that people were exposed to hundreds of years ago may have weeded out people with greater susceptibility to this virus in the ancestors of Caucasian populations, but not in the ancestors of Hispanic populations
      • false positives---The number of swine flu confirmed deaths seems to be dropping. The latest I heard was 8, down from 20 two days ago. It is very possible that the tests initially used to determine the cause of death were wrong. It is also very possible that the person was exposed to swine flu but was sick from something else entirely. For example, somebody might get Ebola and on his/her death bed, might get exposed to swine flu. Guess which one killed that person....

      It's way too early to say much about this so far. Right now, there's a lot of speculation and precious little accurate data.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    13. Re:Semi-Pandemic by houghi · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It is still much more dangerous to cross the street for lunch, how about a banner to Stop for Pedestrians :(

      The active word is still and we must see that it stays that way. When a person gets killed while crossing the road, he does not let 8 others cross the road to get killed and who then force others to get killed crossing the road.

      The problem is that we do not know how dangerous it could become. 1 or even 100 cases (or more?) cases can be easily controlled and if that means 100 or 1000 people dying, that means nothing.

      Look what happend in 1918 It is estimated that anywhere from 20 to 100 million people were killed worldwide. 20 million (when looking at the low numbers and not calculating a higher world population) would be a tad more then people who get killed crossing the road.

      So we must not look at what happend, but what might happen. We just do not know how dangerous the wolf is and if we should cry wolf.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    14. Re:Semi-Pandemic by aetherworld · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, the virus strikes people with healthy immune systems, and the causes of death are an immune system overreaction. Translated: People with excellent immune systems are more likely to die than those with weaker ones.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cytokine_storm

      ACTUALLY, you should read the article you're citing:

      Recent reports of high mortality among healthy young adults in the 2009 swine flu outbreak has led to speculation that cytokine storms could be responsible for these deaths.[6] However, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention(CDC) has indicated that symptoms reported from this strain so far are similar to those of normal seasonal flu,[7] with the CDC stating that there is "insufficient information to date about clinical complications of this variant of swine-origin influenza A (H1N1) virus infection."[7]

  4. The who by thedogcow · · Score: 5, Funny

    ""Late in the afternoon on Wednesday, the WHO raised the pandemic threat level for H1N1 "swine flu" to 5."

    Wow. I knew they had good music but I did not know Peter Townshend was in charge of changing pandemic threat levels.

    --
    Yes! I listen to NYC Speedcore and do math at 3AM. I suggest you try it too.
    1. Re:The who by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 5, Funny

      If Spinal Tap was in charge the pandemic threat level would go to 11.

  5. not easy to know how to respond by phantomfive · · Score: 4, Informative

    I read an article a couple days ago, apparently there was a swine flu outbreak in 1976, and the US was quite proactive in stopping it, encouraging everyone to get vaccinated. The problem came when more people died from the vaccine than from the flu. So the correct path of action is not always clear, how far should you go to try to prevent this? Wall Street Journal has an interesting article dealing with these issues.

    As for me, being young and healthy, looks like I'm about to roll one of my d20. Whatever happens happens, I'll enjoy it to the end.

    --
    Qxe4
    1. Re:not easy to know how to respond by DragonWriter · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I read an article a couple days ago, apparently there was a swine flu outbreak in 1976, and the US was quite proactive in stopping it, encouraging everyone to get vaccinated. The problem came when more people died from the vaccine than from the flu.

      That's not really the right comparison to judge a "problem" with the course of action. It would clearly be, in retrospect, the wrong decision if more people died of the vaccine than would have been expected to have died from the flu had the vaccination not been carried out, but the fact that more people died of the vaccine than died of the flu when the vaccination was carried out does not appear to be a valid basis, on its own, for criticism.

      Otherwise, a vaccination program that prevented all deaths from a disease (even if, unchecked, it would have been expected to kill billions) would be the wrong decision if even one person died from the vaccine, a result that is clearly ludicrous.

    2. Re:not easy to know how to respond by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's like the people that believe we wasted time and money on the Y2K problem, because there was huge disaster. They just don't get that the time and money was what prevented the disaster from happening.

    3. Re:not easy to know how to respond by Kryis · · Score: 2, Informative

      Sadly, when you take into account incubation time, it can be very difficult to contain something like the 'flu. The virus is out in the world, not just mexico. Anyone an infected person comes in to contact with between them contracting the virus and being diagnosed could potentially pick up the virus themselves.

      Even if you totally closed off Mexico right now, there are sill infected people that have already left the country, and are in contact with the general population of whatever country they are in right now. The WHO have already said that this is past the point that it can be contained. We just have to hope that this doesn't turn out to be the super-deadly virus the media claim it is.

  6. Doesn't scare me at all by mcrbids · · Score: 5, Funny

    The media can do what they will with this non-story.

    I'm safe - I don't believe in that e-vo-lution crap, so this new disease could not have evolved from swine! It's all just pig nonsense.

    I'm going back to prepare a round of raw bacon sushi!

    --
    I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    1. Re:Doesn't scare me at all by maxume · · Score: 2

      Mmmmmh. Trichinosis.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trichinosis

      (Actually not that likely and not that deadly, but still not that awesome)

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    2. Re:Doesn't scare me at all by ChromaticDragon · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Sigh...

      If only this were just funny.

      I actually had this conversation with a friend a year ago or so. Of course, they didn't express a desire to relish in raw pork. And it was related to the Bird Flu. But pretty much dead on the same.

      Their reasoning was that Bird Flu wasn't going to be an issue because it couldn't "evolve" the ability of human-to-human transmission because... evolution was a bunch of nonsense. And the media had lost interest by that time so my friend thought it had all just been overblown.

      But H5N1 (Bird Flu) hasn't gone away at all. This H1N1 (Swine Flu) may be bad; it may not. But even if it has low mortality rate, if it spreads quickly far and wide, it may increase the chance H5N1 picks up human-to-human. That would be very bad indeed.

    3. Re:Doesn't scare me at all by mcrbids · · Score: 2, Insightful

      On a side note - I didn't write it to be funny, I wrote it to make a point.

      Sometimes the best way to make a point, though, is to be funny about it. Witness Stephen Colbert.

      --
      I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    4. Re:Doesn't scare me at all by Shikaku · · Score: 2, Insightful

      http://www.cdc.gov/swineflu/key_facts.htm

      Can people catch swine flu from eating pork?
      No. Swine influenza viruses are not transmitted by food. You can not get swine influenza from eating pork or pork products. Eating properly handled and cooked pork and pork products is safe. Cooking pork to an internal temperature of 160ÂF kills the swine flu virus as it does other bacteria and viruses.

      Thanks for tanking the pork prices with your misinformation though. Lots of pork for me to eat!

    5. Re:Doesn't scare me at all by Alexandra+Erenhart · · Score: 2, Funny

      Cooking pork to an internal temperature of 160ÂF kills the swine flu virus

      Good! now I know what to do if I get swine flu!!

      ... oh wait

    6. Re:Doesn't scare me at all by bemymonkey · · Score: 2, Informative

      "Cooking pork to an internal temperature of 160ÃF kills the swine flu virus as it does other bacteria and viruses."

      So undercooking it (=under 160 deg F), like the blueskies said, _can_ lead to infection...

  7. Just a distraction by V50 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Bah, we all should know this "swine flu" is actually a well orchestrated distraction from our real threat.

    ZOMBIES!

    Fear not the Swine Flu pandemic. Fear instead the imminent Zombie pandemic.

    Unless of course this is just phase 1...

    1. Re:Just a distraction by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Funny

      Unless of course this is just phase 1...

      Yeah, I'm afraid you have - Pink Eye. I'd give you topical medicine, but I don't wanna touch ya.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  8. I'll repeat what I heard elsewhere by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "Citation needed."

    Seriously, I see Internet doomsdayers saying this, but I don't see the CDC saying this. So, can you provide a link to a reputable source for this? I'm genuinely interested in reading one. If not, then perhaps you should stop spreading it.

    1. Re:I'll repeat what I heard elsewhere by Delwin · · Score: 2, Informative
    2. Re:I'll repeat what I heard elsewhere by Knara · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Mod parent up. "Cytokine storm" is the new Internet meme lately.

      With the grand WHO total of deaths being caused by H1N12009 being EIGHT, and the most well documented death so far being a 23 year old, the whole idea that this is killing otherwise healthy (a BIG assumption, this is Mexico, not the US, the health care system and environmental conditions in Mexico City is not very good in the former and absolutely terrible in the latter case) adults is isn't founded at all.

    3. Re:I'll repeat what I heard elsewhere by Estanislao+Mart�nez · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Seriously, I see Internet doomsdayers saying this, but I don't see the CDC saying this. So, can you provide a link to a reputable source for this? I'm genuinely interested in reading one. If not, then perhaps you should stop spreading it.

      The cytokine storm stuff (i.e., the claim that the virus hits healthy people harder than those with compromised immune systems) is really just an early leading hypothesis that's based on the mortality data from Mexico; the virus there is reported to have primarily killed adults 20-50. I really don't think there's any other evidence for it so far.

      There's a big puzzle going on right now in that the virus in the USA hasn't been nearly as deadly as in Mexico. From all I've read, this is being actively debated, with hypotheses ranging from flawed data about what's going on in Mexico (i.e., we only know about the most lethal Mexican cases of a much larger outbreak), to the possibility that the USA may have a milder version of the same strain so far.

      The thing to stress, however, is that the knowledge about this is still very incomplete, and evolving rapidly.

    4. Re:I'll repeat what I heard elsewhere by Estanislao+Mart�nez · · Score: 5, Insightful

      With the grand WHO total of deaths being caused by H1N12009 being EIGHT, and the most well documented death so far being a 23 year old, the whole idea that this is killing otherwise healthy (a BIG assumption, this is Mexico, not the US, the health care system and environmental conditions in Mexico City is not very good in the former and absolutely terrible in the latter case) adults is isn't founded at all.

      The WHO grand total of confirmed deaths is low because confirmation of which strain was involved in each specific case is slow. The actual number of deaths so far by the strain is almost certainly significantly higher. To put it more precisely, a large proportion of the cases that have been labeled as suspected swine flu deaths will turn out to be so.

      Also, I don't think your Mexican health care and environment objection holds. Given no other data, you would expect that to increase the number of deaths, but not the distribution of deaths across age groups. You need a stronger hypothesis: that the poor health care in Mexico increases the risk of death from H1N1 disproportionately among young adults and middle-aged adults will die from H1N1, compared to children and the elderly.

      The one thing that's sure at this point is that our information is quite likely to have very serious holes yet, however.

    5. Re:I'll repeat what I heard elsewhere by maxume · · Score: 2, Insightful

      1 U.S. death. A child from Mexico.

      The pork thing is unfortunate, but there is a lot of risk with a novel flu virus, so a strong reaction is the prudent thing (when the lethality picture clears up, things can relax pretty quickly).

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    6. Re:I'll repeat what I heard elsewhere by Nyeerrmm · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because flu viruses are particularly prone to spread (especially if it hangs around until fall and winter), and if it spreads like a normal flu in a normal season, and the high fatality rate keep up, and the , then it could be devastating.

      Obviously, there are a lot of ifs in that statement. I'd guess that the fatality rate is partially inflated due to poor conditions in Mexico, uncertainties in diagnoses, and other factors; even 1% is pretty scary though. Also, given the time of year, I'd imagine we'll have a good handle on it by the time it could get serious.

      Given all of that, the government response of tracking it, stockpiling anti-virals, and other efforts make perfect sense. All the press conferences have been pretty clear on the point that it sounds worse than it is. If the publicity makes people wash their hands more and other common-sense methods to prevent spread, so much the better.

      The only worrying part is the pork-export issues (fears which are completely unfounded from what I can tell), and general commerce limits during an already fragile economic situation. As far as the overwhelming news coverage... it could be worse, we could be hearing endless discussions of the first (arbitrary-time-period) of Obama's presidency instead. Its the news, pick and choose what you want to read.

    7. Re:I'll repeat what I heard elsewhere by dc29A · · Score: 3, Funny

      Some doc posted some information on Boing Boing, they don't believe that swine flu is causing Cytokine Storms.

      Info here

      I think we'll be safe from an Aporkalypse.

    8. Re:I'll repeat what I heard elsewhere by Meski · · Score: 2, Insightful

      When there are 1000 data points (read deaths) what do you suppose the total people *infected* with H1N12009 will be?

  9. Um, no. by Estanislao+Mart�nez · · Score: 4, Informative

    One of the remarkable facts about this outbreak is that the deaths in Mexico are primarily among healthy adults between 20 and 50--similar to the profile of the Spanish flu of 1918. However, one of the yet unresolved puzzles about the virus is why the mortality figures in Mexico are proportionally so much larger than in the USA, so yeah, we just don't know what's going on yet...

    1. Re:Um, no. by Anachragnome · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Quite possibly genetic.

      It is well known that people in equatorial regions have a genetic "resistance" to malaria, but at the same time have a markedly increased incidence of sickle cell anemia. The trait that allows for one also allows for the other, but if your living near the equator, your better off with the malaria resistance.

      What may be good for the goose, ain't always good for the gander.

      As it applies here, there may be some genetic trait MORE common to the locals that provides them with some advantage for their particular environment that is ALSO a determining factor in susceptibility to the swine flu.

      One single genetic loci could be responsible for the differences in survival rates.

  10. Just what is a pandemic? by night_flyer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    in the US alone there are An estimated 100,000 hospitalizations and about 20,000 deaths occur each year from the plain old flu or its complications... so what is the big deal?

    --


    Thanks to file sharing, I purchase more CDs
    Thanks to the RIAA, I buy them used...
    1. Re:Just what is a pandemic? by et764 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      From what I've read the fears over this one are that so far it is killing a lot higher percentage than the flu normally kills. This flu also seems to kill a disproportionate number of people in the 20-50 age rage. Normally flu deaths are mostly confined to infants and the elderly.

      From a pure numbers standpoint it's not so bad. What's scary is the similarity to earlier flu pandemics. No one's really sure how bad this may get, so people are taking extra precautions.

  11. And some just don't understand. by Nethead · · Score: 5, Interesting

    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/egypt-orders-slaughter-of-all-pigs-over-swine-flu-1676090.html

    Egypt began slaughtering the roughly 300,000 pigs in the country Wednesday as a precautionary measure against the spread of swine flu... Agriculture Minister Amin Abaza told reporters that farmers would be allowed to sell the pork meat so there would be no need for compensation.

    Yeah, what's the price of pork in a vastly flooded market. Other stories on the subject report riots by the pig farmers and also note that the WHO says that you can't catch it from eating pork. This is more a case of the non-pork eating religious majority using this as an excuse to crap on the pork eating religious minority (and 'unclean' pig farmers.)

    --
    -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    1. Re:And some just don't understand. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Given that the pigs farmers are almost all part of the Coptic Christian minority, which has a history of being oppressed, this doesn't surprise me at all. As parent says, it's not about the swine flu.

  12. Who? by Yeef · · Score: 3, Funny
    --
    I was once a horse.
  13. From a Hot Zone by mathx314 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Allow me to explain my bias before embarking on this rant: I currently attend University of Delaware. At present there are 10 unconfirmed cases among the student body. Not a big number (total student number is ~13,000), but diseases do have a tendency to spread quickly among student populations.

    What bothers me about this isn't that people are overreacting, which they are to a large extent. I don't feel the need to wander around with a surgical mask and I'm right in the middle of a hot zone. Rather, what bothers me is that people are underreacting. There seems to be a knee-jerk reaction that says that swine flu won't cause any sort of devastation; that it's not something to worry about.

    The fact of the matter is that while they're probably right, there's no reason not to take simple precautions. So long as this is going on, I'll make sure to was my hands with soap and water after using the bathroom, to try to avoid sick people, and to go to health services if I start showing flu-like symptoms. On the other hand, I hear plenty of people at school saying that they don't care, that if they get it it's "just the flu." I see a lot of people here on /. saying that this is just a media circus and just for drug companies to capitalize on. Maybe you guys are right, but what if you aren't?

    As I said, I'm biased since I'm in a hot zone, but I'd rather be safe about this than contract it.

    1. Re:From a Hot Zone by FatFreeCelery · · Score: 5, Insightful

      So long as this is going on, I'll make sure to was my hands with soap and water after using the bathroom

      I hope that you continue your newly found routine even after this has gone on.

    2. Re:From a Hot Zone by friedman101 · · Score: 2, Funny

      So long as this is going on, I'll make sure to was my hands with soap and water after using the bathroom, to try to avoid sick people, and to go to health services if I start showing flu-like symptoms

      it might be a wise idea to do these things even when you're not in the epicenter of a hot zone

  14. Swine Flu by painandgreed · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's the Aporkalypse!

  15. Governments are already taking huge action by scourfish · · Score: 5, Funny

    For example, Madagascar has just closed its seaport. And here I was, so close, to winning :(

    1. Re:Governments are already taking huge action by evanbd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, it's to Pandemic (or its sequel, Pandemic 2, which is the better game).

  16. There you go again by oldhack · · Score: 2, Funny

    Damn Congress, we told them to cut the pork, and the jerks bring the plague on the House instead.

    --
    Fuck systemd. Fuck Redhat. Fuck Soylent, too. Wait, scratch the last one.
  17. Still Unknown Case Fatality Rate by Baldrson · · Score: 4, Interesting
    There are basically 3 regimes of Case Fatality Rate separated by about a factor of 10 each:

    1) more than 1%
    2) .1% to 1%
    3) less than .1%

    We still don't know which range we're dealing with and, uh, like, it matters.

    All it would take is to focus on a standard sample like Mexico City hospital interns, process their swabs STAT and count the deaths so far.

    Seriously, folks, where are the adults?

  18. Patient zero by projector · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There's something vaguely comforting and familiar about medical professionals also starting their indexes at 0.

  19. Most of the deaths have been young adults by billstewart · · Score: 4, Informative

    Most of the deaths reported in the press have been non-elderly adults, as opposed to the regular flu where 90% of the deaths are already-sick old people and the rest are mostly kids who are too young for flu shots. Until the latest news articles (which said that "150 deaths" was "maybe actually only 7-8 confirmed to be swine flu"), the number of deaths from swine flu was about 1% of the total number of regular-seasonal-flu deaths during the past week.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  20. suddenoutbreakofswineflu by supahdren · · Score: 2, Insightful

    To whomever tagged this with suddenoutbreakofswineflu: genius. haha

  21. Re:No evidence for "Cytokine Storm" by theNAM666 · · Score: 4, Informative

    People, stop spreading this stupid, unfounded meme. The folks who have been verified to have died from H1N1 2009 have been from a country with a poor health care system and a city that is horrible in terms of air pollution and other environmental conditions.

    Please STOP spreading this racist, unfounded meme. While Mexico is a developing nation with a "poor" health care system, hospitals in Mexico City and elsewhere are modern, with up-to-date equipment and well-trained personnel. While pollution is a problem, not necessarily more so than in parts of New York City or LA, especially in the downtown zones under the new environmental rules. Significant advances in air quality have been made in the past 10 years, under AMLO and Ebrard.

    There is no clear, obvious reason for a higher morality rate across Mexico, including and especially in the downtown Mexico City hospitals, than in the US.

  22. This is how it always starts.... by macraig · · Score: 5, Funny
  23. Re:No evidence for "Cytokine Storm" by erroneus · · Score: 2, Funny

    There is no clear, obvious reason for a higher morality rate across Mexico, including and especially in the downtown Mexico City hospitals, than in the US.

    Well I heard that the hospital gowns in Mexico actually close in the back and cover the ass completely. If that isn't reason for a higher morality rate, then I don't know what would be...

  24. CDC says bacterial secondary infection was killer by billstewart · · Score: 5, Informative

    If you look at that CDC search, one article that jumps out is this one, which says that based on later research, it looks like the big killer wasn't actually the influenza itself or related cytokine storms, but secondary bacterial infections causing pneumonia among people weakened by the influenza. That's actually fairly good news, because it's much more likely that we can treat those in a hurry with existing antibiotics (as opposed to waiting 6 months to get a newly-tuned H1N1 vaccine or using the increasingly-ineffective antivirals like Tamiflu), and because quarantine also reduces the spread of bacterial infections so people who do get the flu are less likely to get the secondaries.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  25. 1918 Flu Pandemic Vector was returning soldiers by billstewart · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The vector that propagated the 1918 Spanish Flu Pandemic was soldiers returning from The World War, and people who were exposed to them, so young people with healthy immune systems were the primary people exposed to the flu, especially since they tended to be crowded together in barracks, ships, and trains where it could easily spread. So the fact that most of the deaths were younger people doesn't tell you as much as it might.

    On the other hand, the world population is much more mobile than it was in 1918 - travel's radically cheaper, and most people aren't farmers who stay home or occasionally go from their villages to small towns; everybody's on the move all the time, so it's easier for infected people to spread disease around than it was for most people in 1918.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  26. Re:No evidence for "Cytokine Storm" by musicalmicah · · Score: 2, Informative

    Please STOP spreading this racist, unfounded meme. While Mexico is a developing nation with a "poor" health care system, hospitals in Mexico City and elsewhere are modern, with up-to-date equipment and well-trained personnel. While pollution is a problem, not necessarily more so than in parts of New York City or LA, especially in the downtown zones under the new environmental rules. Significant advances in air quality have been made in the past 10 years, under AMLO and Ebrard.

    There is no clear, obvious reason for a higher morality rate across Mexico, including and especially in the downtown Mexico City hospitals, than in the US.

    Really? I'd think that having minimal running water for days at a time could be a problem. Also, how about a population density that's over seven times that of New York City?

  27. Re:Patient zero? Yeah, right. by LordKronos · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Mexico's response has been so disorganized they have no CLUE who "patient zero" is.

    Yeah, the part I found especially interesting is, you've got this 5 year old with the swine flu, yet they test others in the town and it turns out this kid was the only person in town that contracted swine flu. Then they go and test the pig farm where they believe the kid may have contracted it from, and all the tests come back negative.

    So you've got the original infection vector, but no identifiable source it could have been contracted from, and no identifiable recipients it could have been passed on to. Seems odd to me.

  28. Re:Leftover Bush Fearmongering plus some reality by regular_gonzalez · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Can you imagine any possible news story where you would not find it relevant to bring up Bush? Let it go already, it's over.

    --
    Due to circumstances beyond my control, I am master of my fate and captain of my soul.
  29. Re:CDC says bacterial secondary infection was kill by Plekto · · Score: 2

    And as I've been saying, it's extremely likely that people with those secondary problems seek attention. And we have a ton of options to treat pneumonia and asthma in the U.S. and Europe. So far, almost none of the 90+ cases in the U.S. are proving to be fatal. We are well taught to take drugs for any serious illness by now.

    Too bad people in Africa, Asia, South America, and other places with a larger population that's more rural don't have the ability or access to deal with more than a handful of serious cases. Note - this also would apply to rural and hard to reach areas in the U.S., like Alaska. It appears that survivability is directly based upon how quickly you can get to medical help.

  30. Re:No evidence for "Cytokine Storm" by radtea · · Score: 2, Interesting

    it certainly is getting a lot of media attention

    The media attention is due to zeitgeist, not anything in particular about the bug. We live in uncertain times, and people are scared, but mostly they don't have anything to be scared OF.

    The economy is burning, they're worried about losing their jobs themselves or that their spouse will, or that they won't be able to keep up with their mortgage or whatever. The economic meltdown is happening slowly, though, and it's hard for people to stay worried about it, so an acute threat that can absorb all of that relatively unfocused anxiety is more than welcome.

    We saw this in the late '70's and early '80's as well. One particularly remarkable case was that herpes was at one time considered a huge public health issue... until AIDS came along. While herpes is nasty, the focus on it had far more to do with generalized anxiety about the state of the world and the sexual revolution as boomers started to settle down and have families than any objective threat level.

    So after the swine flu mess passes over, expect to see other stories of this kind popping up every few months until global economic conditions start to improve, or until a real threat finally materializes (or is manufactured) to take people's minds off their mundane worries.

    It's always possible that this flu will turn out to be a real threat, although in the case of the 1918 flu there was a significantly increased death rate up to three years before: the rate of death from influenza in England and Wales was over 10,000 in 1915, and less than 6000 in the several years before.

    The war may have had an effect on this, of course, providing many susceptible human hosts to allow the virus lots of opportunities to mutate into the hellishly virulent strain of 1918. So the odds are that this isn't going to be nearly so bad, but until it's past we won't know, and that could take up to a year, given that the 1918 virus was mild in the spring and unprecedentedly deadly in the fall.

    --
    Blasphemy is a human right. Blasphemophobia kills.
  31. It's OK, pandemics are natural by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 3, Funny

    And all organic.

    As a bonus, it's "green". Anyone who succumbs to this will naturally reduce their carbon footprint.

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
  32. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  33. I've seen this episode... by akpoff · · Score: 4, Funny

    The Dr and Rose appear on a spaceship cunningly disguised as a planet only to find there's a mysterious disease that's killing spectacularly low numbers of people who all happen to live in the same city. Normally he wouldn't worry about it but Rose manages to get infected so the Dr raises the threat level to OMG. He works night and day to find a cure only to be forced to infect himself, die from the disease, but not really as his seemingly magic, but really explainable in materialistic terms, Time Lord powers cause him to regenerate in the form of Tom Baker.

    He draws some of his own blood with his sonic screwdriver and, treats Rose, who makes a full recovery. As a gesture of good will, and for the episode to end on a relative high note (despite Tom Baker's haggard appearance), he takes the TARDIS into a low "earth" orbit and sprays the serum into the jet stream, thus curing and inoculating most of the world. The Dr and Rose leave for better times.

    Just moments later the Vogons appear and destroy the world to make way for hyperspace bypass.

  34. Re:No evidence for "Cytokine Storm" by glwtta · · Score: 2, Interesting

    We live in uncertain times, and people are scared

    I wonder if anyone in the history of the world has actually considered the times they lived in to be "certain"?

    --
    sic transit gloria mundi
  35. Re:No evidence for "Cytokine Storm" by Knara · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's not racist. Mexico City's infrastructure is not great on average, and it's MUCH more polluted than NYC or LA. This isn't a knock against Mexicans, it's a fact of life.

  36. Reality check? by mangu · · Score: 2, Insightful

    young people with healthy immune systems were the primary people exposed to the flu, especially since they tended to be crowded together in barracks, ships, and trains where it could easily spread.

    Except that the US mobilized 4.3 million soldiers and 50 million people died of the flu.

    Being crowded together could get all of those soldiers contaminated, but then each one of them would have to infect twelve other non-soldier people after being released from that togetherness.

  37. On the bright side by Ozric · · Score: 2

    On the bright side, due to the colossal stupidity of the public, pork prices are droping.

    In down times it is good to have some cheap meat products at the store.

    Pork, its what's for dinner. :)

  38. Terrible name by st0rmshad0w · · Score: 4, Funny

    Swine flu is a horrible name.

    I'm going to call it "bacon lung".

    Everything's better with bacon.

  39. Re:banning handshakes and greeting-hugs-kisses by Max_W · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Handshakes differ from, say, touching a door handle. Microorganisms are extremely vulnerable to light, air, temperature change; they like when it is wet, dark, and warm. These are the conditions more or less existing on a warm and wet human hand or face.

    As soon as viruses or bacterias are exposed to a sun light and a fresh air they began to die or at least get weakened. Some can survive only seconds of such exposure.

    We, who saw it in experiments at the microbiological laboratories, should bring this awareness and advice into societal consciousness. It is not about being unfriendly, but about changing a dangerous habit.

    There are 6 billions people on Earth now. The handshakes and greeting-hugs like sparks in a room full of a powder. It is the perfect way for viruses to spread in a geometrical progression. What is even more worse is that this European culture of handshakes and greeting-hugs spreads around the world. Indeed, why not using a bow instead?

  40. Re:Kind of reminds me... by sentientbeing · · Score: 3, Funny

    You call it swine flu.

    I call it weaponized bacon.

    --

    ------
    beware he who would deny you access to information, for in his mind he dreams himself your master
  41. Re:No evidence for "Cytokine Storm" by Acapulco · · Score: 2, Informative

    Uhmm....I don't want to sound like a troll but...are you even a Mexican living in Mexico City?

    I am and I really don't think air quality has improved in any measurable rate, let alone "significant advances".

    Also, while I agree with you on stopping racist memes, Mexico really does have a VERY poor health care system. Those modern, well-equipped hospitals with well-trained personnel are mostly private ones, and the few of them who are actually public ones are not enough to take care of millions of patients. Sure, you might have a surgery with the best equipment in a public hospital, but that's going to happen after a VERY restrictive screening process. There's just not enough money to build a health care system efficient enough to combat a possible pandemic like the one we might be facing.

    Hell, our public health care system is in bankruptcy, quickly driving towards the cliff in part because we have more administrative personnel than actual doctors and nurses....go figure... (I can't find the link right now, but it's a well-known statistic down here)

    --
    Slashdot. Unreadable news to annoy nerds. - wonkey_monkey
  42. New twist on an old rhyme by thegermanpolice · · Score: 2, Funny

    Ring a ring of nachos
    A pocket full of tissues
    Arriba Arriba
    We all fall down.

  43. Re:Patient zero? Yeah, right. by blackest_k · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Smithfield is quite 'well known' for its intensive pig farming techniques, let me show you a few links
    http://nationalhogfarmer.com/mag/farming_smithfield_draws_mixed/ this is from an industry site not environmentalist hippies
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4035081.stm BBC report.
    http://www.saplonline.org/pubs/Quarterly/07-56-04/07_56_4p1415.htm

    Here's an extract from the third link.

    "When biology student Dana Spinu and I visited Timisoara a few weeks before the Smithfield takeover, we found officials and academics naively unprepared for what awaited them. We were invited to Paderini, one of six Contim farms being operated by a Romanian firm, in its last days of independence before being swallowed up. In contrast to US and Polish hog factories, the operation was scrupulously clean. The effluent was pumped to sewage ponds a kilometer away; the feeder pigs had four times more room than in the United States, twice that required under EU regulations. Piglets were weaned at 36 days and took six months to reach market weight. My description of Smithfield practices--piglets weaned at 11 days and brought to market weight at 120 days, feed doped with growth enhancers and antibiotics, dumpsters overflowing with dead animals--was greeted with incredulity by company veterinarians. "Impossible! Illegal! It can't happen here!"

    Smithfield's first move upon its arrival was to fire former managers, post guards at hog factory gates, and order employees to say nothing about their work. Evidence of high level corruption was not long in coming. Local officials were ordered to keep "hands off" the company; academic critics were disciplined. Smithfield's relationship with the neo-liberals who came to power in 2005 was even more intimate. Free of interference, even exempted from EU regulations until 2012, Smithfield moved rapidly to consolidate its position, reactivating the Contim farms, and buying refrigeration and transportation companies. While the government shut down small slaughterhouses (ostensibly because of the EU), leaving small farmers with no place to market pigs, Smithfield flooded the country with pork imported from Poland and the United States.

    In July 2007, however, Smithfield encountered an opponent that it could not bribe. At Cenei, west of Timisoara, 3,500 Smithfield pigs died suddenly. The company blamed it on a heat wave, but nauseating piles of carcasses attracted the press, and the county veterinary inspectorate was forced to do its job. On Aug. 3, it discovered classical swine fever, a viral disease long endemic in Romania, among Cenei's 20,000 pigs. At this point, the "hands off Smithfield" policy came to an abrupt end. The county disease control center halted all movement of Smithfield hogs, freezing its operations; the National Veterinary and Food Safety Authority began emergency inspections of the entire Contim system. Within a few days, two more infected farms with 30,000 pigs were discovered at Igris, on the Hungarian border.

    At the same time, it was learned that 11 Smithfield farms had not even applied for sanitary-veterinary authorization and were operating in blatant contempt of Romanian law. Agency head Radu Roatus excoriated local officials and announced that the unregistered farms would be shut down. Agriculture Minister Decebal Traian Remes confirmed that all exposed pigs would be killed and incinerated, and he suggested that the company "probably" would not be compensated for them. Muzzles removed, lesser officials blamed the Americans. "Our doctors have not had access to American farms to perform routine inspections," said Timis county veterinarian Csaba Doraczi. "Every time they tried they were pushed away by the guards." It even came to light that Smithfield workers are paid so little, about $230 US a month, that the company suffered fro